1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{aastex}
3: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
4:
5: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
6: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
7: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
8: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
9: \newcommand{\bfv}{{\bf v}}
10: \newcommand{\bu}{{\bf u}}
11: \newcommand{\bA}{{\bf A}}
12: \newcommand{\tomega}{{\tilde\omega}}
13: \newcommand{\rmRe}{{\rm Re}}
14: \newcommand{\rmIm}{{\rm Im}}
15: \def\bomega{{\mbox{\boldmath $\omega$}}}
16: \def\bmu{{\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}}}
17: \def\cD{{\cal D}}
18: \def\cF{{\cal F}}
19: %\newcommand{\go}{\agt}
20: %\newcommand{\lo}{\alt}
21: %%\gtrsim
22: %%\lesssim
23: \def\go{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
24: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
25: \def\lo{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$}\mkern-14mu
26: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
27:
28: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{
29: \medskip
30: \def\@captype{figure}
31: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
32: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\medskip}
33:
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: \title{Wave Excitation in Disks Around Rotating Magnetic Stars}
37: \author{Dong Lai\altaffilmark{1} and Hang Zhang\altaffilmark{2}}
38: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy,
39: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. Email: dong@astro.cornell.edu}
40: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, JS 210097,
41: P.R.~China}
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44: The accretion disk around a rotating magnetic star (neutron star,
45: white dwarf or T Tauri star) is subjected to periodic
46: vertical magnetic forces from the star, with the forcing frequency equal to
47: the stellar spin frequency or twice the spin frequency. This gives rise
48: bending waves in the disk that may influence the variabilities of the system.
49: We study the excitation, propagation and dissipation of these waves
50: using a
51: %purely
52: hydrodynamical model coupled with a generic model description of
53: the magnetic forces. The $m=1$ bending waves are excited at the
54: Lindblad/vertical resonance, and propagate either to larger radii or
55: inward toward the corotation resonance where dissipation takes place.
56: While the resonant torque is negligible compared to the accretion torque,
57: the wave nevertheless may reach appreciable amplitude and can cause or
58: modulate flux variabilities from the system. We discuss
59: applications
60: %possible relevance
61: of our result to the observed quasi-periodic oscillations from
62: various systems, in particular neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries.
63: \end{abstract}
64: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks - hydrodynamics - waves - binaries:
65: general - stars: magnetic fields - stars: neutron}
66:
67:
68: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: Disk accretion onto magnetic central objects occurs in a variety of
72: astrophysical systems, ranging from classical T Tauri stars (e.g.,
73: Bouvier et al.~2007a), cataclysmic variables (intermediate polars;
74: e.g. Warner 2004), to accretion-powered X-ray pulsars (e.g. Lewin \&
75: van der Klis 2006). The basic picture of the disk-magnetosphere
76: interaction is well known: The stellar magnetic field disrupts the
77: accretion flow at the magnetospheric boundary and funnels the plasma
78: onto the polar caps of the star or ejects it to infinity.
79: %(e.g., Pringle \& Rees 1972).
80: The magnetosphere boundary is located where the magnetic and plasma
81: stresses balance,
82: \be
83: r_m =\xi\,[\mu^4/(GM\dot M^2)]^{1/7},
84: %r_m =\xi \left({\mu^4\over GM\dot M^2}\right)^{1/7},
85: \ee
86: where $M$ and $\mu$ are the mass and magnetic moment of the central
87: object, $\dot M$ is the mass accretion rate
88: and $\xi$ is a dimensionless constant of order 0.5-1.
89: %unity (estimate of $\xi$ ranges from 0.5 to 1).
90: The funnel flow occurs when $r_m$ is less
91: than the corotation
92: radius $r_c$ (where the disk rotates at the same rate as the
93: star). For $r_m\go r_c$, centrifugal forces may lead to ejection of
94: the accreting matter (``propeller'' effect).
95: %Illarionov \& Sunyaev 1975).
96: Over the last several decades, numerous theoretical studies
97: have been devoted to understand the interaction between accretion
98: disk and magnetized star (e.g., Ghosh \& Lamb 1979;
99: %1979a,b;
100: Aly 1980;
101: Lipunov \& Shakura 1980;
102: Anzer \& B\"orner 1983; Arons 1993;
103: %Anzer \& B\"orner 1980,1983; Arons 1993;
104: %1987,1993;
105: Aly \& Kuijpers 1990; Spruit \& Taam 1993;
106: %1990,1993;
107: Shu et al.~1994,2000;
108: %van Ballegooijen 1994;
109: Wang 1995;
110: Lovelace et al.~1995,1999; Li et al.~1996;
111: %Wickramasinge \& R\"udiger 1996;
112: Campbell 1997; Lai 1998,1999;
113: Terquem \& Papaloizou 2000; Shirakawa \& Lai 2002a,b; Pfeiffer \& Lai 2004;
114: Uzdensky 2004; Matt \& Pudritz 2005). There have also been many
115: numerical simulations on accretion onto magnetic stars,
116: with increasing sophistication and realism
117: (e.g., Stone \& Norman 1994; Hayashi et al.~1996; Goodson et al.~1997;
118: Miller \& Stone 1997;
119: %Toropin et al.~1999;
120: Fendt 2003; Romanova et
121: al.~2003,2006; Ustyugova et al.~2006; Long et al.~2007).
122:
123: In this paper we carry out an analytical study of wave excitation
124: in disks around rotating magnetic stars. The idea is very simple:
125: A rotating dipole, inclined relative to the stellar spin axis,
126: induces a time-dependent magnetic force on the disk.
127: The forcing frequency normally equals to the spin frequency $\omega_s$,
128: but we show that under certain conditions the magnetic force could
129: also have a $2\omega_s$ component (see \S 2). The magnetic forces
130: excite $m=1$ density/bending waves in the disk, most prominently at the
131: Lindblad/vertical resonance. This magnetically driven resonance
132: was noted before (Lai 1999) but not studied.
133: %Here we develop the theoretical tool
134: %to examine the excitation, propagation and damping of the waves quantitatively.
135: Since details of the magnetic field -- disk interaction are
136: complex (e.g., the interaction depends on magnetic field
137: dissipation/reconnection), we will
138: model the magnetic force using simple models that,
139: % (we believe)
140: we conjecture,
141: capture the essential dynamical feature of the system.
142: Petri (2005) examined several aspects of the forced oscillations in
143: magnetized disks, but did not study the resonantly excited bending waves
144: and their evolution that are of interest in this paper
145: %but a number of assumptions (e.g. regarding field
146: %geometry and disk responses) had to be made to make the problem trackable
147: (see also related work by Agapitou et al.~1997; Terquem \& Papaloizou 2000).
148:
149: Wave excitations in magnetic disks may be relevant to understanding
150: the flux variabilities that have been observed in many accreting systems,
151: from pre-main-sequence stars (e.g., O'Sullivan er al.~2005,
152: Bouvier et al.~2007b and references therein) to accreting magnetic
153: white dwarfs and neutron stars.
154: It has been suggested that the phenomenology of the
155: qausi-periodic brightness modulations in CVs might be explained by
156: magnetically excited traveling waves in the disk (Warner 2004).
157: Of great interest are the high-frequency (kHz) quasi-periodic
158: oscillations (QPOs) observed in the X-ray fluxes of more than 20
159: neutron stars in Low-Mass X-ray Binaries (LMXBs) (see van der Klis 2006
160: for a review). These kHz QPOs often occur in pairs, with intriguing
161: correlation between the upper-frequency $\nu_u$, the
162: lower-frequency $\nu_l$ and the spin frequency $\nu_s$.
163: In particular, in the accreting millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4-3658,
164: $\nu_u=694\pm 4$~Hz, $\nu_l=499\pm 4$~Hz, and $\nu_u-\nu_l$ equals
165: $\nu_s=401$~Hz to within a few Hz (Wijnands et al.~2003).
166: In another accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1807.4-294,
167: $\nu_u-\nu_l$ remains constant with an average value of
168: $205\pm 6$~Hz, approximately equal to $\nu_s=191$~Hz, even
169: when both $\nu_l$ and $\nu_u$ vary over a range of more than
170: $200$~Hz (Linares et al.~2005). In some systems, however,
171: $\nu_u-\nu_l$ are found to vary significantly (e.g.,
172: Circinus X-1, Boutloukos et al.~2006). In general, there
173: is some evidence that $(\nu_u-\nu_l)/\nu_s$ clusters around 0.5 and
174: 1 in those systems (about 10) for which these quantities have been measured,
175: indicating that the neutron star spin plays an important
176: role, although this issue is still under debate (see
177: Yin et al.~2007; Mendez \& Belloni 2007). It is also of interest to
178: note that recent observations
179: (Casella et al.~2007; Altamirano et al.~2007)
180: suggest that many neutron stars in LMXBs have
181: non-negligible (but complex) magnetic fields.
182:
183: Our paper is organized as follows. In \S 2 we discuss
184: the generic forms of magnetic forces on a disk around a rotating
185: magnetic dipole. The basic equations governing the hydrodynamical
186: response of a disk to an external periodic force are presented in \S 3.
187: \S 4 focuses on wave dynamics around the Lindblad/vertical resonance
188: and corotation resonance and \S 5 gives the global solution of the
189: disk response to the periodic magnetic force. Some
190: %possible
191: applications of our result to QPOs in LMXBs
192: are discussed in \S 6.
193:
194:
195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
196: \section{Periodic Magnetic Forces on the Disk}
197:
198: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
199: %\begin{inlinefigure}
200: %\scalebox{.9}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f1.eps}}}
201: %\figcaption{
202: %Sketch of the coordinate system used in calculating the magnetic forces.
203: %The $z$-axis is along {\boldmath $l$}, the normal vector of the unperturbed
204: %disk. The angular velocity vector of the star,
205: %${\mbox{\boldmath $\omega_s$}}$,
206: %is inclined at an angle $\beta$ with respect to {\boldmath $l$},
207: %and lies in the $yz$-plane. The stellar dipole moment
208: %${\mbox{\boldmath $\mu$}}$ rotates around
209: %${\mbox{\boldmath $\omega_s$}}$ and the angle of obliquity is $\theta$.
210: %}\end{inlinefigure}
211: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
212:
213: The interaction between the dipole magnetic field of a star and
214: its accretion disk is complex, and many papers have been
215: published on it (\S 1).
216: To focus on the dynamics of waves driven by magnetic
217: forces, we consider two simple analytical models, representing two
218: limiting behaviors of the disk. The basic geometric setup is as
219: follows:
220: % (see Fig.~1):
221: The disk lies in the $xy$-plane with its normal vector long
222: the $z$-axis; the spin ($\bomega_s$)
223: of the star is inclined with respect to
224: the $z$-axis by an angle $\beta$ and lies in the $yz$-plane.
225: Because of the possibility of
226: large-scale disk warping driven by the (static) stellar magnetic field,
227: we will allow for $\beta\neq 0$; Lai 1999, Pfeiffer \& Lai 2004;
228: see below). The stellar dipole $\bmu$ rotates around $\bomega_s$,
229: and the angle between $\bmu$ and $\bomega_s$ is $\theta$, such that
230: $\bmu$ varies in time according to
231: $\bmu=\mu\,\left(\sin\theta\cos\varphi_\mu\,\hat x
232: +\sin\theta\sin\varphi_\mu\,\hat y+\cos\theta\,\hat z\right).$
233:
234: \subsection{Simple Model}
235:
236: First consider the limiting case where the disk is a perfect conductor
237: and has no large-scale
238: magnetic field of its own. The inner radius of the disk is located at $r=r_m$.
239: % the magnetospheric radius.
240: The magnetic field produced by the stellar dipole cannot
241: penetrate the disk, and a diamagnetic
242: surface current is induced. Aly (1980) has found the
243: exact analytic solution for the magnetic field outside the thin disk.
244: At a point $(r,\phi,z=0)$ (cylindrical coordinates) on the disk
245: surface ($z=0,~r>r_m$), the field is given by
246: \ba
247: B_r&=&{2\mu\over r^3}\sin\chi\cos(\varphi-\varphi_\mu)\mp{4\mu\over\pi r^3
248: \cD}\cos\chi,\label{br1}\\
249: B_\varphi&=&{\mu\over r^3}\sin\chi\sin(\varphi-\varphi_\mu),\label{bphi1}
250: %\\
251: %B_z&=&0,
252: \ea
253: and $B_z=0$, where $\chi=\chi(t)$ is the angle between $\bmu$ and the z-axis.
254: In eq.~(\ref{br1}), the upper (lower) sign applies to the upper
255: (lower) disk surface, and
256: %the factor $\cD$ is
257: %\be
258: $\cD={\rm max}\left(\sqrt{{r^2/r_m^2}-1},
259: \sqrt{{2h/r_m}}\right)$,
260: %\label{Dfunc}\ee
261: where $h\ll r_m$ is the half-thickness of the disk.
262: The vertical magnetic force per unit area on the disk is
263: \be
264: F_z={2\mu^2\over\pi^2r^6\cD}\sin 2\chi\,\cos(\varphi-\varphi_\mu).
265: \label{force1}
266: \ee
267: Using the relations between various angles,
268: %identities
269: %\ba \cos\chi &=&\cos\beta\cos\theta-\sin\beta\sin\theta\sin\omega_s t,\label{id1}\\
270: %\sin\chi\cos\varphi_\mu &=&\sin\theta\cos\omega_s t,\label{id2}\\
271: %\sin\chi\sin\varphi_\mu
272: %&=& \sin\beta\cos\theta+\cos\beta\sin\theta\sin\omega_s t,
273: %\label{id3}\ea
274: %the force (\ref{force1}) can be written as
275: we have
276: \be
277: F_z=\rmRe\sum_{\omega_f}F_{\omega_f}(r)\exp(i\phi-i\omega_f t),
278: \label{eq:force}\ee
279: where $\omega_f=0,\pm\omega_s,\pm 2\omega_s$, with
280: \ba
281: F_0(r)&=&-i\cF_D\,(2-3\sin^2\theta)\,\sin 2\beta,\nonumber\\
282: F_{\omega_s}(r)&=&\cF_D\sin 2\theta \,(\cos\beta+\cos 2\beta),\nonumber\\
283: F_{-\omega_s}(r)&=& \cF_D \sin 2\theta\,(\cos\beta-\cos 2\beta),\nonumber\\
284: F_{2\omega_s}(r)&=& -i\cF_D\sin^2\theta\,\sin\beta\,(\cos\beta+1),\nonumber\\
285: F_{-2\omega_s}(r)&=& -i\cF_D\sin^2\theta\,\sin\beta\,(\cos\beta-1),
286: \ea
287: and
288: \be
289: \cF_D\equiv
290: {\mu^2\over\pi^2r^6\cD}.
291: \ee
292:
293: %\subsection{Partial-Magnetically Threaded Disk}
294:
295: The disk is unlikey to be completely diamagnetic: various instabilities
296: and dissipation mechanisms will allow some of the stellar
297: magnetic field to partially penetrate the disk. As a simple model,
298: we decompose the vertical stellar dipole field on the disk into
299: a static component and a time-varying component:
300: \be
301: \! B_z^{(0)}=-{\mu\over r^3}\cos\chi=
302: %-{\mu\over r^3}\cos\beta\cos\theta
303: %+{\mu\over r^3}\sin\beta\sin\theta\sin\omega_s t.
304: {\mu\over r^3}\left(\sin\beta\sin\theta\sin\omega_s t
305: -\cos\beta\cos\theta\right).
306: \label{bz0}\ee
307: We assume that the static field penetrates the disk, while the
308: the variable field is shielded out of the disk by a screening current.
309: Because of the shear between the disk and the plasma outside the disk,
310: the threaded vertical field is wound to produce an azimuthal field that
311: has different signs on the upper and lower surfaces of the disk.
312: We thus adopt the following {\it ansatz} for the magnetic field in the disk
313: (see Lai 1999)
314: \ba
315: \!\!\!B_r&=&{2\mu\over r^3}\sin\chi\cos(\varphi\!-\!\varphi_\mu)\!\pm
316: \!{4\mu\over\pi
317: r^3\cD}\sin\beta\sin\theta\sin\omega_s t,\label{br3}\\
318: \!\!\!
319: B_\varphi&=&{\mu\over r^3}\sin\chi\sin(\varphi\!-\!\varphi_\mu)\!\pm\!
320: \zeta{\mu\over
321: r^3}\cos\beta\cos\theta,\label{bphi3}\\
322: \!\!\!B_z&=&-{\mu\over r^3}\cos\beta\cos\theta,\label{bz3}
323: \ea
324: where $\zeta$ is a positive constant of order unity.
325: The vertical magnetic force (per unit area) on the disk is given by
326: \ba
327: && F_z=-{4\mu^2\over\pi^2 r^6\cD}\sin\beta\sin\theta
328: \sin\omega t\sin\chi\cos(\varphi-\varphi_\mu) \nonumber\\
329: &&\qquad\quad -{\zeta\mu^2\over 2\pi r^6}\cos\beta\cos\theta\sin\chi
330: \sin(\varphi-\varphi_\mu).
331: \label{force3}\ea
332: This force can be written in the form of eq.~(\ref{eq:force}), with
333: \ba
334: &&\!\!F_0(r)\!=\!i\cF_D\,\sin^2\theta\,\sin 2\beta+\cF_T\,\cos^2\theta\,
335: \sin 2\beta,\nonumber\\
336: &&\!\!F_{\omega_s}(r)\!=\! \cF_D\,\sin 2\theta\,\sin^2\beta+
337: i\cF_T\,\sin 2\theta\,\cos\beta\cos^2{\beta\over 2},\nonumber\\
338: &&\!\!F_{-\omega_s}(r)\!=\! -\cF_D \sin 2\theta\,\sin^2\beta+
339: i\cF_T\sin 2\theta\cos\beta\sin^2{\beta\over 2},\nonumber\\
340: &&\!\!F_{2\omega_s}(r)\!=\! -i\cF_D\sin^2\theta\,\sin\beta\,(2+\cos\beta),
341: \nonumber\\
342: &&\!\!F_{-2\omega_s}(r)\!=\! i\cF_D\sin^2\theta\,\sin\beta\,(2-\cos\beta),
343: \ea
344: where
345: \be
346: \cF_T\equiv {\zeta\mu^2\over 4\pi r^6}.
347: \ee
348:
349:
350: \subsection{General Property of Magnetic Forces}
351:
352: The magnetic forces discussed
353: %in sections 2.1 and 2.2
354: above share some general
355: properties. The zero-frequency force components $F_0$ have been shown to
356: lead to secular warping and precession of the disk (Lai 1999;
357: Shirakawa \& Lai 2002a,b; Pfeiffer \& Lai 2004): The force resulting
358: from threaded field ($\propto \cF_T$) induces a warping instability, while
359: the force resulting from the dielectric response of the disk ($\propto \cF_D$)
360: gives rise to precession. The negative-frequency components ($F_{-\omega_s}$
361: and $F_{-2\omega_s}$) average to zero on the timescale of spin period.
362:
363: The positive-frequency forces, $F_{\omega_s}$ and $F_{2\omega_s}$, are
364: of interest for this paper. They are generally present for
365: non-zero magnetic field inclination angle $\theta$. Note that
366: the $2\omega_s$ component arises because the dipole field
367: varies as $\sin\omega_s t$ or $\cos\omega_s t$, and the induced
368: screening current also varies as $\sin\omega_s t$ or $\cos\omega_s t$,
369: and $F_{2\omega_s}$ is present only when $\sin\beta\neq 0$.
370:
371: We note that periodic magnetic forces in the radial direction are also
372: present in some disk models, but we we will focus on the dynamics of
373: the disk under the periodic vertical force in this paper.
374:
375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
376: \section{Basic Equations: Disk dynamics under a periodic non-potential
377: forcing}
378:
379: The key approximation underlying our study is that we treat the
380: waves in the disk using pure hydrodynamics, with the magnetic effect
381: entering only as external forces. This simplification allows
382: us to focus on the dynamics of wave excitation, propagation and
383: dissipation. As we will see, the wave dynamics is sufficiently
384: complex and subtle even without magnetic fields,
385: % that a hydrodynamical
386: % treatment should be considered a useful first step.
387: and we believe that such a
388: hydrodynamical treatment can be considered a useful first step.
389: Future study using
390: MHD will be of great interest (and obviously much more difficult).
391: We conjecture
392: %suspect
393: that in a real system, the wave dynamics will not differ
394: qualitatively from that described in this paper since the the waves of
395: interest here are basically sound waves modified by disk rotation, and
396: in the presence of magnetic fields the sound waves simply become fast
397: magnetosonic waves (with the sound speed replaced by fast wave speed).
398:
399: %Before studying the dynamics of disks under vertical
400: %magnetic forcing,
401: In this section we develop the general hydrodynamical equations
402: for three-dimensional (3D) disks under generic non-potential forces
403: (cf. Zhang \& Lai 2006).
404: We consider a geometrically thin gas disk and adopt cylindrical
405: coordinates $(r,\varphi,z)$. The unperturbed disk has velocity
406: $\bfv_0=(0,r\Omega,0)$, where the angular velocity $\Omega=\Omega(r)$
407: is taken to be a function of $r$ alone. The disk is assumed to be
408: isothermal in the vertical direction
409: and non-self-gravitating.
410: %The equation of hydrostatic
411: %equilibrium (for $z\ll r$) reads
412: %\be {dp_0/dz}=-\rho_0\Omega_\perp^2 z.\ee
413: Thus the vertical density profile is
414: given by
415: \be
416: \rho_0(r,z)={\sigma\over\sqrt{2\pi}h}\exp (-Z^2/2),\quad
417: {\rm with}~~ Z=z/h
418: \label{eq:rho0}\ee
419: where $h=h(r)=c/\Omega_\perp$ is the disk scale
420: height, $c=c(r)=\sqrt{p_0/\rho_0}$ is the isothermal sound speed,
421: $\sigma=\sigma(r)=\int dz\,\rho_0$ is the surface density, and
422: $\Omega_\perp$ is the vertical oscillation frequency of the disk.
423:
424: We now consider perturbation of the disk driven by an external force
425: (per unit mass) ${\bf f}$. For simplicity, we shall assume that the
426: perturbation is isothermal, so that the (Eulerian) density and pressure
427: perturbations are related by $\delta P=c^2\delta\rho$.
428: The linear perturbation equations read
429: \ba
430: &&{\partial \bu\over\partial t}+(\bfv_0\cdot\nabla)\bu+(\bu\cdot\nabla)\bfv_0
431: =-\nabla\eta+{\bf f},\label{eq:u}\\
432: && {\partial\rho\over\partial
433: t}+\nabla\cdot(\rho_0\bu+\bfv_0\delta\rho)=0,
434: \label{eq:rho}\ea
435: where $\bu=\delta\bfv$ is the (Eulerian) density perturbation,
436: and $\eta\equiv\delta p/\rho_0$ is the enthalpy perturbation.
437: Without loss of generality, each perturbation variable and the external
438: force are assumed to depend on $t$ and $\varphi$ as
439: %\be
440: %X(r,\varphi,z,t)=X(r,z)
441: $\exp(im\varphi-i\omega t)$,
442: %\ee
443: where $m>0$ is an integer and $\omega$ is allowed
444: to be either positive or negative, corresponding to the
445: prograde or retrograde wave, respectively.
446: %Note that only the real part
447: %of the perturbation has physical meaning and we will not write
448: %out explicitly the dependence on $m$ and $\omega$
449: %for the amplitude $X(r,z)$ and other related quantities
450: %in the reminder of the paper.
451: Equations (\ref{eq:u}) and (\ref{eq:rho}) then reduce to
452: \ba
453: &&\!\!\!-i\tomega u_r-2\Omega u_\varphi=-{\partial\over\partial r}\eta+f_r,
454: \label{eq:fluid1}\\
455: &&\!\!\!
456: -i\tomega u_\varphi +{\kappa^2\over 2\Omega}u_r=-{im\over r}\eta+f_\varphi,
457: \label{eq:fluid22}\\
458: &&\!\!\!-i\tomega u_z=-{\partial \over\partial z}\eta+f_z,\label{eq:fluid3}\\
459: &&\!\!\!-i\tomega {\rho_0\over c^2}\eta+{1\over r}{\partial\over\partial
460: r} (r\rho_0 u_r)+{im\over r}\rho_0 u_\varphi +{\partial\over\partial
461: z}(\rho_0 u_z)=0. \label{eq:fluid}\ea
462: Here $\tomega$ is the ``Doppler-shifted'' frequency
463: \be
464: \tomega=\omega-m\Omega,
465: \ee
466: and $\kappa$ is the epicyclic frequency, defined by
467: \be \kappa^2={2\Omega\over r}{d\over
468: dr}(r^2\Omega). \ee
469: In this paper we will consider cold, (Newtonian)
470: Keplerian disks, for which the three characteristic frequencies,
471: $\Omega,\Omega_\perp$ and $\kappa$, are identical and equal to the
472: Keplerian frequency $\Omega_K=(GM/r^3)^{1/2}$.
473: However, we continue to use different notations ($\Omega,\Omega_\perp,
474: \kappa$) for them in our treatment below when possible so that
475: the physical origins of various terms are clear.
476:
477: To separate out the $z$-dependence,
478: we expand the perturbations with Hermite polynomials $H_n$
479: (cf.~Okazaki et al.~1987; Kato 2001)
480: %; Tanaka et al.~2002)
481: \ba
482: \left[\begin{array}{c}
483: f_r(r,z)\\
484: f_\varphi(r,z)\\
485: \eta(r,z)\\
486: u_r(r,z)\\
487: u_\varphi(r,z)\end{array}\right]
488: &=& \sum_n \left[\begin{array}{c}
489: f_{rn}(r)\\
490: f_{\varphi n}\\
491: \eta_n(r)\\
492: u_{rn}(r)\\
493: u_{\varphi n}(r)\end{array}\right] H_n(Z),\nonumber\\
494: \left[\begin{array}{c}
495: f_z(r,z)\\
496: u_z(r,z)\end{array}\right]
497: &=& \sum_n \left[\begin{array}{c}
498: f_{zn}(r)\\
499: u_{zn}(r)\end{array}\right] H_n'(Z),
500: \label{eq:expand}\ea
501: where $H'_n=dH_n/dZ$, and the Hermite polynomial is defined by
502: $H_n(Z)\equiv(-1)^n e^{Z^2/2}d^n(e^{-Z^2/2})/dZ^n$.
503: % satisfy the following equations:
504: %\ba && H_n''-ZH_n'+nH_n=0,\\
505: %&& H_n'=nH_{n-1},\\
506: %&& ZH_n=H_{n+1}+nH_{n-1},\\
507: %&& \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\!\exp(-Z^2/2)H_n H_{n'}dZ=\sqrt{2\pi}
508: %\,n!\,\delta_{nn'}.\label{n!}
509: %\ea
510: %We note that any complete set of functions can be used as the basis of
511: %the expansion. For example, Lubow(1981) used Taylor series in the
512: %expansion of vertical variable. However, choosing the Hermite
513: %polynomials as the basis set greatly simplifies the
514: %mathematics involved, since they are eigenmodes in
515: %variable $z$ for locally isothermal disks with a constant scale
516: %height $h$ and quasi-eigenmodes for disks with a small radial
517: %variation of $h$.
518: Note that since $H_1=Z$, $H_2=Z^2-1$, the $n=1$ mode
519: coincides with the bending mode studied by Papaloizou \& Lin (1995)
520: (who considered disks with no resonance), and the $n=2$ mode is similar
521: to the mode studied by Lubow (1981).
522: With the expansion in (\ref{eq:expand}), the fluid equations (\ref{eq:fluid})
523: become
524: \ba &&-i\tomega u_{rn}-2\Omega u_{\varphi n}=
525: -{d\over dr} \eta_n+{n\mu\over r}\eta_n\nonumber\\
526: && \qquad \qquad \qquad +{(n+1)(n+2)\mu\over r}\eta_{n+2}+f_{rn},\label{u1}\\
527: &&-i\tomega u_{\varphi n} +{\kappa^2\over 2\Omega}u_{rn}=-{im\over r}\eta_n
528: +f_{\varphi n},\label{u2}\label{eq:fluida}\\
529: &&-i\tomega u_{zn}=-{\eta_n\over h}+f_{zn},\label{eq:fluidb}\\
530: &&-i\tomega {\eta_n\over c^2}+
531: \left({d\over dr}\ln r\sigma +{n\mu\over r}\right)u_{rn}+
532: {\mu\over r}u_{r,n-2}+{d\over dr} u_{rn}\nonumber\\
533: &&\qquad\qquad\qquad +{im\over r}u_{\varphi n}
534: -{n\over h}u_{zn}=0,
535: \label{eq:fluid2}\ea
536: where
537: %\be
538: %$\mu\equiv {d\ln h\over d\ln r}$.
539: $\mu\equiv {d\ln h/d\ln r}$.
540: %\ee
541: Eliminating $u_{\varphi n}$ and $u_{zn}$ from
542: eqs.~(\ref{u1})-(\ref{eq:fluid2}),
543: we have
544: \ba
545: &&{d\eta_n\over dr}={2m\Omega\over r\tomega}\eta_n-{D\over\tomega }iu_{rn}
546: +{\mu\over r}[n\eta_n+(n+1)(n+2)\eta_{n+2}]\nonumber\\
547: && \qquad +f_{rn}
548: +i{2\Omega\over\tomega}f_{\varphi n},\label{eq:dwndr}\\
549: &&{du_{rn}\over dr}=-\left[{d\ln(r\sigma)\over dr}+
550: {m\kappa^2\over 2r\Omega\tomega}\right]u_{rn}+{1\over i\tomega}
551: \left({m^2\over r^2}+{n\over h^2}\right)\eta_n\nonumber\\
552: &&\qquad +{i\tomega\over c^2}\eta_n
553: -{\mu\over r}(n u_{rn}+u_{r,n-2})
554: +{m\over \tomega r}f_{\varphi n}+{in\over\tomega h}f_{zn},
555: \label{eq:durndr}
556: \ea
557: where we have defined
558: \be
559: D\equiv \kappa^2-\tomega^2=\kappa^2-(\omega-m\Omega)^2.
560: \ee
561: We can check that for an external potential force, ${\bf f}=-\nabla
562: \phi$, these equations reduce to those of Zhang \& Lai (2006).
563:
564: Consider local free wave solution of the form
565: %\be
566: $\eta_n\propto \exp\left[i\int^r\!k(s) ds\right]$.
567: %\ee
568: For $|kr|\gg 1$, from the eqs.~(\ref{eq:dwndr})-(\ref{eq:durndr}),
569: in the absence of the external force, we find (see Okazaki et al.~1987;
570: Kato 2001)
571: \be
572: (\tomega^2-\kappa^2)(\tomega^2-n\Omega_\perp^2)/\tomega^2=k^2c^2,
573: \label{eq:disp}\ee
574: where we have used $h=c/\Omega_\perp\ll r$ (thin disk),
575: and $m,n\ll r/h$. The dispersion relation is useful for identifying
576: wave propagation zones in the disk (see Zhang \& Lai 2006).
577:
578: %leads to several special points %in the disk. They are:
579: %(i) Lindblad resonances, where $D=0$ or $\tomega^2=\kappa^2$, at which
580: %the wave number $k=0$. The Lindblad resonances are turning points at which
581: %waves are generated or reflected.
582: %(ii) Vertical resonances, where $\tomega^2=n\Omega_\perp^2$ (with
583: %$n\ge 1$). The vertical resonances are also turning points of the
584: %wave equation.
585: %(iii) Corotation resonance, where $\tomega=0$. In general, the
586: %corotation resonance is a (regular) singularity of the wave equation.
587: %The singularity implies that a steady emission or absorption of waves
588: %may occur there.
589:
590:
591:
592: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
593: \section{Waves at Lindblad/Vertical Resonance and Corotation Resonance}
594:
595: We now consider the magnetic force on the disk as given in \S 2, i.e.,
596: the force per unit area is $F_z=F_\omega(r)\exp(i\varphi-i\omega t)$,
597: with $\omega=\omega_s$ or $2\omega_s$. This corresponds to
598: $m=n=1$, with
599: \be
600: f_{z1}(r)={1\over\sigma}F_\omega(r),\quad f_r=f_\varphi=0,\qquad
601: (\omega=\omega_s,\,2\omega_s).
602: \ee
603: The wave propagation diagram [based on the dispersion relation
604: (\ref{eq:disp}) with $n=m=1$] is shown in Fig.~1.
605:
606: Note that for $\omega\ll \Omega=\kappa=\Omega_\perp$, the $m=n=1$
607: mode dispersion relation (\ref{eq:disp})
608: reduces to $\omega =\pm c k/2$, i.e.,
609: the bending wave propagates non-dispersively at speed $c/2$. This is the
610: regime explored in a number of previous works (e.g., Papaloizou \& Lin 1995;
611: Ogilvie 2006). However, here we are particularly interested in the
612: disk region where $\Omega$ is of the same order as $\omega$.
613:
614: %\clearpage
615: %\begin{figure}
616: %\vskip -1.7cm
617: %\scalebox{1.1}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f1.eps}}}
618: %\vskip -2.6cm
619: %\caption{
620: \begin{inlinefigure}
621: \vskip -2.cm
622: \hskip -2.cm
623: \scalebox{1.2}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f1.eps}}}
624: \vskip -2.8cm
625: \figcaption{
626: A sketch of the function $G=(\kappa^2-\tomega^2)(1-\Omega_\perp^2/
627: \tomega^2)$ as a function of $r$ for $m=n=1$. The WKB dispersion relation is
628: $G=-k^2c^2$, and thus waves propagate in the region $G<0$. Note that
629: the Lindblad/vertical resonance (L/VR) is the turning point $k\rightarrow 0$
630: and the corotation resonance (CR) is a singularity ($k\rightarrow\infty$).
631: }
632: \end{inlinefigure}
633: %}\end{figure}
634: %\clearpage
635:
636: Consider eqs.~(\ref{eq:dwndr}-(\ref{eq:durndr}) for $n=1$.
637: The coupling terms
638: can be neglected if $|\eta_1|\go |\eta_3|$, which is justified since
639: there is no $n=3$ driving force. Keeping only the potentially singular terms
640: ($\propto D^{-1},\,\tomega^{-2}$), we have
641: \ba
642: && \Biggl[{d^2\over dr^2}+\left({d\over dr}\ln{r\sigma\over D}\right)
643: {d\over dr}
644: -{D(\tomega^2-n\Omega_\perp^2)\over h^2\Omega_\perp^2\tomega^2}\nonumber\\
645: &&\qquad\qquad -{2\Omega\over r\tomega}\left({d\over dr}\ln{\sigma\Omega
646: \over D}\right)\Biggr] \eta_1
647: ={D\over \tilde{\omega}^2h}f_{z1}
648: \label{main1}\ea
649: This equation can be simplified further by changing variable via
650: \be
651: \eta_1(r)=\left({-D/r\sigma}\right)^{1/2}y(r).
652: \label{change}\ee
653: Keeping the leading-order terms, we obtain
654: \ba
655: &&\left[\frac{d^{2}}{dr^{2}}
656: -\frac{(\tilde{\omega}
657: ^{2}-\Omega_{\perp }^{2})D}
658: {h^2\tilde{\omega}^{2}\Omega _{\perp }^{2}}
659: -\frac{3(\tomega d\Omega/dr+\kappa d\kappa/dr)^2}{D^2}
660: \right]y\nonumber\\
661: &&\qquad\qquad =-\frac{(-r\sigma D)^{1/2}}{h\tilde{\omega}^{2}}
662: f_{z1}.\label{y}\ea
663: The terms dropped inside $[...]$ in the above equation are
664: considered to be smaller than the retained
665: terms for the following reasons: Firstly, away from
666: the $D=0$ region, they are negligible compared
667: to the term $\propto h^{-2}$ owing to the assumed smallness of $h$,
668: and secondly, they are insignificant with respect
669: to the term $\propto D^{-2}$ in the vicinity of $D=0$.
670:
671: Equation (\ref{y}) reveals two special points: one is at
672: ${\tilde{\omega} }=0$ (corotation resonance),
673: the other is at $\tilde{\omega}^{2}=\kappa^{2}$ (Lindblad resonance).
674: The corotation resonance is a singularity of the wave equation, and
675: the singularity implies that a steady emission or absorption of waves
676: may occur there. The Lindblad resonances are turning points at which
677: waves are generated or reflected.
678: Another interesting point is at
679: $\ \tilde{\omega}^{2}=\Omega _{\perp }^{2}$.
680: It is a transition point where the vertical resonance occurs.
681: For a Keplerian disk, $ \kappa =\Omega _{\perp}=\Omega $, the
682: vertical resonance coincides with the
683: Lindblad resonance, and we will call it Lindblad/vertical resonance
684: (L/VR). Equation (\ref{y}) then reduces to
685: \ba
686: &&\left[\frac{d^{2}}{dr^{2}}
687: +\frac{(\tilde{\omega}^{2}-\Omega^{2})^2}
688: {h^2\tilde{\omega}^{2}\Omega _{\perp }^{2}}
689: -\frac{3\omega ^{2}(d\Omega/dr)^{2}}{(\tilde{\omega}^{2}-\kappa^{2})^{2}}
690: \right]y\nonumber\\
691: &&\qquad =-\frac{\sigma^{\frac{1}{2}}r^{\frac{1}{2}}
692: (\tilde{\omega}^{2}-\kappa ^{2})^{1/2}}{h\tilde{\omega}^{2}}
693: f_{z1}\equiv S_\omega(r).
694: \label{w}\ea
695: This is our basic working equation.
696: % for the analysis below.
697:
698: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
699: \subsection{Lindblad/Vertical Resonance}
700:
701: We now study wave excitations near a Lindblad/vertical resonance
702: (L/VR), where $D=0$,
703: or $\tomega=\kappa=\Omega$, $\omega=2\Omega$, and the (outer) L/VR
704: radius is denoted by $r_L$. Changing $r$ to the new
705: variable $x\equiv (r-r_{L})/r_{L}$ and keeping the leading order terms,
706: we find that, for $|x|\ll 1$, eq.~(\ref{w}) reduces to
707: \be
708: \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}y+\left(b^2x^{2}-\frac{3}{4x^2}\right)y=
709: S_\omega r_L^2,\label{yl}\ee
710: where
711: %$b=6(r/h)_L$.
712: \be
713: b^2=\frac{64}{\omega^{2}}\frac{(d\Omega /dr)^{2}r^{4}}{h^{2}}
714: \Biggl |_L=36\left({r\over h}\right)^2_L
715: \ee
716: (The subscript ``L'' implies that the quantity should be evaluated
717: at $r=r_L$). The two independent solutions of the homogeneous version of
718: eq.~(\ref{yl}) are
719: \be
720: y_{\pm}\propto (bx)^{-1/2}\,e^{\pm ibx^2/2}.
721: \label{eq:yll}\ee
722: The general solution of the inhomogeneous eq.~(\ref{yl}) is then
723: \be
724: y=-y_+\int^x {y_-S_\omega r_L^2\over W}\,dx
725: +y_-\int^x {y_+S_\omega r_L^2\over W}dx
726: +C_+ y_+ +C_- y_-,
727: \ee
728: where $W=y_+dy_-/dx-y_-dy_+/dx=-2i$ is the Wronskian. The constants
729: $C_{\pm}$ can be fixed by requiring waves propagating away from the
730: resonance. Using eq.~(\ref{change}), we obtain
731: \ba
732: &&\eta_1=i\left({rh\over 24}\right)^{1/2}_Lf_{z1}
733: \Biggl[e^{i\zeta^2/2}\int^\zeta_{-\infty} e^{-i\zeta^2/2}d\zeta
734: \nonumber\\
735: &&\qquad +e^{-i\zeta^2/2}\int^{\infty}_\zeta e^{i\zeta^2/2}d\zeta\Biggr],
736: \label{ynh}\ea
737: where $f_{z1}$ is evaluated at $r=r_L$, and we have defined $\zeta=b^{1/2}x$.
738: Note that although our analysis here is limited to $|x|\ll 1$, we have
739: extended the integration limit to $\zeta=\pm\infty$ in eq.~(\ref{ynh}).
740: This is valid because $b=6r_L/h\gg1$ for a thin disk and
741: the integrands in the integrals are highly oscillatory for $|\zeta|\gg 1$
742: (so that the contribution to the integrals from the $|\zeta|\gg 1$ region
743: is negligible).
744:
745: To calculate the angular momentum transfer through the resonance,
746: we note that for $\zeta\rightarrow +\infty$ (but still $x\ll 1$),
747: equation (\ref{ynh}) becomes
748: \be
749: \eta_1=i\left({rh\over 24}\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}\,
750: (-2\pi i)^{1/2}\,e^{i\zeta^2/2}\qquad (\eta\rightarrow\infty).
751: \label{eq:pinf}\ee
752: The angular momentum flux to the $r>r_L$ is
753: \ba
754: &&F(r>r_L)={\pi r\sigma\over D}{\rm Im}\left(\eta_1{d\eta_1^\ast\over dr}
755: \right)\nonumber\\
756: &&\quad=-{\pi^2\over 2}\left({\sigma\,r\over dD/dr}|f_{z1}|^2\right)_L
757: ={\pi^2\over 3\omega^2}\left(r^2\sigma |f_{z1}|^2\right)_L.
758: \ea
759: Similarly, for $\zeta\rightarrow -\infty$, equation (\ref{ynh}) gives
760: \be
761: \eta_1=i\left({rh\over 24}\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}\,
762: (2\pi i)^{1/2}\,e^{-i\zeta^2/2}\qquad (\eta\rightarrow -\infty).
763: \label{eq:minf}\ee
764: The angular momentum flux to the $r<r_L$ region is identical to
765: $F(r>r_L)$. The total torque on the disk acted through the OL/VR is then
766: \be
767: T_L=2F(r>r_L)=
768: {2\pi^2\over 3\omega^2}\left(r^2\sigma |f_{z1}|^2\right)_L.
769: %{\pi\over 6}\left({\sigma\,r^2\over\Omega^2}|f_{z1}|^2\right)_L.
770: \label{eq:tl}
771: \ee
772:
773: To estimate the torque $T_L$, we consider $\omega=\omega_s$, and
774: use $f_{z1}=F_\omega/\sigma$ with $F_\omega\sim \mu^2/(4\pi r^6)$
775: (see \S 2). For a Keplerian disk, $r_L=2^{2/3}r_c$ and
776: we assume $r_c/r_m=\lambda$ (for accretion to occur, we require $\lambda>1$).
777: Using eq.~(1), we then obtain
778: \be
779: T_L\sim 4\times 10^{-4}{\dot M^2\over (\xi\lambda)^7\sigma(r_L)}.
780: \ee
781: The canonical accretion torque is $T_A\equiv \dot M (GMr_m)^{1/2}$.
782: Using $\dot M=2\pi (r\sigma |u_r|)_L$ (where $u_r$ is the radial
783: velocity if the unperturbed accretion flow), we find
784: \be
785: {T_L\over T_A}\sim 3\times 10^{-3}\xi^{-7}\lambda^{-6.5}
786: \left({|u_r|\over r\Omega}
787: \right)_L.
788: \ee
789: Thus the resonant torque is much smaller than the accretion torque.
790:
791:
792:
793: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
794: \subsection{Corotation Resonance}
795:
796: The corotation resonance (CR) is located where $\tomega=0$ or $\omega=
797: m\Omega(r_c)$. The WKB dispersion relation
798: shows that for $n=0$, waves are evanescent in the region around
799: the corotation radius $r_c$, while for $n>0$ wave propagation is
800: possible around $r_c$.
801:
802: We again focus on the $n=m=1$ waves.
803: In the vicinity of corotation,
804: the terms $\propto h^{-2}$ in eq.~(\ref{main1}) or (\ref{w})
805: are dominant, and we only need to keep these terms and the
806: second-order differential term.
807: Equation (\ref{main1}) then reduces to
808: \be
809: {d^2\over dr^2}\eta_1
810: -{D(\tomega^2-\Omega^2)\over h^2\tomega^2\Omega_\perp^2}\eta_1
811: ={D\over h\tomega^2}f_{z1}.
812: \label{eq:a3}\ee
813: Defining $x=(r-r_c)/r_c$ and expanding eq.~(\ref{eq:a3}) around $x=0$, we have
814: \be
815: \left[{d^2\over dx^2}+{C\over (x+i\epsilon)^2}\right]\eta_1
816: = C{hf_{z1}\over (x+i\epsilon)^2}
817: \label{c1}\ee
818: where $hf_{z1}$ is evaluated at $r=r_c$, and
819: \be
820: C=\left({\Omega\over h\,d\Omega/dr}\right)^2_{c}=
821: \left({2r\over 3h}\right)_{c}^2\gg 1
822: \ee
823: (where the subscript ``c'' means that the quantity is evaluated at $r=r_c$).
824: In eq.~(\ref{c1}), we have inserted a small imaginary part $i\epsilon$
825: (with $\epsilon>0$) in $1/x^2$ because we consider the response of the
826: disk to a slowly increasing perturbation.
827: %(see Goldreich \& Tremaine 1979)
828: %or because a real disk always has some dissipation which has not been
829: %explicitly included in our analysis.
830:
831: The general solution to eq.~(\ref{c1}) is
832: \ba
833: \eta_1 &=&hf_{z1}+Mz^{1/2}z^{i\nu}+Nz^{1/2}z^{-i\nu}\nonumber\\
834: &=& h f_{z1} +Mz^{1/2}e^{i\nu \ln z}+Nz^{1/2}e^{-i\nu \ln z},
835: \label{c10}\ea
836: where $\nu=\sqrt{C-{1\over4}}\gg 1$, $z=x+i\epsilon$ (with $\epsilon>0$)
837: and $M$ and $N$ are constants. The first term, the non-wave part, is a particular solution,
838: while the other two terms are solutions to the homogeneous equation,
839: depicting the waves. The $z^{1/2}z^{i\nu}$ term has a local wave number
840: $k=d(\nu\ln z)/dr=\nu/(r_c x)$, with the group velocity
841: $v_g=d\omega/dk=-\tomega/k=-3r_cx^2\Omega_c/(2\nu)<0$,
842: thus it represents waves propagating toward small $r$. Similarly,
843: the $z^{1/2}z^{i\nu}$ term has $v_g>0$ and represents waves propagating
844: toward large $r$.
845: %If we require no wave to propagate into the corotation,
846: %then we must have $M=0$ and $N=0$. This shows explicitly that
847: %waves are not excited at corotation. This is understandable
848: %because $|k|\rightarrow \infty$ near corotation, and
849: %short-wavelength perturbations couple weakly to the external force.
850:
851: As shown in Zhang \& Lai (2006), waves with $n=1$ can propagate into the corotation
852: region and get absorbed there. Consider
853: an incident wave propagating from the $x>0$ region toward $x=0$:
854: \be
855: \eta_1(x>0)=A_+\, x^{1/2}e^{i\nu \ln x},
856: \label{eq:incident}\ee
857: where $A_+$ is constant specifying the wave amplitude.
858: %We demand that the solution to eq.~(\ref{c1}) be analytic
859: %in the complex plane, $z=x+i\epsilon$ (with $\epsilon>0$).
860: %To make the solution single-valued,
861: %we can choose the negative imaginary axis as the branch cut of the
862: %function $e^{i\nu\ln z}$. In doing so,
863: %we have $e^{i\nu\ln z}=e^{i\nu(\ln |x|+i\pi)}$ for $x<0$. Thus
864: The transmitted wave is given by
865: \be
866: \eta_1(x<0)=i\, A_+\, e^{-\pi\nu} (-x)^{1/2}e^{i\nu\ln (-x)}.
867: %\quad (x<0;~~{\rm transmitted~wave}).
868: \ee
869: Since $\nu\gg 1$, the wave amplitude is vastly decreased by a
870: factor $e^{-\pi\nu}$ after propagating through the corotation.
871: The net angular momentum flux absorbed at corotation is
872: \ba
873: \Delta F_c=
874: \pi \left({\sigma\over \kappa^2}\right)_{c}\!\nu |A_+|^2(1+
875: e^{-2\pi\nu})\simeq
876: \left({2\pi r\sigma\over 3 h \omega^2}\right)_{c}|A_+|^2,
877: \label{deltafc}\ea
878: where in the last equality we have used $\nu\simeq \sqrt{C}\gg 1$.
879: Thus, a wave propagating from $r>r_c$ into the corotation resonance
880: deposits almost all of its positive angular momentum at $r=r_c$.
881: Similarly, a wave propagating from $r<r_c$ into the corotation resonance
882: deposits its negative angular momentum at $r=r_c$.
883:
884: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
885: \section{Global Disk Response}
886:
887: Having studied the behavior of waves near L/VR and CR, we can now
888: construct global solution for the waves excited by the external
889: force.
890:
891: Away from the L/VR, the two linearly independent WKB solutions to the
892: homogeneous wave eq.~(\ref{w}) are
893: \be
894: y_\pm=k_r^{-1/2}\exp\left(\pm \,i\int^r k_r\,dr\right),
895: \label{eq:ypm}\ee
896: where
897: \be
898: k_r\equiv {\tomega^2-\Omega^2\over h\Omega\tomega}
899: ={\omega(\omega-2\Omega)\over h\Omega(\omega-\Omega)}.
900: \ee
901: It is easy to check that eq.~(\ref{eq:ypm}) reduces to
902: (\ref{eq:yll}) for $|r-r_L|\ll r_L$,
903: thus it is valid even near the L/VR. From eq.~(\ref{change}), we have
904: \be
905: \eta_{1\pm}=\left[{h\Omega(\omega-\Omega)\over r\sigma}\right]^{1/2}
906: \exp\left(\pm \,i\int^r k_r\,dr\right).
907: \label{eq:etapm}\ee
908: Near the CR, this solution reduces to
909: \be
910: \eta_{1\pm}\propto x^{1/2}e^{\mp i\nu\ln x}, \qquad {\rm for}~~
911: |x|=|(r-r_c)/r_c|\ll 1.
912: \ee
913: Thus equation (\ref{eq:etapm}) represents the two independent solutions of the
914: homogeneous wave equation for all radii.
915:
916: As discussed before, Waves are mainly excited at the L/VR, where
917: waveform is given by eq.~(\ref{ynh}). Matching eq.~(\ref{eq:pinf})
918: or (\ref{eq:minf})
919: with the general solution, $\eta_1=C_+\eta_{1+}+C_-\eta_{1-}$
920: (where $C_\pm$ are constants), we find that the waves away from the
921: L/VR are:
922: \ba
923: &&\eta_1=\left({i\pi r^2\sigma\over 3\omega^2}\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}(r_L)\,
924: \left[{h\Omega(\omega-\Omega)\over r\sigma}\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\
925: &&\qquad\qquad \times\exp\left(\,i\int^r_{r_L} k_r\,dr\right),\qquad (r>r_L)
926: \label{eq:eta111}\\
927: &&\eta_1=\left({-i\pi r^2\sigma\over 3\omega^2}\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}(r_L)\,
928: \left[{h\Omega(\omega-\Omega)\over r\sigma}\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\
929: &&\qquad\qquad \times
930: \exp\left(\,-i\int^r_{r_L} k_r\,dr\right),\quad (r_c<r<r_L).
931: \label{eq:etarcrl}
932: \ea
933: Note that although for $r_c<r<r_L$ the wave (\ref{eq:etarcrl})
934: has positive phase velocity (since $k_r<0$ for $r_c<r<r_L$),
935: the group velocity is negative, i.e. the wave propagates toward small
936: radii. As this wave approaches $r_c$, the waveform reduces to
937: [see eq.~(\ref{eq:incident})]
938: \be
939: \eta_1=A_+x^{1/2}\,e^{i\nu\ln x},
940: \qquad
941: \left(0<x={r-r_c\over r_c}\ll 1\right)
942: \ee
943: where
944: %\be
945: $\nu={2r_c/(3h_c)}$
946: %\ee
947: and
948: \ba
949: && A_+=\left(-i\pi r^2\sigma\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}(r_L)\,
950: \left({h\over 2r\sigma}\right)_c^{1/2}\nonumber\\
951: &&~~\qquad \times\exp\left(-i\int^{r_+}_{r_L} k_r\,dr
952: -i\,\nu\,\ln x_{+}\right),
953: \ea
954: where $0<x_+\equiv (r_+-r_c)/r_c\ll 1$.
955: After passing through the CR, the wave amplitude is significantly reduced:
956: \ba
957: &&\eta_1=i\, A_+\,
958: e^{-\pi\nu}(-x)^{1/2}\,
959: e^{i\,\nu\ln (-x)},\nonumber\\
960: &&\qquad\qquad\quad
961: \left(x={r-r_c\over r_c}<0,~~~|x|\ll 1\right).
962: \ea
963: This then joins onto the inward-going wave solution
964: \ba
965: &&\eta_1=e^{-\pi\nu}\,
966: \left({-i\pi r^2\sigma\over 3\omega^2}\right)^{1/2}_L\!f_{z1}(r_L)
967: \left[{h\Omega(\omega-\Omega)\over r\sigma}\right]^{1/2}\nonumber\\
968: &&\qquad\times \exp\left(-i\int^r_{r_-} k_r\,dr-i\varphi\right),
969: \qquad (r<r_c),
970: \ea
971: with $\varphi=\int^{r_+}_{r_L} k_r\,dr
972: +\nu\ln (-x_{+}/x_-)$, where $x_-=(r_--r_c)/r_c<0$ and $|x_-|\ll 1$.
973: Using eq.~(\ref{deltafc}), we find that the angular momentum flux
974: deposited at $r_c$ is
975: \be
976: \Delta F_c={\pi^2\over 3\omega^2}\left(r^2\sigma |f_{z1}|^2\right)_L,
977: \ee
978: in agreement with the angular momentum flux
979: emitted from $r_L$ toward corotation
980: [see eq.~(\ref{eq:tl})].
981:
982: Figure 2 depicts the global solution describing waves excited at
983: the L/VR, which either propagates outwards or inwards toward the CR
984: at which the angular momentum deposition occurs.
985:
986: %\clearpage
987: %\begin{figure}
988: %\scalebox{1.1}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f2.eps}}}
989: %\vskip -0.5cm
990: %\caption{
991: \begin{inlinefigure}
992: \scalebox{1.1}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f2.eps}}}
993: \figcaption{
994: The enthalpy perturbation $\eta_1$ of the wave driven by
995: an external force ($m=n=1$). The wave is excited
996: at the L/VR ($r/r_L=1$), and propagates toward large radii and small radii.
997: The inward-going wave is absorbed at the corotation resonance. The lower
998: panel focuses on the region between corotation and $r_L$.
999: }\end{inlinefigure}
1000: %}\end{figure}
1001: %\clearpage
1002:
1003: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1004: \section{Application to QPOs}
1005:
1006: The main result of the paper is illustrated in Fig.~2. It shows that
1007: under a periodic magnetic vertical forcing, the disk responds by launching
1008: $m=n=1$ waves from the Lindblad/vertical resonance (where $\omega=2\Omega$,
1009: with the forcing frequency $\omega=\omega_s$ or $2\omega_s$).
1010: The wave either propagates to large radii or propagates inward
1011: where it gets absorbed at corotation resonance (where $\omega=\Omega$).
1012:
1013: We have already shown that the torque carried by the excited
1014: wave is small compared to the canonical accretion torque (see \S 4.1).
1015: Nevertheless the wave may manifest itself by inducing or modulating
1016: variabilities.
1017: Clearly, the wave is most visible at the Lindblad/vertical resonance
1018: since the wavelength is the largest there. Variations caused by the wave
1019: are most likely due to fluid elements around $r_L$. From
1020: eqs.~(\ref{eq:eta111})-(\ref{eq:etarcrl}), we find that the amplitude of
1021: enthalpy perturbation at $r_L$ is given by
1022: $|\eta_1|=(\pi r/12 h)^{1/2}(F_\omega h/\sigma)$ (all quantities are evaluated
1023: at $r=r_L$). With $F_\omega\sim \mu^2/(4\pi r^6)$ (see \S 2),
1024: $r_m=r_c/\lambda$ (where $\lambda>1$ is a constant),
1025: $r_L=2^{2/3}r_c$, and using eq.~(1) and
1026: $\dot M=2\pi r\sigma |u_r|$, we find
1027: the dimensionless amplitude
1028: \be
1029: {|\eta_1|\over c^2}\sim 0.05\,(\lambda\xi)^{-7/2}\left({r u_r^2\over h c^2}
1030: \right)^{1/2}_L,
1031: \ee
1032: where $u_r$ is the radial (inflow) velocity. For a $\alpha$-disk,
1033: $|u_r|\simeq (3/2r)\alpha hc$ not too close to the disk inner edge, we have
1034: \be
1035: {|\eta_1|\over c^2}\sim 0.1\,\alpha\,(\lambda\xi)^{-7/2}\left({h\over r}
1036: \right)^{1/2}_L.
1037: \ee
1038: The dimensionless vertical velocity perturbation, $|u_{z1}|/c$,
1039: is the of the same order of magnitude
1040: at $r\sim r_L$ as $|\eta_1|/c^2$.
1041: Since $\lambda\xi\sim 1$, the dimensionless perturbation amplitude
1042: may reach a few percent, while definitely remaining in the linear regime.
1043: Note that the vertical velocity perturbation amplitude increases
1044: toward the corotation radius, non-linear saturation will occur there.
1045: But since the wavelength approaches
1046: zero as $r\rightarrow r_c$, variations caused by fluid elements around
1047: corotation resonance may not be visible.
1048:
1049: It seems inevitable that bending waves studied in this paper
1050: will be excited in disks around magnetic stars.
1051: We may suggest various ways that these resonantly excited waves may
1052: induce variabilities and QPOs. In the context of LMXBs
1053: (van der Klis 2006), one may
1054: imagine that the oscillating fluid perturbation at the Lindblad resonance
1055: can produce a beat phenomenon by modulating the ``seed'' radiation from the
1056: inner region of the disk (e.g. Lamb \& Miller 2003).
1057: Suppose the ``seed'' radiation has a quasi-periodic
1058: variability with frequency $\nu_h$ (e.g. due to orbital motion of blobs
1059: at the disk inner edge or some other mechanisms). The fluid element
1060: at the Lindblad/vertical resonance has orbital frequency $\Omega=\omega/2$
1061: (since $\omega-\Omega=\Omega_\perp$ for $m=1$, and $\Omega_\perp\simeq
1062: \Omega$). The reprocessed radiation would then show an additional QPO
1063: at frequency $\nu_l=\nu_h-\nu/2$.
1064: In this regard, it is particularly interesting that in our model, the
1065: driving frequency $\nu=\omega/(2\pi)$ can be either the spin frequency
1066: $\nu_s$ or twice of that, depending on the disk geometry with respect to
1067: the stellar spin and dipole axes (see \S 2). As noted in \S 1,
1068: both $\nu_h-\nu_l=\nu_s$ and $\nu_h-\nu_l=\nu_s/2$ have been
1069: observed in LMXBs. This feature has not been explained by current models
1070: (see van der Klis 2006). For many systems, the beat is not perfect. This might be
1071: due to the fact the excited wave still has significant strength
1072: away from the Lindblad/vertical resonance (see Fig.~2).
1073:
1074: Finally we note that our treatmnet of wave excitation by magnetic
1075: forces
1076: is performed under simplifying assumptions, as detailed in section 3.
1077: %contains important approximations (see beginning of section 3).
1078: We hope that the novel features of our model in connection with QPOs
1079: will motivate future, more rigorous studies of the dynamics of waves
1080: in disks around magnetic stars.
1081:
1082:
1083: \acknowledgments
1084: This work has been supported in part by NASA Grant NNX07AG81G and by NSF
1085: grant AST 0707628.
1086:
1087:
1088:
1089: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1090:
1091: \bibitem[]{1066}
1092: Agapitou, V., Papaloizou, J.~C.~B., \& Terquem, C. 1997, MNRAS, 292, 631
1093:
1094: \bibitem[]{1069}
1095: Altamirano, D. et al. 2007, ApJ, in press (arXiv:0708.1316)
1096: %Intermittent millisecond X-ray pulsations from the neutron-star X-ray
1097: %transient SAX J1748.9-2021 in the globular cluster NGC 6440
1098:
1099: \bibitem[]{1074}
1100: Aly, J.~J. 1980, A\&A, 86, 192.
1101: % Exact solution of diamagnetic disk
1102:
1103: \bibitem[]{1078}
1104: Aly, J.~J., \& Kuijpers, J. 1990, A\&A, 227, 473.
1105:
1106: %\bibitem[]{1081}
1107: %Anzer, U., \& B\"orner, G. 1980, A\&A, 83, 133.
1108:
1109: \bibitem[]{1084}
1110: Anzer, U., \& B\"orner, G. 1983, A\&A, 122, 73.
1111:
1112: %\bibitem[]{1087}
1113: %Arons, J. 1987, in ``The Origin and Evolution of Neutron Stars'' (IAU
1114: %Symp.~No.~125), ed. D.~J. Helfand \& J.-H. Huang (D. Reidel Pub.:
1115: %Dordrecht).
1116:
1117: \bibitem[]{1092}
1118: Arons, J. 1993, ApJ, 408, 160.
1119:
1120: \bibitem[]{1095}
1121: Arons, J., \& Lea, S.~M. 1980, ApJ, 235, 1016.
1122:
1123: \bibitem[]{1098}
1124: Boutloukos, S. et al.~2006, ApJ, 653, 1435
1125:
1126: \bibitem[]{1101}
1127: Bouvier, J., et al.~2007a, in Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth et al.
1128: (Tucson: U. Arizona Press)
1129:
1130: \bibitem[]{1105}
1131: Bouvier, J. et al. 2007b, A\&A, 463, 1017
1132: % Magnetospheric accretion-ejection processes in the classical T Tauri
1133: % star AA Tauri
1134:
1135: \bibitem[]{1110}
1136: Campbell, C.G. 1997, Magnetohydrodynamics in Binary Stars (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
1137:
1138: \bibitem[]{1113}
1139: Casella, P., Altamirano, D., Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., 2007, ApJ, in
1140: press (arXiv:0708.1110)
1141: % Diskovery of coherent millisecond X-ray pulsations in Aql X-1
1142:
1143: \bibitem[]{1118}
1144: Fendt, C. 2003, Astrophys. Space Sci. 287, 59
1145: %MHD simulations of the long-term evolution of a dipolar magnetosphere
1146: %surrounded by an accretion disk
1147:
1148: \bibitem[]{1123}
1149: Ghosh, P., \& Lamb, F.~K. 1979, ApJ, 232, 259
1150:
1151: %\bibitem[]{1126}
1152: %Ghosh, P., \& Lamb, F.~K. 1979b, ApJ, 234, 296
1153:
1154: \bibitem[]{1129}
1155: Goldreich, P. \& Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857
1156:
1157: \bibitem[]{1132}
1158: Goodson, A.~P., Winglee, R.~M., \& B\"ohm, K.-H. 1997, ApJ, 489, 199.
1159: % Time-dependent accretion by magnetic young stellar objects as a launching
1160: % mechanism for stellar jets
1161:
1162: \bibitem[]{1137}
1163: Hartmann, L. 1998, Accretion Processes in Star Formation (Cambridge
1164: Univ. Press)
1165:
1166: \bibitem[]{1141}
1167: Hayashi, M.~R., Shibata, K., \& Matsumoto, R. 1996, ApJ, 468, L37.
1168:
1169: \bibitem[]{1144}
1170: K\"onigl, A. 1991, ApJ, 370, L39.
1171:
1172: \bibitem[]{1147}
1173: Lai, D. 1998, ApJ, 502, 721.
1174:
1175: \bibitem[]{1150}
1176: Lai, D. 1999, ApJ, 524, 1030
1177:
1178: \bibitem[]{1153}
1179: Lamb, F.K., Miller, M.C. 2003, arXiv:astro-ph/0308179
1180:
1181: \bibitem[]{1156}
1182: Lewin, W., van der Klis, M. 2006, Compact Stellar X-ray Sources (Cambridge
1183: U. Press)
1184:
1185: \bibitem[]{1160}
1186: Li, J., Wickramasinge, D.~T., \& R\"udiger, G. 1996, ApJ, 469, 765.
1187: %Magnetized Accretion and Funnel Flow
1188:
1189: \bibitem[]{1164}
1190: Linares, M., van der Klis, M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1250
1191:
1192: %\bibitem[]{1167}
1193: %Lipunov, V.~M., Sem\"enov, E.~S., \& Shakura, N.~I. 1981, Sov. Astron.,
1194: %25, 439.
1195:
1196: \bibitem[]{1171}
1197: Lipunov, V.~M., \& Shakura, N.~I. 1980, Sov. Astron. Lett., 6, 14.
1198:
1199: \bibitem[]{1174}
1200: Long, M., Romanova, M.M., Lovelace, R.V.E. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 436
1201: % Accretion to stars with non-dipole magnetic fields
1202:
1203: \bibitem[]{1178}
1204: Lovelace, R.~V.~E., Romanova, M.~M., \& Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.~S. 1995,
1205: MNRAS, 275, 244.
1206:
1207: \bibitem[]{1182}
1208: Lovelace, R.V.E., Romanova, M.M., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S. 1999, ApJ, 514, 368
1209: % Magnetic Propeller Outflows
1210:
1211: \bibitem[]{1186}
1212: Lubow, S.H, 1981, ApJ, 245, 274
1213:
1214: \bibitem[]{1189}
1215: Matt, S., Pudritz, R.E. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 167
1216:
1217: \bibitem[]{1192}
1218: Mendez, M., Belloni, T. 2007, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:0708.0015)
1219: %Is there a link between the neutron-star spin and the frequency
1220: %of the kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations?
1221:
1222: \bibitem[]{1197}
1223: Miller, K.~A., \& Stone, J.~M. 1997, ApJ, 489, 890.
1224:
1225: \bibitem[]{1200}
1226: Ogilvie, G.~I. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 977
1227:
1228: \bibitem[]{1203}
1229: Okazaki, A., Kato, S., \& Fukue, J. 1987, PASJ, 39, 457
1230:
1231: \bibitem[]{1206}
1232: O'Sullivan, M., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 632
1233: % Modelling the photopolarimetric variability of AA Tau
1234:
1235: \bibitem[]{1210}
1236: Papaloizou, J.C.B., \& Lin, D.C. 1995, ApJ, 438, 841
1237: % On the dynamics of warped disks
1238:
1239: \bibitem[]{1214}
1240: Park, S.~J., \& Vishniac, E.~T. 1996, ApJ, 471, 158.
1241:
1242: \bibitem[]{1217}
1243: Petri, J. 2005. A\&A, 439, 443
1244:
1245: \bibitem[]{1220}
1246: Pfeiffer, H.P., Lai, D. 2004, ApJ, 604, 766
1247:
1248: %\bibitem[]{1223}
1249: %Pringle, J.~E., \& Rees, M.~J. 1972, A\&A, 21, 1.
1250:
1251: \bibitem[]{1226}
1252: Romanova, M.M., Ustyugova, G.V., Koldoba, A.V., Wick, J.V., Lovelace, R.V.E.
1253: 2003, ApJ, 595, 1009
1254: % Three-dimensional Simulations of Disk Accretion to an Inclined
1255: % Dipole. I. Magnetospheric Flows at Different жи
1256:
1257: \bibitem[]{1232}
1258: Romanova, M.M. et al. 2006, Adv. Space Res., 38, 2887 (arXiv:astro-ph/0604116)
1259: % 2D and 3D MHD simulations of disk accretion by rotating magnetized
1260: % stars: Search for variability
1261:
1262: \bibitem[]{1237}
1263: Shirakawa, A., Lai, D. 2002a, ApJ, 564, 361
1264:
1265: \bibitem[]{1240}
1266: Shirakawa, A., Lai, D. 2002b, ApJ, 565, 1134
1267:
1268: \bibitem[]{1243}
1269: Shu, F.~H., et al.~1994, ApJ, 429, 781.
1270:
1271: \bibitem[]{1246}
1272: Shu, F.H., Najita, J.R., Shang, H., Li, Z.-Y. 2000, in Protostars and Planets
1273: IV, eds. V. Mannings et al. (U. Arizona Press: Tucsn)
1274:
1275: %\bibitem[]{1250}
1276: %Spruit, H.~C., \& Taam, R.~E. 1990, A\&A, 229, 475.
1277:
1278: \bibitem[]{1253}
1279: Spruit, H.~C., \& Taam, R.~E. 1993, ApJ, 402, 593.
1280:
1281: \bibitem[]{1256}
1282: Stone, J.~M., \& Norman, M.~L. 1994, ApJ, 433, 746.
1283:
1284: %\bibitem[]{1259}
1285: %Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., Ward, W.R. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257
1286:
1287: \bibitem[]{1262}
1288: Terquem, C., Papaloizou, J.C.B. 2000, A\&A, 360, 1031
1289: % The response of an accretion disk to an inclined dipole with
1290: % application to AA Tau
1291:
1292: \bibitem[]{1267}
1293: Ustyugova, G.V., Koldoba, A.V., Romanova, M.M., Lovelace, R.V.E. 2006, ApJ,
1294: 646, 304
1295: %``Propeller'' Regime of Disk Accretion to Rapidly Rotating Stars
1296:
1297: \bibitem[]{1272}
1298: Uzdensky, D.A. 2004, Astrophys. Space Sci. 292, 573
1299: % Magnetic Interaction Between Stars And Accretion Disks
1300:
1301: %\bibitem[]{1276}
1302: %van Ballegooijen, A.~A. 1994, Space Science Rev., 68, 299.
1303:
1304: \bibitem[]{1279}
1305: van der Klis, M. 2006, in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources,
1306: eds. W. Lewin, and M. van der Klis (Cambridge U. Press)
1307:
1308: %\bibitem[]{1283}
1309: %Wang, Y.-M. 1987, A\&A, 183, 257.
1310:
1311: \bibitem[]{1286}
1312: Wang, Y.-M. 1995, ApJ, 449, L153.
1313:
1314: %\bibitem[]{1289}
1315: %Ward, W.R., Hahn, J.M., 2003, ApJ, 125, 3389
1316:
1317: \bibitem[]{1292}
1318: Warner, B. 2004, PASP, 116, 115
1319: % Rapid Oscillations in Cataclysmic Variables
1320:
1321: \bibitem[]{1296}
1322: Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., Homan, J., et al. 2003,
1323: Nature, 424, 44
1324:
1325: \bibitem[]{1300}
1326: Yin, H.X. et al. 2007, A\&A, 471, 381
1327:
1328: \bibitem[]{1303}
1329: Zhang, H., Lai, D. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 917
1330:
1331: \end{thebibliography}
1332:
1333: \end{document}
1334: