1: %% This is a manuscript based on the marked-up file
2: %% sample.tex, which was supplied w/ the
3: %% AASTeX v5.2 LaTeX 2e macros.
4:
5: %% The command below calls the preprint style
6: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
7: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
8: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
9: %%
10: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
11:
12: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
13:
14: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
15:
16: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
17:
18: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
19:
20: %% use the easy-to-use ps fig includes...
21: %%\usepackage{graphics,graphicx}
22:
23: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
24:
25: \slugcomment{Submitted to {\it The Astrophysical Journal (Letters)}}
26: %\slugcomment{DRAFT in prep for {\it The Astrophysical Journal (Letters)}}
27:
28: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
29: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
30: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
31: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
32: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
33: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
34:
35: \shorttitle{Serendipitous X-ray Detection of NGC~5315}
36: \shortauthors{Kastner et al.}
37:
38: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
39: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
44: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
45: %% you desire.
46:
47: \title{Serendipitous {\it Chandra} X-ray Detection of a Hot Bubble
48: within the Planetary Nebula NGC~5315}
49:
50: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
51: %% author and affiliation information.
52: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
53: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
54: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
55: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
56:
57: \author{Joel H. Kastner\footnote{ Visiting Astronomer, Laboratoire
58: d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, Universit\'e Joseph Fourier --- CNRS,
59: BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France } \and Rodolfo Montez, Jr.}
60: \affil{Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging
61: Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, 54 Lomb Memorial Dr.,
62: Rochester, NY 14623 } \email{jhk@cis.rit.edu, rxm9447@cis.rit.edu}
63: %\and Visiting Astronomer, Laboratoire
64: % d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, Universit\'e Joseph Fourier --- CNRS,
65: % BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France \email{joel.kastner@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr} }
66:
67: %\author{Rodolfo Montez, Jr.}
68: %\affil{Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging
69: % Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, 54 Lomb Memorial Dr.,
70: % Rochester, NY 14623}
71: %\email{rxm9447@cis.rit.edu}
72:
73: \author{Bruce Balick}
74: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195--1580}
75: \email{balick@astro.washington.edu}
76:
77: \and
78:
79: \author{Orsola De Marco}
80: \affil{Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024}
81: \email{orsola@amnh.org}
82:
83: %%\author{Noam Soker}
84: %%\affil{Department of Physics, Technion-Israel Institute of
85: %% Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel}
86: %%\email{soker@physics.technion.ac.il}
87:
88: %% Notice that each of these authors might have alternate affiliations, which
89: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
90: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
91: %% affiliation.
92:
93: %% \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
94: %%CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
95: %%Foundation.}
96:
97: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
98: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
99: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
100: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
101: %% editorial office after submission.
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104: We report the serendipitous detection of the planetary nebula
105: NGC~5315 by the {\it Chandra} X-ray Observatory. The {\it Chandra}
106: imaging spectroscopy results indicate that the X-rays from this PN,
107: which harbors a Wolf-Rayet (WR) central star, emanate from a $T_X
108: \sim 2.5\times10^6$ K plasma generated via the same wind-wind
109: collisions that have cleared a compact ($\sim8000$ AU radius)
110: central cavity within the nebula. The inferred X-ray luminosity of
111: NGC~5315 is $\sim2.5\times10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (0.3-2.0 keV),
112: placing this object among the most luminous such ``hot bubble''
113: X-ray sources yet detected within PNe. With the X-ray detection of
114: NGC~5315, objects with WR-type central stars now constitute a clear
115: majority of known examples of diffuse X-ray sources among PNe; all
116: such ``hot bubble'' PN X-ray sources display well-defined,
117: quasi-continuous optical rims. We therefore assert
118: that X-ray-luminous hot bubbles are characteristic of
119: young PNe with large central star wind kinetic energies and closed
120: bubble morphologies. However, the evidence at hand also suggests
121: that processes such as wind and bubble temporal evolution, as well
122: as heat conduction and/or mixing of hot bubble and nebular gas,
123: ultimately govern the luminosity and temperature of superheated
124: plasma within PNe.
125: \end{abstract}
126:
127: \keywords{planetary nebulae: general --- planetary nebulae:
128: individual (\objectname{NGC~5315})
129: --- stars: winds, outflows --- stars: Wolf-Rayet ---
130: X-rays: ISM}
131:
132: \section{Introduction}
133:
134: Imaging spectroscopy of planetary nebulae (PNe) by the {\it
135: Chandra} and {\it XMM-Newton} X-ray observatories has
136: yielded a steadily accumulating body of compelling
137: observational evidence for ``hot bubbles'' within certain
138: PNe. Such a hot bubble may be produced as the central star
139: makes the transition from post-asymptotic giant branch
140: (post-AGB) star to white dwarf, following an evolutionary
141: track of increasing $T_\star$ at constant $L_\star$,
142: followed by decreasing $L_\star$ and $T_\star$. In this
143: phase the star produces very fast and energetic winds (with
144: speeds $\sim1000$ km s$^{-1}$ and mass loss rates
145: $\stackrel{>}{\sim}10^{-7}$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$). When such
146: a fast wind collides with ambient (previously ejected AGB)
147: gas, it is shocked and superheated (e.g., Zhekov \&
148: Perinotto 1996). The shocked fast wind forms an
149: overpressured bubble that accelerates outwards and displaces
150: the ambient (visible, nebular) gas as it grows (Kwok,
151: Purton, \& Fitzgerald 1978). The supersonic growth of the
152: bubble plows the displaced older material into a rim of
153: dense gas which, when projected on the sky, is seen as
154: a thin molecular, dust, and/or ionized structure that traces the
155: bubble's perimeter.
156: %So long
157: %as the growth of the rim is constrained by the ram pressure
158: %of ``old'' (either AGB or ISM) gas ahead of it, the hot,
159: %X-ray-emitting bubble should not rapidly expand or cool
160: %adiabatically.
161:
162: So far, nine of $\sim25$ PNe targeted by {\it Chandra} or
163: {\it XMM} have been detected as diffuse X-ray sources
164: (Kastner et al.\ 2000, 2001, 2003; Chu et al.\ 2001;
165: Guerrero et al.\ 2002, 2005; Sahai et al.\ 2003; Montez et
166: al.\ 2005; Gruendl et al.\ 2006). In most of these nebulae,
167: the X-ray-emitting region is fully contained within bright
168: optical rims or bubbles, as predicted by the preceding ``hot
169: bubble'' scenario. Furthermore, many of the detected objects
170: harbor central stars that are of Wolf-Rayet (WR) type (i.e.,
171: ``[WC]'' or ``[WO]'' stars) and/or display optical
172: spectroscopic evidence for large mass-loss rates and wind
173: velocities. In this {\it Letter}, we report the
174: serendipitous detection by {\it Chandra} of X-ray emission
175: associated with an additional [WC] PN, NGC~5315, and we
176: present evidence that this emission also arises within a hot
177: bubble. The accidental detection of NGC~5315 underscores
178: certain trends that are emerging from X-ray detections of PN
179: hot bubbles over the past decade.
180:
181: \section{X-ray Detection of NGC~5315}
182:
183: In a Cycle 5 Chandra study, we observed two [WC] PNs, NGC 40
184: and Hen 2-99; we detected the former, but failed to detect
185: the latter (Montez et al.\ 2005). Recently, while searching
186: the Chandra archives for targeted observations of PNs, one
187: of us (Montez) established that a {\it second} [WC] PN,
188: NGC~5315 (Fig.~\ref{fig:HST}), was present in the 29 ks
189: Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) observation
190: that targeted Hen 2-99 (OBSID 4480). The position of NGC~5315 lies just
191: within the field of view of the ACIS-S detector array, on a
192: CCD (the front-illuminated S4) that lies adjacent to the
193: prime imaging CCD (the back-illuminated S3). Examination of
194: the Chandra/ACIS image revealed an X-ray source at the
195: position of NGC~5315, $\sim12.5'$ off-axis
196: (Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra}).
197:
198: Due to the large off-axis angle and the fact that --- when
199: not used in conjunction with the high-energy transmission
200: gratings --- ACIS-S4 deviates significantly from the focal
201: surface of the Chandra mirror assembly, the NGC~5315 X-ray
202: source is subject to severe image aberrations. The Chandra
203: PSF semimajor axis is $\sim10-20''$ at such off-axis
204: angles\footnote{See e.g.
205: http://cxc.harvard.edu/ccw/proceedings/02\_proc/presentations/c\_allen/offaxis\_psf.pdf.gz},
206: without accounting for the displacement of the S4 detector
207: from the focal surface. Hence, apart from establishing that
208: an X-ray source is coincident with the position of NGC~5315,
209: no spatial information can be readily extracted from the
210: ACIS-S4 image.
211:
212: We used version 3.4 of
213: CIAO\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/} to extract
214: source and background spectra, spectral responses, and light
215: curves. The circular source extraction region radius was
216: 34$''$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra}), which should encompass the
217: 95\% encircled energy of a point source at the off-axis
218: angle corresponding to the position of NGC~5315. Background
219: was extracted from a $\sim2.5'\times3.5'$ rectangular region
220: adjacent to the NGC~5315 source
221: (Fig.~\ref{fig:Chandra}). The resulting,
222: background-subtracted spectrum displays prominent Ne {\sc
223: ix} emission at $\sim0.9$ keV and a blend of O {\sc vii} and
224: O {\sc viii} emission lines at $\sim0.65$ keV
225: (Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC5315spec}).The background-subtracted
226: count rate of the source is $12.4 \pm 0.7$ ks$^{-1}$. The
227: light curve (not shown) reveals no significant variation in
228: this count rate during the 28.7 ks exposure.
229:
230: \section{Spectral Modeling}
231:
232: We used version 12.3.0 of
233: XSPEC\footnote{http://heasarc.nasa.gov/docs/xanadu/xspec/}
234: (Arnaud 1996) to fit absorbed thermal plasma emission models
235: to the NGC~5315 X-ray source
236: (Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC5315spec}). The model absorbing column was
237: fixed at $\log{N_H} ({\rm cm}^{-2}) = 21.36$, corresponding
238: to the measured extinction toward NGC~5315 ($A_V \approx
239: 1.3$; Peimbert et al.\ 2004; Pottasch et al.\ 2002; Cahn et
240: al.\ 1992). Applying the VMEKAL variable-abundance plasma
241: emission model (Liedahl et al.\ 1995 and references
242: therein), we find the best-fit plasma temperature is $T_x =
243: 2.6\times10^6$ K ($\pm10$\%) and the inferred intrinsic
244: X-ray luminosity is $L_x \sim 2.6\times10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$
245: (0.3--2.0 keV) assuming a distance\footnote{Estimates of the
246: distance to NGC~5315 range from $\sim$1.3 kpc (Cahn et al.\
247: 1992; Pottasch 1982) to 2.6 kpc (Gathier et al.\ 1986).} of
248: 2.5 kpc (Marcolino et al.\ 2007). The plasma modeling
249: suggests Ne is enhanced and Fe is depleted; the best-fit
250: VMEKAL model abundances are $4.3 \pm 1.3$ and $0.6 \pm 0.3$,
251: respectively, relative to solar (Anders \& Grevesse 1989).
252:
253: \section{Discussion}
254:
255: Due to the very poor off-axis {\it Chandra}/ACIS-S image
256: quality at the position of NGC~5315, it is not possible to
257: ascertain from the ACIS image alone whether the X-rays trace
258: a hot bubble within this PN, emanate from the PN nucleus, or
259: are emitted by both the nebula and its central
260: star(s). However, the background-subtracted spectrum
261: (Fig.~\ref{fig:NGC5315spec}), the luminosity, and the
262: temporal behavior of the X-ray source associated with
263: NGC~5315 appear quite definitive regarding the origin of the
264: X-rays. The spectrum shows strong Ne~{\sc ix} line emission
265: as well as a blend of O~{\sc vii} and O~{\sc viii} lines,
266: with no evidence for Fe L-shell lines. Spectral modeling
267: indicates that the emission arises in a $\sim2.5$ MK thermal
268: plasma with enhanced Ne and depleted Fe. These results and
269: the inferred source $L_X$ are very similar to those obtained
270: for the best-characterized diffuse X-ray PN, BD
271: +30$^\circ$3639 (Kastner et al.\ 2000, 2006; Maness et al.\
272: 2003). Meanwhile, the Chandra/ACIS light curve shows no
273: evidence for variability, and the absorption-corrected X-ray
274: luminosity of NGC~5315 is at least an order of magnitude
275: larger than that of any unresolved PN core region detected
276: thus far (Guerrero et al.\ 2001; Kastner et al.\ 2003),
277: further supporting the interpretation that the X-rays arise
278: from an extended region within NGC~5315.
279:
280: Assuming the X-rays from NGC~5315 indeed arise from its
281: compact ($\sim1''$ radius), sharply delineated central
282: cavity (Fig.~\ref{fig:HST}), the results reported here
283: establish NGC~5315 as one of the most luminous ``hot bubble'' X-ray
284: sources yet detected (Table 1). The detection of NGC~5315 by
285: {\it Chandra} therefore underscores three significant trends that
286: have emerged from the X-ray observations of PNe obtained
287: thus far by {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM}:
288: \begin{enumerate}
289: \item Objects with WR-type (i.e., [WC], [WO], or WR(H)) central stars
290: --- which display characteristically large wind velocities ($v_w$), large
291: mass-loss rates ($\dot{M}$), and relatively low effective
292: temperatures ($T_{\rm eff} \sim 30-60$ kK; e.g., Crowther et al.\
293: 1998) --- account for five of the seven detections of ``hot bubble''
294: (as opposed to jet-excited) PN X-ray sources (Table 1). Given that
295: $\stackrel{<}{\sim}10$\% of galactic PNe are known to harbor WR-type
296: central stars (Gorny \& Stasinska 1995; Tylenda 1996), such PNe (and
297: [WC] PNe in particular) clearly constitute a disportionately large
298: fraction of objects that are established sources of luminous,
299: diffuse X-ray emission. One of the two PNe in Table 1 that does not
300: have a WR-type central star, NGC 7009, displays a very large central
301: star wind velocity. The only X-ray nondetection among the [WC] PNe, the cool
302: ([WC 9]) and very young Hen 2-99, appears to contain a bright,
303: compact core, and hence may not yet have formed a central,
304: wind-blown bubble (Montez et al.\ 2005).
305: \item All of the Table 1 objects --- not just the WR-type PNe ---
306: feature central stars that are relatively cool and luminous ($T_{\rm
307: eff} \stackrel{<}{\sim}80$ kK and $L \sim 3000-10000$ $L_\odot$;
308: e.g., Mal'Kov 1997) confirming that PNe with X-ray-luminous bubbles
309: are quite young (Soker \& Kastner 2003) and suggesting such PNe are
310: generally the descendants of relatively massive
311: progenitors. Specifically, comparison with theoretical post-AGB
312: evolutionary tracks (e.g., Fig.\ 1 of Perrinoto et al.\ 2004)
313: suggests post-AGB ages $\stackrel{<}{\sim} 3000$ yr (in general
314: agreement with the dynamical ages of these PNe; see, e.g., Fig.\ 7
315: of Akashi et al.\ 2006) and progenitor masses in the range $1-5$
316: $M_\odot$.
317: \item In all cases in which diffuse X-ray emission is detected, the
318: optical/IR structures that enclose the regions of diffuse X-rays are
319: clearly defined, and these structures generally display thin,
320: bright, uninterrupted edges (or ``rims'') surrounding a cavity of
321: lower surface brightness that is coincident with the extended X-ray
322: emission (see also Gruendl et al.\ 2006).
323: \end{enumerate}
324: %{\it Chandra} archival data
325: %also reveals that the relatively large, diffuse
326: %PNe NGC 246 and K 1--16 --- whose PG 1159-type central stars
327: %display large $v_w$ and $\dot{M}$ and are likely the
328: %descendants of [WC] stars --- are also undetected as diffuse
329: %X-ray sources.
330:
331: In Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends} we display scatter diagrams for various
332: of the observed quantities listed for the X-ray-detected PNe in Table
333: 1. The top panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends} demonstrate that the
334: characteristic temperature of the X-ray-emitting plasma is far lower
335: than expected, based on simple shock models, in almost all PNs in
336: which diffuse X-ray emission has been detected thus far (consistent
337: with the early X-ray CCD spectroscopic results reported for BD
338: $+30^\circ$3639 by Arnaud et al.\ 1996). The heat generated by stellar
339: wind shocks should produce a post-shock temperature $T = 2.5\times10^6
340: (v_w/400)^2$ (where $v_w$ is in km s$^{-1}$; e.g., Stute \& Sahai 2006
341: and references therein). There is only
342: one Table 1 object, NGC 2392, for which the temperature so predicted
343: is consistent with $T_X$; for all other PNe, the predicted post-shock
344: temperatures are larger than observed by factors ranging from $\sim2$
345: (BD $+30^\circ$3639) to $\sim200$ (NGC 7026). Furthermore, $T_X$
346: appears uncorrelated with present-day central star wind velocity, but
347: is weakly anticorrelated with PN bubble radius
348: (Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends}, upper panels), suggesting that PN age is
349: more important than present-day wind kinetic energy in determining the
350: temperature of the X-ray-emitting plasma.
351:
352: The bottom panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends} indicate
353: that X-ray luminosity is correlated with present-day central
354: star wind luminosity $L_w = \frac{1}{2} \dot{M}v_w^2$, and
355: is perhaps anticorrelated with bubble radius. In the $L_X$ vs.\
356: $L_w$ plot (Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends}, lower left), NGC 40
357: appears somewhat underluminous in X-rays relative to the
358: other PNe, consistent with the ``punctured'' appearance of
359: its central bubble (Montez et al.\ 2005 and references
360: therein).
361: %however, in a plot of $L_X$ vs.\ wind luminosity flux at the
362: %bubble working surface (i.e., $L_w$ ``diluted'' by a factor
363: %$4\pi R_B^2$, where $R_B$ is the bubble radius), the
364: %correlation between $L_X$ and $L_w$ appears stronger, and
365: %NGC 40 is no longer an obvious outlier
366: %(Fig.~\ref{fig:PNXraytrends}, lower right).
367: The shallow slope of the $L_X$ vs.\ $L_w$ correlation ---
368: wherein 4 orders of magnitude in $L_w$ results in only a
369: factor $\sim20$ range in $L_X$ --- may suggest either that
370: the conversion of wind kinetic energy to plasma radiation
371: becomes more efficient as the central star wind declines in
372: strength, or that the luminosities (and, perhaps, temperatures) of
373: the hot bubbles within these PNe are
374: established during early phases of the post-AGB evolution
375: of central stars with rapidly evolving winds
376: (Akashi et al.\ 2006, 2007).
377:
378: \section{Conclusions}
379:
380: We have detected luminous ($L_X \sim2.5\times10^{32}$ erg s$^{-1}$),
381: soft ($T_X \sim2.5\times10^{6}$ K) X-ray emission from the [WC] PN
382: NGC~5315. The emission most likely emanates from a relatively compact
383: ($\sim8000$ AU radius), wind-blown bubble within this PN. Placed in
384: the context of results obtained to date by {\it Chandra} and {\it
385: XMM}, these results for NGC~5315 indicate that the combination of
386: (1) relatively young, massive PNe harboring central stars with large wind
387: kinetic energies ($L_w \stackrel{>}{\sim} 10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$) and
388: (2) a ``closed containment vessel'' is necessary to yield PN hot
389: bubbles with plasma densities sufficient to produce detectable soft
390: (0.3-2.0 keV) X-ray luminosities $L_X \stackrel{>}{\sim} 10^{31}$ erg
391: s$^{-1}$. There should exist many other examples of diffuse, ``hot
392: bubble'' X-ray emission in addition to those listed in Table 1,
393: particularly among [WC] PNe with large ``present-day'' central star
394: wind luminosities and ``closed'' bubble/lobe morphologies. A
395: systematic {\it Chandra} and {\it XMM} survey of such PNe as well as a
396: set of ``control'' objects --- in particular, [WC] PNe with
397: open/amorphous morphologies on the one hand, and PNe with low-$L_w$
398: central stars but closed, bubble-like structures on the other ---
399: would test these assertions. In addition, to determine the longevity
400: of X-ray-luminous hot bubbles, it is important to search for X-ray
401: emission from the descendants of [WC] PNe, i.e., PNe with PG~1159-type
402: central stars. In this regard, it is intriguing that two such objects,
403: K 1--16 and NGC 246 (Jeffery et al.\ 1996), apparently have gone
404: undetected by {\it Chandra}\footnote{Based on preliminary analysis of
405: archival data; see http://www.iaa.es/xpn/.}.
406:
407: Collectively, these results provide further motivation for
408: ongoing modeling efforts that attempt to incorporate
409: processes such as the early onset (and rapid
410: decline) of the central star's fast wind, adiabatic cooling
411: of the (expanding) hot bubble, and heat conduction between
412: the shocked wind and nebular gas in predicting the range and
413: evolution of $L_X$ and $T_X$ in PNe (see discussions in
414: Soker \& Kastner 2003; Akashi et al.\ 2006, 2007; Stute \&
415: Sahai 2006; Sch\"onberner et al.\ 2006). Additional,
416: detailed modeling of a much larger and more representative
417: database of X-ray observations of PNe will be required to
418: establish which (if any) of the above processes are
419: particularly significant in determining $L_X$ and $T_X$
420: within PN hot bubbles.
421:
422: \acknowledgments
423: This research was supported by NASA through Chandra awards
424: GO4--5169X and GO5--6008X issued to Rochester Institute of
425: Technology by the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is
426: operated by Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on
427: behalf of NASA under contract NAS8--03060. The authors wish to
428: acknowledge important contributions to (and comments on) this paper by Noam
429: Soker.
430:
431: \facility{CXO(ACIS)}
432:
433: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
434: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
435: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
436: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
437: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
438: %%
439: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
440: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
441: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
442: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
443: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
444: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
445: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
446: %% place of the \cite commands.
447:
448: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
449: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
450: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
451:
452: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
453: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
454: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
455: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
456: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
457:
458: \begin{thebibliography}{}
459: %% \bibitem[Auri\`ere(1982)]{aur82} Auri\`ere, M. 1982, \aap,
460: %% 109, 301
461: %% \bibitem[Canizares et al.(1978)]{can78} Canizares, C. R.,
462: %% Grindlay, J. E., Hiltner, W. A., Liller, W., \&
463: %% McClintock, J. E. 1978, \apj, 224, 39
464:
465: %\bibitem[Acker et al. (1996)]{acker96} Acker, A., Gorny,
466: % S. K., \& Cuisinier, F. 1996, A\&A, 305, 944
467:
468: \bibitem[Akashi et al. (2006)]{akashi06} Akashi, M.,
469: Soker, N., \& Behar, E., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1706
470:
471: \bibitem[Akashi et al. (2006)]{akashi07} Akashi, M.,
472: Soker, N., \& Behar, E., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 137
473:
474: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse (1989)]{anders89} Anders, E., \&
475: Grevesse, N. 1989, Geo.\ Cos.\ Acta, 53, 197
476:
477: \bibitem[Arnaud (1996)]{arnaud96} Arnaud, K., 1996, Astronomical Data
478: Analysis Software and Systems V, eds. Jacoby G. \& Barnes, J., p.\ 17,
479: PASP Conf. Series Vol.\ 101
480:
481: \bibitem[Arnaud et al. (1996)]{arnbor96} Arnaud, K., Borkowski, K.J.,
482: Harrington, J.P., 1996, ApJ, 462, L75
483:
484: %\bibitem[Balick \& Hajian (2004)]{balick04} Balick, B., \&
485: % Hajian, A.R. 2004, AJ, 127, 2269
486:
487: \bibitem[Cahn et al. (1992)]{cahn92} Cahn, J.H., Kaler,
488: J.B., \& Stanghellini, L.et al. 1992, A\&AS, 94, 399
489:
490: \bibitem[Chu et al. (2001)]{chu01} Chu, Y.-H., Guerrero,
491: M.A., Gruendl, R.A., Williams, R.M., \& Kaler, J.B., 2001,
492: ApJ, 553, L69
493:
494: \bibitem[Crowther et al.\ (1998)]{crowther98} Crowther,
495: P. A., De Marco, O., \& Barlow, M. J. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 367
496:
497: \bibitem[Gathier et al.\ (1986)]{gathier86} Gathier R.,
498: Pottasch S.R., \& Pel J.W. 1986, A\&A, 157, 171
499:
500: \bibitem[Gorny \& Stasinska (1995)]{gorny95} Gorny, S. K.,
501: \& Stasinska, G. 1995, A\&A, 303, 893
502:
503: \bibitem[Gruendl et al. (2006)]{gruendl06} Gruendl, R.A.,
504: Guerrero, M.A., Chu, Y.-H., Williams, R.M. 2006, ApJ,
505: 653, 339
506:
507: \bibitem[Guerrero et al. (2001)]{guerrero01} Guerrero, M.A.,
508: Chu, Y.-H., Gruendl, R.A., Williams, R.M., \& Kaler, J.B.,
509: 2001, ApJ, 553, L55
510:
511: \bibitem[Guerrero et al. (2002)]{guerrero02} Guerrero, M.A.,
512: Chu, Y.-H., \& Gruendl, R.A., 2002, A\&A, 387, L1
513:
514: \bibitem[Guerrero et al. (2005)]{guerrero05} Guerrero, M.A.,
515: Chu, Y.-H., Gruendl, R. A., \& Meixner, M. 2005, A\&A, 430, L69
516:
517: %\bibitem[Herald et al. (2005)]{herald05} Herald et al. 2005, ...
518:
519: \bibitem[Hyung \& Feibelman (2004)]{hyung04} Hyung, S., \&
520: Feibelman, W. A. 2004, ApJ, 614, 745
521:
522: \bibitem[Jeffery et al.\ (1996)]{jeffery96} Jeffery, C.S.,
523: Heber, U., Hill, P.W., Dreizler, S., Drilling, J.S.,
524: Lawson, W.A., Leuenhagen, U., \& Werner, K. 1996, in
525: {\it Hydrogen deficient stars}, ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol. 96,
526: eds.\ C. S. Jeffery \& U. Heber, p.\ 471
527:
528: \bibitem[Kastner et al. (2000)]{kastner00} Kastner, J.H.,
529: Soker, N., Vrtilek, S.D., \& Dgani, R., 2000, ApJ, 545, L57
530:
531: \bibitem[Kastner et al. (2001)]{kastner01} Kastner, J.H.,
532: Vrtilek, S.D., Soker, N., 2001, ApJ, 550, L189
533:
534: %\bibitem[Kastner et al. (2002)]{kastner02} Kastner, J.H.,
535: % Jingqiang, Li, Vrtilek, S.D., Gatley, I., Merrill, K.M., Soker, N.,
536: % 2002, ApJ, 581, 1225
537:
538: \bibitem[Kastner et al. (2003)]{kastner03} Kastner, J.H.,
539: Balick, B., Blackman, E.G., Frank, A., Soker, N., Vrtilek, S.D.,
540: Jingqiang, Li, 2003, ApJ, 591, L37
541:
542: \bibitem[Kastner et al. (2006)]{kastner06} Kastner, J.H.,
543: Yu, Y.S., Houck, J., Behar, E., Nordon, R., \& Soker,
544: N. 2006, in {\it Planetary Nebulae}, Proc.\ IAU Symp.\ 234,
545: eds.\ Barlow \&
546: Mendez (Camb.\ U. Press), p. 169
547:
548: \bibitem[Koesterke \& Hamann (1997)]{koesterke97} Koesterke,
549: L., \& Hamann, W.-R. 1997, in {\it Planetary Nebulae},
550: Proc.\ IAU Symp.\ 180, eds.\ H. J. Habing \&
551: H. J. G. L. M. Lamers (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
552:
553: %\bibitem[Koesterke (2001)]{koesterke01} Koesterke, L. 2001,
554: % ApSS, 275,
555:
556: \bibitem[Kwok et al. (1978)]{kwok78} Kwok, S., Purton, C.R.,
557: \& Fitzgerald, P.M. 1978, ApJ, 219, L125
558:
559: \bibitem[Leuenhagen et al. (1996)]{leuen96} Leuenhagen, U.,
560: Hamann, W.-R., Jeffery, C.S., 1996, A\&A, 312, 167
561:
562: \bibitem[Liedahl et al.\ (1995)]{liedahl95} Liedahl, D.A.,
563: Osterheld, A.L., \& Goldstein, W.H. 1995, ApJL, 438, 115
564:
565: \bibitem[Mal'kov (1997)]{mol97} Mal'Kov, Yu.F. 1997, ARep, 41, 760
566:
567: \bibitem[Maness et al. (2003)]{maness03} Maness, H.L.,
568: Vrtilek, S.D., Kastner, J.H., \& Soker, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 439
569:
570: \bibitem[Marcolino et al. (2007)]{marcolino07} Marcolino,
571: W.L.F., Hillier, D.J., de Araujo, F.X. \& Pereira,
572: C.B. 2007, ApJ, 654, 1068
573:
574: \bibitem[Montez et al. (2005)]{montez05} Montez, R.,
575: Kastner, J.H., De Marco, O., Soker, N. 2005, ApJ, 635, 381
576:
577: \bibitem[Peimbert et al. (2004)]{peimbert04} Peimbert, M.,
578: Peimbert, A., Ruiz, M. T., \& Esteban, C., 2004, ApJS, 150,
579: 431
580:
581: \bibitem[Perinotto (1993)]{perinotto93} Perinotto, M. 1993,
582: in {\it Planetary Nebulae}, Proc.\ IAU Symp.\ 155, eds.\
583: R. Weinberger \& A. Acker (Kluwer), p. 57
584:
585: \bibitem[Perinotto et al. (1989)]{perinotto89} Perinotto,
586: M., Cerruti-Sola, M., \& Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 1989, ApJ,
587: 337, 382
588:
589: \bibitem[Perinotto et al. (2004)]{perinotto804} Perinotto,
590: M., Sch\"onberner, D., Steffen, M., \& Calonoci, C. 2004, A\&A, 414, 993
591:
592: \bibitem[Pottasch (1982)]{pottasch82} Pottasch, S.R. 1982,
593: in {\it Planetary Nebulae},
594: Proc.\ IAU Symp.\ 103, ed.\ D.R. Flower, p.\ 391
595:
596: \bibitem[Pottasch et al. (2002)]{pottasch02} Pottasch, S.R.,
597: Beintema, D. A., J. Bernard Salas, J.,
598: Koornneef, J., Feibelman, W. A., 2002, A\&A, 393, 285-294)
599:
600: \bibitem[Sahai et al. (2003)]{sahai03} Sahai, R.,
601: Kastner, J.H., Frank, A., Morris, M., \& Blackman, E. G. 2003, ApJ, 599, L87
602:
603: \bibitem[Sch\"onberner et al. (2006)]{schon06}
604: Sch\"onberner, D., Steffen, M., \& Warmuth, A.
605: 2006, in {\it Planetary Nebulae}, Proc.\ IAU Symp.\ 234, eds.\ Barlow \&
606: Mendez (Camb.\ U. Press), p. 161
607:
608: \bibitem[Soker \& Kastner (2003)]{sokastner03} Soker, N. \&
609: Kastner, J.H., 2003, ApJ, 583, 368
610:
611: \bibitem[Stute \& Sahai (2006)]{stute06} Stute M., \& Sahai,
612: R. 2006, ApJ, 651, 882
613:
614: \bibitem[Tinkler \& Lamers (2002)]{tinkler02} Tinkler,
615: C. M., \& Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2002, A\&A, 384, 987
616:
617: \bibitem[Tylenda (1996)]{tylenda96} Tylenda, R. 1996, in
618: {\it Hydrogen deficient stars}, ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol. 96,
619: eds.\ C. S. Jeffery \& U. Heber, p.\ 101
620:
621: \bibitem[Zhekov \& Perinotto (1996)]{zhekov96} Zhekov, S.A., \&
622: Perinotto, M. 1996, A\&A, 309, 648
623:
624: \end{thebibliography}
625:
626: \clearpage
627:
628: \input{table1}
629:
630: \clearpage
631:
632: \begin{figure}[htb]
633: \begin{center}
634: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{ngc5315_colorHST.eps} %...color
635: \includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{ngc5315_ha.eps} %...BW, just Ha; used below
636: %\includegraphics[scale=1.0,angle=0]{f1.eps}
637: \end{center}
638: \caption{{\it Hubble Space Telescope} WFPC2 H$\alpha$ (F656N) image
639: of NGC~5315 obtained 2007 February. North is up and east is to the left.}
640: \label{fig:HST}
641: \end{figure}
642:
643: \begin{figure}[htb]
644: \begin{center}
645: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=0]{ngc5315_f2_update2.eps}
646: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=0]{f2.eps}
647: \end{center}
648: \caption{Serendipitous Chandra/ACIS observation of NGC~5315. Displayed
649: are rebinned ($3.9''\times3.9''$ pixel) images of the entire 6-CCD
650: field (upper half of figure) and a smaller ($5'\times5'$) region
651: that includes the NGC 5315 X-ray source (lower left), as well as an
652: unbinned ($0.49''\times0.49''$ pixel) image of the ($34''$ radius)
653: source spectral extraction region (lower right). The background
654: spectral extraction region is also indicated.}
655: \label{fig:Chandra}
656: \end{figure}
657:
658: \begin{figure}[htb]
659: \begin{center}
660: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=-90]{ngc5315_vmekal.ps}
661: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=-90]{f3.ps}
662: \end{center}
663: \caption{ Chandra/ACIS spectrum of the X-ray
664: source associated with NGC~5315 (crosses), with best-fit
665: absorbed thermal plasma (VMEKAL) model spectrum
666: overlaid. The fit residuals are indicated in the lower panel.}
667: \label{fig:NGC5315spec}
668: \end{figure}
669:
670: \begin{figure}[htb]
671: \begin{center}
672: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{TxLxLwR_4.ps}
673: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{f4.ps}
674: \end{center}
675: \caption{ Results obtained thus far for PNe
676: detected as ``hot bubble'' X-ray sources by Chandra and
677: XMM-Newton (Table 1). Upper left:
678: PN plasma temperature ($T_X$) vs.\ central star fast wind
679: velocity. Upper right: $T_X$ vs.\ PN optical bubble
680: radius. Lower left: PN X-ray luminosity ($L_X$) vs.\ wind
681: luminosity of the PN central star ($L_w$) relative to
682: $L_w$ of the central star of NGC 6543 ($L_w$ for NGC 2392
683: [triangle] is an upper limit). Lower right: $L_X$ vs.\ PN optical bubble
684: radius. }
685: \label{fig:PNXraytrends} \end{figure}
686:
687: %\begin{figure}[htb]
688: %\begin{center}
689: %\includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=90]{HRdiagramXray.ps}
690: %\end{center}
691: %\caption{ Diagram of $L_X$ vs.\ $T_X$ for X-ray-detected
692: % ``hot bubble'' planetary nebulae (crosses) and for PNe
693: % whose X-ray emission appears to arise as a consequence of
694: % collimated outflows or jets (asterisks; data from Kastner
695: % et al.\ 2001 [NGC 7027], Kastner et al.\ 2003 [Menzel 3],
696: % and Sahai et al.\ 2003 [Hen 3-1475]).}
697: %\label{fig:XrayHRdiagram} \end{figure}
698:
699: \end{document} %% %% End of file
700: