1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{epsf}
3: \bibliographystyle{apj}
4: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mathrm{M}_{\odot}}
5: \newcommand\sfr{{\rm SFR}}
6: \newcommand\loh{{12+\log{\rm(O/H)}}}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \shortauthors{Prieto et al.}
11:
12: \title{LBT Discovery of a Yellow Supergiant Eclipsing Binary in the
13: Dwarf Galaxy Holmberg~IX\altaffilmark{1}}
14:
15: \author{J.~L.~Prieto\altaffilmark{2}, K.~Z.~Stanek\altaffilmark{2},
16: C.~S.~Kochanek\altaffilmark{2}, D.~R.~Weisz\altaffilmark{3},
17: A.~Baruffolo\altaffilmark{4}, J.~Bechtold\altaffilmark{5},
18: V.~Burwitz\altaffilmark{6}, C.~De~Santis\altaffilmark{7},
19: S.~Gallozzi\altaffilmark{7}, P.~M.~Garnavich\altaffilmark{8},
20: E.~Giallongo\altaffilmark{7}, J.~M.~Hill\altaffilmark{9},
21: R.~W.~Pogge\altaffilmark{2}, R.~Ragazzoni\altaffilmark{4},
22: R.~Speziali\altaffilmark{7}, D.~J.~Thompson\altaffilmark{9},
23: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{2,9}}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on data acquired using the Large Binocular
26: Telescope (LBT). The LBT is an international collaboration among
27: institutions in the United States, Italy and Germany. LBT Corporation
28: partners are: The University of Arizona on behalf of the Arizona
29: university system; Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Italy; LBT
30: Beteiligungsgesellschaft, Germany, representing the Max-Planck Society,
31: the Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, and Heidelberg University; The Ohio
32: State University, and The Research Corporation, on behalf of The
33: University of Notre Dame, University of Minnesota and University of
34: Virginia.}
35:
36: \altaffiltext{2}{\small Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210}
37: \altaffiltext{3}{\small Department of Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455}
38: \altaffiltext{4}{\small INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy}
39: \altaffiltext{5}{\small Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
40: \altaffiltext{6}{\small Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstra\ss e, 85741 Garching, Germany}
41: \altaffiltext{7}{\small INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via di Frascati 33, I-00040 Monteporzio, Italy}
42: \altaffiltext{8}{\small University of Notre Dame, 225 Nieuwland Science, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5670}
43: \altaffiltext{9}{\small Large Binocular Telescope Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721-0065}
44:
45: \email{prieto@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48: In a variability survey of M81 using the Large Binocular Telescope we
49: have discovered a peculiar eclipsing binary ($M_{V} \sim -7.1$) in the
50: field of the dwarf galaxy Holmberg~IX. It has a period of 271~days and
51: the light curve is well-fit by an overcontact model in which both stars
52: are overflowing their Roche lobes. It is composed of two yellow
53: supergiants ($V-I \simeq 1$~mag, $T_{\rm eff}\simeq 4800$~K), rather
54: than the far more common red or blue supergiants. Such systems must be
55: rare. While we failed to find any similar systems in the literature, we
56: did, however note a second example. The SMC F0 supergiant R47 is a
57: bright ($M_{V}\sim -7.5$) periodic variable whose All Sky Automated
58: Survey (ASAS) light curve is well-fit as a contact binary with a 181~day
59: period. We propose that these systems are the progenitors of supernovae
60: like SN~2004et and SN~2006ov, which appeared to have yellow
61: progenitors. The binary interactions (mass transfer, mass loss) limit
62: the size of the supergiant to give it a higher surface temperature than
63: an isolated star at the same core evolutionary stage. We also discuss
64: the possibility of this variable being a long-period Cepheid.
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords{binaries: eclipsing}
68:
69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72:
73: Although small in number, massive stars are critical to the formation
74: and evolution of galaxies. They shape the ISM of galaxies through their
75: strong winds and high UV fluxes, and are a major source of the heavy
76: elements enriching the ISM \citep[e.g,][and references
77: therein]{massey03,zinnecker07}. A large fraction of massive stars are
78: found in binaries \citep[e.g.,][]{kiminki07}. Eclipsing binaries are of
79: particular use because they allow us to determine the masses and radii
80: of the components and the distance to the system. Many young, massive
81: eclipsing binaries have been found and studied in our Galaxy, the LMC,
82: and the SMC, primarily in OB associations and young star clusters
83: \citep[e.g.,][]{bonanos04,peeples07,gonzalez05,hilditch05}. The study of
84: massive eclipsing binaries beyond the Magellanic clouds has been limited
85: until very recently, when variability searches using medium-sized
86: telescopes with wide-field CCD cameras, coupled with spectroscopy using
87: 8-meter class telescopes, have yielded the first systems with accurately
88: measured masses in M31 \citep{ribas05} and M33 \citep{bonanos06}.
89:
90: We conducted a deep variability survey of M81 and its dwarf irregular
91: companion, Holmberg~IX, using the Large Binocular Camera (LBC)
92: mounted on the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT),
93: between January and October 2007. Holmberg~IX is a young dwarf galaxy (age
94: $\la 200$~Myr), with a stellar population dominated by blue and red
95: supergiants with no signs of old stars in the red giant branch
96: \citep{makarova02}. The dwarf may have formed during a recent tidal
97: interaction between M81 and NGC~2976 \citep[e.g.,][]{boyce01}. The
98: gas-phase metal abundance of Holmberg~IX of between 1/8 and 1/3 solar
99: \citep[e.g.,][]{miller95,makarova02} is consistent with this hypothesis
100: \citep[e.g.,][]{weilbacher03}. A normal, isolated dwarf on the
101: luminosity-metallicity relationship would have a metallicity of $\sim
102: 1/20$ solar \citep{lee06}.
103:
104: In this Letter, we report on the discovery of a $271$~day period,
105: evolved, massive eclipsing binary in Holmberg~IX using data from the
106: LBT. The overcontact system is the brightest periodic variable
107: discovered in our LBT variability survey. It has an out-of-eclipse
108: magnitude of $V_{max}=20.7$~mag and is located at $\alpha = 09^{\rm
109: h}57^{\rm m}37\fs 14$, $\delta = +69^{\circ} 02' 11''$ (J2000.0). In
110: \S~2 we discuss the observations and data reduction, in \S~3 we present
111: the light curve and the best-fit eclipsing binary model, and note a
112: similar eclipsing binary in the SMC. In \S~4 we discuss the results and
113: their possible implications for Type~II supernovae. Throughout this
114: Letter, we assume the HST Key Project distance to M81 of $\mu=27.80$~mag
115: ($3.6$~Mpc; \citealt{freedman01}) as the distance to Holmberg~IX, and
116: correct only for a foreground Galactic extinction of $E(B-V)=0.08$~mag
117: \citep{sfd}.
118:
119: \section{Observations}
120:
121: Holmberg~IX was observed as part of a variability survey of the entire
122: M81 galaxy conducted between January and October~2007 with the LBT 8.4-meter
123: telescope \citep{hill06}, using the LBC-Blue CCD camera \citep{rag06,gial07}
124: during Science Demonstration Time. The survey cadence and depth
125: (1~min single exposures, with $\geq 3$ consecutive exposures) are
126: optimized to detect and follow-up Cepheid variables with periods between
127: 10--100 days ($V\la 24$~mag), getting better than 10\% photometry in the
128: $B$ and $V$ filters. We obtained 168 $V$-band images
129: on 24 different nights, and 87 $B$-band images on 13 nights. We coadded
130: the $B$-band images from each night (usually 3--4) to improve the
131: signal-to-noise in the combined images. The seeing (FWHM) varied between
132: $0\farcs 7-2\farcs0$ in $V$ (median $1\farcs 4$), and between $1\farcs 0
133: - 3\farcs 3$ in $B$-band (median $1\farcs 9$). Our program did not
134: request especially good image quality for these queue scheduled SDT
135: observations.
136:
137: We also observed Holmberg~IX as part of a variability survey of M81
138: conducted with the 8K~Mosaic imager mounted on the MDM 2.4-meter
139: telescope. The observations were obtained in 5 one-week runs between
140: February~2006 and February~2007. All the images were obtained in
141: $V$-band using 15~min exposures. Due to weather loses and bad seeing, we
142: ended up using only 36 images from 12 different nights. The typical
143: seeing was $\sim 1\farcs 1$.
144:
145: \section{Light Curve}
146:
147: We used the ISIS difference image analysis package
148: \citep{alard,hartman04} to obtain the $V$-band light curves of all the
149: point sources detected in the LBT reference image. The detection of all
150: point sources and the transformation of difference-flux light curves to
151: instrumental magnitudes were done using the DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR package
152: \citep{stetson87,stetson92}. After visual inspection of all the light
153: curves of variable point-sources selected by standard criteria (rms and
154: AoV significance; \citealt{hartman07}), we detected \mbox{$\sim 20$}
155: periodic variables in the field of Holmberg~IX. These include Cepheids
156: with periods of $10-60$~days and one long-period variable. The analysis
157: of the Cepheid PL-relation and the distance to Holmberg~IX will be
158: presented in a future paper (Prieto et~al. 2008, in preparation). The
159: brightest periodic variable is the peculiar, long-period
160: ($P=270.7$~days) eclipsing binary we discuss here (hereafter V1).
161:
162: After discovering the binary in the LBT data, we also ran ISIS and
163: DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR on the MDM data to extract the light curve of the
164: long-period binary. The variability data from LBT and MDM were
165: complemented with single-epoch archival imaging of the field obtained
166: from the SDSS Data Release 6 \citep{sdss} in the $gri$ bands (UT
167: Nov. 30, 2003), and the HST/ACS Wide Field Camera (GO proposal 10605, PI
168: E.~Skillman) in the $F555W$ and $F814W$ filters (UT Mar. 23, 2006). The
169: high resolution HST/ACS images (${\rm FWHM} \sim 0\farcs 1$,
170: corresponding to $\sim 2$~pc at the distance of Holmberg~IX) show that
171: the binary is spatially coincident with a stellar association in the
172: dwarf galaxy.
173:
174: Figure~\ref{fig1} shows the phased $V$-band light curve and $B-V$ color
175: curve of the eclipsing binary system. We include all the LBT, MDM, SDSS
176: and HST/ACS $V$-band photometry. The LBT and MDM photometry have been
177: calibrated using SDSS photometry of several relatively bright ($r \la
178: 21.0$~mag) and unsaturated stars in the field, transforming the $gr$
179: magnitudes to standard $BV$ magnitudes with the transformations
180: presented in \citet{ivezic07}. The rms deviations of the absolute
181: calibration are $0.02-0.03$~mag for LBT-$BV$, and $\sim 0.05$~mag for
182: MDM-$V$. The SDSS $gri$ photometry of the binary was extracted in the
183: same way as for LBT and MDM, using the DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR package to obtain
184: instrumental magnitudes calibrated using absolute photometry of the
185: bright stars in the field. Our $g$ and $r$ magnitudes of the binary from
186: the SDSS data are 0.2 and 0.5~mag brighter, respectively, than the
187: magnitudes reported in the SDSS-DR6 catalog, while the $i$-band
188: magnitude agrees at the 1\% level. We think this is due to problems in
189: the SDSS photometry for faint sources in a crowded field
190: \citep[e.g.,][]{smolcic07}. The details of the HST photometry can be
191: found in Weisz et al. (2008, in preparation).
192:
193: In Figure~\ref{fig2} we show the position of the binary in the color
194: magnitude diagrams (CMD), obtained from calibrated LBT and HST/ACS
195: photometry. The CMDs show the well-populated blue and red supergiant
196: sequences in Holmberg~IX. The binary is among the most luminous stars in
197: this dwarf galaxy, with $M_{V} \sim -7.1$~mag, and it has clearly
198: evolved from the main-sequence. With such a high intrinsic luminosity,
199: the binary is bound to be massive. After correcting for Galactic
200: foreground extinction, the $B-V$ and $V-I$ colors are consistent with an
201: effective temperature of $T_{\rm eff} = 4800\pm 150$~K
202: \citep{houdashelt00}. Both components seem to be G-type yellow
203: supergiants given the equal depths of the eclipses and the lack of color
204: variations (see Figure~\ref{fig1}).
205:
206: We used the eclipsing binary model-fitting program
207: NIGHTFALL\footnote{\scriptsize{{\tt
208: http://www.hs.uni-hamburg.de/DE/Ins/Per/Wichmann/Nightfall.html}}} to
209: model the $V$-band light curve. As shown in Figure~\ref{fig1}, we obtain
210: a good fit to the light curve with an overcontact configuration where
211: both stars are overflowing their Roche lobes. We fixed the effective
212: temperature of the primary at $T_{1}=4800$~K obtained from the
213: colors. We assumed equal masses for the stars, a linear limb-darkening
214: law, circular orbits, and synchronous rotation. We fit for four
215: parameters: the Roche lobe filling factors, the inclination, and the
216: temperature of the secondary. The time of the primary eclipse and the
217: period were determined externally and were fixed for these fits. The
218: main parameters of the binary are listed in Table~\ref{tab1}. The light
219: curve shows a hint of the \citet{oconnell} effect, in which the maxima
220: (out-of-eclipse regions) show a difference in brightness
221: \citep[e.g.,][]{pilecki07}.
222:
223: We searched the literature for other examples of evolved, massive
224: eclipsing binaries in the yellow supergiant phase and found
225: none\footnote{Note, however, that a possible Galactic counterpart is the
226: contact binary BM Cas \citep{fernie97}, composed by an A7~Iab supergiant
227: ($M_{V}\simeq -6.3$) and a late-type giant.}. We also searched the
228: available catalogs of eclipsing binaries in the LMC and SMC. The MACHO
229: catalog of eclipsing binaries in the LMC \citep{derekas07} contains 25
230: contact systems with red colors (i.e., evolved), $(V-R) > 0.5$~mag, and
231: periods $>200$~days. However, these systems have absolute magnitudes
232: $M_{V} \ga -4$ ($V\ga 14.5$~mag), that are $\sim 3$~mag fainter than the
233: yellow supergiant eclipsing binary in
234: Holmberg~IX\footnote{\citet{mennickent06} obtained spectroscopy of 17
235: ``peculiar'' periodic variables in the SMC from the OGLE database, and
236: found a 184~day period eclipsing binary composed by two yellow
237: supergiants (F5Ie + G5-K0I). However, this system is $\sim 2$~mag
238: fainter than the binary in Holmberg~IX.}. The All Sky Automated Survey
239: (ASAS; \citealt{asas}) contains complete Southern sky coverage for
240: $V<15$~mag. To our surprise, we found in the ASAS catalog a luminous
241: ($M_{V} \sim -7.5$, $V_{max} \sim 11.5$~mag), 181~day period contact
242: eclipsing binary in the SMC. The star, SMC~R47 ($\alpha = 01^{\rm
243: h}29^{\rm m}17\fs 26$, $\delta = -72^{\circ} 43' 20.2''$), had been
244: spectroscopically classified as an FO supergiant ($T_{\rm eff} \simeq
245: 7500$~K) with emission lines by \citet{humphreys83}. The ASAS $V$-band
246: light curve of SMC~R47, obtained between December 2002 and June 2006,
247: and the fit obtained with NIGHTFALL are shown in Figure~\ref{fig3}. The
248: best-fit eclipsing binary model requires a contact configuration, with
249: non-zero eccentricity to account for the difference in timing between
250: the eclipses. Even though we selected a clean part of the full ASAS
251: light curve, there seems to be intrinsic variability from the binary
252: components. The main parameters of this eclipsing binary are in
253: Table~\ref{tab1}. While substantially hotter than the Holmberg~IX
254: binary, it does not lie on the SMC blue supergiant sequence
255: \citep{grieve86}.
256:
257: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
258:
259: An eclipsing binary is the best explanation for the light curve of the
260: brightest variable we have discovered in our LBT variability survey of
261: the dwarf irregular companion of M81 Holmberg~IX. The other possible
262: explanation for the periodic variability of V1 is a long-period
263: ($P=135$~days) Cepheid. Such long-period Cepheids ($P>100$~days) have
264: been observed in dwarf galaxies like the LMC and SMC
265: \citep[e.g.,][]{freedman85}, NGC~55 \citep[ e.g.,][]{pietrzynski06},
266: NGC~300 \citep[e.g.,][]{pietrzynski02}, NGC~6822
267: \citep[e.g.,][]{pietrzynski04}, IC~1613 \citep[e.g.,][]{antonello99},
268: and I~Zw~18 \citep{aloisi07}. The magnitude of V1 is consitent with the
269: magnitude of a Cepheid with $P=135$~days ($M_{V}\simeq -7.0$),
270: extrapolating the period-luminosity relationship of
271: \citet{fouque07}. However, while a few of these long period Cepheids
272: have quasi-sinusoidal light curves that are nearly symmetric under a
273: time reversal, they all have larger amplitudes in bluer bands ($B$
274: amplitudes $1.3-1.6$ times $V$ amplitudes) due to the changes in the
275: effective temperature as the star pulsates
276: \citep[e.g.,][]{freedman85,madore91}. Spectroscopy of V1, while
277: challenging, would eliminate any remaining ambiguities in classifying
278: this system.
279:
280: We can safely rule out the possibility that the eclipsing binary is in
281: our Galaxy. Using the period, estimated effective temperature, magnitude
282: at maximum, and assuming that the stars are of similar size in a contact
283: configuration, we can use Kepler's law and their total surface
284: brightness to estimate a distance to the system of $D \simeq
285: (M_{total}/\Msun)^{1/3}$~Mpc, where $M_{total} = M_{1} + M_{2}$
286: \citep[e.g.,][]{gaposchkin62}. Conversely, we can estimate the total
287: mass of the binary system by assuming the distance, \mbox{$M_{total}
288: \simeq 45\,(D/3.6\,{\rm Mpc})^{3}\,\Msun$}. This should be taken as a
289: rough estimate because of the overly simple model $-$ to accurately
290: constrain the total mass of the system, and its components, we need
291: radial velocity measurements. Another piece of evidence that puts the
292: binary system in Holmberg~IX is its spatial coincidence with a stellar
293: overdensity in the dwarf, observed in the HST/ACS images.
294:
295: We expected that such systems were rare\footnote{While the relative
296: numbers of eclipsing binaries is a much more complicated problem, we
297: note that the relative abundances of red, blue and yellow supergiants is
298: 4:13:1 for the Geneva evolutionary track \citep{geneva} of a single,
299: non-rotating star with $M=15\,\Msun$ and $Z=0.004$.}, but were surprised
300: to find none in the literature. However, we found a similar eclipsing
301: binary system in the SMC (SMC~R47) searching through the ASAS
302: catalog. From the absolute magnitudes of both binaries and their colors,
303: we estimate that at least one of the stars in each binary is $\sim
304: 15-20\,\Msun$ (main-sequence age $\sim 10-15$~Myr) using the
305: evolutionary tracks for single stars of \citet{geneva} (see
306: Figure~\ref{fig4}).
307:
308: The stellar evolutionary path of stars of a given mass in binary systems
309: can differ significantly from their evolution in isolation
310: \citep[e.g.,][]{paczynski71}. In particular, binary interactions through
311: mass loss, mass accretion, or common-envelope evolution, play a very
312: important role in the pre-supernova evolution
313: \citep[e.g.,][]{podsiadlowski92}. Most of the massive stars with masses
314: $30\,\Msun \ga M \ga 8\,\Msun$ are expected to explode as supernova when
315: they are in the red supergiant stage, with a small contribution from
316: blue supergiants (e.g., SN~1987A; \citealt{west87}). Surprisingly,
317: \citet{li05} identified the progenitor of the Type~IIP supernova 2004et
318: in pre-explosion archival images and determined that it was a yellow
319: supergiant with a main-sequence mass of $\sim 15\,\Msun$. Also, the
320: position in the CMD of the likely progenitor of the Type~IIP supernova
321: 2006ov (see Fig.~10 in \citealt{li07}) is remarkably similar to the
322: position of the eclipsing binary in Holmberg~IX (see Figure~\ref{fig4}).
323:
324: We propose that the binary we discovered in Holmberg~IX and the binary
325: found in the SMC\footnote{A possible earlier stage of these yellow
326: supergiant binaries might be represented by the B-supergiant pair HD
327: 1383 \citep{boyajian06}.} are the kind of progenitor objects of
328: supernovae like SN~2004et and SN~2006ov that appeared to be the
329: explosions of yellow supergiants. A close binary provides a natural
330: means of slowing the transition from blue to red, allowing the star to
331: evolve and then explode as a yellow supergiant. As the more massive star
332: evolves and expands, the Roche lobe limits the size of the star forcing
333: it to have a surface temperature set by the uncoupled core luminosity
334: and the size of the Roche lobe. It can expand further and have a cooler
335: envelope only by becoming a common envelope system, which should only
336: occur as the secondary evolves to fill its Roche lobe. This delayed
337: temperature evolution allows the core to reach SN~II conditions without
338: a red envelope.
339:
340: \acknowledgments
341:
342: We are grateful to the referee, Douglas~Gies, for his helpful comments
343: and suggestions. The authors thank the LBT Science Demonstration Time
344: (SDT) team for assembling and executing the SDT program. We also thank
345: the LBC team and the LBTO staff for their kind assistance. We are
346: grateful to Alceste Bonanos, Marc Pinsonneault, Lev Yungelson and Stan
347: Woosley for helpful discussions and comments on earlier versions of this
348: draft. We thank G.~Pojmanski for making the excellent ASAS data publicly
349: available. JLP and KZS acknowledge support from NSF through grant
350: AST-0707982.
351:
352: \begin{thebibliography}{}
353: \bibitem[Alard(2000)]{alard} Alard, C. 2000, \aap, 144, 363
354: \bibitem[Aloisi et al.(2007)]{aloisi07} Aloisi, A., et~al.\ 2007, \apjl, 667, L151
355: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{sdss} Adelman-McCarthy, J., et al. 2007, \apjs, submitted (arxiv:0707.3413)
356: \bibitem[Antonello et al.(1999)]{antonello99} Antonello, E., et~al.\ 1999, \aap, 349, 55
357: \bibitem[Bonanos et al.(2004)]{bonanos04} Bonanos, A.~Z., et~al.\ 2004, \apjl, 611, L33
358: \bibitem[Bonanos et al.(2006)]{bonanos06} Bonanos, A.~Z., et~al.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 313
359: \bibitem[Boyajian et al.(2006)]{boyajian06} Boyajian, T.~S., et~al.\ 2006, \apj, 646, 1209
360: \bibitem[Boyce et al.(2001)]{boyce01} Boyce, P.~J., et~al.\ 2001, \apjl, 560, L127
361: \bibitem[Derekas et al.(2007)]{derekas07} Derekas, A., Kiss, L.~L., \& Bedding T.~R.\ 2007, \apj, 663, 249
362: \bibitem[Fernie \& Evans(1997)]{fernie97} Fernie, J.~D., \& Evans, N.~R.\ 1997, \pasp, 109, 541
363: \bibitem[Fouque et al.(2007)]{fouque07} Fouque, P., et~al.\ 2007, \aap, in press (arxiv:0709.3255)
364: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(1985)]{freedman85} Freedman, W.~L., Grieve, G.~R., \& Madore, B.~F.\ 1985, \apjs, 59, 311
365: \bibitem[Freedman et al.(2001)]{freedman01} Freedman, W.~L., et~al.\ 2001, \apj, 553, 47
366: \bibitem[Gaposchkin(1962)]{gaposchkin62} Gaposchkin, S.\ 1962, \aj, 67, 358
367: \bibitem[Giallongo et al.(2007)]{gial07} Giallongo, E., Ragazzoni, R., Grazian, A. et al. 2007 in preparation
368: \bibitem[Gonz{\'a}lez et al.(2005)]{gonzalez05} Gonz{\'a}lez, J.~F., et~al.\ 2005, \apj, 624, 946
369: \bibitem[Grieve \& Madore(1986)]{grieve86} Grieve, G.~R., \& Madore, B.~F.\ 1986, \apjs, 62, 427
370: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(2004)]{hartman04} Hartman, J.~D., et~al.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 1761
371: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(2007)]{hartman07} Hartman, J.~D., et~al.\ 2007, \apj, submitted (arxiv:0709.3484)
372: \bibitem[Hilditch et al.(2005)]{hilditch05} Hilditch, R.~W., Howarth, I.~D., \& Harries, T.~J.\ 2005, \mnras, 357, 304
373: \bibitem[Hill et al.(2006)]{hill06} Hill, J.~M., Green, R.~F., \& Slagle, J.~H.\ 2006, \procspie, 6267, 62670Y
374: \bibitem[Houdashelt et al.(2000)]{houdashelt00} Houdashelt, M.~L., Bell, R.~A., \& Sweigart, A.~V.\ 2000, \aj, 119, 1448
375: \bibitem[Humphreys(1983)]{humphreys83} Humphreys, R.~M.\ 1983, \apj, 265, 176
376: \bibitem[Ivezi{\'c} et~al.(2007)]{ivezic07} Ivezi{\'c}, {\v Z}., et~al.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 973
377: \bibitem[Kiminki et~al.(2007)]{kiminki07} Kiminki, D.~C., et~al.\ 2007, \apj, 664, 1102
378: \bibitem[Lee et~al.(2006)]{lee06} Lee, H., et~al. 2006, \apj, 647, 970
379: \bibitem[Lejeune \& Schaerer(2001)]{geneva} Lejeune, T., \& Schaerer, D.\ 2001, \aap, 366, 538
380: \bibitem[Li et al.(2005)]{li05} Li, W., et~al.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 121
381: \bibitem[Li et al.(2007)]{li07} Li, W., et~al.\ 2007, \apj, 661, 1013
382: \bibitem[Madore \& Freedman(1991)]{madore91} Madore, B.~F., \& Freedman, W.~L.\ 1991, \pasp, 103, 933
383: \bibitem[Makarova et al.(2002)]{makarova02} Makarova, L.~N., et~al.\ 2002, \aap, 396, 473
384: \bibitem[Massey(2003)]{massey03} Massey, P.\ 2003, \araa, 41, 15
385: \bibitem[Mennickent et al.(2006)]{mennickent06} Mennickent, R.~E., et~al.\ 2006, RMxAC, 26, 74
386: \bibitem[Miller(1995)]{miller95} Miller, B.~W.\ 1995, \apjl, 446, L75
387: \bibitem[O'Connell(1951)]{oconnell} O'Connell, D.~J.~K.\ 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, 2, 85
388: \bibitem[Paczy{\'n}ski(1971)]{paczynski71} Paczy{\'n}ski, B.\ 1971, \araa, 9, 183
389: \bibitem[Peeples et al.(2007)]{peeples07} Peeples, M.~S., et~al.\ 2007, \apjl, 654, L61
390: \bibitem[Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al.(2006)]{pietrzynski06} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., et~al.\ 2006, \apj, 132, 2556
391: \bibitem[Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al.(2004)]{pietrzynski04} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., et~al.\ 2004, \apj, 128, 2815
392: \bibitem[Pietrzy{\'n}ski et al.(2002)]{pietrzynski02} Pietrzy{\'n}ski, G., et~al.\ 2002, \apj, 123, 789
393: \bibitem[Pilecki et~al.(2007)]{pilecki07} Pilecki, B., Fabrycky, D., \& Poleski, R.\ 2007, \mnras, 378, 757
394: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski et al.(1992)]{podsiadlowski92} Podsiadlowski, P., Joss, P.~C., \& Hsu, J.~J.~L\ 1992, \apj, 391, 246
395: \bibitem[Pojmanski(2002)]{asas} Pojmanski, G. 2002, \actaa, 52, 397
396: \bibitem[Ragazzoni et al.(2006)]{rag06} Ragazzoni, R., et al.\ 2006, \procspie, 6267, 626710
397: \bibitem[Ribas et al.(2005)]{ribas05} Ribas, I., et al.\ 2005, \apjl, 635, L37
398: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sfd} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
399: \bibitem[Smol{\v c}i{\'c} et al.(2007)]{smolcic07} Smol{\v c}i{\'c}, V., et al.\ 2007, \aj, 134, 1901
400: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stetson87} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
401: \bibitem[Stetson(1992)]{stetson92} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1992, \jrasc. 86, 71
402: \bibitem[Weilbacher et al.(2003)]{weilbacher03} Weilbacher, P.~M., et~al.\ 2003, \aap, 397, 545
403: \bibitem[West et al.(1987)]{west87} West, R.~M., et~al.\ 1987, \aap, 177, L1
404: \bibitem[Zinnecker \& Yorke(2007)]{zinnecker07} Zinnecker, H., \& Yorke, H.~W.\ 2007, \araa, 45, 481
405:
406: \end{thebibliography}
407:
408: \newpage
409:
410: \begin{figure*}[!t]
411: \epsscale{1.0}
412: \plotone{f1.eps}
413: \caption{Phased $V$-band light curve of the 270.7~day period eclipsing
414: binary in Holmberg~IX ({\it top panel}) and its $B-V$ color evolution
415: ({\it lower panel}). The different symbols correspond to photometry from
416: different telescopes: LBT ({\it filled circles}), MDM ({\it open
417: triangles}), HST/ACS ({\it filled square}) and SDSS ({\it open
418: square}). The {\it solid line} shows an overcontact eclipsing binary
419: model that best fits the light $V$ light curve. \label{fig1}}
420: \end{figure*}
421:
422: \begin{figure*}[!t]
423: \epsscale{1.0}
424: \plotone{f2.eps}
425: \caption{Color Magnitude Diagrams of stars in the field of Holmberg~IX
426: obtained from the LBT-$BV$ reference images ({\it left panel}) and
427: HST/ACS-$VI$ single-epoch observations ({\it right panel}). The ACS CMD
428: shows well-defined stellar sequences for the main sequence (MS) and the
429: evolved blue (BSG) and red supergiants (RSG). The eclipsing binary
430: ({\it pentagon}) lies between the blue and red supergiant
431: sequences. \label{fig2}}
432: \end{figure*}
433:
434: \begin{figure*}[!t]
435: \epsscale{1.0}
436: \plotone{f3.eps}
437: \caption{Phased $V$-band light curve of the long-period, evolved
438: eclipsing binary SMC~R47 obtained from the ASAS catalog
439: \citep{asas}. The star was classified spectroscopically as an F0
440: supergiant by \citet{humphreys83}. The {\it solid line} shows the
441: contact eclipsing binary model that best fits the light curve. The {\it
442: lower panel} shows the residuals of the fit
443: (observed-calculated). \label{fig3}}
444: \end{figure*}
445:
446: \begin{figure*}[!t]
447: \epsscale{1.0}
448: \plotone{f4.eps}
449: \caption{CMD of Holmberg~IX from HST/ACS $V$ and $I$ photometry. The
450: connected {\it filled symbols} show the position of the evolved
451: eclipsing binaries in Holmberg~IX ({\it filled pentagons}) and the SMC
452: ({\it filled triangles}) at maximum and minimum. The lines show
453: evolutionary tracks with extended mass-loss from the Geneva group
454: \citep{geneva} for single stars with masses between 12--25~$\Msun$,
455: assuming two different metallicities: 1/3 solar ({\it dashed}) and 1/5
456: solar ({\it solid}). We use a distance modulus of $\mu = 27.80$~mag to
457: Holmberg~IX, and Galactic color-excess $E(B-V) = 0.08$~mag, to put the
458: evolutionary tracks in the diagram. \label{fig4}}
459: \end{figure*}
460:
461: \input{tab1.tex}
462:
463: \end{document}
464: