1: % V1 sent by MB June 22, 2007
2: % V2 SR July 4, 2007
3: %VSR MB July 5, 2007
4: % sent by MB to SR on July 7, 2007
5:
6:
7: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
8: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
13:
14:
15: \shorttitle{Pulsation of EE~Cam}
16: \shortauthors{Breger, Rucinski, \& Reegen}
17:
18: \begin{document}
19:
20:
21: \title{Pulsation of EE~Cam}
22:
23: \author{M. Breger\affil}
24: \affil{Institut f\"ur Astronomie der Universit\"at Wien,
25: T\"urkenschanzstr. 17, A--1180 Wien, Austria}
26: \email{michel.breger@univie.ac.at}
27:
28:
29: \author{S.~M.~Rucinski\affil}
30: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
31: University of Toronto David Dunlap Observatory,
32: P.O.\ Box 360, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada}
33: \email{rucinski@astro.utoronto.ca}
34:
35: \and
36:
37: \author{P. Reegen\affil}
38: \affil{Institut f\"ur Astronomie der Universit\"at Wien,
39: T\"urkenschanzstr. 17, A--1180 Wien, Austria}
40: \email{reegen@astro.univie.ac.at}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: EE~Cam is a previously little studied Delta Scuti pulsator
44: with amplitudes between those of the HADS (High-Amplitude
45: Delta Scuti stars) group and the average low-amplitude pulsators.
46: Since the size of stellar rotation determines both which
47: pulsation modes are selected by the star as well as their amplitudes,
48: the star offers a great opportunity to examine the
49: astrophysical connections. Extensive photometric measurements
50: covering several months were carried out. 15 significant pulsation
51: frequencies were extracted. The dominant mode at 4.934~cd$^{-1}$
52: was identified as a radial mode by examining the phase shifts at different
53: wavelengths. Medium-dispersion spectra yielded a $v\sin i$ value of
54: $40 \pm 3$ km s$^{-1}$. This shows that EE~Cam belongs to the important
55: transition region between the HADS and normal Delta Scuti stars.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{stars: variables: delta Scuti --- stars: individual (EE~Cam)}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: The Delta~Scuti stars are common pulsators on and near the main-sequence
63: situated inside the classical instability strip. They generally pulsate
64: with nonradial modes and small photometric
65: amplitudes in the millimag range. These stars also essentially share the high
66: rotational velocity of the average star of spectral type A.
67: However, a number of Population I stars shows dominant radial
68: modes, amplitudes in excess of 0.3 mag and rotates with a projected
69: rotational velocity less than 30 km s$^{-1}$.
70: The members of this subgroup are called HADS
71: (High-Amplitude Delta Scuti stars).
72:
73: For the Delta Scuti stars, there exists a strong connection between
74: rotation and pulsation properties, such as amplitude. We are presently
75: engaged in a program to examine the stars between the two extremes of
76: amplitude (e.g., for 44~Tau, see \citealt{Antoci et al 2007, Zima et al 2007}).
77: We note that with extensive data and
78: nonradial mode identifications the aspect angle can be determined
79: accurately, so that the true rotational velocity can be obtained
80: from the spectroscopic $v \sin i$ measurements.
81:
82: The list of pulsators in the HIPPARCOS catalogue \citep{ESA 1997}, as
83: reanalyzed for multiperiodicity by \citet{Koen 2001}, contains a number of
84: stars belonging to this 'intermediate' group. EE~Cam
85: (HIP~27199, HD~37857) is a promising target with reported
86: peak-to-peak amplitudes near 80 millimag. Its rotational velocity is
87: presently unknown, but was suspected to be low because of the
88: relatively large pulsational amplitude. In particular, we are
89: interested in detecting another variable such as 44~Tau
90: \citep{Antoci et al 2007} which has a $v\sin i$ value of only
91: 2 km s$^{-1}$, in order to separate the effects of true low rotational
92: velocity and geometric aspect. \citet{Olson 1980} classified EE Cam as
93: an F3 giant (gF3). The catalog by \citet{Nordstrom et al 2004} gives a
94: temperature of 6530K and a [Fe/H] abundance of 0.06 relative to the Sun.
95: \citet{Koen 2001} analyzed the Hipparcos data and suggested two frequencies
96: of 4.93 and 5.21 c/d, respectively.
97:
98: \section{New photometry}
99:
100: In 2006 and 2007, photometric observations were performed using the
101: Vienna University Automatic Photoelectric Telescope
102: (APT; \citealt{Strassmeier et al 1997, Granzer Reegen Strassmeier 2001})
103: located at Washington Camp, Arizona, USA. The ``Wolfgang'' telecope
104: acquired altogether 304 hours of Str\"omgren $vy$ data from
105: 2006 February 14 to 2006 April 2 and from 2006 September 19 to
106: 2007 April 5. The three-star technique was employed with
107: HD~35606 (C1, $V = 8\fm15$, $B-V = 0.48$, F8) and HD~32745
108: (C2, $V = 8\fm21$, $B-V = 0.96$, G0) as comparison stars.
109: Since for C2, long-term variability at time scales of days could
110: not be excluded, the data reduction was applied solely
111: relying on C1. While the three-star technique was not applied in the
112: final reductions, the importance of the technique in checking for possible small-amplitude
113: variability in the chosen comparison stars was again demonstrated.
114:
115: A complete list of the measurements used to
116: extract the light curves is provided in Table~\ref{TABjournal}.
117: Typical examples of light curves of EE~Cam are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1}
118: together with the multifrequency solution derived in the next section.
119:
120: \section{Multiple frequency analysis}
121:
122: The pulsation frequency analyses were performed with a package of computer
123: programs with single-frequency and multiple-frequency techniques
124: (PERIOD04\footnote{The computer package to determine periodicities
125: can be obtained from http://www.univie.ac.at/tops/period04.},
126: \citealt{Lenz Breger 2005}),
127: which utilize Fourier as well as multiple-least-squares algorithms.
128: The latter technique fits up to several hundred simultaneous sinusoidal
129: variations in the magnitude domain and does not rely on sequential
130: prewhitening. The amplitudes and phases of all modes/frequencies
131: are determined by minimizing the residuals between the measurements
132: and the fit. The frequencies can also be improved at the same time.
133:
134: To decrease the noise in the power spectra, we have combined the
135: measurements obtained in the $y$ and $v$ passbands. The dependence
136: of the pulsation amplitude on wavelength was compensated by
137: multiplying the $v$ data set by an experimentally determined
138: factor of 0.64 and increasing the weight of these data points
139: correspondingly. This scaling creates similar amplitudes in both passbands but
140: does not falsify the power spectra. Note that different colors and data
141: sets were only combined to detect new frequency peaks in the
142: Fourier power spectrum and to determine the significance of
143: the detection. The effects of imperfect amplitude scaling
144: and small phase shifts between colors can be shown to be
145: negligible for period finding. For prewhitening, separate
146: solutions were obtained for each color by multiple least-square fits.
147: In the analysis of the Delta Scuti Network campaign data,
148: we usually apply a specific statistical criterion for judging the
149: reality of a newly discovered peak in the Fourier spectra, viz.,
150: a ratio of amplitude signal/noise = 4.0 (see \citealt{Breger et al 1993}).
151:
152: Our analysis consists of a number of different steps to be repeated.
153: Each step involves the computation of a Fourier analysis
154: (power spectrum) from the original data or a previously
155: prewhitened fit. The dominant peaks in the power spectrum were
156: then examined for statistical significance and possible
157: effects of daily and annual aliasing. For computing new
158: multifrequency solutions, the amplitudes and phases
159: were computed separately for each color, so that even
160: these small errors associated with combining
161: different colors were avoided. Note that the new
162: multifrequency solutions were always computed from the
163: observed (not the prewhitened) data. Because of the day-time
164: and observing-season (annual) gaps, different alias
165: possibilities were tried out and the fit with the lowest
166: residuals selected. The resulting optimum multifrequency
167: solutions were then prewhitened and the analysis repeated
168: while adding more and more frequencies, until the new
169: peaks were no longer statistically significant.
170:
171: An independently performed {\sc SigSpec} analysis
172: \citep{Reegen 2007}, which employs a statistical treatment
173: of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) amplitudes that would be produced by white noise,
174: provided exact consistency with the results obtained
175: from the above procedure.
176: Fig.~\ref{fig2} shows the details of the search for the multiple frequencies,
177: which are listed in Table~\ref{TABfreqs}.
178:
179: The average residuals of the 15-frequency fit in the $y$
180: passband were $\pm$ 0.005 mag per single measurement, which
181: is higher than the 0.003 mag expected from typical APT campaigns.
182: This is caused by the large number of presently
183: unresolved additional pulsation frequencies with small amplitudes,
184: as revealed by the power spectrum of the residuals.
185:
186: We can now compare the new multifrequency results with a
187: previous result based on much fewer data: the two
188: frequencies of 4.93 and 5.21 cd$^{-1}$ found by \citet{Koen
189: 2001} are in exact agreement with our two frequencies
190: showing the highest amplitudes.
191:
192: It is possible to estimate the nonradial degree, $\ell$,
193: of the dominant pulsation mode from the available photometry
194: (for a recent application see \citealt{Lenz et al 2007}).
195: From the $v$ and $y$ passbands we derive a value
196: of $\phi(v)-\phi(y)$ = + 3.3 $\pm$ 0.4$\degr$. In this
197: temperature domain, such positive values generally indicate radial
198: pulsation. Indeed, preliminary pulsation model calculations for EE Cam
199: identify a unique value of $\ell$ = 0, i.e., radial pulsation.
200:
201: The frequency ratio $f_1/f_2$ = 0.946. Such a frequency ratio cannot
202: be identified with radial modes (e.g.,
203: see \citealt{Suarez Garrido Goupil 2006}), so that $f_2$
204: has to be nonradial. We also note that $f_1$ and $f_6$ form a close
205: frequency pair. Such close frequencies are not unusual in Delta Scuti stars
206: (e.g., see \citealt{Breger Pamyatnykh 2006}). In the case of EE Cam, however,
207: we cannot yet exclude the possibility that the close-frequency pair
208: could be an artifact of strong amplitude variability of the dominant mode.
209:
210: \section{Spectroscopy}
211:
212: EE~Cam certainly deserves a thorough spectroscopic study.
213: Here we present new results which shed light on
214: the subject of the rotation of the star. Two spectra of EE~Cam
215: and one spectrum of a standard star, HD~89449 (40~Leo, F6IV),
216: were obtained with the David Dunlop Observatory 1.88m telescope on Feb. 14, 2006.
217: For EE Cam, the UT start times were 05:15:19 (1220 s
218: exposure time) and 06:14:02 (1803 s exposure time), while
219: for HD 89449 the values were 06:52:16 and 200s.
220:
221: The spectra were centred at the Mg~I 5184 \AA\ triplet
222: and covered the range 5070 to 5306 \AA\ with an effective
223: spectral resolution of about 0.35 \AA.
224: A full technical description is given in \citet{Rucinski 2002}.
225: The spectra were rectified and then processed using the broadening
226: function (BF) formalism (as described in the same paper)
227: and subsequently improved during the
228: DDO binary-star program (for the last paper of the series,
229: see \citet{Pribulla et al 2007}).
230: The BF's were determined over the span of 61 points at
231: the 6.7 km~s$^{-1}$ spacing thus covering $\pm 150$ km~s$^{-1}$.
232: With such processing, a BF of a very sharp-line spectrum
233: has a half-width at the base of 19.5 km~s$^{-1}$.
234: The broken line in the figure (Figure~\ref{fig3})
235: shows the rotational profile calculated for the limb darkening
236: of $u = 0.7$ (this choice is not critical) in comparison
237: with the BF for EE~Cam. The BF differs from the simple
238: rotational profile in having a well-defined, but
239: unexplainable structure. The complex shape of the
240: BF for EE~Cam can be
241: interpreted as: (1) a superposition of two sharp peaks,
242: possibly from two different, unresolved stars with
243: slightly different velocities or (2)
244: one broad peak with some self-absorption, or (3)
245: signatures of two shocks propagating through the atmosphere.
246: The most likely is the last interpretation as the
247: first two have no real support in what we know about the
248: star. If the broadening of the BF
249: at the base is interpreted by rotation
250: of EE~Cam, then the observed half-width at the
251: base (45.4 and 44.8 km~s$^{-1}$ respectively) can be
252: used to estimate $v \sin i$. The two BF's, when corrected for
253: the intrinsic broadening introduced by the formalism
254: and for $v \sin i \simeq 17$ of the template itself, give
255: $v\sin i = 40$ km~s$^{-1}$. The real uncertainty is larger
256: than one determined from the difference of the two spectra
257: and is about 3 km~s$^{-1}$
258: as based on results for similar stars observed in
259: the DDO programme.
260: Note that the depression of the
261: baseline around the BF peak is of no importance;
262: it is a characteristic feature for BF's of
263: stars with rotationally broadenened lines as this
264: reflects the uncertainty of the pseudo-continuum
265: placement in the spectrum rectification step.
266: At the time of observations, the star appeared
267: to have the mean heliocentric velocity of $+11 \pm 1$
268: km~s$^{-1}$, on the assumption that the radial
269: velocity of the template star
270: HD~89449 is $+6$ km~s$^{-1}$.
271: This assumed the fit by the rotationally broadened profile,
272: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig3};
273: note that the standard/template star in the BF technique
274: is used to determine the broadening profile for the
275: program star as shown in this figure (and used
276: for the $v\sin i$ determination) as
277: well as the relative radial velocities.
278: The mean radial velocity of
279: EE~Cam was estimated at $+14.9$ km~s$^{-1}$ in
280: \citet{Nordstrom et al 2004}.
281:
282: The intensity of the BF can be used as an
283: indication of the spectral match of the template;
284: an integral of unity indicates a perfect match
285: and an identical spectral type (or more exactly,
286: an identically strong Mg~I 5184 \AA\ triplet). The two
287: spectra gave the BF integrals of 0.91 and 0.90 which
288: means that the lines are weaker than in the
289: F6IV standard HD~89449 indicating a spectral type
290: close to F5. This is confirmed by the data in the
291: Tycho-2 Catalog \citep{Hog et al 2000} (star number GSC~4098-123)
292: where the mean magnitudes give a well defined color index
293: $B-V=0.427$ which correponds to the spectral type F5
294: on the Main Sequence.
295:
296: \section{Conclusion}
297:
298: Extensive photometric measurements at the millimag level
299: covering several months were carried out.
300: The frequency analysis has revealed 15 significant
301: pulsation frequencies. The residuals show
302: that many additional modes in the 0 to 15 cd$^{-1}$
303: are present with small amplitudes. The
304: dominant pulsation at 4.934 cd$^{-1}$ was
305: identified as a radial mode by examining the phase shifts
306: of the light curves at different wavelengths.
307: The second most dominant mode at 5.214 cd$^{-1}$ was
308: found to be nonradial. This star, therefore, is an excellent
309: example of a star showing both the properties of the HADS
310: and the common small-amplitude pulsators,
311: in which the radial modes are either absent or very weak.
312:
313: This picture of a star in the astrophysical transition region
314: is supported by new measurements of the
315: projected rotational velocity: two medium-dispersion spectra
316: yielded a $v\sin i$ value of $40 \pm 3$ km s$^{-1}$.
317: This value is higher than the upper limit of 30 km s$^{-1}$ for the HADS,
318: but lower than the rotational velocity of the typical low-amplitude
319: Delta Scuti star.
320:
321: Due to the relatively high amplitudes and the rich pulsation
322: spectrum, EE Cam is ideal for further detailed studies of mode identification
323: in order to compare to asteroseismic models.
324:
325: \acknowledgments
326:
327: It is a pleasure to thank Heide DeBond and Jim Thomson for
328: assistance with the spectroscopic observations. It is a
329: pleasure to thank Patrick Lenz for computing a preliminary
330: pulsation model. This investigation has been supported by the
331: Austrian Fonds zur F\"{o}rderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung and
332: the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada.
333:
334: \begin{thebibliography}{}
335:
336: \bibitem[Antoci et al.(2007)]{Antoci et al 2007}
337: Antoci, V., Breger, M., Rodler, F., Bischof, K., \& Garrido, R. 2007, \aap, 463, 225
338:
339: \bibitem[Breger et al.(1993)]{Breger et al 1993}
340: Breger, M., Stich, J., Garrido, R., et al. 1993, A\&A, 271, 482
341:
342: \bibitem[Breger \& Pamyatnykh(2006)]{Breger Pamyatnykh 2006}
343: Breger, M., Pamyatnykh, A. A. 2006, \mnras, 368, 571
344:
345: \bibitem[ESA(1997)]{ESA 1997}
346: ESA, 1997, in 'The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues',
347: ESA SP-1200. ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk
348:
349: \bibitem[Granzer, Reegen \& Strassmeier(2001)]{Granzer Reegen Strassmeier 2001}
350: Granzer, T., Reegen, P., Strassmeier, K. G. 2001, AN, 322, 325
351:
352: \bibitem[H{\o}g et~al.(2000)]{Hog et al 2000}
353: H{\o}g, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., Urban, S.,
354: Corbin, T., Wycoff, G., Bastian, U., \\
355: Schwekendiek, P., \& Wicenec, A. 2000, \aap, 355L, 27
356:
357: \bibitem[Koen(2001)]{Koen 2001}
358: Koen, C. 2001, \mnras, 321, 44
359:
360: \bibitem[Lenz \& Breger(2005)]{Lenz Breger 2005}
361: Lenz, P., \& Breger, M., 2005, CoAst, 146, 53
362:
363: \bibitem[Lenz et al.(2007)]{Lenz et al 2007}
364: Lenz, P., Pamyatmykh, A. A., Breger, M., Antoci, V. 2007, \aap, in press
365:
366: \bibitem[Nordstrom et al.(2004)]{Nordstrom et al 2004}
367: Nordstrom B., Mayor M., Andersen J., Holmberg J.,
368: Pont F., Jorgensen B.R., Olsen E.H., Udry S., Mowlavi N. 2004, \aap, 418, 989
369:
370: \bibitem[Olson(1980)]{Olson 1980}
371: Olson E. H. 1980, A\&A Suppl. 39, 205
372:
373: \bibitem[Pribulla et al.(2007)]{Pribulla et al 2007}
374: Pribulla, T., Rucinski, S. M., Conidis, G., DeBond, H.,
375: Thomson, J. R., Gazeas, K., Ogloza, W. 2007, \aj, 133, 1977
376:
377: \bibitem[Reegen(2007)]{Reegen 2007}
378: Reegen, P. 2007, \aap, 467, 1353
379:
380: \bibitem[Rucinski(2002)]{Rucinski 2002}
381: Rucinski, S. M. 2002, \aj, 124, 1746
382:
383: \bibitem[Rucinski et al.(2005)]{Rucinski et al 2005}
384: Rucinski , S. M., Pych, W., Ogloza, W., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 767
385:
386: \bibitem[Strassmeier et al.(1997)]{Strassmeier et al 1997}
387: Strassmeier, K. G., Granzer, T., Boyd, L. J., Epand, D. H. 1997, PASP, 109, 157
388:
389: \bibitem[Suarez, Garrido \& Goupil(2006)]{Suarez Garrido Goupil 2006}
390: Suarez, J. C., Garrido, R., Goupil, M. J. 2006, \aap, 447, 649
391:
392: \bibitem[Zima et al.(2007)]{Zima et al 2007}
393: Zima, W., Lehmann, H., St\"utz, Ch, Ilyin, I. V., Breger, M. 2007, \aap, 471, 237
394:
395: \end{thebibliography}
396:
397: \clearpage
398: \begin{figure*}
399: % [bb=19 520 568 781,width=150mm,clip]
400: % [bb=19 520 568 781,width=150mm,clip]
401: \begin{center}
402: \includegraphics*[width=150mm]{f1.eps}
403: \caption{Sample light curves of EE~Cam. The four successive nights (out
404: of a total of 87 nights) have typical residuals between
405: the observations and the 15-frequency fits.
406: Both passbands $y$ and $v$ are shown.
407: \label{fig1}}
408: \end{center}
409: \end{figure*}
410:
411: \clearpage
412: % [bb=51 28 505 761,width=75mm,clip]
413: \begin{figure}
414: \begin{center}
415: \includegraphics*[bb=51 28 505 761,width=75mm,clip]{f2.eps}
416: \caption{Power spectra of EE~Cam for the 2005 and 2006 photometry.
417: The panels show the power spectra after the inclusion of
418: additional frequencies into the multiple-frequency solution.
419: Note the 1 cd$^{-1}$ alias patterns (spectral-window
420: insert of the top panel). The lowest panel clearly shows
421: the power spectrum of the residuals from the 15-frequency solution:
422: the excess power in the 5 to 15 cd$^{-1}$ range
423: shows additional pulsation frequencies and
424: demonstrates the rich pulsation spectrum of EE~Cam.
425: \label{fig2}}
426: \end{center}
427: \end{figure}
428:
429: \clearpage
430: \begin{figure}
431: \plotone{f3.eps}
432: \caption{The Broadening Functions for two spectra of EE~Cam, as
433: explained in the text. The rotational profile with $v \sin i = 40$
434: km~s$^{-1}$, centered at +11 km~s$^{-1}$, is shown by a broken line.
435: \label{fig3}}
436: \end{figure}
437:
438: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
439: \clearpage
440: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrr}
441: \tablecolumns{5}
442: \tablewidth{0pt}
443: \tablenum{1}
444: \tablecaption{Journal of the photometric observations of EE~Cam\label{TABjournal}}
445: \tablehead{
446: \colhead{Start} &
447: \colhead{Length} &
448: \colhead{} &
449: \colhead{Start} &
450: \colhead{Length} \\
451: \colhead{HJD} &
452: \colhead{hours} &
453: \colhead{} &
454: \colhead{HJD} &
455: \colhead{hours} \\
456: \colhead{245 0000+} &
457: \colhead{} &
458: \colhead{} &
459: \colhead{245 0000+} &
460: \colhead{}
461: }
462: \startdata
463: 3791.5925 & 3.30 & \hspace{10mm} & 4079.6626 & 1.78 \\
464: 3796.6821 & 0.80 & \hspace{10mm} & 4080.6584 & 2.28 \\
465: 3797.6170 & 1.18 & \hspace{10mm} & 4081.6584 & 7.60 \\
466: 3798.6337 & 1.82 & \hspace{10mm} & 4084.9154 & 0.48 \\
467: 3799.5965 & 2.78 & \hspace{10mm} & 4086.6439 & 6.64 \\
468: 3803.6372 & 1.51 & \hspace{10mm} & 4090.6314 & 6.14 \\
469: 3805.5997 & 1.28 & \hspace{10mm} & 4093.6188 & 5.04 \\
470: 3808.6153 & 1.60 & \hspace{10mm} & 4094.6146 & 6.86 \\
471: 3810.6021 & 1.82 & \hspace{10mm} & 4095.6139 & 3.13 \\
472: 3997.8792 & 3.14 & \hspace{10mm} & 4100.5988 & 6.88 \\
473: 4000.9181 & 2.24 & \hspace{10mm} & 4101.5946 & 5.05 \\
474: 4003.8632 & 3.61 & \hspace{10mm} & 4102.5953 & 6.81 \\
475: 4005.8595 & 3.77 & \hspace{10mm} & 4103.5930 & 6.81 \\
476: 4010.8476 & 3.61 & \hspace{10mm} & 4104.5869 & 6.96 \\
477: 4023.9142 & 2.54 & \hspace{10mm} & 4105.5876 & 6.87 \\
478: 4024.8081 & 5.19 & \hspace{10mm} & 4108.5755 & 6.95 \\
479: 4025.8054 & 5.21 & \hspace{10mm} & 4116.5703 & 6.48 \\
480: 4028.7963 & 5.51 & \hspace{10mm} & 4117.5707 & 6.48 \\
481: 4029.7944 & 5.51 & \hspace{10mm} & 4124.5788 & 5.75 \\
482: 4030.7936 & 5.52 & \hspace{10mm} & 4127.5763 & 5.58 \\
483: 4031.7896 & 5.67 & \hspace{10mm} & 4128.5810 & 5.39 \\
484: 4035.7800 & 6.00 & \hspace{10mm} & 4134.5845 & 4.94 \\
485: 4038.8807 & 3.66 & \hspace{10mm} & 4135.6248 & 3.96 \\
486: 4048.7434 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4136.5857 & 4.84 \\
487: 4049.7408 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4140.5878 & 4.55 \\
488: 4050.7387 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4143.6649 & 2.39 \\
489: 4054.7279 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4146.6432 & 2.82 \\
490: 4055.7273 & 2.17 & \hspace{10mm} & 4147.6938 & 1.44 \\
491: 4056.7237 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4152.5903 & 3.67 \\
492: 4057.7199 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4153.5906 & 2.24 \\
493: 4058.7168 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4154.5913 & 3.51 \\
494: 4059.7159 & 2.17 & \hspace{10mm} & 4156.5923 & 3.35 \\
495: 4060.7150 & 2.17 & \hspace{10mm} & 4157.5928 & 3.27 \\
496: 4061.7102 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4158.5935 & 3.24 \\
497: 4062.7057 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4160.5943 & 3.03 \\
498: 4064.7010 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4161.6335 & 2.08 \\
499: 4067.6962 & 2.18 & \hspace{10mm} & 4169.6321 & 1.60 \\
500: 4069.6876 & 2.33 & \hspace{10mm} & 4170.5992 & 2.24 \\
501: 4070.6872 & 2.18 & \hspace{10mm} & 4171.6000 & 2.24 \\
502: 4071.6826 & 2.34 & \hspace{10mm} & 4172.6004 & 2.08 \\
503: 4072.6826 & 2.24 & \hspace{10mm} & 4173.6007 & 2.08 \\
504: 4074.6737 & 2.34 & \hspace{10mm} & 4174.6013 & 1.92 \\
505: 4077.6648 & 2.34 & \hspace{10mm} & 4175.6017 & 1.92 \\
506: 4178.6033 & 1.60 & \hspace{10mm} & & \\
507: \enddata
508: \end{deluxetable}
509: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------
510: \clearpage
511: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcrr}
512: \tablecolumns{5}
513: \tablewidth{0pt}
514: \tablenum{2}
515: \tablecaption{Detected pulsation frequencies of EE~Cam\label{TABfreqs}}
516: \tablehead{
517: \colhead{} &
518: \colhead{Frequency} &
519: \colhead{Detection} &
520: \colhead{Amplitude} &
521: \colhead{Notes} \\
522: \colhead{} &
523: \colhead{} &
524: \colhead{Significance} &
525: \colhead{$y$ filter} &
526: \colhead{} \\
527: \colhead{} &
528: \colhead{cd$^{-1}$} &
529: \colhead{Ampl. S/N} &
530: \colhead{mag} &
531: \colhead{}
532: }
533: \startdata
534: & & & $\pm$ 0.0005 & \\
535: f1 & 4.934 & 97 & 0.0360 & \\
536: f2 & 5.214 & 51 & 0.0195 & \\
537: f3 & 9.840 & 16 & 0.0065 & \\
538: f4 & 8.333 & 15 & 0.0061 & \\
539: f5 & 8.457 & 13 & 0.0049 & \\
540: f6 & 4.937 & 9.8 & 0.0036 & \\
541: f7 & 10.147 & 8.7 & 0.0036 & =f1+f2 \\
542: f8 & 7.905 & 7.9 & 0.0032 & \\
543: f9 & 4.765 & 7.8 & 0.0029 & \\
544: f10 & 10.869 & 6.5 & 0.0027 & \\
545: f11 & 6.205 & 6.2 & 0.0024 & \\
546: f12 & 7.263 & 5.9 & 0.0024 & \\
547: f13 & 9.548 & 5.2 & 0.0021 & \\
548: f14 & 7.665 & 4.9 & 0.0019 & \\
549: f15 & 10.319 & 4.6 & 0.0019 & \\
550: \enddata
551: \tablecomments{A detection is considered significant if the\\
552: amplitude signal/noise ratio $\geq$ 4.00 (Breger et al. 1993).\\
553: This is similar to a power signal/noise ratio of $\sim$ 12.6.\\
554: The noise was calculated over 2 cd$^{-1}$ ranges.}
555: \end{deluxetable}
556:
557: \end{document}=