1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: \documentclass{emulateapj} %apt-get update; apt-get install emulateapj
5: \usepackage{apjfonts}
6:
7: \def\msun{M$_\odot$}
8: \def\mic{$\mu$m}
9: \def\den{$N_{\rm e}$}
10: \def\tem{$T_{\rm e}$}
11: \def\cm{cm$^{-3}$}
12:
13: \newcommand{\mum}{\ifmmode{\rm \mu m}\else{$\mu$m}\fi}
14:
15: %\slugcomment{\apjl Draft v4, 1 - Aug - 2007}
16:
17: \shorttitle{Ne and S Abundances of PNe in the Magellanic Clouds}
18: \shortauthors{Bernard-Salas et al.}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22:
23: \title{Neon and Sulfur Abundances
24: of Planetary Nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds}
25:
26: \author{J.~Bernard-Salas\altaffilmark{1},
27: S.~R.~Pottasch\altaffilmark{2},
28: S.~Gutenkunst,\altaffilmark{1},
29: P.~W.~Morris\altaffilmark{3},
30: J.~R.~Houck\altaffilmark{1}
31: }
32:
33:
34:
35: %\email{jbs@isc.astro.cornell.edu}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell
38: University, 222 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY 14853-6801, USA.}
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, 9700 AV, Groningen,
40: The Netherlands.}
41: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA Herschel Science Center, IPAC/Caltech, MS
42: 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125.}
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45:
46: The chemical abundances of neon and sulfur for 25 planetary nebulae
47: (PNe) in the Magellanic Clouds are presented. These abundances have
48: been derived using mainly infrared data from the {\em Spitzer Space
49: Telescope}. The implications for the chemical evolution of these
50: elements are discussed. A comparison with similarly obtained
51: abundances of Galactic PNe and H\,II regions and Magellanic Clouds
52: H\,II regions is also given. The average neon abundances are
53: 6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$ and 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$ for the PNe in the
54: Large and Small Magellanic Clouds respectively. These are $\sim$1/3
55: and 1/6 of the average abundances of Galactic planetary nebulae to
56: which we compare. The average sulfur abundances for the LMC and SMC
57: are respectively 2.7$\times$10$^{-6}$ and 1.0$\times$10$^{-6}$. The
58: Ne/S ratio (23.5) is on average higher than the ratio found in
59: Galactic PNe (16) but the range of values in both data sets is
60: similar for most of the objects. The neon abundances found in PNe
61: and H\,II regions agree with each other. It is possible that a few
62: (3-4) of the PNe in the sample have experienced some neon
63: enrichment, but for two of these objects the high Ne/S ratio can be
64: explained by their very low sulfur abundances. The neon and sulfur
65: abundances derived in this paper are also compared to previously
66: published abundances using optical data and photo-ionization models.
67:
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: \keywords{Infrared: general --- ISM: abundances --- Magellanic Clouds
71: --- planetary nebulae: general}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: Stars of low- and intermediate-mass ($\sim$1-8~\msun) become planetary
77: nebulae after they evolve off the Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB)
78: \citep{ibe}. In the PN phase the hot central star ionizes the
79: previously ejected material which then emits copious amounts of
80: emission lines of different ions. These emission lines are ideal to
81: study the chemical composition of the gas. The abundances of elements
82: such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen can be used to give information on
83: the nucleosynthesis history of the progenitor star. Other elements,
84: such as neon, sulfur and argon are not supposed to be altered in the
85: course of evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars and are
86: therefore indicators of the chemical composition at the epoch of
87: formation \citep{mar}.
88:
89: It is for these reasons that PNe have been the subject of many
90: spectroscopic studies over the years. Due to limitations in the
91: observations, the bulk of this spectroscopic work has been focused on
92: analysing PNe in the Milky Way (MW). However, observations of PNe
93: outside the Galaxy are very important because one can probe different
94: metallicity regions and, unlike Galactic PNe, the distance is known
95: which allows one to relate the abundance to the central star
96: luminosity. During the last years several papers \citep[e.g.][ and
97: references therein]{mag01,mag03,cor05} have been devoted to
98: identifying PNe outside the Galaxy. As a consequence, the number of
99: PNe known in the Local Group keeps increasing. The Large and Small
100: Magellanic Clouds (hereafter LMC and SMC respectively) are ideal
101: candidates to obtain spectroscopic observations of PNe.
102:
103: \citet{all81} and \citet{all83} published optical spectroscopic data
104: for 6 PNe in the LMC and 7 in SMC respectively. In a follow-up paper
105: \citet{all87} presented ultraviolet data from the {\em IUE} satellite
106: of 12 PNe in the Magellanic Clouds (MC) and derived abundances for
107: several elements. Ultraviolet data are essential in order to derive
108: abundances of elements such as carbon and nitrogen. Optical
109: spectroscopy and abundances of 71 MC PNe were presented by
110: \citet{mon88}. In the early 90's \citet{mea91a, mea91b} obtained
111: optical spectroscopy of over a hundred PNe in the MC. \citet{mor}
112: presented FLAIR spectroscopy of 97 PNe in the LMC which included
113: fluxes of the \ion{[O}{3]}, \ion{[S}{2]}, \ion{[N}{2]}, and
114: \ion{He}{2} lines. Using optical and IUE data, \citet{pen97} studied
115: a sample of MC PNe with WR nuclei and found that the distribution of
116: spectral type was different from those of Galactic WR-PNe.
117: \citet{sta02,sta03} have characterised optically a large number of PNe
118: in the Magellanic Clouds using {\em HST} observations. And more
119: recently \citet{lei06} have derived the abundances of several elements
120: for a large sample of PNe in the MC using optical data.
121:
122: Despite their importance, infrared spectroscopic studies of PNe in the
123: MC are scarce in the literature. This is mainly because full
124: integrated spectra in the infrared can only be achieved from space.
125: IRAS detected several PNe in the MC \citep{zij94}, mainly at 12 and
126: 25~$\mu$m, but some of the identifications are dubious. The SWS
127: spectrograph \citep{deg} on board {\em ISO} did an excellent job
128: studying nearby PNe, but it did not have enough sensitivity to allow
129: the study of PNe outside the Galaxy. The {\em Spitzer Space Telescope}
130: \citep{wer} with its increased sensitivity enables us to observe PNe
131: outside the Milky Way \citep[][]{ber06,ber04}. The importance of using
132: infrared lines when deriving abundances has been highlighted by
133: \citet{rub} and we summarize these reasons here. Infrared lines are
134: little affected by extinction as opposed to optical or UV lines.
135: Uncertainties in the electron temperature or fluctuations in the
136: temperature within the nebula are not important when using infrared
137: lines because they originate from levels very close to the ground
138: level. Additionally many ions emit in the infrared, and therefore the
139: use of ionization correction factors (ICFs) can be greatly reduced by
140: including infrared observations. This is especially true for neon,
141: sulfur and argon. Finally, and while not discussed in this paper,
142: emission of dust can be studied in this part of the electromagnetic
143: spectrum.
144:
145: In this paper we present {\it Spitzer} high-resolution spectroscopic
146: observations of 25 PNe in the MC (18 in the LMC and 7 in the SMC).
147: This paper focuses on the emission of fine-structure lines and their
148: use in the abundance determination. The measured lines are used to
149: derive abundances for sulfur and neon. These abundances are mainly
150: compared to Galactic PNe abundances from \cite{pot06}, as well as
151: Galactic, MC, M33 and M83 H\,II regions abundances from \citet{leti},
152: \citet{ver}, and \citet{rub07}. All of these abundances have been
153: derived using infrared data and in a similar way to that presented in
154: this paper. Dust features present in the spectra such as Polycyclic
155: Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and silicates will be discussed in a
156: future paper.
157:
158:
159: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
160: \label{obs_s}
161:
162: The observations were made using the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS)
163: \citep{hou} on board the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} and resulted in
164: high- and low-resolution spectra of 25 PNe. These observations were
165: part of the GTO program (ID 103) and were taken between March and
166: November 2005. The object name and AORkey numbers for each
167: observation are given in the first and second columns of
168: Table~\ref{tene_t}. The nomenclature given by \cite{san} is adopted
169: through the paper. In addition, the analysis includes data on
170: SMP~LMC~31, and abundances on SMP~LMC~83 derived by \citet{ber04}.
171: These data were taken during In Orbit Check-Out (IOC). There are two
172: high-resolution modules in the IRS, named Short-High and Long-High (SH
173: and LH respectively). Together, they cover the wavelength region
174: between 10 and 37~$\mu$m at a resolution of 600. The reader should
175: refer to the paper by \citet{hou} for more information on the IRS
176: instrument. We used coordinates given by \citet{sta02, sta03} and
177: \citet{lei97}, and performed blue Peak-Up acquisition on a nearby star
178: to obtain accurate pointing (0.4\arcsec). Figure~\ref{lmcirac_f}
179: shows the position of the LMC PNe on an IRAC image from the SAGE team
180: \citep[][]{mei}.
181:
182: \begin{deluxetable}{c c c c c c}
183: %\tablecolumns{6}
184: \tablewidth{0pc}
185: \tablecaption{Adopted parameters for abundance determination.\label{tene_t}}
186:
187: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{AORkey} &
188: \colhead{Log(F$_{H\beta}$)\tablenotemark{a,b}} &
189: \colhead{C$_{H\beta}$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{T$_e$ (K)\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{N$_e$
190: (cm$^{-3}$)\tablenotemark{a}}}
191:
192: \startdata
193:
194: SMP LMC~02 & 4946944 & -13.18 & 0.06 & 11600 & 3000\tablenotemark{c} \\
195: SMP LMC~08 & 15902464 & -13.74 & 0.23 & 11000 & 5500 \\
196: SMP LMC~11 & 4947712 & -13.94 & 0.31 & 25000 & 6200 \\
197: SMP LMC~13 & 4947968 & -12.88 & 0.09 & 13600 & 3800 \\
198: SMP LMC~28 & 4948224 & -13.57 & 0.32 & 10000 & 2000 \\
199: SMP LMC~31 & 7459584 & -12.92 & 0.54 & 12800 & 6800 \\
200: SMP LMC~35 & 4948736 & -12.81 & 0.04 & 13300 & 1600 \\
201: SMP LMC~36 & 4949248 & -12.72 & 0.41 & 15000 & 3000\tablenotemark{c} \\
202: SMP LMC~38 & 12633600 & -12.62 & 0.21 & 13000 & 9800 \\
203: SMP LMC~40 & 4949504 & -13.25 & 0.20 & 13900 & 1100 \\
204: SMP LMC~53 & 15902720 & -12.62 & 0.13 & 13700 & 4000 \\
205: SMP LMC~58 & 4950784 & -12.54 & 0.11 & 12100 & 20000 \\
206: SMP LMC~61 & 12633856 & -12.48 & 0.22 & 10800 & 26000 \\
207: SMP LMC~62 & 4951040 & -12.30 & 0.07 & 15800 & 4400 \\
208: SMP LMC~76 & 4951296 & -12.54 & 0.34 & 11600 & 13600 \\
209: SMP LMC~78 & 15902208 & -12.60 & 0.21 & 14200 & 4300 \\
210: SMP LMC~85 & 4952320 & -12.42 & 0.26 & 10500 & 31400 \\
211: SMP LMC~87 & 4952576 & -12.91 & 0.25 & 19200 & 1900 \\
212: & & & & & \\
213: SMP SMC~01 & 4953088 & -12.85 & 0.287 & 11000 & 9600 \\
214: SMP SMC~03 & 4953600 & -13.13 & 0.000 & 13800 & 5600 \\
215: SMP SMC~06 & 4954112 & -12.80 & 0.385 & 15300 & 14700 \\
216: SMP SMC~11 & 15902976 & -12.87 & 0.82 & 17600 & 1100 \\
217: SMP SMC~22 & 4954624 & -12.94 & 0.165 & 18800 & 2500 \\
218: SMP SMC~24 & 15901952 & -12.66 & 0.047 & 12700 & 1300 \\
219: SMP SMC~28 & 4955136 & -13.18 & 0.200 & 20300 & 8800 \\
220:
221: \enddata
222:
223: \tablenotetext{a}{Values taken from the following references (see
224: \S~3.2): \citet{lei06, mea88, mea91a, mea91b, sha06, sta02,
225: sta05, vil03, vil04, woo87}.}
226: \tablenotetext{b}{Flux in units of erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.}
227: \tablenotetext{c}{Assumed electron density.}
228:
229: \end{deluxetable}
230:
231: \begin{figure}
232: \begin{center}
233: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{f1.eps}
234: \end{center}
235: \caption{IRAC four-band mosaic of the LMC (SAGE) with the positions
236: of the PNe overlaid on it (circles). The dynamical center of the
237: LMC as given by \cite{kim} is indicated by the square close to the
238: center of the figure.
239: \label{lmcirac_f}}
240: \end{figure}
241:
242: The data were processed through a copy of the S13.2 version of the
243: {\it Spitzer} Science Center's pipeline which is maintained at Cornell
244: and using a script version of {\it Smart} \citep{hig}. The reduction
245: started from the {\it droop} images. These are equivalent to the most
246: commonly used {\it bcd} data and only lack the flatfield and
247: stray-cross-light removal (which is only important for bright
248: sources). Rogue pixels which are especially notorious in the LH
249: module were removed using the {\it irsclean}\footnote{This tool is
250: available from the SSC web site: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu}
251: tool. The rogue pixels were first flagged using a campaign mask and
252: then removed. If different cycles (repetitions) were present for a
253: given observation these were combined using the mean to improve the
254: S/N. The 2D-images were extracted using full aperture extraction. The
255: calibration was performed by dividing the resultant spectrum by that
256: of the calibration star $\xi$dra (extracted in the same way as the
257: target) and multiplying by its template \citep[][ and Sloan et al. in
258: prep]{coh}. Finally, glitches which were not present in both nod
259: positions or in the overlapping region between orders were removed
260: manually.
261:
262: There is an expected mismatch between the SH and LH spectra. This
263: mismatch is due to differences in the background contribution that
264: falls into the slits because the slit size of the LH module is about
265: 4.6 times larger in area than the SH slit. We do not scale the spectra
266: because we are interested in the line fluxes and the nebulae are
267: contained in both slits. These PNe are not extended at such a
268: distances. Diameters of PNe in the LMC given by \citet{sha01} and
269: \citet{sta99} are usually less than 1\arcsec, and only in a very few
270: cases does the diameter reach 3\arcsec~(still smaller than the SH slit
271: width of 4.5\arcsec). Representative examples of the full extracted
272: high-resolution spectra from 10-37~$\mu$m are shown in
273: Figure~\ref{spectra_f}.
274:
275: \begin{figure*}
276: \begin{center}
277: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{f2.eps}
278: \end{center}
279: \caption{SH and LH spectra of a handful of PNe. The jump around
280: 19.5$\mu$m is due to the larger background contribution that falls
281: in the LH slit compared to the smaller SH slit (see \S2).\label{spectra_f}}
282: \end{figure*}
283:
284: \section{Analysis}
285:
286: \subsection{Line emission}
287:
288:
289: Figure~\ref{lines_f} shows an inset of the most relevant lines for
290: the abundance determination present in the spectra of all the
291: objects. The sample ranges from PNe showing high excitation to low
292: excitation lines (e.g. SMP~LMC~85, SMP~LMC~62). Most of the spectra
293: show features (PAHs) characteristics of carbon-rich material (e.g.
294: SMP~LMC~36, SMP~SMC~11 in Fig.~2), except for SMP~LMC~53 and
295: SMP~LMC~62 (Fig.~\ref{spectra_f}) which show amorphous silicates in
296: emission at 9 and 18 $\mu$m which is usually an indicator of an
297: oxygen-rich environment.
298:
299: \tabletypesize{\small}
300:
301: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c}
302: %\tablecolumns{8}
303: \tablewidth{0pc}
304: \tablecaption{Line fluxes\tablenotemark{a}~ of the observed LMC and SMC PNe.\label{line_t}}
305:
306: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{\ion{[S}{4]}} &
307: \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{2]}} & \colhead{\ion{[Ar}{5]}} &
308: \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{5]}} & \colhead{\ion{[Ne}{3]}} &
309: \colhead{\ion{[S}{3]}} & \colhead{\ion{[O}{4]}} \\
310: \colhead{} & \colhead{(10.51$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(12.89$\mu$m)} &
311: \colhead{(13.10$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(14.31$\mu$m)} &
312: \colhead{(15.55$\mu$m)} & \colhead{(18.73$\mu$m)} &
313: \colhead{(25.89$\mu$m)}}
314:
315: \startdata
316:
317: SMP LMC~02 & $<$0.72 & 1.84 & $<$0.32 & $<$0.26 & $<$0.66 & 0.82 & $<$0.75 \\
318: SMP LMC~08 & 2.95 & 7.48 & $<$0.38 & $<$0.38 & 34.19 & 1.98 & $<$0.63 \\
319: SMP LMC~11 & $<$1.08 & 1.89 & $<$0.77 & $<$0.69 & 0.67 & $<$0.68 & $<$1.38 \\
320: SMP LMC~13 & 12.08 & 0.22\tablenotemark{b} & $<$0.19 & 0.94 & 12.74 & 2.10 & 55.54 \\
321: SMP LMC~28 & 0.44 & 1.96 & $<$0.30 & 0.32 & 3.55 & 0.51 & $<$1.15 \\
322: SMP LMC~31 & $<$0.75 & 22.45 & $<$0.31 & $<$0.17 & 0.38\tablenotemark{b} & 0.99 & $<$1.09 \\
323: SMP LMC~35 & 10.29 & 0.48 & $<$0.19 & 0.20\tablenotemark{b} & 16.53 & 1.87 & 27.22 \\
324: SMP LMC~36 & 12.75\tablenotemark{b} & 1.34 & 0.52 & 25.37 & 36.35 & 1.83 & 22.31\tablenotemark{b} \\
325: SMP LMC~38 & 12.96\tablenotemark{b} & 2.57 & $<$0.24 & $<$0.31 & 48.67 & 3.80 & $<$1.53 \\
326: SMP LMC~40 & 2.96 & 0.87 & $<$0.24 & 2.59 & 6.29 & 1.33 & 24.04 \\
327: SMP LMC~53 & 20.55 & 0.90 & $<$0.23 & $<$0.26 & 26.17 & 4.57 & $<$1.49 \\
328: SMP LMC~58 & 2.92 & 2.06 & $<$0.24 & $<$0.38 & 20.06 & 1.10 & $<$2.16 \\
329: SMP LMC~61 & 7.59 & 6.11 & $<$0.46 & $<$0.35 & 30.09 & 6.36 & $<$0.59 \\
330: SMP LMC~62 & 27.80 & 1.41 & 1.24 & 28.80 & 32.06 & 6.47 & 38.91 \\
331: SMP LMC~76 & 4.05 & 2.28 & $<$0.29 & $<$0.23 & 20.66 & 2.33 & $<$0.42 \\
332: SMP LMC~78 & 25.63 & 1.92 & 0.94 & 26.83 & 46.13 & 5.83 & 47.39 \\
333: SMP LMC~85 & 1.85 & 13.15 & $<$0.27 & $<$0.40 & 16.53 & 2.33 & $<$0.86 \\
334: SMP LMC~87 & 11.39 & 3.63 & 0.75 & 12.53 & 11.28 & 4.58 & 39.53 \\
335: & & & & & & & \\
336: SMP SMC~01 & $<$0.53 & 8.10 & $<$0.29 & $<$0.34 & 2.89 & 0.63 & $<$0.66 \\
337: SMP SMC~03 & 2.11 & $<$0.35 & $<$0.32 & $<$0.24 & 3.09 & $<$0.48 & $<$1.25 \\
338: SMP SMC~06 & 4.41 & 0.95 & $<$0.23 & $<$0.36 & 14.87 & 0.92 & $<$0.65 \\
339: SMP SMC~11 & 3.76 & 13.44 & $<$0.30 & $<$0.37 & 8.19 & 12.67 & $<$1.18 \\
340: SMP SMC~22 & 1.67 & 1.30 & $<$0.30 & 3.60 & 2.53 & 1.25\tablenotemark{b} & 7.44 \\
341: SMP SMC~24 & 1.52 & 1.82 & $<$0.33 & $<$0.25 & 7.46 & 2.28 & $<$0.84 \\
342: SMP SMC~28 & 1.53\tablenotemark{b} & 0.43 & $<$0.24 & 2.53 & 1.70 & 0.47 & 1.29\tablenotemark{b} \\
343:
344: \enddata
345:
346: \tablenotetext{a}{Fluxes in units of $\times$10$^{-14}$
347: erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. Unless otherwise indicated, the
348: uncertainties are less than 10\% for all the lines except the
349: \ion{[S}{4]} line flux which has an uncertainty between 10 and
350: 20\%.}
351:
352: \tablenotetext{b}{These lines have uncertainties in the flux
353: between 20 and 30\%, except for the \ion{[O}{4]} line in
354: SMP~SMC~28 where the error is 42\%.}
355: \end{deluxetable*}
356:
357: \tabletypesize{\normalsize}
358:
359:
360: \begin{figure*}
361: \begin{center}
362: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3a.eps}
363: \end{center}
364: \caption{Inset of the \ion{[S}{4]}, \ion{[Ne}{2]}, \ion{[Ne}{5]},
365: \ion{[Ne}{3]}, and \ion{[S}{3]} fine-structure lines for each
366: object, except for SMP~LMC~11 because this spectrum was shown in
367: \citet{ber06}. The vertical dashed lines indicate the nominal
368: position of the lines in the vacuum.\label{lines_f}}
369: \end{figure*}
370:
371: \setcounter{figure}{2}
372:
373: \begin{figure*}
374: \begin{center}
375: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3b.eps}
376: \end{center}
377: \caption{Continued.}
378: \end{figure*}
379:
380: \setcounter{figure}{2}
381:
382: \begin{figure*}
383: \begin{center}
384: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3c.eps}
385: \end{center}
386: \caption{Continued.}
387: \end{figure*}
388:
389: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3b.eps}}
390: %\centerline{Fig. 3. --- Continued.}
391: %
392: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=13cm]{./f3c.eps}}
393: %\centerline{Fig. 3. --- Continued.}
394:
395:
396: The line fluxes are listed in Table~\ref{line_t}. In addition to the
397: lines listed in this table, other lines such as \ion{[Mg}{5]} at
398: 13.52~$\mu$m have been measured for the PNe with higher S/N. The
399: \ion{[S}{3]} 33.48~$\mu$m line is always detected when the 18.7~$\mu$m
400: is present, but because the spectrum is noisier at the long wavelength
401: end of the LH module (see Fig.\ref{spectra_f}) we preferred to use the
402: 18.71~$\mu$m line flux for the abundance determination of this ion
403: which also has a larger transition probability and critical density.
404: Similarly we favored the use of the \ion{[Ne}{3]} 15.55~$\mu$m line
405: instead of the 36.0~$\mu$m line when both were measured.
406: Table~\ref{line_t} also includes (mostly) upper-limits on the argon
407: line at 13.1~$\mu$m. Although not shown in this paper, the
408: \ion{[Ar}{3]} line at 8.99~$\mu$m is detected in 9 objects in the
409: low-resolution spectra, and the \ion{[Ar}{2]} 6.99~$\mu$m line in 2
410: objects. The line fluxes were measured using the Gaussian
411: line-fitting routine in {\it Smart}. These were derived for each nod
412: independently. The uncertainty in the fluxes was assumed to be the
413: largest of either the difference between the flux in the {\em nod}
414: positions, or the uncertainty in the fit. These errors are given as
415: footnotes in the Table. The upper-limits were calculated from a
416: Gaussian fit with height 3 times the {\em rms} and a FWHM as given by
417: the resolution of the instrument.
418:
419:
420: \subsection{Assumed parameters}
421:
422: Table~\ref{tene_t} lists the H$\beta$ flux, extinction, electron
423: density (N$_{e}$) and electron temperature (T$_{e}$) assumed to
424: calculate the abundances. These values were compiled from a large
425: list of references which are given in the footnote of the table.
426: When several values were given by different authors an average was
427: used. Only in the cases where several values differed by a large
428: amount (i.e. SMP~LMC~87, SMP~SMC~11), we assumed those we estimate
429: are more accurate. The infrared lines are little affected by
430: uncertainties in the T$_{e}$ and extinction corrections but the
431: abundances relative to hydrogen are derived using optical
432: measurements of H$\beta$ which are affected by these factors. The
433: extinction law used is that of \citet{flu}. In two cases no N$_{e}$
434: was reported and we assumed a value of 3000~cm$^{-3}$ which seems a
435: reasonable value in view of the other measurements.
436:
437: \subsection{Abundance determination}
438:
439: Using the above parameters, the ionic abundances were computed from
440: the infrared line intensities using Eq.~1 of \citet{ber01}. The
441: results are shown in Table~3. The total abundances are also given in
442: this table, where sometimes a correction due to missing ionization
443: stages is necessary.
444:
445: For the sulfur abundance the addition of S$^+$, S$^{+2}$ and
446: S$^{+3}$ is sufficient for those nebulae for which no \ion{O}{4} is
447: observed. The S$^{+}$ abundance was determined using the optical
448: lines of S$^{+}$ measured by \citet{mea91a, mea91b} and
449: \citet{sta02,sta03}. The contribution from this ion is usually
450: small and in the order of what it is found in Galactic PNe. For the PNe which show the
451: \ion{O}{4} line we must take into account the possibility that
452: S$^{+4}$ is present. An estimate may be obtained by looking at
453: the two photo-ionization models of Me2-1 \citep{sur04} and NGC 6886
454: \citep{pot05}. Both of these PNe are excited by high temperature
455: stars (with T$_{eff}$ between 140\,000 and 180\,000~K) and both show
456: \ion{O}{4} lines. In addition, Me2-1 has lower average abundances
457: compared to Galactic PNe which are closer to the nebulae studied
458: here. Both models give similar results and show that S$^{+4}$
459: contributes between 7 and 23\% of the total sulfur abundance based
460: on the S$^{+4}$/S$^{+3}$ ratio. We have used these numbers to
461: correct the sulfur abundances in Table~3.
462:
463: In the case of neon no \ion{Ne}{4} line has been observed. For those PNe
464: which do not show an \ion{O}{4} line it is unlikely that there is
465: any Ne$^{+3}$ because it requires a higher energy radiation field
466: than does \ion{O}{4}. For those PNe which do show the \ion{O}{4}
467: line (7 in the LMC and 2 in the SMC) a correction must be made. This
468: can be done in two ways. First, using the same models as for sulfur
469: we obtain a contribution of Ne$^{+3}$ that varies from 2 to 33\%
470: of the total neon abundance depending on the strength of the
471: \ion{Ne}{5} line. A second way of determining the correction could
472: be done by looking at the neon abundances in the sample studied by
473: \cite{pot06}. This study made use of the same infrared lines as used
474: here and had both \ion{Ne}{3} and \ion{Ne}{5} lines, but the
475: ultraviolet lines of \ion{Ne}{4} at 2422 \AA~were also observed so
476: that Ne$^{+3}$ could also be determined. For these PNe the
477: Ne$^{+3}$ abundance was on average 21\% of the total neon
478: abundance and 35\% of the sum of Ne$^{+2}$ and Ne$^{+4}$. To be
479: consistent with the sulfur abundance we have used the first method,
480: but the results using the second method would result in the same
481: values within the expected errors. The total neon abundances are
482: given in Table~3.
483:
484: The uncertainty in the values of both the Ne$^{+3}$ and S$^{+4}$
485: abundances is probably not more than a factor of 2. This leads to a
486: maximum error for sulfur and neon of about 30\% from this source. In
487: addition uncertainties of measurement of the other ions in the
488: infrared are about 10\% with only a few exceptions (see footnote in
489: Table~2). The error in the optical lines we used is of the same
490: order. In addition an error in the extinction affects the H$\beta$
491: flux and uncertainties in the electron temperature dominate the
492: uncertainty in our abundance determination. By comparing the optical
493: measurements for the same objects by different observers in the
494: literature, which usually agree, we estimate that the total error
495: remains within 50\% except for SMP~LMC~08 and SMP~SMC~11. The
496: abundances of SMP~LMC~08 are uncertain probably because of the assumed
497: H$\beta$ flux. (see \S5.3). In SMP~SMC~11 the uncertainty is dominated by
498: the inconsistent H$\beta$ flux and extinction quoted in the literature
499: and for the purpose of this paper the most recent values given in
500: the literature have been adopted.
501:
502:
503: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c c c c c}
504: \tabletypesize{\small}
505: \tablecolumns{12}
506: \tablewidth{0pc}
507: \tablecaption{Neon and Sulfur abundances\tablenotemark{a}.\label{abun_t}}
508:
509: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{Ne$^{+}$/H} &
510: \colhead{Ne$^{+2}$/H} & \colhead{Ne$^{+4}$/H} &
511: \colhead{ICF} & \colhead{Ne/H} & \colhead{S$^{+}$/H} &
512: \colhead{S$^{+2}$/H} & \colhead{S$^{+3}$/H} &
513: \colhead{ICF} & \colhead{S/H} & \colhead{Ne/S}}
514:
515: \startdata
516:
517:
518: SMP~LMC~02 & 3.14 &$<$0.55 & & 1 & 3.41 & & 1.26 &$<$0.22 & 1 & 1.37 & 25 \\
519: SMP~LMC~08\tablenotemark{c} & 32.10 & 73.60 & & 1 & 105.70 & & 9.06 & 2.64 & 1 & 11.70 & 90 \\
520: SMP~LMC~11 & 4.56 & & & 1 & 4.56 & & & & & & \\
521: SMP~LMC~13 & 0.17 & 4.81 & 0.05 & 1.02 & 5.12 & 0.14 & 1.46 & 1.75 & 1.20 & 4.01 & 13 \\
522: SMP~LMC~28 & 4.68 & 4.11 & 0.45 & 1.09 & 10.06 & 0.79 & 1.06 & 0.19 & 1 & 2.03 & 49 \\
523: SMP~LMC~31 & 6.95 & 0.06 & & 1 & 7.01 & 0.13 & 0.34 &$<$0.05 & 1 & 0.47 & 148 \\
524: SMP~LMC~35 & 0.35 & 5.86 & & 1 & 6.21 & 0.11 & 1.10 & 1.28 & 1.19 & 2.97 & 21 \\
525: SMP~LMC~36 & 0.32 & 4.36 & 0.46 & 1.18 & 5.96 & & 0.38 & 0.58 & 1.23 & 1.18 & 51 \\
526: SMP~LMC~38 & 0.84 & 8.25 & & 1 & 9.09 & 0.29 & 1.62 & 1.04 & 1 & 2.95 & 31 \\
527: SMP~LMC~40 & 1.19 & 4.19 & 0.24 & 1.08 & 6.06 & 0.53 & 1.45 & 0.68 & 1.10 & 2.92 & 21 \\
528: SMP~LMC~53 & 0.34 & 4.95 & & 1 & 5.29 & 0.29 & 1.61 & 1.51 & 1 & 3.41 & 16 \\
529: SMP~LMC~58 & 0.74 & 3.95 & & 1 & 4.69 & 0.05 & 0.79 & 0.35 & 1 & 1.18 & 40 \\
530: SMP~LMC~61 & 1.54 & 4.34 & & 1 & 5.88 & 0.79 & 3.99 & 0.75 & 1 & 5.53 & 11 \\
531: SMP~LMC~62 & 0.27 & 3.11 & 0.44 & 1.23 & 4.61 & 0.22 & 1.15 & 1.22 & 1.18 & 3.05 & 15 \\
532: SMP~LMC~76 & 0.48 & 2.33 & & 1 & 2.81 & 0.19 & 0.79 & 0.24 & 1 & 1.22 & 23 \\
533: SMP~LMC~78 & 0.57 & 6.87 & 0.60 & 1.14 & 9.11 & 0.17 & 1.63 & 1.50 & 1.17 & 3.87 & 24 \\
534: SMP~LMC~85 & 2.70 & 1.98 & & 1 & 4.68 & 0.40 & 1.37 & 0.17 & 1 & 1.94 & 24 \\
535: SMP~LMC~87 & 1.59 & 2.45 & 0.46 & 1.20 & 5.32 & 0.49 & 1.55 & 0.90 & 1.12 & 3.28 & 16 \\
536: $<$LMC$>$\tablenotemark{b} & & & & & 6.03 & & & & & 2.72 & 2.2 \\
537: SMP~SMC~01 & 3.97 & 0.73 & & 1 & 4.70 & 0.04 & 0.41 &$<$0.06 & 1 & 0.46 & 103 \\
538: SMP~SMC~03 & $<$0.58 & 2.58 & & 1 & 2.87 & 0.18 &$<$0.35 & 0.71 & 1 & 1.07 & 29 \\
539: SMP~SMC~06 & 0.30 & 2.48 & & 1 & 2.78 & 0.07 & 0.44 & 0.39 & 1 & 0.90 & 31 \\
540: SMP~SMC~11\tablenotemark{c} & 1.62 & 0.48 & & 1 & 2.10 & 0.01 & 1.16 & 0.08 & 1 & 1.25 & 17 \\
541: SMP~SMC~22 & 0.76 & 0.74 & 0.17 & 1.21 & 1.98 & 0.23 & 0.58 & 0.18 & 1.07 & 1.06 & 19 \\
542: SMP~SMC~24 & 0.94 & 1.87 & & 1 & 2.81 & 0.08 & 0.95 & 0.13 & 1 & 1.17 & 24 \\
543: SMP~SMC~28 & 0.37 & 0.76 & 0.21 & 1.33 & 1.71 & 0.23 & 0.45 & 0.31 & 1.12 & 1.10 & 16 \\
544: $<$SMC$>$ & & & & & 2.71 & & & & & 1.00 & 27 \\
545:
546: \enddata
547: \tablenotetext{a}{The neon and sulfur abundances are in
548: $\times$10$^{-5}$ and $\times$10$^{-6}$ respectively.}
549: \tablenotetext{b}{The average also includes SMP~LMC~83 from \citet{ber04}.}
550: \tablenotetext{c}{Large uncertainty in the abundance (see \S3.3).}
551: \end{deluxetable*}
552:
553:
554:
555: \section{Comparison Sources}
556:
557: This section describes the sources to which the MC PN abundances are
558: compared in \S5.2. These comparison sources include Galactic PNe,
559: Galactic, MC, M33 and M83 H\,II regions, and the solar abundance.
560:
561: \subsection{Solar values}
562:
563: The solar carbon, oxygen, sulfur, argon and neon abundances have
564: been subject to significant changes, especially during the last
565: seven years. These changes reflect in some way the difficulty in
566: deriving solar abundances. The neon and argon abundances are
567: especially troublesome because there are no lines of these elements
568: in the solar photosphere and their abundances must be derived from
569: coronal lines. \citet{asp05} quoted a neon value of
570: 6.9$\times$10$^{-5}$ using the oxygen solar abundance and assuming a
571: ratio of the Ne/O of 0.15. Previously, \citet{fel} using coronal
572: line measurements found a neon abundance of 1.2$\times$10$^{-4}$.
573: This value is much higher than the value by \citet{asp05} but agrees
574: better with the earlier values reported by \citet{gre98}. This
575: discrepancy is important in the debate over the consistency of the
576: helioseismological measurements and the solar model \citep{ant,bah}.
577: The neon abundance derived by \citet{pot06} in a sample of Galactic
578: PNe is more consistent with the higher neon value of \citet{fel}.
579: Very recently \cite{lan07} derived a value of 1.29$\times$10$^{-4}$,
580: again higher than the value given by \citet{asp05} and in very good
581: agreement to the previous values reported \cite{fel} and
582: \cite{gre98}. The quoted value of the solar sulfur abundance has
583: been decreasing in the last years. The sulfur abundance derived by
584: \citet{gre} is 1.4$\times$10$^{-5}$ while \citet{asp05} find
585: 0.94$\times$10$^{-5}$. Given these discrepancies, in the rest of
586: the paper instead of assuming a certain value we will refer and
587: compare to the above range of solar values.
588:
589: \subsection{PNe and H\,II regions}
590:
591: For comparison purposes we have selected a sample of PNe and H\,II
592: regions for which abundances were also derived from infrared data
593: and in a similar way to the PNe presented in this paper. The
594: Galactic PNe abundances in \citet{pot06} using ISO data have been
595: complemented with the Spitzer derived abundances of IC\,2448
596: \citep{shannon}, M\,1-42 \citep{pot07}, and NGC\,2392 (Pottasch et
597: al., in prep). Galactic and MC H\,II regions were taken from
598: \citet{leti} and \citet{ver} respectively. They include ISO derived
599: abundances from 26 H\,II regions in the Milky Way, 13 in the LMC,
600: and 3 in the SMC. The Spitzer abundances in Lebouteiller et al.\,(in
601: prep) of the giant H\,II regions NGC\,3603 (in the MW), 30 Doradus
602: (LMC), and NGC\,346 (SMC) are also included. While Lebouteiller et
603: al. (in prep) derive abundances at several positions in each region,
604: the calculated abundances are very similar for a given region and
605: here we adopt their average value. \citet{rub07} derived recently
606: the Ne/S abundance ratio of H\,II regions in M83 using Spitzer data
607: but the absolute values are not given. The same authors are working
608: on a study of H\,II regions in M33 and we use their neon and sulfur
609: abundance ranges\footnote{These abundances were presented in the
610: Xiang Shan workshop in 2007 (http://ast.pku.edu.cn/~xs2007/).} in
611: Figure~5.
612:
613:
614: \section{Discussion}
615:
616: \subsection{Neon, Sulfur and the Ne/S ratio}
617:
618: Neon and sulfur are alpha-process elements and therefore
619: should track each other. Their abundances are representative of the
620: chemical composition of the cloud from which they formed. Recent
621: work has suggested that some PNe may produce neon in the course of
622: evolution \citep{mar}. \cite{lei06} claim that because their derived
623: oxygen and neon abundances correlate with each other that when oxygen
624: is enriched neon must be also self-enriched in their MC sample.
625: According to the theoretical models of \citet{kar03} this enrichment
626: is modest and the mass range at which neon production in low- and
627: intermediate mass stars may occur is very small (around 3\msun).
628: Thus statistically few PNe should experience such an effect.
629:
630: From the LMC abundances listed in Table~\ref{abun_t} SMP~LMC~08
631: shows unusually high abundances of neon and sulfur. Except for
632: SMP~LMC~11, this PN has the lowest H$\beta$ flux of the LMC sample
633: (see Table~\ref{tene_t}), and it is likely that the high abundances
634: are in part the result of this low H$\beta$ flux which we use to
635: derive the abundance. The neon enrichment predicted by \citep{kar03,
636: mar} is not large enough to predict such high values. The lowest
637: neon abundance corresponds to SMP~LMC~76 which also has a low sulfur
638: abundance compared to the rest of objects (but not the lowest). The
639: neon abundance of SMP~LMC~11 has been derived using only the
640: Ne$^{+}$ stage of ionization. This is a very low excitation
641: object, and has been described as a pre-planetary nebula by
642: \cite{ber06} due to its very peculiar infrared spectrum which shows,
643: among others features, molecular absorption bands of acetylene and
644: poly-acetylene. There are no \ion{[Ne}{3]} or \ion{[S}{3]} and
645: \ion{[S}{4]} lines in the IRS spectrum.
646:
647: Not including SMP~LMC~08, the average neon abundance of the PNe in
648: the LMC is 6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$, which is 1/2.7 of the average neon
649: abundance of Galactic PNe (1.6$\times$10$^{-4}$) used as comparison
650: (\S4.2). The mean sulfur abundance is 2.7$\times$10$^{-6}$, which
651: yields a slightly lower ratio of 1/3.7 when compared to the average
652: value of Galactic PNe (0.99$\times$10$^{-5}$). The SMC sample
653: contains only 7 objects. Although this is a small number to attempt
654: statistics it can be seen in Table~3 that the sulfur and especially
655: the neon abundances are very similar in most of the SMC objects.
656: The mean neon abundance of the SMC PNe is 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$,
657: which is 1/6.0 of the average neon abundance in Galactic PNe. The
658: sulfur abundance in the SMC PNe is also low, 1/10 of the average
659: Galactic PNe sulfur abundance. Thus, keeping in mind that the SMC
660: sample contains only a few objects, it seems that either the sulfur
661: abundance in MC PNe is lower than in Galactic PNe or the neon
662: abundance higher.
663:
664: Figure~\ref{nes_f} is a plot of the Ne/S ratio against the neon
665: abundance (as an indicator of metallicity) for PNe (top) and H\,II
666: regions (bottom). This abundance ratio has the advantage over the
667: elemental abundance measurements in that any uncertainty introduced
668: by combining infrared measurements with optical hydrogen measurements
669: cancels out, and uncertainties in T$_{e}$ are much reduced. Also
670: plotted are the median values for the different data sets. The
671: figure shows that most of the MC PNe have ratios between 15 and 30
672: (with a median value of 23.5), with SMC and LMC PNe displaying a
673: similar range of values. This range is similar to the ratio
674: displayed by Galactic PNe (7.5-32), although as we saw before the MC
675: PNe have a slightly higher ratio (solid and dashed lines in the
676: figure). The Ne/S ratio in Galactic H\,II regions ranges from 10 to
677: 50 with a median value of 21 (dotted-dashed line in
678: Fig.~\ref{nes_f}) and agrees very well with the MC PNe. The MC H\,II
679: regions have on average a lower Ne/S ratio but the number of sources
680: is not very large. The H\,II regions studied by \citet{rub07} in
681: the metal-rich galaxy M83 have Ne/S ratios that vary from 24.4 to
682: 41.9 and thus are similar to the ratios shown by the MC PNe. In
683: summary, the Ne/S ratios show large variations within each dataset.
684: The fact that most LMC/SMC PNe show values which are similar to
685: Galactic PNe and different H\,II regions implies that these elements
686: have a common origin and if any enrichment of neon has occurred it
687: has remained modest. This agrees with the result of \cite{dop97} who
688: find no sign of dredge-up of $^{22}$Ne in their sample of LMC PNe.
689:
690: There are two PNe with a Ne/S ratio which is significantly higher
691: than any of the comparison datasets. Two other objects have a ratio
692: of $\sim$50 which is high compared to the rest of the sample of PNe
693: although some Galactic H\,II regions also reach such values. These
694: objects are labeled in Figure~4 (top). The extremely high values of
695: the Ne/S ratio in SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01 are mainly the result of
696: their lower sulfur abundance. These two objects show the lowest
697: sulfur abundances: SMP~LMC~31 has a sulfur abundance which is 5.7
698: times lower than the average LMC PNe, and the sulfur abundance in
699: SMP~SMC~01 is about 2.2 lower than the average SMC PNe (see
700: Table~3). These differences in sulfur can account for the high
701: ratio observed in this two objects. However, these two objects
702: together with SMP~LMC~28 also show a high neon abundance compared to
703: the rest of objects in their sample and it is therefore possible
704: that neon-enrichment has taken place in these objects.
705:
706: The grey band in Figure~\ref{nes_f} indicates the lower and higher
707: solar ratio found using the abundances given in \S3.1 and it is
708: clearly lower than Galactic and MC PNe or H\,II regions. This is
709: known and several authors have already discussed that the solar
710: sulfur abundance seems too high compared to Galactic PNe and H\,II
711: regions \citep{pot06,mar, leti}. In addition, several authors
712: \citep{pot06,wan07} favor the higher neon solar abundance given by
713: \citet{fel} and \citet{lan07} instead of the one quoted by
714: \citet{asp05}. This work also supports the higher neon abundance in
715: the literature but from Figure~4 it is clear that the Ne/S in most
716: datasets is higher than the solar ratio.
717:
718: \begin{figure}
719: \begin{center}
720: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{f4.eps}
721: \end{center}
722: \caption{Ne/S ratio with respect to the total neon abundance of
723: the PNe (top panel) and H\,II regions (bottom). The grey band
724: represents the solar Ne/S ratio. The horizontal lines represent
725: the median of the Ne/S for PNe (with a typical error bar on the
726: right side of the line) and H\,II regions in the Galaxy, the
727: LMC, and the SMC.\label{nes_f}}
728: \end{figure}
729:
730:
731:
732:
733: \subsection{Comparison to other sources}
734:
735: \begin{figure}
736: \begin{center}
737: \includegraphics[width=7cm,angle=90]{f5.eps}
738: \end{center}
739: \caption{Comparison of the neon and sulfur abundances in PNe and
740: H\,II regions for the Milky Way, the LMC and the SMC. The range
741: of abundances for H\,II regions in M33 are also shown. A 50\%
742: error bar for the LMC and SMC PNe is shown in the lower side of
743: the figure (see \S3.3).\label{abun_f}}
744: \end{figure}
745:
746: Figure~\ref{abun_f} shows a comparison of the neon and sulfur
747: abundances in PNe and H\,II regions in the MW, LMC, SMC and M33. The
748: grey band in the figure represents the range of solar values found in
749: the literature.
750:
751: Galactic PNe and H\,II regions display a neon abundance that is
752: closer to the higher solar value. Note that while we are comparing
753: with solar values the effect of the Galactic abundance gradient has
754: not been taken into account in this plot. The Galactic sources also
755: show a clear under-abundance of sulfur compared to the solar value.
756: The neon abundances in PNe and H\,II regions show a remarkable
757: agreement in the Milky Way, LMC and SMC. M33 which is usually
758: regarded as having half the solar metallicity \citep{mag07} shows a
759: very large range of neon abundance which encompasses both the LMC
760: and SMC PNe sample.
761:
762:
763: The interpretation of the sulfur abundance is complicated. As
764: mentioned before, both Galactic PNe and H\,II regions show clearly
765: an under-abundance of sulfur with respect to solar, and this has
766: been ascribed in some studies to the solar sulfur abundance being
767: too high. The LMC PNe sulfur abundance shows a very large
768: dispersion in values. Most PNe show sulfur values that are in the
769: range of the LMC H\,II regions but 6 objects are below that range.
770: This does not mean that these PNe have anomalous sulfur abundances
771: as the number of LMC H\,II regions used for comparison is small, but
772: seems to point to a slightly lower sulfur abundance in the PNe. The
773: low sulfur abundances shown by these six PNe are not due to errors
774: in the ICF used to correct for S$^{+4}$ because some of them are
775: in fact low ionization PNe and no ICF is needed. We have compared
776: the average abundance of sulfur in high- and low-excitation PNe
777: separately and find similar average abundances of 2.9 and
778: 2.3$\times$10$^{-6}$ for the high- and low-excitation PNe
779: respectively. Except for SMP~LMC~31, the range of sulfur abundances
780: in the H\,II regions in M33 (which has a metallicity close to that
781: of the LMC) is similar to the sulfur abundances we measure in these
782: PNe. The comparison of the PNe and H\,II region sulfur abundances
783: in the SMC is hampered by the low number of sources. Considering
784: the uncertainties both data sets compare well, although one source
785: (SMP~SMC~01) has a sulfur abundance which is clearly lower than the
786: rest of PNe and H\,II regions. We do not know the reasons for the
787: apparent sulfur depletion in SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01. Sulfur can
788: be depleted onto dust (e.g. MgS, FeS). Although both SMP~LMC~31 and
789: SMP~SMC~01 do show a strong MgS feature a further investigation of
790: this possibility must be made before any conclusion can be drawn.
791:
792:
793: \subsection{Comparison with the literature}
794:
795:
796: \begin{deluxetable*}{c c c c c c c c c c}
797: \tabletypesize{\small}
798: \tablecolumns{10}
799: \tablewidth{0pc}
800: \tablecaption{Abundance Comparison.\label{comp_t}}
801: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} &
802: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Ne/H$\times$10$^{-5}$} & &
803: \multicolumn{4}{c}{S/H$\times$10$^{-6}$}\\ \cline{2-5} \cline{7-10}
804: (SMP) & \colhead{Present} & \colhead{DM\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{D97\tablenotemark{a}} &
805: \colhead{LD\tablenotemark{a}} & & Present &
806: \colhead{DM\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{D97\tablenotemark{a}} &
807: \colhead{LD\tablenotemark{a}}}
808:
809: \startdata
810:
811: LMC02 & 3.41 & & 2.8 & $<$0.18 & & 1.4 & 1.6 & 4.0 & $<$4.2 \\
812: LMC08 & 105.7 & 2.2 & 2.1 & 1.82 & & 11.7 & 6.0 & 4.9 & 1109.7 \\
813: LMC11 & 4.6 & & & 0.55 & & & & & 1.15 \\
814: LMC13\tablenotemark{d} & 5.1 & 3.8 & & 4.0 & & 4.0 & 3.9 & & \\
815: LMC28\tablenotemark{d} & 10.1 & & & & & 2.0 & & & \\
816: LMC31 & 7.0 & & & 0.04 & & 0.47 & & & 1.86 \\
817: LMC35\tablenotemark{d} & 6.2 & 4.0 & 3.0 & 3.0 & & 3.0 & 2.8 & 6.0 & 24.0 \\
818: LMC36\tablenotemark{d} & 6.0 & & & 5.3 & & 1.18 & & & \\
819: LMC38 & 9.1 & 4.1 & & 3.6 & & 2.9 & 1 & & 23.4 \\
820: LMC40\tablenotemark{d} & 6.1 & 6.0 & 4.5 & 6.9 & & 2.9 & 4.6 & 6.2 & 36.3 \\
821: LMC53 & 5.3 & & & 4.1 & & 3.4 & & & 18.2 \\
822: LMC58 & 4.7 & 2.0 & & 1.23 & & 1.18 & 3.1 & & 95.5 \\
823: LMC61 & 5.9 & 4.2 & & 5.8 & & 5.5 & 7.4 & & 5.7 \\
824: LMC62\tablenotemark{d} & 4.6 & 3.3 & & 2.2 & & 3.1 & 8.0 & & 4.6 \\
825: LMC76 & 2.8 & 2.4 & 2.2 & 1.86 & & 1.2 & 4.0 & 4.0 & \\
826: LMC78\tablenotemark{d} & 9.1 & 4.5 & & 3.6 & & 3.9 & 5.2 & & 30.9 \\
827: LMC83 & 8.6 & 4.1 & 5.1 & & & 4.8 & 6.5 & 2.4 & \\
828: LMC85 & 4.7 & 4.0 & 3.0 & 0.68 & & 1.9 & 4.0 & 2.0 & 4.7 \\
829: LMC87\tablenotemark{d} & 5.3 & 11.0 & & 3.1 & & 3.3 & 6.8 & & 18.2 \\
830: SMC01 & 4.7 & 0.7 & & 0.26 & & 0.46 & & & \\
831: SMC03 & 2.9 & 1.3 & & 1.00 & & 1.01 & & & 5.7 \\
832: SMC06 & 2.8 & 2.2 & & 1.38 & & 0.90 & 6.0 & & 23.4 \\
833: SMC11 & 2.1 & 1.5 & & $<$1.00 & & 1.25 & 2.8 & & $<$5.9 \\
834: SMC22\tablenotemark{d} & 2.0 & 2.1 & & 0.56 & & 1.06 & 3.2 & & 4.0 \\
835: SMC24 & 2.8 & & & 1.15 & & 1.17 & & & 0.31 \\
836: SMC28\tablenotemark{d} & 1.7 & 3.0 & & 0.72 & & 1.10 & 4.0 & & 7.4 \\
837:
838: \enddata
839: \tablenotetext{a}{References to abundances: DM
840: \citep{dop91a,dop91b}, D97 \citep{dop97}, LD \citep{lei06}.}
841: \tablenotetext{d}{High excitation PNe.}
842: \end{deluxetable*}
843:
844:
845:
846: A comparison of the abundances derived in this paper with those
847: derived in \citet{dop91a,dop91b,dop97} using photo-ionization models and
848: \citet{lei06} using optical data is given in Table~\ref{comp_t}.
849:
850: The neon abundances we derive are in agreement with the abundances
851: of \citet{dop91a,dop91b}. In most of the cases the agreement is very
852: good. For the few objects where the agreement is not that
853: satisfactory, the abundances usually compare well within a factor of
854: two which is reasonable considering the uncertainties in the
855: abundances we derive and those involved in the use of
856: photo-ionization models. \cite{dop97} revised the abundances for 8
857: LMC PNe adding {\em HST} spectroscopy to their ground observations.
858: Some of their revised abundances agree with their previous
859: determinations but in some cases (especially for sulfur) the
860: differences amount to a factor of 1.3 to 3. Our abundances are
861: roughly similar to those of \citet{lei06} for most of the
862: high-excitation PNe\footnote{Those PNe showing high-excitation lines
863: such as \ion{[Ne}{5]}. See footnote in Table~4.} except for
864: SMP~LMC~62 and SMP~LMC~83. \citet{lei06} however state that their
865: neon abundance for these two objects was poorly determined. For most
866: of the remaining sources (low-excitation PNe) our abundances are
867: significantly larger than those by \cite{lei06}. To determine the
868: reasons for this discrepancy, we have calculated the \ion{Ne}{3}
869: abundance using their measured optical line at 3869\AA~and assumed
870: T$_e$. The \ion{Ne}{3} fractional abundance we derive using the
871: optical line agrees within 30\% with the results from the infrared
872: line for the high-excitation PNe and a few of the low-excitation PNe
873: (SMP~LMC~53, SMP~LMC~61, SMP~LMC~76). For the rest of the objects
874: the difference in the \ion{Ne}{3} ionic abundance is large enough to
875: account for the difference in the total neon abundance. A possible
876: explanation for this discrepancy is the uncertainty of T$_e$ when
877: deriving abundances using optical lines. In some PNe the T$_e$
878: derived using the \ion{Ne}{3} is significantly lower than using
879: other ions \citep{ber01}. A lower T$_e$ increases the ionic
880: abundance, and a difference of a couple of thousand degrees Kelvin
881: in the T$_e$ can account for the differences we see.
882:
883:
884: The sulfur abundance reported in this paper agrees (although to a
885: lesser extent than the neon) with those of \cite{dop91a,dop91b}.
886: The abundances are usually within a factor of 3; when the agreement
887: is less good our abundances are always lower. \citet{dop91a,dop91b}
888: have information on the S$^{+}$ and S$^{+2}$ ions, and in
889: several cases only upper-limits for one or both ions could be
890: derived. However, the contribution to the sulfur abundance in PNe
891: comes mainly from the S$^{+2}$ and S$^{+3}$, and both these ions
892: can be measured in the infrared. The abundances by \cite{lei06} are much
893: higher than either presented in this paper or by
894: \cite{dop91a,dop91b}. The discrepancies are sometimes larger than a
895: factor of 15. Some of the sulfur abundances reported by
896: \cite{lei06} are even higher than solar by factors of a few which is
897: difficult to interpret. This large difference cannot be accounted
898: for by differences in the S$^{+2}$ fractional abundance using
899: infrared or optical lines which we have recalculated. The \ion{S}{3}
900: line at 6312\AA~used by \cite{lei06} is blended with a \ion{He}{2}
901: line which may add a fraction to the total sulfur abundance. In
902: addition, for many cases \cite{lei06} could only measure
903: upper-limits to the \ion{S}{3} line and they state that their sulfur
904: abundance is very uncertain. It is possible that the ICFs used to
905: derive the total sulfur abundance in \cite{lei06} may overestimate
906: the contribution of S$^{+3}$ by a large factor. Despite the
907: uncertainties explained in our abundance determination we consider
908: our sulfur abundances to be more accurate than the previous work as
909: we have measured the important stages of ionisation and complemented
910: with the existing data in the literature.
911:
912:
913: SMP~LMC~08 needs special mention. \citet{lei06} quote a much lower
914: abundance of neon (1.8$\times$10$^{-5}$) than the one we derive. We
915: find that using their measured optical line at 3869\AA, extinction,
916: T$_e$, and N$_e$ values, the Ne$^{+2}$ fractional abundance is a
917: factor 32 lower than using the infrared line. The infrared line at
918: 15.5$\mu$m is very bright (Fig.~3) and could be measured easily.
919: While we do not know the nature of this discrepancy, a small part of
920: this discrepancy can be ascribed to difference in the extinction,
921: since \citet{lei06} use a very low value (C$=$0.01) compared to the
922: one by \citet{mea91a} which we use, or uncertainties in the T$_e$.
923: The IRS spectrum of the object shows that \ion{Ne}{2} is also an
924: important contributor to the total neon abundance (about 30\%) and
925: this may be underestimated by \citet{lei06}. SMP~LMC~08 also shows
926: a large abundance of sulfur but interestingly in this case
927: \citet{lei06} quote a lower limit to its abundance which is a factor
928: 10 higher than ours (1.17$\times$10$^{-5}$) and of the order of the
929: solar value (1.4$\times$10$^{-5}$). The Ne/S abundance we find is
930: about 9, which is similar (but a bit on the lower end) to the rest
931: of the sample. This may imply that the H$\beta$ flux we use for
932: this object \citep{woo87} to derive the elemental abundance is
933: probably not adequate, and will render the abundance derived for
934: this object as uncertain.
935:
936:
937:
938: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
939:
940: We report the high-resolution Spitzer-IRS observations of a sample of
941: 18 PNe in the LMC and 7 in the SMC. The spectra cover the 10-37~$\mu$m
942: wavelength range and show the usual fine-structure lines of neon,
943: sulfur and oxygen typically seen in PNe. Some nebulae also show high
944: excitation lines of argon and magnesium.
945:
946: The abundances for neon and sulfur have been derived and compared to
947: Galactic PNe and H\,II regions, MC H\,II regions and the solar values.
948: The neon average abundances are 6.0$\times$10$^{-5}$ and
949: 2.7$\times$10$^{-5}$ in the LMC and SMC respectively. This is
950: $\sim$1/3 and 1/6 of the average neon abundance of the Galactic PNe
951: used as comparison. Given the uncertainties, these values agree well
952: with the most quoted values for the LMC and SMC metallicity (1/3 and
953: 1/5 solar respectively).
954:
955: The average Ne/S ratio of the MC PNe (23.5) is slightly higher than
956: the average ratio for Galactic PNe (16) but the range of Ne/S values
957: is similar in both samples. These values are also similar to those
958: found in H\,II regions. We believe that this is an indication that
959: neon-enrichment has either not occurred or remained modest in most of
960: the nebulae. This agrees with the conclusion by \citet{dop97} based on
961: their derived abundances in a sample of LMC PNe. In fact,
962: nucleosynthesis models suggest that this process occurs in a very
963: narrow range of masses and thus statistically few objects would
964: experience such enrichment. Four objects show a high Ne/S ratio. In
965: two of them (SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01) the high ratio is mainly due
966: to the very low sulfur abundance of these objects, but together with
967: SMP~LMC~28 they show the highest neon abundance in the sample so it
968: is a possibility that these PNe may have experienced some
969: neon-enrichment.
970:
971: The range of neon abundances of PNe and H\,II regions is the same in
972: the Milky Way, the LMC and the SMC. The sulfur abundance of Galactic
973: PNe and H\,II regions is also similar for both sets of objects. For
974: the LMC it seems that some PNe show lower sulfur abundances than the
975: H\,II regions, but the number of LMC H\,II regions to which we compare
976: is not very large. The sulfur abundances of M33 H\,II regions have a
977: similar range of abundances to those of the LMC and SMC PNe. Given
978: the low number of objects in the sample of SMC PNe and H\,II regions
979: we state that it seems that both types of objects show similar sulfur
980: abundances but clearly more objects of both kinds are needed.
981:
982: The two nebulae, SMP~LMC~31 and SMP~SMC~01, showing a clear lower
983: sulfur abundance compared to the rest of the objects also show a MgS
984: feature in their low-resolution IRS spectra. One could argue that some
985: of the sulfur is depleted in dust. However other objects which show
986: the MgS feature do not have a lower sulfur abundance. This should be
987: further investigated.
988:
989: The PNe abundances derived are also compared to previous
990: determinations by \cite{lei06} from optical line measurements and
991: \citet{dop91a,dop91b,dop97} using photo-ionization models. The
992: comparison shows that our derived neon abundance agrees very well
993: with those by \citet{dop91a,dop91b} and to a lesser extent with those
994: of \cite{lei06}. The sulfur abundances we derive agree well for about
995: half of the objects with the abundances determined by
996: \citet{dop91a,dop91b} but for the rest of the PNe they are up to a
997: factor of 3 lower. The sulfur abundances derived by \cite{lei06} are
998: much higher than either the ones derived in this paper or the ones by
999: \citet{dop91a,dop91b}. The advantage of the abundances presented in
1000: this paper over previous work is that we have measured and used the
1001: most important stages of ionization and complemented with existing
1002: data in the literature.
1003:
1004:
1005: \acknowledgments We thank an anonymous referee whose comments have
1006: improved the paper. JBS would like to thank Duncan Farrah for reading
1007: parts of the manuscript. This work is based on observations made with
1008: the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
1009: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA contract
1010: 1407. Support for this work was provided by NASA through Contract
1011: Number 1257184 issued by JPL/Caltech.
1012:
1013:
1014:
1015: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1016:
1017: \bibitem[Aller et al.(1987)]{all87} Aller, L.H., Keyes, C.D., Maran,
1018: S.P., et al. 1987, \apj, 320, 159
1019:
1020: \bibitem[Aller(1983)]{all83} Aller, L.H. 1983, \apj, 273, 590
1021:
1022: \bibitem[Aller et al.(1981)]{all81} Aller, L.H., Keyes, C.D., Ross,
1023: J.E., \& O'Mara, B.J. 1981, \mnras, 194, 613
1024:
1025: \bibitem[Antia \& Basu(2005)]{ant} Antia, M., \& Basu, S., 2005, \apj, 621, L85
1026:
1027: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asp05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \&
1028: Sauval, A.J. 2005, ASPC 336, 25
1029:
1030: \bibitem[Bahcall et al.(2005)]{bah} Bahcall, J.N., Basu, S., \&
1031: Serenelli, A.M., 2005, \apj, 631, 1281
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2006)]{ber06} Bernard-Salas, J.,
1034: Peeters, E., Sloan, G.C., Cami, J., Guiles, S., \& Houck, J.R. 2006,
1035: \apjl, 652, L29
1036:
1037: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2004)]{ber04} Bernard-Salas, J., Houck,
1038: J.R., Morris, P.W., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 278
1039:
1040: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et~al.(2003)]{ber03} Bernard-Salas J., Pottasch
1041: S.R., Wesselius P.R., Feibelman W.A., 2003,\aap, 406, 165
1042:
1043: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2001)]{ber01} Bernard--Salas, J.,
1044: Pottasch, S. R., Beintema, D.A., \& Wesselius, P. R. 2001, \aap,
1045: 367, 949
1046:
1047: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{coh} Cohen, M., Megeath, T.G.,
1048: Hammersley, P. L., Martin-Luis, F., \& Stauffer, J. 2003, \aj, 125,
1049: 2645
1050:
1051: \bibitem[Corradi et al.(2005)]{cor05} Corradi, R.L.M., Magrini, L.,
1052: Greimel, R., et al. 2005, \aap, 431, 555
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Dopita et al.(1997)]{dop97} Dopita, M.A., Vassiliadis, E.,
1055: Wood, P.R., et al. 1997, \apj, 474, 188
1056:
1057: \bibitem[de Graauw et al.(1996)]{deg} de Graauw, T., Whittet, D.C.B.,
1058: Gerakines, P.A., et al. 1996, \aap, 315, 345
1059:
1060: \bibitem[Dopita \& Meatheringham(1991a)]{dop91a} Dopita, M.A., \&
1061: Meatheringham, S.J., 2001a, \apj, 367, 115
1062:
1063: \bibitem[Dopita \& Meatheringham(1991b)]{dop91b} Dopita, M.A., \&
1064: Meatheringham, S.J., 2001b, \apj, 377, 480
1065:
1066: \bibitem[Feldman \& Widing(2003)]{fel} Feldman, U., \& Widing, K.G.
1067: 2003, Sp.Sci.Rev. 107, 665
1068:
1069: \bibitem[Fluks et al.(1994)]{flu} Fluks, M.A., Plez, B., de Winter,
1070: D., et al. 1994, \aaps, 105, 311
1071:
1072:
1073: \bibitem[Guiles et al.(2007)]{shannon} Guiles, S., Bernard-Salas,
1074: J., Pottasch, S.R., \& Roellig, T.L. 2007, \apj, 660, 1282
1075:
1076: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Sauval(1998)]{gre98} Grevesse, N., \& Sauval,
1077: A.J., 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Grevesse \& Noels(1993)]{gre} Grevesse, N., Noels, A., 1993,
1080: Origin and Evolution of the Elements. Publisher: Cambridge
1081: University Press. Edited by Prantzos, N., Vangioni-Flam, E., and
1082: Cass\'e, M.
1083:
1084: \bibitem[Henry \& Kwitter(2004)]{hen04} Henry, R.B.C., Kwitter, K.B.,
1085: \& Balick, B. 2004, AJ 127, 2284
1086:
1087: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{hig} Higdon, S.J.U., Devost, D., Higdon,
1088: J.L. et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 975
1089:
1090: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004)]{hou} Houck, J. R., Appleton, P. N.,
1091: Armus, L., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
1092:
1093: \bibitem[Iben \& Renzini(1983)]{ibe} Iben I., Renzini A., 1983,
1094: ARA\&A, 21, 271
1095:
1096: \bibitem[Karakas \& Lattanzio(2003)]{kar03}
1097: Karakas, A.I., \& Lattanzio, J.C. 2003. PASA 20, 393
1098:
1099: \bibitem[Kim et al.(1998)]{kim} Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dopita,
1100: M.A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 503, 674
1101:
1102: \bibitem[Landi et al.(2007)]{lan07} Landi, E., Feldman, U., \&
1103: Doschek, G.A., 2007, \apj, 659, 743
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Leisy \& Dennefeld(2006)]{lei06} Leisy, P., \& Dennefeld, M.
1106: 2006, \aap, 456, 451
1107:
1108: \bibitem[Leisy et al.(1997)]{lei97} Leisy, P., Dennefeld, M., Alard,
1109: C., \& Guibert, J. 1997, \aaps, 121, 407
1110:
1111: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2003)]{mag03} Magrini, L., Corradi, R.L.M.,
1112: Greimel, R., et al. 2003, \aap, 400, 511
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2001)]{mag01} Magrini, L., Perinotto, M.,
1115: Corradi, R.L.M., \& Mampaso, A. 2001, \aap, 379, 90
1116:
1117: \bibitem[Marigo et al.(2003)]{mar} Marigo, P., Bernard-Salas, J.,
1118: Pottasch, S.R., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Wesselius, P.R., 2003, \aap,
1119: 409, 619
1120:
1121: \bibitem[Meatheringham and Dopita(1991a)]{mea91a} Meatheringham, S.
1122: J., \& Dopita, M. A. 1991, \apjs, 75, 407
1123:
1124: \bibitem[Meatheringham and Dopita(1991b)]{mea91b} Meatheringham, S.
1125: J., \& Dopita, M. A. 1991, \apjs, 76, 1085
1126:
1127: \bibitem[Meatheringham et al.(1998)]{mea88} Meatheringham, S.J.,
1128: Dopita, M.A., \& Morgan, D.H., \apj, 329, 166
1129:
1130:
1131: \bibitem[Magrini et al.(2007)]{mag07} Magrini, L., Vilchez, J.M.,
1132: Mampaso, A., Corradi, R.L.M., \& Leisy, P. 2007, \aap, 470, 865
1133:
1134: \bibitem[Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'andez et al.(2002)]{leti}
1135: Mart\'{i}n-Hern\'andez, N.L., Peeters, E., Morisset, C., et
1136: al. 2002, \aap, 381, 606
1137:
1138: \bibitem[Meixner et al.(2006)]{mei} Meixner, M., Gordon, K.D.,
1139: Indebetow, R., et al. 2006, \aj, 132, 2268
1140:
1141: \bibitem[Monk et al.(1988)]{mon88} Monk, D.J., Barlow, M.J., \& Clegg,
1142: R.E.S. 1988, \mnras, 234, 583
1143:
1144: \bibitem[Morgan \& Parker(1998)]{mor} Morgan, \& Parker 1998, \mnras,
1145: 296, 921
1146:
1147: \bibitem[Pe\~{n}a et al.(1997)]{pen97} Pe\~{n}a, M., Ruiz, M.T., \&
1148: Torres-Peimbert, S., \aap, 324, 674
1149:
1150: \bibitem[Pottasch et al.(2007)]{pot07} Pottasch, S.R.,
1151: Bernard-Salas, J., \& Roellig, T.L. 2007, \aap, in press
1152:
1153: \bibitem[Pottasch \& Bernard-Salas(2006)]{pot06} Pottasch, S.R., \&
1154: Bernard-Salas, J. 2006, \aap, 457, 189
1155:
1156: \bibitem[Pottasch \& Surendiranath(2005)]{pot05} Pottasch, S.R., \&
1157: Surendiranath, R. 2005, \aap, 432, 139
1158:
1159: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(2007)]{rub07} Rubin, R.H., Simpson, J.P.,
1160: Colgan, S.W.J., et al. 2007, \mnras, 377, 1407
1161:
1162: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1988)]{rub} Rubin, R.H., Simpson, J.P.,
1163: Erickson, E.F., \& Haas, M.R. 1988, \apj, 327, 377
1164:
1165: \bibitem[Sanduleak et al.(1978)]{san} Sanduleak, N., MacConnel, D.J.,
1166: Philip, A.G.D. 1978, PASP, 90, 621
1167:
1168: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2006)]{sha06} Shaw, R.A., Stanghellini, L.,
1169: Villaver, E., \& Mutcher, M. 2006, \apjs, 167, 201
1170:
1171: \bibitem[Shaw et al.(2001)]{sha01} Shaw, R.A., Stanghellini, L.,
1172: Mutcher, M., Balick, B., \& Blades, J.C. 2001, \apj, 548, 727
1173:
1174: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2005)]{sta05} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1175: R.A., \& Gilmore, D., et al. 2005, \apj, 622, 294
1176:
1177: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2003)]{sta03} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1178: R.A., Balick, B., et al. 2003, \apj, 596, 997
1179:
1180: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(2002)]{sta02} Stanghellini, L., Shaw,
1181: R.A., Mutchler, M., et al. 2002, \apj, 575, 178
1182:
1183: \bibitem[Stanghellini et al.(1999)]{sta99} Stanghellini, L., Blades,
1184: J.C., Osmer, S.J., Barlow, M.J., \& Liu, X.-W. 1999, \apj, 510, 687
1185:
1186: \bibitem[Surendiranath et al.(2004)]{sur04} Surendiranath, R.,
1187: Pottasch, S.R., \& Garc\'{i}a-Lario, P. 2004, \aap, 421, 1051
1188:
1189: \bibitem[Vermeij \& van der Hulst(2002)]{ver} Vermeij, R., \& van der
1190: Hulst, J.M., 2002, \aap, 391, 1081
1191:
1192: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2004)]{vil04} Villaver, E., Stanghellini, L.,
1193: \& Shaw, R.2004, \apj, 614, 716
1194:
1195: \bibitem[Villaver et al.(2003)]{vil03} Villaver, E., Stanghellini, L.,
1196: \& Shaw, R. 2003, \apj, 585, 49
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{wer} Werner, M., Roellig, T. L., Low, F.
1199: J., et al. 2004, \apjs, 154, 1
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1987)]{woo87} Wood, P.R., Meatheringham, S.J.,
1202: Dopita, M.A., \& Morgan, D.H. 1987, \apj, 320, 178
1203:
1204: \bibitem[Wang \& Liu(2007)]{wan07} Wang, W., \& Liu, X.-W 2007, \mnras, accepted
1205:
1206: \bibitem[Zijlstra et al.(1994)]{zij94} Zijlstra, A.A., van Hoof,
1207: P.A.M., Chapman, J.M., \& Loup, C. 1994, \aap, 290, 228
1208:
1209:
1210: \end{thebibliography}
1211:
1212:
1213:
1214: \end{document}
1215:
1216: