1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[a4,12pt,psfig,epsfig]{basi}
3: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{emulateapj}
4: %\documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e} %Original
5: %\documentstyle[psfig,epsfig,rotating]{mn2e}
6: %\documentstyle[psfig,epsfig,rotating]{emulateapj}
7: %\bibliographystyle{Atish}
8: %\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
9: %\usepackage{longtable}
10: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}
11: %\setlength{\baselineskip}{50pt}
12: %
13: %================================
14: % Authors' macros will go here
15: %================================
16: %
17: %Definitions
18:
19: \def \apj {ApJ}
20: \def \apjl {ApJ Lett}
21: \def \nat {Nature}
22: \def \mnras {MNRAS}
23: \def \aap {A\&A}
24: \def \araa {ARA\&A}
25:
26: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
27: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30: %---------------------MNRAS Style------------------------%
31: %\title[GRB 050319 : Wind to ISM transition]{Observations of the Optical Afterglow of
32: %GRB 050319 : Wind to ISM transition in view ?}
33: %
34: %\author[Kamble et al.]
35: % {Atish Kamble$^{1}$\thanks{e-mail : atish@rri.res.in}, L. Resmi$^{1,2}$, Kuntal Misra$^{3}$\\
36: %$^{1}$ Raman Research Institute, Bangalore - 560 080, India\\
37: %$^{2}$ Joint Astronomy Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India\\
38: %$^{3}$ Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Manora Peak, Nainital - 263 129, India}
39: %
40: %\pubyear{}
41: %\volume{}
42: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}
43: %\setcounter{page}{17}
44: %\date{Received ---; accepted ---}
45: %\maketitle
46: %\label{firstpage}
47: %---------------------ApJ Letters Style------------------------%
48: \shorttitle{GRB 050319 : Wind to ISM transition}
49: \shortauthors{Kamble et al.}
50: \title{Observations of the Optical Afterglow of GRB 050319 : Wind to ISM transition in view}
51:
52: \author{
53: Atish Kamble\altaffilmark{1},
54: L. Resmi\altaffilmark{1,2},
55: Kuntal Misra\altaffilmark{3}
56: }
57: \altaffiltext{1} {Raman Research Institute, Bangalore - 560 080, India}
58: \altaffiltext{2} {Joint Astronomy Programme, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560 012, India}
59: \altaffiltext{3} {Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Manora Peak, Nainital - 263 129, India}
60: %\begin{center}
61: %\centerline {\emph{\copyright 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.}}
62: ~~~~~~~~~\emph{\copyright 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.}
63: %\end{center}
64: %-------------------------------------------ABSTRACT------------------------------------%
65: \begin{abstract}
66: The collapse of a massive star is believed to be the most probable progenitor
67: of a long GRB. Such a star is expected to modify its environment by stellar wind.
68: The effect of such a circum-stellar wind medium is expected to be seen
69: in the evolution of a GRB afterglow, but has so far not been conclusively found.
70: We claim that a signature of wind to constant density medium transition
71: of circum-burst medium is visible in the afterglow of GRB 050319.
72: Along with the optical observations of the afterglow of GRB 050319
73: we present a model for the multiband afterglow of GRB 050319. We show that
74: the break seen in optical light curve at $\sim$ 0.02 day could be explained
75: as being due to wind to constant density medium transition of circum-burst medium,
76: in which case, to our knowledge, this could be the first ever detection of such
77: a transition at any given frequency band. Detection of such a transition
78: could also serve as a confirmation of massive star collapse scenario
79: for GRB progenitors, independent of supernova signatures.
80: \end{abstract}
81:
82: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts}
83:
84: %-------------------------------------------KEYWORDS---------------------------------------%
85: %\begin{keywords}
86: %Gamma-ray bursts, GRB afterglows, flux decay, spectral index
87: %\end{keywords}
88: %------------------------------------------INTRODUCTION-------------------------------------%
89: \section{Introduction}
90:
91: One of the long standing questions in astrophysics is the progenitors
92: of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). Collapse of a massive star is one of the most favoured
93: progenitors of the long GRBs. Evidence for a massive star being
94: a GRB progenitor may be obtained in two different ways, both using
95: observations of GRB afterglows.
96: {\it (1) Supernova (SN) component underlying the GRB afterglow} :
97: A few of the nearby GRB afterglows have shown the temporal and spectroscopic
98: signature of an underlying SN. see e.g., \citep{030329_00}
99: {\it (2) Evolution of GRB afterglow in the stellar wind medium} :
100: Massive stars modify the density profile of the circum-stellar medium
101: due to the powerful winds they drive during their life time. For a constant mass loss rate
102: and constant wind velocity the circum-burst medium assumes a density profile $\rho \propto r^{-2}$
103: as compared to $\rho =$ constant in the absence of stellar wind.
104: Evolution of the GRB afterglow light curves is significantly different in these two cases of
105: density profiles \citep{Wijers1999, Chevalier2000}. Attempts
106: to look for the signatures of such a wind-modified circum-burst density profile in the light curves
107: of GRB afterglows have not been conclusive so far. In the case of GRB 050904 \citet{050904_Gendre}
108: finds that the early x-ray afterglow suggests a wind like density profile of the circum-burst
109: medium while the late optical afterglow was consistent with evolution in a constant density medium.
110: Hence, they conjecture that a transition between these two types of density profiles
111: would have taken place somewhere in between. However, this transition was not directly observed
112: in the light curve of any given band. We show that the afterglow of GRB 050319 could be explained
113: as being due to the transition of the circum-burst density profile from wind-like
114: to constant density.\\
115:
116: GRB 050319 was detected by the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) instrument of the SWIFT satellite
117: on 2005 March 19, 09:31:18.44 UT \citep{GCN3117,GCN3119}.
118: However, \citet{Cusumano}, using the re-analysis of the BAT data, pointed out that
119: {\em Swift} was slewing during the GRB onset and the BAT trigger was switched off.
120: The GRB was recognised about 135 seconds after its actual onset.
121: The total duration of the GRB ($\rm T_{90}$) was thus 149.7 s \citep{Cusumano}
122: instead of $10 \pm 2$ s \citep{GCN3117,GCN3119}. The burst fluence in 15-350 keV band
123: within the $\rm T_{90}$ duration is estimated to be 1.6 $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ erg cm$^{-2}$.
124: The photon index of the time-averaged single power law spectrum is 2.1 $\pm$ 0.2.
125: {\em Swift} XRT and UVOT located a bright source at $\alpha$ = $10\rm^{h} 16\rm^{m} 48\rm^{s}$
126: and $\delta$ = $+43^{\circ} 32^{\arcmin} 47^{\arcsec}$ (J2000) which was later confirmed
127: by \citet{GCN3116} with ROTSE-IIIb. \citet{GCN3136} obtained the spectra
128: of the afterglow of GRB 050319 on 2005 March 20 and the redshift of the afterglow
129: was measured to be z = 3.24. At this redshift, the gamma ray isotropic
130: equivalent energy released during the burst is $3.7 \times 10^{52}$ erg for a flat universe with
131: $\rm \Omega_{m} = 0.3, \Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7 ~and~ H_{0} = 70 ~km~s^{-1} ~Mpc^{-1}$.\\
132:
133: %------------------------OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION--------------------------------------%
134: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
135: Optical CCD observations of the afterglow of GRB 050319 were carried
136: out in Johnson BV and Cousins RI filters using the 104-cm Sampurnanand Telescope
137: of ARIES, Nainital with regular specifications of the CCD camera and using standard
138: observation procedures of bias subtraction and flat fielding. For details see \citet{060124_Misra}.
139:
140: The BVRI magnitudes of the optical transient (OT) obtained were calibrated
141: differentially using secondary stars numbered 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 in the list of \citet{GCN3454}.
142: The magnitudes derived in this way are given in Table ~\ref{tab:data}.
143: Photometric magnitudes available in the literature by \citet{050319_Raptor,Quimby,050319_Mason,Huang}
144: were converted to the present photometric scales using the five secondary stars mentioned above.
145: %---------------------------------------TABLE 1 (050319)--------------------------------------%
146: \begin{table}[h]
147: \medskip
148: \begin{center}
149: \begin{tabular} {cccc}\hline
150: \hline
151: Date (UT)&Magnitude&Exposure Time&Passband\\
152: 2005 March&(mag)&(s)&\\
153: \hline
154: &&&\\
155: 19.7512&21.02$\pm$0.14&2$\times$900&B\\
156: &&&\\
157: 19.7457&20.23$\pm$0.20&600&V\\
158: 19.8558&20.60$\pm$0.21&600&V\\
159: &&&\\
160: 19.6949&19.46$\pm$0.16&300&R\\
161: 19.6999&19.25$\pm$0.10&300&R\\
162: 19.7215&19.98$\pm$0.11&300&R\\
163: 19.7539&20.06$\pm$0.13&300&R\\
164: 19.7874&20.03$\pm$0.16&300&R\\
165: &&&\\
166: 19.7129&19.59$\pm$0.19&300&I\\
167: 19.7587&19.66$\pm$0.25&300&I\\
168: &&&\\
169: \hline
170: \end{tabular}
171: \end{center}
172: \caption{CCD BVRI broad band optical observations of the GRB 050319 afterglow using the 104-cm
173: Sampurnanand Telescope at ARIES, Nainital.}\label{tab:data}
174: \end{table}
175: %---------------------------------------------------------------%
176: \section{Light curves of GRB 050319}
177:
178: Along with our own observations we have used observations reported in
179: the literature to study the light curves of GRB 050319 afterglow.
180: The x-ray afterglow was observed by {\em Swift} XRT starting from
181: $\sim 220$s to 28 days \citep{Cusumano} after the burst.
182: Attempts to observe the afterglow
183: at radio wavebands resulted in upper limits \citep{GCN3127,GCN3132,GCN3153}.
184: The optical afterglow was observed by \citet{050319_Raptor,Quimby,050319_Mason}
185: resulting in a coverage from a few seconds to $\sim 4$ days
186: after the burst.
187:
188: To construct the optical light curve we have corrected the observed magnitudes
189: for the standard Galactic extinction law given by \citet{Mathis}. The galactic
190: extinction in the direction of GRB 050319 is estimated to be E(B-V) = 0.011
191: mag from the smoothed reddening map provided by \citet{Schlegel}.
192: The effective wavelength and normalization given by \citet{Bessel} were used to
193: convert the magnitudes to fluxes in $\mu$Jy.\\
194:
195: Most of the GRB afterglow light curves are well characterized
196: by a broken power law of the form
197: $\rm F = F_{0}\{(t/t_{b})^{\alpha_{1}s} + (t/t_{b})^{\alpha_{2}s}\}^{-1/s}$
198: where $\alpha_{1}$ and $\alpha_{2}$ are the afterglow flux decay indices
199: before and after the break time ($\rm t_{b}$), respectively.
200: $\rm F_{0}$ is the flux normalization and `s' is a smoothening parameter which
201: controls the sharpness of the break. Most known GRB afterglows have
202: $\alpha_{2} > \alpha_{1}$ i.e. the decay becomes steeper
203: after the break. Interestingly, the optical afterglow light curve of GRB 050319
204: shows steeper to flatter decay with a break at $\sim 0.02$ day.
205: This behavior of light curve decay is difficult to explain within the standard
206: afterglow models.
207: The x-ray and optical light curves also show some variability superimposed on
208: the power law decay. The x-ray light curve shows a break near $\sim$ 0.3 day.
209: We quantify the various characteristics of the afterglow
210: light curves as summarized below.\\
211:
212: \begin{itemize}
213:
214: \item[1.] The x-ray afterglow of GRB 050319 shows a very rapid decay before
215: $\sim 0.005$ day ($\sim 384$ s) after the GRB. The decay then flattens before
216: steepening again at $\sim 0.3$ day.
217: \citet{Cusumano} has characterised the afterglow into three separate temporal
218: evolutions in x-ray bands :
219: $\rm \alpha_{X1} = 5.53 \pm 0.67 ~(\Delta t < 384~s)$;
220: $\rm \alpha_{X2} = 0.54 \pm 0.04 ~(384 ~s < \Delta t < 0.3 day)$;
221: $\rm \alpha_{X3} = 1.14 \pm 0.2 ~(\Delta t > 0.3 day)$;
222: \item[2.] The B, V and R band light curve also show a rapid decline during
223: the early phase ($\rm \Delta t < 0.02$ day) which flattens at later epochs.
224: Thus, the afterglow can be separated into two separate temporal
225: evolutions in R band %as follows :
226: $\rm \alpha_{R1} = 1.09 \pm 0.03 ~(\Delta t < 0.02 day)$;
227: $\rm \alpha_{R2} = 0.51 \pm 0.03 ~(0.02 day < \Delta t < 10.0 day)$;\\
228: And for B, V and I bands we measure following $\alpha$ s :
229: $\rm \alpha_{B1} = 1.46 \pm 0.26 ~(\Delta t < 0.02 day)$;
230: $\rm \alpha_{B2} = 0.33 \pm 0.05 ~(0.02 day < \Delta t < 1.0 day)$;
231: $\rm \alpha_{V1} = 0.90 \pm 0.05 ~(\Delta t < 0.02 day)$;
232: $\rm \alpha_{V2} = 0.50 \pm 0.04 ~(0.02 day < \Delta t < 1.0 day)$;
233: $\rm \alpha_{I2} = 0.59 \pm 0.13 ~(0.02 day < \Delta t < 1.0 day)$;
234: The average decay index of the optical light curve, at early and late epochs,
235: is then $1.15 \pm 0.27 $ and $ 0.48 \pm 0.15$ respectively.
236:
237: \end{itemize}
238:
239: \section{GRB 050319 afterglow : wind or homogeneous density profile ?}
240:
241: The breaks seen in x-ray light curve (at $\sim 384$ s and at $\sim 0.3$ day)
242: are not accompanied by simultaneous breaks in optical wavebands.
243: Similarly, the break seen in optical band has no simultaneous counterpart
244: in the x-ray light curve. Also, the sense of slope change,
245: i.e. $\alpha_{2} < \alpha_{1}$, as seen in optical waveband is contrary
246: to the predictions of the fireball model \citep{Sari01, Sari02} which
247: expects $\alpha_{1} < \alpha_{2}$.
248:
249: We propose a different model to explain the afterglow
250: of GRB 050319 as being due to a transition of the circum-burst medium
251: density profile that the explosion generated shock wave is interacting with.
252: We propose that the observed change from steep to flat decay of the
253: optical afterglow of GRB 050319 at 0.02 day is due to the change in
254: the density profile of the circum-burst medium from wind modified ($\rho \propto r^{-2}$)
255: to the constant density medium ($\rho =$ constant).
256: The break in the light curve occurs when the shock front interacts with
257: the boundary between the two density profiles. Below we describe and
258: reproduce various features of the GRB 050319 afterglow using this
259: model of `wind to constant density medium transition'.
260:
261: The early steep decay of x-ray afterglows ($\alpha \sim$ 3 to 5)
262: as is seen in the case of GRB 050319 are now seen routinely
263: in most of the GRBs \citep{Steep00} and has become
264: a canonical feature of the GRB x-ray afterglows.
265: In the case of GRB 050319 \citet{Cusumano} conjecture that the early steep decay
266: emission could be low energy tail of the GRB prompt emission. We exclude this
267: early emission from the rest of our discussion and we will restrict ourselves
268: to the rest of the x-ray light curve.
269:
270: %\subsection{\bf $\alpha-\beta$ relations}
271: The radiation spectrum of GRB afterglows exhibits a power law spectrum
272: characterised by three break frequencies - the self absorption
273: frequency $\rm \nu_{a}$, the peak frequency $\nu_{\rm m}$
274: corresponding to the lower cutoff in the electron energy distribution
275: ($n(\gamma) \propto \gamma^{-p}$, $\gamma > \gamma_{m}$), and
276: the synchrotron cooling frequency $\nu_{\rm c}$. The flux $F_{\rm m}$
277: at $\nu_{\rm m}$ provides the normalisation of the spectrum
278: \citep{Sari01}.
279:
280: The photon index ($\Gamma$) of the afterglow and the electron energy
281: distribution index $p$ are related in any given spectral regime
282: ($\Gamma - 1 = p/2$ if $\rm \nu_{c} < \nu$ and
283: $\Gamma - 1 = (p - 1)/2$ if $\rm \nu < \nu_{c}$).
284: The corresponding temporal decay index $\alpha$ would be $(3p-2)/4$
285: and $3(p-1)/4$ respectively before the jet break and would equal $p$ in both spectral
286: regimes after the jet break, according to the standard fireball model
287: for an afterglow expanding in a homogeneous interstellar medium (ISM).
288: For the shock wave expanding into the wind density profile
289: the corresponding $\alpha$ would be $(3p-2)/4$ and $(3p-1)/4$
290: respectively before the jet break and $p$ after the jet break.
291:
292: In the present case, the observed values of the photon index
293: ($\Gamma = 1.69 \pm 0.06$) and temporal decay index
294: ($\alpha_{\rm X} = 0.54 \pm 0.04$) of the x-ray afterglow
295: are consistent with the spectral regime $\rm \nu_{X} > \nu_{c}$
296: and $p=1.5$. The observed decay indices of optical light curve
297: are also consistent with the inferred value of $p$, the spectral regime
298: $\rm \nu_{\rm opt} < \nu_{c}$ and wind-constant density transition at 0.02 day.
299: As discussed above, the expected temporal decay index of the x-ray
300: afterglow, $\alpha_{\rm X} = (3p-2)/4$, is the same for wind and homogeneous ISM
301: density profiles. The absence of a break in the x-ray afterglow
302: light curve simultaneous with the optical break makes the multiband afterglow
303: features consistent with the proposed transition of the circum-burst medium
304: density profile from wind to constant density.
305: In Figure 1. we compare the predictions of our model of wind to constant
306: density transition of the circum-burst density profile with
307: multiband observations of GRB 050319 afterglow.
308: A detailed list of the best fit spectral parameters can be found in Table ~\ref{tab:fitpara}.
309: The observed B band light curve is systematically lower than that predicted by
310: the model which could be due to the $Lyman ~\alpha$ absorption at $z = 3.24$
311: appearing in the observer's B band as suggested by \citet{Huang}.
312: The steepening of the x-ray light curve at $\Delta t \sim 0.3$ day could be due
313: to jet break \citep{Cusumano} but unfortunately the variability in
314: R band light curve and insufficient sampling of the data in B and V bands
315: after $\sim 1.0$ day makes it difficult to verify the achromaticity of the break.
316:
317: %\subsection{\bf Spectral Parameters}
318: Given the above model spectral parameters we find that the broadband behavior
319: of the afterglow is very well explained. However, we are restricting ourselves
320: to the overall behavior of the afterglow and hence do not attempt in our model
321: to reproduce the variations seen in the optical light curve.
322: The reason for these variations could be density inhomogenities in
323: the circum-burst medium.\\
324:
325: \subsection{Physical Parameters}
326: Four spectral parameters ($\rm \nu_{a} ,
327: \nu_{m} , \nu_{c}\ and\ F_{peak}$) are related to four physical parameters
328: viz n (no density of the constant density circum-burst medium) or
329: $A_{\ast}$ (defined as $\rho(r) = 5 \times 10^{11} A_{\ast} r^{-2}$
330: for wind density medium),
331: E (total energy content of the fireball), energy fraction in relativistic
332: electrons $\rm \epsilon_{e}$ and that in magnetic field $\epsilon_{B}$.
333: The typical value of self absorption frequency $\rm \nu_{a}$ lies in
334: radio-mm waves and hence is best estimated only if the afterglow is well
335: observed in these bands. Unfortunately, the afterglow of GRB 050319
336: was never detected at the radio band \citep{GCN3127,GCN3132,GCN3153}.
337: Therefore we expressed the remaining three spectral parameters,
338: known separately from parts of the light curves corresponding to the wind
339: and the constant density circum-burst medium, in terms of A$_{\ast}$ and $n$,
340: respectively. Equating the kinetic energies estimated from two density profiles,
341: i.e. $E^{K}_{wind} = E^{K}_{ISM}$, we obtain a relation between A$_{\ast}$ and $n$ :
342: A$_{\ast} = 5.097 \times 10^{-3} ~n^{2/5}$. For a typical range of values of
343: $n$ (1 to 100), estimated A$_{\ast}$ ranges from $5.097 \times 10^{-3}$
344: to $0.032$ which results in the range of $E^{K}_{iso}$ from $1.3 \times 10^{54}$
345: to $5.3 \times 10^{53}$ erg. All the estimated physical parameters
346: are listed in Table ~\ref{tab:physpara}.
347:
348: \section{Discussion}
349: \subsection{Signature of Wind Reverse Shock ?}
350: Morphology and evolution of the wind bubbles has been studied
351: by \citet{Castor,Weaver}. A reverse shock forms at the surface where
352: the stellar wind meets the surrounding ISM and it then propagates into the wind.
353: The free wind (upstream of the reverse shock) has a density profile $\rho \propto r^{-2}$
354: and the shocked wind (downstream of the reverse shock) has a constant density profile.
355: The effects of such a density transition on the afterglow of a GRB
356: has been studied by \citet{Peer}.
357: It could be this transition of the density profile that we are observing at 0.02 day
358: in the present case of GRB 050319. From the observations of long GRB afterglows,
359: it has been inferred that most of the GRBs occur in constant density environment
360: and the absence of wind signatures in the GRB afterglow
361: was surprising. Various ways which can bring the wind reverse shock closer
362: to the exploding star have recently been proposed to resolve this mystery
363: surrounding the absence of winds \citep{vanMarle,Eldridge}.
364: In the case of GRB 050319, for a range of assumed values
365: of $n = 1 ~to~ 100$ we estimate the radius of the reverse shock to be
366: $R_{SW} \sim 0.5$ pc to $0.1$ pc comparable to the values obtained by \citet{Eldridge_2006}.
367: The constraint $\epsilon_{B} < 1$ puts a lower bound on density :
368: $n > 0.03$
369:
370: \subsection{Implications for the models of GRB progenitors}
371: %Our interpretation of the afterglow of GRB 050319 as being due to the
372: %wind-constant density transition supports the collapsar model of GRBs.
373: %This detection was made possible chiefly because of the quick follow
374: %up abilities of the robotic telescopes RAPTOR \citep{050319_Raptor}
375: %and ROTSE-III \citep{Quimby} coupled with those of {\em Swift} XRT \citep{Cusumano}
376: %and UVOT \citep{050319_Mason}. Time dilation due to cosmological redshift delays
377: %the occurrence of the transition in the observer's frame of reference and
378: %makes it favourable to detect such a transition in distant GRBs.
379: %It is necessary to carefully analyse multiband observations of distant GRBs
380: %to look for more examples of similar transition.
381:
382: Our interpretation of the afterglow of GRB 050319 as being due to the
383: wind-constant density transition supports the collapsar model of GRBs.
384: Detection of similar transitions in other afterglows have so far eluded us
385: perhaps because of the smaller size of the wind bubbles and the resultant
386: early transition times. The present detection was made possible chiefly
387: because of the quick follow up abilities of the robotic telescopes
388: RAPTOR \citep{050319_Raptor} and ROTSE-III \citep{Quimby} coupled with
389: those of {\em Swift} XRT \citep{Cusumano} and UVOT \citep{050319_Mason}.
390: Time dilation due to cosmological redshift delays
391: the occurrence of the transition in the observer's frame of reference and
392: makes it favourable to detect such a transition in distant GRBs.
393: The robotic telescopes are now routinely detecting GRB afterglows
394: as early as a few minutes after the burst and with careful analysis
395: of multiband observations of distant GRBs it should be possible to detect
396: more examples of similar transition. For example, a probable detection of
397: similar density transition, though not in the same waveband, has been reported
398: by \citet{050904_Gendre} in the case of GRB 050904 (z $\sim$ 6.3)
399: where the transition time is assumed to be $\sim 1700$ s ($\sim$ 0.02 days)
400: after the burst, similar to that for GRB 050319 afterglow in the present case.
401: %
402: \section{Summary}
403: We have modeled the multiband afterglow of GRB 050319, using our own optical observations
404: and other observations available in the literature, as being due to
405: the interaction of the relativistic blast wave
406: with circum-burst medium which shows a transition of density profile from
407: wind to constant density.
408: Our conclusions can be summarised as follows :
409: \begin{enumerate}
410: \item We present BVRI band observations of GRB 050319 afterglow.
411: \item We showed that the unusual break in the light curves of optical afterglow
412: at 0.02 day can be explained as being due to the transition of circum-burst density
413: profile from wind to constant density. The observed x-ray afterglow light curve
414: without a simultaneous break is consistent with this interpretation.
415: The overall afterglow can be explained by using a relatively low value
416: of electron energy distribution index $p$ which is also consistent with
417: the x-ray spectral photon index.
418: \item The transition of the density profile could be due to the wind reverse
419: shock propagating into the stellar wind driven by the progenitor of GRB 050319.
420: We estimate radius of the wind reverse shock
421: to be $R_{SW} \sim 0.5 ~pc ~to~ 0.1 ~pc$ for assumed values of
422: $n \sim 1 ~to~ 100$ cm$^{-3}$ respectively.
423: \end{enumerate}
424: %--------------------------------------%
425: \begin{figure}
426: \begin{center}
427: \hbox{
428: %\includegraphics[height=12.5cm,width=9cm]{050319_WIND_HISM_Calzetti_mono1.ps}}
429: %\includegraphics[height=8cm,width=6cm,angle=-90]{fig1.ps}}
430: \includegraphics[height=15cm,angle=-90]{fig1.ps}}
431: %\includegraphics[height=12cm,width=10cm,angle=-90]{fig1.ps}}
432: %\includegraphics[height=8cm,width=8cm,angle=-90]{050319_WIND_HISM_Calzetti_color.ps}}
433: %\includegraphics[height=8cm,width=8cm,angle=-90]{050319_WIND_HISM_lcurve_Calzetti.ps}}
434: %\includegraphics[height=8cm,width=8cm,angle=-90]{050319_WIND_HISM_lcurve_Calzetti.ps}}
435: \caption{The afterglow light curves of GRB 050319.
436: The solid lines represent a model in which the expanding fireball
437: encounters the transition in density profile from the wind to constant density medium
438: at 0.02 day. The best fit spectral parameters of this model are listed
439: in Table ~\ref{tab:fitpara}}
440: \end{center}
441: \end{figure}
442: %--------------------------------------%
443: \begin{table}
444: \begin{center}
445: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
446: \hline
447: \hline
448: & wind density medium & constant density medium \\
449: \hline
450: $ \nu_{m} (Hz)$ & $1.6^{+0.9}_{-0.7}\times 10^{13}$ & $1.0^{+0.35}_{-0.5} \times 10^{12}$ \\
451: $ \nu_{c} (Hz)$ & $1.1^{+3.7}_{-0.4}\times 10^{15}$ & $2.1^{+0.6}_{-0.8} \times 10^{15}$ \\
452: $ F_{peak}(\mu Jy)$ & $2370 \pm 355$ & $1810^{+260}_{-170}$ \\
453: $p$ & $1.59 \pm 0.06$ & $1.52 \pm 0.02$ \\
454: \hline
455: $\chi^{2}_{dof} (dof)$& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{1.4 (161)} \\
456: \hline
457: \end{tabular}
458: \end{center}
459: \caption{The best fit spectral parameters for wind ($< 0.02$ day) and constant density ($> 0.02$ day) profile.
460: All the parameters are fitted at 0.003 day after the burst.}\label{tab:fitpara}
461: \end{table}
462: %--------------------------------------%
463: \begin{table}
464: \begin{center}
465: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
466: \hline
467: \hline
468: Parameter & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{n = 1; A$_{\ast} = 5.097\times10^{-3}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{n = 100; A$_{\ast} = 0.032$}\\
469: \hline
470: & wind & ISM & wind & ISM \\
471: \hline
472: $ E^{iso}_{54} $ & $1.3$ & $1.3$ & $0.53$ & $0.53$ \\
473: $\epsilon_{e} $ & $4.4\times 10^{-3}$ & $2.2\times 10^{-3}$& $1.1 \times 10^{-2}$ & $5.4 \times 10^{-3}$ \\
474: $\epsilon_{B} $ & $0.14$ & $1.2\times 10^{-3}$& $0.01$ & $ \sim 10^{-4}$ \\
475: \hline
476: \end{tabular}
477: \end{center}
478: \caption{Physical parameters estimated using the best fit spectral parameters mentioned in Table ~\ref{tab:fitpara}}\label{tab:physpara}
479: \end{table}
480: %--------------------------------------%
481: \section*{Acknowledgments}
482: We are thankful to D. Bhattacharya for critical comments and detailed discussions
483: throughout this work and to Ram Sagar for his support during the observations.
484: We are thankful to the anonymous referee for constructive comments which
485: has improved the $Letter$ significantly.
486: %\bibliography{$CITE/050319_All,$CITE/030329_RP,$CITE/Bloom,$CITE/Classic_GRB,$CITE/Frail,$CITE/Galama,$CITE/Rhoads,$CITE/SRK,$CITE/Steep_Decay,$CITE/Extinction,$CITE/Models,$CITE/Review}
487:
488: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
489: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
490: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
491: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
492: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
493: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
494: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
495: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
496: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
497: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
498: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
499: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
500: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
501:
502: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Stanek} et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{{Stanek},
503: {Matheson}, {Garnavich}, {Martini}, {Berlind}, {Caldwell}, {Challis},
504: {Brown}, {Schild}, {Krisciunas} et~al.}}]{030329_00}
505: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~Z.} \bibnamefont{{Stanek}}},
506: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Matheson}}},
507: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Garnavich}}},
508: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Martini}}},
509: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Berlind}}},
510: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{{Caldwell}}},
511: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Challis}}},
512: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{{Brown}}},
513: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Schild}}},
514: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Krisciunas}}},
515: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl}
516: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{591}}, \bibinfo{pages}{L17} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}),
517: \eprint{astro-ph/0304173}.
518:
519: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Wijers} and {Galama}}(1999)}]{Wijers1999}
520: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~A.~M.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Wijers}}}
521: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~J.}
522: \bibnamefont{{Galama}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj}
523: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{523}}, \bibinfo{pages}{177} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}),
524: \eprint{astro-ph/9805341}.
525:
526: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Chevalier} and {Li}}(2000)}]{Chevalier2000}
527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~A.} \bibnamefont{{Chevalier}}}
528: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.-Y.} \bibnamefont{{Li}}},
529: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{536}}, \bibinfo{pages}{195}
530: (\bibinfo{year}{2000}), \eprint{astro-ph/9908272}.
531:
532: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Gendre} et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont{{Gendre}, {Galli},
533: {Corsi}, {Klotz}, {Piro}, {Stratta}, {Bo{\"e}r}, and
534: {Damerdji}}}]{050904_Gendre}
535: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{{Gendre}}},
536: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Galli}}},
537: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Corsi}}},
538: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Klotz}}},
539: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Piro}}},
540: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Stratta}}},
541: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Bo{\"e}r}}},
542: \bibnamefont{and}
543: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{{Damerdji}}},
544: \bibinfo{journal}{\aap} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{462}}, \bibinfo{pages}{565}
545: (\bibinfo{year}{2007}), \eprint{astro-ph/0603431}.
546:
547: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Krimm}
548: et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{{Krimm}, {Still}, {Barthelmy},
549: {Barbier}, {Campana}, {Capalbi}, {Chester}, {Cummings}, {Fenimore}, {Gehrels}
550: et~al.}}]{GCN3117}
551: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{{Krimm}}},
552: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Still}}},
553: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Barthelmy}}},
554: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Barbier}}},
555: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Campana}}},
556: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Capalbi}}},
557: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Chester}}},
558: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Cummings}}},
559: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Fenimore}}},
560: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{{Gehrels}}},
561: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network}
562: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3117}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1}
563: (\bibinfo{year}{2005}{\natexlab{a}}).
564:
565: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Krimm}
566: et~al.}(2005{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{{Krimm}, {Sakamoto}, {Barthelmy},
567: {Barbier}, {Cummings}, {Fenimore}, {Gehrels}, {Hullinger}, {Markwardt},
568: {Marshall} et~al.}}]{GCN3119}
569: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{{Krimm}}},
570: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Sakamoto}}},
571: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Barthelmy}}},
572: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Barbier}}},
573: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Cummings}}},
574: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Fenimore}}},
575: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{{Gehrels}}},
576: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{{Hullinger}}},
577: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{{Markwardt}}},
578: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{{Marshall}}},
579: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network}
580: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3119}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1}
581: (\bibinfo{year}{2005}{\natexlab{b}}).
582:
583: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Cusumano} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Cusumano},
584: {Mangano}, {Angelini}, {Barthelmy}, {Beardmore}, {Burrows}, {Campana},
585: {Cannizzo}, {Capalbi}, {Chincarini} et~al.}}]{Cusumano}
586: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Cusumano}}},
587: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{{Mangano}}},
588: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Angelini}}},
589: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Barthelmy}}},
590: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{{Beardmore}}},
591: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~N.} \bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
592: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Campana}}},
593: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~K.} \bibnamefont{{Cannizzo}}},
594: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Capalbi}}},
595: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Chincarini}}},
596: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{639}},
597: \bibinfo{pages}{316} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{2005astro.ph..9689C}.
598:
599: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Rykoff} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Rykoff},
600: {Schaefer}, and {Quimby}}}]{GCN3116}
601: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Rykoff}}},
602: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{{Schaefer}}},
603: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Quimby}}},
604: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3116}},
605: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
606:
607: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Fynbo} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Fynbo}, {Hjorth},
608: {Jensen}, {Jakobsson}, {Moller}, and {Naranen}}}]{GCN3136}
609: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.~U.} \bibnamefont{{Fynbo}}},
610: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Hjorth}}},
611: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~L.} \bibnamefont{{Jensen}}},
612: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Jakobsson}}},
613: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Moller}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
614: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Naranen}}},
615: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3136}},
616: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
617:
618: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Misra} et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont{{Misra},
619: {Bhattacharya}, {Sahu}, {Sagar}, {Anupama}, {Castro-Tirado}, {Guziy}, and
620: {Bhatt}}}]{060124_Misra}
621: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Misra}}},
622: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{{Bhattacharya}}},
623: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~K.} \bibnamefont{{Sahu}}},
624: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Sagar}}},
625: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~C.} \bibnamefont{{Anupama}}},
626: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Castro-Tirado}}},
627: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Guziy}}},
628: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~C.}
629: \bibnamefont{{Bhatt}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints}
630: (\bibinfo{year}{2007}), \eprint{astro-ph/0701413}.
631:
632: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Henden}}(2005)}]{GCN3454}
633: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Henden}}},
634: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3454}},
635: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
636:
637: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Wo{\'z}niak} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Wo{\'z}niak},
638: {Vestrand}, {Wren}, {White}, {Evans}, and {Casperson}}}]{050319_Raptor}
639: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~R.} \bibnamefont{{Wo{\'z}niak}}},
640: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~T.} \bibnamefont{{Vestrand}}},
641: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{{Wren}}},
642: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~R.} \bibnamefont{{White}}},
643: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Evans}}},
644: \bibnamefont{and}
645: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{{Casperson}}},
646: \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{627}}, \bibinfo{pages}{L13}
647: (\bibinfo{year}{2005}), \eprint{astro-ph/0505336}.
648:
649: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Quimby} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Quimby}, {Rykoff},
650: {Yost}, {Aharonian}, {Akerlof}, {Alatalo}, {Ashley}, {G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c
651: s}}, {G{\"u}ver}, {Horns} et~al.}}]{Quimby}
652: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Quimby}}},
653: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Rykoff}}},
654: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.} \bibnamefont{{Yost}}},
655: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{{Aharonian}}},
656: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~W.} \bibnamefont{{Akerlof}}},
657: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Alatalo}}},
658: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~C.~B.} \bibnamefont{{Ashley}}},
659: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{G{\"o}{\u g}{\"u}{\c s}}}},
660: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{G{\"u}ver}}},
661: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{{Horns}}},
662: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{640}},
663: \bibinfo{pages}{402} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{2005astro.ph.11421Q}.
664:
665: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Mason} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Mason}, {Blustin},
666: {Boyd}, {Holland}, {Page}, {Roming}, {Still}, {Zhang}, {Breeveld}, {de
667: Pasquale} et~al.}}]{050319_Mason}
668: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~O.} \bibnamefont{{Mason}}},
669: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Blustin}}},
670: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Boyd}}},
671: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~T.} \bibnamefont{{Holland}}},
672: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Page}}},
673: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Roming}}},
674: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Still}}},
675: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{{Zhang}}},
676: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Breeveld}}},
677: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{de Pasquale}}},
678: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{639}},
679: \bibinfo{pages}{311} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0511132}.
680:
681: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Huang} et~al.}(2007)\citenamefont{{Huang}, {Urata},
682: {Kuo}, {Ip}, {Ioka}, {Aoki}, {Chen}, {Chen}, {Isogai}, {Lin} et~al.}}]{Huang}
683: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~Y.} \bibnamefont{{Huang}}},
684: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{{Urata}}},
685: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~H.} \bibnamefont{{Kuo}}},
686: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~H.} \bibnamefont{{Ip}}},
687: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Ioka}}},
688: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Aoki}}},
689: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~W.} \bibnamefont{{Chen}}},
690: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~P.} \bibnamefont{{Chen}}},
691: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Isogai}}},
692: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~C.} \bibnamefont{{Lin}}},
693: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl}
694: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{654}}, \bibinfo{pages}{L25} (\bibinfo{year}{2007}),
695: \eprint{astro-ph/0611323}.
696:
697: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Soderberg}}(2005{\natexlab{a}})}]{GCN3127}
698: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Soderberg}}},
699: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3127}},
700: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}{\natexlab{a}}).
701:
702: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Soderberg}}(2005{\natexlab{b}})}]{GCN3132}
703: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Soderberg}}},
704: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3132}},
705: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}{\natexlab{b}}).
706:
707: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Volvach} and {Pozanenko}}(2005)}]{GCN3153}
708: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Volvach}}} \bibnamefont{and}
709: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Pozanenko}}},
710: \bibinfo{journal}{GRB Coordinates Network} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{3153}},
711: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
712:
713: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Mathis}}(1990)}]{Mathis}
714: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Mathis}}},
715: \bibinfo{journal}{\araa} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{28}}, \bibinfo{pages}{37}
716: (\bibinfo{year}{1990}).
717:
718: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Schlegel} et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{{Schlegel},
719: {Finkbeiner}, and {Davis}}}]{Schlegel}
720: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Schlegel}}},
721: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~P.} \bibnamefont{{Finkbeiner}}},
722: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Davis}}},
723: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{500}}, \bibinfo{pages}{525}
724: (\bibinfo{year}{1998}), \eprint{astro-ph/9710327}.
725:
726: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Bessell} et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{{Bessell},
727: {Castelli}, and {Plez}}}]{Bessel}
728: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Bessell}}},
729: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{{Castelli}}},
730: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{{Plez}}},
731: \bibinfo{journal}{\aap} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{333}}, \bibinfo{pages}{231}
732: (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
733:
734: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Sari} et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{{Sari}, {Piran}, and
735: {Narayan}}}]{Sari01}
736: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Sari}}},
737: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Piran}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
738: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Narayan}}},
739: \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{497}},
740: \bibinfo{pages}{L17+} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}), \eprint{astro-ph/9712005}.
741:
742: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Sari} et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{{Sari}, {Narayan},
743: and {Piran}}}]{Sari02}
744: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Sari}}},
745: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Narayan}}},
746: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Piran}}},
747: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{473}}, \bibinfo{pages}{204}
748: (\bibinfo{year}{1996}), \eprint{astro-ph/9605005}.
749:
750: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Nousek} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Nousek},
751: {Kouveliotou}, {Grupe}, {Page}, {Granot}, {Ramirez-Ruiz}, {Patel}, {Burrows},
752: {Mangano}, {Barthelmy} et~al.}}]{Steep00}
753: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{{Nousek}}},
754: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{{Kouveliotou}}},
755: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{{Grupe}}},
756: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~L.} \bibnamefont{{Page}}},
757: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Granot}}},
758: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Ramirez-Ruiz}}},
759: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~K.} \bibnamefont{{Patel}}},
760: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~N.} \bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
761: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{{Mangano}}},
762: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Barthelmy}}},
763: \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{642}},
764: \bibinfo{pages}{389} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0508332}.
765:
766: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Castor} et~al.}(1975)\citenamefont{{Castor}, {McCray},
767: and {Weaver}}}]{Castor}
768: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Castor}}},
769: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{McCray}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
770: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Weaver}}},
771: \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{200}},
772: \bibinfo{pages}{L107} (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).
773:
774: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Weaver} et~al.}(1977)\citenamefont{{Weaver}, {McCray},
775: {Castor}, {Shapiro}, and {Moore}}}]{Weaver}
776: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Weaver}}},
777: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{McCray}}},
778: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Castor}}},
779: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{{Shapiro}}},
780: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Moore}}},
781: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{218}}, \bibinfo{pages}{377}
782: (\bibinfo{year}{1977}).
783:
784: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Pe'er} and {Wijers}}(2006)}]{Peer}
785: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Pe'er}}} \bibnamefont{and}
786: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~A.~M.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Wijers}}},
787: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{643}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1036}
788: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0511508}.
789:
790: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{van Marle} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{van Marle},
791: {Langer}, {Achterberg}, and {Garca{\'{\i}}a-Segura}}}]{vanMarle}
792: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~J.} \bibnamefont{{van Marle}}},
793: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{{Langer}}},
794: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Achterberg}}},
795: \bibnamefont{and}
796: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Garca{\'{\i}}a-Segura}}},
797: \bibinfo{journal}{\aap} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{460}}, \bibinfo{pages}{105}
798: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}), \eprint{astro-ph/0605698}.
799:
800: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Eldridge}}(2007)}]{Eldridge}
801: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Eldridge}}},
802: \bibinfo{journal}{ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints} (\bibinfo{year}{2007}),
803: \eprint{astro-ph/0701707}.
804:
805: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Eldridge}}(2006)}]{Eldridge_2006}
806: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{{Eldridge}}},
807: \bibinfo{journal}{ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}),
808: \eprint{astro-ph/0610413}.
809:
810: \end{thebibliography}
811: %\slugcomment{\copyright 2007. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.}
812:
813:
814: \clearpage
815: \newpage
816:
817: \label{lastpage}
818: \end{document}
819: