1: %\documentclass[12pt,referee]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
4: \usepackage{epsf}
5:
6: %======================================================================
7: % author's own macros
8: %======================================================================
9:
10: \newcommand{\sect}[1]{\S\,\ref{#1}}
11: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{displaymath}}
12: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{displaymath}}
13: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
15: \newcommand\msol{M_{\odot}}
16: \newcommand\cc{$^{12}$C/$^{13}$C}
17: %======================================================================
18:
19: %\received{}
20: %\accepted{}
21: %\journalid{}{}
22: %\articleid{}{}
23:
24: %\slugcomment{Astrophysical Journal, submitted}
25:
26: \shortauthors{Denissenkov \& Pinsonneault}
27: \shorttitle{The impact of carbon enhancement on extra mixing}
28:
29: %\received{2003 April 3}
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{THE IMPACT OF CARBON ENHANCEMENT ON EXTRA MIXING IN METAL-POOR STARS}
33:
34: \author{Pavel A. Denissenkov\altaffilmark{1,2}, and Marc Pinsonneault\altaffilmark{1}}
35: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 4055 McPherson Laboratory,
36: 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210; dpa@astronomy.ohio-state.edu, pinsono@astronomy.ohio-state.edu.}
37: \altaffiltext{2}{On leave from Sobolev Astronomical Institute of St. Petersburg State University,
38: Universitetsky Pr. 28, Petrodvorets, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia.}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: We critically examine the constraints imposed by carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars on the
42: mixing mechanisms that operate in red giants. CEMP stars are created when the surface layers of a metal-poor dwarf are
43: enriched with He-burning products via mass transfer from an evolved donor. The difference between
44: main sequence (MS) and red giant CEMP abundances can be used as a diagnostic of the timescale
45: for the mixing of the processed material into stellar interiors on the MS. Abundance trends
46: with luminosity among red giant CEMP stars test theories of canonical extra mixing for low mass giants with
47: a high bulk metallicity. We find a significant dilution in CN enrichment in giant CEMP stars relative to their MS
48: precursors, and take this as evidence that thermohaline mixing induced by mean molecular weight inversions is
49: ineffective in CEMP stars. This contradicts models that rely on efficient thermohaline mixing induced by small $\mu$
50: gradients in red giants, because such models would predict that MS CEMP stars with large $\mu$ inversions
51: would be homogenized on a very short timescale. The data do not rule out slower MS
52: thermohaline mixing comparable to previously published estimates. We also find that canonical extra mixing is strongly
53: suppressed in CEMP giants relative to stars with the same iron abundance. A likely cause is the shift in the location
54: of non-equilibrium CN processing relative to the steep $\mu$ gradient in the hydrogen burning shell, which also occurs in
55: solar metallicity RGB stars. Implications for the mass accreted by CEMP stars and the mechanism for canonical extra mixing are discussed.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{stars: abundances --- stars: evolution --- stars: interiors}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61: \label{sec:intro}
62:
63: It has long been known that asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars can have their surfaces enriched in helium, carbon and slow neutron capture products, and such stars are known
64: nucleosynthetic sources (e.g., \citealt{h05}). If there is a nearby main sequence (MS) companion, mass transfer from the giant can produce surface abundance anomalies that persist even after
65: the AGB star is gone. Such a system would appear to be a chemically peculiar MS star. In recent years there have been large-scale surveys
66: for metal-poor stars that have included substantial spectroscopic follow-up campaigns, such as the Hamburg/ESO R-process Enhanced Star Survey (HERES: Christlieb et
67: al. 2004).
68: A large population of carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars has been discovered (e.g., \citealt{bch05,lea06}),
69: and a majority of the CEMP stars have white dwarf companions (\citealt{lea05}). This is strong evidence that there is a significant population of
70: low mass metal-poor stars which have experienced mass transfer from a former AGB companion. Much of
71: the interest in these stars has been driven by chemical evolution studies (e.g., \citealt{fea05,t07}).
72: However, we wish to emphasize another important property of CEMP stars: they
73: are unique astrophysical laboratories that can be used to test theories of mixing in low mass stars. A comparison of MS and evolved CEMP stars can test
74: the timescale for mixing on the MS, and abundance trends within evolved stars can be used
75: to test mixing on the red giant branch (RGB). In this paper we demonstrate that
76: CEMP stars are not fully homogenized on the MS and that they do not experience the same RGB mixing pattern as other stars with the same iron abundance, and
77: explore the theoretical explanations and consequences of both results.
78:
79: There are sound theoretical reasons to expect internal mixing in stars that accrete mass from an evolved companion. Metal-poor turnoff stars have thin
80: surface convection zones, and as a result their surface abundances after mass transfer will
81: reflect the composition of the accreted material. The He and C rich ejecta of an evolved AGB star has a higher mean molecular weight $\mu$ than a normal stellar envelope. Although the strong density gradients in a star prevent a classical Rayleigh-Taylor instability when such ejecta is accreted, Stancliffe et al. (2007) pointed out that this structure is unstable against thermohaline
82: convection\footnote{Thermohaline convection is driven by a density difference between a fluid element and its surrounding medium,
83: provided that the latter has a higher mean molecular weight and the heat exchange keeps a temperature difference sufficiently small.}.
84: The precise timescale, however, depends critically on assumptions about the fluid geometry. Under the assumption of a simple spherical geometry (following \citealt{kea80}), Stancliffe et al. derived a
85: characteristic timescale of order 1 Gyr for homogenizing a CEMP star. In this theoretical model the surface abundances are diluted through 90\% of the mass of the star within this timescale for
86: typical companion masses and ages, with only the nuclear processed core escaping full mixing. As supporting evidence the authors cite both the
87: absence of extremely high ([C/Fe]\footnote{We use the standard spectroscopic notation: [A/B]\,=\,$\log\,(N({\rm
88: A})/N({\rm B}))-\log\,(N({\rm A})/N({\rm B}))_\odot$, where $N({\rm A})$ and
89: $N({\rm B})$ are number densities of the nuclides A and B.}\,$ > 2.5$) enrichment in MS stars and the apparent lack of a difference between MS and RGB surface abundances.
90:
91: There has also been considerable interest in thermohaline mixing as an explanation for deep mixing in the envelopes of red giants.
92: There is clear evidence that ordinary low-mass giants experience {\it in situ} mixing of CN-processed
93: material as they become more luminous (e.g., \citealt{grea00,sm03}).
94: Because of its universality, \cite{dv03} proposed to call it canonical extra mixing.
95: Rotational mixing has long been a popular explanation (e.g., \citealt{sm79,chea98,dt00,dv03,dea06}),
96: but viable models have proven to be difficult to construct (\citealt{chea05,pea06}).
97: Attention has therefore recently shifted towards other physical mechanisms.
98:
99: When performing hydrodynamic simulations using the 3D stellar evolution code {\tt Djehuty}, \cite{eea06}
100: found unexpected convective-like motions in the radiative envelope of an upper RGB model.
101: They attributed this to a Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI) driven by a mild ($\Delta\mu/\mu\approx -10^{-4}$)
102: $\mu$ inversion generated by $^3$He burning. $^3$He is produced by non-equilibrium pp burning on
103: the MS and dredged up on the lower RGB. On the upper RGB material enriched in $^3$He falls onto
104: the hydrogen burning shell and the $^3$He($^3$He,\,2p)$^4$He reaction lowers $\mu$, while equilibrium
105: H burning raises $\mu$ in still deeper layers; the net effect is a well-defined local minimum above the hydrogen burning shell.
106:
107: We note that the RTI would not be expected in compressible, and hence stratified, stellar material.
108: Instead, thermohaline convection (for the same reasons as in the CEMP case) would be a natural consequence.
109: This phenomenon would be an attractive candidate to drive canonical extra mixing if it could provide
110: mixing depths and rates consistent with their empirically constrained values.
111: However, \cite{chz07} as well as \cite{dp07} have demonstrated that the $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection will be fast enough
112: to explain the RGB mixing patterns only if fluid elements have finger-like structures with a length to diameter
113: ratio $l/d\ga 10$. This produces a much shorter mixing timescale than proposed by Kippenhahn et al. (1980).
114:
115: If canonical extra mixing is to be explained by thermohaline convection, the inferred mixing timescale
116: in MS CEMP stars should be extremely short (of order 1\,--\,10 Myr). If CEMP stars are fully mixed after
117: a mass transfer episode, this implies that there will be no dilution of the abundance anomalies during the classical first dredge-up (FDU). By contrast, if mixing is
118: inefficient on the MS one might expect that large abundance anomalies confined to the outer layers will be diluted
119: when the star goes to the RGB and develops a deep
120: surface convection zone. We therefore propose to use the relative abundances in MS and RGB CEMP stars as a diagnostic of the mixing timescale on the MS,
121: and by extension as a test of the timescale for thermohaline convection in a very favorable environment.
122:
123: Canonical extra mixing might also be expected to set in for CEMP stars when they reach the upper RGB, and a distinctive manifestation
124: of canonical extra mixing at low metallicities is a decline of [C/Fe] with increased luminosity (e.g. Smith \& Martel 2003).
125: There have been published claims (\citealt{lea06,aea07})
126: that the abundances of CEMP stars decline with increased luminosity. However, these studies did not separate out the MS/RGB transition (which tests the
127: depth of accreted material) from the RGB trends. We therefore both examine the data for trends with luminosity and compare to theoretical expectations for empirical
128: models based on normal metal-poor giant data.
129: Again, in addition to the direct implications our test can be used to study the metallicity dependence of RGB mixing.
130: It is known that solar-abundance open-cluster RGB stars have weaker extra mixing than globular-cluster giants
131: (e.g., \citealt{chea05}). However, the open-cluster giants are both more metal-rich and more massive; both properties
132: could influence the mixing pattern. CEMP stars permit a direct comparison of low-mass stars with different metal abundances.
133:
134: \section{Observational Data}
135:
136: Ideally, our goal would be to select a sample of binary mass transfer systems where we can
137: look for abundance trends both between MS and RGB stars and with luminosity on the RGB.
138: There are now large samples of CEMP stars, but there are obvious potential biases associated
139: with examining abundance patterns in samples defined by abundance measurements. As a result,
140: some discussion of the selection of the observational sample is essential.
141:
142: One important clue is that the amount of carbon in CEMP stars is very high relative to halo non-C-enhanced stars. This is
143: most heavily seen in the anti-correlation between [C/Fe] and [Fe/H] (Fig.~3 in \citealt{aea07}).
144: This is the pattern that one would expect
145: if mass transfer from an evolved companion gave the recipient star so much C that the initial inventory was
146: negligible. However, especially at the iron-poor end, some chemical evolution models might be able to produce
147: exotic abundance patterns for the primordial composition (e.g., \citealt{rea05,fea05,kea07}). Fortunately, the binary mass transfer model makes other
148: predictions: there should still be a white dwarf companion and there should be associated s-process anomalies.
149: A majority of CEMP stars exhibit radial velocity variations consistent with a white dwarf companion; the observed
150: fraction of 68\% is consistent with all CEMP stars being in binaries (Lucatello et al. 2005). Extensive surveys
151: have also shown s-process enrichment (e.g., \citealt{bea05,aea07}).
152:
153: We have therefore used two samples of CEMP stars: a smaller sample from \cite{aea07} in which
154: only stars with s-process enhancement ([Ba/Fe]\,$> +0.5$) were included, and a larger one (\citealt{lea06}) where
155: the standard definition ([C/Fe]\,$ > 1$) to distinguish between CEMP and normal field halo stars was used.
156: Lucatello et al.'s sample is in fact a subsample of stars from the HERES survey (\citealt{bea05}) that were re-analyzed.
157: We did not use the stars with [C/Fe]\,$> 1$ from Barklem et al.'s original paper.
158: The automated procedure used in that paper to infer $T_{\rm eff}$ values from colors became unreliable
159: for CEMP stars with strong CH, C$_2$, and CN molecular bands (Lucatello, 2007, private communication).
160: The luminosities were inferred from the surface gravity and $T_{\rm eff}$ with an assumed mass of $M=0.8$\,--\,$0.85\,M_\odot$.
161: The values of $\log\,L/L_\odot \la 0.8$ and $\log\,L/L_\odot \ga 1.4$ were defined as the divisions between unevolved MS and subgiant stars that have not
162: experienced the FDU yet and evolved RGB stars in which the FDU has already ended.
163: We have found that 10 out of 14 unevolved stars in the second sample have [Ba/Fe]\,$> +1$ according to Barklem et al.'s data, which is a distinctive feature of
164: accretion of AGB material.
165:
166: Under the binary mass transfer hypothesis the initial carbon inventory is dwarfed by the transferred carbon, so the physical
167: quantities of interest are [C/H] and [N/H] rather than [C/Fe] and [N/Fe]. As a result, we work in the former plane. There is a striking
168: difference in carbon as a function of luminosity between CEMP and normal halo stars (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}, blue open and black filled
169: circles, respectively), with canonical extra mixing being
170: clearly seen in the non-C-enhanced stars above $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 2.2$
171: but not in the CEMP stars. The black curve reproduces the evolutionary decline of [C/H] in the non-C-enhanced stars by
172: our stellar models with canonical extra mixing (for details, see next section).
173: The red curve is a model constructed under the assumption that neither the MS thermohaline
174: convection nor RGB extra mixing have taken place. The only mixing event experienced by this model is
175: the standard FDU. It seems to adequately describe the [C/H] abundances in the CEMP stars.
176:
177: We compare the trends in our small and large CEMP samples in Fig.~\ref{fig:f2},
178: and find that they are very similar. In fact, the [C/H] abundances in the two samples have the same linear fit (\citealt{lea06,aea07}).
179: We also note that there is a small, but real, difference between the MS and RGB abundances.
180: To be more precise, \cite{lea06} have obtained very similar slopes $-0.18\pm 0.05$, $-0.21\pm 0.05$, and $-0.19\pm 0.04$
181: for [C/H], [N/H], and [(C+N)/H], respectively.
182: We argue that this is evidence for dilution of enriched material in the MS stars by the classical FDU in the RGB stars.
183: Both effects are quantified below.
184:
185: \section{Reduced Efficiency of Canonical Extra Mixing in RGB CEMP Stars}
186:
187: In this section, we show that the efficiency of canonical extra mixing in CEMP stars is strongly reduced.
188: This is most likely due to shallower mixing which does not penetrate deep enough to dredge up
189: carbon-deficient material. The most plausible interpretation of the shallower mixing depth is that it
190: is limited by a steeper $\mu$-gradient built up by H burning on the abundant $^{12}$C nuclei.
191: \cite{dea06} came to a similar conclusion for solar-metallicity
192: red giants. Given that RGB mixing is inefficient in CEMP stars, we can use the C and N abundance
193: distributions for unevolved (the MS and subgiant branch) and evolved (upper RGB) CEMP stars
194: to test the FDU and draw conclusions about the efficiency of thermohaline convection in MS CEMP stars.
195: This will be done in the next section.
196:
197: The slope of [C/H] as a function of $\log\,L/L_\odot$ produced by canonical extra mixing
198: depends on the mixing depth and diffusion coefficient $D_{\rm mix}$.
199: We model canonical extra mixing by setting
200: $D_{\rm mix}$ equal to a fixed fraction of the thermal diffusivity $K$.
201: This parameterization takes into account that
202: large-scale mixing instabilities in a stably stratified radiative zone may only develop
203: on a timescale longer than the thermal one, in which case one would expect $D_{\rm mix} < K$.
204: The known examples of such instabilities that have been proposed as possible driving mechanisms
205: for canonical extra mixing are rotational shear instability (\citealt{dt00,dv03,dea06})
206: and thermohaline convection (\citealt{chz07,dp07}). In the latter case,
207: the diffusion coefficient can be estimated using the following heuristic expression:
208: \bea
209: D_{\rm mix} \approx \left(\frac{l}{d}\right)^2\frac{|\nabla_\mu|}{\nabla_{\rm ad}-\nabla_{\rm rad}}K,
210: \label{eq:dmix}
211: \eea
212: where $\nabla_\mu$, $\nabla_{\rm ad}$, and $\nabla_{\rm rad}$ are the $\mu$- and temperature (adiabatic and radiative) gradients
213: (logarithmic and with respect to pressure). Equation (\ref{eq:dmix}) adequately represents
214: both the diffusion coefficient for thermohaline convection derived by \cite{kea80}
215: \bea
216: D_{\rm Kipp} = \frac{3K}{\nabla_{\rm ad}-\nabla_{\rm rad}}\,|\nabla_\mu|,
217: \label{eq:dkipp}
218: \eea
219: who argued that the length (or, the mean free path) $l$ of a convective element
220: should be of the order of its diameter $d$, and the rate of mixing by elongated narrow ``fingers'' ($l>d$)
221: advocated by \cite{u72}
222: \bea
223: D_{\rm Ulrich} = \frac{8}{3}\pi^2\,\frac{K}{\nabla_{\rm ad}-\nabla_{\rm rad}}\,|\nabla_\mu|\left(\frac{l}{d}\right)^2.
224: \label{eq:dulrich}
225: \eea
226:
227: Unfortunately, the ratio $l/d$ cannot be estimated from first principles. Semi-empirical models
228: require $l/d > 10$ to generate sufficient mixing to explain the data (\citealt{chz07,dp07}). The maximum depth of the $^3$He-driven thermohaline
229: convection is uncertain also. The naive assumption that it coincides with
230: the location of the minimum on the $\mu$-profile produces mixing that is too shallow (\citealt{dp07}).
231: Therefore, we have chosen to specify the mixing depth $r_{\rm mix}$ in units of $R_\odot$ and adjust it appropriately.
232: This choice is motivated by our finding that the $\mu (r)$ does not change much with time.
233: In the absence of any information on how the mixing depth should vary
234: with time, keeping $r_{\rm mix}$ constant is a reasonable parameterization.
235:
236: To allow an interpolation in the abundances of He and C as the AGB material gets redistributed
237: inside an accreting star by convection and extra mixing we have modified our stellar evolution code
238: (\citealt{dea06}) to include the 2005 version of the OPAL equation of state
239: (\citealt{rea96})\footnote{The update is at {\tt http://www-phys.llnl.gov/Research/OPAL/EOS\_2005/}.}.
240: Taking into account that the average metallicity of the non-C-enhanced stars from the spectroscopic study of \cite{bea05}
241: is $\langle [\mbox{Fe}/\mbox{H}]\rangle\approx -2.7$,
242: we have represented them with a stellar model having the heavy-element mass fraction $Z = 4\times 10^{-5}$.
243: For the initial helium mass fraction, stellar mass, and mixing length parameter we have used the values $Y=0.24$, $M = 0.85\,M_\odot$, and
244: $\alpha_{\rm MLT} = 1.58$, respectively.
245:
246: We begin with the normal halo star sample, and we use them to constrain our model of canonical extra mixing.
247: The sharp decline of [C/H] at $\log\,L/L_\odot\ga 2.2$ in the non-C-enhanced very metal-poor (VMP) stars
248: (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}) has been reproduced by us with
249: $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$ and $D_{\rm mix} = 0.1\,K$. The chosen depth is shown with the vertical black
250: line in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}A. It guarantees that
251: material deficient in C is dredged up to the bottom of convective envelope, as indicated by observations.
252: A similar result can be obtained for a slightly smaller $r_{\rm mix}$
253: with an appropriately reduced value of $D_{\rm mix}$, e.g. for
254: $r_{\rm mix} = 0.045\,R_\odot$ and $D_{\rm mix} = 0.04\,K$. At the adjusted mixing depths
255: $T(r_{\rm mix})$ is lower than the temperature at the base of the H shell
256: by $\Delta\log T\approx 0.24$ and 0.19,
257: respectively, which agrees very well with the estimates obtained by \cite{dv03} based on globular-cluster data.
258:
259: Our results for the CEMP stars are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}.
260: The short-dashed red and solid blue curves have been computed for a stellar model with $Y=0.24$ and $Z=10^{-4}$
261: (the CEMP stars have $\langle[\mbox{Fe}/\mbox{H}]\rangle\approx -2.1$)
262: whose initial mass and CN abundances were $M = 0.7\,M_\odot$, [C/Fe]\,$= +0.3$, and [N/Fe]\,$= -0.5$.
263: Following \cite{sea07}, we have assumed that
264: at the age of 0.86 Gyr the star began accreting material with the rate
265: $10^{-6}\,M_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$ from its AGB binary companion. The total mass accreted and
266: its He and CN abundances were chosen to be $M_{\rm accr} = 0.15\,M_\odot$, $Y=0.34$, [C/Fe]$_{\rm accr} = +2.1$,
267: and [N/Fe]$_{\rm accr} = +1.6$.
268:
269: Canonical extra mixing in our CEMP model has been modeled using the same
270: mixing parameters that we have adjusted for the non-C-enhanced VMP stars.
271: Comparing the [C/H] data at $\log\,L/L_\odot\ga 2.4$ with the short-dashed red and solid blue curves in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}A,
272: we infer that the efficiency of canonical extra mixing appears to be strongly reduced in the CEMP stars
273: compared to their non-C-enhanced VMP counterparts.
274:
275: The reduced efficiency of canonical extra mixing in the CEMP stars becomes even more evident when we consider
276: their [N/H] values as a function of luminosity (Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}B).
277: CN processing for a high initial carbon should result in a sharp increase of [N/H] on the upper RGB (the short-dashed red and solid blue curves
278: at $\log\,L/L_\odot\ga 2.4$). Contrary to this, the observed trend of [N/H], as well as those of [C/H] and
279: the sum [(C+N)/H], with luminosity were characterized by \cite{lea06} as gradual declines (long-dashed black lines
280: in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}). They have ascribed them to a dilution ``by mixing with a much larger
281: H content''. We concur in part, and interpret the decline from the MS to the RGB as being a dilution effect
282: produced by the FDU alone. However, we also believe that representing this dilution as a continuing
283: process occurring on the RGB is not supported. The FDU is effectively complete at $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 1.4$.
284: At $1.4\la\log\,L/L_\odot\la 1.8$ the convective envelope mass is still increasing, but only by another 3\,--\,4\%.
285: So, no noticeable changes of the surface chemical composition due to the FDU dilution would be expected above
286: $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 1.4$, and we contend that no trend is seen.
287:
288: Canonical extra mixing begins to operate only at $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 2.4$ but it must {\em increase} the surface N abundance,
289: as it really does in non-C-enhanced VMP stars (the open blue circles in Fig.~\ref{fig:f5}), and not
290: {\em decrease} it. Hence, a dilution of the accreted He-, C-, and N-rich material can only occur
291: either on the MS, as a result of thermohaline convection, or on the lower RGB at $0.8\la\log\,L/L_\odot\la 1.4$,
292: as a result of the FDU. We will return to this problem in the next section. Here, we have to conclude
293: that, as revealed by the non-increase of [N/H] in the upper RGB CEMP stars,
294: canonical extra mixing does not manifest itself in them. This conclusion agrees with the different
295: behavior of [C/H] at high luminosities in the CEMP and non-C-enhanced VMP stars (Fig.~\ref{fig:f1}).
296:
297: Interestingly, there is another group of stars in which canonical extra mixing is observed to have a low efficiency.
298: These are low-mass RGB stars of nearly solar metallicity. Only modest depletions of
299: the carbon isotopic ratio ($^{12}$C/$^{13}\mbox{C}\approx 10$\,--\,15)
300: are reported in them, while the variations of [C/H] and [N/H] are close to
301: their FDU limits (e.g., \citealt{gb91,oea06}). This contrasts with metal-poor red giants in which canonical extra mixing often reduces
302: the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio down to its equilibrium value $\sim$\,4, which is accompanied by the well-marked evolutionary decline
303: of [C/H]. \cite{chea98} have shown that such dependence of the efficiency of canonical extra mixing
304: on metallicity is expected if the mixing cannot penetrate below some universal
305: critical $\mu$-gradient $(\nabla_\mu)_{\rm crit}$. Recently, \cite{dea06} have
306: proposed that the shallower mixing in the solar-metallicity red giants is caused by
307: a contribution to the $\mu$-gradient from the H depletion that accompanies
308: the C to N transformation. This contribution increases with the metallicity because $N(\mbox{C})\propto Z$.
309: At a metallicity close to the solar one, the H burning on the $^{12}$C nuclei builds up an additional hump in
310: the $\mu$-gradient profile that prevents mixing from approaching the H-burning shell as close as in metal-poor giants.
311: If this interpretation is correct then the reduced efficiency of canonical extra mixing in
312: RGB CEMP stars is almost definitely caused by their much higher C abundances compared
313: to their non-C-enhanced counterparts.
314:
315: To test this hypothesis, we confront the CN-abundance and $\nabla_\mu$ profiles in the vicinity of
316: the H-burning shell in our two upper RGB models in which the H shell has just erased the discontinuity
317: in the H-abundance profile left behind by the bottom of convective envelope at the end of the FDU
318: (it is not until this moment when canonical extra mixing begins to manifest itself). The first model represents the non-C-enhanced VMP stars:
319: it has $M=0.85\,M_\odot$, $Z=4\times 10^{-5}$, [C/Fe]\,=\,$+0.3$, and [N/Fe]\,=\,$-0.5$ (panels A and C in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}).
320: The second had the initial mass $M=0.7\,M_\odot$ and abundances $Z=10^{-4}$, [C/Fe]\,=\,$+0.3$, and [N/Fe]\,=\,$-0.5$ but it
321: had accreted $0.15\,M_\odot$ of material with [C/Fe]\,=\,$+2.1$ and [N/Fe]\,=\,$+1.6$ (panels B and D in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4}).
322: The vertical line crossing panels A and C shows the mixing depth $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05$ that has been used to model
323: the evolutionary decline of [C/H] in the non-C-enhanced VMP stars.
324: The horizontal line crossing panels C and D reads the value of $(\nabla_\mu)_{\rm crit}\approx 3.6\times 10^{-5}$ corresponding
325: to this mixing depth. When applied to the C-enhanced model this $(\nabla_\mu)_{\rm crit}$
326: determines a shallower mixing depth ($r_{\rm mix}\approx 0.061$, panels B and D) with which extra mixing
327: will only be able to diminish the surface $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio without changing [C/H] and [N/H]
328: (panel B). For comparison, dotted curves in panels B and D show the C-abundance and $\nabla_\mu$ profiles
329: in a solar-metallicity $1\,M_\odot$ RGB model. It is seen that in terms of the depth of canonical extra mixing the CEMP
330: model is equivalent to the solar-metallicity model. Hence, it is most likely the mixing depth that is affected by
331: the variation of the star's C content in the first place.
332:
333: For our CEMP model we have intentionally chosen the large positive value of [N/Fe]$_{\rm accr}$ because
334: it resembles the observed N abundance anomaly in unevolved CEMP stars.
335: It is thought that $^{12}$C dredged-up from the He-burning shell in AGB stars
336: might have partially been converted into N in the hot-bottom burning (in more massive
337: AGB stars) or by extra mixing similar to the canonical one (\citealt{nbw03,mea06,sea06,jea07}).
338: To illustrate this point, we have reproduced in a slightly modified form Fig.~4 from the paper of \cite{sea06} in our Fig.~\ref{fig:f5}.
339: For non-C-enhanced VMP stars, we have used the data obtained by \cite{sea05} (the filled and open blue circles denote
340: {\it unmixed} and {\it mixed} RGB stars in their terminology). For CEMP stars, we have used the data compiled by
341: \cite{sea06} (the filled and open red squares represent stars with $\log\,g > 3.5$ and $\log\,g < 3.5$, respectively).
342: We have also plotted the C and N average abundances returned to the ISM by metal-poor AGB stars, as predicted by \cite{h04} (the magenta
343: asterisks with numbers below them giving the AGB model's mass).
344: The black curve in Fig.~\ref{fig:f5} shows changes of the surface C and N abundances
345: in an RGB model with $M=0.83\,M_\odot$ and $Z=0.0001$ produced by canonical extra mixing with the depth $r_{\rm mix} = 0.045\,R_\odot$ and
346: rate $D_{\rm mix} = 0.04\,K$. It is important to note that open blue circles ({\it mixed} stars) are located on
347: the upper RGB (\citealt{sea05}). This observational fact and a comparison of our black curve with the blue data points
348: support the conclusion made by \cite{sea05} that they had revealed the abundance patterns produced by canonical extra mixing in VMP stars.
349:
350: It is interesting that most of the CEMP stars in Fig.~\ref{fig:f5} fill the gap between the C and N abundance yields predicted for the low-
351: and intermediate-mass AGB stars. The latter are well separated from the former because in the intermediate-mass AGB models
352: C is efficiently transformed into N at the bottoms of their convective envelopes (the hot-bottom burning).
353: The mysterious location of the CEMP stars in the gap probably indicates that in their low-mass AGB donors
354: C was also transported down to a high-temperature region where it was partially transformed into N.
355: The rather low carbon isotopic ratios ($^{12}$C/$^{13}$C\,$< 40$) in low-luminosity s-element-rich CEMP stars
356: (\citealt{rea05}) support this hypothesis because without such extra mixing the low-mass AGB stars
357: would produce $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C\,$> 1000$ (\citealt{h04}).
358:
359: \section{Low Efficiency of Thermohaline Convection in MS CEMP Stars}
360:
361: In the previous section, we have presented observational and theoretical arguments for
362: the shallower depth of canonical extra mixing in RGB CEMP stars. The depth seems to be shallow enough
363: for extra mixing to leave the post-FDU C and N abundances unchanged.
364: As we noted, the FDU starts at $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 0.8$
365: and it effectively ends at $\log\,L/L_\odot\approx 1.4$
366: (the short-dashed red and solid blue curves in Fig.~\ref{fig:f3}). Hence, we
367: can compare the C and N abundance distributions for the CEMP stars with $\log\,L/L_\odot < 0.8$ and
368: for those of them with $\log\,L/L_\odot > 1.4$ to estimate the degree of dilution of the CN-rich material
369: by the FDU. These are plotted in panels A, B (for our larger sample), and C (for the smaller sample) in Fig.~\ref{fig:f6}. We see that the distributions for the stars
370: that have not experienced the FDU yet (shaded histograms) are shifted toward higher abundances
371: with respect to the distributions for the stars in which the FDU has already ended (thick solid histograms). This holds true for
372: both the C (panels A, C) and N (panel B) abundance.
373: There is a difference in the mean too, but it is not statistically significant because of the large star-to-star
374: scatter. However, there is a clearly defined median, and we employ a median based test.
375: We interpret the abundance distribution shifts as a signature of
376: the FDU dilution. The amplitude of the shift depends on both the average accreted mass $\langle M_{\rm accr}\rangle$ and the maximum mass of
377: convective envelope attained during the FDU $M_{\rm CE}^{\rm max}\approx 0.5\,M_\odot$.
378: To estimate their ratio, and hence $\langle M_{\rm accr}\rangle$, we shifted the shaded histograms to the left
379: by small steps in [X/H], where X stands for C and N (the shifts were applied to each star in the group), and we calculated
380: the Kolmogorov-Smirnov probability $P_{\rm KS}$ that the shifted shaded and thick solid histograms did not
381: differ from one another after each step. Results of this statistical test are plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:f6}D.
382: They show that the same shift $\Delta$[X/H]\,$\approx -0.4$ leads to the maximum and quite large values of $P_{\rm KS}$ for
383: both C and N. Neglecting the initial CN abundances, as compared to their accreted and post-FDU values,
384: we estimate $\langle M_{\rm accr}\rangle\approx 10^{\Delta [{\rm X}/{\rm H}]}\,M_{\rm CE}^{\rm max}\approx 0.2\,M_\odot$.
385:
386: The fact that the pre-FDU and post-FDU C and N abundance distributions are surprisingly well separated implies
387: a low efficiency of thermohaline convection in MS CEMP stars, which has immediate implications for RGB mixing.
388: In Fig.~\ref{fig:f7}, we illustrate the $\mu$-profiles in our MS (red curve) and
389: upper RGB (blue curve) CEMP models. On the scale of the MS inversion $(\Delta\mu/\mu)_{\rm MS}\sim 0.1$ the tiny RGB depression
390: $(\Delta\mu/\mu)_{\rm RGB}\sim 10^{-4}$ at $r\approx 0.067\,R_\odot$ can hardly be seen. When comparing these profiles,
391: one should keep in mind that the efficiency of thermohaline convection is also proportional to the thermal diffusivity $K$ (equation \ref{eq:dmix}).
392: In the MS model, $K$ is three to four orders of magnitude lower than in the radiative zone of
393: the RGB model. As a result, the MS thermohaline diffusion coefficient can be less than 10\% of $D_{\rm mix}$ in the RGB model.
394: However, this rate is still fast enough to mix the MS CEMP star on a timescale shorter than 10 Myr, i.e. almost
395: instantaneously compared to the star's MS lifetime. The evidence that this does not happen casts doubt on
396: thermohaline convection as the mechanism for canonical extra mixing.
397:
398: \section{Conclusion}
399:
400: In this paper, we have put forward the hypothesis that the anomalously high C abundances in
401: the material accreted by MS CEMP stars
402: result in shallower depths of canonical extra mixing in these stars during their subsequent RGB evolution.
403: The shallower mixing depths are limited by steeper $\mu$-gradients produced by the H burning on abundant $^{12}$C nuclei.
404: A similar phenomenon occurs in open cluster RGB stars, which are of comparable total metal abundance.
405: Until now, it was not clear whether the reduced efficiency of mixing in open cluster giants was caused by their higher metallicity
406: or their higher mass relative to globular cluster giants. We now see the same trend in low mass CEMP giants, and can therefore
407: conclude that metallicity is the primary determinant of the depth of mixing. Mixing would still be expected in the outer envelopes of
408: these giants, and could impact other diagnostics, such as the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio. Observational data on abundance trends
409: with luminosity of tracers of shallower mixing, such as the carbon isotopic ratio, would be a useful further test of this theoretical prediction.
410:
411: For thermohaline mixing to be effective on the RGB the timescale must be 100 to 1000 times shorter than the \cite{kea80} estimates.
412: A comparable increase in efficiency on the MS relative to the \cite{sea07} estimates would imply a mixing timescale
413: far shorter than the MS lifetime. As a result, we would
414: expect to see no dilution effect in the abundances, which contradicts the data. We therefore conclude that thermohaline mixing is inefficient
415: in MS CEMP stars, contrary to the natural prediction of models where it is the dominant mechanism for RGB mixing.
416: In light of the potential importance of this conclusion, we now discuss the limits that we can place on
417: the timescale of MS mixing, potential observational and theoretical issues, and future observational tests.
418:
419: We cannot make a similarly strong claim for thermohaline convection operating over Gyr timescales, as advocated by \cite{sea07}.
420: Our globally averaged result is a $0.2\,M_\odot$ average depth of the accreted material; this could be an unmixed $0.2\,M_\odot$ accreted layer,
421: or an initially lower mass accreted layer that has diffused to an average depth of $0.2\,M_\odot$. A model with a diffusive timescale of order
422: the post-mass transfer MS lifetime and a $0.1\,M_\odot$ accreted layer, for example, would be consistent with our results.
423: When the mixing timescale is comparable to the evolutionary lifetime, a population synthesis approach is required for a comprehensive analysis.
424: One must account for the distribution of abundance anomalies in the donor stars, mass accretion amounts, and the range of secondary masses
425: over which the MS recipient can become a red giant. Such calculations would be interesting, but are beyond the scope of this paper.
426:
427: Observational selection effects are also a concern. If there was a differential bias in the effective temperature estimates for dwarfs and giants,
428: for example, the relative abundance patterns could be impacted. Similarly, a selection criterion where dwarfs would require higher carbon anomalies
429: than giants to be discovered would manifest itself as a dilution effect. There is no evidence for the latter effect in the data; the observed carbon anomalies
430: are well-separated from the normal halo star pattern. Effective temperature scale estimates are a more significant concern, especially for color-based
431: estimates, because of the spectral energy distribution distortions from very high [C/Fe] ratios. \cite{aea07}, for example, found evidence for iron abundances
432: dependent upon the excitation potential of the lines, which is usually a signature of an incorrect effective temperature. However, to impact our results there would
433: need to be a differential impact on the abundances derived in dwarfs and giants rather than an overall systematic effective temperature shift, and Aoki et al. did not
434: report such an effect. We also note that very similar relative trends appear in samples where spectroscopic and color-based effective temperature estimates are
435: employed.
436:
437: Is there a theoretical mechanism that could differentially suppress thermohaline convection in MS (but not RGB) stars?
438: \cite{dp07} have proposed that thermohaline convection can be suppressed by horizontal turbulent diffusion.
439: It is, at least in principle, possible to invoke stronger horizontal turbulence in dwarfs than in giants.
440: Angular momentum constraints from the existence of rapid rotation in horizontal branch stars do imply
441: strong differential rotation with depth in the convective envelopes of RGB stars
442: (\citealt{p83,pea92,sp00}). One would therefore expect rotation rates
443: in the RGB envelope comparable to those in MS radiative interiors, and as a result comparable degrees of
444: horizontal turbulence. This is an area that deserves further theoretical scrutiny.
445:
446: There is indirect evidence for extra mixing in low-mass AGB stars (e.g., see Fig.~\ref{fig:f5}
447: and its discussion in section 3). However, if extra mixing in RGB stars is really driven by $^3$He burning then it should
448: die out by the end of the RGB evolution because of the $^3$He exhaustion.
449: In this case, the $^3$He-driven thermohaline convection could not resume working
450: in the same stars on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB). So, we would expect
451: the absence of observational signatures of extra mixing in low-mass ($M\la 2\,M_\odot$)
452: AGB stars unless the mixing in them is of a different nature.
453: However, given the similarities in their depth and in the structure of radiative zone
454: where they operate, it is unlikely that the RGB and AGB mixing
455: have different physical mechanisms.
456:
457: Further observational work would be extremely fruitful. Samples should be examined for their binary
458: nature in order to generate binary mass transfer samples, and both the reliability of temperature estimates and
459: the relative and absolute abundance errors should be rigorously examined. If thermohaline convection occurs over
460: an intermediate timescale, there should be a difference in the mean abundance level between MS stars that experienced
461: mass transfer recently and stars with older mass transfer episodes. Hotter white dwarfs can be detected photometrically,
462: particularly for dwarf CEMP stars, and a difference in surface abundance between systems with younger and older
463: white dwarf companions would be definitive evidence for (or argument against) a moderate timescale for thermohaline mixing.
464:
465: \acknowledgements
466: We are grateful to Sara Lucatello for sending us the C and N abundance data for the CEMP stars.
467: It is our pleasure to thank Jennifer Johnson, Thomas Masseron, Grant Newsham, Kristen Sellgren, and Don Terndrup for usefull discussions.
468: We acknowledge support from the NASA Grant No.\,NNG05 GG20G.
469:
470: %\newpage
471:
472: \begin{thebibliography}{}
473:
474: \bibitem[Aoki at al.(2007)]{aea07}
475: Aoki, W., Beers, T.~C., Christlieb, N., Norris, J.~E., Ryan, S.~G.,
476: \& Tsangarides, S.~2007, ApJ, 655, 492
477:
478: \bibitem[Barklem at al.(2005)]{bea05}
479: Barklem, P.~S., et al.~2005, A\&A, 439, 129
480:
481: \bibitem[Beers \& Christlieb(2005)]{bch05}
482: Beers, T.~C., \& Christlieb, N.~2005, ARA\&A, 43, 531
483:
484: \bibitem[Chanam\'{e}, Pinsonneault, \& Terndrup(2005)]{chea05}
485: Chanam\'{e}, J., Pinsonneault, M., \& Terndrup, D.~M.~2005, ApJ, 631, 540
486:
487: \bibitem[Charbonnel, Brown, \& Wallerstein(1998)]{chea98}
488: Charbonnel, C., Brown, J.~A., \& Wallerstein, G.~1998, A\&A, 332, 204
489:
490: \bibitem[Charbonnel \& Zahn(2007)]{chz07}
491: Charbonnel, C., \& Zahn, J.-P.~2007, A\&A, 467, L15
492:
493: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Tout(2000)]{dt00}
494: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Tout, C.~A.~2000, MNRAS, 316, 395
495:
496: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& VandenBerg(2003)]{dv03}
497: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& VandenBerg, D.~A.~2003, ApJ, 593, 509
498:
499: \bibitem[Denissenkov et al.(2006)]{dea06}
500: Denissenkov, P.~A., Chaboyer, B., \& Li, K.~2006, ApJ, 641, 1087
501:
502: \bibitem[Denissenkov \& Pinsonneault(2007)]{dp07}
503: Denissenkov, P.~A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~2007, arXiv:0708.3864v1 [astro-ph]
504:
505: \bibitem[Eggleton, Dearborn, \& Lattanzio(2006)]{eea06}
506: Eggleton P.~P., Dearborn, D.~S.~P., \& Lattanzio, J.~C.~2006, Science, 314, 1580
507:
508: \bibitem[Frebel et al.(2005)]{fea05}
509: Frebel, A., Aoki, W., Christlieb, N., et al.~2005, Nature, 434, 871
510:
511: \bibitem[Gilroy \& Brown(1991)]{gb91}
512: Gilroy, K.~K., \& Brownl, J.~A.~1991, ApJ, 371, 578
513:
514: \bibitem[Gratton et al.(2000)]{grea00}
515: Gratton, R.~G., Sneden, C., Carretta, E., \& Bragaglia, A.~2000, A\&A, 354, 169
516:
517: \bibitem[Herwig(2004)]{h04}
518: Herwig, F.~2004, ApJS, 155, 651
519:
520: \bibitem[Herwig(2005)]{h05}
521: Herwig, F.~2005, ARA\&A, 43, 435
522:
523: \bibitem[Johnson et al.(2007)]{jea07}
524: Johnson, J.~A., Herwig, F., Beers, T.~C., \& Christlieb, N.~2007, ApJ, 658, 1203
525:
526: \bibitem[Kippenhahn et al.(1980)]{kea80}
527: Kippenhahn, R., Ruschenplatt, G., \& Thomas, H.-C.~1980, A\&A, 91, 175
528:
529: \bibitem[Komiya et al.(2007)]{kea07}
530: Komiya, Y., Suda, T., Minaguchi, H., Shigeyama, T., Aoki, W., \& Fujimoto, M.~Y.~2007,
531: ApJ, 658. 367
532:
533: \bibitem[Lucatello et al.(2005)]{lea05}
534: Lucatello, S., Tsangarides, S., Beers, T.~C., Gratton, R.~G.,
535: \& Ryan, S.~G.~2005, ApJ, 625, 825
536:
537: \bibitem[Lucatello et al.(2006)]{lea06}
538: Lucatello, S., Beers, T.~C., Christlieb, N., Barklem, P.~S., Rossi, S.,
539: Marsteller, B., Sivarani, T., \& Lee, Y.~S.~2006, ApJ, 652, L37
540:
541: \bibitem[Masseron et al.(2006)]{mea06}
542: Masseron, T., Van Eck, S., Famaey, B., Goriely, S., Plez, B., Siess, L.,
543: Beers, T.~C., Primas, F., \& Jorissen, A.~2006, A\&A, 455, 1059
544:
545: \bibitem[Nollett, Busso, \& Wasserburg(2003)]{nbw03}
546: Nollett, K.-M., Busso, M., \& Wasserburg, G.~J.~2003, ApJ, 582, 1036
547:
548: \bibitem[Origlia et al.(2006)]{oea06}
549: Origlia, L., Valenti, E., Rich, R.~M., \& Ferraro, F.~R.~2006, ApJ, 646, 499
550:
551: \bibitem[Palacios et al.(2006)]{pea06}
552: Palacios, A., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S., \& Siess, L.~2006, A\&A, 453, 261
553:
554: \bibitem[Peterson(1983)]{p83}
555: Peterson, R.~C.~1983, ApJ, 275, 737
556:
557: \bibitem[Pinsonneault et al.(1992)]{pea92}
558: Pinsonneault, M.~H., Deliyannis, T.~P., \& Demarque, P.~1992, ApJS, 78, 179
559:
560: \bibitem[Rogers, Swenson, \& Iglesias(1996)]{rea96}
561: Rogers, F.~J., Swenson, F.~I., \& Iglesias, C.~A.~1996, ApJ, 456, 902
562:
563: \bibitem[Ryan et al.(2005)]{rea05}
564: Ryan, S.~G., Aoki, W., Norris, J.~E., \& Beers, T.~C.~2005, ApJ, 635, 349
565:
566: \bibitem[Sills \& Pinsonneault(2000)]{sp00}
567: Sills, A., \& Pinsonneault, M.~H.~2000, ApJ, 540, 489
568:
569: \bibitem[Sivarani et al.(2006)]{sea06}
570: Sivarani, T., et al.~2006, A\&A, 459, 125
571:
572: \bibitem[Smith \& Martell(2003)]{sm03}
573: Smith, G.~H., \& Martell, S.~L.~2003, PASP, 115, 1211
574:
575: \bibitem[Spite et al.(2005)]{sea05}
576: Spite, M., et al.~2005, A\&A, 430, 655
577:
578: \bibitem[Stancliffe et al.(2007)]{sea07}
579: Stancliffe, R.~J., Glebbeek, E., Izzard, R.~G., \& Pols, O.~R.~2007, A\&A, 464, L57
580:
581: \bibitem[Sweigart \& Mengel(1979)]{sm79}
582: Sweigart, A.~V., \& Mengel, J.~G.~1979, ApJ, 229, 624
583:
584: \bibitem[Tumlinson(2007)]{t07}
585: Tumlinson, J.~2007, ApJ, 664, L63
586:
587: \bibitem[Ulrich(1972)]{u72}
588: Ulrich, R.~K.~1972, ApJ, 172, 165
589:
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
593: %\pagestyle{empty}
594: %\voffset=-3 cm
595: \begin{figure}
596: %\epsfxsize=15cm
597: %\epsffile [60 180 580 695] {f1.eps}
598: \plotone{f1.eps}
599: \caption{The C abundance as a function of luminosity in the CEMP (black filled circles)
600: and non-C-enhanced VMP (blue open circles; the blue cross
601: shows the errorbars) stars. The latter are seen to experience
602: canonical extra mixing at $\log\,L/L_\odot \ga 2.2$. The declining part of
603: the black curve has been computed for the mixing depth $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05\,R_\odot$ (panels A and C in Fig.~\ref{fig:f4})
604: and diffusion coefficient $D_{\rm mix} = 0.1\,K$, where $K$ is the thermal diffusivity.
605: The only mixing episode experienced by the CEMP stars appears to be the standard
606: first dredge-up at $0.8\la\log L/L_\odot\la 1.4$ (red curve).
607: }
608: \label{fig:f1}
609: \end{figure}
610:
611: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
612:
613: %h-----------------------------------------------------------------
614: %\pagestyle{empty}
615: %\voffset=-3 cm
616: \begin{figure}
617: %\epsfxsize=15cm
618: %\epsffile [60 150 580 695] {f2.eps}
619: \plotone{f2.eps}
620: \caption{The [C/H] as a function of luminosity for Ba-enhanced
621: CEMP stars from \cite{aea07} (open circles) and for a larger sample of
622: CEMP stars from \cite{lea06} (filled circles). The cross shows
623: the data errorbars. Both samples have the same linear fit.
624: }
625: \label{fig:f2}
626: \end{figure}
627:
628: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
629:
630: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
631: %\pagestyle{empty}
632: %\voffset=-3 cm
633: \begin{figure}
634: %\epsfxsize=15cm
635: %\epsffile [60 200 580 695] {f3.eps}
636: \plotone{f3.eps}
637: \caption{The C and N abundances in the CEMP stars (circles) are compared with those predicted by
638: our stellar evolution models in which canonical extra mixing has been parameterized with
639: $r_{\rm mix} = 0.05$, $D_{\rm mix} = 0.1\,K$ (short-dashed red curves), and
640: $r_{\rm mix} = 0.045$, $D_{\rm mix} = 0.04\,K$ (solid blue curves). Crosses show the observational errorbars.
641: Black long-dashed lines are linear fits to the data with slopes
642: $-0.18\pm 0.05$, $-0.21\pm 0.05$, and $-0.19\pm 0.04$ for [C/H], [N/H], and [(C+N)/H], respectively (\citealt{lea06}).
643: }
644: \label{fig:f3}
645: \end{figure}
646:
647: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
648:
649: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
650: %\pagestyle{empty}
651: %\voffset=-3 cm
652: \begin{figure}
653: %\epsfxsize=11cm
654: %\epsffile [60 200 450 695] {f4.eps}
655: \plotone{f4.eps}
656: \caption{The abundance (panels A and B) and $\mu$-gradient (panels C and D)
657: profiles in our non-C-enhanced (panels A and C) and C-enhanced (panels B and D)
658: upper RGB models. Dotted curves in panels B and D are from our solar-metallicity
659: $1\,M_\odot$ upper RGB model.
660: }
661: \label{fig:f4}
662: \end{figure}
663:
664: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
665:
666: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
667: %\pagestyle{empty}
668: %\voffset=-3 cm
669: \begin{figure}
670: %\epsfxsize=15cm
671: %\epsffile [60 200 580 695] {f5.eps}
672: \plotone{f5.eps}
673: \caption{The C and N abundances for the {\it unmixed} and {\it mixed} VMP stars (filled and open blue circles)
674: obtained by \cite{sea05} as well as those for the CEMP stars with $\log\,g > 3.5$ and $\log\,g < 3.5$
675: (filled and open red squares) compiled by \cite{sea06}. Magenta asterisks represent the average abundance yields
676: predicted by \cite{h04} for metal-poor AGB models whose masses (in $M_\odot$) are given below the data points.
677: Black curve shows changes of the surface C and N abundances produced by canonical extra mixing
678: with the depth $r_{\rm mix} = 0.045\,R_\odot$ and rate $D_{\rm mix} = 0.04\,K$ in an RGB model
679: with $M=0.83\,M_\odot$ and $Z=0.0001$. Note that most of the CEMP stars are located in the gap
680: between the predicted AGB yields.
681: }
682: \label{fig:f5}
683: \end{figure}
684:
685: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
686:
687: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
688: %\pagestyle{empty}
689: %\voffset=-3 cm
690: \begin{figure}
691: %\epsfxsize=12cm
692: %\epsffile [60 150 450 695] {f6.eps}
693: \plotone{f6.eps}
694: %\vspace{-4cm}
695: \caption{The C (panels A and C) and N (panel B) abundance distributions for the CEMP stars
696: that have not experienced the FDU yet (shaded histograms) and for those of them in which
697: the FDU has already ended (thick solid curves). The data are from \cite{lea06} (panels A and B)
698: and from \cite{aea07} (panel C). Panel D shows the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
699: probabilities that the shaded histograms in panels A and B do not differ from their thick solid counterparts
700: after being shifted to the left by $\Delta$\,[X/H].
701: }
702: \label{fig:f6}
703: \end{figure}
704:
705: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
706:
707: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
708: %\pagestyle{empty}
709: %\voffset=-3 cm
710: \begin{figure}
711: %\epsfxsize=15cm
712: %\epsffile [60 200 580 695] {f7.eps}
713: \plotone{f7.eps}
714: \caption{The $\mu$ profiles in two models with $M=0.85\,M_\odot$ and $Z=0.0001$.
715: The first (red curve) is our CEMP MS model that began its evolution
716: as a $0.7\,M_\odot$ star and has just accreted $0.15\,M_\odot$ of AGB material
717: enriched in He and C. The second (blue curve) is a model in which the H shell has just erased
718: the H-abundance discontinuity. It has preserved its initial composition.
719: The blue curve has a local minimum of
720: $\Delta\mu/\mu\approx 1.4\times 10^{-4}$ located at $r\approx 0.067\,R_\odot$.
721: It is produced by $^3$He burning.
722: If canonical extra mixing in upper RGB stars is identified with thermohaline
723: convection driven by this tiny $\mu$ inversion then a similar mechanism
724: should produce very efficient mixing in CEMP MS stars as well, given their much
725: stronger $\mu$ inversions (red curve), even though the thermal diffusivity is
726: several orders of magnitude lower in the MS model (see text).
727: The arrow shows the radius of a mass shell
728: down to which the base of convective envelope penetrates at the end of FDU.
729: }
730: \label{fig:f7}
731: \end{figure}
732:
733: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
734:
735: \end{document}
736:
737:
738: