1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 2005 December 5

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: %%

18: 

19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

20: %\usepackage{graphicx}

21: 

22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

23: 

24: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

25: 

26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

27: 

28: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

29: 

30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the

31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,

32: %% use the longabstract style option.

33: 

34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}

35: 

36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

38: %% the \begin{document} command.

39: %%

40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

43: %% for information.

44: 

45: 

46: %\input{mydefs}

47: 

48: % My macro definitions

49: %------------MY DEFINITIONS ---------------------

50: \def\typeset{}

51: \def\etal{{et\,al. }}

52: \def\Msun{\mbox{\,M$_{\odot}$}}

53: \def\Ls{\mbox{\,L$_{\odot}$~}}

54: \def\lfir{\hbox{L$_{\rm FIR}$}}

55: \def\msun{\hbox{M$_{\odot}$}}

56: \newcommand{\ml}{~\Msun ~\rm yr^{-1}}

57: \def\rsun{\hbox{R$_{\odot}$}}

58: \def\lsun{\hbox{L$_{\odot}$}}

59: \def\msunyr{\mbox{\,${\rm M_{\odot}\, yr^{-1}}$}}

60: \def\mdot{\dot M}

61: \def\Mdot{\dot M}

62: %\def\Msun{\hbox{~{\rm M}_\odot}}

63: \def\Msunyr{\hbox{~{\rm M}_\odot~{\rm yr}^{-1}}}

64: \def\grad{\hbox{$^\circ$}}

65: \def\degs{\ifmmode ^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}

66: \def\amin{\ifmmode ^{\prime}\else$^{\prime}$\fi}

67: \def\asec{\ifmmode ^{\prime\prime}\else$^{\prime\prime}$\fi}

68: \def\fm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm m}$}}            % Fractions of magnitudes

69: \def\fd{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm d}$}}            % Fractions of days

70: \def\fss{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$}}        % Fractions of seconds

71: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}          % Fractions of degrees

72: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}  % Fractions of arcseconds

73: \def\fhour{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm h}$}} % Fractions of hours

74: \def\h{\hbox{$^{\rm h}$}}

75: \def\m{\hbox{$^{\rm m}$}}

76: \def\s{\hbox{$^{\rm s}$}}

77: \def\js{\hbox{J$_{\rm s}$}}

78: \def\degs{\ifmmode ^{\circ}\else$^{\circ}$\fi}

79: \def\amin{\ifmmode ^{\prime}\else$^{\prime}$\fi}

80: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}

81: \unitlength=1mm

82: \def\EE#1{\times 10^{#1}}

83: \def\gcm{\mbox{\,g~cm$^{-3}$}}

84: \def\cm{\mbox{\,cm}}

85: \def\ccc{\mbox{\,cm$^{-3}$}}

86: \def\cm3{\mbox{\,cm$^{-3}$}}

87: \def\kms{\mbox{\,km~s$^{-1}$}}

88: \def\cms{\mbox{\,cm~s$^{-1}$}}

89: \def\erg{\mbox{\,erg}}

90: \def\ergs{\mbox{\,erg~s$^{-1}$}}

91: \def\ergshz{\mbox{~erg~s$^{-1}$~Hz$^{-1}$}}

92: \def\kms{\mbox{\,km s$^{-1}$}}

93: \def\kmsmpc{\mbox{~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$}}

94: \def\mpc{\mbox{\,Mpc}}

95: \def\Mpc{\mbox{\,Mpc}}

96: \def\kpc{\mbox{\,kpc}}

97: \def\pc{\mbox{\,pc}}

98: \def\deltamin{\mbox{\,$\delta_{\rm min}$}}

99: \def\hminus{\mbox{\,$h^{-1}$}}

100: \def\betap{\mbox{\,$\beta_{\rm app}$}}

101: \def\masyr{\mbox{~mas~yr$^{-1}$}}

102: \def\s{\mbox{\,s}}

103: \def\yr{\mbox{\,yr}}

104: \def\Myr{\mbox{\,Myr}}

105: \def\snrate{\mbox{\,$\nu_{\rm SN}$}}

106: \def\wl{~\lambda}

107: \def\wll{~\lambda\lambda}

108: \def\mum{\mbox{$\mu$m}}

109: \def\muJ{\mbox{$\mu$Jy}}

110: \def\lsim{\!\!\!\phantom{\le}\smash{\buildrel{}\over

111:  {\lower2.5dd\hbox{$\buildrel{\lower2dd\hbox{$\displaystyle<$}}\over

112:                                  \sim$}}}\,\,}

113: \def\gsim{\!\!\!\phantom{\ge}\smash{\buildrel{}\over

114: {\lower2.5dd\hbox{$\buildrel{\lower2dd\hbox{$\displaystyle>$}}\over

115:                                \sim$}}}\,\,}

116: %------------END OF MY DEFINITIONS ---------------------

117: 

118: 

119: \shorttitle{Radio Detection of SN 2004ip in IRAS 18293-3413}

120: \shortauthors{P\'erez-Torres et al.}

121: 

122: \begin{document}

123: 

124: 

125: %\vspace*{-1cm}

126: 

127: 

128: \title{Radio Detection of Supernova 2004ip in the Circumnuclear Region

129: of the Luminous Infrared Galaxy IRAS 18293-3413}

130:      

131: 

132: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

133: %% author and affiliation information.

134: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

135: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

136: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

137: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.

138: 

139: \author{M.A. P\'erez-Torres}

140: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andalucia, IAA-CSIC, Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain, torres@iaa.es}

141: \author{S. Mattila\altaffilmark{1}}

142: \affil{Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, V\"ais\"al\"antie 20, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland, S.Mattila@qub.ac.uk}

143: \author{A. Alberdi}

144: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andalucia, IAA-CSIC, Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain, antxon@iaa.es}

145: \author{L. Colina}

146: \affil{Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, IEM-CSIC,  28006 Madrid, Spain, colina@damir.iem.csic.es}

147: \author{J.M. Torrelles}

148: \affil{Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC)-IEEC, Facultat de F\'{\i}sica,

149: Universitat de Barcelona, Mart\'{\i} i Franqu\`es 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, \\torrelles@ieec.fcr.es}

150: \author{P. V\"ais\"anen}

151: \affil{South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa, petri@saao.ac.za }

152: \author{S. Ryder}

153: \affil{Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia, \\sdr@aao.gov.au}

154: \author{N. Panagia\altaffilmark{2,3}} 

155: \affil{STScI, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, \\panagia@stsci.edu}

156: \author{A. Wilson}

157: \affil{Astronomy Department, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA, \\wilson@astro.umd.edu}

158: 

159: 

160: \altaffiltext{1}{Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK.}

161: \altaffiltext{2}{INAF-CT, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, I-95123 Catania, Italy.}

162: \altaffiltext{3}{Supernova Ltd. OYV \# 131, Virgin Gorda, British Virgin Islands.}

163: 

164: %\normalsize

165: 

166: \begin{abstract}

167: We report a radio detection of supernova SN 2004ip in the

168: circumnuclear region of the luminous infrared galaxy \object{IRAS

169: 18293-3413}, using Very Large Array (VLA) observations at 8.4 GHz on

170: 11 June 2007. SN 2004ip had been previously discovered at

171: near-infrared wavelengths using adaptive optics observations, but its

172: nature (core-collapse or thermonuclear) could not be definitely

173: established.  Our radio detection, about three years after the

174: explosion of the supernova, indicates a prominent interaction of the

175: ejecta of SN 2004ip with the circumstellar medium, confirming that the

176: supernova was a core-collapse event (probably a Type II), and strongly

177: suggesting that its progenitor was a massive star with a significant

178: mass-loss prior to its explosion.  SN 2004ip has a 8.4 GHz luminosity

179: of 3.5$\EE{27}$\ergshz, about three times as bright as \object{SN 2000ft} in

180: NGC 7469 at a similar age, and given its projected distance to the

181: nucleus ($\sim$500 pc), is one of the closest of all known radio SNe

182: to a galaxy nucleus, and one of the brightest radio SNe ever.

183: 

184:           

185: \end{abstract}

186: 

187: \keywords { --- galaxies: starburst --- 

188: supernovae: individual (\object{SN 2004ip}) 

189: --- radio continuum: stars --- radio continuum: galaxies}

190: 

191: 

192: \section{Introduction}

193: 

194: Stars more massive than $\sim$8 M$_{\odot}$~explode as 

195: core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe), i.e., Types Ib/c and II.

196: Given a reasonable assumption for the initial

197: mass function (IMF), the observed CCSN rate can be used as 

198: a direct measure of the current star formation

199: rate (SFR). Thus, CCSN searches (e.g. Cappellaro et al. 

200: 1999; Dahlen et al. 2004; Cappellaro et al. 2005) can yield a 

201: new independent measurement of the star formation history

202: of the Universe. However, optical searches are only able to

203: discover the SNe not severely affected by dust extinction

204: and therefore most of the SNe occurring in dusty starburst

205: galaxies have remained undiscovered even in the local

206: Universe. 

207: 

208: Furthermore, a large fraction of the star formation at high-$z$ took

209: place in luminous (L$_{{\rm IR}}$ $>$ 10$^{11}$ L$_{\odot}$; LIRGs)

210: and ultraluminous (L$_{{\rm IR}}$ $>$ 10$^{12}$ L$_{\odot}$; ULIRGs)

211: infrared galaxies (P\'erez-Gonz\'alez et al. 2005) where the dust

212: extinction is even more severe.  The existence of hidden SN factories

213: in the nuclear and circumnuclear regions of (U)LIRGs has already been

214: demonstrated by high-resolution radio observations. For example, VLA

215: observations of the circumnuclear starburst in NGC 7469 revealed an

216: extremely bright radio supernova, SN 2000ft (Colina et

217: al. 2001b). More recently, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI)

218: observations of the nearby ULIRG, Arp 220, have revealed luminous

219: radio SNe within its innermost 150 pc nuclear regions at a rate of

220: 4$\pm$2 yr$^{-1}$, which indicates a SFR high enough to power its

221: entire IR luminosity (Lonsdale et al. 2006). These studies confirm

222: that CCSN rates a couple of orders of magnitude higher than in

223: ordinary field galaxies can be expected for starburst dominated

224: (U)LIRGs.

225: 

226: Ground-based near-infrared (IR) observations (with spatial resolution

227: $\sim$1 arcsec) can provide a complementary tool to high-resolution

228: radio observations in the search for CCSNe in (U)LIRGs (Van Buren et

229: al. 1994; Grossan et al. 1999; Mattila \& Meikle 2001; Maiolino et

230: al. 2002; Mannucci et al. 2003; Mattila et al. 2004; Mattila et

231: al. 2005a,b).  More recently, Mattila et al. (2007a,b) reported the

232: first-ever adaptive optics (AO) assisted discovery of a SN making use

233: of the NAOS CONICA (NACO) AO system on the ESO Very Large Telescope

234: (VLT). As a result of their K$_{\rm S}$-band [2.2 microns] search for

235: highly-obscured CCSNe in a sample of (U)LIRGs (see also V\"ais\"anen

236: et al. 2007), SN 2004ip was discovered in IRAS 18293-3413, a

237: LIRG at a distance of 79 Mpc (at this distance 1 arcsecond corresponds

238: to 383 pc), with an estimated host galaxy extinction towards SN 2004ip

239: between 5 and 40 magnitudes in $A_{\rm V}$

240: (Mattila et al. 2007b). SN 2004ip is located in the nuclear regions of IRAS

241: 18293-3413 at 1".14 east and 0".78 north of (about 500 pc projected

242: distance from) the galaxy's K$_{\rm s}$-band nucleus.  

243: 

244: It has been proposed that CCSNe exploding in dense environments, like

245: those encountered in the circumnuclear regions of starburst

246: galaxies, can result in very luminous radio SNe (Chevalier 1982,

247: Chugai 1997). An apparent confirmation of such a theory came from the

248: discovery of the radio bright SN 2000ft (Colina et al. 2001a,b) in a

249: circumnuclear starburst ring ($\sim$600 pc from the nucleus) of its

250: LIRG host NGC 7469 ($D\approx$~70~Mpc).  However, the case of SN

251: 2000ft is outstanding because its six-year long VLA monitoring has

252: shown that the supernova shares essentially the same properties that

253: are common to radio SNe identified as Type II SNe, despite having

254: exploded in the dusty and very dense environment of the circumnuclear

255: region (Alberdi et al. 2006). We also note that the optical glow of SN 2000ft

256: has recently been identified in archival HST images taken on 13 May 2000

257: (Colina et al. 2007), consistent with the predicted date of the

258: explosion from the analysis of its radio light curves (Alberdi et

259: al. 2006).

260: 

261: 

262: The observations of SN 2004ip at near-IR wavelengths did not allow it to

263: be unambiguously identified with either a core-collapse (Type Ib/c, or II SN),

264: or thermonuclear (Type Ia) event.  Furthermore, the discovery of SN 2004ip

265: could only be announced very recently (Mattila et al. 2007a), thus

266: making any follow-up observations difficult. However, assuming that SN

267: 2004ip was a \object{SN 2000ft}-like event, we could expect it to be bright

268: enough as to be detectable with the VLA even three years after its

269: explosion. Hence, we proposed rapid response science VLA time to

270: search for cm-wavelength radio emission at its location. In this

271: Letter, we report the first radio detection of SN 2004ip, indicating a

272: strong interaction with its circumstellar medium. 

273: 

274:            

275: \section{VLA Observations}

276: 

277: We observed the host galaxy of SN 2004ip, IRAS 18293-3413, on 11 June

278: 2007 at the frequency of 8.4 GHz with the VLA in A configuration,

279: aimed at resolving and detecting SN 2004ip at radio wavelengths.  We

280: used rapid response exploratory VLA Time, since the angular distance

281: of the supernova to the nucleus (about 1.4 arcsec) made it necessary

282: to ask for the VLA in its most extended, A-configuration.  We observed

283: at 8.4 GHz, which resulted in an angular resolution of 0\farcs62 and

284: 0\farcs21 in right ascension (R.A.) and declination (decl.),

285: respectively, enough to discern the radio emission from the supernova

286: from that of the nucleus. Also, at 8.4 GHz any extended radio

287: emission from the galaxy and its nucleus should be less prominent than

288: at lower frequencies (the only previously existing VLA radio

289: observations of IRAS 18293-3413 were carried-out at 1.4 GHz with an

290: angular resolution of about 5 arcseconds, indicating a large flux

291: density, $\sim$130 mJy for the entire galaxy), while at higher

292: frequencies the supernova was expected to be too faint to be

293: detectable.

294: 

295: The observations lasted for two hours, and consisted of $\sim$11.5~min

296: scans on SN 2004ip (for a total on-target time of $\sim$81 min),

297: interleaved with $\sim$2.5~min scans on the phase and amplitude

298: calibrator J1820-254, and each time ending with a $\sim$5~min

299: observation of the quasar 3C~286 (1331+305) to set the absolute flux

300: density scale.  We edited, calibrated, and imaged our 8.4 GHz VLA data

301: by following standard data reduction techniques implemented within the

302: NRAO Astronomical Image Processing System ({\it AIPS}).

303: 

304: \section{Results}

305: 

306: 

307: Our results are summarized in Figure 1 and Table 1.  Figure 1 shows

308: the 8.4 GHz radio emission from the central parts of IRAS 18293-3413

309: (contours) overlaid on a subtracted NACO K$_{\rm S}$-band image (shown

310: with an inverted brightness scale), which is the result of subtracting

311: a K$_{\rm S}$-band image obtained on 4th May 2004 from the image

312: obtained on 15th September 2004 (for details see Mattila et al. 2007b). 

313: A strong negative residual coincident

314: with the K$_{\rm S}$-band nucleus is visible in white color, and SN

315: 2004ip is clearly visible as a positive point source (in black

316: colour).  A local maximum of radio emission within the circumnuclear

317: region of the galaxy is right coincident with SN~2004ip. 

318: 

319: The radio contours also indicate evidence for a number of bright,

320: compact objects whose discussion is beyond the scope of this

321: Letter. We only note here that we have found eight such compact

322: regions with signal-to-noise ratios larger than 20 ($S_\nu \ga

323: 460$\muJ), but which have no clear counterpart in the near-IR image.

324: Future multi-wavelength VLA observations of this galaxy will allow us to

325: shed some light on the nature of these compact sources.  In Table 1, we show

326: the 8.4 GHz VLA flux densities of the nucleus of IRAS 18293-3413 

327: and a source we identify as SN 2004ip, which exploded

328: between 4th May and 13th September 2004 within the nuclear starburst

329: of the galaxy.

330: 

331: 

332: The absolute position of SN~2004ip was only reported with an estimated

333: precision of $\pm$0.4'' by Mattila et al. (2007b). To compare with the

334: position of the source detected in our VLA image (see Fig. 1), the

335: precision of the supernova astrometry first needed to be improved. For

336: this purpose we used archival K-band data of IRAS 18293-3413 obtained

337: with the SOFI near-IR camera on the New Technology Telescope (NTT) on

338: 8th September 2001. The final K-band image, reduced using standard

339: IRAF routines, has an on-source exposure time of 30 min and a seeing

340: FWHM of $\sim$1.2''. Due to the low galactic latitude a large number

341: of stars is visible within the $\sim$7'' $\times$ 7'' field of view of

342: the combined NTT image. Therefore, we were able to identify over 400

343: bright and isolated stars with astrometry available from 2MASS. These

344: yielded a world coordinate system (WCS) solution for the NTT image

345: with rms of 4 and 3 milliarcsec (mas) in R.A. and Decl.,

346: respectively. We then used the centroid coordinates of 14 isolated

347: stars, detected within the field of view of both the 42'' $\times$

348: 42'' NACO and NTT images, to align the images in IRAF using a general

349: geometric transformation with no non-linear part. This yielded an rms of

350: 34 and 22 mas in R.A. and Decl., respectively. Finally, the position

351: of the supernova was measured in a NACO K$_{\rm S}$-band image which

352: is the result of subtracting an image obtained on 4th May 2004 from an

353: image obtained on 15th September 2004 (for details on the images and

354: the subtraction method see Mattila et al. 2007b).  We adopted the

355: average from three different methods (centroid, gauss, ofilter) used

356: in IRAF as the SN position. The position uncertainty as indicated by

357: the standard deviation of these measurements was very small $\sim$1

358: mas for both $x$ and $y$, thanks to the well sampled NACO PSF and the

359: flat and close to zero background in the subtracted image. Using the

360: WCS of the NTT image aligned to the NACO image, we obtained R.A. =

361: 18h32m41.207s and Decl. = -34$^{o}$11'26.80'' (equinox 2000.0) for the

362: SN with an estimated precision of $\pm$34 and $\pm$22 mas in R.A. and

363: Decl., respectively.

364: 

365: 

366: Therefore, the radio source we identified as SN 2004ip appears

367: coincident with the near-IR position of the supernova within 10 and 20

368: mas in R.A. and Decl., respectively. This is within the uncertainties

369: of the SN near-IR position (as derived above) and radio position

370: ($\pm$20 mas and $\pm$10 mas in R.A. and Decl., respectively), which

371: confirms that the radio emission corresponds to SN 2004ip. 

372: 

373: 

374: \section{Discussion and Summary}

375: 

376: 

377: Thermonuclear (Type Ia) supernovae are not expected to be strong radio

378: emitters, and have not yet been detected at radio wavelengths (e.g.,

379: Panagia et al. 2006).  Current modelling of their radio emission

380: indicates that the circumstellar wind around the progenitor star is

381: much less dense than in the case of CCSNe, and would be overrun in

382: about one day due to its proximity and the much higher velocity of the

383: supernova blast wave.  At the distance of IRAS 18293-3413, this would

384: result in an SN Ia radio emission reaching 8.4 GHz peak values of

385: (13--50)\,$\mu$Jy at around (3--10)\,days after the explosion, and quickly

386: decreasing below (0.3--3)\,$\mu$Jy after a hundred days, depending on the

387: particular model (P. Lundqvist, private communication).  Therefore, a

388: thermonuclear origin for SN 2004ip --detected at $\sim 470 \mu$Jy

389: after more than 1000 days after its explosion-- can be ruled out.

390: 

391: CCSNe are expected --as opposed to thermonuclear SNe-- to become

392: strong radio emitters when the SN ejecta interact with the

393: circumstellar medium (CSM) that was ejected by the progenitor star

394: before its explosion as a supernova (Chevalier 1982; Weiler et

395: al. 1986).  Indeed, the interaction gives rise to a high-energy

396: density shell, which is Rayleigh-Taylor unstable and can drive

397: turbulent motions that may amplify the existing magnetic field and

398: efficiently accelerate relativistic electrons, thus enhancing the

399: emission of synchrotron radiation at radio wavelengths (Chevalier

400: 1982).  The duration of this radio SN phase is limited, however, by

401: the extent of the expanding wind of the progenitor star, which can reach

402: a radius where the ram pressure of the wind, $\rho_w\,v_w^{2}$,

403: equals the external pressure of the insterstellar medium ISM,

404: $P_{ISM}$ (Chevalier \& Fransson 2001).  For a spherically symmetric,

405: steady wind ($\rho_w \propto r^{-2}$), this radius is $r_w \approx

406: 0.18\,\dot M_{-4}^{1/2}v_{w1}^{1/2}p_7^{-1/2}$ pc, where $\dot M_{-4}$

407: is the mass loss rate in units of $10^{-4}\ml$, $v_{w1}$ is the wind

408: velocity in units of $10\kms$, and $p_7$ is the ISM pressure in units

409: of $10^7$ cm$^{-3}$ K, which is the estimated pressure for the central

410: region of the starburst in M~82 (Chevalier \& Clegg 1985). At this

411: distance, a CCSN would then enter the supernova remnant (SNR) phase,

412: and the radio emission would no longer be due to the interaction with

413: the CSM, but rather with the ISM. However, even if the ejecta of SN

414: 2004ip would have been freely expanding at a constant velocity of $v_s

415: = 10^4$\kms, the distance reached by the circumstellar shock in three

416: years would be $r \lsim 0.03$ pc, which is much smaller than $r_w$

417: assuming an ISM pressure similar to M~82.  

418: We conclude that SN 2004ip

419: is still in its SN phase and its radio emission is being powered

420: --even three years after the SN explosion-- by prominent interaction

421: with the CSM. This fact confirms that the supernova was a

422: core-collapse event, and implies that its progenitor was a massive

423: star with a significant mass-loss ($\dot M \ga 10^{-4}\ml$) prior to

424: its core collapse.

425: 

426: 

427: SN 2004ip exploded sometime between 4th May and 13th September 2004,

428: so its radio emission is now likely in a decaying phase.  The 8.4 GHz

429: flux density of SN 2004ip detected in the June 2007 observations

430: ($\sim$470$\mu$Jy) correspond to an isotropic luminosity of

431: 3.5$\EE{27}$\ergshz, or three times as luminous as \object{SN 2000ft}

432: in NGC 7469 at a similar age.  Given the fact that it exploded about

433: three years earlier, SN 2004ip might have been one of the most

434: luminous radio SNe ever at its peak (and probably significantly

435: brighter than the nucleus of its host galaxy), and would therefore

436: belong to the class of extremely bright and long-lasting radio SNe,

437: like SN 1978K (Schlegel et al. 1999), \object{SN 1986J} (Weiler et

438: al. 1990; P\'erez-Torres et al. 2002), SN 1988Z (Van Dyk et

439: al. 1993b), or SN 2000ft (Colina et al. 2001b), which at their peak

440: emission were a thousand to a few thousand times more luminous than

441: Cas A, the brightest radio SN in the Milky Way (Weiler et al. 1986).

442: In addition to its extreme radio brightness, SN 2004ip shares with

443: \object{SN 2000ft} in the LIRG NGC 7469 (Alberdi et al. 2006), and

444: with the young radio supernovae in the central regions of Arp 299

445: (Neff et al. 2004), other characteristics in common.  Indeed, SN

446: 2004ip exploded in the circumnuclear region of a Luminous Infrared

447: Galaxy, is located at a similar projected distance ($r\sim 500$

448: pc) from the galaxy nucleus, is still in its radio SN phase, and is

449: detectable several years after its explosion, These facts indicate

450: that such radio SNe might be a relatively common phenomenon in

451: circumnuclear starburst environments.

452: 

453: 

454: Extremely bright and long lasting radio SNe are identified in the

455: optical as Type II supernovae, and because of their huge radio

456: luminosities, their progenitors are believed to be massive stars in

457: the 20 to 30 \Msun~ range (Weiler et al. 1990; Van Dyk et al. 1993)

458: that explode in very dense environments (e. g., Chugai 1997). The

459: typical spectral index for normal Type II supernovae is $-$0.6 to

460: $-$0.8 (Weiler et al. 2002). Type II radio SNe also exhibit slow rises

461: and declines, and normally take more than one year to reach their 8.4

462: GHz peak radio emission.  On the other hand, Type Ib/c supernovae can

463: also produce bright radio SNe, e.g., SN 1983N (Sramek et al. 1984;

464: Weiler et al. 1986) and SN 1990B (van Dyk et al.  1993a), and the

465: brightest of all, SN 1998bw (Kulkarni et al. 1998).  However, the

466: radio emission of these supernovae is characterized by a rather fast

467: rise and decay (few days to a few weeks), and by radio spectral

468: indices of about $-$1.1 to $-$1.2 (Weiler et al. 2002).  While the 

469: measured single radio flux of SN 2004ip does not allow a

470: definite classification, the fact that its radio luminosity is so high

471: even three years after the explosion favours strongly a Type II origin

472: since their radio flux densities tend to decrease much more slowly

473: than the radio emission from Type Ib/c SNe.

474: 

475: The level of the 8.4 GHz radio emission of SN 2004ip detected in our

476: June 2007 observation ($\sim$470$\mu$Jy) suggests that we might be

477: able to monitor the radio flux density evolution of SN 2004ip with the

478: VLA for some years from now, thus probing the circumstellar

479: interaction around the supernova, eventually allowing us to detect its

480: transition from the SN phase to the SNR phase, as has been suggested

481: for a number of compact sources in the nuclear starburst of Arp 220

482: (Parra et al. 2007). In addition, a radio light curve follow-up could

483: provide more detailed information on the progenitor of SN 2004ip. For

484: example, Ryder et al. (2004) inferred the action of a binary companion

485: from periodic modulations in the radio light curve of SN 2000ig, which

486: was subsequently confirmed from imaging at Gemini (Ryder et al. 2006).

487: This would make SN 2004ip the second case, only after \object{SN

488: 2000ft} in NGC 7469, where such radio monitoring has been carried out

489: for a SN in the circumnuclear starburst of a LIRG, and will help to

490: better understand the behaviour of SNe within dense starburst

491: environments (e.g., Alberdi et al. 2006).  Furthermore, Mattila et

492: al. (2007b) estimated an average SFR of 135 M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ for

493: IRAS 18293-3413 corresponding to a CCSN rate of about 1.0 SN per

494: year. Therefore, radio monitoring at high-resolution and sensitivity

495: with the VLA might easily result also in the discovery of new radio

496: SNe.

497: 

498:      

499: The number of CCSNe discovered in circumnuclear regions of (U)LIRGs,

500: both at infrared and radio wavelengths, is still small. However, these

501: events may have an important impact when estimating the {\it complete}

502: local CCSN rates including also the SNe in the optically obscured

503: parts of the galaxies. The direct detection and study of CCSNe in

504: starburst galaxies over a large range of IR luminosities (L$_{\rm IR}$

505: = 10$^{10}$--10$^{12}$ L$_{\odot}$) is also crucial for interpreting

506: the results of the high-z CCSN searches, since a large fraction of the

507: massive star formation at high-$z$ took place in IR luminous galaxies.

508: Therefore, our discovery shows that the combination of high-resolution

509: observations at near-infrared and radio wavelengths is a powerful tool

510: to search for CCSN events from LIRGs in the local Universe, and thus

511: establish their core-collapse supernova rates and star formation

512: rates, as well as to constrain the nature of the discovered events

513: through their interaction with the surrounding medium.

514: 

515: \acknowledgments 

516: We are grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful comments on the

517: manuscript.  We are also grateful to the National Radio Astronomy

518: Observatory (NRAO) for granting us Rapid Response, Very Large Array

519: (VLA) time for this project. NRAO is a facility of the National

520: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated

521: Universities Inc.  MAPT research is supported by the Ram\'on y Cajal

522: programme of the Spanish Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

523: MAPT and AA, and JMT acknowledge support from the Spanish grants

524: AYA2006-14986-C02-C01 and AYA2005-08523-C03, respectively.  SM

525: acknowledges financial support from the Participating Organisations of

526: EURYI and the EC Sixth Framework Programme and from the Academy of

527: Finland (project: 8120503).

528: 

529: 

530: \begin{thebibliography}{}

531: 

532: \bibitem[Alberdi et al. 2006]{alberdi06} Alberdi, A., Colina, L., Torrelles, J.M., Panagia, N., Wilson, A.S., \& Garrington, S. 2006, ApJ 638, 938

533: \bibitem[Cappellaro et al.(1999)]{342} Cappellaro, E., Evans, R., Turatto, M. 1999, A\&A, 351, 459

534: \bibitem[Cappellaro et al.(2005)]{2005A&A...430...83C} Cappellaro, E., et al.\ 2005, A\&A, 430, 83 

535: \bibitem[Chevalier(1982)]{1982ApJ...259..302C} Chevalier, R.~A.\ 1982, \apj, 259, 302 

536: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Clegg(1985)]{1985Natur.317...44C} Chevalier, R.~A., 

537: \& Clegg, A.~W.\ 1985, \nat, 317, 44 

538: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Fransson(2001)]{2001ApJ...558L..27C} Chevalier, 

539: R.~A., \& Fransson, C.\ 2001, ApJL, 558, L27 

540: \bibitem[Chugai(1997)]{1997ARep...41..672C} Chugai, N.~N.\ 1997, Astronomy 

541: Reports, 41, 672 

542: \bibitem[Colina et al.(2001a)]{2001IAUC.7587....1C} Colina, L., Alberdi, A., 

543: Torrelles, J.~M., Panagia, N., \& Wilson, A.~S.\ 2001a, \iaucirc, 7587, 1 

544: \bibitem[Colina et al.(2001b)]{2001ApJ...553L..19C} Colina, L., Alberdi, A., 

545: Torrelles, J.~M., Panagia, N., \& Wilson, A.~S.\ 2001b, ApJL, 553, L19 

546: \bibitem[Colina et al.(2007)]{2007A&A...467..559C} Colina, L., 

547: D{\'{\i}}az-Santos, T., Alonso-Herrero, A., Panagia, N., Alberdi, A., 

548: Torrelles, J.~M., \& Wilson, A.~S.\ 2007, \aap, 467, 559 

549: \bibitem[Dahlen et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...613..189D} Dahlen, T., et al.\ 

550: 2004, ApJ, 613, 189

551: \bibitem[Grossan et al.(1999)]{1999AJ....118..705G} Grossan, B., Spillar, 

552: E., Tripp, R., Pirzkal, N., Sutin, B.~M., Johnson, P., \& Barnaby, D.\ 

553: 1999, AJ, 118, 705 

554: \bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(1998)]{1998Natur.395..663K} Kulkarni, S.~R., et 

555: al.\ 1998, \nat, 395, 663 

556: \bibitem[Lonsdale et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...647..185L} Lonsdale, C.~J., 

557: Diamond, P.~J., Thrall, H., Smith, H.~E., \& Lonsdale, C.~J.\ 2006, ApJ, 

558: 647, 185 

559: \bibitem{maio} Maiolino, R., Vanzi, L., Mannucci, F. et al. 2002, A\&A, 389, 84

560: \bibitem[Mannucci et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...401..519M} Mannucci, F., et al. 

561: 2003, A\&A, 401, 519

562: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2001)]{mattila01} Mattila S. \& Meikle W.P.S. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 325

563: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2004)]{2004NewAR..48..595M} Mattila, S., Meikle, 

564: W.~P.~S., \& Greimel R. 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 595

565: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2005)]{2005IAUC.8474....1M} Mattila, S., Greimel, 

566: R., Gerardy, C., \& Meikle, W.~P.~S 2005a, IAUC, 8474, 1

567: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2005)]{2005IAUC.8473....1M} Mattila, S., et al.\ 

568: 2005b, IAUC, 8473, 1 

569: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2007)]{2007CBET..858....1M} Mattila, S., et al.\ 

570: 2007a, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 858, 1

571: \bibitem[Mattila et al.(2007)]{552} Mattila, S., {\it et al.} 2007b, ApJ, 659, L9

572: \bibitem[Neff et al.(2004)]{2004ApJ...611..186N} Neff, S.~G., Ulvestad, 

573: J.~S., \& Teng, S.~H.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 186 

574: \bibitem[Panagia et al.(2006)]{2006ApJ...646..369P} Panagia, N., Van Dyk, 

575: S.~D., Weiler, K.~W., Sramek, R.~A., Stockdale, C.~J., \& Murata, K.~P.\ 

576: 2006, \apj, 646, 369

577: \bibitem[Parra et al.(2007)]{2007ApJ...659..314P} Parra, R., Conway, J.~E., 

578: Diamond, P.~J., Thrall, H., Lonsdale, C.~J., Lonsdale, C.~J., \& Smith, 

579: H.~E.\ 2007, \apj, 659, 314 

580: \bibitem[P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...630...82P} 

581: P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez, P.~G., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 82 

582: \bibitem[P{\'e}rez-Torres et al.(2002)]{2002MNRAS.335L..23P} 

583: P{\'e}rez-Torres, M.~A., Alberdi, A., Marcaide, J.~M., Guirado, J.~C., 

584: Lara, L., Mantovani, F., Ros, E., \& Weiler, K.~W.\ 2002, \mnras, 335, L23 

585: \bibitem[Ryder et al.(2004)]{2004MNRAS.349.1093R} Ryder, S.~D., Sadler, 

586: E.~M., Subrahmanyan, R., Weiler, K.~W., Panagia, N., \& Stockdale, C.\ 

587: 2004, \mnras, 349, 1093 

588: \bibitem[Ryder et al.(2006)]{2006MNRAS.369L..32R} Ryder, S.~D., Murrowood, 

589: C.~E., \& Stathakis, R.~A.\ 2006, \mnras, 369, L32 

590: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1999)]{1999AJ....118.2689S} Schlegel, E.~M., 

591: Ryder, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Petre, R., Colbert, E., Dopita, M., \& 

592: Campbell-Wilson, D.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2689 

593: \bibitem[Sramek, Panagia \& Weiler 1984]{SPW84} Sramek, R.A., Panagia, N., \& Weiler, K.W.  1984, ApJ 285, L59

594: \bibitem[Vaisanen et al.(2007)]{2007arXiv0708.2365V} Vaisanen, P., et al.\ 

595: 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.2365 

596: \bibitem{b37} Van Buren, D. \& Greenhouse, M.A. 1994, ApJ, 431, 640

597: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...409..162V} Van Dyk, S.~D., Sramek, 

598: R.~A., Weiler, K.~W., \& Panagia, N.\ 1993a, \apj, 409, 162 

599: \bibitem[Van Dyk et al.(1993)]{1993ApJ...419L..69V} van Dyk, S.~D., Weiler, 

600: K.~W., Sramek, R.~A., \& Panagia, N.\ 1993b, \apjl, 419, L69

601: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(1986)]{1986ApJ...301..790W} Weiler, K.~W., Sramek, 

602: R.~A., Panagia, N., van der Hulst, J.~M., \& Salvati, M.\ 1986, \apj, 301, 

603: 790 

604: \bibitem[Weiler, Panagia \& Sramek 1990]{WPS90} Weiler, K.W., Panagia, N., \& Sramek, R.A.

605:          1990, ApJ 364, 611

606: \bibitem[Weiler et al.(2002)]{2002ARA&A..40..387W} Weiler, K.~W., Panagia, 

607: N., Montes, M.~J., \& Sramek, R.~A.\ 2002, \araa, 40, 387 

608: 

609: \end{thebibliography}

610: 

611: 

612: \clearpage

613: 

614: 

615: 

616: \clearpage

617: 

618: \begin{deluxetable}{lccr}

619: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

620: %\rotate

621: \tablecaption{8.4 GHz VLA positions and flux densities

622:       of SN 2004ip and the nucleus of its host galaxy IRAS 18293-3413}

623: \tablehead{

624: \colhead{Component} & \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)} &  \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)} & 

625: \colhead{S$_{\nu}$ [$\mu$Jy]}

626: } 

627: \startdata

628:      SN 2004ip  & 18\h 32\m 41\fs208 & -34\degs11\amin26\farcs82 

629:                                                     &  466 $\pm$ 25 \\

630:      Nucleus    & 18\h 32\m 41\fs108 & -34\degs11\amin27\farcs62 

631:                                                     & 1708 $\pm$ 41 \\

632: \enddata

633: \tablecomments{The errors in the flux density measurements

634: represent one statistical standard

635: deviation, $\sigma_f$, and are calculated as 

636: $\sigma_f^2 = (\epsilon\,S_0)^2 + \sigma_0^2$, where $S_0$ is the

637: measured peak flux density, $\sigma_0$ is the off-source rms, and the

638: fractional error $\epsilon$

639: (assumed to be of 2\%) accounts for the inaccuracy

640: of VLA flux density calibration and possible deviations of the primary

641: calibrator from an absolute flux density scale.

642: }

643: \end{deluxetable}

644: 

645: \clearpage

646: 

647: \begin{figure}[tbh]

648: \epsscale{1.0}

649: \plotone{f1.eps}

650: \caption{Contours of 8.4~GHz observations of IRAS~18293-3413 made on

651:   11 June 2007 with the VLA in A configuration, overlaid on a NACO

652:   K$_{\rm S}$-band (near-IR) image (shown with an inverted brightness

653:   scale).  A local maximum of radio emission within the circumnuclear

654:   region of the galaxy is coincident with SN~2004ip.  The VLA contours

655:   are drawn at (-2,2,$2\,\sqrt{2}$,4,...)$\times$ the off-source rms

656:   noise in the image, which is 23\,$\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$, and the

657:   synthesized beam size is of 0\farcs62 $\times$ 0\farcs21 along

658:   P.A. 6\fdg5.  The 8.4 GHz peak brightness is 1.71 mJy beam$^{-1}$,

659:   and corresponds to the radio nucleus of IRAS 18293-3413.  The total

660:   continuum 8.4 GHz emission from IRAS 18293-3413 above 3\,$\sigma$ is

661:   40.1 mJy.}

662: \end{figure}

663: 

664: 

665: \end{document}

666: 

667: 

668: 

669: 

670: 

671: