1: %
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
5: %% AASTeX v5.0 LaTeX 2e macros.
6: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.0 document
7: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
8: %% any data that comes before this command.
9:
10: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,
11: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.
12: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
13: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
14:
15: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
16:
17: %% preprint produces a one-colnmn, single-spaced document:
18:
19: % emulateapj actually works now
20: \documentclass{emulateapj}
21:
22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
23:
24: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
25:
26: \usepackage{graphicx}
27: %\usepackage{psfig}
28: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
29: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
30: %% the \begin{document} command.
31: %%
32: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
33: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
34: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide
35: %% for information.
36:
37: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
38: \newcommand{\myemail}{mlacy@ipac.caltech.edu}
39:
40: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
41:
42: \slugcomment{}
43:
44: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
45: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
46: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
47: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
48: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
49: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
50:
51: \shorttitle{The host galaxies of type-2 quasars}
52: \shortauthors{Lacy et al.}
53:
54:
55:
56: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
57: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
58:
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
62: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
63: %% you desire.
64:
65: \title{Large amounts of optically-obscured star formation in the host
66: galaxies of some type-2 quasars.}
67:
68:
69: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
70: %% author and affiliation information.
71: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
72: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
73: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
74: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
75:
76: \author{M.\ Lacy\altaffilmark{1}
77: %\footnote{Visiting astronomer, IRTF},
78: A.\ Sajina\altaffilmark{1},
79: A.O.\ Petric\altaffilmark{1,2},
80: N. Seymour\altaffilmark{1},
81: G.\ Canalizo\altaffilmark{3},
82: S.E.\ Ridgway\altaffilmark{4}
83: L.\ Armus\altaffilmark{1},
84: L.J.\ Storrie-Lombardi \altaffilmark{1}}
85: \altaffiltext{1}{Spitzer Science Center, Caltech, Mail Code 220-6,
86: Pasadena, CA 91125; mlacy@ipac.caltech.edu,sajina@ipac.caltech.edu,
87: lisa@ipac.caltech.edu}
88: \altaffiltext{2}{Columbia University of New York, NY, USA; andreea@ipac.caltech.edu}
89: \altaffiltext{3}{University of California, Riverside, CA, USA; gabriela.canalizo@ucr.edu}
90: \altaffiltext{4}{NOAO, Colina El Pino s/n, Casialla 603, La Serena, Chile;
91: seridgway@ctio.noao.edu}
92:
93:
94: \begin{abstract}
95: We present {\em Hubble Space Telescope} images, and spectral energy
96: distributions from optical to infrared wavelengths for a sample of
97: six $0.3<z<0.8$
98: type-2 quasars selected in the mid-infrared using data from the
99: {\em Spitzer Space Telescope}. All the host galaxies show some signs of
100: disturbance. Most seem to possess dusty, star-forming disks. The disk
101: inclination, estimated from the axial ratio of the hosts,
102: correlates with the depth of the silicate feature in the mid-infrared
103: spectra, implying that at least some of the reddening towards the AGN
104: arises in the
105: host galaxy. The star formation rates in these objects, as inferred
106: from the strengths of the PAH features and far-infrared continuum, range
107: from $3-90 M_{\odot}{\rm yr^{-1}}$, but
108: are mostly much larger than those inferred from the [O{\sc ii}]3727
109: emission line luminosity, due to obscuration.
110: Taken together with studies of type-2 quasar hosts from samples
111: selected in the optical and X-ray, this is consistent with
112: previous suggestions that two types
113: of extinction processes operate within the type-2 quasar population, namely
114: a component due to the dusty torus in the immediate environment of the
115: AGN, and a more extended component due to a dusty, star forming disk.
116:
117: \end{abstract}
118:
119: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
120: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
121: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
122: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
123:
124: \keywords{quasars:general -- galaxies:Seyfert -- infrared:galaxies -- galaxies:starburst}
125:
126:
127:
128: \section{Introduction}
129:
130: Co-evolution of black holes and their host galaxies is a prediction
131: of most models for the observed close correlation between black hole mass
132: and bulge luminosity/velocity dispersion in local galaxies (e.g.\ Kauffmann
133: \& Haehnelt 2000; di Matteo, Springel \& Herquist 2005).
134: Studies of local AGN and type-1 (unobscured) quasars show a correlation
135: between AGN luminosity in the mid-infrared and starburst luminosity, estimated
136: from the far-infrared emission and/or PAH features
137: (Schweitzer et al.\ 2006; Shi et al.\ 2007; Maiolino et al.\
138: 2007), and the host galaxies of quasars with strong far-infrared excesses
139: do seem to be forming stars (Canalizo \& Stockton 2001).
140: However, in general, host galaxy imaging studies in the optical
141: and near-IR do not suggest that
142: strong star formation occurs simultaneously with quasar activity in
143: the majority of quasars. Imaging of type-1 quasar host galaxies show that
144: the hosts of luminous quasars tend to be elliptical
145: galaxies with little obvious signs of disturbance in {\em Hubble
146: Space Telescope} (HST) images (e.g.\ Floyd et al.\ 2004), and only about
147: 30\% of quasars show signs of mergers or interactions in HST or adaptive
148: optics images (Marble et al.\ 2003; Guyon et al.\ 2007),
149: though deeper (several orbit) {\em HST}/ACS imaging often reveals
150: faint tidal features in quasar hosts (Canalizo et al.\ 2007;
151: Bennert et al., in prepraration). Studies of type-2 (obscured)
152: quasars have so far been
153: consistent with this picture, and with the idea that the obscuration
154: takes place in a nuclear torus. Sturm et al.\ (2006), in
155: their {\em Spitzer} study of X-ray selected type-2 quasars, make the
156: claim that ``type-2 quasars are not ULIRGs'' based on featureless
157: mid-infrared spectra. {\em HST} imaging studies
158: of the host galaxies of type-2 quasars selected from the
159: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) show that
160: they are consistent with being hosted by relatively undisturbed
161: elliptical galaxies, once the likely effects of scattered light are accounted
162: for (Zakamska et al.\ 2006).
163:
164: In this Letter, we present results of
165: {\em Spitzer} spectroscopy and photometry, and
166: {\em Hubble Space Telescope} ($HST$) imaging of a sample of type-2 quasars,
167: and discuss the implications for the co-evolution of galaxies and black holes.
168: Our sample is selected in the mid-infrared, which is less sensitive
169: to reddening in the host galaxy than X-ray or optical selection, and their
170: type-2 nature allows us to image the central regions of the host with
171: high fidelity. The combination of infrared SEDs and optical imaging
172: of this sample thus allows
173: us for the first time
174: to present a coherent picture of the nature of the star formation in
175: the host galaxies of type-2 quasars.
176:
177: \section{observations}
178:
179: We selected all six candidate type-2 quasars with $0.3<z<0.8$ from the
180: 1mJy 8$\mu$m flux density limited sample
181: of Lacy et al.\ (2004). The redshift range ensures that these objects are
182: luminous enough to be on or above the quasar/Seyfert divide in the
183: mid-infrared (5$\mu$m luminosity, $L_{5\rm {\mu m}} \sim 10^{23.6}{\rm
184: WHz^{-1}}$,
185: Lacy et al.\ 2005a), but low enough for rest-frame $B$-band to be within
186: the F814W filter of the Advanced Camera for Surveys
187: (ACS) aboard $HST$. The objects were observed with the
188: Multiband Imaging Photometer (MIPS) and Infrared Spectrograph (IRS)
189: as part of {\em
190: Spitzer} program 20083, and with HST as program GO-10848 (Table 1).
191: Redshifts were obtained, and optical spectral classifications
192: attempted (Lacy et al.\ 2007). Low dispersion spectra were also
193: obtained with the Spex instrument (Rayner et al.\ 2003)
194: in prism mode at the Infrared
195: Telescope Facility (IRTF).
196:
197: \begin{table}
198: \caption{Observations}
199: {\scriptsize
200: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
201: \hline
202: Name & IRS & MIPS &ACS filters\\
203: & reqkey& reqkey&\\\hline
204: SSTXFLS J172123.1+601214&14016768&14018304&F625W,F435W\\
205: SSTXFLS J171147.4+585839&14016000&14017536&F814W,F555W\\
206: SSTXFLS J171324.2+585549&14016256&14017792&F775W,F475W\\
207: SSTXFLS J171831.5+595317&14016512&14018048&F775W,F475W\\
208: SSTXFLS J171106.8+590436&14015744&14017280&F775W,F475W\\
209: SSTXFLS J172458.3+591545&14017024&14018560&F775W,F475W\\\hline
210: \end{tabular}
211: }
212: \end{table}
213:
214: The IRS data were obtained in
215: stare mode, using the short-low and long-low modules. The IRS
216: short-low data had a background image subtracted, made by taking a median of
217: all the short-low observations in the Astronomical
218: Observation Request. The long-low data were combined by subtracting
219: nodded pairs, then combining the pairs with minmax rejection.
220: Extraction was performed using the SPICE tool\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/postbcd/spice.html},
221: with optimal extraction. Aperture photometry was performed
222: on the pipeline (post-BCD) MIPS mosaics using standard aperture
223: corrections\footnote{http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/mips/apercorr/}.
224:
225: The ACS data were taken in two filters, one longward and one shortward
226: of the 4000\AA$\;$break in the rest frame of the galaxy. Observations
227: consisted of four exposures in each filter
228: in a standard dither pattern, for one
229: orbit per object per filter.
230: The ACS pipeline mosaics were also adequate for the analysis
231: performed here. A full analysis of the data will be presented in
232: Seymour et al.\ (2007, in preparation).
233:
234: Four of our six objects were easily classified as type-2 quasars in
235: Lacy et al.\ (2007) based on
236: well established optical emission line diagnostics.
237: However, SSTXLFS~J171106.8+590436 and SSTXFLS~J172458.3+591525
238: had optical emission lines properties which were ambiguous.
239: For SSTXFLS172458.3+591525, we are able
240: to estimate a ([S{\sc ii}]6719+6732)/(H$\alpha$+[N{\sc ii}])
241: ratio of 0.4 from the IRTF/Spex spectrum, which, together
242: with an [O{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio of 10 and assuming typical
243: [N{\sc ii}]6584/H$\alpha$ ratios of 0.1-1.6, places
244: this object firmly amongst the AGN in the diagnostic plot
245: of Kewley et al.\ (2006), with a range in
246: log([S{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$) $\approx -0.4-0.1$.
247: In the case of SSTXFLS~171106.8+590436,
248: the H$\alpha$ and
249: [S{\sc ii}] lines are too weak to do this. However, the very high
250: [O{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratio of $>10:1$, detection of He{\sc ii}4686,
251: and a marginal detection of [Ne{\sc v}]14.3$\mu$m in the
252: IRS spectrum make it very likely that an AGN classification for the
253: optical spectrum is correct. We thus assume for the rest of this paper
254: that all six objects contain powerful AGN.
255:
256: \section{Analysis}
257:
258: We fit our SEDs and spectra using a model based on those of Sajina
259: et al.\ (2005, 2006). The IRS spectra were fit directly, along with
260: photometric points in $r$, $i$ and $z$ bands
261: from the SDSS, IRAC
262: 3.6 and 4.5$\mu$m data (Lacy et al.\ 2005b), MIPS 70 and 160$\mu$m data
263: (Frayer et al.\ 2006 and this paper) and near-infrared photometry from
264: IRTF. We also checked the IRS
265: spectrophotometry against the IRAC 5.8 and 8.0$\mu$m and MIPS 24$\mu$m
266: (Fadda et al.\ 2006) broad-band photometry, and found them to agree within
267: $\approx 10$\%.
268:
269: The far-infrared (FIR) emission was fit as a modified
270: black body with temperature $\approx 45$K. A warm
271: (small grain) component was included
272: with a power-law index of $\approx 2$, and cutoffs at high and low frequency.
273: The FIR luminosity, $L_{\rm FIR}$,
274: was estimated by summing the warm and cold components.
275: The hot dust component was based on a power-law with variable spectral index.
276: The long wavelength cutoff was determined by a fit of a Fermi
277: function to the least starforming
278: AGN in our sample, SSTXLFS~J172123.1+601214,
279: which shows a turndown in the
280: hot dust emission beginning at a rest-frame wavelength $\approx 20\mu$m.
281: Netzer et al.\ (2007) also suggest that the AGN-related hot dust emission
282: starts to decrease beyond $\approx 20\mu$m in type-1 quasars.
283: The hot dust emission was exponentially cutoff at high frequencies
284: with a variable cutoff frequency. The unreddened luminosity of the
285: AGN, $L_{\rm AGN}$, was estimated by integrating this component.
286: The hot dust component is
287: then reddened by the Galactic Center extinction law of
288: Chiar \& Tielens (2006),
289: likely to be a good approximation to the extreme density environments of
290: AGN (Sajina et al. 2007).
291:
292: A modified version of the starburst
293: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) emission
294: template of Sajina et al.\ (2007) was used to fit the PAH features. AGN are
295: known to modify the PAH spectra (Smith et al.\ 2007). In particular, for our
296: objects, we found a better match by boosting the 7.7$\mu$m feature in the
297: template by hand. This PAH template was
298: fitted to the SEDs of all galaxies except SSTXFLS~J172123.1+601214,
299: which had a small amount of silicate emission added instead. Total
300: PAH luminosities, $L_{\rm PAH}$, were determined by integrating over the
301: fitted template. Finally, a 5Gyr old single stellar population
302: from Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) was fit to the optical points. The basic
303: properties of the fits are listed in Table 2.
304: %Although this is clearly not an accurate fit to the
305: %stellar population in the blue in several cases, the total stellar
306: %luminosity estimate from this SED is
307: %likely to be reliable enough for the purposes of this paper.
308: Parameters
309: which are not well-constrained by the data (for example
310: the warm dust continuum strength in objects not detected at 160$\mu$m)
311: are held fixed. Full
312: details of the fitting process will be given in a future paper
313: (Ridgway et al.\ 2007, in preparation).
314:
315: \begin{figure*}
316: \plotone{f1.ps}
317: \caption{SEDs and HST images of the six type-1 quasars, in order of increasing
318: silicate absorption. The solid black lines are the IRTF/Spex and
319: {\em Spitzer}/IRS spectra (both smoothed to reduce noise)
320: and the black open circles photometry from SDSS, IRTF and
321: {\em Spitzer}. The model fit is shown as the red dashed line, with,
322: from left to right, the stellar
323: component, hot dust component (including absorption, but excluding PAH
324: emission) and sum of warm and cold dust components shown
325: as blue chain-dotted lines. To the right of the SEDs we show expanded
326: plots of the IRS spectra around the PAH wavelengths.
327: The ACS images have the long wavelength
328: image colored red and the short wavelength image in green.}
329: \end{figure*}
330:
331:
332: \section{discussion}
333:
334: We first address the amount of star
335: formation in the host galaxies. Star formation rates (SFRs)
336: derived from FIR emission
337: alone are suspect for quasars, as reprocessed quasar emission can, in
338: principle, contribute to the FIR flux. In the 5/6 cases where
339: PAHs are detected, however, they show typical
340: ratios of PAH/FIR luminosities over a
341: wide range of $L_{\rm FIR}$ (0.02-0.06 in total PAH integrated over our
342: template, corresponding to 0.0014-0.0042 in the 6.2$\mu$m
343: feature, within the range for star-forming galaxies and ULIRGs seen by
344: Peeters, Spoon \& Tielens [2004] of $\sim 0.005-0.1$).
345: This indicates
346: that the bulk of the FIR emission is indeed likely to be
347: from star formation (see also Sajina et al., in preparation).
348: A similar result has been found for type-1 quasars by
349: Schweitzer et al.\ (2006). As Figure 2 shows, however,
350: the [O{\sc ii}]3727 emission (from the spectra of Lacy et al.\ [2007],
351: aperture corrected using the SDSS
352: photometry) is significantly below that
353: expected in an unreddened starburst in most cases,
354: particularly for the objects with high FIR luminosities.
355: This is consistent with the result of Ho (2005),
356: who found low [O{\sc ii}]3727 emission from type-1 quasar hosts compared to
357: their expected star formation rates based on measurements of molecular gas.
358: However, the ratio of the
359: [Ne{\sc ii}]12.8$\mu$m to the FIR luminosity
360: is similar for all our objects.
361: [Ne{\sc ii}] is of similar ionization to [O{\sc ii}] and
362: is also therefore dominated by emission from the starburst.
363: This suggests that dust
364: reddening is to blame for the lack of [O{\sc ii}]3727 emission, and is also
365: consistent with the
366: host galaxy colors and morphologies. As can be seen in Figure 1, the
367: host galaxies of the objects with high $L_{\rm FIR}$ are typically disturbed,
368: red objects, likely to be late stage merger remnants.
369: This suggests that star formation in a significant
370: fraction of quasar host galaxies is heavily obscured in the optical.
371:
372: \begin{figure}
373: \plotone{f2.ps}
374: \caption{The ratio of narrow line luminosity in [O{\sc ii}]3727 to
375: FIR luminosity (circles) and in [Ne{\sc ii}]12.8$\mu$m to FIR
376: luminosity (triangles). Host galaxies
377: dominated by a disk component are shown as filled symbols,
378: SSTXFLS J172123.1+601214, which has an elliptical host, is shown with
379: open symbols. The dashed line is the ratio
380: of [O{\sc ii}] to FIR luminosity expected in an unextincted starburst.}
381: \end{figure}
382:
383: \begin{figure}
384: \plotone{f3.ps}
385: \caption{Absorption depth in the 9.7$\mu$m silicate feature
386: plotted against axial ratio. Symbols as for Figure 2. The dashed lines
387: represent the predictions of simple uniform disk models of differing
388: opacity measured perpendicular to the disk.}
389: \end{figure}
390:
391: Obscuration by dusty starforming regions also seems to affect the extinction
392: to the AGN.
393: Figure 3 shows a plot of axial ratio of the host galaxy
394: (measured using the {\em ellipse} task in {\sc iraf} on the longer
395: wavelength image) versus the
396: depth of the 9.7$\mu$m silicate feature, $S_{\rm sil}$,
397: as defined by Levenson et al.\ (2006).
398: Although our sample is small, the five of our six host galaxies
399: with apparent or possible disk-like structures, and 1d-profiles
400: close to exponential disks (excluding morphological
401: disturbances and bulge components), represented by the solid points,
402: seem to show a trend in the sense that
403: the more highly-extincted objects have more edge-on inclinations
404: (lower axial ratios). The one galaxy which does not appear disk-like,
405: SSTXFLS~J172123.1+601214 (open symbol), has an
406: underlying $r^{1/4}$ law profile, and is probably an example of an elliptical
407: host merging with a smaller gas-rich galaxy, and lacks the large
408: amount of star formation seen in the mergers of two gas-rich galaxies. In this
409: case, the obscuration is probably almost entirely due to the torus.
410: For the disk-like hosts, a simple uniform dusty disk model appears to work for
411: most, with a spread of about a factor of two in
412: opacity for a line of sight perpendicular to the disk. One object
413: (SSTXLFS~J171106.8+590436), however, would have a high opacity in this model
414: even if viewed face-on, corresponding to $S_{\rm sil}\approx -1$. This
415: may be because the extinction is patchy, and a high inclination
416: significantly increases the chance of the
417: line of sight passing through a high opacity region such as a dense molecular
418: cloud. Our two most obscured type-2 quasars (with $S_{\rm sil}=-1.6$ and $-2$)
419: have silicate absorption as deep or deeper than the most obscured AGN in the
420: sample of Shi et al.\ (2006). These
421: radio galaxies and Seyfert 2s have $S_{\rm sil}\geq -1.6$,
422: suggesting that extinction
423: can be very extreme in the radio quiet quasar population.
424:
425: The implication of our result is that many type-2 quasars have at least a
426: component of the extinction towards the nucleus from an extended, star forming
427: disk on scales of kpc, in addition to, or instead of,
428: the traditional obscuring torus, which interferometry suggests is only a few
429: pc in size (Jaffe et al.\ 2004).
430: Previous suggestions that the host galaxy can contribute significantly to the
431: AGN extinction in type-2 objects have
432: been made by Martinez-Sansigre et al.\ (2006) and Rigby et
433: al.\ (2006), based on optical emission line properties.
434: Our results suggest that a significant fraction of the quasar population
435: have their AGN obscured by starforming regions in their host galaxies.
436: Thus studying obscured quasars is essential if
437: we are to understand the origin of the links between the evolution of
438: quasars and their hosts.
439:
440: \acknowledgments
441:
442: We thank the referee for a helpful report.
443: ML and AOP were visiting astronomers at the IRTF,
444: which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement
445: no. NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA),
446: Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program.
447: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope,
448: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
449: Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by
450: NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech. This work is also based on
451: observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope,
452: obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), operated by the
453: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA
454: contract NAS 5-26555, and are associated with program 10848,
455: partly supported by a grant from STScI.
456:
457:
458:
459: \begin{thebibliography}{}
460: %\bibitem[]{443} Alonso-Herrero, A.\ et al.\ 2006, ApJ, 640, 167
461: %\bibitem[]{444} Brand, K.\ et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 663, 677
462: \bibitem[]{445} Bruzual, G.\ \& Charlot, S.\ 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000
463: \bibitem[]{446} Canalizo, G.\ \& Stockton, A.N.\ 2001, ApJ, 555, 719
464: \bibitem[]{447} Canalizo, G., Bennert, N., Jungwiert, B., Stockton, A.,
465: Schweizer, F., Lacy, M.\ \& Peng, C.\ 2007, ApJ, in press
466: \bibitem[]{449} Chiar, J.E.\ \& Tielens, A.G.G.M.\ 2006, ApJ, 637, 774
467: \bibitem[]{450} di Matteo, T., Springel, V.\ \& Hernquist, L.\ 2005, Nat, 433, 604
468: \bibitem[]{451} Fadda, D.\ et al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 2859
469: \bibitem[]{452} Floyd, D., Kukula, M.J., Dunlop, J.S., McLure, R.J., Miller, L.,
470: Percival, W.J., Baum, S.A., O'Dea, C.P.\ 2004, MNRAS, 355, 196
471: \bibitem[]{454} Frayer, D.T.\ et al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 250
472: \bibitem[]{} Guyon, O., Sanders, D.B.\ \& Stockton, A.\ 2006, ApJS, 166, 89
473: \bibitem[]{455} Ho, L.\ ApJ, 2005, 629, 680
474: \bibitem[]{456} Jaffe, W.\ et al.\ 2004, Nat, 429, 47
475: \bibitem[]{457} Kauffmann, G.\ \& Haehnelt, M.G.\ 2000, MNRAS, 311, 576
476: \bibitem[]{} Kewley, L.J., Geller, M.J.\ \& Jansen, R.A.\ 2004, AJ, 127, 2002
477: \bibitem[]{458} Kewley, L.J., Groves, B.\ Kauffmann, G.\ \& Heckman, T.\ 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961
478: \bibitem[]{459} Lacy, M.\ et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 166
479: \bibitem[]{} Lacy, M.\ et al.\ 2005a, MmSAI, 76, 154
480: \bibitem[]{460} Lacy, M.\ et al.\ 2005b, ApJS, 161, 41
481: \bibitem[]{461} Lacy, M., Petric, A.O., Sajina, A., Canalizo, G.,
482: Storrie-Lombardi, L.J., Armus, L., Fadda, D.\ \& Marleau, F.R.\ 2007, AJ,
483: 133, 186
484: \bibitem[]{464} Levenson, N.A., Sirocky, M.M., Hao, L., Spoon, H.H.W., Marshall,
485: J.A., Elitzur, M., Houck, J.R.\ 2007, ApJ, 654, L45
486: \bibitem[]{} Maiolino, R., Shemmer, O., Imanishi, M., Netzer, H., Oliva, E.,
487: Lutz, D.\ \& Sturm, E.\ 2007, A\&A, 468, 979
488: \bibitem[]{} Marble, A.R., Hines, D.C., Schmidt, G.D., Smith, P.S.,
489: Surace, J.A., Armus, L., Cutri, R.M.\ \& Nelson, B.O., 2003, ApJ, 590, 707
490: %\bibitem[]{466} Mart\'{i}nez-Sansigre, A.\ et al.\ 2005, Nat, 436, 666
491: \bibitem[]{467} Mart\'{i}nez-Sansigre, A.\ et al.\ 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1479
492: \bibitem[]{468} Netzer, H.\ et al.\ 2007, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0706.0818
493: \bibitem[]{469} Peeters, E., Spoon, H.W.W.\ \& Tielens, A.G.G.M.\ 2004, ApJ,
494: 613, 986
495: \bibitem[]{471} Rayner, J.T.\ et al.\ 2003, PASP, 115, 362
496: %\bibitem[]{472} Richards, G.T.\ et al.\ 2006, ApJS, 166, 470
497: \bibitem[]{473} Rigby, J.R., Rieke, G.H., Donley, J.L, Alonso-Herrero, A.,
498: Perez-Gonz\'{a}lez, P.G.\ 2006, ApJ, 645, 115
499: \bibitem[]{475} Sajina, A., Lacy, M.\ \& Scott,D.\ 2005, ApJ, 621, 256
500: \bibitem[]{} Sajina, A., Scott, D., Dennefeld, M., Dole, H., Lacy, M.\ \&
501: Lagache, G.\ 2006, MNRAS, 369, 939
502: \bibitem[]{476} Sajina, A., Yan, L., Armus, L., Choi, P., Fadda, D., Helou, G.,
503: Spoon, H.\ 2007, ApJ, 664, 713
504: \bibitem[]{478} Schweitzer, M.\ et al.\ 2006, ApJ, 649, 79
505: \bibitem[]{} Shi, Y.\ et al.\ 2006, ApJ, 653, 127
506: \bibitem[]{} Smith, J.D.T.\ et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 656, 770
507: \bibitem[]{479} Sturm, E., Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., Mainieri, V., Genzel, R.,
508: Lehnert, M.D., Lutz, D.\ \& Tacconi, L.J.\ 2006, ApJ, 642, 81
509: %\bibitem[]{481} Yan, L.\ et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 658, 778
510: \bibitem[]{482} Zakamska, N.L.\ et al.\ 2006, AJ, 132, 1496
511:
512: \end{thebibliography}
513:
514: \begin{table*}
515: \caption{Host galaxy properties}
516: \scriptsize{
517: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
518: \hline
519: Object & z&log$(L_{\rm AGN}$ & log($L_{\rm FIR}$ & log($L_{\rm PAH}$&log($L_{\rm [OII]}$&$S_{\rm sil}$ & Axial & SFR & SFR\\
520: & & $[L_{\odot}])$ & $[L_{\odot}])$ & $[L_{\odot}])$ & $[L_{\odot}])$ & & ratio& (FIR)& ([O{\sc ii}])\dag \\
521: & & & & &&&&($M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$)&($M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$)\\\hline
522: SSTXFLS J172123.1+601214&0.325&11.4&10.6&$<$9.4&8.17& - &0.63$\pm$0.02&3.3&3.9\\
523: SSTXLFS J171147.4+585839&0.800&12.1&11.7& 10.5&8.44&-0.21& 0.96$\pm$0.02 &56&7.2\\
524: SSTXFLS J171324.2+585549&0.609&11.8&11.3& 9.8&8.26&-0.34& 0.79$\pm$0.01 &16&4.8\\
525: SSTXFLS J171831.5+595317&0.700&11.9&12.0& 10.3&8.45&-0.53& 0.76$\pm$0.05 &87&7.4\\
526: SSTXFLS J171106.8+590436&0.462&11.8&11.5& 10.1&7.49&-1.56& 0.67$\pm$0.01 &33&0.8\\
527: SSTXFLS J172458.3+591545&0.494&11.6&11.6& 10.4&7.91&-1.97& 0.24$\pm$0.02 &37&2.1\\\hline
528: \end{tabular}
529:
530: \noindent
531: $\dag$ from Kewley et al.\ (2004), assuming solar metallicity.
532: }
533: \end{table*}
534:
535:
536: \end{document}
537:
538:
539: %%
540: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
541:
542:
543: