0709.3292/ms.tex
1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}  
2: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: \documentclass{emulateapj} %apt-get update; apt-get install emulateapj
5: \usepackage{apjfonts}
6: 
7: \def\msun{M$_\odot$}
8: \def\mic{$\mu$m}
9: \def\den{$N_{\rm e}$}
10: \def\tem{$T_{\rm e}$}
11: \def\cm{cm$^{-3}$}
12: 
13: \newcommand{\mum}{\ifmmode{\rm \mu m}\else{$\mu$m}\fi}
14: 
15: %\slugcomment{\apjl  Draft v4, 1 - Aug - 2007}
16: 
17: \shorttitle{Ne and S Abundances of PNe in the Magellanic Clouds}
18: \shortauthors{Bernard-Salas et al.}
19: 
20: \begin{document}
21: 
22: 
23: \title{Neon and Sulfur Abundances
24:   of Planetary Nebulae in the  Magellanic Clouds}
25: 
26: \author{J.~Bernard-Salas\altaffilmark{1},
27: S.~R.~Pottasch\altaffilmark{2},
28: S.~Gutenkunst,\altaffilmark{1},
29: P.~W.~Morris\altaffilmark{3},
30: J.~R.~Houck\altaffilmark{1}
31: }
32: 
33: 
34: 
35: %\email{jbs@isc.astro.cornell.edu}
36: 
37: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell
38: University, 222 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853-6801, USA.}
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, 9700 AV, Groningen,
40: The Netherlands.}
41: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA Herschel Science Center, IPAC/Caltech, MS
42: 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125.}
43: 
44: \begin{abstract}
45:   
46:   The chemical abundances of neon and sulfur for 25 planetary nebulae
47:   (PNe) in the Magellanic Clouds are presented. These abundances have
48:   been derived using mainly infrared data from the {\em Spitzer Space
49:     Telescope}.  The implications for the chemical evolution of these
50:   elements are discussed. A comparison with similarly obtained
51:   abundances of Galactic PNe and H\,II regions and Magellanic Clouds
52:   H\,II regions is also given.  The average neon abundances are
53:   6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$ and 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$ for the PNe in the
54:   Large and Small Magellanic Clouds respectively.  These are $\sim$1/3
55:   and 1/6 of the average abundances of Galactic planetary nebulae to
56:   which we compare.  The average sulfur abundances for the LMC and SMC
57:   are respectively 2.7$\times$10$^{-6}$ and 1.0$\times$10$^{-6}$.  The
58:   Ne/S ratio (23.5) is on average higher than the ratio found in
59:   Galactic PNe (16) but the range of values in both data sets is
60:   similar for most of the objects.  The neon abundances found in PNe
61:   and H\,II regions agree with each other. It is possible that a few
62:   (3-4) of the PNe in the sample have experienced some neon
63:   enrichment, but for two of these objects the high Ne/S ratio can be
64:   explained by their very low sulfur abundances.  The neon and sulfur
65:   abundances derived in this paper are also compared to previously
66:   published abundances using optical data and photo-ionization models.
67: 
68: \end{abstract}
69: 
70: \keywords{Infrared: general --- ISM: abundances --- Magellanic Clouds
71:   --- planetary nebulae: general}
72: 
73: 
74: \section{Introduction}
75: 
76: Stars of low- and intermediate-mass ($\sim$1-8~\msun) become planetary
77: nebulae after they evolve off the Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB)
78: \citep{ibe}. In the PN phase the hot central star ionizes the
79: previously ejected material which then emits copious amounts of
80: emission lines of different ions. These emission lines are ideal to
81: study the chemical composition of the gas. The abundances of elements
82: such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen can be used to give information on
83: the nucleosynthesis history of the progenitor star. Other elements,
84: such as neon, sulfur and argon are not supposed to be altered in the
85: course of evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars and are
86: therefore indicators of the chemical composition at the epoch of
87: formation \citep{mar}.
88: 
89: It is for these reasons that PNe have been the subject of many
90: spectroscopic studies over the years.  Due to limitations in the
91: observations, the bulk of this spectroscopic work has been focused on
92: analysing PNe in the Milky Way (MW). However, observations of PNe
93: outside the Galaxy are very important because one can probe different
94: metallicity regions and, unlike Galactic PNe, the distance is known
95: which allows one to relate the abundance to the central star
96: luminosity. During the last years several papers \citep[e.g.][ and
97: references therein]{mag01,mag03,cor05} have been devoted to
98: identifying PNe outside the Galaxy. As a consequence, the number of
99: PNe known in the Local Group keeps increasing.  The Large and Small
100: Magellanic Clouds (hereafter LMC and SMC respectively) are ideal
101: candidates to obtain spectroscopic observations of PNe.
102: 
103: \citet{all81} and \citet{all83} published optical spectroscopic data
104: for 6 PNe in the LMC and 7 in SMC respectively. In a follow-up paper
105: \citet{all87} presented ultraviolet data from the {\em IUE} satellite
106: of 12 PNe in the Magellanic Clouds (MC) and derived abundances for
107: several elements.  Ultraviolet data are essential in order to derive
108: abundances of elements such as carbon and nitrogen. Optical
109: spectroscopy and abundances of 71 MC PNe were presented by
110: \citet{mon88}. In the early 90's \citet{mea91a, mea91b} obtained
111: optical spectroscopy of over a hundred PNe in the MC.  \citet{mor}
112: presented FLAIR spectroscopy of 97 PNe in the LMC which included
113: fluxes of the \ion{[O}{3]}, \ion{[S}{2]}, \ion{[N}{2]}, and
114: \ion{He}{2} lines.  Using optical and IUE data, \citet{pen97} studied
115: a sample of MC PNe with WR nuclei and found that the distribution of
116: spectral type was different from those of Galactic WR-PNe.
117: \citet{sta02,sta03} have characterised optically a large number of PNe
118: in the Magellanic Clouds using {\em HST} observations. And more
119: recently \citet{lei06} have derived the abundances of several elements
120: for a large sample of PNe in the MC using optical data.
121: 
122: Despite their importance, infrared spectroscopic studies of PNe in the
123: MC are scarce in the literature. This is mainly because full
124: integrated spectra in the infrared can only be achieved from space.
125: IRAS detected several PNe in the MC \citep{zij94}, mainly at 12 and
126: 25~$\mu$m, but some of the identifications are dubious. The SWS
127: spectrograph \citep{deg} on board {\em ISO} did an excellent job
128: studying nearby PNe, but it did not have enough sensitivity to allow
129: the study of PNe outside the Galaxy. The {\em Spitzer Space Telescope}
130: \citep{wer} with its increased sensitivity enables us to observe PNe
131: outside the Milky Way \citep[][]{ber06,ber04}. The importance of using
132: infrared lines when deriving abundances has been highlighted by
133: \citet{rub} and we summarize these reasons here. Infrared lines are
134: little affected by extinction as opposed to optical or UV lines.
135: Uncertainties in the electron temperature or fluctuations in the
136: temperature within the nebula are not important when using infrared
137: lines because they originate from levels very close to the ground
138: level.  Additionally many ions emit in the infrared, and therefore the
139: use of ionization correction factors (ICFs) can be greatly reduced by
140: including infrared observations. This is especially true for neon,
141: sulfur and argon.  Finally, and while not discussed in this paper,
142: emission of dust can be studied in this part of the electromagnetic
143: spectrum.
144: 
145: In this paper we present {\it Spitzer} high-resolution spectroscopic
146: observations of 25 PNe in the MC (18 in the LMC and 7 in the SMC).
147: This paper focuses on the emission of fine-structure lines and their
148: use in the abundance determination.  The measured lines are used to
149: derive abundances for sulfur and neon.  These abundances are mainly
150: compared to Galactic PNe abundances from \cite{pot06}, as well as
151: Galactic, MC, M33 and M83 H\,II regions abundances from \citet{leti},
152: \citet{ver}, and \citet{rub07}. All of these abundances have been
153: derived using infrared data and in a similar way to that presented in
154: this paper.  Dust features present in the spectra such as Polycyclic
155: Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and silicates will be discussed in a
156: future paper.
157: 
158: 
159: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
160: \label{obs_s}
161: 
162: The observations were made using the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS)
163: \citep{hou} on board the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} and resulted in
164: high- and low-resolution spectra of 25 PNe.  These observations were
165: part of the GTO program (ID 103) and were taken between March and
166: November 2005.  The object name and AORkey numbers for each
167: observation are given in the first and second columns of
168: Table~\ref{tene_t}. The nomenclature given by \cite{san} is adopted
169: through the paper. In addition, the analysis includes data on
170: SMP~LMC~31, and abundances on SMP~LMC~83 derived by \citet{ber04}.
171: These data were taken during In Orbit Check-Out (IOC). There are two
172: high-resolution modules in the IRS, named Short-High and Long-High (SH
173: and LH respectively). Together, they cover the wavelength region
174: between 10 and 37~$\mu$m at a resolution of 600. The reader should
175: refer to the paper by \citet{hou} for more information on the IRS
176: instrument. We used coordinates given by \citet{sta02, sta03} and
177: \citet{lei97}, and performed blue Peak-Up acquisition on a nearby star
178: to obtain accurate pointing (0.4\arcsec).  Figure~\ref{lmcirac_f}
179: shows the position of the LMC PNe on an IRAC image from the SAGE team
180: \citep[][]{mei}.
181: 
182: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c c}
183:   %\tablecolumns{6}
184:   \tablewidth{0pc}
185:   \tablecaption{Adopted parameters for abundance determination.\label{tene_t}}
186: 
187:   \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{AORkey} &
188:   \colhead{Log(F$_{H\beta}$)\tablenotemark{a,b}} &
189:   \colhead{C$_{H\beta}$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{T$_e$ (K)\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{N$_e$
190:   (cm$^{-3}$)\tablenotemark{a}}}
191: 
192:   \startdata    
193: 
194:   SMP LMC~02  &  4946944  &  -13.18 &  0.06  &   11600  &   3000\tablenotemark{c} \\
195:   SMP LMC~08  &  15902464 &  -13.74 &  0.23  &   11000  &   5500  \\
196:   SMP LMC~11  &  4947712  &  -13.94 &  0.31  &   25000  &   6200  \\ 
197:   SMP LMC~13  &  4947968  &  -12.88 &  0.09  &   13600  &   3800  \\
198:   SMP LMC~28  &  4948224  &  -13.57 &  0.32  &   10000  &   2000  \\
199:   SMP LMC~31  &  7459584  &  -12.92 &  0.54  &   12800  &   6800  \\
200:   SMP LMC~35  &  4948736  &  -12.81 &  0.04  &   13300  &   1600  \\
201:   SMP LMC~36  &  4949248  &  -12.72 &  0.41  &   15000  &   3000\tablenotemark{c} \\
202:   SMP LMC~38  &  12633600 &  -12.62 &  0.21  &   13000  &   9800  \\
203:   SMP LMC~40  &  4949504  &  -13.25 &  0.20  &   13900  &   1100  \\
204:   SMP LMC~53  &  15902720 &  -12.62 &  0.13  &   13700  &   4000  \\
205:   SMP LMC~58  &  4950784  &  -12.54 &  0.11  &   12100  &  20000  \\
206:   SMP LMC~61  &  12633856 &  -12.48 &  0.22  &   10800  &  26000  \\ 
207:   SMP LMC~62  &  4951040  &  -12.30 &  0.07  &   15800  &   4400  \\
208:   SMP LMC~76  &  4951296  &  -12.54 &  0.34  &   11600  &  13600  \\
209:   SMP LMC~78  &  15902208 &  -12.60 &  0.21  &   14200  &   4300  \\
210:   SMP LMC~85  &  4952320  &  -12.42 &  0.26  &   10500  &  31400  \\
211:   SMP LMC~87  &  4952576  &  -12.91 &  0.25  &   19200  &   1900  \\
212:               &		  & 	    &        &          &         \\
213:   SMP SMC~01  &  4953088  &  -12.85 &  0.287 &   11000  &   9600  \\
214:   SMP SMC~03  &  4953600  &  -13.13 &  0.000 &   13800  &   5600  \\
215:   SMP SMC~06  &  4954112  &  -12.80 &  0.385 &   15300  &  14700  \\
216:   SMP SMC~11  &  15902976 &  -12.87 &  0.82  &   17600  &   1100  \\
217:   SMP SMC~22  &  4954624  &  -12.94 &  0.165 &   18800  &   2500  \\
218:   SMP SMC~24  &  15901952 &  -12.66 &  0.047 &   12700  &   1300  \\ 
219:   SMP SMC~28  &  4955136  &  -13.18 &  0.200 &   20300  &   8800  \\  
220: 
221:   \enddata
222: 
223:   \tablenotetext{a}{Values taken from the following references (see
224:     \S~3.2): \citet{lei06, mea88, mea91a, mea91b, sha06, sta02,
225:       sta05, vil03, vil04, woo87}.}
226:   \tablenotetext{b}{Flux in units of erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.}
227:   \tablenotetext{c}{Assumed electron density.}
228: 
229: \end{deluxetable}
230: 
231: \begin{figure}
232:   \begin{center}
233:   \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1.eps}
234:   \end{center}
235:   \caption{IRAC four-band mosaic of the LMC (SAGE) with the positions
236:     of the PNe overlaid on it (circles). The dynamical center of the
237:     LMC as given by \cite{kim} is indicated by the square close to the
238:     center of the figure.
239:     \label{lmcirac_f}}
240: \end{figure}
241: 
242: The data were processed through a copy of the S13.2 version of the
243: {\it Spitzer} Science Center's pipeline which is maintained at Cornell
244: and using a script version of {\it Smart} \citep{hig}.  The reduction
245: started from the {\it droop} images. These are equivalent to the most
246: commonly used {\it bcd} data and only lack the flatfield and
247: stray-cross-light removal (which is only important for bright
248: sources).  Rogue pixels which are especially notorious in the LH
249: module were removed using the {\it irsclean}\footnote{This tool is
250:   available from the SSC web site: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu}
251: tool.  The rogue pixels were first flagged using a campaign mask and
252: then removed. If different cycles (repetitions) were present for a
253: given observation these were combined using the mean to improve the
254: S/N. The 2D-images were extracted using full aperture extraction. The
255: calibration was performed by dividing the resultant spectrum by that
256: of the calibration star $\xi$dra (extracted in the same way as the
257: target) and multiplying by its template \citep[][ and Sloan et al. in
258: prep]{coh}. Finally, glitches which were not present in both nod
259: positions or in the overlapping region between orders were removed
260: manually.
261: 
262: There is an expected mismatch between the SH and LH spectra.  This
263: mismatch is due to differences in the background contribution that
264: falls into the slits because the slit size of the LH module is about
265: 4.6 times larger in area than the SH slit. We do not scale the spectra
266: because we are interested in the line fluxes and the nebulae are
267: contained in both slits. These PNe are not extended at such a
268: distances. Diameters of PNe in the LMC given by \citet{sha01} and
269: \citet{sta99} are usually less than 1\arcsec, and only in a very few
270: cases does the diameter reach 3\arcsec~(still smaller than the SH slit
271: width of 4.5\arcsec). Representative examples of the full extracted
272: high-resolution spectra from 10-37~$\mu$m are shown in
273: Figure~\ref{spectra_f}. 
274: 
275: \begin{figure*}
276:   \begin{center}
277:     \includegraphics[width=15cm]{f2.eps}
278:   \end{center}
279:   \caption{SH and LH spectra of a handful of PNe. The jump around
280:     19.5$\mu$m is due to the larger background contribution that falls
281:     in the LH slit compared to the smaller SH slit (see \S2).\label{spectra_f}}
282: \end{figure*}
283: 
284: \section{Analysis}
285: 
286:   \subsection{Line emission}
287: 
288: 
289:   Figure~\ref{lines_f} shows an inset of the most relevant lines for
290:   the abundance determination present in the spectra of all the
291:   objects.  The sample ranges from PNe showing high excitation to low
292:   excitation lines (e.g.  SMP~LMC~85, SMP~LMC~62). Most of the spectra
293:   show features (PAHs) characteristics of carbon-rich material (e.g.
294:   SMP~LMC~36, SMP~SMC~11 in Fig.~2), except for SMP~LMC~53 and
295:   SMP~LMC~62 (Fig.~\ref{spectra_f}) which show amorphous silicates in
296:   emission at 9 and 18 $\mu$m which is usually an indicator of an
297:   oxygen-rich environment.
298: 
299: \tabletypesize{\small}
300: 
301: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c}
302:   %\tablecolumns{8}
303:   \tablewidth{0pc} 
304:   \tablecaption{Line fluxes\tablenotemark{a}~ of the observed LMC and SMC PNe.\label{line_t}} 
305: 
306:   \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{\ion{[S}{4]}} &
307:     \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{2]}} & \colhead{\ion{[Ar}{5]}} &
308:     \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{5]}} & \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{3]}} &
309:     \colhead{\ion{[S}{3]}} & \colhead{\ion{[O}{4]}} \\
310:     \colhead{} & \colhead{(10.51$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(12.89$\mu$m)} &
311:     \colhead{(13.10$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(14.31$\mu$m)} &
312:     \colhead{(15.55$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(18.73$\mu$m)} &
313:     \colhead{(25.89$\mu$m)}}
314: 
315:     \startdata
316: 
317:     SMP LMC~02  &   $<$0.72  &      1.84  &   $<$0.32  &   $<$0.26  &   $<$0.66  &      0.82  &   $<$0.75  \\ 
318:     SMP LMC~08  &      2.95  &      7.48  &   $<$0.38  &   $<$0.38  &     34.19  &      1.98  &   $<$0.63  \\ 
319:     SMP LMC~11  &   $<$1.08  &      1.89  &   $<$0.77  &   $<$0.69  &      0.67  &   $<$0.68  &   $<$1.38  \\ 
320:     SMP LMC~13  &     12.08  &      0.22\tablenotemark{b} &   $<$0.19  &      0.94  &     12.74  &      2.10  &     55.54  \\ 
321:     SMP LMC~28  &      0.44  &      1.96  &   $<$0.30  &      0.32  &      3.55  &      0.51  &   $<$1.15  \\ 
322:     SMP LMC~31  &   $<$0.75  &     22.45  &   $<$0.31  &   $<$0.17  &      0.38\tablenotemark{b} &      0.99  &   $<$1.09  \\ 
323:     SMP LMC~35  &     10.29  &      0.48  &   $<$0.19  &      0.20\tablenotemark{b} &     16.53  &      1.87  &     27.22  \\ 
324:     SMP LMC~36  &     12.75\tablenotemark{b} &      1.34  &      0.52  &     25.37  &     36.35  &      1.83  &     22.31\tablenotemark{b} \\ 
325:     SMP LMC~38  &     12.96\tablenotemark{b} &      2.57  &   $<$0.24  &   $<$0.31  &     48.67  &      3.80  &   $<$1.53  \\ 
326:     SMP LMC~40  &      2.96  &      0.87  &   $<$0.24  &      2.59  &      6.29  &      1.33  &     24.04  \\ 
327:     SMP LMC~53  &     20.55  &      0.90  &   $<$0.23  &   $<$0.26  &     26.17  &      4.57  &   $<$1.49  \\ 
328:     SMP LMC~58  &      2.92  &      2.06  &   $<$0.24  &   $<$0.38  &     20.06  &      1.10  &   $<$2.16  \\ 
329:     SMP LMC~61  &      7.59  &      6.11  &   $<$0.46  &   $<$0.35  &     30.09  &      6.36  &   $<$0.59  \\ 
330:     SMP LMC~62  &     27.80  &      1.41  &      1.24  &     28.80  &     32.06  &      6.47  &     38.91  \\ 
331:     SMP LMC~76  &      4.05  &      2.28  &   $<$0.29  &   $<$0.23  &     20.66  &      2.33  &   $<$0.42  \\ 
332:     SMP LMC~78  &     25.63  &      1.92  &      0.94  &     26.83  &     46.13  &      5.83  &     47.39  \\ 
333:     SMP LMC~85  &      1.85  &     13.15  &   $<$0.27  &   $<$0.40  &     16.53  &      2.33  &   $<$0.86  \\ 
334:     SMP LMC~87  &     11.39  &      3.63  &      0.75  &     12.53  &     11.28  &      4.58  &     39.53  \\ 
335:                 &            &            &            &            &            &            &            \\ 
336:     SMP SMC~01  &   $<$0.53  &      8.10  &   $<$0.29  &   $<$0.34  &      2.89  &      0.63  &   $<$0.66  \\ 
337:     SMP SMC~03  &      2.11  &   $<$0.35  &   $<$0.32  &   $<$0.24  &      3.09  &   $<$0.48  &   $<$1.25  \\ 
338:     SMP SMC~06  &      4.41  &      0.95  &   $<$0.23  &   $<$0.36  &     14.87  &      0.92  &   $<$0.65  \\ 
339:     SMP SMC~11  &      3.76  &     13.44  &   $<$0.30  &   $<$0.37  &      8.19  &     12.67  &   $<$1.18  \\ 
340:     SMP SMC~22  &      1.67  &      1.30  &   $<$0.30  &      3.60  &      2.53  &      1.25\tablenotemark{b} &      7.44  \\ 
341:     SMP SMC~24  &      1.52  &      1.82  &   $<$0.33  &   $<$0.25  &      7.46  &      2.28  &   $<$0.84  \\ 
342:     SMP SMC~28  &      1.53\tablenotemark{b} &      0.43  &   $<$0.24  &      2.53  &      1.70  &      0.47  &      1.29\tablenotemark{b} \\ 
343: 
344:      \enddata
345:     
346:      \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes in units of $\times$10$^{-14}$
347:        erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. Unless otherwise indicated, the
348:        uncertainties are less than 10\% for all the lines except the
349:        \ion{[S}{4]} line flux which has an uncertainty between 10 and
350:        20\%.}
351: 
352:      \tablenotetext{b}{These lines have uncertainties in the flux
353:        between 20 and 30\%, except for the \ion{[O}{4]} line in
354:        SMP~SMC~28 where the error is 42\%.}
355:   \end{deluxetable*}
356: 
357: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
358: 
359: 
360: \begin{figure*}
361:   \begin{center}
362:     \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3a.eps}
363:   \end{center}
364:   \caption{Inset of the \ion{[S}{4]}, \ion{[Ne}{2]}, \ion{[Ne}{5]},
365:     \ion{[Ne}{3]}, and \ion{[S}{3]} fine-structure lines for each
366:     object, except for SMP~LMC~11 because this spectrum was shown in
367:     \citet{ber06}. The vertical dashed lines indicate the nominal
368:     position of the lines in the vacuum.\label{lines_f}}
369: \end{figure*}
370: 
371: \setcounter{figure}{2}
372: 
373: \begin{figure*}
374:   \begin{center}
375:     \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3b.eps}
376:   \end{center}
377:   \caption{Continued.}
378: \end{figure*}
379: 
380: \setcounter{figure}{2}
381: 
382: \begin{figure*}
383:   \begin{center}
384:     \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3c.eps}
385:   \end{center}
386:   \caption{Continued.}
387: \end{figure*}
388: 
389: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3b.eps}}
390: %\centerline{Fig. 3. --- Continued.}
391: %
392: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3c.eps}}
393: %\centerline{Fig. 3. --- Continued.}
394: 
395: 
396: The line fluxes are listed in Table~\ref{line_t}. In addition to the
397: lines listed in this table, other lines such as \ion{[Mg}{5]} at
398: 13.52~$\mu$m have been measured for the PNe with higher S/N. The
399: \ion{[S}{3]} 33.48~$\mu$m line is always detected when the 18.7~$\mu$m
400: is present, but because the spectrum is noisier at the long wavelength
401: end of the LH module (see Fig.\ref{spectra_f}) we preferred to use the
402: 18.71~$\mu$m line flux for the abundance determination of this ion
403: which also has a larger transition probability and critical density.
404: Similarly we favored the use of the \ion{[Ne}{3]} 15.55~$\mu$m line
405: instead of the 36.0~$\mu$m line when both were measured.
406: Table~\ref{line_t} also includes (mostly) upper-limits on the argon
407: line at 13.1~$\mu$m.  Although not shown in this paper, the
408: \ion{[Ar}{3]} line at 8.99~$\mu$m is detected in 9 objects in the
409: low-resolution spectra, and the \ion{[Ar}{2]} 6.99~$\mu$m line in 2
410: objects.  The line fluxes were measured using the Gaussian
411: line-fitting routine in {\it Smart}.  These were derived for each nod
412: independently. The uncertainty in the fluxes was assumed to be the
413: largest of either the difference between the flux in the {\em nod}
414: positions, or the uncertainty in the fit.  These errors are given as
415: footnotes in the Table. The upper-limits were calculated from a
416: Gaussian fit with height 3 times the {\em rms} and a FWHM as given by
417: the resolution of the instrument.
418: 
419: 
420:   \subsection{Assumed parameters}
421: 
422:   Table~\ref{tene_t} lists the H$\beta$ flux, extinction, electron
423:   density (N$_{e}$) and electron temperature (T$_{e}$) assumed to
424:   calculate the abundances. These values were compiled from a large
425:   list of references which are given in the footnote of the table.
426:   When several values were given by different authors an average was
427:   used. Only in the cases where several values differed by a large
428:   amount (i.e. SMP~LMC~87, SMP~SMC~11), we assumed those we estimate
429:   are more accurate. The infrared lines are little affected by
430:   uncertainties in the T$_{e}$ and extinction corrections but the
431:   abundances relative to hydrogen are derived using optical
432:   measurements of H$\beta$ which are affected by these factors. The
433:   extinction law used is that of \citet{flu}. In two cases no N$_{e}$
434:   was reported and we assumed a value of 3000~cm$^{-3}$ which seems a
435:   reasonable value in view of the other measurements.
436: 
437:   \subsection{Abundance determination}
438: 
439:   Using the above parameters, the ionic abundances were computed from
440:   the infrared line intensities using Eq.~1 of \citet{ber01}. The
441:   results are shown in Table~3. The total abundances are also given in
442:   this table, where sometimes a correction due to missing ionization
443:   stages is necessary.
444: 
445:   For the sulfur abundance the addition of S$^+$, S$^{+2}$ and
446:   S$^{+3}$ is sufficient for those nebulae for which no \ion{O}{4} is
447:   observed. The S$^{+}$ abundance was determined using the optical
448:   lines of S$^{+}$ measured by \citet{mea91a, mea91b} and
449:   \citet{sta02,sta03}.  The contribution from this ion is usually
450:   small and in the order of what it is found in Galactic PNe. For the PNe which show the
451:   \ion{O}{4} line we must take into account the possibility that
452:   S$^{+4}$ is present.  An estimate may be obtained by looking at
453:   the two photo-ionization models of Me2-1 \citep{sur04} and NGC 6886
454:   \citep{pot05}. Both of these PNe are excited by high temperature
455:   stars (with T$_{eff}$ between 140\,000 and 180\,000~K) and both show
456:   \ion{O}{4} lines. In addition, Me2-1 has lower average abundances
457:   compared to Galactic PNe which are closer to the nebulae studied
458:   here.  Both models give similar results and show that S$^{+4}$
459:   contributes between 7 and 23\% of the total sulfur abundance based
460:   on the S$^{+4}$/S$^{+3}$ ratio.  We have used these numbers to
461:   correct the sulfur abundances in Table~3.
462: 
463:   In the case of neon no \ion{Ne}{4} line has been observed. For those PNe
464:   which do not show an \ion{O}{4} line it is unlikely that there is
465:   any Ne$^{+3}$ because it requires a higher energy radiation field
466:   than does \ion{O}{4}. For those PNe which do show the \ion{O}{4}
467:   line (7 in the LMC and 2 in the SMC) a correction must be made. This
468:   can be done in two ways. First, using the same models as for sulfur
469:   we obtain a contribution of Ne$^{+3}$ that varies from 2 to 33\%
470:   of the total neon abundance depending on the strength of the
471:   \ion{Ne}{5} line. A second way of determining the correction could
472:   be done by looking at the neon abundances in the sample studied by
473:   \cite{pot06}. This study made use of the same infrared lines as used
474:   here and had both \ion{Ne}{3} and \ion{Ne}{5} lines, but the
475:   ultraviolet lines of \ion{Ne}{4} at 2422 \AA~were also observed so
476:   that Ne$^{+3}$ could also be determined. For these PNe the
477:   Ne$^{+3}$ abundance was on average 21\% of the total neon
478:   abundance and 35\% of the sum of Ne$^{+2}$ and Ne$^{+4}$.  To be
479:   consistent with the sulfur abundance we have used the first method,
480:   but the results using the second method would result in the same
481:   values within the expected errors. The total neon abundances are
482:   given in Table~3.
483: 
484:   The uncertainty in the values of both the Ne$^{+3}$ and S$^{+4}$
485:   abundances is probably not more than a factor of 2. This leads to a
486:   maximum error for sulfur and neon of about 30\% from this source. In
487:   addition uncertainties of measurement of the other ions in the
488:   infrared are about 10\% with only a few exceptions (see footnote in
489:   Table~2). The error in the optical lines we used is of the same
490:   order. In addition an error in the extinction affects the H$\beta$
491:   flux and uncertainties in the electron temperature dominate the
492:   uncertainty in our abundance determination. By comparing the optical
493:   measurements for the same objects by different observers in the
494:   literature, which usually agree, we estimate that the total error
495:   remains within 50\% except for SMP~LMC~08 and SMP~SMC~11. The
496:   abundances of SMP~LMC~08 are uncertain probably because of the assumed
497:   H$\beta$ flux. (see \S5.3). In SMP~SMC~11 the uncertainty is dominated by
498:   the inconsistent H$\beta$ flux and extinction quoted in the literature
499:   and for the purpose of this paper the most recent values given in
500:   the literature have been adopted.
501: 
502: 
503: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c c c c c}
504: \tabletypesize{\small}
505:   \tablecolumns{12}
506:   \tablewidth{0pc} 
507:   \tablecaption{Neon and Sulfur abundances\tablenotemark{a}.\label{abun_t}} 
508: 
509:   \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{Ne$^{+}$/H} &
510:     \colhead{Ne$^{+2}$/H}  & \colhead{Ne$^{+4}$/H} &
511:     \colhead{ICF} & \colhead{Ne/H} & \colhead{S$^{+}$/H} &
512:     \colhead{S$^{+2}$/H} & \colhead{S$^{+3}$/H} &
513:     \colhead{ICF} & \colhead{S/H} & \colhead{Ne/S}}
514: 
515:   \startdata
516: 
517: 
518: SMP~LMC~02  &    3.14 &$<$0.55 &        &   1    &     3.41 &          &   1.26 &$<$0.22 &   1     &   1.37 &   25 \\ 
519: SMP~LMC~08\tablenotemark{c}  &   32.10 &  73.60 &        &   1    &   105.70 &          &   9.06 &   2.64 &   1     &  11.70 &   90 \\ 
520: SMP~LMC~11  &    4.56 &        &        &   1    &     4.56 &          &        &        &         &        &       \\
521: SMP~LMC~13  &    0.17 &   4.81 &   0.05 &   1.02 &     5.12 &     0.14 &   1.46 &   1.75 &   1.20  &   4.01 &   13 \\ 
522: SMP~LMC~28  &    4.68 &   4.11 &   0.45 &   1.09 &    10.06 &     0.79 &   1.06 &   0.19 &   1     &   2.03 &   49 \\ 
523: SMP~LMC~31  &    6.95 &   0.06 &        &   1    &     7.01 &     0.13 &   0.34 &$<$0.05 &   1     &   0.47 &  148 \\ 
524: SMP~LMC~35  &    0.35 &   5.86 &        &   1    &     6.21 &     0.11 &   1.10 &   1.28 &   1.19  &   2.97 &   21 \\ 
525: SMP~LMC~36  &    0.32 &   4.36 &   0.46 &   1.18 &     5.96 &          &   0.38 &   0.58 &   1.23  &   1.18 &   51 \\ 
526: SMP~LMC~38  &    0.84 &   8.25 &        &   1    &     9.09 &     0.29 &   1.62 &   1.04 &   1     &   2.95 &   31 \\ 
527: SMP~LMC~40  &    1.19 &   4.19 &   0.24 &   1.08 &     6.06 &     0.53 &   1.45 &   0.68 &   1.10  &   2.92 &   21 \\ 
528: SMP~LMC~53  &    0.34 &   4.95 &        &   1    &     5.29 &     0.29 &   1.61 &   1.51 &   1     &   3.41 &   16 \\ 
529: SMP~LMC~58  &    0.74 &   3.95 &        &   1    &     4.69 &     0.05 &   0.79 &   0.35 &   1     &   1.18 &   40 \\ 
530: SMP~LMC~61  &    1.54 &   4.34 &        &   1    &     5.88 &     0.79 &   3.99 &   0.75 &   1     &   5.53 &   11 \\ 
531: SMP~LMC~62  &    0.27 &   3.11 &   0.44 &   1.23 &     4.61 &     0.22 &   1.15 &   1.22 &   1.18  &   3.05 &   15 \\ 
532: SMP~LMC~76  &    0.48 &   2.33 &        &   1    &     2.81 &     0.19 &   0.79 &   0.24 &   1     &   1.22 &   23 \\ 
533: SMP~LMC~78  &    0.57 &   6.87 &   0.60 &   1.14 &     9.11 &     0.17 &   1.63 &   1.50 &   1.17  &   3.87 &   24 \\ 
534: SMP~LMC~85  &    2.70 &   1.98 &        &   1    &     4.68 &     0.40 &   1.37 &   0.17 &   1     &   1.94 &   24 \\ 
535: SMP~LMC~87  &    1.59 &   2.45 &   0.46 &   1.20 &     5.32 &     0.49 &   1.55 &   0.90 &   1.12  &   3.28 &   16 \\ 
536: $<$LMC$>$\tablenotemark{b} &          &        &        &        &     6.03 &          &        &        &        &     2.72 &     2.2  \\
537: SMP~SMC~01  &    3.97 &   0.73 &        &   1    &     4.70 &     0.04 &   0.41 &$<$0.06 &   1     &   0.46 &  103 \\ 
538: SMP~SMC~03  & $<$0.58 &   2.58 &        &   1    &     2.87 &     0.18 &$<$0.35 &   0.71 &   1     &   1.07 &   29 \\ 
539: SMP~SMC~06  &    0.30 &   2.48 &        &   1    &     2.78 &     0.07 &   0.44 &   0.39 &   1     &   0.90 &   31 \\ 
540: SMP~SMC~11\tablenotemark{c}  &    1.62 &   0.48 &        &   1    &     2.10 &     0.01 &   1.16 &   0.08 &   1     &   1.25 &   17 \\ 
541: SMP~SMC~22  &    0.76 &   0.74 &   0.17 &   1.21 &     1.98 &     0.23 &   0.58 &   0.18 &   1.07  &   1.06 &   19 \\ 
542: SMP~SMC~24  &    0.94 &   1.87 &        &   1    &     2.81 &     0.08 &   0.95 &   0.13 &   1     &   1.17 &   24 \\ 
543: SMP~SMC~28  &    0.37 &   0.76 &   0.21 &   1.33 &     1.71 &     0.23 &   0.45 &   0.31 &   1.12  &   1.10 &   16 \\ 
544: $<$SMC$>$ &          &        &        &        &     2.71 &          &        &        &         &   1.00 &   27 \\
545: 
546:   \enddata
547:   \tablenotetext{a}{The neon and sulfur abundances are in
548:     $\times$10$^{-5}$ and $\times$10$^{-6}$ respectively.}
549:   \tablenotetext{b}{The average also includes SMP~LMC~83 from \citet{ber04}.}
550:   \tablenotetext{c}{Large uncertainty in the abundance (see \S3.3).}
551: \end{deluxetable*}
552: 
553: 
554: 
555: \section{Comparison Sources}
556: 
557: This section describes the sources to which the MC PN abundances are
558: compared in \S5.2. These comparison sources include Galactic PNe,
559: Galactic, MC, M33 and M83 H\,II regions, and the solar abundance.
560: 
561:   \subsection{Solar values}
562: 
563:   The solar carbon, oxygen, sulfur, argon and neon abundances have
564:   been subject to significant changes, especially during the last
565:   seven years. These changes reflect in some way the difficulty in
566:   deriving solar abundances. The neon and argon abundances are
567:   especially troublesome because there are no lines of these elements
568:   in the solar photosphere and their abundances must be derived from
569:   coronal lines.  \citet{asp05} quoted a neon value of
570:   6.9$\times$10$^{-5}$ using the oxygen solar abundance and assuming a
571:   ratio of the Ne/O of 0.15.  Previously, \citet{fel} using coronal
572:   line measurements found a neon abundance of 1.2$\times$10$^{-4}$.
573:   This value is much higher than the value by \citet{asp05} but agrees
574:   better with the earlier values reported by \citet{gre98}.  This
575:   discrepancy is important in the debate over the consistency of the
576:   helioseismological measurements and the solar model \citep{ant,bah}.
577:   The neon abundance derived by \citet{pot06} in a sample of Galactic
578:   PNe is more consistent with the higher neon value of \citet{fel}.
579:   Very recently \cite{lan07} derived a value of 1.29$\times$10$^{-4}$,
580:   again higher than the value given by \citet{asp05} and in very good
581:   agreement to the previous values reported \cite{fel} and
582:   \cite{gre98}.  The quoted value of the solar sulfur abundance has
583:   been decreasing in the last years.  The sulfur abundance derived by
584:   \citet{gre} is 1.4$\times$10$^{-5}$ while \citet{asp05} find
585:   0.94$\times$10$^{-5}$.  Given these discrepancies, in the rest of
586:   the paper instead of assuming a certain value we will refer and
587:   compare to the above range of solar values.
588: 
589:   \subsection{PNe and H\,II regions}
590:   
591:   For comparison purposes we have selected a sample of PNe and H\,II
592:   regions for which abundances were also derived from infrared data
593:   and in a similar way to the PNe presented in this paper. The
594:   Galactic PNe abundances in \citet{pot06} using ISO data have been
595:   complemented with the Spitzer derived abundances of IC\,2448
596:   \citep{shannon}, M\,1-42 \citep{pot07}, and NGC\,2392 (Pottasch et
597:   al., in prep).  Galactic and MC H\,II regions were taken from
598:   \citet{leti} and \citet{ver} respectively. They include ISO derived
599:   abundances from 26 H\,II regions in the Milky Way, 13 in the LMC,
600:   and 3 in the SMC. The Spitzer abundances in Lebouteiller et al.\,(in
601:   prep) of the giant H\,II regions NGC\,3603 (in the MW), 30 Doradus
602:   (LMC), and NGC\,346 (SMC) are also included. While Lebouteiller et
603:   al. (in prep) derive abundances at several positions in each region,
604:   the calculated abundances are very similar for a given region and
605:   here we adopt their average value.  \citet{rub07} derived recently
606:   the Ne/S abundance ratio of H\,II regions in M83 using Spitzer data
607:   but the absolute values are not given. The same authors are working
608:   on a study of H\,II regions in M33 and we use their neon and sulfur
609:   abundance ranges\footnote{These abundances were presented in the
610:     Xiang Shan workshop in 2007 (http://ast.pku.edu.cn/~xs2007/).} in
611:   Figure~5.
612: 
613: 
614: \section{Discussion}
615: 
616:   \subsection{Neon, Sulfur and the Ne/S ratio}
617: 
618:   Neon and sulfur are alpha-process elements and therefore 
619:   should track each other.  Their abundances are representative of the
620:   chemical composition of the cloud from which they formed. Recent
621:   work has suggested that some PNe may produce neon in the course of
622:   evolution \citep{mar}. \cite{lei06} claim that because their derived
623:   oxygen and neon abundances correlate with each other that when oxygen
624:   is enriched neon must be also self-enriched in their MC sample.
625:   According to the theoretical models of \citet{kar03} this enrichment
626:   is modest and the mass range at which neon production in low- and
627:   intermediate mass stars may occur is very small (around 3\msun).
628:   Thus statistically few PNe should experience such an effect.
629: 
630:   From the LMC abundances listed in Table~\ref{abun_t} SMP~LMC~08
631:   shows unusually high abundances of neon and sulfur.  Except for
632:   SMP~LMC~11, this PN has the lowest H$\beta$ flux of the LMC sample
633:   (see Table~\ref{tene_t}), and it is likely that the high abundances
634:   are in part the result of this low H$\beta$ flux which we use to
635:   derive the abundance. The neon enrichment predicted by \citep{kar03,
636:     mar} is not large enough to predict such high values.  The lowest
637:   neon abundance corresponds to SMP~LMC~76 which also has a low sulfur
638:   abundance compared to the rest of objects (but not the lowest). The
639:   neon abundance of SMP~LMC~11 has been derived using only the
640:   Ne$^{+}$ stage of ionization. This is a very low excitation
641:   object, and has been described as a pre-planetary nebula by
642:   \cite{ber06} due to its very peculiar infrared spectrum which shows,
643:   among others features, molecular absorption bands of acetylene and
644:   poly-acetylene.  There are no \ion{[Ne}{3]} or \ion{[S}{3]} and
645:   \ion{[S}{4]} lines in the IRS spectrum.
646: 
647:   Not including SMP~LMC~08, the average neon abundance of the PNe in
648:   the LMC is 6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$, which is 1/2.7 of the average neon
649:   abundance of Galactic PNe (1.6$\times$10$^{-4}$) used as comparison
650:   (\S4.2).  The mean sulfur abundance is 2.7$\times$10$^{-6}$, which
651:   yields a slightly lower ratio of 1/3.7 when compared to the average
652:   value of Galactic PNe (0.99$\times$10$^{-5}$).  The SMC sample
653:   contains only 7 objects. Although this is a small number to attempt
654:   statistics it can be seen in Table~3 that the sulfur and especially
655:   the neon abundances are very similar in most of the SMC objects.
656:   The mean neon abundance of the SMC PNe is 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$,
657:   which is 1/6.0 of the average neon abundance in Galactic PNe. The
658:   sulfur abundance in the SMC PNe is also low, 1/10 of the average
659:   Galactic PNe sulfur abundance. Thus, keeping in mind that the SMC
660:   sample contains only a few objects, it seems that either the sulfur
661:   abundance in MC PNe is lower than in Galactic PNe or the neon
662:   abundance higher.
663: 
664:   Figure~\ref{nes_f} is a plot of the Ne/S ratio against the neon
665:   abundance (as an indicator of metallicity) for PNe (top) and H\,II
666:   regions (bottom).  This abundance ratio has the advantage over the
667:   elemental abundance measurements in that any uncertainty introduced
668:   by combining infrared measurements with optical hydrogen measurements
669:   cancels out, and uncertainties in T$_{e}$ are much reduced. Also
670:   plotted are the median values for the different data sets. The
671:   figure shows that most of the MC PNe have ratios between 15 and 30
672:   (with a median value of 23.5), with SMC and LMC PNe displaying a
673:   similar range of values. This range is similar to the ratio
674:   displayed by Galactic PNe (7.5-32), although as we saw before the MC
675:   PNe have a slightly higher ratio (solid and dashed lines in the
676:   figure). The Ne/S ratio in Galactic H\,II regions ranges from 10 to
677:   50 with a median value of 21 (dotted-dashed line in
678:   Fig.~\ref{nes_f}) and agrees very well with the MC PNe. The MC H\,II
679:   regions have on average a lower Ne/S ratio but the number of sources
680:   is not very large.  The H\,II regions studied by \citet{rub07} in
681:   the metal-rich galaxy M83 have Ne/S ratios that vary from 24.4 to
682:   41.9 and thus are similar to the ratios shown by the MC PNe. In
683:   summary, the Ne/S ratios show large variations within each dataset.
684:   The fact that most LMC/SMC PNe show values which are similar to
685:   Galactic PNe and different H\,II regions implies that these elements
686:   have a common origin and if any enrichment of neon has occurred it
687:   has remained modest. This agrees with the result of \cite{dop97} who
688:   find no sign of dredge-up of $^{22}$Ne in their sample of LMC PNe.
689: 
690:   There are two PNe with a Ne/S ratio which is significantly higher
691:   than any of the comparison datasets. Two other objects have a ratio
692:   of $\sim$50 which is high compared to the rest of the sample of PNe
693:   although some Galactic H\,II regions also reach such values.  These
694:   objects are labeled in Figure~4 (top).  The extremely high values of
695:   the Ne/S ratio in SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01 are mainly the result of
696:   their lower sulfur abundance.  These two objects show the lowest
697:   sulfur abundances: SMP~LMC~31 has a sulfur abundance which is 5.7
698:   times lower than the average LMC PNe, and the sulfur abundance in
699:   SMP~SMC~01 is about 2.2 lower than the average SMC PNe (see
700:   Table~3).  These differences in sulfur can account for the high
701:   ratio observed in this two objects. However, these two objects
702:   together with SMP~LMC~28 also show a high neon abundance compared to
703:   the rest of objects in their sample and it is therefore possible
704:   that neon-enrichment has taken place in these objects.
705:   
706:   The grey band in Figure~\ref{nes_f} indicates the lower and higher
707:   solar ratio found using the abundances given in \S3.1 and it is
708:   clearly lower than Galactic and MC PNe or H\,II regions. This is
709:   known and several authors have already discussed that the solar
710:   sulfur abundance seems too high compared to Galactic PNe and H\,II
711:   regions \citep{pot06,mar, leti}. In addition, several authors
712:   \citep{pot06,wan07} favor the higher neon solar abundance given by
713:   \citet{fel} and \citet{lan07} instead of the one quoted by
714:   \citet{asp05}. This work also supports the higher neon abundance in
715:   the literature but from Figure~4 it is clear that the Ne/S in most
716:   datasets is higher than the solar ratio.
717:  
718:   \begin{figure}
719:     \begin{center}
720:       \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f4.eps}
721:     \end{center}
722:     \caption{Ne/S ratio with respect to the total neon abundance of
723:       the PNe (top panel) and H\,II regions (bottom). The grey band
724:       represents the solar Ne/S ratio. The horizontal lines represent
725:       the median of the Ne/S for PNe (with a typical error bar on the
726:       right side of the line) and H\,II regions in the Galaxy, the
727:       LMC, and the SMC.\label{nes_f}}
728:   \end{figure}
729:   
730: 
731: 
732: 
733:   \subsection{Comparison to other sources}
734: 
735:   \begin{figure}
736:     \begin{center}
737:       \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=90]{f5.eps}
738:     \end{center}
739:     \caption{Comparison of the neon and sulfur abundances in PNe and
740:       H\,II regions for the Milky Way, the LMC and the SMC. The range
741:       of abundances for H\,II regions in M33 are also shown. A 50\%
742:       error bar for the LMC and SMC PNe is shown in the lower side of
743:       the figure (see \S3.3).\label{abun_f}}
744:   \end{figure}
745: 
746:   Figure~\ref{abun_f} shows a comparison of the neon and sulfur
747:   abundances in PNe and H\,II regions in the MW, LMC, SMC and M33.  The
748:   grey band in the figure represents the range of solar values found in
749:   the literature.
750: 
751:   Galactic PNe and H\,II regions display a neon abundance that is
752:   closer to the higher solar value. Note that while we are comparing
753:   with solar values the effect of the Galactic abundance gradient has
754:   not been taken into account in this plot. The Galactic sources also
755:   show a clear under-abundance of sulfur compared to the solar value.
756:   The neon abundances in PNe and H\,II regions show a remarkable
757:   agreement in the Milky Way, LMC and SMC.  M33 which is usually
758:   regarded as having half the solar metallicity \citep{mag07} shows a
759:   very large range of neon abundance which encompasses both the LMC
760:   and SMC PNe sample.
761:   
762: 
763:   The interpretation of the sulfur abundance is complicated. As
764:   mentioned before, both Galactic PNe and H\,II regions show clearly
765:   an under-abundance of sulfur with respect to solar, and this has
766:   been ascribed in some studies to the solar sulfur abundance being
767:   too high.  The LMC PNe sulfur abundance shows a very large
768:   dispersion in values. Most PNe show sulfur values that are in the
769:   range of the LMC H\,II regions but 6 objects are below that range.
770:   This does not mean that these PNe have anomalous sulfur abundances
771:   as the number of LMC H\,II regions used for comparison is small, but
772:   seems to point to a slightly lower sulfur abundance in the PNe.  The
773:   low sulfur abundances shown by these six PNe are not due to errors
774:   in the ICF used to correct for S$^{+4}$ because some of them are
775:   in fact low ionization PNe and no ICF is needed.  We have compared
776:   the average abundance of sulfur in high- and low-excitation PNe
777:   separately and find similar average abundances of 2.9 and
778:   2.3$\times$10$^{-6}$ for the high- and low-excitation PNe
779:   respectively.  Except for SMP~LMC~31, the range of sulfur abundances
780:   in the H\,II regions in M33 (which has a metallicity close to that
781:   of the LMC) is similar to the sulfur abundances we measure in these
782:   PNe.  The comparison of the PNe and H\,II region sulfur abundances
783:   in the SMC is hampered by the low number of sources.  Considering
784:   the uncertainties both data sets compare well, although one source
785:   (SMP~SMC~01) has a sulfur abundance which is clearly lower than the
786:   rest of PNe and H\,II regions. We do not know the reasons for the
787:   apparent sulfur depletion in SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01. Sulfur can
788:   be depleted onto dust (e.g. MgS, FeS).  Although both SMP~LMC~31 and
789:   SMP~SMC~01 do show a strong MgS feature a further investigation of
790:   this possibility must be made before any conclusion can be drawn.
791:   
792: 
793:   \subsection{Comparison with the literature}
794: 
795: 
796: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c c c}
797:   \tabletypesize{\small}
798:   \tablecolumns{10}
799:   \tablewidth{0pc} 
800:   \tablecaption{Abundance Comparison.\label{comp_t}} 
801:   \tablehead{\colhead{Object} &
802:     \multicolumn{4}{c}{Ne/H$\times$10$^{-5}$} & &
803:     \multicolumn{4}{c}{S/H$\times$10$^{-6}$}\\ \cline{2-5} \cline{7-10}
804:     (SMP) & \colhead{Present} & \colhead{DM\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{D97\tablenotemark{a}} &
805:     \colhead{LD\tablenotemark{a}} & & Present &
806:     \colhead{DM\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{D97\tablenotemark{a}} &
807:     \colhead{LD\tablenotemark{a}}}
808: 
809:   \startdata
810: 
811:   LMC02  &     3.41 &        &  2.8 & $<$0.18  &  &       1.4  &     1.6 &  4.0  &   $<$4.2    \\
812:   LMC08  &   105.7  &    2.2 &  2.1 &    1.82  &  &      11.7  &     6.0 &  4.9  &   1109.7    \\
813:   LMC11  &     4.6  &        &      &    0.55  &  &            &         &       &      1.15   \\
814:   LMC13\tablenotemark{d}  &     5.1  &    3.8 &      &    4.0   &  &       4.0  &     3.9 &       &             \\
815:   LMC28\tablenotemark{d}  &    10.1  &        &      &          &  &       2.0  &         &       &             \\
816:   LMC31  &     7.0  &        &      &    0.04  &  &       0.47 &         &       &      1.86   \\
817:   LMC35\tablenotemark{d}  &     6.2  &    4.0 &  3.0 &    3.0   &  &       3.0  &     2.8 &  6.0  &     24.0    \\
818:   LMC36\tablenotemark{d}  &     6.0  &        &      &    5.3   &  &       1.18 &         &       &             \\
819:   LMC38  &     9.1  &    4.1 &      &    3.6   &  &       2.9  &    1    &       &     23.4    \\
820:   LMC40\tablenotemark{d}  &     6.1  &    6.0 &  4.5 &    6.9   &  &       2.9  &     4.6 &  6.2  &     36.3    \\
821:   LMC53  &     5.3  &        &      &    4.1   &  &       3.4  &         &       &     18.2    \\
822:   LMC58  &     4.7  &    2.0 &      &    1.23  &  &       1.18 &     3.1 &       &     95.5    \\
823:   LMC61  &     5.9  &    4.2 &      &    5.8   &  &       5.5  &     7.4 &       &      5.7    \\
824:   LMC62\tablenotemark{d}  &     4.6  &    3.3 &      &    2.2   &  &       3.1  &     8.0 &       &      4.6    \\
825:   LMC76  &     2.8  &    2.4 &  2.2 &    1.86  &  &       1.2  &     4.0 &  4.0  &             \\
826:   LMC78\tablenotemark{d}  &     9.1  &    4.5 &      &    3.6   &  &       3.9  &     5.2 &       &     30.9    \\
827:   LMC83  &     8.6  &    4.1 &  5.1 &          &  &       4.8  &     6.5 &  2.4  &             \\
828:   LMC85  &     4.7  &    4.0 &  3.0 &    0.68  &  &       1.9  &     4.0 &  2.0  &      4.7    \\
829:   LMC87\tablenotemark{d}  &     5.3  &   11.0 &      &    3.1   &  &       3.3  &     6.8 &       &     18.2    \\
830:   SMC01  &     4.7  &    0.7 &      &    0.26  &  &       0.46 &         &       &             \\
831:   SMC03  &     2.9  &    1.3 &      &    1.00  &  &       1.01 &         &       &      5.7    \\
832:   SMC06  &     2.8  &    2.2 &      &    1.38  &  &       0.90 &     6.0 &       &     23.4    \\
833:   SMC11  &     2.1  &    1.5 &      & $<$1.00  &  &       1.25 &     2.8 &       &   $<$5.9    \\
834:   SMC22\tablenotemark{d}  &     2.0  &    2.1 &      &    0.56  &  &       1.06 &     3.2 &       &      4.0    \\
835:   SMC24  &     2.8  &        &      &    1.15  &  &       1.17 &         &       &      0.31   \\
836:   SMC28\tablenotemark{d}  &     1.7  &    3.0 &      &    0.72  &  &       1.10 &     4.0 &       &      7.4    \\
837:   
838:   \enddata
839:   \tablenotetext{a}{References to abundances: DM
840:     \citep{dop91a,dop91b}, D97 \citep{dop97}, LD \citep{lei06}.}
841:   \tablenotetext{d}{High excitation PNe.}
842: \end{deluxetable*}
843: 
844: 
845: 
846:   A comparison of the abundances derived in this paper with those
847:   derived in \citet{dop91a,dop91b,dop97} using photo-ionization models and
848:   \citet{lei06} using optical data is given in Table~\ref{comp_t}.
849: 
850:   The neon abundances we derive are in agreement with the abundances
851:   of \citet{dop91a,dop91b}. In most of the cases the agreement is very
852:   good. For the few objects where the agreement is not that
853:   satisfactory, the abundances usually compare well within a factor of
854:   two which is reasonable considering the uncertainties in the
855:   abundances we derive and those involved in the use of
856:   photo-ionization models.  \cite{dop97} revised the abundances for 8
857:   LMC PNe adding {\em HST} spectroscopy to their ground observations.
858:   Some of their revised abundances agree with their previous
859:   determinations but in some cases (especially for sulfur) the
860:   differences amount to a factor of 1.3 to 3.  Our abundances are
861:   roughly similar to those of \citet{lei06} for most of the
862:   high-excitation PNe\footnote{Those PNe showing high-excitation lines
863:     such as \ion{[Ne}{5]}. See footnote in Table~4.} except for
864:   SMP~LMC~62 and SMP~LMC~83.  \citet{lei06} however state that their
865:   neon abundance for these two objects was poorly determined. For most
866:   of the remaining sources (low-excitation PNe) our abundances are
867:   significantly larger than those by \cite{lei06}.  To determine the
868:   reasons for this discrepancy, we have calculated the \ion{Ne}{3}
869:   abundance using their measured optical line at 3869\AA~and assumed
870:   T$_e$.  The \ion{Ne}{3} fractional abundance we derive using the
871:   optical line agrees within 30\% with the results from the infrared
872:   line for the high-excitation PNe and a few of the low-excitation PNe
873:   (SMP~LMC~53, SMP~LMC~61, SMP~LMC~76). For the rest of the objects
874:   the difference in the \ion{Ne}{3} ionic abundance is large enough to
875:   account for the difference in the total neon abundance. A possible
876:   explanation for this discrepancy is the uncertainty of T$_e$ when
877:   deriving abundances using optical lines. In some PNe the T$_e$
878:   derived using the \ion{Ne}{3} is significantly lower than using
879:   other ions \citep{ber01}. A lower T$_e$ increases the ionic
880:   abundance, and a difference of a couple of thousand degrees Kelvin
881:   in the T$_e$ can account for the differences we see.
882: 
883: 
884:   The sulfur abundance reported in this paper agrees (although to a
885:   lesser extent than the neon) with those of \cite{dop91a,dop91b}.
886:   The abundances are usually within a factor of 3; when the agreement
887:   is less good our abundances are always lower.  \citet{dop91a,dop91b}
888:   have information on the S$^{+}$ and S$^{+2}$ ions, and in
889:   several cases only upper-limits for one or both ions could be
890:   derived. However, the contribution to the sulfur abundance in PNe
891:   comes mainly from the S$^{+2}$ and S$^{+3}$, and both these ions
892:   can be measured in the infrared.  The abundances by \cite{lei06} are much
893:   higher than either presented in this paper or by
894:   \cite{dop91a,dop91b}.  The discrepancies are sometimes larger than a
895:   factor of 15.  Some of the sulfur abundances reported by
896:   \cite{lei06} are even higher than solar by factors of a few which is
897:   difficult to interpret.  This large difference cannot be accounted
898:   for by differences in the S$^{+2}$ fractional abundance using
899:   infrared or optical lines which we have recalculated. The \ion{S}{3}
900:   line at 6312\AA~used by \cite{lei06} is blended with a \ion{He}{2}
901:   line which may add a fraction to the total sulfur abundance. In
902:   addition, for many cases \cite{lei06} could only measure
903:   upper-limits to the \ion{S}{3} line and they state that their sulfur
904:   abundance is very uncertain.  It is possible that the ICFs used to
905:   derive the total sulfur abundance in \cite{lei06} may overestimate
906:   the contribution of S$^{+3}$ by a large factor.  Despite the
907:   uncertainties explained in our abundance determination we consider
908:   our sulfur abundances to be more accurate than the previous work as
909:   we have measured the important stages of ionisation and complemented
910:   with the existing data in the literature.
911: 
912: 
913:   SMP~LMC~08 needs special mention. \citet{lei06} quote a much lower
914:   abundance of neon (1.8$\times$10$^{-5}$) than the one we derive. We
915:   find that using their measured optical line at 3869\AA, extinction,
916:   T$_e$, and N$_e$ values, the Ne$^{+2}$ fractional abundance is a
917:   factor 32 lower than using the infrared line. The infrared line at
918:   15.5$\mu$m is very bright (Fig.~3) and could be measured easily.
919:   While we do not know the nature of this discrepancy, a small part of
920:   this discrepancy can be ascribed to difference in the extinction,
921:   since \citet{lei06} use a very low value (C$=$0.01) compared to the
922:   one by \citet{mea91a} which we use, or uncertainties in the T$_e$.
923:   The IRS spectrum of the object shows that \ion{Ne}{2} is also an
924:   important contributor to the total neon abundance (about 30\%) and
925:   this may be underestimated by \citet{lei06}.  SMP~LMC~08 also shows
926:   a large abundance of sulfur but interestingly in this case
927:   \citet{lei06} quote a lower limit to its abundance which is a factor
928:   10 higher than ours (1.17$\times$10$^{-5}$) and of the order of the
929:   solar value (1.4$\times$10$^{-5}$). The Ne/S abundance we find is
930:   about 9, which is similar (but a bit on the lower end) to the rest
931:   of the sample.  This may imply that the H$\beta$ flux we use for
932:   this object \citep{woo87} to derive the elemental abundance is
933:   probably not adequate, and will render the abundance derived for
934:   this object as uncertain.
935: 
936: 
937: 
938: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
939: 
940: We report the high-resolution Spitzer-IRS observations of a sample of
941: 18 PNe in the LMC and 7 in the SMC. The spectra cover the 10-37~$\mu$m
942: wavelength range and show the usual fine-structure lines of neon,
943: sulfur and oxygen typically seen in PNe. Some nebulae also show high
944: excitation lines of argon and magnesium.
945: 
946: The abundances for neon and sulfur have been derived and compared to
947: Galactic PNe and H\,II regions, MC H\,II regions and the solar values.
948: The neon average abundances are 6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$ and
949: 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$ in the LMC and SMC respectively. This is
950: $\sim$1/3 and 1/6 of the average neon abundance of the Galactic PNe
951: used as comparison. Given the uncertainties, these values agree well
952: with the most quoted values for the LMC and SMC metallicity (1/3 and
953: 1/5 solar respectively).
954: 
955: The average Ne/S ratio of the MC PNe (23.5) is slightly higher than
956: the average ratio for Galactic PNe (16) but the range of Ne/S values
957: is similar in both samples. These values are also similar to those
958: found in H\,II regions. We believe that this is an indication that
959: neon-enrichment has either not occurred or remained modest in most of
960: the nebulae. This agrees with the conclusion by \citet{dop97} based on
961: their derived abundances in a sample of LMC PNe. In fact,
962: nucleosynthesis models suggest that this process occurs in a very
963: narrow range of masses and thus statistically few objects would
964: experience such enrichment. Four objects show a high Ne/S ratio. In
965: two of them (SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01) the high ratio is mainly due
966: to the very low sulfur abundance of these objects, but together with
967: SMP~LMC~28 they show the highest neon abundance in the sample so it
968: is a possibility that these PNe may have experienced some
969: neon-enrichment.
970: 
971: The range of neon abundances of PNe and H\,II regions is the same in
972: the Milky Way, the LMC and the SMC. The sulfur abundance of Galactic
973: PNe and H\,II regions is also similar for both sets of objects.  For
974: the LMC it seems that some PNe show lower sulfur abundances than the
975: H\,II regions, but the number of LMC H\,II regions to which we compare
976: is not very large. The sulfur abundances of M33 H\,II regions have a
977: similar range of abundances to those of the LMC and SMC PNe.  Given
978: the low number of objects in the sample of SMC PNe and H\,II regions
979: we state that it seems that both types of objects show similar sulfur
980: abundances but clearly more objects of both kinds are needed.
981: 
982: The two nebulae, SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01, showing a clear lower
983: sulfur abundance compared to the rest of the objects also show a MgS
984: feature in their low-resolution IRS spectra. One could argue that some
985: of the sulfur is depleted in dust. However other objects which show
986: the MgS feature do not have a lower sulfur abundance. This should be
987: further investigated.
988: 
989: The PNe abundances derived are also compared to previous
990: determinations by \cite{lei06} from optical line measurements and
991: \citet{dop91a,dop91b,dop97} using photo-ionization models. The
992: comparison shows that our derived neon abundance agrees very well
993: with those by \citet{dop91a,dop91b} and to a lesser extent with those
994: of \cite{lei06}. The sulfur abundances we derive agree well for about
995: half of the objects with the abundances determined by
996: \citet{dop91a,dop91b} but for the rest of the PNe they are up to a
997: factor of 3 lower. The sulfur abundances derived by \cite{lei06} are
998: much higher than either the ones derived in this paper or the ones by
999: \citet{dop91a,dop91b}. The advantage of the abundances presented in
1000: this paper over previous work is that we have measured and used the
1001: most important stages of ionization and complemented with existing
1002: data in the literature.
1003: 
1004: 
1005: \acknowledgments We thank an anonymous referee whose comments have
1006: improved the paper. JBS would like to thank Duncan Farrah for reading
1007: parts of the manuscript. This work is based on observations made with
1008: the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
1009: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA contract
1010: 1407. Support for this work was provided by NASA through Contract
1011: Number 1257184 issued by JPL/Caltech.
1012: 
1013: 
1014: 
1015: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1016: 
1017: \bibitem[Aller et al.(1987)]{all87} Aller, L.H., Keyes, C.D., Maran,
1018:   S.P., et al. 1987, \apj, 320, 159
1019: 
1020: \bibitem[Aller(1983)]{all83} Aller, L.H. 1983, \apj, 273, 590
1021: 
1022: \bibitem[Aller et al.(1981)]{all81} Aller, L.H., Keyes, C.D., Ross,
1023:   J.E., \& O'Mara, B.J. 1981, \mnras, 194, 613
1024: 
1025: \bibitem[Antia \& Basu(2005)]{ant} Antia, M., \& Basu, S., 2005, \apj, 621, L85
1026: 
1027: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asp05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \&
1028:   Sauval, A.J. 2005, ASPC 336, 25
1029: 
1030: \bibitem[Bahcall et al.(2005)]{bah} Bahcall, J.N., Basu, S., \&
1031:   Serenelli, A.M., 2005, \apj, 631, 1281
1032: 
1033: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2006)]{ber06} Bernard-Salas, J.,
1034:   Peeters, E., Sloan, G.C., Cami, J., Guiles, S., \& Houck, J.R. 2006,
1035:   \apjl, 652, L29
1036: 
1037: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2004)]{ber04} Bernard-Salas, J., Houck,
1038:   J.R., Morris, P.W., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 278
1039: 
1040: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et~al.(2003)]{ber03} Bernard-Salas J., Pottasch
1041:   S.R., Wesselius P.R., Feibelman W.A., 2003,\aap, 406, 165
1042: 
1043: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2001)]{ber01} Bernard--Salas, J.,
1044:   Pottasch, S. R., Beintema, D.A., \& Wesselius, P. R. 2001, \aap,
1045:   367, 949
1046: 
1047: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{coh} Cohen, M., Megeath, T.G.,
1048:   Hammersley, P. L., Martin-Luis, F., \& Stauffer, J. 2003, \aj, 125,
1049:   2645
1050: 
1051: \bibitem[Corradi et al.(2005)]{cor05} Corradi, R.L.M., Magrini, L.,
1052:   Greimel, R., et al. 2005, \aap, 431, 555
1053: 
1054: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(1997)]{dop97} Dopita, M.A., Vassiliadis, E.,
1055:   Wood, P.R., et al. 1997, \apj, 474, 188
1056: 
1057: \bibitem[de Graauw et al.(1996)]{deg} de Graauw, T., Whittet, D.C.B.,
1058:   Gerakines, P.A., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, 345
1059: 
1060: \bibitem[Dopita \& Meatheringham(1991a)]{dop91a} Dopita, M.A.,  \&
1061:   Meatheringham, S.J., 2001a, \apj, 367, 115
1062: 
1063: \bibitem[Dopita \& Meatheringham(1991b)]{dop91b} Dopita, M.A.,  \&
1064:   Meatheringham, S.J., 2001b, \apj, 377, 480
1065: 
1066: \bibitem[Feldman \& Widing(2003)]{fel} Feldman, U., \& Widing, K.G.
1067:   2003, Sp.Sci.Rev. 107, 665
1068: 
1069: \bibitem[Fluks et al.(1994)]{flu} Fluks, M.A., Plez, B., de Winter,
1070:   D., et al. 1994, \aaps, 105, 311
1071: 
1072: 
1073: \bibitem[Guiles et al.(2007)]{shannon} Guiles, S., Bernard-Salas,
1074:   J., Pottasch, S.R., \& Roellig, T.L. 2007, \apj, 660, 1282
1075: 
1076: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{gre98} Grevesse, N., \& Sauval,
1077:   A.J., 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161
1078: 
1079: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Noels(1993)]{gre} Grevesse, N., Noels, A., 1993,
1080:   Origin and Evolution of the Elements. Publisher: Cambridge
1081:   University Press. Edited by Prantzos, N., Vangioni-Flam, E., and
1082:   Cass\'e, M. 
1083: 
1084: \bibitem[Henry \& Kwitter(2004)]{hen04} Henry, R.B.C., Kwitter, K.B.,
1085:   \& Balick, B. 2004, AJ 127, 2284
1086: 
1087: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{hig} Higdon, S.J.U., Devost, D., Higdon,
1088:   J.L. et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975
1089: 
1090: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{hou} Houck, J. R., Appleton, P. N.,
1091:   Armus, L., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
1092: 
1093: \bibitem[Iben \& Renzini(1983)]{ibe} Iben I., Renzini A., 1983,
1094:   ARA\&A, 21, 271
1095: 
1096: \bibitem[Karakas \& Lattanzio(2003)]{kar03}
1097: Karakas, A.I., \& Lattanzio, J.C. 2003. PASA 20, 393
1098: 
1099: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1998)]{kim} Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dopita,
1100:   M.A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 503, 674
1101: 
1102: \bibitem[Landi et al.(2007)]{lan07} Landi, E., Feldman, U., \&
1103:   Doschek, G.A., 2007, \apj, 659, 743
1104: 
1105: \bibitem[Leisy \& Dennefeld(2006)]{lei06} Leisy, P., \& Dennefeld, M.
1106:   2006, \aap, 456, 451
1107: 
1108: \bibitem[Leisy et al.(1997)]{lei97} Leisy, P., Dennefeld, M., Alard,
1109:   C., \& Guibert, J. 1997, \aaps, 121, 407
1110: 
1111: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2003)]{mag03} Magrini, L., Corradi, R.L.M.,
1112:   Greimel, R., et al. 2003, \aap, 400, 511
1113: 
1114: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2001)]{mag01} Magrini, L., Perinotto, M.,
1115:   Corradi, R.L.M., \& Mampaso, A. 2001, \aap, 379, 90
1116: 
1117: \bibitem[Marigo et al.(2003)]{mar} Marigo, P., Bernard-Salas, J.,
1118:   Pottasch, S.R., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Wesselius, P.R., 2003, \aap,
1119:   409, 619
1120: 
1121: \bibitem[Meatheringham and Dopita(1991a)]{mea91a} Meatheringham, S.
1122:   J., \& Dopita, M. A. 1991, \apjs, 75, 407
1123: 
1124: \bibitem[Meatheringham and Dopita(1991b)]{mea91b} Meatheringham, S.
1125:   J., \& Dopita, M. A. 1991, \apjs, 76, 1085
1126: 
1127: \bibitem[Meatheringham et al.(1998)]{mea88} Meatheringham, S.J.,
1128:   Dopita, M.A., \& Morgan, D.H., \apj, 329, 166
1129: 
1130: 
1131: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2007)]{mag07} Magrini, L., Vilchez, J.M.,
1132:   Mampaso, A., Corradi, R.L.M., \& Leisy, P. 2007, \aap, 470, 865
1133: 
1134: \bibitem[Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'andez et al.(2002)]{leti}
1135:   Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'andez, N.L., Peeters, E., Morisset, C., et
1136:   al. 2002, \aap, 381, 606
1137: 
1138: \bibitem[Meixner et al.(2006)]{mei} Meixner, M., Gordon, K.D.,
1139:   Indebetow, R., et al. 2006, \aj, 132, 2268
1140: 
1141: \bibitem[Monk et al.(1988)]{mon88} Monk, D.J., Barlow, M.J., \& Clegg,
1142:   R.E.S. 1988, \mnras, 234, 583
1143: 
1144: \bibitem[Morgan \& Parker(1998)]{mor} Morgan, \& Parker 1998, \mnras,
1145:   296, 921
1146: 
1147: \bibitem[Pe\~{n}a et al.(1997)]{pen97} Pe\~{n}a, M., Ruiz, M.T., \&
1148:   Torres-Peimbert, S., \aap, 324, 674
1149: 
1150: \bibitem[Pottasch et al.(2007)]{pot07} Pottasch, S.R., 
1151:   Bernard-Salas, J., \& Roellig, T.L. 2007, \aap, in press 
1152: 
1153: \bibitem[Pottasch \& Bernard-Salas(2006)]{pot06} Pottasch, S.R., \&
1154:   Bernard-Salas, J. 2006, \aap, 457, 189
1155: 
1156: \bibitem[Pottasch \& Surendiranath(2005)]{pot05} Pottasch, S.R., \&
1157:   Surendiranath, R. 2005, \aap, 432, 139
1158: 
1159: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(2007)]{rub07} Rubin, R.H., Simpson, J.P.,
1160:   Colgan, S.W.J., et al. 2007, \mnras, 377, 1407
1161: 
1162: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1988)]{rub} Rubin, R.H., Simpson, J.P.,
1163:   Erickson, E.F., \& Haas, M.R. 1988, \apj, 327, 377
1164: 
1165: \bibitem[Sanduleak et al.(1978)]{san} Sanduleak, N., MacConnel, D.J.,
1166:   Philip, A.G.D. 1978, PASP, 90, 621
1167: 
1168: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2006)]{sha06} Shaw, R.A., Stanghellini, L.,
1169:   Villaver, E., \& Mutcher, M. 2006, \apjs, 167, 201
1170: 
1171: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2001)]{sha01} Shaw, R.A., Stanghellini, L.,
1172:   Mutcher, M., Balick, B., \& Blades, J.C. 2001, \apj, 548, 727
1173: 
1174: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2005)]{sta05} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1175:   R.A., \& Gilmore, D.,  et al. 2005, \apj, 622, 294
1176: 
1177: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2003)]{sta03} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1178:   R.A., Balick, B., et al. 2003, \apj, 596, 997
1179: 
1180: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2002)]{sta02} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1181:   R.A., Mutchler, M., et al. 2002, \apj, 575, 178
1182: 
1183: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(1999)]{sta99} Stanghellini, L., Blades,
1184:   J.C., Osmer, S.J., Barlow, M.J., \& Liu, X.-W. 1999, \apj, 510, 687
1185: 
1186: \bibitem[Surendiranath et al.(2004)]{sur04} Surendiranath, R.,
1187:   Pottasch, S.R., \& Garc\'{i}a-Lario, P. 2004, \aap, 421, 1051
1188: 
1189: \bibitem[Vermeij \& van der Hulst(2002)]{ver} Vermeij, R., \& van der
1190:   Hulst, J.M., 2002, \aap, 391, 1081
1191: 
1192: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2004)]{vil04} Villaver, E., Stanghellini, L.,
1193:   \& Shaw, R.2004, \apj, 614, 716
1194: 
1195: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2003)]{vil03} Villaver, E., Stanghellini, L.,
1196:   \& Shaw, R. 2003, \apj, 585, 49
1197: 
1198: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer} Werner, M., Roellig, T. L., Low, F.
1199:   J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1200: 
1201: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1987)]{woo87} Wood, P.R., Meatheringham, S.J.,
1202:   Dopita, M.A., \& Morgan, D.H. 1987, \apj, 320, 178 
1203: 
1204: \bibitem[Wang \& Liu(2007)]{wan07} Wang, W., \& Liu, X.-W 2007, \mnras, accepted 
1205: 
1206: \bibitem[Zijlstra et al.(1994)]{zij94} Zijlstra, A.A., van Hoof,
1207:   P.A.M., Chapman, J.M., \& Loup, C. 1994, \aap, 290, 228
1208: 
1209: 
1210: \end{thebibliography}
1211: 
1212: 
1213: 
1214: \end{document}
1215: 
1216: