1: %%

2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',

3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.

4: %%

5: %% The original source files were:

6: %%

7: %% template.raw  (with options: `6s')

8: %%

9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.

10: %%

11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach

12: %% All rights reserved

13: %%

14: %%

15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $

16: %%

17: 

18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you

20: %% are satisfied that your installation is

21: %% complete and working.

22: %%

23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting

24: %% potential problems.

25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

26: 

27: \input{aipcheck}

28: 

29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT

31: %%

32: %% The class supports further options.

33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.\newcommand{\vxi}{\boldsymbol\xi}

34: %%

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: 

37: \documentclass[

38:     ,final            % use final for the camera ready runs

39: %%  ,draft            % use draft while you are working on the paper

40:     ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections

41: %%  ,                 % add further options here if necessary

42:   ]

43:   {aipproc}

44: 

45: \usepackage{bm}

46: \layoutstyle{6x9}

47: 

48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

49: %% FRONTMATTER

50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

51: 

52: %\newcommand{\Y}{Y_\ell^m}

53: %\newcommand{\am}{\vert m \vert}

54: %\newcommand{\vx}{\mbox{\boldmath{$x$}}}

55: %\newcommand{\vx}{\boldsymbol x}

56: %\newcommand{\di}{\mbox{\rm div}}

57: %\newcommand{\vxi}{\mbox{\boldmath{$\xi$}}}

58: %\newcommand{\vxi}{\boldsymbol\xi}

59: \begin{document}

60: 

61: \title{Forecasting Seismic

62: Signatures of Stellar Magnetic Activity}

63: 

64: \classification{96.60.Ly, 96.60.qd, 97.10.Jb, 97.10.Sj, 97.20.-w}

65: 

66: \keywords{Helioseismology, solar activity, stellar activity,

67: stellar seismology, $\beta$ Hyi}

68: 

69: \author{W. A. Dziembowski}{

70:   address={Warsaw University Observatory, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478

71:   and Copernicus Astronomical Center, ul. Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warszawa, Poland}

72: }

73: 

74: 

75: \begin{abstract}

76: For the Sun, a tight correlation between various activity measures

77: and oscillation frequencies is well documented. For

78: other stars, we have abundant data on magnetic activity and its

79: changes but not yet on its seismic signature. A prediction of

80: the activity induced frequency changes in stars based

81: on scaling the solar relations is presented. This seismic

82: signature of the activity should be measurable in the data expected

83: within few years.

84: 

85: \end{abstract}

86: 

87: \maketitle

88: 

89: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

90: %% MAINMATTER

91: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

92: 

93: \section{Introduction}

94: 

95: Only a few years after the discovery of low-degree modes of the solar

96: five minute oscillations, Woodard and Noyes (1985) showed using

97: data from the SMM mission taken during the declining phase of

98: cycle 21 that the oscillation frequencies decrease with decreasing

99: Sun's activity. The correlation between various activity measures

100: and the frequencies was definitely confirmed with the data taken

101: during the next activity cycle (Libbrecht \& Woodard 1990;

102: Bachmann \& Brown 1993; Regulo et al. 1994; Elsworth et al.

103: 1994). High precision frequency measurements are now available for

104: a number of solar-like stars (e.g. Bedding \& Kjeldsen 2007).

105: Although, the expected seismic signature of the magnetic activity

106: is very weak indeed, its discovery seems to be only a matter of

107: time.

108: 

109: The relative frequency changes in the eleven-year cycle are at

110: most of the order of $10^{-4}$, which is one order of magnitude less

111: than the changes in the irradiance and three orders less than in

112: the chromospheric emission measures. We should expect a similar

113: situation in distant stars. For many

114: solar-like objects, cyclic variations variations of the

115: chromospheric emission are well established (e.g. Baliunas 1998).

116: Nonetheless, an effort to measure the much weaker seismic signature

117: is of interest because it reflects the changes taking place in

118: deeper layers.

119: 

120: In expectation of data from measurements,

121: Metcalf et al. (2007, hereinafter M07)

122: developed a method for predicting frequency shifts based on

123: scaling the measured p-mode frequency variations and changes

124: of the chromospheric activity indices in the Sun.

125: Specific forecast was made for the radial modes in the

126: subgiant $\beta$ Hyi. In this paper, I outline the principle of

127: the forecasting method adopted in that work and expand on the part

128: concerning nonradial modes.

129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

130: \section{Activity related changes in oscillation frequencies}

131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

132: The starting point in the forecast presented in M07

133: was the variational expression for frequency shifts

134: \begin{equation}

135: \Delta\nu_j={\int d^3{\boldsymbol x}{\cal K}_j{\cal S}\over

136: 2I_j\nu_j},\label{Dn1}

137: \end{equation}

138: where $j\equiv(n,\ell,m)$ identifies the mode, ${\cal K}_j$ is the

139: kernel, which depends on the unperturbed stellar model parameters and

140: eigenvectors of its free oscillations, ${\boldsymbol\xi}({\boldsymbol x})$.

141: The quantity

142: \begin{equation}

143: I_j=\int d^3{\boldsymbol x}\rho|{\boldsymbol\xi}|^3

144:    =R^5\bar\rho\tilde I\label{I}

145: \end{equation}

146: denotes the mode inertia. The second equality defines the dimensionless

147: mode inertia, $\tilde I$. The source, ${\cal S}$, must include the

148: direct feed-back from the magnetic field perturbed by an oscillation

149: mode but also the indirect field effects caused by the perturbation of the

150: equilibrium density, temperature, and velocity of convection. All

151: these effects may be important for frequency shifts at a level of

152: $0.1 \mu$Hz.

153: Disentangling these effects in the solar data is

154: impossible and calculation of their relative contributions to the

155: source is still very uncertain. The general form of the kernels

156: for various effects (see e.g. Goldreich et al. 1991, Dziembowski

157: \& Goode 2004) is complicated but for all of them the leading

158: terms are proportional to $|{\mbox{\rm div}}{\boldsymbol\xi}_j|^2$.

159: 

160: In their semi-empirical determination of ${\cal S}({\boldsymbol x})$ for the

161: Sun, M07 adopted the common kernel

162: \begin{equation}

163: {\cal K}_j({\boldsymbol x})=|{\mbox{\rm div}}{\boldsymbol\xi}_j|^2

164:                            =q_j(D)|Y_\ell^m|^2\label{K1},

165: \end{equation}

166: where $D$ denotes the depth below the photosphere, absorbing the

167: model dependent parameters such as gas density or adiabatic

168: exponent in the unknown source ${\cal S}$. Only the part of ${\cal

169: S}$ that is symmetric about the equator affects mode frequencies.

170: Therefore, without loss of generality, they could use the

171: following expression

172: \begin{equation}

173: {\cal S}({\boldsymbol x})=\sum_{k=0}{\cal S}_k(D)P_{2k}(\mu), \label{S1}

174: \end{equation}

175: where $\mu=\cos\theta$. It follows from equations\,\eqref{Dn1}, \eqref{K1},

176: and \eqref{S1} that only the terms up to $k=\ell$ contribute to the

177: shifts of modes with degree $\ell$.

178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

179: \section{Frequency changes in the Sun}

180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

181: Most of what we know about the changes in the solar oscillation

182: frequencies comes from disc-resolved measurements. The data from such

183: measurements are now commonly represented in the form

184: \begin{equation}

185: \nu_{nlm}=\sum_{i=0}a_{i,n\ell}{\cal P}^\ell_i(m),\label{a}

186: \end{equation}

187: where ${\cal P}^\ell_i(m)$ are orthogonal polynomials of order $i$

188: (see e.g. Schou et al. 1994). The  mean frequencies,

189: $a_0$, yield information on the radial structure of the Sun.

190: The higher even-order $a_k$-coefficients yield separately

191: information on the Sun's asphericity described by the individual

192: Legendre polynomial $P_{2k}(\mu)$ . Thus,

193: from measured shifts, $\Delta a_{2i}$ ($i=0, 1,...$), as functions of

194: the mean frequency, we get our constraints on

195: ${\cal S}_{2i}(D)$ in the Sun.

196: 

197: Using equations\,\eqref{K1} and \eqref{S1} in \eqref{Dn1}, we get

198: \begin{equation}

199: \Delta\nu_{nlm}={q_{nl}\sum_{k=0}^\ell{\cal S}_k\kappa_{k,lm} \over

200: 2I_{nl}\nu_{nl}}\label{Dn2}

201: \end{equation}

202: where, $$\kappa_{k,lm}\equiv\int d\mu d\phi|Y_\ell^m|^2P_{2k}(\mu)={\cal

203: P}^\ell_{2k}(m)Z^\ell_k$$ and $$Z^\ell_k=(-1)^k{(2k-1)!!\over

204: k!}{(2\ell+1)!!\over(2\ell+2k+1)!!} {(\ell-1)!\over(\ell-k)!}.$$

205: This equation with ${\cal S}_k$ derived from data extending from $\ell=0$

206: to over $\ell=100$, allows us to determine the shifts of the low-$\ell$

207: modes much more accurately than if they may have been measured directly.

208: 

209: Data on the frequency shifts show that the source is localized

210: near the Sun's photosphere. Thus, the following simple form of the

211: depth dependence of the coefficients in \eqref{S1} was assumed

212: in M07:

213: \begin{equation}

214: {\cal S}_k(D)=1.5\times10^{-11}A_k\delta(D-D_{c,k}) \mu{\rm Hz}^2,\label{S2}

215: \end{equation}

216: where $A_k$ and $D_{c,k}$ were determined by fitting equation (7) to the

217: data of the $a_{2k}$ coefficient shifts,

218: using the relation

219: \begin{equation}

220: \Delta a_{2k,n\ell}=A_kZ_{k,\ell}Q_{n\ell}(D_{c,k})\label{Da},

221: \end{equation}

222: where we denoted

223: \begin{equation}

224: Q_{n\ell}=1.5\times10^{-11}{q_{n\ell}\over\nu_{n\ell}\tilde I_{n\ell}}\label{Q}.

225: \end{equation}

226: The relation \eqref{Da} follows from equations\,\eqref{a}, \eqref{Dn2},

227: \eqref{S2},

228: and \eqref{I}. The numerical factor is arbitrary. M07 determined only

229: the value of $A_0$, using data for p-modes with $n>1$

230: and $\nu>2.5$. They showed that the mean frequency

231: shifts, $\Delta a_0$, for over 1500 p-modes are well described with

232: our two-parameter fit and that $D_{c,0}\approx0.3\mbox{Mm}$. There was

233: a small systematic departure at low frequencies, indicating that

234: the source extends beneath 0.3 Mm, but it was regarded to be unimportant.

235: For other $a_{2k}$ of low $k$, the fit is also good at similar

236: values of $D_{c,k}$. Thus, data on shifts for each of the low order

237: even $a$-coefficients may be reduced to the single parameters

238: $A_k$. How these parameters correlate with the MgII activity index

239: is shown in Figure\,1. The plotted $A_k$ values were determined on

240: the basis of the $a_{2k}$ coefficients calculated by Jesper Schou

241: for the SOHO MDI

242: data\footnote{http://quake.Stanford.EDU/~schou/asym1/}. The values

243: of $\Delta i_{\rm MgII}$ shown in the bottom panel are from M07

244: and they were based on the NOAA

245: data\footnote{http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/sbuv/NOAMgII.dat}.

246: 

247: \begin{figure}

248:   \includegraphics[height=.48\textheight]{ADI.eps}

249:   \caption{Low order $A_k$ coefficients describing the source of

250:   the oscillation frequency changes

251:   and the changes in the MgII activity index during activity cycle\,23.

252:   The coefficient $A_0$ with a $1\sigma$ error bar, shown in the

253:   top panel, describes the mean-frequencies shifts.

254:   The next three coefficients are shown in the middle panel.

255:   The errors bars are similar to those of $A_0$.}

256: \end{figure}

257: 

258: By comparing the top and lower panels in Figure\,1 (similar plots are

259: shown in Figure\,3 of M07), we see the excellent

260: correlation of the parameter $A_0$ with the changes in the MgII

261: index. Similar correlations exist for the CaII and other activity

262: indexes.

263: %M07 found for the value 22 for the $A_0/\Delta i_{\rm

264: %MgII}$ ratio and adopted it in their forecast of the

265: %frequency changes in $\beta$ Hyi.

266: More complicated variability patterns of the higher order $A_k$, shown

267: in the mid

268: panel of Figure\,1, are closely related to the shift of the activity

269: from intermediate to low latitudes. We may see that there is a

270: correlation between $-A_1$ and $\Delta i_{\rm MgII}$ but other

271: coefficients reach their extreme values at different phases of the cycle.

272: 

273: Having determined the first four $A_k$-coefficients, we may calculate

274: the frequency shifts for modes with degrees $\ell\leq3$. Ignoring

275: small changes in the $a_i$ coefficients, related to the torsional

276: oscillations, we get from equations\,\eqref{Dn2} and \eqref{S2}

277: \begin{equation}

278: \Delta\nu_{nlm}

279: ={R\over M}\sum_{k=0}^\ell A_kQ_{n\ell}(D_{c,k})\kappa_{k,lm},\label{Dn3}

280: \end{equation}

281: where $R$ and $M$ are expressed in solar units. We keep these

282: quantities, because we want to apply this equation to other stars.

283: 

284: With known $A_k(t)$, equation\,\eqref{Dn3} allows us to evaluate changes in

285: the mode frequencies within individual multiplets of low degrees. The plots in

286: Figure\,2 show the calculated frequency changes during cycle 23 of all

287: components in the two selected multiplets. The plots,

288: which begin at the solar minimum phase, take into account

289: rotational frequency shifts, including the linear shift of

290: $m\times0.45\mu$Hz and the tiny second-order effect arising from

291: the centrifugal distortion. At the minimum phase, the multiplets are

292: nearly symmetric about the $m=0$ mode frequency. The small

293: asymmetry of the $\ell=2$ multiplet comes mainly from the $a_4$

294: coefficient, which arises from the polar field. Even the smaller

295: asymmetry of the $\ell=1$ multiplet comes solely from the

296: centrifugal distortion. At the solar maximum the asymmetry is very

297: large. However, this spectacular signature of the magnetic

298: activity is not easy to detect. In fact the asymmetry of an $\ell=2$

299: multiplet was directly measured by Chaplin et al. (2003), long

300: after the first seismic signature of the solar activity has

301: been detected by Woodard and Noyes (1985).

302: 

303: \begin{figure}

304:   \includegraphics[height=.38\textheight]{split}

305:   \caption{The changes in the multiplet structure during the activity

306:   cycle 23 for two

307:   selected multiplets calculated from the $a_0$, $a_1$, and $a_2$

308:   SOHO MDI data.

309:   The dashed lines refer to modes, which correspond to odd values of

310:   $\ell+|m|$ and thus are not detectable in the Sun. There is a drastic

311:   departure from

312:   symmetry about the zonal ($m=0$) frequency at high activity.}

313: \end{figure}

314: 

315: 

316: \section{Predictions for other stars}

317: 

318: The basic assumption in our prediction presented in M07 of

319: the $\ell=0$ mode frequency changes in $\beta$ Hyi was that the

320: relation $$A_0=22\Delta i_{\rm MgII},$$

321: which was found for various phases of the solar cycle is valid for other stars.

322: Instead of $i_{\rm MgII}$, one may use any other global activity index

323: available for

324: the Sun and for a considered star. The richest data on global activity

325: are from {\it the Mount Wilson Observatory - HK Project}, which

326: uses CaII. Unfortunately, this is a northern hemisphere project, which

327: neither includes $\beta$ Hyi, nor any other well studied solar-like

328: pulsators. To apply relation \eqref{Dn3}, we still had to scale

329: $D_{c,0}$ and for that we assumed that it is proportional to the

330: pressure scaleheight at the photosphere, that is

331: \begin{equation}

332: D_{c,0}\propto H_p\propto L^{0.25}R^{1.5}M^{-1}\label{Dc}.

333: \end{equation}

334: 

335: In order to make prediction for nonradial modes, we have to adopt

336: a scaling of the parameters at $k>0$ in equation\,\eqref{S2}. The

337: simplest choice is

338: \begin{equation}

339: A_k\propto A_0\propto\Delta i_{\rm MgII}\quad\mbox{ and }D_{c,k}\propto D_{c,0}.\label{AD}

340: \end{equation}

341: The first proportionality amounts to assume the same

342: {\it butterfly diagram} pattern as

343: in the Sun. The second is another extrapolation of the property found

344: in the solar data.

345: Once we make these additional assumptions, we may calculate, with the use

346: of equation\,\eqref{Dn3}, the expected frequency shift of low degree modes

347: for any star for which the shift in $i_{\rm MgII}$, or any other global

348: activity measure, is known.

349: 

350: If we had measurements of the individual mode frequencies within

351: multiplets, we could test our prediction based on equation\,\eqref{Dn3}

352: with single-season observations because the same equation

353: describes the momentary $\nu(m)$-dependence induced by the

354: momentary magnetic activity. However, such measurements may be

355: difficult, as we learnt from the case of the low-$\ell$ solar

356: oscillation. The problem is that the width of the peaks in the

357: oscillation spectrum is larger than the frequency splitting between

358: the modes. We thus expect that the mean (averaged over multiplet

359: components) frequency shifts will be the first detected seismic

360: signature of the magnetic activity in distant stars.

361: 

362: In order to calculate the mean frequency shifts, we have to

363: weight the individual components which depend

364: on the inclination of the rotation axis to the line of sight, $\theta_o$.

365: The weights should be proportional to the power, which --on average--

366: is proportional to $|Y_\ell^m(\theta_o,0)|^2$. Hence

367: (see equation\,\ref{Dn3}), the mean shifts are given by

368: \begin{equation}

369: \Delta\nu_{n\ell}={2\ell+1\over2}{R\over M}\sum_{k=0}^\ell

370: \left[\sum_{m=-\ell}^{m=\ell}|Y_\ell^m(\theta_o,0)|^2\kappa_{k,lm}\right]

371: A_kQ_{n\ell}(D_{c,k}).\label{Dn4}

372: \end{equation}

373: An unknown inclination introduces additional uncertainty to our

374: prediction for nonradial modes.

375: 

376: \section{The case of $\beta$ Hydri}

377: 

378: The G2IV star $\beta$ Hyi was chosen by M07 for predicting

379: radial mode frequency changes. Modes with $\ell\le2$

380: were measured in the two well separated seasons: 2000.5

381: (Bedding et al. 2001) and 2005.7 (Bedding et al. 2007). There are

382: eight identified p modes with $\ell\le2$ in both data sets.

383: Bedding et al. (2007) find only an insignificant mean frequency

384: shift of $0.1\pm0.4\mu$Hz between these dates.

385: 

386: Archival IUE spectra taken between 1978.5 and 1995.5 are available

387: for this star allowing to determine the changes in the MgII index. The

388: new analysis presented in M07 has led to an estimated cycle period of

389: 12\,y and to a full amplitude of $\Delta i_{\rm MgII}=0.15$. Both

390: numbers are not very different from their solar counterparts. The

391: last observed activity minimum took place around 1992.5. In 2000.5

392: the star was about four years before the next estimated minimum and in

393: 2005.7 about a year after. This means that the interval is not

394: well suited for testing our predictions but there is no better

395: data available on frequencies and activity for any object.

396: 

397: In order to apply equation\,\eqref{Dn4} for predicting frequency shifts, we

398: need a stellar model. The one used by M07 and

399: here has mass, $M=1.1$, radius, $R=1.82$, luminosity, $L=3.17$

400: (all in solar units), age=6.7 Gy, and the metallicity parameter

401: $Z=0.0138$. It reproduces the observed mean parameters of the star and

402: the large frequency separation. The values of $A_k$ and $D_c$ were

403: calculated according to relations \eqref{Dc} and \eqref{AD}, adopting

404: $\Delta i_{\rm MgII}=0.8\Delta i_{\rm MgII,\odot}$ and

405: $D_{c,\odot}=0.3\,$Mm. The numbers calculated for modes

406: identified in the $\beta$ Hyi oscillation spectrum by Bedding et al. (2007)

407: are shown in Figure\,3.

408: \begin{figure}

409:   \includegraphics[height=.4\textheight]{bH}

410:   \caption{Predicted oscillation frequency shifts in $\beta$ Hyi between

411:    its activity minimum (2004.5) and maximum (2010.5). The dates were

412:    inferred in M07 on the basis of the $i_{\rm MgII}$

413:    behaviour between 1978.5 and 1995.5}

414: \end{figure}

415: From the numbers in this figure, we may see that within a few years we

416: have a chance to detect a marginally significant seismic signature

417: of the high activity state of $\beta$ Hyi. However, a major

418: improvement in frequency measurements is needed in order to learn

419: more about the star's activity changes by means of asteroseismology.

420: Once it is achieved and the differences in frequency shifts

421: between modes of different degrees are measured, we may get a

422: useful constraint on the longitudinal dependence of the activity

423: changes.

424: 

425: \section{Discussion}

426: 

427: The presented method of calculating an expected seismic signature of

428: stellar magnetic activity consists in extrapolating

429: the solar relation between changes in the p-mode frequencies and the

430: chromospheric activity indices. The extrapolation lacks a sound

431: physical justification so it should be regarded as a very

432: uncertain forecast.

433: 

434: Numerical predictions of the frequency shifts

435: were given for $\beta$ Hyi, which, like our Sun. is not a very

436: active star. The star is brighter and more evolved than the Sun but

437: there are no large differences between the two objects. The predicted shifts

438: were found similar to those measured in the Sun. They are small

439: and consistent with the null results of existing measurements but

440: they may be measurable within the next few years.

441: 

442: It could be more interesting to test the prediction for

443: a more active object. Unfortunately, there are none among those stars

444: for which data on solar-like oscillations are available. Magnetic activity

445: inhibits precise frequency measurements. Indeed, the analysis of the data

446: collected

447: during the solar cycle 23 shows that the widths of the peaks in the

448: oscillation spectra increase by some 15\%

449: at the high activity phase (Jim\'enez-Reyes et al. 2003).

450: On the other hand, since more active stars are

451: also faster rotators, the multiplet structure should be easier to

452: resolve. Thus, I believe such objects should be included in the

453: list of asteroseismic targets. The forecast based on the extrapolation

454: of solar data to more active stars is more risky.

455: However, regardless whether the forecast is right or wrong, its comparison

456: with reality will teach us something interesting about stellar activity.

457: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

458: %% BACKMATTER

459: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

460: 

461: \begin{theacknowledgments}

462: This work was supported by the Polish MNiI grant No.~1~P03D~021~28.

463: \end{theacknowledgments}

464: 

465: \begin{thebibliography}{15}

466: \bibitem{3}

467: Bachmann K.~T., Brown T.~M., 1993, ApJ, 411, L45

468: \bibitem{7}

469: Baliunas S.~L., Donahue R.~A., Soon W., Henry G.~W., 1998, in

470: Donahue R.~A., Bookbinder J.~A, eds,  ASP Conf. Ser. Vol.\,85,

471: Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun. Astron. Soc. Pac.,

472: San Francisco, p.\,153

473: \bibitem{13}

474: Bedding T.~R. et al., 2001, ApJ, 549, L105

475: \bibitem{14}

476: Bedding T.~R. et al., 2007, ApJ, 663, 1315

477: \bibitem{6}

478: Bedding T.~R., Kjeldsen H., 2007, Comm. Asteroseis., 150, 106

479: \bibitem{11}

480: Chaplin W.~J. et al., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 343

481: \bibitem{10}

482: Dziembowski W.~A., Goode P.~R., 2004, ApJ, 600, 464

483: \bibitem{5}

484: Elsworth Y. et al., 1994, ApJ, 434, 801

485: \bibitem{9}

486: Goldreich P., Murray N., Willette G., Kumar P., 1991, ApJ,

487: 370, 752

488: \bibitem{15}

489: Jim\'enez-Reyes S.~J., Garc\'ia R.~A., Jim\'enez A., Chaplin

490: W.~J., 2003, ApJ, 595, 446

491: \bibitem{2}

492: Libbrecht K.~G., Woodard M.~F., 1990, Nat., 345, 779

493: \bibitem{8}

494: Metcalfe T.~S., Dziembowski W.~A., Judge P.~G., Snow M.,

495: 2007, MNRAS, 379, L16 (M07)

496: \bibitem{4}

497: Regulo C., Jimenez A., Palle P.~L., Perez~Hernandez F.,

498: Roca~Cortes T., 1994, ApJ, 434, 384

499: \bibitem{12}

500: Schou J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Thompson M.~J., 1994, ApJ, 433, 389

501: \bibitem{1}

502: Woodard M., Noyes R., 1985, Nat., 318, 449

503: \end{thebibliography}

504: \end{document}

505: