1:
2: \documentclass[a4paper]{aa}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{natbib}
6: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
7: \usepackage{bm}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{A deeply embedded young protoplanetary disk around L1489~IRS observed by
11: the Submillimeter Array}
12: \titlerunning{A deeply embedded young protoplanetary disk around L1489~IRS}
13: \author{C.~Brinch\inst{1}
14: \and A.~Crapsi\inst{1}
15: \and J.~K.~J{\o}rgensen\inst{2,3}
16: \and M.~R.~Hogerheijde\inst{1}
17: \and T.~Hill\inst{1}}
18: \date{}
19: \institute{Leiden Observatory, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands\\
20: \email{brinch@strw.leidenuniv.nl}
21: \and Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Mail
22: Stop 42, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
23: \and Argelander-Institut f\"ur Astromomie, Universit\"at Bonn, Auf dem
24: H\"ugel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
25: \abstract
26: {Circumstellar disks are expected to form early in the process that leads to the
27: formation of a young star, during the collapse of the dense molecular cloud
28: core. It is currently not well understood at what stage of the collapse the
29: disk is formed or how it subsequently evolves.}
30: {We aim to identify whether an embedded Keplerian protoplanetary disk
31: resides in the L1489~IRS system. Given the amount of envelope material still
32: present, such a disk would respresent a very young example of a protoplanetary
33: disk.}
34: {Using the Submillimeter Array (SMA) we have observed the HCO$^+$ $J=$ 3--2 line
35: with a resolution of about 1$''$. At this resolution a protoplanetary disk
36: with a radius of a few hundred AUs should be detectable, if present. Radiative
37: transfer tools are used to model the emission from both continuum and line
38: data.}
39: {We find that these data are consistent with theoretical models of a collapsing
40: envelope and Keplerian circumstellar disk. Models reproducing both the SED and
41: the interferometric continuum observations reveal that the disk is inclined
42: by 40$^\circ$ which is significantly different to the surrounding envelope
43: (74$^\circ$).}
44: {This misalignment of the angular momentum axes may be caused by a gradient within
45: the angular momentum in the parental cloud or if L1489~IRS is a binary system
46: rather than just a single star. In the latter case, future observations looking
47: for variability at sub-arcsecond scales may be able to constrain these
48: dynamical variations directly. However, if stars form from turbulent cores, the
49: accreting material will not have a constant angular momentum axis (although the
50: average is well defined and conserved) in which case it is more likely to have
51: a misalignment of the angular momentum axes of the disk and the envelope.}
52:
53: \keywords{Stars: formation -- circumstellar matter -- ISM: individual objects:
54: L1489~IRS -- Submillimeter}
55: \maketitle
56:
57: \section{Introduction}\label{intro}
58: Circumstellar disks constitute an integral part in the formation of low-mass
59: protostars, being a direct result of the collapse of rotating molecular cloud
60: cores and the likely birthplace of future planetary systems. When a
61: molecular cloud core collapses to form a low-mass star, its initial angular
62: momentum causes material to pile up on scales of $\sim 100$~AU in a
63: circumstellar disk~\citep{cassen1981,terebey1984,adams1987,adams1988}. Due to
64: accretion processes as the young stellar object (YSO) evolves, the disk grows in
65: size while the envelope dissipates~\citep[e.g.,][]{basu1998,yorke1999}. In the
66: more evolved stages of young stellar objects such disks can be imaged directly
67: at optical and near-infrared wavelengths \citep[e.g.,][]{burrows1996,
68: padgett1999} and their chemical and dynamical properties can be derived from
69: comparison to submillimeter spectroscopic observations~\citep[e.g.,][]{thi2001}.
70: Still, this latter method is often not unique, but requires \emph{a priori}
71: assumptions about the underlying disk structure. In the earlier embedded stages
72: this method is even more complex, because the disk is still deeply embedded in
73: cloud material so that any signature of rotation in the disk itself, for
74: example, is smeared out by emission that originates in the still collapsing
75: envelope. By going to higher resolution using interferometric observations, as
76: well as observing high density gas tracers, more reliable detections of
77: protoplanetary disks can be made as direct imaging is approached
78: \citep{rodriguez1998,qi2004,jorgensen2005}. In this paper we present such
79: high-angular resolution submillimeter wavelength observations from the
80: Submillimeter Array (SMA) of the embedded YSO L1489~IRS. We show how these
81: observations place strong constraints on its dynamical structure and
82: evolutionary status through detailed modeling.
83:
84: L1489~IRS (IRAS 04016+2610) is an intriguing protostar in the Taurus star
85: forming region ($d=140$ pc) classified as a Class I YSO according to the
86: classification scheme of~\citet{Lada1984}. It is still embedded in a large
87: amount of envelope material in which a significant amount of both infall and
88: rotation has been observed on scales ranging from a few tenths of an AU out to
89: several thousands of AUs~\citep{hogerheijde2001, boogert2002}. This large degree
90: of rotation makes this source an interesting case study for the evolution of
91: angular momentum during the formation of low-mass stars, potentially linking the
92: embedded (Class 0 and I) and revealed (Class II and III) stages.
93:
94: In a recent study by~\citet{brinch2007} (referred to as Paper~I), a model of
95: L1489~IRS was presented based on data from a large single-dish molecular line
96: survey~\citep{jorgensen2004}. This study was motivated by the intriguing
97: peculiarities seen in L1489~IRS, such as the unusual large size and shape of the
98: circumstellar material. The aim was to constrain the structure of its
99: larger-scale infalling envelope and to place it in the right context of the
100: canonical picture of low-mass star formation (see for example several reviews
101: in~\citeauthor{reipurth2007} 2007).
102:
103: The model presented in Paper~I describes a flattened envelope with an
104: inspiraling velocity field, parameterized by the stellar mass and the (constant)
105: angle of the field lines with respect to the azimuthal direction. A spherical
106: temperature profile was adopted and the model did not explicitly contain a disk.
107: The mass of the envelope is 0.09 M$_\odot$, adopted from
108: \citet{jorgensen2002}. The use of such a ``global'' model is sufficient when
109: working with single-dish data, where the emission is dominated by the emission
110: from the large-scale envelope. With this description it was possible to
111: accurately reproduce all the observed single-dish lines.
112:
113: What the study of Paper~I could not address, is whether a rotationally dominated
114: disk is present on scales of the order of hundreds of AUs, although the amount
115: of rotation which is inferred by the single-dish observations certainly suggests
116: that a disk should have formed. In addition, two specific puzzles remain about
117: the structure of L1489~IRS inferred on basis of the model when compared to other
118: studies in the literature. First, the best fit was obtained with a central mass
119: of 1.35 M$_\odot$, which is a very high value given that the luminosity of the
120: star has been determined to be only 3.7 L$_\odot$~\citep{kenyon1993a}. Second,
121: it was found that the best fit inclination of the system was 74$^\circ$. This is
122: in agreement with the result from~\citet{hogerheijde2001} where they showed
123: that in order to reproduce the observed aspect ratio the inclination cannot be
124: less than 60$^\circ$. However, in a recent study,~\citet{eisner2005},
125: modeled the spectral energy distribution (SED) of L1489~IRS and demonstrated
126: that this required a significantly different systemic inclination of only
127: 36$^\circ$.
128:
129: In this paper, we try to address these issues through arc second scale
130: interferometric observations of the dense gas tracer HCO$^+$ $J=3-2$ from the
131: Submillimeter Array. These observations provide information on the gas dynamics
132: on scales $\sim$100 AU and reveal an embedded protoplanetary disk. We show
133: how careful modeling of the full SED from near-infrared through millimeter
134: wavelengths can place strong constraints on the geometry of such a disk.
135:
136: The outline of this paper is as follows: Sect.~\ref{obs} describes the details
137: of the observations and data reduction while Sect.~\ref{results} presents the
138: data. Sect.~\ref{analysis} introduces our model in which we have now included a
139: disk and we also show how this model can fit all available observations
140: including our new SMA data. Finally, in Sect.~\ref{discus} and~\ref{summary} we
141: discuss the implications of our model and summarize our results.
142:
143: \section{Observations and data reduction}\label{obs}
144: Observations were carried out at the Submillimeter Array (SMA)\footnote{The
145: Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical
146: Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics
147: and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica} located
148: on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Our data set consists of two separate tracks of
149: measurements in different array configurations. The first track was obtained on
150: December 11, 2005. This track was done in the compact configuration resulting in
151: a spatial resolution of $\sim$ 2.5$''$ with projected baselines ranging between
152: 10 and 62 k$\lambda$. A second track was obtained on November 28, 2006, in the
153: extended configuration with the resolution of about 1$''$ and baselines between
154: 18 and 200 k$\lambda$. The resolution of the two configurations corresponds to
155: linear sizes of 350 AU and 140 AU respectively. The synthesized beam
156: size of the combined track using uniform visibility weighting is 0.9$'' \times$
157: 0.7$''$ with a position angle of 78$^\circ$.
158:
159: In both tracks the receiver was tuned to HCO$^+$ $J=$ 3--2 at 267.56 GHz. We
160: used a correlator configuration with high spectral resolution across the line,
161: providing a channel width of 0.2~kms$^{-1}$ over 0.104~GHz. The remainder of the
162: 2~GHz bandwidth of the SMA correlator was used to measure the continuum. No
163: other lines in this band are expected to contaminate the continuum. We did not
164: encounter any technical problems during observations and the weather conditions
165: were excellent during both tracks. For the compact configuration track,
166: $\tau_{225}$ was 0.06 and for the extended track $\tau_{225}$ was at 0.08.
167:
168: Mars was used as flux calibrator in the first track, and Uranus for the second
169: track. The quasars 3c454.3, 3c273, and 3c279 were used for passband calibration
170: for both tracks, while the complex gains were calibrated using the two quasars
171: 3c111 and 3c84 located within 18~degrees from L1489~IRS. The calibrators
172: were measured every 20 minutes throughout both tracks. Their fluxes have been
173: determined to be 3.1 and 2.6 Jy for 3c111 and 3c84 in the compact track, and 2.3
174: and 2.2 Jy respectively in the extended track. For the gain calibration, a time
175: smoothing scale of 0.7 hours was used which ensures that the large scale
176: variations in the phase during the track are corrected for. The data do not
177: show any significant small scale variations (i.e., rapid fluctuations in the
178: phases or amplitudes). The quasars appear as point sources even at the longest
179: baselines, which means that phase decorrelation due to atmospheric turbulence is
180: negligible. The signal-to-noise of the calibrators is $>$50 per integration.
181:
182: The data were reduced using the MIR software package
183: \citep{qi2005}\footnote{Available at
184: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~cqi/mircook.html.}. Due to the excellent
185: weather conditions, the data quality is very high and the data reduction
186: procedure went smooth and unproblematic. All post-processing of the data,
187: including combining the two visibility sets was done using the MIRIAD
188: package~\citep{sault1995}\footnote{Available at
189: http://bima.astro.umd.edu/miriad/miriad.html}. Relevant numbers are presented
190: in Table~\ref{observations}.
191:
192: In this paper we also make use of continuum measurements of L1489~IRS found in
193: the literature ranging from the near-infrared~\citep{kenyon1993a, eisner2005,
194: padgett1999, park2002, whitney1997, myers1987, Kessler-Silacci2005} to
195: (sub)millimeter wavelengths~\citep{hogerheijde2000, Moriarty-Schieven1994,
196: motte2001, hogerheijde1997, ohashi1996, saito2001, lucas2000}.
197: \begin{table}
198: \caption{Summary of the SMA observations. }\label{observations}
199: \begin{tabular}{l c}
200: \hline \hline
201: Source & L1489~IRS \\
202: $\alpha,\delta$(2000)$^a$ & 04:04:42.85, +26:18:56.3 \\
203: Frequency\qquad\qquad & 267.55762 GHz (1.12 mm) \\
204: \hline
205: Integrated line intensity & 41.85 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$\\
206: Peak line intensity & 2.04 K\\
207: \qquad Noise level (rms) & 0.35 Jy beam$^{-1}$ \\
208: Continuum flux & 36.0$\pm$2.3 mJy \\
209: \qquad Noise level (rms) & 3.7 mJy beam$^{-1}$ \\
210: Synthesized beam size & $0.9''\times 0.7''$ \\
211: \quad (Uniform weighting) & \\
212: \hline
213: \end{tabular}
214:
215: $^a$ Coordinates are given at the position where the continuum emission peaks.
216: \end{table}
217:
218:
219: \section{Results}\label{results}
220: The two tracks of observations provide us with two sets of $(u,v)$--points
221: which, when combined and Fourier transformed, samples the image $(x,y)$ plane
222: well from scales of 1 to 30$''$ (140 to 4200~AU). Emission on spatial
223: scales greater than this is filtered out by the interferometer due to its
224: finite shortest spacing. This filtering is accounted for when comparing models to
225: the observations.
226:
227: The measured continuum emission is shown as an image in Fig.~\ref{continuum}.
228: Previous attempts to measure the continuum at 1.1 mm with the BIMA
229: interferometer were not successful~\citep{hogerheijde2001}. The SMA however,
230: reveals a complex and detailed, slightly elongated, structure.
231: \begin{figure}
232: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/continuum.eps}
233: \caption{Reconstructed image of the continuum emission at the highest
234: resolution (0.9$'' \times$ 0.7$''$). The contours are linearly spaced with 1$\sigma$ starting at
235: 2$\sigma$ and dashed lines are negative contour levels.}\label{continuum}
236: \end{figure}
237:
238: Two reconstructed images of the HCO$^+$ emission are shown in Fig.~\ref{mom}
239: using the \emph{natural} and \emph{uniform} weighting schemes, optimizing the
240: signal-to-noise and angular resolution, respectively. In this figure, the zero
241: moment map is plotted as solid contour lines and the first moment is shown as
242: shaded contours. It is clear that both images reveal an elongated, flat
243: structure. In the uniformly weighted image there is a large amount of asymmetry
244: in the structure, which is less prominent in the naturally weighted image.
245: \begin{figure}
246: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/mom_nat.eps}
247: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/mom_uni.eps}
248: \caption{Zero and first moment plots of the HCO$^+$ $J =$ 3--2 emission toward
249: L1489~IRS. Contours are linearly spaced by 2$\sigma$ with a clip level of
250: 2$\sigma$. $\sigma$ equals 1.1 and 2.0 Jy bm$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for
251: the natural and uniform weighting schemes respectively. Negative contours
252: appear as dashed lines.}\label{mom}
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: The velocity contours in the lower panel of Fig.~\ref{mom} are seen to be closed
256: around a point which is offset with some 3$''$ from the peak of the emission.
257: There is also clearly a gradient in the velocity field along the major axis of
258: the object. This feature was previously reported by~\citet{hogerheijde2001} using
259: interferometric observations of HCO$^+$ $J=$ 1--0, and low S/N HCO$^+$ $J=$ 3--2
260: observations, from the BIMA and OVRO arrays. The gradient in the velocity field
261: coincides almost perfectly with the long axis of the structure. When compared to
262: the BIMA HCO$^+$ $J=$ 3--2 observations, the SMA data give 5--10 times better
263: resolution. Furthermore, the BIMA data had to be self-calibrated using the
264: HCO$^+$ $J=$ 1--0 image as a model and thus the resulting image was somewhat
265: dependent of the structure of the lower excitation emission. The image we obtain
266: from the SMA data is of considerably better quality.
267:
268: In Fig.~\ref{image}, the zero moment emission contours have been superposed on the
269: near-infrared scattered light image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope
270: \citep{padgett1999}. The figure shows that many of the details in the SMA image
271: coincide with features seen in the scattered light image.
272: \begin{figure}
273: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/overlay_nicmos.eps}
274: \caption{HCO$^+$ emission (1$\sigma$) contours superposed on the near-infrared
275: scattered light image~\citep{padgett1999}.}\label{image}
276: \end{figure}
277:
278: The spectral map in Fig.~\ref{specmap} shows single spectra at positions offset
279: by 2$''$ from each other. Each position shown here is the spectrum
280: contained within one synthesized beam. The center most spectrum coincides with
281: the peak of the emission in Fig.~\ref{mom}. Here is seen a very broad, double
282: peaked line. Moving outward from the center, the lines become single peaked and
283: offset in velocity space with respect to the systemic velocity. Perpendicular to
284: the long axis of the structure, the line intensity falls off quickly. The lines
285: shown in Fig.~\ref{specmap} are reconstructed using the natural weighting
286: scheme. For the remainder of this paper we will use the uniformly weighted maps
287: where the resolution is optimal.
288: \begin{figure}
289: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/specmap_ann.eps}
290: \caption{Spectral map of L1489~IRS. The spectra are evenly spaced with 2$''$.
291: The bandwidth in each panel is 20 kms$^{-1}$. The scale on the
292: $y$-axis goes from 0 to 2 Jybm$^{-1}$.}\label{specmap}
293: \end{figure}
294:
295: Fig.~\ref{pv} shows the emission in a position-velocity diagram, where the image
296: cube has been sliced along the major axis to produce the intensity distribution
297: along the velocity axis. The PV--diagram shows almost no emission in the second
298: and fourth quadrant which is a strong indicator of rotation. The small amount of
299: low velocity emission seen close to the center in the fourth quadrant may be
300: accounted for by infalling gas.
301: \begin{figure}
302: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/pv.eps}
303: \caption{Position-Velocity (PV) diagram. This plot shows that the emission on the scales
304: measured by the SMA is entirely dominated by rotation. The black curves show
305: the Keplerian velocity, calculated from the dynamic mass (1.35 M$_\odot$)
306: obtained in Paper~I. The curves have been inclination corrected with
307: 74$^\circ$ for the full lines and 40$^\circ$ for the dashed lines.
308: Contours start at 2$\sigma$ and
309: increase with 1$\sigma$ = 0.12 Jy beam$^{-1}$.}\label{pv}
310: \end{figure}
311:
312:
313: \section{Analysis}\label{analysis}
314: With the resolution provided by the SMA it is possible to probe the central
315: parts of L1489~IRS on scales of $\sim$100 AU, where the protoplanetary disk is
316: expected to be present (see Section~\ref{intro}). Furthermore, the
317: HCO$^+$ $J=$ 3--2 transition traces H$_2$ densities of $10^6$~cm$^{-3}$ or
318: more~\citep{schoier2005}, which are expected in the inner envelope and disk. The
319: model of Paper~I was not explicitly made to mimic a disk, but rather to describe
320: the morphology of the images on large scales. Using this model, which works
321: well on a global scale, we can explore how well it fits the SMA spectra when
322: extrapolated to scales unconstrained by the single-dish observations.
323:
324: Fig.~\ref{sma_specs} compares the SMA observations to the predictions of this
325: model (dashed line). For doing this comparison, the model is
326: imaged using the $(u,v)$-spacings from the observations, so that directly
327: comparable spectra are obtained. While the spectra away from the center are
328: fairly well reproduced in terms of line width, the center position is too wide,
329: i.e., the model produces velocities that are too extreme compared to the
330: measured velocities.
331: \begin{figure*}
332: \begin{center}
333: \includegraphics[width=16cm]{figures/specs_oldmod.eps}
334: \caption{This figure shows three spectra from the SMA observations with model
335: spectra superposed. The two off-positions are chosen in the direction along
336: the long axis of the object. The offsets are chosen to be a resolution
337: element. Three models are also shown: The dashed line shows the unmodified
338: model from Paper~I, the full line is the model from Paper~I, but inclined at
339: 40$^\circ$, and the dotted line shows a model where HCO$^+$ is absent on
340: scales smaller than 200 AU.}\label{sma_specs}
341: \end{center}
342: \end{figure*}
343:
344:
345: To check that this emission does in fact originate from scales less than 200 AU,
346: a model where HCO$^+$ is completely absent within a radius of 200 AU is also
347: shown in Fig.~\ref{sma_specs} with the dotted line. In this model the wide wings
348: disappear and only a very narrow line is left. The two off-positions, which lie
349: outside of the radius of 200~AU, are not affected minimally introducing this
350: cavity.
351:
352: Fig.~\ref{sma_specs} also shows a spectrum which is made from the Paper~I model,
353: but inclined at 40$^\circ$ (full line). This is a considerably better fit than
354: the other two models (again the two off-positions are little affected). While
355: the observations of the larger scale structure (Paper~I,
356: \citet{hogerheijde2001}) demonstrates that the inclination of the flattened,
357: collapsing envelope is $\sim$74$^\circ$, the SMA observations suggest that a
358: change in the inclination occurs on scales of 100--200 AU, reflecting a
359: dynamically different component there. On the other hand, since the model of
360: Paper~I was tuned to match the single-dish observation on scales of $\sim$1000
361: AU or more and did not explicitly take the disk into account it is not
362: unexpected that it does not fully reproduce the SMA observations.
363:
364: \subsection{Introducing a disk model}\label{diskmod}
365: To reproduce also the interferometric observations we have modified the model
366: from Paper~I on scales corresponding to the innermost envelope and disk: The
367: improvements consists largely of two things, namely a different parameterization
368: of the density distribution and the explicit inclusion of a disk.
369:
370: The description used in Paper~I has a discontinuity for small values of $r$ and
371: $\theta$: again, this is not a problem when working with the large scale
372: emission, but becomes a problem when interfaced with a disk where a continuous
373: transition from envelope to disk is preferred. The new parameterization we use
374: for the envelope is adopted from~\citet{ulrich1976}. In this representation the
375: envelope density is given by,
376: \begin{eqnarray}
377: \rho_{env}(r,\theta) &=& \rho_0 \left(\frac{r}{R_{rot}}\right)^{-1.5}
378: \left(1+\frac{\cos\theta}{\cos\theta_0}\right)^{-1/2} \nonumber \\
379: && \times \left( \frac{\cos\theta}{2 \cos\theta_0} + \frac{R_{rot}}{r} \cos2
380: \theta_0\right)^{-1},
381: \end{eqnarray}
382: where $\theta_0$ is the solution of the parabolic motion of an infalling
383: particle given by $r/R_{rot} (\cos \theta_0 -\cos \theta) / (\cos \theta_0
384: \sin2 \theta_0)=1 $, $R_{rot}=150$ AU is the centrifugal radius of the envelope,
385: and $\rho_0$ is the density on the equatorial plane and at the centrifugal
386: radius. Since the outer radius, total mass, aspect ratio, and peak density are
387: held fixed, the new parameterization is qualitatively similar to the Plummer-like
388: profile used in Paper~I. The numerical value of $R_{rot}$ is chosen so
389: that the maximum deviation in density in the ($r,\theta$)-plane only reaches
390: 20\% in the most dense parts (outside of the disk cavity) and has an average
391: deviation of less than 5\%.
392:
393: In addition to this envelope, a generic disk is also introduced in the model.
394: The density of the disk is given by,
395: \begin{eqnarray}
396: \rho_{disk}(r,\theta)=\frac{\Sigma_0 \, (r/R_0)^{-1}}{\sqrt{2\pi} \,
397: H_0} \exp \left\{-\frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{r \, \cos \theta}{H_0}
398: \right]^2 \right\},
399: \end{eqnarray}
400: where $\theta$ is the angle from the axis of symmetry, $R_0$ is the disk outer
401: radius and $H_0$ is the scale height of the disk. The model thus has four free
402: parameters: disk radius, pressure scale height, mass (taken as a fraction of
403: the total mass of the circumstellar material), and inclination. In order to
404: maximize the mid-infrared flux, we use a flat disk, i.e., with no increase in
405: scale height with radius and fix the scale height to 0.25. The outer radius is
406: fixed to 200~AU, the distance from the center of the emission in Fig.~\ref{mom}
407: to the position of the closed velocity contour, thereby effectively reducing
408: the number of free parameters to two. This outer disk radius is not a
409: strongly constrained parameter since neither the SED nor the model spectra are
410: influenced much by changes in this value. It is only possible to rule out the
411: extreme cases, where the disk either gets so small that it is no longer
412: influencing the SED or where it gets so big that it holds a significant fraction
413: of the total mass. We find that the best fit is provided by a disk mass of
414: $M_{disk}=4\times 10^{-3} $~M$_\odot$. A cross section of the model is shown in
415: Fig.~\ref{diskstruct}.
416:
417: The velocity field in the envelope is similar to the one used in Paper~I, where
418: the velocity field was parameterized in terms of a central mass and an angle
419: between the velocity vector and the azimuthal direction, so the the ratio of
420: infall to rotation could be controlled by adjusting this angle. The best fit
421: parameter values obtained in Paper~I of 1.35M$_\odot$ for the central mass and
422: flow lines inclined with 15$^\circ$ with respect to the azimuthal direction,
423: are used. No radial motions are allowed in the disk: only full Keplerian motion
424: is present in the region of the model occupied by the disk.
425:
426: In order to produce synthetic observations which can be directly compared to the
427: data, we use numerical radiative transfer tools. The 3D continuum radiative
428: transfer code RADMC~\citep{dullemond2004} is used to calculate the scattering
429: function and the temperature structure in the analytical axisymmetric density
430: distribution. In these calculations, the luminosity measurement
431: by~\citet{kenyon1993a} of 3.7 L$_\odot$ is used for the central source.
432: The solution is then ``ray--traced'' using RADICAL \citep{dullemond2000} to
433: produce the spectral energy distribution and the continuum maps at the observed
434: frequencies. In both RADMC and RADICAL we assume certain properties of
435: the dust. We use the dust opacities that give the best fit to extinction
436: measurements in dense cores (Pontoppidan et al., in prep).
437:
438: The same density and temperature structure are afterward given as input to the
439: excitation and line radiative transfer code RATRAN~\citep{hogerheijde2000a}
440: which is used to calculate the spatial and frequency dependent HCO$^+$ $J=$
441: 3--2 emission. The HCO$^+$ models are post-processed with the MIRIAD tasks
442: \emph{uvmodel, invert, clean,} and \emph{restore} to simulate the actual SMA
443: observations.
444: \begin{figure}
445: \begin{center}
446: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/diskstruct.eps}
447: \caption{A slice through the model of L1489~IRS: The top panels show the
448: temperature on different scales and the bottom panels show the corresponding
449: density profiles.}\label{diskstruct}
450: \end{center}
451: \end{figure}
452:
453: \subsection{Modeling the continuum emission}\label{sec:sed}
454: In Fig.~\ref{dustamps}, we compare our model to the continuum observations. We
455: calculate $(u,v)$--amplitudes at 1.1 mm which we plot on top of the observed
456: amplitudes. The result is in good agreement with the data,
457: suggesting that the dust emission is well-described by our parameterization down
458: to scales of $\sim$~100~AU. This comparison is not very dependent on the
459: inclination, since the continuum emission is quite compact. For this particular
460: figure, an inclination of 40$^\circ$ is assumed.
461: \begin{figure}
462: \begin{center}
463: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/cont_amps_tria.eps}
464: \caption{The averaged $(u,v)$--amplitudes of the continuum at 1 mm in both
465: compact and extended configurations. The full line show our
466: model. The compact configuration visibilities cover the
467: $(u,v)$--distance up to 60 k$\lambda$. The black triangle marks the
468: total flux at 1 mm~\citep{Moriarty-Schieven1994}. The histogram
469: indicates the zero-signal expectation values.}\label{dustamps}
470: \end{center}
471: \end{figure}
472:
473: Recently,~\citet{eisner2005} modeled the SEDs of a number of Class I objects in
474: Taurus including L1489~IRS. The model used in their work is parameterized
475: differently from ours, but it essentially describes a similar structure. As
476: pointed out above, \citeauthor{eisner2005} find a best fit inclination
477: of 36$^\circ$ in contrast to the inclination of 74$^\circ$ found in Paper~I.
478:
479: To test the result of~\citet{eisner2005} we calculated the SED using the
480: described model with only the system inclination as a free parameter
481: (Fig.~\ref{sed}). The best fit is found for an inclination of about 40$^\circ$,
482: in good agreement with the result of~\citet{eisner2005}. The models with
483: inclinations of 50$^\circ$ and 74$^\circ$, are also plotted in
484: Fig.~\ref{sed} in order to show how the SED depends on inclination.
485: \begin{figure}
486: \begin{center}
487: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/sed.eps}
488: \caption{The model spectral energy distribution assuming
489: inclinations of 40$^\circ$ (full line) and 50$^\circ$ and
490: 74$^\circ$ (broken lines) plotted on top of flux measurements from
491: the literature (marked by crosses) and the Spitzer/IRS spectrum
492: from 2 -- 40 microns (red line).}\label{sed}
493: \end{center}
494: \end{figure}
495:
496: Note that the quality of our best fit to the SED is comparable to the fit
497: presented by~\citet{eisner2005}, whereas the fit becomes rapidly worse with
498: increasing inclination larger than 40$^\circ$, thus bringing about disagreement
499: with the results from~\citep{hogerheijde2001} and Paper~I. The three different
500: models plotted in Fig.~\ref{sed} cannot be distinguished for wavelength above
501: $\sim$60~$\mu$m, which corresponds to a temperature of about 40~K
502: using Wiens displacement law. This temperature occurs on radial distances of
503: approximately 100 AU from the central object which means that outside of this
504: radius, the SED is no longer sensitive to the inclination. We interpret this
505: behavior as a change in the angular momentum axis on disk scales, causing the
506: disk to be inclined with respect to the envelope.
507:
508:
509: \subsection{Modeling the HCO$^+$ emission}\label{sec:hcop}
510: In Paper~I it was found that the characteristic double peak feature of the
511: HCO$^+$ $J=$ 4--3 line could not be reproduced with an inclination below
512: 70$^\circ$. On the other hand including a disk inclined by 40$^\circ$ into the
513: model of Paper~I does not alter the fit to the single dish lines
514: (Fig~\ref{specs}): the geometry and the velocity field of the material at
515: scales smaller than $\sim$300 AU does not influence the shape of these lines.
516: This fit is not perfect though as it still overestimates the red-shifted wing in
517: the $J=$ 3--2 line and the width of the $J=$ 1--0 line slightly, but the quality
518: of the fit is similar to that presented in Paper~I.
519: \begin{figure}
520: \begin{center}
521: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/singledish.eps}
522: \caption{Three transitions of HCO$^+$ observed by single-dish telescope (see
523: Paper~I for details) with our model superposed. The quality of the
524: fit is comparable to the fit in Paper~I although a disk model has now
525: been included.}\label{specs}
526: \end{center}
527: \end{figure}
528:
529: We need to test how well this tilted disk model works with the line observations
530: from the SMA. It was shown in Sect.~\ref{analysis} that the off-position spectra
531: are weakly dependent on changes in the inclination and that the same is true when
532: using the model where the disk is tilted with respect to the envelope. The
533: central position however, is seen in Fig.~\ref{bestfit} to be very well
534: reproduced in terms of line width and wing shape by this model. The model
535: spectrum is slightly more asymmetric than the data, which means that the
536: infall to rotation ratio is not quite correct on disk scales. The magnitude of
537: the velocity field projected onto our line of sight is correct though, since the
538: width of the line is well fit.
539: \begin{figure}
540: \begin{center}
541: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/specs_newmod.eps}
542: \caption{The SMA spectrum towards the center of L1489~IRS with our model,
543: consisting of a disk which is inclined with respect to the envelope,
544: superposed. As in Fig.~\ref{sma_specs}, the model has been imaged with
545: the $(u,v)$-spacings from the observations.}\label{bestfit}
546: \end{center}
547: \end{figure}
548:
549: We also compared the averaged $(u,v)$--amplitudes to evaluate the quality of our
550: model similar to the procedure for the continuum. Fitting the
551: $(u,v)$--amplitudes in this way tests whether the model produces the right amount
552: of emission at every scale. The best fit is shown in Fig.~\ref{uvamps}. The
553: zero-spacing flux has been shown in this plot as well, marked by the black
554: triangle. This method has previously been used to study the abundance variations
555: of given molecules in protostellar envelopes, in particular imaging directly
556: where significant freeze-out occurs in protostellar envelopes
557: \citep{jorgensen2004a,jorgensen2005a}. The model does a good job reproducing
558: the observed HCO$^+$ brightness distribution on almost all scales with a
559: constant abundance, except around 20--40 k$\lambda$ where it overestimates the
560: amount of observed flux. This correspond to a radius of about 1000 AU, that is
561: well outside of the disk. On the other hand single-dish observations of low-mass
562: protostellar envelopes suggest that these are scales where significant
563: freeze-out in particular of CO may occur at temperatures $\lesssim 20-30$~K,
564: which because of the gas-phase chemical relation between CO and HCO$^+$ also
565: reflects directly in the observed distribution of HCO$^+$
566: \citep[e.g.,][]{jorgensen2004,jorgensen2005}. Despite this, the difference between
567: the model prediction and observations is small with this constant abundance,
568: suggesting that the amount of freeze-out is small in L1489~IRS. This is in agreement
569: with the single-dish studies of \cite{jorgensen2002,jorgensen2004,jorgensen2005},
570: who generally found little depletion in the envelopes of L1489~IRS and other
571: Class~I sources in contrast to the more deeply embedded, Class~0, protostars.
572: \begin{figure}
573: \begin{center}
574: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{figures/line_amps_tria.eps}
575: \caption{Similar to Fig.~\ref{dustamps} but for the HCO$^+$ $J=$
576: 3--2 measurements. The triangle marks the total flux obtained from
577: the single dish observations. The amplitudes have been averaged
578: over $\pm 5$~kms$^{-1}$ relative to the systemic velocity. The
579: histogram indicates the zero-signal expectation values. The insert is an
580: enlargement of the longest baselines.}\label{uvamps}
581: \end{center}
582: \end{figure}
583:
584: The model parameter values obtained in this section including values from
585: Paper~I are summarized in Table~\ref{parameters}. The best fit
586: values that are derived in this paper are tuned by hand rather than
587: systematically optimized by a $\chi^2$ minimization method. Therefore we can
588: only give an estimate on the uncertainties. However, Fig.~\ref{sed}
589: shows that the SED fit gets rapidly worse when changing the inclination, and
590: given the strong dependence of the envelope inclination on the single-dish
591: lines, we estimate that both angles are accurate to within 10$^\circ$. For the
592: disk mass and radius, the uncertainties on the parameter values are less well
593: defined for reasons given in Section~\ref{diskmod}, but we estimate an accuracy
594: within a factor of 2 in each of these parameters.
595:
596: \begin{table}
597: \caption{Model parameter values}\label{parameters}
598: \begin{tabular}{l c}
599: \hline \hline
600: Envelope & Value \\
601: \hline
602: Outer radius$^a$ & 2000 AU\\
603: Envelope mass$^a$ & 0.093 M$_\odot$\\
604: Inclination$^{a,b}$ & 74$^\circ$\\
605: HCO$^+$ abundance$^a$\qquad & 3.0$\times$10$^{-9}$\\
606: \quad & \quad\\
607: \hline
608: Disk & Value \\
609: \hline
610: Radius$^b$ & 200 AU\\
611: Disk mass$^b$ & 4$\times$10$^{-3}$ M$_\odot$\\
612: Inclination$^b$ & 40$^\circ$\\
613: Scale height$^c$ & z=0.25R\\
614: Central mass$^a$ & 1.35 M$_\odot$\\
615: Central luminosity$^c$ & 3.7 L$_\odot$\\
616: Distance$^c$ & 140 pc\\
617: \hline
618: \end{tabular}
619:
620: $^a$ Values from Paper I\\
621: $^b$ Fitted values\\
622: $^c$ Values adopted from the literature\\
623: \end{table}
624:
625:
626: \section{Discussion}\label{discus}
627: It seems that depending on the physical size scales that we probe, the solution
628: favors a different inclination. When taking \emph{all available} observations
629: into account we need to introduce a model where the angular momentum vector of
630: the disk is misaligned with the angular momentum vector of the (rotationally
631: flattened) envelope. We adopt a two component model (illustrated in
632: Fig.~\ref{cartoon}), disk and envelope, but in reality, the angular momentum
633: axis may indeed be a continuous function of radius on the scales of the disk
634: ($\lesssim$ a few hundred AU). The origin of such a misalignment can actually be
635: explained in a simple way by considering the initial conditions of the collapse.
636: \begin{figure}
637: \begin{center}
638: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{figures/cartoon.eps}
639: \caption{An (exaggerated) illustration of the proposed model where the angular
640: momentum axis is changing with radius. The line of sight is illustrated by the
641: dashed line. }\label{cartoon}
642: \end{center}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645: The state of a pre-stellar core before the gravitational collapse begins is
646: typically described by a static sphere with a solid body rotation perturbation
647: \citep{terebey1984}. Due to strict angular momentum conservation, such a model
648: would be perfectly aligned throughout the collapse and consequently disk
649: formation models are often described numerically by axisymmetric representations
650: \citep[e.g.,][]{yorke1999}.
651:
652: However, there is no \emph{a priori} reason why a pre-stellar core should rotate
653: as a solid body. Of course the cloud has an average angular momentum which on a
654: global scale determines the axis of rotation. The cloud does not collapse
655: instantly to form a disk though, but rather from the inside and out as described
656: by~\citet{shu1977}, and therefore a shell of material from deep within the
657: cloud, which may very well have an average angular momentum that is different
658: from the global average, will collapse and form a disk before material from
659: further out has had a change to accrete yet. Actually, if the parental cloud is
660: turbulent, it is to be expected that the accreting material has randomly
661: oriented angular momentum and a misalignment of the angular momentum on different
662: scales is more likely than a perfect alignment. In this way, a system similar to
663: the model proposed to describe L1489~IRS in this paper can be formed.
664:
665: To obtain a gradient in the angular momentum as initial condition for the
666: collapse, one may consider a cloud which is not spherically symmetric or one which
667: does not collapse around its geometrical center but rather around an over dense
668: clump offset from the center. The former scenario may indeed be true for the
669: case of L1489~IRS which is seen to be dynamically connected to a neighboring
670: cloud (which was also modeled in Paper~I to explain the excess of cold emission
671: seen in some of the low-$J$ lines). Actually, the uniformly weighted moment map
672: (Fig.~\ref{mom}) shows significant asymmetry with a secondary emission peak to
673: the north-east.
674:
675: It is interesting to note that the HCO$^+$ emission from the SMA observations
676: agree very well with the near-infrared image (Fig.~\ref{image}): the secondary
677: peak, a few arc seconds northeast of the main continuum and HCO$^+$ peaks, nicely
678: coincides with a bright spot in the scattered light image and also the shape of
679: the cavity towards the south follows the contours of the HCO$^+$ emission. The
680: same details are not revealed in the naturally weighted SMA image, in which
681: shorter baselines are given more weight. We thus conclude that by going to the
682: extended SMA configuration, it is possible to probe structure in YSOs on the same
683: scales as can be resolved by large near-infrared telescopes such as the Hubble
684: Space Telescope. The structure seen in both images, however, also emphasizes
685: that for a fully self-consistent description of L1489~IRS, a global
686: non-axisymmetric model has to be considered.
687:
688: Another (non-exclusive) explanation of a misaligned disk would be that L1489~IRS
689: formed as a triple stellar system and, that due to gravitational interaction,
690: one of the stars was ejected. L1489~IRS would thus be a binary system as
691: suggested by~\citet{hogerheijde2000}. The loss of angular momentum due to the
692: ejection would result in a rearrangement of the remaining binary, which could
693: ``drag'' the inner viscous disk along. Such a scenario has been investigated
694: numerically by~\citet{larwood1996}. In the case of L1489~IRS, it would have to
695: be a very close binary with a separation of no more than a few AUs since the
696: near-infrared scattered light image~\citep{padgett1999} with a resolution of
697: $\sim$0.2$''$ (30 AU), does not reveal multiple sources. The ratio
698: of binary separation to disk radius is therefore significantly lower than the
699: cases investigated by~\citet{larwood1996} and it is therefore not clear whether
700: similar effects could be present in L1489~IRS.
701:
702: If indeed the system is binary, it would resolve the issue that we find
703: a central mass of 1.35 M$_\odot$ while the luminosity is estimated to be 3.7
704: L$_\odot$~\citep{kenyon1993a}. A single young star that massive would require a
705: much higher luminosity, but two stars of 0.6--0.7 M$_\odot$ would fit nicely
706: with the estimated luminosity since luminosity is not a linear function of mass
707: for YSOs.
708:
709: To test whether L1489~IRS indeed is a binary and to constrain the innermost disk
710: geometry on AU scales, measurements of temporal variability in super high
711: resolution are needed. The timescale for variations of a possible binary is of
712: the order of years depending on the exact separation of the stars (assuming
713: scales of 1 AU). Such observations would, for example, be feasible with ALMA.
714:
715: \section{Conclusion}\label{summary}
716: In this paper, we have presented high angular resolution interferometric
717: observations of the low-mass Class I YSO L1489~IRS. The observations reveal a
718: rotationally dominated, very structured central region with a radius of about
719: 200--300 AU. We interpret this as a young Keplerian disk which is still deeply
720: embedded in envelope material. This conclusion is supported by a convincing fit
721: with a disk model to the SED.
722:
723: We conclude further that the inclination of the disk is not aligned with the
724: inclination of the flattened envelope structure, due to the possibility that
725: L1489~IRS is a binary system and/or that the average angular momentum axis of
726: the cloud is not aligned with the angular momentum axis of the dense core that
727: originally collapsed to form the star(s) plus the disk.
728:
729: We find that a disk with a mass of $4\times 10^{-3}$ M$_\odot$, a radius of 200
730: AU, and a pressure scale height of z=0.25R is consistent with both the SED and
731: the HCO$^+$ observations. Only a small amount of chemical depletion of HCO$^+$
732: is allowed for, due to a slight over-estimate of the $(u,v)$--amplitudes at
733: 20--40 k$\lambda$ by our model, in agreement with the results from previous
734: single-dish studies and the nature of L1489~IRS as a Class I YSO.
735:
736: The combination of a detailed modeling of the SED with spatially resolved line
737: observations, which contains information on the gas kinematics, appears to be a very
738: efficient way of determining the properties of disks, especially embedded disks
739: which are not directly observable.\\
740:
741:
742: \noindent \emph{Acknowledgments} The authors would like to thank Kees Dullemond
743: for making his code available to us. CB is supported by the European Commission
744: through the FP6 - Marie Curie Early Stage Researcher Training programme. JKJ
745: acknowledges support from an SMA fellowship. AC was supported by a fellowship
746: from the European Research Training Network ``The Origin of Planetary Systems''
747: (PLANETS, contract number HPRN-CT-2002-00308). The research of MRH and AC is
748: supported through a VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organiztion for Scientific
749: Research.\\
750:
751: \bibliographystyle{aa}
752: \bibliography{/home/brinch/papers/references}
753: \end{document}
754:
755:
756:
757: