1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\feh{{\rm[Fe/H]}}
4: \def\alphafe{{\rm[\alpha/Fe]}}
5: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
6: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
7: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
8: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Integrated Light GC Abundances}
11: \shortauthors{McWilliam \& Bernstein}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \newcommand{\znh}{[{\rm Zn/H}]}
16: \newcommand{\msol}{M_\odot}
17: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.\ }
18: \newcommand{\delv}{\Delta v}
19: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$ }
20: \newcommand{\cm}[1]{\, {\rm cm^{#1}}}
21: \newcommand{\N}[1]{{N({\rm #1})}}
22: \newcommand{\e}[1]{{\epsilon({\rm #1})}}
23: \newcommand{\f}[1]{{f_{\rm #1}}}
24: \newcommand{\rAA}{{\AA \enskip}}
25: \newcommand{\sci}[1]{{\rm \; \times \; 10^{#1}}}
26: \newcommand{\ltk}{\left [ \,}
27: \newcommand{\ltp}{\left ( \,}
28: \newcommand{\ltb}{\left \{ \,}
29: \newcommand{\rtk}{\, \right ] }
30: \newcommand{\rtp}{\, \right ) }
31: \newcommand{\rtb}{\, \right \} }
32: \newcommand{\ohf}{{1 \over 2}}
33: \newcommand{\nohf}{{-1 \over 2}}
34: \newcommand{\rhf}{{3 \over 2}}
35: \newcommand{\smm}{\sum\limits}
36: \newcommand{\perd}{\;\;\; .}
37: \newcommand{\cmma}{\;\;\; ,}
38: \newcommand{\intl}{\int\limits}
39: \newcommand{\mkms}{{\rm \; km\;s^{-1}}}
40: \newcommand{\ew}{W_\lambda}
41:
42: %\special{papersize=8.5in,11in}
43:
44: \title{Globular Cluster Abundances from High-Resolution Integrated
45: Light Spectra, I: 47 Tuc}
46:
47: \author{Andrew McWilliam}
48: \affil{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institute of Washington, \\
49: 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101--1292}
50: \email{andy@ociw.edu}
51:
52: \and
53:
54: \author{Rebecca A. Bernstein}
55: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1156 High Street,\\
56: UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
57: \email{rab@ucolick.org}
58:
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61:
62: We describe the detailed chemical abundance analysis of a
63: high-resolution (R$\sim$35,000), integrated-light (IL), spectrum of
64: the core of the Galactic globular cluster 47~Tuc, obtained using the
65: du~Pont echelle at Las Campanas. This is the first paper describing
66: the abundance analysis of a set of Milky Way clusters of which we
67: have obtained integrated light spectra; we are analyzing these to
68: develop and demonstrate an abundance analysis strategy that can be
69: applied to spatial unresolved, extra-galactic clusters.
70:
71: We have computed abundances for
72: Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Nd
73: and Eu. For an analysis with the known color-magnitude
74: diagram ({\em cmd}) for 47~Tuc we obtain a mean [Fe/H] value
75: of $-$0.75 $\pm$0.026$\pm$0.045 dex (random and systematic error),
76: in good agreement with the mean of 5 recent
77: high resolution abundance studies, at $-$0.70 dex. Typical random errors
78: on our mean [X/Fe] ratios are 0.07--0.10 dex, similar
79: to studies of individual stars in 47~Tuc.
80: Only Na and Al appear
81: anomalous, compared to abundances from individual stars: they are
82: enhanced in the IL spectrum, perhaps due to proton burning
83: in the most luminous cluster stars.
84:
85: Our IL abundance analysis with an unknown {\em cmd} employed
86: theoretical Teramo isochrones; however, the observed frequency of AGB bump
87: stars in 47~Tuc is approximately three times higher than theoretical predictions,
88: so we adopt zero-point abundance corrections to account for this deficiency.
89: The spectra, alone, provide mild constraints on the cluster age, ruling-out
90: ages younger than $\sim$2 Gyr. However, when we include theoretical IL B$-$V colors
91: and metallicity derived from the
92: Fe~I lines, the age is constrained to 10--15 Gyr and we obtain
93: [Fe/H]=$-$0.70$\pm$0.021$\pm$0.052 dex.
94:
95:
96:
97: % In addition to these abundances measurements, we can constrain a
98: % number of other properties of the stellar population that bear
99: % on stellar evolution in clusters and horizontal branch morphology.
100: % In particular, we identify diagnostic abundance plots that could be
101: % used to place constraints on cluster age and to discriminate
102: % between blue horizontal branch and main sequence stars.
103:
104: We also find that trends of IL Fe line abundances with equivalent width
105: and excitation potential can constrain the horizontal
106: branch morphology of an unresolved cluster, as well as age. Lastly,
107: our spectrum synthesis of 5.4 million TiO lines indicates that the
108: 7300--7600\AA\ TiO window should be useful for estimating the effect of M giants
109: on the IL abundances, and important for clusters more metal-rich than 47~Tuc.
110:
111:
112: \end{abstract}
113:
114: \keywords{stars: abundances --- globular clusters: individual (47 Tuc)}
115:
116: \section{Introduction}
117:
118:
119: Detailed high-resolution chemical abundance analysis of individual
120: stars in Galactic globular clusters (GCs) has been pursued for
121: 30 years (e.g. Cohen 1978; Pilachowski, Canterna \& Wallerstein 1980).
122: Such abundance studies are a critical tool for probing the chemical
123: evolution of the Galaxy as well as stellar evolution up the giant
124: branch (e.g. Sneden et al. 1991; Briley, Smith \& Lambert 1994) and
125: complemented earlier work on nearby field stars (e.g. Wallerstein
126: 1962, Luck \& Bond 1985). Unfortunately, similar studies have never
127: been possible in other galaxies beyond the Local Group dwarfs,
128: as even the brightest red giant branch stars are too faint to be seen
129: in distant galaxies. Indeed, only recently have abundances of
130: individual GC red giant stars in the closest members of the Local
131: Group become available (e.g. Johnson, Ivans \& Stetson 2006; Letarte
132: et al. 2006).
133:
134: For extra-galactic GCs, integrated-light metallicities have been
135: estimated for systems ranging from M31 to the Virgo cluster of galaxies,
136: using broad-band photometric colors (e.g. Forte, Strom \&
137: Strom 1981; Geisler et al. 1996) and low-resolution spectra
138: (e.g. Racine, Oke \& Searle 1978; Brodie \& Huchra 1990). The low
139: resolution spectra typically employ the ``Lick'' index system
140: (e.g. Faber 1973), which is based on correlations between strong absorption
141: features at low resolution and detailed abundances obtained for individual
142: Galactic GC stars, at high spectral resolution.
143: All of these indices contain numerous lines from several elements, although many
144: are dominated by particular species that can be empirically calibrated to
145: give very approximate composition information (e.g. the Mg$_2$ index can be
146: calibrated for approximate [Mg/Fe] or [$\alpha$/Fe]). An example of
147: this is the study of NGC~5128 by Peng, Ford \& Freeman (2004); in this
148: case even quite crude composition information provides a powerful investigative
149: tool. Results from such studies include the discovery of bimodal GC
150: metallicity/color distribution in extra-galactic systems (e.g. Elson \& Santiago 1996;
151: Whitmore et al. 1995), reminiscent of the bimodal GCs in the Galaxy (e.g. Zinn 1985).
152:
153: Because of their relative homogeneity, ages ($>>$ 1 Gyr), and high luminosity,
154: GCs can be used to probe the chemical evolution history of galaxies. The most
155: luminous GCs presumably only trace the major star forming events, including mergers.
156: As indicated above, even basic metallicity provides interesting information
157: for comparison with the Milky Way galaxy. However, detailed chemical composition
158: of GCs could potentially provide a plethora of information on galaxy evolution,
159: because the chemical elements are produced by a variety of stars, with
160: varying sensitivity to stellar mass and metallicity.
161:
162: We are developing a method for measuring detailed chemical abundances
163: of GCs using high resolution spectra of their integrated light
164: (McWilliam \& Bernstein 2002; Bernstein \& McWilliam 2005). Due to
165: low the velocity dispersions of GCs ($\sigma$$\sim$1--20 Km/s), the
166: intrinsic line widths of the integrated light spectra are small enough
167: that individual lines are well resolved and blending is not much more
168: problematic than for individual red giant stars. In
169: Figure~\ref{fig-sigmv}, we demonstrate this point with a plot of
170: velocity dispersion as a function of M$_{\rm v}$ for Galactic GCs. Also
171: shown in that figure is the line width parameter, $R$=$\lambda$/FWHM,
172: that corresponds to the plotted velocity dispersions. It is clear
173: from this plot that spectral resolutions of R$\geq$10,000 are
174: necessary to resolve the spectral lines in even the brightest GCs;
175: R$\geq$30,000 is necessary for the average Galactic GCs. With
176: spectrograph resolving power somewhat larger than these values of $R$,
177: line profiles can be fully characterized. These narrow line widths
178: are in stark contrast to those of giant galaxies (elliptical and
179: spiral), which have velocity dispersions in the range 100-300 Km/s
180: (e.g. Faber \& Jackson 1976) and line width parameters, $R$, of order
181: 1,000--3,000. The Lick system, which has been used to measure the
182: ages and metallicities of stellar systems from GCs to giant elliptical
183: galaxies, is based on spectra with resolving power
184: $\lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim$600 (e.g. Faber et al. 1985; Worthey et
185: al. 1994; Trager 2004). While the sampling of this index system is
186: justified for faint giant galaxies, a low resolution system such as
187: this does not utilize the available information for bright GCs. As we
188: show in this paper, it is possible to use high dispersion
189: integrated-light spectra of GCs to reveal a wealth of abundance
190: information from the weak lines of numerous elements that are lost in
191: low resolution, low S/N, spectra. Indeed, high resolution spectra,
192: employing diagnostics similar to those used in the spectral analysis
193: of single stars, can be used to break the age-metallicity degeneracy
194: that is troublesome at low spectral resolution.
195:
196:
197: In this paper we demonstrate the possibilities and some of the
198: practical challenges for using IL spectra of GCs to measure detailed
199: chemical composition. This analysis holds significant potential for
200: galaxy evolution constraints. Due to the high luminosity of GCs,
201: high-resolution spectra of sufficient quality can be obtained for GCs
202: at extra-galactic distances and used to probe the chemical evolution
203: of distant galaxies. The luminosities of the brightest GCs are
204: comparable to young supergiant stars, for which abundances have been
205: measured in Local Group galaxies (e.g. Venn et al. 2001; Kaufer et al.
206: 2004) using spectra from large telescopes. However, unlike short-lived,
207: supergiant stars that reveal only recent gas compositions,
208: GCs ages cover the full range of galactic history.
209:
210: In particular, this paper focuses on the analysis of
211: one cluster (NGC 104) from a sample of ``training set''
212: clusters that we have observed and analyzed with the goal of
213: developing and demonstrating a technique for abundance analysis of a
214: single age, chemically homogeneous, stellar population.
215: Our ``training set'' is comprised of a sample
216: of Galactic and LMC GCs. Of these, the Galactic GCs are
217: well studied, with photometric and detailed
218: abundance studies of individual stars in the literature. Because they
219: are well studied, distance and reddening parameters are readily
220: available for use in our analysis, as are ``fiducial'' abundances
221: obtained from individual stars which we can use to check our final
222: abundance results. We begin with the luminous GC 47~Tuc
223: ([Fe/H]$\sim$$-$0.7 e.g. Carretta et al. 2004) for several reasons.
224: 47~Tuc is very bright, making IL spectra easy to obtain, and it has
225: very low reddening (near E(B$-$V)=0.03 magnitudes), which will be
226: useful for the analysis. Furthermore, the relatively high metallicity
227: results in easy visibility of lines from many elements.
228:
229:
230: \section{Observations and Reductions}
231:
232: We acquired high resolution, integrated light spectra of our ``training
233: set'' GCs using the echelle spectrograph on the Las Campanas 2.5m
234: du Pont telescope during lunar dark time in July 2000. We limit the
235: discussion here to 47~Tuc; the full training set
236: will be discussed in a later paper (Bernstein et al 2008). The
237: observations were facilitated by a modification to the telescope
238: guider program, kindly performed by S. Shectman, which enabled
239: a uniform scan of the echelle slit across a $32\times32$ arcsecond square
240: region of sky, from $16''$ South-West to $16''$ North-East of the
241: field center. Since the cluster regions were scanned once per
242: exposure, clear skies were necessary to ensure an unbiased weighting
243: of the cluster light. The entire 1$\times$4 arcsecond echelle slit was
244: filled with cluster light during these scans of the cluster core, and
245: significant sky flux outside the telluric emission lines was only
246: detected near twilight. Nevertheless sky exposures were taken
247: separately to allow subtraction of the sky signal from the science
248: exposures. We obtained three exposures of roughly 1 hour each on the
249: 47~Tuc core and five 20 minute exposures on the sky.
250:
251: We performed the basic data reduction steps using the echelle package
252: in IRAF, including the routines for overscan, bias subtraction, and
253: flat-field division. The sky spectra were scaled and subtracted from
254: the individual integrated-light exposures using simple arithmetic
255: routines.
256:
257: The mean line widths of the Th-Ar comparison spectra, at 2.6 pixels,
258: correspond to a spectral resolving power ($R$=$\lambda$/FWHM) of 34,760,
259: but this value varies over the CCD by $\sigma$$\sim$4\%, due to focus
260: variations in the camera optics.
261:
262:
263: While our du~Pont echelle integrated-light spectra cover the wavelength
264: interval 3700--7800\AA , the useful range is limited at the red end, because
265: the orders are too close in the cross dispersion direction for good extraction,
266: and due to blending with telluric absorption lines. The utility of the blue
267: side is limited by the reduced flux and increased line blending. Thus, the
268: useful wavelength coverage of our 47~Tuc spectrum is from $\sim$5000 to 7570\AA .
269:
270: In spectra from the du Pont echelle, the wings of adjacent orders in
271: the red region of the spectrum ($\lambda$$\geq$6000\AA) overlap
272: slightly, making it difficult to identify the local scattered-light
273: background levels; this problem is particularly acute when the source
274: fills the slit, as in our observations, thus widening the order profile
275: relative to the spectrum of a point source. It was therefore necessary to
276: estimate the scattered-light background using an empirical model. To
277: do so, we used the two-dimensional image of a spectrum of a bright red
278: giant star, taken with the smallest possible slit (0.75$\times$0.75
279: arcseconds square). The bright giant star flux distribution is
280: similar to that of the integrated-light spectrum of an old cluster
281: like 47~Tuc.
282: This short slit gave well separated spectral orders, with
283: much less inter-order light in the red region (where the orders are
284: closest) than for the cluster integrated-light spectra. The
285: relatively flat bottomed troughs of the short slit inter-order
286: light suggests scattered-light rather than overlapping wings of
287: adjacent orders. In Figure~\ref{fig-scatt} we show a comparison of the GC
288: spectral orders and the orders of the short slit star spectrum;
289: essentially, we use the ratio of total flux in an order to the
290: inter-order flux for the short slit spectrum to define the scattered
291: light in the GC spectrum. It is notable that the scaled short slit
292: inter-order flux in Figure~\ref{fig-scatt} is consistent with the GC
293: inter-order light for column positions less than 910 pixels.
294: We found that the scattered light is roughly $\sim 6$\% of the total
295: stellar flux, in a given order, and is a function of wavelength redder
296: than $5000$\AA. To
297: measure the total flux in each order of the science spectra, we
298: extracted the orders using the IRAF echelle routine {\em apall} with
299: wide apertures and without background subtraction. The scattered light flux
300: in the model was scaled according to the total flux and the size of the
301: extraction aperture and then subtracted from the object spectrum.
302:
303: We noticed that the scattered light followed approximately the continuous
304: flux distribution of the object spectrum, in the wavelength and
305: cross-dispersion directions.
306: To gain a greater understanding of the scattered-light, we constructed a
307: simple analytical model for the scattering and performed numerical
308: experiments to try to mimic the shape of the scattered-light along the
309: dispersion and cross-dispersion directions on the CCD. This analytical
310: model included only two parameters: the amount of light scattered and a
311: scattering scale length, based on a Gaussian scattered-light distribution.
312: Our results indicated that the scattered-light scale length was
313: approximately 200 pixels. At any given pixel, the scattered light therefore
314: came from a $\sim$10--20 \AA\ region in the dispersion direction and roughly
315: 8 or 9 echelle orders in the cross-dispersion direction. We used only the
316: empirical scattered-light model derived from the bright star spectrum through
317: the (0.75$\times$0.75 arc sec) short slit, not the analytical model,
318: in the reduction of our science exposures.
319:
320: Although the empirical scattered-light model appeared to work quite
321: well for the red region of the spectrum, it did not always compare
322: well with the measured scattered light in the blue, where the orders
323: are well spaced and scattered light can be measured directly.
324: We believe that this is because the scattered-light in
325: the blue portion of the CCD was overwhelmed by scattered light from
326: the bright red part of the spectrum; essentially, a small fraction of
327: light scattered from the far red end of the spectrum could
328: overwhelm the local scattered light between the blue spectral orders. In
329: this case, a color difference between 47~Tuc and the star used for the
330: empirical scattered-light model could make the empirical scattering
331: model unreliable in the blue spectral region. Fortunately, the bluer
332: orders of the IL spectrum are well separated, so that it is possible
333: to measure the scattered light directly from the GC IL spectrum at these
334: wavelengths. Therefore, we chose to use the scattered-light model
335: only for the red orders where direct measurement of the scattered
336: light was not possible.
337:
338: After extraction and wavelength calibration, multiple exposures were
339: combined using IRAF {\em combine} routines, with the {\em crreject}
340: algorithm to eliminate pixels affected by cosmic ray strikes. For the
341: purpose of measuring equivalent widths, we performed a simple
342: normalization which removes the shape of the echelle blaze function
343: from each order. The approximate shape of the blaze function was
344: obtained by tracing the continuum flux of a bright giant in NGC~6397.
345:
346: The S/N of the final spectrum is listed at three wavelengths in
347: Table~\ref{table1}. Figures~\ref{fig-mgb} and \ref{fig-eu} show
348: examples of the integrated-light spectra for GCs NGC~6397 and 47~Tuc.
349: The average line widths of weak lines in the 5000--6500\AA\ region of
350: the 47~Tuc spectrum was measured at $\lambda$/FWHM=10,552, corresponding
351: to an intrinsic $\lambda$/FWHM=11,065 once the spectrograph is taken into
352: account. This line width indicates
353: a velocity dispersion of 11.5 $\pm$0.2 Km/s, exactly equal to the result of
354: Prior \& Meylan (1993). From Figures~\ref{fig-mgb} and \ref{fig-eu}
355: it is clear that abundance information for numerous elemental species is
356: present in the high resolution integrated-light spectra, even for the relatively
357: broad lines of 47~Tuc ($M_{\rm v}=-9.4$). Lines in GC integrated-light
358: spectra are weaker and wider than for individual red giants, as a
359: result of both the velocity broadening and the contribution of weaker lines
360: from stars warmer and less luminous than the bright cluster giants. For
361: this reason, greater S/N is required to obtain reliable abundances
362: from integrated-light spectra than for individual red giant stars.
363:
364:
365: \section{Analysis}
366:
367: Our goal in this paper is to explore strategies for the detailed
368: abundance analysis of high-resolution IL spectra of GCs. To simplify
369: the issues, we have used two methods that isolate different
370: aspects of the problem to some degree. In the first method, we employ
371: extant photometry of 47~Tuc and characterize the stellar populations
372: by regions on the color-magnitude diagram ({\em cmd}). We begin by
373: splitting the observed {\em cmd} into 27 regions (``boxes''), each with a small
374: range in color and magnitude (see Figure \ref{fig-47tuccmd}). Our
375: analysis then involves synthesizing a theoretical equivalent width
376: (EW) for each spectral line for each of these boxes; we then combine
377: these EWs, weighted by the continuum flux at each line and the total
378: flux in each box to obtain a theoretical, flux weighted, IL EW.
379: Obviously, it is not possible to employ this particular technique for
380: very distant GCs that are spatially unresolved, because the {\em cmds}
381: are not available; however, the method could be used to study GCs in nearby
382: galaxies (e.g. M31) using space-based photometry.
383:
384: The objective for this part of the investigation is to first, provide
385: an independent abundance analysis of the integrated-light spectrum
386: of 47~Tuc. The second, and more important, goal is to check our
387: abundance analysis algorithms with minimal uncertainty in the
388: adopted isochrone (or {\em cmd}).
389: Thus, with this method we simply use the available information
390: regarding the stellar population of the cluster to determine whether
391: an IL spectrum synthesis method will, ultimately, be able to measure
392: detailed chemical abundances from high resolution GC spectra. If IL
393: spectra combined with the known color-magnitude diagrams of the
394: clusters do not provide reliable abundance results, then it will
395: certainly not be possible in the situation where a theoretical {\em
396: cmd} must be assumed.
397:
398: Our second method for analyzing IL spectra employs theoretical
399: isochrones in place of the resolved cluster photometry. The accuracy
400: of the derived abundances will clearly depend on how well the
401: predicted isochrones match the luminosity function and temperatures of
402: the stars in the clusters, and whether critical isochrone parameters
403: can be constrained using the IL spectra alone. Since we do not know
404: {\em a priori} what isochrone to use when analyzing unresolved GCs,
405: we also develop diagnostics that enable us to
406: constrain the isochrone parameters for the abundance analysis.
407:
408:
409: \subsection{Measurement of the Spectral Lines}
410:
411: The first step in our analysis is uniform, repeatable measurement of
412: the absorption line equivalent widths (EWs) in the 47~Tuc integrated-light
413: spectrum. We measured the EWs by fitting the lines with
414: Gaussian profiles using the semi-automated program GETJOB (see
415: McWilliam et al. 1995a). We select our list of lines from those used
416: by McWilliam \& Rich (1994), McWilliam et al. (1995a,b), and
417: Smecker-Hane \& McWilliam (2002). There are fewer useful lines in
418: globular cluster integrated-light spectra than for stars because the
419: GC lines are broader and weaker than in the spectrum of individual red
420: giant stars, and thus more difficult to measure. A complete list of
421: our lines and EWs is given in
422: Table~\ref{table2}. These line measurements are used for both of the
423: analyses outlined below.
424:
425: \subsection{Integrated-Light Abundances with the Resolved CMD}
426: \label{sec:cmd_analysis}
427:
428: As a preliminary step in developing a way to analyze unresolved
429: globular clusters, we first consider the abundance analysis of the
430: integrated light spectra using the available photometry for this
431: resolved Milky Way cluster. The analysis involves two general stages:
432: characterizing the stellar population in the cluster and synthesizing
433: the strength of the spectral lines.
434:
435: To begin the first stage of the analysis using the observed {\em cmd},
436: we divided the observed {\em cmd} into small boxes containing stars
437: with similar photometric properties and we used standard relations to
438: derive the flux-weighted ``average'' atmosphere parameters of the stars in each
439: box. The boxes run from the main-sequence to the tip of the red giant
440: branch, then along the horizontal branch/red clump region and the
441: AGB. Two additional boxes are included for the blue straggler
442: population. In this analysis, the mean stellar atmosphere parameters
443: for stars in each box are estimated from the flux-weighted photometry.
444: We then computed the absolute visual luminosities using reddening
445: corrections and the distance modulus according to the equation
446: \begin{equation}
447: M_{\rm v} = V - (m-M) . %Eqn 1
448: \end{equation}
449: The flux-weighted temperatures appropriate for each {\em cmd} box was
450: computed using standard color-temperature relations. With initial
451: estimates for [Fe/H], T$_{\rm eff}$ and $\log{g}$, the bolometric
452: corrections, BC, were interpolated from the Kurucz grid (2002
453: unpublished)\footnote{available from
454: http://kurucz.harvard.edu/grids.html}. Bolometric magnitudes and
455: luminosities were computed using the expressions
456: \begin{equation}
457: M_{\rm bol} = M_{\rm v} + BC %Eqn 2
458: \end{equation}
459: and
460: \begin{equation}
461: \log L/L{_\odot} = -0.4(M_{\rm bol} - M_{\rm bol\odot}), %Eqn 3
462: \end{equation}
463: where M$_{\rm bol \odot}$ = 4.74. Gravities were computed using
464: the expression
465: \begin{equation}
466: \log{g} = \log{g}_{\odot} + \log M/M_{\odot} -
467: log L/L_{\odot} + 4log T_{\rm eff}/T_{\rm eff\odot} , %Eqn 4
468: \end{equation}
469: assuming a solar effective temperature of T$_{\rm eff \odot}$=5777K,
470: solar gravity of $\log{g}_{\odot}$=4.4378, and a mass for the cluster
471: stars of 0.8M$_{\odot}$. We re-evaluated the specific gravity and
472: bolometric corrections iteratively until convergence in $\log{g}$ was
473: obtained to within 0.05 dex. Because 47~Tuc is old, and because our
474: photometry included only a small portion of the main-sequence, we note
475: that a negligible error in the final result would occur by assuming
476: that the masses of all the stars in our {\em cmd} were equal to the
477: turnoff mass. Microturbulent velocities were assumed to fit a linear
478: regression through 1.00 Km/s for the sun at $\log{g}=4.44$, to 1.60
479: Km/s for Arcturus, at $\log{g}=1.60$ (Fulbright, McWilliam \& Rich
480: 2006):
481: \begin{equation}
482: \xi = \xi_{\odot} + \frac{(logg_{\odot} - logg)}
483: {(logg_{\odot}-logg_{\alpha Boo})}
484: (\xi_{\alpha Boo} - \xi_{\odot}) . %Eqn 5
485: \end{equation}
486: Finally, stellar radii were computed for each {\em cmd} box according
487: to the expression
488: \begin{equation}
489: R/R_{\odot} = (T_{\rm eff}\odot/T_{\rm eff})^2 \sqrt[]{L/L_{\odot}} %Eqn 6
490: \end{equation}
491: These radii are needed in order to compute the total flux from each {\em cmd}
492: box.
493:
494: In Figure~\ref{fig-47tuccmd} we show the 47~Tuc V, B$-$V {\em cmd} (from
495: Guhathakurta et al. 1992; Howell et al. 2000) for
496: the central, 32$\times$32 arc seconds, scanned region. This region contains
497: 4192 stars, which we have divided into 27 boxes; an additional 229 stars
498: lay beyond the {\it cmd} boxes, but contribute insignificant flux to
499: the total. As outlined above, we computed the flux-weighted V and
500: B$-$V values for each {\em cmd} box, and used those values to
501: calculate mean effective temperatures and gravities with the Alonso et
502: al. (1999) color-temperature relations. Ancillary assumptions included
503: [Fe/H]=$-$0.7 to compute the bolometric corrections and a turnoff mass
504: of 0.8 M$_{\odot}$ for the gravity.
505:
506: Because the B$-$V color--temperature relation and bolometric correction
507: are sensitive to the stellar metallicity, it is necessary to adopt an
508: initial [Fe/H] for the calculation of T$_{\rm eff}$ and BC. As a consequence
509: the abundance analysis must be iterated until the adopted [Fe/H] value is
510: consistent with the abundances derived from the Fe lines.
511: Fortunately, the iterations converge extremely quickly: for 47~Tuc
512: if we derive temperatures and BC values starting with
513: an assumed metallicity of [Fe/H]=0.0 the first iteration obtains [Fe/H]=$-$0.65
514: from the lines, and the second iteration gives [Fe/H] within 0.02 dex of the
515: self-consistent value. However, for other
516: colors, such as V$-$I and V$-$K, the sensitivity of the color--T$_{\rm eff}$
517: relations and BC to metallicity are extremely small, so iteration is not
518: required.
519:
520:
521: Table~\ref{table3}
522: provides the adopted stellar atmosphere parameters for the 47~Tuc BV
523: {\em cmd} boxes. It is interesting to note that 50\%
524: of the V-band flux comes from giant stars at the red clump luminosity
525: and brighter in this cluster (see Figure~\ref{fig-47tuccmd}).
526:
527: The second stage in the abundance analysis then involves spectrum
528: synthesis to compute theoretical EWs of each line for each {\em cmd}
529: box using a model atmosphere. The final EWs of lines in the
530: integrated light of a cluster can then be computed by averaging the
531: synthesized EWs together, weighted by the flux in each {\em cmd} box.
532: In the line synthesis, the only adjustable parameter is the input
533: abundances. All other parameters are fixed by the average stellar
534: atmosphere parameters of the stars in each {\em cmd} box and the properties
535: of the spectral line being calculated. The spectrum synthesis was
536: performed using the program MOOG (Sneden 1973) modified to be called
537: as a subroutine and to provide the continuum flux, $F_c$, for each
538: line, within a larger program, ILABUNDS. Our code employs the
539: alpha-enhanced Kurucz models (Castelli \& Kurucz 2004)\footnote{The models
540: are available from Kurucz's website at
541: http://kurucz.harvard.edu/grids.html} with the latest opacity
542: distribution function (AODFNEW), linearly interpolated to arbitrary
543: T$_{\rm eff}$, logg and [Fe/H].\footnote{The use of solar
544: alpha-element ratios does not significantly alter the Fe~I
545: abundances derived, but lines sensitive to electron density, like
546: [O~I], Fe~II, are affected by the choice of alpha enhancement. If
547: analysis of the $\alpha$-elements indicates solar abundances are
548: appropriate for a given unresolved cluster, models with
549: self-consistent $\alpha$-abundances would be used.} The
550: flux-weighted, average line equivalent width for the integrated-light
551: of the cluster was computed according to the following expression:
552: \begin{equation}
553: \overline{EW} = \frac{ \sum _{i=1}^n EW_i w_i } {\sum _{i=1}^n w_i }, % Eqn 6
554: \end{equation}
555: where $EW_i$ is the equivalent width of the line for a given box ($i$)
556: and $w_i$ are the weights for each {\em cmd} box. We compute $w_i$
557: values using the radii, $R/R_{\odot}$, number of stars in the {\em
558: cmd} box, $N_*$, and the emergent continuum fluxes (computed using
559: MOOG) for the box, $F_c$, according to
560: \begin{equation}
561: w = R^2 N_* F_c . % Eqn 7
562: \end{equation}
563:
564: Abundances were determined by iteratively adjusting the assumed
565: abundance in the line synthesis until the synthetic flux-weighted EW
566: matched the observed IL EW for each line. We continued to iterate with
567: small adjustments to the input abundance until the observed and
568: predicted IL EWs agreed to one percent.
569:
570: The use of an observed {\em cmd} limits the utility of this technique
571: for detailed abundance analysis to globular clusters within the Local
572: Group of galaxies, where ground or space-based telescopes are able to
573: at least partially resolve individual cluster stars. While future 30
574: meter class telescopes, equipped with adaptive optics systems, may be
575: able to resolve GC stars to even greater distances, ultimately our
576: objective is to measure detailed composition from unresolved globular
577: clusters. Analysis using observed photometry is a step toward that
578: goal and confirms that the basic strategy of computing light weighted
579: EWs is sound.
580:
581:
582: \subsubsection{Iron Abundances}
583: \label{sec:Iron_Abundances}
584:
585: We begin our abundance study with the analysis for iron, because its
586: numerous lines provide useful diagnostics of stellar atmosphere
587: parameters. In our IL abundance analysis we employ the atmospheric
588: parameters from the observed {\em cmd} listed in Table~\ref{table3},
589: the EWs and atomic parameters given in Table~\ref{table2}, and the prescription
590: outlined above in \S\ref{sec:cmd_analysis}. The atomic line parameters
591: listed in Table~\ref{table2} were taken from McWilliam \& Rich (1994)
592: and McWilliam et al. (1995). In
593: Figures~\ref{fig-47tuc.ewab.bv}--\ref{fig-47tuc.wab.bv} we show
594: diagnostic plots, using the abundances derived from the iron lines,
595: similar to the diagnostics used for standard abundance analysis of
596: single stars. Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.ewab.bv} shows that
597: $\epsilon$(Fe) is independent of EW, which indicates that the assumed
598: microturbulent velocity law that we have employed is sufficiently
599: accurate; a positive slope would have suggested microturbulent
600: velocities that are too low. The plot of $\epsilon$(Fe) versus
601: excitation potential in Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.epab.bv} is sensitive to
602: the temperatures of the {\em cmd} boxes; the near-zero slope indicates
603: that the adopted temperatures for the cmd boxes was approximately
604: correct. Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.wab.bv} shows that our iron abundances
605: are independent of wavelength. This provides a general check on our
606: abundance analysis, from consistency of the EW measurements to the mix
607: of stellar types and the continuous opacity subroutines in our
608: spectrum synthesis code. The increased upper envelope and scatter of
609: iron abundances for lines redder than 7000\AA\ led us to suspect that
610: the scattered-light subtraction was flawed in this region, but it
611: might instead be due to the effects of blends or poor $gf$ values. In
612: general the trend of abundance with wavelength should provide a probe
613: of the existence of sub-populations of varying temperature, such as
614: hot stars on the blue horizontal giant branch.
615:
616: From 102 measurements of 96 Fe I lines, we obtain a mean Fe~I
617: abundance of 6.77 $\pm$0.03 dex, with rms scatter about the mean of
618: 0.26 dex. From 7 Fe~II lines, we obtain a mean Fe~II abundance of
619: 6.73 $\pm$0.06 dex, with rms scatter about the mean of 0.16 dex,
620:
621: The recent estimate of the solar iron abundance by Asplund, Grevesse
622: \& Sauval (2005) indicates a value of 7.45$\pm$0.05 dex, based on a 3D
623: hydrodynamical solar model. Lodders (2003) found a solar iron
624: abundance of 7.54 dex. While we believe that the Asplund et
625: al. (2005) solar iron abundance value is probably the best current
626: estimate, it is more reasonable for us to obtain a consistent and
627: differential [Fe/H] value for 47~Tuc relative to the sun, by using the
628: same lines, $gf$ values, grid of Kurucz 1D atmospheres and abundance
629: analysis program for the sun and 47~Tuc. In this way, our Fe lines
630: indicate a solar iron abundance of $\epsilon$(Fe)=7.52 for Fe~I lines and
631: $\epsilon$(Fe)=7.45 for Fe~II lines. For [X/Fe] abundance ratios we
632: adopt a solar iron abundance of $\epsilon$(Fe)=7.50, which is the
633: average of many studies in recent years.
634:
635: Our differential iron abundance values from Fe~I and
636: Fe~II lines in 47~Tuc are $-$0.75$\pm$0.026 and $-$0.72$\pm$0.056 dex respectively,
637: independent of adopted $gf$ values, where the uncertainties represent the
638: 1$\sigma$ random error on the mean. We consider the 1$\sigma$ systematic uncertainties
639: on our derived [Fe/H] values from the model atmospheres (0.03 and 0.03 dex for
640: Fe~I and II respectively), $gf$ scale zero-point (0.03 and 0.04 dex), and the
641: effect of $\alpha$-enhancement (0.015 and 0.04 dex). We refer the reader to
642: Koch \& McWilliam (2008) for details of these systematic uncertainties. Thus,
643: we estimate the total 1$\sigma$ random + systematic uncertainty on the [Fe/H]
644: values of 0.052 and 0.085 dex for Fe~I and Fe~II respectively. Note that these
645: uncertainties do not include potential uncertainty due to non-LTE; we prefer to
646: simply provide the condition that our abundances are calculated using the LTE
647: assumption. The 0.03 dex difference between our mean Fe~II and Fe~I abundances is
648: less than half of the formal uncertainty on the mean Fe~II abundance.
649:
650: Our [Fe~I/H] value of $-$0.75 dex is consistent with other values in the
651: literature., Brown \& Wallerstein (1992) obtained [Fe/H]=$-$0.81, based
652: on a differential analysis of echelle spectra; Carretta \& Gratton
653: (1997) found [Fe/H]=$-$0.70; the Kraft \& Ivans (2003) reanalysis of
654: various literature EWs gave [Fe/H]=$-$0.63; echelle analysis of
655: turnoff stars by Carretta et al. (2004) yields [Fe/H]=$-$0.67. In
656: addition to these high resolution results, we note that there
657: are several calcium triplet results based on the calibration by
658: Kraft \& Ivans (2003), who found [Fe/H]=$-$0.79 for their
659: calibration against Kurucz model
660: atmosphere results. Wylie et al. (2006) obtained [Fe~I/H]=$-$0.60 and
661: [Fe~II/H]=$-$0.64 dex. Finally, Koch and McWilliam (2008)
662: find [Fe/H]=$-$0.76~$\pm$0.01~$\pm$0.04 dex (random and systematic error respectively)
663: for 47~Tuc, based on a
664: robust differential analysis of 8 individual red giant stars relative
665: to Arcturus.
666:
667: We omit here a discussion of the individual systematic
668: differences between the literature studies listed above that might
669: yield a consensus best estimate of the [Fe/H]. We prefer the following
670: simple conclusion: from the comparison of reported results, our
671: integrated-light abundance analysis for the core of 47 Tuc provides an
672: iron abundance close (within 0.10 dex) to that obtained by detailed
673: analysis of individual cluster stars.
674:
675: Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.grow} shows the fractional contribution to the
676: total equivalent width of each {\em cmd} box, for three Fe lines:
677: one high excitation potential Fe~I line, one low excitation potential Fe~I
678: line, and an Fe~II line. All three lines are weak, being close to
679: 30m\AA\ in the 47~Tuc IL spectrum. It is clear from this figure that the
680: Fe~I lines are predominately formed by stars on the Red Giant Branch, with
681: some contribution from the AGB and red clump (RC); however, very little
682: contribution to the Fe~I line EWs occurs in the subgiant branch (SG),
683: turnoff (TO) and main sequence (MS). The most important contribution
684: to the Fe~II line strength comes from the red clump and AGB. The
685: coolest {\em cmd} boxes do not contribute as much to the total Fe~II
686: EW, unlike the Fe~I lines, presumably because of the low
687: ionization fraction in these cool stars. The differences between Fe~I
688: and Fe~II formation, seen in Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.grow}, indicates
689: that the Fe~II/Fe~I differences may provide constraints on the giant
690: branch luminosity function. Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.grow} also shows
691: that blue stragglers make no significant contribution to the EW of our
692: iron lines.
693:
694: Although not shown in Figure~\ref{fig-47tuc.grow}, our calculations
695: also indicate that very strong Fe~I lines have significant formation
696: across all {\em cmd} boxes, rather than being strongly skewed to the
697: top of the RGB. This is partly due to the fact that the lines in the
698: RGB stars are strongly saturated. Thus, for strong and weak lines to
699: produce the same abundance it is necessary to correctly account for
700: the stars at the lower end of the luminosity function. This may form
701: the basis of a probe of the lower luminosity population, but it will
702: be sensitive to the adopted microturbulent velocity law, damping
703: constants, and the coolest parts of the model atmospheres.
704:
705:
706: \subsubsection{M Giants, B$-$V colors and the Tip of the Giant Branch}
707:
708: One difficulty with an abundance technique that relies upon measured
709: EWs, as outlined above, is that the line and continuum could suffer
710: from line blanketing. Line and continuum blending is particularly
711: acute for the M stars, which are characterized by heavy blanketing
712: from the TiO molecule over the entire optical region. The continuum
713: and line regions in these stars can be heavily depressed by TiO
714: absorption that would alter their contribution to the IL EWs of a GC.
715:
716: While much of the red giant branch contains stars of G and K spectral
717: type, with identifiable continuum regions, the very tip of the giant
718: branch may include a number of M giants which are difficult to
719: identify from photometry, as we discuss further below. The TiO
720: density in the atmospheres depends, approximately, on the square
721: metallicity; thus, the exact fraction of M giants that lie on the
722: giant branch is a function of the metal content, with more M giants in
723: the more metal-rich clusters. The actual number of M stars
724: contributing to the IL flux also depends on the luminosity of the
725: cluster region, because lower luminosity clusters may not contain
726: enough stars to completely populate the top of their giant branches.
727: Because of the potentially significant uncertainty in the identification
728: of the continuum level in the IL spectrum, due to the M star population,
729: we have taken some care to quantify the
730: effect of these stars in our IL analysis. In the following
731: section, we evaluate how many M giants were present in our 47~Tuc
732: spectrum, develop a crude method to include the M giants in our IL EW
733: abundance analysis, and determine the effect that these giants have on
734: the derived abundances using the EW technique.
735:
736: The tip of the 47~Tuc giant branch is well known to contain numerous M
737: giant stars. In order to assess the consequences of the presence of M
738: giants in our IL spectrum, we first need to correctly identify the M
739: giant population in the 47~Tuc core, included in our spectrum.
740: Unfortunately, the TiO blanketing in M giants reduces both the V and
741: B-band fluxes, such that the M giant B$-$V colors are similar to
742: hotter K giants. This blanketing lowers the V magnitude of the
743: coolest M giants more than the early M giants. Thus, while our B$-$V
744: {\em cmd} can be used to estimate the run of stellar parameters for
745: giants earlier (hotter) than M0, the extant M giants are confused for
746: K giants, so we cannot use the HST B$-$V photometry to find the M
747: giants in the 47~Tuc core.
748:
749: The degeneracy of the K and M giants does not occur for the (V$-$I)
750: color-magnitude diagram, presumably because the V and I band blanketing are
751: less saturated than the B band. The Kaluzny et al. (1998) (V$-$I)
752: versus I {\em cmd}, for an outer region of 47~Tuc, clearly shows the M
753: giant population at the tip of the giant branch. Based on the M-star
754: to Clump-star number ratio in the Kaluzny (1997) V$-$I {\em cmd} and
755: the frequency of clump stars in the HST B$-$V {\em cmd} we expect 2.0
756: M giants in the 32$\times$32 arc second scanned core of 47~Tuc.
757: Direct evidence of M giants in the 47~Tuc core is also seen in the
758: list of long period variables (LPVs) from Lebzelter \& Wood
759: (2005). Their coordinates show that there {\em are} two LPVs (LW11 and
760: LW12) that lie within the 32$\times$32 arc second core
761: included in our spectrum. Thus, for our {\em cmd} abundance analysis of
762: our IL spectrum, these two M giants are the only ones that we need to
763: consider.
764:
765: The V$-$K colors of these two M giants are given by Lebzelter \& Wood
766: (2005) as 5.82 and 4.55 respectively. These very red colors are due,
767: mainly, to the effect of TiO blanketing on the V-band. If
768: [Fe/H]=$-$0.7 dex is adopted for 47~Tuc, the metallicity-dependent
769: theoretical color-temperature relations of Houdashelt et al. (2000)
770: and Ku$\check{c}$inskas et al. (2006) indicates that these two M stars
771: have effective temperatures of 3350K and 3600K respectively. However,
772: because 47~Tuc has an enhanced, halo-like, Ti/Fe ratio, the TiO bands
773: must be stronger than solar composition M stars of the same
774: temperature. Since the theoretical color-temperature relations of
775: Houdashelt et al. (2000) and Ku$\check{c}$inskas et al. (2006) were
776: computed based on assumed solar composition, the actual temperatures
777: of the 47~Tuc M giants must be slightly higher than their relations
778: indicate, but probably not much higher. For the coolest solar
779: metallicity M giants, inspection of the individual synthetic M giant
780: star spectra of Houdashelt et al. (2000) indicates that the flux is so
781: strongly blanketed in the 6000--7000\AA\ region that individual atomic
782: lines, useful for EW abundance analysis, are almost completely
783: obliterated. Also, the blanketing reduces the optical flux
784: contributed by these cool solar-metallicity M stars to insignificance
785: compared to slightly warmer K giants. The TiO band-strength and
786: blending decreases gradually with increasing temperature. Because of
787: this gradual change in TiO blanketing it is difficult to give an exact
788: temperature limit, below which the M stars would contribute negligible
789: V-band flux to a GC IL optical spectrum. However, it is more important to
790: account for the spectral flux coming from the earlier (warmer,
791: e.g. M0-M2) M giants than the coolest M giants.
792: The temperature below which the M star phenomenon occurs depends on
793: TiO formation, which in turn depends on metallicity; at the metallicity
794: of 47~Tuc, the M0 stars begin below roughly 3600K, but perhaps as high
795: as 3700K. For comparison, M0 giants occur starting below $\sim$3900K at
796: solar metallicity.
797:
798: To understand the effect on the cluster core IL spectrum caused by
799: blanketing and blending in the M star spectra, we present
800: Figures~\ref{fig-tio3600} and \ref{fig-tio3350}, which show synthetic
801: spectra in the region 5500--7600\AA\ for the two M giants known to be
802: in the core of 47~Tuc. The atomic lines measured in our IL EW
803: spectrum analysis are also included in these figures. The synthetic
804: spectra were computed using the 2004 version of the synthesis program
805: MOOG (modified to take large line lists) and 5.4 million TiO lines
806: from the 2006 version\footnote{see
807: ftp://saphir.dstu.univ-montp2.fr/GRAAL/plez/TiOdata/} of the list by
808: Plez (1998). We have not included other molecules
809: or atomic lines in our calculations other than the list of Fe lines that were measured in
810: the IL spectrum. We employed Kurucz alpha-enhanced model atmospheres
811: with [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 dex and [O/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] = $+$0.3 dex. The
812: model atmospheres were derived from the alpha-enhanced Kurucz grid;
813: the cooler M giant model was extrapolated using a cubic spline
814: technique, whereas the warmer M giant model was obtained by linear
815: interpolation. Figures~\ref{fig-tio3600} and \ref{fig-tio3350} show
816: syntheses computed both with and without our Fe line list. The
817: comparison demonstrates the effect of the TiO blends and pseudo
818: continuum on the detectability of these atomic lines. Note that the
819: TiO blanketing is significantly less than would be expected of
820: solar-metallicity M stars of the same temperature (see Houdashelt et
821: al. 2000) due to reduced TiO formation at the low metallicity of
822: 47~Tuc.
823:
824: It is clear from these figures that the TiO blanketing in the coolest
825: of the 47~Tuc core M giants has severely attenuated the apparent
826: continuum flux, and obliterated many of the atomic lines below 7300\AA
827: . Thus, pseudo equivalent widths for many of the atomic lines may be
828: very small, suggesting that the coolest M star in the core of 47~Tuc
829: probably makes very little contribution to the integrated-light EW of
830: lines below 7300\AA . The warmer of the two M giants in the core of
831: 47~Tuc, with intermediate strength TiO bands, has greater optical flux
832: and potentially a more serious effect on IL line EWs. Because TiO
833: formation and the M giant fraction increases with metallicity, the EW
834: abundance method used here will be less reliable for GCs more
835: metal-rich than 47~Tuc.
836:
837: The effect of the M giants on the integrated light EW of Fe~I lines is
838: difficult to assess without detailed computations due to two
839: competing effects: First, while the neutral metal line strength increase for
840: cooler stars, so does the TiO line blanketing, which effectively
841: reduces the apparent continuum flux level. As indicated above, the
842: continuum line blanketing is dominant for the coolest M giants.
843: Second, the M giants constitute $\sim$8.0\% of the total I band light, but
844: only $\sim$2.5\% of the total V band light for the cluster. Thus, the
845: inclusion of the M giants would seem to be important for lines in the
846: I band $\sim$8000--9000\AA , but much less important in the V band,
847: near 5500\AA .
848:
849: To test the effect of the M stars on our abundance results, we
850: made two changes to the analysis described so far based on
851: the HST photometry. First, we reduced the number of K giants by two
852: and, second, we included the two M giant LPVs indicated by Lebzelter
853: \& Wood (2005). In order to include the M stars in the EW IL
854: abundance analysis, we generated pseudo continuum fluxes and pseudo
855: EWs for the two known 47~Tuc core M giants over the 5500--7600\AA\
856: region, based on the spectrum synthesis calculations that we generated
857: for Figures~\ref{fig-tio3600} and \ref{fig-tio3350}. As mentioned
858: earlier, the syntheses included the Fe lines for which we had EW
859: measurements, plus the 5.4 million TiO lines. The abundance input for
860: the synthesis of each M giant was scaled to [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 dex, with
861: [Ti/Fe] and [O/Fe]=$+$0.3 dex. The pseudo continuum flux levels were
862: determined for the synthetic spectrum by integrating the theoretical
863: spectrum synthesis flux over the wavelength bounds of the actual
864: continuum windows used for measuring the EWs from the IL spectrum.
865: For each iron line we averaged the synthetic fluxes in the adjacent
866: continuum windows and then we calculated a pseudo EW by integrating
867: the synthetic flux over 0.4\AA , centered on the line. In most cases
868: the pseudo EWs were smaller than if there had been no TiO, due to the
869: pseudo continuum TiO blanketing, but in a few cases TiO features
870: increased the apparent line EW. For yet other
871: lines the pseudo EWs were negative, due to heavy blanketing in the
872: continuum regions, but not in the lines. The ILABUNDS program was
873: then enhanced to permit the use of pre-calculated pseudo EWs for the M
874: giants to be included in the calculation of the total mean
875: integrated-light EW.
876:
877: To test the reliability of the calculations, we substituted pre-computed
878: pseudo-EWs for a {\em cmd} box containing three K giants; the method
879: reproduced the mean [Fe/H] within 0.006 dex of the mean determined
880: without the approximation. In the nominal method, omission of the
881: three K giants would have altered the derived mean iron abundance by 0.06
882: dex; thus, the approximation was accurate to about 10\%.
883:
884: When we compare the IL abundance results from the {\em cmd} with the
885: two M-giants to abundances determined for a {\em cmd} in which the two
886: M giants were excluded, the [Fe/H] from neutral and ionized species
887: increased by 0.02 and 0.01 dex respectively. Furthermore, there was
888: no obvious effect on the Fe lines redder than 7000\AA , so the small
889: discrepancy between lines redder and bluer than this wavelength does
890: not appear to have been due to the M giants. Most likely the problem
891: resulted from difficulties associated with extraction of the data for
892: orders that are very close together on the CCD. With corrections of
893: only 0.01 to 0.02 dex we can conclude that for 47~Tuc we are fortunate
894: that the M giants in the {\em cmd}, with their heavy TiO blanketing,
895: make a negligible difference to the derived abundances and the IL
896: spectrum.
897:
898: We note also that wavelength interval 7300--7600\AA\ has vastly lower
899: TiO opacity than surrounding regions, as can be readily seen in
900: Figures~\ref{fig-tio3600} and \ref{fig-tio3350}. This window has been
901: used for abundance analysis of individual M giants (e.g. Smith \&
902: Lambert 1985). Because the M giant continuum flux is unimpeded by TiO
903: absorption in this window, a comparison of EW abundance results from
904: lines in this region with line abundances from bluer wavelengths
905: (where the continuum is heavily blanketed in M giants) will be
906: sensitive to the M giant fraction in the cluster. The M giant window
907: not only provides a potential probe for unresolved GC M giants, but the
908: EW abundance method could be employed more reliably in this wavelength
909: interval for metal-rich GCs, without the need to account for TiO
910: blanketing effects. This is not a good option in our du~Pont data,
911: because there is some evidence that the orders might suffer from
912: background subtraction problems at these wavelengths.
913: %However it may
914: %provide a valuable check in the analysis of spectra from other instruments.
915:
916: Because globular clusters more metal-rich than 47~Tuc have a larger
917: fraction of M giants, they would require bigger corrections to the EW
918: analysis result than the 0.01--0.02 dex found for 47~Tuc. For
919: clusters with significant M giant populations, and very large
920: abundance corrections to the EW technique (using pseudo EWs), it will
921: be necessary to abandon the EW analysis technique entirely, and
922: instead use spectrum synthesis profile matching for every line and
923: continuum region not in the M giant window. This would significantly
924: increase the effort required and the uncertainty of the results.
925: Further computational studies are necessary to determine the
926: metallicity beyond which it will be important to employ this spectrum
927: synthesis profile matching abundance method.
928:
929: In summary, we have explored the effect of the M giant population on
930: the IL spectrum and abundance analysis for 47~Tuc using an approximate
931: method of pseudo-EWs for these stars, including synthesis of millions
932: of TiO lines. We find that the derived overall GC IL abundances
933: change by only 0.02 to 0.01 dex for Fe~I and Fe~II lines respectively.
934: Thus, the M giants could safely be ignored in an abundance analysis of
935: 47~Tuc, but for higher metallicity GCs, with a larger fraction of M
936: stars, the effect will be greater, possibly enough to require use of a
937: laborious, and less reliable, synthesis profile matching abundance
938: technique. For GC IL abundance studies at high metallicities, the M
939: giant window at 7300--7600\AA\ would constitute a valuable check
940: on the abundance results from lines outside this window.
941:
942:
943: \subsubsection{Abundances of Elements Other than Iron}
944:
945: Abundances for elements other than Fe were computed using the EWs and
946: atomic parameters listed in Table~\ref{table2}. Due to the
947: velocity broadening in 47~Tuc, various lines that are normally clean in red
948: giant stars were not usable. A notable example is the strongest line
949: of a Mg~I triplet at 6318.708\AA , which is blended with a Ca~I line 0.1
950: \AA\ to the blue. The [O~I] line near 6300\AA\ is another unfortunate
951: case, as it is blended with the very strong telluric emission line.
952: In GCs with large systemic velocities, however, the oxygen feature may be usable.
953:
954: Elements with odd numbers of protons or neutrons, or elements with
955: significant fraction of odd-numbered isotopes, suffer from hyperfine
956: splitting (hfs) of the energy levels. For lines with large hfs
957: splittings, the line is split into many non-overlapping, or partially
958: overlapping, sub-components that reduce or eliminate saturation of the
959: feature. Desaturation by hfs can significantly lower the computed
960: abundance compared to a single line. However, for the case of unsaturated,
961: weak, lines (e.g. $\leq$20--30m\AA ), the hfs treatment gives the
962: same result as a single line approximation.
963:
964: We have computed hfs abundances for lines of Ba, Co, Cu, Eu, La, Mn, Nd,
965: V and Zr, by synthesis of each line including all hfs components.
966: Previous experience with lines of Al, Na, Sc and Y indicated that the
967: hfs effect is too small to make a difference, so we neglected to perform
968: hfs abundance calculations for those species. The A and B hfs constants
969: for each line were taken from references indicated by McWilliam \&
970: Rich (1994) and McWilliam et al. (1995), and the wavelengths and
971: strengths of the hfs components were computed using standard formulae.
972: For the lines considered here we find typical hfs abundance
973: corrections for Cu, Co, Mn, La, V and Nd of $-$0.8, $-$0.3, $-$0.3, $-$0.15,
974: $-$0.1 and $-$0.08 dex respectively; abundances derived with hfs are always
975: lower than abundances derived assuming a single line. We note that for the
976: La~II line at 6774\AA\ hfs constants were available only for one level in the
977: transition; however, we are still able to use the line because its small
978: equivalent width ensured that the single line treatment was reliable.
979:
980: In Table~\ref{table4} we list the average
981: integrated-light abundances for all measured elements in 47~Tuc. For
982: abundance ratios relative to Fe we employed the solar abundance
983: distribution of Asplund et al. (2005), except for Fe, for which we
984: adopted a solar abundance of 7.50 dex.
985: Table~\ref{table4} also contains comparisons with other
986: analyses for 47~Tuc: Brown \& Wallerstein (1992), Carretta et
987: al. (2004), Alves-Brito et al. (2005), Wylie et al. (2006), and Koch
988: \& McWilliam (2008).
989:
990: A difficulty in the comparison with previous studies is that there is
991: variance between the earlier works in the 0.1 to 0.2 dex range. This
992: not surprising, given the variety of techniques and assumptions
993: employed by previous studies to measure chemical abundances for
994: 47~Tuc. If we compare our mean abundance ratios with the mean of the
995: previously published studies listed in
996: Table~\ref{table4}, we find that, of 14 species measured
997: by two or more previous studies, our values are higher by 0.08 dex
998: with a standard deviation of 0.17 dex. Only two [X/Fe] ratios
999: measured here differ by more than two sigma from the mean literature
1000: values: Zr and Eu. These elements are represented by one weak line
1001: each. In the case of Zr the line occurs at the ends of two adjacent
1002: orders, where the noise is large. However, since our [Zr/Fe] ratio,
1003: near zero, is similar to our other heavy elements it seems possible
1004: that the value found here is correct. The single Eu~II line in our
1005: spectrum, at 6645\AA\ , is quite weak (EW$\sim$16 m\AA ), so it is
1006: possible that our EW is artificially low due to noise.
1007:
1008: It is notable that our [Na/Fe] ratio, at $+$0.45 dex, is larger than
1009: the mean of previous studies by 0.2--0.3 dex, depending on whether the
1010: Wylie et al. (2006, henceforth W06) result is included. This
1011: difference may not be significant, given the 0.17 dex rms scatter in
1012: our Na abundances, however part of the difference likely results from
1013: the low solar photospheric abundance for Na given by Asplund et
1014: al. (2005), which is 0.10 dex lower than their meteoritic value
1015: (itself lower by 0.06 dex than earlier estimates of the solar
1016: meteoritic Na abundance). Yet another possibility is that the
1017: integrated-light Na abundance may really be higher than in individual
1018: red giant and turnoff stars if a significant fraction of the AGB star
1019: population in 47~Tuc shows proton burning products in their
1020: atmospheres. In this regard it is interesting that the sample of W06
1021: is dominated by AGB stars and is unusually enhanced in Na, with a
1022: mean [Na/Fe]=$+$0.65 dex. If our high Na values reflect proton
1023: burning products in the envelopes of luminous evolved stars in the
1024: cluster, then we might also expect to see depletions of O, and
1025: possibly Mg, combined with enhancements of Al in the integrated-light
1026: analysis. We were unable to measure O in this work, however we do
1027: find that Mg is lower than the average of the published studies by 0.18 dex,
1028: and Al is higher by 0.15 dex. More detailed work would be required
1029: to investigate this possibility.
1030:
1031: Besides these comparisons with other studies of 47~Tuc we may
1032: investigate how well our integrated-light abundances compare with the
1033: composition of the Galaxy in general. This is particularly useful for
1034: elements studied here that were not included in previous work on
1035: 47~Tuc (e.g. Cu, Mn). We are interested to know whether our
1036: integrated-light abundances are consistent with Galactic stars and
1037: clusters with metallicity similar to 47~Tuc.
1038: For example, the mean [X/Fe] for alpha elements studied here (Mg, Si,
1039: Ca, Ti), at $+$0.34 dex, compares well with the halo average of
1040: $+$0.35 (e.g. see McWilliam 1997).
1041:
1042: As discussed above the [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] ratios are higher (by
1043: $\sim$0.2 and 0.1 dex respectively) than typically seen for the 47~Tuc
1044: metallicity, but this is likely due to proton burning products in the
1045: atmospheres of the most luminous stars in the cluster.
1046: Within the measurement uncertainties our 47~Tuc [Mn/Fe] ratio, at
1047: $-$0.44 dex, is lower than, but consistent with, the deficient values
1048: seen in Galactic stars and clusters at the same [Fe/H], near
1049: $\sim$$-$0.3 dex (e.g. Sobeck et al. 2006; Johnson 2002; McWilliam, Rich \&
1050: Smecker Hane 2003; Carretta et al. (2004).
1051:
1052: In the disk and halo of the Galaxy the [Cu/Fe] ratio declines roughly
1053: linearly with decreasing [Fe/H], reaching a value of $\sim$$-$0.6 to
1054: $-$0.7 dex by [Fe/H]$\sim$$-$1.5 (Mishenina et al. 2002; Simmerer et
1055: al. 2003). At the metallicity of 47~Tuc previous studies indicate
1056: [Cu/Fe] near $-$0.1 to $-$0.2 dex. This is entirely consistent with
1057: the [Cu/Fe] ratio found here, at $-$0.13 dex, from our integrated-light
1058: analysis.
1059:
1060: W06 abundances for the light s-process elements Y and Zr are enhanced
1061: by $\sim$0.6 to 0.7 dex, in contrast to the solar-like ratios found
1062: here; unfortunately, there is insufficient data from other studies of 47~Tuc
1063: to draw a conclusion regarding these two elements. W06 selected a sample
1064: of AGB and RGB stars from 47~Tuc, so it may be that their s-process
1065: abundance enhancements simply reflect AGB evolution of the stars
1066: themselves; however, they found similar s-process enhancements in both
1067: their RGB and AGB populations. Previous studies of Y and
1068: Zr in nearby Galactic disk and halo stars (e.g. Edvardsson et al. 1993;
1069: Gratton \& Sneden 1994)
1070: show that [Y/Fe] remains at the solar ratio to the metallicity of 47~Tuc, and
1071: that [Zr/Fe] is very slightly enhanced, near 0.1 to 0.2 dex, consistent
1072: with the results for these two elements found here. We suggest that the enhancements
1073: found for Y and Zr by W06 are most likely due to either systematic errors, or
1074: result from s-process enhancements in their AGB stars.
1075:
1076: The [Eu/Fe] ratio in Galactic metal-poor stars follows a trend similar
1077: to the alpha elements, increasing with decreasing [Fe/H] in the solar
1078: neighborhood, to a value near 0.3 to 0.4 dex and roughly flat below
1079: [Fe/H]$\sim$$-$1 (McWilliam \& Rich 1994; Woolf et al. 1995). At the
1080: 47~Tuc metallicity the measured [Eu/Fe] ratio of Galactic stars ranges
1081: from 0.2 to 0.3 dex. Thus, our rather low [Eu/Fe] ratio, at 0.04 dex,
1082: is not only lower than other reported measurements in individual
1083: 47~Tuc stars, but is also at odds with the general trend seen in
1084: Galactic stars in general. With a central line depth of only $\sim$3
1085: percent it is hardly surprising that the Eu~II line at 6645\AA\ gives
1086: discordant results.
1087:
1088: Table~\ref{table4} indicates a 0.25 dex enhancement in
1089: [Sc~II/Fe], based on one line, but a normal solar-scaled Sc abundance
1090: from a single Sc~I line. However, the Sc~II enhancement in our
1091: integrated-light analysis is in qualitative agreement with claims of
1092: mild Sc enhancements with decreasing metallicity (e.g. Bai et
1093: al. 2004; Nissen et al. 2000); but see Prochaska \& McWilliam (2000).
1094:
1095: The remaining elements roughly scale with [Fe/H], similar to the trends seen
1096: in the Galaxy (e.g. Edvardsson et al 1993; Sneden \& Gratton 1994; McWilliam 1997).
1097:
1098:
1099: The above abundance trends indicate that our integrated-light 47~Tuc
1100: abundances are consistent with the composition of Galactic stars of
1101: similar metallicity. This supports the idea that we have successfully
1102: managed to perform detailed chemical abundance analysis on the
1103: integrated light spectrum of the core of 47~Tuc, using the observed
1104: color-magnitude diagram as an essential input ingredient.
1105:
1106:
1107:
1108: \subsection{Integrated-Light Abundance Analysis With Theoretical Isochrones}
1109:
1110: For GCs beyond the Local Group it is not currently possible to resolve
1111: individual stars to obtain empirical {\em cmds}. Thus, the next
1112: step in developing an IL abundance analysis strategy for
1113: extra-galactic clusters is to use theoretical isochrones with
1114: parameters constrained by the IL spectrum. In this paper, we have
1115: employed theoretical isochrones from two groups: Padova and Teramo. The
1116: Padova isochrones of Girardi et al. (2000) and Salasnich et al. (2000)
1117: were obtained from the group's website.\footnote{Padova isochrones were
1118: obtained from the web site {\tt
1119: http://pleiadi.pd.astro.it/isoc\_photsys.00/isoc\_ubvrijhk}.} The
1120: isochrones we use are the set computed with convective overshoot and a
1121: constant mixing length. For the Padova isochrones, our IL abundance
1122: calculations were made with scaled solar composition only, due to the
1123: very limited selection of alpha-enriched models. The competing
1124: isochrones from the Teramo\footnote{Teramo (BaSTI) isochrones were
1125: obtained from the web site {\tt http://www.te.astro.it/BASTI/}.}
1126: group (e.g. Cassisi, Salaris \& Irwin 2003; Pietrinferni et al. 2006)
1127: were available for a variety of assumptions at the start of our work,
1128: including alpha-enhanced or scaled solar composition, with or without
1129: convective overshooting, two mass-loss rates (Riemer's mass-loss
1130: parameter $\eta$=0.2 and 0.4), and normal or extended AGB. Maraston
1131: (2005) investigated the merits of the these various Teramo isochrones,
1132: as well as those from the Padova group, by comparing to observed
1133: clusters and favored the Teramo (BaSTI) isochrones. Guided by the
1134: Maraston (2005) and the BaSTI web site recommendations, we selected
1135: the Teramo classical evolutionary tracks with no overshooting for the
1136: treatment of the core, a metallicity-dependent mixing length
1137: parameter, an extended AGB, and a mass-loss parameter of $\eta$=0.40.
1138: Most recently the Teramo isochrones have been updated for corrections
1139: to the alpha-enhanced opacities initiated by Ferguson et al. (2005).
1140: While the Teramo isochrones offer a greater parameter flexibility than
1141: the Padova isochrones, we believe that it is useful to compare the IL
1142: abundance results obtained using both the Teramo and Padova
1143: isochrones.
1144:
1145: Both the Teramo and Padova isochrones are provided without luminosity
1146: or mass functions. We therefore computed the frequency of each point
1147: on the theoretical isochrones using the IMF recommended by Kroupa
1148: (2002), and the initial masses indicated for each isochrone
1149: point. A simple program was used to bin points along the theoretical
1150: isochrones into {\em cmd} boxes, each containing at least 3.5\% of the
1151: total V-band flux. For each box the V-band flux-weighted model
1152: atmosphere parameters were computed according to the equations 4, 5
1153: and 6, above. In this way, the theoretical isochrones provided an
1154: input file of atmosphere parameters for our IL abundance analysis
1155: program with 21--27 {\em cmd} boxes, similar to the input file
1156: used for the observed {\em cmd} analysis (see Table~\ref{table3}).
1157:
1158: For the most luminous stars in the cluster, near the tip of the giant
1159: branch, small number statistics can lead to incomplete sampling if the
1160: cluster has a low total luminosity or if only a small fraction of the
1161: cluster is scanned with the spectrograph. The latter is true for our
1162: spectrum of 47~Tuc. In order to address the issue of this statistical
1163: incompleteness in the observed IL spectrum of the 47~Tuc core we used
1164: the theoretical isochrones and Kroupa IMF to estimate the number of
1165: stars in each {\em cmd} box. To make this calculation it was
1166: necessary to input an estimated M$_{\rm v}$ for the 32$\times$32 arc
1167: second region of the core scanned with the spectrograph slit. We did
1168: this by summing the observed V-band fluxes of the stars in the HST
1169: core photometry and correcting for our adopted distance modulus and
1170: foreground reddening. This procedure resulted in a value of
1171: M$_{\rm v}$(core) =$-$6.25. As the giant branch tip is approached,
1172: the number of stars in the high luminosity {\em cmd } boxes decreases.
1173: We truncated the top of the {\em cmd} luminosity function at the point
1174: where the integrated probability of finding a single star fell below
1175: 0.5, since it was more probable that no stars were present in the cluster
1176: beyond this point.
1177:
1178:
1179: Following the same analysis procedures as before we computed Fe~I and
1180: Fe~II abundances from the 47~Tuc IL EWs using theoretical isochrones, from
1181: the Padova and Teramo groups, in place of the observed {\em cmds}. However,
1182: because the age and metallicity were not known in advance we computed the
1183: line abundances for a range of assumed age and metallicity. For the Padova
1184: scaled solar isochrones we used scaled solar composition Kurucz model
1185: atmospheres with the ODFNEW opacity distribution function; the results are
1186: presented in Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun}. From the Teramo (BaSTI)
1187: group, we used the alpha-enhanced isochrones throughout, corrected for
1188: the Ferguson et al. (2005) alpha opacities, together with the
1189: alpha-enhanced Kurucz stellar model atmosphere grid with the AODFNEW
1190: opacity distribution functions (Castelli \& Kurucz 2004). For the
1191: Teramo (BaSTI) isochrones, spanning a large range of age and
1192: metallicity, the iron abundance results are shown in
1193: Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha}.
1194:
1195: In Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun} and
1196: \ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha}, the Fe~I abundances
1197: that we identify using the
1198: isochrones at any given age
1199: change by less than 0.2 dex over the whole range of input isochrone
1200: metallicities. The Fe~I abundances agree with the input isochrone metallicity
1201: near [Fe/H]$\sim$$-$0.5 to $-$0.6 dex for the 15 Gyr models.
1202: The figures show that significantly higher
1203: [Fe/H] values are obtained from the lines if very young ages are
1204: adopted; at 1Gyr, agreement between isochrone metallicity and line
1205: abundances occurs near $-$0.1 dex, while for old ages the result
1206: hardly changes at all between 10 and 15 Gyr. For iron abundance
1207: uncertainties of $\sim$0.1 dex the convergence of the stellar
1208: isochrones result in an insensitivity to age older than about 5 Gyr.
1209:
1210: The Fe~II line abundances in Figures~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun} and
1211: \ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha} increase much more strongly with
1212: isochrone metallicity than the Fe~I lines. We interpret the strong
1213: dependence of the Fe~II abundance with adopted input isochrone
1214: metallicity as follows: when the adopted isochrone metallicity is
1215: overestimated, the computed continuum opacity is artificially enhanced
1216: due to increased H$^-$ from increased electrons from the ionization of
1217: the extra metals. In this case, to match the integrated-light Fe~II
1218: line strength requires an over-estimate of the true metal content, as
1219: this depends on the line to continuum opacity. In this way, the
1220: computed Fe~II abundances increase with the adopted isochrone Z. For
1221: Fe~I lines, on the other hand, an overestimated isochrone metallicity
1222: results in enhanced recombination of Fe~II to Fe~I in the model
1223: atmospheres. This increase in the Fe~I number is matched by a similar
1224: increase in the H$^-$ opacity and, as a result, the computed Fe~I line
1225: strengths remain relatively unchanged for a given input isochrone
1226: metallicity. At very low isochrone Z, around 1/100 solar, the Fe~II
1227: abundance trends in Figures~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun} and
1228: \ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha} become less sensitive to metallicity.
1229: We believe that this results from the fact that the electron density
1230: in very metal-poor stellar atmospheres no longer depends upon
1231: ionization of metals, but is dominated by the ionization of hydrogen.
1232: We note that the Fe~II abundances in
1233: Figures~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun} and
1234: \ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha} also show a sensitivity to isochrone
1235: age, with the largest change for the youngest ages; but the direction
1236: of the derived abundance changes is such that younger isochrones give
1237: lower Fe~II abundances, whereas Fe~I abundances are increased.
1238:
1239: It must be noted that the initial impression from
1240: Figures~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun} and
1241: \ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha} is that the self consistency appears to
1242: be better for the Padova iron abundance than for the Teramo results,
1243: because the Fe~II and Fe~I abundances and the isochrone [Fe/H] value
1244: agree at similar values, near $-$0.6 dex as mentioned above. On the
1245: other hand, in these figures, the Fe~I and Fe~II agreement for the
1246: Teramo-based analysis agree at much lower [Fe/H] than Fe~I and the
1247: isochrone [Fe/H]. This could easily be due to higher adopted
1248: [$\alpha$/Fe] ratios for the Teramo isochrones and Kurucz
1249: alpha-enhanced models than actually present in 47~Tuc. Furthermore,
1250: the whole issue is somewhat confused by the recent changes in the
1251: solar composition by Asplund et al. (2005) and the delay between such
1252: solar results and the compositions used to compute stellar model
1253: atmospheres and isochrones. While the Padova agreement is better we
1254: must remember that 47~Tuc really is enhanced in alpha elements
1255: (e.g. see Table~\ref{table4}), as expected from its overall
1256: metallicity, so alpha-enhanced models are appropriate. Thus, it may
1257: be that the Fe~I, Fe~II and isochrone [Fe/H] agreement found by use of
1258: the solar-composition Padova isochrones was simply fortuitous.
1259:
1260:
1261: \subsubsection{Isochrone Problems?}
1262:
1263: In order to identify the cause of the differences between
1264: the iron abundance results from observed {\em cmd} and
1265: theoretical isochrones, we have compared the
1266: observed and predicted luminosity functions for 47~Tuc in detail.
1267: To do so, we adopt the 47~Tuc distance modulus of 13.50$\pm$0.08
1268: and age, of 11.2$\pm$1.1 Gyr, from Gratton et al. (2003). We note
1269: that more recent results reviewed by Koch \& McWilliam (2008)
1270: indicate a mean distance modulus of 13.22, but this short
1271: scale leads to a change in $\log{g}$ of $\sim$0.1 dex, and does not
1272: significantly affect the resultant abundances. For the reddening we
1273: averaged the two E(B$-$V) values given by Gratton et al. (2003), at
1274: 0.021 and 0.035, with the value of 0.032 from Schlegel et al. (1998),
1275: for a mean of 0.03 magnitudes. For this comparison, we adopted the
1276: alpha-enhanced, AGB-enhanced, Teramo isochrones with a metallicity of
1277: Z=0.0080 (corresponding to [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 according to the Teramo web
1278: site), and a mass-loss parameter of $\eta$=0.40. We note that the
1279: assumed conversion between [Fe/H] and Z for alpha-enhanced composition
1280: varies significantly in the literature; this is likely due to the
1281: recent changes to the best estimates for the solar oxygen and iron
1282: abundances (e.g. Asplund et al. 2005).
1283:
1284: In Figure~\ref{fig-basti.11gyr.compare}, we compare the observed and
1285: theoretical V-band luminosity functions for 47~Tuc. We note that
1286: while the adopted age of 11 Gyr provides a good match to the {\em cmd}
1287: at the main sequence turnoff and the Red Clump, it is also possible to
1288: obtain good matches with the observed luminosity function using older
1289: ages and a shorter distance modulus for the cluster. For this reason,
1290: we cannot confidently measure the cluster age. For the isochrones
1291: which produce good matches to the observed luminosity function, three
1292: major differences are still apparent: a deficit of stars below the
1293: turnoff in the observations; a general excess of observed giants above
1294: the Red Clump, highlighted by the spike in stars at the AGB bump; and an
1295: excess in the observed {\em cmd} at the very tip of the giant branch.
1296:
1297: While it might be reasonable to assume that the paucity of stars
1298: observed below the main sequence turnoff is due to incomplete
1299: photometry, Howell et al. (2000) has noted this in the data and
1300: attributed it to a real deficit of low-mass stars, presumably caused
1301: by dynamical mass-segregation processes. Mass segregation was first
1302: observed in the 47~Tuc core by Paresce et al. (1995) and is known in
1303: numerous other cluster cores (e.g. King, Sosin \& Cool 1995; Ferraro
1304: et al. 1997; Gouliermis et al. 2004). The striking excess of AGB bump
1305: stars in the observed core V-band luminosity function corresponds to
1306: the group of stars near V$\sim$13.2 and (B$-$V)$\sim$1.0 in the {\em
1307: cmd} shown in Figure~\ref{fig-47tuccmd}. We note that this same
1308: group of stars is present in the Kaluzny (1997) V,V$-$I 47~Tuc
1309: color-magnitude diagram of an outer field. We investigated a number
1310: of parameters for the Teramo isochrones, but we could find no
1311: combination of ages, from 10 to 14 Gyr, or mass-loss rate that gave a
1312: spike corresponding to the AGB bump. We conclude that the models are
1313: deficient in predicting the AGB bump, despite the use of ``AGB
1314: enhanced'' models. This under-prediction is reminiscent of the
1315: Schiavon et al. (2002) 0.4 dex deficiency of the theoretical AGB
1316: numbers compared with observations; however, here we require an
1317: enhancement for the AGB bump only. Finally, while there is an excess
1318: of flux at the tip of the observed giant branch luminosity function,
1319: compared to the predictions, the total flux at the tip comes from only
1320: 5 stars; thus, at $\sim$30\% this flux excess is within the 1$\sigma$
1321: Poisson noise of $\sim$45\%. Therefore, while the excess flux from
1322: the giant branch tip is real, it does not indicate a problem with the
1323: theoretical isochrone.
1324:
1325: We have applied two corrections to the theoretical Teramo isochrone to
1326: make the corresponding V-band luminosity function appear more like the
1327: observed function. First, to approximately match the main sequence
1328: turnoff region, we ignore all stars with M$_{\rm v}$ more than
1329: $+$4.90. Second, to match the observed AGB bump region, we apply an
1330: enhancement factor of 3.0 to stars in the M$_{\rm v}$ range from
1331: $-$0.10 to $-$0.70. Figure~\ref{fig-altered.11gyr.compare} compares
1332: the observed luminosity function with the corrected Teramo isochrone;
1333: the match is significantly improved, although it is clear that the
1334: real cluster still has slightly more flux coming from the giants than
1335: the model. Although not plotted here, we note that the theoretical
1336: luminosity function for Padova isochrones with age and abundance
1337: parameters like 47~Tuc show differences with the 47~Tuc luminosity
1338: function that are very similar to those discussed above; they also
1339: show a deficit in the predicted AGB bump by a factor of 3, and RGB tip
1340: deficit slightly more than for the Teramo isochrones, and a
1341: near-identical overestimate of dwarf stars below the turnoff.
1342:
1343:
1344: A computation of the IL abundances from the measured Fe~I and Fe~II
1345: lines gives different results for the original 47~Tuc Teramo isochrone
1346: and our modified version of the isochrone with the MS and AGB bump
1347: corrections. For our list of Fe~I lines the mean difference is
1348: $-$0.125 dex, while for the Fe~II lines the difference is $-$0.165
1349: dex, where these differences are corrected-isochrone minus
1350: uncorrected-isochrone abundance. To first order the differences
1351: provide zero-point offsets to be applied to uncorrected-isochrone
1352: abundances. We note that these offsets are valid only for one specific
1353: age and metallicity. Given the variability of turnoff, RGB, HB and AGB
1354: stars in GCs with different ages and metallicities it is unlikely that
1355: these offsets will be universal.
1356: When these corrections are applied to the abundances in
1357: Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha} we obtain a corrected plot,
1358: Figure~\ref{fig-tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha}, showing the dependence
1359: of [Fe~I/H] and [Fe~II/H] on assumed age and isochrone metallicity.
1360: We note that there is a systematic trend of decreasing derived Fe~I
1361: abundance with increasing age, similar to the Padova isochrone results
1362: in Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun}, but at 15 Gyr the Fe~I
1363: abundances show an increase over the 10 Gyr model; a similar
1364: turn-around occurs in the direction of the derived Fe~II abundances.
1365: This effect appears to result from a change in the core helium-burning
1366: stars in the isochrone from red clump to blue horizontal branch,
1367: and is related to age, metallicity and the mass-loss parameter,
1368: $\eta$.
1369:
1370: As shown in
1371: Figure~\ref{fig-tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha}, the Fe~I lines give
1372: $-$0.70 dex for the 10--15 Gyrs isochrones with [Fe/H] $-$0.70 dex.
1373: The satisfying agreement between isochrone [Fe/H] and the value
1374: derived from Fe~I lines indicates an older age range (10--15 Gyr) for
1375: 47~Tuc, as expected from color-magnitude diagrams (e.g. Gratton et
1376: al. 2003); ages of 3 Gyr or less are completely inconsistent with the
1377: Fe~I line abundances. The Fe~II lines give higher abundances than by
1378: 0.08 and 0.09 dex, respectively, for the 10-15 Gyr isochrones with
1379: [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 dex. While the difference of $\sim$0.08 dex between Fe~I
1380: and Fe~II abundances are within measurement uncertainties, there is a
1381: systematic difference which bears some thought. We suggest three
1382: possibilities that might explain these systematically higher Fe~II
1383: abundances derived from the theoretical isochrones. First, there may
1384: be systematic errors in the measured equivalent widths of Fe~II lines,
1385: which are weak and often blended in the 47~Tuc IL spectrum. Second,
1386: the alpha enhancement adopted for the theoretical isochrone may be
1387: higher than the actual alpha enhancement of the cluster. This may be
1388: related to the reduction in the solar oxygen abundance by Asplund et
1389: al. (2005). Third, there may be a statistical variance, or other
1390: mechanism, that increased the representation of stars at the tip of
1391: the giant branch in excess of those predicted by the Teramo
1392: isochrones.
1393:
1394: Given that our Padova isochrones employed solar composition rather
1395: than including the alpha enhancements necessary for to 47~Tuc, more
1396: detailed comparisons of the merits of the two sets of theoretical
1397: isochrones is not possible at this time.
1398:
1399:
1400: \subsubsection{Isochrone Diagnostics and Abundances for Unresolved GCs}
1401:
1402: A significant difficulty in the use of the theoretical isochrones for
1403: IL abundance analysis is the choice of isochrone parameters of age,
1404: metallicity, and alpha enhancement. Fortunately, for 47~Tuc we can
1405: assume a roughly old age, and be assured that our Fe~I abundances will
1406: be close to the truth. For unresolved clusters, the integrated colors
1407: could be used to constrain the combined effects of age and metallicity;
1408: however, the well-known age-metallicity
1409: degeneracy seen in cluster {\em cmds} makes determination of the
1410: isochrone parameters impossible solely on the basis of photometry.
1411: This is similar to the covariance between temperature and metallicity
1412: in the abundance analysis of individual stars. For full spectroscopic
1413: analysis of individual stars, various abundance diagnostics are used
1414: to constrain the atmosphere parameters. Likewise, we propose to use
1415: diagnostic spectral features to constrain the GC isochrone parameters,
1416: resulting in an isochrone choice that is completely consistent with
1417: the spectra. The most obvious example of such a diagnostic is that
1418: the isochrone metallicity must be consistent with the abundances
1419: computed from the absorption lines; this may include the alpha
1420: enhancement, which should agree with the abundances returned from the
1421: alpha element lines. We discuss a variety of other diagnostics below.
1422:
1423: In general the abundance computed for an individual line depends on
1424: the isochrone age and metallicity, but also on the excitation potential
1425: and ionization stage of the line. For example, if an isochrone with an
1426: incorrect age is adopted in the analysis, abundances derived from low
1427: excitation Fe~I lines will be different than for high excitation Fe~I
1428: lines due to the inappropriate stellar temperatures, resulting in a non-zero
1429: slope in the plot of iron abundance versus excitation potential. Our work (see
1430: below) bears out this expectation, however we also note that this use
1431: of excitation potential versus iron Fe~I line abundances as an age
1432: diagnostic may be complicated by the presence of a hot horizontal
1433: branch that might be confused with hot main sequence stars in old, low
1434: metallicity clusters. The Fe~II lines should also provide a
1435: diagnostic, because they are sensitive to the electron density (unlike
1436: the Fe~I lines), which in individual stars is a strong function of
1437: gravity. Thus, a constraint on the isochrone parameters comes
1438: from the consistency of the abundance results for lines from both
1439: ionization stages of iron.
1440:
1441: Another potential spectral diagnostic is derived from the computed
1442: abundance of individual Fe lines as a function of wavelength. A
1443: sub-population of relatively hot stars within a cluster will have its
1444: greatest contribution to the total flux at blue wavelengths. Thus, we
1445: may only expect agreement between iron abundances from blue and red
1446: wavelengths with the correct mix of hot and cool stars.
1447: This constraint of consistency with wavelength is similar
1448: to the the method used by Maraston et al. (2006), who found that
1449: thermally pulsing AGB stars contribute significantly to the total infrared
1450: fluxes of stellar populations in the $\sim$1 Gyr age range.
1451:
1452:
1453: To investigate spectral diagnostics of the isochrone parameters we begin with
1454: Figure~\ref{fig-ewepiso15z008}, which shows iron abundances
1455: versus EW and excitation potential (EP) for the lines
1456: in Table~2. Abundances for this plot were
1457: derived using a theoretical, alpha-enhanced, Teramo {\em cmd}
1458: for an age of 15 Gyr. Similar
1459: plots are used as diagnostics for studies of individual stars.
1460: Figure~\ref{fig-ewepiso15z008} shows that the iron abundance is
1461: approximately independent of EW and EP, which indicates that the
1462: microturbulent velocities and temperatures employed in the abundance
1463: calculations were consistent with the measured line EWs.
1464:
1465: Figure~\ref{fig-ewepiso1z008} shows the results of our abundance
1466: calculations using a Teramo isochrone for an age of only 1Gyr. In this
1467: case the plot of iron abundance versus EW indicates that abundances derived
1468: from strong and weak lines do not agree, with strong lines giving higher
1469: abundances. In an analysis of a single star's spectrum, this observation
1470: would indicate that the adopted microturbulent velocity parameter is
1471: too small. Since Figures~\ref{fig-47tuc.ewab.bv} and our analysis
1472: using the empirical {\em cmd} has already demonstrated that our
1473: adopted microturbulent velocity law is roughly correct, the
1474: disagreement between strong and weak lines in
1475: Figure~\ref{fig-ewepiso1z008} suggests that the input isochrone has
1476: too many stars with low microturbulent velocity. This suggests that
1477: the input isochrone contains more dwarf stars than the cluster,
1478: because dwarf stars have lower microturbulent
1479: velocities than giants. The plot of iron abundance with excitation
1480: potential for the 1 Gyr isochrone shows a decrease in abundance with
1481: increasing EP. For single stars this would indicate that the adopted
1482: temperature is too low. In the integrated light analysis this
1483: suggests that there is an excess of hot stars in the input isochrone
1484: compared to the real cluster, which is consistent with the idea that
1485: there is a larger fraction of dwarf stars in the 1Gyr isochrone than
1486: in the observed cluster. Thus, both the EW and EP plots suggest that
1487: the older, 10--15 Gyr isochrones provide better consistency among
1488: computed iron line abundances than do very young isochrones ($\sim$1
1489: Gyr).
1490:
1491:
1492: Figures~\ref{fig-ewepiso15z008} and \ref{fig-ewepiso1z008} are used
1493: here only to demonstrate diagnostic possibilities; clearly careful
1494: measurement of the deviations from zero slope in the EW and EP plots
1495: offers the possibility to determine the best fit isochrone age. The
1496: measured 1$\sigma$ uncertainty in the slopes of these two figures, at
1497: 0.00063 dex/m\AA\ and 0.019 dex/eV, respectively, is sufficient to
1498: provide 3$\sigma$ constraints on ages younger than 2 Gyr only.
1499: However, a factor of 2 improvement in the abundance measurement uncertainties
1500: would permit 3$\sigma$ measurement of ages up to 5 Gyr. This reduced
1501: abundance scatter could reasonably be expected by mitigation of uncertainties
1502: due to $gf$ values, blends, and use of higher S/N spectra. In this regard a
1503: differential abundance technique, relative to a standard giant or a known
1504: cluster, and a careful study of each line would be fruitful.
1505: Indeed, results with a GC training set (Bernstein et al. 2008) suggests that
1506: it will be possible to provide age constraints for the current plots
1507: to ages up to $\sim$3--5 Gyr. Older than 5 Gyr the abundance slope
1508: differences are too small to constrain the age.
1509:
1510: In principle, iron ionization equilibrium (consistency of the Fe~I and
1511: Fe~II abundances and isochrone metallicity) can also be used to constrain
1512: the isochrone age. This is particularly sensitive to the Fe~II abundance,
1513: which requires the additional constraint of the isochrone alpha enhancement
1514: and proper accounting for the most luminous stars in the isochrone, since the
1515: Fe~II lines are strongest at the lowest gravities. In
1516: Figure~\ref{fig-tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha} we see that the 5 Gyr isochrone
1517: for our 47~Tuc model is closest to consistency of Fe~I, Fe~II abundances and
1518: the isochrone metallicity; however, the 47~Tuc {\em cmd} suggests a significantly
1519: older age, close to 12 Gyr (e.g. Koch \& McWilliam 2008).
1520:
1521:
1522: Another age diagnostic may be obtained from a plot of iron abundance
1523: with wavelength. In this case, excessively young ages would give
1524: different abundances for lines at blue wavelengths. In
1525: practice, both our 1Gyr and 10--15 Gyr give noisy, approximately flat,
1526: trends of abundance with wavelength for our spectra; although
1527: much bluer spectral lines may have shown sensitivity to age.
1528:
1529: Given the limitation associated with spectral age diagnostics we now
1530: include broad-band, B$-$V colors, combined with the abundances
1531: derived from the spectra, to improve constraints on both age and metallicity.
1532: Essentially we use the different sensitivity to age of the integrated-light
1533: colors and abundances derived from the Fe absorption lines to simultaneously
1534: constrain age and [Fe/H].
1535: In Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh} we show theoretical integrated-light B$-$V colors, for
1536: alpha-enhanced, $\eta$=0.4, Teramo isochrones with ages ranging from 1 to 15 Gyr.
1537: To calculate the cluster B$-$V color we integrated the predicted B and V fluxes for
1538: each point on the Teramo isochrone, appropriately weighted by the Kroupa IMF.
1539: We note that our IL B$-$V colors depend upon the reliability of the Teramo
1540: isochrones, and as we have already seen the AGB bump in the Teramo predictions
1541: are under-estimated compared to the 47~Tuc {\em cmd}. Fortunately, when we
1542: enhance the AGB bump of the Teramo isochrones the effect on our IL B$-$V color
1543: is negligible, with a change of only $-$0.004 magnitudes; therefore, we should
1544: lower the loci in Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh} by 0.004 magnitudes. We note that
1545: the effect of $\alpha$-enhancement on the integrated B$-$V color seems to be rather
1546: small for 47~Tuc parameters: for 12 Gyr and [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 our solar composition
1547: calculations give B$-$V 0.012 magnitudes bluer than the alpha-enhanced isochrone;
1548: thus, an uncertainty of $\sim$0.1 dex in the adopted alpha-enhancement would change
1549: the predicted B$-$V color by only 0.002 magnitudes. Another isochrone
1550: morphology effect occurs for the oldest tracks with the choice of mass-loss parameter,
1551: $\eta$, such that the helium burning stars at high mass-loss and low masses reside
1552: on the Horizontal Branch instead of the Red Clump. Indeed, the unusual behavior of
1553: the 15 Gyr track in Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh} is due to the emergence of the
1554: Horizontal Branch compared to younger isochrones; notably, the 15 Gyr isochrone
1555: with a lower mass-loss rate ($\eta$=0.2) behaves more regularly.
1556: Another isochrone systematic that can affect the our colors is the
1557: relationship between color, temperature and metallicity adopted by the Teramo
1558: group: the B-band is particularly challenging for spectrum synthesis, due to the
1559: large number of strong absorption lines in red giants, and the M star spectra
1560: are especially complex.
1561:
1562: Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh} indicates the computed [Fe/H] for each age track, where
1563: the isochrone metallicity and [Fe/H] from the Fe~I lines are consistent, as
1564: derived from Figure~\ref{fig-tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha}. These points
1565: form a locus that intersects the observed B$-$V color for the isochrone whose
1566: age and metallicity are consistent with both the photometric and spectroscopic
1567: data. The horizontal dashed line in the figure shows the observed IL B$-$V
1568: color of 47~Tuc from Peterson (1986), de-reddened for E(B$-$V)=0.03; the
1569: $\pm$1$\sigma$ error bar of the observed (B$-$V)$_0$, at 0.014 mag., is the
1570: quadrature sum of 0.01 magnitude uncertainties in both the observed color and
1571: the reddening.
1572:
1573: The random error on the mean integrated-light [Fe/H] value, determined from the
1574: Fe~I lines is 0.021 dex. The systematic uncertainties, as discussed in
1575: section \S\ref{sec:Iron_Abundances}, give a total random + systematic uncertainty
1576: on the [Fe~I/H] values in Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh}, of 0.050 dex; this is indicated by
1577: the horizontal $\pm$1$\sigma$ error bars on the 1Gyr point. When we also include
1578: the 0.025 dex uncertainty, due to the choice of isochrone age (estimated from
1579: Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh}), the total 1$\sigma$ systematic + random uncertainty on
1580: unresolved IL [Fe/H] from Fe~I lines becomes $\pm$0.056 dex.
1581:
1582: Other potential sources of uncertainty include non-LTE corrections, and
1583: errors in the input isochrones, including the adopted helium mass fraction, Y,
1584: the assumptions about mixing length, mass-loss and innumerable other parameters
1585: that went into the Teramo isochrone calculations.
1586:
1587:
1588: Figure~\ref{fig-bvfeh} constrains the 47~Tuc isochrone age in the range 10 to 15 Gyr,
1589: with [Fe/H]=$-$0.70 $\pm$0.056 dex.
1590: The B$-$V color and [Fe/H] uncertainties indicates that the 8 Gyr isochrone is ruled out
1591: at the 2.7$\sigma$ level. This integrated-light result is completely consistent with
1592: the {\em cmd} best fit of 12 Gyr with the Teramo isochrones by Koch \& McWilliam (2008) and
1593: [Fe/H]=$-$0.76 $\pm$0.01~$\pm$0.04 from echelle spectra of individual K giants, as well
1594: as our value of [Fe/H]=$-$0.75$\pm$0.026$\pm$0.045 dex, obtained for the
1595: IL analysis which employed the known 47~Tuc {\em cmd}.
1596:
1597: The excellent agreement between IL [Fe/H] and age with other studies is tempered by the
1598: recognition that the isochrone parameters (e.g. mass-loss parameter, helium mass fraction,
1599: no convective overshooting) were chosen that best match Galactic globular clusters; thus,
1600: it is not surprising that the 47~Tuc (an important Galactic GC) {\em cmd} is well matched
1601: by the Teramo isochrones employed here. However, since intermediate age and young GCs
1602: are not found in the Galaxy the constraints on that part of parameter space is limited.
1603: Fortunately for this analysis of 47~Tuc, the helium core burning stars occupy a well defined
1604: red clump. Analysis of GCs with prominent blue horizontal branches may be much
1605: more difficult, although some horizontal branch tests with GCs have been performed (e.g.
1606: Cassisi \& Salaris 1997).
1607:
1608:
1609: Finally, we note that the EW and EP plots in
1610: Figures~\ref{fig-ewepiso15z008} and \ref{fig-ewepiso1z008} show that
1611: there is a possibility to detect the difference between hot main
1612: sequence stars and hot horizontal branches. If a cluster contains
1613: more hot horizontal giant branch stars than are present in the
1614: isochrone being used for the analysis, the EP--abundance plot would
1615: show a slope resulting from hotter than predicted stellar temperatures.
1616: While this EP plot may not distinguish between the high temperatures of young dwarf
1617: stars and horizontal branch stars, the EW plot would differ for these
1618: two cases, because the Horizonatal Branch stars have higher microturbulent
1619: velocities than dwarf stars. This diagnostic possibility will be explored in
1620: a later paper.
1621:
1622:
1623:
1624:
1625: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
1626:
1627: We are developing a method for analyzing the detailed chemical
1628: abundances of extragalactic, spatial unresolved globular clusters
1629: using high resolution spectroscopy. To do so, we have taken spectra
1630: of a ``training set'' of resolved GCs in the Milky Way and LMC. In
1631: this paper, we take the first step in developing the analysis method
1632: by exploring the analysis of an integrated light spectrum of
1633: the core of the Galactic globular cluster 47~Tuc. The spectra
1634: discussed here are high signal to noise ratio ($\sim$100 per
1635: pixel) echelle spectra that we obtained by scanning over the central
1636: 32$\times$32 arcsecond region of the cluster. Further work on the training
1637: set will be presented in later papers.
1638:
1639: We have explored two methods for detailed abundance analysis of
1640: IL GC spectra: first, with observed {\em cmds}
1641: and subsequently using theoretical isochrones to calculate
1642: integrated-light EWs from model atmosphere spectrum synthesis. We
1643: have modified the stellar spectrum synthesis program, MOOG, in order
1644: to compute abundances from IL EWs of single lines, and for the general
1645: case of blended features, including features arising from hyperfine
1646: structure. The main purpose of calculating abundances using the
1647: observed {\em cmd} was to verify the basic strategy associated with
1648: modeling an light--weighted equivalent width, but it would also be of
1649: value for measuring abundances from ground-based spectra of clusters
1650: in nearby galaxies (e.g. LMC, M31, and M33) that are resolved by
1651: space-based telescopes.
1652:
1653: We have demonstrated that GCs similar to 47~Tuc (M$_v$$\sim$$-$9) can
1654: be used to derive abundances for many elemental species, with
1655: accuracies similar to extant studies of individual stars. Given the
1656: current faint limit of echelle spectrographs on the world's largest
1657: telescopes, this suggests that we may derive detailed chemical
1658: abundances for clusters to a distance of $\sim$5 Mpc.
1659:
1660: Our {\em cmd}-based IL spectral abundance analysis of the 47~Tuc core
1661: provides [Fe~I/H] and [Fe~II/H] abundances of $-$0.75$\pm$0.026$\pm$0.045
1662: and $-$0.72$\pm$0.056$\pm$0.064 dex respectively (random and systematic errors).
1663: These [Fe/H] values are well within the
1664: [Fe/H] range, of $-$0.60 to $-$0.81 dex, reported by recent high
1665: resolution studies of individual stars in 47~Tuc.
1666:
1667: Diagnostic plots of iron abundance versus EW, line excitation
1668: potential, and wavelength reveal no systematic trends for the Fe~I
1669: lines in our {\em cmd} analysis. In the study of single stars, these
1670: diagnostic plots are used to constrain stellar atmosphere parameters.
1671: For our integrated-light analysis the EW plot indicates that our
1672: adopted run of microturbulent velocity with gravity is approximately
1673: correct. The wavelength and excitation potential plots suggests that
1674: the mix of stellar temperatures of the adopted isochrone model is
1675: correct.
1676:
1677: Comparison of our {\em cmd}-based 47~Tuc IL abundance results for
1678: various elements are consistent with previous studies within the range
1679: of reported [X/Fe] values. It is notable that elements whose
1680: abundances, relative to Fe, are measured higher or lower than the
1681: solar ratio in previous studies (e.g. Mg, Si, Ca, Ti, Mn) are
1682: confirmed in this work, while elements whose abundances scale with
1683: [Fe/H] (e.g. s-process elements, V, Cr, Ni, Co) follow the scaling
1684: here. Our [Cu/Fe] ratio, at $-$0.13 dex, while not measured by any
1685: study of individual 47~Tuc stars (perhaps due to the complications of
1686: hfs analysis) is completely consistent with the small deficiency seen
1687: in Galactic stars having the same [Fe/H] as 47~Tuc; indeed, our [X/Fe]
1688: ratios for 47~Tuc are generally consistent with expectations based on
1689: its [Fe/H]. The notable exceptions to the abundance consistencies are
1690: our higher values for Na and Al, our low value for Eu, and a slightly
1691: low value for Mg (but Mg is still enhanced). Given the very small
1692: central depth of the single Eu~II line available we believe that the
1693: low Eu result is simply an artifact of the spectrum noise. However,
1694: we believe that the pattern of Na, Mg and Al abundances indicates the
1695: presence of proton burning products, presumably in the envelopes of
1696: the luminous AGB star population within the cluster. If this is
1697: correct then it may be a general feature to be found in other old
1698: populations, such as extra-galactic bulges and elliptical galaxies. A
1699: difference between abundance results here and in the literature that
1700: we are not able to understand are the enhanced abundances of light
1701: s-process elements found by Wylie et al. (2006). It is possible that
1702: Wylie et al. (2006) detected genuine s-process abundance enhancements
1703: in the stars, formed during AGB evolution, that is not present in the
1704: majority of the cluster.
1705:
1706: Table~\ref{table4} shows that the median rms scatter of our
1707: integrated-light abundances is 0.18 dex, in good agreement with the
1708: 0.17 dex scatter with published abundances. For our 102 Fe~I lines
1709: the rms scatter is slightly higher, at 0.26 dex, probably due to the
1710: inclusion of blended lines, or lines with somewhat uncertain $gf$
1711: values. The formal error on our mean Fe~I abundance is 0.03 dex,
1712: while most other species have errors on the mean in the range 0.07 to
1713: 0.10 dex.
1714:
1715: A break-down of the fractional EW contributed by each {\em cmd} region
1716: indicates that the integrated-light Fe~I lines are formed mostly in
1717: the upper part of the RGB, increasing towards the most luminous stars,
1718: with a non-negligible contribution from the AGB and Red Clump regions.
1719: The low excitation potential Fe~I line formation is skewed even more
1720: to the most luminous red giants. On the other hand the Fe~II lines
1721: have the greatest contribution from the AGB and Red Clump regions with
1722: significant formation in the RGB, but not especially skewed to the
1723: most luminous RGB stars.
1724:
1725: We have explicitly investigated the potential complications in IL
1726: analysis that might arise due to M giants by performing spectrum
1727: synthesis calculations, including 5.4 million TiO lines, for two M
1728: giants contained in the scanned core region of 47~Tuc. From the
1729: synthetic spectra we measured pseudo-EWs and included these as
1730: corrections to the flux-weighted EWs for the cluster analysis. This
1731: led to negligible abundance corrections for 47~Tuc. The mild impact
1732: of M stars on the 47~Tuc IL analysis was partly due to the low M giant
1733: fraction, resulting from the low metallicity of the cluster, and also
1734: because the heavy TiO blanketing greatly reduced the M giant flux
1735: contribution for the lines. However, we note that a TiO window, in
1736: the region 7300--7600\AA , will allow flux from M stars to have a
1737: greater influence on the integrated light than at other wavelengths.
1738: Thus, we suggest that Fe~I line abundances from the TiO window,
1739: compared to other wavelengths, would provide a diagnostic of the
1740: M giant fraction; this will be especially important for clusters
1741: more metal-rich than 47~Tuc.
1742:
1743: Although integrated light abundance analysis of resolved clusters
1744: present interesting possibilities for clusters in some Local Group
1745: galaxies, most applications of IL abundance analysis will be for
1746: unresolved clusters in more distant galaxies. Therefore, we have
1747: extended our integrated light analysis technique to the case of
1748: unresolved clusters, using theoretical isochrones. We include scaled
1749: solar abundance theoretical isochrones of the Padova group (Girardi et
1750: al. 2000; Salasnich et al.2000), but we focus on the alpha-enriched
1751: isochrones of the Teramo group with mass loss parameter $\eta$=0.4 and
1752: extended AGB treatment (e.g. Cassisi, Salaris \& Irwin 2003;
1753: Pietrinferni et al. 2006) that employ the recently corrected
1754: alpha-element opacities of Ferguson et al. (2005). For both sets of
1755: theoretical isochrones we used the Kroupa (2002) IMF to set the number
1756: of stars at each mass.
1757:
1758: Abundances were computed using the measured integrated-light EWs and a
1759: grid of theoretical isochrones ranging from 1 to 15 Gyr. However,
1760: because the Teramo isochrones include choices of mass-loss parameter,
1761: alpha enhancement, and AGB treatment, where the Padova models do not
1762: have as much flexibility, and following the recommendations of
1763: Maraston (2005), we favor the Teramo isochrones.
1764:
1765: Plots of isochrone [Fe/H] versus [Fe/H] derived from the Fe~I and
1766: Fe~II lines in the integrated-light spectrum show different behaviors
1767: for Fe~I and Fe~II lines. For a given age, the Fe~I line abundances
1768: are insensitive to the input isochrone metallicity, with a range of
1769: only $\sim$0.2 dex over 2 dex in isochrone metallicity. Above
1770: [Fe/H]$\sim$$-$1.5, the derived Fe~II abundances scale with the adopted
1771: input isochrone metallicity (for a given age), with unit slope; below
1772: this metallicity limit the Fe~II abundances are roughly independent of
1773: isochrone metallicity, similar to the Fe~I lines.
1774: The Fe~I line abundances do show a strong dependence on the adopted
1775: isochrone age. This is apparently modulated by the mean temperature of
1776: the cluster stars, which increases with decreasing age.
1777: For old ages, from 10 to 15Gyr, the
1778: derived abundances vary by only $\sim$0.1 dex, presumably because the
1779: red giant branches are very similar.
1780:
1781: Our diagnostic plots of Fe abundance versus line EP, and line
1782: EW, show distinct trends when an isochrone age is selected that is
1783: significantly younger than the observed cluster: there is a slope in
1784: the EW versus abundance plot due to the low mean microturbulent
1785: velocity of the extra dwarf stars in the young isochrone, and there is
1786: a slope in the excitation versus abundance plot due to the high
1787: average temperature of the extra hot dwarfs in the young isochrone.
1788: By use of these diagnostics we may certainly eliminate the ages of 1
1789: to 2 Gyr for the 47~Tuc spectrum. Careful differential abundance
1790: analyses may push this age discrimination up to 5 Gyr, but the
1791: abundance trends are too subtle for anything older. Our mild age
1792: discriminant may be of limited use; however, for old GCs the exact
1793: age has very little effect on the derived abundances.
1794:
1795: These diagnostics suggest to us a possible discriminant between blue
1796: horizontal giant branch (BHB) stars in an old cluster and hot dwarf
1797: stars in a young cluster. The BHB stars will affect the abundance
1798: versus EW plot differently than dwarf stars in a young cluster,
1799: because the BHB stars have higher microturbulent velocities than dwarf
1800: stars. Thus, while the excitation versus abundance plot may show that
1801: there is a population of hot stars in the cluster, the EW versus
1802: abundance plot will indicate whether these hot stars are low gravity
1803: BHB stars, or high gravity dwarfs.
1804:
1805: Comparing the luminosity function of the theoretical Teramo
1806: isochrones with the best fit parameters of Gratton et al.(2003), we
1807: find that the theoretical isochrone over-predicted stars below the
1808: main sequence turnoff and under-predicted the luminosity of the AGB
1809: bump; there is also a slight under-prediction for the tip of the
1810: giant branch, but this could reasonably be due to Poisson noise
1811: effects. The lack of stars below the main sequence turnoff is a well
1812: known result of mass-segregation in cluster cores. We are unaware of
1813: the source of the under-predicted AGB bump luminosity, but we note
1814: that Schiavon et al. (2002) found a similar under-prediction 47~Tuc,
1815: but his correction covered all luminous giants; it appears that both
1816: Teramo and Padova theoretical isochrones fall short of an accurate
1817: description of the AGB bump. In order to reproduce HST observations
1818: of the 47~Tuc core we corrected the theoretical luminosity function by
1819: increasing the contribution of the AGB bump region by a factor of 3.0,
1820: and applied a cut to eliminate main sequence stars less luminous than
1821: M$_{\rm v}$=4.90.
1822:
1823: We find that the corrected theoretical isochrone for 47~Tuc core
1824: reduces the derived IL abundances of Fe~I and Fe~II lines by 0.125 and
1825: 0.165 dex, respectively. We have applied these as zero-point
1826: corrections to IL abundances derived for Teramo isochrones; but,
1827: strictly speaking, they are only valid for only one age and metallicity.
1828:
1829: When the corrected theoretical isochrones are used the [Fe/H] based on
1830: Fe~I lines is consistent with the input isochrone [Fe/H] at $-$0.70 dex and
1831: an age of 10 to 15 Gyr; however, in this analysis the trend of line abundance
1832: with excitation potential only rules-out ages younger than $\sim$2 Gyr.
1833:
1834: In order to improve our constraints on our age estimate from integrated-light,
1835: we computed theoretical integrated-light B$-$V colors, as a function of metallicity
1836: and age, based on the Teramo isochrones and the Kroupa IMF. We found that the
1837: observed B$-$V color combined with the self consistent [Fe/H], from the spectral
1838: line abundance analysis, indeed results in superior constraints on both age and
1839: metallicity than from the spectra alone. The B$-$V color plus spectral lines give an
1840: age in the range 10 to 15 Gyr, with 8 Gyr ruled out at at the 2.7$\sigma$ level,
1841: and [Fe/H]=$-$0.70$\pm$0.021$\pm$0.045 dex, based on the Fe~I lines. This
1842: integrated-light result is completely consistent with the {\em cmd} best fit of
1843: 12 Gyr with the Teramo isochrones by Koch \& McWilliam (2008) and
1844: [Fe/H]=$-$0.76 $\pm$0.01~$\pm$0.04 from echelle spectra of individual K giants.
1845: Indeed, based on Fe~I lines, the mean of 5 high resolution abundance
1846: studies of individual stars in 47~Tuc gives a mean of [Fe/H]=$-$0.70
1847: $\pm$0.04 dex, with a scatter about the mean of 0.086 dex, in perfect
1848: agreement with our value derived using theoretical isochrones alone.
1849:
1850: One slight inconsistency is that [Fe/H] derived from the Fe~II lines
1851: is higher than the intersection of Fe~I and isochrone values by
1852: $\sim$0.08 dex. While this difference may simply be due to
1853: measurement error, other explanations include the possibility that the
1854: input alpha enhancement for the isochrones and model atmospheres is
1855: higher than for the cluster, or that Poisson noise at the tip of the
1856: giant branch increased the number of tip giants over the predicted
1857: value. In any event, the difference is small and similar to the
1858: dispersion between studies.
1859:
1860: We have shown that detailed chemical abundance analysis of the
1861: integrated-light of Galactic globular cluster 47~Tuc provides results
1862: similar to the analysis of its individual stars. This relies on the
1863: low velocity dispersion of this rather luminous cluster. Our work
1864: suggests that we may employ techniques outlined in this paper to study
1865: the composition of globular clusters in distant galaxies, out to about
1866: 5~Mpc, using existing spectrograph-telescope combinations.
1867: Thus, it now appears possible to use GCs to study the detailed chemical
1868: composition of galaxies far beyond the Local Group.
1869:
1870:
1871: \acknowledgements
1872:
1873: We are grateful to Steve Shectman for not only building the du~Pont
1874: echelle spectrograph and writing the du~Pont telescope control
1875: software, with which the data for this paper was obtained, but also
1876: for volunteering to modify the du~Pont guider control software to
1877: permit scanning of the echelle slit over a large enough area of sky to
1878: obtain the echelle format integrated light spectra of 47 Tuc and other
1879: Galactic globular clusters. We also thank Raja Guhathakurta and
1880: Ricardo Schiavon for making available to us their HST photometry of
1881: the 47 Tuc core. RAB acknowledges support from the NSF through grant
1882: number AST-0507350.
1883:
1884: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1885:
1886: \bibitem[Alonso et al.~(1999)]{a99}
1887: Alonso, A., Arribas, S. \& Martinez-Roger, C. 1999, A\&AS, 140, 261
1888: %``The Effective Temperature Scale of Giant Stars (F0--K5). II. Empirical
1889: % Calibration of T$_{\rm eff}$ Verses Colours and [Fe/H]"
1890:
1891: \bibitem[Alonso et al.~(2001)]{a01}
1892: Alonso, A., Arribas, S. \& Martinez-Roger, C. 2001, A\&AS, 376, 1039
1893: %``Erratum: The Effective Temperature Scale of Giant Stars (F0--K5). II. Empirical
1894: % Calibration of T$_{\rm eff}$ Verses Colours and [Fe/H]"
1895:
1896:
1897: \bibitem[Alves-Brito et al.~(2005)]{a05_01}
1898: Alves-Brito, A., Barbuy, B., Ortolani, S., Momany, Y., Hill, V., Zoccali, M., Renzini, A. et al.
1899: 2005, A\&A, 435, 657
1900:
1901: \bibitem[Asplund et al.~(2005)]{a05_02}
1902: Asplund, M., Grevesse, N. \& Sauval, A.J. 2005,
1903: ``Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis'', ASP Conference Series vol. 336, 2005, p.~25;
1904: Austin, Texas; eds. F.N. Bash \& T.G. Barnes (also astro-ph/0410214).
1905:
1906:
1907: \bibitem[Bai et al. (2004)]{1704}
1908: Bai, G.S., Zhao, G., Chen, Y.Q., Shi, J.R., Klochkova, V.G., Panchuk, V.E., Qui, H.M., \&
1909: Zhang, H.W. 2004, A\&A 425, 671
1910:
1911: \bibitem[Bernstein \& McWilliam (2005)]{bm05}
1912: Bernstein, R.A., \& McWilliam, A. 2005, in ``Resolved Stellar Populations'', ASP Conf Series,
1913: eds. D. Valls-Gabaud and M. Chavez (astro-ph/0507042)
1914:
1915: \bibitem[Brodie \& Huchra (1990)]{bh90}
1916: Brodie, J.P., \& Huchra, J.P. 1990, ApJ, 362, 503
1917:
1918: \bibitem[Brown et al. (1994)]{bsl94}
1919: Briley, M.M., Smith, V.V., \& Lambert, D.L. 1994, ApJ, 424, L119
1920:
1921: \bibitem[Brown \& Wallerstein (1992)]{bw92}
1922: Brown, J.A., \& Wallerstein, G. 1992, AJ, 104, 1818
1923:
1924: \bibitem[Carretta et al.~2004]{cg47t}
1925: Carretta, E., Gratton, R.G., Bragaglia, A., Bonifacio, P., \& Pasquini, L. 2004, A\&A, 416, 925
1926:
1927: \bibitem[Cohen 1978]{cohen78}
1928: Cohen, J.G., 1978, ApJ, 223, 487
1929:
1930: \bibitem[Cassisi \& Salaris 1997]{cs97}
1931: Cassisi, S., \& Salaris, M. 1997, \mnras, 285, 593
1932:
1933: \bibitem[Cassisi, Salaris & Irwin 2003]{1727}
1934: Cassisi, S., Salaris, M. \& Irwin, A.W. 2003, ApJ, 588, 862
1935:
1936: \bibitem[Castelli \& Kurucz~2004]{1730}
1937: Castelli, F., \& Kurucz, R.L. 2004, IAU Symposium 210, ``Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres'',
1938: eds. N. Piskanov et al., poster A20 (astro-ph/0405087)
1939:
1940: \bibitem[Castilho et al.~2000]{castilho}
1941: Castilho, B.V., Pasquini, L., Allen, D.M., Barbuy, B., \& Molaro, P. 2000, A\&A, 361, 92
1942:
1943: \bibitem[Edvardsson (1993)]{1737}
1944: Edvardsson, B., Andersen, J., Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D.L., Nissen, P.E., \& Tomkin, J.
1945: 1993, \aap, 275, 101
1946:
1947: \bibitem[Elson \& Santiago (1996)]{1741}
1948: Elson R.A.W., \& Santiago, B.X. 1996, \mnras, 278, 617
1949:
1950: \bibitem[Faber (1973)]{1744}
1951: Faber, S.M. 1973, ApJ, 179, 731
1952:
1953: \bibitem[Faber~\&~Jackson~(1976)]{1747}
1954: Faber, S.M., \& Jackson R.E. 1976, ApJ, 204, 668
1955:
1956: \bibitem[Faber et al.~(1985)]{faber85}
1957: Faber, S.M., Friel, E.D., Burstein, D.,, \& Gaskell, C.M. 1985, ApJS, 57, 711
1958:
1959: \bibitem[Forte, Strom \& Strom 1981]{fss81}
1960: Forte, J.C., Strom, S.W., \& Strom, K.M. 1981, ApJ, 245, L9
1961:
1962: \bibitem[Ferguson et al. 2005]{1756}
1963: Ferguson, J.W., Alexander, D.R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J.G., Hauschildt, P.H., Heffner-Wong, A., Tamanai, A.
1964: 2005, ApJ, 623, 585.
1965:
1966:
1967: \bibitem[Ferraro et al. 1997]{1761}
1968: Ferraro, F.R., Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Renzini, A., Ortolani, S.
1969:
1970: \bibitem[Fulbright, McWilliam \& Rich 2006]{fmr06}
1971: Fulbright, J., McWilliam, A., \& Rich, R.M. 2006, ApJ, 636, 821
1972:
1973: \bibitem[Geisler et al. 1996]{g96}
1974: Geisler, D., Lee, M.G., \& Kim, E. 1996, AJ, 111, 1529
1975:
1976: \bibitem[Girardi et al. 2000]{1770}
1977: Girardi et al. 2000, AAS 141, 371
1978:
1979: \bibitem[Gouliermis et al. 2004]{1773}
1980: Gouliermis, D., Keller, S.C., Kontizas, M., Kontizas, E., Bellas-Velidis, I. 2004, A\&A, 416, 137
1981:
1982: \bibitem[Salasnich et al. 2000]{1776}
1983: Salasnich et al. 2000, AA 361, 1023
1984:
1985: \bibitem[Gratton et al. 1994]{1779}
1986: Gratton, R.G. \& Sneden, C. 1994, \aap, 287, 927
1987:
1988: \bibitem[Gratton et al. 2003]{1782}
1989: Gratton, R.G., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E., Clementini, G., Desider, S., Grundahl, F., \&
1990: Lucatello, S. 2003, AA, 408, 529
1991:
1992: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval (1999)]{1786}
1993: Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A.J. 1999, A\&A, 347, 348
1994:
1995: \bibitem[Guhathakurta et al. 1992]{1789}
1996: Guhathakurta, P., Yanny, B., Schneider, D.P., \& Bahcall, J.N. 1992, AJ, 104, 1790
1997:
1998: \bibitem[Harris 1991]{1792}
1999: Harris, W.E. 1991, ARA\&A, 29, 543
2000:
2001: \bibitem[Houdashelt et al. 2000]{1795}
2002: Houdashelt, M.L., Bell, R.A., Sweigart, A.V., \& Wing, R.F. 2000, ApJ, 119, 1424
2003:
2004: \bibitem[Howell et al. 2000]{1798}
2005: Howell, J.H., Guhathakurta, P., \& Gilliland, R.L. 2000, PASP, 112, 1200
2006:
2007: \bibitem[Johnson 2002]{1801}
2008: Johnson, J.A. 2002, ApJS, 139, 219
2009:
2010: \bibitem[Kaluzny 1997]{1804}
2011: Kaluzny, J. 1997, A\&AS, 122, 1
2012:
2013: \bibitem[Kaluzny et al. 1998]{1807}
2014: Kaluzny, J., Kubiak, M., Szymanski, M., Udalski, A., Krzeminski, W., Mateo, M. \& Stanek, K.Z.
2015: 1998, A\&AS, 128, 19
2016:
2017: \bibitem[Kaufer et al.~2004]{1811}
2018: Kaufer, A., Venn, K.A., Tolstoy, E., Pinte, C., Kudritzki, R.P. 2004, AJ, 127, 2723
2019:
2020: \bibitem[King et al.~1995]{1814}
2021: King, I.R., Sosin, C., \& Cool, A.M. 1995, ApJ, 452, L36
2022:
2023: \bibitem[Koch \& McWilliam (2008)]{1817}
2024: Koch, A., \& McWilliam, A. 2007, in preparation
2025:
2026: \bibitem[Kroupa~2002]{1820}
2027: Kroupa, P., 2002, Science, 295, 82
2028:
2029: \bibitem[Ku\check{c}inskas et al.~2006]{1823}
2030: Ku$\check{c}$inskas, A., Hauschildt, P.H., Brott, I., Vansevi$\check{c}$ius, V., Lindegren, L., Tanab$\acute{e}$, T.,
2031: \& Allard, F. 2006, A\&A, 452, 1021
2032:
2033: \bibitem[Letarte et al. 2006]{let06}
2034: Letarte, B., Hill, V., Jablonka, P., Tolstoy, E., Francois, P., \& Meylan, G. 2006, A\&A, 453, 547
2035:
2036: \bibitem[Lebzelter \& Wood 2005]{1830}
2037: Lebzelter, T. \& Wood, P.R. 2005, A\&A, 441, 1117
2038:
2039: \bibitem[Luck \& Bond (1985)]{lb85}
2040: Luck, R.E., \& Bond, H.E. 1985, ApJ, 292, 559
2041:
2042: \bibitem[Maraston 2005]{1836}
2043: Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799
2044:
2045: \bibitem[Maraston et al. 2006]{1839}
2046: Maraston, C., Daddi, E., Renzini, A., Cimatti, A., Dickinson, M., Papovich, C.,
2047: Pasquali, A., \& Pirzcal, N. 2006, ApJ, 652, 85
2048:
2049: \bibitem[McWilliam 1997]{1843}
2050: McWilliam, A. 1997, ARAA, 35, 503
2051:
2052: \bibitem[McWilliam \& Bernstein 2002]{1846}
2053: McWilliam, A., \& Bernstein, R.A. 2002, in ``Extragalactic Star Clusters'', IAU Symposium 207,
2054: Held in Pucon, Chile March 12-16, 2001.
2055: Edited by D. Geisler, E.K. Grebel, and D. Minniti.
2056: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2002., p.739
2057:
2058: \bibitem[McWilliam, Rich \& Smecker Hane 2003]{1852}
2059: McWilliam, A., Rich, R.M., Smecker Hane, T.A. 2003, ApJ, 592, L21
2060:
2061: \bibitem[Mishenina et al. 2002]{1855}
2062: Mishenina, T.V., Kovtyukh, V.V., Soubiran, C., Travaglio, C., \& Busso, M. 2002,
2063: A\&A, 396, 189
2064:
2065: \bibitem[Nissen et al. (2000)]{1859}
2066: Nissen, P.E., Chen, Y.Q., Schuster, W.J., \& Zhao, G. 2000, A\&A, 353, 722
2067:
2068: \bibitem[Paresce et al. 1995]{1862}
2069: Paresce, F., de Marchi, G., Jedrzejewski, R. 1995, ApJ, 442, L57
2070:
2071: \bibitem[Peng, Ford \& Freeman (2004)]{1865}
2072: Peng, E.W., Ford, H.C., \& Freeman, K.C. 2004, \apj, 602, 705
2073:
2074: \bibitem[Peterson (1986)]{peterson86}
2075: Peterson, C.J. 1986, \pasp, 98, 192
2076:
2077: \bibitem[Pietrinferni et al. (2006)]{1868}
2078: Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli, F. 2006, ApJ, 642, 797
2079:
2080: \bibitem[Pilachowski et al. 1980]{p80}
2081: Pilachowski, C.A., Canterna, R., \& Wallerstein, G. 1980, ApJ, 235, L21
2082:
2083: \bibitem[Plez 1998]{1874}
2084: Plez, B. 1998, A\&A, 337, 495
2085:
2086: \bibitem[Prochaska \& McWilliam (2000)]{1877}
2087: Prochaska, J.X., \& McWilliam, A. 2000, ApJ, 537, 57
2088:
2089:
2090: \bibitem[Pryor \& Meylan 1993]{1881}
2091: Pryor, C. \& Meylan, G. 1993, ASP Conference Series, vol. 50, 357.
2092: S.G. Djorgovski and G. Meylan (eds.)
2093:
2094:
2095: \bibitem[Racine, Oke \& Searle 1978]{1886}
2096: Raceine, R., Oke, J.B., \& Searle, L. 1978, ApJ, 223, 82
2097:
2098: \bibitem[Schiavon et al. 2002]{1889}
2099: Schiavon, R.P., Faber, S.M., Rose, J.A., \& Castilho, B.V. 2002, ApJ, 580, 873
2100:
2101: \bibitem[Schlegel et al. 1998]{1892}
2102: Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
2103:
2104: \bibitem[Simmerer et al.(2003)]{1895}
2105: Simmerer, J., Sneden, C., Ivans, I.I., Kraft, R.P., Shetrone, M.D., \&
2106: Smith, V.V. 2003, AJ, 125, 2018
2107:
2108: \bibitem[Smith \& Lambert (1985)]{1899}
2109: Smith, V.V. \& Lambert, D.L., 1985, ApJ, 294, 326
2110:
2111: \bibitem[Sneden, C. 1973]{1902}
2112: Sneden, C. 1973, ApJ, 184, 839
2113:
2114: \bibitem[Sneden et al. 1973]{s91}
2115: Sneden, C., Kraft, R.P., Prosser, C.F., \& Langer, G.E. 1991, AJ, 102, 2001
2116:
2117: \bibitem[Sobeck et al. 2006]{1908}
2118: Sobeck, J.S., Ivans, I.I., Simmerer, J.A., Sneden, C., Hoeflich, P., Fulbright,
2119: J.P., \& Kraft, R.P. 2006, ApJ, 131, 2949
2120:
2121: \bibitem[Trager 2004]{1912}
2122: Trager, S.C. 2004, in {\em Origin and Evolution of the Elements}, Carnegie Observatories
2123: Centennial Symposia, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press.
2124: Edited by A. McWilliam and M. Rauch, 2004, p. 391.
2125:
2126:
2127: \bibitem[Venn et al.~2001]{1918}
2128: Venn, K.A., Lennon, D.J., Kaufer, A., McCarthy, J.K., Przybilla, N., Kudritzki, R.P.,
2129: Lemke, M., Skillman, E.D., \& Smartt, S.J. 2001, ApJ, 547, 765
2130:
2131:
2132: \bibitem[Wallerstein 1962]{w62}
2133: Wallerstein, G. 1962, ApJS, 6, 407
2134:
2135: \bibitem[Whitmore et al. 1995]{1926}
2136: Whitmore, B.C., Sparks, W.B., Lucas, R.A., Macchetto, F.D., \& Biretta, J.A. 1995, \apj, 454, L73
2137:
2138: \bibitem[Winkler 1997]{1929}
2139: Winkler, 1997, MNRAS, 287, 481
2140:
2141: \bibitem[Worthey et al.~(1994)]{worthey94}
2142: Worthey, G., Faber, S.M., Gonzalez, J.J., \& Burstein D. 1994, ApJS, 94, 687
2143:
2144: \bibitem[Wylie et al. (2006)]{1935}
2145: Wylie, E.C., Cottrell, P.L., Sneden, C.A., \& Lattanzio, J.C. 2006, ApJ, 649, 248
2146:
2147: \bibitem[Zinn (1985)]{1938}
2148: Zinn, R. 1985, ApJ, 293, 424
2149:
2150: \end{thebibliography}
2151:
2152:
2153:
2154: \clearpage
2155:
2156: \input{tab1.tex} % Log of observations of IL spectra
2157:
2158: \input{tab2.tex}
2159:
2160: \input{tab3.tex}
2161:
2162: %\input{47tuc.vi.photometry}
2163:
2164: \input{tab4.tex}
2165:
2166: \clearpage
2167:
2168: \begin{figure}
2169: %\plotone{sigmvbw.eps}
2170: \plotone{f1.eps}
2171: \caption{The relation between velocity dispersion and globular cluster
2172: absolute visual magnitude for Galactic globular clusters, based on
2173: Pryor \& Meylan (1993); 47~Tuc (the globular cluster analyzed in
2174: this paper) and NGC~6397 (a metal-poor cluster of low luminosity)
2175: are identified.}
2176: \label{fig-sigmv}
2177: \end{figure}
2178: \clearpage
2179:
2180:
2181: \begin{figure}
2182: %\plotone{sc.eps}
2183: \plotone{f2.eps}
2184: \caption{A cut along the cross-dispersion direction of a 47~Tuc echelle
2185: integrated-light exposure (1$\times$4 arc sec slit; heavy solid line)
2186: compared with a scaled echelle spectrum of a single red giant star
2187: through a short slit (0.75$\times$0.75 arc sec; dotted line).
2188: The short slit flux was scaled to the total flux in the 47~Tuc spectrum
2189: in the order near column 1055. Note the similarity of the inter-order
2190: light of the two spectra below column 910. The sharp minima of the
2191: 47~Tuc spectra at larger column positions (redder wavelengths) suggests
2192: that the inter-order light there suffers contamination from the
2193: order wings. Where the GC IL scattered-light cannot be measured directly
2194: we employ the ratio of total flux to scattered-light
2195: in the short slit spectrum to determine the scattered-light
2196: for the 47~Tuc spectrum.}
2197: \label{fig-scatt}
2198: \end{figure}
2199: \clearpage
2200:
2201:
2202:
2203:
2204:
2205: \begin{figure}
2206: %\plotone{mgb.eps}
2207: \plotone{f3.eps}
2208: \caption{The integrated-light spectrum of the Mgb line region in NGC
2209: 6397 and 47 Tuc. }
2210: \label{fig-mgb}
2211: \end{figure}
2212: \clearpage
2213:
2214:
2215: \begin{figure}
2216: %\plotone{eu.eps}
2217: \plotone{f4.eps}
2218: \caption{The integrated-light spectrum of the Eu~II line region in 47
2219: Tuc (above), compared to the same region in an RGB star (below). }
2220: \label{fig-eu}
2221: \end{figure}
2222:
2223: \clearpage
2224:
2225: \begin{figure}
2226: %\plotone{47tuc_cmd32.eps}
2227: \plotone{f5.eps}
2228: \caption{CMD of the scanned region of 47 Tucanae (inner 32x32 arc
2229: sec), from HST images of Guhathakurta et al. (1992), Howell et
2230: al. (2000); kindly provided by R.~Schiavon. Boxes indicate how the
2231: CMD was split into 27 sub-regions for the abundance analysis. }
2232: \label{fig-47tuccmd}
2233: \end{figure}
2234: \clearpage
2235:
2236:
2237:
2238:
2239:
2240: \begin{figure}
2241: %\plotone{ewab_47tuc.eps}
2242: \plotone{f6.eps}
2243: \caption{Iron abundance versus line equivalent width, in m\AA .
2244: Filled circles represent Fe~I lines, open squares are Fe~II lines.
2245: The absence of a trend of abundance with EW validates our choice of
2246: the microturbulent velocity law.}
2247: \label{fig-47tuc.ewab.bv}
2248: \end{figure}
2249: \clearpage
2250:
2251:
2252: \begin{figure}
2253: %\plotone{epab_47tuc.eps}
2254: \plotone{f7.eps}
2255: \caption{Iron abundance versus line excitation potential, in eV.
2256: Filled circles represent Fe~I lines, open squares are Fe~II lines.
2257: The abundance is approximately independent of excitation potential,
2258: which suggests that the atmosphere temperatures are approximately
2259: correct. The Fe~I and Fe~II abundances show good overlap, although
2260: the average $\epsilon$(Fe II) is higher by 0.09 dex.}
2261: \label{fig-47tuc.epab.bv}
2262: \end{figure}
2263:
2264: \clearpage
2265:
2266:
2267: \begin{figure}
2268: %\plotone{wavab_47tuc.eps}
2269: \plotone{f8.eps}
2270: \caption{Iron abundance versus line wavelength, in m\AA . Filled
2271: circles represent Fe~I lines, open squares are Fe~II lines. }
2272: \label{fig-47tuc.wab.bv}
2273: \end{figure}
2274:
2275: \clearpage
2276:
2277:
2278: \begin{figure}
2279: %\plotone{47tuc.grow.eps}
2280: \plotone{f9.eps}
2281: \caption{The fractional contribution to the total equivalent width
2282: from each {\em cmd} box. Temperature increases for the {\em cmd}
2283: boxes from left to right, in the two segments of the figure. The
2284: figure shows the growth of one Fe~I line of high excitation at
2285: 6597\AA (4.8 eV, filled circles), an Fe~I line of low excitation
2286: (1.0 eV, open squares) at 6648\AA, and an Fe~II line, at 6432\AA\
2287: (five pointed stars). All three lines are weak, being close to
2288: 30m\AA\ in 47 Tuc. The Fe~I lines are predominately formed by stars
2289: on the Red Giant Branch, with some contribution from the AGB and red
2290: clump (RC); however, very little contribution to the Fe~I line EWs
2291: occurs in the subgiant branch (SG), turnoff (TO) and main sequence
2292: (MS). The most important contribution to the Fe~II line strength
2293: comes from the red clump and AGB. The coolest {\em cmd} boxes do
2294: not contribute as much to the total Fe~II EW as they do for the Fe~I
2295: lines due to the low ionization in these cool stars. The blue
2296: stragglers make no significant contribution to the EW of our iron
2297: lines. }\label{fig-47tuc.grow}
2298: \end{figure}
2299:
2300: \clearpage
2301:
2302: \begin{figure}
2303: %\plotone{tio3600.eps}
2304: \plotone{f10.eps}
2305: %\plotfiddle{FILE}{VSIZ}{ROT}{HSF}{VSF}{HTRANS}{VTRANS}
2306: %\plotfiddle{f1.eps}{8.5cm}{0.}{80.}{80.}{0}{0}
2307: \caption{ A synthetic spectrum from 5500-7600\AA\ for the M giant with
2308: T$_{\rm eff}$=3600K, in the core of 47~Tuc, including 5.4 million
2309: TiO lines, and Fe lines measured for the EW analysis of the IL
2310: spectrum. The green color indicates the synthesis performed with
2311: TiO plus Fe lines, and the black color indicates synthesis of TiO
2312: only. The TiO band heads of the alpha system are clearly visible.
2313: }
2314: \label{fig-tio3600}
2315: \end{figure}
2316:
2317: \clearpage
2318:
2319:
2320: \begin{figure}
2321: %\plotone{tio3350.eps}
2322: \plotone{f11.eps}
2323: %\plotfiddle{FILE}{VSIZ}{ROT}{HSF}{VSF}{HTRANS}{VTRANS}
2324: %\plotfiddle{f1.eps}{8.5cm}{0.}{80.}{80.}{0}{0}
2325: \caption{ A synthetic spectrum from 5500-7600\AA\ for the M giant with
2326: T$_{\rm eff}$=3350K, in the core of 47~Tuc, including 5.4 million
2327: TiO lines, and Fe lines measured for the EW analysis of the IL
2328: spectrum. Colors are the same as for Figure~\ref{fig-tio3600}.
2329: Notice the heavy TiO blanketing below $\sim$7300\AA\ , that
2330: depresses the continuum and obliterates most atomic lines; the M
2331: giant window in the interval 7300--7600\AA\ is relatively unaffected
2332: by TiO blanketing . }
2333: \label{fig-tio3350}
2334: \end{figure}
2335:
2336: \clearpage
2337:
2338:
2339: \begin{figure}
2340: %\plotone{tracks1.padova.odfnew.eps}
2341: \plotone{f12.eps}
2342: \caption{Computed abundances from Fe~I and Fe~II lines in 47~Tuc
2343: (filled circles and open squares respectively) for Padova isochrones
2344: of various ages and metallicities. Note the different sensitivity
2345: to isochrone metallicity of the Fe~I and Fe~II lines, and the
2346: dependence on age. The dashed line is the locus of [Fe/H] from the Fe lines
2347: equal to the value in the input isochrone.}
2348: \label{fig-ilabunds.padova.sun}
2349: \end{figure}
2350:
2351: \clearpage
2352:
2353:
2354: \begin{figure}
2355: %\plotone{tracks1.basti.alpha.eps}
2356: \plotone{f13.eps}
2357: \caption{Computed abundances, from Fe~I and Fe~II lines (filled
2358: circles and open squares respectively) in 47~Tuc, for various ages
2359: and metallicities, using Teramo (BaSTI) alpha-enhanced,
2360: AGB-enhanced, classical isochrones with mass loss parameter
2361: $\eta$=0.40. Note the different sensitivity to isochrone
2362: metallicity of the Fe~I and Fe~II lines, and the dependence on age.}
2363: \label{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha}
2364: \end{figure}
2365:
2366:
2367: \clearpage
2368:
2369: \begin{figure}
2370: %\plotone{basti.11gyr.iso.compare.eps}
2371: \plotone{f14.eps}
2372: \caption{A comparison of the observed V-band luminosity function for
2373: the 47~Tuc core (dashed line) with the 11 Gyr alpha-enhanced, AGB
2374: enhanced, Teramo (BaSTI) isochrone, with no overshooting, Z=0.0080
2375: and $\eta$=0.40 (solid line). The observations indicate a paucity
2376: of stars below the main sequence turnoff, but more red giants, in
2377: particular the AGB bump region near M$_{\rm v}$=$-$0.5. }
2378: \label{fig-basti.11gyr.compare}
2379: \end{figure}
2380:
2381: \clearpage
2382:
2383: \begin{figure}
2384: %\plotone{altered.11gyr.iso.compare.eps}
2385: \plotone{f15.eps}
2386: \caption{A comparison of the observed V-band luminosity function for
2387: the 47~Tuc core (dashed line) with a the modified 11 Gyr
2388: alpha-enhanced, AGB enhanced, Teramo (BaSTI) isochrone, with no
2389: overshooting, Z=0.0080 and $\eta$=0.40 (solid line). Modifications
2390: include a cutoff for low luminosity stars below M$_{\rm v}$=$+$4.90,
2391: and an enhancement, by a factor of 3.0, for stars in the between
2392: M$_{\rm v}$ of $-$0.10 and $-$0.70. The modified isochrone is a
2393: much better fit to the observed {\em cmd}, but there are still more
2394: giants in the real cluster than the predictions. }
2395: \label{fig-altered.11gyr.compare}
2396: \end{figure}
2397:
2398: \clearpage
2399:
2400: \begin{figure}
2401: %\plotone{tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha.eps}
2402: \plotone{f16.eps}
2403: \caption{Computed abundances for Fe~I and Fe~II (filled circles and
2404: open squares respectively) in 47~Tuc integrated light, using Teramo
2405: (BaSTI) isochrones with corrections of $-$0.125 and $-$0.165 dex
2406: respectively; similar to Figure~\ref{fig-ilabunds.basti.alpha}.
2407: Note that for 10 and 15 Gyr Fe~I and Fe~II abundances are equal
2408: $\sim$0.3 dex lower than the isochrone metallicity; we do not
2409: understand this inconsistency. }
2410: \label{fig-tracks1.corrected.basti.alpha}
2411: \end{figure}
2412:
2413: \clearpage
2414:
2415:
2416:
2417: \begin{figure}
2418: %\plottwo{ewiso16z004.eps}{episo16z004.eps}
2419: \plottwo{f17a.eps}{f17b.eps}
2420: \caption{ Plots of iron abundance versus EW and EP, computed using the
2421: Teramo 15Gyr, z=0.008, alpha-enhanced isochrone. {\bf Left
2422: Panel:\quad} The iron abundance is independent of EW, indicating
2423: that the adopted mix of microturbulent velocities is consistent with
2424: the observed cluster. \quad{\bf Right Panel:\quad} The roughly
2425: independent run of iron abundance with EP indicates that the mixture
2426: of stellar temperatures is consistent with the spectrum.}
2427: \label{fig-ewepiso15z008}
2428: \end{figure}
2429:
2430: \clearpage
2431:
2432:
2433: \begin{figure}
2434: %\plottwo{ewiso1z004.eps}{episo1z004.eps}
2435: \plottwo{f18a.eps}{f18b.eps}
2436: \caption{ Plots of iron abundance versus EW and EP, computed using the
2437: Teramo 1Gyr, z=0.008, alpha-enhanced isochrone and measured EWs.
2438: {\bf Left Panel:\quad} The positive slope of iron abundance with EW
2439: indicates that the actual {\em cmd} contains stars with smaller microturbulent
2440: velocities than the observed cluster; presumably this results from
2441: the large fraction of main sequence stars in the 1Gyr isochrone, which
2442: have high gravities and low microturbulent velocities.
2443: \quad{\bf Right Panel:\quad} The decreasing iron abundance with line
2444: excitation potential indicates that the actual Globular Cluster is
2445: cooler than the input isochrone; this is expected if the adopted isochrone
2446: contains more young, hot main sequence stars than the cluster.}
2447: \label{fig-ewepiso1z008}
2448: \end{figure}
2449:
2450:
2451: \clearpage
2452:
2453:
2454: \begin{figure}
2455: \plotone{f19.eps}
2456: \caption{Solid lines indicate our computed integrated-light (B$-$V)$_0$ GC colors,
2457: based on Teramo isochrones (canonical alpha-enhanced models with $\eta$=0.4),
2458: for a range of age and [Fe/H]. Filled circles indicate the [Fe/H] values
2459: derived from 100 Fe~I lines in the IL spectrum, depending on assumed age.
2460: The dashed horizontal line shows the observed (B$-$V)$_0$ color for the inner
2461: 47~Tuc region included in our IL spectrum, as measured by Peterson (1986).
2462: Error bars indicate $\pm$1$\sigma$ uncertainties in the observed color and
2463: on the mean [Fe/H]. The intersection of the observed (B$-$V)$_0$ color with derived
2464: [Fe/H] point indicates a self-consistent solution at [Fe/H]=$-$0.70$\pm$0.056
2465: and age $\geq$10 Gyr. Note that the 15 Gyr isochrone color trend differs from younger
2466: isochrones, due to the presence of a blue horizontal branch at 15 Gyr, instead
2467: of a red clump.}
2468: \label{fig-bvfeh}
2469: \end{figure}
2470:
2471:
2472:
2473: \clearpage
2474:
2475:
2476:
2477:
2478:
2479: \end{document}
2480:
2481: