1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \textwidth 165 truemm
5: %\textheight 240 truemm
6: \textheight 235 truemm
7: \tolerance 500
8: \voffset = -1.0truecm %% сдвинут вниз
9: \hoffset = -1.0truecm %% результат сдвинут в право
10:
11: \def\leaderfill{\leaders\hbox to 1em{\hss.\hss}\hfill} %% точка-проводник
12: \def\bull{\vrule height .9ex width .8ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
13: \def\bul{\vrule height .4ex width .4ex depth -.1ex} %% квадрат
14:
15: \sloppy
16:
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \noindent {\footnotesize\it ISSN 1063-7737,
20: Astronomy Letters, 2007, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 720--728.
21: \copyright Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2007.
22: \noindent Original Russian Text
23: \copyright V.V. Bobylev, A.T.
24: Bajkova, 2007, published in Pis'ma v
25: Astronomicheski$\check{\imath}$ Zhurnal, 2007, Vol. 33, No. 11,
26: pp. 809--818.}
27:
28: \noindent
29: \begin{tabular}{llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll}
30: & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
31: \hline \hline
32: \end{tabular}
33:
34: \vskip 1.5cm
35:
36: \centerline {\large\bf Galactic Rotation Parameters from Data on Open Star
37: Clusters}
38: \bigskip
39: \centerline {V.V. Bobylev, A.T. Bajkova, and S.V. Lebedeva}
40: \bigskip
41: \centerline {\small\it
42: Central (Pulkovo) Astronomical Observatory of RAS, St-Petersburg}
43: \bigskip
44:
45: {\bf Abstract--}Currently available data on the field of
46: velocities $V_r$, $V_l$, $V_b$ for open star clusters are used to
47: perform a kinematic analysis of various samples that differ by
48: heliocentric distance, age, and membership in individual
49: structures (the Orion, Carina--Sagittarius, and Perseus arms).
50: Based on 375 clusters located within 5 kpc of the Sun with ages up
51: to 1~Gyr, we have determined the Galactic rotation parameters
52: $\omega_0 =-26.0\pm0.3 $ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
53: $\omega'_0 = 4.18\pm0.17$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$,
54: $\omega''_0=-0.45\pm0.06$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$,
55: the system contraction parameter
56: $K = -2.4\pm0.1$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
57: and the parameters of the kinematic center
58: $R_0 =7.4\pm0.3$ kpc and $l_0 = 0\pm1^\circ$.
59: The Galactocentric distance $R_0$ in the model used has been found
60: to depend significantly on the sample age. Thus, for example, it
61: is $9.5\pm0.7$ kpc and $5.6\pm0.3$ kpc for the samples of young
62: ($\leq50$ Myr) and old ($>50$ Myr) clusters, respectively. Our
63: study of the kinematics of young open star clusters in various
64: spiral arms has shown that the kinematic parameters are similar to
65: the parameters obtained from the entire sample for the
66: Carina-Sagittarius and Perseus arms and differ significantly from
67: them for the Orion arm. The contraction effect is shown to be
68: typical of star clusters with various ages. It is most pronounced
69: for clusters with a mean age of $\approx100$~Myr, with the
70: contraction velocity being $Kr = -4.3\pm1.0$ km s$^{-1}$.
71:
72:
73: \section*{INTRODUCTION}
74:
75: The Galactic rotation parameters have been repeatedly determined
76: by many authors using objects belonging to various Galactic
77: structural components: from ionized and neutral hydrogen (Fich et
78: al. 1989; Merrifield 1992; Brand and Blitz 1993; Nikiforov 1999;
79: Avedisova 2005), from distant OB associations of stars (Dambis et
80: al. 2001; Mel'nik et al. 2001), and from open star clusters
81: (Zabolotskikh et al. 2002; Gerasimenko 2004; Popova and Loktin
82: 2005b).
83:
84: Open stars clusters (OSCs) are of great interest in studying the
85: kinematics of the Galaxy, since they are located in a wide solar
86: neighborhood and have reliable distance and age estimates.
87:
88: Data only on the radial velocities $V_r$ (Mishurov et al. 1997;
89: Gerasimenko 2004; Popova and Loktin 2005b) are commonly used for a
90: kinematic analysis of OSCs, because the random errors in the
91: radial velocities are essentially distance-independent and, hence,
92: distant objects can be used. Note also that data only on the
93: radial velocities are available for distant hydrogen clouds (Fich
94: et al. 1989; Avedisova 2005).
95:
96: When such catalogs as Hipparcos (1997) and Tycho-2 (Hog et al.
97: 2000) appeared, it became possible to accurately determine the
98: mean proper motions of OSCs (Beshenov and Loktin 2004; Kharchenko
99: et al. 2005b). A number of authors used simultaneously two
100: observed velocity components, $V_r$ and $V_l$ (Mishurov and Zenina
101: 1999; Dambis et al. 2001), or all three velocity components,
102: $V_r$, $V_l$, and $V_b$ (Zabolotskikh et al. 2002; Bobylev 2004),
103: to samples of stars within 3.4 kpc of the Sun. In this paper, we
104: also used all three observed velocity components.
105:
106: One of the important problems is to determine the distance to the
107: center of Galactic rotation $R_0$. This parameter is estimated
108: indirectly from an analysis of the velocities of objects by
109: reconciling the adopted model with observational data. Only in
110: recent years has this parameter been estimated directly from
111: objects of the Galactic nucleus (McNamara 2000; Eisenhauer et al.
112: 2003). A summary of the $R_0$ values determined in the last decade
113: by various methods can be found in Avedisova (2005) and an
114: overview of the $R_0$ estimation methods is given in Nikiforov
115: (2004).
116:
117: The goal of this paper is to determine the Galactic rotation
118: parameters
119: ($\omega_0$,
120: $\omega'_0$,
121: $\omega''_0$) and the parameters of the
122: kinematic center (Galactocentric distance $R_0$ and direction
123: $l_0$) from currently available data on the field of space
124: velocities $V_r$, $V_l$, and $V_b$, distances, and ages of OSCs
125: and to study the kinematic peculiarities of various samples
126: differing by heliocentric distance, age, and membership in
127: individual arms.
128:
129: \section*{DATA}
130:
131: At present, more than 1700 OSCs are known in the solar
132: neighborhood. Data on their proper motions, radial velocities, and
133: positions are needed for our purposes. A catalog that includes 652
134: OSCs (Kharchenko 2001; Kharchenko et al. 2005a, 2005b; Piskunov et
135: al. 2006) forms the basis for our work list. The advantage of this
136: catalog is a homogeneity and a high accuracy of the determination
137: of mean cluster proper motions achieved by using the ASCC-2.5 all
138: sky catalog (Kharchenko 2001) compiled from Hipparcos (1997),
139: Tycho-2 (Hog et al. 2000), and several other sources. The age
140: estimates obtained by comparison with isochrones are available for
141: the clusters of this catalog. The cluster distance estimates are
142: based on the results by Loktin and Beshenov (2003), who reconciled
143: the photometric estimates with the Hipparcos distance scale.We
144: took other data from the compilation by Dias et al. (2002) and the
145: WEBDA database (http://obsww.unige.ch/webda/).
146:
147: For such open clusters as ASCC 16, ASCC 18, and Tr 10, we used the
148: mean radial velocities that we improved (Bobylev 2006) using the
149: OSACA catalog (Bobylev et al. 2006a).
150:
151: As a result, we compiled a database on the proper motions, radial
152: velocities, and distances of 394 OSCs. They are located within
153: about 5 kpc of the Sun. Their ages do not exceed 1.5 Gyr. The
154: radial velocities with estimates of their random errors are
155: available for 270 ($\approx70\%$ of the sample) clusters. Note for
156: comparison, that Dias and Lepine (2005) used only 212 OSCs with
157: measured proper motions and radial velocities served as a source
158: for their kinematic analysis.
159:
160: To identify clusters belonging to various structures (e.g., the
161: Orion, Perseus, and Carina-Sagittarius arms), we use a
162: probabilistic approach that we developed (Bobylev and Bajkova
163: 2007). It is based on the approximation of the two-dimensional
164: ($XY$) probability density function for the objects under
165: consideration by a set of Gaussians that represent the probability
166: density functions of individual features.
167:
168: \section*{THE METHOD}
169:
170: In this paper, we use a rectangular Galactic coordinate system
171: with the axes directed away from the observer toward the Galactic
172: center ($l=0^\circ$, $b=0^\circ$, the $X$ axis), along the
173: Galactic rotation ($l=90^\circ$, $b=0^\circ$, the $Y$ axis), and
174: toward the North Galactic Pole ($b=90^\circ$, the $Z$ axis).
175:
176: The youngest disk objects that lie in the Galactic plane are
177: commonly used to determine the Galactic rotation parameters. As a
178: result, the observed velocity component $V_b$ is generally not
179: considered, while the component of solar motion $w_\odot$ is
180: assumed to be known (Dambis et al. 2001; Gerasimenko 2004). At the
181: same time, analysis of relatively distant objects (Zabolotskikh et
182: al. 2002; Bobylev 2004) showed that including the components
183: $w_\odot$ and $V_b$ in the model allows their values to be also
184: determined reliably. Therefore, we dwell on this more general
185: approach. In the special case where the clusters are distributed
186: in a ring (see the Carina-Sagittarius and Perseus sample below),
187: we used a fixed value of $w_\odot=7.2$ km s$^{-1}$ (Dehnen and
188: Binney 1998).
189:
190: The method for determining the kinematic parameters used here
191: consists in minimizing the quadratic functional $F$,
192: $$
193: \displaylines{\hfill
194: \min~~F=\sum_{i=1}^N w_r^i (V_r^i-\hat{V}_{r}^i)^2
195: +\sum_{i=1}^N w_l^i (V_l^i-\hat{V}_{l}^i)^2+\sum_{i=1}^N w_b^i (V_b^i-\hat{V}_{b}^i)^2
196: \hfill\llap(1)
197: }
198: $$
199: under the following constraints derived from Bottlinger's formulas
200: (Ogorodnikov 1965) with the angular velocity of Galactic rotation
201: expanded in a series to terms of the second order of smallness in
202: $r/R_0$:
203: $$
204: \displaylines{\hfill
205: V_r=-u_\odot\cos b\cos (l-l_0)-
206: \hfill\llap(2)\cr\hfill
207: -v_\odot\cos b\sin (l-l_0)
208: -w_\odot\sin b-
209: \hfill\cr\hfill
210: -R_0(R-R_0)\sin (l-l_0)\cos b \omega'_0-
211: \hfill\cr\hfill
212: -0.5R_0 (R-R_0)^2 \sin (l-l_0)\cos b \omega''_0+
213: \hfill\cr\hfill
214: +r K \cos^2 b,\hfill
215: \cr\hfill
216: %%
217: V_l= u_\odot\sin (l-l_0) - v_\odot\cos (l-l_0) -
218: \hfill\llap(3)\cr\hfill
219: -(R-R_0)(R_0\cos (l-l_0)-r\cos b) \omega'_0-
220: \hfill\cr\hfill
221: -(R-R_0)^2 (R_0\cos (l-l_0)-r\cos b)\times
222: \hfill\cr\hfill
223: \times 0.5\omega''_0 + r \omega_0 \cos b,\hfill\cr\hfill
224: %%
225: V_b=u_\odot\cos (l-l_0) \sin b +
226: \hfill\llap(4)\cr\hfill
227: +v_\odot\sin (l-l_0) \sin b
228: -w_\odot\cos b +
229: \hfill\cr\hfill
230: +R_0(R-R_0)\sin (l-l_0)\sin b\omega'_0+
231: \hfill\cr\hfill
232: +0.5R_0(R-R_0)^2\sin (l-l_0)\sin b\omega''_0-
233: \hfill\cr\hfill
234: -r K \cos b\sin b,
235: \hfill
236: }
237: $$
238: where $N$ is the number of clusters used; $i$ is the current
239: cluster number; $V_{r,l,b}$ are the cluster velocities to be
240: calculated, with $V_r$ being the radial velocity and
241: $V_l= 4.74r\mu_l \cos b$ and $V_b= 4.74\mu_b$
242: being the proper motion velocity components in the $l$ and
243: $b$ directions, respectively (the coefficient 4.74 is the quotient
244: of the number of kilometers in an astronomical unit by the number
245: of seconds in a tropical year);
246: $\hat{V}_{r}^i, \hat{V}_{l}^i, \hat{V}_{b}^i$
247: are the measured components of the velocity field;
248: $w_r$,$w_l$,$w_b$
249: are the weights; $r$ is the heliocentric distance of the cluster
250: calculated via the photometric parallax determined by bringing the
251: cluster main sequence into coincidence with the corresponding
252: isochrone (Piskunov et al. 2006); the cluster proper motion
253: components $\mu_l \cos b$ and $\mu_b$ are in mas yr$^{-1}$, the
254: radial velocity $V_r$ is in km s$^{-1}$;
255: $u_\odot$, $v_\odot$, $w_\odot$ are the cluster
256: centroid velocity components relative to the Sun; $R_0$ is the
257: distance from the Sun to the kinematic center of the system; $R$
258: is the distance from the cluster to the center of rotation; $l_0$
259: is the direction of the kinematic center; $R$, $R_0$, and $r$ are
260: in kpc. The quantity $\omega_0$ is the angular velocity of
261: rotation at distance $R_0$, the parameters $\omega'_0$ and
262: $\omega''_0$ are the first and second-order derivatives of the
263: angular velocity, respectively; $K$ is the Oort constant that
264: describes the expansion/contraction of the stellar system. The
265: distance $R$ can be calculated using the expression
266: $$
267: \displaylines{\hfill
268: R^2=(r\cos b)^2-2R_0 r\cos b\cos (l-l_0)+R^2_0.\hfill\llap(5)
269: }
270: $$
271: Note also that Eqs. (2)--(4) are written in such a way that the
272: direction of rotation from the $X$ axis to the $Y$ axis is
273: positive.
274:
275: The weights in functional (1) are assigned in accordance with the
276: expressions (for simplification, the index $i$ was omitted)
277: $$
278: \displaylines{\hfill
279: w_r=S_0/\sqrt {S_0^2+\sigma^2_{V_r}},
280: \hfill\llap(6)\cr\hfill
281: w_l=\beta^2 S_0/\sqrt {S_0^2+\sigma^2_{V_l}},
282: \hfill\cr\hfill
283: w_b=\gamma^2 S_0/\sqrt {S_0^2+\sigma^2_{V_b}},\hfill
284: }
285: $$
286: where $S_0$ denotes the dispersion averaged over all observations,
287: which has the meaning of the ``cosmic'' dispersion that we take to
288: be 8 km s$^{-1}$;
289: $\beta =\sigma_{V_r}/\sigma_{V_l}$ and
290: $\gamma=\sigma_{V_r}/\sigma_{V_b}$
291: are the scale factors (in our case, $\beta=1$ and $\gamma=2$). The
292: errors in the velocities $V_l$ and $V_b$ can be calculated using
293: the formula
294: $$
295: \displaylines{\hfill
296: \sigma_{(V_l,V_b)} = {4.74\over\pi}
297: \sqrt{\mu^2_{l,b}\Biggl({\sigma_\pi\over\pi}\Biggr)^2+\sigma^2_{\mu_{l,b}}},\hfill
298: }
299: $$
300: where $\sigma_\pi/\pi$ is taken to be 0.2, a typical
301: error in the photometric parallax.
302:
303: In this paper, apart from the system of weights (6) described
304: above, we also use a variant of unit weights where $w_r=w_l=w_b=1$
305: for comparison.
306:
307: The optimization problem (1)--(5) is solved for nine unknown
308: parameters $u_\odot$, $v_\odot$, $w_\odot$, $\omega_0$,
309: $\omega'_0$, $\omega''_0$, $K$, $R_0$, and $l_0$ by a
310: coordinate-wise descent method (the sought-for parameters are
311: taken as the coordinates). According to this method, the increment
312: $z_x$ for each unknown, which we arbitrarily denote by $x$, is
313: sought from a necessary condition for the existence of an extremum
314: of the functional $F(z_x)$:
315: $$
316: \displaylines{\hfill
317: \frac{dF(z_x)}{dz_x}=0.\hfill\llap(7)
318: }
319: $$
320: The functional $F(z_x)$ is obtained by substituting Eqs. (2)--(4)
321: for $V_r(z_x)$, $V_l(z_x)$, $V_b(z_x)$ into (1) using (5) in which
322: the variable $x$ is replaced by $x+z_x$.
323:
324: Generally, Eq. (7) is a nonlinear equation for $z_x$. Its
325: numerical solution by the Newton method is an iterative process.
326: The value for $z_x$ at iteration $i$ is
327: $$
328: \displaylines{\hfill
329: z_x^i=z_x^{i-1}
330: -\Big({dF(z_x)}/{dz_x}\Big)
331: /\Big({d^2 F(z_x)}/{dz_x^2}\Big)\Big|_{z_x=z_x^{i-1}}.\hfill
332: }
333: $$
334: The solution for $z_x$ usually converges after 1--3 iterations. As
335: a result of one descent, the sought-for variable acquires a new
336: value, $x+z_x$. In our case, about 1000 descents in all nine
337: sought-for variables were required to obtain a solution with a
338: sufficiently high accuracy.
339:
340: A sufficient condition for the existence of a global extremum is
341: that the Hessian matrix composed of elements
342: $\{a_{i,j}\}=d^2F/dx_i dx_j$,
343: where $x_{i} (i=1,...9)$ denote the sought-for parameters, be
344: positively defined everywhere. We calculated the Hessian matrix in
345: a wide domain of parameters:
346: $4\le u_\odot,v_\odot\le 16, 2\le w_\odot\le 11, -30\le\omega_0\le 0, -3\le \omega'_0\le 6, -0.6\le
347: \omega''_0\le 0.3, -4\le K\le 5, 3\le R_0\le 15,-20\le l_0\le 10$.
348: Our analysis of the Hessian matrix for both weighting variants for
349: all of the cluster samples considered here showed it to be
350: positively defined. This suggests the existence of a global
351: minimum in this domain and, as a result, the uniqueness of the
352: solution. For unit weights, the Hessian matrix is also positively
353: defined far outside this domain, which could not be established in
354: the case of weighting according to rule (6). However, as will be
355: shown below, the adopted weighting allowed the accuracy of the
356: solutions obtained to be increased noticeably.
357:
358: Interestingly, using weights of the form
359: $w_{r, l, b}=1/\sigma^2_{V_{r, l, b}}$
360: provided no positive definiteness of the Hessian matrix in the
361: domain considered. It thus follows that several local extrema
362: exist in this case. Therefore, to find the correct solution, we
363: must know the initial approximation as accurately as possible. In
364: contrast, if a global extremum exists, then we can start from any
365: point of the domain. This, in particular, explains the
366: modification of the weights according to rule (6), which provided
367: a global minimum in a fairly wide domain of parameters.
368:
369:
370: We estimated the errors in the sought-for parameters by means of
371: Monte-Carlo simulations. The errors were estimated by performing
372: 100 cycles of computations. At this number of cycles, the mean
373: values of the solutions virtually coincide with the solutions
374: obtained only from the input data, i.e., without any addition of
375: the measurement errors.
376:
377:
378: \section*{CONSTRAINTS}
379:
380: In solving the optimization problem (1)--(5), we used the
381: following constraints on the data: (i) the magnitude of the
382: peculiar velocity $|V_{pec}|<90$ km s$^{-1}$; (ii) the cluster
383: height above the Galactic plane $|z|<500$~pc. The velocity
384: $V_{pec}$ is calculated with respect to the local standard of rest
385: $u_\odot=10.0$ km s$^{-1}$,
386: $v_\odot= 5.3$ km s$^{-1}$,
387: $w_\odot= 7.2$ km s$^{-1}$
388: (Dehnen and Binney 1998). According to constraint (i), four
389: clusters were rejected. Constraint (ii) is important only for
390: clusters older than 50 Myr. According to this criterion, the seven
391: oldest clusters were rejected; all of the remaining clusters
392: proved to be younger than 1 Gyr. After applying an additional
393: constraint on the sample radius, $r<5$~kpc, 375 clusters remained
394: out the originally compiled list of 392 clusters, which served as
395: the material for a further analysis.
396:
397:
398: \section*{RESULTS}
399:
400:
401: Figure 1 presents the spatial distribution of OSCs in the Galactic
402: $XY$ plane. Since a kinematic analysis of OSC samples with age
403: separation is also the goal of this paper, we separately displayed
404: the distributions of OSCs younger and older than 50 Myr in Figs.
405: 1a and 1b, respectively. We see from Fig. 1a that young clusters
406: clearly reproduce three segments of the spiral arms (Mel'nik et
407: al. 2001; Dias and L\'epine 2005; Popova and Loktin 2005a). The
408: concentration regions are marked in the figure by the ellipses:
409: the Perseus arm is on the left, the Orion arm is at the center,
410: and the Carina-Sagittarius arm is on the right. We clearly see
411: that the distribution of older clusters (Fig. 1b) is considerably
412: more uniform, more compact, and concentrated closer to the Sun.
413:
414: Figure 2 shows the mean errors $\sigma_{V_r}$, $\sigma_{V_l}$, and
415: $\sigma_{V_b}$ as a function of the heliocentric distance. Note
416: that in solving the optimization problem (1)--(5), we take into
417: account the peculiarities of the error distribution using the
418: weighting procedure (6).
419:
420: Table 1 presents the results of our kinematic analysis of OSC
421: samples with different sample radii ($r<5$ kpc and $r<2.5$ kpc)
422: and age separation (younger and older than 50 Myr) using the two
423: weighting methods. Column 1 gives the sample type and size; column
424: 2 lists the centroid velocity components relative to the Sun;
425: columns 3, 4, and 5 list the rotation parameters; columns 6, 7,
426: and 8 give the values of the $K$-effect, $R_0$, and $l_0$. The
427: results obtained with unit weights and weights (6) are presented
428: in the upper and lower parts of the table, respectively. As can be
429: seen from Table 1, the random errors in virtually all parameters
430: decrease when the system of weights (6) is used. For both
431: weighting methods, the difference in $R_0$, which is significant
432: for the sample of old clusters, is largest. As can be seen from
433: Table 1, we obtain a discrepancy in $\omega''_0$ depending on the
434: constraint on the sample radius. Figure 3 shows how the parameter
435: $\omega''_0$ affects the Galactic rotation curve. To properly
436: compare the results and to construct the curves indicated in Fig.
437: 3, we obtained two solutions at fixed $R_0=7.4$ kpc:
438: $$
439: \displaylines{\hfill
440: \omega_0=-26.7\pm 0.3~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$}, \hfill\llap(8)\cr\hfill
441: \omega'_0= 4.27\pm0.11~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$}, \hfill\cr\hfill
442: \omega''_0=-1.05\pm0.06~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$}, \hfill
443: }
444: $$
445: for the $r<2.5$ kpc sample and
446: $$
447: \displaylines{\hfill
448: \omega_0=-26.0\pm 0.2~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$}, \hfill\cr\hfill
449: \omega'_0= 4.14\pm0.10~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$}, \hfill\cr\hfill
450: \omega''_0=-0.44\pm0.04~\hbox{km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$} \hfill
451: }
452: $$
453: for the $r<5$ kpc sample. As can be seen from Fig. 3, the
454: difference in the rotation curve due to the influence of the
455: second derivative becomes noticeable as one receded from $R_0$ to
456: distances exceeding $\approx1.5$ kpc.
457:
458: The Oort constants
459: $A=0.5 R_0 \omega'_0$ and
460: $B= \omega_0+0.5 R_0 \omega'_0$ calculated from the data in the fifth row of Table 1 are
461: $A= 15.4\pm0.6$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
462: $B=-10.6\pm0.7$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
463: have no significant differences for all solutions of Table 1.
464:
465: In Fig. 4, linear contraction velocity $Kr$ is plotted against
466: heliocentric distance $r$ and mean sample age $t$. To obtain these
467: characteristics, we divided the entire data set into four groups
468: in such a way that each group contained approximately the same
469: number of clusters. The dependences in Fig. 4 were derived at
470: fixed Galactocentric distance $R_0=7.4$ kpc. It follows from Fig.
471: 4a that the contraction effect is traceable at all heliocentric
472: distances $r>1$ kpc and is, on average, $Kr = -3.2\pm1.0$ km
473: s$^{-1}$. As we see from Fig. 4b, the contraction effect is
474: typical of star clusters with various ages, but it is most
475: pronounced for clusters with a mean age $t\approx100$ Myr; the
476: contraction velocity in this case is $Kr =-4.3\pm1.0$ km s$^{-1}$.
477:
478: To study the kinematic peculiarities of various structures, we
479: analyzed clusters younger than 50 Myr belonging to various arms
480: (Fig. 1a). To identify the arms, we calculated the probability
481: that each cluster belonged to one or another arm and then
482: attributed it to the arm the probability of belonging to which was
483: at a maximum. In this case, the probability densities of cluster
484: belonging to each arm were fitted by Gaussians whose bases in the
485: shape of ellipses are shown in Fig. 1b. The results of our
486: kinematic analysis in which all parameters were found
487: simultaneously are presented in the first four rows of Table 2.
488: The first and second two rows give, respectively, the results
489: obtained with unit weights and with weights (6).
490:
491: For the Carina-Sagittarius and Perseus sample, which contains
492: mostly distant clusters, we also obtained a solution at fixed
493: $w_\odot=7.2$ km s$^{-1}$ using weighting (6). This solution is given in the last
494: row of Table 2. It shows that a change in parameter $w_\odot$ by
495: $\sim2$ km s$^{-1}$ does not affect significantly the
496: determination of other model parameters.
497:
498: \section*{DISCUSSION}
499: \subsection*{Parameters of the Kinematic Center}
500:
501: As can be seen from Table 1, the values of $R_0$ obtained with
502: various weighting methods agree well, within the 1$\sigma$ error
503: limits. $R_0=7.4\pm0.3$ kpc that we found using clusters with a
504: mixed (in age) composition is in good agreement with the $R_0$
505: estimates made by various authors.
506:
507: Thus, for example, in the opinion of Avedisova (2005), the most
508: probable value of $R_0$ lies within the range from 7.5 to 8.2 kpc.
509: By analyzing the $R_0$ determinations by various authors,
510: Nikiforov (2004) showed that the currently best value of $R_0$ is
511: $7.9\pm0.2$ kpc. Using 270 OSCs, Chen and Zhu (2007) obtained an
512: estimate of $R_0=7.95\pm0.62$ kpc.
513:
514: Note that the Galactocentric distance $R_0=7.4\pm0.3$ kpc we found
515: provides more evidence for the short distance scale (Dambis et al.
516: 2001) than the IAU recommendations (1985), $R_0=8.5$ kpc.
517:
518: At the same time, as we see from Table. 1, $R_0$ depends
519: significantly on the sample age. Thus, for example, it is
520: $R_0=9.5\pm0.7$ kpc for clusters younger than 50 Myr. On the other
521: hand, a value of $R_0=7.1\pm0.6$ kpc, which is close to that found
522: from all 375 OSCs, was found from clusters younger than 50 Myr
523: that belong only to the Carina-Sagittarius and Perseus arms, but
524: not to the Orion arm (Table 2). Our separate study of the Orion
525: arm showed a significant difference almost in all kinematic
526: parameters (see Table 2).
527:
528: Clusters older than 50 Myr are distributed fairly uniformly in
529: space (Fig. 1b); the influence of the Galactic spiral structure
530: and the Local system of stars in their motions is minor. One would
531: think that they should be well suited to a reliable determination
532: of $R_0$, but we found $R_0=5.6\pm0.3$ kpc for them (the lower
533: part of Table 1). Based on a kinematic analysis of the OSC radial
534: velocities from various catalogs and, in particular, the catalog
535: by Piskunov et al. (2006), Nikiforov and Kazakevich (2006) point
536: out a great uncertainty in $R_0$. In particular, they found
537: $R_0=6\pm0.7$ kpc from a sample of old
538: ($\log t>8.8$) clusters, in good agreement with our result.
539:
540: Analysis of the motions of the stars nearest the Sun showed that
541: the vertex deviation for the youngest stars reaches $30^\circ$
542: (Dehnen and Binney 1998). Based on the clusters the results of
543: whose analysis are presented in Table 1, we found no significant
544: deviation from the direction $l_0=0^\circ$. This means that the
545: rotation of the Galactic disk is nearly axisymmetric on large
546: scales.
547:
548: \subsection*{The Galactic Rotation Curve}
549:
550: The parameters of the Galactic rotation curve that we found in
551: solution (8) at fixed $R_0=7.4$ kpc (which, in our case, is best
552: suited to a proper comparison) are in good agreement with
553: $\omega_0 =-27.5\pm1.4 $ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
554: $\omega'_0 = 4.54\pm0.24$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$,
555: $\omega''_0=-1.09\pm0.19$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$
556: determined from open clusters by Zabolotskikh et al. (2002) for
557: the short distance scale and for $R_0=7.5$ kpc. There is also good
558: agreement with the results of our analysis of distant OB stars
559: (Bobylev 2004):
560: $\omega_0 =-28.0 \pm 0.6$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
561: $\omega'_0 = 4.17\pm0.14$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$,
562: $\omega''_0= -0.81\pm0.12$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$
563: (for $R_0=7.1$ kpc).
564:
565: We found the parameter $\omega''_0$ to decrease in absolute value
566: with increasing sample radius. Far from the Sun, the Galactic
567: rotation curve constructed from our data (Fig. 3) disagrees with
568: the rotation curve constructed, for example, from the molecular
569: gas (Avedisova 2005), which is flat in a wide $R$ range, from 2
570: kpc to 15 kpc. Therefore, using a larger number of terms in the
571: expansion of $\omega_0$ in terms of $r/R_0$ is of considerable
572: interest in establishing the shape of the Galactic rotation curve
573: from OSCs far from the Sun.
574:
575: \subsection*{The Contraction Velocity}
576:
577: It is interesting to compare the contraction parameter
578: $K=-2.4\pm0.1$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ that we found from all
579: clusters with the results by Torra et al. (2000). Based on the
580: Ogorodnikov-Milne linear model, these authors found
581: $K=-2.0\pm0.4$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ for OB stars of all ages in the range of
582: distances 100--2000 pc and
583: $K=-5.1\pm1.5$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ for OB
584: stars with ages $t>60$ Myr in the range of distances 100--2000 pc.
585: Fern\'andez et al. (2001) and Bobylev et al. (2006b) showed that
586: including the spiral structure did not eliminate the $K$-effect.
587: Based on our results (Fig. 4), we can assume that the observed
588: contraction velocity reflects the filling rate of the interarm
589: space (Marochnik and Suchkov 1984), but a detailed study of this
590: effect is outside the scope of our paper.
591:
592: \subsection*{Kinematic Peculiarities of the Arms}
593:
594: In this paper, we applied no corrections for the influence of the
595: spiral structure to the observed velocities. However, the
596: influence of the spiral structure was studied in our previous
597: paper (Bobylev et al. 2006b), where we showed that it has a major
598: effect on the centroid velocity components relative to the Sun.
599: This can explain the significant difference in the components
600: $\Delta u_\odot\approx2$ km s$^{-1}$ and
601: $\Delta v_\odot\approx5$ km s$^{-1}$ found from
602: various arms.
603:
604: Analysis of the kinematic parameters for young clusters belonging
605: to the Orion arm indicates that such parameters as
606: $\omega_0=-31.7\pm0.6$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ and
607: $l_0 =-3\pm1^\circ$ differ significantly from the
608: Galactic rotation parameters found from all clusters. This shows
609: that the Orion arm has an additional rotation with an angular
610: velocity of $\approx5$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$ around a center that
611: may not be associated with the Galactic center.
612:
613:
614:
615:
616: \section*{CONCLUSIONS}
617:
618: We compiled a database on 375 OSCs from various present-day
619: catalogs and published sources. The clusters considered are
620: located with $<5$ kpc of the Sun. Their ages do not exceed 1 Gyr.
621:
622: The following Galactic rotation parameters were determined from
623: data on the field of velocities $V_r$, $V_l$, $V_b$ for these
624: OSCs:
625: $\omega_0 =-26.0\pm0.3 $ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
626: $\omega'_0 = 4.18\pm0.17$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$,
627: $\omega''_0=-0.45\pm0.06$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$,
628: the system contraction parameter
629: $K = -2.4\pm0.1$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$,
630: and the parameters of the center of rotation
631: $R_0=7.4\pm0.3$ kpc and $l_0=0^\circ$.
632:
633: In addition, we performed a kinematic analysis of various OSC
634: samples differing by heliocentric distance, age, and membership in
635: individual arms. The value of $R_0$ was found to depend on the
636: sample age. Thus, for example, it is $9.5\pm0.7$ kpc for clusters
637: younger than 50 Myr and $5.6\pm0.3$ kpc for clusters older than 50
638: Myr. Our study of the kinematics of young OSCs in various arms
639: showed that the derived kinematic parameters are similar to the
640: parameters obtained from the entire OSC sample for the
641: Carina-Sagittarius arms and differ significantly from them for the Orion
642: arm. The contraction effect was shown to be typical of star
643: clusters with various ages and to be most pronounced for clusters
644: with a mean age of $\approx100$ Myr; the linear contraction
645: velocity in this case is $Kr=-4.3\pm1.0$ km s$^{-1}$.
646:
647: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
648:
649: We wish to thank I.I. Nikiforov for a discussion of our results
650: and the referees for helpful remarks that contributed
651: significantly to an improvement of the paper. This work was
652: supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project
653: no. 05-02-17047).
654:
655: \section*{REFERENCES}
656:
657: {\small
658:
659: ~~~~~1. V.S. Avedisova, Astron. Zh. 82, 488 (2005) [Astron. Rep.
660: 49, 435 (2005)].
661:
662: 2. G.V. Beshenov and A.V. Loktin, Astron. Astrophys. Trans. 23,
663: 103 (2004).
664:
665: 3. V.V. Bobylev, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 30, 185 (2004) [Astron. Lett.
666: 30, 159 (2004)].
667:
668: 4. V.V. Bobylev, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 32, 906 (2006) [Astron. Lett.
669: 32, 816 (2006)].
670:
671: 5. V.V. Bobylev, G.A. Goncharov, and A.T. Bajkova, Astron. Zh. 83,
672: 821 (2006a) [Astron. Rep. 50, 733 (2006a)].
673:
674: 6. V.V. Bobylev, A.T. Bajkova, and G.A. Gontcharov, Astron.
675: Astrophys. Trans. 25, 143 (2006b).
676:
677: 7. V.V. Bobylev and A.T. Bajkova, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 33, 643
678: (2007) [Astron. Lett. 33, 571 (2007)].
679:
680: 8. J. Brand and L. Blitz, Astron. Astrophys. 275, 67 (1993).
681:
682: 9. M. Chen and Z. Zhu, Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 7, 120 (2007).
683:
684: 10. A.K. Dambis, A.M. Melnik, and A.S. Rastorguev, Pis'ma Astron.
685: Zh. 27, 68 (2001) [Astron. Lett. 27, 58 (2001)].
686:
687: 11. W. Dehnen and J.J. Binney, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 298, 387
688: (1998).
689:
690: 12. W.S. Dias and J. R.D. L\'epine, Astrophys. J. 629, 825 (2005).
691:
692: 13. W.S. Dias, B.S. Alessi, A. Moitinho, et al., Astron.
693: Astrophys. 389, 971 (2002).
694:
695: 14. F. Eisenhauer, R. Schodel, R. Genzel, et al., Astrophys. J.
696: 597, L121 (2003).
697:
698: 15. D. Fern\'andez, F. Figueras, and J. Torra, Astron. Astrophys.
699: 372, 833 (2001).
700:
701: 16. M. Fich, L. Blitz, and A.A. Stark, Astrophys. J. 342, 272
702: (1989).
703:
704: 17. T.P. Gerasimenko, Astron. Zh. 81, 124 (2004) [Astron. Rep. 48,
705: 103 (2004)].
706:
707: 18. The HIPPARCOS and Tycho Catalogues, ES ASP- 1200 (1997).
708:
709: 19. E. Hog, C. Fabricius, V.V. Makarov, et al., Astron. Astrophys.
710: 355, L27 (2000).
711:
712: 20. N.V. Kharchenko, Kinematika Fiz. Nebesnykh Tel 17, 409 (2001).
713:
714: 21. N.V. Kharchenko, A.E. Piskunov, S. R\"{o}ser, et al., Astron.
715: Astrophys. 438, 1163 (2005a).
716:
717: 22. N.V. Kharchenko, A.E. Piskunov, S. R\"{o}ser, et al., Astron.
718: Astrophys. 440, 403 (2005b).
719:
720: 23. A.V. Loktin and G.V. Beshenov, Astron. Zh. 80, 8 (2003)
721: [Astron. Rep. 47, 6 (2003)].
722:
723: 24. L.S. Marochnik and A.A. Suchkov, Galaxies (Fizmatgiz, Moscow,
724: 1984) [in Russian].
725:
726: 25. D.H. McNamara, J.B. Madsen, J. Barnes, et al., Publ. Astron.
727: Soc. Pacif. 112, 202 (2000).
728:
729: 26. A.M. Mel'nik, A.K. Dambis, and A.S. Rastorguev, Pis'ma Astron.
730: Zh. 27, 611 (2001) [Astron. Lett. 27, 521 (2001)].
731:
732: 27. M.R. Merrifield, Astron. J. 103, 1552 (1992).
733:
734: 28. Yu.N. Mishurov and I.A. Zenina, Astron. Astrophys. 341, 81
735: (1999).
736:
737: 29. Yu.N. Mishurov, I.A. Zenina, A.K. Dambis, et al., Astron.
738: Astrophys. 323, 775 (1997).
739:
740: 30. I.I. Nikiforov, Astron. Zh. 76, 403 (1999) [Astron. Rep. 43,
741: 345 (1999)].
742:
743: 31. I.I. Nikiforov, Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 316, 199 (2004).
744:
745: 32. I.I. Nikiforov and E.E. Kazakevich, Astron. Astrophys. Trans.
746: 25, 189 (2006).
747:
748: 33. K.F. Ogorodnikov, Dynamics of Stellar Systems (Fizmatgiz,
749: Moscow, 1958; Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).
750:
751: 34. A.E. Piskunov, N.V. Kharchenko, S. R\"{o}ser, et al., Astron.
752: Astrophys. 445, 545 (2006).
753:
754: 35. M.E. Popova and A.V. Loktin, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 31, 190
755: (2005a) [Astron. Lett. 31, 171 (2005a)].
756:
757: 36. M.E. Popova and A.V. Loktin, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 31, 743
758: (2005b) [Astron. Lett. 31, 663 (2005b)].
759:
760: 37. J. Torra, D. Fern\'andez, and F. Figueras, Astron. Astrophys.
761: 359, 82 (2000).
762:
763: 38. M.V. Zabolotskikh, A.S. Rastorguev, and A.K. Dambis, Pis'ma
764: Astron. Zh. 28, 516 (2002) [Astron. Lett. 28, 454 (2002)]. }
765:
766:
767: \bigskip
768: Translated by V. Astakhov
769:
770:
771: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
772: {
773: \begin{table}[t] %% table 1
774: \small
775: \caption[]{\small\baselineskip=1.0ex\protect
776: Kinematic parameters of Galactic rotation
777: }
778: \begin{center}
779: \begin{tabular}{|c|r|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
780: &&&&&&&\\
781: Sample
782: & $u_\odot, v_\odot, w_\odot$,
783: & $\omega_0$,
784: & $\omega'_0$,
785: & $\omega''_0$,
786: & $K$,
787: & $R_0$,
788: & $l_0$,\\
789: & km/s~~~ & km/s/kpc & km/s/kpc$^2$ & km/s/kpc$^3$ & km/s/kpc & kpc & deg. \\\hline
790: %%
791: $r<5$ & $ 9.5_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
792: kpc & $10.9_{(0.3)}$~~~ & $-26.7_{(0.4)}$ & $3.91_{(0.21)}$ & $-0.35_{(0.08)}$ & $-2.3_{(0.1)}$ & $8.0_{(0.4)}$ & $ 0_{(1)}$ \\
793: (N=375) & $ 9.1_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
794: $r<2.5$ & $ 9.2_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
795: kpc & $11.9_{(0.3)}$~~~ & $-27.2_{(0.5)}$ & $3.72_{(0.32)}$ & $-0.70_{(0.13)}$ & $-2.6_{(0.2)}$ & $8.5_{(0.7)}$ & $-2_{(1)}$ \\
796: (N=340) & $ 8.4_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
797: $t\leq50$ & $ 9.6_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
798: Myr & $11.7_{(0.4)}$~~~ & $-27.4_{(0.5)}$ & $3.21_{(0.25)}$ & $-0.14_{(0.07)}$ & $-1.4_{(0.2)}$ & $9.8_{(0.7)}$ & $ 0_{(1)}$ \\
799: (N=196) & $ 9.4_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline %%
800: $t>50$ & $ 9.7_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
801: Myr & $10.2_{(0.4)}$~~~ & $-25.3_{(0.9)}$ & $4.59_{(0.60)}$ & $-0.59_{(0.19)}$ & $-3.5_{(0.3)}$ & $6.7_{(0.8)}$ & $~0_{(1)}$ \\
802: (N=178) & $ 8.8_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
803: \hline %%
804: \hline %%
805: $r<5$ & $ 9.2_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
806: kpc & $10.7_{(0.2)}$~~~ & $-26.0_{(0.3)}$ & $4.18_{(0.17)}$ & $-0.45_{(0.06)}$ & $-2.4_{(0.1)}$ & $7.4_{(0.3)}$ & $ 0_{(1)}$ \\
807: (N=375) & $ 8.2_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
808: $r<2.5$ & $ 8.8_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
809: kpc & $12.0_{(0.2)}$~~~ & $-26.7_{(0.3)}$ & $3.45_{(0.26)}$ & $-0.69_{(0.11)}$ & $-2.4_{(0.1)}$ & $9.0_{(0.7)}$ & $-2_{(1)}$ \\
810: (N=340) & $ 8.0_{(0.1)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
811: $t\leq50$ & $ 9.2_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
812: Myr & $11.5_{(0.3)}$~~~ & $-26.7_{(0.4)}$ & $3.24_{(0.22)}$ & $-0.19_{(0.07)}$ & $-1.4_{(0.2)}$ & $9.5_{(0.7)}$ & $ 0_{(1)}$ \\
813: (N=196) & $ 8.6_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline %%
814: $t>50$ & $ 9.4_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
815: Myr & $10.0_{(0.2)}$~~~ & $-25.5_{(0.5)}$ & $5.57_{(0.37)}$ & $-0.89_{(0.15)}$ & $-3.5_{(0.2)}$ & $5.6_{(0.3)}$ & $-1_{(1)}$ \\
816: (N=178) & $ 7.8_{(0.2)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
817: \hline
818: \end{tabular}
819: \end{center}
820: \end{table}
821: }
822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
823: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
824: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
825: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
826: {
827: \begin{table}[t] %% table 2
828: \small
829: \caption[]{\small\baselineskip=1.0ex\protect
830: Kinematic parameters of young ($<50$ Myr) OSCs in the arms
831: }
832: \begin{center}
833: \begin{tabular}{|c|r|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
834: &&&&&&&\\
835: Arm
836: & $u_\odot, v_\odot, w_\odot$,
837: & $\omega_0$,
838: & $\omega'_0$,
839: & $\omega''_0$,
840: & $K$,
841: & $R_0$,
842: & $l_0$,\\
843: & km/s~~~ & km/s/kpc & km/s/kpc$^2$ & km/s/kpc$^3$ & km/s/kpc & kpc & deg. \\\hline
844: %
845: Car-Sag & $ 9.0_{(0.7)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
846: and Perseus & $ 9.6_{(1.4)}$~~~ & $-27.3_{(0.6)}$ & $4.04_{(0.41)}$ & $-0.37_{(0.16)}$ & $-1.8_{(0.4)}$ & $8.3_{(1.0)}$ & $~1_{(1)}$ \\
847: (N=92) & $ 9.5_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
848: Orion & $ 8.7_{(1.0)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
849: (N=93) & $14.2_{(0.4)}$~~~ & $-31.6_{(1.0)}$ & $4.46_{(0.84)}$ & $~0.23_{(0.38)}$ & $-0.5_{(0.6)}$ & $5.4_{(0.9)}$ & $-3_{(2)}$ \\
850: & $ 9.5_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
851: \hline\hline
852: Car-Sag & $ 6.5_{(0.5)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
853: and Perseus & $ 8.7_{(1.1)}$~~~ & $-25.8_{(0.5)}$ & $4.52_{(0.37)}$ & $-0.70_{(0.17)}$ & $-2.6_{(0.4)}$ & $7.1_{(0.6)}$ & $ 1_{(1)}$ \\
854: (N=92) & $ 9.1_{(0.4)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\\hline
855: Orion & $ 8.7_{(0.5)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
856: (N=93) & $14.0_{(0.4)}$~~~ & $-31.7_{(0.6)}$ & $5.14_{(0.65)}$ & $-0.20_{(0.34)}$ & $-0.5_{(0.4)}$ & $4.9_{(0.5)}$ & $-3_{(1)}$ \\
857: & $ 8.3_{(0.3)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
858: \hline\hline
859: Car-Sag & $ 6.5_{(0.6)}$~~~ & & & & & & \\
860: and Perseus & $ 8.7_{(1.0)}$~~~ & $-25.9_{(0.5)}$ & $4.55_{(0.38)}$ & $-0.69_{(0.17)}$ & $-2.6_{(0.4)}$ & $7.1_{(0.7)}$ & $ 1_{(1)}$ \\
861: (N=92) & --- ~~~~~ & & & & & & \\
862: \hline
863: \end{tabular}
864: \end{center}
865: \end{table}
866: }
867: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
868: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
870:
871:
872: \newpage
873: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.1:
874: \begin{figure}[t]
875: {
876: \begin{center}
877: \includegraphics[width=160mm]{f_1.eps}
878: \end{center}
879: } Fig. 1. Distribution of OSCs (a) younger than 50~Myr and (b)
880: older than 50~Myr in the Galactic $XY$ plane.
881: \end{figure}
882: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
883:
884: \newpage
885: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.2:
886: \begin{figure}[t]
887: {
888: \begin{center}
889: \includegraphics[width=110mm]{f_2.eps}
890: \end{center}
891: } Fig. 2. Mean errors $\sigma_{V_r}$ (1), $\sigma_{V_l}$ (3), and
892: $\sigma_{V_b}$ (2) versus heliocentric distance.
893: \end{figure}
894: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.3:
895: \begin{figure}[t]
896: {
897: \begin{center}
898: \includegraphics[width=120mm]{f_3.eps}
899: \end{center}
900: } Fig. 3. Galactic rotation curve from clusters within 2.5 kpc (1)
901: and 5 kpc (2) of the Sun. The thin lines mark the boundaries of
902: the 1$\sigma$ confidence intervals; the vertical line indicates
903: the position of $R_0=7.4$ kpc.
904: \end{figure}
905: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
906:
907: \newpage
908: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIG.4:
909: \begin{figure}[t]
910: {
911: \begin{center}
912: \includegraphics[width=160mm]{f_4.eps}
913: \end{center}
914: } Fig. 4. Linear contraction velocity versus (a) heliocentric
915: distance and (b) mean sample age.
916: \end{figure}
917: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
918:
919:
920:
921:
922: \end{document}
923: