1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: \documentclass{MolSpaLab}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: %
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%--BODY--%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: %
8: \begin{document}
9: \TitreGlobal{Molecules in Space \& Laboratory}
10: %%-----------------------------
11: %% the top matter
12: %%-----------------------------
13: \title{Formation of molecular hydrogen \\
14: on amorphous silicate surfaces}
15: %
16: \author{
17: L. Li}
18: \address{Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA}
19: \author{
20: G. Manic\'o}
21: \address{Universit\'a di Catania, DMFCI, 95125 Catania, Sicily, Italy}
22: \author{
23: E. Congiu$^{1,2}$}
24: \address{Universit\'a di Cagliari, Dipartimento di Fisica, Cagliari Italy}
25: \author{
26: J. Roser}
27: \address{NASA Ames, Mail Stop 245-6, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA}
28: \author{
29: S. Swords$^1$}
30: \author{
31: H.B. Perets}
32: \address{Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institue of Science,
33: Rehovot 76100, Israel}
34: \author{
35: A. Lederhendler}
36: \address{Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University,
37: Jerusalem 91904, Israel}
38: \author{
39: O. Biham$^6$}
40: \author{
41: J.R. Brucato}
42: \address{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Napoli, Italy}
43: \author{
44: V. Pirronello$^3$}
45: \author{
46: G. Vidali$^1$}
47:
48: \runningtitle{Formation of molecular hydrogen}
49:
50: \setcounter{page}{1}
51:
52: \maketitle
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55:
56: Experimental results on the formation of molecular hydrogen on amorphous
57: silicate surfaces are presented and analyzed using a rate equation model.
58: The energy barriers for the relevant diffusion and
59: desorption processes are obtained.
60: They turn out to be significantly higher than those obtained
61: for polycrystalline silicates,
62: demonstrating the importance of grain morphology.
63: Using these barriers we evaluate the
64: efficiency of molecular hydrogen formation on amorphous silicate
65: grains under interstellar conditions.
66: It is found that unlike polycrystalline silicates, amorphous silicate
67: grains are efficient catalysts of H$_{2}$ formation
68: in diffuse interstellar clouds.
69:
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: H$_{2}$ is the most abundant molecule in the interstellar medium (ISM).
73: It plays a crucial role in the initial cooling of clouds during
74: gravitational collapse and is involved in most reaction schemes
75: that produce other molecules.
76: It is widely accepted that
77: H$_{2}$ formation in the ISM takes place on the surfaces of dust grains
78: (Gould \& Salpeter 1963).
79: In this process,
80: H atoms that collide with a grain
81: quickly equilibrate
82: and stick on its surface.
83: The adsorbed atoms diffuse on the surface.
84: They may encounter each other and form
85: H$_{2}$ molecules
86: (Williams 1968, Hollenbach \& Salpeter 1971, Hollenbach et al. 1971),
87: or desorb thermally
88: in atomic form.
89:
90: In recent years, we have conducted a series of
91: experiments on molecular hydrogen formation on
92: dust grain analogues
93: such as polycrystalline silicates
94: (Pirronello et al. 1997),
95: amorphous carbon
96: (Pirronello et al. 1999)
97: and amorphous water ice
98: (Manico et al. 2001, Roser et al. 2002, Perets et al. 2005),
99: under astrophysically relevant conditions.
100: In these experiments, the surface was irradiated by beams of H and D atoms.
101: The production of HD molecules
102: was measured during the irradiation and during
103: a subsequent temperature programmed desorption (TPD) experiment.
104: Related studies were done on
105: amorphous ice and other surfaces
106: (Hornekaer et al. 2003, Perets et al. 2005, Dulieu et al. 2005,
107: Hornekaer et al. 2005, Amiaud et al. 2006, Creighan et al. 2006,
108: Williams et al. 2007).
109:
110: \begin{figure}[ht]
111: \begin{center}
112: \vspace{0.2in}
113: \includegraphics[width=8 cm]{fig1.eps}
114: \caption{
115: TPD curves of HD desorption
116: after irradiation of
117: HD molecules ($\times$)
118: and
119: H+D atoms ($\circ$)
120: on amorphous silicate.
121: The H+D results are fitted using the rate equation model
122: (solid line).
123: Also shown, for comparison,
124: is HD desorption after irradiation
125: with H+D atoms on polycrystalline silicate ($\triangle$).
126: }
127: \label{fig:1}
128: \end{center}
129: \end{figure}
130:
131:
132: The results were analyzed using rate equation models.
133: The energy barriers for the diffusion and desorption
134: processes were obtained
135: (Katz et al. 1999, Cazaux \& Tielens 2004, Perets et al. 2005).
136: Using these parameters,
137: the conditions for efficient H$_{2}$
138: formation on different astrophysically relevant surfaces
139: were found.
140: In particular, the
141: formation of H$_{2}$ on polycrystalline silicates
142: was found to be efficient only in
143: a narrow temperature window below 10K.
144: Since the typical dust grain temperature in diffuse interstellar
145: clouds is higher than 10K,
146: these results
147: indicated that polycrystalline silicate grains cannot be efficient
148: catalysts for H$_{2}$ formation in most diffuse clouds.
149:
150:
151:
152:
153: Here we present
154: experiments on molecular hydrogen formation
155: on \emph{amorphous} silicates
156: and analyze the results using a suitable rate equation model
157: (\cite{Perets2005}).
158: Using the parameters that best fit the experimental
159: results, the efficiency of hydrogen recombination on grains
160: is obtained for
161: a range of conditions pertinent to diffuse interstellar clouds.
162: It is found that
163: unlike the polycrystalline silicate grains,
164: amorphous silicate grains, which are the main silicate
165: component in interstellar clouds,
166: are efficient catalysts for H$_{2}$ formation within a broad temperature
167: window that extends at least up to about 14K
168: (Perets et al. 2007).
169:
170: In the experiments reported here, we
171: used beams of low
172: fluxes and short dosing times.
173: Using the standard Langmuir-Hinshelwood analysis,
174: plotting the total yield of HD vs. the exposure time
175: (\cite{Perets2007})
176: we estimated the coverage to be a small fraction
177: (a few percent) of a monolayer (ML).
178: This is still far from interstellar values but is within the
179: regime in which results can be safely extrapolated to diffuse
180: cloud conditions
181: (\cite{Katz1999,Perets2005}).
182: The interstellar dust analogues we used are amorphous silicate
183: samples,
184: (Fe$_{0.5}$, Mg$_{0.5}$)$_{2}$SiO$_{4}$,
185: prepared by laser ablation
186: (\cite{Brucato2002}).
187:
188: \begin{figure}[ht]
189: \begin{center}
190: \vspace{0.2in}
191: \includegraphics[width=8 cm]{fig2.eps}
192: \caption{
193: TPD curves of HD desorption after irradiation of
194: H+D atoms ($\circ$) and HD molecules ($\times$)
195: on the amorphous silicate sample at surface
196: temperature of 10K.
197: The H+D data was fitted using the rate equation model
198: (solid line).
199: \label{fig:2}
200: }
201: \end{center}
202: \end{figure}
203:
204:
205: The experiment consists of adsorbing hydrogen atoms onto the surface
206: while monitoring the amount of hydrogen molecules that are
207: formed.
208: To increase the signal to noise ratio, hydrogen and deuterium
209: atoms are used and the formation of HD is monitored.
210: The measurement of HD formation is done in two steps.
211: First, we record the amount of HD that forms and comes off
212: the surface while the sample is being dosed with H and D atoms
213: (the \emph{irradiation phase}).
214: Next, after dosing is completed, in a
215: TPD experiment, the surface temperature
216: is raised rapidly and the rate of HD desorption
217: is measured
218: (the \emph{TPD phase}).
219: By far, the main contribution comes from the TPD phase.
220:
221: Irradiations with beams of H and D
222: (\char`\"{}H+D\char`\"{} thereafter)
223: were done on an amorphous silicate surface,
224: at a surface temperature of $T_{0} \simeq 5.6$K,
225: and the formation of HD molecules was measured.
226: In a separate experiment, a beam
227: of HD molecules was irradiated on the same surface.
228: During the TPD runs, the sample temperature was monitored as a function of
229: time.
230: The desorption rates of HD molecules vs. surface temperature during the
231: TPD runs are shown in Fig. 1,
232: for H+D irradiation on polycrystalline silicate ($\triangle$)
233: and amorphous silicate ($\circ$)
234: surfaces, with irradiation times of 120 s.
235: The TPD curve following
236: irradiation of HD molecules on an amorphous silicate
237: surface
238: is also shown
239: ($\times$).
240: The results of current experiments of H+D irradiation on amorphous silicates,
241: clearly differ from those of earlier experiments
242: on polycrystalline silicates.
243: The desorption curves from amorphous silicates contain two wide peaks,
244: located at a significantly higher temperatures than the single narrow
245: peak obtained for the polycrystalline silicate.
246: The higher peak temperatures
247: indicate that the relevant energy
248: barriers are larger, while their large width
249: reflects a broader distribution
250: of the energy barriers of the HD desorption
251: sites.
252: The TPD curve of HD desorption from amorphous silicates, after irradiation
253: with HD molecules (crosses in Fig. 1),
254: is qualitatively similar to the curve obtained for H+D irradiation.
255: In particular, the peak temperatures are the same.
256: The relative weights of the high temperature peaks vs. the
257: low temperature peaks are somewhat different.
258: Also, in similar experiments with higher values of $T_0$
259: (Vidali et al. 2007),
260: a third peak was observed at higher temperatures
261: (Fig. 2).
262: We attribute this behavior to diffusion of HD molecules,
263: which gradually migrate from shallow into
264: deep adsorption sites
265: (\cite{Perets2005,Amiaud2006}).
266: An analysis of experimental data for irradiation at
267: higher temperature and from amorphous silicates with
268: other Mg/Fe ratios wiil be given elsewhere.
269:
270: The experimental results were fitted using
271: the rate equation model described in
272: Perets et al. (2005).
273: The fits are shown as
274: solid lines in Figs. 1 and 2.
275: When a Gaussian distribution of activation energies
276: is introduced around the reported barrier for each process,
277: the solid lines follow the experimental traces much more
278: closely
279: (Perets et al. 2007).
280: The parameters for the diffusion
281: and desorption of hydrogen atoms and molecules
282: on the amorphous silicate surface were obtained.
283: These include the energy barrier
284: $E_{\rm H}^{\rm diff}$
285: for the diffusion of H atoms
286: and the barrier
287: $E_{\rm H}^{\rm des}$
288: for their desorption.
289: The value obtained for the desorption barrier
290: of H atoms
291: should be considered only as a lower bound,
292: because the TPD results are insensitive
293: to variations in
294: $E_{\rm H}^{\rm des}$,
295: as long as it is higher than the reported value.
296: A justification for not considering explicitly
297: the two isotopes (H and D) is given in
298: Vidali et al. (2007).
299: The desorption barriers of HD molecules adsorbed
300: in shallow (lower temperature peak)
301: and deep (higher temperature peaks)
302: sites, are given by
303: $E_{\rm HD}^{\rm des}(j),$
304: where $j=1$, 2 and 3, respectively.
305: The density of adsorption sites,
306: $s=7 \times 10^{14}$ (cm$^{-2}$)
307: on the amorphous silicate sample,
308: was also obtained
309: (\cite{Perets2007}).
310:
311: The recombination efficiency is defined
312: as the fraction of hydrogen atoms adsorbed on the surface which come
313: out as molecules.
314: Using the parameters obtained from the experiments,
315: we evaluated
316: the recombination efficiency on
317: amorphous silicate surfaces
318: under interstellar conditions
319: as a function of the grain temperature.
320: The incoming flux was taken as
321: 5.2 $\times$ $10^{-10}$ (ML s$^{-1}$).
322: This flux
323: corresponds to gas density of 10
324: (atoms cm$^{-3}$) and
325: gas temperature of 100K.
326: %
327: \begin{table}
328: \caption{
329: Parameters for molecular hydrogen formation:
330: the diffusion and desorption barriers
331: of H atoms, the desorption barrier of HD molecules
332: and the density of adsorption sites.
333: }
334: \vspace{0.1in}
335: \begin{centering}
336: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
337: \hline
338: Material &
339: $E_{\rm H}^{\rm diff}$(meV) &
340: $E_{\rm H}^{\rm des}$(meV) &
341: $E_{\rm HD}^{\rm des}$(meV) &
342: $s$ (cm$^{-2}$) \\
343: \hline
344: Polycrystalline Silicate&
345: 25 &
346: 32 &
347: 27 &
348: 2 $\times 10^{14}$ \\
349: Amorphous Silicate&
350: 35 &
351: 44 &
352: 35, 53, 75 &
353: 7 $\times 10^{14}$ \\
354: \hline
355: \end{tabular}
356: \par
357: \end{centering}
358: \label{t:E_barriers}
359: \end{table}
360: %
361: A window of high recombination efficiency is found between 8-13K,
362: compared to 6-10K for polycrystalline silicate under similar conditions.
363: For gas density of 100
364: (atoms cm$^{-2}$),
365: the high efficiency window for the amorphous silicates
366: surface shifts to 9-14K.
367: At higher temperatures
368: atoms desorb from the surface before they have sufficient time to
369: encounter each other.
370: At lower temperatures diffusion is suppressed and
371: the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism is no longer efficient.
372: Saturation of the surface with immobile
373: H atoms
374: might render the Eley-Rideal mechanism more efficient
375: in producing some
376: recombination
377: (\cite{Katz1999,Perets2005}).
378: Our results
379: thus indicate that the
380: recombination efficiency of hydrogen on
381: amorphous silicates is high
382: in this temperature range, which is relevant to
383: diffuse interstellar clouds.
384: Therefore, amorphous silicates
385: seem to be good candidates for interstellar
386: grain components on which hydrogen recombines
387: with high efficiency.
388: These results are in agreement with theoretical
389: predictions
390: on the effects of surface roughness
391: (\cite{Cuppen2005}).
392: They also indicate
393: that on amorphous surfaces,
394: newly formed H$_{2}$ molecules are thermalized on the surface
395: and do not promptly desorb.
396: Consequently, H$_{2}$ molecules formed
397: on and desorbed from realistic
398: \emph{amorphous} interstellar dust
399: are expected to
400: have low kinetic energy and
401: would probably not occupy excited
402: vibrational or rotational states.
403:
404: This work was supported
405: by NASA grants NAG5-11438 and NAG5-9093 (G.V),
406: NSF grant AST-0507405 (G.V),
407: the Adler
408: Foundation for Space Research and the Israel Science Foundation (O.B)
409: and the
410: Italian Ministry for University and Scientific Research (V.P).
411:
412: \begin{thebibliography}{}
413:
414: \bibitem[Amiaud et al. 2006]{Amiaud2006}
415: Amiaud, L., Fillion, J.H., Baouche, S., Dulieu, F.,
416: Momeni, A., \& Lemaire, J.L.
417: 2006, J. Chem. Phys., 124, 094702
418:
419: \bibitem[Brucato et al. 2002]{Brucato2002}
420: Brucato, J.R., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., Rotundi, A., \& Palumbo, P.
421: 2002, Plan. Space Sci. 50, 829
422:
423: \bibitem[Cazaux \& Tielens 2004]{Cazaux2004}
424: Cazaux, S., \& Tielens, A.G.G.M.
425: 2004, ApJ, 604, 222
426:
427: \bibitem[Creighan et al. 2006]{Creighan2006}
428: Creighan, S.C., Perry, J.S.A., \& Price, S.D.
429: 2006, J. Chem. Phys., 124, 114701
430:
431: \bibitem[Cuppen \& Herbst 2005]{Cuppen2005}
432: Cuppen, H. M. \& Herbst, E.,
433: 2005, MNRAS, 361, 565
434:
435: \bibitem[Dulieu et al. 2005]{Dulieu2005}
436: Dulieu, F., Amiaud, L., Baouche, S., Momeni, A.,
437: Fillion, J.H., \& Lemaire, J.L.
438: 2005, Chem. Phys. Lett., 404, 187
439:
440: \bibitem[Gould \& Salpeter 1963]{Gould1963}
441: Gould, R.J., \& Salpeter, E.E.
442: 1963, ApJ, 138, 393
443:
444: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& Salpeter 1971]{Hollenbach1971a}
445: Hollenbach, D.J., \& Salpeter, E.E.
446: 1971, ApJ, 163, 155
447:
448: \bibitem[Hollenbach et al. 1971]{Hollenbach1971b}
449: Hollenbach, D.J., Werner, M.W. \& Salpeter, E.E.
450: 1971, ApJ, 163, 165
451:
452: \bibitem[Hornekaer et al. 2003]{Hornekaer2003}
453: Hornekaer, L., Baurichter, A., Petrunin, V.V.,
454: Field, D., \& Luntz, A.C.
455: 2003, Science, 302, 1943
456:
457: \bibitem[Hornekaer et al. 2005]{Hornekaer2005}
458: Hornekaer, L., Baurichter, A., Petrunin, V.V.,
459: Luntz, A.C., Kay, B.D., \& Al-Halabi, A.
460: 2005, J. Chem. Phys., 122, 124701
461:
462: \bibitem[Katz et al. 1999]{Katz1999}
463: Katz, N., Furman, I., Biham, O., Pirronello, V., \& Vidali, G.
464: 1999, ApJ, 522, 305
465:
466: \bibitem[Manico et al. 2001]{Manico2001}
467: Manic\'o, G., Ragun\'i, G., Pirronello, V., Roser, J.E., \& Vidali, G.
468: 2001, ApJ, 548, L253
469:
470: \bibitem[Perets et al. 2005]{Perets2005}
471: Perets, H.B., Biham, O., Manic\'o, G., Pirronello, V.,
472: Roser, J., Swords, S., \& Vidali, G.
473: 2005, ApJ, 627, 850
474:
475: \bibitem[Perets et al. 2007]{Perets2007}
476: Perets, H.B., Lederhendler, A., Biham, O., Vidali, G.,
477: Li, L., Swords, S., Congiu, E., Roser, J., Manic\'o, G.,
478: Brucato, J.R., \& Pirronello, V.
479: 2007, ApJ, 661, L163
480:
481: \bibitem[Pirronello et al. 1997]{Pirronello1997}
482: Pirronello, V., Biham, O., Liu, C., Shen, L., \& Vidali, G.
483: 1997, ApJ, 483, L131
484:
485: \bibitem[Pirronello et al. 1999]{Pirronello1999}
486: Pirronello, V., Liu, C., Roser, J.E., Vidali, G.
487: 1999, A\&A, 344, 681
488:
489: \bibitem[Roser et al. 2002]{Roser2002}
490: Roser, J.E., Manic\'o, G., Pirronello, V., \& Vidali, G.
491: 2002, ApJ, 581, 276
492:
493: \bibitem[Vidali et al. 2007]{Vidali2007}
494: Vidali, G., Pirronello, V., Li, L.,
495: Roser, J., Manic\'o, G.,
496: Mehl, H., Lederhendler, A.,
497: Perets, H.B., Brucato, J.R., \& Biham, O.
498: 2007, J. Phys. Chem., submitted
499:
500: \bibitem[Williams 1968]{Williams1968}
501: Williams D.A.
502: 1968, ApJ, 151, 935
503:
504: \bibitem[Williams et al. 2007]{Williams2007}
505: Williams, D.A., Brown, W.A., Price, S.D., Rawlings, J.M.C., \& Viti, S.
506: 2007, Astron. Geophys., 48, 25
507:
508: \end{thebibliography}
509:
510: \end{document}
511:
512:
513: