1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms5]{article}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
5: \newcommand{\fig}[1] {Figure~\ref{fig:#1}}
6: \newcommand{\eqn}[1] {Eq.~\ref{eqn:#1}}
7:
8: \received{}
9: \accepted{}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Arecibo HI Pulsar Absorption}
12: \shortauthors{Weisberg et al}
13: \usepackage{subfigure}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Arecibo HI Absorption Measurements of Pulsars and the Electron
18: Density at Intermediate Longitudes in the First Galactic Quadrant}
19:
20: \author{J. M. Weisberg\altaffilmark{1}, S. Stanimirovi{\' c}\altaffilmark{2},
21: K. Xilouris\altaffilmark{3}, A. Hedden\altaffilmark{1,3}, A. de la
22: Fuente\altaffilmark{1}, S. B. Anderson\altaffilmark{4}, and
23: F. A. Jenet\altaffilmark{4,5}}
24: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College,
25: Northfield, MN 55057}
26: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
27: Berkeley, CA 94720}
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona,
29: Tucson, AZ 85721}
30: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology,
31: MS 105-24, Pasadena CA 91125}
32: \altaffiltext{5}{Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, University of Texas
33: at Brownsville, TX 78520}
34:
35: \slugcomment{Accepted by ApJ 2007 September}
36:
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: We have used the Arecibo telescope to measure the HI absorption spectra of eight pulsars.
40: We show how kinematic distance measurements
41: depend upon the values of the galactic constants $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$, and we select our
42: preferred current values from the literature. We then
43: derive kinematic distances for the low-latitude pulsars in our sample and electron densities
44: along their lines
45: of sight. We combine these measurements with all others in the inner galactic plane visible from
46: Arecibo to study the electron density in this region. The electron density in the interarm range
47: $48\degr < l < 70\degr$
48: is $[0.017 \ (-0.007,+0.012) \ (68\% \ c.l.$)] cm$^{-3}$. This
49: is $0.75\ (-0.22,+0.49)\ (68\% \ c.l.)$ of the value
50: calculated by the \citet{cl02} galactic electron density model. The model agrees more closely with
51: electron density measurements toward Arecibo pulsars lying closer to the galactic center, at $30\degr<l<48\degr$.
52: Our analysis leads to the best current estimate of the distance of
53: the relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16: $d=(9.0\pm3$) kpc.
54:
55: We use the high-latitude pulsars to search for small-scale structure in the
56: interstellar hydrogen observed in absorption over multiple epochs. PSR B0301+19 exhibited
57: significant changes in its absorption spectrum
58: over 22 yr, indicating HI structure on a $\sim500$ AU scale.
59:
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \keywords{Pulsars: distances --- Galaxy: fundamental parameters ---
63: ISM: structure --- ISM: abundances --- ISM: clouds --- Radio lines: ISM}
64:
65: \section{Introduction}
66:
67: Neutral hydrogen (HI) absorption measurements of pulsar signals
68: at $\lambda=21$ cm are important probes of various
69: properties of the interstellar medium such as the small-scale structure of of
70: cold HI \citep{d81,s03b} and calibrators of the
71: pulsar distance scale and electron density models at large galactic distances \citep{w79,
72: w87,w95,fw90}.
73: These measurements
74: are complementary to interferometrically determined
75: parallaxes, which can be utilized on nearer sources \citep{bET02,cET04}.
76: We report new
77: Arecibo HI absorption observations of eight pulsars, and we use these
78: measurements to study the electron density of the interstellar
79: medium and the small-scale structure of neutral hydrogen clouds.
80:
81: Sensitivity limitations indicate that few if any additional pulsar HI
82: absorption measurements of electron density in the galactic plane at the intermediate
83: first-quadrant galactic longitudes accessible to the
84: Arecibo telescope will be made in the next decade or so. Hence it is an appropriate
85: time to combine the new results with all previous pulsar HI measurements
86: at these longitudes to globally assess the density in the galactic plane in this region. We will
87: use this information to estimate the distance to the relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16.
88: In addition, HI absorption measurements on some of our high-latitude pulsars were
89: originally measured over twenty years ago, during which interval the pulsars have moved many
90: AU through the interstellar medium. Hence comparison of the old and new absorption
91: spectra yields information on the small scale structure of the absorbing neutral hydrogen.
92:
93: The plan of the paper is as follows: The pulsar HI absorption observational technique
94: is sketched in the next section (\S2). We present HI absorption spectra and kinematic distance
95: results for
96: low-latitude pulsars in \S3. In \S4, we use all measured pulsar distances in the inner galactic plane
97: visible from Arecibo Observatory to analyze the electron density in that region. In \S4.1, we review
98: the latest
99: work on the galactocentric distance of the Sun and the orbital velocity of the Local Standard of Rest
100: in order to select an optimum model to use in refining pulsar kinematic distances and galactic
101: electron densities. Then
102: in \S4.2, we apply the results of \S4 and \S4.1 to determine the distance of the relativistic binary pulsar PSR
103: B1913+16. We provide absorption spectra of high-latitude pulsars in \S5, along with analyses of
104: time-variability of absorption in those cases where earlier epoch data are available. Finally,
105: we discuss our conclusions in \S6.
106:
107: \section{Observations}
108:
109: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
110:
111: All observations were made with the 305-m Arecibo telescope from 1998
112: to 2000. The radio frequency signals near 1420 MHz were mixed to
113: baseband, sampled, and recorded with the Caltech Baseband Recorder
114: \citep{j01}, a 10 MHz bandwidth, fast-sampling receiver backend. Every
115: 100 ns, the CBR sampled
116: complex voltages with four-level digitization from the two orthogonally
117: polarized feed channels, and recorded the samples
118: to tape for later processing. (For additional details of the observing
119: techniques and equipment, see Stanimirovi{\' c} et al
120: [2003a,b]). The data were then corrected for quantization \citep{ja98},
121: Fourier transformed and folded modulo the apparent pulsar period with
122: the Supercomputers of Caltech's Center for Advanced Computing Research,
123: resulting in data cubes consisting of intensity as a function of pulsar
124: rotational phase (128 phase bins) and radio frequency (2048 frequency
125: channels, each having 1 km/s width). Subsequent processing at Carleton
126: College collapsed the data
127: cubes into two spectra: the pulsar-{\it{on}} spectrum is a sum
128: of the
129: spectra gathered during the pulsar pulse weighted by $I_{psr}(\phi)^2$, while
130: the sum of those gathered
131: in the interval between pulses is called the pulsar-{\it{off}} spectrum. Here
132: $I_{psr}(\phi)$ is the broadband pulsar intensity in a given pulse phase bin
133: $\phi$.
134:
135: Two final spectra are formed and displayed for each pulsar. The pulsar
136: {\it{absorption}} spectrum, which represents the spectrum of the pulsar
137: alone less any absorption caused by intervening neutral hydrogen, is the
138: normalized difference of the pulsar-{\it{on}} and -{\it{off}} spectra. In
139: order to maximize sensitivity, multiple integrations are summed with a
140: weight depending on the square of the pulsar signal strength
141: $I_{psr}(t)$ during each integration. In some cases, additional sensitivity
142: was achieved by Hanning smoothing the final absorption spectrum, yielding a
143: resolution of 2 km/s. (Any absorption spectrum that has been Hanning smoothed
144: is labelled as such when displayed below.) The HI
145: {\it{emission}} spectrum is the time-integrated, pulsar-{\it{off}}
146: spectrum, calibrated in brightness temperature units by matching its peak
147: with the Leiden/Argentine/Bonn HI Survey \citep{hb97,aET00,bET05,k05}. All spectra
148: were frequency switched and low-order polynomials
149: were fitted to and removed from them in some cases in order to flatten
150: intrinsic or scintillation-induced bandpass ripples.
151:
152:
153:
154: The basic observing parameters are tabulated for low- and high-latitude pulsars in
155: the early columns of Tables 1 and 3, respectively. The quantities
156: $T_{sys,\rm off-line}$ and $\sigma_{\tau,\rm off-line}$,
157: the system temperature and measured 1-$\sigma$ noise
158: in optical depth away from the HI line, are both given. The former value is the sum of
159: an estimated 40 K receiver contribution, plus a sky background determined by
160: extrapolating the 408 MHz sky temperature \citep{hET82} at the pulsar position
161: to 1420 MHz with a spectral index of -2.6.
162: The HI emission line itself contributes significantly to the system temperature (and hence
163: to the noise) at those
164: velocities where it is present. To determine the expected optical depth noise at any
165: velocity $v$, one may use $\sigma_{\tau}(v)=
166: \sigma_{\tau,\rm off-line}\times [T_{HI}(v)+T_{sys,\rm off-line}]/T_{sys,\rm off-line}$, where
167: $T_{HI}(v)$ is the measured brightness temperature of HI at that velocity.
168:
169: \section{Kinematic Distance Analyses and Results on Low-Latitude Pulsars}
170:
171: A low-latitude pulsar HI absorption spectrum can be used to set limits on
172: the pulsar's distance, using the ``kinematic'' technique. A pulsar is
173: farther than an HI cloud that absorbs its
174: signal, and closer than one that does {\em{not}}. The latter ``no
175: absorption''
176: criterion is impossible to ascertain in real spectra because of the inevitable
177: presence of noise which could mask weak absorption. However it was shown
178: by \citet{w79} that emission features with $T_b \geq 35$ K almost always
179: exhibit significant absorption of radiation from background objects.
180: Therefore
181: subsequent investigators have assigned an upper distance limit only at
182: the velocity where one finds both no significant absorption, {\em{and}}
183: an emission feature of $T_b \geq 35$ K. We use a flat \citet{fbs89}
184: galactic rotation model and the IAU galactic constants of $R_o=8.5$ kpc
185: and $\Theta_o=220$ km/s \citep{kl86} to convert the radial velocities to distance.
186: The resulting model radial velocities are
187: shown in a panel under each absorption/emission spectrum pair.
188: We also add and subtract velocities of 7 km/s to our nominal velocities,
189: in order
190: to derive estimates of the uncertainties in distance limits due to streaming
191: and random gas motions in the Galaxy. These procedures are identical to those
192: used in the critical evaluation of all such measurements then extant by
193: \citet{fw90}, and by
194: all subsequent pulsar HI absorption experimenters. Hence our results are
195: directly intercomparable with these earlier ones. Our derived distance
196: limits are discussed below for each pulsar, and are summarized in Table 1.
197: See \S 4.1 for a discussion of modifications to our derived distances for
198: different values of the Galactic constants.
199:
200:
201: \subsection{PSR J1909+0254=B1907+02 ({\it{l}}=37\fdg6; {\it{b}}=-2\fdg7),
202: Fig. \ref{fig:B1907+02} }
203:
204: The farthest observed absorption feature is at $ v = 60 $ km/s, well before the
205: tangent point. Hence the pulsar lies beyond a lower distance limit of
206: $3.8 \pm 0.5$ kpc. Unfortunately the HI emission has $T_b \lesssim 10$
207: K at all velocities where one might test for an upper distance limit via
208: lack of absorption, because
209: the $b=2\fdg7$ line of sight rapidly leaves the hydrogen layer. Since
210: significant absorption could not in any case be guaranteed at the velocity
211: of such weak emission \citep{w79}, no upper distance limit can be set.
212:
213: \subsection{PSR J1922+2110=B1920+21 ({\it{l}}=55\fdg3; {\it{b}}=2\fdg9),
214: Fig. \ref{fig:B1920+21} }
215:
216: \citet{w87} observed this pulsar. Their HI spectrum was
217: contaminated by interstellar scintillation and was rather
218: noisy, prompting
219: us to reobserve it with greater sensitivity. The highest velocity
220: absorption that \citet{w87} could confidently detect
221: was at $v = 26 $ km/s,
222: leading to their limit of $(1.9 \pm 0.7$ kpc ) $\lesssim d$. Our new
223: observations clearly exhibit absorption at $v = 41$ km/s, near the
224: tangent point. Hence we revise the lower distance limit significantly
225: upwards: $(4.8 \pm 1.8$ kpc ) $\lesssim d$.
226: The \citet{w87} spectrum also showed an absorption feature at this velocity but it
227: was not sufficiently above the noise to serve as a reliable kinematic distance
228: indicator. The dip in the current absorption spectrum at $v=-48$ km/s is probably
229: noise and will not be used to set a distance limit. (It appears much more
230: prominently in one of the two circular polarization channels than in the other,
231: and is not visible in the \citet{w87} absorption spectrum. Furthermore, the nearby
232: source G55.6+2.3=B1923+210 does not exhibit reliable far side absorption until
233: $v\lesssim -60$ km/s [Dickey et al 1983; Colgan et al 1988].) Conversely,
234: the {\it{lack}} of absorption in the $T_b= 41$ K emission feature at $v=-65$ km/s
235: sets the upper distance limit of $d \lesssim (16.2\pm1.0)$ pc.
236:
237: \subsection{PSR J1926+1648=B1924+16 ({\it{l}}=51\fdg9; {\it{b}}=0\fdg1),
238: Fig. \ref{fig:B1924+16} }
239:
240: While the Fich et al. model predicts a tangent point velocity of 48 km/s in this
241: direction, we detect significant emission and absorption well beyond this velocity,
242: with
243: the last major feature centered near $v=61$ km/s. These features are due to the
244: Sagittarius arm \citep{b70}. \citet{gd89} and \citet{cst88} also
245: observe HI absorption out to these velocities in the nearby sources G50.625-0.031
246: and G51.4-0.0, respectively. We choose the tangent point as our
247: lower distance limit, so $ (5.2\pm1.8)$ kpc $\lesssim d$. The lack of absorption in
248: the $T_b \sim
249: 42$ K emission feature at $v \sim -47$ km/s yields the upper distance limit:
250: $ d \lesssim 14.9\pm0.8$ kpc
251:
252:
253: \section{Analysis of the Electron Density in the Inner Galactic Plane Visible from
254: Arecibo}
255:
256: The currently reported HI absorption distance measurements are probably
257: among the last to be determined at Arecibo in the foreseeable future, as all
258: known pulsars having sufficient flux density to achieve adequate $S/N$ in a
259: reasonable time have now been measured as well as is possible with this
260: procedure. Unfortunately galactic HI emission is
261: now the dominant noise source, so that future receiver improvements will not
262: significantly decrease the overall noise. Therefore, new low-latitude pulsars
263: discovered in the future in this longitude range will probably be too faint for the HI
264: absorption technique, even at Arecibo. Consequently now is a good time to
265: review all such measurements and their implications for the electron density
266: in the inner galactic plane visible from Arecibo.
267:
268: The dispersion measure $DM$ of a pulsar, derived from multiple-frequency
269: timing measurements and reported in \citet{m05}\footnote{The catalog is
270: maintained and updated at
271: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat}, directly yields the
272: path-integrated electron density along the line of sight: $DM = \int{n_e} ds$.
273: Hence our distance limits, $d$, can be combined with the published dispersion
274: measures to yield mean electron densities $\langle n_e \rangle$ along
275: the line of sight:
276:
277: \begin{equation}
278: \langle n_e \rangle \equiv \frac{ \int{n_e ds} } {d}= \frac {DM} {d}.
279: \end{equation}
280:
281: Table 2 lists the electron density limits derived in this fashion from our
282: measurements and from all earlier ones in similar directions; i.e., toward
283: the inner
284: galactic plane accessible to the Arecibo telescope. Note that the kinematic
285: distances listed in Table 2 were all derived
286: with the standard procedures discussed above in \S 3, namely the uniform
287: criteria established by \citet{fw90} and the IAU standard
288: galactic constants \citep{kl86}. Procedures to modify these values for other
289: choices of galactic constants are given below in \S4.1.
290:
291: In Fig. \ref{fig:density}a, we display measured limits on the mean electron
292: density as a function of galactic longitude $l$ in the inner galactic plane visible
293: from Arecibo. Only those pulsars from Table 2 with $|b|<3\degr$ and a
294: lower distance limit $d_l \ge 1$ kpc are included in Fig. \ref{fig:density}a
295: in order to concentrate on kpc-scale averages in the galactic plane. Almost
296: all of these measurements were derived from Arecibo pulsar HI absorption
297: spectra. While there is significant scatter,
298: it is apparent that the measured densities tend to decline as the line of sight
299: rotates away from the inner Galaxy, with a notable drop in the region
300: between the Sagittarius arm (the first arm interior to our location) and the local
301: spiral arm (see Fig. \ref{fig:galplane}). \citet{am76} were the first to have
302: adequate $\langle n_e \rangle$
303: measurements to infer that interarm densities are lower than those in
304: spiral arms. As illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:density}a, the numerous measurements
305: made since that epoch serve to confirm and refine their suggestion, at least in
306: this particular interarm region. Indeed, the drop in
307: $\langle n_e \rangle$ as $l$ exceeds $48\degr$ corresponds with the line
308: of sight finally reaching a longitude where it no longer intercepts the
309: Sagittarius arm (see Fig. \ref{fig:galplane}). Meanwhile, with only one
310: exception, {\it{every}} pulsar measurement in the interarm range
311: $48\degr < l < 70\degr$ is consistent with a relatively low
312: $\langle n_e \rangle\sim0.02$ cm$^{-3}$ (see below for further analysis).
313: The electron density at lower latitudes
314: sampled in Fig. \ref{fig:density}a is clearly significantly higher, with an average
315: in the vicinity of 0.05 cm$^{-3}$ (plus superposed variations) in the $30-40\degr$
316: longitude range.
317:
318: It is also useful to compare our updated set of electron density measurements with
319: the most widely used galactic density model (NE2001, Cordes \& Lazio 2002).
320: Fig. \ref{fig:density}b exhibits the measured limits on $\langle n_e \rangle$,
321: normalized by the mean electron densities {\it{predicted}} by the NE2001 model.
322: The measured-to-model electron density ratio hovers near
323: 1 (with some inevitable scatter) for $l \lesssim 48\degr$, indicating that the model
324: fits the data adequately at those longitudes. However, at the higher longitudes
325: $48\degr < l < 70\degr$ discussed above, there is a tendency for the typical
326: measured-to-model density ratio to lie below 1, suggesting that the NE2001 model densities are somewhat high in this interarm region.
327:
328: In order to further explore the electron density in this interarm region, we performed
329: Monte Carlo simulations to assess the best value and uncertainty on $\langle n_e \rangle$
330: and on the measured-to-model $\langle n_e \rangle$ ratio for the pulsars in this region.
331: Of the ten pulsars with measured distance limits and
332: limits on $\langle n_e \rangle$ in this range (see Table 2), we discarded the data from
333: PSR J1935+1616 since it lacks a measured upper distance and lower density limit. For each of the
334: remaining nine pulsars, all possible distances between the measured upper and lower limits
335: were rendered equally probable in our simulations by choosing distances randomly from a uniform
336: distribution between the measured distance limits. Note that the assumption of uniform probability
337: is the simplest reasonable hypothesis for measurements such as these which have only a lower
338: and upper limit. We find that $\langle n_e \rangle = [0.017 \ (-0.007,+0.012) \ (68\% \ c.l.$)] cm$^{-3}$,
339: and that the
340: ratio of measured-to-NE2001 electron density is $0.75\ (-0.22,+0.49)\ (68\% \ c.l.)$ for
341: $48\degr < l < 70\degr$. Future models should take this discrepancy into account.
342:
343: For simplicity, both the measured and model densities discussed above are based on the
344: standard IAU galactic constants. As described below in \S4.1, the {\em{ratio}}
345: plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:density}b remains virtually identical if both constituents are
346: rescaled to incorporate other choices of galactic constants.
347:
348: \subsection{The Effects of Improved Galactic Constants $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$}
349:
350: Much progress has been made on galactic structure and
351: kinematics in the $\sim 20$ years since the IAU constants were defined.
352: Therefore it is useful to discuss improved measurements of $R_o$ and and $\Theta_o$,
353: and to investigate the influence of these
354: better values on the kinematic distances and electron densities discussed in \S3 and \S4.
355:
356: From remarkable proper motion and radial velocity measurements of the orbit of star S2
357: about Sgr A* through much of its 15-yr period, \citet{eis05}
358: find that the distance to the galactic center $R_o=7.62\pm0.32$ kpc. \citet{rb04} have made
359: equally stunning interferometric measurements of the proper motion of Sgr A*, which yield
360: an angular velocity of the Local Standard of Rest (LSR) about the galactic center,
361: $ \Omega_o = \Theta_o / R_o =
362: (29.45 \pm 0.15)$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$. Both of these measurements are notable in that
363: they rest on far fewer assumptions than earlier determinations, and hence should be freer of
364: systematic errors. Consequently we adopt them in what follows. An even newer estimate
365: of $R_o$ from infrared measurements of red clump
366: giants in the galactic bulge \citep{nET06} yields a value of $7.52\pm0.10$ (statistical)
367: $\pm 0.35 $ (systematic) kpc, which is consistent with our above adopted value.
368:
369: Consider material traversing a circular orbit in the plane at galactocentric
370: radius $R$. Given a flat rotation curve
371: with circular velocity $\Theta_o$, its radial velocity with respect to the LSR
372: is $v_{rad}=\Theta_o(R_o/R-1)\sin l$.
373: With $R=(R_o^2 + d^2 -2 R_o d \cos l)^{1/2}$, the distance as a function of
374: $v_{rad}$ is given by
375:
376: \begin{equation}
377: d = R_o \left( \cos l \pm \sqrt{1+\frac{v_{rad} }{\Theta_o \sin l} } - \sin^2 l \right).
378: \end{equation}
379:
380: Hence our new adopted galactic parameters, giving a small change in $\Theta_o$ but a
381: relatively large change in
382: $R_o$, result in a recalibration of the distance in a particular direction, accomplished by
383: rescaling it with an
384: approximately constant factor of $R_{o,new}/R_{o,old} = 7.62 / 8.50 = 0.896$. Kinematic
385: distance limits and
386: galactic distance models that use the old IAU galactic constants should be adjusted by
387: this factor to
388: reflect the improved constants.
389:
390: Fig. \ref{fig:rotcurve} displays distance - radial velocity curves toward $l=50\degr$ derived with
391: the old and new flat galactic rotation curves. Fig. \ref{fig:rotcurve}a illustrates that the
392: old and new model
393: distances differ primarily by a constant multiplicative factor, as indicated in the previous
394: analysis. It follows from the above, that when distance is {\it{normalized}} by
395: $R_o$, the old and new radial velocity - distance curves are almost identical (Fig.
396: \ref{fig:rotcurve}b). Such normalized distances are useful in the analysis of the
397: acceleration of pulsars in the galactic gravitational field, as will be discussed in the
398: next section (\S4.2).
399:
400:
401:
402: As described above, the new galactic constants would result primarily in the
403: measured
404: distances being rescaled by the ratio of new to old $R_o$. The electron
405: densities, including
406: model densities that have been calibrated via pulsar kinematic distance
407: measurements, would
408: then be rescaled by the inverse of this ratio (see Eq. 1). Hence Fig.
409: \ref{fig:density}a would be thus rescaled; while Fig. \ref{fig:density}b
410: would remain unchanged since it displays the ratio of two densities, each
411: of which should be rescaled by the same factor.
412:
413: \subsection{The Distance to the Relativistic Binary Pulsar B1913+16}
414:
415: The relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16 lies in the heart of the region of the
416: Galaxy that we are studying,
417: at $(l,b)\sim(50\degr,2\degr)$.
418: The orbital decay of this system due to gravitational wave emission provides
419: a strong test of
420: relativistic gravitation \citep{tw89}. Currently, the precision of the relativistic
421: test is limited by
422: uncertainties in the galactic acceleration of the pulsar and the solar system
423: \citep{dt91}, which are
424: currently dominated by uncertainties in the pulsar distance $d$ [or more specifically,
425: uncertainties in $\delta$, the distance normalized by $R_o$ \citep{wt03,wt05}].
426: Hence it is very important
427: to assess the current results in an effort to improve our knowledge of B1913+16's
428: distance.
429:
430: Fig. \ref{fig:density}a shows that the measured electron density appears to have
431: a local minimum near the pulsar's
432: longitude. The relatively low value of $\langle n_e \rangle$ at $l\sim50\degr$
433: is not surprising, since we noted in \S4 that
434: the line of sight in this direction traverses a long path {\it{between}}
435: spiral arms (see Fig. \ref{fig:galplane}). The tightest limits on
436: $\langle n_e \rangle$ in the whole
437: inner plane visible from Arecibo are for PSR B1915+13 at $l=48\degr$,
438: which happens also to be the
439: pulsar closest to PSR B1913+16. Hence we adopt the measured limits
440: from B1915+13, including
441: an allowance for up to 7 km s$^{-1}$ non-circular velocities (not shown in
442: Table 2 or Fig. \ref{fig:density}):
443: %note that \; and \: are medium and thick space in math mode (Lamport LaTex p52)
444: $\langle n_e \rangle \sim (0.0188 \pm 0.006)\left( \frac{8.5\: {\rm kpc}}{ R_o}\right) {\rm cm}^{-3} .$
445: Note that this value is congruent with and has modestly tighter limits than the electon density
446: derived in this interarm region in \S4.
447:
448: Armed with our new estimate of $\langle n_e \rangle$, we use Equation 1
449: to find the distance
450: to PSR B1913+16, which has $DM\sim169$ pc cm$^{-3}$:
451: \begin{equation}
452: d_{\rm{B }1913+16}=(10.0\pm3.2) \left( \frac{ R_o}{8.5\: {\rm kpc}}\right)
453: \end{equation}
454: kpc. Our result can also be compared with the \citet{cl02} NE2001
455: model distance of $5.90 \left( \frac{ R_o}{8.5\: {\rm kpc}}\right) $ kpc,
456: which is lower for the reasons discussed above.
457: \citet{dt91} used techniques similar to ours
458: to estimate that
459: $d_{\rm{B }1913+16}=(9.2\pm1.4)\left( \frac{ R_o}{8.5\: {\rm kpc}}\right)$.
460: While the error bars of their and our estimates
461: overlap significantly, we are not able to justify tightening them to the degree
462: that \citet{dt91} did. Finally, adopting what we judged in \S4.1 to be the current best
463: measurement of $R_o \ (R_o=7.62\pm0.32$ kpc; Eisenhauer et al. 2005)
464: leads to our best estimate of the distance to PSR B1913+16:
465: $d_{\rm{B }1913+16}=(9.0\pm3)$ kpc.
466:
467: As noted above, the uncertainty in the general relativistic orbital decay rate of this pulsar is
468: currently dominated by the uncertainty in the quantity $\delta_{\rm{B }1913+16}$. For these
469: purposes, it is useful to give
470: \begin{equation}
471: \delta_{\rm{B }1913+16} \equiv (d_{\rm{B }1913+16} / R_o) = (1.18 \pm 0.38).
472: \end{equation}
473:
474: \section{High Galactic Latitude Pulsars and Searches for Temporal Variability of Absorption}
475:
476: Relatively nearby pulsars are
477: excellent targets for studies of the tiny-scale atomic structure (TSAS, \citet{h97}).
478: Comparison of their HI absorption spectra at multiple epochs as they move across the
479: sky permits us to study structure down to AU scales. We discuss here our
480: measurements of five such pulsars. All but two have been
481: previously observed, so we will search for changes between the previous and
482: current epochs. The pulsars' observing parameters, distances, and transverse velocities
483: are listed in Table 3.
484:
485:
486: The pulsars discussed in this section are all located at high galactic latitudes
487: (in all cases, $|b| > 25\degr$). Since their lines of sight leave the galactic hydrogen layer
488: fairly quickly, they are not amenable to the kinematic distance technique discussed in \S3.
489: Conversely, we can not search for temporal absorption variations in the low-latitude pulsars
490: of \S3 because two have never before been observed, and the third's absorption spectrum
491: was too noisy at the earlier epoch to yield meaningful differences. (Indeed we reobserved it
492: in order to more confidently measure its kinematic distance because the noise in the
493: earlier spectrum precluded a secure result.)
494:
495: \subsection{J0304+1932=B0301+19 ({\it{l}}=161\fdg1; {\it{b}}=-33\fdg3),
496: Figs. \ref{fig:B0301+19} and \ref{fig:B0301+19diff}}
497:
498: The HI absorption spectrum of this pulsar was first observed in 1976-77
499: by \citet{d81}. That spectrum and our new one are plotted together in Fig.
500: \ref{fig:B0301+19}. Both epochs' spectra have a similar $\sim 1$ km/s
501: resolution. Both the {\em{integrated}}
502: optical depth (the equivalent width) and the depth of most individual
503: absorption components have changed significantly between the two epochs.
504: Although the early observations were gathered with a spectrometer
505: that digitized the signal to only one bit, its response to rapidly varying pulsar signals
506: was very well-characterized by \citet{w78}. Careful quantization corrections have also been
507: made for the current epoch \citep{ja98}. Hence we believe that both spectra are accurate
508: and that the change is real.
509:
510: The channel spacing of the old and new spectra are 1.056 and 1.031 km/s, respectively. In order to
511: study the absorption changes more carefully, we slightly coarsened the spacing of the new data
512: via interpolation
513: to match the channel spacing and center frequency of the old data. We also ensured that the old and
514: new channel frequencies matched by verifying that the (essentially noise-free) {\em{emission}}
515: spectra were consistent to less than a channel width. Fig. \ref{fig:B0301+19diff} displays the old and
516: (resampled) new absorption spectra (top) and their difference (bottom). The difference spectrum
517: also displays a $\pm2\sigma$ noise envelope in order to assess the significance of variations.
518: [The noise envelope grows at the central velocities because the HI emission line itself
519: contributes significantly to the system noise \citep{j03,s03b}.] The difference spectrum clearly
520: shows a general trend whereby the absorption line depth is greater at the later epoch in most of the
521: central channels, with the largest single-channel difference being significant at the 2.6$\sigma$ level.
522:
523: The $\sim22$ year time baseline is unique in being one of
524: the longest extant showing absorption variations, leading to a length scale of $\sim500$ AU
525: which is second only to the PSR 1557-50 scale of $\sim1000$ AU \citep{j03}.
526: Further implications of these results for small-scale
527: structure in the interstellar medium will be analyzed in a separate paper
528: (Stanimirovic et al, in preparation).
529:
530: \subsection{J1239+2453=B1237+25 ({\it{l}}=252\fdg5; {\it{b}}=86\fdg5), Fig.
531: \ref{fig:B1237+25} }
532:
533: \citet{d81} also measured the HI absorption spectrum of this pulsar in 1976-77.
534: The original and current pulsar spectra show no absorption. These results are
535: not surprising, given the galactic polar line of sight and the very weak HI emission
536: in this direction. The pulsar moved $\sim2200$ AU between the two observations.
537:
538: \subsection{J1537+1155=B1534+12 ({\it{l}}=19\fdg8; {\it{b}}=48\fdg3), Fig.
539: \ref{fig:B1534+12} }
540:
541: This pulsar is a member of a double neutron star binary system. Its pulse
542: timing parallax gives $d > 0.67$ kpc \citep{s02}.
543: Under the assumption that general relativity provides the correct description
544: of gravitational wave emission, the excess observed orbital period change not
545: attributable to gravitational wave damping
546: yields $d=(1.02 \pm 0.05)$ kpc \citep{s02}. There is no statistically significant
547: absorption evident in our pulsar spectrum along this high galactic
548: latitude line of sight. No previous HI absorption measurements have been made
549: on this source.
550:
551: \subsection{J1543+0929=B1541+09 ({\it{l}}=17\fdg8; {\it{b}}=45\fdg8), Fig.
552: \ref{fig:B1541+09} }
553:
554: No statistically significant absorption is present in this high galactic latitude
555: pulsar's spectrum. This is the first absorption spectrum from this pulsar.
556:
557: \subsection{J2305+3100=B2303+30 ({\it{l}}=97\fdg7; {\it{b}}=-26\fdg7), Fig.
558: \ref{fig:B2303+30} }
559:
560: The broad, shallow dip in the displayed spectrum disappears in
561: one of our two orthogonal polarizations, leading us to conclude that it is not real. This
562: pulsar was also observed in 1976-77 by \citet{d81}. In that case as well, no significant
563: absorption was seen. The pulsar traversed $\sim1600$ AU in the intervening time.
564:
565:
566: \section{Conclusions}
567:
568: We have determined the HI absorption spectra of eight pulsars. The three low-latitude pulsars
569: yield kinematic distances and electron densities in the inner galactic plane visible from
570: Arecibo. These observations mark the completion of a two-decade effort to accurately
571: measure the HI absorption spectrum of all such pulsars that are strong
572: enough to be accessible to this technique. Therefore, we have combined our new measurements
573: with all others in this direction to study the
574: electron density in this region. We find that the mean electron density in the plane in the interarm
575: range $48\degr < l < 70\degr$
576: is $ [0.017 \ (-0.007,+0.012) \ (68\% \ c.l.)$] cm$^{-3}$, which is
577: $0.75\ (-0.22,+0.49)\ (68\% \ c.l.)$ of the \citet{cl02} model value currently used by most researchers.
578: At the lower longitudes accessible to Arecibo $(30\degr<l<48\degr)$, the \citet{cl02} model appears
579: to conform generally to the measurements, aside from expected local variations.
580:
581: As part of the process, we show how to modify kinematic distances
582: and electron densities as a function of the galactic constants $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$. We review
583: recent efforts to determine the values of these constants and select the best current answers.
584: Applying all of these results to the relativistic
585: binary pulsar B1913+16, we find a dispersion measure distance of
586: $d=(10.0\pm3.2) \left( \frac{ R_o}{8.5\: {\rm kpc}}\right) $ kpc, or $d=(9.0\pm3$) kpc if we adopt
587: our current best choice for $R_o$ \citep{eis05}.
588:
589: The five high-latitude pulsars are most useful in multiepoch studies of small-scale structure in the
590: interstellar medium. Two were observed for the first time by us in this experiment. Of the
591: other three, two showed no measurable absorption at either of two epochs separated by
592: twenty-two years; while one, PSR B0301+19, exhibited a significant change in absorption profile
593: over that timespan, indicating HI structure on a $\sim500$ AU scale.
594:
595: \acknowledgements{JMW, AH, and AF were supported by grant
596: AST 0406832 from the National Science Foundation. Arecibo Observatory
597: is operated by Cornell University under cooperative agreement with the NSF. }
598:
599: \begin{thebibliography}{}
600:
601: \bibitem[Ables \& Manchester(1976)]{am76} Ables, J.~G., \&
602: Manchester, R.~N.\ 1976, \aap, 50, 177
603:
604: \bibitem[Arnal et al.(2000)]{aET00} Arnal, E.~M., Bajaja, E.,
605: Larrarte, J.~J., Morras, R., P{\"o}ppel, W.~G.~L.\ 2000, \aaps, 142, 35
606:
607: \bibitem[Bajaja et al.(2005)]{bET05} Bajaja, E., Arnal, E.~M., Larrarte, J.~J., Morras, R.,
608: P{\"o}ppel, W.~G.~L., \& Kalberla,
609: P.~M.~W.\ 2005, \aap, 440, 767
610:
611: \bibitem[Blair et al.(1984)]{bET84} Blair, W.~P., Fesen,
612: R.~A., Rull, T.~R., \& Kirshner, R.~P.\ 1984, \apj, 282, 161
613:
614: \bibitem[Brisken et al.(2002)]{bET02} Brisken, W.~F., Benson,
615: J.~M., Goss, W.~M., \& Thorsett, S.~E.\ 2002, \apj, 571, 906
616:
617: \bibitem[Brisken et al.(2003)]{b03} Brisken,~W.~F., Fruchter,~A.~S., Goss,~W.~M.,
618: Herrnstein,~R.~S., \& Thorsett~S.~E.,
619: 2003, \aj, 126, 3090
620:
621: \bibitem[Burton(1970)]{b70} Burton, W.~B.\ 1970, \aaps, 2, 291
622:
623: \bibitem[Caswell et al.(1975)]{cmr+75} Caswell, J.~L., Murray,
624: J.~D., Roger, R.~S., Cole, D.~J., \& Cooke, D.~J.\ 1975, \aap, 45, 239
625:
626: \bibitem[Chatterjee et al.(2004)]{cET04} Chatterjee, S.,
627: Cordes, J.~M., Vlemmings, W.~H.~T., Arzoumanian, Z., Goss, W.~M., \& Lazio,
628: T.~J.~W.\ 2004, \apj, 604, 339
629:
630: \bibitem[Colgan et al.(1988)]{cst88} Colgan, S.~W.~J.,
631: Salpeter, E.~E., \& Terzian, Y.\ 1988, \apj, 328, 275
632:
633: \bibitem[Cordes \& Lazio(2002)]{cl02} Cordes, J.~M., \&
634: Lazio, T.~J.~W.\ 2002, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0207156
635:
636: \bibitem[Damour \& Taylor(1991)]{dt91} Damour, T., \&
637: Taylor, J.~H.\ 1991, \apj, 366, 501
638:
639: \bibitem[Dickey et al.(1981)]{d81} Dickey, J.~M., Weisberg,
640: J.~M., Rankin, J.~M., \& Boriakoff, V.\ 1981, \aap, 101, 332
641:
642: \bibitem[Dickey et al.(1983)]{d83} Dickey, J.~M., Kulkarni,
643: S.~R., Heiles, C.~E., \& van Gorkom, J.~H.\ 1983, \apjs, 53, 591
644:
645: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2005)]{eis05} Eisenhauer, F., et
646: al.\ 2005, \apj, 628, 246
647:
648: \bibitem[Fich et al.(1989)]{fbs89} Fich, M., Blitz, L., \&
649: Stark, A.~A.\ 1989, \apj, 342, 272
650:
651: \bibitem[Frail \& Weisberg(1990)]{fw90} Frail, D.~A., \&
652: Weisberg, J.~M.\ 1990, \aj, 100, 743 (FW90)
653:
654: \bibitem[Garwood \& Dickey(1989)]{gd89} Garwood, R.~W., \& Dickey,
655: J.~M.\ 1989, \apj, 338, 841
656:
657: \bibitem[Hartmann \& Burton(1997)]{hb97} Hartmann, D., \&
658: Burton, W.~B.\ 1997, Atlas of Galactic Neutral Hydrogen, by Dap Hartmann
659: and W.~Butler Burton, pp.~243.~ISBN 0521471117.~Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
660: University Press, February 1997.
661:
662: \bibitem[Haslam et al.(1982)]{hET82} Haslam, C.~G.~T.,
663: Salter, C.~J., Stoffel, H., \& Wilson, W.~E.\ 1982, \aaps, 47, 1
664:
665: \bibitem[Heiles(1997)]{h97} Heiles, C. 1997, \apj, 481, 193
666:
667: \bibitem[Jenet \& Anderson(1998)]{ja98} Jenet, F.~A., \&
668: Anderson, S.~B.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 1467
669:
670: \bibitem[CBR,~Jenet et al.(2001)]{j01} Jenet, F.~A., Anderson,
671: S.~B., \& Prince, T.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 558, 302
672:
673: \bibitem[Johnston et al.(2003)]{j03} Johnston, S.,
674: Koribalski, B., Wilson, W., \& Walker, M.\ 2003, \mnras, 341, 941
675:
676: \bibitem[Kalberla et al.(2005)]{k05} Kalberla, P.~M.~W.,
677: Burton, W.~B., Hartmann, D., Arnal, E.~M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R.,
678: Poppel, W.~G.~L.\ 2005, \aap, 440, 775
679:
680: \bibitem[Kerr \& Lynden-Bell(1986)]{kl86} Kerr, F.~J., \&
681: Lynden-Bell, D.\ 1986, \mnras, 221, 1023
682:
683: \bibitem[Konacki, Wolszczan, \& Stairs(2003)]{kws03}
684: Konacki,~M., Wolszczan,~A., \& Stairs,~I.~H., 2003, \apj, 589, 495
685:
686: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2001)]{las01} Lu, F.~J., Aschenbach, B.,
687: \& Song, L.~M.\ 2001, \aap, 370, 570
688:
689: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2002)]{lET02} Lu, F.~J., Wang, Q.~D.,
690: Aschenbach, B., Durouchoux, P., \& Song, L.~M.\ 2002, \apjl, 568, L49
691:
692: \bibitem[Lyne, Anderson \& Salter(1982)]{las82}
693: Lyne,~A.~G., Anderson,~B., Salter,~M.~J., 1982, \mnras, 201, 503
694:
695: \bibitem[Manchester et al.(2005)]{m05} Manchester, R.~N., Hobbs, G.~B.,
696: Teoh, A., \& Hobbs, M.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 1993
697:
698: \bibitem[Nishiyama et al.(2006)]{nET06} Nishiyama, S., et
699: al.\ 2006, \apj, 647, 1093
700:
701: \bibitem[Reid \& Brunthaler(2004)]{rb04} Reid, M.~J., \&
702: Brunthaler, A.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 872
703:
704: \bibitem[Rosino et al.(1997)]{r97} Rosino, L., Ortolani,
705: S., Barbuy, B., \& Bica, E.\ 1997, \mnras, 289, 745
706:
707: \bibitem[Stairs et al.(2002)]{s02} Stairs, I.~H., Thorsett,
708: S.~E., Taylor, J.~H., \& Wolszczan, A.\ 2002, \apj, 581, 501
709:
710: \bibitem[Stanimirovi{\' c} et al.(2003a)]{s03a}
711: Stanimirovi{\' c}, S., Weisberg, J.~M., Dickey, J.~M., de la Fuente, A.,
712: Devine, K., Hedden, A., \& Anderson, S.~B.\ 2003a, \apj, 592, 953
713:
714: \bibitem[Stanimirovi{\' c} et al.(2003b)]{s03b}
715: Stanimirovi{\' c}, S., Weisberg, J.~M., Hedden, A., Devine, K.~E., \&
716: Green, J.~T.\ 2003b, \apjl, 598, L23
717:
718: \bibitem[Taylor \& Weisberg(1989)]{tw89} Taylor, J.~H., \&
719: Weisberg, J.~M.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 434
720:
721: \bibitem[Velusamy \& Becker(1988)]{vb88} Velusamy, T., \&
722: Becker, R.~H.\ 1988, \aj, 95, 1162
723:
724: \bibitem[Weisberg(1978)]{w78} Weisberg, J.~M.\ 1978,
725: Ph.D.~Thesis, U. Iowa
726:
727: \bibitem[Weisberg et al.(1979)]{w79} Weisberg, J.~M.,
728: Boriakoff, V., \& Rankin, J.\ 1979, \aap, 77, 204
729:
730: \bibitem[Weisberg et al.(1987)]{w87} Weisberg, J.~M.,
731: Rankin, J.~M., \& Boriakoff, V.\ 1987, \aap, 186, 307
732:
733: \bibitem[Weisberg et al.(1995)]{w95} Weisberg, J.~M.,
734: Siegel, M.~H., Frail, D.~A., \& Johnston, S.\ 1995, \apj, 447, 204
735:
736: \bibitem[Weisberg \& Taylor(2003)]{wt03} Weisberg, J.~M., \&
737: Taylor, J.~H.\ 2003, ASP Conf.~Ser.~302: Radio Pulsars, 302, 93
738:
739: \bibitem[Weisberg \& Taylor(2005)]{wt05} Weisberg, J.~M., \&
740: Taylor, J.~H.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~328: Binary Radio Pulsars, 328, 25
741: \end{thebibliography}
742:
743: \newpage
744:
745:
746: \begin{table}
747: \caption{ Observing Parameters and Measured Kinematic Distances for Low Latitude Pulsars}
748: \scriptsize
749: \begin{flushleft}
750: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccccc}
751: \tableline
752: \tableline
753: PSR J & PSR B &$t_{obs}$ &$T_{sys, \rm off-line}$&$\sigma_{\tau, \rm off-line}$& {\it{l}} & {\it{b}} & DM &$v_l$\tablenotemark{a}
754: &$v_u$\tablenotemark{a} & $d_l$\tablenotemark{b} & $d_u$\tablenotemark{b} \\
755: & & (hr) & (K) &&(deg) & (deg) &(pc cm$^{-3})$ &(km/s)& (km/s) & (kpc) & (kpc) \\
756: \tableline
757: J1909+0254 & B1907+02 & 3.0 &45&0.11& 37.6 & -2.7 & 171.7 & 60 & -- & $3.8 \pm 0.5$ & -- \\
758: J1922+2110 & B1920+21 & 2.5 &43&0.09& 55.3 & 2.9 & 217.1 & TP\tablenotemark{c} & -65 & $4.8\pm1.8$&$16.2\pm1.0$ \\
759: J1926+1648 & B1924+16 & 7.4 &45&0.06& 51.9 & 0.1 & 176.9 & TP\tablenotemark{c} & -47 & $5.2\pm1.8$&$14.9\pm0.8$ \\
760: \tableline
761: \end{tabular}
762: \end{flushleft}
763: \normalsize
764: \tablenotetext{a}{$v_l$ and $v_u$ are lower and upper velocity limits, respectively.}
765: \tablenotetext{b}{$d_l$ and $d_u$ are lower and upper distance limits, respectively. A flat \citet{fbs89} rotation curve
766: with the standard IAU values of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$ \citep{kl86} was used. }
767: \tablenotetext{c}{The tangent point velocity is adopted as the lower limit.}
768:
769: \end{table}
770:
771:
772: \begin{table}
773: \caption{ Measured Electron Densities toward Pulsars with $30\degr < l < 70\degr; |b| < 3 \degr$; and 1 kpc $\leq d.$ }
774: \scriptsize
775: \begin{flushleft}
776: \begin{tabular}{llcrccccccc}
777: \tableline
778: \tableline
779: PSR J & PSR B & {\it{l}} & {\it{b}} & DM
780: & $d_l$\tablenotemark{a} & $d_u$\tablenotemark{a} &$\langle n_{e,u}\rangle$\tablenotemark{b}&$\langle n_{e,l}\rangle$\tablenotemark{b} & Distance&Assoc. \\
781: & & (deg) & (deg) &(pc cm$^{-3})$ & (kpc) & (kpc) &(cm$^{-3})$ & (cm$^{-3})$ & Ref.\tablenotemark{c} \\
782: \tableline
783: J1848-0123 & B1845-01 & 31.34 & 0.04 & 159.5 & 4.2 & 4.8 & 0.038 & 0.033 & FW90 & \\
784: J1852+0031 & B1849+00 & 33.52 & 0.02 & 787.0 & 7.1 & 16.6 & 0.111 & 0.047 & FW90 & \\
785: J1856+0113 & B1853+01 & 34.56 & -0.50 & 96.7 & 2.7 & 3.9 & 0.036 & 0.025 & C75 & SNR:W44 \\
786: J1857+0212 & B1855+02 & 35.62 & -0.39 & 506.8 & 6.9 & & 0.073 & & FW90 & \\
787: J1901+0331 & B1859+03 & 37.21 & -0.64 & 402.1 & 6.8 & 15.1 & 0.059 & 0.027 & FW90 & \\
788: J1901+0716 & B1859+07 & 40.57 & 1.06 & 252.8 & 2.8 & 4.7 & 0.090 & 0.054 & FW90 & \\
789: J1902+0556 & B1900+05 & 39.50 & 0.21 & 177.5 & 3.1 & 4.3 & 0.057 & 0.041 & FW90 & \\
790: J1902+0615 & B1900+06 & 39.81 & 0.34 & 502.9 & 6.5 & 15.8 & 0.077 & 0.032 & FW90 & \\
791: J1903+0135 & B1900+01 & 35.73 & -1.96 & 245.2 & 2.8 & 4.0 & 0.088 & 0.061 & FW90 & \\
792: J1905+0154A & & 36.20 & -2.20 & 194.0 & 6.4 & 8.2 & 0.030 & 0.024 & R97 & GC:NGC6749 \\
793: J1906+0641 & B1904+06 & 40.60 & -0.30 & 472.8 & 6.5 & 14.0 & 0.073 & 0.034 & FW90 & \\
794: \textbf{J1909+0254} & \textbf{B1907+02} & \textbf{37.60} & \textbf{-2.71} & \textbf{171.7} &\textbf{3.8} & & \textbf{0.045} & & \textbf{this work} & \\
795: J1909+1102 & B1907+10 & 44.83 & 0.99 & 150.0 & 4.3 & 6.0 & 0.035 & 0.025 & FW90 & \\
796: J1915+1009 & B1913+10 & 44.71 & -0.65 & 241.7 & 6.0 & 14.5 & 0.040 & 0.017 & FW90 & \\
797: J1916+1312 & B1914+13 & 47.58 & 0.45 & 237.0 & 4.0 & 5.7 & 0.059 & 0.042 & FW90 & \\
798: J1917+1353 & B1915+13 & 48.26 & 0.62 & 94.5 & 4.8 & 5.7 & 0.020 & 0.017 & FW90 & \\
799: \textbf{J1922+2110} & \textbf{B1920+21} & \textbf{55.28} & \textbf{2.93} & \textbf{217.1} & \textbf{4.8} & \textbf{16.2} & \textbf{0.045} & \textbf{0.013} & \textbf{this work} & \\
800: \textbf{J1926+1648} & \textbf{B1924+16} & \textbf{51.86} & \textbf{0.06} & \textbf{176.9} & \textbf{5.2} & \textbf{14.9} & \textbf{0.034} & \textbf{0.012} & \textbf{this work} & \\
801: J1930+1852 & & 54.10 & 0.27 & 308.0 & 3.2\tablenotemark{d} & 10\tablenotemark{d} & 0.096 & 0.031 & VB88; LAS01 & SNR:G54.1+ 0.3\\
802: J1932+2020 & B1929+20 & 55.57 & 0.64 & 211.2 & 4.8 & 14.9 & 0.044 & 0.014 & FW90 & \\
803: J1932+2220 & B1930+22 & 57.36 & 1.55 & 219.2 & 10.4 & 13.7 & 0.021 & 0.016 & FW90 & \\
804: J1935+1616 & B1933+16 & 52.44 & -2.09 & 158.5 & 5.2 & & 0.030 & & FW90 & \\
805: J1939+2134 & B1937+21 & 57.51 & -0.29 & 71.0 & 4.6 & 14.8 & 0.015 & 0.005 & FW90 & \\
806: J1952+3252 & B1951+32 & 68.77 & 2.82 & 45.0 & 1.0 & 4.0 & 0.045 & 0.011 & B84 & SNR:CTB80 \\
807: J2004+3137 & B2002+31 & 69.01 & 0.02 & 234.8 & 7.0 & 12.0 & 0.034 & 0.020 & FW90 & \\
808: \tableline
809: \end{tabular}
810: \end{flushleft}
811: \normalsize
812: \tablenotetext{a}{$d_l$ and $d_u$ are lower and upper distance limits, respectively. A
813: flat \citet{fbs89} rotation curve with the standard IAU values of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$ \citep{kl86} was used. See
814: text for procedures to determine distances with other choices of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$. }
815: \tablenotetext{b}{$\langle n_{e,u}\rangle$ and $\langle n_{e,l} \rangle $ are upper and lower mean
816: electron density limits, respectively.}
817: \tablenotetext{c}{Reference key: B84=\citet{bET84}; C75=\citet{cmr+75}; FW90=\citet{fw90};
818: LAS01=\citet{las01}; R97=\citet{r97}; VB88=\citet{vb88}. Other data are from the ATNF Pulsar
819: Catalogue at http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat
820: \citep{m05}.}
821: \tablenotetext{d}{Subsequent work by \citet{lET02} suggests $d\sim5$ kpc under an assumption of uniform HI
822: density in this direction, which the present authors find unlikely. (See Fig. 5.)}
823:
824:
825: \end{table}
826:
827: \begin{table}
828: \caption{ Observing Parameters, Estimated Distances, and Transverse Speeds of High-Latitude Pulsars}
829: \scriptsize
830: \begin{flushleft}
831: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccc}
832: \tableline
833: \tableline
834: PSR J & PSR B & $t_{obs}$ &$T_{sys, \rm off-line}$&$\sigma_{\tau, \rm off-line}$& DM &$d$\tablenotemark{a} & $\mu_{tot}$\tablenotemark{b} & Prop. Mo. & $v_{trans}$ &$v_{trans}$ \\
835: & & (hr) & (K)& &(pc cm$^{-3})$ & (kpc) & (mas/yr) & Ref.\tablenotemark{c} &(AU/yr) & (km/s) \\
836: \tableline
837: J0304+1932 & B0301+19 & 1.3 & 41&0.015&15.737 & 0.62 & 37 (5) & LAS82 & 23 & 110 \\
838: J1239+2453 & B1237+25 & 1.4 &41&0.009& 9.242 & 0.85 & 115.6 (12) & B03 & 98 & 470 \\
839: J1537+1155 & B1534+12 & 1.7 &42&0.13 & 11.61436 & 1.02 & 25.086 (20) & KWS03 & 26 & 121 \\
840: J1543+0929 & B1541+09 & 2.9 &42&0.03& 35.24 & 3.49 & 8.3 (10) & B03 & 29 & 140 \\
841: J2305+3100 & B2303+30 & 1.2 &41&0.07& 49.544 & 3.66 & 20 (2) & B03 & 73 & 350 \\
842: \tableline
843: \end{tabular}
844: \end{flushleft}
845: \normalsize
846: \tablenotetext{a}{Distance $d$ is from the DM and the \citet{cl02} electron density model, except for J1239+2453
847: [interferometric parallax; \citet{bET02}] and J1537+1155 [differential galactic acceleration (see text); \citet{s02}].}
848: \tablenotetext{b}{The uncertainty in units of the last digit of the quoted value is given in parentheses.}
849: \tablenotetext{c}{Reference key: B03=\citet{b03}; KWS03=\citet{kws03}; LAS82=\citet{las82}.
850: Other data are from the ATNF Pulsar Catalogue at http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat
851: \citep{m05}.}
852:
853: \end{table}
854:
855:
856:
857: \newpage
858:
859: %fig 1 follows:
860: \begin{figure*}
861: %%%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f1.eps}
862: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f1.eps}
863: \caption{ For PSR J1909+0254 = B1907+02. {\it{Top:}} HI emission spectrum in the
864: direction of the pulsar. {\it{Middle:}} Pulsar
865: absorption spectrum. The resolution is 1 km/s unless Hanning smoothing is indicated,
866: in which
867: case it is 2 km/s. {\it{Bottom:}} Radial velocity as a function of distance, calculated from a
868: \citet{fbs89} flat rotation
869: curve with the standard IAU values of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$ \citep{kl86}. See
870: text for procedures to determine distances with other choices of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$.}
871: \label{fig:B1907+02}
872: \end{figure*}
873:
874: %new fig 2 follows:
875: \begin{figure*}
876: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f2.eps}
877: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f2.eps}
878: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward PSR
879: J1922+2110 = B1920+21. See Fig. 1 caption for
880: additional details.}
881: \label{fig:B1920+21}
882: \end{figure*}
883:
884: %new fig 3 follows:
885: \begin{figure*}
886: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f3.eps}
887: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f3.eps}
888: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
889: PSR J1926+1648 = B1924+16. See Fig. 1 caption
890: for additional details.}
891: \label{fig:B1924+16}
892: \end{figure*}
893:
894: %new fig 4 follows:
895: \begin{figure*}
896: %%%%%%\subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90, trim=1.0in -0.8in 0 0in]{f4a.eps} }
897: %%%%%%\subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90, trim=1.0in -0.8in 0 0in]{f4b.eps} }
898: \subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90, trim=1.0in -0.8in 0 0in]{f4a.eps} }
899: \subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=-90, trim=1.0in -0.8in 0 0in]{f4b.eps} }
900: \caption{The mean electron density in the inner galactic plane visible from Arecibo
901: Observatory. The
902: IAU \citep{kl86} values of $R_o$ and $\Theta_o$ were used; see text for procedures
903: to rescale with
904: other values. Pulsars in Table 2 with $d_l <$ 1 kpc or $|b| > 3\degr $ are not shown.
905: (a) Measured electron density limits (error bars) and NE2001 model electron densities
906: (circles), versus longitude. (b) The ratio of measured electron density to the NE2001
907: model value, versus longitude.}
908: \label{fig:density}
909: \end{figure*}
910:
911: %new fig 5 follows:
912: \begin{figure*}
913: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.6,angle=-90,trim=0.5in 2.2in 0.5in 0in] {f5.eps}
914: \includegraphics[angle=270] {f5.eps}
915: \caption{The galactic plane, showing spiral arms \citep{cl02} and Arecibo inner
916: galactic plane pulsars with measured distances [upper and lower limits are
917: delineated by the ends of
918: lines pointing at the Sun, which is at $(X,Y)=(0.0,8.5)$ kpc]. Galactic longitudes
919: in the Arecibo range, $30\degr\le l \le 70\degr$,
920: are shown at the bottom and right edges of the plot. Note especially the long
921: interarm path in the direction of PSR B1913+16, at $l\sim50\degr$. }
922: \label{fig:galplane}
923: \end{figure*}
924:
925: %new fig 6 follows:
926: \begin{figure*}
927: %%%%%%\subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f6a.eps} }
928: %%%%%%\subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f6b.eps} }
929: \subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f6a.eps} }
930: \subfigure{\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{f6b.eps} }
931: \caption{Calculated radial velocity as a function of distance along a line of sight in
932: the galactic plane
933: at $l=50\degr$. A flat rotation curve with the IAU \citep{kl86} values of $R_o$ and
934: $\Theta_o$
935: yields the solid line, while a flat rotation curve with new galactic constants (see
936: text) is shown by a
937: dashed line. (a) Radial velocity versus distance $d$ along the line of
938: sight. (b) Radial velocity versus {\it{normalized}} distance $\delta$ along the line of
939: sight, where $\delta=d/R_o$. }
940: \label{fig:rotcurve}
941: \end{figure*}
942:
943: %new fig 7 follows:
944: \begin{figure*}
945: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f7.eps}
946: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f7.eps}
947: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
948: PSR J0304+1932 = B0301+19.
949: The 1976-77 absorption spectrum of \citet{d81} is also plotted
950: atop ours as a dotted line. Note that the absorption spectrum vertical
951: scale is magnified for clarity. See Fig. 1 caption for additional details.}
952: \label{fig:B0301+19}
953: \end{figure*}
954:
955: %new fig 8 follows:
956: \begin{figure*}
957: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.70]{f8.eps}
958: \includegraphics[scale=0.70]{f8.eps}
959: %\plotone{f6.eps}
960: \caption{Changes in the absorption spectrum of PSR J0304+1932 =
961: B0301+19 over twenty-two years.
962: (a) The old and new spectra are shown after the new spectrum has been
963: interpolated to the same
964: frequencies as the old spectra. This plot is similar to the central panel of
965: Fig. \ref{fig:B0301+19}, except that the new spectrum
966: in the earlier figure was not resampled. (b) The difference spectrum, with a
967: $\pm2\sigma$ error envelope superposed (dashed lines).}
968: \label{fig:B0301+19diff}
969: \end{figure*}
970:
971: %new fig 9 follows:
972: \begin{figure*}
973: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f9.eps}
974: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f9.eps}
975: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
976: PSR J1239+2453 = B1237+25. See Fig. 1 caption for details.}
977: \label{fig:B1237+25}
978: \end{figure*}
979:
980: %new fig 10 follows:
981: \begin{figure*}
982: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f10.eps}
983: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f10.eps}
984: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
985: PSR J1537+1155 = B1534+12. See Fig. 1 caption for details.}
986: \label{fig:B1534+12}
987: \end{figure*}
988:
989: %new fig 11 follows:
990: \begin{figure*}
991: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f11.eps}
992: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f11.eps}
993: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
994: PSR J1543+0929 = B1541+09. See Fig. 1 caption for details.}
995: \label{fig:B1541+09}
996: \end{figure*}
997:
998: %new fig 12 follows:
999: \begin{figure*}
1000: %%%%%%\includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f12.eps}
1001: \includegraphics[scale=0.60,angle=-90 ]{f12.eps}
1002: \caption{HI emission and pulsar absorption spectra, and rotation curve, toward
1003: PSR J2305+3100 = B2303+30. See Fig. 1 caption for details.}
1004: \label{fig:B2303+30}
1005: \end{figure*}
1006:
1007: \end{document}
1008: