1:
2: \chapter{Linear Stability Analysis of the Four-Body equilibrium solutions}
3:
4: In Chapter 3 we discussed the equilibrium configurations for
5: various cases of the four body problem. We will now complete a
6: linear stability analysis of these solutions.
7:
8: We first derive the equations of motion for the general four body
9: problem in a rotating frame of reference in section 4.1. In
10: section 4.2 we derive the linear stability criterion for the
11: equilibrium points. This criterion is derived by using the
12: standard method of Classical Mechanics i.e. by perturbing one of
13: the particles from its Lagrange point. If the resultant motion of
14: the particle, after perturbation, is a rapid departure from the
15: vicinity of the point we can call such a position of equilibrium
16: an unstable one, but if the particle oscillates about the point it
17: is said to be a stable position. In section 4.3 we apply our
18: stability criterion to the equilibrium configurations discussed in
19: chapter 2. Linear stability of the equal mass cases, have already
20: been discussed by \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie} which we will revisit
21: using our own standard method of Celestial Mechanics. We conclude
22: that all the equal mass cases are unstable which agrees with the
23: results of \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie}. We also show that any
24: configuration with a pair of equal masses are unstable. In section
25: 4.4 we give summary of the conclusions of the chapter.
26:
27: \section{The Equations of motion}
28:
29: In this section, the equations of motion for the four body problem
30: are derived in a rotating frame of reference . We consider the
31: motion of a particle moving under the gravitational influence of
32: three particles of masses $m_{1}$ , $m_{2}$ and $m_{3}$. Let all
33: the four particles (masses) have circular orbits about their
34: common center of mass. Consider a set of axes $\xi ,\eta ,\zeta $
35: in the inertial frame having its origin at the center of mass of
36: the system. Let the coordinates of the three masses in this
37: reference frame be $(\xi _{1},\eta _{1},\zeta _{1})$ , $(\xi
38: _{2},\eta _{2},\zeta _{2})$ and $(\xi _{3},\eta _{3},\zeta _{3})$.
39: Let the coordinates of the fourth mass be $(\xi ,\eta ,\zeta )$.
40: By applying the vector form of the inverse square law, the
41: equations of motion of the particle are (See any standard text for
42: details, for example \citeasnoun{CarlMurray})
43:
44: \begin{equation}
45: \stackrel{..}{\xi }=m_{1}\frac{\xi _{1}-\xi
46: }{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{\xi _{2}-\xi }{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}\frac{\xi
47: _{3}-\xi }{r_{34}^{3}}, \label{1.1}
48: \end{equation}
49: \begin{equation}
50: \stackrel{..}{\eta }=m_{1}\frac{\eta _{1}-\eta
51: }{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{\eta _{2}-\eta
52: }{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}\frac{\eta _{3}-\eta }{r_{34}^{3}},
53: \label{1.2}
54: \end{equation}
55: \begin{equation}
56: \stackrel{..}{\xi }=m_{1}\frac{\zeta _{1}-\zeta }{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{%
57: \zeta _{2}-\zeta }{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}\frac{\zeta _{3}-\zeta
58: }{r_{34}^{3}}, \label{1.3}
59: \end{equation}
60: where,
61: \begin{equation}
62: r_{14}^{2}=(\xi _{1}-\xi )^{2}+(\eta _{1}-\eta )^{2}+(\zeta
63: _{1}-\zeta )^{2},
64: \end{equation}
65: \begin{equation}
66: r_{24}^{2}=(\xi _{2}-\xi )^{2}+(\eta _{2}-\eta )^{2}+(\zeta
67: _{2}-\zeta )^{2},
68: \end{equation}
69: \begin{equation}
70: r_{34}^{2}=(\xi _{3}-\xi )^{2}+(\eta _{3}-\eta )^{2}+(\zeta
71: _{3}-\zeta )^{2}.
72: \end{equation}
73:
74:
75: Note that these equations are also valid in the general four-body
76: problem, since they do not require any assumptions about the paths
77: of the masses.
78:
79: The motion of the four masses in circular orbits fixes the
80: distances between them and they move about their common center of
81: mass at a fixed angular velocity, the mean motion $n$. In these
82: circumstances it is natural to consider the motion of the particle
83: in a rotating reference frame in which the location of the three
84: masses are also fixed. Consider a new rotating coordinate system
85: that also has the origin at the center of mass of the system but
86: which is rotating at a uniform rate $n$ in the positive
87: direction. The coordinates of the three masses, in our arrangement, are $%
88: (x_{1},y_{1},0)$, $(x_{2},0,0)$ and $(x_{3},y_{3},0).$ These
89: coordinates are related to the non-rotating coordinate system by
90: the simple relation
91:
92: \begin{equation}
93: \left(
94: \begin{array}{c}
95: \xi \\
96: \eta \\
97: \zeta
98: \end{array}
99: \right) =\left(
100: \begin{array}{ccc}
101: \cos nt & -\sin nt & 0 \\
102: \sin nt & \cos nt & 0 \\
103: 0 & 0 & 1
104: \end{array}
105: \right) \left(
106: \begin{array}{c}
107: x \\
108: y \\
109: z
110: \end{array}
111: \right) . \label{1.5}
112: \end{equation}
113:
114:
115: Differentiating each component in Equation(\ref{1.5}) twice we get
116:
117: \begin{equation}
118: \left(
119: \begin{array}{c}
120: \stackrel{..}{\xi } \\
121: \stackrel{..}{\eta } \\
122: \stackrel{..}{\zeta }
123: \end{array}
124: \right) =\left(
125: \begin{array}{ccc}
126: \cos nt & -\sin nt & 0 \\
127: \sin nt & \cos nt & 0 \\
128: 0 & 0 & 1
129: \end{array}
130: \right) \left(
131: \begin{array}{c}
132: \stackrel{..}{x}-2n\stackrel{.}{y}-n^{2}x \\
133: \stackrel{..}{y}+2n\stackrel{.}{x}-n^{2}y \\
134: \stackrel{..}{z}
135: \end{array}
136: \right) .
137: \end{equation}
138: The coordinate transformation from a non-rotating reference frame
139: to a rotating frame has introduced terms in $n\stackrel{.}{x}$ and
140: $n\stackrel{.}{ y}$ ( {\it The Corioli's acceleration}) and
141: $n^{2}x$ and $n^{2}y$ ({\it the centrifugal acceleration}) into
142: the equations of motion. Substituting $\xi ,\eta ,\zeta $ and its
143: derivatives into Equation (\ref{1.1}), (\ref{1.2}) and (
144: \ref{1.3}) we get
145: \begin{eqnarray}
146: &&(\stackrel{..}{x}-2n\stackrel{.}{y}-n^{2}x)\cos nt-(\stackrel{..}{y}+2n%
147: \stackrel{.}{x}-n^{2}y)\sin nt= \nonumber \\
148: &&(m_{1}\frac{x_{1}-x}{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{x_{2}-x}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}%
149: \frac{x_{3}-x}{r_{34}^{3}})\cos nt \label{1.6} \\
150: &&+(m_{1}\frac{y_{1}-y}{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{y_{2}-y}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}%
151: \frac{y_{3}-y}{r_{34}^{3}})\sin nt, \nonumber
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: \begin{eqnarray}
154: &&(\stackrel{..}{x}-2n\stackrel{.}{y}-n^{2}x)\sin nt+(\stackrel{..}{y}+2n%
155: \stackrel{.}{x}-n^{2}y)\cos nt= \nonumber \\
156: &&(m_{1}\frac{x_{1}-x}{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{x_{2}-x}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}%
157: \frac{x_{3}-x}{r_{34}^{3}})\sin nt \label{1.7} \\
158: &&+(m_{1}\frac{y_{1}-y}{r_{14}^{3}}+m_{2}\frac{y_{2}-y}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}%
159: \frac{y_{3}-y}{r_{34}^{3}})\cos nt, \nonumber
160: \end{eqnarray}
161: \begin{equation}
162: \stackrel{..}{z}=-(\frac{m_{1}}{r_{14}^{3}}+\frac{m_{2}}{r_{24}^{3}}+\frac{%
163: m_{3}}{r_{34}^{3}})z. \label{1.8}
164: \end{equation}
165: where
166: \begin{equation}
167: r_{14}^{2}=(x-x_{1})^{2}+(y-y_{1})^{2}+z^{2}
168: \end{equation}
169: \begin{equation}
170: r_{24}^{2}=(x-x_{2})^{2}+(y-y_{2})^{2}+z^{2}
171: \end{equation}
172: \begin{equation}
173: r_{34}^{2}=(x-x_{3})^{2}+(y-y_{3})^{2}+z^{2}
174: \end{equation}
175: If we multiply Equation(\ref{1.6}) by $\cos nt$, and
176: Equation(\ref{1.7}) by $\sin nt,$ and add the results, and then
177: multiply Equation (\ref{1.6}) by $-\sin nt$, and Equation(
178: \ref{1.7}) by $\cos nt$ and add these together, the equations of
179: motion in the rotating coordinate system become
180: \begin{equation}
181: (\stackrel{..}{x}-2n\stackrel{.}{y}-n^{2}x)=(m_{1}\frac{x_{1}-x}{r_{14}^{3}}
182: +m_{2}\frac{x_{2}-x}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}\frac{x_{3}-x}{r_{34}^{3}}),
183: \label{1.17}
184: \end{equation}
185: \begin{equation}
186: (\stackrel{..}{y}+2n\stackrel{.}{x}-n^{2}y)=(m_{1}\frac{y_{1}-y}{r_{14}^{3}}%
187: +m_{2}\frac{y_{2}-y}{r_{24}^{3}}+m_{3}\frac{y_{3}-y}{r_{34}^{3}}),
188: \label{1.18}
189: \end{equation}
190: \begin{equation}
191: \stackrel{..}{z}=-(\frac{m_{1}}{r_{14}^{3}}+\frac{m_{2}}{r_{24}^{3}}+\frac{%
192: m_{3}}{r_{34}^{3}})z. \label{1.19}
193: \end{equation}
194: Let a function $U=U(x,y,z)$ be defined by
195: \begin{equation}
196: U=\frac{n^{2}}{2}(x^{2}+y^{2})+\frac{m_{1}}{r_{14}}+\frac{m_{2}}{r_{24}}+%
197: \frac{m_{3}}{r_{34}}
198: \end{equation}
199: then it can easily be seen that Equations (\ref{1.17}),
200: (\ref{1.18}) and (\ref {1.19}) may be written as
201: \begin{equation}
202: \stackrel{..}{x}-2n\stackrel{.}{y}=\frac{\partial U}{\partial x},
203: \label{1.9}
204: \end{equation}
205: \begin{equation}
206: \stackrel{..}{y}+2n\stackrel{.}{x}=\frac{\partial U}{\partial y},
207: \label{1.10}
208: \end{equation}
209: \begin{equation}
210: \stackrel{..}{z}=\frac{\partial U}{\partial z}, \label{1.11}
211: \end{equation}
212:
213: \section{Stability Criterion for the Equilibrium Points}
214:
215: In chapter 3 we have found Equilibrium points for different
216: geometrical arrangements for the four body problem. We now would
217: like to determine the stability of such points. In this section a
218: standard procedure for determining linear stability will be
219: developed. To do this we extend the method as given by
220: \citeasnoun{CarlMurray} for the three body problem, to the four
221: body problem. The procedure will then be applied to the following
222: special solutions of the four body problem to determine their
223: stability:
224:
225: \begin{enumerate}
226: \item All Equal mass cases.
227:
228: \item All cases with two pairs of equal masses.
229: \end{enumerate}
230:
231: In order to carry out a proper study of the stability we need to
232: examine the behavior of a particle that is given a small
233: displacement from an equilibrium position. We will follow the well
234: known linearization procedure for linearizing the equations of
235: motion and carrying out a linear stability analysis (see any
236: standard text for further details).
237:
238: As all the equilibrium solutions of chapter 3 are coplanar, we
239: will use the coplanar equations from now on in this chapter. Let
240: the location of an equilibrium point in the circular four-body
241: problem be denoted by $(x_{0},y_{0})$ and consider a small
242: displacement $(X,Y)$ from the point such that $x=x_{0}+X$ and
243: $y=y_{0}+Y$. Then by substituting in Equations (\ref{1.9}) and
244: (\ref{1.10}), and expanding in Taylor series, we have
245: \begin{eqnarray}
246: \stackrel{..}{X}-2n\stackrel{.}{Y} &\approx &\left( \frac{\partial U}{%
247: \partial x}\right) _{0}+X\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left( \frac{%
248: \partial U}{\partial x}\right) \right) _{0}+Y\left( \frac{\partial }{
249: \partial y}\left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}\right) \right) _{0}+\cdots
250: \nonumber \\
251: &=&X\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}U}{\partial x^{2}}\right)
252: _{0}+Y\left( \frac{
253: \partial ^{2}U}{\partial x\partial y}\right) _{0}+\cdots ,
254: \end{eqnarray}
255: and
256: \[
257: \stackrel{..}{Y}+2n\stackrel{.}{X\approx \left( \frac{\partial
258: U}{\partial y} \right) _{0}+X}\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial
259: x}\left( \frac{\partial U}{
260: \partial y}\right) \right) _{0}+Y\left( \frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(
261: \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}\right) \right) _{0}+\cdots
262: \]
263: \begin{equation}
264: =X\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}U}{\partial x\partial y}\right)
265: _{0}+Y\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}U}{\partial y\partial ^{2}}\right)
266: _{0}+\cdots \textrm{,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
267: \end{equation}
268: where the suffix zero means that after the partial derivatives of
269: $U$ are accomplished $x,\,y\,$and $z$ are set equal to
270: $x_{0},y_{0}$ and $z_{0}$
271: respectively. We have used the fact that $\left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial x%
272: }\right) _{0}=\left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}\right) _{0}=0$
273: (because the equilibrium points are derived by solving the
274: equations $\partial U/\partial x=\partial U/\partial y=0)$.
275: Because of our interest in the motion in the immediate vicinity of
276: the equilibrium points, the higher order terms are neglected.
277: These higher order terms will always be small quantities. Carrying
278: out the standard procedure to {\it linearize }the equations of
279: motion, the end result is a set of linear differential equations
280: of the form
281: \begin{equation}
282: \stackrel{..}{X}-2\stackrel{.}{Y}=XU_{xx}+YU_{xy},
283: \end{equation}
284: \begin{equation}
285: \stackrel{..}{Y}+2\stackrel{.}{X}=XU_{xy}+YU_{yy},
286: \end{equation}
287: where we have taken $n=1$ and the quantities
288: \begin{equation}
289: Uxx=\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}U}{\partial x^{2}}\right)
290: _{0}\textrm{ etc.}
291: \end{equation}
292:
293: and the $U$ are all constants since they are evaluated at
294: equilibrium point.
295:
296: The linearized equations in the matrix form are
297: \begin{equation}
298: \left(
299: \begin{array}{c}
300: \stackrel{.}{X} \\
301: \stackrel{.}{Y} \\
302: \stackrel{..}{X} \\
303: \stackrel{..}{Y}
304: \end{array}
305: \right) =\left(
306: \begin{array}{cccc}
307: 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
308: 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
309: U_{xx} & U_{xy} & 0 & 2 \\
310: U_{xy} & U_{yy} & -2 & 0
311: \end{array}
312: \right) \left(
313: \begin{array}{c}
314: X \\
315: Y \\
316: \stackrel{.}{X} \\
317: \stackrel{.}{Y}
318: \end{array}
319: \right) ,
320: \end{equation}
321: Our problem of solving two simultaneous second order differential
322: equations is changed to solving four, simultaneous, first order
323: differential equations. These equations can also be written in the
324: following matrix form
325: \begin{equation}
326: \stackrel{.}{{\bf X}}={\bf AX,} \label{1.12}
327: \end{equation}
328: where
329: \begin{equation}
330: {\bf X=}\left(
331: \begin{array}{c}
332: \stackrel{.}{X} \\
333: \stackrel{.}{Y} \\
334: \stackrel{..}{X} \\
335: \stackrel{..}{Y}
336: \end{array}
337: \right) \textrm{ and }{\bf A=}\left(
338: \begin{array}{cccc}
339: 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
340: 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
341: U_{xx} & U_{xy} & 0 & 2 \\
342: U_{xy} & U_{yy} & -2 & 0
343: \end{array}
344: \right) .
345: \end{equation}
346:
347: If any vector {\bf X }satisfies the equation
348: \begin{equation}
349: \bf AX=\lambda X, \label{1.13}
350: \end{equation}
351: where $\lambda $ is a scalar constant, then {\bf X} is said to be
352: an {\it eigenvector} of the matrix {\bf A} and $\lambda $ is the
353: corresponding eigenvalue.
354:
355: The first step in the solution of Equation (\ref{1.12}) is to find
356: the eigenvalues of {\bf A. }We can rewrite Equation (\ref{1.13})
357: as
358: \begin{equation}
359: \left( {\bf A}-\lambda {\bf I}\right) {\bf X=0,}
360: \end{equation}
361: where I is a $4\times 4$\ unit matrix. The characteristic equation
362: is given by
363: \begin{equation}
364: \det ({\bf A-\lambda I)=}\left|
365: \begin{array}{cccc}
366: -\lambda & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
367: 0 & -\lambda & 0 & 1 \\
368: U_{xx} & U_{xy} & -\lambda & 2 \\
369: U_{xy} & U_{yy} & -2 & -\lambda
370: \end{array}
371: \right| =0
372: \end{equation}
373: which reduces to the polynomial equation
374: \begin{equation}
375: \lambda ^{4}+\left( 4-U_{xx}-U_{yy}\right) \lambda
376: ^{2}+U_{xx}U_{yy}-U_{xy}^{2}=0. \label{1.14}
377: \end{equation}
378: Equation (\ref{1.14}) is a quartic equation in the variable
379: $\lambda $ but it is also quadratic in $\lambda ^{2}$. This makes
380: it relatively easy to find the four roots. They are
381: \begin{equation}
382: \lambda _{1,2}=\pm \left[ \frac{1}{2}\left( U_{xx}+U_{yy}-4\right) -\frac{1}{%
383: 2}\left[ \left( 4-U_{xx}-U_{yy}\right) ^{2}-4\left(
384: U_{xx}U_{yy}-U_{xy}^{2}\right) \right] ^{1/2}\right] ^{1/2}
385: \label{1.15}
386: \end{equation}
387: and
388: \begin{equation}
389: \lambda _{3,4}=\pm \left[ \frac{1}{2}\left( U_{xx}+U_{yy}-4\right)
390: +\frac{1}{ 2}\left[ \left( 4-U_{xx}-U_{yy}\right) ^{2}-4\left(
391: U_{xx}U_{yy}-U_{xy}^{2}\right) \right] ^{1/2}\right] ^{1/2}
392: \label{1.16}
393: \end{equation}
394:
395: The stability of the equilibrium points can be determined from an
396: analysis of the eigenvalues alone. To investigate the nature of
397: eigenvalues we define the quantities
398: \begin{eqnarray}
399: A&=&\frac{m_{1}}{r_{1}^{3}}+\frac{m_{2}}{r_{2}^{3}}+\frac{m_{3}}{r_{3}^{3}},\\
400: %\end{equation}
401: %\begin{equation}
402: B&=&3\left[ m_{1}\frac{\left( y-y_{1}\right)
403: ^{2}}{r_{1}^{5}}+m_{2}\frac{ \left( y-y_{2}\right)
404: ^{2}}{r_{2}^{5}}+m_{3}\frac{\left( y-y_{3}\right) ^{2}
405: }{r_{3}^{5}}\right] ,\\ \nonumber
406: %\end{equation}
407: %\begin{equation}
408: C&=&3\left[ m_{1}\frac{\left( x-x_{1}\right) \left( y-y_{1}\right)
409: }{r_{1}^{5}} +m_{2}\frac{\left( x-x_{2}\right) \left(
410: y-y_{2}\right) }{r_{2}^{5}}+m_{3} \frac{\left( x-x_{3}\right)
411: \left( y-y_{3}\right) }{r_{3}^{5}}\right] ,\\ \\
412: %\end{equation}
413: %\begin{equation}
414: D&=&3\left[ m_{1}\frac{\left( x-x_{1}\right)
415: ^{2}}{r_{1}^{5}}+m_{2}\frac{ \left( x-x_{2}\right)
416: ^{2}}{r_{2}^{5}}+m_{3}\frac{\left( x-x_{3}\right) ^{2}
417: }{r_{3}^{5}}\right] .
418: \end{eqnarray}
419: In terms of $A,B,C$ and $D$ we can write
420: \begin{equation}
421: U_{xx}=1-A+D,
422: \end{equation}
423: \begin{equation}
424: U_{yy}=1-A+B,
425: \end{equation}
426: \begin{equation}
427: U_{xy}=C.
428: \end{equation}
429:
430: The general form of the eigenvalues given in (\ref{1.16}) is
431: \begin{equation}
432: \lambda _{1,2}=\pm \left( j_{1}+ik_{1}\right) ,\qquad \lambda
433: _{3,4}=\pm \left( j_{2}+ik_{2}\right) ,
434: \end{equation}
435:
436: If the eigenvalues are pure imaginary numbers, then an oscillatory
437: solution will result because terms with $e^{\pm ikt}$ will reduce
438: to sines and cosines. However, if its real part is non-zero then
439: there will always be exponential growth in at least one mode and
440: so the perturbed solution will be unstable. Therefore the
441: equilibrium point will be stable if all the eigenvalues are purely
442: imaginary. We will apply this analysis to special cases of four
443: body problem of equal masses and with two pairs of equal masses.
444: \section{Linear Stability analysis of the equilibrium points}
445: \subsection{Equilibrium Configuration of four body problem with four equal
446: masses making a square}
447:
448: Here we consider the four body problem of four equal masses making
449: a square \cite{RoyandSteves1998}. \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie} have
450: discussed its stability and shown that this configuration is
451: unstable. Now we will also discuss its stability as a test case
452: for our method developed at the beginning of this section.
453:
454: In this highly symmetric case of the four body problem we consider
455: the origin of the coordinate system to be at the centre of mass
456: and therefore all four bodies are equally spaced on the axis. i.e.
457: \begin{equation}
458: r_{1}=r_{2}=r_{3}=a\textrm{ and }r_{14}=r_{34}.
459: \end{equation}
460: Using all the relevant available information we get
461: \begin{eqnarray}
462: Uxx&=&1 + \frac{0.0159}{a^3}\\
463: Uxy&=&1 +\frac{ 0.5519}{a^3}\\
464: \textrm{ and }Uyy&=&\frac{0.422}{a^3}
465: \end{eqnarray}
466: Hence from equations (\ref{1.15}) and (\ref{1.16}) we get the
467: following eigenvalues
468: \begin{eqnarray}
469: \lambda_{1,2}=\pm
470: \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-4+\frac{1.136}{a^3}-2\sqrt{\frac{1.003}{a^6}-\frac{4.544}{a^3}}}\\
471: \lambda_{3,4}=\pm
472: \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-4+\frac{1.136}{a^3}+2\sqrt{\frac{1.003}{a^6}-\frac{4.544}{a^3}}}
473: \end{eqnarray}
474: By substituting $n=M=1$ in equation (3.10) we get $a=1.3937$ and
475: hence the following eigenvalues:
476: \begin{equation}
477: \lambda _{1,2}=(-0.311626 \mp 0.996094 i)\textrm{ and }\lambda
478: _{3,4}=\pm (0.311626 \mp 0.996094 i).
479: \end{equation}
480:
481:
482: The real part of all the eigenvalues is not equal to zero.
483: Therefore there will be an exponential growth in all directions
484: which shows that this configuration is linearly unstable to
485: perturbations. This result is in confirmation with the result
486: obtained by \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie}.
487:
488: \subsection{Equilateral Triangle equilibrium configuration of four body
489: equal mass problem}
490:
491: Consider the equilateral triangle equilibrium configuration of
492: equal mass four body problem \cite{JaganBonnie}. Let the fourth
493: mass be at the centre of mass which is also the centroid of the
494: triangle. \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie} showed that this configuration
495: is linearly unstable to perturbations. We will again use our
496: method to check its stability. This will also serve as a test case
497: for our method.
498:
499: Consider the centre of mass to be the centroid of the triangle. As
500: this is an equilateral triangle configuration therefore
501: \begin{equation}
502: r_{14}=r_{24}=r_{34}=\frac{a}{\sqrt{3}}\textrm{ and
503: }r_{13}=r_{23}=r_{12}=a
504: \end{equation}
505: This shows that all three bodies are equidistant from the centre
506: of mass. The initial conditions are
507: $$
508: (x,y) =(0,0);\qquad (x_1,y_1) = (\frac{-1}{2a},
509: \frac{-1}{\sqrt{12}}a);
510: $$
511:
512: $$
513: (x_2,y_2) =(0, \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}a); (x_3,y_3)=(0.5a,
514: \frac{-1}{\sqrt{12}}a)
515: $$
516:
517: Using the above initial conditions we get
518:
519: \begin{eqnarray}
520: Uxx&=&1 - \frac{5.84}{a^2} -\frac{3.897}{a^3},\\
521: Uxy&=&0\\
522: Uyy&=&1 + \frac{7.79}{a^3}
523: \end{eqnarray}
524:
525: By substituting $n=M=1$ in equation (3.16) we get $a=2.016$. Now
526: from equations (4.34) and (4.35) we get
527: \begin{equation}
528: \lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.716297)\textrm{ and }\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
529: (1.86434i).
530: \end{equation}
531: As two of the four eigenvalues are real, this configuration is
532: linearly unstable to perturbations, confirming the results of
533: \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie}. It is to be noted that $a$ gives the
534: size of the triangle and therefore does not have any effect on the
535: form of the eigenvalues and hence the stability of the system.
536:
537: \subsection{Collinear equilibrium configuration of the equal mass four body
538: problem.}
539:
540: Consider the collinear equilibrium configuration of the equal mass
541: four body problem \cite{RoyandSteves1998}. Its stability has also
542: been discussed by \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie} using their own method.
543: We will use our method to discuss its stability. The initial
544: conditions are
545: \begin{eqnarray}
546: \left( x,y\right) &=&\left( -1,0\right)r_1 ,\left( x_{1},y_{1}\right) =(1,0)r_1, \\
547: \left( x_{2},y_{2}\right) &=&\left( \alpha ,0\right)r_1 \textrm{
548: and }\left( x_{3},y_{3}\right) =\left( -\alpha ,0\right)r_1 ,
549: \end{eqnarray}
550: where $\alpha =0.316$ and hence
551: \begin{equation}
552: U_{xx}=1+2A,U_{yy}=1-A\textrm{ and }U_{xy}=0.
553: \end{equation}
554: The eigenvalues are
555: \begin{equation}
556: \lambda _{1,2}=\pm (1.18218)\textrm{ and }\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
557: 0.811759
558: \end{equation}
559: As two of the eigenvalues are real, the configuration is linearly
560: unstable to perturbations, confirming the results of
561: \citeasnoun{JaganBonnie}
562:
563: Now we will determine the stability of equilibrium configurations
564: of the following cases of two pairs of equal masses.
565:
566: \subsection{The Triangular equilibrium configuration of the four-body problem with two bigger
567: masses making the base of the triangle}
568:
569: We consider the triangular configuration of the four-body problem
570: having two pairs of equal masses with the fourth mass on the
571: positive y-axis and the two bigger masses making the base of the
572: triangle. We have already obtained equilibrium solutions for it in
573: chapter 2 and now will discuss its stability.
574:
575: The initial conditions are
576: \begin{eqnarray}
577: \left( x,y\right) &=&\left( C_{4}X,0\right)r_{31} ,\left(
578: x_{1},y_{1}\right)
579: =(-\mu X,-1/2)r_{31}, \\
580: \left( x_{2},y_{2}\right) &=&\left( C_{2}X,0\right)r_{31} \textrm{
581: and }\left( x_{3},y_{3}\right) =(-\mu X,1/2)r_{31},
582: \end{eqnarray}
583: where $C_{2}$ and $C_{4}$ are defined by equations (\ref{22a}) and
584: (\ref{22b}) respectively, while
585: \begin{equation}
586: X=\frac{\sqrt{\beta ^{2}-1/4}}{C_{4}+\mu }.
587: \end{equation}
588:
589: Following the same procedure, as in the equal mass cases, we have
590: tried different mass ratios between 0 and 1 and all of them are
591: unstable and hence the configuration is linearly unstable to
592: perturbations. Details of all mass ratios are given in
593: table (\ref{Table1})
594:
595: \begin{table*}
596: \begin{center}
597: \caption{Triangular configuration of four-body problem with two bigger
598: masses making the base of the triangle}\label{Table1}
599:
600:
601: \begin{tabular}{|c||c||c|}\hline
602:
603: $\mu $ & Eigenvalues & Remarks \\ \hline \hline 1 &
604: $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 4.24$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.679i$ &
605: Linearly unstable \\ \hline 0.9 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm3.513$ and
606: $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.77i$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline
607: 0.8 &
608: $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 3.23$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.672i$ & Linearly unstable \\
609: \hline
610: 0.7 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 3.022$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.573i$ & Linearly unstable \\
611: \hline 0.6 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 2.845\textrm{ and }\lambda
612: _{3,4}=\pm 2.482i$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline 0.5 & $\lambda
613: _{1,2}=\pm 2.688\textrm{ and }\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.392i$ &
614: Linearly unstable \\ \hline 0.4 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 2.54\textrm{
615: and }\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.304i$ & Linearly
616: unstable \\ \hline 0.3 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 2.52\textrm{
617: and }\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.322i$ & Linearly unstable \\
618: \hline
619: 0.2 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm 2.24$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.11i$ & Linearly unstable \\
620: \hline
621: 0.1 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm2.048$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 1.985i$ & Linearly unstable \\
622: \hline 0.0001 & $\lambda _{1,2}= \pm 2.039$ and $ \lambda
623: _{3,4}=\pm 1.98i$ & Linearly unstable
624: \\ \hline
625: $10^{-7}$ & $\lambda _{1,2}= \pm 1.51$ and $ \lambda _{3,4}= \pm
626: 1.59i$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline $10^{-10}$ & $\lambda
627: _{1,2}=\pm 1.46$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 1.558i$ & Linearly
628: unstable \\ \hline
629: \end{tabular}
630: % }
631: \end{center}
632: \end{table*}
633: \subsection{The Triangular equilibrium configuration of the four-body problem with two smaller
634: masses making the base of the triangle}
635:
636: Consider the triangular configuration of the four-body problem
637: having two pairs of two equal masses with the fourth mass on the
638: negative y-axis and the two smaller masses making the base of the
639: triangle. We have already obtained equilibrium solutions for it
640: and now will discuss its stability.
641:
642: The initial conditions are
643: \begin{equation}
644: \left.
645: \begin{array}{c}
646: \left( x,y\right) =\left( \frac{1}{2}-\mu \alpha ,0\right)r
647: ,\left( x_{1},y_{1}\right) =\left( \alpha ,\beta \right)r
648: ,\textrm{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
649: \\
650: \left( x_{2},y_{2}\right) =\left( -\frac{1}{2}-\mu \alpha
651: ,0\right)r ,\left( x_{3},y_{3}\right) =\left( \alpha ,-\beta
652: \right)r
653: \end{array}
654: \right\}
655: \end{equation}
656: Following the same procedure, as in all other cases, we find that
657: all the equilibrium points are linearly unstable to perturbations.
658: For more details see table (\ref{Table2}).
659:
660: \begin{table*}
661: \begin{center}
662: \caption{The Triangular configuration of four-body problem with two smaller
663: masses making the base of the triangle}\label{Table2}
664:
665:
666:
667:
668: \begin{tabular}{|c||c||c|}\hline
669:
670: $\mu $ & Eigenvalues & Remarks\\ \hline \hline 1 & $\lambda =\pm
671: 0.946 \pm 0.978i $ & Linearly unstable\\ \hline 0.999 & $\lambda =
672: \pm
673: 0.94 \pm 0.981i $ & Linearly unstable \\
674: \hline 0.998 & $\lambda =\pm 0.93 \pm 0.983i $ & Linearly unstable
675: \\ \hline 0.9975 & $\lambda
676: =\pm 0.904 \pm 0.99i $ & Linearly unstable \\
677: \hline 0.9973 & $\lambda
678: =\pm 0.91\pm 0.991i $ & Linearly unstable \\
679: \hline
680:
681: \end{tabular}
682: % }
683: \end{center}
684: \end{table*}
685:
686:
687: \subsection{The Trapezoidal Equilibrium Configuration with two pairs of equal
688: masses}
689:
690: Consider the Trapezoidal equilibrium configurations of the four
691: body problem with two pairs of equal masses. Let the origin of the
692: coordinate system be the centre of mass of the system. The initial
693: positions of the three masses are the following:
694: \begin{eqnarray}
695: P_{1}(M) =(-1/2,-\frac{\mu \beta}{\mu +1})r, \nonumber \\
696: P_{2}(m)=(-\alpha /2,\frac{\beta}{\mu +1})r,\quad \nonumber \\
697: P_{3}(m) =(\alpha /2,\frac{\beta}{\mu +1})r.,\qquad
698: \end{eqnarray}
699: The fourth mass, whose stability is under discussion, has an
700: initial position at $(1/2,-\frac{\mu \beta}{\mu +1})$. Here $\mu $
701: is the mass ratio and $\alpha ,\beta $ are the distance ratios.
702: All three ratios are related to each other by two highly
703: non-linear algebraic equations, given in chapter 2. Like others,
704: the equilibrium points for this configuration are also given in
705: chapter 2 \cite{RoyandSteves1998}.
706:
707: For the mass ratio equal to one this becomes a special case of the
708: equal mass four body problem i.e. Equilibrium Configuration of
709: four body problem with four equal masses making a square, which is
710: an unstable equilibrium configuration discussed before. Other mass
711: ratios between 0 and 1 have also been analyzed and all of them
712: turned out to be linearly unstable. For further details on other
713: mass ratios see table 3.3.
714:
715: \begin{table*}
716: \begin{center}
717: \caption{Trapezoidal Equilibrium Configuration with two pairs of equal
718: masses}\label{Table3}
719:
720: \bigskip
721:
722: \begin{tabular}{|c||c||c|}\hline
723:
724: $\mu $ & Eigenvalues & Remarks \\ \hline \hline
725:
726: 1 & Indeterminate & Linearly unstable \\ \hline 0.9 & $\lambda
727: _{1,2}=\pm (86.26i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 110.549$ & Linearly unstable \\
728: \hline 0.8 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (28.26i)$
729: and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 36.137$ & Linearly unstable \\
730: \hline .7 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (14.202i)$ and $\lambda
731: _{3,4}=\pm 17.986$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .6 & $\lambda
732: _{1,2}=\pm (8.45i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 10.57$ & Linearly
733: unstable \\ \hline .5 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (5.5i)$
734: and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 6.734$ & Linearly unstable \\
735: \hline .4 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (3.76i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
736: 4.41$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .3 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm
737: (2.65i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.83$ & Linearly unstable \\
738: \hline .2 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (1.81i)$
739: and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm 2.02$ & Linearly unstable \\
740: \hline .1 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (1.92i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
741: 1.46$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline
742: \end{tabular}
743:
744: % }
745: \end{center}
746: \end{table*}
747:
748: \subsection{The Diamond Equilibrium Configuration with two pairs of equal masses}
749:
750: We discuss here the stability of the diamond equilibrium
751: configuration of the four body problem, with two pairs of equal
752: masses. This is a highly symmetric, being symmetric about both the
753: x-axis and the y-axis. The origin of the coordinate system is the
754: centre of mass of the system under discussion. The initial
755: positions of the three masses are the following:
756: \begin{equation}
757: P_{1}(M)=(-1,0)r,P_{2}(m)=(0,\alpha )r\textrm{ and
758: }P_{3}(m)=(1,0)r,
759: \end{equation}
760: The fourth mass, whose stability is under discussion, has its
761: initial position at $(0,-\alpha )$. Here $\mu $ is the mass ratio
762: and $\alpha $ is the distance ratio. We used the same method for
763: stability analysis of this configuration as we have used for
764: others. The stability for different mass ratios is was analyzed
765: and all of them turn out to be linearly unstable to perturbations.
766: Results obtained for the different mass ratios are shown in table
767: (\ref{Table4})
768:
769: \begin{table*}
770: \begin{center}
771: \caption{Diamond Equilibrium Configuration with two pairs of equal masses}\label{Table4}
772:
773: \bigskip
774:
775: \begin{tabular}{|c||c||c|}\hline
776: $\mu $ & Eigenvalues & Remarks \\ \hline \hline 1 & $\lambda
777: _{1,2}=\pm (0.409-0.86i)$ and $ \lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.409+0.86i)$
778: & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .9 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.4-0.9i)$
779: and\ $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.4+0.9i)$ & Linearly unstable
780: \\ \hline .8 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.39-0.91i)$ and
781: $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.39+0.91i)$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .7
782: & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.38-0.93i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
783: (0.38+0.93i)$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .6 & $\lambda
784: _{1,2}=\pm (0.37-0.94i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.37+0.94i)$ &
785: Linearly unstable \\ \hline .5 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.36-0.95i)$
786: and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.36+0.95i)$ & Linearly unstable
787: \\ \hline .4 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.35-0.96i)$ and
788: $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.35+0.96i)$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .3
789: & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.34-0.97i) $ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm
790: (0.34+0.97i)$ & Linearly unstable \\ \hline .2 & $\lambda
791: _{1,2}=\pm (0.33-0.98i)$ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.33+0.98i)$ &
792: Linearly unstable \\ \hline .1 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.32-0.98i)
793: $ and $\lambda _{3,4}=\pm (0.32+0.98i)$ & Linearly unstable \\
794: \hline 0 & $\lambda _{1,2}=\pm (0.3-0.98i)$ and $\lambda
795: _{3,4}=\pm (0.3+0.98i)$ & Linearly unstable
796: \\ \hline
797: \end{tabular}
798:
799: % }
800: \end{center}
801: \end{table*}
802:
803: \subsection{Collinear Equilibrium Configurations with two pairs of equal mass
804: }
805:
806: \subsubsection{Case-I}
807:
808: Consider the collinear equilibrium configuration of the four-body
809: problem having two pairs of equal masses with the smaller masses
810: at the ends of the line while the larger masses lie in the middle.
811: We will discuss the linear stability of the equilibrium solutions
812: obtained in chapter 2.
813:
814: The initial conditions for all mass ratios in this case are
815: \begin{equation}
816: {\bf r}_{1}=(1,0)r,\textrm{ }{\bf r}_{2}=\left( \alpha ,0\right)r
817: ,\textrm{ }{\bf r }_{3}=\left( -\alpha ,0\right)r ,\textrm{ and
818: }\left( x,y\right) =\left( -1,0\right)r ,
819: \end{equation}
820: where $\alpha $ has different value for different values of $\mu
821: .$
822: \begin{equation}
823: U_{xx}=1+2A,U_{yy}=1-A\textrm{ and }U_{xy}=0,
824: \end{equation}
825: where
826: \begin{equation}
827: A=\frac{m}{r_{1}^{3}}+\frac{M}{r_{2}^{3}}+\frac{M}{r_{3}^{3}}.
828: \label{A}
829: \end{equation}
830: Hence the characteristic equation becomes
831: \begin{equation}
832: \lambda ^{4}+\left( 2-A\right) \lambda ^{2}+\left(
833: 1+A-2A^{2}\right) =0. \label{ChEq}
834: \end{equation}
835: The eigenvalues becomes
836: \begin{equation}
837: \lambda _{1,2}=\pm i\sqrt{2\left( 1+A\right) }\textrm{ and }\lambda _{3,4}=%
838: \sqrt{2\left( 2A-1\right) }. \label{case-1}
839: \end{equation}
840: In order to have stable equilibrium points all the eigenvalues
841: should be pure imaginary. Therefore we must establish if $\lambda
842: _{3,4}$ is real or imaginary. As $A$ always remain greater than 1,
843: $\lambda _{3,4}$ is always a real number. Thus the
844: equilibrium configuration is linearly unstable for all values of
845: the mass ratio $\mu .$
846:
847: \subsubsection{Case-II}
848:
849: Consider the collinear equilibrium configuration of the four-body
850: problem having two pairs of equal masses with the larger masses at
851: the ends of the line while the smaller masses lie in the middle.
852: We will discuss the linear stability of the equilibrium solutions
853: obtained in chapter 2.
854:
855: The initial conditions remain the same as for case-I and therefore
856: the form of eigenvalues also remain the same as given in
857: (\ref{case-1}). The value of $A$ remains greater than 1 for all
858: values of the mass ratio $\mu $ and thus $\lambda _{3,4}$ is real
859: and the equilibrium configurations are unstable.
860:
861: \subsubsection{Cases-III and IV}
862:
863: Consider the non-symmetric collinear equilibrium configuration of
864: the four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses having
865: smaller and bigger masses alternatively on the straight line.
866:
867: The initial conditions are
868: \begin{equation}
869: {\bf r}_{1}=(1,0)r,\textrm{ }{\bf r}_{2}=\left( \alpha ,0\right)r
870: ,\textrm{ }{\bf r }_{3}=\left( -\beta ,0\right)r ,\textrm{ and
871: }\left( x,y\right) =\left( -\gamma ,0\right)r ,
872: \end{equation}
873: where $\alpha ,\beta $ and $\gamma $ are the distance ratios
874: having different values for different values of $\mu$. All these
875: ratios satisfy the following expression
876: \begin{equation}
877: \gamma =\alpha +\mu \left( 1-\beta \right) .
878: \end{equation}
879: The characteristic equation and therefore the form of the
880: eigenvalues remain the same as in the first case and are given by
881: (\ref{ChEq}) and (\ref{case-1} ). After careful inspection of
882: (\ref{A}), we conclude that it remains greater than 1 for all
883: values of $\mu $ and therefore $\lambda _{3,4}$ is real. Hence
884: this equilibrium configuration is also unstable to perturbations.
885: Similarly the fourth and final collinear equilibrium configuration
886: (discussed in chapter 2) turns out to be unstable.
887:
888: \section{Summary and conclusions}
889:
890: We discuss the linear stability of equilibrium solutions of the
891: four body problems which included equal mass problem
892: \cite{RoyandSteves1998} and those with two pairs of equal masses.
893:
894: We have extended the method given by \citeasnoun{CarlMurray} for
895: the three body problem, to the general four body problem. We
896: applied this method to all the equilibrium solutions we have
897: determined for the four body problem in chapter 3. All these
898: solutions are unstable to perturbations. Therefore it is unlikely
899: that such four body stellar systems would exist for a substantial
900: period of time and hence they are unlikely to be observed in these
901: configurations.
902: