1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Local Group LBVs}
4: \shortauthors{Massey et al}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{A Survey of Local Group Galaxies Currently Forming Stars: III. A Search for
9: Luminous Blue Variables and Other H$\alpha$ Emission-Lined Stars\altaffilmark{1}}
10:
11: \author{
12: Philip Massey\altaffilmark{2,3},
13: Reagin T. McNeill\altaffilmark{2,4},
14: K. A. G. Olsen\altaffilmark{3,5},
15: Paul W. Hodge\altaffilmark{6},
16: Cynthia Blaha\altaffilmark{7},
17: George H. Jacoby\altaffilmark{8},
18: R. C. Smith\altaffilmark{9},
19: Shay B. Strong\altaffilmark{2,10}
20: }
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}{Observations reported
23: here were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the Smithsonian Institution
24: and the University of Arizona.}
25: \altaffiltext{2}{Lowell Observatory, 1400 W Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff,
26: AZ 86001; Phil.Massey@lowell.edu}
27: \altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO)
28: and Cerro Tololo
29: Inter-American Observatory (CTIO),
30: National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO), which is
31: operated by AURA, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
32: Science Foundation (NSF).}
33: \altaffiltext{4} {Participant in the Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)
34: program at Lowell Observatory, 2006. Present address: Five College Astronomy Dept., Smith College, McConnell Hall, Northampton, MA 01063; rmcneill@email.smith.edu.}
35: \altaffiltext{5}{Gemini Science Center, National Optical Astronomy Observatory,
36: 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85726-6732; kolsen@noao.edu.}
37: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
38: hodge@astro.washington.edu.}
39: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, One North College Street, Northfield, MN 55057; cblaha@carleton.edu}
40: \altaffiltext{8}{WIYN Observatory, P. O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726-6732;
41: gjacoby@noao.edu. The WIYN Observatory is a joint facility of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Indiana University, Yale University, and the National Optical Astronomy Observatory.}
42: \altaffiltext{9}{CTIO, NOAO, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile; rsmith@noao.edu.}
43: \altaffiltext{10}{Research Experiences for Undergraduates at CTIO, 2001. Current
44: address: Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, RLM 16318, Austin,
45: TX 78712-1083; sholmes@astro.as.utexas.edu.}
46:
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: We describe a search for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars in M31, M33, and
51: seven dwarfs in or near the Local Group (IC 10, NGC 6822, WLM,
52: Sextans B, Sextans A, Pegasus and the Phoenix dwarf)
53: using interference filter imaging with the KPNO and CTIO 4-m telescope and Mosaic cameras. The survey is aimed primarily
54: at identifying new Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) from their spectroscopic
55: similarity to known LBVs, avoiding the bias towards photometric variability,
56: which may require centuries to manifest itself if LBVs go through long
57: quiescent periods. Followup spectroscopy with WIYN confirms that our survey detected a wealth of stars whose spectra
58: are similar to the known LBVs. We ``classify" the spectra of known LBVs, and
59: compare these to the spectra of the new LBV candidates. We demonstrate
60: spectacular spectral variability for several of the new LBV candidates, such
61: as AM2, previously classified as a Wolf-Rayet star, which now shows
62: Fe I, Fe II and Balmer emission lines but neither the N~III $\lambda$$\lambda$4634,42 nor
63: He~II $\lambda$4686 emission that it did in 1982. Profound spectral changes
64: are also noted for other suspected and known LBVs. Several of the LBV candidates also
65: show $>0.5$ mag changes in $V$ over the past 10-20 years. The number of known or
66: suspected LBVs is now 24 in M31, 37 in M33, 1 in NGC 6822, and 3 in IC 10.
67: We estimate that the total number of LBVs in M31 and M33 may be several
68: hundred, in contrast to the 8 known historically through large-scale photometric
69: variability. This has significant implications for the time scale of the LBV phase.
70: We also identify a few new WRs and peculiar emission-lined objects.
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: \keywords{catalogs --- galaxies: stellar content --- stars: early-type --- supergiants --- surveys}
74:
75: \section{Introduction}
76: \label{Sec-intro}
77:
78: The nearby galaxies of the Local Group serve as our astrophysical
79: laboratories for understanding the effect that metallicity has on
80: the evolution of massive stars. For instance, the relative number
81: of red supergiants (RSGs) and Wolf-Rayet stars (WRs) is known to
82: vary by two orders of magnitude with just a 0.8~dex change in
83: oxygen abundance (Massey 2003 and references therein), in
84: keeping with the general predictions of massive star evolutionary
85: theory (Maeder et al.\ 1980). Although such studies are made more
86: difficult by the stars' faintness and crowding, they have the
87: advantages over Galactic studies that the distances of these systems
88: are relatively well known (usually to a few percent; see van den Bergh
89: 2000), and that in general the correction for interstellar extinction
90: is low and relatively uniform within these galaxies.
91:
92: In previous papers of this series, we presented {\it UBVRI} catalogs
93: for the two Local Group spiral galaxies M31 and M33, (Massey et al.
94: 2006, hereafter Paper I) and for the seven dwarf irregular galaxies
95: IC 10, NGC 6822, WLM, Sextans B, Sextans A, Pegasus, and Phoenix
96: (Massey et al. 2007, hereafter Paper II). This paper now discusses
97: the analysis of narrow band (50 \AA, FWHM) images centered on
98: H$\alpha$, [SII] $\lambda \lambda 6717,31$ , and [OIII] $\lambda 5007$. The data are used to identify $H\alpha$
99: emission-lined stars in these nine galaxies, and in particular stars which
100: are spectroscopically similar to Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs).
101:
102: LBVs are a rare class of luminous stars
103: which undergo episodic mass-loss, and represent a transitional phase
104: between the most massive O stars and the WR stage. The archetype
105: LBVs in the Milky Way are the stars $\eta$ Carinae and P Cygni.
106: Observations of nebulae around these stars reveal very high ejecta
107: masses, of order 10$M_\odot$, and evidence of multiple ejections
108: on the time-scales of order $10^3$ years. (For two recent provocative
109: reviews, see Smith \& Owocki 2006 and Smith 2007.) Massey (2003)
110: has argued that if $\eta$ Car or P Cyg were located in M31 or
111: M33 we would not know of them today, since their spectacular
112: photometric outbursts were hundreds of years ago. Indeed, Hubble
113: \& Sandage (1953) identified only 5 such stars in all of M31 and M33
114: looking for photometric variability on archival plates dating back
115: 40 years. (Subsequent work brought this number to 8; see Parker
116: 1997.) In the absence of large photometric variability (which
117: might take a thousand years to manifest itself), better statistics
118: concerning the number of LBVs (and hence their lifetimes) might be
119: gathered by finding stars which are spectroscopically indistinguishable
120: from the known LBVs. In the recent past, such {\it LBV candidates}
121: have been identified in nearby galaxies by spectroscopic surveys
122: of UV-bright objects (Massey et al.\ 1996), He-emission objects
123: (Corral \& Herrero 2003), $H\alpha$ emission stars (Neese et al.\ 1991;
124: Corral 1996; King et al.\
125: 1998), or just blundering across them spectroscopically (Massey et
126: al.\ 2000; Massey 2006) by spectroscopic surveys of bright blue
127: stars.
128:
129: While we are mainly searching for LBVs, our selection has the
130: potential to uncover many other types of interesting $H\alpha$
131: emission-lined stars, such as the brightest Of-type stars, WRs,
132: and Be and B[e] stars.
133: We expect that if there exists an equivalent to SS~433 (a
134: ``mini-quasar" with a pair of jets ejecting material at 0.26 times the speed
135: of light; see Margon 1984) in the Local Group, our survey is likely
136: to pick it out, as such an object would also have strong $H\alpha$
137: emission with colors similar to LBVs and other early-type stars.
138:
139: In \S\ref{Sec-obs} we describe our observations and how we did our
140: photometry. The basis of selecting H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars
141: is given in \S\ref{Sec-pick}, along with the resulting catalogs.
142: Spectroscopy of the initial sample for M31, M33, NGC 6822, and IC 10 is given in
143: \S\ref{Sec-WIYN}. We discuss our results in \S\ref{Sec-discuss}.
144:
145: \section{Data and Photometry}
146: \label{Sec-obs}
147:
148: The narrow-band observations were made with the Mosaic cameras
149: mounted at the prime foci of the KPNO and CTIO 4-m telescopes. The
150: instruments and basic reduction procedures are given in detail in
151: Paper I. Here we note that each camera consists of a 2x4 array of
152: 2048x4096 SITe CCDs. The field of view is 36'x36', and the plate-scale
153: of the final reduced images is 0.27" pixel$^{-1}$. Exposures were
154: obtained through 50 \AA\ wide filters centered on H$\alpha$, [SII]
155: $\lambda \lambda 6717, 31$, and [OIII] $\lambda$ 5007. A typical
156: sequence consisted of 5 exposures of 300s each with the telescope
157: offset slightly between adjacent exposures in order to compensate
158: for the small gaps between adjacent CCDs. The journal of observations
159: is given in Table~\ref{tab:journal}, along with the delivered image
160: quality (DIQ) measured on each frame. Conditions were generally
161: good, but not necessarily photometric.
162:
163: For the seven
164: dwarfs in our sample
165: we restricted our analysis to the regions centered on the galaxy, as the FOV
166: is much larger than the size of the galaxies.
167: The coordinate ranges can be found in the captions of Figs.~14 to 20 of Paper II,
168: except that there is misprint for the coordinates used for Sextans A (Fig.~18 of Paper II),
169: where the correct range is $\alpha_{\rm 2000}=10^h10^m48^s$ to $10^h11^m15^s$
170: and $\delta_{\rm 2000}=-4^\circ 45'$ to $-4^\circ 39'$, an area of 0.011 deg$^2$.
171: We also extended the analysis region of NGC~6822 by 2' to the south of the region
172: listed in Paper II, as we found it had been too conservative; the range we used
173: was $\alpha_{\rm 2000}=19^h44^m34^s$ to $19^h45^m22^s$
174: and $\delta_{\rm 2000}=-14^\circ 58'$ to $-14^\circ 40'$, an area of 0.058~deg$^2$.
175:
176:
177: For the {\it UBVRI} photometry in Papers~I and II we found that we
178: needed to treat each CCD as a separate detector due to the slight
179: differences in color-terms. However, this effect is negligible for
180: the narrow-band imaging discussed here, and so we did the photometry
181: of these images on the average of the registered (``stacked") images.
182: Our photometry relied upon the broad-band source lists given in Papers~I
183: and II. We began with the 0.1" coordinates given in those catalogs,
184: and performed aperture photometry at those positions on the H$\alpha$,
185: [SII], and [OIII] stacked images. We chose a 5-pixel (1.35") radius measuring
186: aperture as a reasonable compromise between seeing and crowding.
187: Sky was determined from the modal value within an annulus extending
188: from 10 to 20 pixels from each object. Only objects that had
189: positive fluxes in all three apertures were retained. For the
190: galaxies consisting of multiple, overlapping fields (M31 and M33)
191: the results were averaged for stars in common.
192:
193: In order to convert counts into approximate flux, we used observations
194: of spectrophotometric standard stars. Our goal was to achieve an
195: absolute calibration good to 5-10\%. Although this is fairly crude, it provides
196: a sufficiently accurate measurement of the absolute measures
197: of the fluxes, while our selection criteria
198: (described below) will rely principally on the
199: relative measures between different filters, and not the absolute fluxes.
200: For the standard stars,
201: we performed
202: aperture photometry using a 15 pixel radius aperture, with a sky
203: annulus extending from 20 to 25 pixels. We corrected for airmass
204: (both with the standards and program photometry)
205: using the ``standard'' KPNO and CTIO coefficients. The KPNO data
206: were collected over four observing runs (2000 October, 2001 February,
207: 2001 September, 2002 September), but the zero-points were found to
208: be quite similar (to within 0.05~mag), and a single average was
209: adopted. The differences between the northern and southern calibrations
210: are also small, as shown in Table~\ref{tab:calib}, and we adopted an
211: average value for each filter. In general,
212: the standards were observed on a single chip (``im2"), but tests
213: conducted one night moving a spectrophotometric standard between
214: the eight chips confirmed that the flat-fielding was sufficiently
215: good to keep chip-to-chip differences in the zero-point to less
216: than one percent. We determined a mean aperture correction (from 15
217: pixels used for the standards to the 5 pixels used on our program
218: frames) of -0.15~mag, with a scatter of 0.06~mag, and applied the -0.15~mag
219: correction to all of our H$\alpha$ magnitudes.
220:
221: We will refer to our fluxes in terms of ``AB" magnitudes
222: (Oke 1974), with the reminder that this is defined in terms of the flux $f_\nu$ [cgs]
223: as simply $-2.5\log f_\nu - 48.60$. Since our H$\alpha$ images are publicly
224: available\footnote{http://www.noao.edu/nsa and ftp://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/massey/lgsurvey/datarelease/}
225: we also give in Table~\ref{tab:calib} the conversion from
226: counts s$^{-1}$ to $f_\lambda$ [cgs], as these may be useful to others wishing to use
227: our images. Note that while
228: this calibration allows us to determine the fluxes of continuum
229: sources, purely emission-lined objects (such as HII regions and
230: PNe) will have their lines ``diluted'' by the bandpass of our filter.
231: We determined a correction factor by following Jacoby et al. (1987),
232: where we determined the effective bandpass using the filter response
233: curves simulated in an f/3 beam, similar to the situation at prime
234: focus at each of the 4-m telescopes. We then divided by the
235: normalized transmission of the filter at the wavelength of the line.
236: These are also provided in Table \ref{tab:calib} for the
237: benefit of others. Although our sources are continuum and emission,
238: the emission is a minor component of the flux.
239:
240:
241: We give in Table~\ref{tab:errors} the photometric errors as a function of
242: magnitude for our three narrow-band filters. These errors reflect only
243: the {\it internal} errors (i.e., photon statistics and read-noise) and not the
244: external (calibration) errors, but since we will rely upon photometric indices
245: to select our objects, it is the internal errors which matter. We see that our
246: errors were negligible $<0.02$ to roughly 20th mag.
247:
248: \section{Analysis: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff}
249: \label{Sec-pick}
250:
251: Determining what criteria to apply to select H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, while
252: rejecting HII regions and planetary nebulae (PNe), required careful consideration and
253: experimentation. We constructed a number of photometric indices, using our
254: H$\alpha$, [SII], and [OIII] magnitudes, in combination with the broad-band
255: values from Papers I and II. We determined what was effective by examining
256: the distribution of known interesting
257: objects in M31 and M33 (LBVs, LBV candidates, and WRs from Tables 8 and 9 of
258: Paper~I) to the general stellar populations of these two galaxies.
259: We illustrate our selection in Figs.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}, and
260: summarize our selection criteria in
261: Table~\ref{tab:cuts}.
262:
263: First, we imposed a flux limit. This was necessary in order to not include objects whose
264: photometry was so poor that they appeared to be emission-lined objects when
265: they were not, and it also included the practical consideration that we wanted stars
266: that were bright enough to be observable on 6.5-m telescopes. We used
267: the magnitude in the H$\alpha$ image itself as a general measure
268: of the brightness of the object (continuum plus emission). Based upon the numbers in
269: Table~\ref{tab:errors}, we decided to impose a cut-off at an H$\alpha$ magnitude of 20th.
270: In Table~\ref{tab:galaxies} we list our adopted distance moduli and reddenings
271: (from Table~1 of Paper II and references therein),
272: along with the apparent distance modulus at H$\alpha$, using a correction for
273: interstellar reddening of $A_{H\alpha}=2.54 E(B-V)$ Cardelli et al.\ 1989).
274: We see that 20th magnitude corresponds to an absolute magnitude (at H$\alpha$) of
275: roughly $-5$ in M31 and M33. For the galaxy with the largest apparent distance modulus,
276: IC10, it corresponds roughly to -6. Although our source catalogs are based upon
277: how good our photometry is (i.e., flux-limited, to a certain apparent magnitude), we still wanted to
278: compare the number
279: of objects to the same absolute magnitude, and so we have adjusted the flux limit for IC10
280: slightly to reach $M_{H\alpha}=-6$ (i.e., Table~\ref{tab:cuts}). We show the effects
281: of this cut on the full sample in Figs.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}{\it a}.
282:
283: Secondly, for a measure of the actual H$\alpha$
284: emission, we chose to use [SII] as our continuum filter, as we found
285: that this provided cleaner separation in the various diagnostic two-color plots
286: than did (say) broad-band $R$. (King et al.\ 1998 also used H$\alpha -$[SII]
287: in their search for LBVs in M31.) Based upon our examination of the known LBVs
288: in M31 and M33 we chose H$\alpha$-[SII]$\leq -0.15$ to separate emission-lined
289: stars from the general stellar population\footnote{For all of our indices, we applied
290: small shifts (of order a few tenths of a magnitude) in order for the general
291: population of stars to have a zero value. This was partially an artifact that the
292: emission-lined indices, such as H$\alpha$-[SII] were constructed without
293: separate aperture corrections. We list these shifts in Table~\ref{tab:shifts}.}.
294: We illustrate the effect of this selection in Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}{\it b}.
295:
296: Thirdly, we constructed an index that would measure the amount of [OIII] emission.
297: For this, we found that a continuum comprised of the average of $V$ and $B$
298: worked well; i.e., [OIII]$-$C, where C=$(V+B)/2$. This was necessary in order to
299: eliminate compact HII regions and PNe. Our examination of the locations
300: of the known LBVs showed that some showed emission in the [OIII] bandpass; this
301: is likely due to emission in the He~I $\lambda 5016$ line. Therefore
302: we adopted a fairly conservative criteria of keeping only objects with [OIII]$-$C$>-0.75$.
303: However, even this will eliminate legitimate H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars which happen
304: to excite small HII regions. The most extreme example of this problem is in IC~10, where
305: the [OIII]$-$C cut resulted in eliminating the vast majority of WRs (Fig.~\ref{fig:ic10cuts}).
306: In most cases, though, we expect that this cut eliminated unwanted gaseous emission
307: regions (Figs.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}{\it c}).
308:
309: After applying all of these criteria, we were surprised to find that some of
310: the remaining objects were actually very red stars. We attribute this to a molecular
311: absorption band located at 6715 \AA. (Mostly these would be
312: foreground red dwarfs, although a few might be bona-fide red supergiants in these
313: galaxies.)
314: This absorption band falls within the [SII] filter and would create the appearance of
315: $H\alpha$ emission. To eliminate these unwanted objects a color criteria was imposed
316: using $B-V< 1.2$ for all galaxies (Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}{\it d}), save one.
317: In IC10, the colors were shifted a fair amount due to reddening. From careful examination
318: of color plots for IC10, we determined that a
319: value of 1.5 would be equivalent for the $B-V$ criteria. (Based purely on
320: the reddening we would have picked a much higher cut-off, about 1.9, but we
321: infer from our plots that the vast majority of the stars are nearer foreground
322: stars, and that just a small increase in our cut-off was sufficient.)
323:
324: In addition, we decided to use the reddening-free color index $Q=U-B-0.72(B-V)$
325: to keep only the intrinsically bluest stars, using Q$\le-0.3$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:phxcuts}{\it e})
326: (O-type stars typically have $Q<-0.9$, while a $-0.4$ corresponds to a B5 dwarf or giant, or an A0 supergiant;
327: see Table~3 of Massey 1998.)
328: Not all of our stars had $U$ band photometry, and the result of this cut meant that
329: any star without good $U$ band photometry would be eliminated.
330: This was judged to be a particular problem for IC10, and so we decided to
331: include stars without $U$ but which met the other criteria.
332:
333:
334: We show our final selections in Figs.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}-\ref{fig:pegcuts}{\it f}, and
335: list these stars in Tables~\ref{tab:m31}
336: through \ref{tab:peg}. (No objects were found in the Phoenix dwarf.) We have included the
337: relevant broad-band photometry
338: from Papers I and II, along with spectral types, both those that were previously
339: known (from Papers I and II and references therein) and those which are
340: newly determined here (\S~\ref{Sec-WIYN}).
341:
342: We include stars in these tables as faint as an AB magnitude of 20.0 in H$\alpha$ (20.2
343: in the case of IC~10). For M31 we find 2,334 potential H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars.
344: In our complete catalog of M31 there are 32,802 sources this bright or brighter
345: in H$\alpha$, so the fraction is about 7\%. In M33 we find 3,707 potential
346: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, while the catalog contains 18,867 stars this bright
347: or brighter, about 20\%: a much larger fraction.
348:
349: The full lists in Tables~\ref{tab:m31}-\ref{tab:peg} are based upon a given apparent
350: magnitude in H$\alpha$. A more meaningful comparison is to use the absolute
351: luminosity. In Table~\ref{tab:galaxies} we list the apparent H$\alpha$ magnitude
352: corresponding to $M_{H\alpha}=-6$. If we count only stars that bright or brighter,
353: then we arrive at the number of H$\alpha$ sources listed in Table~\ref{tab:nums}.
354: We include in that table the absolute visual magnitude of each galaxy, along with the
355: current SFR. There is clearly a much better correlation with SFR than with $M_V$:
356: for instance, we find about twice as many sources in M33 as in M31, although the
357: latter is 8 times more luminous. The current SFR in M33 (integrated over the
358: galaxy) is twice as large as in M31. It is interesting that the number of sources
359: we detect in IC~10 is much lower than the current SFR would indicate. However,
360: our [OIII]-C cut eliminated most of the WRs, and we believe that therefore our
361: potential list is spuriously low for that galaxy. The results for NGC 6822 are harder to explain, as only 9
362: objects were found, while we might expect 85-90 by scaling from M31 or M33.
363: Perhaps in the dwarfs we are seeing the effects of low metallicity: that
364: lower mass-loss rates result in disproportionately fewer H$\alpha$ emission stars.
365: The paucity of potential
366: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars in NGC 6822 {\it is} consistent with its scant number (4)
367: of WRs, compared to (say) M33, where a deep surveys of about half of the galaxy
368: have confirmed roughly 160 WRs (Massey \& Johnson 1998). We also include
369: in Table~\ref{tab:nums} the number of stars with $M_{H\alpha}\leq-6$ for which
370: we know the spectral types, either from previous work or from the present study.
371: We can see that despite the efforts reported in the next section, we have only
372: just begun to investigate the interesting emission-lined stars in these nearby galaxies.
373:
374: \section{A Spectroscopic Reconnaissance in M31, M33, IC10, and NGC 6822}
375: \label{Sec-WIYN}
376:
377: The stars listed in Tables~\ref{tab:m31} to \ref{tab:peg} are {\it potentially} interesting
378: objects, likely---but not certain---to have H$\alpha$ emission. Although our detection
379: criteria were chosen to be fairly conservative (by necessity, so as to not to include
380: too many non-emission lined objects), the inherent uncertainties of such photometry
381: in crowded fields necessitates spectroscopy to see what it is we actually have.
382:
383: We observed on four nights (19-22 September 2006) with the Hydra fiber positioner
384: at the WIYN 3.5-m telescope.
385: On the first two nights we used the blue fiber cable
386: (consisting of $\sim 100$ fibers of 3.1" diameter) with a 790 line mm$^{-1}$ grating (``KPC-18C") used in second order
387: with a BG-39 blocking filter. The spectral coverage was 3970-5030 \AA, with a spectral
388: resolution of 1.5 \AA; the setup was identical to that described in Paper I. The first night was clear, with
389: good conditions (seeing $\approx$1"), while there were intermittent clouds on the second.
390: On the third and fourth nights we used the red fiber cable
391: ($\sim 100$ fibers of 2.0" diameter) with a the 600 line mm$^{-1}$ grating (``600\@10.1") in first
392: order with a GG-420 blocking filter. The spectral coverage was 4550-7400 \AA, with a
393: spectral resolution of 3.4 \AA. Conditions were marginal on the first red night (21 September 2006) and
394: we were only able to observe for the first hour or so of the night due to humidity; conditions were again good for 22 September.
395: For both setups we used the Bench Spectrograph Camera with the T2KA
396: CCD, a 2048$\times$2048 device with 24$\mu$m pixels and excellent cosmetics.
397:
398: The FOV of Hydra is 1$^\circ$, and we assigned fibers to two overlapping fields in M31, two
399: overlapping fields in M33, and one field each in NGC 6822 and IC10. Each field was observed
400: for 2.3-3.0 hrs in the blue, and 1.0-2.0 hrs in the red, as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:spectexp}.
401: The IC10 field was not observed in the blue, and the second M31 field was not observed in the
402: red, due to the variable conditions.
403:
404: In addition to our Hydra spectra, we also obtained a new high signal-to-noise spectrum with the 6.5-m
405: MMT of two of our P Cygni
406: like LBV candidates: the star J004341.84+411112.0, previously described by
407: Massey (2006), and J013416.07+303642.1, newly described here. We used
408: the Blue Channel spectrograph on 28 October 2006 with
409: the 832 line mm$^{-1}$ grating in second order (CuSO$_4$ blocking filter)
410: with a 1.25" slit, for a resolution of 1.1 \AA, and covering 4075-5020 \AA. These
411: spectra were obtained principally for the purposes of modeling, but we will use these
412: spectra here for illustration.
413:
414: Finally, we include here three spectra contributed by N. Caldwell, who contacted us
415: during the course of our writing this paper with questions about several M31 objects that
416: he thought resembled LBVs.
417: Three of these turned out to be in our list of M31 potential H$\alpha$ sources
418: (Table~\ref{tab:m31}), J004229.87+410551.8, J004322.50+413940.9, and
419: J004442.28+415823.1. These had
420: not been observed at WIYN, and he kindly suggested we include their
421: spectra here. He obtained these spectra on the
422: MMT 6.5-m with the Hectospect fiber positioner on 15 November 2006 using the 270 line mm$^{-1}$
423: grating, which provided wavelength coverage from 3650\AA\ to 9200\AA\ and a resolution of
424: roughly 5 \AA.
425:
426: Nearly every object
427: had H$\alpha$ emission, as shown by the red spectra. Many of our objects (60\%)
428: were simply stars
429: in low excitation HII regions (usually with minimal [OIII] $\lambda 5007$) but in general our selection
430: criteria worked very well, and our spectroscopy revealed a wealth of interesting objects.
431: We list the results of spectroscopy in Table~\ref{tab:newsp} and
432: discuss the newly discovered objects below.
433:
434: \subsection{New LBV Candidates}
435:
436: The vast majority of our discoveries were stars whose spectra are
437: extremely similar to that of known LBVs. Of course,
438: these stars cover a significant range in spectral properties, and, in addition, some of these
439: stars are known to have drastic changes in their spectra. We illustrate some current, and
440: past, spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:lbv1}-\ref{fig:pcyg}, where we draw primarily
441: from the previously known 8 LBVs in M31 and M33.
442:
443: \subsubsection{Hot LBV Candidates}
444: Generally, during the visual minimum (``quiescent") phase,
445: the optical spectra of high-luminosity LBVs are marked by strong emission in the
446: lower hydrogen lines (H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, and H$\gamma$), plus emission
447: of singly ionized metals, primarily [FeII] (Massey 2000 and references therein).
448: We consider the prototype of this spectrum to be the current spectral state of Var C,
449: one of the original Hubble \& Sandage (1953) variables, although many other LBVs in M31 and
450: M33 share this spectral characteristic, such as A-1 and Var 15, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:lbv1}.
451: A 1983 spectrum of AE And shown in Kenyon \& Gallagher (1985) is very similar, and
452: we used this star's line list to identify lines shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:lbv1}\footnote{Our
453: September 2006 spectrum of this star shows some changes in the intervening 23 years, with the Balmer lines and He~I lines now showing P Cygni profiles, which were
454: missing in the 1983 spectrum.
455: We show our
456: spectrum in Fig.~\ref{fig:AEnow} for comparison to Fig.~4 in Kenyon \& Gallagher
457: (1985).}.
458: S Doradus itself, the star whose name used to refer to the class of objects now known as
459: LBVs, has shown similar spectra (see Fig.~2 of Wolf \& Kaufer 1997).
460: It should be noted that at our dispersion, these spectra are sometimes indistinguishable
461: from those of
462: the high luminosity B[e] stars, which Conti (1997a) has argued are not LBVs. The emission
463: in B[e] stars is believed to originate in a disk, as demonstrated by the study of R136 (in the LMC)
464: by Zickgraf et al.\ (1985). In contrast, the emission in the quiescent LBVs shows P Cygni profiles
465: at high dispersion (cf.\ Kenyon \& Gallagher 1985). Here we will call stars
466: that resemble Var C, AE And, and Var A-1 ``hot LBV candidates", but note that more detailed
467: studies might reclassify some of them as B[e]. In the nomenclature of Bohannan (1989) such stars
468: would be called ``A extr".
469: Massey et al.\ (1996) discovered four such stars in M33 by
470: observing the brightest UV sources, and King et al.\ (1998) discovered five similar objects
471: in M31 based upon observing H$\alpha$-bright sources. It is unsurprising that many more
472: remained to be discovered.
473:
474: We begin by showing the spectra of 10 similarly hot LBV candidates, five in M31 and five in M33, compared to that of Var A-1 in Fig.~\ref{fig:lbvhot}.
475: We include in this figure one previously identified LBV candidate, J004417.10+411928.0
476: (``k350" in the study of King et al.\ 1998).
477: For ease of displaying these spectra we have (roughly) divided these into stars whose
478: [FeII] and FeII lines are stronger than those in Var A-1 (Fig.~\ref{fig:lbvhot} {\it top}), and
479: those with weaker lines (Fig.~\ref{fig:lbvhot} {\it bottom}).
480:
481: Two additional
482: such stars were found in M31 by N. Caldwell,
483: J004229.87+410551.8 and J004322.50+413940.9. Both spectra are somewhat
484: peculiar (Fig.~\ref{fig:nelson}).
485: The spectrum of J004229.87+410551.8 may be a composite.
486: Although the Balmer lines are in emission and [FeII] is present, the strength of the H and K Ca II
487: lines and the presence of the G-band would indicate a much cooler absorption spectrum
488: than we see in the other hot stars.
489: The spectrum of the other star, J004322.50+413940.9, looks at first blush to be that
490: of a P Cygni type LBV, with strong P Cygni profiles in the lower Balmer lines
491: (H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, and H$\gamma$). However, closer inspection reveals
492: P Cygni lines in (permitted) Fe II, notably $\lambda 4924$, $\lambda 5018$, and
493: $\lambda 5169$\footnote{Given the dispersion of the Hectospect spectra, we could
494: not be certain of the line identifications. We considered the possibility that the first
495: two lines were He~I $\lambda 4922$ and $\lambda 5016$. However, the absence
496: of any other He~I lines in the spectra ruled this out.}. The spectrum of Var~C shown
497: by Kenyon \& Gallagher (1985) also showed strong P Cygni profiles in many of the
498: permitted Fe II lines, and is also lacking in He~I. However, J004322.50+413940.9
499: is somewhat peculiar compared to the Kenyon \& Gallagher (1985) Var~C exposure, as
500: the many other strong Fe II emission lines in the blue aren't evident. Possibly this
501: is due to the lower resolution and modest signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum.
502: There is also an absorption line near 4643 \AA\ that we were unable to identify
503: unambiguously. Both of these stars show significant photometric variability over the time
504: scale of a decade, as shown below.
505:
506: There are another five stars (one in M31 and four in M33) for which we have blue
507: spectra similar to those of the hot LBV candidates. All have H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$
508: in emission, and all also show He I $\lambda 4922$ and $\lambda 5016$ in emission.
509: However, any [Fe II] or Fe II emission is so weak as to be considered either incipient or uncertain.
510: We show their spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:hotmaybe}, where we have again included the
511: spectrum of Var A-1 for comparison. One of these stars, J004411.36+413257.2,
512: was previously described as an LBV candidate by King et al.\ (1998), where
513: it was listed as ``k315a".
514:
515: We have only a red spectrum of the M33 star J013332.64+304127.2
516: (Fig.~\ref{fig:am2} {\it top} and {\it middle}), but it too
517: reveals Balmer emission plus [FeII] and FeII emission. This star would simply serve
518: as another example of a ``hot LBV candidate" were it not for the fact that this
519: star is M33WR41 (AM2), whose spectrum was called WNL by Massey \& Johnson (1997),
520: based on an observation made in September 1982 and shown
521: in Fig.~2b of Massey \& Conti (1983), where it
522: is identified as number 28. We have checked the cross identification carefully
523: and there appears to be nothing amiss. The star J013332.64+304127.2 is certainly the star
524: labeled 2 in Armandroff \& Massey (1985) where it showed up in on-band,
525: off-band imaging in
526: He~II $\lambda 4686$. Furthermore, it was independently identified as being
527: bright in He~II $\lambda 4686$ in the {\it HST} imaging of Drissen et al.\ (1993), where they identified it as NGC~595-WR6. In Fig.~\ref{fig:am2} we compare the two.
528: Although the 1982 spectrum is quite noisy, there is no question that it is of
529: a WN-type WR. The resolution of the 1982 data (taken with the Intensified Image Dissector Scanner on the KPNO 4-m) is 6\AA, and it is possible that the star was
530: actually a Ofpe/WN9, with the P Cygni absorption components washed out by the relatively low resolution. Unfortunately, it was not in the sample of M33 WRs recently re-observed
531: by Abbott et al.\ (2004). The star HDE 269858 (Radcliffe 127) is (or rather, was) an Ofpe/WN9
532: star that underwent an LBV-like outburst in 1980 (Stahl et al.\ 1983). We believe that J013332.64+304127.2 (AM2)
533: is another such example.
534:
535: Spectra of two stars in IC 10 are very similar, although they do not
536: have the signal-to-noise ratio needed to reveal weak emission (Fig.~\ref{fig:ic10}). One of
537: these stars, J002020.35+591837.6, is located just 1.6" from
538: RSMV8 (J002020.56+591837.3),
539: classified as ``WN10" by Crowther et al.\ (2003).
540: Their classification is equivalent to the Ofpe/WN9 designation. We do not
541: think, though, that our spectrum of J002020.35+591837.6
542: has been contaminated by this object, as we used the 2" diameter red fibers
543: for the observation, and RSMV8 is at least a magnitude fainter than
544: J002020.35+591837.6.
545:
546:
547: A third IC 10 star, and the only NGC 6822 star to prove of interest, are
548: even less certain examples.
549: J002016.48+591906.9 (IC 10) and J194503.77-145619.1 (NGC 6822) show
550: only Balmer emission. J013442.14+303216.0 (M33) is very similar.
551: We show their spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:n6822}. It is a stretch
552: to call these LBV candidates based on these spectra, so we inlcude
553: a ``?" in their classification.
554: Higher S/N data is clearly warranted, as they {\it may} reveal [FeII] emission.
555: We will note, however, that J002016.48+591906.9 (IC 10) showed photometric variability at the
556: 0.7~mag level in a 10 year period (see below), bolstering its case.
557:
558: \subsubsection{Cool LBV Candidates}
559: At outburst (visual maximum), the spectra of LBVs are often said to
560: resemble that of an extreme F-type supergiant, with
561: the absorption arising in a ``pseudo-photosphere" (see, for example, Humpheys \& Davidson 1994). The spectra of all five of the original Hubble-Sandage variables
562: (Var 2, Var A, Var B, Var C, all of which are in M33; Var 19 in M31)
563: were in this state when observed by
564: Hubble \& Sandage (1953)\footnote{Note that Var A is now considered to be
565: an LBV {\it candidate} by some; see Humphreys \& Davidson (1994) and Parker (1998).}.
566: We use Var B during its 1992-1993
567: outburst (Szeifert et al.\ 1996) as the archetype (Fig.~\ref{fig:lbv2}). We would estimate the spectral type of this
568: photosphere to be late F or even early G-type. The figure shows that
569: S Doradus exhibited
570: a very similar spectrum in October 1999, although the star was clearly {\it not} undergoing a
571: (photometric) outburst at the time (Massey 2000). This, we believe, underscores how complex and poorly
572: understood the LBV phenomenon really is, and why additional examples of LBVs can only
573: help improve our understanding of the LBV phenomenon.
574: We will refer to LBVs showing such spectra as being in their ``cool state" rather than in outburst.
575:
576: We did not observe any star that was quite as extreme as Var B during its outburst.
577: However, there are six stars that show
578: underlying absorption spectra which are not that late, more like B8 to early F, along with very
579: strong emission at H$\alpha$ and P Cygni profiles at H$\beta$. We compare the spectrum
580: of one of these, J004507.65+413740.8, to that of the outburst spectrum of Var~B in
581: Fig.~\ref{fig:coolguys} ({\it top}). J004507.65+413740.8 is clearly of earlier type (compare, for
582: example, the strength of the G-band). We estimate the absorption spectral type as F2~Ia.
583: We show all six spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:coolguys} ({\it bottom}), where we have scaled the figure
584: to emphasize the absorption spectra. Note that the two lines to the red of H$\beta$ are clearly
585: FeII $\lambda \lambda 4924, 5018$, and not the He~I $\lambda \lambda 4922, 5016$ lines visible
586: in the spectra of the hotter stars discussed above. This is evident not only from the wavelengths, but
587: also from the lack of other, usually stronger, He~I lines, such as $\lambda 4471$.
588: The emission profiles of H$\beta$ and H$\alpha$ can
589: be found in Fig.~\ref{fig:coolprofiles}. This shows that all six have strong P Cygni profiles in the
590: Balmer lines.
591:
592: It is interesting to note that our September 2006
593: observation of Var B shows a fairly
594: boringly weak emission-line spectrum with the Balmer lines
595: in emission, slight P Cygni emission in the He I lines, and a few {\it doubly} ionized forbidden Fe
596: lines, i.e., [FeIII] $\lambda \lambda 4658, 4702$.) We compare this to the December 1993
597: spectrum in Fig.~\ref{fig:varb}. It is hard to believe we are looking at the same star! Less dramatic spectral changes for Var B
598: on the time-scale of months were discussed and illustrated by
599: Szeifert et al.\ (1996).
600:
601: We do have spectra of two other M33 stars which may be ``cool" LBV candidates:
602: J013416.44+303120.8 and J013429.64+303732.1. Both of these show an absorption
603: spectrum typical of a B8~I. However, H$\beta$ shows a very narrow emission component
604: superposed on a very broad component. We show the blue spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:weird} ({\it top}).
605: We also show the H$\alpha$ profiles in Fig.~\ref{fig:weird} ({\it bottom}). Such a broad profile
606: {\it could} be indicative of a rapidly rotating disk, but it could also be indicative of a more
607: optically thick wind, reminiscent of Wolf-Rayet stars. The narrow emission component
608: could be nebular, although the region around the H$\alpha$ profile seems to suggest otherwise,
609: as there is no sign of the [NII] $\lambda \lambda 6548, 6584$ lines nor is there [OIII] $\lambda 5007$
610: emission characteristic of a nebula. The broad components extend to $\pm 600-1000$ km s$^{-1}$.
611:
612: \subsubsection{P Cygni LBV Candidates}
613:
614: Of course, not all LBV spectra fall into these two extremes. The most notable exception is
615: the Galactic star P Cygni. This star contains no Fe~II or [Fe II] features, but rather the
616: He I and Balmer lines show characteristic line
617: profiles that bear the name of this famous star: there
618: is a blue-shifted absorption component,
619: with a strong emission component extending redwards from line center. A good
620: signal-to-noise spectrum
621: also reveals lines of NII, indicative of enriched material at the stellar surface.
622: We show the spectrum of P Cygni, AF And, and
623: J004341.84+411112.0 in Fig.~\ref{fig:pcyg}. Although the latter has not shown the same sort of
624: spectacular photometric outbursts that characterize LBVs, its spectrum is uniquely similar to
625: that of P Cygni itself, and like P Cygni it may be surrounded by nebulosity indicative of a
626: past eruption---about 2 millennia ago in the case of J004341.84+411112.0 (Massey 2006).
627: The spectrum of J004341.84+411112.0 shown here is new, and was acquired with the MMT 6.5-m
628: on 28 October 2006, and will be discussed elsewhere; here we just note that the NII features
629: only hinted at in the lower S/N spectra shown by Massey (2006) are quite obvious in this higher
630: S/N data.
631:
632: We identify six similar stars here, and compare their spectra to that of P Cygni in Fig.~\ref{fig:pcygs}.
633: Although all six show strong P Cygni components in the Balmer lines, and some in the He I lines
634: (i.e., J004242.33+413922.7, J013351.46+304057.0, and J013416.07+303642.1)
635: none show the startling close resemblance to P Cygni itself as does J004341.84+411112.0
636: (Fig.~\ref{fig:pcyg}). Still, the same three that show He~I P Cygni also show evidence of the
637: NII emission bands indicative of enriched material at the surface. In the case of J013416.07+303642.1
638: we show our MMT spectrum of the star, as our Hydra spectrum has significant nebular
639: contamination.
640:
641: One of these P Cygni-like stars, J013339.52+304540.5, had previously been classified
642: as ``B0.5I+WNE" (Massey et al.\ 1996, where it was called UIT154; the star is listed
643: in Massey \& Johnson 1998 as ``M33-WR57") Its spectrum was also described
644: by Crowther et al.\ (1997), where it is referred to by its Humphreys \& Sandage
645: (1980) designation, ``B517". We compare the 1993 spectrum
646: with that from 2006 in Fig.~\ref{fig:pcygprob1}. The broad He~II $\lambda 4686$
647: feature has clearly disappeared, while the Balmer emission has gotten
648: stronger. (In 1993 H$\delta$ was primarily absorption while in 2006 it shows strong
649: P Cygni emission.) Nevertheless, the P Cygni lines were quite evident in the 1993 spectrum, and the classification of this star as ``B0.5I+WNE" appears, in retrospect,
650: to have been overly simplistic. Crowther et al.\ (1997) described it as ``WN11h"
651: based upon a 1995 optical spectrum; the star showed only weak He~II
652: $\lambda 4686$ at that time.
653: Finally, we note that another of these P Cygni-like LBV candidates, J013341.28+302237.2,
654: had previously been called a B1~Ia by Monteverde et al.\ (1996), who refer to the
655: star by its designation in Humphreys \& Sandage (1980), ``110-A". Its spectrum is
656: shown in Monteverde et al.\ (1996)'s Figs.~1 and 2. Although H$\alpha$ is in
657: emission, there is no sign of P Cygni emission at H$\gamma$, although it may
658: be partially filled in by emission. Thus the spectrum has clearly changed, as
659: H$\gamma$ has roughly equal absorption and emission components in our
660: spectrum (Fig.~\ref{fig:pcyg}) of this star. Monteverde et al.\ (1996) did not include
661: H$\beta$.
662:
663: \subsubsection{Ofpe/WN9 LBV Candidates}
664:
665:
666: Further complicating the LBV issue, R 127, AG Car,
667: and HDE 269582 are three examples of stars whose spectra at minimum light are
668: Ofpe/WN9 stars (Walborn 1977; Bohannan \& Walborn 1989; Humphreys \& Davidson 1994 and references therein; see also Smith et al.\ 1995).
669: Therefore we have chosen to discuss newly found
670: ``slash stars" with the other LBV candidates rather than with Wolf-Rayets. We also find below
671: that the Ofpe/WN9 stars tend to be photometrically variable.
672:
673:
674:
675: We show the blue spectra of J013509.73+304157.3 (M33) and J004334.50+410951.7
676: (M31)
677: in Fig.~\ref{fig:ofpe}, where we have used the LMC star BE 381 as a reference.
678: BE 381 was
679: one of the stars that originally defined the class (see Bohannan \& Walborn 1989),
680: and its spectrum
681: was kindly made available by B. Bohannan. The M33 star J013509.73+304157.3,
682: also known as Romano's star, known to be photometrically variable by more than
683: a magnitude (Romano 1978), and is usually included in lists of LBV candidates
684: (see, for example, Parker 1997). Its spectrum was recently discovered independently
685: to have
686: changed to that of Ofpe/WN9 (Viotti et al.\ 2007). The Ofpe/WN9 nature of the M31
687: star J004334.50+410951.7 is newly discovered here.
688:
689: A third star, J013432.76+304717.2, located in M33, we also call Ofpe/WN9. We have
690: only a ``red" spectrum ($>4550$\AA) of this star. The spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ofpeRED},
691: where we compare it to that of J013509.73+304157.3. They are clearly quite similar.
692:
693: With the addition of these newly found Ofpe/WN9 stars, the number
694: of such stars known in M31 is now two, and in M33 is eight. Such stars are
695: quite rare.
696:
697:
698:
699: \subsection{Wolf-Rayet and Of Stars}
700:
701: We expected to find few WRs: we saw in \S~\ref{Sec-pick} that our
702: selection criteria eliminated the vast majority of known WRs,
703: primarily at the stage of eliminating HII regions via the [OIII]-C restriction.
704: This is simply because most WRs are found in HII regions. The exceptions tended
705: to be the previously known
706: Ofpe/WN9 stars, which
707: generally were retained in our H$\alpha$ catalogs.
708: Nevertheless, we found 3 new WRs in M31, 3 or 4 new WRs in M33 (one of which
709: may simply be an Of star), and identified
710: a classification problem with a previously identified WR.
711:
712: Of the other stars with WR-like emission lines, one is a WC-type, three are
713: WN-type, and one is likely to be an Of star rather than a WN. We show their spectra in
714: Fig.~\ref{fig:wrguys}. For the Wolf-Rayets, the low S/N of the data, plus the presence of nebular
715: emission, precludes a more precise classification than WNL (based on the
716: strength of NIII $\lambda 4634,42$ for the WNs) and WC.
717:
718: The star M33 star
719: J013406.72+304154.5 by far has the weakest emission of any of these.
720: That star had been classified by Massey et al.\ (1996) as an ``early O star",
721: which we would indeed expect to have the NIII $\lambda 43634,42$ and
722: He II $\lambda 4686$ emission that characterizes Of stars. We measure
723: its equivalent width to be $-1.4$ \AA. This is significantly weaker than the
724: -10 \AA\ usually taken as the cut-off between WNs and Ofs, and so we
725: call it an Of star. We note with some amusement that this star is located just
726: 5" to the north of the much brighter LBV candidate J013406.63+304147.8.
727:
728: The M33 star J013334.27+304136.7 is very close (1.7") to another known WNL star,
729: J013334.31+304138.3 (M33WR49=AM6). It is possible that the light from
730: latter contaminated our spectrum of the former, although the region around
731: He~II $\lambda 4686$ looks identical on both our blue exposure, taken with a
732: 3.1" diameter fiber, and red, taken with a 2.0" diameter fiber. It is also conceivable
733: that the cross-identification of M33WR49 with J013334.31+304138.3 is wrong,
734: and that the correct identification should have been with J013334.27+304136.7.
735: Future observations will have to resolve that issue.
736: The WNL star J013355.87+304528.4 (M33) is 7.4" from J013355.60+304534.9 (M33WR107=MJ B17), another WN star, but this separation is large enough so there
737: is likely to be no confusion.
738:
739:
740: {\subsubsection{J013307.50+304258.5=M33-WR19}
741: The star J013307.50+304258.5 was classified by Massey et al.\ (1996) as
742: WNE+B, where it was designated UIT041.
743: The star was recognized as being blue by Humphreys \& Sandage (1980),
744: where it is called ``B52". Massey \& Johnson (1998) repeat the WNE+B spectral
745: type and re-christen it as M33-WR19. It is quite bright, with a continuum magnitude
746: of $\sim 17.2$.
747:
748: Our blue spectrum of this star reveals a very flat-topped He~II $\lambda 4686$ and
749: no absorption lines present.
750: We rechecked the spectra used by Massey et al.\ (1996), and
751: found that the spectra of UIT041 and UIT177 were interchanged in their Fig.~6.
752: The classification ``WNE+B" really belongs to UIT 177
753: (M33-WR75 in Massey \& Johnson
754: 1998, or J013343.34+303534.1), which was also called ``WN4.5+O6-9" on the basis of a better spectrum.
755: The real classification of UIT041 (=J013307.50+304258.5=B 52=M33-WR19)
756: was never made.
757:
758: The spectrum we show in Fig.~\ref{fig:UIT} shows a
759: very broad He~II $\lambda 4686$ feature. The width (60 \AA) would suggest
760: it is an early-type WN, but the equivalent width of about -20\AA is quite weak
761: for a WNE; see Fig.~5 in Armandroff \& Massey (1991). The star is 1.5" to the west
762: of a bright late-type star (J013307.60+304259.0) which compromised our red
763: spectrum of the object.
764:
765:
766:
767:
768:
769:
770: \subsection{Supergiants in HII Regions}
771:
772: There are six stars which we observed whose presence in the H$\alpha$ list
773: is due to their lying in an HII region (as evidenced by [OIII]
774: $\lambda \lambda 4959, 5007$
775: [NII] $\lambda \lambda 6548, 6584$
776: and [S II] $\lambda \lambda 6717, 31$ emission) but whose blue spectra
777: reveal them to be interesting supergiants in their own right. We show their
778: spectra in Fig.~\ref{fig:nice}. In the top panel are two late-A or early-F type
779: supergiants. Such stars are very rare. In the bottom two panels we show the spectra
780: of four B supergiants, ranging from B1~I to B8~I: J013300.86+303504.9 (B1~I),
781: J013339.42+303124.8 (B3~I), J004434.65+412503.6 (B3~I), and J013359.01+303353.9 (B8~I).
782: We have identified the strongest lines, using
783: Coluzzi (1993) and Walborn \& Fitzpatrick (1990). Three of the stars
784: had been previously classified.
785: The star J004434.65+412503.6 was
786: classified as ``B1:" from spectra obtained in Paper~I; our spectrum here is
787: superior, and we adopt the B3~I type. J013300.86+303504.9 was called
788: B1.5~Ia+ by Massey et al.\ (1995), in essential agreement with the B1~I type assigned
789: here, which we prefer.
790: The star J013339.42+303124.8 was called B1~Ia by Massey et al.\ (1995),
791: but our current spectra shows it is somewhat later, and we adopt the B3~I type here.
792:
793:
794:
795:
796: \subsection{A Very Broad-lined H$\alpha$ Emission Object}
797:
798: As in any such survey, there are a few truly peculiar objects which are not easily categorized.
799: Our most interesting such object is J004057.03+405238.6,
800: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:bizzare}. We see very broad emission
801: at H$\beta$ (as well as at H$\gamma$ and H$\delta$, not shown). Are the two broad emission
802: to the redwards of H$\beta$ He~I $\lambda \lambda 4922, 5016$ or could they be
803: Fe II $\lambda \lambda 4924, 5018$? We lack a red spectrum of the star, and the rest of
804: the blue is too noisy to permit identification of weak lines.
805: The full width at half maximum of the H$\beta$ profile is
806: 20.5\AA, or nearly 1270 km s$^{-1}$. Such broad lines might be seen in WR stars, but there
807: is no He~II $\lambda 4686$. The heliocentric
808: radial velocity based on H$\beta$ is $-225$ km s$^{-1}$. However,
809: at its location at $X/R=-0.973$ (in the notation of Rubin \& Ford 1970)
810: we would expect a radial velocity of $-530$ km s$^{-1}$, significantly more negative.
811: The object might be part of M31's halo population and not partake of the disk's rotation.
812: Alternatively, the object might be variable in radial velocity. The broadness of the lines
813: is a bit reminiscent of those of SS 433 (Margon 1984), although without showing the
814: characteristic three components. Still, one is reminded of one of the early spectra of SS 433,
815: caught when all three components had similar velocities (Margon et al.\ 1979).
816: The object is coincident with a long-period variable 15043 with a 330 day period
817: (Mould et al.\ 2004), but does not appear to be an x-ray source. A similar object in M33
818: {\it may} be described by Neese et al.\ (1991). Whatever the object is, it is not one of
819: the familiar emission-line objects (LBVs, WRs) that we have so far discussed.
820:
821:
822:
823:
824: \section{Discussion}
825: \label{Sec-discuss}
826:
827: Clearly our survey has been very effective in identifying interesting objects.
828: Our spectroscopy has identified 12 new LBV candidates in M31 (excluding the
829: 3 previously suggested by King et al.\ 1998 that we re-observed here) and
830: 18 new LBV candidates in M33. This brings the number of known or suspected
831: LBVs to 24 in M31 and 37 in M33\footnote{Parker (1998) lists 4 known
832: and 5 candidate LBVs in M31, plus 4 known and 12 candidate LBVs in M33.
833: However, among the latter group, he lists two of the stars twice, under separate
834: names, not recognizing that Corral (1996)'s S193 is the same star as
835: Massey et al.\ (1996)'s UIT 301, and that Corral (1996)'s S95 is the same star
836: as Massey et al.\ (1996)'s UIT 212. The fact that Corral (1996) and Massey
837: et al.\ (1996) were published at about the same time meant that these works did
838: not cross-reference each other, resulting in some subsequent confusion.}.
839: In addition, our spectroscopy identified 3 possible LBVs in IC 10, and 1 in
840: NGC 6822; none had previously been reported in either galaxy. We list
841: the full list of known and candidate LBVs in Table~\ref{tab:LBVs}.
842:
843: To what extent are we certain that these newly found objects are truly LBVs?
844: In some cases, spectral and photometric variability may require decades---if
845: not centuries, or even millennia, to manifest itself. Still, it is worth recalling
846: that in this paper we found evidence of spectral variability for several of the
847: LBV candidates. In some cases this spectral variability is spectacular, as we
848: found for the (former) WR star AM2, whose spectrum now lacks either He~II or
849: N~III.
850:
851: We can also ask to what extent we know that these stars
852: vary photometrically. Answering that is somewhat more difficult than is
853: sometimes assumed, as many of the past photometric surveys, particularly
854: the photographic ones, have large magnitude-dependent errors associated
855: with them when compared to modern CCD data (see discussion in Paper~I).
856: For IC 10, we used some August 1992 CCD images obtained on the 4-m by
857: PM and GHJ and performed differential photometry of the LBV candidates relative to
858: nearby stars, which we calibrated using the IC 10 LGGS photometry from Paper II.
859: These data are previously unpublished, and were obtained as part of testing
860: ``T2KB", a (then) brand new 2048x2048 device with 24$\mu$m pixels. The seeing was
861: quite poor, about 2.0", which is why the data were not previously used. However, they do
862: suffice to check for variability of two of the IC 10 LBV candidates; the third was too crowded.
863: For M31 we compare the LGGS 2000-2001 $V$-band photometry of
864: Paper I with the CCD photometry of Magnier et al.\ (1992), obtained from images
865: taken in 1990.
866: For M33 we use the photographic photometry of Ivanov et al.\ (1993).
867: Some of the plates used in that study were obtained at the CFHT in the early
868: 1980s; the rest were from plates obtained from the Rozhen 2-m telescope
869: at an unspecified time. In Paper I we showed that the Magnier et al.\ (1992) data
870: agreed well, on average, with the LGGS data, while the Ivanov et al.\ (1993) data
871: agreed moderately well only for stars brighter than about $V=19$, fainter than which
872: the Ivanov et al.\ (1993) values are too bright compared to the LGGS data.
873:
874: We list the photometry and $\Delta V$ (in the sense of LGGS {\it minus} other) in
875: Table~\ref{tab:LBVs}. We see that the known LBVs show (absolute)
876: differences of 0.6~mag to 1.5~mag, with some exceptions (Magnier et al.\ 1992
877: did not include photometry of AE And, and Var~B shows only a $-0.19$ mag difference.)
878: In general, the (absolute) differences in the photometry of the LBV candidates is
879: smaller, but perhaps this just means that these stars are not variable {\it at present}:
880: after all, the archetypical P Cyg has shown little photometric variability over many
881: decades of monitoring; see Israelian \& de Groot (1999). Nevertheless, {\it some} of
882: the LBV {\it candidates} listed in Table~\ref{tab:LBVs} show quite significant variations,
883: of 0.6-1.3~mag. This includes some of the spectroscopically questionable LBV candidates, such as the
884: IC~10 star J002016.48+591906.9.
885:
886: We also checked to see which stars appear in the list of variables discovered by
887: the DIRECT project, using a merged list of stars kindly prepared by A. Bonanos,
888: and based upon the nine separate lists published by
889: Kaluzny et al.\ (1998, DIRECT I; 1999, DIRECT IV);
890: Stanek et al.\ (1998, DIRECT II; 1999, DIRECT III);
891: Mochejska et al.\ (1999, DIRECT V; 2001a, DIRECT VII; 2001b, DIRECT VIII);
892: Macri et al.\ (2001, DIRECT VI); and
893: Bonanos et al.\ (2003, DIRECT IX). Their fields do not cover all of M31 and M33,
894: so the lack of designation of a variable is not particularly telling, but several
895: of these stars are listed. Two of them are identified as Cepheids from their
896: light curves, which is not consistent with the spectra we show here. For M33
897: we also checked two additional resources: (1) the
898: updated version of the Hartman et al.\ (2006) variable list\footnote{http://www.astro.livjm.ac.uk/~dfb/M33/} and the
899: Wise Observatory M33 Variability study (Shporer \& Mazeh 2006)
900: \footnote{http://wise-obs.tau.ac.il/~shporer/m33/}. We are indebted to K. Stanek
901: for calling both of these
902: to our attention. These lists reveal several additional variables, the majority
903: of which turned out to be the Ofpe/WN9 stars! Such long-term monitoring programs as the DIRECT, Hartman et al.\ (2006), and the Wise Observatory project are quite valuable, and their continuation into the future
904: is quite useful.
905:
906: Our NGC 6822 LBV candidate is slightly too south to be included in the
907: photometry of Bianchi et al.\ (2001). However, the star was found to be
908: a low-amplitude, non-periodic variable in the $I$ band
909: by Mennickent et al.\ (2006).
910:
911: Only about 40\% of the sources we observed spectroscopically proved to
912: be interesting. It is not clear how the percentage will be affected going to
913: fainter limits. Of the non-interesting objects, most proved to be HII regions,
914: with a small smattering of stars without emission, principally in the two dwarf
915: galaxies.
916:
917: With our additional knowledge, could we further refine our selection criteria?
918: In Fig.~\ref{fig:winlose} we compare our selection criteria to the ``winners"
919: (LBVs, LBV candidates, and Ofpe/WN9 stars) and ``losers" (HII regions and
920: the occasional star with no emission). We see that there is no adjustment we
921: could have made in our selection criteria that would have favored the ``winners"
922: over the ``losers". Still, our approach has been one dimensional, and it is possible
923: that with the new data one could devise more effective selection criteria by
924: a multidimensional approach.
925:
926: It is worth noting that we cut off the selection of objects
927: for spectroscopic observation at about $B=19.5$;
928: fainter than this, we expected to obtain no useful spectroscopic data with
929: the WIYN telescope and Hydra. We obtained spectra
930: of 42 stars in M31 and 79 in M33 (Table~\ref{tab:newsp}),
931: but the complete catalogs (Tables~\ref{tab:m31} and \ref{tab:m33})
932: contain 307 and 820 stars, respectively, brighter than this limit.
933: Thus our spectroscopy, even at this magnitude limit, was only about 10\% complete.
934: We can therefore expect {\it many} more LBV candidates and other interesting objects
935: to be found, with potentially profound effects on the statistics of LBVs in nearby
936: galaxies. We expect that the actual number of LBVs, rather than being 4 each
937: in M31
938: and M33 (as the generally recognized LBVs number), is probably more on order
939: several hundred. This clearly has implications for the duration of the LBV phase.
940:
941: Throughout this paper we have taken the conservative approach of referring to
942: stars with spectroscopic similarities to known LBVs as LBV {\it candidates}.
943: In attempting to ``define" an LBV at the 1996 Kona meeting,
944: Bohannan (1997) argued that ``A star should not
945: be considered an LBV because its current spectroscopic character is similar to that of a known
946: LBV. Remember what is said about ducks: it may look like a duck, walk like a duck, but
947: it is not a duck until it quacks."
948: In this case, the ``quacking" involves photometric variability, or possibly an ``outburst".
949: In his ``redefinition" of an LBV at the same meeting,
950: Conti (1997b) concurred, arguing that an outburst is
951: needed to ``promote" a candidate to an LBV.
952: Here, we would make two points. First, many of the stars in this sample in fact do have
953: demonstrated photometric variability, and at a level comparable to the known LBVs, at least
954: over a twenty year time span. We leave it to others to decide if this variability is sufficient to
955: ``promote" any of these stars from ``candidate" status to true LBV. But, our more important
956: point is that we would argue that the ``requirement" of variability may be misguided. Major
957: outbursts may occur only on the time scales of centuries, or milleninum, and so we would argue
958: that the {\it lack} of variability should not preclude a star from being considered an LBV.
959: Perhaps instead spectral resemblance to known LBVs should be considered a sufficient criterion,
960: as what other objects have such spectra? In a raft of ducks, at any one time, some will be quacking and some will be not.
961: Momentary silence does not transform a duck into a goose, nor would it confuse most bird spotters.
962:
963:
964: \acknowledgments
965: We are grateful for correspondence with A. Bonanos, S. Kenyon, and K. Stanek.
966: We acknowledge the suggestion by N. King that we include the [SII] filter for use in
967: our study, and the excellent support received at Kitt Peak and Cerro Tololo where
968: the observations were made. N. Caldwell graciously donated three of his spectra
969: for this paper. D. Hunter kindly offered useful comments on an early version of this
970: manuscript. Comments from an anonymous referee improved the paper.
971: RTM's involvement in this project was supported through an NSF
972: grant, AST-0453611.
973:
974: \clearpage
975:
976:
977: \begin{references}
978: \reference {} Abbott, J. B., Crowther, P. A., Drissen, L, Dessart, L, Martin, P.,
979: \& Boivin, G. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 552
980: \reference {} Armandroff, T. E., \& Massey, P. 1985, ApJ, 291, 685
981: \reference {} Armandroff, T. E., \& Massey, P. 1991, AJ, 102, 927
982: \reference {} Bianchi, L., Scuderi, S., Massey, P., \& Romaniello, M. 2001,
983: AJ, 121, 2020
984: \reference {} Bohannan, B. 1989, in Physics of Luminous Blue Variables,
985: ed. K. Davidson, A. F. J. Moffat, \& H. J. G. L. M. Lamers (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 35
986: \reference {} Bohannan, B. 1997, in ASP Conf.\ Ser 120,Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars
987: in Transition, ed. A. Nota \& H. J. G. L. M. Lamers (San Francisco: ASP), 3
988: \reference {} Bohannan, B., \& Walborn, N. R 1989, PASP, 101, 520
989: \reference {} Bonanos, A. Z., Stanek, K. Z., Sasselov, D. D., Mochejska, B. J.,
990: Macri, L. M., \& Kaluzny, J. 2003, AJ, 126, 175 (DIRECT IX)
991: \reference {} Bresolin, F., Pietrzynski, G., Urbaneja, M. A., Gieren, W., Kudritzki, R.-P.,
992: Venn, K. A. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1007
993: \reference {} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245
994: \reference {} Coluzzi, R. 1993, Bull.\ Inf.\ Centre Donnees Stellaires, 43, 7, \\http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/htbin/Cat?VI/71
995: \reference {} Conti, P. S. 1997a, in ASP Conf.\ Ser. 120,
996: Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition,
997: ed A. Nota \& H. J. H. L. M. Lamers (San Francisco: ASP), 161
998: \reference {} Conti, P. S. 1997b, in ASP Conf.\ Ser. 120,
999: Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition,
1000: ed A. Nota \& H. J. H. L. M. Lamers (San Francisco: ASP), 387
1001: \reference {} Corral, L. J. 1996, AJ, 1450
1002: \reference {} Corral, L. J. \& Herrero, A., 2003, Rev. Mex. A\&A, (Serr. Conf.), 16, 265
1003: \reference {} Crowther, P. A., Drissen, L., Abbott, J. B., Royer, P., \& Smartt, S. J. 2003,
1004: A\&A, 404, 483
1005: \reference {} Crowther, P. A., Szeifert, T., Stahl, O., \& Zickgraf, F.-J. 1997, A\&A, 318, 543
1006: \reference {} Drissen, L., Moffat, A. F. J., \& Shara, M. M. 1993, AJ, 105, 1400
1007: \reference {} Hartman, J. D., Bersier, D., Stanek, K. Z., Beaulieu, J.-P.,
1008: Kaluzny, J.,
1009: Marquette, J.-B.,
1010: Stetson, P. B.,
1011: \&
1012: Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1405
1013: \reference {} Hubble, E., \& Sandage, A. 1953, ApJ, 118, 353
1014: \reference {} Humphreys, R. M. \& Davidson. K. 1994, PASP, 106, 1025
1015: \reference {} Humphreys, R. M., \& Sandage, A. 1980, ApJS, 44, 319
1016: \reference {} Israelian, G., \& de Groot, M. 1999, Space Sci.\ Rev., 90, 493
1017: \reference {} Ivanov, G. R., Freedman, W. L., \& Madore, B. F. 1993, ApJS, 89, 85
1018: \reference {} Kaluzny, J., Mochejska, B. J., Stanek, K. Z.,
1019: Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D., Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1999, AJ, 118, 346
1020: (DIRECT IV)
1021: \reference {} Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K. Z., Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D.,
1022: Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1998, AJ, 115, 1016 (DIRECT I)
1023: \reference {} Jacoby, G. 2000, NOAO CCD Mosaic Imager User Manual (Tucson: NOAO), \\ http://www.noao.edu/kpno/mosaic/manual/
1024: \reference {} Jacoby, G. H., Africano, John L., Quigley, Robert J. 1987, PASP, 99, 672
1025: \reference {} Kaluzny, J., Mochejska, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., Krockenberger, M.,
1026: Sasselov, D. D., Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1999, AJ, 118, 346 (DIRECT IV)
1027: \reference {} Kenyon, S. J., \& Gallagher, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 290, 542
1028: \reference {} King, N. L., Walterbos, R. A. M., \& Braun, R. 1998, ApJ, 507, 210
1029: \reference {} Maeder, A., Lequeux, J., \& Azzopardi, M. 1980, A\&A 90, L17
1030: \reference {} Magnier, E. A., Lewin, W. H. G., van Paradijs, J., Hasinger, G.,
1031: Jain, A., Pietsch, W., \& ruemper, J. 1992, A\&AS, 96, 379
1032: \reference {} Macri, L. M., Stanek, K. Z., Sasselov, D. D., Krockenberger, M., \& Kaluzny, J. 2001, AJ, 121, 870 (DIRECT VI)
1033: \reference {} Margon, B., 1984, ARA\&A, 22, 507
1034: \reference {} Margon, B., Ford, H. C., Katz, J. I., Kwitter, K. B., Ulrich, R. K., Stone, R. P. S., \& Klemola, A. 1979, ApJ, 230, L41
1035: \reference {} Massey, P. 1998, in Stellar Astrophysics for the Local Group, ed.\ A. Aparicio, A. Herrero, \& F. Sanchez
1036: (Cambridge, Cambridge Univ.\ Press), 95
1037: \reference {} Massey, P. 2000, PASP 112, 144
1038: \reference {} Massey, P. 2003, ARA\&A,41,15
1039: \reference {} Massey, P. 2006, ApJ, 638, L93
1040: \reference {} Massey, P., \& Armandroff, T. E. 1995, AJ, 109, 2470
1041: \reference {} Massey, P., Armandroff, T. E., \& Conti, P. S. 1986, AJ 92, 1303
1042: \reference {} Massey, P., Armandroff, T. E., Pyke, R., Patel, K., \& Wilson, C. D. 1995, AJ, 110, 2715
1043: \reference {} Massey, P., Bianchi L., Hutchings J. B., Stecher T. P., 1996, ApJ, 469, 629
1044: \reference {} Massey, P., \& Conti, P. S. 1983, ApJ 273, 576
1045: \reference {} Massey, P., \& Johnson, O. 1998, ApJ, 505, 793
1046: \reference {} Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge, P. W., Strong, S. B., Jacoby, G. H., Schlingman, W., \& Smith, R. C. 2006, AJ 131, 2478 (Paper I)
1047: \reference {} Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge, P. W., Jacoby, G. H., McNeill, R. T., Smith, R. C. \& Strong S. B. 2007, AJ, 133, 2393 (Paper II)
1048: \reference {} Massey, P., Waterhouse, E., DeGioia-Eastwood, K. 2000, AJ, 119, 2214
1049: \reference {} Mennickent, R. E., Gieren, W., Soszynski, I.,
1050: Pietrzynski, G. 2006, A\&A, 450, 873
1051: \reference {} Mochejska, B. J., Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K. Z.,
1052: Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D. 1999, AJ, 118, 2211 (DIRECT V)
1053: \reference {} Mochejska, B. J., Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K. Z., Sasselov, D. D.,
1054: \& Szentgyorgyi, A. H. 2001a, AJ, 121, 2032 (DIRECT VII)
1055: \reference {} Mochejska, B. J., Kaluzny, J., Stanek, K. Z., Sasselov, D. D.,
1056: \& Szentgyorgyi, A. H. 2001b, AJ, 122, 2477 (DIRECT VIII)
1057: \reference {} Monteverde, M. I., Herrero, A., Lennon, D. J., Kudritzki, R. P. 1996,
1058: A\&A, 312, 24
1059: \reference {} Mould, J., Saha, A., \& Hughes, S. 2004, ApJS, 154, 623
1060: \reference {} Neese, C. L., Armandroff, T. E., \& Massey, P. 1991, in Wolf-Rayet
1061: Stars and Interrelations with Other Massive Stars in Galaxies,
1062: IAU Symp.\ 143 (Dordrecht:
1063: Kluwer), 651
1064: \reference {} Oke, J. B. 1974, ApJS, 27, 21
1065: \reference {} Parker, J. W. 1997, in ASP Conf.\ Ser. 120,
1066: Luminous Blue Variables: Massive Stars in Transition,
1067: ed A. Nota \& H. J. H. L. M. Lamers (San Francisco: ASP), 368
1068: \reference {} Romano, G. 1978, A\&A, 67, 291
1069: \reference {} Rosino, L., \& Bianchini, A. 1973, A\&A, 22, 453
1070: \reference {} Rubin, V. C., \& Ford, W. K. 1970, ApJ, 159, 379
1071: \reference {} Shporer, A., \& Mazeh, T. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1429
1072: \reference {} Smith, L. J., Crowther, P. A., \& Willis, A. J. 1995, A\&A, 302, 830
1073: \reference {} Smith, N. 2007, in Mass Loss from Stars and the Evolution of
1074: Stellar Clusters, ed. A. de Koter, L. J. Smith, \& L. B. F. M. Waters (San Francisco: ASP), in press, astro-ph/0609422
1075: \reference {} Smith, N., \& Owocki, S. P. 2006, ApJ, 645, L45
1076: \reference {} Stahl, O., Wolf, B., Glare, G., Cassatella, A., Krautter, J., Persi, P., \& Ferrari-Toniolo, M. 1983, A\&A, 127, 49
1077: \reference {} Stanek, K. Z., Kaluzny, J., Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D.,
1078: Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1998, AJ, 115, 1894 (DIRECT II)
1079: \reference {} Stanek, K. Z., Kaluzny, J., Krockenberger, M., Sasselov, D. D.,
1080: Tonry, J. L., \& Mateo, M. 1999, AJ, 117 (DIRECT III)
1081: \reference {} Szeifert, Th., Humphreys, R. M., Davidson, K., Jones, T. J., Stahl, O., Wolf, B.,
1082: \& Zickgraf, F.-J., 1996, A\&A, 314, 131
1083: \reference {} van den Bergh, S. 2000, The Galaxies of the Local Group (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
1084: \reference {} Viotti, R. F., Galleti, S., Gualandi, R., Montagni, F., Polcaro, V. F.,
1085: Rossi, C., \& Norci, L. 2007, A\&A, 464, L53
1086: \reference {} Walborn, N. R. 1977, ApJ, 215, 53
1087: \reference {} Walborn, N. R., \& Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1990, PASP, 102, 379
1088: \reference {} Westerlund, B. E., Azzopardi, M., Breysacher, J., \& Lequeux, J. 1983, A\&A, 123, 159
1089: \reference {} Willis, A. J., Schild, H., \& Smith, L. J. 1992, A\&A, 261, 419
1090: \reference {} Wolf, B., \& Kaufer, A. 1997, in Luminous Blue Variables, ASP Conf.~Ser.~120,
1091: ed. Nota, A., \& Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (San Francisco, ASP), 26
1092: \reference {} Zickgraf, F.-J., Wolf, B., Stahl, O., Leitherer, C., \& Klare, G. 1985, A\&A 143, 421
1093:
1094:
1095: \end{references}
1096: \clearpage
1097:
1098: \begin{figure}
1099: %\epsscale{0.30}
1100: %\plotone{m31figa.eps}
1101: %\plotone{m31figc.eps}
1102: %\plotone{m31figd.eps}
1103: %\plotone{m31fige.eps}
1104: %\plotone{m31figf.eps}
1105: %\plotone{m31figg.eps}
1106: \plotone{f1alt3.eps}
1107: \vskip -200pt
1108: \caption{\label{fig:m31cuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to M31.
1109: Red points denote the
1110: previously known LBVs and LBV candidates, while blue and green points denote
1111: WRs of WN- and WC-type, respectively.
1112: (a) We demonstrate that the errors in the H$\alpha$ fluxes begin to increase
1113: past a (spectrophotometric) magnitude of $\sim$ 20th. Imposing 20th mag
1114: as a cutoff keeps all of the LBVs but only the brightest of
1115: the WRs. (b) Rejecting the stars that show little or no H$\alpha$ emission is done
1116: by eliminating stars with H$\alpha$-[S II]$\geq-0.15$. (c) We attempt to eliminate HII regions and PNe by requiring little [O III] emission, i.e., [OIII]-C$\geq -0.75$. (d) Our sample is still dominated by red foreground stars, which we eliminate by $B-V<1.2$. (e) Finally, in order to keep stars which are only intrinsically quite blue, we impose a cutoff $Q\leq -0.4$, where $Q=(U-B)-0.72(B-V)$, the Johnson reddening-free index. (f) Our final
1117: sample contains 2,334 stars. }
1118: \end{figure}
1119:
1120: \begin{figure}
1121: %\epsscale{0.30}
1122: %\plotone{m33figa.eps}
1123: %\plotone{m33figc.eps}
1124: %\plotone{m33figd.eps}
1125: %\plotone{m33fige.eps}
1126: %\plotone{m33figf.eps}
1127: %\plotone{m33figg.eps}
1128: \plotone{f2alt3.eps}
1129: \vskip -200pt
1130: \caption{\label{fig:M33cuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to M33.
1131: Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except (f) our final sample contains 3,707 stars.
1132: }
1133: \end{figure}
1134:
1135: \begin{figure}
1136: %\epsscale{0.30}
1137: %\plotone{ic10figa.eps}
1138: %\plotone{ic10figc.eps}
1139: %\plotone{ic10figd.eps}
1140: %\plotone{ic10fige.eps}
1141: %\plotone{ic10figf.eps}
1142: %\plotone{ic10figg.eps}
1143: \plotone{f3alt3.eps}
1144: \vskip -200pt
1145: \caption{\label{fig:ic10cuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to IC10. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known LBVs, and (f) our final sample contains 81 stars. }
1146: \end{figure}
1147:
1148: \begin{figure}
1149: %\epsscale{0.30}
1150: %\plotone{n6822figa.eps}
1151: %\plotone{n6822figc.eps}
1152: %\plotone{n6822figd.eps}
1153: %\plotone{n6822fige.eps}
1154: %\plotone{n6822figf.eps}
1155: %\plotone{n6822figg.eps}
1156: \plotone{f4alt3.eps}
1157: \vskip -200pt
1158: \caption{\label{fig:n6822cuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to NGC 6822. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known LBVs or WCs, and (f) our final sample contains 163 stars.}
1159: \end{figure}
1160:
1161: \begin{figure}
1162: %\epsscale{0.30}
1163: %\plotone{wlmfiga.eps}
1164: %\plotone{wlmfigc.eps}
1165: %\plotone{wlmfigd.eps}
1166: %\plotone{wlmfige.eps}
1167: %\plotone{wlmfigf.eps}
1168: %\plotone{wlmfigg.eps}
1169: \plotone{f5.eps}
1170: \vskip -200pt
1171: \caption{\label{fig:wlmcuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to WLM. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known
1172: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, and (f) our final sample contains 15 stars.}
1173: \end{figure}
1174:
1175: \begin{figure}
1176: %\epsscale{0.30}
1177: %\plotone{sexBfiga.eps}
1178: %\plotone{sexBfigc.eps}
1179: %\plotone{sexBfigd.eps}
1180: %\plotone{sexBfige.eps}
1181: %\plotone{sexBfigf.eps}
1182: %\plotone{sexBfigg.eps}
1183: \plotone{f6.eps}
1184: \vskip -200pt
1185: \caption{\label{fig:sexBcuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to Sextans B. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known
1186: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, and (f) our final sample contains 2 stars.}
1187: \end{figure}
1188:
1189: \begin{figure}
1190: %\epsscale{0.30}
1191: %\plotone{sexAfiga.eps}
1192: %\plotone{sexAfigc.eps}
1193: %\plotone{sexAfigd.eps}
1194: %\plotone{sexAfige.eps}
1195: %\plotone{sexAfigf.eps}
1196: %\plotone{sexAfigg.eps}
1197: \plotone{f7.eps}
1198: \vskip -200pt
1199: \caption{\label{fig:sexAcuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to Sextans A. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known
1200: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, and (f) our final sample contains 8 stars.}
1201: \end{figure}
1202:
1203: \begin{figure}
1204: %\epsscale{0.30}
1205: %\plotone{pegfiga.eps}
1206: %\plotone{pegfigc.eps}
1207: %\plotone{pegfigd.eps}
1208: %\plotone{pegfige.eps}
1209: %\plotone{pegfigf.eps}
1210: %\plotone{pegfigg.eps}
1211: \plotone{f8.eps}
1212: \vskip -200pt
1213: \caption{\label{fig:pegcuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to Pegasus. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known
1214: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, and (f) our final sample contains 1 star.}
1215: \end{figure}
1216:
1217:
1218: \begin{figure}
1219: %\epsscale{0.30}
1220: %\plotone{phxfiga.eps}
1221: %\plotone{phxfigc.eps}
1222: %\plotone{phxfigd.eps}
1223: %\plotone{phxfige.eps}
1224: %\plotone{phxfigf.eps}
1225: \plotone{f9.eps}
1226: \vskip -200pt
1227: \caption{\label{fig:phxcuts} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars applied to Phoenix. Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:m31cuts}, except that there are no previously known
1228: H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars, and our final sample sadly contains no stars.}
1229: \end{figure}
1230:
1231: \clearpage
1232: \begin{figure}
1233: \epsscale{1.0}
1234: %\plotone{lbv1.eps}
1235: \plotone{f10.eps}
1236: \caption{\label{fig:lbv1} Spectra of known ``hot" LBVs with [FeII] emission. We show spectra of Var C (M33), Var 15 (M31), and Var A-1 (M31)
1237: in their ``quiescent" state, where the spectra are dominated by emission of the Balmer lines, He I, and forbidden Fe II. We have identified
1238: only the strongest lines; the wavelengths of the other emission features correspond to [Fe II]
1239: lines listed by Kenyon \& Gallagher (1985) for AE And (their Table 3).
1240: }
1241: \end{figure}
1242:
1243:
1244: \clearpage
1245: \begin{figure}
1246: \epsscale{0.8}
1247: %\plotone{AEnow.eps}
1248: \plotone{f11.eps}
1249: \caption{\label{fig:AEnow} Spectrum of AE And in September 2006. In the 1983
1250: spectrum shown by Kenyon \& Gallagher (1985) many of the
1251: [FeII] lines were significantly stronger than that of H$\beta$. In our rather noisy
1252: spectrum we see only H$\beta$ emission, as a P Cygni line superposed on
1253: broad emission.
1254: }
1255: \end{figure}
1256:
1257: \clearpage
1258: \begin{figure}
1259: \epsscale{0.8}
1260: %\plotone{hotstrong.eps}
1261: %\plotone{hotweak.eps}
1262: \plotone{f12a.eps}
1263: \plotone{f12b.eps}
1264: \caption{\label{fig:lbvhot} Spectra of newly found M31 and M33
1265: hot LBV candidates compared to Var A-1.
1266: At top we show the stars whose spectra have strong [Fe II], while at bottom
1267: we show stars which have relatively weak [Fe II] and Fe II lines. For line identifications see
1268: Fig.~\ref{fig:lbv1}. All the spectra were obtained in September 2006, except for that of J004442.28+415823.1, which was obtained by N. Caldwell in November 2006. The star J004417.10+411928.0
1269: was previously identified as an LBV candidate (k350) by King et al.\ (1998).
1270: }
1271: \end{figure}
1272:
1273: \clearpage
1274: \begin{figure}
1275: \epsscale{0.8}
1276: %\plotone{nelson.eps}
1277: %\plotone{nelsonnew.eps}
1278: \plotone{f13a.eps}
1279: \plotone{f13b.eps}
1280: \caption{\label{fig:nelson} Two peculiar hot LBV candidates.
1281: The spectrum of the M31 star J004229.87+410551.8 (top)
1282: shows [Fe II] and Balmer emission, but also an absorption spectrum
1283: characteristic of a mid-F star or later. The spectrum may be composite.
1284: The spectrum of the M31 star J004322.50+413940.9 (bottom) shows
1285: P Cygni emission in the lower Balmer lines plus several lines of Fe II.
1286: The spectra were
1287: obtained by N. Caldwell in November 2006.
1288: }
1289: \end{figure}
1290:
1291: \clearpage
1292: \begin{figure}
1293: \epsscale{0.8}
1294: %\plotone{hotmaybe.eps}
1295: \plotone{f14.eps}
1296: \caption{\label{fig:hotmaybe} Spectra of newly found additional hot LBV candidates compared to Var A-1. These stars show Balmer and some He I emission,
1297: but any [FeII] emission is incipient at best. The M31
1298: star (J004411.36+413257.2) was previously identified by King et al.\ (1998) as an LBV
1299: candidate (k315a) based upon its spectrum.}
1300: \end{figure}
1301:
1302: \clearpage
1303: \begin{figure}
1304: \epsscale{0.6}
1305: %\plotone{hotmore1.eps}
1306: %\plotone{hotmore2.eps}
1307: %\plotone{am2.eps}
1308: \plotone{f15a.eps}
1309: \plotone{f15b.eps}
1310: \plotone{f15c.eps}
1311: \caption{\label{fig:am2} Spectra of the M33 star
1312: J013332.64+304127.2 (AM2 from Armandroff \& Massey 1985, also known
1313: to Simbad as [MC83] 28),
1314: formerly
1315: a WN star and now an LBV candidate.
1316: {\it Top and middle:} Currently this star show Balmer, He I emission, and numerous metal lines
1317: of Fe~I and Fe~II. {\it Bottom:} In 1982, however, its spectrum was that of a WN-type
1318: Wolf-Rayet star.}
1319: \end{figure}
1320:
1321: \clearpage
1322: \begin{figure}
1323: \epsscale{0.8}
1324: %\plotone{ic10A.eps}
1325: \plotone{f16.eps}
1326: \caption{\label{fig:ic10} Spectra of two hot LBV candidates in IC10.
1327: The stars show He~I and Balmer emission. Note that the absorption feature
1328: to the red of He~I $\lambda 5876$ is due to Na D interstellar line. }
1329: \end{figure}
1330:
1331: \clearpage
1332: \begin{figure}
1333: \epsscale{0.6}
1334: %\plotone{ic10B.eps}
1335: %\plotone{n6822.eps}
1336: %\plotone{J013442.eps}
1337: \plotone{f17a.eps}
1338: \plotone{f17b.eps}
1339: \plotone{f17c.eps}
1340: \caption{\label{fig:n6822} Spectra of three questionable LBV candidates.
1341: These stars show H$\alpha$ and
1342: H$\beta$ emission but none of the forbidden lines we would expect of an HII region.
1343: Incomplete night-sky (NS), NaI D interstellar (IS), and the atmospheric B band (Atm)
1344: are the only other features visible in the IC 10 spectrum at top. }
1345: \end{figure}
1346:
1347: \clearpage
1348: \begin{figure}
1349: \epsscale{0.8}
1350: %\plotone{cool1.eps}
1351: \plotone{f18.eps}
1352: \caption{\label{fig:lbv2} Spectra of LBVs in their cool state. {\it Top:} We show the spectrum of the M33 LBV Var B obtained
1353: in December 1993 (during its 1992-1993 outburst) to that of a spectrum of
1354: the LMC LBV S Doradus obtained in October 1996. The absorption line spectra
1355: resemble that of an extreme late-type F-type supergiant, with numerous metal absorption lines.
1356: This figure is based on Fig.~1 of Massey (2000).
1357: }
1358: \end{figure}
1359:
1360:
1361:
1362:
1363: \clearpage
1364: \begin{figure}
1365: \epsscale{0.8}
1366: %\plotone{cool2.eps}
1367: %\plotone{cool3.eps}
1368: \plotone{f19a.eps}
1369: \plotone{f19b.eps}
1370: \caption{\label{fig:coolguys} Blue absorption
1371: spectra of newly found LBVs in their cool state. In the top panel,
1372: we compare the spectrum of the M33 LBV
1373: Var B during outburst to that of the M31 star
1374: J004507.65+413740.8. We
1375: have identified some of the prominent lines in J004507.65+413740.8 using the very useful line
1376: list given by Coluzzi (1993). In the bottom panel, we show the spectra of J004507.65+413740.8
1377: compared to those of the other 5 newly found ``cool" LBV candidates in M31 and
1378: M33, with the spectra
1379: scaled to emphasize the absorption components. The star J004425.18+413452.2 was previously described as an LBV candidate (k411) by King et al.\ (1998).
1380: See also Fig.~\ref{fig:coolprofiles}.}
1381: \end{figure}
1382:
1383: \clearpage
1384: \begin{figure}
1385: \epsscale{0.8}
1386: %\plotone{coolhbeta.eps}
1387: %\plotone{coolhalpha.eps}
1388: \plotone{f20a.eps}
1389: \plotone{f20b.eps}
1390: \caption{\label{fig:coolprofiles} Emission spectra of newly found LBVs in their cool state. Here
1391: we show the H$\beta$ profiles (top) and H$\alpha$ profiles (bottom) of our
1392: ``cool" LBV candidates. See also Fig.~\ref{fig:coolguys}.
1393: }
1394: \end{figure}
1395:
1396: \clearpage
1397: \begin{figure}
1398: \epsscale{1.0}
1399: %\plotone{varb.eps}
1400: \plotone{f21.eps}
1401: \caption{\label{fig:varb} Changes in the spectra of the M33 LBV Var B. We show the spectrum of Var B obtained
1402: in December 1993 (during its 1992-1993 outburst) to that obtained in September 2006.}
1403: \end{figure}
1404:
1405: \clearpage
1406: \begin{figure}
1407: \epsscale{0.8}
1408: %\plotone{weird1.eps}
1409: %\plotone{weird2.eps}
1410: \plotone{f22a.eps}
1411: \plotone{f22b.eps}
1412: \caption{\label{fig:weird} Two possible additional cool LBV candidates.
1413: These two stars show B8 I absorption spectra, with H$\beta$ and H$\alpha$ emission.
1414: Both the H$\beta$ and H$\alpha$ profiles show a very broad component with a narrow
1415: component superposed.}
1416: \end{figure}
1417:
1418: \clearpage
1419: \begin{figure}
1420: \epsscale{1.0}
1421: %\plotone{pcyg.eps}
1422: \plotone{f23.eps}
1423: \caption{\label{fig:pcyg} Spectra of P Cygni LBVs. The upper spectrum is of AF And,
1424: an LBV in M31. The middle spectrum shows the spectrum of P Cyg itself. The bottom
1425: spectrum is of the star J00341.84+411112.0, an LBV candidate in M31 (Massey 2006).
1426: Prominent lines are labeled.
1427: }
1428: \end{figure}
1429:
1430: \clearpage
1431: \begin{figure}
1432: \epsscale{0.48}
1433: %\plotone{J004242.eps}
1434: %\plotone{J004444.eps}
1435: %\plotone{J013339.eps}
1436: %\plotone{J013341.eps}
1437: %\plotone{J013351.eps}
1438: %\plotone{J013416alt.eps}
1439: \plotone{f24a.eps}
1440: \plotone{f24b.eps}
1441: \plotone{f24c.eps}
1442: \plotone{f24d.eps}
1443: \plotone{f24e.eps}
1444: \plotone{f24f.eps}
1445: \caption{\label{fig:pcygs} Spectra of P Cygni type LBV candidates in M31 and M33. We compare the blue
1446: spectra of 6 more LBV candidates to that of P Cygni. For line identifications see Fig.~\ref{fig:pcyg}. The star J013416.07+303642.1 was also described as an LBV candidate
1447: by Corral (1996), who called it H 108.}
1448: \end{figure}
1449:
1450: \clearpage
1451: \begin{figure}
1452: \epsscale{0.8}
1453: %\plotone{pcygprob1.eps}
1454: \plotone{f25.eps}
1455: \caption{\label{fig:pcygprob1} Spectrum of the M33 star
1456: J013339.52+304540.5 in 1993 and 2006.
1457: Emission in the Balmer lines has strengthened, and the broad He~II $\lambda 4686$
1458: feature in the 1993 spectrum has disappeared.
1459: }
1460: \end{figure}
1461:
1462: \clearpage
1463: \begin{figure}
1464: \epsscale{0.8}
1465: %\plotone{ofpe1.eps}
1466: %\plotone{ofpe2.eps}
1467: \plotone{f26a.eps}
1468: \plotone{f26b.eps}
1469: \caption{\label{fig:ofpe} Spectrum of two newly discovered Ofpe/WN9 stars in M33
1470: (top) and M33 (bottom).
1471: For each star, we compare the spectra to the LMC star
1472: BE 381, one of original Ofpe/WN9s
1473: (Bohannan \& Walborn 1989). The star J013509.73+30417.3 is
1474: also known as Romano's Star, an LBV candidate recently found independently
1475: to be in an Ofpe/WN9 state by Viotti et al.\ (2007).
1476: }
1477: \end{figure}
1478:
1479: \clearpage
1480: \begin{figure}
1481: \epsscale{0.8}
1482: %\plotone{ofpe3.eps}
1483: %\plotone{ofpe4.eps}
1484: \plotone{f27a.eps}
1485: \plotone{f27b.eps}
1486: \caption{\label{fig:ofpeRED} Red spectrum of an additional Ofpe/WN9 star in M33.
1487: Here we compare the spectrum of J013432.76+304717.2 to that of J013509.73+304157.3. The blue spectrum of the latter is shown in Fig~\ref{fig:ofpe}.
1488: }
1489: \end{figure}
1490:
1491:
1492:
1493: \clearpage
1494: \begin{figure}
1495: \epsscale{0.8}
1496: %\plotone{wr1.eps}
1497: \plotone{f28.eps}
1498: \caption{\label{fig:wrguys} Spectra of other newly found WR stars in M31 and M33. We classify all of
1499: these as WNL except for J004500.90+413100.7, which is a WC.
1500: }
1501: \end{figure}
1502:
1503: \clearpage
1504: \begin{figure}
1505: \epsscale{0.8}
1506: %\plotone{UITblue.eps}
1507: \plotone{f29.eps}
1508: \caption{\label{fig:UIT} Spectrum of the M33 star
1509: J013307.50+304258.5. This is a previously
1510: recognized WR star, but one which was not properly classified until now. }
1511: \end{figure}
1512:
1513:
1514:
1515: \clearpage
1516: \begin{figure}
1517: \epsscale{0.6}
1518: %\plotone{nice1.eps}
1519: %\plotone{nice2.eps}
1520: %\plotone{nice3.eps}
1521: \plotone{f30a.eps}
1522: \plotone{f30b.eps}
1523: \plotone{f30c.eps}
1524: \caption{\label{fig:nice} Spectra of supergiants found in HII regions in M31 and M33. In the upper
1525: panel we show the spectra of two A/F supergiants. We estimate the spectral types
1526: to be late A or early F. In the middle panel we show
1527: the spectra of two B-type supergiants. The spectral types are B3~I (J004434.65+412503.6) and B8~I (J013359.01+303353.9). In the bottom panel we show
1528: the spectra of two more B-type supergiants. The spectral types are B3~I
1529: (J013339.42+303124.8) and B1~I
1530: (J013300.86+303504.8).}
1531: \end{figure}
1532:
1533: \clearpage
1534: \begin{figure}
1535: \epsscale{0.8}
1536: %\plotone{bizarre.eps}
1537: \plotone{f31.eps}
1538: \caption{\label{fig:bizzare} Spectra of an unusual emission-line source in M31.}
1539: \end{figure}
1540: \clearpage
1541:
1542: \begin{figure}
1543: %\epsscale{0.30}
1544: %\plotone{winfigc.eps}
1545: %\plotone{winfigd.eps}
1546: %\plotone{winfige.eps}
1547: %\plotone{winfigf.eps}
1548: \plotone{f32.eps}
1549: \vskip -100pt
1550: \caption{\label{fig:winlose} Selection criteria for H$\alpha$ emission-lined stars compared to ``winners" (red dots) and ``losers" (black +). The ``winners" included the
1551: previously known and newly found LBVs, LBV candidates, and Ofpe/WN9 stars.
1552: The ``losers" include HII regions and stars with no emission.}
1553: \end{figure}
1554:
1555:
1556: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c l l l l l l l l l}
1557: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1558: \tablewidth{0pc}
1559: \tablenum{1}
1560: \tablecolumns{12}
1561: \tablecaption{\label{tab:journal}Mosaic Observations}
1562: \tablehead{
1563: \colhead{Field}
1564: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1565: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1566: &\colhead{Obs.}
1567: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$H\alpha$\tablenotemark{a}}
1568: & \colhead{}
1569: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{[SII]\tablenotemark{a}}
1570: & \colhead{}
1571: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{[OIII]\tablenotemark{a}}
1572: \\ \cline{5-6} \cline{8-9} \cline{11-12}
1573: \colhead{} & & & & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{DIQ(")} && \colhead{Date} & \colhead{DIQ(")} && \colhead{Date} & \colhead{DIQ(")}
1574: }
1575: \startdata
1576: M31-F1 & 00 47 02.4 &+42 18 02 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 17 & 1.3 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.1 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.2 \\
1577: M31-F2 & 00 46 06.5 &+42 03 28 &KPNO& 2000 Oct 5 & 0.9 && 2000 Oct 5 & 1.0 && 2000 Oct 5 & 1.1 \\
1578: M31-F3 & 00 45 10.6 &+41 48 54 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 17 & 1.4 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.5 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.5 \\
1579: M31-F4 & 00 44 14.7 &+41 34 20 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 17 & 1.2 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.2 && 2001 Sep 17 & 1.3 \\
1580: M31-F5 & 00 43 18.8 &+41 19 46 &KPNO& 2002 Sep 12 & 1.0 && 2002 Sep 12 & 1.3 && 2002 Sep 12 & 1.2 \\
1581: M31-F6 & 00 42 22.9 &+41 05 12 &KPNO& 2002 Sep 12 & 0.9 && 2002 Sep 12 & 0.9 && 2002 Sep 12 & 1.1 \\
1582: M31-F7 & 00 41 27.0 &+40 50 38 &KPNO& 2002 Sep 9 & 0.9 && 2002 Sep 9 & 0.8 && 2002 Sep 9 & 0.9 \\
1583: M31-F8 & 00 40 31.1 &+40 36 04 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 19 & 1.3 && 2001 Sep 19 & 1.1 && 2001 Sep 19 & 1.1 \\
1584: M31-F9 & 00 39 35.2 &+40 21 30 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 20 & 1.2 && 2001 Sep 20 & 1.0 && 2001 Sep 20 & 1.0 \\
1585: M31-F10 & 00 38 39.3 &+40 06 56 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 21 & 1.1 && 2001 Sep 21 & 1.3 && 2001 Sep 12 & 1.2 \\
1586: M33-North & 01 34 00.1& +30 55 37 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 18 & 0.9 && 2001 Sep 18 & 0.9 && 2001 Sep 18 & 1.0 \\
1587: M33-Center & 01 33 50.9 &+30 39 37 &KPNO& 2000 Oct 5 & 1.0 && 2000 Oct 5 & 1.1 && 2000 Oct 5 & 1.1 \\
1588: M33-South & 01 33 11.3 &+30 22 10 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 18 & 0.9 && 2001 Sep 20 & 1.1 && 2001 Sep 21 & 1.1 \\
1589: IC10\tablenotemark{b} & 00 20 24.5 &+59 17 30 &KPNO& 2001 Sep 22 & 0.9 &&2001 Sep 22 & 0.9 && 2001 Sep 22 &1.0 \\
1590: NGC 6822 & 19 44 56.1 &$-$14 48 05 &CTIO& 2000 Sep 2 & 0.9 &&2000 Sep 2 & 1.0 && 2000 Sep 2\tablenotemark{c} & 1.0 \\
1591: WLM & 00 01 57.9 &$-$15 27 51 &CTIO& 2000 Sep 2 & 0.9 &&2000 Sep 2 & 0.9 && 2000 Sep 2 & 1.0 \\
1592: Sextans B\tablenotemark{b}& 10 00 00.1 &+05 19 56 &KPNO& 2001 Feb 27& 1.2 &&2001Feb 27 & 1.5 && 2001 Feb 27 & 1.4 \\
1593: Sextans A\tablenotemark{b}& 10 11 00.8 &$-$04 41 34 &KPNO& 2001 Feb 27& 1.3 &&2001Feb 27 & 1.1 && 2001 Feb 27 & 1.2 \\
1594: Pegasus\tablenotemark{b} & 23 28 36.2 &+14 44 35 &KPNO& 2000 Oct 5 & 1.4 &&2000 Oct 5 & 1.4 && 2000 Oct 5 & 1.5 \\
1595: Phoenix & 01 51 06.3 &$-$44 26 41 &CTIO& 2000 Sep 2 &0.8 &&2000 Sep 2 & 0.9 && 2000 Sep 2 & 1.0 \\
1596: \enddata
1597: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes,
1598: and seconds, and units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and
1599: arcseconds.}
1600: \tablenotetext{a}{Series of 5 dithered 300s, unless otherwise noted.}
1601: \tablenotetext{b}{Field was offset 540" south and 270" west in order to
1602: center on chip ``imt2" (Jacoby 2000).}
1603: \tablenotetext{c}{Series of 5 dithered 360s exposures.}
1604: \end{deluxetable}
1605:
1606: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r l}
1607: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1608: \tablewidth{0pc}
1609: \tablenum{2}
1610: \tablecolumns{8}
1611: \tablecaption{\label{tab:calib} Adopted Calibration\tablenotemark{a} }
1612: \tablehead{
1613: &\multicolumn{3}{c}{Continuum Source}
1614: &&\multicolumn{3}{c}{Emission-line Source}\\ \cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
1615: \colhead{Observatory}
1616: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1617: &\colhead{[SII]}
1618: &\colhead{[OIII]}
1619: &&\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1620: &\colhead{[SII]}
1621: &\colhead{[OIII]}
1622: }
1623: \startdata
1624: KPNO &$2.14\times 10^{-18}$ &$2.21\times 10^{-18}$ &$6.41\times 10^{-18}$ &&$1.79\times 10^{-16}$ &$1.84\times 10^{-16}$ &$3.92\times 10^{-16}$\\
1625: CTIO &$2.18\times 10^{-18}$ &$2.02\times 10^{-18}$ &$5.11\times 10^{-18}$ &&$1.80\times 10^{-16}$ &$1.71\times 10^{-16}$ &$2.75\times 10^{-16}$\\
1626: \enddata
1627: \tablenotetext{a}{These numbers are the equivalent of 1 count s$^{-1}$ in units of
1628: ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$ for a point source measured with a 15-pixel radius aperture.}
1629: \end{deluxetable}
1630:
1631:
1632:
1633: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r}
1634: \rotate
1635: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1636: \tablewidth{0pc}
1637: \tablenum{3}
1638: \tablecolumns{20}
1639: \tablecaption{\label{tab:errors}Photometric Errors}
1640: \tablehead{
1641: \colhead{}
1642: &\multicolumn{9}{c}{H$\alpha$, [SII]}
1643: &\colhead{}
1644: &\multicolumn{9}{c}{OIII} \\ \cline{2-10} \cline{12-20}
1645: \colhead{Mag}
1646: &\colhead{M31}
1647: &\colhead{M33}
1648: &\colhead{IC10}
1649: &\colhead{N6822}
1650: &\colhead{WLM}
1651: &\colhead{Sex B}
1652: &\colhead{Sex A}
1653: &\colhead{Pegasus}
1654: &\colhead{Phoenix}
1655: &\colhead{}
1656: &\colhead{M31}
1657: &\colhead{M33}
1658: &\colhead{IC10}
1659: &\colhead{N6822}
1660: &\colhead{WLM}
1661: &\colhead{Sex B}
1662: &\colhead{Sex A}
1663: &\colhead{Pegasus}
1664: &\colhead{Phoenix}
1665: }
1666: \startdata
1667: 15 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & \nodata & 0.00
1668: && 0.00 & 0.00& 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1669: 16 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00
1670: && 0.00 & 0.00& 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00\\
1671: 17 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00
1672: && 0.00 & 0.00& 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00\\
1673: 18 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 0.00
1674: && 0.00 & 0.01& 0.00 & 0.01& 0.01 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 0.01\\
1675: 19 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01
1676: && 0.01 & 0.01& 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01 & 0.01\\
1677: 20 & 0.04 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02
1678: && 0.02 & 0.02& 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.03 & 0.02\\
1679: 21 & 0.08 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 0.06 & 0.05 & 0.04 & 0.04 & 0.06 & 0.03
1680: && 0.05 & 0.05& 0.04 & 0.06 & 0.06 & 0.04 & 0.04 & 0.07 & 0.05\\
1681: 22 & 0.12 & 0.11 & 0.12 & 0.12 & 0.10 & 0.10 & 0.09 & 0.14 & 0.07
1682: && 0.10 & 0.10 & 0.10 & 0.12 & 0.12 & 0.08 & 0.07 & 0.13 & 0.10 \\
1683: \enddata
1684: \tablecomments{Median error (mags) for stars within 0.5~mag of the stated value; i.e., 14.5-15.5
1685: for the first row.}
1686: \end{deluxetable}
1687:
1688: \begin{deluxetable}{l r}
1689: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1690: \tablewidth{0pc}
1691: \tablenum{4}
1692: \tablecolumns{2}
1693: \tablecaption{\label{tab:cuts} Selection Criteria}
1694: \tablehead{
1695: \colhead{Index}
1696: &\colhead{Used}
1697: }
1698: \startdata
1699: H$\alpha$ & $\leq 20.0$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1700: H$\alpha-$[SII] & $\leq -0.15$ \\
1701: \[[OIII]-C & $\geq -0.75$ \\
1702: $B-V$ & $\leq 1.2$\tablenotemark{b}\\
1703: $Q$ & $\leq 0.4$\tablenotemark{c} \\
1704: \enddata
1705: \tablenotetext{a}{For IC10, $\leq 20.2$.}
1706: \tablenotetext{b}{For IC10, $\leq 1.5$.}
1707: \tablenotetext{c}{For IC10, stars without $U-B$ were also retained.}
1708: \end{deluxetable}
1709:
1710:
1711: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c}
1712: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1713: \tablewidth{0pc}
1714: \tablenum{5}
1715: \tablecolumns{5}
1716: \tablecaption{\label{tab:galaxies}Adopted Distances and Reddenings}
1717: \tablehead{
1718: \colhead{Galaxy}
1719: &\colhead{$(m-M)_0$\tablenotemark{a}}
1720: &\colhead{$E(B-V)$\tablenotemark{b}}
1721: &\colhead{$(m-M)_{H\alpha}$\tablenotemark{c}}
1722: &\colhead{$M_{H\alpha}=-6$}
1723: }
1724: \startdata
1725: M31 &24.4 & 0.13 & 24.7 & 18.7 \\
1726: M33 &24.5 & 0.12 & 24.8 & 18.8 \\
1727: IC10 &24.1 & 0.81 & 26.2 & 20.2 \\
1728: NGC 6822 &23.5 &0.25 & 24.1 & 18.1\\
1729: WLM & 24.8 &0.07 & 25.0 & 19.0 \\
1730: Sextans B &25.6 &0.09 & 25.8 & 19.8 \\
1731: Sextans A &25.8 &0.05 & 25.9 & 19.9 \\
1732: Pegasus &24.4 &0.15 & 24.8 & 18.8\\
1733: Phoenix &23.0 & 0.15 & 23.4 & 17.4 \\
1734: \enddata
1735: \tablenotetext{a}{True distance moduli are from van den Bergh 2000.}
1736: \tablenotetext{b}{Typical color excess of a blue star, from Paper II.}
1737: \tablenotetext{c}{Apparent distance moduli at H$\alpha$ follow from
1738: $(m-M)_0 + 2.54 E(B-V).$}
1739: \end{deluxetable}
1740:
1741:
1742:
1743: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r}
1744: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1745: \tablewidth{0pc}
1746: \tablenum{6}
1747: \tablecolumns{3}
1748: \tablecaption{\label{tab:shifts} Photometric Shifts applied}
1749: \tablehead{
1750: \colhead{Galaxy}
1751: &\colhead{$H\alpha-[SII]$}
1752: &\colhead{\[[OIII]-C}
1753: }
1754: \startdata
1755: %Note: the signs have all been changed here to make them additive
1756: %the opposite of what Taylor used.
1757: M31 &-0.10 &-0.32\\
1758: M33 &-0.06 &-0.29\\
1759: IC10 &-0.17 &-0.10\\
1760: NGC 6822 &-0.20 &+0.07\\
1761: WLM &-0.16 &+0.00\\
1762: Sextans B &+0.34 &-0.51\\
1763: Sextans A &-0.17 &-0.37\\
1764: Pegasus &-0.02 &-0.33\\
1765: Phoenix &-0.09 &-0.05\\
1766: \enddata
1767: \end{deluxetable}
1768:
1769: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r}
1770: \tablewidth{0pc}
1771: \tablenum{7}
1772: \tablecaption{\label{tab:nums} Number of Potential H$\alpha$ Emission-Lined Objects with $M_{H\alpha}\le -6$}
1773: \tablehead{
1774: \colhead{Galaxy}
1775: &\colhead{$M_V$\tablenotemark{a}}
1776: &\colhead{$\log \dot{M}$\tablenotemark{b}}
1777: &\colhead{Num.}
1778: &\colhead{Num.\ with spectra}
1779: }
1780: \startdata
1781: M31 & -21.2& -1.3 & 498 & 59 \\
1782: M33 & -18.9 & -1.0 & 1068 & 136\\
1783: IC10 & -16.3 & -1.3 & 96 & 7\\
1784: NGC 6822 & -16.0 & -2.0 & 9 & 2\\
1785: WLM & -14.4 & -2.8 & 6 & 0\\
1786: Sextans B & -14.3 & -3.0 & 1 & 0 \\
1787: Sextans A & -14.2 & -2.2 & 9 & 0 \\
1788: Pegasus & -12.3 & -4.4 & 0 & 0 \\
1789: Phoenix & -9.8 & \nodata & 0 & 0\\
1790: \enddata
1791: \tablenotetext{a}{Absolute visual magnitude from van den Bergh 2000 and references
1792: therein.}
1793: \tablenotetext{b}{Star formation rate in terms of $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ integrated over the entire
1794: galaxy, from Table 1 of Paper II and references therein.}
1795: \end{deluxetable}
1796:
1797: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
1798: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1799: \rotate
1800: \tablewidth{0pc}
1801: \tablenum{8}
1802: \tablecolumns{13}
1803: \tablecaption{\label{tab:m31}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in M31}
1804: \tablehead{
1805: \colhead{LGGS}
1806: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1807: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1808: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1809: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
1810: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
1811: &\colhead{$V$}
1812: &\colhead{$B-V$}
1813: &\colhead{$U-B$}
1814: &\colhead{$Q$}
1815: &\colhead{Spectral Type}
1816: &\colhead{Cross ID}
1817: &\colhead{Ref.}
1818: }
1819: \startdata
1820: J004140.32+411730.9&00 41 40.32&+41 17 30.9& 18.02& -0.87& -0.06& 19.10& 0.33& -0.80& -1.04& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1821: J004140.46+411714.1&00 41 40.46&+41 17 14.1& 19.88& -0.23& 0.04& 19.92& 0.28& -0.77& -0.97& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1822: J004142.91+411822.1&00 41 42.91&+41 18 22.1& 19.90& -0.43& -0.20& 20.27& 0.13& -0.75& -0.84& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1823: J004142.96+412043.9&00 41 42.96&+41 20 43.9& 19.81& -0.35& -0.56& 20.20& -0.03& -0.97& -0.95& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1824: J004143.00+412042.7&00 41 43.00&+41 20 42.7& 19.56& -0.25& -0.33& 19.70& -0.04& -0.99& -0.96& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1825: J004143.13+411551.9&00 41 43.13&+41 15 51.9& 19.03& -0.35& 0.10& 18.95& 0.01& -0.97& -0.98& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1826: J004143.44+411555.3&00 41 43.44&+41 15 55.3& 19.66& -1.81& -0.16& 22.50& 0.24& -0.87& -1.04& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1827: J004143.54+411820.1&00 41 43.54&+41 18 20.1& 19.53& -0.35& -0.36& 19.98& 0.08& -0.89& -0.95& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1828: J004143.56+411815.8&00 41 43.56&+41 18 15.8& 18.91& -0.78& -0.27& 20.16& 0.86& -0.33& -0.95& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1829: J004143.71+411826.3&00 41 43.71&+41 18 26.3& 20.00& -1.07& 0.08& 21.20& 0.08& -0.78& -0.84& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1830: \enddata
1831: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
1832: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.
1833: Table~\ref{tab:m31} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the
1834: {\it Astronomical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding form and
1835: content.}
1836: \tablerefs{For spectral types and cross-IDs:
1837: (1) Paper I; (2) This paper; (3) Massey et al.\ 1995; (4) Bianchi et al.\ 1994; (5) Hubble \& Sandage 1953; (6) Massey \& Johnson 1998
1838: and references therein.}
1839:
1840: \end{deluxetable}
1841:
1842: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
1843: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1844: \rotate
1845: \tablewidth{0pc}
1846: \tablenum{9}
1847: \tablecolumns{13}
1848: \tablecaption{\label{tab:m33}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in M33}
1849: \tablehead{
1850: \colhead{LGGS}
1851: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1852: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1853: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1854: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
1855: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
1856: &\colhead{$V$}
1857: &\colhead{$B-V$}
1858: &\colhead{$U-B$}
1859: &\colhead{$Q$}
1860: &\colhead{Spectral Type}
1861: &\colhead{Cross ID}
1862: &\colhead{Ref.}
1863: }
1864: \startdata
1865: J013225.51+302652.3&01 32 25.51&+30 26 52.3& 18.94& -1.10& -0.66& 20.60& -0.01& -0.94& -0.93& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1866: J013226.94+302538.1&01 32 26.94&+30 25 38.1& 18.90& -1.22& -0.46& 20.68& 0.04& -0.55& -0.58& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1867: J013226.99+302413.2&01 32 26.99&+30 24 13.2& 18.56& -1.21& -0.15& 20.41& -0.02& -1.14& -1.13& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1868: J013227.89+302542.8&01 32 27.89&+30 25 42.8& 20.00& -1.05& -0.05& 21.23& 0.02& -0.90& -0.91& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1869: J013228.78+303044.8&01 32 28.78&+30 30 44.8& 19.80& -0.21& -0.12& 19.73& -0.16& -1.09& -0.97& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1870: J013229.01+303453.7&01 32 29.01&+30 34 53.7& 19.47& -0.23& 0.02& 19.83& -0.05& -1.14& -1.10& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1871: J013229.03+302819.6&01 32 29.03&+30 28 19.6& 18.48& -0.76& 0.10& 19.00& 0.04& -0.77& -0.80& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1872: J013229.24+303445.3&01 32 29.24&+30 34 45.3& 19.18& -0.41& -0.14& 19.56& -0.03& -1.03& -1.01& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1873: J013229.35+303445.4&01 32 29.35&+30 34 45.4& 19.90& -0.29& -0.44& 20.42& -0.14& -0.83& -0.73& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1874: J013229.57+303412.8&01 32 29.57&+30 34 12.8& 18.81& -0.16& -0.08& 18.87& -0.09& -0.81& -0.75& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1875: \enddata
1876: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
1877: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.
1878: Table~\ref{tab:m33} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the
1879: {\it Astronomical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding form and
1880: content.}
1881: \tablerefs{For spectral types and cross-IDs:
1882: (1) Paper I; (2) This paper; (3) Massey et al.\ 1996; (4) Massey et al.\ 1995; (5) Monteverde et al.\ 1996; (6) Hubble \& Sandage 1953;
1883: (7) Massey \& Johnson 1998 and references therein; (8) Corral 1996; (9) Viotti et al.\ 2007 and references therein.}
1884: \end{deluxetable}
1885:
1886:
1887: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
1888: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1889: \rotate
1890: \tablewidth{0pc}
1891: \tablenum{10}
1892: \tablecolumns{12}
1893: \tablecaption{\label{tab:ic10}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in IC 10}
1894: \tablehead{
1895: \colhead{LGGS}
1896: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1897: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1898: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1899: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
1900: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
1901: &\colhead{$V$}
1902: &\colhead{$B-V$}
1903: &\colhead{$U-B$}
1904: &\colhead{$Q$}
1905: &\colhead{Spectral Type}
1906: &\colhead{Cross ID}
1907: &\colhead{Refs.}
1908: }
1909: \startdata
1910: J002003.24+591343.7&00 20 03.24&+59 13 43.7& 19.84& -0.33& 0.00& 20.69& 0.73& -0.51& -1.04& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1911: J002024.68+591648.3&00 20 24.68&+59 16 48.3& 20.00& -0.16& -0.04& 20.75& 1.11& 0.38& -0.42& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1912: J002027.96+591659.4&00 20 27.96&+59 16 59.4& 19.61& -0.80& -0.74& 21.80& 1.32& 100.00& 99.99& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1913: J002030.95+591702.3&00 20 30.95&+59 17 02.3& 18.95& -0.78& -0.13& 20.21& 0.85& -0.40& -1.01& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1914: J002026.65+591714.4&00 20 26.65&+59 17 14.4& 19.93& -0.35& -0.01& 22.06& 0.99& 100.00& 99.99& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1915: J002028.07+591714.3&00 20 28.07&+59 17 14.3& 19.86& -3.24& -0.60& 21.54& 0.78& -0.26& -0.82& WN7-8 & RSMV2 & 1 \\
1916: J002020.20+591724.1&00 20 20.20&+59 17 24.1& 19.99& -0.35& -0.50& 21.72& 0.94& 100.00& 99.99& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1917: J002030.85+591728.4&00 20 30.85&+59 17 28.4& 20.06& -1.48& 0.58& 21.76& 0.88& 100.00& 99.99& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1918: J002011.89+591737.6&00 20 11.89&+59 17 37.6& 19.49& -0.85& 0.05& 20.88& 1.04& -0.26& -1.01& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1919: J002024.66+591744.6&00 20 24.66&+59 17 44.6& 19.81& -0.87& -0.50& 22.06& 0.70& -0.55& -1.05& \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1920: \enddata
1921: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
1922: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.
1923: An entry of ``99.99" denotes no measurement.
1924: Table~\ref{tab:ic10} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the
1925: {\it Astronomical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding form and
1926: content.}
1927: \tablerefs{For spectral types and cross-IDs:
1928: (1) Crowther et al.\ 2003; (2) This paper; (3) Massey \& Armandroff 1995}
1929: \end{deluxetable}
1930:
1931: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
1932: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1933: \rotate
1934: \tablewidth{0pc}
1935: \tablenum{11}
1936: \tablecolumns{13}
1937: \tablecaption{\label{tab:n6822}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in NGC 6822}
1938: \tablehead{
1939: \colhead{LGGS}
1940: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1941: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1942: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1943: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
1944: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
1945: &\colhead{$V$}
1946: &\colhead{$B-V$}
1947: &\colhead{$U-B$}
1948: &\colhead{$Q$}
1949: &\colhead{Spectral Type}
1950: &\colhead{Cross ID}
1951: &\colhead{Ref.}
1952: }
1953: \startdata
1954: J194434.02-144229.0&19 44 34.02&-14 42 29.0& 19.93& -0.50& -0.47& 20.04& 0.09& -0.74& -0.80& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1955: J194434.10-144224.5&19 44 34.10&-14 42 24.5& 18.91& -0.33& -0.10& 19.37& 0.04& -0.82& -0.85& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1956: J194434.17-144229.8&19 44 34.17&-14 42 29.8& 18.55& -0.63& -0.69& 19.13& 0.01& -0.78& -0.79& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1957: J194434.24-144149.0&19 44 34.24&-14 41 49.0& 19.93& -0.57& 0.17& 20.54& 0.20& -0.72& -0.86& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1958: J194434.39-144227.5&19 44 34.39&-14 42 27.5& 18.38& -0.16& 0.02& 18.50& 0.18& -0.85& -0.98& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1959: J194435.78-144620.0&19 44 35.78&-14 46 20.0& 19.97& -0.48& 0.14& 20.37& 0.18& -0.68& -0.81& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1960: J194436.37-144820.8&19 44 36.37&-14 48 20.8& 19.87& -0.44& 0.11& 20.38& 0.24& -0.70& -0.87& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1961: J194437.40-145044.0&19 44 37.40&-14 50 44.0& 19.70& -0.31& -0.21& 19.98& 0.16& -0.43& -0.55& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1962: J194437.97-145106.2&19 44 37.97&-14 51 06.2& 19.66& -0.26& 0.08& 19.83& 0.01& -0.76& -0.77& WN&N6822-WR4 & 1 \\
1963: J194438.39-145147.0&19 44 38.39&-14 51 47.0& 19.70& -0.68& -0.31& 20.36& 0.04& -0.75& -0.78& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1964: \enddata
1965: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
1966: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.
1967: Table~\ref{tab:n6822} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the
1968: {\it Astronomical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding form and
1969: content.}
1970: \tablerefs{For spectral types and cross-IDs:
1971: (1) Massey \& Johnson 1998. Note that for the WR stars, the CDS lists these
1972: as ``[AM85] N". (2) This paper. (3) Westerlund et al.\ 1983.}
1973: \end{deluxetable}
1974:
1975: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
1976: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1977: \rotate
1978: \tablewidth{0pc}
1979: \tablenum{12}
1980: \tablecolumns{13}
1981: \tablecaption{\label{tab:wlm}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in WLM}
1982: \tablehead{
1983: \colhead{LGGS}
1984: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
1985: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
1986: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
1987: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
1988: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
1989: &\colhead{$V$}
1990: &\colhead{$B-V$}
1991: &\colhead{$U-B$}
1992: &\colhead{$Q$}
1993: &\colhead{Spectral Type}
1994: &\colhead{Cross ID}
1995: &\colhead{Ref.}
1996: }
1997: \startdata
1998: J000153.57-152732.6&00 01 53.57&-15 27 32.6& 19.81& -0.54& 0.09& 20.29& -0.24& -0.92& -0.75& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1999: J000154.96-152831.4&00 01 54.96&-15 28 31.4& 19.69& -1.64& 0.07& 22.24& -0.43& -1.27& -0.96& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2000: J000155.24-152718.7&00 01 55.24&-15 27 18.7& 19.76& -0.17& 0.15& 19.78& -0.04& -1.03& -1.00& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2001: J000155.90-152839.3&00 01 55.90&-15 28 39.3& 19.21& -0.17& -0.40& 20.09& -0.23& -1.04& -0.87& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2002: J000156.08-152837.5&00 01 56.08&-15 28 37.5& 18.48& -1.37& -0.67& 20.77& -0.10& -0.95& -0.88& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2003: J000156.16-152841.9&00 01 56.16&-15 28 41.9& 18.86& -0.17& -0.13& 18.92& -0.07& -0.80& -0.75& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2004: J000156.16-152841.9&00 01 56.16&-15 28 41.9& 18.86& -0.17& -0.13& 18.92& -0.07& -0.80& -0.75& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2005: J000156.53-152703.2&00 01 56.53&-15 27 03.2& 18.44& -0.18& -0.01& 18.50& -0.06& -0.94& -0.90& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2006: J000156.75-152636.6&00 01 56.75&-15 26 36.6& 19.89& -0.45& 0.10& 20.27& 0.11& -0.35& -0.43& A3II & B8 & 1 \\
2007: J000157.14-152700.9&00 01 57.14&-15 27 00.9& 19.92& -0.70& -0.55& 21.52& 0.61& -0.78& -1.22& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2008: J000157.20-152648.2&00 01 57.20&-15 26 48.2& 18.82& -1.44& -0.69& 21.25& -0.15& -1.09& -0.98& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2009: J000159.58-152728.9&00 01 59.58&-15 27 28.9& 19.25& -1.24& -0.13& 21.19& -0.17& -1.00& -0.88& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2010: J000159.62-153016.0&00 01 59.62&-15 30 16.0& 19.71& -1.36& 0.22& 21.43& -0.15& -1.00& -0.89& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2011: J000200.42-152935.7&00 02 00.42&-15 29 35.7& 19.69& -0.78& -0.46& 21.07& -0.18& -0.81& -0.68& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2012: J000201.95-152744.8&00 02 01.95&-15 27 44.8& 19.46& -0.28& 0.13& 19.47& -0.17& -0.89& -0.77& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2013: J000202.33-152743.2&00 02 02.33&-15 27 43.2& 17.74& -1.47& -0.30& 19.46& 0.09& -0.66& -0.72& \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2014: \enddata
2015: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
2016: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
2017: \tablerefs{For spectral types and Cross-IDs:
2018: (1) Bresolin et al.\ 2006.}
2019: \end{deluxetable}
2020:
2021: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
2022: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2023: \rotate
2024: \tablewidth{0pc}
2025: \tablenum{13}
2026: \tablecolumns{10}
2027: \tablecaption{\label{tab:sexB}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in Sextans B}
2028: \tablehead{
2029: \colhead{LGGS}
2030: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
2031: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
2032: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
2033: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
2034: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
2035: &\colhead{$V$}
2036: &\colhead{$B-V$}
2037: &\colhead{$U-B$}
2038: &\colhead{$Q$}
2039: }
2040: \startdata
2041: J100002.93+052022.8&10 00 02.93&+05 20 22.8& 19.12& -1.31& -0.47& 19.86& -0.29& -1.05& -0.84\\
2042: J100005.54+051802.5&10 00 05.54&+05 18 02.5& 19.86& -1.35& -0.45& 21.68& -0.28& -1.08& -0.88\\
2043: \enddata
2044: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
2045: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. }
2046: \end{deluxetable}
2047: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
2048: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2049: \rotate
2050: \tablewidth{0pc}
2051: \tablenum{14}
2052: \tablecolumns{10}
2053: \tablecaption{\label{tab:sexA}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in Sextans A}
2054: \tablehead{
2055: \colhead{LGGS}
2056: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
2057: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
2058: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
2059: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
2060: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
2061: &\colhead{$V$}
2062: &\colhead{$B-V$}
2063: &\colhead{$U-B$}
2064: &\colhead{$Q$}
2065: }
2066: \startdata
2067: J101053.60-044117.8&10 10 53.60&-04 41 17.8& 19.60& -1.23& -0.52& 20.97& -0.05& -0.83& -0.79 \\
2068: J101053.67-044118.4&10 10 53.67&-04 41 18.4& 19.76& -1.10& -0.57& 21.07& -0.17& -1.13& -1.01 \\
2069: J101053.90-044111.0&10 10 53.90&-04 41 11.0& 19.99& -0.42& -0.58& 20.32& -0.10& -0.99& -0.92 \\
2070: J101053.94-044110.1&10 10 53.94&-04 41 10.1& 19.98& -0.38& -0.68& 20.53& -0.23& -1.09& -0.92 \\
2071: J101054.08-044111.5&10 10 54.08&-04 41 11.5& 19.76& -0.23& 0.04& 19.49& -0.22& -1.03& -0.87 \\
2072: J101100.56-043930.9&10 11 00.56&-04 39 30.9& 19.93& -0.22& 0.06& 19.87& 0.23& -0.26& -0.43 \\
2073: J101105.07-044214.6&10 11 05.07&-04 42 14.6& 20.00& -0.18& 0.11& 19.74& -0.24& -1.10& -0.93 \\
2074: J101105.17-044236.0&10 11 05.17&-04 42 36.0& 19.30& -0.46& -0.33& 19.36& -0.04& -0.46& -0.43 \\
2075: J101105.30-044210.1&10 11 05.30&-04 42 10.1& 19.89& -0.56& -0.02& 19.98& -0.27& -1.12& -0.93 \\
2076: J101105.38-044240.1&10 11 05.38&-04 42 40.1& 19.26& -0.46& -0.57& 19.46& -0.26& -1.14& -0.95 \\
2077: J101105.69-044213.6&10 11 05.69&-04 42 13.6& 19.75& -0.49& 0.11& 19.70& -0.24& -1.07& -0.90 \\
2078: J101106.56-044217.1&10 11 06.56&-04 42 17.1& 19.90& -1.42& -0.63& 21.29& -0.31& -1.12& -0.90\\
2079: J101107.34-044231.7&10 11 07.34&-04 42 31.7& 19.43& -1.46& -0.26& 20.57& -0.23& -1.20& -1.03 \\
2080: J101109.27-044053.3&10 11 09.27&-04 40 53.3& 19.96& -1.71& -0.36& 21.80& -0.23& -1.31& -1.14 \\
2081:
2082: \enddata
2083: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
2084: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. }
2085: \end{deluxetable}
2086: \begin{deluxetable}{l r r r r r r r r r l l l}
2087: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2088: \rotate
2089: \tablewidth{0pc}
2090: \tablenum{15}
2091: \tablecolumns{10}
2092: \tablecaption{\label{tab:peg}H$\alpha$ Emission-lined Stars in Pegasus}
2093: \tablehead{
2094: \colhead{LGGS}
2095: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
2096: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
2097: &\colhead{$H\alpha$}
2098: &\colhead{$H\alpha$-[SII]}
2099: &\colhead{\[[OIII]$-$ C}
2100: &\colhead{$V$}
2101: &\colhead{$B-V$}
2102: &\colhead{$U-B$}
2103: &\colhead{$Q$}
2104: }
2105: \startdata
2106: J232834.97+144356.9&23 28 34.97&+14 43 56.9& 19.63& -1.55& 0.55& 22.44& -0.32& -0.80& -0.57 \\
2107: \enddata
2108: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units
2109: of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. }
2110: \end{deluxetable}
2111:
2112: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c c c}
2113: %\tabletypesize{\}
2114: \tablewidth{0pc}
2115: \tablenum{15}
2116: \tablecolumns{5}
2117: \tablecaption{\label{tab:spectexp}Spectroscopic Exposures}
2118: \tablehead{
2119: \colhead{Field}
2120: &\colhead{$\alpha_{\rm 2000}$}
2121: &\colhead{$\delta_{\rm 2000}$}
2122: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Exposures} \\ \cline{4-5}
2123: \multicolumn{3}{c}{}
2124: &\colhead{Blue}
2125: &\colhead{Red}
2126: }
2127: \startdata
2128: M31-NE & 00 43.8 & +41 33 & 6x1800s & 3x1800s \\
2129: M31-SW & 00 41.2 & +40 44 & 4x1800s,1000s & \nodata \\
2130: M33-N & 01 33.7 & +30 44 & 3x1800s,3x1600s & 4x1800s \\
2131: M33-S & 01 33.7 & +30 34 & 5x1800, 1600s & 4x1800s \\
2132: IC10 & 00 20.2 & +59 18 & \nodata & 3x1200s \\
2133: NGC6822 & 19 44.7 & $-$14 53 & 4x1800s, 1200s & 3x1600s \\
2134: \enddata
2135: \end{deluxetable}
2136: \begin{deluxetable}{l l l}
2137: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2138: \tablewidth{0pc}
2139: \tablenum{16}
2140: \tablecolumns{3}
2141: \tablecaption{\label{tab:newsp}New Spectroscopic Identifications}
2142: \tablehead{
2143: \colhead{LGGS}
2144: &\colhead{Spectra}
2145: &\colhead{Figure}
2146: }
2147: \startdata
2148: \cutinhead{IC10}
2149: J002012.13+591848.0&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:ic10} \\
2150: J002016.48+591906.9&hot LBV candidate? &\ref{fig:n6822}\\
2151: J002020.35+591837.6&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:ic10}\\
2152: \cutinhead{M31}
2153: J003910.85+403622.4&HII? &\nodata\\
2154: J003944.71+402056.2&HII&\nodata\\
2155: J004030.28+404233.1&HII/B1.5\tablenotemark{a} &\nodata\\
2156: J004032.37+403859.8&HII/B\tablenotemark{a} &\nodata\\
2157: J004033.80+405717.2&HII/B0.2\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2158: J004043.10+410846.0&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2159: J004052.19+403116.6&no emission--star/B8\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2160: J004057.03+405238.6&broad-lined peculiar &\ref{fig:bizzare}\\
2161: J004058.04+410327.9&HII/B8\tablenotemark{a} &\nodata\\
2162: J004109.26+404906.0&HII&\nodata\\
2163: J004129.74+405100.8&HII&\nodata\\
2164: J004130.37+410500.9&WNL &\ref{fig:wrguys}\\
2165: J004220.31+405123.2&HII&\nodata\\
2166: J004229.87+410551.8&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:nelson}\\
2167: J004242.33+413922.7&P Cyg LBV candidate &\ref{fig:pcygs}\\
2168: J004253.42+412700.5&star in HII region&\nodata\\
2169: J004259.31+410629.1&HII&\nodata \\
2170: J004303.21+410433.8&HII&\nodata\\
2171: J004313.27+410257.4&no emission---star\\
2172: J004322.50+413940.9&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:nelson}\\
2173: J004334.50+410951.7&Ofpe/WN9 &\ref{fig:ofpe}\\
2174: J004339.28+411019.4&HII? &\nodata\\
2175: J004350.50+414611.4&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2176: J004410.90+413203.2&star in HII region &\nodata\\
2177: J004411.36+413257.2&hot LBV candidate (k315a) &\ref{fig:hotmaybe} \\
2178: J004415.00+420156.2&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2179: J004416.28+412106.6&HII&\nodata\\
2180: J004417.10+411928.0&hot LBV candidate (k350) &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2181: J004425.18+413452.2&cool LBV candidate (k411) &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2182: J004433.58+415248.0&HII&\nodata \\
2183: J004434.65+412503.6&B3 I/B1:\tablenotemark{b} in HII &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2184: J004438.55+412511.1&HII &\nodata\\
2185: J004442.07+412732.3&HII&\nodata\\
2186: J004442.28+415823.1&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2187: J004443.57+412616.5&star in HII&\nodata \\
2188: J004444.52+412804.0&P Cyg LBV candidate &\ref{fig:pcygs} \\
2189: J004500.90+413100.7&WC in HII &\ref{fig:wrguys}\\
2190: J004507.65+413740.8&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2191: J004511.60+413716.8&HII&\nodata \\
2192: J004522.58+415034.8&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2193: J004526.62+415006.3&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2194: J004545.94+415030.5&AVe (foreground)&\nodata \\
2195: \cutinhead{M33}
2196: J013235.25+303017.6&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:hotmaybe}\\
2197: J013241.30+302231.2&HII&\nodata\\
2198: J013242.26+302114.1&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:hotmaybe}\\
2199: J013245.00+303456.7&HII&\nodata \\
2200: J013248.26+303950.4&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:hotmaybe}\\
2201: J013259.74+303854.8&HII?&\nodata\\
2202: J013300.86+303504.9&B1~I in HII/B1.5Ia\tablenotemark{b } &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2203: J013301.24+303051.3&HII&\nodata\\
2204: J013303.09+303101.8&HII&\nodata\\
2205: J013307.50+304258.5&WN (UIT041=M33-WR19) &\ref{fig:UIT}\\
2206: J013311.26+304515.3&HII&\nodata\\
2207: J013311.45+302951.3&HII&\nodata \\
2208: J013315.21+305318.5&HII&\nodata\\
2209: J013316.50+303212.1&late A~I/early F~I &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2210: J013317.22+303201.6&HII&\nodata\\
2211: J013324.62+302328.4&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2212: J013327.03+303841.6&HII&\nodata\\
2213: J013329.88+303147.3&HII/O+neb\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata \\
2214: J013332.64+304127.2&hot LBV candidate\tablenotemark{c} &\ref{fig:am2}\\
2215: J013333.22+303343.4&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2216: J013334.06+304744.3&HII plus HeII $\lambda$ 4686?&\nodata\\
2217: J013334.27+304136.7&WNL in HII &\ref{fig:wrguys}\\
2218: J013334.29+303400.1&HII&\nodata\\
2219: J013334.39+303208.4&HII&\nodata\\
2220: J013335.32+303931.0&HII&\nodata\\
2221: J013337.56+303202.3&HII&\nodata\\
2222: J013339.08+302010.7&star in HII&\nodata\\
2223: J013339.42+303124.8&B3 I/B1~Ia\tablenotemark{b} &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2224: J013339.42+303810.8&HII&\nodata \\
2225: J013339.52+304540.5&P Cyg LBV candidate\tablenotemark{d} &\ref{fig:pcygs}\\
2226: J013341.28+302237.2&P Cyg LBV candidate\tablenotemark{e} (101-A) &\ref{fig:pcygs}\\
2227: J013342.03+304733.6&star in HII&\nodata\\
2228: J013342.52+303258.6&HII&\nodata\\
2229: J013343.19+303906.4&HII&\nodata\\
2230: J013343.50+303911.5&HII&\nodata\\
2231: J013344.52+304432.3&HII/OB+neb\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata \\
2232: J013344.56+303201.3&HII&\nodata\\
2233: J013344.79+304432.4&HII/OB+neb\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2234: J013344.85+303600.4&HII&\nodata \\
2235: J013345.25+303626.6&HII/B\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2236: J013347.33+303306.8&HII&\nodata\\
2237: J013349.28+305250.2&HII&\nodata\\
2238: J013349.72+303730.6&HII&\nodata\\
2239: J013349.94+302928.8&HII&\nodata\\
2240: J013350.21+303347.6&HII&\nodata\\
2241: J013351.46+304057.0&P Cyg LBV candidate &\ref{fig:pcygs}\\
2242: J013352.19+303636.6&HII&\nodata \\
2243: J013352.39+303920.9&HII/OB+neb&\nodata\\
2244: J013355.51+304526.8&HII&\nodata\\
2245: J013355.87+304528.4&WNL in HII\\
2246: J013357.73+301714.2&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2247: J013359.01+303353.9&B8I in HII &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2248: J013359.11+303437.2&star in HII&\nodata\\
2249: J013359.40+302311.0&HII/A0Ia\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2250: J013401.44+303630.8&HII&\nodata\\
2251: J013401.68+303720.0&HII&\nodata\\
2252: J013406.72+304154.5&Of/early O\tablenotemark{b} &\ref{fig:wrguys}\\
2253: J013407.32+304732.4&HII&\nodata\\
2254: J013408.21+303405.2&HII&\nodata\\
2255: J013410.93+303437.6&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2256: J013414.21+303343.3&HII&\nodata\\
2257: J013415.43+303707.4&HII&\nodata\\
2258: J013416.07+303642.1&P Cyg LBV candidate (H108) &\ref{fig:pcygs}\\
2259: J013416.35+303712.3&HII/WN7\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2260: J013416.44+303120.8&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:weird}\\
2261: J013422.91+304411.0&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2262: J013424.78+303306.6&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:coolguys}\\
2263: J013426.11+303424.7&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:hotmaybe}\\
2264: J013429.64+303732.1&cool LBV candidate &\ref{fig:weird}\\
2265: J013430.29+304039.8&star in HII&\nodata\\
2266: J013432.76+304717.2&Ofpe/WN9 &\ref{fig:ofpeRED}\\
2267: J013433.10+304659.0&HII&\nodata\\
2268: J013435.15+304705.1&HII&\nodata\\
2269: J013438.76+304358.8&HII/Late O\tablenotemark{a}&\nodata\\
2270: J013439.73+304406.6&late A~I/early F~I &\ref{fig:nice}\\
2271: J013442.14+303216.0&hot LBV candidate? &\ref{fig:n6822}\\
2272: J013459.47+303701.9&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2273: J013500.30+304150.9&hot LBV candidate &\ref{fig:lbvhot}\\
2274: J013509.73+304157.3&Ofpe/WN9 (Romano's Star) &\ref{fig:ofpe},\ref{fig:ofpeRED}\\
2275: \cutinhead{NGC 6822}
2276: J194452.97-144305.1&HII&\nodata\\
2277: J194503.77-145619.1&hot LBV candidate? &\ref{fig:n6822}\\
2278: \enddata
2279: \tablenotetext{a}{In a few cases where our fiber spectroscopy revealed only the
2280: spectra of an HII region, previous long-slit spectra had permitted a spectral type
2281: to be determined of the underlying star. We include these here, and retain the
2282: original in Tables~\ref{tab:m31} through \ref{tab:n6822}.}
2283: \tablenotetext{b}{Previous spectral type is shown, but we adopt the new one (given first) here.}
2284: \tablenotetext{c}{Previously called ``WN" by Massey \& Conti 1983; see text.}
2285: \tablenotetext{d}{Previously called ``B0.5Ia+WNE by Massey et al.\ 1996; see text.}
2286: \tablenotetext{e}{Previously called B1~Ia (101-A) by Monteverde et al.\ 1996; see text.}
2287: \end{deluxetable}
2288:
2289: \begin{deluxetable}{l l l l l l l l}
2290: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
2291: \rotate
2292: \tablewidth{0pc}
2293: \tablenum{17}
2294: \tablecolumns{8}
2295: \tablecaption{\label{tab:LBVs}Spectroscopic Luminous Blue Variables in IC10, M31, M33, and NGC 6822}
2296: \tablehead{
2297: \colhead{LGGS}
2298: &\colhead{Type}
2299: &\colhead{Cross-ID\tablenotemark{a}}
2300: &\colhead{Ref}
2301: &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$V$}
2302: &\colhead{$\Delta V$}
2303: &\colhead{Other Var.} \\ \cline{5-6}
2304: &&&&\colhead{LGGS}
2305: &\colhead{Older} \\
2306: }
2307: \startdata
2308: \cutinhead{IC10}
2309: J002012.13+591848.0&hot LBVcand & \nodata & 1 & 19.37 & 19.48 & -0.11 & \nodata \\
2310: J002016.48+591906.9&hot LBVcand? & \nodata & 1 &19.19 & 19.84 & -0.65 & \nodata \\
2311: J002020.35+591837.6&hot LBVcand & \nodata & 1 &19.10 &
2312: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2313: \cutinhead{M31}
2314: J004043.10+410846.0&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.62 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2315: J004051.59+403303.0&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 2 & 16.99 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2316: J004056.49+410308.7&Ofpe/WN9 & OB69WR2 &3 & 18.09 & 18.13 & -0.04 & \nodata \\
2317: J004229.87+410551.8&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.78 & 17.51 & 1.27 & \nodata \\
2318: J004242.33+413922.7&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.56 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2319: J004302.52+414912.4&LBV &AE And &4 & 17.43 & \nodata & \nodata & Spect var, DIRECT IX D31J04302.5+414912.3 \\
2320: J004320.97+414039.6&LBVCand &k114a &5 & 19.22 & 19.12 & 0.10 & \nodata \\
2321: J004322.50+413940.9&hot LBV Cand & \nodata & 1 & 20.35 & \nodata &\nodata & \nodata \\
2322: J004333.09+411210.4&hot LBV &AF And &4 & 17.33 & 16.44 & 0.88 & \nodata \\
2323: J004334.50+410951.7&Ofpe/WN9 & \nodata & 1 & 18.14 & 18.17 & -0.04 & \nodata \\
2324: J004341.84+411112.0&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 6 & 17.55 & 17.53 & 0.02 & \nodata \\
2325: J004350.50+414611.4&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.70 & 17.54 & 0.16 & \nodata \\
2326: J004411.36+413257.2&hotLBVCand &k315a &1,5 & 18.07 & 18.02 & 0.05 & DIRECT IX D31J04411.4+413257.2\tablenotemark{d}\\
2327: J004415.00+420156.2&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.29 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2328: J004417.10+411928.0&hot LBVCand &k350 &1,5 & 17.11 & 17.20 & -0.09 & \nodata \\
2329: J004419.43+412247.0&LBV &Var15 &4 & 18.45 & 16.97 & 1.48 & \nodata \\
2330: J004425.18+413452.2&cool LBVCand &k411 &1,5 & 17.48 & 17.50 & -0.03 & DIRECT IX D31J04425.2+413452.1 \\
2331: J004442.28+415823.1&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 19.68 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2332: J004444.52+412804.0&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.07 & \nodata & \nodata & DIRECT IV V13833 D31C \\
2333: J004450.54+413037.7&LBV &VarA-1 &7,8 & 17.14 & 16.50 & 0.64 & DIRECT IX D31J04450.6+413037.7\\
2334: J004507.65+413740.8&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 16.15 & 16.34 & -0.19 & \nodata \\
2335: J004522.58+415034.8&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.47 & 18.52 & -0.05 & \nodata \\
2336: J004526.62+415006.3&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.16 & 16.31 & 0.84 & \nodata \\
2337: J004621.08+421308.2&LBVCand &k895 &5 & 18.16 & 17.84 & 0.32 & \nodata \\
2338: \cutinhead{M33}
2339: J013235.25+303017.6&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.01 & \nodata & \nodata & Hartman 250024 \\
2340: J013237.72+304005.6&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR2,MCA 1B,UIT003,H235&9,10,11& 17.63 & 17.50 & 0.13 & \nodata \\
2341: J013242.26+302114.1&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.44 & 18.30 & -0.86 & \nodata \\
2342: J013245.41+303858.3&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR5,UIT 008 & 10 & 17.61 & 17.40 & 0.21 & Hartman 250427\\
2343: J013248.26+303950.4&hot LBVcand & \nodata & 1 & 17.25 \\
2344: J013300.02+303332.4&hot LBVcand &UIT026 & 10 & 18.32 & 18.00 & 0.32 & Hartman 251233 \\
2345: J013309.14+304954.5&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR22,UIT 045 & 10 & 17.91 & 17.81 & 0.10 & Hartman 150200 \\
2346: J013324.62+302328.4&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 19.58 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2347: J013327.26+303909.1&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR39,MJ C7 & 12 & 17.95 & \nodata & \nodata & Hartman 242552, Wise 31347 \\
2348: J013332.64+304127.2&hot LBVCand &M33WR41,AM2 & 1 & 18.99 & 19.20 & -0.21 & Spect var \\
2349: J013333.22+303343.4&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 19.40 & \nodata & \nodata & DIRECT VIII D33J013333.2+303344.5\tablenotemark{e} \\
2350: J013335.14+303600.4&LBV &VarC & 4 & 16.43 & 15.20 & 1.23 & Wise 31284 \\
2351: J013339.52+304540.5&P Cyg LBVCand &B517,S193 & 1,11,13& 17.50 & 17.68 & -0.18 & Spec var \\
2352: J013340.60+304137.1&hot LBV Cand &S204 & 11 & 18.31 & 18.20 & 0.11 & \nodata \\
2353: J013341.28+302237.2&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 16.28 & 16.10 & 0.18 & \nodata \\
2354: J013349.23+303809.1&LBV &VarB & 1,4 & 16.21 & 16.40 & -0.19 & Spec var \\
2355: J013350.12+304126.6&hot LBVCand &UIT212,S95 & 10,11 & 16.82 & 16.60 & 0.22 & \nodata \\
2356: J013350.92+303936.9&hot LBVCan &UIT218 & 10 & 14.17 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2357: J013351.46+304057.0&P Cyg LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.73 & 17.80 & -0.07 & \nodata \\
2358: J013353.60+303851.6&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR103,MJ X15 & 12 & 18.09 & 18.50 & -0.41 & Hartman 23654 \\
2359: J013355.96+304530.6&cool LBVCand &UIT247,B324 & 10 & 14.86 & 15.20 & -0.34 & Wise 10327 \\
2360: J013357.73+301714.2&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.39 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2361: J013406.63+304147.8&hot LBVcand &UIT301 & 10 & 16.08 & 16.30 & -0.22 & \nodata \\
2362: J013410.93+303437.6&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 16.03 & 16.48 & -0.45& Wise 21206 \\
2363: J013416.07+303642.1&P Cyg LBVCand &H108 & 1,11 & 17.95 & 18.10 & -0.15& DIRECT VIII D33J013416.1+303641.8, Hartman 221349\\
2364: J013416.10+303344.9&LBVCand &UIT341,B526 & 10 & 17.12 & 16.70 & 0.42& \nodata \\
2365: J013416.44+303120.8&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.10 & 17.00 & 0.10& Wise 22199\\
2366: J013418.74+303411.8&Ofpe/WN9 &M33WR132,UIT 349 & 10 & 19.58 & 19.20 & 0.38& \nodata \\
2367: J013422.91+304411.0&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.22 & 17.08 & 0.14& \nodata \\
2368: J013424.78+303306.6&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 16.84 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2369: J013426.11+303424.7&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.97 & 18.85 & 0.12 & Hartman 222305 \\
2370: J013429.64+303732.1&cool LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 17.10 & 17.42 & -0.32 & \nodata \\
2371: J013432.76+304717.2&Ofpe/WN9 & \nodata & 1 & 19.09 & 18.90 & 0.19 & \nodata \\
2372: J013442.14+303216.0&hot LBVcand? & \nodata & 1 & 17.34 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2373: J013459.47+303701.9&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 18.37 & 17.94 & 0.43 & Hartman 210675 \\
2374: J013500.30+304150.9&hot LBVCand & \nodata & 1 & 19.30 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
2375: J013509.73+304157.3&Ofpe/WN9 &Romano's Star & 1,14 & 18.04 & \nodata & \nodata & Hartman 110031 \\
2376: \cutinhead{NGC 6822}
2377: J194503.77-145619.1&hot LBVCand? & \nodata & 1 & 18.24 & \nodata & \nodata & Mennickent Field 2/Star 411 \\
2378: \enddata
2379: \tablerefs{
2380: (1)This paper;
2381: (2) Paper I;
2382: (3) Massey 1998;
2383: (4) Hubble \& Sandage 1953;
2384: (5) King et al.\ 1998;
2385: (6) Massey 2006;
2386: (7) Rosino \& Bianchini 1973;
2387: (8) Keynon \& Gallagher 1985;
2388: (9) Willis et al.\ 1992;
2389: (10) Massey et al.\ 1996;
2390: (11) Corral 1996;
2391: (12) Massey \& Johnson 1998;
2392: (13) Crowther et al.\ 1997;
2393: (14) Viotti et al.\ 2007 and references therein.}
2394: \tablenotetext{a}{
2395: Cross-IDs:
2396: MCAnnn designations
2397: are from Massey, Conti, \& Armandroff 1987 and are listed in CDS;
2398: UITnnn designations are from Massey et al.\ 1996;
2399: M33WRnnn designations Massey \& Johnson 1998, known to CDS as ``[MJ98] WR nnn";
2400: Bnnn are blue stars from Humphreys \& Sandage 1980;
2401: Hnn and Snnn are from Corral 1996, and known to CDS with the prefix ``[S92b]";
2402: knnn designations are from King et al.\ 1998;
2403: MJ designations are from Massey \& Johnson 1998;
2404: AMnn designations are from Armandroff \& Massey 1985, known to CDS as
2405: [AM85] M33 nn;
2406: OB69WR2 is from Massey et al.\ 1986}
2407: \tablenotetext{b}{``Other" sources for the photometry are Magnier et al.\ 1992
2408: for M31 and Ivanov et al.\ 1993 for M33.}
2409: \tablenotetext{c}{Other variability. We note if the star is shown in this paper to be
2410: a spectral variable, or cite references which claim that the star is photometrically
2411: variable. The latter includes the DIRECT series of papers (see text),
2412: Hartman et al.\ 2006, and Mennickent 2006.}
2413: \tablenotetext{d}{Listed as a Cepheid with a period of 11.0987 days.}
2414: \tablenotetext{e}{Listed as a Cepheid with period iof 9.985 days.}
2415: \end{deluxetable}
2416:
2417: \end{document}
2418: