1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\documentclass{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,apjfonts}
5:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
8: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
9: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
10: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14:
15: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
16: \newcommand{\myemail}{aprestwich@cfa.harvard.edu}
17: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}}
18: \newcommand{\swift}{{\it SWIFT}}
19: \newcommand{\mac}{[MAC92] 17-A}
20: \newcommand{\xone}{IC 10 X-1}
21: \newcommand{\heii}{HeII 4686\AA}
22: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}}
23: \newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}
24: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
25:
26:
27: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
28: %\slugcomment{to be submitted to ApJ, October 2001}
29:
30: \shorttitle{The Orbital Period of IC 10 X-1 }
31: \shortauthors{Prestwich et al.}
32:
33: %\received{2002 June 8}
34:
35: \title{The Orbital Period of the Wolf-Rayet Binary \xone; Dynamic
36: Evidence that the Compact Object is a Black Hole}
37:
38: \author{A .H. Prestwich \& R. Kilgard}
39: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA
40: 02138}
41: \author{P.A Crowther}
42: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, UK}
43: \author{S. Carpano \& A.M.T. Pollock}
44: \affil{\xmm\ Science Operations Center, ESAC, 28080 Madrid,
45: Spain}
46: \author{A. Zezas \& S.H. Saar}
47: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA
48: 02138}
49: \author{T.P. Roberts \& M. J. Ward}
50: \affil{Dept of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE,
51: UK}
52:
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: \xone\ is a bright (L$_x$=10$^{38}$ ergs$^{-1}$) variable X-ray
56: source in the local group starburst galaxy IC 10. The most plausible
57: optical counterpart is a luminous Wolf-Rayet star, making \xone\ a rare
58: example of a Wolf-Rayet X-ray binary. In this paper, we report on the
59: detection of an X-ray orbital period for \xone\ of 34.4 hours. This result,
60: combined with a re-examination of optical spectra, allow us
61: to determine a mass function for the system $f(M)=7.8$\msun\ and a
62: probable
63: mass for the compact object of $24-33$\msun. If this analysis is
64: correct, the compact object is the most massive known stellar black
65: black hole. We further show that the
66: observed period is inconsistent with Roche lobe overflow, suggesting
67: that the binary is detached and the black hole is accreting the wind
68: of the Wolf-Rayet star. The observed mass loss rate of \mac\ is
69: sufficient to power the X-ray luminosity of \xone.
70:
71: \end{abstract}
72: \keywords{stars: Wolf-Rayet --- galaxies: starburst --- X-rays:
73: binaries --- X-rays: galaxies}
74:
75:
76:
77: \section{Introduction}
78:
79: Models of the evolution of High Mass X-ray Binaries (HMXB) predict the
80: existence of helium star+compact object pairs
81: \citep{vandenH73}. Such systems should form at the very end of the
82: X-ray binary evolution, after the secondary (donor) star has been
83: stripped of it's hydrogen either through Roche lobe overflow or mass
84: loss via a strong wind. In either case, a luminous helium star with
85: a compact companion is formed \citep{E&Y98}. These systems are expected to be
86: rare. \cite{E&Y98} predict $\sim$100 helium star+black hole
87: pairs in the Galaxy. However, only a small number of these are
88: expected to form accretion disks and hence be visible as X-ray sources. Identification of such rare systems is important, because they have
89: the potential to put strong constraints on the evolution of massive binary
90: pairs. There are currently only three candidates: Cyg X-3, NGC 300
91: X-1
92: \citep{carpano07a} and \xone.
93:
94: \xone\ is a bright (L$_x$=10$^{38}$ ergs$^{-1}$) variable X-ray
95: source in the local group metal-poor starburst galaxy IC 10
96: \citep{brandt97,B&B04}. It is surrounded by a shell of non thermal
97: radio emission \citep{yang93} and X-ray emission
98: \citep{wang05,brandt97} which may be associated with the supernova
99: which produced the compact object in \xone. There are 4 possible
100: optical counterparts to the X-ray source,
101: with the most plausible being a bright Wolf Rayet star \mac\
102: \citep{Crow03}. Spectroscopic observations of \mac\ reveal prominent
103: He II line emission, suggesting an identification as a WNE star
104: \citep{C&C04}. In this
105: paper we report the discovery of an X-ray orbital period in \xone\ using data
106: from \swift\ and \chandra\ \citep{prestwich_atel06}. In
107: Section~\ref{obs} we describe the \chandra\ and \swift\
108: observations, and in Section~\ref{discuss} we discuss the constraints
109: the period puts on the accretion mechanisms and mass of the compact
110: companion.
111:
112: \section{Obervations and Data Analysis}
113: \label{obs}
114: \xone\ was observed with \chandra\ on 2006 2 November and 2006 4
115: November for approximately 45 ks per observation (ObsIDs 7802 and
116: 8458). Data were processed using standard \textit{CIAO} analysis
117: software, version 3.4. After extraction of a lightcurve, we observed
118: a large (factor of 7) flux increase in the first Chandra observation followed
119: by a similar flux decrease in the second observation (see
120: Figure~\ref{fig:lc}). The large flux change and sharp profile of the
121: flux modulations suggested we were observing eclipses in \xone.
122: We immediately applied for, and were generously awarded, a SWIFT
123: target-of-opportunity (TOO) observation of 100 ks. \xone\ was observed with \swift\ beginning 2006 21 November for
124: approximately 700 seconds per 90 minute \swift\ orbit for a total of
125: 97 ks spanning 246 hours. Data were processed by the \swift\ pipeline and screened using standard procedures outlined in the XRT Data Reduction Guide.
126:
127: \subsection{Timing Analysis}
128:
129: In order to search for periodic signals in the \swift\ observations of
130: \xone, we merge the \swift\ event files using the \textit{CIAO} tool
131: \textit{dmmerge}. We extract the events in a 60\arcsec\ radius around
132: the \chandra\ source position; this is reasonable due to both the
133: extent of the \swift\ point-spread function and the sparsity of nearby
134: sources as observed in the \chandra\ observations. The A Lomb-Scargle (LS)
135: periodogram of \xone\ is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:PG}. The
136: periodogram shows no evidence for increased noise at low frequencies
137: (``red noise''), indicating that the LS method can be used to search
138: for peaks in the power spectrum. The
139: full data range was searched from the Nyquist frequency (twice the
140: 2.5073 s XRT readout rate) to half the full observation duration of
141: 123 hours. The normalization used in the LS method is the
142: total variance of the data \citep{horne86}. The LS periodogram determines a period of 34.40. Following the method of
143: \cite{horne86} we determine a period
144: uncertainty of $\pm$ 0.83 hours.
145:
146: Two sets of simulations to were
147: carried out to ascertain the false alarm probability (FAP) of the signal. The first
148: was a Monte Carlo simulation, in which fake spectra were generated
149: with Gaussian noise set to the standard deviation of the actual data. The second was a bootstrap method,
150: which creates a fake periodogram by randomly rearranging real data
151: values. Observation times were taken from the real data, and
152: $1\times10^5$ fake spectra were generated for each method. The number of simulated spectra with peak amplitudes greater
153: than the the observed peak amplitude (i.e. the FAP) was
154: 0 in both Monte Carlo and Bootstrap simulations. Thus the FAP $< 1\times10^{-5}$,
155: and the significance $> 4.5 \sigma$
156:
157: \xone\ was observerd in 2003 by both \chandra\ and \xmm. The 30 ks \chandra\ observation of \xone\ showed the source to be
158: variable, but did not show any evidence for an eclipse \citep{B&B04}.
159: A sharp increase in the X-ray flux of \xone\
160: during the 45 ks \xmm\ observation is probably due to an eclipse egress
161: \citep{wang05}. The data in these observations are consistent with
162: the period derived in this paper.
163:
164:
165:
166:
167: \section{Discussion}
168: \label{discuss}
169:
170: The most plausible explanation for the
171: regular flux modulations is an
172: orbital eclipse of the X-ray emitting object by the donor
173: star. It is unlikely the observed period is super-orbital (e.g. due to a precessing
174: warped accretion disk) because it is shorter than
175: most super-orbital periods (most are 10-100 days,
176: e.g. \cite{clarkson04}). While we cannot rule out an alternative
177: explanation without a fully sampled optical radial velocity curve, we
178: assume the modulation is orbital for the rest of the paper.
179:
180:
181: \subsection{Constraints on the Accretion Mechanism}
182:
183: The period can be used to constrain the accretion mechanism, in
184: particular to determine whether the donor fills its Roche lobe, or
185: whether accretion occurs via a wind. Here
186: we test the hypothesis that the accretion is via Roche lobe overflow
187: by determing whether the observed period is consistent with
188: theoretical values of the period for compact object masses in the
189: range 1-100\msun.
190:
191: The orbital period, P, is related to the mass of the primary ($M_1$),
192: the mass of the donor ($M_2$) and
193: the separation between them ($a$) via Kepler's Third Law:
194:
195:
196: \begin{equation}
197: \label{kep}
198: P=\frac{2\pi a^{3/2}}{[G(M_1+M_2)]^{1/2}}
199: \end{equation}
200:
201: Here we assume that the inclination of the system is close to 90 $\deg$, as
202: implied by the existence of an eclipse.
203: If we assume that the donor fills its Roche lobe, we can make the
204: simplifying assumption that the Roche lobe radius ($R_{cr}$) is equal
205: to the donor radius ($R_2$). The separation can then be expressed as
206: \citep{egg83}:
207:
208: \begin{equation}
209: a=R_{2} \frac{0.6q^{2/3}+ln(1+q^{1/3})}{0.49q^{2/3}}
210: \label{roche}
211: \end{equation}
212:
213: where $q=M_2/M_1$. If the mass and radius of the donor star are
214: known, equations \ref{kep} and \ref{roche} can be used to determine
215: values of the period for plausible masses of the compact object.
216:
217: The
218: mass of \mac\ derived from spectroscopic data is $\sim35$ \msun\
219: \citep{C&C04}. The uncertainty on this value is large. It is
220: possible (but unlikely) that \mac\ might have a mass as low as 17
221: \msun. The radius of \mac\ is derived using standard Mass-Radius values for WR stars taken from
222: \cite{lang89}. Assuming that \mac\ is indeed the donor star, we find
223: that for M$_1$=1-100\msun\ the period derived using equations
224: \ref{kep} and \ref{roche} is 2-3.5 hours. These conclusions still
225: apply if the mass of \mac\ is closer to 17 \msun than 35 \msun. Clearly, the observed
226: period is inconsistent with Roche lobe overflow and implies that
227: accretion is via a wind as seen in many other high mass X-ray
228: binaries.
229:
230: \subsection{The Mass of the Compact Object}
231:
232: The standard method to measure the mass of stars in a binary system
233: is to determine the mass function (e.g. \cite{mcl06}):
234: \begin{equation}
235: f(M) \equiv \frac{P K_{2}^{3}}{2\pi G}=\frac{M_1\sin^3 i}{(1+q)^2}
236: \label{mf}
237: \end{equation}
238:
239: where $K_2$ is the half amplitude of the velocity curve of the
240: secondary. The mass function is the minimum mass of the compact
241: primary. In the case of the \xone\ system, we have reasonable
242: estimates for the the orbital period and the
243: inclination but require a value of $K_2$ to secure the mass
244: function. The centroid of the \heii\ line is commonly used to
245: determine the radial velocity of WR+OB binaries because it is formed
246: in the inner wind, close to the star. In the light of the discovery of the orbital period in
247: \xone, we re-examined the optical spectra presented by \cite{C&C04} to
248: search for shifts in the centroid of the \heii\ line which might
249: be due to the orbital motion. We note that the spectrum of \mac\ is
250: characteristic of a WN star, and does not show evidence for features
251: seen in accretion driven outflows (e.g. HI, HeI, FeII). We are
252: therefore reasonably confident that the \heii\ line in \mac\ is associated with the
253: donor star and has minimal contribution from any accretion disk.
254:
255: Individual Gemini GMOS spectra of \mac\ were re-extracted
256: relative to the IC~10 nebular [OIII] 5006.8 \AA\ line.
257: Figure~\ref{fig:opt} shows the individual spectra together with
258: Gaussian fits to the \heii\ line. Two one-hour exposures were taken sequentially on the
259: night of December 22 2001, and two further spectra obtained on the nights of
260: January 13 2002 and January 15 2002. As might expected for a binary
261: system with a period of 34.4 hours, there is no evidence for a shift
262: in the velocity centroid of the stellar \heii\ line within IC 10 for the two
263: exposures taken on December 22 2001. However, the line centroid on 15
264: Jan 2002 is definitely shifted substantially relative to the other
265: datasets. The FWHM of the fitted gaussian for the 15 Jan 2002 dataset is narrower
266: than that determined for the other epochs (10\AA\ vs 15-17\AA). This
267: may be due to a CCD defect which contaminates the red component of
268: the 15 Jan 2002 line. Our best estimate for the centroid of the \heii\
269: line on 15 Jan 2002 is $\sim -300$ \kms, compared to $\sim
270: +450$ \kms\ for the other epochs.
271:
272:
273: We make the assumption that the
274: shift in the \heii\ line centroid of approximately $750$ \kms\ is
275: due to the radial velocity of \mac. We further assume that
276: $750$ \kms\ corresponds to the maximum possible velocity
277: displacement. We find that $K_2=375$ \kms\ and the mass function
278: $f(M)=7.8$ \msun. This value of the mass function implies that the compact
279: object is a black hole.
280:
281: We can further constrain the mass of the
282: compact object by using equation \ref{mf} and assuming a range of
283: reasonable values for the mass of the donor star and inclination of
284: the system, as shown in Table~\ref{tab:inc}. The mass of \mac\ derived by \cite{C&C04} from
285: spectroscopic data is $\sim35$ \msun. There is considerable
286: uncertainty in this estimate, and so we use a conservative lower
287: limit of $17$ \msun. The existance of deep eclipses suggests that the
288: inclination of the system is close to 90 $\deg$, however we cannot rule
289: out the possibility that the inclination is considerably less and use
290: 45 $\deg$ as a lower limit. Table~\ref{tab:inc} demonstrates that the
291: minimum mass of the black hole to satisfy the constraints of
292: equation~\ref{mf} is $\sim23$ \msun. Assuming the inclination of the
293: system is close to 90 $\deg$, the mass of the black
294: hole is most plausibly in the range $23-34$ \msun. However, if the
295: inclination is much lower than expected (close to 45 $\deg$) the black hole mass can be as
296: high as $\sim57$ \msun.
297:
298: If the mass of the the compact object in \xone\ is indeed $>$23
299: \msun, it is the most massive known stellar black hole with a
300: dynamically a determined mass (the record is curently held by GRS
301: 1915+105 with a mass 10-18 \msun \citep{r&mcc06}.) Most models
302: predict that the remnants of a supernova explosion have masses below
303: 20 \msun \citep{Fry&K01}. It is possible that the black hole in \xone\ has increased
304: it's mass by accreting material from \mac\ \citep{Pod03} The low metallicity of IC
305: 10 may also be conducive to the formation of higher mass black holes \citep{Fry&K01}. Detailed
306: theoretical models need to be developed to understand the evolutionary
307: history of \xone.
308:
309:
310:
311:
312:
313: \subsection{Is the Model of \xone\ Self Consistent?}
314: \label{consist}
315:
316: The results from this and previous studies of the \xone\ system suggest
317: that it is a detached binary composed of a massive
318: ($\sim35$ \msun) Wolf-Rayet star with a 23-34 \msun\ black hole
319: companion. X-rays are produced as material from the wind of \mac\ is
320: accreted via an accretion disk onto the black hole. It is important to test the self-consistency of this model
321: and show that such a system is indeed capable of forming an accretion
322: disk and producing X-rays.
323:
324: A black hole in a detached binary system can form an accretion disk
325: (and hence be a strong X-ray source) if the following condition is
326: met e.g.\citep{E&Y98}:
327:
328: \begin{equation}
329: P < 4.8(M_{BH}/M_{\odot})v_{1000}^{-4}\delta^2
330: \end{equation}
331: where $M_{BH}$ is the mass of the black hole, $v$ the velocity of the
332: wind impacting the compact object in
333: units of $1000$ \kms, P is the period in hours,
334: and $\delta$ a dimensionless parameter of order unity. If the mass
335: of the black hole is $24-34$ \msun\ we find that this condition is
336: satisfied if $v \leq 1400-1500$ \kms. The terminal wind velocity of
337: \mac\ was estimated by \cite{C&C04} to be $v_{\infty}= 1750$ \kms. The velocity of the wind impacting the black hole will be
338: less than the terminal velocity; the upper limit of $1400-1500$ \kms\
339: is consistent with the wind structure of a Wolf-Rayet star
340: \citep{carp07}.
341:
342:
343: The energy released by material falling onto a compact object via an
344: accretion disk is given by $L=\eta \dot{M} c^2$, \citep{S&S73},
345: where $\dot{M}$ is the accretion rate and $\eta$ the efficiency. If
346: we assume $\eta=0.1$, the mass accretion rate required to sustain an
347: X-ray luminosity of L$_x\sim 2\times10^{38}$ ergs$^{-1}$ is
348: $\sim 3.5 \times 10^{-8}$ \msun yr$^{-1}$. The
349: mass loss rate of \mac\ derived by \cite{C&C04} is $\sim 10^{-5}$ \msun
350: yr$^{-1}$. We therefore conclude that direct wind fed accretion is
351: consistent with the observed X-ray luminosity.
352:
353: \subsection{\xone\ and the Star Formation History of IC 10}
354:
355: Both the mass of the donor and the mass of the compact object in
356: \xone\ indicate that
357: this system is less than 10~Myr old. This is consistent
358: with the suggestion that there have been pockets of
359: star formation $\sim3-4$~Myr ago which may still be on-going
360: \citep{hunter01}. There are several dozen WR stars in IC 10, also
361: indicating recent star formation
362: \citep{M&H02,Crow03}. The fact that the donor is a
363: He-core WR star indicates that its initial mass was much higher
364: (probably in
365: excess of 60\msun\ \cite{M&M05}) in which case the
366: system could have formed in one of the recent star formation events.
367: The presence of a shell of ionized gas around the system, probably
368: related to supernova activity, indicates that there is still on-going
369: star-formation in that region. The formation of the very massive progenitors of this binary requires a very
370: flat IMF. \cite{hunter01}, finds that such a flat IMF is consistent
371: with a star-formation scenario of widespread activity $\sim40$~Myr ago
372: and more recent ($\sim3-4$~Myr) localized events.
373:
374: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
375: We have used \swift\ and \chandra\ to determine the orbital period of
376: the bright Wolf-Rayet X-ray binary \xone\ to be 34.4 hours. Using this
377: value of the period, and the mass of the donor star derived by
378: \cite{C&C04} from optical spectroscopy, we use Kepler's laws to show
379: that the donor star almost certainly does not fill its Roche lobe.
380: We cannot derive the mass function of the binary system or mass of the
381: compact companion from the period alone. However, re-examination of
382: published optical data reveals a shift in the centroid of the
383: \heii\ line most likely due to orbital motion of the donor
384: star. If this is the case, the mass function $f(M)\sim7.8$ \msun\ and
385: the compact object is a black hole. Assuming that the mass of the
386: donor star is $17-35M$ \msun, we calculate that the black hole mass is
387: $\sim24-34$ \msun. If confirmed, this makes \xone\
388: the most massive black hole binary known. We
389: show that it is possible for an accretion disk to form and that the
390: observed mass loss rate can power the X-ray luminosity.
391:
392:
393: \section{Acknowledgments}
394: We are grateful to the Swift science team, in particular Neil Gehrels
395: and David Burrows for approving our Swift TOO. We also thank Swift
396: team members Kim Page and David Morris for assistance with observation
397: planning and analysis. We are very grateful to Miriam Krauss for
398: help with the timing analysis, and to
399: Frank Primini and Jeff McClintock for helpful discussions.
400:
401: Support for this work was provided by the National Aeronautics and
402: Space Administration through Chandra Award Number GO6-7080X issued by
403: the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the
404: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the
405: National Aeronautics Space Administration under contract
406: NAS8-03060. This work was also supported by NASA contract NAS 8-39073.
407:
408: This paper
409: uses data from the Gemini Observatory, which is opperated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the Particle Physics \& Research Council (UK), the National Reseach Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil), and CONICET (Argentina).
410:
411:
412:
413: \begin{thebibliography}{}
414:
415: \bibitem[Bauer \& Brandt(2004)]{B&B04} Bauer, F.~E., \&
416: Brandt, W.~N.\ 2004, \apjl, 601, L67
417:
418: \bibitem[Brandt et al.(1997)]{brandt97} Brandt, W.~N., Ward,
419: M.~J., Fabian, A.~C., \& Hodge, P.~W.\ 1997, \mnras, 291, 709
420:
421:
422: \bibitem[Carpano et al.(2007a)]{carpano07a} Carpano, S., Pollock,
423: A.~M.~T., Wilms, J., Ehle, M., \& Schirmer, M.\ 2007a, \aap, 461, L9
424:
425: \bibitem[Carpano et al. (2007b)]{carp07} Carpano, S., Pollock, A.M.T.,
426: Prestwich, A., Crowther, P., Wilms, J., Yungelson, L., \& Ehle, M.\
427: 2007b, accepted for publication in \aap
428:
429: \bibitem[Carpano et al.(2007c)]{carp_atel07} Carpano, S., Pollock,
430: A., Prestwich, A., Crowther, P., Yungelson, L., Wilms, J., Ehle, M. \&
431: Pollock, A.M.T. \
432: 2007c, The Astronomer's Telegram, 974, 1
433:
434: \bibitem[Eggleton(1983)]{egg83} Eggleton, P.~P.\ 1983, \apj,
435: 268, 368
436:
437: \bibitem[Massey \& Holmes(2002)]{M&H02} Massey, P., \&
438: Holmes, S.\ 2002, \apjl, 580, L35
439:
440:
441: \bibitem[McClintock \& Remillard(2006)]{mcl06} McClintock,
442: J.~E., \& Remillard, R.~A.\ 2006, Compact stellar X-ray sources, 157
443:
444: \bibitem[Clark \& Crowther(2004)]{C&C04} Clark, J.~S., \&
445: Crowther, P.~A.\ 2004, \aap, 414, L45
446:
447:
448: \bibitem[Clarkson et al.(2004)]{clarkson04} Clarkson, W.~I.,
449: Charles, P.~A., Coe, M.~J., \& Laycock, S.\ 2004, Nuclear Physics B
450: Proceedings Supplements, 132, 588
451:
452: \bibitem[Crowther et al.(2003)]{Crow03} Crowther, P.~A.,
453: Drissen, L., Abbott, J.~B., Royer, P., \& Smartt, S.~J.\ 2003, \aap, 404,
454: 483
455:
456: \bibitem[Ergma \& Yungelson(1998)]{E&Y98} Ergma, E., \&
457: Yungelson, L.~R.\ 1998, \aap, 333, 151
458:
459:
460: \bibitem[Fryer \& Kalogera(2001)]{Fry&K01} Fryer, C.~L., \&
461: Kalogera, V.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 548
462:
463: \bibitem[Ghosh et al.(2006)]{ghosh06} Ghosh, K.~K., Rappaport,
464: S., Tennant, A.~F., Swartz, D.~A., Pooley, D., \& Madhusudhan, N.\ 2006,
465: \apj, 650, 872
466:
467:
468: \bibitem[Horne \& Baliunas(1986)]{horne86} Horne, J.~H., \&
469: Baliunas, S.~L.\ 1986, \apj, 302, 757
470:
471: \bibitem[Hunter(2001)]{hunter01} Hunter, D.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 559,
472: 225
473:
474: \bibitem[Langer(1989)]{lang89} Langer, N.\ 1989, \aap, 210, 93
475:
476: \bibitem[Meynet \& Maeder(2005)]{M&M05} Meynet, G., \&
477: Maeder, A.\ 2005, \aap, 429, 581
478:
479:
480: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski et al.(2003)]{Pod03} Podsiadlowski,
481: P., Rappaport, S., \& Han, Z.\ 2003, \mnras, 341, 385
482:
483: \bibitem[Prestwich et al.(2006)]{prestwich_atel06} Prestwich, A.~H.,
484: Kilgard, R.~E., Carpano, S., Saar, S., Page, K., Roberts, A.~P.~T., Ward,
485: M., \& Zezas, A.\ 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 955, 1
486:
487: \bibitem[Remillard \& McClintock(2006)]{r&mcc06} Remillard,
488: R.~A., \& McClintock, J.~E.\ 2006, \araa, 44, 49
489:
490: \bibitem[Shakura \& Syunyaev(1973)]{S&S73} Shakura, N.~I., \&
491: Syunyaev, R.~A.\ 1973, \aap, 24, 337
492:
493: \bibitem[van den Heuvel \& de Loore(1973)]{vandenH73} van den
494: Heuvel, E.~P.~J., \& de Loore, C.\ 1973, \aap, 25, 387
495:
496:
497: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2005)]{wang05} Wang, Q.~D., Whitaker,
498: K.~E., \& Williams, R.\ 2005, \mnras, 362, 1065
499:
500: \bibitem[Yang \& Skillman(1993)]{yang93} Yang, H., \&
501: Skillman, E.~D.\ 1993, \aj, 106, 1448
502:
503:
504: \end{thebibliography}
505:
506: \clearpage
507:
508: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
509: \tablecolumns{5}
510: \tablewidth{0pc}
511: \tablecaption{Black Hole Mass (in \msun) as a Function of Inclination and Donor Mass}
512: \tablehead{
513: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Donor Mass (\msun)} \\
514: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{17} & \colhead{25} & \colhead{35}\\
515: \colhead{Inclination ($\deg$)} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &\colhead{} }
516: \startdata
517:
518: 90& & 23 & 28 & 34\\
519: 60 & & 29 & 35 & 41\\
520: 45 & & 43 & 49 & 57 \\
521: \enddata
522: \label{tab:inc}
523: \end{deluxetable}
524:
525: \clearpage
526:
527: \begin{figure}
528: \epsscale{0.5}
529: \plotone{f1.ps}
530: \caption{\swift\ lightcurve of \xone\ in 100 second time bins. Overplotted in red is the \chandra\ lightcurve in 1000 second bins. The \chandra\ count rate is reduced by a factor of 5 to approximate the lower effective area of \swift. The \chandra\ data is also shifted forward in time by $13\times\ p$ where p is the Lomb-Scargle period. Times are relative to the start of \swift\ observations, 2006 21 November at 05:11:05 UTC. The blue curve is the period derived by the Lomb-Scargle periodogram.}
531: \label{fig:lc}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534:
535: \begin{figure}
536: \epsscale{0.5}
537: \plotone{f2.ps}
538: \caption{The power spectrum of \xone. The horizontal dotted lines
539: correspond to the false-alarm probability corresponding to 1, 2, and
540: 3-sigma significance.}
541: \label{fig:PG}
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: \begin{figure}
545: \epsscale{0.5}
546: \plotone{f3.eps}
547: \caption{The HeII 4686 \AA line in \mac. Four individual spectra are
548: shown. Zero velocity is shown as the dashed line. There is clear evidence that the
549: line centroid has shifted.}
550: \label{fig:opt}
551: \end{figure}
552: \end{document}
553:
554:
555: