1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: % 

3: % \usepackage{graphicx}

4: % \usepackage{natbib}

5: % \citestyle{aa}

6: % \bibliographystyle{apj}

7: % \usepackage{longtable}

8: % 

9: % Astronomical definitions

10: % 

11: \def\nid{\noindent}

12: \def\cen{\centerline}

13: \def\mvs{\vskip 0.2in}

14: \def\svs{\vskip 0.1in}

15: % 

16: % Abbreviations

17: \def \ie        {\hbox{\it i.e.,~}}

18: \def \eg        {\hbox{\it e.g.,~}}

19: \def \cf        {\hbox{\it cf.~}}

20: \def \vs        {\hbox{\it vs.~}}

21: \def \etal      {\hbox{\it et~al.}}

22: \def \hst       {{\it HST}}

23: % Astronomical quantities and Units

24: \def \msun      {\ M_{\odot}}

25: \def \lsun      {\ L_{\odot}}

26: \def \arcmin    {^\prime}

27: \def \arcsec    {{^{\prime\prime}}}

28: \def \mpc       {{\rm\ Mpc}}

29: \def \kpc       {{\rm\ kpc}}

30: \def \pc        {{\rm\ pc}}

31: \def \kms       {\hbox{ km s$^{-1}$}}

32: \def \hr        {{\rm\ hr}}

33: \def \yr        {{\rm\ yr}}

34: \def \myr       {{\rm\ Myr}} 

35: \def \gyr       {{\rm\ Gyr}} 

36: \def \dln       {\hbox{\rm d$\,$ln }}

37: \def \dlog      {\hbox{\rm d$\,$log }}

38: \def \K         {\hbox{$\,$ K} }

39: \def \H0        {{\rm\ H_{0}}}

40: \def \kmsmpc    {{\rm\ km\ s^{-1}\ Mpc^{-1}}}

41: \def \kev       {{\rm\ keV}}

42: \def \ev        {{\rm\ eV}}

43: \def \msol      {{\rm M}_\odot}

44: \def \h         {\hbox{$\, h$} }

45: \def \hinv      {\hbox{$\, h^{-1}$} }

46: \def \ergs      { \hbox{$\,$ erg s$^{-1}$} }

47: \def \rms       {{\it rms~} }

48: \def \cgsflux   {{\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}}}

49: \def \cntflux   {{\rm\ cnts\ s^{-1}\ arcmin^{-2}}} 

50: \def \cc        {{\rm cm^{-3}}}

51: \def \mag       {{\rm\ mag}}

52: \def \magarc    {{\rm\ mag\ arcmin^{-2}}}

53: % Mike's definitions

54: \def\arcsecpoint{$''\!,$}

55: \def\arcminpoint{$'\!.$}

56: \def\deg{$^{\rm o}$}

57: \def\ltsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{<}{\sim}\;$}}

58: \def\gtsim{\raisebox{-.5ex}{$\;\stackrel{>}{\sim}\;$}}

59: % More of my definitions

60: \def \mum       {{\rm\ {\mu}m}}

61: \def \kel       {{\rm\ K}}

62: 

63: % 

64: % begin paper content

65: \begin{document}

66: % \journalid{}{}

67: % \articleid{}{}

68: % \slugcomment{submitted to {\it The Astrophysical Journal}}

69: 

70: \shortauthors{Deo, Crenshaw, \& Kraemer}

71: 

72: \shorttitle{{\it Spitzer}/IRS Spectra of Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s}

73: 

74: \title{Spitzer/IRS Observations of Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s:\\

75:   A Comparison with Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s}

76: 

77: \author{R. P. Deo\altaffilmark{1}, D. M. Crenshaw\altaffilmark{1},

78:   S. B. Kraemer\altaffilmark{2}, M. Dietrich\altaffilmark{3},

79:   M. Elitzur\altaffilmark{4}, H. Teplitz\altaffilmark{5},

80:   T. J. Turner\altaffilmark{6}}

81: 

82: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University,

83:   Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; deo@chara.gsu.edu and crenshaw@chara.gsu.edu}

84: 

85: \altaffiltext{2}{Catholic University of America, and the Exploration of the

86:   Universe Division, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 667,

87:   Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; stiskraemer@yancey.gsfc.nasa.gov.}

88: 

89: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 4055

90:   McPherson Laboratory, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;

91:   dietrich@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}

92: 

93: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

94:   Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0055, USA; moshe@pa.uky.edu}

95: 

96: \altaffiltext{5}{Spitzer Science Center, MS 220-6, Caltech, Pasadena, CA

97:   91125, USA. hit@ipac.caltech.edu}

98: 

99: \altaffiltext{6}{Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland Baltimore County,

100:   1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA

101:   turner@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov ; Code 662, Exploration of the Universe

102:   Division, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}

103: 

104: \begin{abstract}

105:   We present {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} mid-infrared spectra of 12 Seyfert

106:   1.8 and 1.9 galaxies over the $5\textrm{--}38 \mum$ region. We compare the

107:   spectral characteristics of this sample to those of $58$ Seyfert 1 and

108:   Seyfert 2 galaxies from the {\it Spitzer} archives. An analysis of the

109:   spectral shapes, the silicate $10 \mum$ feature and the emission line fluxes

110:   have enabled us to characterize the mid-IR properties of Seyfert 1.8/1.9s.

111:   We find that the equivalent widths of the $10 \mum$ silicate feature are

112:   generally weak in all Seyfert galaxies, as previously reported by several

113:   studies. The few Seyfert galaxies in this sample that show deep $10 \mum$

114:   silicate absorption features are highly inclined and/or merging galaxies. It

115:   is likely that these absorption features originate primarily in the dusty

116:   interstellar medium of the host galaxy rather than in a dusty torus on

117:   parsec scales close to the central engine. We find that the equivalent width

118:   of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) band at $6.2\mum$ correlates

119:   strongly with the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index. Either of these

120:   quantities are good indicators of the amount of starburst contribution to

121:   the mid-IR spectra. The spectra of Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9s are dominated by

122:   these starburst features, similar to most Seyfert 2s. They show strong PAH

123:   bands and a strong red continuum toward $30\mum$. The strengths of the

124:   high-ionization forbidden narrow emission lines [O~IV] $25.89\mum$, [Ne~III]

125:   $15.56\mum$ and [Ne~V] $14.32\mum$ relative to [Ne~II] $12.81\mum$ are

126:   weaker in Seyfert 1.8/1.9s and Seyfert 2s as compared to Seyfert 1s. The

127:   weakness of high-ionization lines in Seyfert 1.8-1.9s is suggestive of

128:   intrinsically weak active galactic nuclei (AGN) continua, and/or stronger

129:   star formation activity leading to enhanced [Ne~II]. We discuss the

130:   implications of these observational results in the context of the Unified

131:   Model of AGN.

132: \end{abstract}

133: \keywords{galaxies: dust, galaxies: active, galaxies: seyfert, spectroscopy:

134:   infrared}

135: 

136: \section{Introduction}

137: The study of optical spectra of Seyfert galaxies \citep{1974ApJ...192..581K}

138: lead to their classification into type 1 and type 2 Seyfert galaxies. Seyfert

139: 1 galaxies have permitted broad ($\sim5000\kms$) and narrow ($\sim500\kms$)

140: emission lines as well as forbidden narrow emission lines, whereas in Seyfert

141: 2 galaxies the broad emission line component is absent. Study of optical

142: spectra of type 2 Seyferts using polarized light

143: \citep{1983ApJ...271L...7M,1985ApJ...297..621A} showed that the broad emission

144: lines can be detected in some objects. These observations implied that the

145: structure and physical nature of the central source is similar in all AGN. The

146: differences between physical properties of type 1 and type 2 Seyfert nuclei

147: are caused by significant amount of optical obscuration that hides the

148: broad-line region (BLR) from the line of sight to the observer in type 2

149: sources. These observations lead to the formation of the Unified Model of AGN

150: \citep[see reviews by][]{1993ARA&A..31..473A, 1995PASP..107..803U}, where a

151: dusty structure with a torus-like geometry prevents the direct view of the BLR

152: when seen at angles close to the equatorial plane of the AGN. The obscuration

153: within the torus is expected to be composed of dusty molecular clouds (Krolik

154: and Begelman 1988). However, the exact nature of this obscuration has been a

155: subject of debate for the last decade \citep[\eg][]{1998ApJS..117...25M}. In

156: this paper, we report on the mid-infrared {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}

157: \citep{2004ApJS..154....1W} spectra of an intermediate class of Seyfert

158: galaxies, Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s. We compare the mid-IR spectra of this

159: intermediate class of Seyfert galaxies with Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s, and

160: derive spectral diagnostics to understand the behavior of the dust obscuration

161: between the subclasses of Seyfert galaxies.

162: 

163: \citet{1981ApJ...249..462O} classified the Seyfert 1 class from 1 to 1.9 with

164: numerically larger types having weaker broad line components as compared to

165: the superposed narrow permitted lines. As one goes from a Seyfert 1 to 1.5

166: class, the superposed permitted narrow emission lines become more

167: distinguishable from the broad component. The Seyfert 1.8s possess weak broad

168: wings on H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$, while the 1.9s only show wings on H$\alpha$.

169: Thus, as we go from a type 1 source to a type 2 source, the waning of broad

170: emission lines in the intermediate types and the presence of broad lines in

171: the spectropolarimetry of a few type 2 objects implies that the intermediate

172: types (1.8/1.9s) may be viewed at intermediate inclination angles to the

173: central source, possibly through the ``atmosphere'' of the dusty torus.

174: 

175: Further, Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s show variations in their broad-line Balmer

176: decrements (H$\alpha/$H$\beta$) over timescales of a few years

177: \citep{1995ApJ...440..141G}. Goodrich showed that these variations were

178: consistent with changes in reddening implying a moving dust screen between our

179: line of sight and the central source. More specifically, the dust screen must

180: be present between the BLR and the narrow-line region (NLR) as the narrow line

181: fluxes did not vary over the observed intervals. This is the postulated

182: location of the dusty torus in AGN. Mid-IR observations of Seyfert 1.8s and

183: 1.9s are thus crucial to constrain the properties of the torus. Further, in

184: the mid-IR the extinction due to dust should be much lower than in the

185: optical. Thus we expect the mid-IR spectra of Seyfert 1.8-1.9 to be more like

186: those of Seyfert 1s than like Seyfert 2s.

187: 

188: Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s also possess relatively weak high-ionization (\eg

189: [Fe~VII] $\lambda 6087$) narrow lines as compared to Seyfert 1s, suggesting

190: that the dust screen may also be obscuring an inner NLR where these lines are

191: thought to arise \citep{1998ApJ...497L...9M,2000AJ....119.2605N}. The mid-IR

192: $5\textrm{--}38\mum$ range includes several narrow forbidden emission lines

193: that arise in the NLR. These lines are useful to test the above hypothesis,

194: since the extinction of the mid-IR lines is expected to be small.

195: 

196: In the last decade, with the advent of {\it ISO}, several local Seyfert

197: galaxies have been studied extensively \citep[see,][]{2005SSRv..119..355V}.

198: Their mid-IR spectral characteristics are well studied

199: \citep{2000A&A...357..839C,2000A&A...358..481S,2002A&A...393..821S,2004A&A...418..465L}.

200: Recent studies with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}

201: \citep{2007ApJ...655L..77H, 2007ApJ...654L..49S, 2006AJ....132..401B,

202:   2005ApJ...633..706W} have focused on obtaining and analyzing the spectra of

203: local Seyfert galaxies. These observations indicate that most Seyfert 2

204: galaxies show weak $10 \mum$ silicate absorption, while most Seyfert 1

205: galaxies show this same feature weakly in emission. Strong silicate absorption

206: features are clearly seen in local Ultra-Luminous InfraRed Galaxies (ULIRGs)

207: \citep{2007ApJ...654L..49S}. Most quasars \citep[\eg PG quasars observed by

208: ][]{2005ApJ...625L..75H} tend to show strong $10$ and $18\mum$ silicate

209: emission bands.

210: 

211: \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} present an IRAS $12\mum$-selected sample of 87

212: Seyfert 1s and 2s. They present principal component analysis (PCA) of $51$

213: nuclear spectra extracted from this sample. Using ISO data,

214: \citet{2000A&A...357..839C} reported a factor of $\sim 8$ difference between

215: Seyfert 1s and 2s for the continuum at $7\mum$. However,

216: \citet{2004A&A...418..465L} using ISO data again, showed that the

217: starburst-corrected continuum luminosities at $6 \mum$ were correlated with

218: absorption-corrected hard X-ray luminosities, implying no significant

219: difference between Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s. With the {\it Spitzer} InfraRed

220: Spectrograph \citep[IRS, ][]{2004ApJS..154...18H} observations,

221: \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} find a factor of $\sim 6$ difference at $6\mum$

222: between Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s. The results of \citet{2006AJ....132..401B}

223: and \citet{2000A&A...357..839C} suggest that the continuum shortward of $15

224: \mum$ is suppressed in Seyfert 2s as compared to Seyfert 1s. This is in

225: agreement with the expected orientation effect in the unification models.

226: Contemporaneous multiwavelength observations are needed to settle the issue.

227: 

228: Thus, the current body of evidence from IRS spectra suggests that the silicate

229: strengths are weak and probably are representative of those expected from

230: clumpy torus models \citep{2002ApJ...570L...9N}. Yet, the behavior of the

231: $5\textrm{--}18\mum$ spectral slope appears to correlate with optical Seyfert

232: type: Seyfert 1s have stronger short wavelength mid-IR emission than Seyfert

233: 2s. If, Seyfert 1.8/1.9s are indeed viewed at intermediate angle between

234: Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s, the nature of their mid-IR spectra should reveal

235: insights into the dust distribution responsible for these trends. In \S 2 we

236: describe our sample and the data analysis. In \S 3 we present the main

237: observational results. Finally in \S 4, we summarize the results and discuss

238: their implications.

239: 

240: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}

241: We have obtained IRS staring mode observations ({\it Spitzer} general observer

242: proposal \#3374, PI:  S. Kraemer) of 12 Seyfert 1.8-1.9 galaxies. Dusty

243: structures are common in the disks of Seyfert host galaxies

244: \citep{1998ApJS..117...25M,2003ApJ...589..774M} and hence it is important to

245: minimize the effects of the host galaxy environment on the nuclear mid-IR

246: spectra. Thus, we chose face-on ($b/a \ge 0.5$) Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 systems

247: for this study. We obtained low resolution ($R \sim 64-128$), short low (SL,

248: $5.2-15.5\mum$) and long low (LL, $15.5 - 38\mum$) spectra. The spectra from

249: all the modules of the IRS (SL and LL) were obtained in two slit (``nod'')

250: positions, with varying number of exposure cycles per observation,

251: commensurate with the mid-IR brightness of the target as estimated from the

252: $12\mum$ IRAS fluxes. The IRS slits have different slit widths for each

253: module. The SL2 slit\footnote{Spitzer Observer's Manual,

254:   http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/documents/SOM/} is

255: $57\arcsec\times3.6\arcsec$, while SL1 is $57\arcsec\times3.7\arcsec$. The LL2

256: slit is $168\arcsec\times10.5\arcsec$, while LL1 is

257: $168\arcsec\times10.7\arcsec$. At a $z$ of $0.01$, $1\arcsec$ corresponds to

258: about $200\pc$ for $H_{0} = 71 \kmsmpc$. Thus, for a full aperture extraction,

259: the SL slit will sample about $700\pc$ in the dispersion direction at $z$ of

260: $0.01$.

261: 

262: The 12 galaxies in our sample are listed in Table~\ref{table1} with their

263: respective Seyfert type, the ratio of host galaxy minor to major axis ($b/a$)

264: and their redshifts. The values for the Seyfert type, $b/a$ and redshift were

265: taken from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED). Based on the nature of

266: mid-IR spectra of NGC 7603 and NGC 2622 as compared to mid-IR spectra of

267: Seyfert 1s \citep{2006AJ....132..401B}, we suggest that these objects are

268: really Seyfert 1s at the time of observations. These sources are known to have

269: variable Seyfert type \citep{1976ApJ...210L.117T,1995ApJ...440..141G} and have

270: transitioned back and forth between Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 1.8 states several

271: times in past. Mrk 622 was considered to be a Seyfert 1.9

272: \citep{1995ApJ...440..141G}, but its Seyfert type is listed in NED as Seyfert

273: 2, and its mid-IR continuum is similar to those of Seyfert 2s like Mrk 3.

274: Thus, this reclassification leads our sample of 12 galaxies to have 9 Seyfert

275: 1.8/1.9s, 2 Seyfert 1s, and 1 Seyfert 2.

276: 

277: To compare our Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 spectra with the spectra of Seyfert 1s and

278: Seyfert 2s, we obtained the available {\it Spitzer} archival datasets

279: originally presented in \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} and

280: \citet{2005ApJ...633..706W}. The observations by \citet{2006AJ....132..401B}

281: are IRS spectral maps; hence we have extracted spectra only from the central

282: slit with the nuclear point source. These comprise a total of 58 Seyfert

283: galaxies with 19 Seyfert 1s, 4 Seyfert 1.8/1.9s (NGC 4579, NGC 4602, NGC 7314,

284: and UGC 7064), and 35 Seyfert 2 galaxies. NGC 7603 and UGC 7064 are common

285: between their sample and our dataset. To this sample, we add observations of

286: NGC 4151 (Seyfert 1.5) and Mrk 3 (Seyfert 2) from \citet{2005ApJ...633..706W}.

287: The sample from \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} includes NGC 4151 and we note that

288: both the spectra match well with each other. Thus, from the archival sample,

289: we have 19 Seyfert 1s (with NGC 7603 considered to be a Seyfert 1), 36 Seyfert

290: 2s (including Mrk 3) and 3 Seyfert 1.8/1.9s, a total of 58 Seyferts with low

291: resolution spectra. For this archival sample, we extracted the $b/a$, the

292: Seyfert type and the redshift from NED.

293: 

294: Combining with our sample with the archival sample, we have 20 Seyfert 1s

295: (considering NGC 2622 from our sample to be a Seyfert 1), 37 Seyfert 2s (with

296: Mrk 622 from our sample), 12 Seyfert 1.8/1.9s (3 archival, 9 from our sample),

297: making a total of 69 Seyferts with low resolution spectra. We also have high

298: resolution datasets for targets from our sample, but in this paper we restrict

299: ourselves to only low resolution datasets.

300: 

301: We started with the basic calibrated data (BCD) as processed with the S13.2

302: pipeline. We used the SMART data analysis system \citep{2004PASP..116..975H}

303: for the reductions. For low resolution spectra, individual exposures per

304: ``nod'' position were median combined at the image level. The median combined

305: detector images from one of the orders were then differenced with the ones

306: from the opposite order (\eg SL2 minus SL1 for first nod position) and

307: vice-versa to subtract the sky background and to correct rogue pixels. The

308: spectra were extracted with the ``automatic tapered column point source''

309: option in SMART with no sky subtraction (since this was done at the image

310: level). The spectrum for each ``nod'' position was then clipped at the end of

311: the spectrum where the spectral response function dies off. We cleaned the

312: data of obviously deviant data points and those data points that were flagged

313: as bad data from the {\it Spitzer} pipeline. The spectra from each nod

314: position for a given order (\eg two nod positions for second order SL

315: spectrum) were then averaged to form the final spectrum for that order. The

316: final spectra for each order where then scaled with respect to the adjacent

317: order so that the LL2 spectrum matched the flux level of the LL1 spectrum, SL1

318: was matched to the scaled LL2 and SL2 was scaled to match the scaled SL1

319: spectrum. These scale factors typically ranged from $1.02$ to $3.85$ with most

320: of the scale factors less than $1.2$. The few large scale factors are likely

321: due to the presence of extended mid-IR emission. The objects most affected

322: are: NGC 5929, UGC 11680, NGC 1667, MCG-3-34-63, NGC 2639 and MRK 471. The

323: archival observations from \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} are IRS mapping mode

324: observations, and hence they have a single ``center nod'' position. The sky

325: subtraction was done using off-order detector images, in a similar way to the

326: staring mode observations where we differenced off-order images with same nod

327: position. The off-order subtraction avoids the problem of differencing nod

328: positions, where it is possible to subtract the source from itself. The final

329: spectra were then resampled to a common wavelength grid. An exact match

330: between spectra extracted from different observing programs for NGC 7603, UGC

331: 7064 and NGC 4151 showed that our spectral extraction process is consistent.

332: 

333: The reduced low resolution IRS spectra of 12 target Seyfert galaxies from our

334: sample are displayed in Figure~1. We plot the spectra as $F_{\lambda} \ \vs

335: \lambda$ instead of the customary $F_{\nu}\ \vs \lambda$ as it allows us to

336: study the spectral features in the $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ range in better

337: contrast to the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ range. We do not reproduce the spectra

338: from \citet{2006AJ....132..401B}, but an overview of the continuum shapes as

339: seen in $\textrm{F}_{\lambda}$ units is given in Figure~2.

340: 

341: We performed further analysis with generic spectrum analysis programs

342: available in IDL. We have measured three quantities: the emission line fluxes,

343: the equivalent widths of the silicate absorption or emission feature and the

344: PAH features, and the continuum fluxes at 6, 15, 20 and $30\mum$ on the

345: complete spectra. The continuum fluxes were measured by weighted averaging of

346: the flux values in a $1\mum$ bin centered at 6, 15, 20 and $30\mum$.

347: Table~\ref{table2} lists the continuum fluxes measured directly from the

348: spectra. Table~\ref{table3} lists the equivalent width of the $6.2\mum$ PAH

349: and the equivalent width of the silicate $10\mum$ feature. Table~\ref{table4}

350: lists the various narrow emission line fluxes measured for each object from

351: the low resolution data.

352: 

353: For emission line fluxes, we measured the feature with continuum points

354: selected on the two sides of the peak of the feature. If the feature was

355: blended with other features, we have selected the continuum points along the

356: spectrum such that only the visible contribution of the feature is measured.

357: We did not attempt deblending of the features which is planned for a future

358: paper. The flux in the feature was obtained by integrating the area under the

359: curve above the interpolated local continuum. The features were measured three

360: times with slightly different continuum points to obtain continuum placement

361: errors. The 1-$\sigma$ uncertainty of these separate measurements were then

362: added in quadrature to the uncertainty in the flux measurement as estimated

363: from 1-$\sigma$ uncertainties on the individual flux points. This value

364: represents the final uncertainty on the flux measurements. We also measured

365: the flux of the 6.2 PAH feature.

366: 

367: A related issue here is that the [Ne~II] $12.81\mum$ emission line is blended

368: with the $12.7\mum$ PAH and the measurement of its flux may be affected due to

369: this. We have high resolution spectra for 12 (11 from our sample and Mrk 3)

370: galaxies in our sample. After examining the high resolution spectra, we note

371: that the [Ne~II] line typically lies between 12.70 to 12.90. We used these

372: same limits on the low dispersion spectra and measured the line fluxes. The

373: [Ne~II] line is distinguishable from the $12.7\mum$ PAH feature in the low

374: resolution spectra. The median value of the absolute difference between the

375: high and low dispersion measurements for the 12 galaxies is 0.08. However, the

376: median value of the relative error ($|f_{high}-f_{low}|/f_{high}$) between the

377: high dispersion and the low dispersion measurement is as high as 47\% for

378: these 12 galaxies. Assuming that our high-dispersion measurements are correct,

379: this indicates a significant mismatch between the high resolution and low

380: resolution line flux measurements. The cause of this mismatch is unclear. The

381: continuum of both high and low resolution spectra have similar shapes but they

382: do not necessarily match each other in the scaling; this could be due to

383: different exposure times, slit widths and the fact that we can not perform sky

384: subtraction for high resolution data. Also, the region of galaxy sampled by

385: the high and low dispersion slits are different due to the different

386: orientations of the slits. A combination of these different observing

387: conditions may lead to this mismatch. Nevertheless, we find a correlation

388: coefficient of 0.87 for the high and low resolution flux measurements for the

389: [Ne~II] line and of 0.91 for the [Ne~III] $15.56\mum$ line. Thus, overall we

390: estimate that it is possible for [Ne~II] measurements to be affected by

391: blending with the $12.7\mum$ PAH for low dispersion measurements. This

392: mismatch between high dispersion and low dispersion fluxes does not appear to

393: affect the measurements of other lines such as [O~IV] $25.89$, [Ne~III]

394: $15.56$, and [Ne~V] $14.32\mum$ as they are not blended with a strong PAH

395: feature.

396: 

397: The equivalent widths were measured using a similar approach to the flux

398: measurements except that the spectrum was divided by a continuum and the

399: measurements were done on the continuum-divided spectrum. The continuum was

400: fitted using continuum flux points at 5.5, 14.5, 20, and $30 \mum$ and a

401: cubic-spline interpolation. The uncertainty due to the subjective choice of

402: the continuum contributes to the uncertainty in the measurement of the

403: equivalent width. We performed a few tests by varying the continuum fit by

404: small amounts and checking the effects of this on the equivalent widths. Based

405: on these tests we estimate that the uncertainty due to subjective choice of

406: the global continuum is $\sim$10\%. When measuring the equivalent width of the

407: silicate absorption/emission feature, we have not removed the relatively minor

408: contribution from various emission features in the $8.6\textrm{--}10.8\mum$

409: range, the most prominent of which are the $9.66\mum\ \textrm{H}_{2}$ emission

410: line and the [S~IV] $10.51\mum$ line.

411: 

412: \section{Results}

413: Past studies of the mid-IR spectra of active galaxies from {\it ISO} have lead

414: to the development of a few spectral diagnostic methods

415: \citep{2002A&A...393..821S, 2000A&A...359..887L}. Here we present diagnostic

416: diagrams to characterize the properties of Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s as compared

417: to Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s using our {\it Spitzer} sample.

418: 

419: \subsection{The Nature of the Mid-IR Spectra of Seyferts}

420: The Seyfert 1.8/1.9 spectra in Figure~1 show that there are strong variations

421: in the continuum shapes of Seyferts in the mid-IR. For example, note the

422: spectrum of Mrk 622, NGC 7603 and UGC 12138. The continuum of UGC 12138 rises

423: toward shorter wavelengths, but much less steeply than in the case of NGC

424: 7603. In the case of Mrk 622, the continuum diminishes toward shorter

425: wavelengths. The spectrum of Mrk 334 or of UGC 12138 also show strong PAH

426: bands, as seen in the spectra of starburst galaxies. In fact, most Seyfert

427: 1.8/1.9 spectra are dominated by these PAH features, in striking similarity to

428: those of Seyfert 2s with strong starburst contribution

429: \citep{2006AJ....132..401B}. However, forbidden narrow emission lines such as

430: [Ne~V] $14.32\mum$ and [O~IV] $25.89\mum$ expected to arise in the NLRs of AGN

431: indicate presence of an active nucleus in these systems.

432: 

433: The mid-IR spectrum of a Seyfert nucleus is the result of re-emission from the

434: dust heated by the strong AGN continuum. Thus, these spectra are mainly

435: dominated by thermal emission due to dust; hot dust ($> 200\kel$) contributes

436: strongly at shorter wavelengths ($\sim 5\textrm{-}15\mum$), warm dust ($\sim

437: 170\kel$) peaking at $\sim 17\mum$, while cold dust ($\sim 60\kel$)

438: contributes strongly to the continuum at $\gtsim 30\mum$ . This is strongly

439: evident in the spectra of Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s. Comparing NGC 7603 with

440: the Seyfert 1 spectra from the archival sample, we note that hot dust

441: contributes more in Seyfert 1s, while Seyfert 2s like Mrk 3 and Mrk 622 are

442: dominated by a lack of contribution from hot dust. This lack of contribution

443: from hot dust can plausibly be attributed to the presence of a torus that is

444: optically thick at these mid-IR wavelengths. Circumnuclear or extended star

445: formation contributes independently to both classes as an additional component

446: in the form of PAH features, low-ionization emission lines, and the cold

447: thermal component. There are several forbidden low-ionization lines like

448: [Ne~II] $12.81 \mum$, [S~III] $18.71\mum$, [S~III] $33.48\mum$ and [Si~II]

449: $34.82\mum$ that trace the starburst component \citep{2002A&A...393..821S}.

450: Apart from these, there are high-ionization lines like [O~IV] $25.89\mum$,

451: [Ne~V] $14.32\mum$ and [Ne~V] $24.32\mum$, that are all indicators of strongly

452: photoionized NLR, revealing the strength of the incident UV/X-ray AGN

453: radiation field in these systems. Due to the relatively low ionization

454: potential of $40.96\ev$ for the [Ne~III] $15.56\mum$, it is possible that this

455: line has a contribution from both AGN and star forming regions. The strengths

456: of the high-ionization lines like [O IV] $25.89 \mum$ that arise in the NLR

457: appear to be directly related to the strength of the incident X-ray AGN

458: continuum (Melendez, M.B. \etal, in preparation).

459: 

460: In Figure~2, we show the variety in continuum shapes of the Seyfert sample

461: discussed in this paper by plotting a few representative spectra from the

462: sample. The spectra are scaled to have the same flux at $20\mum$ as that of

463: Mrk 9. Further, all the spectra are smoothed by a factor of 10 for clarity on

464: the graph. As can be seen in Figure~2, there are Seyfert galaxies like NGC

465: 7603 or Mrk 9 that show steeping spectra in the $5\textrm{--}15\mum$ range.

466: The spectra that are similar in shape to NGC 4151 show a break around

467: $17\mum$. Such a ``break'' or ``hump'' is even more pronounced in spectra like

468: Mrk 622, where the continuum emission decreases in the $5-15\mum$ range. There

469: are also spectra like those of NGC 1194 which show strong $10\mum$ absorption

470: while showing strong continua in the $5-15\mum$ range. Apart from these

471: variations, there are spectra that show enhanced contribution from star

472: forming features like PAHs (Mrk 622 and NGC 3079). In such starburst-dominated

473: sources, there is significant contribution at longer wavelengths

474: ($20\textrm{--}30\mum$) giving rise to the red continuum behavior mentioned by

475: \citet{2006AJ....132..401B}.

476: 

477: \subsection{Spectral Diagnostics}

478: In Figures~3--6 we show the trends in spectral characteristics and their

479: behavior with Seyfert type. In these graphs, Seyfert 1s are represented with

480: plus symbols, Seyfert 2s are square symbols and Seyfert 1.8/1.9s are filled

481: triangles. All systems with $b/a \le 0.5$ are circled. Fluxes are measured in

482: $F_{\lambda}$ units ($\textrm{W}\ \textrm{cm}^{-2}{\mum}^{-1}$) and equivalent

483: widths are in microns.

484: 

485: Figure~3 is a comparison of $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ and $20\textrm{--}30\mum$

486: continuum spectral indices. We define the spectral index as $\alpha_{1-2} =

487: \log(f_{1}(\lambda)/f_{2}(\lambda))/\log(\lambda_{1}/\lambda_{2})$. The

488: continuum fluxes used in this figure are measured directly from the spectrum

489: and not from the fitted continuum. A positive $20\textrm{--}30$ spectral index

490: implies a positive slope on a $log(F_{\lambda})\ \vs log(\lambda)$ plot. In

491: this graph, the dashed line shows a single power law (see NGC~7603 and Mrk~9

492: in Figure~2). A more positive $6\textrm{--}15$ and negative $20\textrm{--}30$

493: (along the arrow labeled BP) results in a broken power law behavior (NGC 4151

494: and Mrk 622 in Figure~2). Note that there are a number of Seyfert 2s (\eg

495: Mrk~3) with positive $6\textrm{--}15$ slopes that have more extreme

496: $6\textrm{--}15$ spectral indices than a Seyfert 1 like NGC~4151. A positive

497: $20\textrm{--}30$ and a negative $6\textrm{--}15$, along the arrow labeled RC,

498: leads towards a starburst type spectrum with strong long wavelength continuum

499: and well defined PAH bands. Most Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s are mid-way (in

500: comparison of spectral shapes) between Seyfert 1 types (broken power law,

501: NGC~4151 and NGC~2622) and starburst type spectra like NGC~3079.

502: 

503: Overall, Figure~3 shows that Seyferts have a wide range of continuum shapes in

504: the mid-IR. One possible interpretation is that the Seyfert 2 galaxies in the

505: upper left corner are dominated by components of warm

506: ($T\approx170\textrm{K}$) dust from the nuclear region (\eg the torus or the

507: inner NLR) that peaks around $17\mum$. These objects have a rather simple

508: thermal continuum, as shown by Mrk 622 in Figure~1. As one moves down and to

509: the right in Figure~3, the increasing contribution from starburst-heated dust

510: (cooler than $\sim 170\ \textrm{K}$) becomes stronger. As one moves from the

511: upper left to middle left in this diagram, we see a larger contribution from

512: the hotter dust in the $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ region, possibly due to heating by

513: the AGN. This is expected for Seyfert 1s, but several Seyfert 2s occupy this

514: region as well. The majority of Seyfert 1.8/1.9s fall in the region occupied

515: by Seyfert 2s with significant star formation.

516: 

517: Figure~4 shows the $10\mum$ silicate equivalent width (EW) compared against

518: the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index. Negative EWs imply emission

519: features. The silicate EWs are {\it small} for most of the Seyferts in the

520: sample. The mean emission EW in our sample is $-0.16\mum$ with a median of

521: $-0.08\mum$. The mean absorption EW in our sample is $0.38\mum$ with a median

522: of $0.26\mum$. \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H} report silicate strengths

523: ($S_{10\mum} = \ln(F_{\lambda}/F_{cont})$) for a large sample of quasars,

524: Seyferts and ULIRG galaxies. The quasar and ULIRG silicate strengths bracket

525: the range of $S_{10\mum}$ for Seyfert galaxies. For quasars, the mean silicate

526: emission strength reported by \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H} is $0.20$. For

527: ULIRGS, it is $-1.56$. For comparison, we measured the apparent silicate

528: optical depth ($\tau_{\lambda}$) at the peak of the $10\mum$ feature for our

529: Seyfert sample. The corresponding mean values of silicate strengths

530: ($S_{10\mum}$) are $-0.07$ for Seyfert 1s and $-0.35$ for Seyfert 2s. The

531: median values are $0.02$ and $-0.18$, respectively. The mean silicate strength

532: reported by \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H} for Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s, from

533: their sample, is -0.18 and -0.61. There are several Seyfert 2s and a Seyfert 1

534: (NGC 1194) in the upper right region of Figure~4. All of these objects are

535: significantly inclined ($b/a \le 0.5$) and/or are merging with companion

536: objects. NGC 5256 has a fairly high silicate equivalent width and is a face-on

537: host galaxy, but is classified in NED as interacting. Thus, their high

538: equivalent widths are probably a result of absorption in the host galaxy disk

539: rather than being intrinsic to the AGN. The most important result from this

540: graph is that Seyferts with inclined or merging host galaxies should be

541: excluded from studies of the circumnuclear regions and once this is done, the

542: nuclear regions show only weak silicate emission or absorption features.

543: 

544: Figure~5 shows the $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent width compared to the

545: $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index. The equivalent widths are negative for

546: emission features and absolute values are plotted on the graph in logarithmic

547: scale. As can be seen, there is a strong correlation between the

548: $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index and the $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent width.

549: Increasing $20\textrm{--}30$ spectral index leads to galaxies with increasing

550: contribution from starbursts. Thus, the PAH contribution is strongly

551: correlated with the $20\textrm{--}30$ spectral index, which supports our use

552: of this index as a starburst indicator in Figure~3.

553: 

554: \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H} find that the silicate strengths correlates with

555: the ratio of fluxes at $14.5\mum$ and $27.5\mum$ for a large sample of

556: Seyfert, ULIRG, starburst and QSO sources. The ratio $F(27.5\mum)/F(14.5\mum)$

557: will trace the continuum contribution of cooler ($T \sim 60\kel$) dust from

558: the star forming regions, similar to the ratio $F(30\mum)/F(20\mum)$ as seen

559: in Figure~5. This result in combination with results from Figure~4 and

560: Figure~5, suggests that inclined host galaxy disks will show the effects of a

561: geometrically thick, and cool dust distribution. This effect should be taken

562: into consideration first before invoking other explanations.

563: 

564: Further, \citet{2007ApJ...654L..49S} find that the $6.2\mum$ equivalent width

565: is anti-correlated with silicate absorption strength for ULIRG and starburst

566: galaxies. This result hints that deep silicate absorption that is expected to

567: arise in geometrically and optically thick dust distributions

568: \citep{2007ApJ...654L..45L} may be connected to highly obscured star forming

569: regions which tend to show weak/absent PAH features. The absence of strong

570: silicate absorptions in PAH-dominated starburst spectra, and their presence in

571: highly inclined and/or merging systems (Figure~4), suggests that the observed

572: deep silicate absorptions may originate primarily in cool dusty regions on

573: scales of hundreds of parsecs.

574: 

575: Figure~6 shows the [O IV] $25.89\mum$ to [Ne II] $12.81\mum$ ratio compared to

576: the [Ne III] $15.56\mum$ to [Ne II] $12.81\mum$ ratio. There is a strong

577: correlation, with Seyfert 2s and Seyfert 1.8/1.9s showing mostly low [O

578: IV]/[Ne II] ratios and low [Ne III]/[Ne II] ratios. We see a similar

579: correlation with [Ne~V]$14.32\mum$/[Ne~II], although there are fewer data

580: points. Most Seyfert 1s have high [O~IV]/[Ne~II], [Ne~V]/[Ne~II] and

581: [Ne~III]/[Ne~II]. This correlation for Seyfert 1.8-1.9s and Seyfert 2s

582: indicates that their NLRs may be subject to similar amounts of ionization,

583: whereas at least a component of the NLR in Seyfert 1s may experience higher

584: ionization states, in general. Another alternative that can lead to the

585: correlation in Figure~6 is that Seyfert 1.8, 1.9 and 2s have more star

586: formation than Seyfert 1s on a absolute scale, and hence stronger [Ne~II].

587: There could be two measurement errors that can affect this correlation as

588: pointed out by the referee: (1) the [Ne~II] line fluxes have a contribution

589: from adjacent $12.7\mum$ PAH in the low resolution measurements, and (2) the

590: [O~IV] line is blended with [Fe~II] $25.99\mum$, and hence starburst dominated

591: systems will have a contribution from the [Fe~II] line as in the case of NGC

592: 3079 \citep{2005ApJ...633..706W}. We discussed the possibility of

593: contamination of [Ne~II] at the end of the last section, and came to the

594: conclusion that by carefully measuring the line, without deblending the lines,

595: our fluxes appear to be consistent with high resolution measurements. We

596: examined the high and low resolution spectra around the [O~IV] line and

597: estimated that out of 12 Seyfert galaxies in our sample, only 3 show

598: comparable contribution from the [Fe~II] line. Without additional high

599: resolution datasets, we can not rule out that other starburst dominated

600: systems will show this effect, but it appears to be unlikely if the [O~IV]

601: line is seen along with [Ne~V] line in the same spectrum. In the case of Mrk

602: 3, we estimate that [Fe~II] contributes less than 10\% of the flux as compared

603: to [O~IV].

604: 

605: \section{Conclusions}  

606: We have compared the mid-IR spectral properties of 12 Seyfert 1.8/1.9s with

607: those of 57 Seyfert 1/1.5s and Seyfert 2s from \citet{2006AJ....132..401B} and

608: \citet{2005ApJ...633..706W}. The main results are as below.

609: 

610: The Seyfert mid-IR spectra appear to be dominated by differing contributions

611: of three main thermal components: (1) the hot dust ($T > 200 \kel$) heated by

612: the nucleus at the inner radius of the dust torus contributing strongly to the

613: continuum in $5\textrm{--}15\mum$; (2) the warm dust ($T \sim 170\

614: \textrm{K}$) heated by the nucleus that is expected to be at distances of tens

615: of parsec from the center; (3) cooler dust ($T \sim 60\kel$) from surrounding

616: circumnuclear star-forming regions on scales of hundreds of parsec giving rise

617: to the continuum in the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ range. This intrinsic form of

618: the continuum is further modified by: (1) the contribution from PAH emission

619: of unobscured circum-nuclear star forming regions, and (2) extinction from

620: cold dust in the host galaxy plane for merging and/or highly inclined host

621: galaxies. Thus, before we can study extinction due to the dust torus, it is

622: necessary to exclude AGN with inclined host disks or mergers from such a

623: study.

624: 

625: The optical classifications of Seyferts do not always carry over to

626: corresponding spectral shapes in the mid-IR, but there seems to be a general

627: agreement for Seyfert 1s to show mostly single or broken ``power-law'' type

628: behavior. Seyfert 2s tend to show a variety of spectral shapes from single and

629: broken ``power-laws'' to PAH-and-red-continuum dominated spectra. (see

630: Figure~2), in agreement with trends noted by \cite{2006AJ....132..401B}. The

631: simplest mid-IR spectra appear to be those of Seyfert 2 galaxies with little

632: star formation (\eg Mrk 3), which are dominated by a prominent thermal

633: component that peaks at $\sim17\mum$, leading to the expected $\approx

634: 170\kel$ temperature of this component. We suggest that this component is

635: present in many Seyfert spectra and becomes evident as the $17\mum$ ``break''.

636: Seyfert 1s tend to have emission from a hotter component ($T > 200\

637: \textrm{K}$) in the $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ band and, in many cases, weak

638: silicate emission, in general agreement with the Unified Model prediction that

639: we are looking down the hot throat of the dusty torus in type 1 objects.

640: 

641: The equivalent width of the $10\mum$ silicate feature in Seyfert galaxies is

642: much weaker than expected from uniform density compact torus models (see

643: Figure~4), confirming previous {\it Spitzer} results by

644: \citet{2006ApJ...653..127S}, \citet{2007ApJ...654L..49S} and

645: \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H}. From the analysis we presented earlier, we note

646: that the Seyfert galaxies that are highly inclined or interacting with

647: companions in our sample show strong silicate absorptions.

648: \citet{2007ApJ...655L..77H} find that the silicate strengths correlate with

649: the ratio of fluxes at $14.5\mum$ and $27.5\mum$ for a large sample of

650: Seyfert, ULIRG, starburst and QSO sources. This hints that at least in some

651: Seyfert galaxies, the strength of the $10\mum$ silicate feature is

652: significantly affected by contamination from dust in the host galaxy. We note

653: that this component has been ignored by a number of recent studies.

654: 

655: We find a strong correlation between the $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent width and

656: the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index (Figure~5). The mid-IR starburst

657: contribution can thus be characterized using either diagnostic. It appears

658: that very strong PAHs go together with very red continua toward $30\mum$. On

659: average, Seyfert 1s tend to show weaker $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent widths than

660: Seyfert2s and Seyfert 1.8/1.9s. We note however, that measuring absolute

661: starburst contribution between Seyfert types will need more work.

662: 

663: In general, the mid-IR spectra of Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 galaxies are similar in

664: shape and PAH strengths (Figure~5) with spectra of Seyfert 2 galaxies with

665: starbursts. This is surprising, since the optical spectra of Seyfert 1.8-1.9s

666: indicate only a modest amount of reddening of the BLR, typically $E(B-V)

667: \approx 1$ \citep{1995ApJ...440..141G}. This leads to a relatively small

668: extinction in the mid-IR, and therefore one would expect that the {\it

669:   Spitzer} IRS spectra of Seyfert 1.8-1.9s should look more like Seyfert 1s.

670: We speculate that the enhanced starburst contribution seen in Seyfert 1.8/1.9

671: spectra may be a combined result of presence of intrinsically stronger star

672: formation in the {\it Spitzer} aperture and/or weaker intrinsic AGN continuum

673: in some Seyfert 1.8/1.9s. Further work on this is being done and results will

674: be reported in an upcoming paper.

675: 

676: In Figure~6 we showed a strong correlation for Seyfert 2s and Seyfert

677: 1.8-1.9s, which tend to show low [O~IV]/[Ne~II] and [Ne~III]/[Ne~II]. There

678: could be three possible scenarios that could give rise to the observed low

679: [O~IV]/[Ne~II]: (1) the ionization state of the NLR is low in Seyfert 1.8/1.9s

680: and Seyfert 2s as compared to Seyfert 1s in the sample, (2) the starburst

681: component as traced by [Ne~II] and PAH fluxes is stronger in Seyfert 1.8, 1.9

682: and 2s than in Seyfert 1s, and, (3) these Seyfert 1.8/1.9s have hidden inner

683: NLRs and are subject to significant obscuration of high-ionization NLR lines.

684: We can rule out the last scenario for Seyfert 1.8-1.9s. The modest amount of

685: extinction observed in the optical for Seyfert 1.8-1.9s suggests that the

686: extinction should be negligible in the mid-IR; thus Seyfert 1.8-1.9s should

687: have similar [O~IV]/[Ne~II] ratio as Seyfert 1s, which is not observed in

688: Figure~6. If the starburst contribution is similar between Seyfert 1s and

689: Seyfert 1.8-1.9s, but the intrinsic AGN continuum is weaker in Seyfert

690: 1.8-1.9s, then that hints at intrinsically low ionization state of the NLRs of

691: Seyfert 1.8-1.9s. On the other hand, the observed correlation between Seyfert

692: 1.8/1.9s and Seyfert 2s, and the possibility of starburst contribution to

693: [Ne~III] suggests that similar circum-nuclear starburst contribution between

694: Seyfert 2s and Seyfert 1.8/1.9s can give rise to this correlation. However,

695: this does not explain why the Seyfert 1.8/1.9s do not show stronger short

696: wavelength (hot dust) contribution like Seyfert 1s, in spite of their low

697: $E(B-V)$ in the optical. An ability to separate absolute contribution of the

698: active nucleus from the absolute contribution of the starburst is essential

699: for further progress and we are pursuing this actively.

700: 

701: The AGN type variability and misclassification of Seyfert galaxies may be a

702: plausible reason for mismatch between the optical Seyfert classification and

703: the expected mid-IR spectral shapes. Some Seyfert 1.8/1.9 galaxies are known

704: to transition back-and-forth between a type 1 and a type 2 class object. The

705: first such detection was for NGC 7603 (one of our targets in this study) by

706: \citet{1976ApJ...210L.117T}. \citet{1995ApJ...440..141G,1989ApJ...340..190G}

707: noted that NGC 7603 and NGC 2622 (also one of our targets), transitioned from

708: a Seyfert 1.8 to a Seyfert 1.5 class possibly as a result of changes in the

709: intrinsic line of sight reddening. In the mid-IR, they show steepening spectra

710: towards short wavelengths (see Figure~1) as compared to the rest of our

711: sample, indicative of Seyfert 1.5 spectra. The mid-IR spectrum of NGC 2622 is

712: similar in it's continuum shape to the mid-IR spectrum of NGC 4151

713: \citep[see,][ and Figure~2]{2005ApJ...633..706W}, except that NGC 2622 shows

714: strong PAH bands. The mid-IR spectrum of NGC 7603 is, however, markedly

715: different than the rest and has characteristics of a type 1 quasar spectrum

716: with strong emission bands at $10$ and $18\mum$ and very little cool dust

717: emission at longer wavelengths. NGC 7603 does however have some starburst

718: contribution in the form of PAH bands (See Figure~5). Thus, it is important to

719: compare contemporaneous optical and mid-IR spectra when possible to eliminate

720: the possibility of type variability in the spectra. For the specific case of

721: Seyfert 1.8/1.9s discussed in this paper, comparison with contemporaneous

722: optical spectra and X-ray observations is being done and results will be

723: reported in a follow-up paper.

724: 

725: \acknowledgments

726: This work is based in part on observations made with the {\it Spitzer Space

727:   Telescope} and in part on archival data obtained with the {\it Spitzer Space

728:   Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California

729: Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work

730: was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech. This research

731: has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated

732: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under

733: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This

734: research has also made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic

735: Services.

736: 

737: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Spitzer}

738: 

739: % 

740: % 

741: % References

742: % \bibliography{ms}

743: \begin{thebibliography}{36}

744:   \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

745: 

746: \bibitem[{{Antonucci}(1993)}]{1993ARA&A..31..473A}

747:   {Antonucci}, R. 1993, \araa, 31, 473

748: 

749: \bibitem[{{Antonucci} \& {Miller}(1985)}]{1985ApJ...297..621A}

750:   {Antonucci}, R.~R.~J., \& {Miller}, J.~S. 1985, \apj, 297, 621

751: 

752: \bibitem[{{Buchanan} {et~al.}(2006){Buchanan}, {Gallimore}, {O'Dea}, {Baum},

753:     {Axon}, {Robinson}, {Elitzur}, \& {Elvis}}]{2006AJ....132..401B}

754:   {Buchanan}, C.~L., {Gallimore}, J.~F., {O'Dea}, C.~P., {Baum}, S.~A., {Axon},

755:   D.~J., {Robinson}, A., {Elitzur}, M., \& {Elvis}, M. 2006, \aj, 132, 401

756: 

757: \bibitem[{{Clavel} {et~al.}(2000){Clavel}, {Schulz}, {Altieri}, {Barr},

758:     {Claes}, {Heras}, {Leech}, {Metcalfe}, \& {Salama}}]{2000A&A...357..839C}

759:   {Clavel}, J., {Schulz}, B., {Altieri}, B., {Barr}, P., {Claes}, P., {Heras},

760:   A., {Leech}, K., {Metcalfe}, L., \& {Salama}, A. 2000, \aap, 357, 839

761: 

762: \bibitem[{{Efstathiou} \& {Rowan-Robinson}(1995)}]{1995MNRAS.273..649E}

763:   {Efstathiou}, A., \& {Rowan-Robinson}, M. 1995, \mnras, 273, 649

764: 

765: \bibitem[{{Genzel} \& {Cesarsky}(2000)}]{2000ARA&A..38..761G}

766:   {Genzel}, R., \& {Cesarsky}, C.~J. 2000, \araa, 38, 761

767: 

768: \bibitem[{{Goodrich}(1989)}]{1989ApJ...340..190G}

769:   {Goodrich}, R.~W. 1989, \apj, 340, 190

770: 

771: \bibitem[{{Goodrich}(1995)}]{1995ApJ...440..141G}

772:   ---. 1995, \apj, 440, 141

773: 

774: \bibitem[{{Granato} \& {Danese}(1994)}]{1994MNRAS.268..235G}

775:   {Granato}, G.~L., \& {Danese}, L. 1994, \mnras, 268, 235

776: 

777: \bibitem[{{Hao} {et~al.}(2005){Hao}, {Spoon}, {Sloan}, {Marshall}, {Armus},

778:     {Tielens}, {Sargent}, {van Bemmel}, {Charmandaris}, {Weedman}, \&

779:     {Houck}}]{2005ApJ...625L..75H}

780:   {Hao}, L., {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Sloan}, G.~C., {Marshall}, J.~A., {Armus}, L.,

781:   {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., {Sargent}, B., {van Bemmel}, I.~M., {Charmandaris},

782:   V., {Weedman}, D.~W., \& {Houck}, J.~R. 2005, \apjl, 625, L75

783: 

784: \bibitem[{{Hao} {et~al.}(2007){Hao}, {Weedman}, {Spoon}, {Marshall},

785:     {Levenson}, {Elitzur}, \& {Houck}}]{2007ApJ...655L..77H}

786:   {Hao}, L., {Weedman}, D.~W., {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Marshall}, J.~A., {Levenson},

787:   N.~A., {Elitzur}, M., \& {Houck}, J.~R. 2007, \apjl, 655, L77

788: 

789: \bibitem[{{Higdon} {et~al.}(2004){Higdon}, {Devost}, {Higdon}, {Brandl},

790:     {Houck}, {Hall}, {Barry}, {Charmandaris}, {Smith}, {Sloan}, \&

791:     {Green}}]{2004PASP..116..975H}

792:   {Higdon}, S.~J.~U., {Devost}, D., {Higdon}, J.~L., {Brandl}, B.~R., {Houck},

793:   J.~R., {Hall}, P., {Barry}, D., {Charmandaris}, V., {Smith}, J.~D.~T.,

794:   {Sloan}, G.~C., \& {Green}, J. 2004, \pasp, 116, 975

795: 

796: \bibitem[{{Houck} {et~al.}(2004){Houck}, {Roellig}, {van Cleve}, {Forrest},

797:     {Herter}, {Lawrence}, {Matthews}, {Reitsema}, {Soifer}, {Watson}, {Weedman},

798:     {Huisjen}, {Troeltzsch}, {Barry}, {Bernard-Salas}, {Blacken}, {Brandl},

799:     {Charmandaris}, {Devost}, {Gull}, {Hall}, {Henderson}, {Higdon}, {Pirger},

800:     {Schoenwald}, {Sloan}, {Uchida}, {Appleton}, {Armus}, {Burgdorf},

801:     {Fajardo-Acosta}, {Grillmair}, {Ingalls}, {Morris}, \&

802:     {Teplitz}}]{2004ApJS..154...18H}

803:   {Houck}, J.~R., {Roellig}, T.~L., {van Cleve}, J., {Forrest}, W.~J., {Herter},

804:   T., {Lawrence}, C.~R., {Matthews}, K., {Reitsema}, H.~J., {Soifer}, B.~T.,

805:   {Watson}, D.~M., {Weedman}, D., {Huisjen}, M., {Troeltzsch}, J., {Barry},

806:   D.~J., {Bernard-Salas}, J., {Blacken}, C.~E., {Brandl}, B.~R.,

807:   {Charmandaris}, V., {Devost}, D., {Gull}, G.~E., {Hall}, P., {Henderson},

808:   C.~P., {Higdon}, S.~J.~U., {Pirger}, B.~E., {Schoenwald}, J., {Sloan}, G.~C.,

809:   {Uchida}, K.~I., {Appleton}, P.~N., {Armus}, L., {Burgdorf}, M.~J.,

810:   {Fajardo-Acosta}, S.~B., {Grillmair}, C.~J., {Ingalls}, J.~G., {Morris},

811:   P.~W., \& {Teplitz}, H.~I. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18

812: 

813: \bibitem[{{Khachikian} \& {Weedman}(1974)}]{1974ApJ...192..581K}

814:   {Khachikian}, E.~Y., \& {Weedman}, D.~W. 1974, \apj, 192, 581

815: 

816: \bibitem[{{Laurent} {et~al.}(2000){Laurent}, {Mirabel}, {Charmandaris},

817:     {Gallais}, {Madden}, {Sauvage}, {Vigroux}, \&

818:     {Cesarsky}}]{2000A&A...359..887L}

819:   {Laurent}, O., {Mirabel}, I.~F., {Charmandaris}, V., {Gallais}, P., {Madden},

820:   S.~C., {Sauvage}, M., {Vigroux}, L., \& {Cesarsky}, C. 2000, \aap, 359, 887

821: 

822: \bibitem[{{Levenson} {et~al.}(2007){Levenson}, {Sirocky}, {Hao}, {Spoon},

823:     {Marshall}, {Elitzur}, \& {Houck}}]{2007ApJ...654L..45L}

824:   {Levenson}, N.~A., {Sirocky}, M.~M., {Hao}, L., {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Marshall},

825:   J.~A., {Elitzur}, M., \& {Houck}, J.~R. 2007, \apjl, 654, L45

826: 

827: \bibitem[{{Lutz} {et~al.}(2004){Lutz}, {Maiolino}, {Spoon}, \&

828:     {Moorwood}}]{2004A&A...418..465L}

829:   {Lutz}, D., {Maiolino}, R., {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., \& {Moorwood}, A.~F.~M. 2004,

830:   \aap, 418, 465

831: 

832: \bibitem[{{Malkan} {et~al.}(1998){Malkan}, {Gorjian}, \&

833:     {Tam}}]{1998ApJS..117...25M}

834:   {Malkan}, M.~A., {Gorjian}, V., \& {Tam}, R. 1998, \apjs, 117, 25

835: 

836: \bibitem[{{Martini} {et~al.}(2003){Martini}, {Regan}, {Mulchaey}, \&

837:     {Pogge}}]{2003ApJ...589..774M}

838:   {Martini}, P., {Regan}, M.~W., {Mulchaey}, J.~S., \& {Pogge}, R.~W. 2003, \apj,

839:   589, 774

840: 

841: \bibitem[{{Miller} \& {Antonucci}(1983)}]{1983ApJ...271L...7M}

842:   {Miller}, J.~S., \& {Antonucci}, R.~R.~J. 1983, \apjl, 271, L7

843: 

844: \bibitem[{{Murayama} \& {Taniguchi}(1998)}]{1998ApJ...497L...9M}

845:   {Murayama}, T., \& {Taniguchi}, Y. 1998, \apjl, 497, L9+

846: 

847: \bibitem[{{Nagao} {et~al.}(2000){Nagao}, {Taniguchi}, \&

848:     {Murayama}}]{2000AJ....119.2605N}

849:   {Nagao}, T., {Taniguchi}, Y., \& {Murayama}, T. 2000, \aj, 119, 2605

850: 

851: \bibitem[{{Nenkova} {et~al.}(2002){Nenkova}, {Ivezi{\'c}}, \&

852:     {Elitzur}}]{2002ApJ...570L...9N}

853:   {Nenkova}, M., {Ivezi{\'c}}, {\v Z}., \& {Elitzur}, M. 2002, \apjl, 570, L9

854: 

855: \bibitem[{{Osterbrock}(1981)}]{1981ApJ...249..462O}

856:   {Osterbrock}, D.~E. 1981, \apj, 249, 462

857: 

858: \bibitem[{{Pier} \& {Krolik}(1992)}]{1992ApJ...401...99P}

859:   {Pier}, E.~A., \& {Krolik}, J.~H. 1992, \apj, 401, 99

860: 

861: \bibitem[{{Pier} \& {Krolik}(1993)}]{1993ApJ...418..673P}

862:   ---. 1993, \apj, 418, 673

863: 

864: \bibitem[{{Shi} {et~al.}(2006){Shi}, {Rieke}, {Hines}, {Gorjian}, {Werner},

865:     {Cleary}, {Low}, {Smith}, \& {Bouwman}}]{2006ApJ...653..127S}

866:   {Shi}, Y., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Hines}, D.~C., {Gorjian}, V., {Werner}, M.~W.,

867:   {Cleary}, K., {Low}, F.~J., {Smith}, P.~S., \& {Bouwman}, J. 2006, \apj, 653,

868:   127

869: 

870: \bibitem[{{Spoon} {et~al.}(2004){Spoon}, {Armus}, {Cami}, {Tielens}, {Chiar},

871:     {Peeters}, {Keane}, {Charmandaris}, {Appleton}, {Teplitz}, \&

872:     {Burgdorf}}]{2004ApJS..154..184S}

873:   {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Armus}, L., {Cami}, J., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., {Chiar},

874:   J.~E., {Peeters}, E., {Keane}, J.~V., {Charmandaris}, V., {Appleton}, P.~N.,

875:   {Teplitz}, H.~I., \& {Burgdorf}, M.~J. 2004, \apjs, 154, 184

876: 

877: \bibitem[{{Spoon} {et~al.}(2007){Spoon}, {Marshall}, {Houck}, {Elitzur}, {Hao},

878:     {Armus}, {Brandl}, \& {Charmandaris}}]{2007ApJ...654L..49S}

879:   {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Marshall}, J.~A., {Houck}, J.~R., {Elitzur}, M., {Hao}, L.,

880:   {Armus}, L., {Brandl}, B.~R., \& {Charmandaris}, V. 2007, \apjl, 654, L49

881: 

882: \bibitem[{{Sturm} {et~al.}(2000){Sturm}, {Lutz}, {Tran}, {Feuchtgruber},

883:     {Genzel}, {Kunze}, {Moorwood}, \& {Thornley}}]{2000A&A...358..481S}

884:   {Sturm}, E., {Lutz}, D., {Tran}, D., {Feuchtgruber}, H., {Genzel}, R., {Kunze},

885:   D., {Moorwood}, A.~F.~M., \& {Thornley}, M.~D. 2000, \aap, 358, 481

886: 

887: \bibitem[{{Sturm} {et~al.}(2002){Sturm}, {Lutz}, {Verma}, {Netzer},

888:     {Sternberg}, {Moorwood}, {Oliva}, \& {Genzel}}]{2002A&A...393..821S}

889:   {Sturm}, E., {Lutz}, D., {Verma}, A., {Netzer}, H., {Sternberg}, A.,

890:   {Moorwood}, A.~F.~M., {Oliva}, E., \& {Genzel}, R. 2002, \aap, 393, 821

891: 

892: \bibitem[{{Tohline} \& {Osterbrock}(1976)}]{1976ApJ...210L.117T}

893:   {Tohline}, J.~E., \& {Osterbrock}, D.~E. 1976, \apjl, 210, L117

894: 

895: \bibitem[{{Urry} \& {Padovani}(1995)}]{1995PASP..107..803U}

896:   {Urry}, C.~M., \& {Padovani}, P. 1995, \pasp, 107, 803

897: 

898: \bibitem[{{Verma} {et~al.}(2005){Verma}, {Charmandaris}, {Klaas}, {Lutz}, \&

899:     {Haas}}]{2005SSRv..119..355V}

900:   {Verma}, A., {Charmandaris}, V., {Klaas}, U., {Lutz}, D., \& {Haas}, M. 2005,

901:   Space Science Reviews, 119, 355

902: 

903: \bibitem[{{Weedman} {et~al.}(2005){Weedman}, {Hao}, {Higdon}, {Devost}, {Wu},

904:     {Charmandaris}, {Brandl}, {Bass}, \& {Houck}}]{2005ApJ...633..706W}

905:   {Weedman}, D.~W., {Hao}, L., {Higdon}, S.~J.~U., {Devost}, D., {Wu}, Y.,

906:   {Charmandaris}, V., {Brandl}, B., {Bass}, E., \& {Houck}, J.~R. 2005, \apj,

907:   633, 706

908: 

909: \bibitem[{{Werner} {et~al.}(2004){Werner}, {Roellig}, {Low}, {Rieke}, {Rieke},

910:     {Hoffmann}, {Young}, {Houck}, {Brandl}, {Fazio}, {Hora}, {Gehrz}, {Helou},

911:     {Soifer}, {Stauffer}, {Keene}, {Eisenhardt}, {Gallagher}, {Gautier}, {Irace},

912:     {Lawrence}, {Simmons}, {Van Cleve}, {Jura}, {Wright}, \&

913:     {Cruikshank}}]{2004ApJS..154....1W}

914:   {Werner}, M.~W., {Roellig}, T.~L., {Low}, F.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.,

915:   {Hoffmann}, W.~F., {Young}, E., {Houck}, J.~R., {Brandl}, B., {Fazio}, G.~G.,

916:   {Hora}, J.~L., {Gehrz}, R.~D., {Helou}, G., {Soifer}, B.~T., {Stauffer}, J.,

917:   {Keene}, J., {Eisenhardt}, P., {Gallagher}, D., {Gautier}, T.~N., {Irace},

918:   W., {Lawrence}, C.~R., {Simmons}, L., {Van Cleve}, J.~E., {Jura}, M.,

919:   {Wright}, E.~L., \& {Cruikshank}, D.~P. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1

920: 

921: \end{thebibliography}

922: 

923: % \clearpage

924: 

925: % 

926: % Figure captions

927: % 

928: \figcaption[fig1a.eps]{{\it Spitzer}/IRS Spectra of Seyfert

929:   1.8s and 1.9s in $F_{\lambda}\ \vs \lambda$ units (rest frame). PAH

930:   emission features and narrow emission lines are identified above the

931:   spectra, and the possible locations of $10\mum$ and $18\mum$ silicate

932:   emission or absorption are noted below the spectra.}

933: 

934: \figcaption[fig2.eps]{Variations in AGN continuum: Mrk 9 (Seyfert

935:   1.5, single power law --- SP), NGC 1194 (Seyfert 1, single power law with

936:   silicate absorption), NGC 4151 (Seyfert 1.5, broken power law --- BP), Mrk

937:   622 (Seyfert 1.9, broken power law --- BP), NGC 3079 (Seyfert 2, strong PAH,

938:   strong red continuum --- RC), and NGC 7603 (Seyfert 1.5, unusual quasar like

939:   spectrum, strong silicate emission feature at $10\mum$). The spectra have

940:   been normalized to the flux at $20\mum$ and smoothed by a factor of 2. The

941:   right arrow indicates that as the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index

942:   becomes positive, the mid-IR spectrum is more and more dominated by

943:   starburst features like PAH bands. The left arrow shows the amount of

944:   variations in the $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ spectral index, as we go down from

945:   NGC 7603 to Mrk 622 the contribution of the hottest dust decreases. Optical

946:   Seyfert classifications do not always agree with the shape of the mid-IR

947:   spectrum.}

948: 

949: \figcaption[fig3.eps]{$6\textrm{--}15 \mum$ spectral

950:   index \vs $20\textrm{--}30 \mum$ spectral index. BP --- Broken Power law,

951:   SP --- Single Power law and RC --- Red Continuum. See Figure~2 for example

952:   spectra.}

953: 

954: \figcaption[fig4.eps]{Silicate equivalent width

955:   ($10\mum$) \vs $20\textrm{--}30\mum$ spectral index. The circled symbols

956:   have host galaxies with $b/a \le 0.5$. NGC 5256 has a fairly high

957:   equivalent width and is a face-on host galaxy, but is classified as

958:   interacting (source: NED).}

959: 

960: \figcaption[fig5.eps]{The $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent

961:   width \vs the $20\textrm{--}30 \mum$ spectral index. Equivalent widths are

962:   negative for emission features and absolute values are plotted here on

963:   logarithmic scale. Going from left to right on the x-axis, starburst

964:   contribution to the spectrum increases.}

965: 

966: \figcaption[fig6.eps]{[O IV] $25.89$ /[Ne II] $12.81$

967:   ratio \vs. [Ne III] $15.56$ /[Ne II] $12.81$ ratio. Correlation between

968:   Seyfert 1.8-1.9s and Seyfert 2s indicates that both subclasses of Seyfert

969:   galaxies have similar amounts of NLR ionization or they have intrinsically

970:   stronger starburst contribution as compared to Seyfert 1s.}

971: 

972: \clearpage

973: 

974: % 

975: % Table 1: Objects

976: % 

977: \begin{deluxetable}{lccl}

978:   \tablewidth{0pt}

979:   \tablecaption{Sample of Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 galaxies.\label{table1}}

980:   \tablehead{\colhead{Galaxy Name} &

981:     \colhead{$z$} &

982:     \colhead{$b/a$} &

983:     \colhead{Seyfert Type}

984:   }

985:   \startdata

986:   Mrk 471   &  0.034  &  0.67  &  Sey 1.8 \\

987:   Mrk 622   &  0.023  &  0.95  &  Sey $\textrm{2}^{a}$ \\

988:   Mrk 883   &  0.038  &  1.00  &  Sey 1.8 \\

989:   NGC 2622  &  0.029  &  0.50  &  Sey $\textrm{1}^{a}$ \\

990:   Mrk 334   &  0.022  &  0.70  &  Sey 1.8 \\

991:   UGC 7064  &  0.025  &  1.00  &  Sey 1.8 \\

992:   Mrk 609   &  0.034  &  0.90  &  Sey 1.8 \\

993:   NGC 7603  &  0.030  &  0.67  &  Sey $\textrm{1}^{a}$ \\

994:   UM 146    &  0.017  &  0.77  &  Sey 1.9 \\

995:   UGC 12138 &  0.025  &  0.88  &  Sey 1.8 \\

996:   NGC 2639  &  0.011  &  0.61  &  Sey 1.9 \\

997:   NGC 3786  &  0.009  &  0.59  &  Sey 1.8 \\

998:   \enddata

999:   \tablecomments{The redshift of galaxies ($z$), the $b/a$ and the Seyfert

1000:     type are taken from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED).}

1001:   \tablenotetext{a}{NGC 7603 and NGC 2622 were originally expected to be

1002:     Seyfert 1.8 but have likely transitioned to the Seyfert 1 class, based on

1003:     the appearance of their mid-IR spectra \citep[see also,

1004:     ][]{1976ApJ...210L.117T,1995ApJ...440..141G}. Mrk 622 is classified as a

1005:     Seyfert 2 in NED, and its mid-IR continuum is similar to other Seyfert 2s

1006:     like Mrk 3.}

1007: \end{deluxetable}

1008: % 

1009: % Table 2: Continuum Fluxes

1010: % 

1011: % \include{tab2}

1012: \begin{deluxetable}{llcccc}

1013:   \rotate

1014:   \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1015:   \tablewidth{0pt}

1016:   \tablecaption{Continuum flux values (in $F_{\lambda}$ units) from mid-IR spectra.\label{table2}}

1017:   \tablecolumns{6}

1018:   \tablehead{

1019:     \colhead{} &

1020:     \colhead{} & 

1021:     \multicolumn{4}{c}{Continuum flux ($10^{-19}\ \textrm{W}\ \textrm{cm}^{-2}\ {\mu}m^{-1}$) at} \\

1022:     \colhead{Galaxy} &

1023:     \colhead{Seyfert Type$^{a}$} &

1024:     \colhead{$6.00 \mum$} &

1025:     \colhead{$15.00 \mum$} &

1026:     \colhead{$20.00 \mum$} &

1027:     \colhead{$30.00 \mum$}

1028:   }

1029:   \startdata

1030: CGCG381-051  & Sey 2   & 1.66 $\pm$ 0.86   & 1.80 $\pm$ 0.06  & 2.57 $\pm$ 0.05  & 1.92 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1031: E33-G2       & Sey 2   & 6.36 $\pm$ 0.49   & 3.67 $\pm$ 0.06  & 2.66 $\pm$ 0.10  & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1032: F01475-0740  & Sey 2   & 2.94 $\pm$ 0.59   & 3.43 $\pm$ 0.11  & 3.55 $\pm$ 0.13  & 2.15 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1033: F04385-0828  & Sey 2   & 15.55 $\pm$ 0.61  & 9.01 $\pm$ 0.29  & 7.92 $\pm$ 0.22  & 6.33 $\pm$ 0.10  \\

1034: F15480-0344  & Sey 2   & 2.95 $\pm$ 0.28   & 3.40 $\pm$ 0.09  & 3.48 $\pm$ 0.08  & 2.23 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1035: IC4329A      & Sey 1.2 & 35.31 $\pm$ 1.83  & 18.49 $\pm$ 0.46 & 14.30 $\pm$ 0.42 & 6.11 $\pm$ 0.13  \\

1036: Mrk 334      & Sey 1.8 & 6.56 $\pm$ 2.38   & 3.49 $\pm$ 0.13  & 4.31 $\pm$ 0.11  & 4.56 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1037: Mrk 335      & Sey 1.2 & 8.03 $\pm$ 0.52   & 2.52 $\pm$ 0.08  & 2.00 $\pm$ 0.10  & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1038: Mrk 348      & Sey 2   & 8.06 $\pm$ 0.33   & 5.12 $\pm$ 0.12  & 4.14 $\pm$ 0.18  & 1.90 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1039: Mrk 471      & Sey 1.8 & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.35   & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.30 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1040: Mrk 6        & Sey 1.5 & 8.69 $\pm$ 0.72   & 4.13 $\pm$ 0.27  & 3.88 $\pm$ 0.12  & 2.06 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1041: Mrk 609      & Sey 1.8 & 2.97 $\pm$ 1.44   & 1.33 $\pm$ 0.09  & 1.38 $\pm$ 0.03  & 1.45 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1042: Mrk 622      & Sey 2   & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.40   & 1.51 $\pm$ 0.09  & 1.93 $\pm$ 0.03  & 1.84 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1043: Mrk 79       & Sey 1.2 & 11.24 $\pm$ 0.64  & 5.20 $\pm$ 0.14  & 4.26 $\pm$ 0.09  & 2.56 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1044: Mrk 817      & Sey 1.5 & 7.66 $\pm$ 0.46   & 5.11 $\pm$ 0.14  & 5.37 $\pm$ 0.16  & 3.89 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1045: Mrk 883      & Sey 1.8 & 0.76 $\pm$ 0.27   & 0.64 $\pm$ 0.06  & 0.89 $\pm$ 0.03  & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1046: Mrk 9        & Sey 1.5 & 6.78 $\pm$ 0.51   & 2.68 $\pm$ 0.06  & 2.38 $\pm$ 0.06  & 1.45 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1047: Mrk 938      & Sey 2   & 10.41 $\pm$ 5.42  & 5.80 $\pm$ 0.16  & 7.68 $\pm$ 0.37  & 14.52 $\pm$ 0.16 \\

1048: M-2-33-34    & Sey 1   & 1.84 $\pm$ 0.45   & 1.61 $\pm$ 0.27  & 1.56 $\pm$ 0.07  & 1.17 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1049: M-2-40-4     & Sey 2   & 13.95 $\pm$ 0.62  & 6.03 $\pm$ 0.13  & 4.93 $\pm$ 0.10  & 3.58 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1050: M-2-8-39     & Sey 2   & 2.03 $\pm$ 0.30   & 3.10 $\pm$ 0.07  & 2.39 $\pm$ 0.08  & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1051: M-3-34-63    & Sey 2   & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.60   & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.28 $\pm$ 0.05  & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1052: M-3-58-7     & Sey 2   & 11.74 $\pm$ 0.75  & 4.93 $\pm$ 0.08  & 4.78 $\pm$ 0.08  & 3.33 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1053: M-5-13-17    & Sey 1.5 & 3.20 $\pm$ 0.44   & 2.79 $\pm$ 0.09  & 2.67 $\pm$ 0.06  & 1.87 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1054: M-6-30-15    & Sey 1.2 & 12.17 $\pm$ 0.55  & 5.85 $\pm$ 0.10  & 4.84 $\pm$ 0.12  & 2.50 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1055: NGC 1056     & Sey 2   & 3.75 $\pm$ 2.51   & 1.34 $\pm$ 0.15  & 1.48 $\pm$ 0.11  & 1.79 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1056: NGC 1125     & Sey 2   & 3.23 $\pm$ 0.85   & 3.12 $\pm$ 0.23  & 3.28 $\pm$ 0.08  & 3.84 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1057: NGC 1143-4   & Sey 2   & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.43    & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         \\

1058: NGC 1194     & Sey 1   & 13.99 $\pm$ 0.80  & 4.90 $\pm$ 0.16  & 3.20 $\pm$ 0.08  & 2.00 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1059: NGC 1241     & Sey 2   & 2.15 $\pm$ 0.76   & 1.27 $\pm$ 0.12  & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.12  & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1060: NGC 1320     & Sey 2   & 9.45 $\pm$ 0.39   & 6.36 $\pm$ 0.15  & 5.55 $\pm$ 0.17  & 3.58 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1061: NGC 1667     & Sey 2   & 3.31 $\pm$ 1.85   & 1.16 $\pm$ 0.11  & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.04  & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1062: NGC 2622     & Sey 1   & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.07   & 0.74 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.62 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.34 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1063: NGC 2639     & Sey 1.9 & 1.44 $\pm$ 0.18   & 0.41 $\pm$ 0.05  & 0.38 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.44 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1064: NGC 3079     & Sey 2   & 21.20 $\pm$ 11.51 & 5.54 $\pm$ 0.38  & 3.81 $\pm$ 0.23  & 10.47 $\pm$ 0.32 \\

1065: NGC 3227     & Sey 1.5 & $\cdots$          & 8.61 $\pm$ 0.78  & 8.71 $\pm$ 0.20  & 6.30 $\pm$ 0.12  \\

1066: NGC 3516     & Sey 1.5 & 11.10 $\pm$ 0.66  & 5.12 $\pm$ 0.14  & 4.58 $\pm$ 0.10  & 2.78 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1067: NGC 3786     & Sey 1.8 & 3.05 $\pm$ 0.68   & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.10  & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1068: NGC 3982     & Sey 2   & 1.59 $\pm$ 0.60   & 1.28 $\pm$ 0.11  & 1.43 $\pm$ 0.06  & 1.42 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1069: NGC 4051     & Sey 1.5 & 14.37 $\pm$ 0.98  & 8.77 $\pm$ 0.22  & 7.39 $\pm$ 0.32  & 4.42 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1070: NGC 4151     & Sey 1.5 & 47.16 $\pm$ 2.18  & 35.85 $\pm$ 1.88 & 30.08 $\pm$ 0.97 & 12.99 $\pm$ 0.20 \\

1071: NGC 424      & Sey 2   & 35.01 $\pm$ 1.79  & 14.44 $\pm$ 0.25 & 10.36 $\pm$ 0.32 & 4.42 $\pm$ 0.13  \\

1072: NGC 4579     & Sey 1.9 & 3.42 $\pm$ 0.37   & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         \\

1073: NGC 4602     & Sey 1.9 & 1.34 $\pm$ 0.63   & 0.64 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.74 $\pm$ 0.11  & 0.78 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1074: NGC 4941     & Sey 2   & $\cdots$          & 1.54 $\pm$ 0.15  & 1.64 $\pm$ 0.08  & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1075: NGC 4968     & Sey 2   & 6.13 $\pm$ 0.94   & 6.26 $\pm$ 0.22  & 5.75 $\pm$ 0.18  & 3.37 $\pm$ 0.05  \\

1076: NGC 5005     & LINER   & 7.91 $\pm$ 1.68   & 2.02 $\pm$ 0.16  & 1.83 $\pm$ 0.12  & 3.40 $\pm$ 0.09  \\

1077: NGC 513      & Sey 2   & 1.97 $\pm$ 0.41   & 1.29 $\pm$ 0.10  & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.09  & 1.05 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1078: NGC 5256     & Sey 2   & 4.75 $\pm$ 2.79   & 2.35 $\pm$ 0.26  & 2.75 $\pm$ 0.09  & 3.87 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1079: NGC 526A     & Sey 1.5 & $\cdots$          & 3.60 $\pm$ 0.07  & 2.67 $\pm$ 0.12  & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1080: NGC 5347     & Sey 2   & 4.38 $\pm$ 0.43   & 5.45 $\pm$ 0.13  & 5.04 $\pm$ 0.13  & 2.87 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1081: NGC 5548     & Sey 1.5 & $\cdots$          & 4.17 $\pm$ 0.09  & 3.68 $\pm$ 0.07  & 1.95 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1082: NGC 5929     & Sey 2   & 2.73 $\pm$ 0.87   & 0.37 $\pm$ 0.10  & 0.40 $\pm$ 0.05  & 0.48 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1083: NGC 5953     & Sey 2   & 5.23 $\pm$ 2.94   & 2.77 $\pm$ 0.22  & 2.87 $\pm$ 0.09  & 3.42 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1084: NGC 7130     & Sey 2   & 6.26 $\pm$ 2.22   & 6.08 $\pm$ 0.27  & 7.69 $\pm$ 0.21  & 9.36 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1085: NGC 7172     & Sey 2   & $\cdots$          & 3.94 $\pm$ 0.25  & 2.34 $\pm$ 0.07  & 2.86 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1086: NGC 7314     & Sey 1.9 & $\cdots$          & 2.30 $\pm$ 0.15  & 1.72 $\pm$ 0.07  & 1.33 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1087: NGC 7469     & Sey 1.2 & 26.83 $\pm$ 8.20  & 19.37 $\pm$ 0.47 & 23.65 $\pm$ 0.17 & 23.83 $\pm$ 0.29 \\

1088: NGC 7496     & Sey 2   & 4.38 $\pm$ 2.27   & 4.26 $\pm$ 0.12  & 6.03 $\pm$ 0.21  & 7.31 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1089: NGC 7603     & Sey 1   & 14.11 $\pm$ 0.73  & 3.16 $\pm$ 0.08  & 1.86 $\pm$ 0.09  & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1090: NGC 7674     & Sey 2   & 13.19 $\pm$ 0.74  & 9.18 $\pm$ 0.33  & 8.46 $\pm$ 0.18  & 5.78 $\pm$ 0.14  \\

1091: NGC 931      & Sey 1.5 & 14.54 $\pm$ 1.11  & 7.11 $\pm$ 0.20  & 5.70 $\pm$ 0.15  & 3.24 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1092: TOL 1238-364 & Sey 2   & 6.53 $\pm$ 1.02   & 9.56 $\pm$ 0.29  & 10.98 $\pm$ 0.27 & 7.91 $\pm$ 0.08  \\

1093: UGC 11680    & Sey 2   & 5.18 $\pm$ 0.66   & 2.45 $\pm$ 0.27  & 2.68 $\pm$ 0.42  & 1.60 $\pm$ 0.65  \\

1094: UGC 12138    & Sey 1.8 & 2.49 $\pm$ 0.32   & 1.55 $\pm$ 0.09  & 1.34 $\pm$ 0.04  & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1095: UGC 7064     & Sey 1.8 & 2.57 $\pm$ 0.40   & 1.79 $\pm$ 0.11  & 1.65 $\pm$ 0.06  & 1.29 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1096: UM 146       & Sey 1.9 & 0.66 $\pm$ 0.05   & 0.44 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.39 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1097:   \enddata

1098:   \tablecomments{For galaxies NGC 1143-4 and NGC 4579, we could only extract

1099:     the SL spectrum, hence only the measurement of $6\mum$ continuum point is

1100:     given. For galaxy, NGC 4922, we could not extract the complete spectrum,

1101:     hence it is not included in this table.}

1102:   \tablenotetext{a}{Seyfert types are taken from the Nasa Extragalactic

1103:     Database (NED).}

1104: \end{deluxetable}

1105: 

1106: % 

1107: % Table 3: PAH Fluxes and Silicate EW.

1108: % 

1109: % \include{tab3}

1110: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}

1111:   \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1112:   \tablewidth{0pt}

1113:   \tablecaption{Equivalent width of $6.2 \mum$ PAH and the silicate feature at $9.7 \mum$.\label{table3}}

1114:   \tablecolumns{3}

1115:   \tablehead{

1116:     & 

1117:     \multicolumn{2}{c}{Equivalent Width (in units of $0.1 \mum$)}\\

1118:     \colhead{Galaxy} &

1119:     \colhead{PAH $6.2 \mum$} &

1120:     \colhead{Silicate $9.7 \mum^{a}$}

1121:   }

1122:   \startdata

1123:   CGCG381-051  & -3.73 $\pm$ 0.15  & -2.43 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1124:   E33-G2       & -0.31 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.35 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1125:   F01475-0740  & -1.73 $\pm$ 0.10  & -1.19 $\pm$ 0.86  \\

1126:   F04385-0828  & -0.37 $\pm$ 0.03  & 12.27 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1127:   F15480-0344  & -0.91 $\pm$ 0.02  & 1.13 $\pm$ 0.15   \\

1128:   IC 4329A     & -0.08 $\pm$ 0.01  & -3.71 $\pm$ 0.14  \\

1129:   Mrk 334      & -3.13 $\pm$ 0.01  & 3.01 $\pm$ 0.04   \\

1130:   Mrk 348      & -0.12 $\pm$ 0.01  & 3.21 $\pm$ 0.05   \\

1131:   Mrk 471      & -3.69 $\pm$ 0.36  & 0.71 $\pm$ 0.43   \\

1132:   Mrk 6        & -0.22 $\pm$ 0.03  & -0.27 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1133:   Mrk 609      & -4.27 $\pm$ 0.03  & 3.90 $\pm$ 0.03   \\

1134:   Mrk 622      & -3.66 $\pm$ 0.13  & -0.75 $\pm$ 0.10  \\

1135:   Mrk 79       & -0.21 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.20 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1136:   Mrk 817      & -0.52 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.28 $\pm$ 0.03  \\

1137:   Mrk 883      & -5.01 $\pm$ 0.18  & 0.55 $\pm$ 0.04   \\

1138:   Mrk 9        & -0.18 $\pm$ 0.02  & -0.30 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1139:   Mrk 938      & -5.07 $\pm$ 0.12  & 9.43 $\pm$ 0.53   \\

1140:   M-2-33-34    & -2.83 $\pm$ 0.29  & -0.00 $\pm$ 0.11  \\

1141:   M-2-40-4     & -0.54 $\pm$ 0.02  & 2.54 $\pm$ 0.11   \\

1142:   M-2-8-39     & -0.38 $\pm$ 0.02  & -0.82 $\pm$ 0.19  \\

1143:   M-3-34-63    & -19.48 $\pm$ 1.26 & -15.22 $\pm$ 1.39 \\

1144:   M-3-58-7     & -0.54 $\pm$ 0.02  & -0.21 $\pm$ 0.08  \\

1145:   M-5-13-17    & -1.45 $\pm$ 0.05  & -0.43 $\pm$ 0.20  \\

1146:   M-6-30-15    & -0.09 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.41 $\pm$ 0.14  \\

1147:   NGC 1056     & -10.01 $\pm$ 0.26 & -4.02 $\pm$ 1.01  \\

1148:   NGC 1125     & -2.95 $\pm$ 0.04  & 12.75 $\pm$ 0.20  \\

1149:   NGC 1143-4   & -2.12 $\pm$ 0.03  & 9.38 $\pm$ 0.45   \\

1150:   NGC 1194     & -0.33 $\pm$ 0.07  & 16.97 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1151:   NGC 1241     & -5.65 $\pm$ 0.13  & 4.52 $\pm$ 0.23   \\

1152:   NGC 1320     & -0.44 $\pm$ 0.02  & 1.43 $\pm$ 0.04   \\

1153:   NGC 1667     & -8.06 $\pm$ 0.04  & 3.92 $\pm$ 0.09   \\

1154:   NGC 2622     & -1.14 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.39 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1155:   NGC 2639     & -0.83 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.45 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1156:   NGC 3079     & -5.35 $\pm$ 0.07  & 10.27 $\pm$ 0.45  \\

1157:   NGC 3516     & -0.34 $\pm$ 0.02  & -0.39 $\pm$ 0.08  \\

1158:   NGC 3786     & -1.94 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.13   \\

1159:   NGC 3982     & -0.75 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.92 $\pm$ 0.22   \\

1160:   NGC 4051     & -0.69 $\pm$ 0.01  & -0.84 $\pm$ 0.15  \\

1161:   NGC 4151     & -0.09 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.75 $\pm$ 0.12   \\

1162:   NGC 424      & -0.17 $\pm$ 0.01  & 1.39 $\pm$ 0.05   \\

1163:   NGC 4579     & -0.70 $\pm$ 0.02  & -1.29 $\pm$ 0.10  \\

1164:   NGC 4602     & -0.58 $\pm$ 0.03  & 1.50 $\pm$ 0.08   \\

1165:   NGC 4968     & -1.10 $\pm$ 0.04  & 2.65 $\pm$ 0.11   \\

1166:   NGC 5005     & -2.27 $\pm$ 0.06  & 3.57 $\pm$ 0.38   \\

1167:   NGC 513      & -1.69 $\pm$ 0.04  & -0.87 $\pm$ 0.20  \\

1168:   NGC 5256     & -7.24 $\pm$ 0.05  & 9.32 $\pm$ 0.08   \\

1169:   NGC 5347     & -0.74 $\pm$ 0.02  & 1.38 $\pm$ 0.14   \\

1170:   NGC 5548     & $\cdots$          & -1.13 $\pm$ 0.07  \\

1171:   NGC 5929     & -0.22 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.32   \\

1172:   NGC 5953     & -5.11 $\pm$ 0.09  & 1.50 $\pm$ 0.78   \\

1173:   NGC 7130     & -3.93 $\pm$ 0.18  & 4.87 $\pm$ 0.17   \\

1174:   NGC 7469     & -2.80 $\pm$ 0.05  & 2.65 $\pm$ 0.21   \\

1175:   NGC 7496     & -5.15 $\pm$ 0.07  & 1.94 $\pm$ 0.05   \\

1176:   NGC 7603     & -0.74 $\pm$ 0.01  & -1.42 $\pm$ 0.06  \\

1177:   NGC 7674     & -0.44 $\pm$ 0.02  & 2.70 $\pm$ 0.21   \\

1178:   NGC 931      & -0.24 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.48 $\pm$ 0.04   \\

1179:   TOL 1238-364 & -0.89 $\pm$ 0.06  & 3.49 $\pm$ 0.12   \\

1180:   UGC 11680    & -1.12 $\pm$ 0.03  & -1.39 $\pm$ 0.04  \\

1181:   UGC 12138    & -1.08 $\pm$ 0.02  & 1.68 $\pm$ 0.03   \\

1182:   UGC 7064     & -1.10 $\pm$ 0.11  & 1.68 $\pm$ 0.01   \\

1183:   UM 146       & -1.34 $\pm$ 0.11  & 0.13 $\pm$ 0.02   \\

1184:   \enddata

1185:   \tablecomments{Emission features have negative equivalent widths. The errors

1186:     quoted here are 1-$\sigma$ measurement errors as propagated from error

1187:     vectors returned by SMART during spectral reductions. There will be an

1188:     additional $10\%$ error due to subjective placement of the continuum.}

1189: 

1190:   \tablenotetext{a}{The silicate equivalent width includes a contribution from

1191:     the $\textrm{H}_{2}$ emission feature at $9.66\mum$ and in some cases from

1192:     the [S~IV] $10.51\mum$ emission line. No attempt has been made to subtract

1193:     these contributions.}

1194: \end{deluxetable}

1195: 

1196: % 

1197: % Table 4: Line Ratios

1198: % 

1199: \pagestyle{empty}

1200: % \include{tab4}

1201: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccccc}

1202:   \rotate

1203:   \tablewidth{1.4\textwidth}

1204:   \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1205:   \tablecaption{Integrated fluxes for prominent narrow emission lines and the $6.2\mum$ PAH feature.\label{table4}}

1206:   \tablecolumns{12}

1207:   \tablehead{

1208:     \colhead{} &

1209:     \multicolumn{11}{c}{Integrated line fluxes ($10^{-19} W cm^{-2}$) at} \\

1210:     \colhead{Galaxy} &

1211:     \colhead{PAH} &

1212:     \colhead{[Ar II]} &

1213:     \colhead{[Ar III]} &

1214:     \colhead{[S IV]} &

1215:     \colhead{[Ne II]} &

1216:     \colhead{[Ne V]} &

1217:     \colhead{[Ne III]} &

1218:     \colhead{[S III]} &

1219:     \colhead{[Ne V]} &

1220:     \colhead{[O IV]} &

1221:     \colhead{[S III]} \\

1222:     \colhead{} &

1223:     \colhead{$6.2 \mum$} &

1224:     \colhead{$6.99 \mum$} &

1225:     \colhead{$8.99 \mum$} &

1226:     \colhead{$10.51 \mum$} &

1227:     \colhead{$12.81 \mum$} &

1228:     \colhead{$14.32 \mum$} &

1229:     \colhead{$15.56 \mum$} &

1230:     \colhead{$18.71 \mum$} &

1231:     \colhead{$24.32 \mum$} &

1232:     \colhead{$25.89 \mum$} &

1233:     \colhead{$33.48 \mum$}

1234:   }

1235:   \startdata

1236:  CGCG381-051 & 0.52 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.17 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1237:  E33-G2      & 0.14 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.01  & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.12 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.06 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.01  \\

1238:  F01475-0740 & 0.44 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.16 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1239:  F04385-0828 & 0.25 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.24 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         \\

1240:  F15480-0344 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.34 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1241:  IC4329A     & 0.27 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.46 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.43 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.70 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.19 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.37 $\pm$  0.02 & 1.08 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1242:  Mrk 3       & $\cdots$         & 0.30 $\pm$  0.07 & $\cdots$         & 0.51 $\pm$  0.08 & 0.86 $\pm$  0.12 & 1.09 $\pm$  0.12 & 2.07 $\pm$  0.29 & 0.59 $\pm$  0.11 & 0.59 $\pm$  0.07 & 2.10 $\pm$  0.26 & 0.82 $\pm$  0.20 \\

1243:  Mrk 334     & 1.55 $\pm$  0.06 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.30 $\pm$  0.08 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.23 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.90 $\pm$  0.08 \\

1244:  Mrk 335     & 0.11 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1245:  Mrk 348     & 0.16 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.25 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1246:  Mrk 471     & 0.25 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1247:  Mrk 6       & 0.20 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.22 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.47 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.21 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.50 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1248:  Mrk 609     & 0.93 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.04 \\

1249:  Mrk 622     & 0.27 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1250:  Mrk 79      & 0.22 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.20 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.51 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1251:  Mrk 817     & 0.36 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1252:  Mrk 883     & 0.22 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1253:  Mrk 9       & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1254:  Mrk 938     & 3.53 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.64 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.20 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.37 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1255:  M-2-33-34   & 0.42 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.14 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.40 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.60 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1256:  M-2-40-4    & 0.73 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.14 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.18 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1257:  M-2-8-39    & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1258:  M-3-34-63   & 0.38 $\pm$  0.10 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.19 $\pm$  0.05 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         \\

1259:  M-3-58-7    & 0.55 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1260:  M-5-13-17   & 0.36 $\pm$  0.18 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1261:  M-6-30-15   & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.20 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1262:  NGC 1056    & 2.06 $\pm$  0.05 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.23 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.25 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.28 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.14 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1263:  NGC 1125    & 0.70 $\pm$  0.06 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.27 $\pm$  0.08 & $\cdots$         & 0.31 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.29 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.06 \\

1264:  NGC 1143-4  & 0.30 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         \\

1265:  NGC 1194    & 0.18 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.19 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.14 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1266:  NGC 1241    & 0.71 $\pm$  0.05 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.04 \\

1267:  NGC 1320    & 0.48 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.32 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         \\

1268:  NGC 1667    & 1.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.21 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.19 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.20 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1269:  NGC 2622    & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1270:  NGC 2639    & 0.10 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1271:  NGC 3079     & 7.79 $\pm$  0.12 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.16 $\pm$  0.05 & 1.48 $\pm$  0.09 & $\cdots$         & 0.28 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.38 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.36 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.65 $\pm$  0.07 \\

1272:  NGC 3227     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.03  & 0.41 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.18 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.73 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1273:  NGC 3516     & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.38 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1274:  NGC 3786     & 0.65 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.12 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.19 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.04 \\

1275:  NGC 3982     & 0.21 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.16 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1276:  NGC 4051     & 0.90 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.23 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.32 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1277:  NGC 4151     & 0.69 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.44 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.37 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.86 $\pm$  0.02 & 1.35 $\pm$  0.03 & 1.08 $\pm$  0.06 & 2.50 $\pm$  0.11 & 1.14 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.52 $\pm$  0.12 & 2.45 $\pm$  0.07 & 0.46 $\pm$  0.04 \\

1278:  NGC 424      & 1.16 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.21 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.32 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1279:  NGC 4579     & 0.26 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         \\

1280:  NGC 4602     & 0.14 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.04 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.16 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.23 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1281:  NGC 4941     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.20 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.04  & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.10  \\

1282:  NGC 4968     & 0.65 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.19 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.30 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.32 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1283:  NGC 5005     & 1.63 $\pm$  0.06 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.60 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.16 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.18 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.20 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1284:  NGC 513      & 0.26 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1285:  NGC 5256     & 2.02 $\pm$  0.08 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.76 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.37 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.61 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.29 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1286:  NGC 526A     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.13 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.01  & $\cdots$         & 0.21 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1287:  NGC 5347     & 0.21 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1288:  NGC 5548     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.14 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.15 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1289:  NGC 5929     & 0.55 $\pm$  0.17 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.21 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1290:  NGC 5953     & 1.88 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 1.05 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.21 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.61 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.22 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.69 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1291:  NGC 7130     & 1.77 $\pm$  0.08 & 0.22 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.71 $\pm$  0.05 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.37 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.37 $\pm$  0.10 & $\cdots$         & 0.43 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.64 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1292:  NGC 7172     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.14 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.50 $\pm$ 0.02  & 0.41 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1293:  NGC 7314     & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.23 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.24 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.53 $\pm$ 0.01  & 0.19 $\pm$ 0.02  \\

1294:  NGC 7469     & 5.36 $\pm$  0.15 & 0.78 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.15 $\pm$  0.02 & 1.68 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.45 $\pm$  0.02 & 1.24 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 1.03 $\pm$  0.16 & 2.05 $\pm$  0.08 \\

1295:  NGC 7496     & 1.41 $\pm$  0.03 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.01 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.34 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.34 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.32 $\pm$  0.02 \\

1296:  NGC 7603     & 1.10 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.11 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.13 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1297:  NGC 7674     & 0.50 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.22 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.31 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.46 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.22 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.24 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.46 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1298:  NGC 931      & 0.44 $\pm$  0.10 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.21 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.18 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.22 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.26 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.43 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1299:  TOL 1238-364 & 0.63 $\pm$  0.09 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.39 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.09 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.34 $\pm$  0.03 & 0.23 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.12 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.53 $\pm$  0.03 \\

1300:  UGC 11680    & 0.53 $\pm$  0.09 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.20 $\pm$  0.04 & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & $\cdots$         & 0.15 $\pm$  0.04 \\

1301:  UGC 12138    & 0.26 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.08 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.11 $\pm$  0.02 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1302:  UGC 7064     & 0.09 $\pm$  0.02 & $\cdots$         & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.10 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.07 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.17 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.06 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1303:  UM 146       & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.03 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.04 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & $\cdots$         & 0.02 $\pm$  0.01 & 0.05 $\pm$  0.01 \\

1304:   \enddata

1305: \end{deluxetable}

1306: 

1307: \clearpage

1308: \pagestyle{plain}

1309: 

1310: % 

1311: % Figures

1312: % 

1313: % Figure 1: Spectra

1314: \setcounter{figure}{0}

1315: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1316:   \vspace{-2.0cm}

1317:   \begin{center}

1318:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1a.eps}\\

1319:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1b.eps}\\

1320:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1c.eps}\\

1321:     \caption{Spectra of Seyferts from our new observations}

1322:   \end{center}

1323: \end{figure}

1324: \clearpage

1325: 

1326: \setcounter{figure}{0}

1327: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1328:   \vspace{-2.0cm}

1329:   \begin{center}

1330:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1d.eps}\\

1331:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1e.eps}\\

1332:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1f.eps}\\

1333:     \caption{Continued -- Spectra of Seyferts from our new observations}

1334:   \end{center}

1335: \end{figure}

1336: \clearpage

1337: 

1338: \setcounter{figure}{0}

1339: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1340:   \vspace{-2.0cm}

1341:   \begin{center}

1342:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1g.eps}\\

1343:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1h.eps}\\

1344:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1i.eps}\\

1345:     \caption{Continued -- Spectra of Seyferts from our new observations}

1346:   \end{center}

1347: \end{figure}

1348: \clearpage

1349: 

1350: \setcounter{figure}{0}

1351: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1352:   \vspace{-2.0cm}

1353:   \begin{center}

1354:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1j.eps}\\

1355:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1k.eps}\\

1356:     \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f1l.eps}\\

1357:     \caption{Continued -- Spectra of Seyferts from our new observations}

1358:   \end{center}

1359: \end{figure}

1360: \clearpage

1361: 

1362: % Figure 2:  Power-laws

1363: % \setcounter{figure}{0}

1364: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1365:   \begin{center}

1366:     \includegraphics[angle=90,width=5.8in,keepaspectratio]{f2.eps}

1367:     \caption{Variations in AGN continuum:  Mrk 9 (Seyfert 1.5, single power

1368:       law --- SP), NGC 1194 (Seyfert 1, single power law with silicate

1369:       absorption), NGC 4151 (Seyfert 1.5, broken power law --- BP), Mrk 622

1370:       (Seyfert 2, broken power law --- BP), NGC 3079 (Seyfert 2, strong PAH,

1371:       strong red continuum --- RC), and NGC 7603 (Seyfert 1, unusual quasar

1372:       like spectrum, strong silicate emission feature at $10\mum$). The

1373:       spectra have been normalized to the flux at $20\mum$ and smoothed by a

1374:       factor of 2. The right arrow indicates that as the $20\textrm{--}30\mum$

1375:       spectral index becomes positive, the mid-IR spectrum is more and more

1376:       dominated by starburst features like PAH bands. The left arrow shows the

1377:       amount of variations in the $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ spectral index, as we

1378:       go down from NGC 7603 to Mrk 622 the contribution of hottest dust

1379:       decreases. Optical Seyfert classifications do not always agree with the

1380:       shape of the mid-IR spectrum.}

1381:   \end{center}

1382: \end{figure}

1383: \clearpage

1384: 

1385: % Figure 3

1386: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1387:   \begin{center}

1388:     \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio]{f3.eps}

1389:     \caption{The $6\textrm{--}15\mum$ spectral index \vs $20\textrm{--}30

1390:       \mum$ spectral index. BP --- Broken Power law, SP --- Single Power law

1391:       and RC --- Red Continuum. The circled symbols have host galaxies with

1392:       $b/a \le 0.5$ and/or are interacting. See Figure~2 for example spectra.}

1393:   \end{center}

1394: \end{figure}

1395: \clearpage

1396: 

1397: % Figure 4

1398: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1399:   \begin{center}

1400:     \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio]{f4.eps}

1401:     \caption{Silicate equivalent width ($10\mum$) \vs $20\textrm{--}30\mum$

1402:       spectral index. The circled symbols have host galaxies with $b/a \le

1403:       0.5$ and/or are interacting.}

1404:   \end{center}

1405: \end{figure}

1406: \clearpage

1407: 

1408: % Figure 5

1409: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1410:   \begin{center}

1411:     \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio]{f5.eps}

1412:     \caption{The $6.2\mum$ PAH equivalent width \vs the $20\textrm{--}30 \mum$

1413:       spectral index. Equivalent widths are negative for emission features and

1414:       absolute values are plotted here in log. Going from left to right on the

1415:       x-axis, starburst contribution to the spectrum increases. The circled

1416:       symbols have host galaxies with $b/a \le 0.5$ and/or are interacting.}

1417:   \end{center}

1418: \end{figure}

1419: \clearpage

1420: 

1421: % Figure 6

1422: \begin{figure}[!ht]

1423:   \begin{center}

1424:     \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\textwidth,keepaspectratio]{f6.eps}

1425:     \caption{The [O IV] $25.89$ /[Ne II] $12.81$ ratio \vs [Ne III] $15.56$

1426:       /[Ne II] $12.81$ ratio. Correlation between Seyfert 1.8-1.9s and Seyfert

1427:       2s indicates that both subclasses of Seyfert galaxies in this sample

1428:       have similar amounts of NLR ionization or they have intrinsically

1429:       stronger starburst contribution as compared to Seyfert 1s.}

1430:   \end{center}

1431: \end{figure}

1432: % \clearpage  

1433: 

1434: \end{document}

1435: