1: %\documentstyle[11pt]
2: %\documentclass[emulateapj]{emulateapj}
3: \documentclass[preprint,12pt]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{natbib}
5: %\pagestyle{myheadings}
6: %\nofiles
7:
8: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
9:
10: %\def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
11: %\def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
12: %\let\prog=\arg
13:
14: %\def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
15: %\marginparwidth 1.25in
16: %\marginparsep .125in
17: %\marginparpush .25in
18: %\reversemarginpar
19: \begin{document}
20: \shorttitle{Gas Accretion at 13 Myr}
21: \shortauthors{Currie, T. et al.}
22: %\setcounter{page}{1}
23: %\title{Gas in Protoplanetary Disks May Last Longer than 10-15 Myr around Some Late Spectral Type Stars}
24: \title{Discovery of Gas Accretion Onto Stars in 13 Myr old h and $\chi$ Persei}
25: \author{Thayne Currie\altaffilmark{1}, Scott J. Kenyon\altaffilmark{1}, Zoltan Balog\altaffilmark{2,3},
26: Ann Bragg\altaffilmark{4}, \& Susan Tokarz\altaffilmark{1}}
27: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA 02140}
28: %\altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
29: %CA, 90095}
30: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Av. Tucson, AZ 85721}
31: \altaffiltext{3}{On leave from the Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, University of Szeged,
32: H-6720 Szeged, Hungary}
33: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH}
34: \email{tcurrie@cfa.harvard.edu}
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We report the discovery of accretion disks associated with
37: $\sim$ 13 Myr-old intermediate/low-mass stars in h and $\chi$ Persei.
38: Optical spectroscopy of $\sim$ 5000 stars in these clusters and a surrounding halo population reveal
39: 32 A-K stars with H$_{\alpha}$ emission. Matching these stars with 2MASS and optical
40: photometry yields 25 stars with the highest probability of cluster membership and EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\ge$ 5 \AA.
41: Sixteen of these sources have EW(H$_{\alpha}$)$\ge$ 10\AA.
42: The population of accreting sources is strongly spectral type dependent: H$_{\alpha}$ emission
43: characteristic of accretion, especially strong accretion (EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\ge$ 10\AA),
44: is much more prevalent around stars later than G0.
45: Strong H$_{\alpha}$ emission from accretion is typically
46: associated with redder K$_{s}$-[8] colors.
47: The existence of accreting pre-main
48: sequence stars in h and $\chi$ Persei implies that circumstellar gas in some systems, especially those
49: with primaries later than G5 spectral type, can last longer than 10-15 Myr.
50: \end{abstract}
51: \keywords{Galaxy: Open Clusters and associations: Individual: NGC Number:
52: NGC 869, Galaxy: Open Clusters and associations: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 884,
53: accretion, accretion disks, planetary systems: protoplanetary disks}
54: \section{Introduction}
55: Young stars are born with massive, $\sim$ 0.01-0.1M$_{\star}$ (stellar mass), disks of gas and
56: dust. The disk viscously spreads, transporting angular momentum away from the star and mass
57: onto the star. Accretion onto the host star is identified from strong H$_{\alpha}$ emission;
58: typical mass accretion rates onto the star are $\sim$ 10$^{-8}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
59: for $\sim$ 1 Myr-old stars \citep{Hr98}. After $\sim$ 5 Myr, fewer sources show strong H$_{\alpha}$ emission indicative
60: of accretion, and accretion rates are typically much lower
61: ($\sim$ 10$^{-9}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) than at earlier ages.
62: By $\sim$ 10 Myr, few sources show signs of active accretion \citep{Si05}.
63:
64: The timescale for accretion to cease and for nebular gas in circumstellar disks to disperse
65: has important implications for planet formation. Massive planets may form in gas-poor/free conditions
66: (\citealt{Ch07, Kw03}). However, gas giant planet formation requires that
67: circumstellar gas lasts longer than the time for a $\sim$ 10-15 M$_{\oplus}$ protoplanetary
68: core to capture a large gaseous envelope ($\sim$ 10$^{6}$-10$^{7}$
69: years; \citealt{Ik00, Pn05}). Though the formation timescale is much shorter,
70: the disk instability model (e.g. \citealt{Bo05}) for Jovian planet formation
71: also requires a massive gas disk. Circumstellar gas is also necessary
72: for planetary migration (see \citealt{GT80, Wa97}), which may explain close-in giant planets ('hot Jupiters'),
73: and circularization of the orbits of terrestrial planets.
74: A spread in the time for accretion to cease and for gas to disperse may
75: then lead to diverse planetary systems.
76:
77: While previous studies show that few stars accrete gas after $\sim$ 10 Myr \citep{Si05},
78: the bulk properties of the longest-lived accreting systems are not well constrained due to
79: small number statistics. There are $\sim$ 5 known actively accreting stars with ages
80: $\gtrsim$ 10 Myr, including PDS 66, AK Sco, and St 34 (Mamajek et al. 2002; Reipurth et al. 1996; \citealt{Wh05}).
81: %There are few nearby massive clusters at ages $\sim$ 10-20 Myr where the spectral type
82: %distribution and other properties of the accreting stars can be constrained.
83: Well-known 10-20 Myr old clusters such as NGC 7160 (\citealt{Si05}) and Sco-Cen \citep{Ch05} have $\lesssim$
84: 200 known members. Because accretion at ages $\gtrsim$ 10 Myr
85: is rare ($\sim$ 2\%; \citealt{Si05}), a larger ($\gtrsim$ 1000-2000 sources)
86: ensemble of 10-20 Myr sources spanning a wide range of spectral types is
87: required to investigate the oldest accretion disks.
88:
89: The double cluster, h and $\chi$ Persei -- 13 $\pm$ 1 Myr old, d=2.34 kpc \citep{Bk05, Sl02, Ke01} --
90: provides an excellent opportunity to study the properties of a statistically significant sample of
91: the longest-lived accretion disks. With $\gtrsim$ 5000 members
92: in the cluster and surrounding halo population \citep{Cu07a}, robust constraints on gas
93: accretion are possible even if the fraction of accreting sources is $\sim$ 1-2\%.
94:
95: In this Letter, we report the discovery of 25 sources in h and $\chi$ Persei with
96: evidence for active gas accretion.
97: In \S 2 we identify these accreting sources by measuring
98: H$_{\alpha}$ equivalent widths and use quantitative spectral types
99: to select actively accreting h and $\chi$ Per members from a sample of
100: $\sim$ 5000 optical spectra. Analysis of our sample in \S 3 reveals that
101: the population of accretors is almost solely comprised of stars with spectral types later than
102: G5. We compare the strength of accretion signatures
103: to dust emission in \S 4, finding a weak correlation between the H$_{\alpha}$
104: equivalent width and IR excess. We conclude with a
105: brief summary and discuss future observations to investigate
106: circumstellar gas accretion in young stars in more detail.
107: These results show that circumstellar gas in at least stars
108: later than $\sim$ G0 lasts $\gtrsim$ 10-15 Myr.
109:
110: \section{Hectospec Observations/Hydra Archival Data of h and $\chi$ Persei and Sample Identification}
111: We obtained Hectospec \citep{Fa05} spectra of 4536 sources with V $\sim$ 16-19, J$\sim$ 14.25-16.25,
112: and J-H $\sim$ 0-1.5 in $\chi$ Persei and the halo population surrounding both clusters
113: on the 6.5m MMT telescope at Whipple Observatory during September and November 2006.
114: Each source was observed in three 10-minute exposures
115: using the 270 mm$^{-1}$ grating. This configuration yields spectra at
116: 4000-9000 \AA\ with 3 \AA\ resolution. The data were
117: processed using the standard Hectospec reduction pipeline \citep{Fa05} and typically had S/N $\gtrsim$
118: 30-50 at 5000 \AA.
119:
120: We acquired additional spectra of 710 sources near h and $\chi$ Per with
121: the Hydra multifiber spectrograph \citep{Ba93} on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope at the Kitt Peak National
122: Observatory. Hydra spectra were obtained during two observing runs in November 2000 and October 2001
123: and include stars with V $\sim$ 14-17 and J $\sim$ 12-14.5 (S/N $\approx$ 10-30 typically).
124: We used the 400 g mm$^{-1}$ setting blazed at 42$^{o}$, with a resolution of 7 \AA\
125: and a coverage of 3600-6700 \AA. The standard IRAF task \textit{dohydra} was
126: used to reduce the spectra.
127:
128: To select candidate emission line stars, we measured spectral indices (I($\lambda$);
129: see \citealt{BK02})
130: with the IRAF \textit{sbands}\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical
131: Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of
132: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under contract to the
133: National Science Foundation.} routine. Because classical T Tauri stars have
134: strong H$_{\alpha}$ emission and often have strong Ca II emission,
135: we derived indices for H$_{\alpha}$, H$_{\beta}$, H$_{\gamma}$, H$_{\delta}$,
136: and several Ca II features. For the H I features, bandpasses with
137: widths of 30 \AA\ ( H$_{\alpha}$) and 20 \AA\ (H$_{\beta}$, H$_{\gamma}$, and H$_{\delta}$)
138: yield good results. For Ca II, we centered bandpasses at 3933 \AA\ (20 \AA\ width)
139: and at 8498, 8542, and 8662 \AA\ (20 \AA) for the IR triplet lines.
140: To identify sources with H$_{\alpha}$ emission, we compared
141: the spectral index of H$_{\alpha}$ to H$_{\beta}$, which was
142: less likely to be in emission and typically had high signal-to-noise.
143:
144: The H$_{\alpha}$ and H$_{\beta}$ spectral indices for most stars
145: lie in a narrow band on I(H$_{\beta}$) vs. I(H$_{\alpha}$)
146: from $\sim$ (-0.2,0) to (0.7,0.4). Accreting sources have
147: anomolously small H$_{\alpha}$ index for a
148: given H$_{\beta}$ index (Figure \ref{specv}a; see also \citealt{BK02} and \citealt{Br02}).
149: Candidate accreting sources are those lying outside the main distribution of sources
150: on I(H$_{\beta}$) vs. I(H$_{\alpha}$), below the line I(H$_{\alpha}$)=0.5$\times$ I(H$_{\beta}$)-0.15
151: (Figure \ref{specv}a). After removing background M giants, Be stars, and low signal-to-noise
152: stars, 32 sources with clear H$_{\alpha}$ emission and
153: moderate to high signal-to-noise spectra remain.
154:
155: While each source clearly shows H$_{\alpha}$ emission, sources with
156: weaker emission may not be accreting \citep{Wb03}.
157: Chromospheric activity can produce
158: very small H$_{\alpha}$ equivalent widths (EW (H$_{\alpha}$)$\lesssim$ 3-5 \AA).
159: Accreting T Tauri stars typically EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\ge$ 10-20 \AA,
160: though low rates of accretion ($\dot{M}$ $\gtrsim$ 10$^{-8}$ M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$)
161: can produce EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\sim$ 3-10 \AA\ for stars earlier than K5 \citep{Wb03, Bn05}.
162: We consider sources with EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\gtrsim$ 5\AA\ as potential accreting stars.
163: To distinguish more clearly between
164: accreting sources and chromospherically active sources, we remeasured EW(H$_{\alpha}$)
165: using the IRAF routine \textit{splot}, smoothing any low signal-to-noise spectra
166: and fitting the line profile to a gaussian. Typically, \textit{splot} derived only slighly smaller
167: EW(H$_{\alpha}$) than \textit{sbands} ($\sim$ a few \AA).
168: Sources with EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\ge$ 10\AA\ are 'strong' accretors.
169: Consistent with observations of T Tauri stars in Taurus-Auriga and other clouds
170: (e.g. \citealt{Kh95}), no sources show evidence of CaII emission.
171:
172: To derive quantitative spectral types for these 32 sources,
173: we used spectral indices for $H_{\beta}$, $H_{\gamma}$,
174: $H_{\delta}$, the G band (4305 \AA), and Mg I (5175 \AA).
175: We fit piecewise linear
176: relationships between each spectral index and spectral type from
177: the \citet{Ja84} standards, derived spectral types for each index, and
178: adopted the median as the spectral type.
179: For the 3 sources with H$_{\beta}$ in emission, we derived a
180: spectral type from the 4 other indices without signs of accretion.
181: The resulting spectral type distribution ranged from A7 to M0
182: with typical uncertainties of $\sim$ 1-2 subclasses.
183: We compared our results to those using the quantitative spectral
184: typing method of \citet{He04} and found the agreement to be
185: excellent.
186:
187: To identify stars likely associated with the clusters,
188: we used optical photometry
189: (\citealt{Ke01}) and 2MASS/IRAC photometry from \citet{Cu07a}. We exploited
190: the well-constrained age and reddening of the double cluster and derived the
191: expected 2MASS J magnitude of members at
192: each spectral type. Sources within 0.2 mags of a band defined by the 12 and 14 Myr
193: stellar isochrones (from \citealt{Si00}) were identified as
194: members (see \citealt{Cu07a}). Figure \ref{specv} shows the 30 sources consistent
195: with membership: the other two sources were a late K star and
196: a M0 star that are too cool to fall within the isochrone.
197: Although these two sources may lie at the cluster distance and
198: have slightly different ages (e.g. 10 or 15 Myr) or
199: extinctions, the clusters appear to have a small age spread
200: \citep{Me93, Ke01, Sl02, Bk05}. Thus, the 30 sources shown
201: in Figure \ref{specv}b are the most likely cluster
202: members. Table 1 lists their properties.
203:
204: Young T Tauri stars show a strong correlation
205: between EW(H$_{\alpha}$) and IR excess from disks \citep{Kh95}.
206: Stars in $\sim$ 1 Myr-old Taurus-Auriga with L band (3.8$\mu m$) excess (K-L $\ge$ 0.4)
207: typically have stronger H$_{\alpha}$ emission (EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\gtrsim$
208: 10\AA) than those lacking excess. Excess sources
209: have a range of EW(H$_{\alpha}$), which implies a range of accretion
210: rates. To search for a similar trend in our sample, we
211: use the K$_{s}$-[8] color derived from the 2MASS/IRAC
212: data \citep{Cu07a} as an indicator of excess emission instead of K$_{s}$-[3.6]. Eighteen of
213: 30 sources with H$_{\alpha}$ emission are detected at [8] with errors $\le$ 0.2 mags.
214: Typically, sources without 8$\mu m$ photometry are fainter in K$_{s}$ ($\sim$ 14.25-14.75) than those
215: with 8$\mu m$ detections (K$_{s}$ $\sim$ 13.5-14).
216: % Two of these sources have marginal/clear [5.8] excess.
217: \section{Results: Evidence for Accretion at $\sim$ 13 Myr}
218: Most of the H$_{\alpha}$ emission stars in h and $\chi$ Per have G0 or later spectral types (Figure \ref{specs}).
219: Overall, 25/30 sources have EW$\gtrsim$5 \AA\ and thus
220: are likely accreting circumstellar gas. All fourteen sources later than G5
221: have EW $\gtrsim$5 \AA. By contrast, 5/16 sources G5 and earlier have
222: EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\le$ 5\AA\ .
223: The distribution of sources with EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\geq$ 10\AA\
224: is even more strongly biased towards later spectral types.
225: Seven out of eight sources later than K0 have EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\geq$ 10\AA\
226: while only 6/16 of the sources G5 and earlier have EW(H$_{\alpha}$) $\geq$ 10\AA.
227: Four of five sources with EW(H$_{\alpha}$)$\ge$ 20\AA\ are later than
228: K0, and the sources with the strongest H$_{\alpha}$ emission (EW $\sim$ 47 \AA\ and 59 \AA)
229: are a K7 and K4 star. The atlas of both emission line and non-emission line stars will
230: appear in the full spectroscopy survey
231: paper (T. Currie et al. 2008, in progress).
232:
233: The spectral type distribution of accreting sources
234: is comprised almost exclusively of sources later than G0.
235: Because we do not have a complete sample of non-accreting sources at a given
236: spectral type, we cannot accurately measure the frequency of accretors
237: as a function of spectral type/mass. Nevertheless, we can estimate the
238: fraction of accreting sources in our sample by deriving how many of
239: the 5145 (4536 from Hectospec, 609 from Hydra) sources with near-IR photometry
240: lie along the h and $\chi$ Per isochrone in J/J-H. We follow \citet{Cu07a} and identify
241: as cluster members 2040 sources within a band that extends 0.3
242: mags fainter and 0.75 mags brighter (the binary locus) than the
243: 13 Myr isochrone, where the vast majority of non members lie below the
244: isochrone. We estimate the spectral types of sources
245: from their J-H colors and divide the sample into two populations,
246: earlier than F8 and later than F8, and compute the frequency of
247: accreting sources in each population.
248:
249: The frequency of accreting sources is low and is consistent with a spectral-type dependence.
250: Overall, $\sim$ 1.2\% (25/2040) of sources consistent with cluster membership are likely accreting.
251: Through F8, 1/1042 (0.1\%) sources with spectra show evidence of accretion. The
252: frequency is 2.4\% (24/998) for later sources.
253: Spectral types for the non-accreting sources will provide better
254: constraints on the frequency of long-lived accretion disks.
255: The low fraction of accreting stars in h and $\chi$ Per is broadly consistent with results from
256: other studies. \citet{Si05} and \citet{Si06}
257: identified accretion in $\sim$ 40\% of stars in the 4 Myr-old Tr 37 Cepheus OB2
258: subgroup and only one of 55 stars ($\sim$ 2\%) in the other Cep OB2 subgroup,
259: NGC 7160 ($\sim$ 11.8 Myr old). An accretion disk fraction of $\sim$ 1.2\%
260: from our sample is consistent with a decline of accretion disk frequency with age.
261:
262: To check these results, we consider possible selection biases. If the
263: emission-line stars have significant optical veiling, their spectral
264: types appear earlier than fainter (J $<$ 16) non-accreting stars with
265: similar masses. We then overestimate their relative frequency. However,
266: stars with large veiling have near-IR excesses, H--K$_s$ $\gtrsim$ 0.5
267: and K$_s$--[3.6] $\gtrsim$ 0.4-0.5 \citep{Kh95}. With H--K$_s$ $\lesssim$ 0.4-0.5
268: and K$_s$--[3.6] $\lesssim$ 0.3-0.4 \citep{Cu07a}, emission-line stars in
269: h \& $\chi$ Per have little or no near-IR excess and probably have negligible
270: veiling. If photometric errors move faint cluster stars outside the isochrone,
271: we underestimate the number of non-accreting stars. Including all stars
272: with J-H $\gtrsim$ 0.48 (F8; 2303 total) in the cluster sample yields a strict lower
273: limit to the accretion frequency, 1.1\% $\pm$ 0.2\%, which is still much
274: larger than the frequency for earlier type stars. Finally, we consider
275: the possibility that the H$\alpha$ emission flux associated with late-type
276: stars is undetectable around 1 mag brighter cluster stars with earlier
277: spectral types. With EW(H$\alpha$) $\sim$ 5--10 \AA\ for the late-type stars,
278: early-type stars with similar H$\alpha$ fluxes should have EW(H$\alpha$)
279: = 2--5 \AA, easily detectable on our spectra. Thus, we conclude that
280: possible selection effects do not produce a false trend of increasing
281: accretion frequency among lower mass stars.
282:
283: Our sample shows a $\sim$ 2-3$\sigma$ correlation between accretion and infrared excess.
284: The majority of stars have negligible K$_{s}$-[8] excess (Figure \ref{eqwv}), but
285: some sources have K$_{s}$-[8]$\sim$ 0.4, the nominal cutoff for IR excess
286: in \citet{Cu07a} and \citet{Kh95}. One source, the K7 star, has K$_{s}$-[8] $\sim$ 1 and
287: is clearly redder than a stellar photosphere. Sources with
288: larger H$_{\alpha}$ ($\ge$20\AA) have redder K$_{s}$-[8]
289: colors than those with small/marginal H$_{\alpha}$ emission. The Spearman rank correlation
290: coefficient between K$_{s}$-[8] and H$_{\alpha}$ emission is r$_{s}$=0.60; this distribution
291: has a low probability of being drawn from a random sample (p$_{d}$ = 0.9\%). The distribution
292: is less correlated for sources with chromospheric H$_{\alpha}$ emission (r$_{s}$=0.35, p$_{d}$ $\sim$ 22\%). We thus
293: find a $\sim$ 2-3 $\sigma$ correlation between IR excess and EW(H$_{\alpha}$)
294: for sources with H$_{\alpha}$ emission. However, some debris disks in h and $\chi$ Per
295: \citep{Cu07b, Cu07c} have strong excesses at [8] and/or [24] without accretion.
296: Therefore, while accretion may imply IR excess, IR excess need not imply accretion.
297: \section{Summary \& Discussion}
298: We have discovered a population of stars with accretion disks in h and $\chi$ Persei.
299: Of the 30 H$_{\alpha}$ emitters that are likely h and $\chi$ Per cluster/halo members, 25
300: have EW(H$_{\alpha}$) consistent with circumstellar gas accretion. The spectral types
301: of accreting sources are almost all later than G0. About $\sim$ 1.2\% of our sample
302: shows evidence for accretion, consistent with the low fraction of accretors at
303: $\sim$ 10 Myr found by \citet{Si05}. We find that H$_{\alpha}$ emission sources with larger
304: EW(H$_{\alpha}$) have redder K$_{s}$-[8] excess.
305:
306: While current survey points to a spectral type dependence on the accretion disk lifetime,
307: a full survey of h and $\chi$ Persei sources can provide stronger constraints on
308: the properties of long-lived disks.
309: Our sample is drawn heavily from $\chi$ Persei and the surrounding halo
310: population. Analyzing spectra of the slightly more massive/dense member of the
311: Double Cluster, h Persei, will test whether the frequency of accreting stars
312: is the same or depends on properties such as the mass and density of the cluster.
313: A complete Hectospec survey of $\sim$
314: 15,000 sources in the h and $\chi$ Per field is underway and will better characterize the
315: population of accreting pre-main sequence stars.
316: \acknowledgements
317: We thank the anonymous referee for a timely and helpful report and
318: Eric Mamajek for useful discussions regarding previously known stars with
319: long-lived accretion disks. TC and SK acknowledge support from the
320: NASA Astrophysics Theory Program grant NAG5-13278 and TPF Grant NNG06GH25G.
321: ZB received support from Hungarian OTKA Grants TS049872 and T049082.
322: \begin{thebibliography}{}
323: %\bibitemAA\u (1999)]{Au99} Augereau, J., et al., 1999, A\&A, 348, 557
324: %\bibitem[Ba (2003)]{Ba03} Bary, J., et al. 2003,AA\pJ, 586, 1136
325: %\bibitemAA\l (2001)]{Al01} Allen, C. W., 2001, Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, Fourth Ed., Arthur N. Cox (ed.), Springer-Verlag
326: %\bibitem[Acke, van den Ancker, and Dullemond (2005)]{Av05} Acke, B., van den Ancker, M., Dullemond, C., 2005, A\&A, 436, 209
327: \bibitem[Barden et al. (1993)]{Ba93} Barden, S., et al., 1993, \pasp, 37, Fiber Optics in Astronomy II,
328: ed. P. M. Gray (San Francisco: ASP), 185
329: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascues and Martin (2005)]{Bn05} Barrado y Navascues, D., Martin, E., 2005, RMxAC, 24, 179
330: \bibitem[Balog and Kenyon (2002)]{BK02} Balog, Z., Kenyon, S., 2002, \aj, 124, 2083
331: \bibitem[Boss (2005)]{Bo05} Boss, A., 2005, \apj, 629, 535
332: \bibitem[Bragg and Kenyon (2002)]{Br02} Bragg, A., Kenyon, S., 2002, \aj, 124, 3289
333: \bibitem[Bragg and Kenyon (2005)]{Bk05} Bragg, A. \& Kenyon, S., 2005, \aj, 130, 134
334: \bibitem[Chen et al. (2005)]{Ch05} Chen, C., et al., 2005, \apj, 623, 493
335: %\bibitem[Ch (2001)]{Ch01} Chambers, J., 2001, Icarus, 152, 205
336: %\bibitem[Co (2003)]{Co03} Cohen, M., et al., 2003,AA\J, 126, 1090
337: %\bibitem[Currie(2005)]{Cu05} Currie, T., 2005,AA\pJ, 629, 549
338: \bibitem[Currie and Hansen (2007)]{Ch07} Currie, T., Hansen, B., 2007, \apj, 666,1232
339: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2007a)]{Cu07a} Currie, T., et al., 2007(a),\apj, 659, 599
340: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2007b)]{Cu07b} Currie, T., et al., 2007(b), ApJL, 663, 105
341: \bibitem[Currie et al.(2007c)]{Cu07c} Currie, T., et al., 2007(c), \apj\ accepted, arXiv:0709.2510
342: %\bibitem[Fa (1998)]{fab98} Fabricant, D., et al., 1998, \pasp, 110, 79
343: \bibitem[Fabricant et al.(2005)]{Fa05} Fabricant, D., et al., 2005, \pasp, 117, 1411
344: \bibitem[Goldreich and Tremaine (1980)]{GT80} Goldreich, P., Tremaine, S., 1980, \apj, 241, 425
345: %\bibitem[Gordon et al.(2005)]{Go05} Gordon, K. D., et al., 2005, \pasp, 117, 503
346: %\bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2006)]{Gr06} Gorlova, N., et al., 2006,AA\pJ, 649, 1028
347: %\bibitem[Ha (2005)]{Ha05} Hartmann, L., et al., 2005,AA\pJ, 629, 881
348: %\bibitem[Hartmann (1998)]{Ha98} Hartmann, L., 1998, Accretion Processes in Star Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
349: \bibitem[Hartmann et al. (1998)]{Hr98} Hartmann, L., et al., 1998, \apj, 495, 385
350: %\bibitem[Hartmann et al. (2005)]{Ha05} Hartmann, L., et al., 2005, \apjl, 628, 147
351: %\bibitem[Hayashi(1981)]{Ha81} Hayashi, C.,1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35
352: \bibitem[Hernandez et al. (2004)]{He04} Hernandez, J., et al., 2004,\aj, 127, 1682
353: %\bibitem[Hernandez et al.(2006)]{He06} Hernandez, J., et al., 2006,AA\pJ, 652, 472
354: %\bibitem[Hillenbrand(2005)]{Hi05} Hillenbrand, L., 2005, astro-ph/0511083
355: \bibitem[Ikoma et al. (2000)]{Ik00} Ikoma, M., et al., 2000,\apj, 537, 1013
356: \bibitem[Jacoby et al. (1984)]{Ja84} Jacoby, G., et al., 1984, \apjs, 56, 257
357: \bibitem[Keller et al.(2001)]{Ke01} Keller, S.C., et al., 2001,\aj, 122, 248
358: %\bibitem[Ke (1999)]{Ke99} Kenyon, S, et al., 1999,AA\pJL, 526, 465
359: %\bibitem[Kenyon and Bromley(2004)]{Kb04} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2004,AA\pJL, 602, 133
360: %\bibitem[KB (2005)]{Kb05} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2005,AA\J, 130, 269
361: %\bibitem[Kenyon and Bromley(2006)]{Kb06} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2006,AA\J, 131, 1837
362: %\bibitem[Kenyon and Hartmann(1987)]{Kh87} Kenyon, S., Hartmann, L., 1987, \apj, 323, 714
363: \bibitem[Kenyon and Hartmann(1995)]{Kh95} Kenyon, S., Hartmann, L., 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
364: \bibitem[Konacki and Wolszczan (2003)]{Kw03} Konacki, M., Wolszczan, A., 2003, \apj, 589, 495
365: %\bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{In05} Indebetouw, R., et al., 2005,AA\pJ, 619, 931
366: %\bibitem[Mathis(2005)]{Ma05} Mathis, J., 1990,AA\RA\&A, 28, 37
367: \bibitem[Mamajek, Meyer, and Liebert (2002)]{Ma02} Mamajek, E., Meyer, M., Liebert, J., 2002, \aj, 124, 1670
368: \bibitem[Meynet et al.(1993)]{Me93} Meynet, G., Mermilliod, J-C., Maeder,A., 1993, A\&AS, 98, 477
369: %\bibitem[Mi (2007)]{Mi07} Meyer, M., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0606399
370: %\bibitem[MS (1979)]{Ms79} Miller, G., \& Scalo, J., 1979AA\pJS, 41, 513
371: \bibitem[Papaloizou and Nelson (2005)]{Pn05} Papaloizou, J., Nelson, R., 2005, A\&A, 433, 247
372: %\bibitem[Pascuicci et al.(2006)]{Pa06} Pascucci, I., et al., 2006,\apj, 651, 1177
373: \bibitem[Reipurth, Pedrosa, and Lago (1996)]{Re96} Reipurth, B., Pedrosa, A., and Lago, M., 1996, A\&AS, 120, 229
374: %\bibitem[Oc (1973)]{Oc73} O'Connell, R., 1973, \aj, 78, 1074
375: %\bibitem[La (2006)]{La06} Lada, C.J., et al., 2006,AA\J, 131, 1574
376: %\bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{Ri05} Rieke, G., et al., 2005,AA\pJ, 620, 1010
377: \bibitem[Siess et al.(2000)]{Si00} Siess, L., et al., 2000,A\&A, 358, 593
378: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2005)]{Si05} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al., 2005, \aj
379: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2006)]{Si06} Sicilia-Aguilar, A., et al., 2006, \aj
380: %\bibitem[Si (2007)]{Si07} SiciliaAA\guilar, A., et al., 2007, astro-ph/0701321
381: %\bibitem[Silverstone et al. (2006)]{Sv06} Silverstone, M., et al., 2006, 639, 1138
382: \bibitem[Slesnick et al.(2002)]{Sl02} Slesnick, C., et al., 2002,\apj, 576, 880
383: \bibitem[Ward (1997)]{Wa97} Ward, W., 1997, Icarus, 126, 261
384: \bibitem[White and Basri (2003)]{Wb03} White, R., Basri, G., 2003, \apj, 582, 1109
385: \bibitem[White and Hillenbrand (2005)]{Wh05} White, R., Hillenbrand, L., 2005, \apjl, 621, 65
386: %\bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(1995)]{Zu95} Zuckerman, B., et al., 1995, Nature, 373, 494
387: %\bibitem[Zuckerman et al. (2001)]{Zu01} Zuckerman, B., et al., 2001, \apjl, 562, 87
388: %\bibitem[Su (2006)]{Su06} Su, K., et al., 2006,AA\pJ, 653, 675
389: %\bibitem[Wi (2007)]{Wi07} Winston, E., et al., 2007,in prep.
390: %\bibitem[Yin (2002)]{Yi02} Yin, Q., et al., 2002, Nature, 418, 949
391: \end{thebibliography}
392: \input{tab1.tex}
393: %\input{tab1f.tex}
394: %\input{tab2.tex}
395: \begin{figure}
396: \epsscale{0.9}
397: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
398: \caption{(left) The H$_{\alpha}$ spectral index plotted against the H$_{\beta}$ index. Sources lying below the dotted line
399: were selected for emission signatures; sources between the main distribution and the line typically had lower signal-to-noise.
400: (right) Spectral type vs. J magnitude for h and $\chi$ Per members with H$_{\alpha}$ emission.
401: The dotted line indicates the faint limit of the
402: survey. The 12 and 14 Myr isochrones (top and bottom thick lines)
403: are overplotted with 0.2 mag errors (top and bottom grey lines). The errors in derived spectral type
404: are overplotted as bars on the data points (triangles).}
405: \label{specv}
406: \end{figure}
407: %\begin{figure}
408: %\plotone{sgi20938.eps}
409: %\caption{Example spectra of H$_{\alpha}$ emission
410: %sources. This source, a K7 star, has a H$_{\alpha}$ equivalent width of $\sim$ 47 \AA\ and
411: %has H$_{\beta}$ ($\sim$ 4860 \AA) in emission as well.}
412: %\label{specex}
413: %Distribution of photospheric (small,thick squares), marginal [24] excess (small asterisks for
414: %sources brighter than J=12.5; small diamonds for those fainter than J=12.5), and
415: %strong [24] excess (large asterisks/diamonds) sources. 'Weak' and 'strong' excesses are defined as sourcs
416: %with $K_{s}$-[24]=0.65-2 and $K_{s}$-[24]$\ge$2, respectively. The IR-excess population is comprised of two
417: %main groups: bright Be stars with optically-thin free-free emission and fainter
418: %(J $\le$ 13.5) pre-main sequenceAA\-F stars that likely harbor protoplanetary disks.}
419: %\end{figure}
420: \begin{figure}
421: \epsscale{0.8}
422: %\plottwo{spec_hist0.ps}{spec_hist5.ps}
423: %\plotone{spec_hist10.ps}
424: \plotone{f2.eps}
425: %\plotone{spec_hist0.ps}
426: %\plotone{spec_hist5.ps}
427: %\plotone{spec_hist10.ps}
428: \caption{Spectral type distribution of H$_{\alpha}$ emission sources (grey line), those with EW$\ge$5\AA\ (dash-dot line), and
429: those with EW$\ge$10\AA\ (thick dotted line). Sources with H$_{\alpha}$$\sim$5-10\AA\ are probably marginally accreting,
430: those with H$_{\alpha}$ $\gtrsim$ 10\AA\ are consistent with the strength of H$_{\alpha}$ emission from
431: Classical T Tauri stars.}
432: \label{specs}
433: \end{figure}
434: \begin{figure}
435: \epsscale{0.75}
436: \plotone{f3.eps}
437: \caption{H$_{\alpha}$ equivalent width vs. K$_{s}$-[8]
438: color. There is a weak correlation between the H$_{\alpha}$ width and IR excess.}
439: \label{eqwv}
440: \end{figure}
441: \end{document}
442: