1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 6.1, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column
10: \documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the lon lists of affiliations
11: %\documentclass[rnote]{aa} % for the research notes
12: %\documentclass[letter]{aa} % for the letters
13: %
14: %\documentclass{aa}
15: %
16: \usepackage{graphicx}
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: \usepackage{color}
19: \usepackage{txfonts}
20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
21: %
22: %
23: %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
24: % abbreviations
25: %+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
26: \newcommand{\dydz}{$\Delta Y / \Delta Z\;$}
27: \newcommand{\kms}{$\,km\,s^{-1}$}
28: \newcommand{\lsun}{log$L/L_{\odot}\,$}
29: \newcommand{\msun}{$M_{\odot}\,$}
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: \title{RR Lyrae stars in Galactic globular clusters. VI. The Period-Amplitude relation.}
34:
35: \author{G. Bono \inst{1,2}, F. Caputo \inst{1}, M. Di Criscienzo \inst{1,3}}
36:
37: \authorrunning{Bono et al.}
38:
39: \offprints{G. Bono\\ \email{bono@mporzio.astro.it} }
40:
41: \institute {INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33,
42: 00040 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy {\tt bono@mporzio.astro.it},
43: {\tt caputo@mporzio.astro.it}, {\tt dicriscienzo@mporzio.astro.it}\\
44: \and European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2,
45: D-85748 Garching bei Munchen, Germany\\
46: \and INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16,
47: 80131 Napoli, Italy
48: }
49:
50:
51:
52: \date{Received, accepted}
53:
54:
55:
56: \abstract
57: % context heading (optional)
58: {}
59: % aims heading (mandatory)
60: {This work uses nonlinear convective models of RR Lyrae stars and
61: evolutionary predictions of low-mass helium burning stellar structures to
62: constrain the properties of cluster and field RR Lyrae variables. In particular,
63: we address two problems: is the Period-Amplitude ($PA_V$) plane of fundamental
64: (RR$_{ab}$) variables a good diagnostic for the metal abundance?
65: Is the $M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H] relation of field and cluster variables linear over
66: the whole metal abundance range of [Fe/H]$\sim -$2.5 to $\sim$ 0?
67: }
68: % methods heading (mandatory)
69: {We perform a detailed comparison between theory and observations for
70: fundamental RR Lyrae variables in the solar neighborhood and in both
71: Oosterhoff type I (OoI) and type II (OoII) Galactic globular clusters.
72: }
73: % results heading (mandatory)
74: {We show that the distribution of cluster RR$_{ab}$ variables in the
75: $PA_V$ plane depends not only on the metal abundance, but also on the
76: cluster Horizontal Branch (HB) morphology. We find that on average the
77: observed pulsation parameter $k_{puls}$, connecting the period to the visual
78: amplitude, increases when moving from metal-poor to metal-rich GGCs.
79: However, this parameter shows marginal changes among OoI clusters
80: with intermediate to red HB types and iron abundances $-1.8\le$[Fe/H]$\le-1.1$,
81: whereas its value decreases in OoII clusters with the bluer HB morphology,
82: although these clusters are also the less metal-poor ones of the group.
83: Moreover, at [Fe/H]=$-1.7\pm$0.1 the OoI clusters present redder
84: HB types and larger $\langle k_{puls}\rangle$ values than the OoII clusters.
85: The RR$_{ab}$ variables in $\omega$~Cen and in the solar neighborhood
86: further support the evidence that the spread in [Fe/H], at fixed $k_{puls}$,
87: is of the order of $\pm$0.5 dex. Using the results of synthetic HB simulations,
88: we show that the $PA_V$ plane can provide accurate cluster distance estimates.
89: We find that the RR$_{ab}$ variables in OoI and in OoII clusters with very blue
90: HB types obey a well-defined
91: $M_V$(RR)-$k_{puls}$ relation, while those in OoII clusters with moderately
92: blue HB types present a zero-point that is $\sim 0.05$ mag brighter. Regarding
93: field variables, we show that with [Fe/H]$\ge -$1.0 a unique $M_V$(RR)-$k_{puls}$
94: relation can be adopted, independently of the color distribution of the parent HB
95: star population.}
96: % conclusions heading (optional)
97: {
98: Current findings suggest that the $PA_V$ distribution does
99: not seem to be a robust diagnostic for the metal abundance of RR$_{ab}$ variables.
100: However, the same observables can be used to estimate the absolute magnitude of
101: globular cluster and field RR$_{ab}$ variables. Eventually, we show that over
102: the metallicity range $-2.4\le[Fe/H]\le 0.0$ the $M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H] relation is
103: not linear but has a parabolic behavior.
104: }
105:
106: \keywords{globular clusters -- stars: evolution -- stars: horizontal branch --
107: stars: oscillations -- stars: variables: RR Lyr}
108:
109:
110:
111: \maketitle
112: %
113: %________________________________________________________________
114:
115:
116:
117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
118: \section{Introduction}
119:
120: It has been far-back recognized that the properties of RR Lyrae
121: variables provide firm constraints to investigate several important
122: aspects of stellar evolution and cosmology. The calibration of the
123: absolute visual magnitude $M_V$(RR) as a function of the
124: iron-to-hydrogen content [Fe/H] is generally used for distance
125: determinations in the Local Group and the RR Lyrae-based distances
126: provide an independent test for the Cepheid distance scale in nearby
127: galaxies (Magellanic Clouds, M31, dwarf spheroidal galaxies) and for
128: the calibration of secondary distance indicators such as the
129: globular cluster luminosity function in more distant galaxies (see
130: e.g. Di Criscienzo et al. 2006, and references therein). Moreover,
131: the distance of RR Lyrae stars observed in globular clusters is a
132: fundamental step to determine the absolute magnitude of the cluster
133: main-sequence turn-off, which is the classical "clock" to estimate
134: the age of these ancient stellar systems.
135:
136: Together with this traditional role for distance determinations, since
137: the pioneering investigation by Preston (1959) it has also been suggested
138: that the location of fundamental mode variables (RR$_{ab}$)
139: in the Period-Amplitude ($PA_V$) plane, i.e., in the so-called Bailey diagram,
140: depends on the metal abundance. Among the more recent papers,
141: we mention Alcock et al. (2000) who used the visual amplitude
142: of RR$_{ab}$ stars in the globular clusters M15 ([Fe/H]=$-$2.1),
143: M3 ([Fe/H]=$-$1.6) and M5 ([Fe/H]=$-$1.4) to get the
144: calibration
145:
146: $$[Fe/H]_A=-2.60-8.85\log P_{ab}-1.33A_V\eqno(1)$$
147:
148: \noindent and Sandage (2004) who determined
149:
150: $$[Fe/H]_S=-2.15-7.99\log P_{ab}-1.45A_V\eqno(2)$$
151:
152: \noindent from field variables with spectroscopic [Fe/H] measurements. Although these
153: Period-Metallicity-Amplitude relations
154: present a large intrinsic indeterminacy of $\sim$ 0.35 dex, they were
155: used by Alcock et al. (2000) to estimate a median metal content
156: of [Fe/H]$\sim -$1.6 for a huge
157: sample of RR$_{ab}$ stars in the bar of the Large Magellanic Cloud
158: (LMC), by Brown et al. (2004) to derive a mean metallicity of
159: [Fe/H]=$-1.8\pm$0.3 for the 29 RR$_{ab}$ variables they identified
160: in a halo field of M31, and by Kinemuchi et al. (2006) to study
161: the properties of RR Lyrae stars in the solar neighborhood.
162:
163: The suggested dependence of the Bailey diagram on the metal
164: abundance accounts for the observational evidence that RR$_{ab}$
165: stars in Oosterhoff type II globular clusters tend to have, for a
166: given amplitude, longer periods than those in Oosterhoff type I
167: clusters. Let us recall that according to the average period
168: $\langle P_{ab}\rangle$ of their $ab$-type variables, the globular
169: clusters are conventionally classified into two Oosterhoff
170: groups: the former group (Oosterhoff type I: OoI) includes
171: metal-intermediate clusters with $\langle P_{ab}\rangle\sim$ 0.55
172: days, while the latter (Oosterhoff type II: OoII) includes
173: metal-poor clusters with $\langle P_{ab}\rangle\sim$ 0.65 days.
174: However, one cannot neglect that OoII
175: clusters show bluer horizontal branch (HB) star distributions than
176: OoI clusters. Therefore the $PA_V$ diagram, as already suggested
177: by Clement \& Shelton (1999), migth not depend on the metal
178: abundance but on the evolutionary status of RR Lyrae stars.
179:
180: From a theoretical point of view, it is widely accepted that the
181: pulsation period $P$ is physically governed by the von Ritter relation
182: $P\rho^{1/2}=Q$ ($\rho$ is the stellar density and $Q$ the pulsation
183: constant) which yields that the pulsation period is a function of the
184: pulsator mass $M$, luminosity $L$, and effective temperature $T_e$.
185: On this ground, since the earlier linear and adiabatic pulsation models,
186: the $P=f(M,L,T_e)$ relation, the so-called van Albada \& Baker
187: (1971, 1973) relation, has been at the basis of several
188: investigations focussed on the estimate of RR Lyrae mass and
189: luminosity. However, accurate predictions concerning the
190: luminosity and the radial velocity variations along the pulsation cycle,
191: and their dependence on the pulsator structural parameters, become
192: available only with the modern nonlinear, convective approach
193: (Stellingwerf 1984).
194:
195: The purpose of the present investigation is to use the updated
196: and detailed sets of nonlinear, convective models for fundamental (F)
197: pulsators computed by our group (see Marconi
198: et al. 2003 [Paper II]; Di Criscienzo, Marconi \& Caputo 2004 [Paper
199: III], and references therein) to investigate the $PA_V$ relation for
200: RR$_{ab}$ variables. The theoretical scenario is
201: discussed in Section 2, while Section 3 deals with the comparison
202: with observations. The role of the Period-Amplitude diagram in the distance
203: estimate of RR$_{ab}$ variables is presented in Section 4 and
204: the conclusions close the paper.
205:
206: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
207: \section{The physical meaning of the $PA_V$ relation}
208:
209: The pulsation models used in the present paper have been computed
210: with the nonlinear convective, hydrodynamical code which has already
211: been described in previous investigations (see Paper II, Paper
212: III, and references therein) and it will not be further discussed.
213: We only wish to mention that the grid of models covers a wide range
214: in stellar mass, luminosity, and chemical composition (see Table 1)
215: and that the bolometric light curves of the models have been
216: transformed into the observational plane by adopting the bolometric
217: corrections and color-temperature transformations provided by
218: Castelli et al. (1997a,b). This approach allows us to derive
219: light-curve amplitudes $A_i$ and mean absolute magnitudes, either
220: intensity-weighted $\langle M_i\rangle$ or magnitude-weighted
221: $(M_i)$, for the various photometric bands.
222:
223: \begin{table}
224: \begin{center}
225: \caption{Main parameters of the pulsation models used in this paper.} \label{PLCM}
226: \begin{tabular}{lccl}
227: \hline \hline
228: $Y$ & $Z$ & $M$/\msun & \lsun\\
229: \hline
230: 0.24& 0.0001& 0.80& 1.72, 1.81, 1.91\\
231: & & 0.75& 1.61, 1.72, 1.81\\
232: & & 0.70& 1.72\\
233: & & 0.65& 1.61\\
234: 0.24& 0.0004& 0.70& 1.61, 1.72, 1.81\\
235: 0.24& 0.001 & 0.75& 1.71\\
236: & & 0.65& 1.51, 1.61, 1.72\\
237: 0.255& 0.006 & 0.58& 1.55, 1.65, 1.75\\
238: \hline
239: \end{tabular}
240: \end{center}
241: \end{table}
242:
243:
244: The entire set of models pulsating in the fundamental mode shows a
245: linear correlation between the bolometric amplitude and the
246: pulsation period (logarithmic scale) in the sense that the
247: amplitude decreases from short to
248: long periods, at fixed mass and luminosity.
249: Moreover, we found that the luminosity amplitude, at
250: fixed period, increases as the stellar luminosity increases or as
251: the stellar mass decreases, but to a lesser extent (see Fig. 3 in
252: Paper II). In this context, it is worth mentioning that the pulsation limit cycle
253: stability is also governed by the efficiency of convection as flux
254: carrier in the stellar envelope, and in turn on the value of the
255: mixing-length parameter $l/H_p$ adopted to close the system of
256: convective and hydrodynamical equations. Note that the depth of the
257: convective region increases when moving from higher to lower effective
258: temperatures and that convection is the physical mechanism that
259: quenches pulsation instability. As a consequence, the RR Lyrae
260: models at constant stellar mass and luminosity show that an
261: increase in the mixing-length parameter from $l/H_p$=1.5 to 2.0
262: causes a systematic decrease ($\sim 100$ K) in the effective
263: temperature of the first overtone blue edge (FOBE) and the simultaneous increase
264: in the effective temperature of both the blue edge (FBE, $\sim$ 100 K)
265: and the red edge (FRE, $\sim$ 300 K) of fundamental pulsation.
266: As a whole, the increase in the
267: efficiency of the convective transport causes a narrowing of the width
268: in temperature of the instability strip.
269: On the other hand, the amplitude of fundamental pulsators reaches its maximum value
270: close to the FBE and attains vanishing values close to the FRE. This yields
271: that different assumptions concerning the mixing-length parameter
272: affect the region of the instability strip where fundamental pulsators
273: are pulsationally unstable, and in turn both the zero-point and the
274: slope of the predicted Period-Amplitude relation.
275:
276: Using the intensity-averaged
277: $\langle M_V\rangle$ magnitudes of fundamental pulsators with
278: $Z$=0.0001-0.006, we find that the correlation
279: between pulsation period, visual amplitude, magnitude, and mass (in solar units)
280: is given by
281: $$\log P_{ab}=0.136-0.189A_V-0.385\langle M_V\rangle-0.30\log M\eqno(3)$$
282: for $l/H_p$=1.5, and
283: $$\log P_{ab}=0.027-0.142A_V-0.385\langle M_V\rangle-0.35\log M\eqno(4)$$
284: for $l/H_p$=2.0, where the rms dispersion of the fit
285: is 0.025 dex. For the sake of the following discussion, let us emphasize that in these
286: relations the pulsator mass and luminosity are free parameters.
287:
288: According to these relations, the RR$_{ab}$ distribution in the $PA_V$
289: diagram is described by the {\it pulsation} parameter
290:
291: $$k(1.5)_{puls}=0.136-\log P_{ab}-0.189A_V$$
292: or
293: $$k(2.0)_{puls}=0.027-\log P_{ab}-0.142A_V,$$
294:
295: \noindent which in turn depends on the pulsator {\it evolutionary}
296: properties as
297:
298: $$k(1.5)_{ev}=0.385\langle M_V\rangle+0.30\log M$$
299: and
300: $$k(2.0)_{ev}=0.385\langle M_V\rangle+0.35\log M$$
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303:
304: \begin{figure}
305: \begin{center}
306: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig1.ps}
307: \caption{From bottom to top: the average mass $M$(RR) in solar units,
308: the absolute visual magnitude $M_V$(RR), and the evolutionary parameter
309: $k(1.5)_{ev}$ as a function of the HB type. Current predictions rely on a
310: set of SHB simulations discussed in Paper IV.}
311: \end{center}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: At variance with the pulsational parameters
315: $k(1.5)_{puls}$ and $k(2.0)_{puls}$, the values of the evolutionary
316: ones $k(1.5)_{ev}$ and
317: $k(2.0)_{ev}$ cannot be directly estimated
318: from observations. However, all the synthetic horizontal branches (SHB)
319: simulations (see, e.g., Demarque et al. 2000; Catelan et al. 2004;
320: Cassisi et al. 2004, [Paper IV]) agree in suggesting that, for a fixed metallicity,
321: the average mass of HB stars in the RR Lyrae region decreases when
322: moving from red to blue HB morphologies, whereas the average
323: luminosity presents an opposite trend. Furthermore, for a
324: fixed HB morphology, an increase in the metal content causes a
325: decrease in the same intrinsic parameters.
326:
327: \begin{table*}
328: \begin{center}
329: \caption{Selected results of SHB simulations with $Z\le$ 0.006. For each metal content $Z$
330: and mean mass of HB stars $M$(HB),
331: we list the predicted mean values of the
332: HB type and of the RR Lyrae mass, absolute magnitude and $k_{ev}$ parameters,
333: together with the rms dispersion about the mean. The masses are in solar units.}\label{PLCM}
334: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
335: \hline \hline
336: $M$(HB) &$\langle$HB$\rangle$&$\langle M$(RR)$\rangle$ & $\langle M_V$(RR)$\rangle$ & $\langle k(1.5)_{ev}\rangle$ & $\langle k(2.0)_{ev}\rangle$ \\
337: \hline
338: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.0001, $Y$=0.23}\\
339: 0.68 & +0.96$\pm$0.01 & 0.70$\pm$0.02 & 0.35$\pm$0.02 & 0.088$\pm$0.012 & 0.080$\pm$0.012 \\
340: 0.70 & +0.90$\pm$0.02 & 0.71$\pm$0.03 & 0.38$\pm$0.01 & 0.101$\pm$0.006 & 0.094$\pm$0.006 \\
341: 0.72 & +0.83$\pm$0.02 & 0.73$\pm$0.03 & 0.41$\pm$0.01 & 0.115$\pm$0.004 & 0.108$\pm$0.006 \\
342: 0.74 & +0.74$\pm$0.02 & 0.75$\pm$0.03 & 0.42$\pm$0.01 & 0.125$\pm$0.002 & 0.119$\pm$0.002 \\
343: 0.76 & +0.62$\pm$0.03 & 0.77$\pm$0.03 & 0.44$\pm$0.01 & 0.134$\pm$0.002 & 0.128$\pm$0.002 \\
344: 0.78 & +0.43$\pm$0.03 & 0.79$\pm$0.03 & 0.45$\pm$0.01 & 0.143$\pm$0.002 & 0.138$\pm$0.002 \\
345: 0.80 & +0.15$\pm$0.01 & 0.81$\pm$0.03 & 0.46$\pm$0.01 & 0.149$\pm$0.002 & 0.144$\pm$0.002 \\
346: 0.82 & $-$0.09$\pm$0.02 &0.82$\pm$0.02 & 0.46$\pm$0.01 & 0.152$\pm$0.002 & 0.148$\pm$0.002 \\
347: 0.84 & $-$0.19$\pm$0.02 &0.84$\pm$0.02 & 0.46$\pm$0.01 & 0.152$\pm$0.002 & 0.148$\pm$0.002 \\
348: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.0003, $Y$=0.23}\\
349:
350: 0.64 & +0.97$\pm$0.01 & 0.66$\pm$0.02 & 0.36$\pm$0.04 & 0.084$\pm$0.030 & 0.075$\pm$0.030 \\
351: 0.66 & +0.91$\pm$0.01 & 0.68$\pm$0.02 & 0.44$\pm$0.02 & 0.117$\pm$0.008 & 0.109$\pm$0.008 \\
352: 0.68 & +0.78$\pm$0.01 & 0.70$\pm$0.02 & 0.49$\pm$0.01 & 0.142$\pm$0.004 & 0.134$\pm$0.004 \\
353: 0.70 & +0.52$\pm$0.02 & 0.71$\pm$0.02 & 0.53$\pm$0.01 & 0.161$\pm$0.002 & 0.154$\pm$0.002 \\
354: 0.72 & +0.11$\pm$0.03 & 0.73$\pm$0.02 & 0.55$\pm$0.01 & 0.170$\pm$0.002 & 0.163$\pm$0.002 \\
355: 0.74 & $-$0.29$\pm$0.03 &0.74$\pm$0.02 & 0.56$\pm$0.01 & 0.174$\pm$0.002 & 0.168$\pm$0.002 \\
356: 0.76 & $-$0.60$\pm$0.02 &0.75$\pm$0.02 & 0.56$\pm$0.01 & 0.176$\pm$0.002 & 0.170$\pm$0.002 \\
357: 0.78 & $-$0.82$\pm$0.01 &0.76$\pm$0.02 & 0.55$\pm$0.01 & 0.176$\pm$0.002 & 0.170$\pm$0.002 \\
358: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.0006, $Y$=0.23}\\
359: 0.62 & +0.97$\pm$0.01 & 0.65$\pm$0.02 & 0.37$\pm$0.03 & 0.087$\pm$0.026 & 0.078$\pm$0.026 \\
360: 0.64 & +0.89$\pm$0.01 & 0.66$\pm$0.02 & 0.48$\pm$0.02 & 0.131$\pm$0.012 & 0.122$\pm$0.012 \\
361: 0.66 & +0.70$\pm$0.02 & 0.68$\pm$0.02 & 0.53$\pm$0.01 & 0.155$\pm$0.006 & 0.147$\pm$0.006 \\
362: 0.68 & +0.28$\pm$0.03 & 0.69$\pm$0.02 & 0.57$\pm$0.01 & 0.170$\pm$0.002 & 0.162$\pm$0.002 \\
363: 0.70 & $-$0.24$\pm$0.02 &0.70$\pm$0.02 & 0.58$\pm$0.01 & 0.176$\pm$0.002 & 0.168$\pm$0.002 \\
364: 0.72 & $-$0.69$\pm$0.02 &0.70$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.180$\pm$0.002 & 0.172$\pm$0.002 \\
365: 0.74 & $-$0.91$\pm$0.01 &0.71$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.182$\pm$0.002 & 0.174$\pm$0.002 \\
366: 0.76 & $-$0.98$\pm$0.01 &0.72$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.183$\pm$0.002 & 0.176$\pm$0.002 \\
367: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.001, $Y$=0.23}\\
368: 0.60 & +0.98$\pm$0.01 & 0.64$\pm$0.01 & 0.41$\pm$0.06 & 0.099 $\pm$0.040 & 0.089$\pm$0.040 \\
369: 0.62 & +0.89$\pm$0.01 & 0.65$\pm$0.01 & 0.51$\pm$0.03 & 0.141 $\pm$0.018 & 0.132$\pm$0.018 \\
370: 0.64 & +0.64$\pm$0.02 & 0.66$\pm$0.01 & 0.58$\pm$0.02 & 0.170 $\pm$0.008 & 0.161$\pm$0.008 \\
371: 0.66 & +0.11$\pm$0.02 & 0.67$\pm$0.01 & 0.61$\pm$0.01 & 0.181 $\pm$0.002 & 0.172$\pm$0.002 \\
372: 0.68 & $-$0.44$\pm$0.03 &0.67$\pm$0.01 & 0.62$\pm$0.01 & 0.188 $\pm$0.002 & 0.180$\pm$0.002 \\
373: 0.70 & $-$0.80$\pm$0.02 &0.68$\pm$0.01 & 0.63$\pm$0.01 & 0.192 $\pm$0.002 & 0.184$\pm$0.002 \\
374: 0.72 & $-$0.96$\pm$0.01 &0.68$\pm$0.01 & 0.63$\pm$0.01 & 0.194 $\pm$0.002 & 0.186$\pm$0.002 \\
375: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.003, $Y$=0.23}\\
376: 0.56 & +0.97$\pm$0.01 & 0.60$\pm$0.01 & 0.56$\pm$0.07 & 0.149 $\pm$0.040 & 0.138$\pm$0.040 \\
377: 0.58 & +0.84$\pm$0.02 & 0.61$\pm$0.01 & 0.68$\pm$0.03 & 0.198 $\pm$0.020 & 0.187$\pm$0.020 \\
378: 0.60 & +0.40$\pm$0.03 & 0.61$\pm$0.01 & 0.73$\pm$0.01 & 0.218 $\pm$0.004 & 0.208$\pm$0.004 \\
379: 0.62 & $-$0.25$\pm$0.03 &0.62$\pm$0.01 & 0.76$\pm$0.01 & 0.227 $\pm$0.004 & 0.217$\pm$0.004 \\
380: 0.64 & $-$0.77$\pm$0.02 &0.62$\pm$0.01 & 0.77$\pm$0.01 & 0.234 $\pm$0.006 & 0.223$\pm$0.006 \\
381: 0.66 & $-$0.97$\pm$0.01 &0.62$\pm$0.01 & 0.78$\pm$0.01 & 0.236 $\pm$0.008 & 0.226$\pm$0.008 \\
382: \multicolumn{6}{c}{$Z$=0.006, $Y$=0.245}\\
383: 0.54 & +0.97$\pm$0.01 & 0.58$\pm$0.01 & 0.63$\pm$0.10 & 0.172 $\pm$0.070 & 0.160 $\pm$0.070 \\
384: 0.56 & +0.79$\pm$0.02 & 0.58$\pm$0.01 & 0.80$\pm$0.03 & 0.237 $\pm$0.012 & 0.226 $\pm$0.012 \\
385: 0.58 & +0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.84$\pm$0.01 & 0.254 $\pm$0.008 & 0.243 $\pm$0.008 \\
386: 0.60 & $-$0.42$\pm$0.02 &0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.86$\pm$0.01 & 0.261 $\pm$0.004 & 0.250 $\pm$0.004 \\
387: 0.62 & $-$0.86$\pm$0.01 &0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.88$\pm$0.01 & 0.270 $\pm$0.006 & 0.258 $\pm$0.006 \\
388: 0.64 & $-$0.98$\pm$0.01 &0.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.88$\pm$0.03 & 0.270 $\pm$0.032 & 0.259 $\pm$0.032 \\
389: \hline
390: \end{tabular}
391: \end{center}
392: \end{table*}
393:
394:
395:
396: Using the SHBs computed in Paper IV for various chemical compositions,
397: we show in Table 2 some selected predictions based on SHB simulations
398: in which the number of predicted RR Lyrae stars approaches $\sim$ 2\% of
399: the global HB star population. For each assumed chemical composition
400: and mean mass\footnote{The SHBs have been computed by assuming a gaussian
401: random distribution of HB masses centered on $M$(HB) and with a standard
402: deviation $\sigma\sim0.02M_{\odot}$.} $M(HB)$
403: of HB stars, we give the average HB type\footnote{This parameter is
404: the ratio (B$-$R)/(B+V+R) among the
405: numbers of HB stars to the blue (B), within (V) and to the red (R)
406: of the RR Lyrae instability strip (Lee 1990).} and
407: the predicted mean values of the
408: RR Lyrae mass, absolute magnitude, and $k_{ev}$ parameter,
409: together with the rms dispersion about the mean. Note that these
410: mean values are derived by averaging the results of 10
411: different simulations.
412:
413: Data listed in Table 2 (see also Fig. 1) disclose four substantial points:
414: \begin{enumerate}
415: \item the mass range of the predicted RR Lyrae decreases with increasing
416: metal content, when moving from very blue to very red HB type distributions;
417: \item the $k_{ev}$ parameter, at fixed metallicity, attains rather constant
418: values from red to moderately blue HB morphology (i.e., for HB type ranging
419: from $\sim -$0.9 to $\sim$ +0.5), whereas it significantly decreases for
420: the bluer populations;
421: \item the $k_{ev}$ parameter, at constant HB type, increases when moving
422: from low to high metal abundances. However, for HB$\ge$ +0.9 the metallicity
423: effect tends to vanish;
424: \item the size of this metallicity effect varies with the metallicity range.
425: In particular, for HB type $\sim$ 0 we get $\Delta k(1.5)_{ev}\sim$ 0.03
426: for $0.0001 \le Z \le 0.001$ and $\Delta k(1.5)_{ev}\sim$ 0.08
427: for $0.001 \le Z \le 0.006$.
428: \end{enumerate}
429:
430: In summary, the constraints on $k_{ev}$ provided by the evolutionary
431: predictions suggest that the $PA_V$ distribution of RR$_{ab}$ stars in
432: globular clusters depends {\it both on the cluster metal abundance
433: and on the HB morphology}.
434:
435:
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437:
438: \section{Observed $PA_V$ diagrams}
439: \subsection{Galactic globular clusters}
440:
441: \begin{table}
442: \begin{center}
443: \caption{Selected parameters for Galactic globular clusters:
444: HB type, average period of $ab$-type RR Lyrae stars and
445: iron-to-hydrogen content [Fe/H]$_K$ according to the
446: Kraft \& Ivans (2003) metallicity scale. For $\omega$~Cen,
447: we list the average [Fe/H]$_R$ value from Rey et al. (2000) data.}\label{PLCM}
448: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
449: \hline \hline
450: Name & HB & $\langle$log$P_{ab}\rangle$ & [Fe/H]$_K$ \\
451: \hline\\
452: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Oosterhoff type II}\\
453: N4590~(M68) & +0.44 & $-$0.201 & $-$2.43 \\
454: N6426 & +0.58 & $-$0.153 & $-$2.43 \\
455: N7078~(M15) & +0.67 & $-$0.189 & $-$2.42 \\
456: N5053 & +0.52 & $-$0.174 & $-$2.41 \\
457: N6341~(M92) & +0.91 & $-$0.195 & $-$2.38 \\
458: N5466 & +0.58 & $-$0.172 & $-$2.22 \\
459: N5024~(M53) & +0.81 & $-$0.189 & $-$2.02 \\
460: N6809~(M55) & +0.87 & $-$0.181 & $-$1.85 \\
461: N6333~(M9) & +0.87 & $-$0.203 & $-$1.79 \\
462: N7089~(M2) & +0.96 & $-$0.168 & $-$1.56 \\
463: \hline\\
464: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Oosterhoff type I}\\
465: N4147 & +0.55 & $-$0.282 & $-$1.79 \\
466: I4499 & +0.11 & $-$0.238 & $-$1.60 \\
467: N6934 & +0.25 & $-$0.252 & $-$1.59 \\
468: N3201 & +0.08 & $-$0.252 & $-$1.56 \\
469: N5272~(M3) & +0.08 & $-$0.257 & $-$1.50 \\
470: N7006 & $-$0.28 & $-$0.246 & $-$1.48 \\
471: N6715~(M54) & +0.75 & $-$0.237 & $-$1.47 \\
472: N6981~(M72) & +0.14 & $-$0.256 & $-$1.42 \\
473: N6229 & +0.24 & $-$0.270 & $-$1.41 \\
474: N6864~(M75) & $-$0.07 & $-$0.231 & $-$1.29 \\
475: N5904~(M5) & +0.31 & $-$0.263 & $-$1.26 \\
476: N1851 & $-$0.36 & $-$0.241 & $-$1.19 \\
477: N6121~(M4) & $-$0.06 & $-$0.275 & $-$1.15 \\
478: N6362 & $-$0.58 & $-$0.265 & $-$1.15 \\
479: N6723 & $-$0.08 & $-$0.262 & $-$1.11 \\
480: N6171~(M107)& $-$0.73 & $-$0.272 & $-$1.10 \\
481: \hline\\
482: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Peculiar clusters}\\
483: N5139~($\omega$~Cen) &+0.92& $-$0.189 & $-$1.62 \\
484: N6441 &$-$0.73& $-$0.132 & $-$0.85 \\
485: \hline
486: \end{tabular}
487: \end{center}
488: \end{table}
489:
490: \begin{table}
491: \begin{center}
492: \caption{Mean $k(1.5)_{puls}$ and $k(2.0)_{puls}$ values for RR$_{ab}$ stars in Galactic
493: globular clusters.} \label{PLCM}
494: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
495: \hline \hline
496: Name& HB & [Fe/H]$_K$ & $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ & $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$\\
497: \hline\\
498: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Oosterhoff type II}\\
499: N4590 & +0.44 & $-$2.43 & 0.181$\pm$0.026 & 0.118$\pm$0.024 \\
500: N6426 & +0.58 & $-$2.43 & 0.131$\pm$0.018 & 0.068$\pm$0.017 \\
501: N7078 & +0.67 & $-$2.42 & 0.184$\pm$0.030 & 0.118$\pm$0.030 \\
502: N5053 & +0.52 & $-$2.41 & 0.163$\pm$0.045 & 0.095$\pm$0.036 \\
503: N6341 & +0.91 & $-$2.38 & 0.144$\pm$0.026 & 0.089$\pm$0.021 \\
504: N5466 & +0.58 & $-$2.22 & 0.116$\pm$0.041 & 0.063$\pm$0.031 \\
505: N5024 & +0.81 & $-$2.02 & 0.137$\pm$0.029 & 0.080$\pm$0.029 \\
506: N6809 & +0.87 & $-$1.85 & 0.132$\pm$0.024 & 0.077$\pm$0.018 \\
507: N6333 & +0.87 & $-$1.79 & 0.130$\pm$0.017 & 0.080$\pm$0.016 \\
508: N7089 & +0.96 & $-$1.56 & 0.132$\pm$0.031 & 0.073$\pm$0.033 \\
509: \hline\\
510: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Oosterhoff type I}\\
511: N4147 & +0.55 & $-$1.79 & 0.215$\pm$0.021 & 0.164$\pm$0.025 \\
512: I4499 & +0.11 & $-$1.60 & 0.209$\pm$0.036 & 0.149$\pm$0.033 \\
513: N6934 & +0.25 & $-$1.59 & 0.219$\pm$0.037 & 0.160$\pm$0.031 \\
514: N3201 & +0.08 & $-$1.56 & 0.211$\pm$0.042 & 0.154$\pm$0.034 \\
515: N5272 & +0.08 & $-$1.50 & 0.194$\pm$0.032 & 0.142$\pm$0.027 \\
516: N7006 & $-$0.28 & $-$1.48 & 0.222$\pm$0.027 & 0.160$\pm$0.023 \\
517: N6715 & +0.75 & $-$1.47 & 0.220$\pm$0.037 & 0.157$\pm$0.032 \\
518: N6981 & +0.14 & $-$1.42 & 0.244$\pm$0.035 & 0.180$\pm$0.033 \\
519: N6229 & +0.24 & $-$1.41 & 0.219$\pm$0.024 & 0.164$\pm$0.019 \\
520: N6864 & $-$0.07 & $-$1.29 & 0.201$\pm$0.059 & 0.141$\pm$0.055 \\
521: N5904 & +0.31 & $-$1.26 & 0.211$\pm$0.049 & 0.156$\pm$0.048 \\
522: N1851 & $-$0.36 & $-$1.19 & 0.198$\pm$0.040 & 0.141$\pm$0.035 \\
523: N6121 & $-$0.06 & $-$1.15 & 0.184$\pm$0.030 & 0.142$\pm$0.034 \\
524: N6362 & $-$0.58 & $-$1.15 & 0.218$\pm$0.030 & 0.162$\pm$0.029 \\
525: N6723 & $-$0.08 & $-$1.11 & 0.210$\pm$0.049 & 0.155$\pm$0.042 \\
526: N6171 & $-$0.73 & $-$1.10 & 0.239$\pm$0.043 & 0.179$\pm$0.041 \\
527: \hline\\
528: \multicolumn{5}{c}{Peculiar clusters}\\
529: N5139 & +0.92 & $-$1.62 & 0.150$\pm$0.043 & 0.092$\pm$0.052 \\
530: N6441 & $-$0.73 & $-$0.85 & 0.106$\pm$0.025 & 0.048$\pm$0.025 \\
531: \hline
532: \end{tabular}
533: \end{center}
534: \end{table}
535:
536:
537:
538: For the RR Lyrae stars in Galactic globular clusters for which the
539: visual amplitude $A_V$ is available in the literature, Table 3 gives
540: the observed HB type (Harris 2003)\footnote{http://physwww.physics.mcmaster.ca/\%7Eharris/mwgc.dat)},
541: the average period of $RR_{ab}$
542: variables and the iron-to-hydrogen content [Fe/H]$_K$ on the Kraft \& Ivans
543: (2003) metallicity scale. For $\omega$~Cen, whose RR Lyrae stars are
544: characterized by a wide spread in metal abundance, we list the
545: average value ([Fe/H]=$-1.62\pm$0.27) based on Rey et al. (2000)
546: data and the HB type determined by Piersimoni et al. (2007, in
547: preparation). As far as NGC~6441 is concerned, the HB type has been
548: determined by Catelan (2005) although it should be
549: mentioned that this cluster shows a very unusual HB extending from a
550: stubby red to a very blue component (Rich et al. 1997). Moreover,
551: the periods of the observed RR$_{ab}$ variables are too long for the
552: current cluster metallicity, thus hampering a safe Oosterhoff
553: classification (see e.g. Pritzl et al. 2001).
554:
555: \begin{figure}
556: \begin{center}
557: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig2.ps}
558: \caption{The HB type versus the metal content [Fe/H]$_K$ for
559: Oosterhoff type II (OoII, filled circles) and
560: Oosterhoff type I (OoI, open circles) Galactic globular clusters.
561: The error bars have been estimated by assuming $\epsilon (HB)=\pm0.1$
562: and $\epsilon [Fe/H]_K=\pm0.1$ For $\omega$~Cen (asterisk),
563: we plot the average value [Fe/H]$_R=-1.62\pm$0.27 derived by
564: Rey et al. (2000).}
565: \end{center}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568: Figure 2 shows the cluster HB type as a function of the metal
569: content [Fe/H]$_K$. It is worth noticing that even the selected
570: sample of RR Lyrae-rich globular clusters presents the so-called
571: {\it second parameter} problem: in order to account for the observed
572: HB morphology, together with the metal abundance it is required a
573: further intrinsic parameter.
574: However, we also note that OoI and
575: OoII clusters seem to follow quite different behaviors: the HB
576: morphology of the OoI clusters becomes bluer as the metal content
577: decreases, whereas for the latter group the HB morphology becomes
578: bluer as the cluster becomes more metal-rich. As a consequence, the
579: OoII clusters with very blue HB morphology, including $\omega$~Cen,
580: appear to be the ``natural'' extension of OoI clusters to lower
581: metal abundances.
582:
583: \begin{figure}
584: \begin{center}
585: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig3.ps}
586: \caption{Visual amplitude versus period for RR$_{ab}$ stars
587: in Oosterhoff type II (OoII, top panel) and Oosterhoff type I (OoI, bottom panel)
588: globular clusters. The solid line shows the ridge line of variables
589: in OoII clusters and is based on the predicted slope
590: $\delta$log$P_F/\delta A_V=-$0.189.}
591: \end{center}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594: Figure 3 shows the $PA_V$ diagram of the observed RR$_{ab}$ stars
595: in OoII (top panel) and OoI (bottom panel) clusters. The variables
596: in $\omega$ Cen and in NGC~6441 have not been included in this figure
597: and will be discussed separately. The solid line in the top panel is
598: the ridge line of variables in OoII clusters and it was drawn by
599: adopting the predicted slope $\delta$log$P_F/\delta A_V=-$0.189 [see
600: Eq. (3)]. The same line is also plotted in the bottom panel to
601: emphasize that RR Lyrae stars in OoI clusters present systematically shorter period,
602: at fixed pulsation amplitude.
603:
604: \begin{figure}
605: \begin{center}
606: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig4.ps}
607: \caption{The average $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ (bottom panel) and
608: $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ (top panel) values for RR$_{ab}$ stars
609: in Oosterhoff type I (OoI, open circles) and Oosterhoff type II
610: (OoII, filled circles) globular clusters plotted as a function of the
611: cluster HB type.}
612: \end{center}
613: \end{figure}
614:
615: \begin{figure}
616: \begin{center}
617: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig5.ps}
618: \caption{The average $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ (bottom panel) and
619: $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ (top panel) values for RR$_{ab}$ stars
620: in Oosterhoff type I (OoI, open circles) and Oosterhoff type II
621: (OoII) globular clusters as a function of metal abundance. The filled
622: circles mark OoII clusters with HB type ranging from red to
623: moderately blue, while the filled squares refer to those with very
624: blue HB type. The dashed and the dotted lines in the bottom panel
625: display two different choices in the selection of the calibrating
626: clusters. See text for more details.}
627: \end{center}
628: \end{figure}
629:
630:
631: Based on the data plotted in Fig. 3, we derive the average $\langle
632: k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ and $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ values
633: listed in Table 4 together with the their standard deviations.
634: Figures 4 and 5 show these parameters versus the cluster HB type
635: and the metal content [Fe/H]$_K$, respectively. In the latter figure,
636: the OoII clusters are also selected according to the HB morphology.
637:
638: As a whole, we find that:
639: \begin{itemize}
640: \item among the OoI clusters, which have metal abundances
641: from [Fe/H]=$-$1.8 to $-$1.1 and HB types redder than +0.75,
642: neither the $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ nor the
643: $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ parameter show significant variations
644: with [Fe/H] or HB type;
645: \item among the OoII clusters, which have metal abundances ranging
646: from [Fe/H]=$-$2.4 to $-$1.6 and HB types bluer than +0.44, both
647: $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ and $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$
648: present a mild decrease for the clusters with bluer HB morphologies,
649: though they are also the less metal-poor ones of the group;
650: \item for [Fe/H]=$-1.7\pm$0.1, where both OoI and OoII clusters
651: are observed, the former clusters have redder HB types {\it and}
652: larger $\langle k_{puls}\rangle$ values than the latter ones.
653: \end{itemize}
654:
655: Bearing in mind the above discussion on the $k_{ev}$
656: values listed in Table 2, the Bailey diagram of the RR$_{ab}$ stars
657: observed in Galactic globular clusters agrees with the evolutionary
658: prescriptions and does not support the use of a unique $PA_V$ relation
659: for robust metal abundance determinations. The linear fit over the
660: entire dataset plotted in the bottom panel of Fig. 5 gives
661: [Fe/H]$\sim -3.1+7.7k(1.5)_{puls}$. This relation
662: would predict the RR$_{ab}$ metallicity with the unpleasant average
663: uncertainty of $\sim$ 0.4 dex. The intrinsic error becomes even
664: worse if the adopted empirical calibration relies on individual
665: clusters. The use of OoI clusters together with
666: OoII clusters with moderately blue HB morphology yields
667: [Fe/H]$\sim -3.9+11.1k(1.5)_{puls}$ (see the dashed line in the
668: bottom panel of Fig. 5), while the use of OoI clusters together
669: with OoII clusters with very blue HB morphology yields (see
670: the dotted line) [Fe/H]$\sim -2.7+5.8k(1.5)_{puls}$.
671: Note that the application of the former relation to RR$_{ab}$
672: variables in OoII clusters with very blue HB stellar populations
673: would underestimate by $\sim$ 0.7 dex the metallicity of these
674: variables, while the application of the latter relation to
675: RR$_{ab}$ variables in OoII clusters with moderately blue
676: HB stellar populations would overestimate by $\sim$ 0.5 dex
677: the metallicity of the these variables.
678:
679:
680: \subsection{NGC 6441 and $\omega$ Cen}
681:
682: Figure 6 shows the $PA_V$ diagram of $ab$-type variables
683: in NGC~6441 and $\omega$~Cen together with the ridge line
684: of Oo II variables (see Fig. 3). Data plotted in this
685: figure support the evidence that all
686: the RR$_{ab}$ stars in NGC~6441 behave as OoII variables
687: (see also the $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$ and $\langle
688: k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ values listed in Table 4) suggesting
689: that the RR Lyrae metal abundance is significantly lower than the
690: current cluster value. This is at odds with the recent spectroscopic
691: measurements by Clementini et al. (2005) confirming that the
692: RR Lyrae stars in NGC~6441 are metal-rich with [Fe/H]$\sim -0.7\pm 0.3$,
693: on the Zinn \& West (1984) scale (see also Gratton et al. 2007, and
694: references therein) .
695:
696: \begin{figure}
697: \begin{center}
698: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig6.ps}
699: \caption{Same as in Fig. 3, but for RR$_{ab}$ stars in the two peculiar
700: clusters NGC~6441 (triangles) and $\omega$~Cen (asterisks).}
701: \end{center}
702: \end{figure}
703:
704: On the other hand, if the NGC~6441 variables are
705: generated by the very blue HB component, we should expect small
706: $k_{ev}$ values even with large metal abundances. However, even
707: adopting HB$\sim$ +0.97 the SHB simulations for $Z$=0.003 and $Y\sim$ 0.25
708: presented in Table 2 suggest $\langle k(1.5)_{ev}\rangle \sim$ 0.15 and
709: $\langle k(2.0)_{ev}\rangle\sim$ 0.14 which are
710: larger than the observed values. Since $k_{ev}$ significantly depends
711: on the pulsator luminosity, this discrepancy might imply a larger helium
712: content, as recently suggested by Caloi \& D'Antona (2007) who give
713: $Y\sim$ 0.37. However, it is worth mentioning that star counts of HB and
714: red giant branch stars in NGC~6441 provided by Layden et al. (1999) do
715: not support the high helium abundance scenario. The new HB simulations
716: with $Y$=0.30 (Caputo et al. 2007, in preparation) and
717: the modeling of the observed light curves (Clementini \& Marconi 2007,
718: in preparation) will probably shed new lights on the unusual properties
719: of the NGC~6441 RR Lyrae variables.
720:
721: \begin{figure}
722: \begin{center}
723: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig7.ps}
724: \caption{The $k(1.5)_{puls}$ (bottom panel) and the $k(2.0)_{puls}$ (top panel)
725: parameter for RR$_{ab}$ stars in $\omega$~Cen (asterisks) as a function of
726: the metal abundance. Open circles, filled circles, and filled squares display
727: Galactic globular clusters and have the same meaning as in Fig. 5.}
728: \end{center}
729: \end{figure}
730:
731: \begin{figure}
732: \begin{center}
733: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig8.ps}
734: \caption{Distribution of the $k(1.5)_{puls}$ parameter for RR$_{ab}$ stars
735: in $\omega$~Cen (bottom panel) together with OoI and OoII Galactic globular clusters.}
736: \end{center}
737: \end{figure}
738:
739: Regarding the variables in $\omega$~Cen, we plot in
740: Fig. 7 the $k(1.5)_{puls}$ and $k(2.0)_{puls}$ values versus the
741: [Fe/H]$_R$ metal abundance determined by Rey et al. (2000). We note
742: again the quite large dispersion of the metallicity at constant
743: $k_{puls}$, thus stressing once more the misleading use of the
744: Bailey diagram for reliable metal abundance determinations. The
745: comparison with the Galactic globular cluster data presented in Fig.
746: 5, here repeated for the sake of clearness, indicates that the bulk
747: of RR$_{ab}$ stars in $\omega$~Cen behave as the variables in OoII
748: clusters, with a minor fraction sharing the properties of the OoI
749: variables (see also Clement \& Rowe 2000). However, it is worth
750: noticing that, consistently with the $\omega$~Cen HB type, the
751: agreement with the OoII group mainly applies to clusters not very
752: metal-poor and with very blue HB morphology ([Fe/H]$\ge -$2.2 and HB
753: type $\ge$ +0.8, filled squares) since the $k_{puls}$ values typical
754: of the variables observed in clusters with very low metal abundance
755: and moderately blue HB morphology (e.g., M15-like) seem to be
756: absent. The lack of this kind of variables shows up quite clearly
757: from Fig. 8 which shows the frequency distribution of the
758: $k(1.5)_{puls}$ values in $\omega$~Cen (bottom) in comparison with
759: those for OoI and OoII clusters. Note that this result, which holds
760: also if the new metal abundances by Sollima et al. (2006) are
761: adopted, cannot be explained by invoking a significant difference between the
762: Kraft \& Ivans (2003) and the Rey et al. (2000) metallicity scales.
763: By using the Gratton et al. (2004) metal
764: abundance [Fe/H]$_G$ determinations for RR Lyrae stars in NGC~1851,
765: NGC~3201, and in NGC~4590 we get [Fe/H]$_G\sim
766: -$0.48+0.65[Fe/H]$_K$, while for $\omega$~Cen variables we derive
767: [Fe/H]$_G\sim -$0.41+0.71[Fe/H]$_R$. Eventually, we find
768: [Fe/H]$_K\sim$ 0.1+1.1[Fe/H]$_R$.
769:
770: \begin{figure}
771: \begin{center}
772: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig9.ps}
773: \caption{
774: RR$_{ab}$ stars in the solar neighborhood with measured [Fe/H] abundances
775: (top panel; Layden 2007, private communication) and visual amplitudes
776: (bottom panel; Nikolov, Buchantsova \& Frolov 1984). The arrows mark the
777: shortest period observed in OoI and OoII Galactic globular clusters. The
778: solid line shows the predicted ridge line for cluster OoII variables
779: (see Fig. 3).
780: }
781: \end{center}
782: \end{figure}
783:
784: \begin{figure}
785: \begin{center}
786: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig10.ps}
787: \caption{Difference between the observed and the calculated [Fe/H]
788: versus period for all the stars in Fig. 9.}
789: \end{center}
790: \end{figure}
791:
792: \subsection{Field RR$_{ab}$ stars}
793:
794: Figure 9 shows the $PA_V$ diagram of RR$_{ab}$ stars in the solar
795: neighborhood for which [Fe/H] (Layden 1995,1998,2007, hereinafter [L07], private
796: communication) and $A_V$ data (Nikolov, Buchantsova \& Frolov 1984) are
797: available. These stars are a mixture of OoII and OoI variables, with a
798: further population at shorter periods than the OoI limit (see also the
799: analysis of Kinemuchi et al. (2006) of a quite huge sample of field
800: variables.) and [Fe/H]$\sim -$0.5.
801: As a first test, we show in Fig. 10 the difference between the measured
802: metal content [Fe/H]$_L$ and the calculated values [Fe/H]$_A$ from Eq. (1)
803: and [Fe/H]$_S$ from Eq. (2). In both cases, the average difference is
804: $\sim \pm$ 0.3 dex, but the discrepancy for individual variables
805: may be two or three times larger.
806:
807:
808: \begin{figure}
809: \begin{center}
810: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig11.ps}
811: \caption{Residuals to Eq. (3) for all the fundamental
812: models from $Z$=0.0001 to $Z$=0.02.}
813: \end{center}
814: \end{figure}
815:
816:
817: \begin{figure}
818: \begin{center}
819: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig12.ps}
820: \caption{Pulsational parameter $k(1.5)_{puls}$ as a function of metal abundance
821: [Fe/H]$_L$ for all the field RR$_{ab}$ stars plotted in Fig. 9. The average values
822: for Galactic globular clusters (symbols as in Fig. 5) and NGC~6441 (triangle)
823: are also reported.}
824: \end{center}
825: \end{figure}
826:
827: To repeat the procedure adopted for the variables in Galactic globular clusters,
828: we have first verified that Eqs. (3) and (4) hold for fundamental RR Lyrae stars
829: with $Z >$0.006. As shown in Fig. 11, our pulsation models constructed by adopting
830: $l/H_p$=1.5 and $Z$=0.01, 0.02 (Bono et al. 1997) suggest that the constant
831: term in Eq. (3) changes as 0.136+0.06(log$Z$+2.22). On this ground, we determine
832: the $k(1.5)_{puls}$ values plotted in Fig. 12.
833: A glance at the data plotted in this figure discloses three relevant points:
834:
835: \begin{itemize}
836: \item the field stars, at constant $k_{puls}$, show a dispersion in
837: iron abundance that might reach $\pm$ 0.5 dex.
838: \item The $k_{puls}$ parameter steadly decreases, on average, when moving
839: from [Fe/H]$\sim$ 0 to [Fe/H]$\sim -$2, but without any further decrease
840: for the most metal-poor ([Fe/H]$\sim -$2.4) variables;
841: \item The behavior of field stars and Galactic globular clusters, in
842: the metallicity range [Fe/H]=$-$1.0 to $-$2.5, is quite similar.
843: This finding supports the evidence for similar physical and evolutionary
844: properties for field and cluster variables within this metallicity range.
845: \item There is a significant difference between the RR$_{ab}$
846: variables in NGC~6441 and field variables with similar metal content.
847:
848: \end{itemize}
849:
850:
851: \section{Exploiting the $PA_V$ diagram}
852: \subsection{Period-Amplitude-Magnitude relation for RR$_{ab}$ stars}
853: The circumstantial empirical and theoretical evidence
854: discussed in the above sections brought into focus the
855: deceptive use of the Bailey diagram of RR$_{ab}$ stars
856: to estimate metal abundances. Therefore we are now facing
857: the question: is there any possibility to exploit its dependence
858: on the evolutionary status of the variables?
859:
860: It is well known that current updated HB models provide, for fixed
861: helium and metal content, slightly different luminosity values which
862: are due to different assumptions on input physics (see, e.g.,
863: Castellani 2003). On the contrary, the predicted mass of the RR Lyrae
864: stars appears a more safe parameter, with an average variation of
865: $\sim$ 2\% among the various evolutionary prescriptions available
866: in the recent literature. On this ground, it has already been shown in
867: Paper II and Paper III that the coupling between the predicted
868: relations inferred by the pulsation models, where mass and luminosity
869: are free parameters, and the pulsator average mass
870: suggested by SHB simulations provides a reliable ``pulsational''
871: route to the determination of the absolute magnitude of RR Lyrae
872: stars {\it in globular clusters with known metal content and HB
873: morphology}.
874:
875:
876:
877: \begin{figure}
878: \begin{center}
879: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig13.ps}
880: \caption{{\it Left panel:} Mean absolute magnitude of RR$_{ab}$ stars
881: in Galactic globular clusters versus $\langle k_{puls}\rangle$ for $l/H_p$=1.5
882: and by adopting scaled-solar chemical compositions and the solar ratio
883: $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245. The symbols are the same as in Fig. 5. The solid line
884: is Eq. (5), while the dashed lines has a brighter zero-point (0.05 mag).
885: {\it Right panel:} Same as in the left panel, but with
886: $l/H_p$=2.0. The solid line is Eq. (6).}
887: \end{center}
888: \end{figure}
889:
890:
891: \begin{table*}
892: \begin{center}
893: \caption{Average mass $M$(RR) of RR$_{ab}$ stars in Galactic
894: globular clusters inferred by SHB computations, adopting
895: solar-scaled chemical compositions and $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245. These
896: masses are used with Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) to estimate the
897: visual distance moduli $\langle
898: \mu_V\rangle$ and the mean absolute magnitudes
899: $\langle M_V\rangle$ isted in columns (5)-(8).} \label{PLCM}
900: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
901: \hline \hline
902: Name&HB&[Fe/H]$_K$&$M$(RR)&$\mu_V^{k(1.5)}$& $\langle M_V^{k(1.5)}\rangle$ &$\mu_V^{k(2.0)}$&$\langle M_V^{k(2.0)}\rangle$\\
903: \hline\\
904: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Oosterhoff type II}\\
905: N4590 & +0.44& $-$2.43& 0.81& 15.06$\pm$0.09& 0.54$\pm$0.13& 15.21$\pm$0.09& 0.39$\pm$0.13 \\
906: N6426 & +0.58& $-$2.43& 0.80& 17.75$\pm$0.07& 0.42$\pm$0.11& 17.90$\pm$0.06& 0.27$\pm$0.11 \\
907: N7078 & +0.67& $-$2.42& 0.78& 15.23$\pm$0.08& 0.57$\pm$0.10& 15.38$\pm$0.08& 0.41$\pm$0.10 \\
908: N5053 & +0.52& $-$2.41& 0.81& 16.07$\pm$0.10& 0.50$\pm$0.11& 16.23$\pm$0.10& 0.34$\pm$0.11 \\
909: N6341 & +0.91& $-$2.38& 0.72& 14.59$\pm$0.09& 0.48$\pm$0.11& 14.71$\pm$0.08& 0.36$\pm$0.11 \\
910: N5466 & +0.58& $-$2.22& 0.77& 16.06$\pm$0.09& 0.40$\pm$0.11& 16.19$\pm$0.07& 0.27$\pm$0.11 \\
911: N5024 & +0.81& $-$2.02& 0.71& 16.32$\pm$0.07& 0.47$\pm$0.10& 16.45$\pm$0.06& 0.34$\pm$0.10 \\
912: N6809 & +0.87& $-$1.85& 0.69& 13.85$\pm$0.07& 0.47$\pm$0.11& 13.98$\pm$0.05& 0.35$\pm$0.11 \\
913: N6333 & +0.87& $-$1.79& 0.68& 15.72$\pm$0.06& 0.47$\pm$0.10& 15.82$\pm$0.05& 0.36$\pm$0.10 \\
914: N7089 & +0.96& $-$1.56& 0.66& 15.46$\pm$0.09& 0.48$\pm$0.13& 15.59$\pm$0.09& 0.36$\pm$0.13 \\
915: \hline\\
916: \multicolumn{8}{c}{Oosterhoff type I}\\
917: N4147 & +0.55& $-$1.79& 0.71& 16.24$\pm$0.11& 0.67$\pm$0.14& 16.35$\pm$0.11& 0.56$\pm$0.14 \\
918: I4499 & +0.11& $-$1.60& 0.70& 16.99$\pm$0.08& 0.66$\pm$0.10& 17.13$\pm$0.07& 0.52$\pm$0.10 \\
919: N6934 & +0.25& $-$1.59& 0.70& 16.19$\pm$0.12& 0.69$\pm$0.12& 16.32$\pm$0.10& 0.55$\pm$0.12 \\
920: N3201 & +0.08& $-$1.56& 0.70& 14.08$\pm$0.13& 0.67$\pm$0.13& 14.21$\pm$0.12& 0.54$\pm$0.12 \\
921: N5272 & +0.08& $-$1.50& 0.69& 15.00$\pm$0.08& 0.63$\pm$0.10& 15.12$\pm$0.07& 0.51$\pm$0.10 \\
922: N7006 & $-$0.28& $-$1.48& 0.70& 18.11$\pm$0.14& 0.69$\pm$0.15& 18.24$\pm$0.14& 0.55$\pm$0.15 \\
923: N6715 & +0.75& $-$1.47& 0.67& 17.38$\pm$0.08& 0.71$\pm$0.11& 17.52$\pm$0.09& 0.57$\pm$0.11 \\
924: N6981 & +0.14& $-$1.42& 0.68& 16.10$\pm$0.11& 0.76$\pm$0.15& 16.24$\pm$0.11& 0.62$\pm$0.15 \\
925: N6229 & +0.24& $-$1.41& 0.68& 17.35$\pm$0.10& 0.70$\pm$0.13& 17.47$\pm$0.10& 0.58$\pm$0.13 \\
926: N6864 & $-$0.07& $-$1.29& 0.67& 17.02$\pm$0.15& 0.66$\pm$0.16& 17.15$\pm$0.18& 0.52$\pm$0.16 \\
927: N5904 & +0.31& $-$1.26& 0.66& 14.38$\pm$0.09& 0.69$\pm$0.13& 14.50$\pm$0.08& 0.57$\pm$0.13 \\
928: N1851 & $-$0.36& $-$1.19& 0.66& 15.40$\pm$0.12& 0.65$\pm$0.12& 15.52$\pm$0.11& 0.53$\pm$0.12 \\
929: N6121 & $-$0.06& $-$1.15& 0.66& 12.73$\pm$0.06& 0.62$\pm$0.10& 12.82$\pm$0.05& 0.53$\pm$0.10 \\
930: N6362 & $-$0.58& $-$1.15& 0.66& 14.56$\pm$0.06& 0.71$\pm$0.10& 14.68$\pm$0.05& 0.58$\pm$0.10 \\
931: N6723 & $-$0.08& $-$1.11& 0.65& 14.68$\pm$0.13& 0.69$\pm$0.16& 14.80$\pm$0.13& 0.57$\pm$0.16 \\
932: N6171 & $-$0.73& $-$1.10& 0.65& 14.91$\pm$0.14& 0.76$\pm$0.15& 15.04$\pm$0.13& 0.63$\pm$0.15 \\
933: \hline
934: \end{tabular}
935: \end{center}
936: \end{table*}
937:
938:
939: Then, we estimate the average mass of RR Lyrae stars in the selected
940: globular clusters using the SHBs listed in Table 2, under the
941: hypothesis of scaled-solar chemical compositions. In order to transform
942: the measured [Fe/H] value into the global metallicity $Z$, we adopt the
943: solar value $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245 (Grevesse \& Noels 1993) and $f$=1
944: in the relation log$Z$=[Fe/H]$-$1.73+log(0.638$f$+0.362),
945: where $f$ is the enhancement factor of $\alpha$-elements with respect
946: to iron (Salaris et al. 1993). The predicted mass values, which have
947: an intrinsic uncertainty of $\sim$ 2\%, are
948: listed in column (4) of Table 5 and, once inserted into Eqs. (3) and
949: (4), they provide the visual distance moduli $\mu_V^{k(1.5)}$ and
950: $\mu_V^{k(2.0)}$ and the RR$_{ab}$ mean absolute magnitudes
951: $\langle M_V^{k(1.5)}\rangle$ and $\langle M_V^{k(2.0}\rangle$
952: given in columns (5)-(8) in the same Table.
953:
954: Data plotted in Fig. 13, where the error bars are not drawn for
955: the sake of clearness, show the direct consequence of the
956: HB morphology-metallicity progression disclosed in Fig. 2:
957: the RR$_{ab}$ stars
958: observed in OoII clusters with HB type bluer than +0.8 (filled
959: squares) and in OoI clusters (open circles) obey a common
960: relations between the absolute magnitude and the $k_{puls}$ parameter,
961: as given by
962:
963: $$\langle M_V^{k(1.5)}\rangle=0.12(\pm0.10)+2.65(\pm0.07)\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle\eqno(5)$$
964: and
965: $$\langle M_V^{k(2.0)}\rangle=0.14(\pm0.10)+2.67(\pm0.07)\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle,\eqno(6)$$
966: \noindent
967: while for the RR Lyrae variables in OoII clusters with moderately
968: blue HB morphology (filled circles) the zero-points of the above
969: relations (dashed lines) are moderately brighter by $\sim$ 0.05 mag.
970:
971: \begin{table*}
972: \begin{center}
973: \caption{Selected results of SHB simulations with $Z\ge$ 0.002.
974: For each given metal abundance, we list the mean mass of HB stars
975: producing very blue and very red HB types and
976: the corresponding mean mass of RR Lyrae stars.
977: The last column gives the average mass (logarithm)
978: of the predicted RR Lyrae stars for the whole range
979: from HB=+0.95 to HB=$-$0.95. All the mass values
980: hold for old stellar structures (see text).}\label{PLCM}
981: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
982: \hline \hline
983:
984: $Z$&[Fe/H]&$\langle M$(HB)$\rangle$&$\langle M$(RR)$\rangle$&$\langle M$(HB)$\rangle$&
985: $\langle M$(RR)$\rangle$&$\langle$log$M$(RR)$\rangle$\\
986: & & HB=+0.95 & HB=+0.95& HB=$-$0.95 & HB=$-$0.95 & \\
987: \hline
988: 0.002 &$-$0.96& 0.58&0.62$\pm$0.02 & 0.69&0.65$\pm$0.03&$-$0.200$\pm$0.024\\
989: 0.003 &$-$0.79& 0.56&0.60$\pm$0.02 & 0.66&0.62$\pm$0.03&$-$0.217$\pm$0.021\\
990: 0.004 &$-$0.66& 0.55&0.59$\pm$0.02 & 0.65&0.61$\pm$0.02&$-$0.225$\pm$0.013\\
991: 0.006 &$-$0.49& 0.54&0.58$\pm$0.02 & 0.64&0.59$\pm$0.02&$-$0.234$\pm$0.010\\
992: 0.008 &$-$0.37& 0.53&0.56$\pm$0.01 & 0.63&0.58$\pm$0.01&$-$0.245$\pm$0.008\\
993: 0.01 &$-$0.27& 0.52&0.56$\pm$0.01 & 0.62&0.57$\pm$0.01&$-$0.249$\pm$0.007\\
994: 0.02 &$+$0.03& 0.51&0.54$\pm$0.01 & 0.58&0.55$\pm$0.01&$-$0.264$\pm$0.005\\
995: \hline
996: \end{tabular}
997: \end{center}
998: \end{table*}
999:
1000: Regarding the field RR Lyrae stars, we do not know the morphology of the
1001: parent HB star distribution, but luckily enough we can take benefit by the
1002: well-known evidence that, for a fixed age, the predicted
1003: mass range of HB stars populating the RR Lyrae instability strip decreases with
1004: increasing the metal content. This is shown in Table 6, where the data
1005: already presented in Table 2 are implemented by new SHB results at $Y$=0.25
1006: (Caputo et al. 2007, in preparation) based on Pietrinferni et al. (2004, 2006)
1007: HB models produced by RGB progenitor having an age of about 13 Gyr.
1008: Adopting [Fe/H]=1.73+log$Z$, a linear regression through
1009: the average values listed in the last column in this Table gives
1010:
1011: $$\langle \log M(RR)\rangle=-0.265-0.063[Fe/H],\eqno(7)$$
1012: \noindent
1013: with the intrinsic uncertainty given by
1014: $\epsilon (\langle$log$M$(RR)$\rangle)=0.005-0.02$[Fe/H].
1015: According to Eq. (3) and bearing in mind that with larger
1016: metal content than $Z$=0.006 the constant term varies as
1017: 0.136+0.06(log$Z$+2.22), we eventually derive
1018: that the absolute magnitude of RR$_{ab}$ stars
1019: is given by
1020: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=0.56-0.49A_V-2.60\log P+0.05[Fe/H]\eqno(8)$$
1021: with $-1.0\le$[Fe/H]$\le -$0.5 and by
1022: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=0.64-0.49A_V-2.60\log P+0.20[Fe/H]\eqno(9)$$
1023: with $-0.5\le$[Fe/H]$\le$0,
1024: with the magnitude total uncertainty varying as
1025: $\epsilon (M_V)$=0.07$-$0.02[Fe/H].
1026:
1027:
1028:
1029: \subsection{$M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H] relation}
1030:
1031: Many calibrations of the RR Lyrae luminosity as
1032: function of the metal content have been published in the
1033: relevant literature (e.g., see Cacciari \& Clementini 2003
1034: for a summary) and the most recent ones suggest that the $M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H]
1035: is nonlinear for metal abundances ranging from [Fe/H]$\sim -$0.5 to
1036: $-$2.4 (see Sandage 2006; Sandage \& Tammann 2006, and
1037: references therein).
1038:
1039: \begin{figure}
1040: \begin{center}
1041: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig14.ps}
1042: \caption{Mean absolute visual magnitudes $\langle M_V^{k(1.5)}\rangle$
1043: (bottom panel) and $\langle M_V^{k(2.0}\rangle$ (top panel) of
1044: RR$_{ab}$ stars in Galactic globular clusters versus [Fe/H]$_K$,
1045: according to scaled-solar chemical compositions and a solar ratio
1046: $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245.
1047: The symbols are the same as in Fig. 5. The solid line shows the linear
1048: regression through the entire sample and has a slope of 0.20 mag
1049: dex$^{-1}$, while the dashed lines the 1$\sigma$ uncertainty. See text
1050: for more details.}
1051: \end{center}
1052: \end{figure}
1053:
1054:
1055: \begin{figure}
1056: \begin{center}
1057: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig15.ps}
1058: \caption{Absolute visual magnitudes $M_V^{k(1.5)}$ versus [Fe/H]$_L$ for
1059: field RR$_{ab}$ stars more metal-rich than [Fe/H]$_L=-$1.0 in comparison with
1060: Galactic globular cluster variables. Symbols and lines are the same
1061: as in the bottom panel of Fig. 14.}
1062: \end{center}
1063: \end{figure}
1064:
1065: \begin{figure}
1066: \begin{center}
1067: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig16.ps}
1068: \caption{Same as Fig. 14, but with cluster and field data fitted with a
1069: quadratic relation.}
1070: \end{center}
1071: \end{figure}
1072:
1073:
1074: For our selected sample of Galactic globular clusters,
1075: Fig. 14 displays the $PA_V$-based mean absolute magnitude of
1076: RR$_{ab}$ stars (columns (6) and (8) in Table 5)
1077: versus the
1078: cluster metallicity [Fe/H]$_K$. The linear regression over the
1079: entire sample (solid line) yields a slope of 0.20$\pm$0.06 mag
1080: dex$^{-1}$, regardless of the adopted mixing-length parameter,
1081: while the zero-point of the relation changes
1082: from 0.94$\pm$0.10 mag to 0.82$\pm$0.10
1083: mag with $l/H_p$=1.5 and 2.0, respectively. However, the data given
1084: in Table 5 clearly shows that at constant metal content the RR $_{ab}$
1085: luminosity depends on the cluster HB type: e.g., the variables in
1086: NGC~7089 (HB=+0.96) are $\sim$ 0.2 mag brighter than those in
1087: IC~4499, NGC~6934 and NGC~3201, which show a HB type from HB=+0.08 to
1088: +0.25,
1089: yet all these clusters have nearly the same metallicity.
1090: This result is not a novelty
1091: since theoretical (see Paper IV and references therein) and
1092: observational studies (Lee \& Carney 1999; Clement \& Shelton 1999;
1093: Alves, Bond \& Onken 2001) have already suggested that the RR Lyrae absolute
1094: magnitude depends on the cluster HB morphology and metal content.
1095:
1096: The comparison with field RR$_{ab}$ stars
1097: with [Fe/H]$\ge -$1.0 is shown in Fig. 15, where the absolute magnitudes
1098: of the field variables are
1099: determined by using Eqs. (8) and (9). It is quite clear that the linear
1100: $M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H] relation provided by Galactic globular clusters is not
1101: suitable to the most metal-rich ([Fe/H]$\ge -$0.7) field variables. Conversely,
1102: we show in Fig. 16 that over the whole metallicity range of
1103: [Fe/H]=$-$2.5 to $\sim$ 0 {\it all} the variables are nicely fitted
1104: by the quadratic relation
1105: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=1.19(\pm0.10)+0.50[Fe/H]+0.09[Fe/H]^2\eqno(10)$$
1106:
1107:
1108: \begin{figure}
1109: \begin{center}
1110: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig17.ps}
1111: \caption{Unreddened visual magnitude $V_0$ of RR$_{ab}$ stars
1112: in $\omega$~Cen plotted versus $k(1.5)_{puls}$ and $k(2.0)_{puls}$.
1113: The solid line plotted in the left panel refers to Eq. (5) and accounts
1114: for an intrinsic distance modulus $\mu_0$=13.68 mag. The solid line
1115: plotted in the right panel refers to Eq. (6) and accounts for
1116: $\mu_0$=13.80 mag.}
1117: \end{center}
1118: \end{figure}
1119:
1120:
1121: \begin{figure}
1122: \begin{center}
1123: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{PAFig18.ps}
1124: \caption{Comparison between the apparent distance moduli of RR$_c$
1125: variables based on the FOBE method and the RR$_{ab}$ distance moduli based
1126: on the $PA_V$ relation for the two adopted values of the mixing-length
1127: parameter. The data refer to scaled-solar chemical compositions and
1128: to the solar ratio $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245.}
1129: \end{center}
1130: \end{figure}
1131:
1132: \subsection{Which value of the mixing length parameter?}
1133:
1134: We have shown that the value of the mixing length parameter
1135: influences the zero-point of the Period-Amplitude-Magnitude
1136: relation [Eqs. (5) and (6)] and consequently the
1137: $M_V$(RR)-[Fe/H] calibration (see Fig. 14).
1138:
1139: In order to constrain the most appropriate value of the
1140: mixing-length parameter for globular cluster RR$_{ab}$
1141: stars, we show in Fig. 17 the $V_0$ magnitudes of
1142: RR$_{ab}$ stars in $\omega$~Cen (Piersimoni et al. 2007, in
1143: preparation) versus the observed $k(1.5)_{puls}$ and $k(2.0)_{puls}$
1144: parameters. By using Eqs. (5) and (6), we find a cluster intrinsic
1145: distance modulus of $\mu_0$=13.68$\pm$0.10 mag and 13.80$\pm$0.10
1146: mag, respectively. Unfortunately, both these estimates agree within
1147: 1$\sigma$ with the distance $\mu_0$=13.75$\pm0.04$ mag based on the
1148: eclipsing binary OGLEGC-17 (Thompson et al. 2001; Kaluzny et al.
1149: 2002). Therefore, we decided to consider a further pulsational
1150: method, namely the FOBE method (Caputo 1997;
1151: Caputo et al. 2000) which provides the cluster apparent distance modulus by matching the
1152: observed distribution of the RR$_c$ variables in the $V$-log$P$
1153: plane with the predicted blue (hot) edge of
1154: the first-overtone instability region.
1155: The reason of this choice deals with the fact that the FOBE-based
1156: distance modulus $\mu_V$(FOBE) is expected to decrease with
1157: increasing the mixing-length parameter (see Eq. (2) in Paper III),
1158: at variance with the apparent distance $\mu_V(PA_V)$ inferred from
1159: the $PA_V$ relation.
1160:
1161: Figure 18 shows the comparison between the two
1162: sets of distance moduli. We find that for $l/H_p$=1.5 the
1163: $\mu_V$(FOBE) distances are on average larger than those
1164: based on $\mu_V(PA_V)$, whereas the opposite applies for
1165: $l/H_p$=2.0. This evidence indicates that we can adopt
1166: $l/H_p\sim$ 1.7, although the best solution discussed in
1167: Paper III is probably given by a mixing-length parameter
1168: that slightly increases when moving from the blue to the
1169: red side of the instability strip,
1170: i.e., from $c$- to $ab$-type variables. In this context, it is worth
1171: noting that the very recent investigation by Ferraro et al. (2006)
1172: on red giant stars in globular clusters supports a value $l/H_p$=2.0
1173: for these cool stars and a negligible dependence on metallicity.
1174:
1175: Finally, we note that the use of different scalings between the iron
1176: abundance and the global metallicity ($Z$-[Fe/H]) has marginal
1177: effects on the RR$_{ab}$ absolute magnitudes listed in Table 5. As a
1178: matter of fact, by adopting $f$=3 ([$\alpha$/Fe]$\sim$ 0.5) with
1179: $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0245 yields, at fixed [Fe/H], smaller masses by
1180: $\sim$ 6\%, and in turn fainter absolute magnitudes by $\sim$ 0.03
1181: mag, when compared with the values listed in Table 5. The dependence
1182: on the adopted solar ratio is even smaller, and indeed by adopting
1183: $(Z/X)_{\odot}$=0.0165 (Asplund et al. 2004), the mass and magnitude
1184: variations for $f$=1 are only $\sim$ +3\% and $-$0.01 mag, while for
1185: $f$=3 we estimate $\sim -$3\% and $\sim$+0.01 mag, respectively.
1186:
1187:
1188: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1189: \section{Conclusions and final remarks}
1190:
1191: Hydrodynamical models of fundamental RR Lyrae stars computed by adopting
1192: metal content from $Z$=0.0001 to 0.006 and
1193: two different values of the mixing-length parameter ($l/H_p$=1.5 and 2.0)
1194: provide detailed predictions concerning the pulsation parameters connecting
1195: the period with the $V$-band amplitude. In order to investigate the
1196: distribution of cluster RR$_{ab}$ stars in the $PA_V$ diagram, we consider
1197: the following pulsational parameters
1198:
1199: $$k(1.5)_{puls}=0.13-\log P_{ab}-0.189A_V$$
1200: and
1201: $$k(2.0)_{puls}=0.03-\log P_{ab}-0.142A_V,$$
1202: \noindent
1203: and we find that the average values $\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$
1204: and $\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle$ do not show significant changes
1205: among OoI clusters with metal abundances ranging from [Fe/H]=$-$1.8
1206: to $-$1.1 and intermediate to red HB types.
1207: On the other hand, the same parameters present a mild decrease among
1208: the OoII clusters with very blue HB types, even if these clusters are
1209: also the less metal-poor of the group.
1210: Moreover, in the relatively narrow metallicity range [Fe/H]=$-1.7\pm$0.1,
1211: where both OoI and OoII clusters are observed, the former clusters have
1212: redder HB types {\it and} larger $\langle k_{puls}\rangle$ values than
1213: the latter ones.
1214:
1215: A linear fit over the entire sample of globular clusters yields a
1216: [Fe/H]-$k_{puls}$ relation with a large intrinsic dispersion of
1217: $\approx 0.4$ dex. The dispersion becomes even larger if the
1218: calibration relies on selected clusters: if we adopt a mix
1219: of OoI and OoII clusters with moderately blue HB morphology, then
1220: the metal abundance of RR$_{ab}$ in clusters characterized by
1221: a very blue HB morphology will be underestimated by $\approx 0.7$ dex, whereas
1222: if we adopt a mix of OoI and OoII clusters with
1223: very blue HB morphologies the metallicity of RR$_{ab}$ in clusters
1224: characterized by a moderately blue HB morphology will be overestimated
1225: by $\approx 0.5$ dex. This circumstantial evidence casts several doubts
1226: on the use of the $PA_V$ distribution of RR$_{ab}$ variables as a
1227: diagnostic of the metal abundance.
1228: This finding is independently supported by the sizable samples of
1229: RR$_{ab}$ variables in $\omega$ Cen and and in the solar neighborhood
1230: for which are available metal abundance and $V-$band amplitudes.
1231: The distribution of these objects in the $PA_V$ plane shows that
1232: the spread in metal abundance, at constant $k_{puls}$, is of the order
1233: of 0.5 dex.
1234:
1235: By coupling pulsation models and synthetic horizontal branch simulations,
1236: we show that
1237: the pulsation parameter $k_{puls}$ is a reliable distance indicator for
1238: globular clusters with known metal content and HB type. We wish to mention
1239: that the occurrence of a
1240: Period-Luminosity-Amplitude relation for RR$_{ab}$ stars was originally
1241: suggested by Sandage (1981a,b) and that the present use of detailed
1242: evolutionary and pulsational predictions provides the opportunity to
1243: constrain the dependence on the globular cluster HB type and metal
1244: content. On this ground, we
1245: find that the RR$_{ab}$ in OoI clusters and in OoII clusters with HB types
1246: bluer than +0.8 do obey to well defined $M_V$-$k_{puls}$ relations.
1247: In particular, we find
1248: $$\langle M_V^{k(1.5)}\rangle=0.12(\pm0.09)+2.65(\pm0.07)\langle k(1.5)_{puls}\rangle$$
1249: and
1250: $$\langle M_V^{k(2.0)}\rangle=0.14(\pm0.09)+2.67(\pm0.07)\langle k(2.0)_{puls}\rangle,$$
1251: \noindent
1252: while the RR$_{ab}$ in OoII clusters with moderately
1253: blue HB morphology present, at fixed $k_{puls}$, a zero-point that is
1254: $\sim$ 0.05 mag brighter.
1255: Regarding the variables in the solar neighborhood, additional
1256: pulsation models with $l/H_p$=1.5 and
1257: $Z>$0.006 together with the predicted metallicity dependence of the mass of
1258: metal-rich ([Fe/H]$\ge-$1.0) RR Lyrae stars
1259: $$\langle \log M(RR)\rangle=-0.265-0.063[Fe/H]$$
1260: \noindent yield
1261: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=0.56-0.49A_V-2.60\log P+0.05[Fe/H]$$
1262: with $-1.0\le$[Fe/H]$\le -$0.5 and
1263: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=0.64-0.49A_V-2.60\log P+0.20[Fe/H]$$
1264: with $-0.5\le$[Fe/H]$\le$0.
1265:
1266: Once the $PA_V$-based absolute magnitude $M_V$(RR) is derived, the
1267: resulting correlation with the globular cluster metallicity [Fe/H]$_K$
1268: has a slope of 0.20$\pm$0.06 mag dex$^{-1}$,
1269: regardless of the adopted mixing-length parameter, while
1270: the zero-point changes from 0.94$\pm$0.10 to 0.82$\pm$0.10 mag
1271: when using pulsation models constructed by assuming a mixing length
1272: parameter $l/H_p$=1.5 and $l/H_p$=2.0, respectively. However, the inclusion of
1273: the metal-rich field variables yields that over the total metallicity range
1274: from [Fe/H]=$-$2.5 to $\sim$ the relation becomes quadratic as
1275: $$M_V^{k(1.5)}=1.19(\pm0.10)+0.50[Fe/H]+0.09[Fe/H]^2$$
1276: \noindent
1277: in agreement with the results presented by by
1278: Bono et al. (2003) and Sandage (2006).
1279:
1280: Finally, in order to constrain the most appropriate value
1281: of the mixing-length parameter, we adopt the RR$_{ab}$ stars
1282: in $\omega$~Cen, but the $PA_V$-based true distance moduli,
1283: $\mu_0$=13.68$\pm$0.09 mag for $l/H_p$=1.5 and 13.80$\pm$0.09 mag
1284: for $l/H_p$=2.0, agree within 1$\sigma$ with the distance
1285: $\mu_0$=13.75$\pm0.04$ mag based on the eclipsing binary
1286: OGLEGC-17 (Thompson et al. 2001; Kaluzny et al. 2002).
1287: Therefore, we adopt the FOBE method that provides cluster
1288: apparent distance moduli which decrease with increasing the
1289: mixing-length parameter. Eventually, we find that distance
1290: estimates based on the $PA_V$ and on the FOBE method
1291: agree for an intermediate mixing-length parameter, namely
1292: $l/H_p\sim$ 1.7.
1293:
1294:
1295: \begin{acknowledgements}
1296: It is a real pleasure to thank H. Smith for several suggestions
1297: and a detailed reading of an early draft of this paper. We also
1298: warmly thank A. Layden for his valuable data on field RR Lyrae
1299: stars and his helpful comments.
1300: We also acknowledge the anonymous referee for his/her positive
1301: comments and suggestions that helped us to improve the readability
1302: of the manuscript.
1303: This work was partially supported by PRIN-INAF2005 (P.I.: A. Buzzoni),
1304: "Galactic Stellar Populations", by PRIN-INAF2004 (P.I.: M. Bellazzini),
1305: "A hierarchical merging tale told by stars: motions, ages and chemical
1306: compositions within structures and substructures of the Milky Way".
1307: \end{acknowledgements}
1308:
1309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1310: %\begin{references}
1311: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1312: %\pagebreak
1313: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1314:
1315: \bibitem{} Alcock, C., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 2194
1316: \bibitem{} Alves, D. R., Bond, H. E., \& Onken, C. 2001, AJ, 121, 318
1317: \bibitem{} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A.J., Allende Prieto, C., \&
1318: Kiselman, D., 2004, A\&A, 417, 751A
1319: \bibitem{} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Cassisi, S., Incerpi, R., \& Marconi, M. 1997, ApJ, 483, 811
1320: \bibitem{} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., Storm, J., \& Degl'Innocenti, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1097
1321: \bibitem{} Brown, T. M., Ferguson, H. C., Smith, E., Kimble, R. A.,
1322: Sweigart, A. V., Renzini, A., \& Rich, R. M. 2004, AJ, 127, 2738
1323: \bibitem{} Cacciari, C., \& Clementini, G. 2003, in Stellar Candles for the Extragalactic
1324: Distance Scale, ed. D. Alloin \& W. Gieren, (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), LNP, 635, 105
1325: \bibitem{} Caloi, V., \& D'Antona, F. 2007, A\&A, 463, 949
1326: \bibitem{} Caputo, F. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 994
1327: \bibitem{} Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., Ripepi, V. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 819
1328: \bibitem{} Cassisi, S., Castellani, M., Caputo, F. \& Castellani, V. 2004, A\&A,
1329: 426, 641 [Paper IV]
1330: \bibitem{} Castellani, V. 2003, in New Horizons in Globular Cluster Astronomy,
1331: ed. G. Piotto, G. Meylan, S.G. Djorgovski, \& M. Riello (San Francisco: ASP), 159
1332: \bibitem{} Castelli, F., Gratton, R. G., \& Kurucz, R. L., 1997a, A\&A, 318, 841
1333: \bibitem{} Castelli, F., Gratton, R. G., \& Kurucz, R. L., 1997b, A\&A, 324, 432
1334: \bibitem{} Catelan, M. 2005, in Resolved Stellar Populations, ed. D. Valls-Gabaud
1335: \& M. Chavez (San Francisco, ASP), 123
1336: \bibitem{} Catelan, M., Pritzl, B. J. \& Smith, H. A. 2004, ApJS, 154, 633
1337: \bibitem{} Clementini, G., Ripepi, V., Bragaglia, A., Fiorenzano, A. F. Martinez, Held, E. V.,
1338: \& Gratton, R. G. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 734
1339: \bibitem{} Ferraro, F. R., Valenti, E., Straniero, O., Origlia, L. 2006, ApJ, 642, 225
1340: \bibitem{} Clement, C. M., \& Rowe, J. 2000, AJ, 120, 2579
1341: \bibitem{} Clement, C. M., \& Shelton, I. 1999, ApJ, 515, L85
1342: \bibitem{} Demarque, P., Zinn, R., Lee, Y.-W., \& Yi, S. 2000, A J, 119, 1398
1343: \bibitem{} Di Criscienzo, M., Caputo, F., Marconi, M., \& Musella, I. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1357
1344: \bibitem{} Di Criscienzo, M., Marconi, M.. \& Caputo, F., 2004, ApJ, 612, 1092 [Paper III]
1345: \bibitem{} Gratton, R. G., Bragaglia, A., Clementini, G., Carretta, E., Di Fabrizio, L., Maio, M., Taribello, E. 2004, A\&A, 421, 937
1346: \bibitem{} Gratton, R. G., Lucatello, S., Bragaglia, A. et al. 2007, A\&A, 464, 953
1347: \bibitem{} Grevesse, N., \& Noels, A. 1993, Physica Scripta, T47, 133
1348: \bibitem{} Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487
1349: \bibitem{} Kaluzny, J., Thompson, I., Krzeminski, W., Olech, A.,
1350: Pych, W., \& Mochejska, B. 2002, in $\omega$Cen, a Unique Window into Astrophysics, ed.
1351: F. van Leeuwen, J.D. Hughes, G. Piotto (San Francisco: ASP), 155
1352: \bibitem{} Kinemuchi, K., Smith, H. A., Wozniak, P. R., \& McKay, T. A. 2006, AJ, 132, 1202
1353: \bibitem{} Kraft, R. P., \& Ivans, I. I., 2003, PASP, 115, 143
1354: \bibitem{} Layden, A. C. 1995, AJ, 110, 2312
1355: \bibitem{} Layden, A. C. 1998, AJ, 115, 193
1356: \bibitem{} Layden, A. C., Ritter, L. A., Welch, D. L., \& Webb, T. M. A. 1999, AJ, 117, 1313
1357: \bibitem{} Lee, Y.-W. 1990, ApJ, 363, 159
1358: \bibitem{} Lee, J.-W., Carney, B. W. 1999, AJ, 118, 1373
1359: \bibitem{} Marconi, M., Caputo, F., Di Criscienzo, M., \& Castellani, M. 2003, ApJ, 596, 299 [Paper II]
1360: \bibitem{} Nikolov, N., Buchantsova, N., \& Frolov, M. 1984, The
1361: Mean Light and Color (B-V and U-B) of 210 Field RR Lyrae Type Stars
1362: (Sofia: Astron. Council USSR Acad. Sci.)
1363: \bibitem{} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., Castelli, F. 2004, ApJ, 612, 168
1364: \bibitem{} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., Castelli, F. 2006, ApJ, 642, 797
1365: \bibitem{} Preston, G. W. 1959, ApJ, 130, 507
1366: \bibitem{} Pritzl, B. J., Smith, H. A., Catelan, M., \& Sweigart, A. V., 2001, AJ, 122, 2600
1367: \bibitem{} Rey, S.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., Walker, A. R., \& Baird, S. 2000, AJ, 119, 1824
1368: \bibitem{} Rich, R. M., et al. 1997, ApJ, 484, L25
1369: \bibitem{} Salaris, M., Chieffi, A., \& Straniero, O. 1993, \apj, 414, 580
1370: \bibitem{} Sandage, A. 1981a, ApJ, 244, L23
1371: \bibitem{} Sandage, A. 1981b, ApJ, 248, 161
1372: \bibitem{} Sandage, A. 2004, AJ, 128, 858
1373: \bibitem{} Sandage, A. 2006, AJ, 131, 1750
1374: \bibitem{} Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G. A. 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 93
1375: \bibitem{} Sollima, A., Borissova, J., Catelan, M., Smith, H. A., Minniti, D., Cacciari, C.,
1376: \& Ferraro, F. R. 2006, ApJ, 640, L43
1377: \bibitem{} Stellingwerf, R. F. 1984, ApJ, 284, 712
1378: \bibitem{} Thompson, I. B., Kaluzny, J., Pych, W., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 3089
1379: \bibitem{} van Albada, T. S., \& Baker, N. 1971, ApJ, 169, 311
1380: \bibitem{} van Albada, T. S., \& Baker, N. 1973, ApJ, 185, 477
1381: \bibitem{} Zinn, R., \& West, M. J. 1984, ApJS, 55, 45
1382: %\bibitem{}
1383: %\bibitem{}
1384:
1385: \end{thebibliography}
1386:
1387:
1388: \end{document}
1389: