1: %%
2: %% This is file `template-6s.tex',
3: %% generated with the docstrip utility.
4: %%
5: %% The original source files were:
6: %%
7: %% template.raw (with options: `6s')
8: %%
9: %% Template for the LaTeX class aipproc.
10: %%
11: %% (C) 1998,2000,2001 American Institute of Physics and Frank Mittelbach
12: %% All rights reserved
13: %%
14: %%
15: %% $Id: template.raw,v 1.12 2005/07/06 19:22:14 frank Exp $
16: %%
17:
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: %% Please remove the next line of code if you
20: %% are satisfied that your installation is
21: %% complete and working.
22: %%
23: %% It is only there to help you in detecting
24: %% potential problems.
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26:
27: \input{aipcheck}
28:
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
31: %%
32: %% The class supports further options.
33: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
34: %%
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36:
37: \documentclass[
38: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
39: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
40: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
41: %% , % add further options here if necessary
42: ]
43: {aipproc}
44:
45: \layoutstyle{6x9}
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48: %% FRONTMATTER
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50:
51: \begin{document}
52:
53: \title{Bowen blend echo-tomography of low mass X-ray binaries}
54:
55: \classification{95.75.Wx, 95.85.Nv, 97.10.Gz, 97.60.Jd, 97.80.Jp}
56: \keywords {X-rays: binaries -- stars: individual: Sco X-1 -- stars: individual: V801 Ara}
57:
58:
59: \author{T.~Mu\~noz-Darias}{
60: address={Instituto de Astrof\'\i{}sica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna,
61: Tenerife, Spain}
62: }
63: \author{I.~G.~Mart\'\i{}nez-Pais}{
64: address={Instituto de Astrof\'\i{}sica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna,
65: Tenerife, Spain}
66: }
67: \author{J.~Casares}{
68: address={Instituto de Astrof\'\i{}sica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna,
69: Tenerife, Spain}
70: }
71: \author{R.~Cornelisse}{
72: address={Instituto de Astrof\'\i{}sica de Canarias, 38200 La Laguna,
73: Tenerife, Spain}
74: }
75: \author{V.~S.~Dhillon}{
76: address={Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Univ. of Sheffield, Sheffield
77: S3 7RH, UK}
78: }
79: \author{T.~R.~Marsh}{
80: address={Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK}
81: }
82:
83: \author{D.~Steeghs}{
84: address={Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge
85: MA 02138, USA}
86: }
87: \author{K.~O'Brien}
88: {address={European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile}}
89: \author{P.~A.~Charles}{
90: address={South Africa astronomical observatory, PO Box 9, observatory, South Africa}
91: }
92: \author{M.~Still}{
93: address={South Africa astronomical observatory, PO Box 9, observatory, South Africa}
94: }
95:
96: \begin{abstract}
97: We present simultaneous high time resolution (1-10 Hz) X-ray and optical observations of the persistent LMXBs Sco X-1 and V801 Ara(=4U 1636-536). In the case of Sco X-1 we find that the Bowen/HeII emission lags the X-ray light-curves with a light travel time of $\sim 11-16$s which is consistent with reprocessing in the donor star. We also present the detection of three correlated X-ray/optical bursts in V801 ara. Although this latter project is still in progress our preliminary results obtained by subtracting the Continuum light-curve from the Bowen/HeII data provide evidence of orbital phase dependent echoes from the companion star.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \maketitle
101:
102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103: %% MAINMATTER
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105:
106: \section{Introduction} \label{introduction}
107: \noindent Low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) are interacting binaries containing a low mass donor star
108: transferring matter onto a neutron star (NS) or black hole.
109: Mass accretion takes place through an accretion disc, and with temperatures approaching $\sim 10^8$ K,
110: such systems are strong X-ray sources. The mass transfer rate supplied by the donor star, $\dot{M}_2$, is driven
111: by the binary/donor evolution and for $\dot{M}_2>\dot{M}_{crit}\sim 10^{-9} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ results in persistently
112: bright X-ray sources. In these binaries optical emission is dominated by reprocessing of the powerful X-ray luminosity in the gas around the compact object which usually swamp the spectroscopic features of the weak companion stars.
113: %Only in exceptional cases, such as long-period LMXBs with much brighter evolved donors (e. g. Cyg X-2) is a complete orbital solution possible (\cite{casa98}; hereafter CCK98).
114: In this scenario, dynamical studies have classically been
115: restricted to the analysis of X-ray transients during quiescence, where the intrinsic
116: luminosity of the donor dominates the optical spectrum of the binary.\\
117: Fortunately, this situation has recently changed thanks to the discovery
118: of the narrow emission components arising from the donor star in the prototypical persistent
119: LMXB Sco X-1 \cite{stee02}. High resolution spectroscopy revealed many narrow high-excitation
120: emission lines, the most prominent associated with HeII $\lambda4686$ and NIII $\lambda\lambda$4634-41 /
121: CIII $\lambda\lambda$4647-50 at the core of the broad Bowen blend. In particular, the NIII lines are powered by fluorescence resonance through
122: cascade recombination which initially requires EUV seed photons of HeII
123: Ly${\alpha}$. These very narrow (FWHM $\leq 50$km s$^{-1}$) components move in antiphase with
124: respect to the wings of HeII $\lambda$4686, which
125: approximately trace the motion of the compact star. Both properties
126: (narrowness and phase offset) imply that these components originate in
127: the irradiated face of the donor star. We repeated this experiment with success in other 8 sources (see e.g. \cite{C04})
128: %namely the {\it
129: %Accretion Disc Corona} binary X1822-371 (Casares et al. 2003), the black
130: %hole binary GX339-4 (Hynes et al. 2003a), V801 Ara(4U 1636-536; Casares et al. 2006; hereafter C06), V926 Sco(4U 1735-444; C06), Aql &X-1(Cornelisse et al. 2007a), GX9+9(Cornelisse et al. 2007b; Hereafter Co07), GR Mus(4U 1254-690; Barnes et al. 2007) and LMC X-2 &(Cornelisse et al. 2007c).
131: which imply that mass donor star irradiation and subsequent Bowen blend fluorescence is a common occurrence in persistent LMXBs.
132: %(i)~Doppler tomography of NIII $\lambda4640$ in the eclipsing ADC ({\it accretion disc corona}) pulsar 2A 1822-371 reveals a
133: %compact spot at the position of the companion star and with velocity $K_{em}=300 \pm 8$ km s$^{-1}$ (\citealt{casa03}).
134: %Moreover, the application of the K-correction
135: %to this $K_{em}$ velocity, combined with other system parameters, strongly points to the presence
136: %of a neutron star with mass $1.6-2.3M_{\odot}$ in this system~(\citealt{mcm05}).\\
137: %(ii)~Radial velocities of narrow Bowen lines in the black hole candidate
138: %GX339-4, detected during the 2002 outburst, led to a mass function in
139: %excess of $5.8 M_{\odot}$, and hence provided the first dynamical proof
140: %that the compact object is indeed a black hole(\citealt{hynes03}).\\
141: %(iii)~Sharp NIII $\lambda$4640 Bowen emission has been detected in 4U 1636-536,
142: %4U 1735-444 (\citealt{c06}), Aql X-1 (\citealt{remon07}), GR Mus, the transient millisecond pulsar XTE J1814-338(\cite{casa04}), which lead to
143: %donor velocity semi-amplitudes in the range 200-300 km s$^{-1}$.
144: \subsection{Echo-Tomography}
145: Echo-tomography is an indirect imaging technique which uses time delays
146: between X-ray and UV/optical light-curves as a function of orbital phase
147: in order to map the reprocessing sites in a binary \cite{obrien02}.
148: The optical light curve can be simulated by the
149: convolution of the (source) X-ray light curve with a transfer function which
150: encodes information about the geometry and visibility of the reprocessing
151: regions. The transfer function~(TF) quantifies the binary response to the
152: irradiated flux as a function of the lag time and it is expected to have two main components:
153: the accretion disc and the donor star. The latter is strongly dependent on
154: the inclination angle, binary separation and mass ratio and, therefore,
155: can be used to set tight constraints on these fundamental parameters.
156: Successful echo-tomography experiments have been performed on several X-ray
157: active LMXBs using X-ray and broad-band UV/optical light-curves. The results
158: indicate that the reprocessed flux is dominated by the large
159: contribution of the accretion disc (e.g. \cite{hynes98},\cite{obrien02}) which dilutes the reprocessed signal arising from the companion. Only \cite{midd81} and \cite{dav75} have reported the detection of reprocessed pulsations in the X-ray binaries 4U 1626-67 and Her X-1 respectively. More recently, \cite{hynes06} have reported possible evidence for a reprocessed signal from the companion
160: through the detection of orbital phase dependent echoes in EXO 0748-676.\\
161:
162: \section{Bowen blend echo-tomography of LMXBs}
163: Based on our previous works where we detect reprocessed Bowen emission from the donor star in many LMXBs, we developed the idea of Bowen blend echo-tomography. To do this, we manufactured two narrow
164: (FWHM =100 \AA) interference filters %in the Green and Red channels,
165: centered at the Bowen and HeII lines ($\lambda_{\rm eff}$=4660\AA) and a featureless region at $\lambda_{\rm eff}$=6000\AA.
166: These filters were built to be used with ULTRACAM, a triple-beam CCD camera which uses two dichroics to split the
167: light into 3 spectral ranges: Blue ($<\lambda$3900),
168: Green($\lambda\lambda$3900-5400) and Red ($>\lambda$5400).
169: It uses frame transfer 1024x1024 E2V CCDs which are
170: continuously read out, and are capable of time resolution down to 2 milliseconds by
171: reading only small selected windows (see \cite{Dhi07} for details). The combination of ULTRACAM and the narrow band filters
172: allows us to obtain continuum-subtracted light-curves of the
173: high excitation lines where the response of the donor's contribution is amplified by suppressing most of the background
174: continuum light, which is associated with the disc.
175: %b) since the lines are formed in an optically thin medium, the
176: %reprocessing time is almost instantaneous and hence the response is
177: %sharper (i.e. only smeared by geometry) and the transfer function
178: %easier to compute (see \citealt{Munoz05}; hereafter MD05).
179: As a first step, we decided to undertake an echo-tomography campaign on the brightest LMXB of all,
180: Sco X-1 which is also the prototypical $Z-source$. Here we also present preliminary results of a new echo-tomography campaign on the X-ray burster V801 Ara.
181: \subsection{Echoes from the companion in Sco X-1}
182: Simultaneous X-ray and optical data of Sco X-1 were obtained on the nights
183: of 17-19 May 2004.
184: %The full 18.9 hr orbital period was covered in 12 snapshots, yielding 16.1 ks of X-ray data simultaneous with optical photometry in 3 different bands.\\
185: For the X-ray observations we used the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) onboard the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) satellite.
186: %Only 2 PCA detectors ($2$ and $5$) were used and the data were analysed
187: %using the FTOOLS software.
188: The STANDARD-1 mode, with a time resolution of 0.125s, was used for the variability analysis and the STANDARD-2 mode data, with a time resolution of 16s, was used for the spectral analysis.
189: %The minimum count rate of $5000$ counts s$^{-1}$ implies that background subtraction was not necessary.
190: Sco X-1 was observed during 15 RXTE windows of 16-31 minutes length spread over the three nights and yielding 20 ks of data.
191: About 80\% of these observations were also covered with simultaneous optical data.\\
192: \begin{figure}
193: \includegraphics[height=10cm,width=10cm]{compo1.ps}
194: \caption{Upper panel: Simultaneous RXTE and ULTRACAM (SDSS $u'$, Bowen+HeII and Continuum) observations of Sco X-1/V818 Sco obtained on the night of 18 May 2004. Lower panel: Zoom of W3 showing a 1000s stream of X-ray (above) and Bowen+HeII non continuum subtracted (below) data. The variability appears clearly correlated.}
195: \label{data}
196: \end{figure}
197: The optical data were obtained with ULTRACAM at the Cassegrain focus of the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope (WHT) at La Palma. We used our interference filters in the green (Bowen+HeII) and red (Continuum) arms of the intruments. A standard SDSS $u'(\lambda3543$ \AA) filter was also mounted in the blue channel.
198: The images were reduced using the ULTRACAM pipeline software with bias subtraction and flatfielding.
199: %Star counts were extracted by adjusting the aperture radii to the seeing, and light-curves were obtained relative to a comparison
200: %star which is 96 arcsecs NW of Sco X-1. Light-curves of the Bowen/HeII lines (hereafter Bowen+HeII CS)
201: %were computed by subtracting the Red (Continuum) from the Green(hereafter Bowen+HeII).
202: The exposure time was initially set to 0.1s but was increased to 0.25s depending on weather conditions.\\
203:
204: In order to look for correlated variability we performed a comprehensive cross-correlation analysis by using the entire data set in blocks from 2 min to 30 min (i.e. one RXTE window).To do this, we used a modified version of the ICF (Interpolation Correlation Function) method which is explained in great detail by \cite{gask87}. Significant ICF peaks were found only on the night of 18 May, when the system stayed at the Flaring Branch and the X-ray flux rose up to $1.3 \times 10^4$ counts s$^{-1}$. During this night the system shows long episodes of flaring activity (fig. \ref{data} upper panel) and correlated variability between the X-ray data and the optical lightcurve was observed (fig. \ref{data} lower panel). We obtain highly significant correlation peaks in the three considered filters by choosing different data blocks during W3 (see fig \ref{data}), especially during the second part of this window where strong correlated variability is present. W3 is centered at orbital phase 0.52, i.e. very close to the superior conjunction of the donor star, when the irradiated face presents its largest visibility with respect to us. In many cases we find ICF time-lags of about 11s between the X-ray and Bowen+HeII light-curves but we finally selected for a detailed analysis a 3 min block of the W3 where the correlation peaks are particularly significant. Table \ref{g_res} lists the ICF results obtained for the 3 bands considered (i.e. SDSS $u'$, Bowen+HeII and Continuum).\\
205: With the aim of amplifying the signal from the donor we subtracted the Red (Continuum) from the Green(Bowen+HeII) channels. However, the Continuum is also strongly correlated with the X-ray emission, and hence, the subtraction process reduces the correlation level of the signal and add noise. In order to determine the optimal amount of continuum to be subtracted, we computed several ICFs after subtracting a fraction $cf$ (with $cf$ in the range 0-1) of the red continuum from the Bowen+HeII light curve. We find that the ICF peak of the continuum subtracted lightcurve (Bowen+HeII CS) smoothly shifts to longer delays for larger $cf$ values, as expected if more disc contribution is subtracted (see upper panel in fig \ref{result}). We obtain a delay in the range $14.3-16.3$s for $cf=0.6-0.8$, when $\sim60\%$ of the continuum light is subtracted. For higher $cf$ values the ICF are nosier and the peaks are not significant.\\
206: \begin{table}
207: %\begin{center}
208: \caption{TF and ICF analysis for W3}
209: \label{g_res}
210: \begin{tabular}{c | c c c}
211: \hline
212: & ICF$\pm1\sigma$(s) & $\tau_0\pm1\sigma$(s) & $\Delta\tau_0\pm1\sigma$(s)\\
213: \hline
214: Bowen+HeII CS & 14.3-16.3 & $13.5\pm3.0$&$8.5\pm3.5$ \\
215: Bowen+HeII &$11.8\pm0.1$ & $10.75\pm1.25$& $6.25\pm1.5$\\
216: SDSS $u'$ &$9.5\pm0.7$ &$9.0\pm1.5$&$5.5\pm2.0$ \\
217: Continuum&$9.0\pm0.7$ &$8.5\pm1.0$ &$5.5\pm1.5$ \\
218: \hline
219: \end{tabular}
220: %\end{center}
221: \end{table}
222: \begin{figure}
223: \includegraphics[height=12cm,width=12cm]{compo2.ps}
224: \caption{Upper panel: ICF for the selected 3min block of W3. The ICFs have been computed using the X-ray data and a Bowen+HeII light curve obtained by subtracting from the green channel the Continuum data scaled by a factor $cf=0$ (i. e. no subtraction), 0.4 and 0.8 . The dotted line shows the $3\sigma$ confidence level and the dashed vertical lines time-lags of $11.8\pm0.1$s, $13.3\pm0.1$s and $16.0\pm0.3$s respectively. Lower panel: Expected range of delays for both the companion and the accretion disc considering $i=50^{\circ}$, $M_1=1.4M_{\odot}$ and the orbital parameters of Sco X-1. The black region shows the $1\sigma$ delays obtained for the Bowen+HeII, and Continuum data. The shadowed region represents the range of delays obtained by subtracting the Continuum from the Bowen+HeII light-curve. The white dashed line is the most probable delay for the companion according to \cite{MD05} and using $\alpha=6^{\circ}$.}
225: \label{result}
226: \end{figure}
227:
228: As a second step in the data analysis we fitted the ULTRACAM light-curves with the results of convolving the RXTE data with a set of synthetic transfer functions. For simplicity we have used Gaussian TFs with two free parameters: the mean delay ($\tau_0$) and the standard deviation of the delay ($\Delta\tau$):
229: \begin{equation}
230: \label{tf}
231: TF(\tau)=A e^{\frac{1}{2}(\frac{\tau-\tau_0}{\Delta\tau})^2}
232: \end{equation}
233: where A is a normalization constant. We have applied this technique to all data sets and find $\tau_0$ values completely consistent with those obtained in the cross-correlation analysis. A summary of the results is presented in Table \ref{g_res}.\\
234:
235: Figure \ref{result} (lower panel) shows the range of expected time-delays for both the companion and the accretion disc as a function of the mass ratio ($q=M_2/M_1$).
236: %In this simulation we have considered the TF presented in cite{MD05} for the standard orbital parameters~($i=50^{\circ}$, $M_1=1.4M_{\odot}$) of Sco X-1 and $\phi_{orb}=0.52$.
237: The time-lags of $\sim 10-11$s obtained for the Bowen+HeII data during W3 lies at the lower edge of the companion region, and shows that part of this emission must arise from reprocessing on the donor star. Regarding the continuum subtracted data, the TF method yields a time-lag of $13.5\pm3.0$s which is perfectly accommodated in the companion region (fig. \ref{result}, lower panel), while the ICF method gives a narrower time-lag range ($14.3-16.3$s). This is larger than expected for the maximum response of the companion and suggests that either the mass of the NS or the orbital inclination are higher than the assumed values.
238: In addition the Continuum data shows delays consistent with reprocessing in the accretion disc whereas the $u'$ band present larger delays. This is probably due to the presence of many high excitation lines arising from the companion in the spectral range covered by this filter. We note that correlated variability is also found during W5 (fig. \ref{data}) when the system shows less activity. In this case we find delays consistent with reprocessing in an accretion disc with a radial temperature profile. (see \cite{MD07} for details)
239:
240: \subsection{Phase-dependent echoes from the companion star in 4U~1636-536/V801 Ara}
241: Encouraged by the successful echo-tomography work on Sco X-1 we decided to undertake a new campaign on V801 Ara where reprocessed Bowen emission from the companion has been reported \cite{C06}. This system is also a well-known X-ray burster which offers the opportunity of exploiting burst events to detect reprocessed signals from the companion at different orbital phases.
242: We observed V801 Ara on 19-20 June 2007 with ULTRACAM attached to the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at Cerro Paranal (Chile). We used the same instrument set up as for the Sco X-1 campaign. We used a time resolution of 0.5s, although it was increased up to 1s during the 2nd night when weather conditions decreased. We also obtained simultaneous RXTE data covering the ground based campaing. Here we present a preliminary ULTRACAM-pipeline data reduction together with the STANDARD-1 RXTE data set at $T_{exp}=0.125$s.\\
243: Three simultaneous X-ray/optical Burst were detected in the course of the 2 nights (see fig.\ref{burst1} left panel). Table \ref{cburst} lists the times of the bursts and the orbital phase at which the events occured according to the ephemerides in \cite{C06}.\\
244: \begin{table}
245: %\begin{center}
246: \caption{Correlated X-ray/optical Type I burst in V801 Ara}
247: \label{cburst}
248: \begin{tabular}{c | c c c c c}
249: \hline
250: BURST & TIME (MJD) & $\varphi_{orbital}$ & ICF-$u'$ band(s) & ICF-Bowen+HeII(s) &ICF-Continuum(s)\\
251: \hline
252: Burst-1 & 54271.04381 & 0.22 & $1.45\pm0.02$ & $1.73\pm0.05$ & $1.73\pm0.05$ \\
253: Burst-2 & 54272.09179 & 0.85 & $1.75\pm0.08$ & $1.93\pm0.14$ & $2.17\pm0.08$\\
254: Burst-3 & 54272.20536 & 0.57 & $2.51\pm0.06$ & $2.93\pm0.06$ & $2.33\pm0.05$ \\
255: \hline
256: \end{tabular}
257: %\end{center}
258: \end{table}
259: \begin{figure}
260: \includegraphics[height=8cm,width=16cm]{burst-cor_1bw.ps}
261: \caption{Left panel:40s streams of X-ray (above) and Bowen+HeII (below) data around Burst-1. The smearing in the shape of the optical event is clearly seen in the figure. Righ panel: ICF obtained through the left panel lightcurves. A clear peak centered at $1.73\pm0.05$ is found.}
262: \label{burst1}
263: \end{figure}
264: ICF functions were computed in the same way as in Sco X-1 by selecting 200s blocks of data around each burst. We find in all the cases very clear ICF peaks centered at positives delays (i.e optical event occurs after X-ray event). Figure \ref{burst1} shows the X-ray and Bowen+HeII light-curves during Burst-1 together with the resulting ICF function (right panel) whereas table \ref{cburst} lists the obtained time lags for all bands considered. We measure longer delays during Burst-3, at $\varphi_{orb}\sim0.57$, when the visibilily of the companion is larger. Furthermore, similar as for Sco X-1, the delay obtained for the Bowen+HeII filter is longer than those observed in the other bands.\\
265: In order to amplify the signal from the donor we subtracted the Continuum emission scaled by a continuum factor ($cf$) from the Bowen+HeII lightcurve. Figure \ref{rburst} shows the delays obtained for each burst vs $cf$. We also mark (grey regions) the expected range of delays for the companion (following \cite{MD05}) by considering an orientative set of orbital paramenters and the orbital phase at which the events were detected. In the three cases the time-lags measured are consistent with reprocessing on the companion star.
266: \begin{figure}
267: \includegraphics[height=8cm,width=14cm]{retraso_bursts_a6bw.ps}
268: \caption{Time-lag vs Continuum subtraction factor for the three burst detected. The grey regions show the expected range of delays for the companion assuming $q=0.265$ (\cite{C06}), $M_{NS}=1.4M_{\odot}$, disc flaring angle $(\alpha) = 6^{\circ}$, orbital inclination in the range 40-60$^{\circ}$ and the orbital phase corresponding to each burst.}
269: \label{rburst}
270: \end{figure}
271: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
272: Following the discovery of narrow high excitation emission lines arising from the companion star in many LMXBs we are undertaking several Bowen blend echo-tomography experiments using ULTRACAM+narrow band filters and RXTE. Our first work on the prototypical LMXB Sco X-1 presents the detection of echoes consistent with reprocessing on the companion star. Correlated variability was found when the system stayed at the Flaring Branch and displayed high and low frequency variability \cite{MD07}. Preliminary results of a new campaign on the X-ray burster V801 Ara yield evidence of orbital-phase dependent echoes from the companion during the three burst which were detected. This latter work is still in progress and we are currently refining our results by fitting time-delayed transfer functions to our data. More observations of other targets with this promising technique are currently underway.
273:
274: \vspace{5cm}
275:
276:
277:
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
279: %% Sample figure:
280: %%
281: %% The option [height=...] scales the picture to the given height,
282: %% without it it would be printed at its nominal size
283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
284:
285:
286:
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288: %% SAMPLE TABLE
289: %%
290: %% Shows the use of \tablehead and \tablenote
291: %% macros
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293:
294:
295: %\begin{theacknowledgments}
296: %ULTRACAM is supported by PPARC grant PP/D002370/1. JC acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and
297: %Technology through the project AYA2002-03570
298: %\end{theacknowledgments}
299:
300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
301: %% The bibliography can be prepared using the BibTeX program or
302: %% manually.
303: %%
304: %% The code below assumes that BibTeX is used. If the bibliography is
305: %% produced without BibTeX comment out the following lines and see the
306: %% aipguide.pdf for further information.
307: %%
308: %% For your convenience a manually coded example is appended
309: %% after the \end{document}
310: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
311:
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313: %% You may have to change the BibTeX style below, depending on your
314: %% setup or preferences.
315: %%
316: %%
317: %% For The AIP proceedings layouts use either
318: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
319:
320: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
321: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
322:
323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
324: %% You probably want to use your own bibtex database here
325: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326: \bibliography{sample}
327:
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329: %% Just a reminder that you may have to run bibtex
330: %% All of it up to \end{document} can be removed
331: %% if you don't like the warning.
332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
333: \IfFileExists{\jobname.bbl}{}
334: {\typeout{}
335: \typeout{******************************************}
336: \typeout{** Please run "bibtex \jobname" to optain}
337: \typeout{** the bibliography and then re-run LaTeX}
338: \typeout{** twice to fix the references!}
339: \typeout{******************************************}
340: \typeout{}
341: }
342: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
343: \bibitem{casa98}
344: Casares J., Charles P.A. \& Kuulkers E. 1998, ApJ, 493, L39-L42.
345: %\bibitem{casa03}
346: %Casares J., Steeghs D., Hynes R.I., Charles P.A. \& O'Brien K. 2003,
347: %{\em ApJ}, 590, 1041.
348: \bibitem{C04}
349: Casares J., Steeghs D., Hynes R.I., Charles P.A., Cornelisse R. \&
350: O'Brien K. 2004,RMxA, 20, 21.
351: \bibitem{C06}
352: Casares, J.,
353: Cornelisse, R., Steeghs, D., Charles, P.~A., Hynes, R.~I., O'Brien, K., \&
354: Strohmayer, T.~E.\ 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1235
355:
356: %\bibitem{char04}
357: %Charles P.A. \& Coe M.J. 2004, in ~{\em Compact Stellar X-ray
358: %Sources}, eds. W.H.G. Lewin \& M. van der Klis, CUP (astro-ph/0308020).
359: \bibitem{dav75}
360: Davidsen, A. Margon, B., Middleditch, J. 1975, ApJ, 198, 653
361: \bibitem{Dhi07}
362: %Dhillon V.S. \& Marsh T.R. 2001, 'ULTRACAM - studying astrophysics on the fastest timescales', {\em NewA Rev.}, 45(1-2), 91-95.
363: Dhillon, V.S. et al., 2007, MNRAS,378, 825
364: \bibitem{gask87}
365: Gaskell C.M. \& Peterson B.M. 1987, ApJ, 65, 1.
366: %\bibitem{grind74}
367: %Grindlay J.E., McClintock J.E., Canizares C.R., Cominsky L., Li F.K.,
368: %Lewin W.H.G. \& van Paradijs J. 1987, {\em Nature}, 274, 567.
369: %\bibitem{hynes05}
370: %Hynes R.I. 2005, in ~{\em The astrophysics of cataclysmic variables
371: %and related object}, eds. J.M. Hameury and J.P. Lasota (astro-ph/0410218).
372: \bibitem{hynes06}
373: Hynes, R.I., Horne, K., O'Brien, K., Haswell, C.A., Robinson, E. L., King, A. R.,
374: Charles, P. A., \& Pearson, K. J., 2006, ApJ, 648, 1156
375: \bibitem{hynes98}
376: Hynes R.I., O'Brien K., Horne K., Chen W. \& Haswell C.A. 1998,{\em MNRAS}, 299, L37.
377:
378: %\bibitem{hynes03}
379: %Hynes R.I., Steeghs D., Casares J., Charles P.A.\& O'Brien K. 2003,
380: %{\em ApJ}, 583, L95.
381: %\bibitem{king96}
382: %King A.R., Kolb U. \& Burderi L. 1996, {\em ApJ}, 464, L127.
383: %\bibitem{mcc75}
384: %McClintock J.E., Canizares C.R. \& Tarter C.B. 1975, {\em ApJ}, 198, 641.
385: \bibitem{midd81}
386: Middleditch, J., Mason, K. O., Nelson, J. E., \& White, N. E. 1981, ApJ, 244, 1001
387: \bibitem{MD05}
388: Mu\~noz-Darias T., Mart\'\i{}nez-Pais I.G. \& Casares J. 2005, in {\em INTERACTING BINARIES: Accretion, Evolution and Outcomes}, eds. L.A. Antonelli, L. Burderi, F. D'Antona, et al.
389: \bibitem{MD07}
390: Mu{\~n}oz-Darias, T., Mart{\'{\i}}nez-Pais, I.~G., Casares, J., Dhillon,
391: V.~S., Marsh, T.~R., Cornelisse, R., Steeghs, D., \& Charles, P.~A.\ 2007,
392: MNRAS, 379, 1637
393: %\bibitem{nay98}
394: %Naylor T. 1998, {\em MNRAS}, 296, 339.
395: %\bibitem{obrien01}
396: %O'Brien K 2001, in {\em The proceedings of the first Galway workshop on high
397: %time resolution astrophysics}, ASP Conf. Ser. (astro-ph/0110267).
398: \bibitem{obrien02}
399: O'Brien K., Horne K., Hynes R.I., Chen W., Haswell C.A. \& Still M.D. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 426.
400: %\bibitem{scha89}
401: %Schachter J., Filippenko A.V. \& Kahn S.M. 1989, {\em ApJ}, 340, 1049.
402: \bibitem{stee02}
403: Steeghs D. \& Casares J. 2002, ApJ, 568, 273-278.
404: %\bibitem{van96}
405: %van Paradijs J. 1996, {\em ApJ}, 464, L139.
406: %\bibitem{van95}
407: %van Paradijs J. \& McClintock J.E. 1995, in {\em X-Ray Binaries},
408: %eds. W.H.G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs and E.P.J. van den Heuvel (CUP 26,
409: %Cambridge), p58.
410: %\bibitem{vrt90}
411: %Vrtilek S.D. et al. 1990, {\em A\&A}, 235, 162.
412: \end{thebibliography}
413: \end{document}
414:
415: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
416: %% The following lines show an example how to produce a bibliography
417: %% without the help of the BibTeX program. This could be used instead
418: %% of the above.
419: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
420:
421: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
422:
423: \bibitem{Brown2000}
424: M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{The New Physique}, Publisher Name,
425: Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
426:
427: \bibitem{BrownAustin:2000}
428: M.~P. Brown, and K.~Austin, \emph{Appl. Phys. Letters} \textbf{85},
429: 2503--2504 (2000).
430:
431: \bibitem{Wang}
432: R.~Wang, ``Title of Chapter,'' in \emph{Classic Physiques}, edited by
433: R.~B. Hamil, Publisher Name, Publisher City, 2000, pp. 212--213.
434:
435: \bibitem{SJ:1999}
436: C.~D.~Smith and E.~F.~Jones, ``Load-Cycling in Cubic Press,'' in
437: \emph{Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-1999}, edited by M.~D.~F. et~al.,
438: AIP Conference Proceedings 505, American Institute of Physics, New York,
439: 1999, pp. 651--654.
440:
441: \end{thebibliography}
442:
443: \endinput
444: %%
445: %% End of file `template-6s.tex'.
446: