1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: \usepackage{graphics,epsfig}

3: \usepackage{graphicx}

4: \usepackage{amsmath}

5: \usepackage{natbib}

6: \usepackage{amssymb}

7: \usepackage{longtable}

8: \usepackage{times}

9: \voffset=-1cm

10: \slugcomment{\copyright 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.}

11: 

12: \shorttitle{Turbulence scale size in comet plasma tail}

13: \shortauthors{Roy, Manoharan, \& Chakraborty}

14: 

15: \begin{document}

16: \title{Occultation observation to probe the turbulence scale size in the plasma 

17: tail of comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B}

18: 

19: \author{Nirupam Roy\altaffilmark{1}, P. K. Manoharan\altaffilmark{2}, and 

20: Pavan Chakraborty\altaffilmark{3}}

21: 

22: \altaffiltext{1} {NCRA-TIFR, Post Bag 3, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India; 

23: nirupam@ncra.tifr.res.in}

24: \altaffiltext{2} {Radio Astronomy Centre, NCRA-TIFR, PO Box 8, Udhagamandalam 

25: 643 001, India; mano@ncra.tifr.res.in}

26: \altaffiltext{3} {Indian Institute of Information Technology, Deoghat, Jhalwa, 

27: Allahabad 211 012, India; pavan@iiita.ac.in}

28: 

29: \begin{abstract}

30: {We present the occultation observation of compact radio source B0019$-$000 

31: through the plasma tail of comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B. The observation 

32: was made with the Ooty Radio Telescope at 326.5 MHz on 2006 May 26, when the 

33: plasma tail of the comet was in front of this source. The scintillation was 

34: found to be increased significantly for the target source compared to that 

35: of a control source. The intensity fluctuation power spectra show both 

36: steepening at high spatial scales and excess power at low spatial scales. 

37: This observation can be attributed to the turbulence in the comet plasma tail. 

38: A two-regime plasma turbulence can explain the time-evolution of the power 

39: spectrum during the occultation observation.}

40: \end{abstract}

41: 

42: \keywords{comets: general --- comets: individual (Schwassmann-Wachmann 3) --- 

43: interplanetary medium --- occultations --- turbulence}

44: 

45: \section{Introduction}

46: \label{sec1}

47: 

48: The interplanetary scintillation (IPS) technique is a useful, convenient, 

49: remote-sensing method to probe the solar wind \citep{hw64,mano93}. It exploits 

50: the scattering of radio waves from a compact radio source by the density 

51: irregularities in the solar wind and provides information on the speed and 

52: turbulence spectrum of the solar wind plasma at the region of closest solar 

53: offset of the line of sight to the radio source \citep[e.g.,][]{mano93}. When 

54: a comet plasma tail intersects the radio path, the electron density 

55: irregularities associated with the comet can cause an enhancement in the 

56: level of scintillation. Several attempts have been made to estimate 

57: the turbulence associated with the cometary plasma by observing the occultation 

58: of radio source by the tail of comet \citep{an75,an87,al86,al89,sl87,hd87}. 

59: However, in order to confirm the effect of the cometary plasma as well as 

60: to assess the contribution to the level of turbulence imposed by any solar 

61: wind transients or disturbances, it is essential to simultaneously monitor 

62: a region just outside the tail of the comet during such observations. 

63: 

64: \citep{an87} reported a significant increase in the plasma turbulence as 

65: the tail of comet Halley approached a radio source. But, a rather similar 

66: enhancement in scintillation was also observed towards control sources, 

67: which were located outside the comet tail \citep{an87}. This emphasized 

68: the need for near-simultaneous monitoring of IPS through the tail of the 

69: comet as well as a region outside the comet tail. This study attributed 

70: an insignificant increase of turbulence associated with the cometary plasma. 

71: In a later work, \citet{sl90} adopted the idea of near-simultaneous 

72: observation of control source during cometary occultation observation and 

73: reported a significant increase of the scintillation of the target source 

74: compared to that of the control source. In this Letter we report the 

75: occultation of the compact radio source B0019$-$000 by the plasma tail of 

76: comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B. The results are substantiate by the 

77: observations of the IPS of a control source outside the tail. Systematic 

78: changes observed in the IPS spectra as the source approached the comet 

79: tail suggest a steeper turbulence spectrum for the cometary plasma at scales 

80: $>$500 km and excessive turbulence at the small-scale part (i.e., $<$50 km) of 

81: the spectrum. Below, in \S2, we give the details of our observations and the 

82: results. We compare the results with previously reported results and discuss 

83: the actual astrophysical implication of the results in \S3. Finally, we 

84: summarize and present our conclusions in \S4. 

85: 

86: \section{Observations and results}

87: \label{sec2}

88: 

89: The comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (also known as 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann) 

90: is a periodic comet. This Jupiter-family comet passed within $\sim$0.1 AU of 

91: the Earth around the middle of 2006. It is to be noted that the comet was going 

92: through breaking and disintegration \citep{bk95,cro96,bo02}, which would 

93: likely to increase the level of turbulence. The occultation observation 

94: reported here was therefore aimed at estimating the turbulence spectrum of 

95: density irregularities and associated scale sizes of the cometary plasma. 

96: 

97: Compact sources lying close to the path of the comet were chosen from the 

98: Molonglo Catalogue \citep{lrg81}.  On 2006 May 26, one of the fragments 

99: (labeled 73P-B, the second brightest fragment at the time of observation) 

100: aligned along the line of sight to the radio source B0019$-$000, which has a 

101: compact component ($\sim$ 50 mas) containing $>75\%$ of the total flux 

102: density, S$_{\rm 408}$=2.99$\pm$0.14 Jy. The line of sight along the radio 

103: source B0019$-$073 (S$_{\rm 408}$ = 1.83$\pm$0.07 Jy), was monitored as the 

104: control region. The systematic monitoring of these sources on the day of 

105: occultation as well as for the next two consecutive days provide the spectrum 

106: of the density irregularities and dominant scale sizes of the cometary plasma. 

107: This Target of Opportunity observation was carried out using the Ooty Radio 

108: Telescope (ORT) at the Radio Astronomy Centre, Ooty \citep{gs71}. The ORT, an 

109: equatorially mounted parabolic cylindrical antenna, is 530 m long in the 

110: north-south direction and 30 m wide in east-west direction. It operates at 

111: 326.5 MHz and can effectively probe solar wind in the heliocentric distance 

112: range of 0.05 -- 1.0 AU. 

113: 

114: On 2006 May 26 -- 28, both the target source (B0019$-$000) and the control 

115: source (B0019$-$073) were observed. The coordinates and flux densities of 

116: these sources are given in Table (\ref{tab:tab1}). The orbital parameters of 

117: the comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B are summarized in Table (\ref{tab:tab2}). 

118: Fig. (\ref{f1}) shows the position of the nucleus of the comet on 2006 May 26 

119: -- 28 with respect to the position of both the target and control sources, 

120: projected on the plane of the sky.  Fig. (\ref{f2}) displays the comet 

121: trajectory on 2006 May 26 over-plotted on the 1.4 GHz image of the field 

122: centered at the target source B0019$-$000 taken from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey 

123: \citep[NVSS;][]{co98}. The positions of the comet on these days are taken from 

124: the online high-precision ephemerides provided by Jet Propulsion Laboratory 

125: (JPL) solar system dynamics group. The target source was observed during 

126: occultation on 2006 May 26 from 0713 to 0804 UT (when the target hour angle 

127: reached the west limit of the ORT) at 326.5 MHz with a total bandwidth of 4.0 

128: MHz and a time resolution of 20 ms. During this span, the control source was 

129: observed for a short period to understand the solar wind characteristics and 

130: to distinguish between any changes caused by the turbulence in the tail of the 

131: comet and the solar wind. Note that the control source is sufficiently close 

132: to the target source. So, these two lines of sight are expected to have 

133: similar solar wind characteristics. A nearby cold region of the sky was also 

134: observed to get the ``off-source'' reference. Both the target and the control 

135: sources were observed again on 2006 May 27 and 28. 

136: 

137: \begin{table}

138:   \caption{Radio sources parameters}

139:   \begin{tabular}{cccc}

140:   \hline

141: \multicolumn{2}{c}{IAU Name}& Ecliptic coordinates & S$_{\rm 408}^a$\\

142:        B1950   &   J2000    & J2000 ($\deg$)       &     (Jy)       \\

143:   \hline          

144:     0019$-$000 & 0022$+$002 & 5.245 $-$ 1.998      &  2.99$\pm$0.14 \\

145:     0019$-$073 & 0022$-$070 & 2.320 $-$ 8.685      &  1.83$\pm$0.07 \\

146:   \hline

147: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^a$ From Molonglo Reference Catalogue \citep{lrg81}}

148: \label{tab:tab1}

149: \end{tabular}

150: \end{table}

151: 

152: \begin{table}

153:   \caption{Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B parameters$^a$}

154:   \begin{tabular}{cccccc}

155:   \hline

156: Date    & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Nuclear ecliptic} & Heliocentric & Topocentric & Elongation \\

157: at      & \multicolumn{2}{c}{ coordinates }    & Distance  & Distance & Leading \\

158: 0800 UT &  ($\deg$) &  ($\deg$) &  (AU) & (AU) & ($\deg$) \\

159:   \hline

160: May 26  &  251.15 &  $-$0.25  & 0.957 & 0.1216 & 59.62 \\

161: May 27  &  252.48 &  $-$0.52  & 0.955 & 0.1287 & 59.60 \\

162: May 28  &  253.82 &  $-$0.79  & 0.952 & 0.1360 & 59.70 \\

163:   \hline

164: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^a$ From JPL solar system dynamics group}

165: \label{tab:tab2}

166: \end{tabular}

167: \end{table}

168: 

169: A detailed account of the IPS observation using the ORT and data analysis 

170: procedure is given in \citet{mano03}. In brief, the Fourier transformation 

171: and spectrum computation from the recorded intensity scintillation 

172: measurements are performed to get the power spectrum of the intensity 

173: fluctuations to bring out the statistical properties of the intervening 

174: medium. A 2048-point fast Fourier transformation yields a frequency resolution 

175: of $\approx$0.025 Hz. The spectrum is corrected for the off-source noise 

176: and the averaging of the adjacent spectral points gives a uniform noise up 

177: to the cutoff frequency (where the power drops to noise level). The area 

178: under the power spectrum is the measure of the scintillation index. Since the 

179: present measurements are made in the weak scattering region, the shape of the 

180: spectrum and the scintillation index are directly related to the turbulence 

181: spectrum of the intervening plasma and the level of plasma turbulence, 

182: respectively \citep{mano93}. 

183: 

184: \begin{figure}

185: \epsscale{0.95}

186: \includegraphics[scale=0.65, angle=0.0]{f1.eps}

187: \caption{\label{f1} \small{Path of the comet with respect to the radio 

188: sources (both the target and the control source). The position of the comet 

189: nucleus on2006 May 26 -- 28 is plotted. Part of the trajectory on 2006 May 26 

190: is shown in the inset, where the positions close to the time of 

191: observation are marked.}}

192: \end{figure}

193: 

194: \begin{figure}

195: \epsscale{0.95}

196: \includegraphics[scale=0.45, angle=-90.0]{f2.eps}

197: \caption{\label{f2} \small{NVSS L-band image of the field centered at the 

198: target source 0019$-$000. Part of the trajectory on 2006 May 26 is 

199: overplotted with the position at 0600, 0700, 0800, and 0900 UT (top right 

200: to bottom left) marked with crosses.}}

201: \end{figure}

202: 

203: \begin{figure*}

204: \epsscale{0.95}

205: \includegraphics[scale=0.65, angle=-90.0]{f3.eps}

206: \caption{\label{f3} \small{Power spectra of the intensity fluctuation. The 

207: horizontal axis is the spectral frequency (Hz) and the vertical axis is power 

208: (dB). Date, source name, and the time of observation (UT) are given at the top 

209: of the each panels. The dashed lines indicate the noise power level. Note the 

210: steepening of the spectrum at high spatial scales (panel $b$ and $c$) and 

211: significant excess power at low spatial scales (panel $c$) compared to the rest 

212: of the spectra from follow-up and control observations (See \S{\ref{sec2}} for 

213: details).}}

214: \end{figure*}

215: 

216: \begin{figure}

217: \epsscale{0.95}

218: \includegraphics[scale=0.45, angle=0.0]{f4.eps}

219: \caption{\label{f4} \small{Scintillation index enhancement in occultation. The 

220: solid line represents the long-time average of the scintillation index as a 

221: function of heliocentric distance of the point of closest approach of the line 

222: of sight towards 0019$-$000 obtained from scintillation monitoring for many 

223: years from the ORT. The triangles are measurements during occultation. The 

224: part of the plot of our interest is magnified in inset.}}

225: \end{figure}

226: 

227: As illustrated in Fig. (\ref{f3}), significant changes are evident in the 

228: shape of the power spectrum as the comet nucleus approached the line of sight 

229: to the radio source. The time of observation (in UT) for each spectrum is 

230: given on the top right of each panel. The details of the implication of the 

231: power spectrum shape and the interpretation of scale size from IPS spectral 

232: variation are described in \citet{mano94} and \citet{mano00}. Panels $a$ -- 

233: $c$ in Fig. (\ref{f3}) show the change of the power spectra during occultation 

234: on 2006 May 26. Panels $d$ and $e$ are the power spectra from the follow-up 

235: observations on 2006 May 27 and 28, respectively. The power spectra for the 

236: control source taken on May 26 (near simultaneous to occultation observation), 

237: 27, and 28 are shown in panels $f$ -- $h$, respectively. The spectrum 

238: towards the source obtained from the first half of the observation (0713 -- 

239: 0740 UT) on May 26 has no significant change. But spectra from the later 

240: part of the observation (0743 -- 0804 UT) shows steepening at lower spatial 

241: frequency. The scale size $a=v/(2 \pi f)$, where $f$ is the temporal 

242: frequency and $v$ is the solar wind speed. Considering a typical solar wind 

243: speed of $\sim$400 km s$^{-1}$, this translates to spatial scales of $>500$ 

244: km. Excess power is also seen at low spatial scales ($<50$ km) on the spectrum 

245: obtained from the end part of the observation (0754 -- 0804 UT). The shape of 

246: the power spectra of the control observations shows normal quiet solar wind 

247: condition. The changes in the spectra during the occultation are attributed to 

248: the turbulence in the comet plasma tail. 

249: 

250: We find that the scintillation index of the control source was normal 

251: during these observations and also during the control observations on the 

252: following days, implying normal quiet solar wind conditions. But we have 

253: noticed significant changes in the scintillation index for the target source. 

254: The scintillation index increased, in about 1 hr time during the course of 

255: our observation, from 0.068 to 0.089. It is clear from the power spectra that 

256: the steepening at the high spatial scales is the dominant source of this 

257: enhancement. Here we consider the ratio of the level of the electron density 

258: spectrum $\Phi_{\rm ne}$ to the mean squared electron density $\langle 

259: n_{\rm e}^2\rangle$ to be a measure of plasma turbulence. For an intervening 

260: medium of effective thickness $L$, the scintillating flux density variance 

261: $\Delta S^2 \propto \Phi_{\rm ne}L$. From this, we can relate the change of 

262: measured scintillation index to the physical parameters of solar wind and 

263: cometary plasma, 

264: \begin{equation}

265: \label{eqn:eqn1}

266: \frac{\Delta S^2}{\langle\Delta S^2\rangle}=\frac{(\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm 

267: e}^2)_{s} n^2_{\rm es} L_{\rm s} + (\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)_{\rm c} 

268: n^2_{\rm ec} L_{\rm c}}{(\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)_{\rm s} n^2_{\rm es} 

269: L_{\rm s}} 

270: \end{equation}

271: where the subscripts `s' and `c' refer to solar and cometary, respectively, and 

272: $\langle\Delta S^2\rangle$ is the estimated variance due to the solar wind on 

273: that day.  

274: 

275: \begin{table}

276:   \caption{Parameters for the plasma tail on May 26}

277:   \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}

278:   \hline

279:  Time  & Flux$^a$ & Scintillation &  $\Delta S^b$ & $\Delta S^2$ & & $(\Phi_{\rm 

280: ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)_{\rm c}$\\

281: \cline{5-5} \cline{7-7}

282:   (UT) &  (Jy)    &  index        &     (mJy)   & $\langle\Delta 

283: S^2\rangle$ & & $(\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)_{\rm s}$\\

284:   \hline          

285: 0725 & 3.1 & 0.068 & 210.8 & 1.327 & &   17.8 \\

286: 0750 & 3.0 & 0.071 & 213.0 & 1.355 & &   19.3 \\

287: 0800 & 2.7 & 0.089 & 240.3 & 1.724 & &   39.4 \\

288:   \hline

289: \multicolumn{7}{l}{$^a$ Flux density measurement is limited by the ORT confusion.}\\

290: \multicolumn{7}{l}{$^b$ $\Delta S$ is not limited by confusion and is much accurate.}

291: \label{tab:tab3}

292: \end{tabular}

293: \end{table}

294: 

295: We have used the data obtained from scintillation monitoring observations from 

296: the ORT for many years towards 0019$-$000 to get the scintillation index as a 

297: function of heliocentric distance of the point of closest approach of the line 

298: of sight \citep[see][for details of scintillation index variation with 

299: heliocentric distance]{mano93,mano06}. During our observation the average 

300: heliocentric distance was $\sim 185.5{\rm R}_\odot$. Fig. (\ref{f4}) shows the 

301: long-time average of the scintillation index, and from this, for normal solar 

302: wind conditions, the expected scintillation index is 0.061 at 

303: $185.5{\rm R}_\odot$ for a flux density of 3.0 Jy. This corresponds to 

304: $\langle\Delta S^2\rangle^{0.5}=183$ mJy. Please note that the peak 

305: scintillation index is $\sim 0.8$ for this source. This implies that the 

306: source is very compact ($\lesssim 50 $ mas) and is an ideal source for 

307: scintillation measurements. From our occultation data we can find, using 

308: Eqn. (\ref{eqn:eqn1}), the normalized level of turbulence 

309: $(\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)$ in the comet plasma tail compared to that in the 

310: solar wind. We assume typical values for $L_{\rm s}$ and $L_{\rm c}$ to be 

311: $10^8$ and $10^5$ km, respectively. Considering that the radio source line of 

312: sight probes the plasma tail at about $1.4 \times 10^4$ km away from the 

313: nucleus and that the angular size of the coma was $\sim 3'$, the expected 

314: value of $L_{\rm c}$ is $\sim 5 \times 10^4$ km. $L_{\rm c}=10^5$ km may be 

315: taken as an upper limit and, for smaller values of $L_{\rm c}$, the 

316: corresponding value of $(\Phi_{\rm ne}/n_{\rm e}^2)_{\rm c}$ will increase. 

317: Average electron number density in the cometary plasma is assumed to be 

318: $n_{\rm ec}=30$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep{gr86}. Earlier reports \citep{al86,sl86,an87} 

319: used, following \citet{rm86}, $n_{\rm es}=5$ cm$^{-3}$ for normal solar wind 

320: condition. We have instead taken the average value of number density to be $7$ 

321: cm$^{-3}$ computed from the 1 minute OMNI data (from the CDAWeb service of the 

322: NASA/GSFC Space Physics Data Facility) for the period of 2006 May 21 -- 31. 

323: We summarize the result of plasma turbulence enhancement in Table 

324: (\ref{tab:tab3}). 

325: 

326: \section{Discussion}

327: \label{sec3}

328: 

329: We present the detection of a rare event of the occultation of a compact 

330: source (B0019$-$000) by the plasma tail of comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B 

331: using scintillation observation and the power spectral analysis. It is 

332: interesting to compare the present results with the earlier reports of 

333: both detections and non-detections of enhanced scintillation. The range of 

334: values of the normalized plasma turbulence from similar observations spread 

335: over almost an order of magnitude \citep{al86,sl86,an87,sl90} for a given set 

336: of parameters (e.g., $L_{\rm c}$, $n_{\rm ec}$). In addition to that, the 

337: turbulence level is likely to change systematically with the distance from the 

338: nucleus of the comet along the plasma tail axis. In other words, occultation 

339: observations probe the plasma at different distances from the comet nucleus and 

340: hence may reveal a variety of turbulence levels. Hence a straightforward 

341: quantitative comparison of plasma turbulence is not possible. But from earlier 

342: results, the clear trend emerges that most of the negative results can be 

343: attributed to a chance of actually probing a lower level of turbulence in the 

344: occultation events \citep{sl90} for various reasons. The rest of the cases 

345: with favorable observing geometry have resulted in a positive detection. In 

346: the present study, given the possibility of enhanced level of turbulence 

347: because of the ongoing disintegration and the small offset of the line of 

348: sight from the nucleus of the comet, our result is in good agreement with this 

349: scenario. 

350: 

351: The change of the intensity fluctuation power spectra has contributions in two 

352: distinct scales. The steepening of the spectrum at low frequency indicates 

353: scale sizes in the intervening plasma at high spatial scales and remarkable 

354: turbulence enhancement associated in this spectral region. For a typical solar 

355: wind speed of 400 km s$^{-1}$, it translates to linear scales of $>500$ km. 

356: At the later part of the observation, at the close encounter of the comet 

357: nucleus and the line of sight to the radio source, we notice the additional 

358: significant contribution in the power spectrum at the low-frequency region, 

359: which corresponds to linear scales of $<50$ km. It is to be noted that the 

360: IPS measurements normally show much less turbulence at these small scales. The 

361: evolution of the spectrum with time during the course of the occultation 

362: indicates that the plasma turbulence level is dominated by small-scale density 

363: irregularities closer to the tail axis. However, it is the large-scale 

364: irregularities, developed most likely due to the interaction of plasma with 

365: the ambient solar wind and the evaporation process, that contribute 

366: significantly at the outer part of the tail. This shows the presence of two 

367: main regimes of turbulence in the comet plasma tail. This is found to be in 

368: agreement with the earlier reported results of \citet{sl86,sl90} for the cases 

369: of comet Halley and comet Wilson, where similar two-regime plasma turbulences 

370: were detected. 

371: 

372: 

373: \section{Conclusions}

374: \label{sec4}

375: 

376: We have present the results from the occultation observation of a compact 

377: radio source B0019$-$000 at 326.5 MHz through the plasma tail of comet 

378: Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-B. We detect significant enhancement in the 

379: scintillation index and change in the intensity fluctuation power spectrum 

380: during the occultation period. The systematic study of the evolution of power 

381: spectrum clearly reveals the dominant effect of large-scale ($>500$ km) 

382: density fluctuations and the presence of a smaller scale ($<50$ km) closer to 

383: the tail axis. Since the shape of the power spectra of all the control 

384: observations show normal quiet solar wind condition, these changes at the 

385: time of occultation are attributed to the plasma tail of the comet. This clearly 

386: shows the presence of a two-regime plasma turbulence with two distinct scales 

387: of density irregularities that may arise from the interaction of solar wind 

388: with the comet plasma tail. 

389: 

390: \acknowledgments

391: We thank Jayaram N. Chengalur, C. H. Ishwara-Chandra and Rajaram Nityananda 

392: for much encouragement and many helpful comments. We are grateful to the 

393: observing staff of the ORT. One of the authors (P.C.) is thankful to IUCAA for 

394: sponsoring his research under the IUCAA visiting associateship program. We are 

395: also grateful to the anonymous referee for useful comments and for prompting 

396: us into substantially improving this paper. This research has made use of 

397: NASA's Astrophysics Data System, the JPL Solar System Dynamics Web site, the CDAWeb 

398: service of the NASA/GSFC Space Physics Data Facility, and the NVSS data products. 

399: 

400: \begin{thebibliography}{}

401: 

402: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Alurkur, Bhonsle, \& Sharma}{Alurkur et al.}

403: {1986}]{al86} Alurkar, S. K., Bhonsle, R. V., \& Sharma, A. K. 1986, Nature, 

404: 322, 439

405: 

406: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Alurkur et al.}{1989}]{al89}

407: Alurkur, S. K., Sharma, A. K., Janardhan, P., Bhonsle, R. V., Ananthakrishnan, 

408: S., Manoharan, P. A., \& Venugapal, V. R. 1989, Nature, 338, 211

409: 

410: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ananthakrishnan, Rao, \& Bhandari}

411: {Ananthakrishnan et al.}{1975}]{an75} Ananthakrishnan, S., Rao, A. P., 

412: \& Bhandari, S. M. 1975, Ap\&SS, 37, 275

413: 

414: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ananthakrishnan, Manoharan, \& Venugopal}

415: {Ananthakrishnan et al.}{1987}]{an87} Ananthakrishnan, S., Manoharan, P. K., 

416: \& Venugopal, V. R. 1987, Nature, 329, 698

417: 

418: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Boehnhardt, \& Kaufl}{1995}]{bk95} Boehnhardt, 

419: H., \& Kaufl, H. U. 1995, IAU Circ., 6274

420: 

421: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Boehnhardt et al.}{2002}]{bo02} Boehnhardt, 

422: H., Holdstock, S., Hainaut, O., Tozzi, G. P., Benetti, S., \& Licandro, J. 

423: 2002, Earth Moon Planets, 90, 131

424: 

425: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Condon et al.}{1998}]{co98} Condon, J. J., 

426: Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., 

427: \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693

428: 

429: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Crovisier et al.}{1996}]{cro96} Crovisier, 

430: J., Bockel\'{e}e-Morvan, D., Gerard, E., Rauer, H., Biver, N., Colom, P., 

431: \& Jorda, L. 1996, A\&A, 310, L17

432: 

433: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Grard et al.}{1986}]{gr86} Grard, R., 

434: Pedersen, A., Trotignon, J. G., Beghin, C., Mogilevsky, M., Mikhailov, Y., 

435: Molchanov, O., \& Formisano, V. 1986, Nature, 321, 290

436: 

437: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hajivassiliou, \& Duffett-Smith}{1987}]{hd87} 

438: Hajivassiliou, C. A., \& Duffett-Smith, P. J. 1987, MNRAS, 229, 485

439: 

440: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hewish, Scott, \& Wills}{1964}]{hw64} Hewish, 

441: A., Scott, P. F., \& Wills, D. 1964, Nature, 203, 1214 

442: 

443: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Large et al.}{1981}]{lrg81} Large, M. I., 

444: Mills, B. Y., Little, A. G., Crawford, D. F., \& Sutton, J. M. 

445: 1981, MNRAS, 194, 693

446: 

447: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Manoharan}{1993}]{mano93} Manoharan, P. K. 

448: 1993, SoPh, 148, 153

449: 

450: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Manoharan, Kojima, \& Misawa}{1994}]{mano94} 

451: Manoharan, P. K., Kojima, M., \& Misawa, H. 1994, JGR, 99, 23411

452: 

453: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Manoharan et al.}{2000}]{mano00} Manoharan, P. 

454: K., Kojima, M., Gopalswamy, N., Kondo, T., \& Smith, Z. 2000, ApJ, 530, 1061

455: 

456: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Manoharan}{2003}]{mano03} Manoharan, P. K. 

457: 2003, The Solar Wind, in Lectures on Solar Physics (Springer-Verlag), 619, 299

458: 

459: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Manoharan}{2006}]{mano06} Manoharan, P. K. 

460: 2006, SoPh, 235, 345

461: 

462: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reme et al.}{1986}]{rm86} Reme, H., Sauvaud, 

463: J. A., D'Uston, C., Cotin, F., Cros, A., Anderson, K. A., Carlson, C. W., 

464: Curtis, D. W., Lin, R. P., Mendis, D. A., Korth, A., \& Richter, A. K. 1986, 

465: Nature, 321, 349

466: 

467: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Slee et al.}{1987}]{sl87} Slee, O. B., 

468: McConnell, D., Lim, J., \& Bobra, A. D. 1987, Nature, 325, 699

469: 

470: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Slee et al.}{1990}]{sl90} Slee, O. B., 

471: Bobra, A. D., Waldron, D., \& Lim, J. 1990, AuJPh, 43, 801

472: 

473: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Swarup et al.}{1971}]{gs71} Swarup, G., Sarma, 

474: N. V. G., Joshi, M. N., Kapahi, V. K., Bagri, D. S., Damle, S. V., 

475: Ananthakrishnan, S., Balasubramanian, V., Bhave, S. S., \& Sinha, R. P. P. 1971, 

476: Nature, 230, 185

477: 

478: \end{thebibliography}

479: 

480: \end{document}

481: