1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}

3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

6: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

7: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

8: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,onecolfloat5,

9: \usepackage{natbib}

10: \citestyle{aa}

11: %\usepackage{epsf}

12: \newcommand{\tx}[1]{\textrm{#1}}

13: \newcommand{\pc}[1]{\protect\citename{#1}}

14: \newcommand{\kms}{km~$\tx{s}^{-1}$}

15: \newcommand{\dv}{$r^{1/4}\,$}

16: \newcommand{\Io}{I$_{814}$}

17: \newcommand{\Vs}{V$_{606}$}

18: \newcommand{\sbe}{$SB_{\tx{e}}$}

19: \newcommand{\resec}{$r_{\tx{e}}$}

20: \newcommand{\Rekpc}{$R_{\tx{e}}$}

21: \newcommand{\mlsun}{M$_{\odot}$/L$_{\odot,V}$}

22: \newcommand{\expnt}[2]{\ensuremath{#1 \times 10^{#2}}}   % scientific notation

23: \newcommand{\gsim}{\gtrsim}

24: \newcommand{\lsim}{\lesssim}

25: \newcommand{\cxo}{\textit{CXO}}

26: \newcommand{\chandra}{\textit{Chandra}}

27: \newcommand{\errrad}{{\ensuremath{2\farcs0}}}

28: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{

29: \def\@captype{figure}

30: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}

31: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}

32: \newenvironment{inlinetable}{

33: \def\@captype{table}

34: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}

35: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}

36: \def\xc{\mathrel{x_{\rm c}}}

37: \def\yc{\mathrel{y_{\rm c}}}

38: \def\rc{\mathrel{r_{\rm core}}}

39: \def\rt{\mathrel{r_{\rm cut}}}

40: \def\sigo{\mathrel{\sigma_{\rm o}}}

41: \def\xr{\mathrel{x_{\rm r}}}

42: \def\xt{\mathrel{x_{\rm t}}}

43: 

44: 

45: 

46: \slugcomment{AJ, in accepted}

47: \shorttitle{Photometric Search for Transients in Galaxy Clusters}

48: \shortauthors{Sand et al.}

49: 

50: \begin{document}

51: %\twocolumn[ 

52: \title{A Photometric Search for Transients in Galaxy Clusters \altaffilmark{1}}

53: 

54: \author{David J. Sand,$\!$\altaffilmark{2} Dennis Zaritsky, St\'{e}phane

55: Herbert-Fort, Suresh Sivanandam, and Douglas Clowe\altaffilmark{3}} \affil{Steward Observatory,

56: Astronomy, Tucson, AZ 91125} \email{dsand@as.arizona.edu}

57: 

58: \begin{abstract}

59: We have begun a program to search for supernovae and other transients

60: in the fields of galaxy clusters with the 2.3m Bok Telescope on Kitt

61: Peak.  We present our automated photometric methods for data

62: reduction, efficiency characterization, and initial spectroscopy.

63: With this program, we aim to ultimately identify $\sim$25-35

64: cluster SN Ia ($\sim$10 of which will be intracluster, hostless

65: events) and constrain the SN Ia rate associated with old, passive

66: stellar populations. With these measurements we will constrain the

67: relative contribution of hostless and hosted SN Ia to the metal

68: enrichment of the intracluster medium.  In the current work, we have

69: identified a central excess of transient events within $1.25 r_{200}$

70: in our cluster fields after statistically subtracting out the

71: 'background' transient rate taken from an off-cluster CCD chip.  Based

72: on the published rate of SN Ia for cluster populations we estimate

73: that $\sim$20 percent of the excess cluster transients are due to

74: cluster SN Ia, a comparable fraction to core collapse (CC) supernovae

75: and the remaining are likely to be active galactic nuclei.

76: Interestingly, we have identified three intracluster SN candidates,

77: all of which lay beyond $R>r_{200}$.  These events, if truly

78: associated with the cluster, indicate a large deficit of intracluster

79: (IC) SN at smaller radii, and may be associated with the IC stars of

80: infalling groups or indicate that the intracluster light (ICL) in the

81: cluster outskirts is actively forming stars which contribute CC SN or

82: prompt SN Ia.

83: 

84: \end{abstract}

85: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general}

86: %]

87: \altaffiltext{1}{Observations reported here were obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the University of Arizona and the Smithsonian Institution.}

88: \altaffiltext{2}{Chandra Fellow}

89: \altaffiltext{3}{Current address: Ohio University, Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Clippinger Labs 251B, Athens, OH 45701}

90: 

91: \section{Introduction}

92: 

93: Because little can escape the deep gravitational potential wells of

94: galaxy clusters, they are among the only sites where one can

95: confidently construct constrained models of chemical enrichment.  The

96: intracluster medium (ICM) contains most of the baryons in clusters

97: \citep[e.g.,][]{Gonzalez07} and is metal enriched, $ \langle Fe/H

98: \rangle \sim 0.3 Z_{\odot}$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Balestra07}.  However,

99: none of the proposed mechanisms to transport the metals produced by

100: supernovae from the galaxies in which they lie to the ICM have proven

101: adequate --- unless large gas outflows from cluster members are

102: invoked \citep[][see also discussion in \citealt{Dupke00}]{Renzini97}.

103: We are left to conclude either that galaxies somehow eject most of

104: their metals, some basic part of the chemical evolution model, such as

105: the SNe rate or yield, is incorrect, or an enrichment channel has been

106: overlooked.

107: 

108: One such channel that has recently been proposed is enrichment by

109: intracluster stars (ICS) whose SNe pollute the ICM in situ

110: \citep{Sasaki01,Zaritsky04,Domainko04,Lin04b,Sivanandam07}.  Because

111: the ICS comprise $\sim$30\% of the total cluster stellar budget

112: \citep{Gonzalez05,Gonzalez07}, a comparable fraction of the ICM metals

113: should come from this population even if galactic winds are highly

114: efficient.  A quantitative attempt to determine whether the dominant

115: source of metals is the ICS or the cluster galaxies has been unable to

116: distinguish between the two sources because of uncertainties in

117: cluster SNe rates and SN Ia progenitors \citep{Sivanandam07}.

118: 

119: Despite the widespread use of SNe Ia's as a probe of the cosmic

120: expansion history, the progenitor systems of SNe Ia remain

121: unidentified \citep[e.g.,][]{Hillebrandt00}.  Understanding the

122: origins and basic physics behind SNe Ia is essential, given that their

123: use as standard candles rests on the assumption that their basic

124: properties are constant as a function of cosmic time and that their

125: luminosities can be calibrated with an unchanging empirical relation

126: \citep[see recent review by][]{Filippenko95}.  One interpretation of

127: the shortfall of metals in the chemical evolutionary models is that

128: there exists a population of SNe that we are missing. Because we do

129: not understand the origin of Ia's, this possibility must be

130: considered.

131: 

132: Independent recent results indeed suggest that SN Ia come from two

133: different stellar populations

134: \citep{Mannucci05,Scannapieco05,Sullivan06}.  One type is associated

135: with star forming regions, which tend to be overluminous, have a rate

136: proportional to the star formation rate, and appear within 1 Gyr of

137: the formation of the stellar population. The other type is associated

138: with old stellar populations, have a rate that is proportional to the

139: total stellar mass of the system, and only appear many Gyrs after the

140: formation of the stellar population.  A SN search that probes both

141: young and old stellar populations must use the star formation history

142: of the survey volume to disentangle the two SNe Ia populations

143: \citep[e.g.,][]{Sullivan06} and measure the SN rate for each

144: population. This necessary modeling leads to larger uncertainties in

145: the inferred rates.

146: 

147: Old, elliptical galaxies only give rise to SN Ia associated with the

148: long delay time population \citep{Sullivan06}, which makes galaxy

149: clusters the natural environment in which to constrain the rate of

150: this type of SNe Ia.  By pursuing a SN survey in low redshift galaxy

151: clusters the modeling problem is averted because old stellar

152: populations dominate. The star formation history of these galaxies can

153: be approximated to high accuracy as a star formation burst at high

154: redshift \citep[e.g.,][]{Holden05}.  Furthermore, the profusion of old

155: ellipticals in clusters also makes it possible to measure the rate of

156: these SNe even though the rate is quite low.

157: 

158: There have been several modern SN surveys that have focused on the

159: galaxy cluster environment, beginning with that of \citet{Norgaard89}.

160: The first systematic survey, the Mount Stromlo Abell Cluster Supernova

161: Search \citep{Reiss98}, ran for 3.5 years and discovered 52 SNe, 25 of

162: which were associated with the cluster targets.  The survey focused on

163: Abell clusters at $0.02 < z < 0.08$, and of the 25 cluster SN Ia, 14

164: were confidently determined to be SN Ia.  This survey did not attempt

165: a SN Ia rate measurement.  \citet{Galyam02} searched {\it Hubble Space

166: Telescope} archival images of nine galaxy clusters that had more than

167: one imaging epoch for SNe.  Despite finding only two probable cluster

168: SN, they were able to put the first real limits on the SNe rate in

169: clusters at both low and high redshift.  This same group has

170: undertaken a longer term program in low redshift ($0.06 < z < 0.19$)

171: galaxy clusters, as part of the Wise Observatory Optical Transient

172: Search \citep[WOOTS;][]{GalYam07a}.  Their results include the

173: discovery of two IC SN Ia \citep{Galyam03} and a measurement of the SN

174: Ia rate in galaxy clusters based on six SN Ia \citep{Sharon07}.  Very

175: recently, \citet{Mannucci07b} presented a measurement of both the SN

176: Ia and CC SN rate in local galaxy clusters, measuring the cluster SN

177: Ia rate to be $\sim$3 times higher than that in field E/S0 galaxies.

178: Work has also begun at higher redshift \citep{Sharonhigh}.

179: 

180: Motivated by all of the above, we began a long-term photometric

181: monitoring campaign of $\sim$60 X-ray selected galaxy clusters at $0.1

182: < z < 0.2$ using the 2.3 m Bok telescope on Kitt Peak with its 90Prime

183: 1-degree field imager \citep{90prime}.  We aim to measure the

184: old-population, SN Ia rate, both in cluster galaxies and among the

185: ICS. The data are also being used to study other transient phenomena.

186: Here, we present the observational design of the survey, transient

187: detection techniques and efficiency calculations, initial spectroscopy

188: and first science results.  In \S~\ref{sec:surveydesign}, we describe

189: the cluster sample, survey design and scientific goals.  In

190: \S~\ref{sec:search} we discuss our automated image reduction pipeline

191: and transient detection technique, followed by our calculated

192: transient detection efficiency in \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}.  We present

193: our current transient catalog in \S~\ref{sec:varcat}, along with a

194: sample of transients that do not appear to lie within galaxies, which

195: are generally referred to as hostless.  Our initial spectroscopy is

196: presented in \S~\ref{sec:spec}.  We present evidence for a central

197: overdensity of transient sources associated with our cluster sample in

198: \S~\ref{sec:overdense} and discuss the nature of these sources in

199: \S~\ref{sec:whatrexcess}.  We devote \S~\ref{sec:ICspec} to a

200: discussion of the intriguing implications of the three IC SN

201: candidates at $R>r_{200}$.  Finally, in \S~\ref{sec:future} we outline

202: our future plans.  Where necessary, we adopt a flat cosmology with

203: $H_{0}$=70 \kms Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m}$=0.3, and

204: $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.7.

205: 

206: 

207: \section{Survey Design and Goals}\label{sec:surveydesign}

208: 

209: The basic observational goal of this survey is to confidently identify

210: SNe Ia within the galaxy clusters in our sample at $0.1 < z < 0.2$,

211: whether they lie among the ICS (hostless) or within cluster galaxies

212: (hosted).  Given our observational strategy and depth, we will

213: eventually correct the observed SN rate to the true rate, measure

214: whether there are significant differences among the hosted and

215: hostless events, and ultimately improve the model of the metal

216: enrichment history of the ICM.

217: 

218: Various considerations play a role in the survey design, including the

219: available field of view, image depth, survey cadence, and sample size.

220: From the depth we achieve with modest exposure times (total 1600 sec,

221: see below), and a desire to have control fields near the clusters, we

222: decided to constrain the sample to redshifts between 0.1 and 0.2.  As

223: described in more detail below, we roughly center our clusters on CCD

224: chip 1 of 90Prime, the prime focus wide field imager on the 2.3m Bok

225: telescope on Kitt Peak.  We use the other three chips to measure the

226: background transient detection rate, given that there is a $\sim$500

227: arcsecond gap between them.  The $\sim$30' x 30' field of chip 1

228: corresponds to a radius of $\sim$1.6 Mpc at z=0.1 and $\sim$3.0 Mpc at

229: z=0.2 and allows us to probe out beyond $r_{200}$ in all of our

230: clusters.

231: 

232: The peak magnitude of type Ia supernovae is $M_{B}=-19.25$, with a

233: small intrinsic dispersion of $0.2-0.3$ mag \citep{Phillips93}.  For

234: the redshift range of our cluster sample, this corresponds roughly to

235: $19 < g < 20$ mag.  Type Ia SNe fade by $\sim$ 1 mag in 15 rest frame

236: days.  By taking four 400 second $g$ band exposures with small dithers

237: we easily find SN candidates down to $g\sim21.5$ during good observing

238: conditions (see \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}), allowing us to observe SNe

239: Ia's well before and after peak brightness.  We will present our

240: formal effective visibility time, the time during which a given survey

241: image is sensitive to SNe, in future work as we determine the SNe Ia

242: rate in our cluster sample. We present preliminary calculations in

243: \S~\ref{sec:howmanysnia}.

244: 

245: For an exposure time of 4$\times$400 seconds per cluster field and a

246: generous allocation of $\sim$4 nights per month on the 2.3m Bok

247: telescope (excluding the southern Arizona monsoon season), we can

248: survey about 60 galaxy clusters monthly.  In addition to spectroscopic

249: followup of a fraction of our cluster SNe candidates, we are also

250: experimenting with multi-band imaging of each cluster field at each

251: epoch to exploit recent progress in single-epoch phototyping of

252: supernovae candidates \citep{Poznanski06}, but do not describe the

253: latter here.  We also employ other methods for statistical

254: determinations of the rate of cluster transients (see

255: \S~\ref{sec:future}).

256: 

257: 

258: As will be discussed in \S~\ref{sec:howmanysnia}, we expect to find

259: $\sim$2-3 cluster SN Ia per month of 90Prime imaging employing the

260: above strategy.  If the program runs for two observing seasons, each

261: spanning six months, we will discover $\sim$25-35 cluster SN Ia, with

262: between $\sim$5 and 10 of these being hostless, IC events.  This

263: survey, when completed, will have 4-6 times the number of cluster SN

264: Ia than previous focused searches which have sought to measure the

265: rate in clusters.  Overcoming previous surveys' small number

266: statistics is essential for pinning down the rate and understanding

267: the long-delay time SN Ia population.

268: 

269: Several secondary science goals can also be pursued with these data.

270: For example, active galactic nuclei (AGN) and quasi-stellar objects

271: (QSOs) constitute a large fraction of our transient objects (see

272: \S~\ref{sec:varcat} and \ref{sec:spec}).  Identification of AGN/QSOs

273: through their variability is highly complementary to other AGN

274: selection techniques \citep{Sarajedini03,Sarajedini06,Totani05}, and

275: may be useful in cluster fields where there is a known overdensity of

276: AGN \citep{Ruderman05,Martini07}.  Another example is the use of our

277: 4$\times$400 second image sequence to study short time scale

278: variability \citep[e.g.,][]{Becker04}.  A final example is the study

279: of rare, mysterious transient events in cluster cores such as that

280: identified in Abell 267 which at the time could not be fit by any

281: known supernova template \citep{Stern04}.

282: 

283: 

284: \subsection{Sample Selection}\label{sec:sample}

285: 

286: We chose our cluster sample from among $0.1 < z < 0.2$ X-ray selected

287: galaxy clusters visible from northern hemisphere telescopes with a

288: preference for galaxy clusters with known strong lensing features (to

289: increase our chances, albeit low, of discovering strongly lensed

290: transient phenomena).  Clusters were preferably chosen to have a high

291: X-ray luminosity, although not in any systematic way.

292: The cluster sample, along with the observing epochs included here, is

293: detailed in Table~\ref{table:clustertable}.  The X-ray luminosities

294: are those reported directly from the BAX online cluster data base,

295: which attempts to homogenize luminosities based on flux measurements

296: and uses a $H_{0}$=50 \kms Mpc$^{-1}$ and $\Omega_{m}$=1.0 cosmology.

297: We refer the reader to the BAX web site for

298: details\footnote{http://bax.ast.obs-mip.fr/}.

299: 

300: 

301: \section{Photometric Transient Search}\label{sec:search}

302: 

303: The observations were conducted with the prime focus imager, 90Prime

304: \citep{90prime}, on the 2.3m Bok telescope on Kitt Peak.  The focal

305: plane array consists of a mosaic of four Lockheed 4k $\times$ 4k blue

306: sensitive CCDs (the peak QE is near 4500 \AA).  With the pixel scale

307: of $0\farcs45$ per pixel, this detector array gives a field of view of

308: about one square degree.  The chip gaps are large, approximately 500

309: arcseconds on the sky.  For our purposes, these gaps are actually an

310: advantage because it places the other chips farther away from the

311: cluster.

312: We center our cluster fields on Chip 1 (cosmetically the best out of

313: the four), giving coverage out to at least $r_{200}$ for all

314: targets. The other three chips provide control fields.  Here, we

315: present transients from chip 3, in addition to chip 1, to quantify the

316: background transient rate.  A charge trap in chip 3 decreases the

317: effective field of view by approximately one-eighth, but otherwise the

318: chip is relatively free of defects.

319: 

320: The images considered here were obtained between January and June

321: 2006, during four observing runs (our pilot program), and one night in

322: December 2006.  The single December night was followed by one night of

323: spectroscopy, which we present in \S~\ref{sec:spec}.  Several other

324: runs beyond the pilot program, which implemented this imaging plus

325: spectroscopy strategy, were spoiled either due to weather or

326: instrument problems, leaving only the one useable night in December

327: 2006 where everything worked. There are five clusters (noted in

328: Table~\ref{table:clustertable}) whose only additional epoch of imaging

329: were taken during the period of the Fall 2006 campaign when the

330: 90Prime imager was operating with anomalously high readout noise.

331: Since these images are of lower quality, they are not generally

332: included in this study, but are used only as the reference image for

333: differencing of the good December data in these five clusters.

334: 

335: 

336: \subsection{Basic Image Calibration}{\label{sec:imagecal}}

337: 

338: The image processing consists of various steps that we describe here.

339: We do the initial image reductions using a nearly automated {\sc IRAF}

340: script that relies heavily on the {\it mscred} mosaic data reduction

341: system.  This script corrects for cross talk, trims and subtracts the

342: overscan region, applies an additional bias subtraction to remove

343: structure seen in the bias exposures, flat-fields the data and rejects

344: cosmic rays in each individual exposure using the {\sc LACOSMIC} task

345: \citep{vandokkum01}.  Regions around saturated and nearly-saturated

346: objects are heavily masked because residuals near poorly subtracted

347: bright objects can be one of the largest sources of false detections

348: in our transient detection pipeline.  We calculate exposure weight

349: maps using a combination of a normalized twilight flat field and the

350: cosmic ray rejection map.  We edit each image header to include the

351: refined world coordinate system solution obtained using the {\it

352: msccmatch} task and the USNO-A2 catalog. The final astrometric

353: solution has a typical rms scatter of $\sim$0\farcs2-0\farcs3.

354: 

355: To combine the individual exposures, we rescale and resample each onto

356: the same astrometric grid using SExtractor \citep{sexbib} and {\sc

357: SWarp}\footnote{version 2.15.7; http://terapix.iap.fr/soft/swarp}.  A

358: final median combined cluster image is made for each observing epoch

359: using the individual exposure weight maps and {\sc SWarp}.  We chose

360: to median combine the frames to remove fast-moving objects, although

361: slowly moving objects, those that move by less than the typical seeing

362: at the Bok telescope during the course of a 4 x 400 image sequence

363: (see Figure~\ref{fig:psf}), remain.

364: 

365: We photometrically calibrate the final images (both the combined and

366: individual exposures) using non-saturated point sources in common with

367: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS;

368: \citet{sdsscite})\footnote{http://www.sdss.org} when there is overlap.

369: Of the fifty-five clusters in this study, thirty have SDSS coverage.

370: Otherwise, we bootstrap calibrations using the photometric zeropoints

371: of SDSS clusters on clear nights.  Every cluster was observed on at

372: least one photometric night (loosely defined to be a night in which

373: the Sloan derived zeropoint did not vary by more than 0.1 mag

374: throughout the night).  We use SExtractor to generate object catalogs

375: of individual and combined images, which also provides a measure of

376: the average image point spread function (PSF) across the field.  See

377: Figure~\ref{fig:psf} for the distribution of image FWHMs and

378: Figure~\ref{fig:zpthist} for the distribution of relative zeropoints

379: during our imaging runs. Both of these quantities play an important

380: role in determining our transient detection efficiency

381: (\S~\ref{sec:efficiency}), and will be discussed briefly here.

382: 

383: When measuring the image PSF and zeropoints by comparison with SDSS,

384: we select only the high S/N objects with SExtractor.  For

385: concreteness, an object must have a minimum of fifteen pixels (the

386: {\sc detect\_minarea} SExtractor parameter) above a detection

387: threshold of $20-\sigma$ ({\sc detect\_thresh} parameter) in order to

388: be considered for the PSF measurement and to be used in the

389: calculation of the image zeropoint.  For the automatic PSF

390: measurement, stars that met these criteria were further flagged to

391: have a flux between 2$\times10^5$ and 1$\times10^6$ counts.  These

392: flux limits were set empirically to minimize outliers due to galaxy

393: contamination and near-saturation objects.  A final PSF measurement

394: (confirmed empirically for a subset of objects) was found by taking

395: the output SExtractor parameter {\sc fwhm\_image} for these objects

396: and computing their mean FWHM using the IDL function {\sc

397: resistant\_mean}, which clips based on the median and the median

398: absolute deviation.  As can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:psf}, the FWHM

399: is not good, although this has been factored into our survey planning

400: and has not kept us from the survey depth and transient detection

401: efficiency desired (see \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}).

402: 

403: For the zeropoint calculation, we take the above high S/N SExtracted

404: objects and WCS match with point sources from the SDSS archive

405: (matches are made to within five 90Prime pixels -- $\sim$2.5 arcsec).

406: The mean image zeropoint was calculated directly using the IDL

407: function {\sc resistant\_mean} (typically hundreds of SDSS point

408: sources and 90Prime counterparts were matched).  On those nights

409: determined to be photometric, a linear fit was performed on the

410: SDSS-derived zeropoint as a function of 90Prime imaging airmass to

411: derive an atmospheric extinction correction for those clusters without

412: counterpart SDSS imaging.  Using this, cluster fields without SDSS

413: imaging were given a zeropoint based on the image airmass and a bright

414: star catalog was created to be used as a photometric catalog for all

415: other imaging epochs of that cluster.

416: 

417: \subsection{Difference imaging and transient detection}{\label{sec:trandetect}}

418: 

419: We implement an automated pipeline to PSF-match and difference an

420: individual epoch image from a reference image, identify candidate

421: variable objects, and post image cut-outs that are reviewed by a human

422: using a combination of Perl and IDL scripts whose core utilizes the

423: ISIS software package \citep{Alard00}.

424: 

425: In detail, the sequence is as follows.  When a new image is obtained,

426: the code identifies a reference image by searching for the

427: corresponding archived image with the tightest PSF.  The new image is

428: registered, resampled onto the reference image grid, PSF matched, and

429: subtracted. Residual objects are classified as candidate

430: transients. If the newly acquired image happens to be the best to

431: date, it is used as the reference image and the second best image is

432: subtracted.  The image differencing is performed with the {\it

433: mrj\_phot} program within the ISIS package and we refer the reader to

434: \citet{Alard00} for details.  We found the procedure works well when

435: we split each 4k $\times$ 4k CCD into 16 subregions for subtraction

436: and the PSF kernel convolution is allowed to vary over each subregion.

437: We set our upper flux limit for detection and image rescaling well

438: below the saturation level (see \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}).  We utilize

439: {\it detect.csh} and {\it find.csh} from within ISIS to find high

440: variance peaks in the differenced images and produce a first list of

441: candidate variables.  We then trim the list by removing objects near

442: bad columns ($<25$ pixels), near masked saturated stars ($<25$

443: pixels), nearby significant negative values in the differenced image

444: ($<7-\sigma$ below a local sky value calculated with an annulus of

445: 50-70 pixels; most likely due to a slight registration misalignment

446: that produces dipoles in the difference image), and near another

447: transient ($<25$ pixels). The latter are likely either residuals from

448: the poor subtraction of a large object or astrometric variables.  We

449: quantify the likelihood of the rejection of real variables in

450: \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}.  These cuts tend to reduce the number of

451: candidates from several hundred to less than several tens in a given

452: image.  Despite our best efforts, some obviously spurious transient

453: candidates remain, and so human review is necessary.

454: 

455: The principal long time scale variable candidates in this project are

456: expected to be variable stars, active galactic nuclei (AGN), novae and

457: supernovae.  Since the primary goal of this work is to search for SNe

458: in the clusters, we tried to screen out known AGN and variable stars

459: by crosschecking with NED through a batch query.  Nonetheless,

460: previously unknown AGN and variable stars are a major source of

461: contamination in this work, but will lead to exciting auxiliary

462: science.

463: 

464: \section{Transient Detection Efficiency} {\label{sec:efficiency}}

465: 

466: To understand the recovery efficiency of transient events in our

467: pipeline as a function of seeing and transient brightness, we add

468: point sources to individual images and attempt to recover them with

469: our transient detection pipeline with the unmodified reference image.

470: These test point sources are randomly placed in images with a

471: uniformly distributed $g$ magnitude between $17 < m_g < 24$.

472: 

473: A typical efficiency run for a given image consists of 50 separate

474: realizations, each of which incorporates 30 random amplitude, randomly

475: placed point sources. The final efficiency calculation for that image

476: is then based on the recovery statistics of 1500 fake point

477: sources. Although we have not devoted the computer resources to

478: measuring our detection efficiency in each of our survey images, we

479: have sampled the parameter space (PSF and transparency) covered by our

480: data.

481: 

482: We present typical results as a function of these two parameters in

483: Figures~\ref{fig:totsceff} and \ref{fig:totzptsceff}.  The recovery

484: rate is $\sim$80-90\% over a magnitude range of $g\sim 18-21.5$ during

485: clear sky conditions and the full range of seeing conditions.  When we

486: do not recover the transient it is sometimes due to its proximity to a

487: masked portion of the image.  Occasionally, a catastrophic image

488: subtraction error in one of the sixteen subtraction subregions occurs.

489: Normally this manifests itself in the form of a slight misregistration

490: of the subregion, which produces dipole residuals in the differenced

491: image, and no viable transient candidates.  Occasionally if a

492: subregion has a very bright star in its sector, it will corrupt the

493: whole subregion, leaving a poor subtraction.  An examination of when

494: this occurs did not reveal any trend towards the outer edges of the

495: field of view, and so this is unlikely to be the cause of the central

496: excess of transients that we find in \S~\ref{sec:overdense}.  In the

497: absence of these relatively rare subtraction errors in a subregion, we

498: recover over 90\% of our fake transients with $18.5 < g < 21.5$.  In

499: addition to recovering the vast majority of the transients, we also

500: generally measure the correct magnitude. In Figure~\ref{fig:magdiff},

501: we plot the difference between input magnitude and that recovered as a

502: function of input transient magnitude.  At the faintest magnitudes

503: where we detect transients ($g\sim 22.5$), the scatter is $\sim$0.2

504: mag, with no bias.  The transient detection efficiency in chip 3 (the

505: off cluster chip) is consistent with that of chip 1 to within the

506: noise of the inidividual magnitude bins, and for the rest of this work

507: we consider them identical.

508: 

509: One additional experiment was performed to gauge the relative

510: detection efficiency for transients in galaxy cores versus those in

511: regions with no apparent galaxy host.  We placed artificial SN with

512: random $g$ magnitudes between 21.0 and 21.5 (the faint end out to

513: which we reliably detect transients) at varying annuli from the BCG

514: center in the same sample of clusters that we used to determine the

515: detection efficiency as a function of image PSF.  To be explicit, 50

516: artificial transients per bin were placed at annuli between 0 and 1

517: PSF, 1 and 2 PSFs, 2 and 5 PSFs, 5 and 10 PSFs, and continuing out to

518: a maximum radius of five hundred pixels from the center of the cluster

519: BCG.  Between 95\% and 100\% of the artificial transients were

520: recovered, with no trend seen as a function of radius.  Those few

521: artificial transients that were not found by our detection pipeline

522: were not found due to proximity with a masked saturated star or other

523: image defect, as determined by visual inspection.  For this reason we

524: do not distinguish detection efficiencies for objects found in the

525: cores of galaxies versus those with no host galaxy.  A similar result

526: was obtained by \citet{Neill06} for the Supernova Legacy Survey,

527: although the WOOTS cluster search did find a significantly decreased

528: detection efficiency in the cores of galaxy hosts versus hostless

529: events \citep{Galyam03}.

530: 

531: We will use these calculated detection efficiencies in

532: \S~\ref{sec:whatrexcess} to estimate the approximate number of cluster

533: SN Ia we should observe and to compare with the observations, although

534: as we mentioned previously this treatment does not properly account

535: for the varying maximum brightness and light curve of SN Ia.

536: 

537: 

538: \section{Identified variable objects}\label{sec:varcat}

539: 

540: We present our transient catalogs for the cluster-centered chip 1 in

541: Table~\ref{table:vartable} and the off-cluster chip 3 in

542: Table~\ref{table:vartable3}. These tables contain the position, epoch

543: of discovery, the apparent $g$ magnitude of the transient, the

544: projected distance from the transient to the brightest cluster galaxy,

545: and any additional comments.  Such comments may include, for example,

546: if the transient was detected in more than one epoch as a variable

547: (repeat detection; RD), if there is a correspondence to a NED source,

548: if the transient is an IC, hostless SN candidate (see

549: \S~\ref{sec:iccands}), or if we were able to get a spectrum of the

550: object (see \S~\ref{sec:spec}).  To get an idea of the magnitude

551: distribution of our discovered transients, we plot magnitude

552: histograms in Figure~\ref{fig:maghist}. The dashed histogram shows the

553: transient magnitude histogram after removal of sources that were

554: detected as variables at multiple observing epochs, and the dotted

555: line shows the transient magnitude histogram after removal of all

556: sources known to not be at the cluster redshift (whether found through

557: NED or our own spectroscopy).

558: 

559: 

560: Of the variable objects associated with NED sources, most are QSOs.

561: In the cluster-centered chip 1, 20 transients were associated with

562: known QSOs (9 in the off-cluster chip 3).  In addition to these, three

563: transients in the cluster-centered chip 1 are associated with cluster

564: members that are known AGN or QSOs from SDSS.  Two additional

565: transients in the off-cluster chip 3 are SDSS AGN at the cluster

566: redshift, but are $\sim$5.2 and 7.7 Mpc from the presumed cluster

567: center.  These AGN may be associated with infalling groups at the

568: outer edges of the cluster, with implications for the origin of AGNs

569: in cluster environments \citep[e.g.,][]{Martini07}.  We will discuss

570: these cluster AGN further in \S~\ref{sec:whatrexcess}.  Fourteen

571: transients in chip 1 (four in chip 3) were 'repeat detections';

572: several of these are known QSOs, but given our visibility time (see

573: \S~\ref{sec:howmanysnia}), some may be SN detected at different parts

574: of their light curve. Three other transients in chip 1 are associated

575: with galaxies at the cluster redshift, none in chip 3.

576: 

577: 

578: \subsection{Transients without Hosts}\label{sec:iccands}

579: 

580: One of the primary goals of this survey is to identify IC supernovae.

581: When a potential IC event is identified, we combine all of

582: the imaging epochs in which the transient was not detected into a

583: single deep image to search for a possible faint host galaxy.  The

584: images are combined as a weighted average (more appropriate for

585: reaching faint limiting magnitudes than a median combination).  We run

586: SExtractor on these deep, combined images with a $3-\sigma$ detection

587: threshold and minimum area of three pixels (MAGAUTO magnitudes are

588: computed).  We consider a transient to be an IC candidate if its

589: Sextractor extraction radius does not overlap any object in the deep

590: object catalog.

591: 

592: A synopsis of our IC SN candidates is presented in

593: Table~\ref{table:ICsumm}.  We list the position, magnitude, projected

594: distance from the BCG ($R_{BCG}$), that projected distance in terms of

595: $r_{200}$, and our $g$-band magnitude limits (both apparent,

596: $m_{lim,g}$, and absolute, $M_{lim,g}$, assuming that the object

597: is at the cluster redshift).  To calculate the limiting magnitude for

598: the faint host detection, we define the point source detection limit

599: identically to that of \citet{Becker04} and the NOAO Archive

600: definition of photometric depth, as

601: %

602: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:maglimit}

603: m_{l} = m_{0} - 2.5 \log (1.2 W \sigma_{sky} n) 

604: \end{equation}

605: 

606: \noindent where $m_{0}$ is the image zero point, $W$ is the seeing of

607: the image, $\sigma_{sky}$ is the sky dispersion around the mode, and

608: $n=3$ represents the $3-\sigma$ detection limit.  Point source

609: limiting magnitudes are given since dwarf galaxies at the cluster

610: redshift (with our typical seeing) should be unresolved

611: \citep[e.g.~dwarf galaxies in the Coma cluster have a typical size of

612: $\sim$1 arcsec;][]{Komiyama02}.  To put the absolute $g$ band

613: detection limits in perspective, one can adopt the Virgo Cluster

614: luminosity function as presented by \citet{Trentham01}.  Assuming this

615: luminosity function is representative of the clusters in our sample,

616: then $\sim$0.2\% of the galaxy light in the cluster would come from

617: dwarf galaxies below $M_{g} = -14$.

618: 

619: Apparently hostless transients may have a variety of explanations.

620: First, these could be true IC SNe.  Second, they may simply lie within

621: hosts that are below the detection threshold of our current imaging,

622: despite the detection limits described above.  As the survey revisits

623: our cluster fields more and more, the constraints will tighten.

624: Third, they may be flaring stars or novae in our galaxy, with

625: precursors too faint given our current detection limits.  Fourth, they

626: may be CC supernovae associated with star formation in

627: IC space, as suggested by recent observations of $H\alpha$ in a tidal

628: tail in the cluster A3627 \citep{Sun07}.  Finally, they may be highly

629: variable higher-redshift objects, such as AGN, that we only detect in

630: high-state.

631: 

632: To resolve this confusion, we are making spectroscopic identification

633: of all of our IC SN candidates a high priority as the survey

634: progresses.  Due to the limited amount of spectroscopic time we have

635: had so far, we were able only to attempt confirmation of the one IC

636: candidate in Abell 516 (see \S~\ref{sec:spec}). Unfortunately, the

637: resulting spectrum is inconclusive due to poor signal to noise. Its

638: magnitude at discovery was $g$=23.83, well below our nominal limit.

639: We will discuss the number of IC SN candidates found relative to the

640: total number of SN Ia expected in our survey up till now in

641: \S~\ref{sec:howmanysnia} and we speculate further in

642: \S~\ref{sec:ICspec} under the assumption that the three IC SN

643: candidates found in chip 1 are indeed part of the cluster and not some

644: foreground or background population.

645: 

646: 

647: 

648: 

649: \section{Initial Followup Spectroscopy}\label{sec:spec}

650: 

651: Spectroscopic identification of a significant subsample of our cluster

652: SNe candidates representing the complete range in brightness and

653: environment is critical to our understanding of the relative

654: populations of foreground SNe, cluster SN Ia, uncataloged AGN, and

655: CC SNe associated with the cluster.

656: 

657: We were allocated five nights for followup spectroscopy during the

658: final trimester of 2006 to implement our full cluster supernovae

659: program.  Unfortunately, as discussed in \S~\ref{sec:search}, the

660: 90Prime noise levels were greatly elevated during most of the

661: observing term, except for the final imaging night when a grounding

662: problem was fixed and the instrument returned to nominal.  Hence, we

663: only have one night of imaging followed by one night of Blue Channel

664: Spectrograph followup at the MMT in this initial post-pilot portion of

665: the program.  We present these data here as a demonstration of our

666: ability to rapidly identify and confirm transient sources.

667: 

668: For the spectroscopy, we use the 300 line grating with a central

669: wavelength of 5800 \AA~(corresponding to a wavelength range of 3200 -

670: 8400 \AA) for our Blue Channel Spectrograph \citep{BCS} observations

671: on the night of December 19-20 2006.  The 1\farcs0 slit was used

672: throughout the night. We use IRAF to do the standard CCD processing,

673: one dimensional spectrum extraction, and wavelength and flux

674: calibration.  No attempt was made to remove potential host-galaxy

675: contamination from any spectrum.  We intend to revisit this issue in

676: future work, especially for the hosted events.

677: 

678: A summary of our initial spectroscopic observations is presented in

679: Table~\ref{table:bcs}.  Target selection is difficult to quantify. We

680: chose targets based on their position on the sky at the given time

681: during the night, with preference given to spectroscopically observing

682: multiple targets in the same cluster field in order to minimize slew

683: and acquisition times.  We gave targets higher priority if they were

684: near the cluster center ($R<r_{200}$) and slightly offset from their

685: host galaxy (note that all four of our confirmed SN Ia's are within

686: $r_{200}$, but two of the four show no apparent offset from their

687: unresolved galaxy host). The IC SN candidate Abell 516/ID11 (whose

688: identification was unsuccessful) was also given highest priority.

689: Otherwise, individual targets were selected more or less at random.

690: Given our seeing ($\sim$2-2.5 arcsec), it was difficult to

691: include host galaxy morphology as a criteria for spectroscopic

692: selection.  A seeing of 2 arcseconds corresponds to $\sim$3.7-6.6 kpc

693: throughout our cluster redshift range.  To determine accurate, broad

694: morphological classification, however, requires resolutions of $\sim$1

695: kpc or better \citep{Lotz04}.  All spectra are presented in

696: Figures~\ref{fig:sn1a}, \ref{fig:speclozgals}, \ref{fig:hizagn},

697: \ref{fig:lozagn}, \ref{fig:specstars}, and \ref{fig:unknown}.  Of the

698: 50 unique transient sources (that is, transients that were not

699: found to be variable in other epochs) discovered in our December data

700: (Table~\ref{table:vartable}), we were able to observe 25

701: spectroscopically, although two of these transients were not

702: confidently confirmed spectroscopically.  We now briefly present the

703: four broad categories of transients we found and highlight individual

704: interesting objects.  We conclude this section with a

705: discussion.

706: 

707: 

708: \subsection{Supernova Ia}

709: 

710: We confirmed four type Ia supernova \citep{Sand07} in our initial

711: spectroscopic followup (Figure~\ref{fig:sn1a}), one of which is

712: clearly associated with the cluster in our sample (A1246/ID10).  The

713: other three are background.  We match our spectra to spectral

714: templates taken from \citet{Nugent02}.  No formal fit was done, but

715: matching by eye was sufficient to identify SNe Ia and estimate the

716: time since peak luminosity.

717: 

718: \subsection{Variable Stars}

719: 

720: Five of the transients targeted for spectroscopy proved to be 

721: stars (Figure~\ref{fig:specstars}).

722: 

723: \subsection{Quasars}

724: 

725: We spectroscopically identified several previously unknown quasars

726: selected from their optical variability, with a redshift range between

727: $z\sim$0.8 and 2.9, and we present their spectra in

728: Figures~\ref{fig:hizagn} and \ref{fig:lozagn}.  As expected, the

729: transient position is always coincident with the center of the galaxy

730: host position.

731: 

732: \subsection{Low-z Galaxies and AGN}\label{sec:lowzspecs}

733: 

734: Our spectroscopic sample includes six low redshift ($z<0.3$) galaxies

735: (Figure~\ref{fig:speclozgals}). The host galaxy for transient

736: Z0256/ID19 is a cluster member, and since there are no star

737: formation signatures this galaxy may have hosted a SN Ia. The

738: cluster redshift for Abell 136 ($z=0.157$) is based on one galaxy

739: redshift \citep{Struble91} and so we tentatively consider A136/ID7 to

740: also be a cluster member.  Since this host galaxy has [O II] in

741: emission, indicating star formation, the nature of any hidden SN is

742: more ambiguous since both CC and SN Ia occur in star forming regions.

743: Both of these transients are coincident with the galaxy host core.

744: Future followup spectroscopy of these host galaxies will allow us to

745: subtract out the host contamination and possibly identify underlying

746: cluster SNe in these systems.

747: 

748: Two other sources show signatures of AGN activity.  Broad MgII in

749: A743/ID10 indicates that this is an AGN.  We measure the redshift of

750: RXJ821/ID15 to be at $z=0.22$ from the Ca H and K absorption lines.

751: At this redshift, the broad emission line near 2800\AA~(assuming

752: $z=0.22$) is not at the correct wavelength to be MgII.  There is a

753: point source $\sim$1.7 arcseconds from the galaxy which is the source

754: of the observed variability (we centered our slit on this point source

755: and not the intervening galaxy, although contamination was

756: inevitable).  We tentatively conclude that this single broad emission

757: line is from a quasar at unknown redshift and that this is the source

758: of the observed variability, rather than the $z=0.22$ foreground

759: galaxy that is contaminating our spectrum.  Similar flares from

760: background AGN superimposed on foreground 'host' galaxies have

761: contaminated SN surveys in the past \citep{Gal-Yam05}.  Finally, it

762: should be noted that just because a host galaxy shows AGN activity

763: does not mean that this is the source of the transient; a SNe is still

764: possible in these systems.

765: 

766: \subsection{Unknown}\label{sec:unknownspec}

767: 

768: We have two spectra that we could not confidently identify

769: (Figure~\ref{fig:unknown}).  The spectrum of A516/ID10 corresponds to

770: a very faint, but IC SN candidate.  This is a blue,

771: relatively featureless spectrum.  The other transient is offset from

772: the host galaxy center with a spectrum that is also relatively blue,

773: but has several broad features.  We tentatively identify this spectrum

774: as that of a SN Ib/c roughly eight days post explosion. The

775: correspondence can be judged relative to the overplotted template

776: spectrum \citep{Nugent02}.  However, due to significant host galaxy

777: contamination and relatively low signal to noise, we categorize this

778: identification as tentative.

779: 

780: \subsection{Discussion of spectroscopic results}

781: 

782: It is worth comparing our spectroscopic results with those

783: obtained in similar general SNe and cluster SNe searches.  We discuss

784: three subjects in particular -- the AGN frequency, the relative number

785: of background/foreground SNe to cluster SNe, and the field ratio of SN

786: Ia to CC SN. Throughout this discussion, it must be kept in

787: mind that we are dealing with small number statistics based on one

788: night's worth of spectroscopy.

789: 

790: %Things to discuss -- the relatively high number of AGN.  The ratio of

791: %cluster to background SN (go to small number statistics.  The ratio of

792: %SN Ia to core collapse supernova.

793: 

794: AGN are a perennial contaminant in SNe surveys, some of which

795: preferentially avoid SNe candidates in galaxy cores for this specific

796: reason \citep[e.g.~Section 3 of][]{Matheson05} or have many epochs of

797: imaging with which to identify intermittent AGN flaring.  Given our

798: poor seeing, many of our SNe candidates appear centered on galaxies

799: (including unresolved galaxies); indeed, two of the four SNe

800: spectroscopically discovered were coincident with point sources 

801: in the reference frame.  This suggests that with our seeing

802: conditions, we should not avoid SN candidates for followup which are

803: in the nuclear regions of their host.  It is difficult for us to

804: compare our fraction of AGN to SNe with other surveys since very few

805: publish all of their spectra or have much more involved SNe candidate

806: identification algorithms.

807: 

808: Of the four confirmed SNe Ia, one is in a cluster and three are

809: background.  While these numbers are subject to incompleteness, very

810: small number statistics, and survey field mismatch, it is worth

811: comparing them to the other cluster SNe surveys.  First, the Mount

812: Stromlo Abell Cluster Supernova Search discovered 48 SNe, half of

813: which were hosted by cluster members \citep{Germany04}.  Similarly,

814: the WOOTS cluster SNe survey found that seven out of their twelve

815: confirmed SNe were in the targeted clusters.  While it appears that

816: these other cluster SNe surveys found a slightly higher cluster to

817: field SNe ratio, given our small sample size we are in agreement with

818: this previous work.

819: 

820: Finally, the ratio of field SNe Ia to CC SNe (three to one

821: if the ambiguous spectrum from \S~\ref{sec:unknownspec} is a field SN

822: Ib/c, although our consistency does not change regardless) is

823: consistent with the spectroscopically complete field results of

824: \citet{GalYam07a}, who found that four out of five of their field SN

825: were SN Ia, although this is a difficult comparison to make since our

826: survey is not spectroscopically complete.  As in the flux-limited

827: WOOTS survey, the effective volume probed for the more luminous SNe Ia

828: is large enough that it outweighs the fact that CC SN are

829: more common per unit volume.

830: 

831: From the above, it is clear that future work must focus on

832: intelligently selecting transient targets for spectroscopic followup.

833: For this purpose, we are obtaining multi-band, multi-epoch data for

834: all of our transients as this survey continues in order to more

835: accurately determine a phototype prior to spectroscopic followup

836: \citep[e.g.~][]{Poznanski06}.

837: 

838: 

839: 

840: \section{Is there an overdensity of transients associated with the clusters?}\label{sec:overdense}

841: 

842: While spectroscopic confirmation is the most direct method of

843: confirming an association between transients and the cluster, a

844: statistical excess within the cluster is another method of confirming

845: a general correspondence.  This approach may not, however, enable a

846: full distinction between certain classes of transient. For example,

847: while variable stars will not correlate with the cluster position,

848: both SNe and AGN will.

849: 

850: To examine the statistical properties of the candidate transients, we

851: place all of the clusters on a similar physical scale by taking their

852: published X-ray luminosities, as shown in

853: Table~\ref{table:clustertable}, and the $L_{X}$-$M_{200}$ relation as

854: found by \citet{Reiprich02} to calculate $M_{200}$ for each cluster.

855: After converting $M_{200}$ to our adopted $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, we

856: then calculate $r_{200}$ using $M_{200}$ = $200(4/3 \pi

857: r_{200}^{3}\rho_{crit})$, where $\rho_{crit}$ is evaluated at the

858: cluster redshift.

859: 

860: 

861: We plot the transient projected density in the cluster-centered CCD

862: chip 1 as a function of scaled radius, $R/r_{200}$, in

863: Figure~\ref{fig:radexcess}.  Error bars are based on Poisson

864: statistics.

865: We measure the 'background' or 'field' projected density of transients

866: using the off cluster CCD chip 3 events (Table~\ref{table:vartable3}).

867: This background transient rate, $0.45\pm0.05$ per $A_{200}$ ($A_{200}$

868: is the area enclosed within $R_{200}$), is plotted as a horizontal

869: band in Figure~\ref{fig:radexcess}.  Beyond a scaled radius of 1.25,

870: the cluster transient projected density matches the background.

871: 

872: The number of transients per $A_{200}$ within $R/r_{200}=1$ is

873: $0.78\pm0.08$.  The statistical significance of the excess in this

874: inner region relative to the background rate is 3.7 $\sigma$. In terms

875: of the 107 unique candidates we have (within $r_{200}$), these numbers

876: suggest that we have roughly 45 cluster-associated transients within

877: $R/r_{200} = 1$.

878: 

879: \section{Cluster Transient Populations}\label{sec:whatrexcess}

880: 

881: There are three plausible sources for the central excess of cluster

882: transients: cluster SN Ia, cluster CC SN, and cluster AGN.

883: We now discuss the relative contribution of each of these classes.

884: 

885: \subsection{Cluster SN-Ia}\label{sec:howmanysnia}

886: 

887: To estimate the expected number of cluster SN Ia in our sample we

888: utilize the standard SN Ia rate per unit stellar mass equation as

889: calculated by a survey:

890: %

891: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:sn1arate}

892: R_{SN Ia}{=}\frac{N}{\sum_{i}\Delta t_{i} M_{\odot,i}}

893: \end{equation}

894: 

895: \noindent where $N$ is the number of SN Ia discovered, $\Delta t_{i}$

896: is the visibility time of the $i$-th observation, and $M_{\odot,i}$ is

897: the stellar mass of the cluster being observed in observation $i$.

898: The sum is over all individual observation epochs.  By solving for

899: $N$, given known visibility times, cluster stellar masses, and an

900: adopted SN Ia rate from the literature we can approximately determine

901: the fraction of our excess cluster transients that are SN Ia.

902: 

903: 

904: For the SN Ia rate, we adopt the rate measured by \citet{Sharon07},

905: $0.098$ SNuM, for several reasons.  First, their sample is the most

906: analogous to the current sample -- they measured the SN Ia rate in

907: galaxy clusters at $0.06 < z < 0.19$.  Second, this rate is a

908: relatively large one in comparison to other SN Ia rate measurements of

909: E/S0 galaxy populations (although it is consistent with other measures

910: within the uncertainties) and so provides a conservative upper limit

911: on the the number of SN Ia expected in the current survey.  Note

912: that if we adopted the SN Ia rate in local galaxy clusters found by

913: \citet{Mannucci07b} -- which is consistent within the uncertainties of

914: Sharon et al. -- our final SN Ia number would be reduced by two-thirds.

915: For our purposes of estimating the expected number of SN Ia at the

916: factor of two level, the adopted rate is not crucial.

917: 

918: To calculate the stellar masses of our galaxy clusters, we utilize the

919: $L_{K,200}-M_{200}$ relation found by \citet{Lin04} and our $M_{200}$

920: values calculated from the $L_{X}$-$M_{200}$ relation utilized in

921: \S~\ref{sec:overdense}.  Adopting $M/L_{*,K}=0.78$ \citep[see Figure 3

922: of][]{Lin03}, we assign a stellar mass to each cluster.  This

923: calculation relies on aspects constructed from different cluster

924: samples and techniques and so should be treated cautiously.

925: 

926: Finally, we need a measure of the effective visibility time of an

927: observation, $\Delta t$, or the time during which a SN Ia in the cluster

928: would be visible given the detection limits and transient detection

929: efficiency of that image.

930: We postpone a detailed calculation of the visibility time till future

931: work where we will measure the SN Ia rate in low redshift clusters

932: directly.  For the moment, an accurate estimate of the visibility time

933: will allow us to estimate the number of SN Ia we should have observed

934: thus far.  With this goal in mind, we use a highly simplified model

935: for our detection efficiency based on our calculations in

936: \S~\ref{sec:efficiency},

937: 

938: \begin{equation}\label{eqn:deteff_par}

939: \eta(m)= \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}

940:   0,&m\le18.5 \\

941: 0.8,&18.5 < m < 21.5 \\

942: 0,&m > 21.5 \\

943: \end{array} \right.

944: \end{equation}

945: 

946: \noindent Although this parameterization is only approximate,

947: it has the advantage of being simple to implement.

948: 

949: 

950: The final step is to determine the time that a SN Ia spends between

951: $18.5 < g < 21.5$ as a function of cluster redshift.  We adopt a

952: non-stretched peak absolute B-magnitude for SN Ia of $M_{B}=-19.25$

953: \citep{Sullivan06}.  In this estimate, we neglect the uncertainty in

954: this value ($\sim$0.15 mag) and the correlation between light curve

955: width and peak magnitude \citep[SN Ia with a brighter peak magnitude

956: have a longer rise and fall time around maximum brightness;

957: parameterized by the 'stretch' relation, e.g,][]{perlmutter99}. The

958: latter leads to an upper limit because the SN Ia originating from old

959: stellar populations, such as those in clusters, tend to have a smaller

960: stretch factor than typical \citep{Sullivan06}.  To obtain $g$ band

961: light curves for SN Ia at a given cluster redshift, we begin with the

962: multiepoch SN Ia spectral and photometric templates of

963: \citet{Nugent02}. Using the $B-$band filter transmission curves, we

964: normalize the \citet{Nugent02} spectra to produce the correct $B$

965: magnitude at a given point on the light curve, redshift the spectra to

966: the cluster redshift, and then synthesize the $g$ magnitude using the

967: $g-$band filter transmission curve.  This method is analogous to that

968: presented by \citet{Sharon07}, and we show sample light curves at

969: $z=0.1,0.2$ in Figure~\ref{fig:samplecurve}.  As a check, we also

970: considered host galaxy extinction by taking $E(B-V)=0.2$ \citep[the

971: 1-$\sigma$ dispersion value used by][]{Neill06} and rerunning our

972: analysis.  Including this level of host extinction would cause

973: $\sim$30\% fewer cluster SN Ia to be indentified by our survey, which

974: for the purposes of the following discussion we neglect.  In any case,

975: the inclusion of host galaxy extinction into our calculation would

976: increase the number of unaccounted for cluster transients.

977: 

978: Putting all of these ingredients together, we calculate that $N$ in

979: Eqn~\ref{eqn:sn1arate} is $\sim$10.  Although this number is a coarse

980: estimate for reasons outlined above, the uncertainty in this number is

981: tens of percent rather than a factor of two.  If we say that $\sim$10 of

982: the excess cluster transients are cluster SN Ia, then the other

983: $\sim$30-35 excess events must be either CC SN or cluster

984: AGN. Importantly, the vast majority of the candidates are not SN Ia's.

985: 

986: Because of the dominance of contamination, it is imperative to

987: classify the transients. Spectroscopy is clearly the preferred way to

988: do this and from the results presented so far we can test whether the

989: above estimate is reasonable. If we divide the number of expected

990: cluster SN Ia (ten) by the number of imaging nights presented in this

991: study (thirteen) to conclude that our detection rate is $\sim$0.8

992: cluster SN Ia per imaging night (the true detection rate of cluster SN

993: Ia is slightly higher because of partial night losses due to weather

994: and instrument problems, but this simple calculation serves our

995: purpose). This value is consistent with the one cluster SN Ia

996: spectroscopically confirmed.

997: %DONE--see Initial spectroscopy section?? what fraction of the candidates did we get spectroscopy for?

998: It is difficult at this time to push further on this comparison

999: because the cluster SN Ia (Abell 1246/ID10) was preferentially

1000: observed due to its proximity to the cluster center and clear offset

1001: from the host galaxy.

1002: 

1003: %we have 25 spectra from the one MMT night

1004: 

1005: %50 transients from Table~4

1006: 

1007: A separate consistency check involves comparing the number of expected

1008: SN Ia with the number of IC SN candidates (although it should be noted

1009: that all of our IC SN candidates are at $R>r_{200}$ while the number

1010: of expected cluster SN Ia was calculated for $R<r_{200}$).  Assuming

1011: that all three of the IC SN candidates found in the cluster-centered

1012: chip 1 are actual IC SN Ia, then $\sim$3/13 would be the resulting

1013: hostless to total SN Ia fraction, implying a $\sim$20\% IC stellar

1014: mass fraction.  This number is in broad agreement with direct

1015: measurements of the IC stellar population

1016: \citep{Feldmeier04,Gonzalez05,Zibetti05,Krick07}.  We discuss the IC

1017: SN candidates further in \S~\ref{sec:ICspec}.

1018: %DONE?? add feldmeier?

1019: 

1020: 

1021: %Germany et al. results -- 25 cluster SN.  14 were SNIa-either spectroscopically confirmed or via light curves.  Many others were not classified, but if the light curve did not look like a 1a, it was not followed up.

1022: 

1023: 

1024: 

1025: 

1026: \subsection{Core Collapse SN}

1027: 

1028: Core collapse SN progenitors are massive, necessarily young stars,

1029: which is consistent with the negligibly small CC supernova rate in

1030: E/S0 type galaxies \citep[e.g.,][]{Mannucci05}.  Therefore one might

1031: not expect CC SN to contribute significantly to our survey.  In

1032: general, CC SN are fainter than their SN Ia counterparts, leading to

1033: shorter visibility times.  In detail this is not always the case

1034: since individual CC SNe can be quite bright or have a very long

1035: plateau phase \citep{Hamuy03}, which would prolong the visibility

1036: time.  However, it so happens that, as we describe below, the CC SN

1037: rate in our survey is comparable to that of Ia's.

1038: 

1039: We begin the exploration of this class by examining results from

1040: previous surveys. The Mount Stromlo Abell cluster supernova survey

1041: \citep{Germany04,Reiss98}, which ran for 3.5 years, searched for SN in

1042: galaxy clusters at a redshift of $0.04 < z < 0.2$.  Of the 25 cluster

1043: SN discovered, 14 were SN Ia (identified spectroscopically or by their

1044: light curve), while the remaining 11 are likely to be CC events

1045: (because the Mount Stromlo Abell cluster supernova survey obtained

1046: light curves for all their candidate SN, it is not likely that these

1047: events were AGN or variable stars).

1048: %DONE?? the 11 were defintely SN though? or could they be AGN or variable stars?

1049: Alternatively, taking the 136 SNe sample of \citet{Cappellaro99}, and

1050: selecting the cluster SNe, \citet{Mannucci07b} found 44 cluster SNe, 16

1051: of which are CC.  These two results suggest that somewhere in the

1052: neighborhood of 40\% of the detected cluster SNe may be CC.

1053: 

1054: Empirically, no cluster SNe search has uncovered more CC SNe than

1055: SNe Ia \citep{Germany04,GalYam07a,Mannucci07b}.  As such, we

1056: conservatively suggest that even if $\sim$10 of our excess cluster

1057: transients are due to CC SN, we still have an unexplained population

1058: of $\sim$20-25 cluster transients.

1059: %??THE IC candidate is not the Ib/c spectrum. any comments on the one Ib/c SNe spectrum?  also, it is one of the IC

1060: %candidates and you intimate in 5.1 that CC SNe might be found in tidal tails....

1061: 

1062: \subsection{Cluster AGN}

1063: 

1064: Active galactic nuclei and quasars exhibit optical variability on a

1065: variety of time scales, from days to years

1066: \citep{Webb00,Totani05,Klesman07}, with somewhere between 30-50\% of

1067: all AGN displaying variability during the course of these surveys.

1068: Indeed, many of the transients found in this survey with known

1069: counterparts are QSOs (see \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}).  We now test

1070: whether the remaining detected central transients can be AGN.

1071: 

1072: Multiwavelength studies of clusters find that roughly 5\% of cluster

1073: members with $M_{R} < -20$ are AGN \citep{Martini07}.  These objects

1074: are more centrally concentrated than cluster galaxies of the same

1075: luminosity, although \citet{Martini07} only probe the area covered by

1076: the ACIS-I chips on board {\it Chandra}, which is always $R< r_{200}$

1077: for their sample.

1078: %DONE?? a fraction could be 1 - is there a more specific number we can cite

1079: Adopting a 5\% AGN fraction and applying the \citet{Popesso07}

1080: $N_{200}$ vs $M_{200}$ scaling relation (for $M_{r} < -20$) we

1081: calculate that our sample contains $\sim$200 cluster AGN.  Of these,

1082: $\sim30-50$\% are variable implying that as many as 60 to 100 cluster

1083: AGN could have been detected.

1084: 

1085: There are various reasons why this number exceeds the actual number we

1086: are trying to account for, $\sim 20-25$.  First, our temporal coverage

1087: is sparse and many of our clusters only have two imaging epochs so

1088: far.  As the survey continues we expect to detect more of the cluster

1089: AGN population.

1090: Also, our estimate for the number of cluster AGNs relies heavily on

1091: galaxy cluster scaling relations based on different samples and

1092: techniques, which can plausibly introduce an error of a factor of

1093: $\sim$2.  Although this doesn't introduce a bias in one direction, it

1094: does result in making the difference between the prediction and

1095: observation less statistically significant.  We conclude that it is

1096: plausible that the remainder of the statistical transient excess in

1097: clusters is due to AGN.  Indeed, if we have over-estimated the

1098: number of cluster SNIa and CC SNe in the previous two sections (we

1099: have tried to get them correct at the factor of $\sim$2 level), it is

1100: also plausible that cluster AGN can make up the difference and account

1101: for the cluster transient excess.

1102: 

1103: 

1104: 

1105: \section{The Intracluster Supernovae Candidates}\label{sec:ICspec}

1106: 

1107: As has been discussed, the number of IC SN candidates in the

1108: cluster-centered chip 1 is in rough agreement with the expected

1109: $\sim$10 cluster SN Ia in the survey thus far (see

1110: \S~\ref{sec:iccands} and \ref{sec:howmanysnia}).  Even if the

1111: simplest explanation for the three IC SN candidates (all at

1112: $R>r_{200}$) is that they are background events whose host was not

1113: detectable in our stacked images, it is interesting for the sake of

1114: argument to explore the implications of the three IC SN

1115: candidates being associated with the clusters.  Note that the

1116: following discussion is not significantly altered if one takes the

1117: 'background' rate of hostless events to be that measured by chip 3,

1118: from which we would conclude that only two out of three of our IC SN

1119: candidates are actually associated with the cluster.

1120: 

1121: A comparison between our IC SN candidates and ICL studies in the

1122: literature points to an untapped regime in IC studies.  First the

1123: three IC SN candidates all lie at $R>r_{200}$ (or $R>1500$ kpc) from

1124: the BCG.  This is an unexplored radial regime among observational ICL

1125: studies, given that the study with the highest radial measurement is

1126: that of \citet{Zibetti05} who stacked 683 SDSS clusters and was able

1127: to probe the average ICL out to $\sim$900 kpc.  A simple reference

1128: point from \citet{Gonzalez07} can be used to show how unusual three IC

1129: SN at $R>r_{200}$ really is.  From their sample of 24 clusters with

1130: direct low surface brightness measurements of the ICL,

1131: \citet{Gonzalez07} find that 80\% of the BCG+ICL light (of which the

1132: ICL dominates) is located within 300 kpc of the cluster center,

1133: although extrapolation is necessary to extend this result out to

1134: $R>r_{200}$.  Using this as a baseline, finding three IC SN at

1135: $R>r_{200}$ would imply that we would expect at least 12 IC SN within

1136: the central 300 kpc of our clusters!  The fact that none were found

1137: suggests that either the three IC SN are in fact not associated with

1138: the cluster, there is an excess of heretofore undetected ICL beyond

1139: $r_{200}$, or that the stellar population in the cluster outskirts is

1140: more conducive to SN events.  The answer could plausibly be a

1141: combination of the second and third possibilities just mentioned.  For

1142: instance, infalling groups at the cluster outskirts would presumably

1143: have their own ICL (unaccounted for in studies at smaller radii), and

1144: it may be IC SN in these infalling groups that we are detecting.  If

1145: these IC stars (whether or not they are associated with infalling

1146: groups) are more recently stripped than those in the central regions

1147: of the cluster (or if a sprinkle of star formation has been induced in

1148: the process of the stars becoming unbound), then these outskirt IC SN

1149: could be either CC events (which is compatible with their

1150: single epoch magnitude) or prompt SN Ia seen to be associated with

1151: star forming regions.  In any case, the possibility of IC SN

1152: in the outskirts of clusters is extremely intriguing and warrants a

1153: more coordinated effort.  To investigate this potential large cluster

1154: radius IC SN population further requires continued cluster SN searches

1155: utilizing wide-field imagers capable of imaging out to the cluster

1156: outskirts.

1157: 

1158: It should also be noted that given that this initial phase of the

1159: survey expected to find $\sim$10 cluster SN, some IC SN candidates

1160: within $r_{200}$ would be expected given that the ICL fraction

1161: typically seen in the literature is $\sim$20\%.  The fact that we

1162: found no candidates within $r_{200}$ is surprising, and a larger data

1163: set is needed to investigate if the true cluster SN Ia rate is lower

1164: than expected from previous cluster studies.  For instance, if we take

1165: the early galaxy type SN Ia rate measurement from \citet{Mannucci05}

1166: (with a SN Ia rate of 0.038 SNuM) as our cluster SN Ia rate rather

1167: than of \citet{Sharon07}, then we would have expected only $\sim$4

1168: cluster SN Ia in the survey thus far and plausibly no IC SN Ia.

1169: Further study is needed to resolve this situation.

1170: 

1171: 

1172: %80\% of the BCG+ICL light is contained within 300 kpc.  \citep{Gonzalez07}

1173: %\citep{Krick07}

1174: %\citep{Zibbeti05} goes out to $\sim$900 kpc

1175: 

1176: \section{Summary and Future Work}\label{sec:future}

1177: 

1178: We have presented initial results from our program to search for and

1179: identify SNe Ia in a sample of X-ray selected clusters at $0.1<z<0.2$.

1180: Of particular interest are hostless SN whose progenitors are IC stars.

1181: This survey will measure the SN Ia rate in galaxy clusters and the

1182: mean ICL fraction by noting the relative number of hosted to hostless

1183: events.  Ultimately, we aim to constrain the metal enrichment of

1184: the ICM and the role that IC SNe play.

1185: 

1186: The data presented in this paper include our intitial

1187: photometry-only campaign followed by our first spectroscopic results.

1188: We use the 30 $\times$ 30 arcminute field of view of Chip 1 on the

1189: 90Prime imager as our cluster-centered field, which allows us to probe

1190: beyond $r_{200}$ in all of our clusters.  We also use one of the

1191: off-cluster CCDs as a probe of the background rate of transients.

1192: 

1193: The initial results presented in the paper include -- 

1194: 

1195: \begin{enumerate} 

1196: 

1197: \item Using our automated pipeline -- which reduces, difference

1198: images, and posts candidate transients to the web for human inspection

1199: -- we have identified 218 unique transient sources in the

1200: cluster-centered Chip 1 (107 of these were within $r_{200}$) and 102

1201: on the off-cluster Chip 3.

1202: 

1203: \item Of the transient sources we have identified, four were

1204: apparently hostless events (three of the four were in the

1205: cluster-centered chip 1).  Continued imaging of these fields will put

1206: tighter constraints on possible faint hosts, while our current limits

1207: reach a magnitude limit of at least $g\sim$25 (corresponding to a

1208: galaxy of $M_g > -14.3$ in all cases).  Interestingly, the three IC

1209: candidates on the cluster-centered chip were all at $R > r_{200}$,

1210: indicating that they are either not genuine cluster events or that

1211: some mechanism must be invoked to cause an excess of IC SN in the

1212: cluster outskirts.  In any case, further study is needed.

1213: 

1214: %?? can we argue that it is unlikely that these are in galaxies then - 

1215: % you say in 5.1 that 0.2% of the light comes from such galaxies so it 

1216: % is unlikely that 3 or 11 would be in such galaxies.

1217: 

1218: \item Initial spectroscopic results from one night of MMT Blue Channel

1219: Spectrograph data shows that we can identify and followup cluster SN

1220: Ia and other interesting variables.  Of the four confirmed SNe Ia, one

1221: is in a cluster. Additionally, we tentatively identify a SNe Ib/c that

1222: could be in a cluster. Spectroscopic followup will become a major

1223: focus as the survey continues.

1224: 

1225: \item Plotting the number of transients as a function of a scaled

1226: radius, $R/r_{200}$, reveals an excess of transients within $1.25

1227: r_{200}$ in our clusters.  Of the $\sim$40-50 excess transients within

1228: $r_{200}$, we conservatively estimate that $\sim$10 of these are

1229: cluster SN Ia, $\sim$10 are CC SN of some form, and the rest are

1230: cluster AGN.

1231: 

1232: \end{enumerate}

1233: 

1234: This survey is in its beginning stages and there are several avenues

1235: of future research.  The main focus will continue to be on finding,

1236: and spectroscopically identifying, hostless and hosted cluster SN Ia.

1237: Inevitably, this will allow for other time domain and cluster science.

1238: For instance, our variability survey offers an opportunity to study

1239: cluster AGN out to a much larger radius than is feasible with most

1240: multi-object spectrographs and X-ray instrumentation

1241: \cite[e.g.,][]{Martini07}.  Using the full data set (all four CCDs) to

1242: search for all transients on long, $\sim$monthly, time scales along

1243: with fast optical transients (objects that vary on $\sim$1000 sec time

1244: scales) and faint eclipsing systems are among our future plans.

1245: 

1246: We are in the process of obtaining deep auxiliary r-band images of all

1247: of our cluster fields.  The resulting red seqence identification will

1248: confidently identify old, early-type galaxies.  Any transients

1249: associated with these galaxies are highly likely to be SN Ia, since

1250: CC SN rarely occur in old stellar populations.  This will

1251: also be a unique, $0.1 < z < 0.2$ data set for studying the cluster

1252: red sequence and the luminous red galaxy halo occupation distribution.

1253: %?? need a better finish....

1254: 

1255: Measuring the SN rate in low redshift galaxy clusters (both from

1256: hosted and hostless systems) will provide a snapshot of the processes

1257: that contribute to the metal enrichment of the ICM.  In combination

1258: with ongoing cluster SN research at higher redshift, we aim to

1259: constrain the SN Ia progenitor associated with old stellar

1260: populations, and ultimately understand the metal enrichment history of

1261: the ICM.

1262: 

1263: 

1264: \acknowledgments

1265: 

1266: We would like to acknowledge the constructive comments of Avishay

1267: Gal-Yam.  We thank Christy Tremonti for help in identifying some of

1268: the spectra presented in this work and Tom Matheson for advice on the

1269: survey and for help typing SNe.  DJS would also like to thank Richard

1270: Cool and Ed Olszewski for advice on using 90Prime and reducing the

1271: data.  DJS acknowledges support provided by NASA through Chandra

1272: Postdoctoral Fellowship grant number PF5-60041.  DZ acknowledges that

1273: this research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation

1274: under Grant No. PHY99-07949 during his visit to KITP, a Guggenheim

1275: fellowship, generous support from the NYU Physics department and

1276: Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics during his sabbatical there,

1277: NASA LTSA grant NNG05GE82G, and NSF grant AST-0307482.  This research

1278: has made use of the X-Rays Clusters Database (BAX) which is operated

1279: by the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Tarbes-Toulouse (LATT), under

1280: contract with the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES).  This

1281: research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)

1282: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California

1283: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics

1284: and Space Administration.

1285: 

1286: 

1287: \bibliographystyle{apj}

1288: \bibliography{apj-jour,mybib}

1289: 

1290: \clearpage

1291: 

1292: \begin{inlinefigure}

1293: \begin{center}

1294: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f1.eps}}

1295: \end{center}

1296: \figcaption{Histogram of the distribution of stellar FWHM during

1297: our 90Prime imaging campaign. \label{fig:psf}}

1298: \end{inlinefigure}

1299: 

1300: \clearpage

1301: 

1302: 

1303: \begin{inlinefigure}

1304: \begin{center}

1305: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}

1306: \end{center}

1307: \figcaption{Histogram of the distribution of image zeropoints

1308: with respect to the median of the distribution.\label{fig:zpthist}}

1309: \end{inlinefigure}

1310: 

1311: \clearpage

1312: 

1313: \begin{inlinefigure}

1314: \begin{center}

1315: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f3.eps}}

1316: \end{center}

1317: \figcaption{Transient point source detection efficiency as a function

1318: of input magnitude for three values of the seeing.  The bright end

1319: cutoff in efficiency is due to our strict rejection of bright

1320: candidates. We are better able to detect

1321: bright transients during poorer seeing conditions simply because the

1322: transients are further from saturation.  The detection

1323: efficiency has been rescaled to account for the area of the chip that

1324: was masked for any reason.  \label{fig:totsceff}}

1325: \end{inlinefigure}

1326: 

1327: \clearpage

1328: 

1329: \begin{inlinefigure}

1330: \begin{center}

1331: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f4.eps}}

1332: \end{center}

1333: \figcaption{Transient point source detection efficiency as a function

1334: of zeropoint deviation from the median.

1335: To achieve high detection

1336: efficiency over the $g\sim$19-21.5 region necessary for this survey,

1337: clear conditions are necessary.  The detection efficiency has been

1338: rescaled to account for the area of the chip that was masked for any

1339: reason.  \label{fig:totzptsceff}}

1340: \end{inlinefigure}

1341: 

1342: \clearpage

1343: 

1344: \begin{inlinefigure}

1345: \begin{center}

1346: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f5.eps}}

1347:  \end{center}

1348: \figcaption{The difference between the magnitude of the artificial transient

1349: placed into an image versus the recovered magnitude 

1350: as a function of input magnitude.  Shown are the

1351: results from a typical run as discussed in

1352: \S~\ref{sec:efficiency}.\label{fig:magdiff}}

1353: \end{inlinefigure}

1354: 

1355: \clearpage

1356: 

1357: \begin{inlinefigure}

1358: \begin{center}

1359: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f6.eps}}

1360: \end{center}

1361: \figcaption{Histogram showing the magnitude distribution of identified

1362: transients. The dashed histogram is plotted after the removal of

1363: transients that were detected as variables in multiple observing

1364: epochs.  The dotted histogram is the transient magnitude distribution

1365: after removal of all sources known to not be at the cluster redshift.

1366: \label{fig:maghist}}

1367: \end{inlinefigure}

1368: 

1369: \clearpage

1370: 

1371: \begin{figure*}

1372: \begin{center}

1373: 

1374: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f7.eps}}

1375: 

1376: \caption{Rest wavelength spectra of SNe Ia.  Overplotted are SNe Ia

1377: template spectra from Peter Nugent \citep{Nugent02}.

1378: \label{fig:sn1a}}

1379: \end{center}

1380: \end{figure*}

1381: 

1382: \clearpage

1383: 

1384: \begin{figure*}

1385: \begin{center}

1386: 

1387: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f8.eps}}

1388: 

1389: \caption{Spectra of six low redshift ($z<0.3$) galaxies.  For a

1390: discussion, see \S~\ref{sec:lowzspecs}.

1391: \label{fig:speclozgals}}

1392: \end{center}

1393: \end{figure*}

1394: 

1395: \clearpage

1396: 

1397: \begin{figure*}

1398: \begin{center}

1399: 

1400: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f9.eps}}

1401: 

1402: \caption{Spectra of five high redshift QSOs.  The location of

1403: the A-band atmospheric absorption feature is indicated with a telluric

1404: symbol.  No attempt was made to remove this feature.

1405: \label{fig:hizagn}}

1406: \end{center}

1407: \end{figure*}

1408: 

1409: \clearpage

1410: 

1411: \begin{figure*}

1412: \begin{center}

1413: 

1414: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f10.eps}}

1415: 

1416: \caption{Spectra of five intermediate redshift QSOs.  The location of

1417: the A-band atmospheric absorption feature is indicated with a telluric

1418: symbol.  No attempt was made to remove this feature.

1419: \label{fig:lozagn}}

1420: \end{center}

1421: \end{figure*}

1422: 

1423: \clearpage

1424: 

1425: \begin{figure*}

1426: \begin{center}

1427: 

1428: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f11.eps}}

1429: 

1430: \caption{Spectra of five variable stars.  The location of the A-band

1431: atmospheric absorption feature is indicated with a telluric symbol.

1432: No attempt was made to remove this feature.

1433: \label{fig:specstars}}

1434: \end{center}

1435: \end{figure*}

1436: 

1437: \clearpage

1438: 

1439: \begin{figure*}

1440: \begin{center}

1441: 

1442: \mbox{\epsfysize=18.0cm \epsfbox{f12.eps}}

1443: 

1444: \caption{Spectra of two unknown objects, although we suspect that the

1445: top spectrum may be a SNI b/c roughly eight days past explosion at a

1446: redshift of $z=0.1$, with some obvious galaxy contamination.  We

1447: overplot a template SN spectrum with these characteristics using the

1448: template of \citet{Nugent02}.  Even though Abell 516/ID10 was very

1449: faint at discovery, we devoted some spectroscopic resources to it

1450: since it was an apparent IC event.  The location of the

1451: A-band atmospheric absorption feature is indicated with a telluric

1452: symbol.  No attempt was made to remove this feature.

1453: \label{fig:unknown}}

1454: \end{center}

1455: \end{figure*}

1456: 

1457: \clearpage

1458: 

1459: \begin{inlinefigure}

1460: \begin{center}

1461: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f13.eps}}

1462: \end{center}

1463: \figcaption{Radial profile of the variable sources as a function of

1464: clustercentric radius, scaled by $r_{200}$.  All values have been

1465: renormalized to account for the different areas probed by the radial

1466: bins (including masked regions).  All of the clusters have been probed

1467: out to $r_{200}$.  The 'background' transient rate is represented by

1468: the horizontal bar and was measured from chip 3.  

1469: \label{fig:radexcess}}

1470: \end{inlinefigure}

1471: 

1472: \clearpage

1473: 

1474: \begin{inlinefigure}

1475: \begin{center}

1476: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{f14.eps}}

1477:  \end{center}

1478: \figcaption{Examples of template $g$ band SN Ia light curves at the

1479: redshift edges of our cluster sample ($0.1 < z <

1480: 0.2$).\label{fig:samplecurve}}

1481: \end{inlinefigure}

1482: 

1483: \clearpage

1484: 

1485: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}

1486: \tabletypesize{\small}

1487: \tablecolumns{9}

1488: \tablecaption{List of Cluster Fields \label{table:clustertable}}

1489: \tablehead{

1490: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{$z_{clus}$} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{$L_{X}$} & \colhead{Epoch 1} & \colhead{Epoch 2} & \colhead{Epoch 3} & \colhead{Epoch 4}\\

1491: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & \colhead{[$10^{44} {\rm ergs\  s}^{-1}]$} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}}

1492: \startdata

1493: A2703&0.114&00:05:30.6&+16:5:11.9&2.72&11/18/06\tablenotemark{$\star$}&12/15/06&&\\

1494: A136&0.157&01:04:14.4&+25:05:03.9&1.32&11/17/06\tablenotemark{$\star$}&12/15/06&&\\

1495: A351&0.105&02:25:42.3&-08:40:21.8&0.21&11/18/06\tablenotemark{$\star$}&12/15/06&&\\

1496: Z0256&0.194&02:59:32.6&+00:13:56.1&0.85&11/17/06\tablenotemark{$\star$}&12/15/06&&\\

1497: A516&0.141&04:50:24.9&-08:49:24.6&0.17&11/18/06\tablenotemark{$\star$}&12/15/06&&\\

1498: A565&0.105&07:06:54.0&+71:40:56.0&1.36&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/22/06&\\

1499: A572&0.104&07:14:18.7&+54:41:03.1&1.38&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/24/06&\\

1500: A580&0.118&07:25:57.2&+41:23:07.7&1.90&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1501: RXJ0759&0.104&07:59:41.1&+54:00:25.7&1.97&01/28/06&04/23/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&12/15/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&\\

1502: RXJ0804&0.187&08:04:21.4&+46:47:12.9&2.40&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&12/15/06\\

1503: A667&0.145&08:28:06.4&+44:46:03.6&4.45&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1504: A750&0.163&09:09:12.7&+10:58:29.3&8.74&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1505: A853&0.165&09:42:15.0&+15:22:53.3&4.06&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/24/06&\\

1506: A961&0.124&10:16:23.2&+33:38:19.8&3.12&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1507: A1201&0.169&11:12:54.6&+13:26:09.8&6.05&01/28/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&04/23/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&&\\

1508: A1413&0.143&11:55:18.2&+23:24:12.4&10.83&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1509: A1689&0.183&13:11:29.9&-01:20:33.3&20.95&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&06/19/06\\

1510: A1361&0.117&11:43:39.7&+46:21:20.4&4.95&01/28/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1511: RXJ0741&0.158&07:41:26.7&+25:58:30.6&1.00&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/24/06&\\

1512: A620&0.135&08:05:43.2&+45:41:02.3&1.47&01/29/06&02/25/06&12/15/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&\\

1513: A665&0.182&08:30:57.4&+65:50:28.3&15.17&01/29/06&02/25/06&&\\

1514: A743&0.133&09:06:44.9&+10:19:03.6&2.64&04/24/06&12/15/06&&\\

1515: RXJ0958&0.147&09:58:12.5&+23:46:44.3&1.96&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/24/06&\\

1516: RXJ1000&0.153&10:00:31.0&+44:08:44.6&2.75&02/25/06&04/24/06&&\\

1517: A868&0.153&09:45:26.5&-08:39:06.7&4.60&01/29/06&02/25/06&&\\

1518: A901&0.170&09:55:57.4&-09:59:01.8&10.73&01/29/06&02/25/06&&\\

1519: A1045&0.138&10:35:0.4&+30:41:40.3&3.53&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/24/06&\\

1520: A1068&0.138&10:40:44.8&+39:57:10.1&5.94&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/24/06&12/15/06\\

1521: A990&0.144&10:23:39.9&+49:08:40.1&6.71&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/25/06&\\

1522: A1264&0.127&11:27:01.8&+17:07:47.7&2.07&01/29/06&02/25/06&&\\

1523: A1246&0.190&11:23:58.8&+21:28:49.0&6.31&01/29/06&02/24/06&12/15/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&\\

1524: A1553&0.165&12:30:48.9&+10:32:48.4&7.19&01/29/06&02/24/06&04/23/06&\\

1525: A1204&0.171&11:13:20.5&+17:35:41.0&6.50&01/29/06&02/25/06&04/24/06&\\

1526: Z1432&0.189&07:51:25.0&+17:30:50.4&5.18&01/30/06&04/25/06&&\\

1527: A646&0.129&08:22:09.3&+47:05:49.3&4.94&01/30/06&02/26/06&12/15/06&\\

1528: RXJ0821&0.110&08:21:02.0&+07:51:48.8&1.39&01/30/06&02/26/06&12/15/06&\\

1529: Z1883&0.194&08:42:56.0&+29:27:26.9&6.21&01/30/06&02/26/06&&\\

1530: A655&0.127&08:25:28.8&+47:08:04.1&4.90&01/30/06&02/26/06&&\\

1531: RXJ0819&0.119&08:19:25.7&+63:37:26.1&2.80&01/30/06&02/26/06&&\\

1532: A795&0.136&09:24:05.4&14:10:24.2&5.70&01/30/06&02/26/06&&\\

1533: A923&0.116&10:06:38.9&+25:54:44.5&2.05&01/30/06&02/26/06&&\\

1534: A1033&0.126&10:31:44.3&+35:02:28.3&5.12&01/30/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&04/25/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&12/15/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}&\\

1535: A1132&0.136&10:58:23.7&+56:47:42.7&6.76&01/30/06&04/25/06&&\\

1536: A1111&0.165&10:50:46.7&-02:21:24.1&4.12&01/30/06&02/25/06&&\\

1537: Z3179&0.143&10:25:58.1&+12:41:10.6&4.71&01/30/06&04/25/06&&\\

1538: RXJ1156&0.142&11:56:55.8&+24:15:37.4&3.10&01/30/06&04/25/06&&\\

1539: A1235&0.104&11:22:16.0&+19:35:49.3&1.70&01/30/06&02/25/06&04/25/06&12/15/06\tablenotemark{$\dagger$}\\

1540: A1366&0.116&11:44:36.9&+67:24:23.5&3.91&01/30/06&02/25/06&04/25/06&\\

1541: A1902&0.160&14:21:40.5&+37:17:32.6&4.55&04/23/06&06/19/06&&\\

1542: A1677&0.183&13:05:50.8&+30:54:13.7&5.37&04/24/06&06/19/06&&\\

1543: A1914&0.171&14:25:56.7&+37:48:59.0&17.30&04/24/06&06/19/06&&\\

1544: A1930&0.131&14:32:38.0&+31:38:50.5&3.99&04/24/06&06/19/06&&\\

1545: A2259&0.164&17:20:09.9&+27:40:08.9&5.95&04/25/06&06/19/06&&\\

1546: A2218&0.176&16:35:49.6&+66:12:44.8&9.55&04/25/06&06/19/06&&\\

1547: RXJ1750&0.171&17:50:17.0&+35:04:59.7&5.34&04/25/06&06/19/06&&\\

1548: \enddata

1549: \tablenotetext{$\star$}{Denotes dates when 90Prime readout noise was anomalously high.  These epochs should not be considered as part of the main sample, but are included for those clusters for which they are the only other imaging epoch.}

1550: \tablenotetext{$\dagger$}{Chip 3 data for this epoch was not used either due to the presence of a vary bright field star in the field, poor focus, or an automated data reduction error}

1551: \end{deluxetable}

1552: 

1553: \clearpage

1554: 

1555: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}

1556: \tablecolumns{8}

1557: \tablecaption{Summary of Intracluster SNe Candidates\label{table:ICsumm}}

1558: \tablehead{

1559: \colhead{Cluster} &

1560: \colhead{$\alpha$} & 

1561: \colhead{$\delta$} &

1562: \colhead{$g$} & 

1563: \colhead{$R_{BCG}$} &

1564: \colhead{$R_{BCG}/r_{200}$} & 

1565: \colhead{$m_{lim,g}$} &

1566: \colhead{$M_{lim,g}$} \\

1567: & 

1568: \colhead{(J2000.0)} & 

1569: \colhead{(J2000.0)} & 

1570: \colhead{[mag]} & 

1571: \colhead{[kpc]} &

1572: \colhead{}&

1573: \colhead{}&

1574: \colhead{}

1575: }

1576: \startdata

1577: A516   & 04:49:42.5 & $-$08:51:42.2 & 23.83 $\pm$ 0.90 & 1595 & 2.0 & 25.1 & $-$14.0\\ 

1578: A1201 & 11:13:12.6 & +13:12:10.3 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2537 & 1.4 & 25.3 & $-$14.3\\

1579: A1413 & 11:56:9.63 & +23:32:29.4 & 22.12 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2172 & 1.0 & 26.1 & $-$13.1\\ 

1580: A2259 & 17:23:33.4 & +27:49:31.6 & 22.54 $\pm$ 0.08 & 7764 & 4.2 & 25.3 & $-$14.2\\ 

1581: \enddata

1582: \end{deluxetable}

1583: 

1584: \clearpage

1585: 

1586: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccl}

1587: %\rotate

1588: \tablecolumns{7}

1589: \tablecaption{List of Identified Variables -- Cluster Centered Chip 1\label{table:vartable}}

1590: \tablehead{

1591: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{$g$} & \colhead{Dist from BCG} &\colhead{Notes}\\

1592: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & \colhead{J2000.0} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{kpc}& \colhead{}}

1593: \startdata

1594: A136 & 2006-12-16 02:43:01 & 1:3:19.9 & 25:4:28.4 & 24.51 $\pm$ 0.60 & 2012 & z=0.172 galaxy; BCS \\ 

1595: A136 & 2006-12-16 02:43:01 & 1:4:2.14 & 25:7:22.8 & 22.91 $\pm$ 0.12 & 589 &  \\ 

1596: A136 & 2006-12-16 02:43:01 & 1:3:55.5 & 24:50:20.5 & 21.75 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2498 & z=0.246 galaxy; BCS \\ 

1597: A351 & 2006-12-16 03:57:01 & 2:26:21.3 & -8:54:19.8 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.17 & 1961 & SN 2006ub; SNIa; BCS \\ 

1598: A351 & 2006-12-16 03:57:01 & 2:25:56.9 & -8:45:38.3 & 21.71 $\pm$ 0.07 & 740 & SN 2006ua; SNIa; BCS \\ 

1599: Z0256 & 2006-12-16 05:11:56 & 2:59:35.2 & 0:18:38.6 & 22.87 $\pm$ 0.14 & 919 &  \\ 

1600: Z0256 & 2006-12-16 05:11:56 & 2:59:7.80 & 0:22:33.9 & 22.81 $\pm$ 0.14 & 2054 & z=0.199 CG; BCS \\ 

1601: Z0256 & 2006-12-16 05:11:56 & 3:0:18.8 & 0:19:11.6 & 23.59 $\pm$ 0.31 & 2455 &  \\ 

1602: Z0256 & 2006-12-16 05:11:56 & 3:0:15.3 & 0:13:28.4 & 22.57 $\pm$ 0.14 & 2069 &  \\ 

1603: A516 & 2006-12-16 04:34:40 & 4:49:42.5 & -8:51:42.2 & 23.83 $\pm$ 0.90 & 1595 & ?; BCS; IC Cand \\ 

1604: A516 & 2006-12-16 04:34:40 & 4:50:52.5 & -8:45:3.96 & 22.09 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1206 & Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1605: A516 & 2006-12-16 04:34:40 & 4:50:29.1 & -8:50:2.11 & 22.93 $\pm$ 0.19 & 183 & Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1606: A743 & 2006-04-25 05:12:57 & 9:7:25.7 & 10:24:30.9 & 21.54 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1620 &  \\ 

1607: A743 & 2006-12-16 08:53:47 & 9:6:55.2 & 10:14:13.6 & 22.00 $\pm$ 0.09 & 775 & z=0.267 Galaxy; BCS \\ 

1608: A743 & 2006-12-16 08:53:47 & 9:6:32.4 & 10:9:29.1 & 21.32 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1425 & SN 2006ud; SNIa; BCS \\ 

1609: A743 & 2006-12-16 08:53:47 & 9:7:12.5 & 10:23:34.9 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.12 & 1158 &  \\ 

1610: A565 & 2006-01-28 02:42:49 & 7:7:26.8 & 71:44:42.2 & 22.14 $\pm$ 0.09 & 528 &  \\ 

1611: A565 & 2006-02-24 02:13:37 & 7:9:33.9 & 71:34:49.1 & 21.52 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1622 &  \\ 

1612: A565 & 2006-04-23 03:04:32 & 7:10:10.5 & 71:50:20.4 & 21.56 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2077 &  \\ 

1613: A565 & 2006-04-23 03:04:32 & 7:7:49.4 & 71:52:31.6 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1429 &  \\ 

1614: A572 & 2006-02-24 02:48:27 & 7:15:26.0 & 54:37:29.0 & 21.80 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1188 &  \\ 

1615: A572 & 2006-02-24 02:48:27 & 7:14:11.5 & 54:26:52.5 & 23.12 $\pm$ 0.15 & 1628 &  \\ 

1616: A572 & 2006-02-24 02:48:27 & 7:13:8.08 & 54:26:39.5 & 22.93 $\pm$ 0.14 & 2025 &  \\ 

1617: A572 & 2006-02-24 02:48:27 & 7:12:56.3 & 54:28:31.2 & 21.03 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1984 &  \\ 

1618: A572 & 2006-02-24 02:48:27 & 7:12:38.0 & 54:41:0.311 & 20.90 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1666 &  \\ 

1619: A572 & 2006-04-25 03:15:23 & 7:13:46.5 & 54:38:22.6 & 22.15 $\pm$ 0.06 & 615 &  \\ 

1620: A572 & 2006-04-25 03:15:23 & 7:13:25.1 & 54:42:15.0 & 23.23 $\pm$ 0.18 & 897 &  \\ 

1621: A580 & 2006-02-24 03:49:52 & 7:26:15.1 & 41:37:34.2 & 21.71 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1897 & RD  \\ 

1622: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:25:5.34 & 41:32:48.4 & 22.15 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1753 &  \\ 

1623: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:26:22.4 & 41:24:43.2 & 21.87 $\pm$ 0.06 & 640 & z=1.803 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1624: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:26:20.5 & 41:14:48.2 & 20.40 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1204 &  \\ 

1625: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:26:15.1 & 41:37:34.2 & 20.76 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1897 & RD  \\ 

1626: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:26:12.5 & 41:22:34.1 & 22.20 $\pm$ 0.08 & 375 & CG; SDSS \\ 

1627: RXJ0759 & 2006-01-28 05:07:38 & 8:0:37.4 & 53:47:50.4 & 22.01 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1728 &  \\ 

1628: RXJ0759 & 2006-01-28 05:07:38 & 7:59:17.3 & 54:2:32.0 & 22.19 $\pm$ 0.07 & 466 &  \\ 

1629: RXJ0759 & 2006-01-28 05:07:38 & 7:58:34.4 & 54:10:30.8 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1607 &  \\ 

1630: RXJ0759 & 2006-04-24 03:52:36 & 7:59:40.3 & 53:55:49.2 & 22.64 $\pm$ 0.10 & 528 &  \\ 

1631: RXJ0759 & 2006-04-24 03:52:36 & 7:58:32.1 & 54:6:42.1 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1362 & RD  \\ 

1632: RXJ0759 & 2006-12-16 09:36:16 & 8:0:46.0 & 53:47:15.5 & 22.59 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1866 &  \\ 

1633: RXJ0759 & 2006-12-16 09:36:16 & 7:59:52.3 & 53:47:44.5 & 21.27 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1466 &  \\ 

1634: RXJ0759 & 2006-12-16 09:36:16 & 7:59:13.0 & 54:4:42.2 & 22.20 $\pm$ 0.04 & 680 & z=2.93 QSO; BCS \\ 

1635: RXJ0759 & 2006-12-16 09:36:16 & 7:58:45.9 & 54:1:17.4 & 22.09 $\pm$ 0.04 & 934 & SN 2006uc; SNIa; BCS \\ 

1636: RXJ0759 & 2006-12-16 09:36:16 & 7:58:32.1 & 54:6:42.9 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1363 & RD  \\ 

1637: RXJ0804 & 2006-01-28 06:15:30 & 8:5:10.2 & 46:43:32.8 & 21.98 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1716 &  \\ 

1638: RXJ0804 & 2006-02-24 05:20:32 & 8:5:6.84 & 46:35:19.0 & 22.58 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2672 &  \\ 

1639: RXJ0804 & 2006-02-24 05:20:32 & 8:4:28.0 & 46:48:15.8 & 22.40 $\pm$ 0.06 & 292 &  \\ 

1640: RXJ0804 & 2006-02-24 05:20:32 & 8:4:24.6 & 46:56:55.1 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1825 &  \\ 

1641: RXJ0804 & 2006-02-24 05:20:32 & 8:4:8.89 & 46:39:10.9 & 19.13 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1561 &  \\ 

1642: RXJ0804 & 2006-04-24 04:33:50 & 8:2:51.8 & 46:48:42.9 & 23.72 $\pm$ 0.32 & 2890 &  \\ 

1643: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:5:18.5 & 46:35:40.3 & 21.60 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2845 & z=1.775 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1644: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:3:24.0 & 46:55:18.9 & 21.95 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2386 &  \\ 

1645: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:3:12.9 & 46:58:12.1 & 21.90 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3010 & z=1.775 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1646: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:4:50.2 & 47:1:45.2 & 21.70 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2881 &  \\ 

1647: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:4:21.4 & 46:57:15.4 & 22.83 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1885 &  \\ 

1648: RXJ0804 & 2006-12-16 07:07:14 & 8:3:57.0 & 46:40:37.7 & 22.32 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1465 &  \\ 

1649: A667 & 2006-01-28 06:52:55 & 8:28:49.1 & 44:44:38.0 & 20.47 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1177 & RD  \\ 

1650: A667 & 2006-01-28 06:52:55 & 8:28:31.9 & 44:34:3.13 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1958 &  \\ 

1651: A667 & 2006-01-28 06:52:55 & 8:28:15.9 & 44:47:24.2 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.07 & 329 &  \\ 

1652: A667 & 2006-02-24 05:57:42 & 8:27:9.95 & 44:29:25.1 & 24.18 $\pm$ 0.47 & 2966 &  \\ 

1653: A667 & 2006-04-24 05:11:06 & 8:28:49.1 & 44:44:38.0 & 20.73 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1177 & RD  \\ 

1654: A667 & 2006-04-24 05:11:06 & 8:26:41.5 & 44:55:37.4 & 23.25 $\pm$ 0.22 & 2716 &  \\ 

1655: A750 & 2006-04-24 05:49:13 & 9:9:47.8 & 11:6:36.6 & 22.34 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1991 &  \\ 

1656: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:43:12.5 & 15:35:9.70 & 22.00 $\pm$ 0.13 & 3140 &  \\ 

1657: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:42:53.6 & 15:26:4.16 & 22.00 $\pm$ 0.12 & 1672 &  \\ 

1658: A961 & 2006-02-24 07:52:05 & 10:17:29.6 & 33:45:15.6 & 22.83 $\pm$ 0.12 & 2063 &  \\ 

1659: A1201 & 2006-01-28 10:18:32 & 11:13:36.0 & 13:38:31.0 & 22.57 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2759 &  \\ 

1660: A1201 & 2006-01-28 10:18:32 & 11:12:17.8 & 13:21:6.03 & 21.55 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1779 & z=0.231 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1661: A1201 & 2006-04-24 07:09:10 & 11:13:29.0 & 13:34:42.0 & 22.87 $\pm$ 0.12 & 2070 &  \\ 

1662: A1201 & 2006-04-24 07:09:10 & 11:13:12.6 & 13:12:10.3 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2537 & IC Cand \\ 

1663: A1201 & 2006-04-24 07:09:10 & 11:12:47.5 & 13:14:4.21 & 21.95 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2114 & QSO z=1.524; SDSS \\ 

1664: A1413 & 2006-01-28 11:09:51 & 11:55:50.3 & 23:23:58.5 & 22.49 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1112 &  \\ 

1665: A1413 & 2006-01-28 11:09:51 & 11:55:4.32 & 23:31:18.7 & 22.19 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1173 &  \\ 

1666: A1413 & 2006-02-24 09:06:07 & 11:56:9.63 & 23:32:29.4 & 22.12 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2171 & IC Cand \\ 

1667: A1413 & 2006-02-24 09:06:07 & 11:56:5.11 & 23:11:16.5 & 23.64 $\pm$ 0.24 & 2537 &  \\ 

1668: A1413 & 2006-02-24 09:06:07 & 11:55:46.6 & 23:24:47.8 & 21.59 $\pm$ 0.04 & 989 &  \\ 

1669: A1413 & 2006-04-24 07:59:00 & 11:55:55.2 & 23:15:44.3 & 21.56 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1808 &  \\ 

1670: A1413 & 2006-04-24 07:59:00 & 11:55:44.4 & 23:37:29.5 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2198 &  \\ 

1671: A1413 & 2006-04-24 07:59:00 & 11:55:42.0 & 23:28:55.6 & 22.03 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1088 &  \\ 

1672: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:10:50.2 & -1:24:20.7 & 18.85 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1958 & RD QUEST 088049/3 \\ 

1673: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:12:6.64 & -1:31:30.2 & 21.35 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2637 & RD  z=0.845 QSO/4 \\ 

1674: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:11:55.8 & -1:25:56.6 & 22.30 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1555 & RD  z=0.962 QSO/4 \\ 

1675: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:11:52.6 & -1:23:4.82 & 21.62 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1150 & CG/5 \\ 

1676: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:11:35.6 & -1:9:26.1 & 22.09 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2069 &  \\ 

1677: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:11:29.6 & -1:16:2.60 & 22.43 $\pm$ 0.08 & 833 & z=1.648 QSO/4 \\ 

1678: A1689 & 2006-02-24 09:46:20 & 13:12:6.64 & -1:31:30.2 & 21.82 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2637 & RD  z=0.845 QSO/4 \\ 

1679: A1689 & 2006-02-24 09:46:20 & 13:12:5.77 & -1:30:8.38 & 22.75 $\pm$ 0.12 & 2422 &  \\ 

1680: A1689 & 2006-02-24 09:46:20 & 13:11:59.8 & -1:28:5.43 & 22.36 $\pm$ 0.16 & 1958 &  \\ 

1681: A1689 & 2006-02-24 09:46:20 & 13:11:55.8 & -1:25:56.1 & 22.64 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1554 & RD  z=0.962 QSO/4 \\ 

1682: A1689 & 2006-04-24 08:39:34 & 13:11:19.3 & -1:20:30.2 & 22.11 $\pm$ 0.07 & 485 & z=2.584 QSO/6 \\ 

1683: A1689 & 2006-04-24 08:39:34 & 13:11:18.3 & -1:14:29.4 & 21.44 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1239 & 2QZ J131118.2-011430/4 \\ 

1684: A1689 & 2006-04-24 08:39:34 & 13:10:55.5 & -1:27:25.1 & 21.63 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2029 & z=1.003 QSO/6 \\ 

1685: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:12:28.0 & -1:21:37.9 & 21.50 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2689 &  \\ 

1686: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:10:57.6 & -1:20:42.4 & 22.16 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1488 &  \\ 

1687: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:10:50.2 & -1:24:20.7 & 18.64 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1958 & RD QUEST 088049/3 \\ 

1688: A1361 & 2006-01-28 12:29:23 & 11:44:20.2 & 46:28:29.6 & 18.56 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1269 & RD  \\ 

1689: A1361 & 2006-01-28 12:29:23 & 11:43:44.1 & 46:23:0.144 & 21.70 $\pm$ 0.03 & 232 &  \\ 

1690: A1361 & 2006-04-24 09:20:33 & 11:44:21.4 & 46:23:4.06 & 22.77 $\pm$ 0.10 & 940 &  \\ 

1691: A1361 & 2006-04-24 09:20:33 & 11:44:20.2 & 46:28:30.0 & 18.58 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1270 & RD  \\ 

1692: A1361 & 2006-04-24 09:20:33 & 11:42:23.4 & 46:26:11.0 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1778 &  \\ 

1693: RXJ0741 & 2006-01-29 02:11:06 & 7:42:18.1 & 25:53:45.7 & 21.85 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2048 & RD  \\ 

1694: RXJ0741 & 2006-01-29 02:11:06 & 7:41:26.6 & 26:7:36.5 & 21.20 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1490 &  \\ 

1695: RXJ0741 & 2006-02-25 02:26:30 & 7:42:18.1 & 25:53:45.7 & 21.75 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2048 & RD  \\ 

1696: RXJ0741 & 2006-02-25 02:26:30 & 7:40:34.2 & 26:3:31.5 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2097 &  \\ 

1697: RXJ0741 & 2006-02-25 02:26:30 & 7:41:18.4 & 25:44:14.1 & 21.97 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2357 &  \\ 

1698: RXJ0741 & 2006-04-25 03:53:15 & 7:40:52.7 & 25:51:51.3 & 22.97 $\pm$ 0.17 & 1658 &  \\ 

1699: A620 & 2006-01-29 02:55:40 & 8:6:14.7 & 45:35:45.0 & 21.95 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1098 & RD Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1700: A620 & 2006-02-25 03:05:49 & 8:4:35.6 & 45:31:0.928 & 22.23 $\pm$ 0.08 & 2227 & CG; SDSS \\ 

1701: A620 & 2006-02-25 03:05:49 & 8:5:6.89 & 45:32:37.7 & 21.20 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1513 & RD Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1702: A620 & 2006-12-16 05:52:00 & 8:5:6.89 & 45:32:37.7 & 21.70 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1513 & RD Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1703: A620 & 2006-12-16 05:52:00 & 8:6:14.7 & 45:35:45.5 & 21.19 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1097 & RD Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1704: A665 & 2006-01-29 04:31:29 & 8:30:1.46 & 65:45:2.30 & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1453 & CG/7 \\ 

1705: RXJ0958 & 2006-01-29 05:54:09 & 9:57:15.9 & 23:41:16.2 & 23.36 $\pm$ 0.37 & 2166 & RD  \\ 

1706: RXJ0958 & 2006-02-25 05:03:22 & 9:57:15.9 & 23:41:16.7 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.13 & 2167 & RD  \\ 

1707: RXJ1000 & 2006-02-25 05:39:58 & 10:1:31.3 & 44:1:45.4 & 22.23 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2057 &  \\ 

1708: RXJ1000 & 2006-04-25 07:19:59 & 9:59:47.7 & 44:15:18.8 & 22.89 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1618 &  \\ 

1709: RXJ1000 & 2006-04-25 07:19:59 & 9:59:24.1 & 43:54:57.9 & 22.70 $\pm$ 0.11 & 2917 &  \\ 

1710: A868 & 2006-02-25 06:16:49 & 9:46:19.4 & -8:49:27.9 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2661 &  \\ 

1711: A901 & 2006-01-29 07:46:57 & 9:57:0.0908 & -9:53:9.53 & 20.76 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2872 &  \\ 

1712: A901 & 2006-01-29 07:46:57 & 9:56:33.7 & -10:8:24.7 & 21.66 $\pm$ 0.04 & 2253 &  \\ 

1713: A901 & 2006-02-25 06:53:39 & 9:55:34.2 & -9:51:15.2 & 21.31 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1677 &  \\ 

1714: A1045 & 2006-04-25 07:58:26 & 10:34:41.5 & 30:47:3.26 & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.06 & 985 &  \\ 

1715: A1045 & 2006-04-25 07:58:26 & 10:34:39.0 & 30:53:36.8 & 21.22 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1871 &  \\ 

1716: A1068 & 2006-02-25 08:14:53 & 10:41:46.4 & 39:47:24.7 & 20.65 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2244 &  \\ 

1717: A1068 & 2006-02-25 08:14:53 & 10:40:34.4 & 39:45:9.89 & 21.61 $\pm$ 0.16 & 1780 &  \\ 

1718: A1068 & 2006-04-25 08:35:17 & 10:39:37.3 & 39:56:40.8 & 22.06 $\pm$ 0.14 & 1894 &  \\ 

1719: A1068 & 2006-12-16 11:35:39 & 10:39:27.2 & 40:8:58.5 & 23.80 $\pm$ 0.26 & 2772 &  \\ 

1720: A1068 & 2006-12-16 11:35:39 & 10:41:8.21 & 39:49:24.3 & 22.27 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1312 &  \\ 

1721: A1068 & 2006-12-16 11:35:39 & 10:39:42.1 & 39:47:22.3 & 22.81 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2270 &  \\ 

1722: A990 & 2006-01-29 09:51:56 & 10:22:15.2 & 49:2:7.73 & 23.03 $\pm$ 0.25 & 2326 &  \\ 

1723: A990 & 2006-02-25 08:52:41 & 10:23:44.4 & 48:57:16.6 & 22.27 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1731 &  \\ 

1724: A990 & 2006-04-26 05:39:01 & 10:23:45.3 & 49:16:47.7 & 23.57 $\pm$ 0.25 & 1239 &  \\ 

1725: A990 & 2006-04-26 05:39:01 & 10:23:34.2 & 49:11:15.5 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.04 & 417 &  \\ 

1726: A990 & 2006-04-26 05:39:01 & 10:22:27.3 & 49:22:52.9 & 22.64 $\pm$ 0.16 & 2802 &  \\ 

1727: A1264 & 2006-01-29 10:29:19 & 11:27:24.3 & 17:11:23.7 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.11 & 884 &  \\ 

1728: A1264 & 2006-01-29 10:29:19 & 11:26:41.2 & 17:3:10.9 & 21.97 $\pm$ 0.09 & 919 &  \\ 

1729: A1264 & 2006-02-25 09:33:14 & 11:26:38.3 & 17:9:53.2 & 22.10 $\pm$ 0.14 & 814 &  \\ 

1730: A1264 & 2006-02-25 09:33:14 & 11:26:34.6 & 17:3:51.1 & 22.11 $\pm$ 0.12 & 1035 &  \\ 

1731: A1246 & 2006-12-16 12:11:23 & 11:24:48.9 & 21:36:5.22 & 21.45 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2614 & z=0.92 QSO; BCS \\ 

1732: A1246 & 2006-12-16 12:11:23 & 11:24:41.5 & 21:12:9.94 & 24.46 $\pm$ 0.46 & 3689 &  \\ 

1733: A1246 & 2006-12-16 12:11:23 & 11:24:2.51 & 21:36:58.1 & 22.54 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1559 & Stellar spec; BCS \\ 

1734: A1246 & 2006-12-16 12:11:23 & 11:23:49.5 & 21:28:40.3 & 20.63 $\pm$ 0.01 & 411 & SN 2006ue; Cluster SNIa; BCS \\ 

1735: A1553 & 2006-01-29 11:52:37 & 12:31:16.9 & 10:48:35.9 & 22.62 $\pm$ 0.17 & 2924 &  \\ 

1736: A1553 & 2006-01-29 11:52:37 & 12:30:50.5 & 10:39:0.640 & 22.58 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1055 & z=0.213 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1737: A1553 & 2006-02-24 11:45:49 & 12:30:10.6 & 10:23:11.6 & 22.69 $\pm$ 0.20 & 2283 &  \\ 

1738: A1553 & 2006-04-24 10:03:28 & 12:30:45.8 & 10:32:50.4 & 22.34 $\pm$ 0.11 & 126 &  \\ 

1739: A1553 & 2006-04-24 10:03:28 & 12:31:22.2 & 10:44:12.8 & 21.75 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2383 & z=0.092 Galaxy; SDSS \\ 

1740: A1204 & 2006-01-29 12:31:42 & 11:12:55.8 & 17:37:36.7 & 22.14 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1078 &  \\ 

1741: A1204 & 2006-02-25 12:13:56 & 11:14:16.6 & 17:40:57.0 & 22.26 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2513 &  \\ 

1742: A1204 & 2006-04-25 09:11:22 & 11:13:59.2 & 17:39:2.83 & 22.06 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1718 &  \\ 

1743: A1204 & 2006-04-25 09:11:22 & 11:13:53.7 & 17:30:14.0 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1681 &  \\ 

1744: Z1432 & 2006-01-30 02:02:53 & 7:52:22.8 & 17:16:36.9 & 21.43 $\pm$ 0.10 & 3754 &  \\ 

1745: Z1432 & 2006-02-26 02:29:16 & 7:51:54.2 & 17:21:43.8 & 21.83 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2173 &  \\ 

1746: Z1432 & 2006-02-26 02:29:16 & 7:51:20.7 & 17:38:58.1 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.38 & 1551 &  \\ 

1747: A646 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 8:22:7.01 & 46:56:0.475 & 21.03 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1356 & z=2.325 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1748: A646 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 8:21:5.55 & 47:16:33.4 & 21.40 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2104 & z=2.22 QSO; BCS \\ 

1749: A646 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 8:22:32.4 & 47:14:45.3 & 21.25 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1348 &  \\ 

1750: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:21:52.2 & 7:39:4.20 & 22.57 $\pm$ 0.13 & 2145 &  \\ 

1751: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:43.0 & 7:41:24.6 & 21.22 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1374 & RD  \\ 

1752: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:42.6 & 8:3:56.1 & 22.32 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1569 &  \\ 

1753: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:29.5 & 7:54:27.1 & 22.21 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1017 &  \\ 

1754: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:28.5 & 7:41:6.98 & 22.95 $\pm$ 0.19 & 1629 & RD  \\ 

1755: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:21:21.2 & 7:42:1.31 & 22.13 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1311 & RD  \\ 

1756: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:21:14.9 & 7:40:31.0 & 22.62 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1413 &  \\ 

1757: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:52.3 & 7:55:35.4 & 22.06 $\pm$ 0.07 & 537 & RD z=1.13 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1758: RXJ0821 & 2006-01-30 03:29:06 & 8:20:45.6 & 8:3:25.8 & 21.77 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1480 & z=2.91 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1759: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:21:21.2 & 7:42:1.31 & 22.31 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1311 & RD  \\ 

1760: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:21:18.0 & 7:53:59.2 & 22.60 $\pm$ 0.13 & 544 & X-ray pt src/2 \\ 

1761: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:20:52.4 & 7:55:34.9 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.09 & 536 & RD z=1.13 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1762: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:20:43.0 & 7:41:24.6 & 21.40 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1374 & RD  \\ 

1763: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:20:28.5 & 7:41:6.08 & 22.59 $\pm$ 0.14 & 1630 & RD  \\ 

1764: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:21:30.6 & 7:50:56.8 & 21.96 $\pm$ 0.08 & 860 &  \\ 

1765: RXJ0821 & 2006-02-26 04:02:42 & 8:21:21.6 & 7:46:25.9 & 22.99 $\pm$ 0.21 & 874 &  \\ 

1766: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:20:34.2 & 7:39:37.6 & 21.73 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1684 & Galaxy z=0.22; BCS \\ 

1767: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:20:22.1 & 7:38:12.1 & 22.41 $\pm$ 0.15 & 2023 &  \\ 

1768: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:20:19.2 & 7:53:24.7 & 21.84 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1288 &  \\ 

1769: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:21:23.0 & 7:39:41.3 & 22.20 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1588 & z=0.90 QSO; BCS \\ 

1770: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:21:16.3 & 8:3:38.1 & 22.48 $\pm$ 0.14 & 1485 &  \\ 

1771: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:20:52.7 & 7:52:38.8 & 21.96 $\pm$ 0.08 & 294 & z=0.795 QSO; BCS \\ 

1772: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:20:44.5 & 7:50:7.56 & 22.43 $\pm$ 0.13 & 558 & z=2.17 QSO; BCS \\ 

1773: Z1883 & 2006-01-30 04:05:53 & 8:43:19.7 & 29:23:48.4 & 22.03 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1221 &  \\ 

1774: A655 & 2006-01-30 04:42:47 & 8:25:49.6 & 47:10:28.4 & 17.45 $\pm$ 0.01 & 583 & CG AGN; SDSS/8 \\ 

1775: RXJ0819 & 2006-01-30 05:19:40 & 8:17:52.7 & 63:42:0.576 & 22.99 $\pm$ 0.36 & 1451 &  \\ 

1776: RXJ0819 & 2006-01-30 05:19:40 & 8:17:48.2 & 63:33:58.4 & 23.42 $\pm$ 0.56 & 1467 &  \\ 

1777: RXJ0819 & 2006-02-26 06:25:49 & 8:19:39.7 & 63:45:46.4 & 20.36 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1093 &  \\ 

1778: RXJ0819 & 2006-02-26 06:25:49 & 8:18:11.7 & 63:45:21.8 & 22.36 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1467 &  \\ 

1779: A795 & 2006-01-30 05:56:39 & 9:24:58.8 & 13:56:55.7 & 22.01 $\pm$ 0.23 & 2703 &  \\ 

1780: A795 & 2006-01-30 05:56:39 & 9:24:40.2 & 14:20:6.92 & 20.88 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1858 &  \\ 

1781: A795 & 2006-01-30 05:56:39 & 9:24:4.61 & 13:56:16.7 & 18.99 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2041 &  \\ 

1782: A795 & 2006-01-30 05:56:39 & 9:23:49.6 & 14:6:25.6 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.24 & 797 &  \\ 

1783: A1033 & 2006-01-30 07:14:07 & 10:31:58.6 & 35:1:17.9 & 21.72 $\pm$ 0.04 & 427 &  \\ 

1784: A1033 & 2006-04-26 06:14:44 & 10:32:35.3 & 34:57:8.35 & 21.78 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1589 & RD  \\ 

1785: A1033 & 2006-04-26 06:14:44 & 10:32:28.9 & 35:2:7.13 & 20.33 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1238 & z=0.128 QSO; CG; SDSS \\ 

1786: A1033 & 2006-12-16 10:58:20 & 10:32:40.5 & 34:58:35.8 & 22.64 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1646 & z=1.56 BAL QSO; BCS \\ 

1787: A1033 & 2006-12-16 10:58:20 & 10:32:35.2 & 34:57:8.41 & 22.62 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1587 & RD  \\ 

1788: A1033 & 2006-12-16 10:58:20 & 10:31:31.0 & 35:16:23.7 & 22.77 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1920 &  \\ 

1789: A1033 & 2006-12-16 10:58:20 & 10:30:31.9 & 34:56:47.9 & 23.16 $\pm$ 0.19 & 2149 & SNIb/c?; BCS \\ 

1790: A1132 & 2006-01-30 07:50:49 & 10:59:6.18 & 56:59:46.8 & 22.30 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1934 &  \\ 

1791: A1132 & 2006-01-30 07:50:49 & 10:58:48.6 & 56:48:0.285 & 22.03 $\pm$ 0.06 & 496 &  \\ 

1792: A1132 & 2006-01-30 07:50:49 & 10:57:35.2 & 56:53:23.7 & 22.49 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1260 &  \\ 

1793: Z3179 & 2006-01-30 09:50:19 & 10:25:20.4 & 12:34:45.2 & 22.21 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1689 & z=1.489 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1794: RXJ1156 & 2006-01-30 10:29:24 & 11:57:30.6 & 24:27:43.2 & 21.26 $\pm$ 0.03 & 2168 &  \\ 

1795: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:57:37.9 & 24:14:43.4 & 22.42 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1447 &  \\ 

1796: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:56:27.6 & 24:12:26.9 & 21.68 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1072 &  \\ 

1797: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:56:25.0 & 24:8:37.4 & 21.99 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1484 &  \\ 

1798: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:56:20.4 & 24:18:52.6 & 22.63 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1301 &  \\ 

1799: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:56:9.60 & 24:9:43.5 & 22.31 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1809 &  \\ 

1800: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:56:7.56 & 24:8:39.3 & 23.11 $\pm$ 0.16 & 1951 &  \\ 

1801: A1235 & 2006-01-30 11:09:02 & 11:22:51.3 & 19:35:51.5 & 22.43 $\pm$ 0.10 & 664 &  \\ 

1802: A1235 & 2006-01-30 11:09:02 & 11:22:26.1 & 19:23:0.141 & 20.69 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1993 &  \\ 

1803: A1235 & 2006-12-16 12:47:19 & 11:22:19.7 & 19:47:5.33 & 21.91 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1991 &  \\ 

1804: A1235 & 2006-12-16 12:47:19 & 11:22:12.7 & 19:35:57.9 & 20.73 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1706 &  \\ 

1805: A1235 & 2006-12-16 12:47:19 & 11:23:18.8 & 19:44:17.4 & 22.00 $\pm$ 0.12 & 973 &  \\ 

1806: A1235 & 2006-12-16 12:47:19 & 11:22:51.3 & 19:28:34.6 & 20.97 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1065 &  \\ 

1807: A1235 & 2006-12-16 12:47:19 & 11:22:44.9 & 19:48:37.7 & 21.47 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1689 &  \\ 

1808: A1366 & 2006-04-26 09:30:39 & 11:46:48.9 & 67:37:6.08 & 21.81 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2253 & z=1.539 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1809: A1366 & 2006-04-26 09:30:39 & 11:43:10.3 & 67:32:5.47 & 22.73 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1424 &  \\ 

1810: A1902 & 2006-04-24 10:42:43 & 14:21:51.9 & 37:5:57.8 & 22.40 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1953 &  \\ 

1811: A1902 & 2006-04-24 10:42:43 & 14:21:29.6 & 37:11:20.7 & 21.69 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1085 &  \\ 

1812: A1902 & 2006-04-24 10:42:43 & 14:20:59.2 & 37:10:57.7 & 22.46 $\pm$ 0.09 & 1741 &  \\ 

1813: A1902 & 2006-06-19 05:40:24 & 14:20:55.3 & 37:9:23.6 & 20.29 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2009 &  \\ 

1814: A1677 & 2006-04-25 09:50:29 & 13:5:58.3 & 30:56:29.6 & 21.10 $\pm$ 0.03 & 513 &  \\ 

1815: A1677 & 2006-06-19 04:59:20 & 13:6:6.00 & 30:47:28.2 & 22.70 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1385 &  \\ 

1816: A1914 & 2006-04-25 10:31:46 & 14:26:20.3 & 37:45:0.308 & 22.11 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1074 &  \\ 

1817: A1914 & 2006-06-19 06:24:29 & 14:25:28.4 & 37:45:39.9 & 22.31 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1133 &  \\ 

1818: A1930 & 2006-06-19 07:06:52 & 14:32:16.4 & 31:40:39.0 & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.05 & 690 & z=0.129 QSO; CG; SDSS \\ 

1819: A1930 & 2006-06-19 07:06:52 & 14:31:44.4 & 31:39:46.9 & 21.89 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1601 &  \\ 

1820: A2259 & 2006-04-26 10:10:35 & 17:20:56.0 & 27:38:12.5 & 18.53 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1757 &  \\ 

1821: A2259 & 2006-04-26 10:10:35 & 17:19:24.2 & 27:51:53.8 & 20.85 $\pm$ 0.02 & 2614 &  \\ 

1822: A2259 & 2006-06-19 08:31:34 & 17:19:27.1 & 27:32:45.7 & 21.52 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2028 & z=1.447 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1823: A2218 & 2006-06-19 07:49:38 & 16:34:2.04 & 66:15:47.7 & 21.96 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2011 &  \\ 

1824: RXJ1750 & 2006-04-26 11:26:39 & 17:49:36.4 & 35:9:55.6 & 18.85 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1685 &  \\ 

1825: RXJ1750 & 2006-04-26 11:26:39 & 17:50:57.1 & 35:14:47.0 & 19.85 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2231 &  \\ 

1826: RXJ1750 & 2006-06-19 09:09:59 & 17:50:57.2 & 35:12:10.3 & 22.76 $\pm$ 0.22 & 1906 &  \\ 

1827: RXJ1750 & 2006-06-19 09:09:59 & 17:49:23.7 & 35:7:15.8 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1942 &  \\ 

1828: \enddata

1829: \tablecomments{The following abbreviations were used under the 'Notes' column.  BCS -- Indicates that this transient was followed up spectroscopically by the Blue Channel Spectrograph on the MMT -- see \S~\ref{sec:spec}. CG -- Indicates that the transient is associated with a cluster galaxy.  IC Cand -- Intracluster SN candidate. RD -- This transient was detected as a variable in more than one epoch }

1830: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{Richards05}; (2) \citet{Gandhi04}; (3) \citet{Rengstorf04}; (4) \citet{Croom04}; (5) \citet{Balogh02}; (6) \citet{Hewett95}; (7) \citet{Oegerle91}; (8) \citet{VandenBerk06} }

1831: \end{deluxetable}

1832: 

1833: \clearpage

1834: 

1835: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccl}

1836: %\rotate

1837: \tablecolumns{7}

1838: \tablecaption{List of Identified Variables  -- Background Chip 3\label{table:vartable3}}

1839: \tablehead{

1840: \colhead{Cluster} & \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{g} & \colhead{Dist from BCG} &\colhead{Notes}\\

1841: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & \colhead{J2000.0} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{kpc}& \colhead{}}

1842: \startdata

1843: RXJ1750 & 2006-04-26 11:26:39 & 17:53:2.73 & 35:5:57.7 & 20.95 $\pm$ 0.04 & 5925 &  \\ 

1844: RXJ1750 & 2006-04-26 11:26:39 & 17:52:46.3 & 35:7:9.76 & 21.72 $\pm$ 0.08 & 5349 &  \\ 

1845: A2218 & 2006-04-26 10:46:38 & 16:40:49.7 & 66:22:48.2 & 21.35 $\pm$ 0.03 & 5670 &  \\ 

1846: A2218 & 2006-04-26 10:46:38 & 16:40:42.8 & 66:11:10.9 & 22.32 $\pm$ 0.07 & 5302 &  \\ 

1847: A2259 & 2006-04-26 10:10:35 & 17:23:33.4 & 27:49:31.6 & 22.54 $\pm$ 0.08 & 7764 & IC Cand \\ 

1848: A2259 & 2006-04-26 10:10:35 & 17:22:7.20 & 27:26:29.7 & 21.87 $\pm$ 0.10 & 4963 &  \\ 

1849: A1677 & 2006-06-19 04:59:20 & 13:9:27.7 & 30:44:19.4 & 20.54 $\pm$ 0.02 & 8794 &  \\ 

1850: A1677 & 2006-06-19 04:59:20 & 13:9:3.27 & 31:6:26.6 & 22.18 $\pm$ 0.07 & 7930 &  \\ 

1851: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:14:46.1 & -1:8:52.2 & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.06 & 9305 &  \\ 

1852: A1689 & 2006-01-28 11:51:19 & 13:13:46.3 & -1:13:19.2 & 22.07 $\pm$ 0.06 & 6431 &  \\ 

1853: A1689 & 2006-02-24 09:46:20 & 13:13:34.8 & -1:18:3.00 & 22.17 $\pm$ 0.07 & 5781 & z=1.675 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1854: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:14:30.8 & -1:29:45.9 & 20.82 $\pm$ 0.03 & 8514 &  \\ 

1855: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:14:17.9 & -1:35:12.1 & 22.13 $\pm$ 0.10 & 8208 &  \\ 

1856: A1689 & 2006-06-19 04:03:19 & 13:13:48.7 & -1:25:39.3 & 22.12 $\pm$ 0.09 & 6472 &  \\ 

1857: A1902 & 2006-04-24 10:42:43 & 14:24:37.2 & 37:20:33.4 & 22.76 $\pm$ 0.16 & 5836 &  \\ 

1858: A1902 & 2006-04-24 10:42:43 & 14:26:2.16 & 37:3:4.55 & 21.92 $\pm$ 0.07 & 8965 &  \\ 

1859: A1914 & 2006-04-25 10:31:46 & 14:29:27.7 & 37:45:21.0 & 21.98 $\pm$ 0.05 & 7316 & z=1.69 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1860: A1914 & 2006-04-25 10:31:46 & 14:28:22.1 & 37:58:14.5 & 22.96 $\pm$ 0.10 & 5264 &  \\ 

1861: A1914 & 2006-06-19 06:24:29 & 14:30:9.63 & 38:0:41.9 & 22.19 $\pm$ 0.05 & 8942 &  \\ 

1862: A1930 & 2006-06-19 07:06:52 & 14:35:9.50 & 31:31:48.3 & 21.86 $\pm$ 0.04 & 4624 & z=0.50 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1863: A1930 & 2006-06-19 07:06:52 & 14:35:0.177 & 31:41:35.7 & 22.97 $\pm$ 0.17 & 4250 &  \\ 

1864: A1930 & 2006-06-19 07:06:52 & 14:34:55.9 & 31:39:24.5 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.05 & 4108 &  \\ 

1865: A1553 & 2006-04-24 10:03:28 & 12:34:12.5 & 10:26:23.9 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.16 & 8565 &  \\ 

1866: RXJ0958 & 2006-01-29 05:54:09 & 10:1:32.4 & 23:40:0.701 & 22.28 $\pm$ 0.10 & 7137 &  \\ 

1867: RXJ0958 & 2006-01-29 05:54:09 & 10:1:25.3 & 23:56:20.2 & 21.05 $\pm$ 0.03 & 6955 &  \\ 

1868: RXJ0958 & 2006-01-29 05:54:09 & 10:0:49.4 & 23:54:33.7 & 21.82 $\pm$ 0.06 & 5664 & RD  \\ 

1869: RXJ0958 & 2006-01-29 05:54:09 & 10:0:7.77 & 23:44:56.0 & 22.60 $\pm$ 0.12 & 4078 &  \\ 

1870: RXJ0958 & 2006-02-25 05:03:22 & 10:0:49.4 & 23:54:33.7 & 21.62 $\pm$ 0.05 & 5664 & RD  \\ 

1871: A1361 & 2006-01-28 12:29:23 & 11:47:27.2 & 46:24:37.6 & 22.30 $\pm$ 0.06 & 4998 &  \\ 

1872: A1361 & 2006-02-24 10:30:22 & 11:48:37.0 & 46:34:16.5 & 22.58 $\pm$ 0.08 & 6694 &  \\ 

1873: A1361 & 2006-02-24 10:30:22 & 11:47:7.16 & 46:34:29.2 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.05 & 4825 &  \\ 

1874: A1361 & 2006-04-24 09:20:33 & 11:47:7.34 & 46:7:12.0 & 23.04 $\pm$ 0.11 & 4909 &  \\ 

1875: A1361 & 2006-04-24 09:20:33 & 11:47:4.65 & 46:21:42.6 & 22.42 $\pm$ 0.05 & 4490 &  \\ 

1876: A1413 & 2006-01-28 11:09:51 & 11:58:15.1 & 23:14:42.1 & 22.74 $\pm$ 0.12 & 6291 &  \\ 

1877: A1413 & 2006-04-24 07:59:00 & 11:58:19.8 & 23:31:38.1 & 21.48 $\pm$ 0.03 & 6374 &  \\ 

1878: A1413 & 2006-04-24 07:59:00 & 11:57:48.9 & 23:13:47.5 & 21.12 $\pm$ 0.02 & 5450 &  \\ 

1879: A961 & 2006-02-24 07:52:05 & 10:18:58.7 & 33:47:15.8 & 22.41 $\pm$ 0.08 & 4477 &  \\ 

1880: A961 & 2006-02-24 07:52:05 & 10:18:51.2 & 33:45:37.6 & 21.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 4222 &  \\ 

1881: A961 & 2006-04-24 06:26:29 & 10:19:55.8 & 33:45:5.33 & 22.02 $\pm$ 0.05 & 5971 &  \\ 

1882: A961 & 2006-04-24 06:26:29 & 10:19:48.4 & 33:26:2.09 & 22.98 $\pm$ 0.12 & 5948 &  \\ 

1883: A961 & 2006-04-24 06:26:29 & 10:19:23.1 & 33:32:10.4 & 22.59 $\pm$ 0.08 & 5075 &  \\ 

1884: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:45:19.1 & 15:14:37.7 & 21.71 $\pm$ 0.09 & 7665 &  \\ 

1885: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:45:4.39 & 15:12:47.9 & 22.22 $\pm$ 0.14 & 7143 &  \\ 

1886: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:44:50.7 & 15:12:37.1 & 19.44 $\pm$ 0.01 & 6611 &  \\ 

1887: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:44:36.3 & 15:22:24.2 & 22.29 $\pm$ 0.29 & 5782 &  \\ 

1888: A853 & 2006-01-28 08:36:18 & 9:44:10.3 & 15:23:54.8 & 21.17 $\pm$ 0.06 & 4720 &  \\ 

1889: A853 & 2006-04-25 05:53:14 & 9:44:35.5 & 15:9:31.2 & 21.93 $\pm$ 0.08 & 6186 &  \\ 

1890: A667 & 2006-04-25 05:53:14 & 8:31:29.9 & 44:32:30.7 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.06 & 5904 & RD  \\ 

1891: A667 & 2006-04-24 05:11:06 & 8:32:24.1 & 44:53:53.6 & 22.66 $\pm$ 0.11 & 7063 & z=1.525 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1892: A667 & 2006-04-24 05:11:06 & 8:31:29.9 & 44:32:30.7 & 22.25 $\pm$ 0.08 & 5905 & RD  \\ 

1893: A580 & 2006-01-28 04:25:28 & 7:29:51.0 & 41:32:55.8 & 21.38 $\pm$ 0.03 & 5735 & RD  \\ 

1894: A580 & 2006-01-28 04:25:28 & 7:28:53.6 & 41:34:36.7 & 22.52 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4470 &  \\ 

1895: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:29:51.1 & 41:32:56.3 & 19.74 $\pm$ 0.01 & 5737 & RD  \\ 

1896: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:29:17.8 & 41:38:2.40 & 21.29 $\pm$ 0.03 & 5161 & NVSS source/2 \\ 

1897: A580 & 2006-04-24 03:05:59 & 7:28:46.9 & 41:29:54.6 & 21.52 $\pm$ 0.04 & 4156 &  \\ 

1898: A646 & 2006-01-30 02:51:19 & 8:25:49.5 & 47:10:27.5 & 18.60 $\pm$ 0.01 & 5210 & z=0.13 CG AGN/3 \\ 

1899: A646 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 8:25:10.5 & 47:16:34.3 & 21.86 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4498 & z=1.425 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1900: A743 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 9:10:13.1 & 10:4:23.3 & 21.97 $\pm$ 0.12 & 7557 &  \\ 

1901: A743 & 2006-12-16 10:22:04 & 9:9:27.2 & 10:5:8.28 & 21.67 $\pm$ 0.07 & 5998 &  \\ 

1902: A743 & 2006-12-16 08:53:47 & 9:8:58.4 & 10:25:32.0 & 21.05 $\pm$ 0.04 & 4743 &  \\ 

1903: RXJ1000 & 2006-02-25 05:39:58 & 10:5:7.00 & 44:0:39.8 & 21.08 $\pm$ 0.03 & 8018 &  \\ 

1904: RXJ1000 & 2006-04-25 07:19:59 & 10:5:3.80 & 44:17:23.7 & 21.85 $\pm$ 0.06 & 7906 & z=0.957 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1905: RXJ1000 & 2006-04-25 07:19:59 & 10:3:17.2 & 44:1:52.6 & 21.75 $\pm$ 0.05 & 4890 &  \\ 

1906: RXJ0804 & 2006-01-28 06:15:30 & 8:9:14.8 & 46:39:38.9 & 20.86 $\pm$ 0.02 & 9560 & z=0.975 (phot) QSO/1 \\ 

1907: RXJ0804 & 2006-04-24 04:33:50 & 8:7:44.3 & 46:38:44.0 & 20.56 $\pm$ 0.02 & 6729 &  \\ 

1908: RXJ0804 & 2006-04-24 04:33:50 & 8:7:18.7 & 47:1:18.1 & 22.82 $\pm$ 0.11 & 6259 &  \\ 

1909: A750 & 2006-01-28 07:59:36 & 9:11:3.81 & 11:4:28.3 & 21.65 $\pm$ 0.05 & 4689 & z=0.928 QSO; SDSS \\ 

1910: A750 & 2006-02-24 06:35:19 & 9:11:56.1 & 11:9:16.5 & 22.53 $\pm$ 0.07 & 6974 &  \\ 

1911: A750 & 2006-04-24 05:49:13 & 9:11:36.7 & 11:11:11.7 & 22.71 $\pm$ 0.12 & 6308 &  \\ 

1912: A750 & 2006-04-24 05:49:13 & 9:11:33.0 & 10:57:3.77 & 21.90 $\pm$ 0.05 & 5794 &  \\ 

1913: A750 & 2006-04-24 05:49:13 & 9:11:22.5 & 11:8:58.3 & 22.91 $\pm$ 0.14 & 5632 &  \\ 

1914: A750 & 2006-04-24 05:49:13 & 9:11:5.82 & 10:58:12.3 & 22.24 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4665 &  \\ 

1915: RXJ0741 & 2006-04-25 03:53:15 & 7:44:23.5 & 26:8:3.07 & 21.35 $\pm$ 0.05 & 6684 & RD  \\ 

1916: RXJ0741 & 2006-01-29 02:11:06 & 7:43:56.4 & 26:9:21.5 & 21.94 $\pm$ 0.06 & 5784 &  \\ 

1917: RXJ0741 & 2006-01-29 02:11:06 & 7:44:46.9 & 25:48:10.3 & 20.83 $\pm$ 0.02 & 7574 & z=0.141 CG QSO; SDSS/4 \\ 

1918: RXJ0741 & 2006-02-25 02:26:30 & 7:44:49.8 & 25:46:11.8 & 20.87 $\pm$ 0.02 & 7756 &  \\ 

1919: RXJ0741 & 2006-02-25 02:26:30 & 7:44:23.5 & 26:8:3.07 & 22.22 $\pm$ 0.08 & 6685 & RD  \\ 

1920: A620 & 2006-01-29 02:55:40 & 8:9:43.3 & 45:32:35.2 & 20.21 $\pm$ 0.01 & 6157 &  \\ 

1921: A620 & 2006-02-25 03:05:49 & 8:8:20.2 & 45:37:37.0 & 22.00 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3971 &  \\ 

1922: A1045 & 2006-02-25 07:36:44 & 10:38:30.8 & 30:54:31.3 & 20.53 $\pm$ 0.08 & 6866 &  \\ 

1923: A990 & 2006-02-25 07:36:44 & 10:27:46.8 & 49:19:41.3 & 22.44 $\pm$ 0.10 & 6325 &  \\ 

1924: A990 & 2006-02-25 08:52:41 & 10:26:21.7 & 48:57:20.9 & 23.04 $\pm$ 0.09 & 4379 &  \\ 

1925: A1264 & 2006-01-29 10:29:19 & 11:30:21.0 & 17:17:44.7 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.05 & 6622 &  \\ 

1926: A1204 & 2006-01-29 12:31:42 & 11:15:59.4 & 17:40:15.1 & 22.32 $\pm$ 0.11 & 6665 &  \\ 

1927: RXJ0821 & 2006-12-16 08:11:33 & 8:23:5.83 & 7:41:52.1 & 21.75 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3881 &  \\ 

1928: Z1883 & 2006-01-30 04:05:53 & 8:45:48.2 & 29:20:54.8 & 20.29 $\pm$ 0.01 & 7363 &  \\ 

1929: A655 & 2006-02-26 05:47:17 & 8:30:3.34 & 47:16:21.7 & 22.13 $\pm$ 0.09 & 6446 &  \\ 

1930: A1132 & 2006-01-30 07:50:49 & 11:4:26.6 & 56:34:7.51 & 21.06 $\pm$ 0.04 & 7484 &  \\ 

1931: A1132 & 2006-01-30 07:50:49 & 11:3:16.7 & 56:54:40.8 & 21.81 $\pm$ 0.06 & 5865 &  \\ 

1932: A1132 & 2006-04-26 08:52:28 & 11:2:56.0 & 56:51:34.7 & 22.15 $\pm$ 0.07 & 5406 &  \\ 

1933: A1132 & 2006-04-26 08:52:28 & 11:2:4.42 & 56:48:44.3 & 22.06 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4366 &  \\ 

1934: Z3179 & 2006-01-30 09:50:19 & 10:29:31.1 & 12:28:4.00 & 21.90 $\pm$ 0.18 & 8082 &  \\ 

1935: Z3179 & 2006-04-26 06:59:56 & 10:28:26.5 & 12:44:23.6 & 22.08 $\pm$ 0.06 & 5476 &  \\ 

1936: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 12:0:27.6 & 24:5:57.1 & -10.83 $\pm$ 0.02 & 7388 &  \\ 

1937: RXJ1156 & 2006-04-26 08:16:34 & 11:59:25.3 & 24:24:16.7 & -9.60 $\pm$ 0.07 & 5264 &  \\ 

1938: A1235 & 2006-01-30 11:09:02 & 11:26:30.8 & 19:22:58.9 & 22.44 $\pm$ 0.11 & 5465 &  \\ 

1939: A1235 & 2006-04-26 07:39:05 & 11:25:22.5 & 19:23:30.3 & 21.88 $\pm$ 0.05 & 3698 &  \\ 

1940: A1235 & 2006-04-26 07:39:05 & 11:25:42.7 & 19:28:35.9 & 21.16 $\pm$ 0.03 & 4046 &  \\ 

1941: A1235 & 2006-04-26 07:39:05 & 11:24:53.6 & 19:33:1.66 & 22.16 $\pm$ 0.06 & 2655 &  \\ 

1942: A1366 & 2006-01-30 12:26:14 & 11:49:46.3 & 67:36:15.9 & 23.07 $\pm$ 0.09 & 4006 &  \\ 

1943: A1366 & 2006-02-25 11:33:20 & 11:52:49.5 & 67:37:42.0 & 22.74 $\pm$ 0.07 & 6142 &  \\ 

1944: A1366 & 2006-02-25 11:33:20 & 11:50:5.13 & 67:36:14.5 & 22.80 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4214 &  \\ 

1945: A565 & 2006-04-23 03:04:32 & 7:15:39.7 & 71:52:47.9 & 21.89 $\pm$ 0.09 & 4917 &  \\ 

1946: A136 & 2006-12-16 02:43:01 & 1:6:55.7 & 25:5:40.9 & 22.57 $\pm$ 0.15 & 5952 &  \\ 

1947: A136 & 2006-12-16 02:43:01 & 1:6:47.5 & 24:58:14.5 & 22.56 $\pm$ 0.15 & 5764 &  \\ 

1948: Z0256 & 2006-12-16 05:11:56 & 3:2:55.7 & 0:2:32.8 & 23.68 $\pm$ 0.53 & 10061 &  \\ 

1949: \enddata

1950: \tablecomments{The following abbreviations were used under the 'Notes' column. IC Cand -- Intracluster SN candidate. RD -- This transient was detected as a variable in more than one epoch }

1951: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{Richards05}; (2) \citet{McMahon02}; (3) \citet{Hao05}; (4) \citet{VandenBerk06}}

1952: 

1953: \end{deluxetable}

1954: 

1955: \clearpage

1956: 

1957: 

1958: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}

1959: %\tabletypesize{\small}

1960: \tablecolumns{8}

1961: \tablecaption{Blue Channel Followup of Transients \label{table:bcs}}

1962: 

1963: \tablehead{

1964: \colhead{Cluster/ID} & \colhead{$\alpha$} & \colhead{$\delta$} &\colhead{UT Date} & \colhead{Classification} & \colhead{$z$} & \colhead{Discovery} & \colhead{Exp.}\\

1965: \colhead{} & \colhead{(J2000.0)} & \colhead{J2000.0} & \colhead{2007 Dec 20} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(sec)}}

1966: \startdata

1967: Abell 1033/ID0&10:32:40.6&+34:58:35.8&0.54&BAL QSO&1.56&22.64$\pm$0.10&600\\

1968: Abell 1033/ID6&10:30:31.9&+34:56:47.0&0.53&SNIb/c?&0.1?&23.16$\pm$0.19&600\\

1969: Abell 1246/ID2&11:24:49.9&+21:36:05.2&0.51&QSO&0.92&21.45$\pm$0.02&600\\

1970: Abell 1246/ID9&11:24:02.5&+21:36:58.1&0.52&Stellar spec&0.0&22.54$\pm$0.06&600\\

1971: Abell 1246/ID10&11:23:49.6&+21:28:40.4&0.50&Cluster SNIa&0.19&20.63$\pm$0.01&900\\

1972: Abell 136/ID3&01:03:55.5&+24:50:20.6&0.08&Galaxy&0.246&21.75$\pm$0.06&1800\\

1973: Abell 136/ID7&01:03:19.9&+25:04:28.4&0.10&Galaxy&0.172&24.5$\pm$0.6&1800\\

1974: Abell 351/ID1&02:26:21.3&-08:54:19.8&0.15&SNIa &0.33&22.71$\pm$0.17&1800\\

1975: Abell 351/ID5&02:25:57.0&-08:45:38.4&0.13&SNIa &0.27&21.71$\pm$0.07&900\\

1976: Abell 516/ID3&04:50:52.5&-08:45:03.5&0.23&Stellar spec&0.0&22.09$\pm$0.07&1800\\

1977: Abell 516/ID8&04:50:29.2&-08:50:01.7&0.26&Stellar spec&0.0&22.93$\pm$0.19&1800\\

1978: Abell 516/ID11&04:49:42.6&-08:51:43.1&0.21&?; IC Candidate&?&23.83$\pm$0.90&1800\\

1979: Abell 620/ID5&08:06:14.8&+45:35:45.5&0.29&Stellar spec&0.0&21.19$\pm$0.04&600\\

1980: Abell 620/ID12&08:05:06.9&+45:32:37.3&0.30&Stellar spec&0.0&21.70$\pm$0.06&1800\\

1981: Abell 646/ID13&08:22:07.0&+46:56:00.5&0.32&QSO&2.36&21.03$\pm$0.07&1800\\

1982: Abell 646/ID19&08:21:05.6&+47:16:33.0&0.35&QSO&2.22&21.40$\pm$0.10&900\\

1983: RXJ0759/ID2&07:59:13.0&+54:04:42.2&0.36&QSO&2.93&22.20$\pm$0.04&900\\

1984: RXJ0759/ID3&07:58:45.9&+54:01:17.5&0.38&Galaxy&0.21&22.09$\pm$0.04&1350\\

1985: RXJ0821/ID4&08:21:23.0&+07:39:41.8&0.45&QSO&0.90&22.20$\pm$0.11&900\\

1986: RXJ0821/ID8&08:20:52.8&+07:52:38.4&0.40&QSO&0.795&21.96$\pm$0.08&900\\

1987: RXJ0821/ID9&08:20:44.6&+07:50:07.6&0.43&QSO&2.17&22.43$\pm$0.13&1350\\

1988: RXJ0821/ID15&08:20:34.3&+07:39:38.1&0.42&Galaxy&0.22&21.73$\pm$0.07&1350\\

1989: Z0256/ID19&02:59:07.8&+00:22:33.0&0.17&Cluster Galaxy&0.199&22.81$\pm$0.14&1800\\

1990: Abell 743/ID10&09:06:55.3&+10:14:13.7&0.48&AGN&0.267&22.00$\pm$0.09&900\\

1991: Abell 743/ID12&09:06:32.5&+10:09:28.7&0.46&SNIa &0.175&21.32$\pm$0.05&1350\\

1992: \enddata

1993: \end{deluxetable}

1994: 

1995: 

1996: 

1997: 

1998: 

1999: 

2000: %?? the R_{BCG}s are way too precise in these tables.

2001: 

2002: 

2003: 

2004: 

2005: \end{document}

2006: