1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8:
9:
10: %\usepackage{epsf}
11: %\usepackage{graphics}
12: %\usepackage{color}
13:
14:
15: %\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 150 30 translate
16: %0 rotate /Times-Roman findfont 40 scalefont setfont
17: %0 0 moveto 0.9 setgray (version 2007-08-31 08:30) show grestore}def end}
18:
19:
20:
21:
22: \newcommand{\bl}{$\bullet$}
23: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
26: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
27: \newcommand{\cts}{cts s$^{-1}$}
28: \newcommand{\ax}{$\alpha_{\rm X}$}
29: \newcommand{\axs}{$\alpha_{\rm X, soft}$}
30: \newcommand{\axh}{$\alpha_{\rm X, hard}$}
31: \newcommand{\aox}{$\alpha_{\rm ox}$}
32: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-2}$}
33: \newcommand{\rb}[1]{\raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{#1}}
34: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}$}
35: \newcommand{\dM}{\dot M}
36: \newcommand{\dMM}{$\dot{M}/M$}
37: \newcommand{\dMedd}{\dot M_{\rm Edd}}
38: \newcommand{\plm}{$\pm$}
39: \newcommand{\nh}{$N_{\rm H}$}
40: \newcommand{\swift}{{\it Swift}}
41: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}}
42: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}}
43: \newcommand{\mkn}{{Mkn~335}}
44:
45: %
46:
47: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
48:
49:
50:
51: %\shorttitle{Multi Multiplet Method}
52:
53: \shorttitle{Swift observation of Mkn 335}
54: \shortauthors{Grupe et al.}
55:
56:
57: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
58:
59: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
60:
61:
62: \begin{document}
63:
64:
65:
66: %\input DGrupe_clipfig.tex
67: %\useunitmm
68:
69:
70:
71:
72:
73: \def\etal{{\it et\thinspace al.}\ }
74: \def\alp{{$\alpha$}\ }
75: \def\al2{{$\alpha^2$}\ }
76:
77:
78: %\def \charthoffset {\hspace{0.2cm}} \def \charthsep {\hspace{0.3cm}}
79: %\def \chartvsepcap {\vspace{0.3cm}}
80: %\def \chartvsep {\vspace{0.1cm}}
81: %\newcommand{\putchartb}[1]{\clipfig{#1}{75}{20}{7}{275}{192}}
82: %\newcommand{\putchartc}[1]{\clipfig{#1}{55}{33}{19}{275}{195}}
83: %
84: %
85: %
86: %\newcommand{\chartlineb}[2]{\parbox[t]{18cm}{\noindent\charthoffset\putchartb{#1}\charthsep\putchartb{#2}\chartvsep}}
87: %\newcommand{\chartlinec}[3]{\parbox[t]{18cm}{\noindent\charthoffset\putchartc{#1}\charthsep\putchartc{#2}\chartvsep\putchartc{#3}\chartvsep}}
88:
89:
90:
91:
92:
93: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
94: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
95: %% you desire.
96:
97:
98: \title{Discovery of the Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy Mkn 335 in an historical low X-ray flux state
99: }
100:
101:
102: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
103: %% author and affiliation information.
104: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
105: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
106: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
107: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
108:
109:
110: \author{Dirk Grupe\altaffilmark{1}
111: \email{grupe@astro.psu.edu},
112: Stefanie Komossa\altaffilmark{2},
113: Luigi C. Gallo\altaffilmark{3}
114: }
115:
116: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State
117: University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802}
118:
119: \altaffiltext{2}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr., D-85748 Garching,
120: Germany; email: skomossa@mpe.mpg.de}
121:
122:
123: \altaffiltext{3}{SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy,
124: University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS;
125: email: lgallo:ap.stmarys.ca}
126:
127:
128:
129:
130: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
131: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
132: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
133: %% affiliation.
134:
135: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observat}
136:
137:
138:
139: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
140: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
141: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
142: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
143: %% editorial office after submission.
144:
145:
146: \begin{abstract}
147: We report the discovery of the Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxy Mkn 335
148: in an extremely low X-ray state.
149: A comparison of
150: \swift\ observations obtained in May and June/July 2007 with all previous X-ray
151: observations between 1971 to 2006
152: show the AGN to have diminished in flux by a factor of more
153: than 30, the lowest
154: X-ray flux Mkn 335 has ever been observed in.
155: The \swift\
156: observations show an extremely hard X-ray spectrum
157: at energies above 2 keV.
158: Possible interpretations include
159: partial covering absorption or X-ray reflection from the disk.
160: In this letter we consider the partial covering
161: interpretation.
162: The \swift\ observations can be well fit
163: by a strong
164: partial covering absorber with varying absorption
165: column density
166: ($N_{\rm H}= 1-4\times
167: 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$) and a covering fraction $f_c$=0.9 - 1.
168: When corrected for intrinsic absorption, the X-ray flux
169: of Mkn 335 varies by only
170: factors of 4-6.
171: In the UV Mkn 335 shows
172: variability in the order of 0.2 mag.
173: We discuss the similarity of Mkn 335 with the highly variable NLS1 WPVS007,
174: and speculate about a possible link between NLS1 galaxies and
175: broad-absorption line quasars.
176: \end{abstract}
177:
178:
179:
180: \keywords{galaxies: active, galaxies: individual (Mkn 335), galaxies: Seyferts, X-rays: galaxies
181: }
182:
183:
184:
185: \section{Introduction}
186:
187: Since the mid 1980s Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxies \citep[NLS1s; ][]{oster85}
188: have become a field of extensive study in
189: AGN science. NLS1s are crucial for our understanding of the AGN phenomenon,
190: because they are most likely AGN at an early stage \citep[e.g. ][]{grupe04b}.
191: They possess relatively low-mass black holes and high Eddington ratios
192: $L/L_{\rm Edd}$.
193: NLS1s are characterized by extreme properties, such as steep
194: soft and hard X-ray spectra, strong X-ray variability, and
195: strong optical Fe II emission
196: \citep[e.g. ][]{bol96, lei99a, lei99b, grupe01, grupe04, bor92}.
197:
198:
199: The NLS1 Mkn 335
200: ($\alpha_{2000}$ = $00^{\rm h} 06^{\rm m} 19.^{\rm s}5$,
201: $\delta_{2000}$ = $+20^{\circ} 12' 11 \farcs 0$, z=0.026) is a well-known bright
202: soft X-ray AGN and has been the target of most X-ray observatories.
203: It was seen as a bright X-ray AGN by UHURU \citep{tananbaum78} and EINSTEIN \citep{halpern82}.
204: \citet{pounds87} reported a strong
205: soft X-ray excess found in the EXOSAT spectrum, which was confirmed by BBXRT observations
206: \citep{turner93}.
207: GINGA observations of Mkn 335 suggested the presence of a warm absorber in the
208: source \citep{nandra94}.
209: During ROSAT observations it also appeared bright and with a strong soft
210: X-ray excess \citep{grupe01}.
211: The X-ray spectrum during the 1993 ASCA observation \citep{george00}
212: was either interpreted by the presence of a warm absorber \citep{lei99b} or
213: by X-ray reflection on the disk \citep{ballantyne01}. Beppo-SAX observations of Mkn 335
214: also confirm the presence of a strong soft
215: X-ray excess \citep{bianchi01} and a small or moderate Compton reflection component.
216: \xmm\ observed Mkn 335 in 2000 and again in 2006
217: \citep{gondoin02,longinotti07a,longinotti07b,oneill07}.
218: Mkn 335 is exceptional in showing evidence for
219: an unusually broad wing in the iron line \citep{longinotti07a}.
220: The wing is required, if the XMM spectrum
221: is explained in terms of reflection; it is not, if
222: a partial covering interpretation is adopted.
223: High-amplitude variability provides
224: important new constraints to distinguish between
225: these different spectral models.
226: Mkn 335 was observed by \swift\ \citep{gehrels04} in 2007 May and appeared to
227: be dramatically fainter in X-rays than seen in all previous observations.
228: In this letter we report on this historical low X-ray flux state of Mkn 335 and
229: compared the continuum properties of the \swift\
230: with previous \xmm\ observations.
231:
232:
233:
234: Throughout the paper spectral indexes are denoted as energy spectral indexes
235: with
236: $F_{\nu} \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$. Luminosities are calculated assuming a $\Lambda$CDM
237: cosmology with $\Omega_{\rm M}$=0.27, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.73 and a Hubble
238: constant of $H_0$=75 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ corresponding to a luminosity distance D=105 Mpc.
239: All errors are 90\% confidence unless stated otherwise.
240:
241:
242: \section{\label{observe} Observations and data reduction}
243:
244: \swift\ observed Mkn 335 on 2007 May 17 and 25 and June 30 to July 02
245: for 4.8, 8.2, and 8.7 ks (Table\,\ref{obs_log}), respectively, with its
246: X-Ray Telescope (XRT) in Photon Counting mode (PC mode)
247: %\citep[XRT, ][]{burrows04}
248: and in all 6 filters of the UV-Optical Telescope (UVOT).
249: X-ray data were reduced with the task {\it xrtpipeline} version 0.11.4.
250: Source and background photons were extracted
251: with {\it XSELECT} version 2.4, from
252: circles with radii of 47$^{''}$ and 189$^{''}$, respectively.
253: The spectral data were re-binned with at least 20 photons per bin
254: {\it grppha} version 3.0.0.
255: The 0.3-10.0 keV spectra were
256: analyzed with {\it XSPEC} version 12.3.1x \citep{arnaud96}.
257: The auxiliary response files were created with {\it
258: xrtmkarf} and corrected using the exposure maps,
259: and the standard response matrix {\it swxpc0to12\_20010101v008.rmf}.
260:
261: The UVOT data were coadded for each segment in each filter with the UVOT
262: task {\it uvotimsum} version 1.3.
263: Source photons in all filters
264: were selected in a circle with a radius of 5$^{''}$.
265: UVOT magnitudes and fluxes were measured with the task {\it uvotsource} version
266: 3.
267: The UVOT data were corrected for Galactic reddening \citep[$E_{\rm B-V}=0.035$; ][]{sfd98}.
268:
269:
270: \xmm\ observed Mkn 335 in 2000 and 2006 for 37ks and 133 ks, respectively (see Table\,\ref{obs_log}).
271: During the 2000 observation the Optical Monitor (OM) did
272: photometry in the V, B, U, and M2 filters.
273: During the 2006 observation the UV grism was used exclusively.
274: The \xmm\ EPIC pn data were analyzed using the
275: XMMSAS version {\it xmmsas\_20060628\_1801-7.0.0}. The 2000 amd 2006 observations were performed in full-frame and small
276: window, respectively. Because the 2000 observation was severely affected by pileup, photons
277: from a 20$^{''}$ source-centered circle were excluded.
278: The source photons in the 2006 pn data were selected in a radius of 1$^{'}$ and
279: background photons of both observations from a source-free region close by with the same radius.
280: The spectra were rebinned with 100 photons per bin.
281: In order to compare the photometry in the OM with the UVOT we selected 5 field stars with
282: similar brightness in V as Mkn 335. Only in B and M2
283: the OM magnitudes had to be adjusted by $-$0.10
284: mag and $+$0.30 mag, respectively.
285:
286:
287:
288:
289:
290:
291: \section{\label{results} Results}
292:
293: None of the \xmm\ and \swift\ spectra can be fitted by a single absorbed
294: power law model.
295: In the literature a variety of spectral models have been
296: applied to the X-ray data of Mkn 335, including warm absorption \citep{lei99a, nandra94}, partial covering
297: \citep{tanaka05} and reflection
298: \citep{gondoin02,ballantyne01, crummy06, longinotti07a,longinotti07b}.
299: Fits with a warm absorber model ({\it absori}) and blackbody plus power law model
300: yield unacceptable results.
301: While fits to the \xmm\ 2000 data yield acceptable fits by using an absorbed broken power law model with the
302: absorption
303: column density fixed to the Galactic value \citep[3.96$\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$; ][]{dic90},
304: the \xmm\ 2006 and \swift\
305: spectra require additional components. We used a partial covering absorber model with an underlying
306: power law and
307: broken power law spectral models.
308: Table\,\ref{xray_res} summarizes the results from the X-ray spectral analysis.
309: Figure\,\ref{mkn335_xspec} displays the \swift\ spectra fitted with a power law and partial covering
310: absorber.
311: Fits to each spectrum were first performed separately. Subsequently all the \swift\ spectra were fitted
312: simultaneously in XSPEC
313: with the power law spectral slopes
314: tied and the absorber parameters and the normalizations left to vary.
315: The results are listed in Table\,\ref{xray_res} and suggest
316: a development of the partial covering absorber over time. The most dramatic change is from the 2006 \xmm\ to the first \swift\
317: observation when the absorber became nearly opaque and only 2\% of the X-ray emission can be seen directly.
318: In this case the absorption column density changes from $5\times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ with a covering fraction of 0.45
319: during the 2006 \xmm\ observation to about
320: $4\times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a covering fraction of 0.98 during the first Swift observation.
321:
322: We fitted all three \swift\ spectra simultaneously in XSPEC by tying the covering fraction $f_c$
323: and spectral indices together. This fit suggests a
324: change in the absorption column density $N_{\rm H,pcf}$ of the partial covering absorber by a factor of 2 within a week between the 2007 May 17 and 25 observations.
325: Alternatively, we also fitted the spectra with $N_{\rm H,pcf}$ tied and $f_c$ left as a free parameter. An F-test gives an F-value of 7.8 that these two
326: fits are different and a probability P=0.006 of a random result. Leaving $N_{\rm H,pcf}$ free gives a significantly better result than leaving $f_c$
327: free to vary.
328: In the rest-frame 0.2-2.0 keV band the observed fluxes (only corrected for Galactic absorption) seem to be highly variable and
329: between the \xmm\ 2000 and the first \swift\ observation we found variability by a factor of 30. However, when correcting also for
330: intrinsic absorption the unabsorbed restframe 0.2-2.0 keV fluxes
331: from ROSAT to Swift
332: are comparable. During the ROSAT All-Sky Survey observation a flux of 4$\times 10^{-14}$ W m$^{-2}$ was found \citep{grupe01}.
333: Correcting for a partial covering absorber in the \xmm\ and \swift\ spectra we found that the flux varied only by factors of 4-6
334: as listed in Table\,\ref{xray_res}.
335:
336:
337: The X-ray spectra of Mkn 335 in the higher and more typical flux state can
338: be well described as arising from an incident power law and reflection
339: component \citep[e.g. ][]{crummy06, longinotti07a}.
340: However, the
341: low-flux spectra are difficult to reproduce by simply rescaling the high-state
342: models or by varying the relative contribution of each component. A modified
343: reflection model, which self-consistently describes the high- and low-flux
344: states is being investigated and is presented in Gallo et al. (in prep).
345:
346:
347: As shown by the spectral energy distribution (SED)
348: in Figure\,\ref{mkn335_sed} there was no dramatic variability in the UV data
349: between the 2000 \xmm\ OM and 2007 \swift\ UVOT observations, although during the 2007 May 17th
350: observation Mkn 335 was about 0.2 mag fainter.
351: The UV/optical
352: spectral slopes are on the order of
353: $\alpha_{\rm UV}=-0.4$, except for the 2007 May 17 observation when it was $\alpha_{\rm UV}=-0.3$.
354: The UV to X-ray spectral slope \aox\footnote{The
355: X-ray loudness is defined by \citet{tananbaum79} as \aox=--0.384
356: log($f_{\rm 2keV}/f_{2500\AA}$).}
357: was significantly steeper during the \swift\ observations with \aox=1.91 and 1.65 during the \swift\ segments 001
358: and 002, respectively. During the 2000 \xmm\ observation, however,
359: an \aox=1.32 was measured, consistent with the value given by \citet{gallo06}.
360:
361:
362:
363:
364:
365:
366:
367: \section{\label{discuss} Discussion}
368:
369: We reported the \swift\ observations of the NLS1 Mkn 335 when it
370: was in its lowest X-ray flux state
371: ever observed.
372: Historically, Mkn 335 has exhibited X-ray variability by about a factor
373: of a few \citep[e.g. ][]{turner93, markowitz04},
374: although the source has always\footnote{Except for an episode in 1983 when it
375: had a rather low X-ray flux during its EXOSAT observation as reported by
376: \citet{pounds87}}
377: remained rather bright
378: at least until the last X-ray observation with
379: {\it Suzaku} in 2006 June (J. Larsson, 2007 priv. comm.).
380: However, sometime between 2006 June and 2007
381: May the observed flux dropped
382: by a factor of more than 30 including a dramatic change in its SED.
383: The X-ray spectrum has become progressively more complex
384: as the X-ray flux has diminished, indicative of either absorption or reflection
385: \citep[e.g. ][]{gallo06}.
386: The 2-10 keV high-flux spectrum in
387: 2000 did not appear overly complex and the high-energy continuum could be simply fitted with a
388: power law. The
389: 2006 \xmm\ data, however, can be fitted with
390: a partial covering absorber model \citep[see also ][]{oneill07},
391: suggesting that the absorber started moving in the
392: line of sight before 2006
393: January.
394: %
395:
396: Partial covering of the central light source has been invoked
397: since the early days of AGN X-ray spectroscopy \citep[e.g. ][]{holt80},
398: and quite often to describe the X-ray spectrum of NLS1
399: \citep[e.g. ][]{gallo04, grupe04c, tanaka05}.
400: Its presence is also indicated by narrow absorption lines (which
401: appear to be saturated but do not reach zero intensity) in
402: UV spectra of Broad Absorption Line (BAL) quasars
403: \citep[e.g. ][]{barlow97, hamann98, wills99}.
404: %% if little space, keep only the first ref., which includes a review
405: However, the geometry and physics of partial coverers
406: are still not well understood. One possible geometry
407: consists of thick blobs of gas, partially covering
408: parts of the accretion disk \citep[e.g. ][]{guilbert88}.
409: In the case of Mkn 335, the clouds must cover only the inner
410: parts of the disk, since we find that the UV emission
411: is not highly variable between the \xmm\ observation in 2000
412: and the \swift\ observations in 2007, while the X-rays vary
413: dramatically\footnote{We note that historic light curves
414: from IUE and HST did show that Mkn 335 has been
415: variable in the UV between 1978 and 1985
416: \citep{dunn06, edelson90} by a factor of 2.
417: The UBVRI photometry of Mkn 335 as reported by \citet{doroshenko05}
418: (see also \citet{czerny07}) also suggests that the AGN is intrinsically
419: highly variable.
420: However, because of the lack of simultaneous X-ray observations during
421: these time periods
422: we do not know if the UV
423: variability was caused by changes in the flux of the central engine or was
424: caused by
425: absorption. }.
426: Note that the fits to the May 17 and May 25 Swift spectra suggest a change in
427: the partial covering absorber column densities by a factor of about 2.
428: This timescale is consistent with e.g. the absorber toy model suggested by
429: \citet{abrassart00}, where thick clouds at 10-100 Schwarzschild radii partially obcure
430: the central region and causing the X-ray variability.
431:
432:
433: Alternatively, a partial covering situation may
434: arise if our line-of-sight passes through an accretion-disk driven
435: wind which is launched at intermediate disk radii
436: \citep[e.g. ][]{elvis00,proga07}.
437: If such a wind varies with time
438: and/or is inhomogeneous, different parts of the central source
439: would be covered at different times.
440: In both partial covering geometries,
441: the physics is still uncertain. In the case
442: of dense blobs: how are they confined and what
443: is their origin \citep[e.g. ][]{kuncic97}.
444: In case of disk-driven winds: what is the driver
445: of these massive outflows \citep[e.g. ][]{proga07}.
446:
447: The high column density
448: we need in our SWIFT spectral fits is similar to those
449: frequently observed in BAL quasars \citep[e.g. ][]{green96, gallagher02, grupe03}.
450: In this context, it is interesting to note that similarities
451: between NLS1 galaxies and BAL quasars have been pointed out repeatedly
452: \citep[e.g. ][]{mathur00, bg00, bor02}.
453: % For instance, both are located at one extreme end of `Eigenvector 1'
454: % parameter space (Boroson 2002).
455: In one specific case, that of the X-ray transient NLS1 galaxy
456: WPVS 007, the onset of heavy X-ray absorption
457: \citep{grupe07b} is indeed accompanied by the onset of
458: UV BALs \citep{leighly07}.
459: When correcting for the effects of intrinsic absorption we found that the
460: X-ray flux of Mkn 335 originating
461: from the central engine has
462: been very similar in the rest-frame 0.2-2.0 keV band between the ROSAT
463: observations and the most recent \swift\
464: observations. Using these fluxes, the intrinsic variability is only a
465: factor of about
466: 4-6, which is quite normal for an
467: AGN, in particular for a NLS1. The change in intrinsic flux between the first and
468: second Swift observations is about a factor of 3 within a week. If a partial covering absorber is
469: the correct model this flux change implies that the soft X-ray scattering region can only be
470: a few light days in diameter which is consistent with the \citet{abrassart00} toy model.
471: % Note:
472: % high outflow speeds, and high column densities, have definitely
473: % been observed in BALs; so we know they exist.
474: The deep low-state of Mkn 335 discovered with \swift\
475: provides us with a rare chance
476: to scrutinize the properties of X-ray low-state AGN in general.
477: Mkn 335 is unique with respect to being
478: relatively bright during its low-state. Therefore, follow-up observations of Mkn 335 in its current
479: low-state are highly encouraged. We will continue our monitoring with \swift\ in order to
480: find the timescales on which the AGN switches from a low to high state, but also deep
481: \xmm\ observations, optical spectrocsopy and spectropolarimetry are needed to clarify the
482: nature of the current low-state.
483:
484:
485: \acknowledgments
486: We want to thank Paul O'Brien and our referee
487: for useful comments on the manuscript.
488: We also want to thank the \swift\ PI Neil Gehrels for approving our ToO request
489: and the \swift\ Science Planners Mike Stroh and
490: Sally Hunsberger for fitting the observations into
491: the \swift schedule.
492: We acknowledge the use of public data from the \xmm\ and Swift data archives.
493: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic
494: Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
495: Caltech, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
496: Administration. Swift is supported at PSU by NASA contract NAS5-00136.
497: This research was supported by NASA contract NNX07AH67G (D.G.).
498:
499:
500:
501: \begin{thebibliography}{}
502: \bibitem[Abrassart \& Czerny(2000)]{abrassart00} Abrassart, A., \& Czerny, B., 2000, \aap, 356
503: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K.~A., 1996, ASP
504: Conf.~Ser.~101: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 17
505: \bibitem[Ballantyne et al.(2001)]{ballantyne01} Ballantyne, D.R., Iwasawa, K., \& Fabian, A.C., 2001, \mnras, 323, 506
506: %\bibitem[Barthelmy (2005)]{barthelmy04} Barthelmy, S.D., 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 143
507: \bibitem[Barlow et al(1997)]{barlow97} Barlow, T.A., Hamann, F., Sargent,
508: W.L.W., 1997, ASPC, 128, 13
509: \bibitem[Bianchi et al.(2001)]{bianchi01} Bianchi, S., Matt, G., Haardt, F., Maraschi, L., Nicastro, F., Perola, G.C., Petrucci,
510: P.O., \& Piro, L., 2001, \aap, 376, 77
511: \bibitem[Boller et al. (1996)]{bol96} Boller, T., Brandt, W.N., \& Fink, H.H.,
512: 1996, \aap, 305, 53
513: \bibitem[Boroson \& Green (1992)]{bor92} Boroson, T.A., \& Green, R.F., 1992,
514: \apjs, 80, 109
515: \bibitem[Boroson (2002)]{bor02} Boroson, T.A., 2002, \apj, 565, 78
516: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(2000)]{brandt00} Brandt, W.N., Laor, A., \& Wills, B.J., 2000, \apj, 528, 637
517: \bibitem[Brandt \& Gallagher (2000)]{bg00} Brandt, W.N., \& Gallagher, S.C., 2000, NewAR, 44, 461
518: %\bibitem[Burrows et al. (2005)]{burrows04} Burrows, D., et al., 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 165
519: \bibitem[Crummy et al.(2006)]{crummy06} Crummy, J., Fabian, A.C., Gallo, L.C., \& Ross, R.R., 2006, \mnras, 365, 1067
520: \bibitem[Czerny \& Janiuk(2007)]{czerny07} Czerny, B., \& Janiuk, A., 2007, \aap, 464, 167
521: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman (1990)]{dic90} Dickey, J.M., \& Lockman, F.J., 1990,
522: \araa, 28, 215
523: \bibitem[Doroshenko et al(2005)]{doroshenko05} Doroshenko, V.T., Sergeev, S.G., Merkulova, N.I., Sergeeva, E.A., \& Golubinsky, Y.V., 2005, \aap,
524: 437, 87
525: \bibitem[Dunn et al. (2006)]{dunn06} Dunn, J.P., Jackson, B., Deo, R.P., Farrington, C., Das, V., \& Crenshaw, D.M., 2006, \pasp,
526: 118, 572
527: \bibitem[Edelson et al.(1990)]{edelson90} Edelson, R.A., Krolik, J.H., \& Pike, G.F., 1990, \apj, 359, 86
528: \bibitem[Elvis(2000)]{elvis00} Elvis, M., 2000, \apj, 545, 63
529:
530: \bibitem[Gallagher et al.(2002)]{gallagher02} Gallagher, S.C., Brandt, W.N.,
531: Chartas, G., \& Garmire, G.P., 2002, \apj, 567, 37
532: \bibitem[Gallo et al. (2004)]{gallo04} Gallo, L.C., Tanaka, Y., Boller, Th., Fabian, A.C., Vaughan, S., \& Brandt, W.N., 2004,
533: \mnras, 353, 1064
534: \bibitem[Gallo (2006)]{gallo06} Gallo, L.C., 2006, \mnras, 368, 479
535: \bibitem[Gallo et al.(2007)]{gallo07} Gallo L.C., Grupe, D., \& Komossa, S., 2007, \mnras, in prep.
536: \bibitem[Gehrels et al. (2004)]{gehrels04} Gehrels, N., et al., 2004, ApJ, 611,
537: 1005
538: \bibitem[George et al.(2000)]{george00} George, I.M., Turner, T.J., Yaqoob, T., Netzer, H., Laor, A., Mushotzky, R.F., Nandra, K.,
539: \& Takahashi, T., 2000, \apj, 531, 52
540: \bibitem[Gondoin et al. (2002)]{gondoin02} Gondoin, P., Orr, A., Lumb, D., \&
541: Santos-Lleo, M., 2002, \aap, 388,74
542: \bibitem[Green \& Mathur (1996)]{green96} Green, P.J., \& Mathur, S., 1996,
543: \apj, 462, 637
544: \bibitem[Grupe (2004)]{grupe04b} Grupe, D., \aj, 127, 1799
545: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2001)]{grupe01} Grupe, D., Thomas, H.-C., \& Beuermann, K.,
546: 2001, \aap, 367, 470
547: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2003)]{grupe03} Grupe, D., Mathur, S., \& Elvis, M., 2003,
548: \aj, 126, 1159
549: \bibitem[Grupe et al. (2004a)]{grupe04} Grupe, D., Wills, B.J., Leighly, K.M., \&
550: Meusinger, H., 2004a, \aj, 127, 156
551: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2004b)]{grupe04c} Grupe, D., Mathur, S., \& Komossa, S., 2004b, \aj, 127, 3161
552: \bibitem[Grupe et al.(2007b)]{grupe07b} Grupe, D., Schady, P., Leighly, K.M., Komossa, S., O'Brien, P.T., \& Nousek, J.A.,
553: 2007, \aj, 133, 1988
554: \bibitem[Guilbert \& Rees (1988)]{guilbert88} Guilbert, P.W., \& Rees, M.J.,
555: 1988, \mnras, 233, 475
556: \bibitem[Halpern(1982)]{halpern82} Halpern, J.P., 1982, PhD thesis, Harvard University
557: %\bibitem[Hill et al. (2004)]{hill04} Hill, J.E., et al., 2004, SPIE, 5165, 217
558: %\bibitem[Hogg (1999)]{hogg99} Hogg, D., 1999, astro-ph/9905116
559: \bibitem[Hamann (1998)]{hamann98} Hamann, F., 1998, \apj, 500, 798
560: \bibitem[Holt et al.(1980)]{holt80} Holt, S., et al., 1980, \apj, 241, L13
561: \bibitem[Kuncic et al.(1997)]{kuncic97} Kuncic, Z., Celotti, A., Rees, M.J.,
562: 1997, \mnras, 284, 717
563: \bibitem[Leighly (1999a)]{lei99a} Leighly, K.M., 1999, \apjs, 125, 297
564: \bibitem[Leighly (1999b)]{lei99b} Leighly, K.M., 1999b, \apjs, 125, 317
565: \bibitem[Leighly et al. in prep(2007)]{leighly07} Leighly, K.M., et al., 2007, in prep
566: \bibitem[Longinotti et al.(2007a)]{longinotti07a} Longinotti, A.L., Sim, S.A.,
567: Nandra, K., \& Cappi, M., 2007a, \mnras, 374, 237
568: \bibitem[Longinotti et al. (2007)]{longinotti07b} Longinotti, A.L., Sim, S.A.,
569: Nandra, K., Cappi, M., \& O'Neill, P., 2007b, ASP Conf. Series, Vol., Eds
570: %\bibitem[Mason et al. (2001)]{mason01} Mason, K.O., et al., 2001, \aap, 365, L36
571: \bibitem[Markowitz \& Edelson(2004)]{markowitz04} Markowitz, A., \& Edelson, R., 2004, \apj, 617, 939
572: \bibitem[Mathur (2000)]{mathur00} Mathur, S., 2000, \mnras, 314, L17
573: \bibitem[Nandra \& Pounds(1994)]{nandra94} Nandra, K., \& Pounds, K.A., 1994, \mnras, 268, 405
574: \bibitem[O'Neill et al.(2007)]{oneill07} O'Neill, P.M., Nandra, K., Cappi, M.,
575: Longinotti, A.L., \& Sim, S.A., 2007, \mnras, accepted, astro-ph/0708.0751
576: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Pogge(1985)]{oster85} Osterbrock, D.E., \& Pogge, R.W., 1985, \apj, 297, 166
577: \bibitem[Pounds et al.(1987)]{pounds87} Pounds, K.A., Stanger, V.J., Turner, T.J., King, A.R., \& Czerny, B., 1987, \mnras, 224, 443
578: \bibitem[Proga (2007)]{proga07} Proga, D., 2007, \apj, 661, 693
579: %\bibitem[Roming et al. (2005)]{roming04} Roming, P.W.A., et al., 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 95
580: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sfd98} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P.,
581: \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
582: %\bibitem[Str\"uder et al.(2001)]{strueder01} Str\"uder, L., et al., 2001, \aap, 365, L18
583: \bibitem[Tanaka et al.(2005)]{tanaka05} Tanaka, Y., Boller, T., \& Gallo, L., in Merloni, A., Nayakshin, S.,
584: Sunyaev, R.A., eds, Growing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological Context, Springer, Berlin, p. 290
585: \bibitem[Tananbaum et al.(1978)]{tananbaum78} Tananbaum, H., Peters, G., Forman, W., Giacconi, R., Jones, C., \&
586: Avni, Y., 1978, \apj, 223, 74
587: \bibitem[Tananbaum et al.(1979)]{tananbaum79} Tananbaum, H., et al., 1979,
588: \apj, 234, L9
589: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1993)]{turner93} Turner, T.J., et al., 1993, \apj, 407, 556
590: \bibitem[Wills et al.(1999)]{wills99} Wills, B.J., Brandt, W.N., \& Laor, A.,
591: 1999, \apj, 520, L91
592: \end{thebibliography}
593:
594: \clearpage
595:
596:
597: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccr}
598: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
599: \tablecaption{\xmm\ \& \swift\ observations of Mkn 335
600: \label{obs_log}}
601: \tablewidth{0pt}
602: \tablehead{
603: \colhead{Mission} & \colhead{T-start\tablenotemark{1}} &
604: \colhead{T-stop\tablenotemark{1}} &
605: \colhead{$\rm T_{exp}$\tablenotemark{2}}
606: }
607: \startdata
608: XMM 2000 & 12-25 17:18 & 12-26 02:06 & 36910 \\
609: XMM 2006 & 01-03 19:10 & 01-05 08:03 & 133251 \\
610: \swift\ 001/2007 & 05-17 00:32 & 05-17 05:37 & 4860 \\
611: \swift\ 002/2007 & 05-25 00:01 & 05-25 19:23 & 8084 \\
612: \swift\ 003/2007 & 06-28 00:01 & 06-28 14:37 & 2932 \\
613: \swift\ 004/2007 & 06-30 00:13 & 06-30 14.52 & 2837 \\
614: \swift\ 005/2007 & 07-02 14:47 & 07-02 21:18 & 2979
615: \enddata
616:
617: \tablenotetext{1}{Start and End times are given in UT}
618: \tablenotetext{2}{Observing time given in s}
619: \end{deluxetable}
620:
621:
622: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccc}
623: %\rotate
624: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
625: \tablecaption{Spectral analysis of the \xmm\ and \swift\ X-ray data.
626: \label{xray_res}}
627: \tablewidth{0pt}
628: \tablehead{
629: \colhead{Observation} &
630: \colhead{Model\tablenotemark{1}} &
631: \colhead{$\alpha_{\rm X,soft}$}
632: & \colhead{$E_{\rm break}$\tablenotemark{2}}
633: & \colhead{$\alpha_{\rm X,hard}$}
634: & \colhead{$N_{\rm H, pcf}$\tablenotemark{3}}
635: & \colhead{$\rm F_{cover}$\tablenotemark{4}}
636: & \colhead{log $F_{\rm X,gal}$\tablenotemark{5}}
637: & \colhead{log $F_{\rm X,all}$\tablenotemark{6}}
638: & \colhead{$\chi^2/\nu$}
639: }
640: \startdata
641: XMM 2000 & (a) & 1.87\plm0.01 & 1.76$^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ & 1.18\plm0.04 & --- & --- & --13.10 & & 513/419 \\
642: & (b) & 1.87\plm0.01 & --- & --- & 7.7$^{+1.1}_{-0.9}$ & 0.58\plm0.02 & --13.10 & --12.72 & 561/419 \\
643: XMM 2006 & (a) & 1.73\plm0.01 & 1.82\plm0.02 & 1.08\plm0.01 & --- & --- & --13.17 & & 2420/1327 \\
644: & (c) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.63\plm0.03 & 1.25\plm0.02 & 55.1$^{+10.0}_{-8.2}$ &
645: 0.45$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ & --13.17 & --12.91 & 1973/1325 \\
646: & (d) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.62\plm0.03 & 1.25\plm0.02 & 51.0$^{+10.2}_{-8.0}$ & 0.43$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ & --13.17 &
647: --12.93 & 2611/1910\tablenotemark{8} \\
648: % & (4) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.60\plm0.03 & 1.28\plm0.02 & 39.7$^{+6.6}_{-6.4}$ & 0.43\plm0.02 & --13.17 & 3298/1801\tablenotemark{7} \\
649: \swift\ 001 & (c) & 2.05$^{+0.24}_{-0.20}$ & --- & --- & 31.1$^{+17.0}_{-13.6}$ & 0.98$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$
650: & --14.63 & & 9/9 \\
651: & (e) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.62\plm0.03 & 1.25\plm0.02 & 38.2$^{+19.2}_{-19.6}$ & 0.95$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ & --14.75 &
652: --13.48 & 2611/1910\tablenotemark{8} \\
653: & (f) & 1.79\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 20.0$^{+8.9}_{-5.4}$ & 0.93\tablenotemark{7} & --14.71 & --13.55 &
654: 87/85\tablenotemark{9} \\
655: & (g) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 20.5$^{+8.6}_{-5.4}$ & 0.94$^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ & --14.70 & --13.51 & 87/86\tablenotemark{9} \\
656: & (h) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 12.8$^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ & 0.91$^{+0.03}_{-0.06}$ & --14.72 & --13.69 & 95/86\tablenotemark{9} \\
657: \swift\ 002 & (c) & 1.78\plm0.14 & --- & --- & 10.4$^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ & 0.93$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & --14.25 & --13.10 & 52/48 \\
658: & (e) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.62\plm0.03 & 1.25\plm0.02 & 10.4$^{+3.6}_{-2.7}$ & 0.88$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & --14.27 &
659: --13.37 & 2611/1910\tablenotemark{8} \\
660: & (f) & 1.79\plm0.12 & --- & --- & 10.4$^{+2.6}_{-2.1}$ & 0.93\plm0.02 & --14.25 & --13.10 & 87/85\tablenotemark{9} \\
661: & (g) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 10.9$^{+2.4}_{-2.0}$ & 0.94$^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ & --14.25 & --13.06 & 87/86\tablenotemark{9} \\
662: & (h) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 12.8$^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ & 0.94$^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ & --14.25 & --13.02 & 95/86\tablenotemark{9} \\
663: % & (4) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.60\plm0.03 & 1.28\plm0.02 & 8.6$^{+2.7}_{-2.1}$ & 0.86\plm0.03 & --14.27 & 3298/1801\tablenotemark{7} \\
664: \swift\ 003-005\tablenotemark{10} & (c) & 1.75\plm0.17 & --- & --- & 16.6$^{+6.4}_{-4.7}$ & 0.93$^{+0.02}_{-0.04}$ &
665: --14.49 & --13.32 & 23/26 \\
666: & (e) & 1.74\plm0.01 & 1.62\plm0.03 & 1.25\plm0.02 & 17.5$^{+9.8}_{-6.6}$ & 0.89$^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$ & --14.50 &
667: --13.56 & 2611/1910\tablenotemark{8} \\
668: & (f) & 1.79\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 16.4$^{+6.1}_{-4.6}$ & 0.94$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & --14.48 & --13.28 &
669: 87/85\tablenotemark{9} \\
670: & (g) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 15.8$^{+4.0}_{-3.2}$ & 0.94$^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ & --14.47 & --13.28 & 87/86\tablenotemark{9} \\
671: & (h) & 1.81\plm0.10 & --- & --- & 12.8$^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ & 0.92$^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & --14.48 & --13.36 & 95/86\tablenotemark{9}
672: \enddata
673:
674: \tablenotetext{1}{Spectral models used are: (a) absorbed power law,
675: (a) absorbed broken power law,
676: (b) partial covering absorbed with a single power law,
677: (c) partial covering absorber and broken power law, (d) same as (c)
678: but simultaneous fits to the 2006 \xmm\ and all \swift\ spectra with the broken
679: power law parameters tied and the partial covering absorber parameters left free to vary,
680: (e) same as (b) but \swift spectra fit simultaneously in XSPEC with the X-ray spectral index tied and the
681: partial covering absorber parameters left free to vary, (f) same as (e) but the covering fraction $f_c$ of all three \swift\ spectra tied,
682: and (g) same as (e) but $N_{\rm H}$ tied and $f_c$ left free.
683: For all models the absorption column density was fixed to the Galactic value
684: \citep[3.96$\times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$][]{dic90}. }
685: \tablenotetext{2}{The break energy $E_{\rm break}$ is given in units of keV.}
686: \tablenotetext{3}{Absorption column density of the redshifted
687: partial covering absorber $N_{\rm H, pcf}$ in units of $10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$}
688: \tablenotetext{4}{Covering fraction $\rm F_{cover}$}
689: \tablenotetext{5}{Rest-frame 0.2-2.0 X-ray flux log $F_{\rm 0.2-2.0 keV}$ corrected for Galactic absorption
690: given in units of W m$^{-2}$}
691: \tablenotetext{6}{Rest-frame 0.2-2.0 X-ray flux log $F_{\rm 0.2-2.0 keV}$ corrected for Galactic and intrinsic absorption
692: given in units of W m$^{-2}$}
693: \tablenotetext{7}{Leaving covering absorber fraction as a free only gives an unconstrained results.
694: We therefore fixed the absorption covering fraction to 0.93 which was found in the other \swift\ data.}
695: \tablenotetext{8}{Simultaneous fit to all \swift\ data}
696: \tablenotetext{9}{Simultaneous fit to all \swift\ data}
697: \tablenotetext{10}{Coadded data from segments 003 to 005}
698: \end{deluxetable}
699:
700: \clearpage
701:
702: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
703:
704: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
705:
706:
707: \begin{figure}
708: \epsscale{0.8}
709: \plotone{f1.ps}
710: \caption{\label{mkn335_xspec} \swift-XRT spectra of Mkn 335 fitted with a power
711: law model with partial covering absorber as listed in Table\,\ref{xray_res}.
712: The black spectrum displays the \swift\ segment 001
713: spectrum, the segment 002 spectrum is in blue (triangles),
714: and the segment 003-005 spectrum in green (stars).
715: }
716: \end{figure}
717:
718:
719:
720: \begin{figure}
721: \epsscale{0.75}
722: \plotone{f2.ps}
723: \caption{\label{mkn335_sed} Spectral energy distributions of Mkn 335.
724: The black crosses are from the \swift observation segment 001,
725: blue triangles form
726: segment 002, and red squares from the 2000 \xmm\ observation. The \swift\ segments 003-005
727: spectrum would be between the 001 and 002 spectra.
728: }
729: \end{figure}
730:
731:
732:
733:
734:
735:
736:
737:
738:
739:
740:
741:
742: \end{document}
743:
744:
745: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
746:
747:
748:
749:
750:
751:
752: