1: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}

2: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

4: 

5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

6: 

7: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

8: 

9: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document: 

10: 

11: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

12: 

13: \usepackage{epsf}

14: \usepackage{graphics}

15: %\input{psfig}

16: 

17: 

18: 

19: %\special{!userdict begin /bop-hook{gsave 300 30 translate 25 rotate

20: %/Times-Roman findfont 40 scalefont setfont 0 0 moveto 0.9 setgray

21: %(version 2003-10-14) show grestore}def end}

22: 

23: 

24: 

25: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

26: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}

27: \newcommand{\cts}{cts s$^{-1}$}

28: \newcommand{\ax}{$\alpha_{\rm X}$}

29: \newcommand{\aox}{$\alpha_{\rm ox}$}

30: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-2}$}

31: \newcommand{\rb}[1]{\raisebox{1.5ex}[-1.5ex]{#1}}

32: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}$}

33: \newcommand{\dM}{$\dot M$}

34: \newcommand{\dMM}{$\dot{M}/M$}

35: \newcommand{\dMedd}{$\dot M_{\rm Edd}$}

36: \newcommand{\pl}{$\pm$}

37: \newcommand{\nh}{$N_{\rm H}$}

38: \newcommand{\sigo}{$\sigma_{\rm [OIII]}$}

39: \newcommand{\sigs}{$\sigma_{*}$}

40: \newcommand{\sig}{$\sigma$}

41: \newcommand{\mbh}{$M_{\rm BH}$}

42: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra }}

43: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al. }}

44: %

45: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}

46: 

47: 

48: \shorttitle{z=0 Absorption}

49: \shortauthors{Mathur et al.}

50: 

51: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

52: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

53: 

54: \begin{document}

55: 

56: 

57: 

58: %\input clipfig.tex

59: %\useunitmm

60: 

61: 

62: \def \charthoffset {\hspace{0.2cm}} \def \charthsep {\hspace{0.3cm}}

63: \def \chartvsepcap {\vspace{0.3cm}}

64: \def \chartvsep {\vspace{0.1cm}}

65: \newcommand{\putchartb}[1]{\clipfig{/home/halley/dgrupe/ps/#1}{85}{20}{0}{275}{192}}

66: \newcommand{\putchartc}[1]{\clipfig{/home/halley/dgrupe/ps/#1}{55}{33}{19}{275}{195}}

67: %

68: %

69: %

70: \newcommand{\chartlineb}[2]{\parbox[t]{18cm}{\noindent\charthoffset\putchartb{#1}\charthsep\putchartb{#2}\chartvsep}}

71: 

72: \newcommand{\chartlinec}[2]{\parbox[t]{18cm}{\noindent\charthoffset\putchartc{#1}\charthsep\putchartc{#2}\chartvsep}}

73: 

74: \def\lya{\ifmmode {\rm Ly}\alpha~ \else Ly$\alpha$~\fi}

75: \def\lyb{\ifmmode {\rm Ly}\beta~ \else Ly$\beta$~\fi}

76: \def\lyg{\ifmmode {\rm Ly}\gamma~ \else Ly$\gamma$~\fi}

77: \def\civ{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc iv}~ \else C\,{\sc iv}~\fi}

78: \def\civn{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc iv}~ \else C\,{\sc iv}\fi}

79: \def\cvn{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc v}~ \else C\,{\sc v}\fi}

80: \def\cvin{\ifmmode {\rm C}\,{\sc vi}~ \else C\,{\sc vi}\fi}

81: \def\nvn{\ifmmode {\rm N}\,{\sc v}~ \else N\,{\sc v}\fi}

82: \def\nvin{\ifmmode {\rm N}\,{\sc vi}~ \else N\,{\sc vi}\fi}

83: \def\nviin{\ifmmode {\rm N}\,{\sc vii}~ \else N\,{\sc vii}\fi}

84: \def\siiii{Si\,{\sc III}~}

85: \def\oi{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc i}}~}}

86: \def\oin{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc i}}}}

87: \def\ov{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc v}}~}}

88: \def\ovi{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc vi}}~}}

89: \def\ovii{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc vii}}~}}

90: \def\oviii{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc viii}}~}}

91: \def\ovn{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc v}}}}

92: \def\ovin{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc vi}}}}

93: \def\oviin{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc vii}}}}

94: \def\oviiin{{{\rm O}\,\hbox{{\sc viii}}}}

95: \def\neix{\ifmmode {\rm Ne}\,{\sc ix}~ \else Ne\,{\sc ix}~\fi}

96: \def\nex{\ifmmode {\rm Ne}\,{\sc x}~ \else Ne\,{\sc x}~\fi}

97: \def\hi{\ifmmode {\rm H}\,{\sc i}~ \else H\,{\sc i}~\fi}

98: \def\kms{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}}

99: \def\hubunits{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}

100: \def\K{\,{\rm K}}

101: \def\cm{{\rm cm}}

102: \def\chandra {{\it Chandra}~}

103: \def\chandran {{\it Chandra}}

104: 

105: %\def\kms    {~km~s$^{-1}$~}

106: %\def\gax    {${_>\atop^{\sim}}$}

107: %\def\lax    {${_<\atop^{\sim}}$}

108: \def\etal   {{\it et~al.}~}

109: \def\kms {{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}

110: 

111: 

112: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

113: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

114: %% you desire.

115: 

116: \title{On the nature of the z=0 X-ray absorbers: I. Clues from an

117:  external group}

118: 

119: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

120: %% author and affiliation information.

121: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

122: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

123: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

124: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

125: 

126: \author{Smita Mathur\altaffilmark{1}, Gregory R. Sivakoff\altaffilmark{1},

127:  Rik J. Williams\altaffilmark{2}, \& Fabrizio Nicastro\altaffilmark{3} }

128: \altaffiltext{1}

129: {Astronomy Department, Ohio State University,

130:     140 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH-43210, U.S.A.}

131: \altaffiltext{2}

132: {Leiden Observatory, Lieden University, P.O.Box 9513,

133: 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands}

134: \altaffiltext{3}

135: {SAO, 60 Garden Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA}

136: 

137: 

138: 

139: \email{smita@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}

140: 

141: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

142: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

143: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

144: %% affiliation.

145: 

146: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observat}

147: 

148: 

149: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

150: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

151: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

152: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

153: %% editorial office after submission.

154: 

155: \begin{abstract}

156: 

157: Absorption lines of \ovii at redshift zero are observed in high quality

158: \chandra spectra of extragalactic sightlines. The location of the

159: absorber producing these lines, whether from the corona of the Galaxy or

160: from the Local Group or even larger scale structure, has been a matter

161: of debate. Here we study another poor group like our Local Group to

162: understand the distribution of column density from galaxy to group

163: scales. We show that we cannot yet rule out the group origin of z=0

164: systems. We further argue that the debate over Galactic

165: vs. extragalactic origin of z=0 systems is premature as they likely

166: contain both components and predict that future higher resolution

167: observations will resolve the z=0 systems into multiple components.

168: \end{abstract}

169: 

170: 

171: \keywords{Galaxy: halo -- Local Group -- galaxies: clusters: general --

172:  galaxies: clusters: individual (NGC~1600) -- intergalactic medium

173:  --X-rays: galaxies: clusters }

174: 

175: \section{Introduction}

176: \label{sec|Intro}

177: 

178:  \chandra and {\it XMM--Newton} observations have detected absorption

179:  lines due to highly ionized elements, notably \ovii, at redshift zero

180:  toward all extragalactic sight lines with sufficiently high quality

181:  grating spectra. The location of the absorber producing these lines has

182:  been a matter of debate, centering primarily on two scenarios: (1) in

183:  the extended halo of our Galaxy or (2) in the Local Group (LG) or the

184:  large scale structure around the Galaxy. There are good arguments in

185:  support of both (1) and (2). Wang et al (2005) find \ovii absorption

186:  toward the large Magellanic cloud (LMC). Bregman \& Lloyd--Davies

187:  (2007) find correlated \ovii line strength with soft X-ray emission

188:  from the Galaxy. Similar observations and theoretical arguments by Fang

189:  et al. (2006) support scenario (1). Galactic fountain models (Shapiro

190:  \& Field 1976) also predict a hot halo around star--forming spiral

191:  galaxies, perhaps including the Galaxy itself. Models of large scale

192:  structure and galaxy formation, on the other hand, suggest that

193:  scenario (2) is a plausible source for local absorption. Comparison of

194:  \ovii absorption strength with the emission measure suggests a

195:  low-density extended environment (Rasmussen et al. 2003). Direct

196:  determinations of temperature and density through photo-- and

197:  collisional--ionization models of the observed absorption line ratios

198:  do not rule out either scenario (Williams et al. 2005,2006,2007), but

199:  in at least two cases the velocity dispersion and/or centroid of the

200:  \ovii\ is inconsistent with known lower--ionization Galactic

201:  components.

202: 

203: The importance of this debate hinges on the total mass probed by the

204: \ovii absorption lines, which in turn depends upon the assumed path

205: length. If the \ovii absorbers are related to the Galaxy, then the

206: associated mass is insignificant (though it can provide an important

207: constraint on models of galaxy formation and feedback). On the other

208: hand, if they trace the large intergalactic scale (or LG) structure, the

209: associated baryon reservoir becomes comparable to the baryonic mass of

210: all Local Group galaxies combined. It is well known that a fraction of

211: LG baryons are ``missing''; the total mass inferred from known galaxies

212: and in observed cold and hot gas falls short of the dynamical mass of

213: the LG assuming the baryon fraction is 15\% of the dark matter (Kahn \&

214: Woltjer 1959; Nicastro et al. 2003 and references therein). It is likely

215: that these missing baryons are in the not-yet observed warm-hot phase,

216: which would be traced by \ovii lines.

217: 

218: It is difficult to resolve this issue with simple observations, because

219: the spectral resolution of current X-ray gratings is insufficient to

220: resolve the absorption lines into Galactic and LG components; this is

221: why a variety of approaches were undertaken by different groups cited

222: above. In fact, there is almost certainly some hot gas associated with

223: the thick disk of the Galaxy. What we need to know is whether there are

224: components to the z=0 systems from the Galactic corona, LG, and extended

225: structures, and if so, what is their relative contribution. In this

226: article we attempt to answer a simple question: given what is seen in

227: other poor groups of galaxies, can we rule out

228: \ovii absorption from intra-group gas at strengths as observed as in

229: $z=0$ systems? We determine, from the perspective of an observer

230: centered within NGC 1600 (a poor group of galaxies comparable to the

231: Local Group), how much the galactic and intragroup media would each

232: contribute to the local warm-hot column density.

233: 

234: 

235: \section{Method}

236: \label{sec|Method}

237: 

238: The Local Group is a poor group of galaxies, consisting of two main

239: galaxies and a number of satellite galaxies. Needless to say, there are

240: other poor groups in the Universe. The physical properties of the

241: intra-group gas, such as temperature and luminosity, and its radial

242: distribution are governed by the group gravitational potential, not by

243: individual galaxies. It would be of interest, therefore, to study the

244: distribution of gas in and around individual galaxies and in the

245: intra-group medium in a poor group similar to the Local Group.

246: 

247: One such group, for which \chandra data already exist, is NGC~1600. The

248: high spatial resolution offered by \chandra is important here, as it

249: allows exact decomposition of observed intensity profile into the

250: galactic and group components; this will be clear in the following

251: discussion. This group is also poor, made of three galaxies, NGC~1600,

252: NGC~1601, and NGC~1603 of which NGC~1601 is a lenticular galaxy while

253: the other two are ellipticals. Admittedly, the galaxies in this group

254: are different from the LG galaxies, but the group richness is similar,

255: so the properties of the intra-group gas, which are of interest for our

256: purpose, should be similar, on the order-of-magnitude level, to the

257: LG. The NGC~1600 group was observed with \chandra in September 2002. The

258: details of the observations and data reduction are presented in

259: Sivakoff, Sarazin \& Carlin (2004, hereafter Paper I). While the focus

260: of their work was on the bright elliptical galaxy NGC~1600, the entire

261: image of the group was analyzed by these authors (see their Figure 1).

262: 

263: The analysis of the extended X-ray emission from the NGC~1600 group

264: presented in Paper I is as follows. The X-ray emission

265: extends all the way from the center of the central galaxy to the

266: outskirts of the group. From visual inspection of the group

267: emission, it is clear that there is a smooth transition from the

268: central galaxy emission to the group emission. The surface brightness

269: profile of the diffuse X-ray emission is well fit by the sum of two beta

270: models, each defined as: 

271: \begin{equation}

272: I_X(a) = I_0\left[1+\left(\frac{a}{a_c}\right)^2\right]^{-3\beta+1/2}

273: \end{equation}

274: where one component corresponds to the interstellar medium of the central

275: galaxy and the other to the intra-group gas; $I_0$ and $a_c$ are

276: the central surface brightness and core radius respectively. The group

277: emission starts to dominate beyond about 25\arcsec\ from the center

278: corresponding to 7.3 kpc at the source. The emission from the central

279: galaxy is soft while that from the group is harder. There is also soft

280: extended emission in/around the other two smaller galaxies. In

281: addition there is a tail of soft emission connecting NGC~1603 and

282: NGC~1600 (see Paper I, Figure 7). The center of the group potential lies

283: to the northeast of the galaxy NGC~1600. The temperature of the group gas

284: is $\sim 1.5$ keV as deduced from the spectral fits, and consistent with

285: the temperature of other X-ray bright groups. Note that 1.5 keV

286: corresponds to a temperature of about $1.6\times 10^7$K; the temperature

287: range of $10^5$--$10^7$K is called warm-hot, and it is in this

288: temperature range most of the baryons in the low redshift Universe are

289: believed to be hiding (Cen \& Ostriker 1999; Nicastro et al. 2004).

290: 

291: From the temperature and the radial surface brightness profile

292: (described as a double beta model), it is straightforward to estimate

293: the radial density distribution. In Paper I, the X-ray emitting hot gas

294: was fitted with an optically thin thermal plasma model (MEKAL model in

295: XSPEC). In this model, the luminosity is simply $L= P^{\prime} \times

296: EM$ and $EM$, the emission measure is $\int n_e^2 dV$. The

297: multiplicative factor $P^{\prime}$ at each wavelength depends on

298: density, temperature and metal abundances (Mewe et al. 1985). Thus, by

299: fitting the observed X-ray spectrum in the 0.3--8 keV band, one can

300: determine the three free parameters of the model, viz. temperature,

301: density and abundance. In Paper I, the metallicity of the intra-group gas

302: was not well constrained, but was found to be consistent with

303: approximately solar (albeit with a factor of $\sim 2$ uncertainty).

304: 

305: For the purpose of this paper, we need to determine the column density

306: of the warm-hot gas from the perspective of an observer centered on the

307: NGC~1600 galaxy, which can be calculated by integrating the density 

308: profile. If we were to observe distant quasars from this vantage point,

309:  our sight lines would pass

310: through both the galaxy and group media. Our aim is to determine how much

311: column density is contributed by each of these components.

312: 

313: %

314: %FS: PLEASE RE-WRITE THE EQUATIONS. I SEEM TO HAVE TEX PROBLEMS.

315: %\begin{eqrray}

316: %{\rm M}_{1450} = AB_{1450} + 2.5\log (1+z) + 97.45 - 5\log D_{\rm

317: %L}(z)

318: %{\rm M}_{\rm B}= {\rm M}_{1450} + 2.5 \alpha \log(4400/1450) +

319: %0.12

320: %\end{equation}

321: 

322: \section{Results}

323: \label{result}

324: 

325: In Figure 1, we have plotted the observed density distribution in the

326: NGC~1600 group. As noted above, the entire surface brightness

327: distribution is described as a double beta model, one corresponding to

328: the gas in the galaxy NGC~1600 and one corresponding to the

329: group. Accordingly, we determine the density distributions of both the

330: components; the dashed line in figure 1 is for the galaxy NGC~1600, the

331: dot-dashed line is for the group and the solid line corresponds to the

332: total. At the distance of the source (D=59.98 Mpc, Prugniel \& Simien

333: 1996), one arcsecond corresponds to 0.29 Kpc. As expected, the density

334: distribution is dominated by the galactic component in the inner 20

335: arcseconds, beyond which the group component dominates. In the

336: transition region around 20 arcseconds from the center, there is a bump

337: in the density distribution which is an artifact of the fitting

338: procedure; the exact density around this transition region, however, is

339: immaterial for the purpose of this paper.

340: 

341: The column density through the gas is simply $N=\int n dr$, which we

342: have plotted in Figure 2. Again the dashed line corresponds to the

343: contribution by the galaxy, while the dot-dashed line marks the group

344: contribution and the solid line is for the total. As expected, the

345: column density due to the galaxy asymptotically approaches a limit of

346: $\sim 3\times 10^{20} \cm^{-2}$ at around 10 kpc from the center. The

347: group contribution is monotonically rising, and dominates the total

348: column density beyond about 200 kpc. At a distance of 1 Mpc from the

349: center, the group's column density is about $4.5\times 10^{20}

350: \cm^{-2}$.

351: 

352: In Figure 3, we have also plotted the mass distributions associated with

353: the warm-hot gas in the galaxy and the group. As expected, the mass

354: associated with the galaxy saturates at about $3\times 10^8$\msun. For a

355: group size of about a Mpc ($\sim 3000^{\prime\prime}$), the mass

356: associated with the group gas is four orders of magnitude larger, about

357: $3.5\times 10^{12}$\msun. The solid line in figure 3 corresponds to the

358: gravitational mass of the group as calculated in Paper I; at 1Mpc this

359: is $4\times 10^{13}$\msun, implying a baryonic to dark matter ratio of

360: about 1/10.

361: 

362: %This implies a baryonic to dark matter

363: %ratio of 1/5 which is higher than the normally accepted value of

364: %1/6. This either means that the ratio is higher for NGC~1600, which is

365: %not a relaxed cluster, so does not have the ``universal'' baryon to dark

366: %matter ratio, or it means that the group does not extend all the way to

367: %1Mpc from the center. WHAT IS GENERALLY KNOWN FOR GROUPS?? If we

368: %restrict the group size to less than 150Kpc, then the baryonic to dark

369: %matter ratio is about 1/6.

370: 

371: 

372: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}

373: \label{Concl}

374: 

375: As discussed in \S 1, we observe absorption lines of \ovii at $z=0$ in

376: \chandra spectra of extragalactic objects. The column density of \ovii

377: varies from about $1.6\times 10^{16} \cm^{-2}$ in Mrk 421 and Mrk 279, to

378: $6.3\times 10^{15} \cm^{-2}$ in PKS~2155-304, all within a $1\sigma$ range

379: of $1\times 10^{16} \cm^{-2}$. Assuming a fraction of oxygen in the \ovii

380: state to be unity (which is the case for the temperatures and densities

381: observed at $z=0$), and solar abundance to be $\log(n_O/n_H)= -3.13$,

382: the corresponding total column density is $N_H = 2.2\times 10^{20}

383: \cm^{-2}$ for [O/H] of $-1$ (a tenth solar metallicity). If the

384: metallicity is a third solar, the total column density would be $N_H =

385: 6.7\times 10^{19} \cm^{-2}$ and if the metallicity is close to solar,

386: the corresponding $N_H = 2.2\times 10^{19} \cm^{-2}$. Note that in

387: groups and clusters of galaxies, metallicities are believed to be of the

388: order of a third solar. However, the comparison that we make here is

389: independent of the actual value of the metallicity assumed as long as we

390: assume it to be the same for the local absorption systems and the group.

391: 

392: In the calculations leading to figures 1, 2, \& 3, solar metallicity was

393: assumed. As mentioned above, the total column density through the galaxy

394: NGC~1600 is $N_H = 4\times 10^{20} \cm^{-2}$. Thus, a column density as

395: observed in the z=0 systems can be easily accommodated in NGC~1600, both

396: the galaxy and the group. 

397: 

398: There are several caveats to the above statement which we need to

399: discuss at this stage. (1) Our Galaxy is a spiral galaxy while NGC~1600

400: is an elliptical, so the distribution of warm/hot gas in the two need

401: not be similar. (2) The observed, emitting gas in the galaxy and the

402: group NGC~1600 is too hot to contain significant amounts of \oviin. (3)

403: The density of the emitting gas is also much higher than what is

404: observed in z=0 absorption systems and (4) the mass of the NGC~1600

405: group is an order of magnitude larger than the LG; the observed high

406: temperature is likely the result of the high mass. We discuss each of

407: these caveats below.

408: 

409: 

410: Elliptical galaxies, such as NGC~1600, are known to be filled with warm

411: hot gas, resulting in diffuse emission. On the other hand, the X-ray

412: emission from spiral galaxies is dominated by their point source

413: population, well correlated with the optical blue light (Palumbo et

414: al. 1985), while extended diffuse X-ray emission is typically associated

415: with outflows from extreme starburst activity. The column density of

416: warm/hot gas through a normal spiral galaxy is thus likely to be much

417: smaller than that through NGC~1600; for instance, diffuse X-ray emission

418: has been detected in M31 but it appears to be primarily concentrated in

419: the bulge and/or associated with hot stars in the disk (Trudolyubov et

420: al. 2005 and references therein). We chose to analyze the NGC~1600 group

421: because of its similarity with the Local Group (in terms of being a poor

422: group), not because of its central galaxy.  Moreover, the question at

423: hand is not whether the $z=0$ system can arise in the Galaxy (or NGC

424: 1600), but rather {\it could the intergalactic gas in a poor group of

425: galaxies, such as the Local Group, produce X-ray absorption at the

426: strength observed at $z=0$?}  For this reason, the exact properties of

427: the constituent galaxies are immaterial.

428: 

429: 

430: 

431: %Moreover, the question at hand was not

432: %{\it can the z=0 system arise in the Galaxy}, but {\it can the z=0

433: %system arise in the Local Group medium}. For this reason, the exact

434: %properties of the constituent galaxies were immaterial.

435: 

436: For NGC~1600, the column density derived, as shown in Figure 2, is for

437: the gas emitting in X-rays. Because the emissivity depends strongly on

438: emission measure, much of the {\it emission} comes from hotter, denser

439: gas while the z=0 {\it absorption} systems would be dominated by low

440: density diffuse gas at lower temperature ($\sim 10^6$K). Indeed, at

441: temperatures above $10^7$K, the fractional ionization of oxygen in \ovii

442: state is practically zero, so the gas observed in emission would

443: contribute nil to \ovii absorption (see, e.g., figure 4 in Mathur,

444: Weinberg \& Chen 2003 for the fractional ionization of oxygen as a

445: function of temperature).  Examination of Figure 1 in Paper I shows that

446: the detectable diffuse emission from the NGC~1600 group extends out to

447: about 70 kpc from the center. At about 300 kpc ($1000^{\prime\prime}$),

448: the density falls to the value observed in the Mrk~421 z=0 system

449: ($1.2\times 10^{-4} cm^{-3}$; figure 1). At such distances, the gas

450: could also be cooler, if it hasn't yet fallen into the group

451: potential. Thus, instead of considering the total column density through

452: the group, it might be more appropriate to determine the column density

453: accumulated beyond 300 kpc. From figure 2, this turns out to be $\sim

454: 1\times 10^{20} cm^{-2}$, which can still accommodate the z=0

455: systems. The assertion of gas being cooler in the outskirts of

456: groups/clusters appears to be justified: the intracluster gas

457: temperature of the Coma cluster is 8.21 keV (Hughes et al. 1993). At

458: such high temperatures, most of the gas is fully ionized, and yet

459: emission lines of \oviin, \oviiin, and \neix were detected at the

460: position of the cluster (Takei et al. 2007), presumably from the cooler

461: outskirts.

462: 

463: It is also interesting to note here that the gas temperature in the

464: galaxy NGC~1600, even though somewhat lower than that in the group core,

465: is still quite hot: 0.85 keV ($9.86\times 10^6$K). The fractional

466: ionization of oxygen in \ovii state at such temperatures is still

467: practically zero. Thus, the gas seen in emission in the galaxy NGC~1600

468: will {\it not} produce absorption lines as seen in the z=0 systems.

469: 

470: The total gravitational mass of the Local Group is $\sim 2\times

471: 10^{12}$\msun (Kahn \& Woltjer 1959; Peebles 1995) which is about an

472: order of magnitude smaller than that of the NGC~1600 group (figure

473: 3). This leads to a column density which is also an order of magnitude

474: smaller (if the change in mass is a result of the change in central

475: density), or $N_H = 4\times 10^{19}$\cm, again consistent with what is

476: observed in the z=0 systems. More importantly, smaller mass of LG would

477: imply lower temperature than the NGC~1600 group, bringing it closer to

478: the WHIM temperature range where fractional ionization of \ovii

479: peaks. Fang et al (2007) detected \oviii absorption line near a small

480: group containing four galaxies, indicating that the temperature becomes

481: higher for groups more massive than ours.

482: 

483: Note also that the beta models were fitted to the NGC~1600 group up to a

484: radius of $180^{\prime\prime}$ and their extrapolation out to

485: $1000^{\prime\prime}$ may not be appropriate. While an abrupt change in

486: the density profile is not to be expected, and would not be physical, we

487: need to keep this caveat in mind. Nonetheless, the analysis of the

488: density profile of a real poor group like NGC~1600 allows us to make

489: reasonable estimates of mass and column density profiles, as shown in

490: figures 2 \& 3. One major argument against the large-scale origin of z=0

491: systems was made by Collins, Shull \& Giroux (2005) based on, what was

492: claimed to be, the unacceptably excessive mass of such a structure. They

493: showed that if the \ovii absorbers are distributed in a spherical shell

494: centered around the LG at a mean radius of $\approx 1$Mpc, then the

495: associated total mass would be 12 times larger than the gravitational

496: mass of the LG (assuming a metallicity of a tenth solar and baryon to

497: dark matter fraction of 1/6). Such excessive mass results from the

498: assumption of the shell geometry, and to a lesser extent from the

499: assumption of metallicity. Williams et al. (2005) have already shown

500: that the mass can be reasonable for metallicities of a third solar and

501: if the gas is uniformly distributed over the sphere of $\approx 1$Mpc

502: radius. With even a more realistic density profile, as shown here by a

503: beta model for NGC~1600, the baryonic mass lies well below 1/6 of the

504: dark matter mass as is clear from figure 3 (and the numbers given in

505: \S3).

506: 

507: Clearly, there are several poor groups in the nearby Universe, and NGC

508: 1600 is just one of them. We will exploit the \chandra archive and

509: perform similar analysis of other poor groups to characterize their

510: similarities and differences to draw further inferences on the nature of

511: the z=0 systems. In particular, it would be of interest to find a group

512: as massive as the LG and containing spiral galaxies.

513: 

514: % In this paper we are {\it not} arguing for the Local Group origin of

515: % the z=0 systems, nor are we saying that there is an exact match between

516: % the NGC~1600 group and the Local Group. The point we are making is the

517: % following. 

518:  Of course, in studying an external group of galaxies we cannot make

519:  {\it direct} inferences about the Local Group's matter content, and we

520:  are thus not claiming a definitive Local Group origin for the $z=0$

521:  X-ray absorption systems.  However, it appears reasonable to state

522:  that, given what we observe in poor groups, such an origin cannot be

523:  ruled out, and is entirely plausible in some circumstances. In fact,

524:  given the current limitations of X-ray spectrographs, it is perhaps

525:  premature to have a debate on their Galactic vs. extragalactic origin.

526:  If we take lessons from other groups, such as NGC~1600, the z=0 systems

527:  most likely contain both Galactic and Local Group components, and also

528:  perhaps components from larger structures such as the Local Sheet. We

529:  predict that future higher resolution observations will resolve the z=0

530:  systems in two or more components. One would be a low velocity

531:  component associated with the disk of the Galaxy and one or more may

532:  arise from extended structures. FUSE, which resolves low- and

533:  high-velocity components, has a spectral resolution of R=20000 in the

534:  medium resolution mode. Next generation X-ray spectrographs will have

535:  to have resolution of at least R=3000 (100 km/s) to begin to resolve

536:  different velocity components.

537: 

538: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURES%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

539: %

540: %

541: 

542: 

543: \begin{thebibliography}{}

544: 

545: \bibitem[Bregman & Lloyd-Davies(2007)]{}

546: Bregman, J.N. \& Lloyd--Davies, E.J. 2007, \apj, accepted (arxiv:0707.1699)

547: 

548: \bibitem[Cen \& Ostriker(1999)]{}

549: Cen, R., \& Ostriker, J.~P.  1999, \apj, 514, 1

550: 

551: \bibitem[Collins et al. (2005)]{}

552: Collins, J; Shull, M.; \& Giroux, M.  2005, ApJ, 623, 196

553: 

554: \bibitem[Fang et al.(2006)]{}

555: Fang, T.-T., McKee, C.F., Canizares, C.R., \& Wolfire, M. 2006, \apj,

556: 644, 174

557: 

558: \bibitem[Fang et al.(2007)]{}

559: Fang, T.-T., Canizares, C.R., \& Yao, Y. 2007, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0708.1800)

560: 

561: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1993)]{}

562: Hughes, J., Butcher, I., Stewart, G., \& Tanaka, Y. 1993, ApJ, 404, 611

563: 

564: \bibitem[Kahn \& Woltjer (1959)]{}

565: Kahn, F. D \& Woltjer, L. 1959 ApJ, 130, 705

566: 

567: \bibitem[Mathur  et al.(2003)]{}

568: Mathur, S., Weinberg, D.H., \& Chen, X. 2003, ApJ, 582, 82

569: 

570: \bibitem[Mewe  et al.(1985)]{}

571: Mewe, et al. 1985, A\&AS, 62, 197

572: 

573: \bibitem[Nicastro et al.(2002)]{}

574: Nicastro, F. \etal 2002, Nature, 421, 719 

575: 

576: \bibitem[Nicastro et al.(2004)]{}

577: Nicastro, F. \etal 2004, Nature, 433, 494

578: 

579: \bibitem[Palumbo et al. (1985)]{}

580: Palumbo, G. G. C.; Fabbiano, G.; Trinchieri, G.; \& Fransson, C. 1985,

581: ApJ, 298, 259

582: 

583: \bibitem[Peebles (1995)]{}

584: Peebles, P.J.E. 1995, ApJ, 449, 52

585: 

586: \bibitem[Prugniel \& Simien (1996)]{}

587: Prugniel, P. \& Simien, F. 1996, A\&A, 309, 749

588: 

589: \bibitem[Rasmussen et al.(2003)]{}

590: Rasmussen, A., Kahn, S.M., \& Paerels, F.  2003, ASSL Conference Proceedings, 

591: 208, 109

592: 

593: \bibitem[Shapiro \& Field(1976)]{}

594: Shapiro, P.R. \& Field, G.B. 1976, \apj, 205, 762

595: 

596: \bibitem[Sivakoff et al. (2004)]{}

597: Sivakoff, G. R., Sarazin, C. \& Carlin, J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 262 (Paper I).

598: 

599: \bibitem[Takei et al.(2007)]{}

600: Takei, Y. et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 831

601: 

602: \bibitem[Trudolyubov et al.(2005)]{}

603: Trudolyubov, S., Kotov, O., Priedhorsky, W., Cordova, F., \& Mason, K. 2005,

604: \apj, 634, 314

605: 

606: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2005)]{}

607: Wang, Q.D., Yao, Y., Tripp, T.M., Fang, T.-T., Cui, W., Nicastro, F.,

608: Mathur, S., Williams, R.J., Song, L., \& Croft, R. 2005, \apj, 635, 386

609: 

610: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2005)]{rikneon}

611: Williams, R.J., Mathur, S., Nicastro, F., Elvis, M., Drake, J.J., Fang,

612: T., Fiore, F., Krongold, Y., Wang, Q.D., \& Yao, Y.  2005, \apj, 631,

613: 856

614: 

615: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2006)]{rik}

616: Williams, R., Mathur, S., \& Nicastro, F.  2006, \apj, 645, 179

617: 

618: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2007)]{pks2155}

619: Williams, R., Mathur, S., Nicastro, F., \& Elvis, M. 2007, \apj, 665, 247

620: 

621: \end{thebibliography}

622: 

623: \newpage

624: \begin{figure*}[t!]

625: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig1.ps}

626: }

627: \caption{The gas density profile in the NGC~1600 galaxy (dashed line)

628: and group (dot-dashed line). The solid line is for the total density

629: profile.}

630: \label{fig|density}

631: \end{figure*}

632: 

633: \begin{figure*}[t!]

634: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig2.ps}

635: }

636: \caption{The column density through NGC~1600. The solid line shows the

637:  total column density while the dashed and dot-dashed lines mark the

638:  contributions of the galaxy and the group gas respectively. While the

639:  galaxy dominates the column density out to 200 kpc, the group column

640:  density dominates the total for longer sightlines.}

641: \label{fig|density}

642: \end{figure*}

643: 

644: \begin{figure*}[t!]

645: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip=true]{fig3.ps}

646: }

647: \caption{The gas mass profiles in the NGC~1600 group. The solid line is

648:  for the total gravitational mass (adapted from Paper I), which is

649:  significantly larger than the gas mass.}

650: \label{fig|density}

651: \end{figure*}

652: 

653: \end{document}

654: 

655: 

656: 

657: %%

658: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

659: