1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
4: %\usepackage{rotating}
5: \def\msun{\rm M_{\sun}}
6: \def\rsun{\rm R_{\sun}}
7: \def\lsun{\rm L_{\sun}}
8: \def\sigO{${\sigma}$ Ori}
9: \def\av{${\rm A_V}$}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \shortauthors{Hernandez et al.}
13: \shorttitle{ {\em Spitzer} disk census in Ori OB1}
14:
15: \title{{\em Spitzer} observations of the Orion OB1 association: disk census in the low mass stars}
16:
17: \author{Jes\'{u}s Hern\'andez\altaffilmark{1,2}, Nuria Calvet\altaffilmark{1}, C. Brice\~{n}o\altaffilmark{2},
18: L. Hartmann\altaffilmark{1}, A. K. Vivas\altaffilmark{2}, J. Muzerolle\altaffilmark{3},
19: J. Downes\altaffilmark{2,4}, L. Allen \altaffilmark{5}, R. Gutermuth \altaffilmark{5}}
20:
21: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison Building, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, US}
22: \altaffiltext{2}{Centro de Investigaciones de Astronom\'{\i}a, Apdo. Postal 264, M\'{e}rida 5101-A, Venezuela}
23:
24: \altaffiltext{3}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, US}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{4}{Escuela de F\'{\i}sica, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apdo. Postal 47586, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{5}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Cambridge, MA 02138, US}
29:
30: \email{hernandj@umich.edu}
31:
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We present new {\em Spitzer Space Telescope} observations of two fields
35: in the Orion OB1 association. We report here IRAC/MIPS observations
36: for 115 confirmed members and 41 photometric candidates of the $\sim$10 Myr
37: 25 Orionis aggregate in the OB1a subassociation, and 106 confirmed members
38: and 65 photometric candidates of the 5 Myr region located in the OB1b subassociation.
39: The 25 Orionis aggregate shows a disk frequency of 6 \% while the field
40: in the OB1b subassociation shows a disk frequency of 13 \%.
41: Combining IRAC, MIPS and 2MASS photometry we place stars bearing disks
42: in several classes: stars with optically thick disks (class II systems),
43: stars with an inner transitional disks (transitional disk candidates)
44: and stars with ``evolved disks''; the last exhibit smaller IRAC/MIPS
45: excesses than class II systems. In all, we identify 1 transitional
46: disk candidate in the 25 Orionis aggregate and 3 in the OB1b field;
47: this represents $\sim$10\% of the disk bearing stars, indicating that
48: the transitional disk phase can be relatively fast.
49: We find that the frequency of disks is a function
50: of the stellar mass, suggesting a maximum around stars with spectral type M0.
51: Comparing the infrared excess in the IRAC bands
52: among several stellar groups we find that inner disk emission
53: decays with stellar age, showing a correlation with the respective
54: disk frequencies. The disk emission at the IRAC and MIPS bands
55: in several stellar groups indicates that disk dissipation
56: takes place faster in the inner region of the disks. Comparison with models
57: of irradiated accretion disks, computed with several degrees of settling, suggests
58: that the decrease in the overall accretion rate observed in young stellar groups
59: is not sufficient to explain the weak disk emission observed in the
60: IRAC bands for disk bearing stars with ages 5 Myr or older;
61: larger degrees of dust settling are necessary to explain these objects.
62:
63:
64:
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords{infrared: stars: formation --- stars: pre-main sequence
68: --- open clusters and associations: individual (Orion OB1 association) ---
69: protoplanetary systems: protoplanetary disk}
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72: \label{sec:int}
73:
74: Observational and theoretical studies indicate that important processes in
75: the evolution of protoplanetary disks take place at ages between 1 and 10 Myr.
76: About 90\% of the low mass stars ($\sim$K5 or later) have lost their
77: primordial disks at 5-7 Myr \citep[e.g.,][]{haisch01, hartmann05b, hernandez07}.
78: Grains grow to sizes of $\sim$1000 km stirring up the leftover small objects
79: in the disks and originating the first generation of reprocessed dust by
80: collisional cascades \citep{kenyon05, hernandez06}. Giant planets
81: are expected to form in this period \citep{pollack96, alibert04}.
82: However, additional studies of disk population in this crucial age range
83: are necessary to improve our knowledge and clarify many details
84: about the evolution from primordial disks to planetary systems.
85:
86:
87: OB associations are excellent laboratories
88: for comparative studies of protoplanetary disk evolution, because they harbor
89: young stellar populations (1-10 Myr) originating from the same giant molecular clouds,
90: spanning a wide range of stellar masses, and in a variety of evolutionary
91: stages and environments \citep{brown99,aurora06, briceno07a, preibisch07}.
92: In particular, the Orion OB1 association (Ori OB1), as other OB associations,
93: shows a well defined age sequence suggesting a large-scale triggered
94: star formation scenario \citep{briceno05, briceno07a, lee07}.
95: Ori OB1 contains very young subgroups
96: (ages $\lesssim$ 1 Myr) still embedded in their natal gas
97: \citep[e.g., Orion A and B clouds; ][]{megeath06}, subgroups in the process of dispersing
98: their natal gas \citep[e.g., the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster, age $\sim$ 3 Myr; ][]{hernandez07}
99: and more evolved populations, which have long since dissipated their progenitor molecular
100: clouds \citep[e.g., the 25 Orionis aggregate, age$\sim$ 10 Myr; ][]{briceno07b}.
101:
102: We are carrying out an optical photometric and spectroscopic survey of
103: $\sim$ 128 $deg^2$ in Ori OB1 in order
104: to identify the low and intermediate mass stellar populations, and study the properties
105: linked to the first stages of star and disk evolution
106: \citep{briceno01, briceno05, briceno07b, briceno07c, calvet05a, hernandez05, hernandez06,hernandez07}.
107: In this work, we expand the results from the optical survey with the capabilities of the {\em Spitzer Space
108: Telescope} at near and mid infrared wavelengths to identify and characterize
109: protoplanetary disks around young stellar objects
110: \citep[e.g.][]{allen04, megeath04, gutermuth04,muzerolle04, hartmann05,aurora06, hernandez07}.
111: In particular we study the near and mid infrared properties of stars
112: in two IRAC/MIPS {\em Spitzer} fields encompassing
113: an area of $\sim$2.5 deg$^2$. One field is located in the
114: 7-10 Myr 25 Orionis stellar aggregate \citep{briceno07b},
115: the most populous $\sim$ 10 Myr stellar group known within 500 pc; the other
116: is located in the Ori OB1b sub-association, in which we have estimated an age
117: of $\sim$ 5 Myr \citep{briceno05,briceno07b,hernandez06}. Additional results
118: from the 3 Myr $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07},
119: also located in the Ori OB1b subassociation, allow us to cover most of
120: the potentially crucial age range in protoplanetary disk evolution.
121: In this cluster, we found 336 photometric members using optical and near
122: infrared color-magnitude diagrams, about a third of this sample exhibits
123: excess in the IRAC and/or MIPS bands indicating that they have disks.
124:
125: This paper is organized as follows. In \S \ref{sec:obs} we present the observational
126: data and a brief description about membership. We analyze the observations
127: and describe the disk emission detection in \S \ref{sec:res}. The main results
128: are summarized in \S \ref{sec:conc}.
129:
130:
131: \section{Observations}
132: \label{sec:obs}
133:
134: \subsection{Infrared photometry}
135: \label{sec2:ir}
136:
137: We have obtained near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared photometry of
138: two regions in the Orion OB1 association using the four channels (3.6, 4.5, 5.8 \& 8.0 {\micron}) of the InfraRed Array Camera \citep[IRAC, ][]{fazio04},
139: and the 24 {\micron} band of the Multiband Imaging Spectrometer
140: \citep[MIPS;][]{rieke04}, on board the {\em Spitzer Space Telescope}.
141: The field located in the 25 Orionis aggregate (hereafter ``25 Orionis'')
142: covers an area of $\sim$1.1 deg$^2$ centered at RA$\sim$ 5.42 hours and DEC$\sim$1.64 deg;
143: the other field (hereafter ``OB1b'') covers an area of $\sim$1.4 deg$^2$
144: on the Orion OB1b sub-association centered at RA$\sim$5.52 hours and DEC$\sim$-1.71 deg.
145: Dust infrared emission maps \citep{schlegel98} reveal that at least 90\%
146: of the regions covered by IRAC images in 25 Orionis and OB1b
147: have visual extinctions smaller than {\av}$\sim$0.12
148: and {\av}$\sim$0.6, respectively \citep[see][]{hernandez06}.
149: These values are mostly in agreement with the mean visual extinction
150: calculated from individual stars in \citet{briceno05}.
151:
152:
153: The IRAC observations were done using a standard raster map with 290" offsets,
154: to provide maximum areal coverage with just a slight overlap between frames,
155: to aid in mosaicking the data. Each position is composed of 3 dithers,
156: with a single-frame integration of 12 seconds. The IRAC observations were processed
157: using the {\sl IRACproc} \citep{schuster06} package to create the final mosaics
158: with a scale of 0.86 \arcsec/pixel \citep[see][]{hernandez06}. Point source detections
159: were carried out individually on each IRAC channel using PhotVis tool (an IDL
160: GUI-based photometry visualization tool developed by R. Gutermuth). More than
161: 20,000 sources in each field were detected in at least one {\em Spitzer} band.
162: We extracted the photometry of these objects using the {\it apphot} package in IRAF,
163: with an aperture radius of 3\arcsec.7 and a background annulus from 3.7 to 8\arcsec.6.
164: We adopted zero-point magnitudes for the standard aperture radius (12\arcsec) and
165: background annulus (12-22\arcsec.4) of 19.665, 18.928, 16.847 and 17.391 in the
166: [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0] channels, respectively. Aperture corrections were
167: made using the values described in IRAC Data Handbook \citep{reach06}.
168:
169: MIPS observations were obtained using the medium scan mode with full-array
170: cross-scan overlap, resulting in a total effective exposure time per pointing
171: of 40 seconds. The images were processed using
172: the MIPS instrument team Data Analysis Tool (DAT), which calibrates
173: the data and applies a distortion correction to each individual exposure
174: before combining it into a final mosaic \citep{gordon05}.
175: We obtained point source photometry at 24 {\micron} with IRAF/{it daophot}
176: point spread function fitting, using an aperture size of about 5.7" and
177: an aperture correction factor of 1.73 derived from the STinyTim PSF model.
178: The absolute flux calibration uncertainty is less than 5\%.
179: Our final flux measurements are complete down to about 1 mJy in both maps
180: (the limit flux is about 0.5 mJy).
181:
182:
183: Figures \ref{f:map1a} and \ref{f:map1b} show color images combining three channels
184: of IRAC ([3.6],[4.5] and [8.0]) for 25 Orionis and for Ori OB1b, respectively.
185: We display the low mass spectroscopic members from \citet{briceno05,briceno07b,briceno07c}
186: and the low mass photometric candidates selected in \S \ref{s:mem};
187: the stars bearing disks studied in \S \ref{s:disksel};
188: and the intermediate mass members including the debris disk candidates and
189: the Herbig Ae stars studied in \citet{hernandez06}.
190:
191:
192:
193: \subsection{Optical photometry}
194: \label{sec2:opt}
195: Optical (V and I Cousin) magnitudes were obtained from the CIDA Variability Survey
196: which is being carried out using the QUEST I camera \citep{baltay02}
197: installed on the Jurgen Stock Telescope (a celar aperture 1-m Schmidt telescope)
198: at the Venezuela National Astronomical Observatory. The camera, an array of 4x4 CCDs,
199: is designed to work in driftscan mode, which is a very efficient way to
200: survey large areas of the sky. Each scan was reduced and calibrated with the
201: standard QUEST software and the method described in \citet{vivas04},
202: in which variable stars can be identified \citep[see ][]{briceno05}.
203:
204:
205: \subsection{Low mass members and photometric candidates}
206: \label{s:mem}
207:
208: We follow the procedures described in \citet{hernandez07} to reject
209: non stellar objects and contaminating sources using IRAC
210: color-color and IRAC color-magnitude diagrams. In brief, we select
211: stars with [3.6]$<$14.5, below this limit, the contamination from
212: extragalactic sources is expected to be more than 50\% \citep{fazio04}.
213: The [4.5]$-$[5.8] versus [5.8]$-$[8.0] and [3.6]$-$[5.8] versus
214: [4.5]$-$[8.0] color-color diagrams were used
215: to eliminate most of the galaxies with polycyclic aromatic
216: hydrocarbon (PAH) emission and objects with strong
217: 8 \micron contamination (Gutermuth et al. 2007, in preparation).
218:
219:
220: Optical and 2MASS counterpart \citep{cutri03} for the IRAC sources
221: were found using a 2'' matching radius. A preliminary list
222: of 623 objects in 25 Orionis and 918 objects in OB1b were created
223: using optical-2MASS color magnitude diagrams (V versus V-Ic,
224: V versus V-J and J versus J-K) to select those objects above the
225: zero age main sequence \citep[ZAMS; ][]{sf00} at the distance of each
226: stellar group \citep[330 pc and 440 pc for 25 Orionis and OB1b, respectively; ][]{briceno05,briceno07b,hernandez05}.
227: We rejected by visual inspection non-members sources, like diffuse objects, and
228: objects with an apparent problem in the photometry, like close binaries, faint companion
229: binaries, and stars on the image border.
230:
231: Low mass members were confirmed by \citet{briceno05, briceno07b, briceno07c} using
232: optical spectra obtained at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory
233: with the 1.5 m telescope equipped with the FAST spectrograph \citep{fabricant98},
234: and with the 6.5 m MMT telescope equipped with the Hectospec and Hectochelle multifiber
235: spectrographs \citep{fabricant05}. Additional low resolution spectra were
236: obtained at the Kitt Peak National Observatory using the Hydra multiobject
237: spectrograph on the 3.5 m WIYN telescope. Low mass members of 25 Orionis
238: and Ori OB1b can be identified by the presence of Li I $\lambda$6707
239: in absorption and the equivalent width of the H$\alpha$ line in emission \citep[e.g.][]{briceno98}.
240: The strength of the H$\alpha$ line is used to separate accreting stars,
241: the Classical T Tauri stars (CTTS), from non-accreting stars, the Weak T Tauri stars (WTTS).
242: To distinguish between the two type of objects
243: we followed the prescription adopted by \cite{white03}.
244: Spectral types were derived using the SPTCLASS code
245: \footnote{http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu/\~hernandj/SPTclass/sptclass/html},
246: which includes several molecular features
247: (like TiO and VO bands), characteristic of low mass stars. Some stars
248: in our sample have additional spectroscopic confirmation using radial velocity
249: distributions. We refer the reader to \citet{briceno05,briceno07b,briceno07c}
250: for more details about spectroscopic membership confirmation of stars belonging to
251: the Ori OB1 association. Tables \ref{t:mem1a} and \ref{t:mem1b} show the IRAC and MIPS
252: photometry for 115 confirmed members of 25 Orionis and 106 confirmed members of
253: Ori OB1b. Column 1 shows the internal running identification number
254: in each sample, columns 2 shows the 2MASS designation \citep{cutri03};
255: columns 3 and 4 are the stellar coordinates; columns 5, 6, 7 and 8 give IRAC
256: magnitudes in the bands [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0], respectively; column 9
257: gives MIPS (24 \micron) magnitudes; column 10 gives the reference
258: for the optical spectroscopic and photometric data
259: ; the last column gives the disk classification based on the IRAC
260: and MIPS analysis (\S \ref{s:disksel}).
261:
262:
263: %\include{Tab1}
264:
265: %\include{Tab2}
266:
267:
268: Figure \ref{f:cmd} shows optical-2MASS color magnitude diagrams (CMDs), V vs V-I
269: and V versus V-J, illustrating the selection of the photometric candidates
270: of 25 Orionis (upper panel) and Ori OB1b ( lower panels). Solid lines represent
271: the ZAMS \citep{sf00} for each stellar group. Dashed lines represent the
272: 10 Myr and 5 Myr isochrones \citep{sf00}. Since, it is well-known that theoretical,
273: non-birthline isochrones do not so well for intermediate mass stars
274: \citep{hartmann03} and the opacity tables at low temperatures are incomplete
275: \citep{lyra06, baraffe98}, these theoretical isochrones are plotted
276: as reference and do not affect the selection of the photometric candidates.
277: We assumed a distance of 330 pc for 25 Orionis and 440 pc for OB1b \citep{briceno05,briceno07b, hernandez05}.
278: The distribution of confirmed members (open circles) can be roughly traced as a
279: straight line in the CMD diagrams, with a larger spread in Ori OB1b due
280: to the larger visual extinction in this region in comparison with 25 Orionis.
281: We calculated the median colors (V-I and V-J) for confirmed members (open circles)
282: within 1.0 mag bins in the visual band. We used the differences between the observed colors
283: and the expected colors (the median; represented by long dashed lines)
284: to calculate the standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the member samples.
285: We selected as photometric candidates (open squares) stars located
286: in the region described by the 2.5$\sigma$ limits in the CMDs \citep[see ][]{hernandez07}.
287: Tables \ref{t:phot1a} and \ref{t:phot1b} show the IRAC, MIPS and optical photometry
288: for the 41 photometric candidates found in 25 Orionis and for the 65 candidates found
289: in OB1b, respectively.
290: The information shown in these tables in columns from 1 to 9 is
291: the same as in Table \ref{t:mem1a}. Columns 10 and 11 show the V magnitude
292: and the color V-I from the CIDA survey; the last column gives the
293: disk classification based on the IRAC and MIPS analysis (\S \ref{s:disksel}).
294:
295:
296:
297: %\include{Tab3}
298:
299: %\include{Tab4}
300:
301:
302:
303:
304: \section{Results}
305: \label{sec:res}
306:
307: \subsection{Disk diagnostics}
308: \label{s:disksel}
309:
310: Figures \ref{f:disk1a} and \ref{f:disk1b} show three diagrams used to identify
311: and roughly characterize the stars bearing disks in 25 Orionis and OB1b,
312: respectively.
313: The top panels show the SED slope, determined from the [3.6]$-$[8.0] color (IRAC SED slope),
314: versus the [8.0] magnitude for members (open circles) and photometric candidates (open squares).
315: The photospheric level is described by the upper solid line, which is calculated using the photometric
316: errors propagated from the [3.6]$-$[8.0] color \citep{hernandez07}. Stars with excess emission at
317: 8 {\micron} can be identified in this diagram. For comparison, IRAC SED slope histograms for Taurus \citep{hartmann05}
318: and for the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07} are displayed. In general, disk bearing stars in Taurus (solid histogram)
319: are located in a well defined region (which we call the class II region) with an IRAC SED slope $>$ -1.8 \citep[see ][]{lada06};
320: this limit ( dashed lines) is used to identify objects with optically thick disks
321: in which the inner disk emission has not been affected significantly by evolutionary processes.
322: In contrast, 15\% of the disk bearing stars in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster
323: exhibit smaller IRAC excesses (dashed histogram) suggesting a
324: reduction in disk photosphere height, possibly due to dust growth
325: and/or settling \citep{hernandez07}.
326: The bottom left panel shows the K$-$[24] versus V-J color-color diagram,
327: in which we identify members (big open circles) and photometric candidates
328: (big open squares) with 24 {\micron} infrared emission above the photospheric level
329: (solid lines) indicating that disks are present around these objects \citep[e.g.; ][]{gorlova06, hernandez06,hernandez07}.
330: In this panel, we display the K$-$[24] color distribution for stars bearing disks in the $\sigma$
331: Orionis cluster with an IRAC SED slope $>$ -1.8 (which represents a disk
332: population similar to those found in Taurus) and we use this histogram to identify
333: stars with K$-$[24] color characteristic of stars with optically thick disks ( K$-$[24]$>$3.5, class II region).
334: In the upper panel and in the bottom left panel, we define the ``evolved disk region''
335: between the class II region and the photospheric region.
336: The bottom right panel shows the IRAC color-color diagram, in which
337: we identify stars with excess emission in the IRAC bands
338: \citep[e.g. ][]{allen04,megeath04,hartmann05, aurora06, hernandez07}.
339: The dashed box displays the colors predicted for CTTS
340: of different accretion rates by the models of \citet{dalessio05b}.
341: In general, the IRAC colors observed for disk bearing stars
342: in Taurus are located in this region \citep{hartmann05, aurora06}.
343:
344:
345: In the top panel of Figure \ref{f:disk1a}, we identify six members and two photometric
346: candidates located on the IRAC class II region; most of them are located near
347: the class II limit possibly indicating that these objects have begun the process
348: of clearing the inner primordial disk. Two members have very small IRAC excesses
349: just above the photospheric region. These objects, also located between the photospheric and
350: the CTTS regions in the IRAC color-color diagram,
351: have no MIPS detections and therefore it is not clear if the small excess observed at
352: 8 {\micron} originates from PAH background contamination, by an unresolved companion,
353: or by disks present around these stars (flagged as ``disk[8]?'' in Table \ref{t:mem1a}).
354: Of particular interest are the member 1a\_1121 and the photometric candidate
355: 1a\_1626 which are located between the photospheric and
356: the class II region in the V-J versus K$-$[24] diagram indicating that the outer disks
357: around these objects are in a more evolved stage. Moreover these stars are
358: also located on the photospheric region in the IRAC color-color diagram and in the IRAC SED
359: slope diagram indicating that the inner disk has already dissipated and no disk
360: emission can be detected at wavelength $\lesssim$8 \micron. The star 1a\_1626 also
361: has a very small excess at 24 {\micron} ( $\sim$ 2 $\sigma$ above the photospheric level)
362: indicating that the presence of a disk around this object is not yet conclusive.
363: Overall, in 25 Orionis we identify 7 stars with disks in the member sample
364: (disk frequency 6.1$\pm$2.3\%), and 3 in the photometric candidate sample
365: (disk frequency 7.3$\pm$4.2\%).
366:
367:
368:
369:
370: Similarly, in the top panel of Figure \ref{f:disk1b} we identify 13 members
371: and 4 photometric candidates in Ori OB1b that show IRAC and MIPS excesses;
372: five of these objects are located between the class II region and the photospheric region.
373: Eight members and one photometric candidate with no MIPS detection are located
374: in the evolved disk region (flagged as ``disk[8]?'' in Table \ref{t:mem1b} and \ref{t:phot1b}).
375: The existence of disks around these objects needs additional confirmation
376: since they could be below the MIPS detection limit, or could be contaminated by PAH
377: background emission (in Figure \ref{f:map1b} it can be clearly seen that
378: the sky background emission at 8 {\micron} is very patchy, and significant at some locations).
379: In general, the range of infrared excesses at 24 {\micron} in OB1b is
380: similar to that of the optically thick disks in the $\sigma$ Orionis
381: cluster. Only one disk bearing star (6\%), the star 1b\_337, has 24 {\micron} excess
382: below the class II limit while 6 stars (39\%) have 8 {\micron} excess below this limit.
383: This suggests a more rapid decrease in dust emission in the inner disk, in agreement
384: with results from \citet{aurora06} in the Cepheus OB2 association.
385: The member 1b\_337, located in the evolved disk region in the V-J versus K$-$[24]
386: diagram, does not have excess in the IRAC bands.
387: Overall, in Ori OB1b we identify 14 stars with disks in
388: the member sample (disk frequency 13.1$\pm$3.5\%) and
389: the 4 disk systems in the photometric candidate sample (disk frequency 6.2$\pm$3.1\%).
390:
391:
392:
393: Figure \ref{f:slope} displays the distribution of the disk bearing stars in a SED slope space
394: diagram for 25 Orionis (left panel) and OB1b (right panel). The vertical axis is
395: the SED slope calculated from the K$-$[5.8] color and the horizontal axis is the SED slope
396: calculated from the K$-$[24] color. The dashed areas define
397: the photospheric level calculated with the STAR-PET {\em Spitzer} tool for stars K5 or later.
398: By comparison the low mass stars bearing disks of the 3 Myr
399: $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07} are also plotted. Error bars represent
400: the quartiles of disk bearing stars in Taurus, calculated from the K$-$[5.8] color
401: in \cite{hartmann05} and from the K$-$[24] color estimated from the
402: median SED slope in \cite{furlan06}, in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster from \cite{hernandez07},
403: in 25 Orionis and in Ori OB1b from this work.
404: An overall decrease in the infrared excess
405: is observed from the 1 Myr old stars in Taurus to the 5 and 10 Myr old stars studied in
406: this work; the disk population of the 3 Myr $\sigma$ Orionis cluster represents
407: an intermediate stage in this evolution. Moreover, it is apparent that the decrease
408: is larger at 5.8 {\micron} than at 24 {\micron}, indicating that evolution processes
409: occur faster in the inner region of the disk.
410:
411: In order to characterize the stars bearing disks in 25 Orionis and OB1b, we
412: identify several regions in Figure \ref{f:slope} defined by the dotted lines
413: (``class II region'', ``evolved disk region'' and ``transitional disk region'').
414: The horizontal dotted line represents the lower quartile of the
415: $\sigma$ Orionis cluster. Above this line $\sim$96\% of the stars bearing
416: optically thick disks in Taurus are also located, indicating a
417: limit where the inner disk emission has not been affected significantly
418: by evolutionary process. We can identify the class II objects as
419: stars located above this line. In general, the class II objects
420: identified using Figure \ref{f:slope} are located in the class II
421: region in Figures \ref{f:disk1a} and \ref{f:disk1b}.
422: Disk bearing stars below the dotted lines have decreased the disk
423: infrared emission at 5.8 {\micron} due to a decrease in the irradiation
424: surface of the inner disks, and so they are in an stage
425: where processes for inner disk dissipation have begun.
426: The vertical dotted line represents the lower quartile of the
427: stars bearing disks in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster
428: (the lower quartile of Taurus is rightward from this line).
429: Using this limit, the stars located below the dotted lines
430: could be sub-grouped based on their disk emission at 24 \micron:
431: ``evolved disks objects'' ( SED slope K$-$[24] $\la$ -1.2),
432: in which we see an overall decrease in the disk emission in
433: the IRAC and MIPS bands,
434: indicating similar evolution in the inner and outer disk \citep{lada06,hernandez07};
435: and ``transitional disk candidates'' ( SED slope K$-$[24] $\ga$ -1.2), which have
436: an inner optically thin disk region, combined with an outer, optically
437: thick disk \citep[e.g.;][]{calvet05b}. As reference, we plotted
438: 3 transitional disk stars, Coku Tau/4 \citep{dalessio05a}, TW Hya \citep{calvet02, uchida04},
439: GM Aur \citep{calvet05b}, which occupy the region defined for the
440: ``transitional disk candidates''. In brief, we identify 5 stars with optically
441: thick disks (class II objects), one transitional disk candidate and 4 evolved disk
442: objects in 25 Orionis. We also identify 10 class II objects,
443: 3 transitional disk candidates and 5 evolved disk objects in OB1b.
444: In spite of the evolved disks and transitional disks objects being a subsequent stage from
445: class II objects, it is not clear if transitional disk objects are a pre-stage
446: of evolved disks or each stage represents an independent stage from class II objects.
447:
448: Figure \ref{f:seds} shows SEDs for selected stars in our samples illustrating the
449: disk classification based on Figure \ref{f:slope}. The first row of SEDs shows
450: stars with optically thick disks (CII) located above the dotted line in Figure \ref{f:slope}.
451: The second row shows transitional disk candidates (TD) located right and below the dotted
452: lines in Figure \ref{f:slope}. Finally, last two rows of panels show stars
453: with evolved disks located left and below the dotted lines in Figure \ref{f:slope}.
454:
455: \subsection {Models}
456: \label{s:model}
457:
458: We have calculated SED slopes for models of irradiated accretion disks including dust
459: settling from \citet{dalessio06}. In these models the disk is assumed to be steadily
460: accreting at rates of {\.{M}} = 1e-9, 1e-8, and 1e-7 M$\sun$/yr,
461: onto a star with mass of 0.6 $\msun$
462: and luminosity of 1.2 $\lsun$, which corresponds to a K7 star with age of 1 Myr \citep{sf00}.
463: Dust settling was included using two populations of grains (big and small grains)
464: having different spatial distributions, with the larger grains concentrated
465: toward the midplane. The small grains located in the upper layers
466: have different depletions given by the $\epsilon $ parameter (with values= 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001),
467: which is the ratio of the dust to gas mass ratio of small grains relative to the
468: the standard dust to gas mass ratio \citep[$\zeta_{small}$/$\zeta_{std}$; ][]{dalessio06}.
469: The inner wall of the disk, located at the dust destruction radius, was settled
470: self-consistently with the same degree of depletion used in the outer disk.
471:
472:
473: Figure \ref{f:model} shows the theoretical SED slopes derived from the colors,
474: [3.6]$-$[8.0], K$-$[5.8] and K$-$[24] versus the degree of settling represented by
475: $\epsilon$. SED slopes were calculated convoluting the theoretical SED with
476: the transmission curves of the respective filters. We plot two inclination angles
477: along the line of sight , 30 deg (left panels) and 60 deg (middle panels); this
478: range in angles represents 40\% of probability of observation.
479: Accretion rates are indicated for the different curves plotted in each panel.
480: The slope has a strong dependency on {\.{M}}, showing flatter slopes for the
481: fastest accretors; the smallest variation in disk emission with {\.{M}}
482: is observed for the slope K$-$[24] of disks without settling ($\epsilon$=1).
483: In general, models with {\.{M}} = 10$^{-9}$ $\msun$/yr show a stronger dependence
484: with dust settling than models for large accretion rates.
485:
486:
487: By comparison, we plotted in the right panels of Figure \ref{f:model} the
488: quartiles observed for disk bearing stars in Taurus,
489: in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster, in Ori OB1b and in 25 Orionis.
490: The range of disk emission observed in Taurus ( 1-2 Myr) can
491: be explained by the models, indicating optically thick disks systems with several
492: degrees of settling \citep{furlan06} and accretion rates \citep{hartmann98, calvet05a}.
493: Most of the stars with disks in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster ($\sim$80\%)
494: can be explained by the theoretical SED slopes but with small accretion rates
495: or/and higher degree of dust settling than in Taurus.
496: Approximately half of the disks observed in 25 Orionis (Figure \ref{f:disk1a})
497: and OB1b (Figure \ref{f:disk1b}) require models with lower accretion
498: rates ({\.{M}} $<$ 10$^{-9}$ $\msun$/yr) or/and large degree of
499: settling ($\epsilon$$<$0.001) to explain the weak disk emissions
500: observed at [3.6]$-$[8.0] and K$-$[5.8]. However, $\sim$75\%
501: of disk bearing stars in 25 Orionis and OB1b have disk emissions
502: at K$-$[24] in agreement with the SED slopes predicted by the models,
503: supporting the scenario where the inner disk evolves faster than the
504: outer disk.
505:
506:
507:
508:
509:
510: \subsection {Disk frequencies}
511: \label{s:diskfrec}
512:
513: In Figures \ref{f:disk1a}, \ref{f:disk1b} and \ref{f:slope}
514: we identify 7 members bearing disks in 25 Orionis and 14 in Ori OB1b,
515: indicating disks frequencies in the member samples of 6.1$\pm$2.3\%
516: and 13.1$\pm$3.5\%, respectively. These frequencies include objects
517: with 24 {\micron} excess as disk bearing stars. In \S \ref{s:disksel},
518: we also identify 2 members of 25 Orionis and 8 members of Ori OB1b
519: that exhibit IRAC
520: excesses but have no MIPS detections; if we add these stars as members with
521: disks, the disk frequencies increase to 7.8$\pm$2.6\% in 25 Orionis
522: and to 20.6$\pm$4.4\% in Ori OB1b. These later values are in better agreement
523: with the disk frequencies calculated for the low mass stars in the
524: Ori OB1a (7 $\pm$ 3 \%) and Ori OB1b (17 $\pm$ 4 \%) sub associations, using
525: the excess emission (2$\sigma$ above the expected photospheric level) from the
526: 2MASS color H-K \citep{hernandez05}.
527: The lower disk frequencies derived using the
528: 24 {\micron} excess could indicate a possible observational bias
529: produced by the flux limit of MIPS observations ($\sim$ 0.5 mJy).
530: Assuming the distances and ages \citep{sf00}
531: plotted in Figure \ref{f:cmd}, with a visual extinction of \av=0.12 mag for
532: 25 Orionis and \av=0.6 mag for OB1b, we cannot expect to
533: detect disks around a 0.6$\msun$ star in the 25 Orionis group if
534: E$_{[24]} \lesssim$2.5, and if E$_{[24]} \lesssim$4.5 for objects in
535: Ori OB1b; where the excess ratio, E$_{[24]}$,
536: is the ratio of the observed flux to the expected photospheric flux at 24 \micron.
537:
538:
539: Using the stars identified as members with infrared
540: excess in Figure \ref{f:slope}, we plotted in Figure \ref{f:diskfrac}
541: the fraction of stars bearing disks versus spectral type
542: for 25 Orionis (dotted line) and OB1b (dashed line). Error bars represent
543: the statistical $\sqrt{N}$ errors in our derived frequencies.
544: Previous studies have indicated that the frequency of disks is strongly dependent
545: on the stellar mass, showing larger frequencies in the TTS mass range (spectral types K and M)
546: than in stars with higher masses \citep{lada95, aurora05, hartmann05b,
547: hernandez05, carpenter06, briceno07a}.
548: Figure \ref{f:diskfrac} also suggests that the disk frequency declines toward lower masses
549: (spectral types later than M1) showing a maximum around K7-M1 stars in agreement with results
550: for the 2-3 Myr cluster IC 348 by \cite{lada06}. However, given the degree of uncertainty
551: in each individual point in Figure \ref{f:diskfrac}, caused by the small number of disk
552: bearing stars in each spectral type bin,
553: plus the observational bias introduced by the limiting magnitude in
554: the MIPS photometry, this result is not conclusive and additional
555: data is necessary to confirm this trend.
556:
557:
558: Using Figure \ref{f:slope}, the frequencies calculated for stars
559: with evolved disks related to the total number of stars bearing disks in
560: the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster (15.6$\pm$4.0 \%), in Ori OB1b
561: (27.8$\pm$12.4 \%) and in 25 Orionis (40$\pm$20\%),
562: indicate a clear trend toward more evolved disks in older stellar groups.
563: The transitional disks candidates in these stellar groups are less
564: frequent than evolved disks (8$\pm$3\% for the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster,
565: 17$\pm$10 \% for OB1b and 10$\pm$10\% for 25 Orionis), suggesting that
566: the transitional disk phase is relatively fast or represents an
567: independent and special stage in the disk clearing period of stars.
568:
569:
570: Disk frequencies of the sample members can be used to estimate the contamination level
571: of non-members in the photometric candidates samples assuming that the photometric
572: candidates bearing disks are actual members of young stellar groups.
573: Since the overall disk frequencies of low mass members (6.1 $\pm$ 2.1 \%) and
574: low mass photometric candidates (7.3 $\pm$ 4.2 \%) in 25 Orionis are similar,
575: we can expect that photometric candidates sample have very low non-member contamination.
576: Since the disk frequency calculated in OB1b for the photometric candidates
577: (6.2 $\pm$ 3.1\%) is lower than the disk frequency of members ( 13.1 $\pm$ 3.5), we can expect
578: that around 50\% of the photometric candidates are not members of OB1b.
579:
580:
581:
582:
583:
584: \subsection {Disk evolution}
585: \label{s:diskevo}
586:
587:
588: The frequency of stars bearing disks in different stellar groups is
589: a function of age, indicating a time scale for disk
590: dissipation in low mass stars of 5-7 Myr \citep[e.g.,][]{haisch01,briceno07a,hernandez05,hernandez07}.
591: The results presented in \S \ref{s:diskfrec} are in agreement with this trend.
592: In addition to this decline in disk frequency,
593: the amount of infrared disk emission also decreases with age.
594: The top panel of Figure \ref{fig:diskevol} shows the median SED slope derived
595: from the color [3.6]$-$[8.0] for disk bearing stars in stellar groups
596: ranging in age from $\sim$1 to $\sim$10 Myr:
597: 1-2 Myr \citep[Taurus;][]{hartmann05},
598: 1-3 Myr \citep[NGC 2264;][]{young06}, 2-3 Myr \citep[IC348;][]{lada06},
599: 3 Myr \citep[$\sigma$ Orionis;][]{hernandez07}, 4 Myr \citep[Tr 37;][]{aurora06}, 5 Myr
600: \citep[OB1b;][ and this work]{briceno07b}, 7-10 Myr \citep[25 Orionis;][ and
601: this work]{briceno07b} and 10-12 Myr \citep[NGC 7160;][]{aurora06}. We estimated
602: the photospheric level using the STAR-PET {\em Spitzer} tool for the star templates
603: with spectral types between K5 to M5.
604: Error bars represent the quartiles given the median value for each stellar group.
605: The median SED slope decreases with age, indicating a reduction of disk emission
606: the inner regions of the disk. In the bottom panel, we display two sets of
607: models described in \S \ref{s:model} with different disk orientations,
608: i=30 $\deg$ (dashed lines) and i=60 $\deg$ (dotted lines).
609: The accretion rate is a function of age \citep{hartmann98,muzerolle00,calvet05a}, so
610: we assumed {\.{M}}=10$^{-8}\msun$ for 1 Myr old stellar groups, which is the mode value
611: for accreting stars in Taurus \citep{hartmann98} and {\.{M}}=10$^{-9}\msun$ for 10 Myr
612: old stellar groups, which is the mode value for accreting stars in the
613: OB1a sub-association \citep{calvet05a}.
614: This plot suggests that the expected decrease in accretion rate
615: is not sufficient to explain the decrease of emission in the
616: inner part of the disk, and it is necessary to increase the
617: degree of settling ($\epsilon$$<$0.001) in the inner disk
618: to explain the observed slopes in stellar groups with ages 5 Myr or older.
619:
620: Since the disk frequency and the infrared disk emission decrease with age,
621: a correlation between these values can be expected. Figure \ref{fig:diskevol2}
622: confirms this suggestion, showing that the disk frequency is correlated with
623: the median SED slope in the IRAC bands (correlation coefficient $\rho$=0.76).
624: This plot clearly demonstrates that the disappearance of inner disks is related
625: to the
626: decrease of optical depth in the inner disk due to the increase of dust
627: settling and the decrease of mass accretion rate \citep[see ][]{dalessio06}.
628:
629:
630:
631:
632: \section{Conclusions}
633: \label{sec:conc}
634:
635: We have used the IRAC and MIPS data from {\em Spitzer} to study the disk frequencies
636: and properties of disks around confirmed members of the Orion OB1 association,
637: 115 belonging to the $\sim 10$ Myr old 25 Orionis aggregate,
638: and 106 in a region within the $\sim 5$ Myr old Ori OB1b sub association,
639: near the Orion belt star $\epsilon$ Ori.
640: Using optical-2MASS color magnitude diagrams 41 stars were selected
641: as additional photometric candidates of the 25 Orionis aggregate,
642: and 65 as additional photometric candidates of the Ori OB1b field.
643: We use IRAC-MIPS diagrams to detect disk bearing stars, and to classify them
644: as either having no detectable disk emission (class III), as systems with
645: optically-thick disks (class II), or as objects in an intermediate phase
646: between class II and class III systems. These intermediate type objects
647: were further grouped in two categories:
648: ``transitional disks candidates'', which have an inner,
649: optically thin disk region combined with an outer, optically thick
650: disk \citep[e.g.;][]{calvet02,calvet05b}; and ``evolved disk objects'', in
651: which there is an overall decrease of emission both the inner
652: and outer regions of the disk \citep{lada06,hernandez07}. It is not clear
653: if ''evolved disks'' are a subsequent event after transitional disks phase, or
654: represent an independent evolutionary stage.
655:
656: We found that the disk frequency in the 25 Orionis aggregate
657: (6 \%) and in the Ori OB1b field (13 \%)
658: is mass dependent, showing a maximum value for stars with spectral
659: type M0, and suggesting a decrease in the disk frequency toward higher
660: and lower masses. The trend toward higher masses has been observed in several
661: stellar groups \citep[e.g.][]{hernandez05, aurora06, carpenter06}. The decrease in
662: disk frequency toward lower masses is not conclusive, but is consistent
663: with the results for other regions like IC 348 \citep{lada06}.
664: We find that objects with evolved disks are more frequent in older
665: stellar groups, while the transitional disk candidates represent a relative
666: small fraction of the disk bearing stars in the various stellar groups,
667: suggesting that the transitional disk phase is relatively fast.
668: %, or represents an independent special phase in the disk dissipation process.
669:
670: Comparing the disk emission in the IRAC and MIPS bands for Taurus,
671: the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster, the Ori OB1b field and the 25 Orionis
672: aggregate, we find that disk emission decreases faster
673: in the innermost regions of the disk;
674: comparison with disk models from \citet{dalessio06} support
675: this scenario.
676: Finally, comparing the disk emission in the IRAC spectral range
677: of several stellar groups ranging in age from $\sim$1 to
678: $\sim$12 Myr , we find that inner disk emission
679: decreases systematically with age, showing a correlation between
680: disk frequencies and inner disk emission.
681: Comparison with models using a typical
682: accretion rate for 1 and 10 Myr suggests that
683: viscous evolution alone
684: is not sufficient to explain the decrease in the inner
685: disk emission, and that large degrees of dust settling ($\epsilon$ $<$ 0.001)
686: are necessary to explain the observed SEDs at ages 5 Myr or older.
687:
688: \acknowledgements
689:
690: We thank Massimo Marengo for his advise during the reduction and mosaicking
691: of the IRAC data. This publication makes use of data products from
692: the CIDA Equatorial Variability Survey, obtained with
693: the J. Stock telescope at the Venezuela National Astronomical
694: Observatory, which is operated by CIDA for the Ministerio del
695: Poder Popular para la Ciencia y Tecnolog{\'\i}a of Venezuela,
696: and from the Two Micron All Sky Survey,
697: which is a joint project of the University
698: of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
699: Institute of Technology.
700: This work is based on observations made with the {\em Spitzer Space Telescope}
701: (GO-1 3437), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
702: Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work
703: was provided by NASA grants NAG5-9670 and NAG10545.
704:
705:
706: %\appendix
707: %\section{Uncertain member sample}
708: %\label{appA}
709:
710: % Using J versus J-K color-magnitude diagram,
711: %we select as uncertain members stars sharing
712: %the same location as members and photometric
713: %candidates \citep[see ][]{hernandez07}.
714: %The disk frequency calculated in each sample,
715: %2.6 \% (5/190) for the 25 Orionis cluster and 5.4 \% (14/259)
716: %for the OB1b field, indicates that these samples have
717: %large contamination by non-members ( above 60\%).
718: %Tables \ref{t:2mass1a} and \ref{t:2mass1b} show the IRAC
719: %and MIPS photometry for the uncertain member sample.
720: %Column 1 shows the internal running identification number
721: %in each sample, columns 2 shows the 2MASS designation;
722: %columns 3 and 4 are the stellar coordinates; columns 5, 6, 7 and 8 give IRAC
723: %magnitudes in the bands [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0], respectively; column 9
724: %gives MIPS (24\micron) magnitudes; the last column gives the disk
725: %classification based on the IRAC and MIPS analysis (see \S \ref{s:disksel})
726:
727: %\include{Tab5}
728:
729: %\include{Tab6}
730:
731:
732:
733:
734:
735: \begin{thebibliography}
736:
737: \bibitem[Alibert et al.(2004)]{alibert04}
738: Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., \& Benz, W.\ 2004, \aap, 417, L25
739:
740: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2004)]{allen04} Allen, L.~E., et al.\
741: 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
742:
743: \bibitem[Baltay et al.(2002)]{baltay02}
744: Baltay, C., et al.\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 780
745:
746: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{baraffe98}
747: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P.~H.\ 1998, \aap, 337, 403
748:
749: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(1998)]{briceno98}
750: Brice{\~n}o, C., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J., \& Martin, E.~L.\ 1998, ASP Conf.~Ser.~134: Brown Dwarfs
751: and Extrasolar Planets, 134, 36
752:
753: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2001)]{briceno01}
754: Brice{\~n}o, C., et al.\ 2001, Science, 291, 93
755:
756: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2005)]{briceno05}
757: Brice{\~n}o, C., Calvet, N., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Vivas, A.~K., Hartmann, L.,
758: Downes, J.~J., \& Berlind, P.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 907.
759:
760: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2007a)]{briceno07a}
761: Brice{\~n}o, C., Preibisch, T., Sherry, W.~H., Mamajek, E.~A., Mathieu, R.~D., Walter,
762: F.~M., \& Zinnecker, H.\ 2007a, Protostars and Planets V, 345
763:
764: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2007b)]{briceno07b}
765: Brice{\~n}o, C., Hartmann, L., Hernandez, J., Calvet, N., Katherina Vivas, A., Furesz, G., \& Szentgyorgyi, A.\ 2007a, \apj, 661, 1119.
766:
767: \bibitem[Brice{\~n}o et al.(2007c)]{briceno07c}
768: Brice{\~n}o, C., Hartmann, L., Hernandez, J., Calvet, N., Katherina Vivas, A., 2007b, in preparation.
769:
770: \bibitem[Brown et al.(1999)]{brown99} Brown, A.~G.~A., Blaauw,
771: A., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J.~H.~J., \& de Zeeuw, P.~T.\ 1999, NATO
772: ASIC Proc.~540: The Origin of Stars and Planetary Systems, 411
773:
774: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{calvet02}
775: Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., \& Sitko, M.\ 2002, \apj, 568, 1008
776:
777: %\bibitem[Calvet et al.(2004)]{calvet04}
778: %Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Brice{\~n}o, C., Hern{\'a}ndez,
779: %J., Hartmann, L., Saucedo, J.~L., \& Gordon, K.~D.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 1294
780:
781: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005a)]{calvet05a}
782: Calvet, N., Brice{\~n}o, C., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Hoyer, S., Hartmann, L., Sicilia-Aguilar, A.,
783: Megeath, S.~T., \& D'Alessio, P.\ 2005a, \aj, 129, 935
784:
785: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005b)]{calvet05b}
786: Calvet, N., et al.\ 2005b, \apjl, 630, L185
787:
788: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2006)]{carpenter06} Carpenter, J.~M.,
789: Mamajek, E.~E., Hillenbrand, L.~A., \& Meyer, M.~R.\ 2006, \apj, 651, 49
790:
791: \bibitem[Cutri et al.(2003)]{cutri03}
792: Cutri, R.~M., et al.\ 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2246, 0.
793:
794: %\bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(1999)]{dalessio99}
795: %D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Lizano, S., \& Cant{\'o}, J.\ 1999, \apj, 527, 893
796:
797: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005a)]{dalessio05a}
798: D'Alessio, P., et al.\ 2005a, \apj, 621, 461
799:
800: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005b)]{dalessio05b}
801: D'Alessio, P., Mer{\'{\i}}n, B., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., \& Montesinos, B.\ 2005b,
802: Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 41, 61.
803:
804: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2006)]{dalessio06} D'Alessio, P.,
805: Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez, R., \& Serv{\'{\i}}n, H.\
806: 2006, \apj, 638, 314
807:
808: \bibitem[Fabricant et al.(1998)]{fabricant98} Fabricant, D.,
809: Cheimets, P., Caldwell, N., \& Geary, J.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 79
810:
811: \bibitem[Fabricant et al.(2005)]{fabricant05} Fabricant, D., et
812: al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1411
813:
814: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04}
815: Fazio, G.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 39
816:
817: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan06}
818: Furlan, E., et al.\ 2006, \apjs, 165, 568
819:
820: \bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{gordon05}
821: Gordon, K.~D., et al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
822:
823: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{gorlova06}
824: Gorlova, N., Rieke, G.~H., Muzerolle, J., Stauffer, J.~R., Siegler, N., Young, E.~T., \&
825: Stansberry, J.~H.\ 2006, \apj, 649, 1028
826:
827: \bibitem[Gutermuth et al.(2004)]{gutermuth04}
828: Gutermuth, R.~A., Megeath, S.~T., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L.~E., Pipher, J.~L., Myers, P.~C.,
829: \& Fazio, G.~G.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 374
830:
831: \bibitem[Haisch et al.(2001)]{haisch01}
832: Haisch, K.~E., Lada, E.~A., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L153
833:
834:
835: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(1998)]{hartmann98}
836: Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., \& D'Alessio, P.\ 1998, \apj, 495, 385
837:
838: \bibitem[Hartmann(2003)]{hartmann03}
839: Hartmann, L.\ 2003, \apj, 585, 398
840:
841: \bibitem[Hartmann(2005)]{hartmann05b}
842: Hartmann, L.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~341: Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk, 341, 131
843:
844: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{hartmann05} Hartmann, L., Megeath,
845: S.~T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P., Franco-Hernandez,
846: R., \& Fazio, G.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 881
847:
848: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2005)]{hernandez05}
849: Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Brice{\~n}o, C., Sicilia-Aguilar, A., \& Berlind, P.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 856.
850:
851: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2006)]{hernandez06} Hern{\'a}ndez,
852: J., Brice{\~n}o, C., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J., \& Quintero,
853: A.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 472
854:
855: \bibitem[Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2007)]{hernandez07} Hernandez, J., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 662, 1067.
856:
857: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(2005)]{kenyon05}
858: Kenyon, M.~J., Jeffries, R.~D., Naylor, T., Oliveira, J.~M., \& Maxted, P.~F.~L.\ 2005, \mnras, 356, 89
859:
860: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kh95}
861: Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Hartmann, L.\ 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
862:
863: \bibitem[Lada \& Lada(1995)]{lada95}
864: Lada, E.~A., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 1682
865:
866: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{lada06}
867: Lada, C.~J., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1574
868:
869: \bibitem[Lee \& Chen(2007)]{lee07}
870: Lee, H.-T., \& Chen, W.~P.\ 2007, \apj, 657, 884
871:
872: \bibitem[Lyra et al.(2006)]{lyra06} Lyra, W., Moitinho, A.,
873: van der Bliek, N.~S., \& Alves, J.\ 2006, \aap, 453, 101
874:
875: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{megeath04} Megeath, S.~T., et al.\
876: 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
877:
878: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2006)]{megeath06}
879: Megeath, S.~T., Allen, L.~E., Allgaier, E., Muzerolle, J., Peterson, D.~E., Siegler, N., Wilson,
880: T.~L., \& Young, E.~C.\ 2006, IAU Symposium, 237
881:
882: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2000)]{muzerolle00}
883: Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., Brice{\~n}o, C., Hartmann, L., \& Hillenbrand, L.\ 2000, \apjl,
884: 535, L47
885:
886:
887: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2004)]{muzerolle04}
888: Muzerolle, J., et al. \ 2004, \apjs, 154, 379.
889:
890: \bibitem[Pollack et al.(1996)]{pollack96}
891: Pollack, J.~B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J.~J., Podolak, M., \& Greenzweig,
892: Y.\ 1996, Icarus, 124, 62
893:
894: \bibitem[Preibisch \& Zinnecker(2006)]{preibisch07}
895: Preibisch, T., \& Zinnecker, H.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0610826
896:
897: \bibitem[Reach et al. (2006)]{reach06}
898: Reach, W. et al. \ 2006, Infrared Array Camera Data Handbook, version 3.0, {\em Spitzer} Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 USA.
899:
900: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04}
901: Rieke, G. H., et al, 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
902:
903: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{schlegel98}
904: Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
905:
906: \bibitem[Schuster et al.(2006)]{schuster06} Schuster, M.~T.,
907: Marengo, M., \& Patten, B.~M.\ 2006, \procspie, 6270, 65.
908:
909: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2005)]{aurora05}
910: Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L.~W., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Brice{\~n}o, C.,
911: \& Calvet, N.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 188
912:
913: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2006)]{aurora06}
914: Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 638, 897
915:
916: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{sf00}
917: Siess, L., Dufour, E., \& Forestini, M.\ 2000, \aap, 358, 593
918:
919: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(2004)]{uchida04} Uchida, K.~I., et al.\
920: 2004, \apjs, 154, 439
921:
922: \bibitem[Vivas et al.(2004)]{vivas04}
923: Vivas, A.~K., et al.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 1158
924:
925: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{white03} White, R.~J., \& Basri,
926: G.\ 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
927:
928: \bibitem[Young et al.(2004)]{young06} Young, E.~T., et al.\
929: 2006, \apj, 642, 972
930:
931:
932:
933: \end{thebibliography}
934:
935:
936: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
937: \rotate
938: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
939: \tablewidth{0pt}
940: \tablecaption{Members of the 25 Orionis aggregate \label{t:mem1a}}
941: \tablehead{
942: \colhead{OB1a} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{Ref} & \colhead{Disk}\\
943: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{opt} & \colhead{types} \\
944: }
945: \startdata
946: 9 & 05224654+0134010 & 80.69393 & 1.56697 & 12.419 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.629 $\pm$ 0.131 & 12.275 $\pm$ 0.036 & 12.458 $\pm$ 0.042 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
947: 25 & 05224842+0140438 & 80.70176 & 1.67885 & 12.817 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.777 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.753 $\pm$ 0.041 & 12.824 $\pm$ 0.057 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
948: 47 & 05225186+0145132 & 80.71609 & 1.75367 & 13.269 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.262 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.139 $\pm$ 0.050 & 13.450 $\pm$ 0.112 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
949: 53 & 05225304+0152151 & 80.72102 & 1.87088 & 12.416 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.348 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.240 $\pm$ 0.036 & 12.258 $\pm$ 0.043 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
950: 905 & 05245885+0125183 & 81.24523 & 1.42177 & 12.904 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.724 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.456 $\pm$ 0.037 & 11.889 $\pm$ 0.040 & 9.20 $\pm$ 0.04 & 3 & EV \\
951: 930 & 05250192+0134563 & 81.25801 & 1.58232 & 11.720 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.865 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.562 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.825 $\pm$ 0.036 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 2 & CIII \\
952: 931 & 05250205+0137210 & 81.25855 & 1.62252 & 11.435 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.228 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.326 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.137 $\pm$ 0.033 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 1 & disk[8]? \\
953: 948 & 05250362+0144121 & 81.26511 & 1.73670 & 11.949 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.061 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.831 $\pm$ 0.034 & 11.876 $\pm$ 0.036 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 2 & CIII \\
954: \enddata
955: \tablecomments{Table \ref{t:mem1a} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
956: A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
957: \tablenotetext{~}{References in column 10: 1 \citet{briceno05}; 2 \citet{briceno07b}; 3 \citet{briceno07c}}
958: \tablenotetext{~}{Disk types: CIII:disk less stars; CII:optically thick disks; EV:evolved disks; TD: transitional disk candidates; disk[8]?:excess at 8 \micron but no MIPS detections.}
959: \end{deluxetable}.
960:
961:
962: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
963: \rotate
964: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
965: \tablewidth{0pt}
966:
967: \tablecaption{Members of the OB1b field \label{t:mem1b}}
968: \tablehead{
969: \colhead{OB1b} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{Ref} & \colhead{Disk}\\
970: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{opt} & \colhead{type} \\
971: }
972: \startdata
973: 21 & 05290540-0127500 & 82.27250 & -1.46390 & 11.830 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.865 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.787 $\pm$ 0.034 & 11.846 $\pm$ 0.038 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
974: 31 & 05290635-0152122 & 82.27648 & -1.87008 & 12.751 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.707 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.632 $\pm$ 0.040 & 12.595 $\pm$ 0.057 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
975: 63 & 05290882-0125393 & 82.28679 & -1.42760 & 11.268 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.291 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.221 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.076 $\pm$ 0.033 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 1 & CIII \\
976: 70 & 05290925-0121227 & 82.28856 & -1.35633 & 12.383 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.291 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.122 $\pm$ 0.035 & 11.813 $\pm$ 0.038 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
977: 78 & 05291078-0117281 & 82.29495 & -1.29115 & 12.004 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.989 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.906 $\pm$ 0.034 & 11.974 $\pm$ 0.040 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
978: 89 & 05291202-0112236 & 82.30010 & -1.20657 & 13.138 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.085 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.120 $\pm$ 0.052 & 13.067 $\pm$ 0.089 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
979: 148 & 05291821-0204066 & 82.32590 & -2.06852 & 11.267 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.152 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.058 $\pm$ 0.032 & 10.917 $\pm$ 0.034 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 3 & CIII \\
980: 209 & 05292326-0125153 & 82.34693 & -1.42092 & 9.457 $\pm$ 0.030 & 9.238 $\pm$ 0.030 & 8.809 $\pm$ 0.030 & 8.392 $\pm$ 0.030 & 5.23 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1 & CII \\
981: \enddata
982: \tablecomments{Table \ref{t:mem1b} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
983: A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
984:
985: \tablenotetext{~}{References in column 10: 1 \citet{briceno05}; 2 \citet{briceno07b}; 3 \citet{briceno07c}}
986: \tablenotetext{~}{Disk types: CIII:disk less stars; CII:optically thick disks; EV:evolved disks; TD: transitional disk candidates; disk[8]?:excess at 8 \micron but no MIPS detections.}
987: \end{deluxetable}
988:
989: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
990: \rotate
991: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
992: \tablewidth{0pt}
993: \tablecaption{Photometric candidates of the 25 Orionis aggregate \label{t:phot1a}}
994: \tablehead{
995: \colhead{OB1a} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{VI} & \colhead{Disk}\\
996: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{type} \\
997: }
998: \startdata
999: 146 & 05230905+0125355 & 80.78774 & 1.42654 & 11.383 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.355 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.278 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.284 $\pm$ 0.034 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 15.75 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.43 $\pm$ 0.05 & CIII \\
1000: 297 & 05233109+0144079 & 80.87958 & 1.73555 & 11.005 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.079 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.028 $\pm$ 0.031 & 10.967 $\pm$ 0.032 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 13.91 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.05 & CIII \\
1001: 359 & 05234182+0152261 & 80.92428 & 1.87394 & 13.144 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.088 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.986 $\pm$ 0.041 & 13.039 $\pm$ 0.055 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 19.11 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3.09 $\pm$ 0.09 & CIII \\
1002: 427 & 05235215+0136314 & 80.96732 & 1.60873 & 11.103 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.191 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.155 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.074 $\pm$ 0.032 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 13.84 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.05 & CIII \\
1003: 458 & 05235854+0151255 & 80.99394 & 1.85709 & 12.114 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.047 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.003 $\pm$ 0.034 & 12.043 $\pm$ 0.040 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 17.29 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.58 $\pm$ 0.07 & CIII \\
1004: 477 & 05240118+0128236 & 81.00493 & 1.47324 & 12.316 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.289 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.123 $\pm$ 0.035 & 12.165 $\pm$ 0.041 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 16.87 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2.49 $\pm$ 0.06 & CIII \\
1005: 543 & 05241034+0155024 & 81.04312 & 1.91735 & 10.322 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.428 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.365 $\pm$ 0.031 & 10.309 $\pm$ 0.031 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 13.16 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.80 $\pm$ 0.05 & CIII \\
1006: 1626 & 05265473+0144337 & 81.72806 & 1.74271 & 10.168 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.273 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.061 $\pm$ 0.031 & 10.069 $\pm$ 0.031 & 9.83 $\pm$ 0.06 & 13.43 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.86 $\pm$ 0.05 & EV \\
1007: \enddata
1008: \tablecomments{Table \ref{t:phot1a} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
1009: A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1010: \tablenotetext{~}{Disk types: CIII:disk less stars; CII:optically thick disks; EV:evolved disks; TD: transitional disk candidates; disk[8]?:excess at 8 \micron but no MIPS detections.}
1011: %\tablenotetext{~}{References in column 10: 1 \citet{briceno05}; 2 \citet{briceno07b}; 3 %\citet{briceno07c}}
1012: \end{deluxetable}
1013:
1014: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
1015: \rotate
1016: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1017: \tablewidth{0pt}
1018: \tablecaption{Photometric candidates of the OB1b field \label{t:phot1b}}
1019: \tablehead{
1020: \colhead{OB1b} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{V} & \colhead{VI} & \colhead{Disk}\\
1021: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{type} \\
1022: }
1023: \startdata
1024: 74 & 05290984-0208250 & 82.29101 & -2.14030 & 12.269 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.217 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.141 $\pm$ 0.036 & 12.113 $\pm$ 0.042 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 18.26 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.89 $\pm$ 0.09 & CIII \\
1025: 187 & 05292160-0201546 & 82.34002 & -2.03184 & 11.142 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.121 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.073 $\pm$ 0.031 & 11.025 $\pm$ 0.034 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 15.91 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2.04 $\pm$ 0.09 & CIII \\
1026: 203 & 05292300-0126559 & 82.34584 & -1.44888 & 13.500 $\pm$ 0.131 & 13.262 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.186 $\pm$ 0.042 & 13.184 $\pm$ 0.085 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 18.89 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.83 $\pm$ 0.08 & CIII \\
1027: 207 & 05292313-0149203 & 82.34638 & -1.82231 & 13.109 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.105 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.059 $\pm$ 0.051 & 13.451 $\pm$ 0.153 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 18.83 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.63 $\pm$ 0.08 & CIII \\
1028: 222 & 05292426-0207354 & 82.35112 & -2.12651 & 12.953 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.055 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.730 $\pm$ 0.042 & 12.825 $\pm$ 0.063 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 17.78 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.27 $\pm$ 0.08 & CIII \\
1029: 236 & 05292591-0144580 & 82.35797 & -1.74945 & 10.810 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.832 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.757 $\pm$ 0.031 & 10.707 $\pm$ 0.032 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 14.64 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.41 $\pm$ 0.06 & CIII \\
1030: 276 & 05293010-0114446 & 82.37544 & -1.24573 & 11.116 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.217 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.175 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.107 $\pm$ 0.034 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 14.37 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.25 $\pm$ 0.00 & CIII \\
1031: 283 & 05293049-0121500 & 82.37707 & -1.36389 & 11.303 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.376 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.314 $\pm$ 0.032 & 11.309 $\pm$ 0.036 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & 14.56 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.30 $\pm$ 0.06 & CIII \\
1032: 342 & 05293578-0148046 & 82.39909 & -1.80129 & 11.138 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.185 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.129 $\pm$ 0.031 & 11.144 $\pm$ 0.034 & \nodata\enddata
1033: \tablecomments{Table \ref{t:phot1b} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
1034: A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1035: \tablenotetext{~}{Disk types: CIII:disk less stars; CII:optically thick disks; EV:evolved disks; TD: transitional disk candidates; disk[8]?:excess at 8 \micron but no MIPS detections.}
1036: %\tablenotetext{~}{References in columns 10: 1 \citet{briceno05}; 2 \citet{briceno07b}; 3 %\citet{briceno07c}}
1037: \end{deluxetable}
1038:
1039:
1040: %\begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
1041: %\rotate
1042: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
1043: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1044: %\tablecaption{Members of the 25 Orionis aggregate \label{t:2mass1a}}
1045: %\tablehead{
1046: %\colhead{OB1a} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{Disk}\\
1047: %\colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{type} \\
1048: %}
1049: %\startdata
1050: %2 & 05224540+0145167 & 80.68920 & 1.75466 & 12.370 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.406 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.371 $\pm$ 0.037 & 12.164 $\pm$ 0.042 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1051: %5 & 05224576+0133277 & 80.69068 & 1.55771 & 13.373 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.301 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.172 $\pm$ 0.049 & 13.353 $\pm$ 0.084 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1052: %21 & 05224811+0133575 & 80.70047 & 1.56598 & 12.113 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.135 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.044 $\pm$ 0.036 & 12.007 $\pm$ 0.040 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1053: %23 & 05224825+0133291 & 80.70108 & 1.55810 & 12.038 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.004 $\pm$ 0.030 & 11.951 $\pm$ 0.034 & 11.929 $\pm$ 0.039 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1054: %42 & 05225082+0130373 & 80.71178 & 1.51038 & 13.671 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.513 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.230 $\pm$ 0.054 & 12.598 $\pm$ 0.050 & 9.06 $\pm$ 0.04 & CIII \\
1055: %95 & 05230060+0134436 & 80.75252 & 1.57879 & 10.654 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.669 $\pm$ 0.030 & 10.588 $\pm$ 0.031 & 10.600 $\pm$ 0.031 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1056: %98 & 05230093+0132215 & 80.75388 & 1.53931 & 12.486 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.532 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.381 $\pm$ 0.037 & 12.487 $\pm$ 0.049 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1057: %105 & 05230248+0132054 & 80.76035 & 1.53484 & 12.669 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.691 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.608 $\pm$ 0.037 & 12.720 $\pm$ 0.054 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1058: %\enddata
1059: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{t:2mass1a} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
1060: %A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1061: %\end{deluxetable}
1062:
1063:
1064:
1065: %\begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllll}
1066: %\rotate
1067: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
1068: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1069: %\tablecaption{Members of the 25 Orionis aggregate \label{t:2mass1b}}
1070: %\tablehead{
1071: %\colhead{OB1a} & \colhead {2MASS} & \colhead{RA(2000)} & \colhead{DEC(2000)} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} & \colhead{[24.0]} & \colhead{Disk}\\
1072: %\colhead{ID} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{deg} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{type} \\
1073: %}
1074: %\startdata
1075: %9 & 05290408-0130300 & 82.26703 & -1.50834 & 13.331 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.275 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.272 $\pm$ 0.054 & 13.048 $\pm$ 0.086 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1076: %14 & 05290480-0138298 & 82.27000 & -1.64163 & 12.425 $\pm$ 0.030 & 12.473 $\pm$ 0.031 & 12.415 $\pm$ 0.039 & 12.394 $\pm$ 0.054 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1077: %27 & 05290595-0202416 & 82.27481 & -2.04491 & 13.957 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.943 $\pm$ 0.034 & 14.112 $\pm$ 0.095 & 13.714 $\pm$ 0.108 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1078: %33 & 05290645-0147089 & 82.27690 & -1.78581 & 13.813 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.866 $\pm$ 0.033 & 13.839 $\pm$ 0.082 & 13.780 $\pm$ 0.143 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1079: %42 & 05290726-0122215 & 82.28026 & -1.37264 & 13.736 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.693 $\pm$ 0.033 & 13.671 $\pm$ 0.062 & 13.435 $\pm$ 0.103 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1080: %75 & 05291013-0202249 & 82.29223 & -2.04025 & 13.257 $\pm$ 0.031 & 13.205 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.044 $\pm$ 0.044 & 13.032 $\pm$ 0.070 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1081: %138 & 05291714-0113005 & 82.32145 & -1.21683 & 13.888 $\pm$ 0.032 & 13.846 $\pm$ 0.033 & 13.952 $\pm$ 0.075 & 13.978 $\pm$ 0.184 & \nodata $\pm$ \nodata & CIII \\
1082: %\enddata
1083: %\tablecomments{Table \ref{t:2mass1b} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}.
1084: %A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1085: %\end{deluxetable}
1086:
1087: \clearpage
1088:
1089: \begin{figure}
1090: %\epsscale{1.0}
1091: \plotone{f1.eps}
1092: %\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{f1.eps}
1093: %\includegraphics[scale=0.35,angle=90]{map_1b.eps}
1094: \caption{IRAC image of the 25 Orionis aggregate. This is a 3-color composite of IRAC
1095: images (3.6 (blue), 4.5 (green), and 8.0 (red) \micron) illustrating the space
1096: distribution of members in this aggregate.
1097: Circles represent stars confirmed as low mass members using spectroscopic
1098: data \citep{briceno05,briceno07b,briceno07c}, squares represent
1099: photometric low mass candidates of 25 Orionis. Solid symbols indicate stars
1100: bearing disks (see \S \ref{s:disksel}). Intermediate mass members
1101: selected in \citet{hernandez06} are represented
1102: as diamonds, open symbols represent stars without disks and solid symbols represent
1103: debris disk candidates. The star indicates the Herbig Ae star V346 Ori \citep{hernandez06}
1104: and the triangle indicates the Be star 25 Ori.[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.] }
1105: \label{f:map1a}
1106: \end{figure}
1107:
1108: \begin{figure}
1109: %\epsscale{1.0}
1110: \plotone{f2.eps}
1111: %\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{f2.eps}
1112: \caption{IRAC image of the OB1b region. This is a 3-color composite of IRAC images,
1113: 3.6 (blue), 4.5 (green), and 8.0 (red) \micron. Symbols are as in Figure \ref{f:map1a}.
1114: The star indicates the Herbig Ae star HD290543 \citep{hernandez06}[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.]}
1115: \label{f:map1b}
1116: \end{figure}
1117:
1118: \begin{figure}
1119: \epsscale{1.0}
1120: \plotone{f3.eps}
1121: \caption{Color magnitude diagrams illustrating the selection of low mass photometric
1122: candidates in 25 Orionis (upper panels) and in OB1b (lower panels). Photometric candidates
1123: (open squares) have similar distribution than members (open circles) confirmed using
1124: spectroscopic methods \citep{briceno05,briceno07b, briceno07c}.
1125: By comparison, the ZAMS (solid lines) and the isochrones at
1126: 10 Myr and 5 Myr \citep[ dashed lines;][]{sf00} are displayed
1127: at the distance of each stellar group; 330 pc for 25 Orionis and 440 pc for OB1b
1128: \citep{briceno05,briceno07b,hernandez05}. Long dashed lines represent the median
1129: colors for the spectroscopic members.[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.]}
1130: \label{f:cmd}
1131: \end{figure}
1132:
1133:
1134: \begin{figure}
1135: \epsscale{1.0}
1136: \plotone{f4.eps}
1137: \caption{Diagrams illustrating the detection of sources with infrared excess
1138: above the photospheric levels (solid lines) in 25 Orionis.
1139: The top panel shows the IRAC SED slope diagram indicating stars
1140: with excess at 8 \micron.
1141: The bottom-left panel shows a 2MASS-MIPS color-color diagram indicating stars
1142: with excess emission at the MIPS 24 {\micron} band. The bottom-right panel shows an
1143: IRAC color-color diagram indicating objects with infrared excess at [4.5]
1144: and [8.0]. Members and photometric candidates are displayed
1145: as circles and squares, respectively. Large circles and large squares
1146: represent stars with infrared excess at 24 \micron. The solid histograms
1147: represent the distribution of IRAC SED slopes for stars with optically
1148: thick disks in Taurus \citep{hartmann05} and in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07};
1149: dashed lines represent the class II region limit based on these histograms.
1150: The open histograms represent the distribution of stars with no IRAC excesses.
1151: The dashed histogram is the distribution of stars with evolved disks in the
1152: $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07}[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.]}
1153: \label{f:disk1a}
1154: \end{figure}
1155:
1156: \begin{figure}
1157: \epsscale{1.0}
1158: \plotone{f5.eps}
1159: \caption{Diagrams illustrating the detection of sources with infrared excess
1160: above the photospheric levels (solid lines) in the OB1b field.
1161: Symbols are similar to Figure \ref{f:disk1a}.[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.]}
1162: \label{f:disk1b}
1163: \end{figure}
1164:
1165: \begin{figure}
1166: \epsscale{1.0}
1167: \plotone{f6.eps}
1168: \caption{SED slope K$-$[5.8] versus SED slope K$-$[24] for members (circles)
1169: and photometric candidates (squares) bearing disks in
1170: 25 Orionis (left panel) and in OB1b (right panel).
1171: Error bars represent the quartiles of the stellar groups,
1172: Taurus (1 Myr), the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster (3 Myr), OB1b (5 Myr), and
1173: 25 Orionis (10 Myr). Stars represent the transitional disk objects, Coku Tau\/4, TW Hya, and GM Aur
1174: \citep{dalessio05a,uchida04, calvet02,calvet05b} .
1175: Photospheric regions derived for K5-M5 stars using STAR-PET {\em Spitzer} tool are
1176: represented as dashed areas. Disk bearing stars in the
1177: $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep{hernandez07} are represented with the symbol X.
1178: The horizontal dotted line represents the lower quartile of the stars bearing disks
1179: in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster, $\sim$96 \% of stars with disks in Taurus are
1180: located above this line; we define the area above this line as
1181: the class II region (CII in Table 1-4).
1182: The vertical dotted line represents the lower quartile of the stars bearing disks
1183: in the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster. We use this limit to separate transitional disk
1184: candidate (TD in Table 1-4) from stars with evolved disks (EV in Table 1-4).}
1185: \label{f:slope}
1186: \end{figure}
1187:
1188: \begin{figure}
1189: \epsscale{1.0}
1190: \plotone{f7.eps}
1191: \caption{Spectral energy distributions for selected disk bearing stars, illustrating the diversity of disks found
1192: at 5 and 10 Myr. Dotted line represents the median SEDs of disk bearing stars in Taurus \citep{hartmann05}.
1193: Dashed line represents the median photosphere of stars in the spectral type range K5-M5 \citep{kh95}. We display
1194: examples of the disk types found in Figure \ref{f:slope}: stars with optically thick disks (CII), transitional disk
1195: candidates (TD) and evolved disks objects (EV).[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.]
1196: }
1197: \label{f:seds}
1198: \end{figure}
1199:
1200:
1201: \begin{figure}
1202: \epsscale{1.0}
1203: \plotone{f8.eps}
1204: \caption{Theoretical SED slopes as function of the degree of settling.
1205: Each panel shows three curves corresponding to different
1206: accretion rates ({\.{M}}=$10^{-7}$,{\.{M}}=$10^{-8}$ and {\.{M}}=$10^{-9})$.
1207: The parameter $\epsilon$ represents the degree of settling in each model.
1208: The central object is a typical T Tauri star with M=0.6$\msun$,
1209: Age=1 Myr, corresponding to a spectral type K7 \citep{sf00}.
1210: Left and middle panels represent disks oriented with an angle of
1211: 30$\deg$ and 60 $\deg$, respectively. In the right panels, we
1212: display the quartiles of the disk population in Taurus \citep[1-2 Myr;][]{hartmann05,furlan06},
1213: the $\sigma$ Orionis cluster \citep[$\sim$3 Myr][]{hernandez07}, and the stellar groups
1214: studied in this contribution, OB1b ($\sim$ 5 Myr) and 25 Orionis ($\sim$ 10 Myr). [See electronic edition of {\apj}
1215: for a color version of this figure.]}
1216: \label{f:model}
1217: \end{figure}
1218:
1219:
1220:
1221: \begin{figure}
1222: \epsscale{1.0}
1223: \plotone{f9.eps}
1224: \caption{Disk frequency as function of spectral type for
1225: the 25 Orionis aggregate (dotted line) and the OB1b field
1226: (dashed line). The error bars represent the Poissonian
1227: statistical uncertainties}
1228: \label{f:diskfrac}
1229: \end{figure}
1230:
1231:
1232:
1233: \begin{figure}
1234: \epsscale{1.0}
1235: \plotone{f10.eps}
1236: \caption{Median SED slope in the IRAC spectral range versus stellar
1237: ages of different stellar groups: Taurus \citep{hartmann05},
1238: NGC 2264 \citep{young06}, IC 348 \citep{lada06}, $\sigma$ Orionis \citep{hernandez07},
1239: Tr37 and NGC 7160 \citep{aurora06}, and 25 Orionis and OB1b
1240: \citep[][ and this work]{briceno07b}.
1241: The dashed region indicates the photospheric levels estimated using STAR-PET {\em Spitzer} tool.
1242: It is apparent that the infrared disk emission decreases with the age of the stellar groups.
1243: The lower panel shows a comparison with theoretical values described in \S \ref{s:model}. Two
1244: set of models are displayed showing different orientation of the disks, 30 deg (dashed lines)
1245: and 60 deg (dotted lines). We assume canonical values for accretion rate at 1 Myr
1246: and 10 Myr (see text). Different lines describe different degree of settling ($\epsilon$=1,0.1,0.01 and 0.001)
1247: showing flatter slopes for models with less degree of settling.[See electronic edition of {\apj} for a color version of this figure.] }
1248: \label{fig:diskevol}
1249: \end{figure}
1250:
1251: \begin{figure}
1252: \epsscale{1.0}
1253: \plotone{f11.eps}
1254: \caption{IRAC disk Frequency versus the median SED slope [3.6]$-$[8.0]
1255: for different stellar groups (see Figure \ref{fig:diskevol}).
1256: These measurements are correlated (correlation coefficient $\rho$=0.76) indicating more flaring disks
1257: in stellar groups with higher disk frequency.}
1258: \label{fig:diskevol2}
1259: \end{figure}
1260:
1261: \end{document}
1262: