1: % EGRET blazars in VIPS v1.2
2:
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass{aastex}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Characteristics of EGRET Blazars in the VLBA Imaging and Polarimetry Survey (VIPS)}
8: \author{G. B. Taylor\altaffilmark{1}, S. E. Healey\altaffilmark{2}, J. F. Helmboldt\altaffilmark{3}, S. Tremblay\altaffilmark{1}, C. D. Fassnacht\altaffilmark{4}, R. C. Walker\altaffilmark{5}, L. O. Sjouwerman\altaffilmark{5}, T. J. Pearson\altaffilmark{6}, A. C. S. Readhead\altaffilmark{6}, L. Weintraub\altaffilmark{6}, N. Gehrels\altaffilmark{7}, R. W. Romani\altaffilmark{2}, P. F. Michelson\altaffilmark{2}, R. D. Blandford\altaffilmark{8}, and G. Cotter\altaffilmark{9}}
9: %\email{helmbold@unm.edu}
10:
11: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, 800 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA}
12: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305}
13: \altaffiltext{3}{Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375}
14: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, University of California at Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616}
15: \altaffiltext{5}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, Socorro, NM 87801, U.S.A.}
16: \altaffiltext{6}{Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 105-24, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}
17: \altaffiltext{7}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
18: \altaffiltext{8}{KIPAC, Stanford University, PO Box 20450, MS 29, Stanford, CA 94309, USA}
19: \altaffiltext{9}{University of Oxford, Department of Astrophysics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH}
20: \received{?}
21: \accepted{?}
22: %\journalid{?}{?}
23: %\articleid{0}{0}
24:
25: %\slugcomment{2007 June 2 DRAFT, for submission to ApJ}
26: \begin{abstract}
27:
28: We examine the radio properties of EGRET-detected blazars observed as
29: part of the VLBA Imaging and Polarimetry Survey (VIPS). VIPS has a
30: flux limit roughly an order of magnitude below the MOJAVE survey and
31: most other samples that have been used to study the properties of
32: EGRET blazars. At lower flux levels, radio flux density does not
33: directly correlate with gamma-ray flux density. We do find that the
34: EGRET-detected blazars tend to have higher brightness temperatures,
35: greater core fractions, and possibly larger than average jet opening
36: angles. A weak correlation is also found with jet length and with
37: polarization. All of the well-established trends can be explained by
38: systematically larger Doppler factors in the $\gamma$-ray loud
39: blazars, consistent with the
40: measurements of higher apparent velocities found in monitoring
41: programs carried out at radio frequencies above 10 GHz.
42:
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \keywords{galaxies: active - surveys - catalogs - galaxies: jets - galaxies: nuclei - radio continuum: galaxies - techniques: image processing}
46:
47: \section{Introduction}
48:
49: At high galactic latitudes at least $\sim$70\% of the sources seen by the
50: Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory (CGRO; Hartman et al. 1999) EGRET
51: instrument are identified with blazars (Sowards-Emmerd et al. 2003,
52: 2004, 2005). These blazars exhibit flat radio spectra, rapid variability,
53: compact cores with one-sided parsec-scale jets, and superluminal
54: motion in the jets (Marscher 2006). At optical wavelengths blazars are
55: characterized by broad or no emission lines, optically violently
56: variable behavior, and relatively high linear polarization (Urry \&
57: Padovani 1995).
58:
59: The identified EGRET blazars display a number of interesting radio
60: properties. Based on 22 and 37 GHz monitoring of 43 sources,
61: L\"ahteenm\"aki \& Valtaoja (2003) suggest that the EGRET flares
62: lagged behind mm flares. This is in direct contrast to other studies
63: (e.g., Reich et al. 1993) that claimed enhanced radio emission
64: following a high level of gamma-ray activity. Lister \& Homan (2005)
65: find that EGRET blazars have more strongly polarized jets than
66: found in compact objects on average based on
67: analysis of 26 EGRET sources overlapping with the Monitoring of Jets
68: in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments (MOJAVE) VLBI survey.
69: Kovalev et al. (2005) reported that EGRET blazars in the 15 GHz MOJAVE
70: survey were more compact than non-EGRET blazars. EGRET blazars have
71: also been claimed to have much higher superluminal speeds than other
72: blazars, and to have gamma-ray flares associated with the ejection of
73: superluminal radio knots (Jorstad et al. 2001a,b; Kellermann et
74: al. 2004). However, in consideration of a larger sample (taken at 2
75: and 8 GHz) Piner et al. (2007) find no significant difference between
76: the jet velocities of EGRET and non-EGRET blazars. In either case it
77: still is unclear whether the radio flaring, or the ejection of new
78: components, precedes or follows the gamma-ray flare, or whether there
79: are in fact two classes of gamma-ray blazars (e.g., Sikora et
80: al. 2001, 2002), one class with steep gamma-ray spectra and another
81: class with flat gamma-ray spectra.
82:
83: We have recently completed the 5 GHz VLBA Imaging and Polarimetry Survey
84: (VIPS) of 1127 flat-spectrum sources stronger than 85 mJy in the
85: Northern Cap region of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). VIPS
86: (Taylor et al. 2005, Helmboldt et al. 2007a) was carried out between
87: January and August of 2006 and includes 5 GHz, full polarization
88: images of 958 sources as well as 147 total intensity images for
89: sources previously observed as part of the Caltech Jodrell Bank Flat
90: spectrum survey (CJF). The small remainder (22) were previously
91: observed in the VIPS pilot survey and/or in the MOJAVE survey. Over
92: 99\% of the VIPS sources have been successfully imaged, with just under
93: 1\% being too weak to reliably self-calibrate and image.
94:
95: The large, uniform sample provided by VIPS will have many uses, including
96: enabling the intelligent follow-up of gamma-ray blazars as they flare
97: and are detected by the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST; Gehrels
98: et al.\ 2001).
99: GLAST, to be launched in late 2007, will provide a dramatic increase
100: in the resolution and energy range and over two orders of magnitude
101: increase in sensitivity over CGRO-EGRET, thereby affording an
102: unprecedented opportunity for the study of the centers of activity and
103: jets in blazars in the gamma-ray energy range.
104:
105: Here we make use of the VIPS survey to examine correlations in the
106: parsec-scale jet properties of EGRET blazars.
107:
108: \section{Sample Definition}
109:
110: We have compared the latest EGRET catalog (Hartman et al. 1999) to the
111: recently compiled Combined Radio All-sky Targeted Eight GHz Survey
112: (CRATES; Healey et al. 2007a), and from the intersection compiled a
113: sample of 173 candidate EGRET sources at $|b| > 10^\circ$.
114: In Fig.~\ref{gamma} we plot the Gamma-ray mean and peak fluxes against
115: the 8.4 GHz radio flux density from CRATES (Healey et al. 2007a) for 173
116: and 117 sources respectively. The VIPS sample
117: (which covers only $\sim$14\% of the sky), is derived from
118: CLASS (Myers et al. 2003), but otherwise has similar
119: radio flux limits and spectral selection as CRATES. Both CRATES
120: and CLASS include A configuration VLA observations at 8.4 GHz.
121: The full
122: radio/$\gamma$-ray properties of the sample will be discussed in
123: Healey et al. 2007b. Here we focus on the candidate EGRET sources
124: within the $\sim$5700 square degree region of the sky covered by VIPS,
125: which provides uniform quality VLBI imaging. The results are summarized in
126: Table 1. This list contains 12 VIPS sources deemed likely candidates,
127: and 19 VIPS sources deemed plausible candidates. Here ``likely'' and
128: ``plausible'' refer to ranges in the Figure of Merit (FoM). The FoM
129: is computed based on the 8.4 GHz flux density, the radio spectral
130: index, the X-ray flux density, and the positional coincidence
131: (Sowards-Emmerd et al. 2003). A source is considered ``likely'' if it
132: has FoM $>$ 1, and ``plausible'' if it has 1.0 $>$ FoM $>$ 0.25.
133:
134: In some cases multiple VIPS sources are assigned to a single EGRET
135: source. Since some EGRET sources may be in fact composites of
136: multiple blazars we have not made any distinction between sources with
137: multiple identifications and those with a single identification. For
138: 6 bright sources otherwise meeting the VIPS source criteria, MOJAVE
139: observations are available. In Fig.~\ref{likely1} we show the 5 GHz
140: VIPS images or 15 GHz MOJAVE images for all 12 sources identified with
141: EGRET blazars with high confidence (the ``likely'' candidates). In
142: Figs.~\ref{maybe1}, and \ref{maybe2} we show the images for 19 sources
143: identified as plausible counterparts. For completeness we include 15
144: GHz MOJAVE images (Kellermann et al. 2004) for those 6 VIPS sources
145: that were not imaged at 5 GHz. One should remember that due to the
146: large range in redshifts, the individual rest-frame emitted
147: frequencies can range over a factor up to 3.2.
148:
149: % omit \section{Gamma-ray Luminosity}
150: %
151: % Unlike previous efforts at
152: % identification which relied almost exclusively on the assumption of a
153: % close correlation between radio and Gamma-ray flux, our identification
154: % (Healey et al. 2007b, in prep) is based on a larger sample of radio
155: % sources, and considers proximity, radio flux, radio spectrum, and
156: % X-ray flux. While there is perhaps some correlation between Gamma-ray
157: % and radio flux density, it is not a direct correlation over many
158: % decades (which would follow the dashed line). At flux densities below
159: % one Jansky the correlation appears to be much weaker as evident by the
160: % large number of points above the dashed line. This is significant as
161: % it implies that the brightest blazar at radio wavelengths within a
162: % gamma-ray error circle may not always be the most likely
163: % identification.
164:
165: \section{Morphological comparison}
166:
167: While a number of radio-bright EGRET sources
168: distributed over the sky have been imaged with VLBI (see references
169: discussed in \S 1),
170: only in the VIPS region has the full EGRET candidate sample been
171: uniformly imaged down to a flux density limit of 85 mJy at 8 GHz. In this
172: section we examine the VLBI-scale properties of the 31 EGRET candidate
173: blazars in this uniform sample, and for the 25 sources imaged as
174: part of VIPS, we compare them to the properties
175: of the VIPS survey of 1127 sources.
176:
177: \subsection{Source Classes}
178:
179: The classification of the EGRET candidates in VIPS is 8 PS (point
180: sources), 3 SJET (short jets), and 14 LJET (long jets) according to
181: the automatic classification scheme of Helmboldt et al. (2007a; see
182: Table 2). There are no CSO (Compact Symmetric Object) candidates or
183: CPLX (complex) sources. Applying the same classification rules to the 6
184: MOJAVE sources adds 5 LJET and 1 SJET for totals of 8 (25\%) PS, 4
185: (13\%) SJET, and 19 (61\%) LJET. This can be compared to the
186: population in VIPS as a whole which is 25\% PS, 22\% SJET, 43\% LJET,
187: 9\% CSO and 2\% CPLX. If EGRET candidates were drawn from the VIPS
188: population at random then we would expect 8 $\pm$ 3 PS, 7 $\pm$ 3
189: SJET, 13 $\pm$ 4 LJET, and 3 $\pm$ 2 CSO and COMPLEX. While the
190: number of PS and SJET sources are roughly as expected we find a
191: marginally significant lack of CSOs, and a marginally significant excess of
192: sources with long jets (LJET) on the parsec-scale.
193:
194: \subsection{Polarization}
195:
196: Polarization is detected from all 6 of the MOJAVE sources and from 9
197: of the 25 VIPS sources for a total of 48 $\pm$ 12\%. This is higher
198: than the average of 36 $\pm$ 4\% in VIPS overall (Helmboldt et
199: al. 2007a), and the 41 $\pm$ 4\% average for LJETs, though the numbers
200: of sources involved are too small to make a definitive statment.
201: Similarly a detailed examination of the polarization properties is
202: handicapped by small number statistics and the fact that we have a mix
203: of 5 GHz measurements for VIPS sources and 15 GHz measurements for
204: MOJAVE sources. Lister \& Homan (2005) found that that the jets (but
205: not the cores) of EGRET blazars tended to have nearly twice the level
206: of fractional polarization compared to MOJAVE sources not detected
207: by EGRET, and
208: are also more luminous. They attribute the difference to a higher
209: mean Doppler factor for the EGRET blazars.
210:
211: \subsection{Core Fraction}
212:
213: In Fig.~\ref{cfrac} we plot the distribution of core-to-jet ratio
214: (defined as the ratio of flux density at 5 GHz in the VLBI core compared to the
215: jet emission from the source at 5 GHz) for the EGRET candidates against the
216: distribution for the VIPS survey as a whole. No k-corrections have been
217: applied, even though the difference in spectral index between the core
218: and the extended emission will result in a change in the ratio with
219: source redshift. Given the similar range in redshifts, and the core
220: dominated nature of the sources, the corrections should be modest and
221: similar for both EGRET-detected blazars and VIPS sources as a whole.
222: From the histograms, the
223: EGRET sources appear to be biased toward more core-dominated
224: systems. The K-S test probability that the two distributions were
225: drawn from the same parent distribution is 4\%. The core flux density
226: for the EGRET blazars can be found in Table 3.
227:
228: \subsection{Brightness Temperature}
229:
230: We have obtained the brightness temperatures from automatic modelfits
231: to source components as described in Helmboldt et al. (2007a). For
232: sources with two or fewer components we have further refined the our
233: modelfitting procedure by fitting to the visibility data directly.
234: Only image plane modelfitting was carried out in Helmboldt et
235: al. (2007a) due to the tendency for the automatic visibility
236: modelfitting to go awry for complicated sources. The minimum
237: observable size for each source was calculated using equation (2) from
238: Kovalev et al. (2005), where we computed the SNR of each core using
239: the core flux density, the rms measured from the 5 GHz image, and a
240: beam FWHM of 3 mas, the largest dimension of our restoring beam. For
241: those sources where the estimated core size is less than this minimum
242: size ($\sim$10\% of all VIPS sources), we used the minimum size to compute
243: $T_B$. In Table 3 we provide the core sizes, core $T_B$, brightest
244: jet component $T_B$, $\delta_PA$, and jet opening half angle for the
245: VIPS blazars. For sources where the estimated core FWHM is less than
246: the minimum, the core diameter is preceded by a '$<$' and the core
247: temperature is preceded by a '$>$'.
248: In all cases we compute the observed brightness temperatures, without
249: any correction to the source rest frame.
250:
251:
252: There is some indication that the brightness temperature for the cores
253: of the EGRET candidates may be higher than average (see distributions
254: in Fig.~\ref{btemp}). The K-S test
255: probability for these two distributions coming from the same
256: parent population is 4\%. For the jet components
257: (formally, the brightest jet component) the two distributions
258: look fairly similar, except that the spread in the EGRET distribution
259: is smaller (see lower panel of Fig.~\ref{btemp}); the K-S test for this
260: pair of distributions is 11\%.
261:
262: \subsection{Jet Opening Angle}
263:
264: We have measured a mean opening half-angle by the following
265: procedure: We measure the separation of each jet component from the core along the
266: jet axis (taken to be a linear fit to the component positions) and the
267: distance of each component from the jet axis, i.e., x' and y'
268: positions in a rotated coordinate system with the jet axis along the
269: x'-axis. For each component, we measure its extent from its center
270: along a line perpendicular to the jet axis using the parameters of its
271: elliptical fit, and then deconvolve this using the extent of the
272: Gaussian restoring beam along the same line. The opening half-angle
273: measured from each component is then taken to be
274: $$
275: \psi = {\rm arctan}[(|y'|+dr)/|x'|]
276: $$ where $dr$ is the deconvolved Gaussian size perpendicular to the
277: jet axis. After measuring this for each jet component, we average
278: them to get one value. This is only done for sources with more than 2
279: total components, (i.e., at least 2 jet components). This means that
280: as in the case of jet bending (see \S 3.6), we only have quantitative estimates for
281: four of the EGRET/VIPS sources (see. Fig.~\ref{angle}). Though this
282: is based on very small statistics there is a hint that EGRET/VIPS jets
283: have unusually large opening angles.
284: We find 3 sources have jet opening half-angles exceeding the VIPS median (18.9$^\circ$).
285: Monte-Carlo simulations of opening angles using the VIPS sample suggests
286: that 3 out of 4 of the randomly
287: sampled values are greater than the median about 30\% of the time. So,
288: there's less than a 1 in 3 chance that the EGRET blazars have the same
289: distribution for the opening angle as the whole VIPS sample.
290: Looking at the EGRET/MOJAVE and
291: EGRET/VIPS sources by eye in Figures 2-4
292: strengthens this impression. We see in Figures 2-4
293: six sources (J08098+5218, J09576+5522, J12215+2813, 1611+343, J16352+3808,
294: J17406+5211) that have opening angles larger than
295: 20 degrees. This can be compared to the VIPS images for the survey
296: as a whole which are online\footnote{See http://www.phys.unm.edu/$\sim$gbtaylor/VIPS/}.
297: In a few of the blazars the emission is rather diffuse
298: which is why they do not show up in the automatic opening
299: angle calculation.
300:
301: \subsection{Jet Bending and Length}
302:
303: We can also compare the amount of bending in the jet on the parsec
304: scale for the EGRET candidates compared to VIPS as a whole. The
305: amount of bending was calculated by fitting a parabola to the
306: centroids of Gaussian model components (Helmboldt et al. 2007b). Again
307: we are limited to only 4 sources (Fig.~\ref{angle}), and the results
308: are inconclusive. In fact the source with the largest reported bend,
309: J09576+5522, could be much less bent depending on if the morphology is
310: attributed to a twisting jet, or to a jet with a broad opening angle.
311: Looking at the EGRET/MOJAVE and EGRET/VIPS sources by eye only
312: increases the number of highly bent jets by one. We see in Figures
313: 2-4 4 sources (J12215+2813, J17226+5856, J17246+6055, J17406+5211)
314: that appear to bend through more than 20 degrees on the parsec scale.
315:
316: Given the slight preponderance of sources with long jets, we compared
317: the distribution of jet length in EGRET blazars with VIPS as a whole.
318: There does not appear to be an appreciable difference between the two
319: populations. The K-S probability that the two are drawn from the same
320: distribution is 34\%.
321:
322: \section{Notes on Individual Sources}
323:
324: \noindent
325: {\bf J11044+3812 = Mrk 421} A well known BL Lac and also one of the
326: first sources to be detected in TeV emission (Punch et al. 1992).
327: Mrk~421 was included in both the CJF (Taylor et al. 1994)
328: and 2cm surveys (Kellermann et al. 2004) and has also been
329: recently imaged by Giroletti et al. (2006).
330:
331: \noindent
332: {\bf J16036+1554} This source is completely unresolved by the
333: VLBA observations at 5 GHz (Helmboldt et al. 2007a), and can
334: be well fit with a single component (the core) with size of
335: $<0.12$ mas. This results in
336: a brightness temperature of $> 1 \times 10^{12}$ K. Such completely
337: unresolved sources without any jet components are quite rare -
338: there are essentially no
339: sources this compact in MOJAVE (Kovalev et al. 2005) or CJF
340: (Taylor et al. 1994).
341:
342: \noindent
343: {\bf J17246+6055} The faint (r band magnitude 21.2) host galaxy does
344: not yet have a known redshift or spectroscopic classification. The
345: parsec-scale radio structure (see Fig.~\ref{maybe2}) is quite unusual
346: with a core-jet and a fairly compact component to the southeast. It
347: is possible that this source could be a compact supermassive binary
348: black hole, and further VLBI observations are in progress to test
349: this hypothesis. Another possible explanation is a jet with a
350: sharp bend and wide opening angle, such as Mrk~501 (Giroletti et al. 2004) or
351: Mrk~421 (Giroletti et al. 2006; and see Fig.~2).
352:
353: \section{Discussion}
354:
355: From an analysis of the properties of the EGRET candidates in \S4, we
356: find that candidates tend to have high core fractions and high
357: brightness temperatures. These facts support models wherein the
358: gamma-rays are produced in a jet oriented at a small angle to the
359: line-of-sight (e.g., Dermer et al. 1992).
360: The large opening angles seen in 6 out of the 31
361: sources could also indicate a sight-line close to or within the
362: beaming cone of the radio emission. A selection effect of this sort
363: would happen naturally if the gamma rays are more tightly beamed or
364: collimated than the radio. In other words,
365: gamma-ray selected sources have higher
366: Doppler factors than the population of compact sources as a whole.
367: This can also explain the observations of higher core fractions,
368: higher brightness temperatures, and higher polarization in
369: gamma-ray blazars compared to the population of AGN as a whole, as
370: well as the reports of faster motions.
371: An unbiased comparison of jet components
372: between the EGRET blazars and the VIPS sample at large supports this,
373: though only 4 of the EGRET/VIPS sources have enough jet components to
374: permit the unbiased (automatic) analysis so the statistics are poor.
375:
376: Somewhat more surprising is the evidence in support of long jets,
377: though this is of marginal significance. Continuing the line of
378: discussion above that EGRET blazars have higher Doppler factors due to
379: small angles to the line-of-sight, the {\it a priori} prediction,
380: assuming jets of a fixed length and modest velocity, would be for
381: shorter jets due to projection. Obtaining longer jets might be
382: possible if the jets of blazars have intrinsically greater surface
383: brightness, or are highly Doppler boosted compared to sources in radio
384: selected samples. Longer jets in blazars could also be obtained if
385: there is a bias in the selection. The redshift distribution for the
386: VIPS sample is still incomplete, so it is difficult to investigate
387: possible selection bias at this time. Given the weakness of the
388: evidence, especially when comparing the distributions of jet lengths
389: (\S 3.6), further speculation on this topic is not yet warranted.
390:
391: \section{Conclusions}
392:
393: Sources selected on the basis of their $\gamma$-ray flux
394: as determined by EGRET
395: appear to have higher Doppler factors than the radio-selected
396: population at large. In the VIPS survey this selection manifests
397: itself in larger
398: core fractions, higher core brightness temperatures, increased
399: polarization, and possibly broader jets.
400:
401: GLAST, which will launch in late 2007 or early 2008, will detect
402: several thousand (Gehrels \& Michelson 1999) of the tens of thousands
403: of compact, radio-loud, flat-spectrum AGN currently known.
404: Confirming the tighter beaming angle for the $\gamma$-rays should
405: be easily achieved with the improved statistics. Greater advances
406: in understanding are anticipated, though
407: detailed studies including multi-wavelength
408: flux monitoring, and multi-frequency, multi-epoch VLBI polarimetry
409: will be possible only for a small subset of objects. As we have
410: shown, the gamma-ray flux density is not simply related to the radio
411: flux-density, so selecting the brightest radio sources for study may
412: not maximize the chances of coincidence with strong gamma-ray
413: emission. Therefore it may be advantageous to consider selecting
414: sources with large core fractions, high central brightness
415: temperatures, and large opening angles, as well as strong radio flux
416: density. GLAST could also see new populations of AGN including
417: Seyfert galaxies, and low power radio galaxies. For this reason
418: it is important to provide contemporaneous ground-based monitoring of a range
419: of source classes, powers, and morphologies. Comparisons between the parsec-scale radio structures as
420: revealed by VLBI observations and the time variable $\gamma$-ray flux,
421: could discriminate between various models describing the
422: production of the $\gamma$-ray emission, or reveal that more than
423: one mechanism is at work.
424:
425:
426: \noindent
427: We thank an anonymous referee for constructive suggestions.
428: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
429: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
430: Universities, Inc.
431:
432: \begin{thebibliography}{}
433: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{1998AJ....115.1693C} Condon, J.~J., Cotton,
434: W.~D., Greisen, E.~W., Yin, Q.~F., Perley, R.~A., Taylor, G.~B., \&
435: Broderick, J.~J.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
436: \bibitem[Dermer et al.(1992)]{1992A&A...256L..27D} Dermer, C.~D.,
437: Schlickeiser, R., \& Mastichiadis, A.\ 1992, \aap, 256, L27
438: \bibitem[Gehrels \& Michelson (1999)]{geh99} Gehrels, N. \& Michelson, P. 1999, Astroparticle Physics, 11, 277
439: \bibitem{} Gehrels, N. et al.\ 2001, in Astrophysics \& Space Science
440: Library, 267, 321
441: \bibitem[Giroletti et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...600..127G} Giroletti, M., et
442: al.\ 2004, \apj, 600, 127
443: \bibitem[Giroletti et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...646..801G} Giroletti, M.,
444: Giovannini, G., Taylor, G.~B., \& Falomo, R.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 801
445: \bibitem[Hartman et al.\ (1999)]{har99} Hartman, R. C., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 79
446: \bibitem[Healey et al.\ (2007a)]{hea07} Healey, S.E., et al.\ 2007, ApJ, in press
447: \bibitem[Helmboldt et al.\ (2007a)]{hel07a} Helmboldt, J.F., et al.\ 2007a, ApJ, 658, 203
448: \bibitem[Helmboldt et al.\ (2007b)]{hel07b} Helmboldt, J.F., Taylor, G.B., Blandford, R.D., \& Walker, R.C.\ 2007b, ApJ, 658, 203
449: \bibitem[Jorstad et al.\ (2001a)]{jor01a} Jorstad, S. G., Marscher, A. P., Mattox, J. R., Wehrle, A. E.,
450: Bloom, S. D., \& Yurchenko, A. V. 2001a, ApJS, 134, 181
451: \bibitem{}Jorstad, S. G., et al. 2001b, ApJ, 556, 738
452: \bibitem[Kellermann et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...609..539K} Kellermann, K.~I.,
453: et al.\ 2004, ApJ, 609, 539
454: \bibitem[Kovalev et al.\ (2005)]{kov05} Kovalev, Y.~Y., et al.\
455: 2005, \aj, 130, 2473
456: \bibitem[L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki \& Valtaoja(2003)]{2003ApJ...590...95L}
457: L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki, A., \& Valtaoja, E.\ 2003, \apj, 590, 95
458: \bibitem[Lister \& Homan (2005)]{lis05} Lister, M. L. \& Homan, D. C. 2005, \aj, 130, 1389
459: \bibitem[Marscher(2006)]{2006AIPC..856....1M} Marscher, A.~P.\ 2006, AIP
460: Conf.~Proc.~856: Relativistic Jets: The Common Physics of AGN,
461: Microquasars, and Gamma-Ray Bursts, 856, 1
462: \bibitem[Myers et al.\ (2003)]{mye03} Myers, S.~T., et al.\ 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1
463: \bibitem[Piner et al.\ (2007)]{pin07} Piner, B.~G., Mahmud, M.,
464: Fey, A.~L., \& Gospodinova, K.\ 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints,
465: arXiv:astro-ph/0702317
466: \bibitem[Punch et al.(1992)]{pun92} Punch, M., et al.\ 1992,
467: \nat, 358, 477
468: \bibitem{1993A&A...273...65R} Reich, W., Steppe, H.,
469: Schlickeiser, R., Reich, P., Pohl, M., Reuter, H.~P., Kanbach, G., \&
470: Schonfelder, V.\ 1993, \aap, 273, 65
471: \bibitem{}Sikora, M., Blazejowski, M., Begelman, M. C., \& Moderski, R.
472: 2001, ApJ, 554, 1
473: \bibitem{}Sikora, M., Blazejowski, M., Moderski, R., \& Madejski, G. M.
474: 2002, ApJ, 577, 78
475: \bibitem{}Sowards-Emmerd, D., Romani, R. W., \& Michelson, P. F. 2003,
476: ApJ, 590, 109
477: \bibitem{}Sowards-Emmerd, D., Romani, R. W., Michelson, P. F., \& Ulvestad, J.\
478: S. 2004, ApJ, 609, 564
479: \bibitem{}Sowards-Emmerd, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 95
480: \bibitem[Taylor et al.\ (1994)]{tay94} Taylor, G. B., Vermeulen, R. C., Pearson, T. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Henstock, D. R., Browne, I. W. A., \& Wilkinson, P. N. 1994, \apjs, 95, 345
481: \bibitem[Taylor et al.\ (1996)]{tay96} Taylor, G. B., Vermeulen, R. C., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., Henstock, D. R., \& Wilkinson, P. N. 1996, \apjs, 107, 37
482: \bibitem[Taylor et al.\ (2005)]{tay05} Taylor, G. B., Fassnacht, C. D., Sjouwerman, L. O., Myers, S. T., Ulvestad, J. S., Walker, R. C., Fomalont, E. B., Pearson, T. J., Readhead, A. C. S., Gehrels, N., \& Michelson, P. F. 2005, \apjs, 159, 27
483: \bibitem{} Urry, C.M. \& Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803
484: \bibitem{} V\'{e}ron-Cetty, M.-P. \& V\'{e}ron, P. 2006, A\&A, 455, 773
485: \end{thebibliography}{}
486:
487: %\textwidth = 8.0truein
488: %\textheight = 10.5truein
489: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrr}
490: %\rotate
491: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
492: \tablecolumns{11}
493: \tablewidth{0pt}
494: \tablecaption{EGRET Identifications}
495: \tablehead{
496: \colhead{3EG name} & \colhead{VIPS name} & \colhead{S 8.4} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\Delta TS$} & \colhead{FoM} & \colhead{Code} & \colhead{Mag} & \colhead{z} & \colhead{Type} & \colhead{In CGRaBS?} \\
497: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} & \colhead{(11)} \\}
498:
499: \startdata
500: J0743+5447 & J0742+5444 & 142.8 & -0.387 & 0.517 & 0.502 & ! & 17.3 & 0.723 & FSRQ \\
501: J0808+5114 & J0807+5117 & 358.8 & 0.280 & 0.359 & 7.241 & !!! & 17.6 & 1.136 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
502: J0808+5114 & J0809+5218 & 154.2 & -0.103 & 2.398 & 1.186 & !!! & 14.5 & 0.138 & BLL \\
503: J0829+2413 & J0830+2410 & 793.7 & 0.027 & 0.701 & 7.009 & !!! & 16.3 & 0.940 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
504: J0853+1941 & J0854+2006 & 3414.9 & 0.443 & 1.519 & 7.872 & !!! & 15.6 & 0.306 & BLL & CGRaBS \\
505: J0917+4427 & J0920+4441 & 1368.3 & 0.153 & 7.051 & 0.470 & ! & 16.5 & 2.190 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
506: J0952+5501 & J0957+5522 & 1498.9 & -0.410 & 3.839 & 0.427 & ! & 16.8 & 0.896 & FSRQ \\
507: J1052+5718 & J1058+5628 & 189.8 & -0.115 & 5.490 & 0.387 & ! & 14.6 & 0.144 & BLL & CGRaBS \\
508: J1104+3809 & J1104+3812 & 631.6 & -0.109 & 1.126 & 6.582 & !!! & 13.0 & 0.031 & BLL & CGRaBS \\
509: J1200+2847 & J1159+2914 & 1233.3 & -0.286 & 4.034 & 0.829 & ! & 17.4 & 0.729 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
510: J1222+2841 & J1221+2813 & 1055.5 & 0.194 & 8.313 & 0.280 & ! & 14.2 & 0.102 & BLL & CGRaBS \\
511: J1224+2118 & J1224+2122 & 1073.9 & -0.383 & 1.445 & 1.522 & !!! & 16.0 & 0.435 & FSRQ \\
512: J1227+4302 & J1221+4411 & 435.2 & -0.149 & 5.239 & 0.456 & ! & 17.8 & 1.344 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
513: J1227+4302 & J1224+4335 & 220.8 & -0.200 & 1.567 & 1.133 & !!! & \nodata & 1.075 & FSRQ \\
514: J1227+4302 & J1226+4340 & 145.1 & -0.141 & 1.367 & 0.866 & ! & 18.5 & 1.999 & FSRQ \\
515: J1323+2200 & J1321+2216 & 323.6 & 0.010 & 5.353 & 0.509 & ! & 19.4 & 0.943 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
516: J1323+2200 & J1322+2148 & 147.3 & -0.288 & 3.400 & 0.261 & ! & 19.1 & 1.680 & FSRQ \\
517: J1323+2200 & J1327+2210 & 984.0 & 0.073 & 6.547 & 0.381 & ! & 18.8 & 1.400 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
518: J1329+1708 & J1331+1712 & 120.7 & -0.233 & 1.454 & 0.425 & ! & 17.2 & \nodata & BLL \\
519: J1329+1708 & J1333+1649 & 483.8 & 0.106 & 3.072 & 1.982 & !!! & 16.4 & 2.097 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
520: J1347+2932 & J1343+2844 & 192.0 & -0.127 & 5.069 & 0.336 & ! & 16.5 & 0.908 & FSRQ \\
521: J1424+3734 & J1419+3821 & 775.8 & 0.120 & 5.408 & 0.840 & ! & 19.2 & 1.831 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
522: J1424+3734 & J1421+3855 & 132.1 & 0.228 & 4.478 & 0.441 & ! & 17.4 & 0.489 & FSRQ \\
523: J1424+3734 & J1426+3625 & 613.0 & 0.201 & 6.357 & 0.428 & ! & 20.3 & 1.091 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
524: J1605+1553 & J1603+1554 & 256.9 & 0.524 & 2.483 & 4.280 & !!! & 12.1 & 0.109 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
525: J1614+3424 & J1613+3412 & 3088.1 & -0.165 & 2.313 & 1.984 & !!! & 17.1 & 1.397 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
526: J1635+3813 & J1635+3808 & 2403.9 & -0.085 & 1.488 & 3.599 & !!! & 17.2 & 1.814 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
527: J1733+6017 & J1722+5856 & 328.0 & 0.189 & 6.953 & 0.264 & ! & 19.0 & 1.979 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
528: J1733+6017 & J1722+6105 & 203.2 & 0.141 & 3.932 & 0.911 & ! & 19.4 & 2.058 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
529: J1733+6017 & J1724+6055 & 166.0 & -0.042 & 2.340 & 0.827 & ! & \nodata &\nodata \\
530: J1738+5203 & J1740+5211 & 1347.2 & 0.275 & 0.314 & 11.149 & !!! & 16.7 & 1.379 & FSRQ & CGRaBS \\
531: \enddata
532:
533:
534:
535: \tablecomments{Col.\ (1): 3EG name based on EGRET coordinates.
536: Col.\ (2): VIPS source name based on CLASS coordinates.
537: Col.\ (3): 8.4 GHz flux density from CLASS.
538: Col.\ (4): $\alpha$ is the spectral index ($S \sim \nu^\alpha$) between
539: NVSS (Condon et al. at 1.4 GHz and CLASS at 8.4 GHz,
540: Col.\ (5): ``$\Delta$TS'' is a measure of the positional correspondence of the radio
541: source to the peak of the gamma-ray flux. Lower values indicate a better
542: positional correspondence (see Sowards-Emmerd et al. 2003).
543: Col.\ (6): ``FoM'' is the figure of merit (Sowards-Emmerd et al. 2003).
544: Col.\ (7): ``Code'' is a classification of the same type as in Sowards-Emmerd et al.
545: 2003: sources with FoM $>$ 1.0 were deemed ``likely'' counterparts (denoted
546: here by ``!!!'') and sources with 0.25 $<$ FoM $<$ 1.0 were deemed
547: plausible counterparts (denoted here by ``!'').
548: Col.\ (8): The optical magnitude of the host galaxy.
549: Col.\ (9): The redshift from V\'{e}ron-Cetty \& V\'{e}ron (2006).
550: Col.\ (10): Source classification, where FSRQ = Flat Spectrum
551: Radio Quasar, and BLL = BL Lac object.
552: Col.\ (11): An indication if the source is included in the
553: CBRaBS sample (Healey et al. 2007b, in prep).}
554: \label{egret}
555: \end{deluxetable}
556:
557:
558: \textwidth = 8.0truein
559: \begin{deluxetable}{r@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}c@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r@{$\;\;$}r}
560: \rotate
561: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
562: \tablecolumns{15}
563: \tablewidth{0pt}
564: \tablecaption{VIPS Source Properties}
565: \tablehead{
566: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\alpha$ (J2000)} & \colhead{$\delta$ (J2000)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$F_{8.5}$} & \colhead{$F_{5}$} & \colhead{$F_{5,max}$} & \colhead{rms$_{5}$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$\overline{R}$} & \colhead{$D_{max}$} & \colhead{$PA_{jet}$} \\
567: \colhead{} & \colhead{Name} & \colhead{($^{h}\:^{m}\:^{s}$)} & \colhead{($^{\circ}\:^{'}\:^{''}$)} & \colhead{UT Date} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy/beam)} & \colhead{(mJy/beam)} & \colhead{$N_{GC}$} & \colhead{T$_{\mbox{\scriptsize a}}$} & \colhead{T$_{\mbox{\scriptsize e}}$} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{($^{\circ}$)} \\
568: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} & \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} & \colhead{(11)} & \colhead{(12)} & \colhead{(13)} & \colhead{(14)} & \colhead{(15)}\\
569: \vspace{-0.3cm}}
570: \startdata
571: 72 & J08070+5117 & 08:07:01.0133 & +51:17:38.670 & 2006-05-31 & 358.8 & 175.9 & 84.0 & 0.23 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.3 & \nodata & \nodata \\
572: 78 & J08098+5218 & 08:09:49.1899 & +52:18:58.252 & 2006-05-31 & 154.2 & 125.6 & 56.1 & 0.25 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.4 & 6.7 & 20.2 \\
573: 402 & J11044+3812 & 11:04:27.3145 & +38:12:31.794 & 1999-11-21 & 631.6 & 421.4 & 372.0 & 0.34 & 3 & LJET & \nodata & 9.6 & 23.8 & $-$42.3 \\
574: 554 & J12248+4335 & 12:24:51.5074 & +43:35:19.276 & 2006-05-27 & 220.8 & 173.5 & 98.2 & 0.21 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 4.0 & 8.0 & 13.0 \\
575: 683 & J13335+1649 & 13:33:35.7819 & +16:49:04.027 & 2006-03-19 & 483.8 & 442.2 & 310.0 & 0.28 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 12.8 & 25.5 & 18.6 \\
576: 937 & J16036+1554 & 16:03:38.0650 & +15:54:02.378 & 2006-04-03 & 256.9 & 348.3 & 347.5 & 0.20 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.2 & \nodata & \nodata \\
577: 994 & J16352+3808 & 16:35:15.4931 & +38:08:04.497 & 1999-11-21 & 2423.3 & 2201.9 & 1240.0 & 0.46 & 2 & SJET & \nodata & 2.4 & 4.8 & 86.2 \\
578: 1102 & J17406+5211 & 17:40:36.9805 & +52:11:43.413 & 1999-11-21 & 1358.5 & 609.4 & 507.4 & 0.30 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.2 & 6.5 & 0.3 \\
579: 27 & J07426+5444 & 07:42:39.7904 & +54:44:24.679 & 2006-05-31 & 142.8 & 207.0 & 163.4 & 0.23 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.2 & \nodata & \nodata \\
580: 214 & J09209+4441 & 09:20:58.4599 & +44:41:53.988 & 1996-08-17 & 1368.3 & 1173.5 & 926.0 & 0.71 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 4.2 & 8.5 & $-$18.6 \\
581: 282 & J09576+5522 & 09:57:38.1837 & +55:22:57.740 & 1999-11-21 & 1498.9 & 563.2 & 80.2 & 1.99 & 4 & LJET & \nodata & 19.1 & 55.9 & 19.6 \\
582: 387 & J10586+5628 & 10:58:37.7261 & +56:28:11.180 & 2006-06-19 & 189.8 & 149.4 & 86.1 & 0.22 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.5 & 7.0 & $-$86.6 \\
583: 548 & J12214+4411 & 12:21:27.0450 & +44:11:29.667 & 1996-08-22 & 435.2 & 351.1 & 288.6 & 0.32 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 5.4 & 10.7 & 52.5 \\
584: 550 & J12215+2813 & 12:21:31.6936 & +28:13:58.497 & 2006-02-25 & 893.1 & 401.2 & 149.4 & 0.24 & 6 & LJET & \nodata & 9.5 & 25.5 & $-$44.3 \\
585: 556 & J12269+4340 & 12:26:57.9051 & +43:40:58.438 & 2006-05-27 & 145.1 & 77.8 & 44.0 & 0.23 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.2 & 6.4 & $-$8.2 \\
586: 655 & J13211+2216 & 13:21:11.2041 & +22:16:12.098 & 2006-02-25 & 323.6 & 253.1 & 160.9 & 0.19 & 2 & SJET & \nodata & 2.3 & 4.7 & 58.2 \\
587: 656 & J13221+2148 & 13:22:11.3989 & +21:48:12.268 & 2006-02-25 & 147.3 & 171.0 & 131.9 & 0.21 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.2 & \nodata & \nodata \\
588: 679 & J13315+1712 & 13:31:33.4457 & +17:12:50.615 & 2006-02-25 & 120.7 & 66.3 & 41.6 & 0.21 & 2 & SJET & \nodata & 2.5 & 5.0 & $-$113.4 \\
589: 697 & J13430+2844 & 13:43:00.1805 & +28:44:07.492 & 2006-03-19 & 192.0 & 153.2 & 99.3 & 0.24 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.2 & 6.5 & $-$140.9 \\
590: 754 & J14197+3821 & 14:19:46.6162 & +38:21:48.485 & 1998-02-08 & 775.8 & 1318.1 & 1282.0 & 0.23 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.1 & \nodata & \nodata \\
591: 758 & J14211+3855 & 14:21:06.0337 & +38:55:22.829 & 2006-08-12 & 132.1 & 54.4 & 49.8 & 0.20 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.1 & \nodata & \nodata \\
592: 769 & J14266+3625 & 14:26:37.0861 & +36:25:09.576 & 1998-02-08 & 613.0 & 432.9 & 397.0 & 0.22 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.1 & \nodata & \nodata \\
593: 1073 & J17226+5856 & 17:22:36.7292 & +58:56:22.265 & 2006-08-07 & 328.0 & 111.9 & 66.3 & 0.27 & 2 & LJET & \nodata & 3.5 & 6.9 & $-$60.8 \\
594: 1074 & J17226+6105 & 17:22:40.0595 & +61:05:59.802 & 2006-08-07 & 203.2 & 105.8 & 96.6 & 0.19 & 1 & PS & \nodata & 1.2 & \nodata & \nodata \\
595: 1082 & J17246+6055 & 17:24:41.4172 & +60:55:55.746 & 2006-08-07 & 166.0 & 157.4 & 91.7 & 0.28 & 3 & LJET & \nodata & 5.8 & 12.7 & $-$131.2 \\
596: \enddata
597:
598: \vspace{-0.4cm}
599: \tablecomments{Col.\ (1): VIPS source number. Col.\ (2): VIPS source name. Col.\ (3): Right ascension (J2000). Col.\ (4): Declination (J2000). Col.\ (5): UT date of the observations. Col.\ (6): The flux density at 8.5 GHz from the CLASS survey. Col.\ (7): The total cleaned flux density from the 5 GHz VLBA map. Col.\ (8): The peak flux density from the 5 GHz VLBA map. Col.\ (9): The rms noise of the 5 GHz VLBA image. Col.\ (10): The number of dominant Gaussian components (i.e., that contain more than 95\% of the total flux) fit to the 5 GHz VLBA map (see \S 2.3). Col.\ (11): The source type derived from the automated Gaussian component classification (see \S 2.3). Col.\ (12): The source type determined by visual inspection of the I image for sources where the ``by-eye'' and automatic classifications disagree. Col.\ (13): The mean radius (i.e., mean distances from the mean component position) for the ensemble of dominant Gaussian components. Col.\ (14): The maximum separation among the dominant Gaussian components. Col.\ (15): The jet position angle (measured from north through east).}
600: \label{props}
601: \end{deluxetable}
602:
603: \textwidth = 8.0truein
604: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
605: %\rotate
606: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
607: \tablecolumns{8}
608: \tablewidth{0pc}
609: \tablecaption{Brightness Temperatures of VIPS Blazars}
610: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{$F_{5,core}$} & \colhead{$D_{core}$} & \colhead{$T_{B,core}$} & \colhead{$T_{B,jet}$} & \colhead{$\Delta$PA} & \colhead{$\Psi$} \\
611: \colhead{} & \colhead{Name} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{$(^{\circ})$} & \colhead{$(^{\circ})$} \\
612: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} & \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)}}
613: \startdata
614: 72 & J08070+5117 & 175.9 & 0.942 & 9.70$\times 10^{9}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
615: 78 & J08098+5218 & 108.9 & 1.050 & 4.83$\times 10^{9}$ & 1.56$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
616: 402 & J11044+3812 & 370.2 & 0.291 & 2.13$\times 10^{11}$ & 3.59$\times 10^{7}$ & -0.62 & 15.07 \\
617: 554 & J12248+4335 & 156.9 & 0.653 & 1.80$\times 10^{10}$ & 3.37$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
618: 683 & J13335+1649 & 417.9 & 0.538 & 7.05$\times 10^{10}$ & 9.97$\times 10^{6}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
619: 937 & J16036+1554 & 348.3 & $<$0.121 & $>$1.16$\times 10^{12}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
620: 994 & J16352+3808 & 2013.7 & 1.999 & 2.47$\times 10^{10}$ & 2.74$\times 10^{8}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
621: 1102 & J17406+5211 & 574.7 & 0.700 & 5.75$\times 10^{10}$ & 4.09$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
622: 27 & J07426+5444 & 207.0 & 0.439 & 5.26$\times 10^{10}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
623: 214 & J09209+4441 & 1080.4 & 0.785 & 8.58$\times 10^{10}$ & 5.19$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
624: 282 & J09576+5522 & 127.3 & 7.206 & 1.20$\times 10^{8}$ & 7.96$\times 10^{7}$ & -32.94 & 60.29 \\
625: 387 & J10586+5628 & 129.6 & 0.817 & 9.49$\times 10^{9}$ & 2.10$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
626: 548 & J12214+4411 & 303.6 & 0.528 & 5.33$\times 10^{10}$ & 2.63$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
627: 550 & J12215+2813 & 177.5 & 0.614 & 2.30$\times 10^{10}$ & 1.62$\times 10^{8}$ & -11.50 & 27.45 \\
628: 556 & J12269+4340 & 72.9 & 0.578 & 1.07$\times 10^{10}$ & 1.54$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
629: 655 & J13211+2216 & 227.7 & 0.780 & 1.83$\times 10^{10}$ & 6.51$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
630: 656 & J13221+2148 & 171.0 & 0.465 & 3.87$\times 10^{10}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
631: 679 & J13315+1712 & 61.0 & 0.788 & 4.80$\times 10^{9}$ & 1.86$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
632: 697 & J13430+2844 & 137.3 & 0.602 & 1.85$\times 10^{10}$ & 3.20$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
633: 754 & J14197+3821 & 1318.1 & 0.242 & 1.10$\times 10^{12}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
634: 758 & J14211+3855 & 54.4 & $<$0.304 & $>$2.88$\times 10^{10}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
635: 769 & J14266+3625 & 432.9 & 0.503 & 8.36$\times 10^{10}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
636: 1073 & J17226+5856 & 97.2 & 0.574 & 1.44$\times 10^{10}$ & 2.26$\times 10^{7}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
637: 1074 & J17226+6105 & 105.8 & 0.224 & 1.03$\times 10^{11}$ & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
638: 1082 & J17246+6055 & 121.5 & 0.604 & 1.63$\times 10^{10}$ & 6.71$\times 10^{7}$ & -89.59 & 30.91 \\
639: \enddata
640:
641: \tablecomments{Col. (1): VIPS source number. Col. (2): VIPS source name. Col. (3): The 5 GHz flux density of the core. Col. (4): The FWHM of the core component estimated using a circular Gaussian fit to the visibility data. Col. (5): The mean brightness temperature of the core. Col. (6): The mean brightness temperature of the brightest component outside the core. Col. (7): The difference between the outer and inner position angles of the jet for sources with more than 2 jet components. Col. (8): The jet opening half-angle for sources with more than 2 jet components.}
642: \end{deluxetable}
643:
644:
645: \textwidth = 7.2truein
646: \begin{figure}
647: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
648: \caption{{\bf Left:} mean EGRET fluxes vs.
649: the 8.4 GHz flux density. The mean fluxes are mission-averaged values
650: from all four EGRET observing cycles, listed as ``P1234'' in the 3EG catalog. {\bf Right:}
651: Peak gamma-ray flux vs. radio flux density, where peak designates the largest
652: flux from a single (typically two week long) EGRET viewing period, provided the
653: detection significance exceeded $3\sigma$. The dashed line is not a fit to the
654: data but is only present to show that assuming $\gamma$-ray
655: flux proportional to the radio flux does not fit well at low radio flux
656: densities; it appears that a statistically significant fraction of sub-Jy
657: blazars may be bright in the $\gamma$-ray. Filled squares indicate VIPS sources
658: discussed in this paper. The vertical dashed lines indicate the
659: flux density limits of the VIPS and MOJAVE surveys assuming a flat
660: spectrum (i.e., no correction has been made for spectral index effects).
661: }
662: \label{gamma}
663: \end{figure}
664:
665:
666: \begin{figure}
667: \plotone{f2.eps}
668: \caption{Images from VIPS and MOJAVE for 12 sources identified as
669: likely EGRET candidates.}
670: \label{likely1}
671: \end{figure}
672:
673: \begin{figure}
674: \plotone{f3.eps}
675: \caption{Images from VIPS and MOJAVE for 12 sources identified as
676: plausible EGRET candidates.}
677: \label{maybe1}
678: \end{figure}
679:
680: \begin{figure}
681: \plotone{f4.eps}
682: \caption{Images from VIPS and MOJAVE for 7 sources identified as
683: plausible EGRET candidates.}
684: \label{maybe2}
685: \end{figure}
686:
687: \begin{figure}
688: \plotone{f5.eps}
689: \caption{Distribution of the 5 GHz ratio of core to jet flux density: $R = F_{core}/(F_{tot} - F_{core})$ where
690: $F_{tot}$ is the total flux density at 5 GHz, for EGRET candidates
691: and for VIPS as a whole. No k-correction has been made (see text).}
692: \label{cfrac}
693: \end{figure}
694:
695: \begin{figure}
696: \plotone{f6.eps}
697: \caption{Distribution of the brightness temperature, T$_b$, for EGRET
698: candidates and for VIPS as a whole.}
699: \label{btemp}
700: \end{figure}
701:
702: \begin{figure}
703: \plotone{f7.eps}
704: \caption{Distributions of the opening angle of the jet, and of the
705: parsec scale bending of the jet for VIPS as a whole. The angles for 4
706: EGRET sources are marked and labeled.}
707: \label{angle}
708: \end{figure}
709:
710: \end{document}
711: