1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: 

3: %\documentclass{emulateapj}

4: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

5: %\usepackage{graphicx,epsf}

6: 

7: \begin{document}

8: \title{Seyfert's Sextet: A Slowly Dissolving Stephan's Quintet?}

9: 

10: \author {

11: A. Durbala\altaffilmark{1}, A. del Olmo\altaffilmark{2}, M. S.

12: Yun\altaffilmark{3}, M. Rosado\altaffilmark{4}, J. W.

13: Sulentic\altaffilmark{1}, H. Plana\altaffilmark{5}, A.

14: Iovino\altaffilmark{6}, J. Perea\altaffilmark{2}, L.

15: Verdes-Montenegro\altaffilmark{2}, I.

16: Fuentes-Carrera\altaffilmark{7}}

17: 

18: 

19: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

20: Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA;

21: adriana.durbala@ua.edu}

22: 

23: \altaffiltext{2}{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andaluc\'{\i}a,

24: CSIC, Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain}

25: 

26: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of

27: Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA}

28: 

29: \altaffiltext{4}{Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional

30: Aut\'{o}noma de M\'{e}xico (UNAM), Apdo. Postal 70-264, 04510,

31: M\'{e}xico, D.F., Mexico}

32: 

33: \altaffiltext{5}{Laboratorio de Astrofisica Teorica e Observacional,

34: Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Brazil}

35: 

36: \altaffiltext{6}{INAF--Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Brera

37: 28, 20121 Milano, Italy}

38: 

39: \altaffiltext{7}{GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Universit\'{e}

40: Paris Diderot, Place Jules Janssen 92190, Meudon, France}

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: 

44: We present a multiwavelength study of the highly evolved compact

45: galaxy group known as Seyfert's Sextet (HCG79: SS). We interpret SS

46: as a 2-3 Gyr more evolved analog of Stephan's Quintet (HCG92: SQ).

47: We postulate that SS formed by sequential acquisition of 4-5

48: primarily late-type field galaxies. Four of the five galaxies show

49: an early-type morphology which is likely the result of secular

50: evolution driven by gas stripping. Stellar stripping has produced a

51: massive/luminous halo and embedded galaxies that are overluminous

52: for their size. These are interpreted as remnant bulges of the

53: accreted spirals. H79d could be interpreted as the most recent

54: intruder being the only galaxy with an intact ISM and uncertain

55: evidence for tidal perturbation. In addition to stripping activity

56: we find evidence for past accretion events. H79b (NGC6027) shows a

57: strong counter-rotating emission line component interpreted as an

58: accreted dwarf spiral. H79a shows evidence for an infalling

59: component of gas representing feedback or possible cross fueling by

60: H79d. The biggest challenge to this scenario involves the low gas

61: fraction in the group. If SS formed from normal field spirals then

62: much of the gas is missing. Finally, despite its advanced stage of

63: evolution, we find no evidence for major mergers and infer that SS

64: (and SQ) are telling us that such groups coalesce via slow

65: dissolution.

66: 

67: \end{abstract}

68: 

69: \keywords{galaxies: active --- galaxies: elliptical and

70: lenticular,cD --- galaxies: interactions --- galaxies: spiral}

71: 

72: \section{Introduction}

73: 

74: Compact groups (CG) are an intriguing component of the large scale

75: structure \citep[e.g.][]{hic97}. They can be described as

76: contradictions in terms involving very high-density galaxy

77: aggregates (typical projected separation $\sim$ 30-40 kpc) found in

78: some of the lowest galaxy density environments. In some ways they

79: mimic a cluster-like environment (galaxy

80: harassment/stripping/secular evolution). Early models

81: \citep[e.g.][]{mam87,bar89} found them to be gravitationally

82: unstable and therefore candidates for rapid collapse into ``fossil''

83: ellipticals. Unfortunately very few fossil elliptical candidates

84: have been found \citep{sul94,zab98} except in denser and,

85: especially, cluster environments. Very few CG show signs of advanced

86: merging \citep[only $\sim$10\% contain a first ranked

87: elliptical;][]{sul97}. Dynamical models, taking into account massive

88: dark matter (DM) haloes \citep{ath97} or formation from a diffuse

89: configuration \citep{ace02} now suggest that such groups can survive

90: for even a Hubble time.

91: 

92: One can study CG both statistically and individually. Each approach

93: has strengths and weaknesses. In either case, but especially the

94: former, this requires a clear definition of the compact group

95: phenomenon. The most local samples \citep[hereafter

96: H1982]{iov02,hic82} suggest that CG can be defined as physically

97: dense aggregates of 4-8 galaxies with separations on the order of a

98: few component diameters. Quartets are by far the most common while

99: systems of 6-8 galaxies are rarely found. It is of course easier to

100: identify numerical populations of such aggregates than to establish

101: true physical density, however first attempts based on redshift

102: concordance and evidence for interaction \citep{men94} suggest that

103: 60/100 of the aggregates in the Hickson Compact Groups (HCG) are

104: {\it bona fide} compact groups \citep[see e.g. table 2 in][]{sul97}.

105: It is assumed that triplets are dynamically distinct (inherently

106: unstable) entities and should not be included in a compact group

107: sample.

108: 

109: Above considerations suggest that CG will be found in a wide range

110: of evolutionary states \citep[e.g.][]{rib98,ver01} and that detailed

111: study of individual CG might be best accomplished within the context

112: of an assumed evolutionary stage. Relatively unstripped, but

113: interacting groups should be very young while aggregates of

114: early-type galaxies embedded in a common stellar halo should be

115: highly evolved. All or most of the CG that have formed in the local

116: Universe may still exist as CG. SQ and SS, two of the densest and

117: best known groups, might be viewed as young/middle aged (few Gyr)

118: and highly evolved (many Gyr) examples, respectively. We considered

119: SQ earlier \citep{sul01} and focus on SS in this paper. The best

120: examples for detailed study involve those compact groups with

121: abundant multiwavelength data and SS certainly qualifies by that

122: criterion. As one of the most evolved groups  we have a further

123: motivation for detailed study.

124: 

125: Seyfert's Sextet (HCG 79, VV 115) is probably the densest (most

126: compact) galaxy aggregate in the local Universe (the systemic

127: recession velocity is v$_R$$ \sim$ 4400 km s$^{-1}$ implying a

128: distance D $\sim$ 60 Mpc assuming H$_0$ = 75 km s$^{-1}$

129: Mpc$^{-1}$). It is also one of the most isolated systems

130: \citep[H1982;][]{sul87,iov02}. In this paper we present new

131: multiwavelength data (optical, IR and radio) including line and

132: continuum imagery, Fabry-P\'{e}rot and slit spectroscopy. In

133: addition to these datasets the paper harvests previously published

134: multiwavelength data for the group in an attempt to give a clear and

135: coherent picture of the phenomena involved and the current

136: evolutionary state. Much of our interpretation of SS will be within

137: the context of our observations and ideas about SQ.

138: 

139: The paper is organized as follows: \S~2 basic observations and

140: reduction information; \S~3 data analysis and presentation with

141: minimal interpretation and \S~4: Inferences about the evolutionary

142: history of SS using new and old observations and interpreted in the

143: light of what we have learned about SQ. Within \S~2 and \S~3 we

144: organize into subsections according to wavelength and/or date type

145: (e.g. IR, radio, optical and imaging, spectroscopy, line,

146: continuum). Discussion in \S~4 contains frequent citations of the

147: relevant parts of \S~3 that support specific inferences.

148: 

149: 

150: 

151: \section{New Observations of SS}

152: 

153: \subsection{Broad-band Optical Images}

154: 

155: SDSS: Optical properties (e.g. magnitudes, morphologies, geometry)

156: of SS and its neighbors were derived from Sloan Digital Sky Survey

157: (Data Release 5: SDSS DR5 -- \citealt{ade07}) images\footnote{This

158: study has made use of SDSS Data Release 5. Funding for the SDSS and

159: SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the

160: Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the

161: U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space

162: Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society,

163: and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web

164: Site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the

165: Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating

166: Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the American Museum

167: of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of

168: Basel, University of Cambridge, Case Western Reserve University,

169: University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the Institute

170: for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns Hopkins

171: University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the Kavli

172: Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean

173: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los

174: Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy

175: (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico

176: State University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,

177: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States

178: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington. }. We

179: downloaded g and r band FITS format images of night sky

180: (``corrected'') frames using the Catalog Archive

181: Server\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr5/access/index.html}. The

182: corrected frames are  flat-field, bias, cosmic-ray, and pixel-defect

183: corrected \citep{sto02}. Sky background fitting and subtraction were

184: performed using IRAF\footnote{Image Reduction and Analysis Facility

185: (IRAF) is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy

186: Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities

187: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with

188: the National Science Foundation - http://iraf.noao.edu/} task

189: IMSURFIT. IRAF task ELLIPSE was used to derive surface brightness,

190: deviation of isophotes from pure ellipses (Fourier coefficient b4 -

191: fourth cosine coefficient of the Fourier expansion), position angle

192: (PAs) and ellipticity as functions of the semimajor axis. Positive

193: and negative values of b4 indicates disky and boxy isophotes

194: respectively. Photometric

195: calibration\footnote{http://www.sdss.org/dr5/algorithms/fluxcal.html}

196: of SDSS images was accomplished using the \emph{aa}, \emph{kk} and

197: \emph{airmass} coefficients (zeropoint, extinction coefficient and

198: airmass) from the TsField files. The surface brightness zeropoint

199: was calculated as:

200: $2.5\times\log(exptime\times0.396^{2})-2.5\times0.4\times(aa+kk\times

201: airmass)$, using the exposure time \emph{exptime} of 53.907456

202: seconds and pixel size of 0\farcs396. Our magnitudes are

203: conventional (``Pogson'') magnitudes.

204: 

205: 

206: NOT: We also obtained deep B and R filter CCD images of SS with the

207: 2.5 m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) of the Observatorio del Roque

208: de los Muchachos (La Palma), using the ALFOSC\footnote{The data

209: presented here have been taken using ALFOSC, which is owned by the

210: Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (IAA) and operated at the

211: Nordic Optical Telescope under agreement between IAA and the NBIfAFG

212: of the Astronomical Observatory of Copenhagen} spectrograph. The

213: detector was a Loral/Lesser $2048\times2048$ pixels with a spatial

214: scale of 0\farcs19 which gives a field of view of $6\farcm5

215: \times6\farcm5$. The broad band images of SS were obtained on a

216: single night of a three night observing run with ALFOSC. A summary

217: of the main characteristics of the images can be found in Table 1.

218: Atmospheric conditions were photometric. Photometric calibration was

219: accomplished with observations of 10 different Landolt standard

220: stars (from \citealt{lan83,lan92} list) in the fields SA110 and SA92

221: obtained on the same night that we observed SS. Seven of these stars

222: were observed 4 times during the night at 4 different airmasses and

223: the other three stars were observed 3 different times at 3 different

224: airmasses. We have in total 37 star flux measures during the night

225: and could obtain with good reliability the extinction during that

226: night allowing us to quantify the photometric conditions. The seeing

227: was also good, as indicated in Table 1. Reduction and calibration of

228: the images were carried out using standard techniques. Bias

229: exposures were used to construct average bias images that were

230: subtracted from the images of SS. Pixel-to-pixel variations were

231: evaluated with a median normalized sky flat-field in each filter.

232: Flux calibration was carried out following the method developed by

233: \citet{you74}. Standard star residuals in the final calibration were

234: always smaller than 0.03 mag. The errors due to variations in the

235: sky were smaller than $1\%$.

236: 

237: 

238: HST: We downloaded seven HST/WFPC2 archival images\footnote{This

239: research is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble

240: Space Telescope, obtained from the Data Archive at the Space

241: Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of

242: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract

243: NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with program \#

244: 8717.} (4-F555W and 3-F814W) of SS all with exposure times of 500 s.

245: We used IRAF to reject cosmic rays and to combine images. The left

246: panel of Figure 1 presents a 31$\times$31 pixels high-pass median

247: filtered image of the average of all seven images. Two contours are

248: superimposed indicating the maximum extent of the luminous halo on

249: HST/SDSS (solid) and NOT images (dotted). The inner contour

250: corresponds to the maximum halo extent on a 51$\times$51 pixels

251: low-pass filtered HST average. The outer contour shows a circle best

252: representing the halo extent on the NOT B-R image shown later in

253: Figure 7. We also downloaded the flux-calibrated archival HST/WFPC2

254: F555W image of SS with total exposure time of 2000 s. Figure 1 upper

255: and lower right panels show 15$\times$15 pixels low-pass median

256: filtered images of H79b and c respectively. Images were extracted

257: and enlarged by a factor of 5.5.

258: 

259: \subsection{Narrow-band Optical--H$\alpha$ Images}

260: 

261: 

262: H$\alpha$ interference filter images (0\farcs533~pixels) were

263: obtained with the Calar Alto (Centro Hispano Aleman) 2.2m telescope

264: in June 1997 \citep[see also][]{xus99}. H$\alpha$ interference

265: filter 667/8 centered at 6667 {\AA} (FWHM = 76 {\AA}) and Johnson R

266: 641/158 centered at 6412 {\AA} (FWHM = 157.5 {\AA}) were used. Three

267: different exposures were obtained with each filter(600s/exposure and

268: 300s/exposure for 667/8 and Johnson R filters, respectively). The

269: IRAF package was used for the H$\alpha$ reduction. The images were

270: bias, flat field, cosmic ray and sky corrected. Individual images

271: were combined into average line and continuum images after

272: centering, equalizing the psf and rescaling. H$\alpha$+[NII]

273: $\lambda\lambda$6548,83 equivalent widths were calculated following

274: the relation from \citet{igl99}:

275: $$EW(H_{\alpha}+[NII])=\frac{C_{\alpha}}{C_{cont}}~W_{f}~,$$ where

276: $C_{\alpha}$ is the number of galaxy counts in the net $H_{\alpha}$

277: image, $C_{cont}$ is the number of counts from the scaled continuum

278: image and $W_{f}$ is the FWHM of the filter in {\AA}.

279: 

280: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy (2D)}

281: 

282: Long-slit spectra were obtained with ALFOSC at the NOT telescope

283: with the same detector used for NOT images. Table 2 contains a

284: summary of the long-slit observations with format as follows: Col. 1

285: spectrum identification with the galaxy or the direction of the

286: slit, Col. 2 position angle, Col. 3 grism used, Col.4 number of

287: exposures in each slit, Col. 5 total exposure time for each slit,

288: Col. 6 resolution in the Spatial scale, Col. 7 spectral resolution

289: in {\AA}/pix and Col. 8 spectral range.

290: 

291: The directions of the slits are marked in Figure 2. The spectra were

292: reduced according to the usual techniques, including subtraction of

293: a mean bias calculated for each night and division by a median

294: flat-field obtained for each configuration. Wavelength calibration

295: was performed in a standard way using He-Ne lamps in each position.

296: The rms of the bidimensional wavelength calibration was found to be

297: of 0.06\AA\ for grism\#8 and 0.4\AA\ for grism\#4. In all the cases

298: several exposures were taken in order to increase the S/N ratio and

299: to remove cosmic rays. Spectra of the spectrophotometric standard

300: stars BD+26\ 2606, HZ44 and BD+33\ 2642 were observed for flux

301: calibration. Observations with Grism\#4 were performed in order to

302: derive some general spectral characteristics of the galaxies. To

303: obtain the kinematics of the galaxies we used the GR8 spectra with a

304: spectral coverage from 5800\AA\ to 8300\AA\ and a spectral

305: resolution of 1.24\AA/pixel. This setup includes the emission lines

306: H$\alpha$, {[}NII{]}, and {[}SII{]} together with the interstellar

307: Na absorption.

308: 

309: In order to obtain redshifts and rotation curves we used the

310: cross-correlation technique developed by \citet{ton79}. For the

311: emission line spectra we used as templates the brightest spatial

312: section of galaxies H79b and H79d, together with a synthetic

313: spectrum built from the rest frame wavelengths of the emission

314: lines. In the case of the absorption line spectra, we used as

315: template also a synthetic spectrum and exposures of three radial

316: velocity standard giant star observed with the same setup.

317: 

318: 

319: \subsection{H$\alpha$ Fabry-P\'{e}rot Spectroscopy (3D)}

320: 

321: SPM: Scanning Fabry-P\'{e}rot (FP) H$\alpha$ interferometry was

322: carried out during the nights of March, 7 and 8, 2000 and March 24,

323: 2001 using the FP interferometer PUMA \citep{ros95} attached to the

324: f/7.9 Ritchey-Chretien focus of the 2.1m telescope at the

325: Observatorio Astronomico Nacional (San Pedro Martir - SPM, Baja

326: California). PUMA involves a scanning FP interferometer, a focal

327: reducer with an f/3.95 camera, a filter wheel, a calibration system

328: and a Site 1024$\times$1024 CCD detector. CCD readout was binned

329: 2$\times$2 resulting in a pixel size of 1\farcs16 with a

330: 10$\times$10 arcmin FOV. The FP has an interference order of 330 at

331: 6563{\AA}. The free spectral range of 934 km s$^{-1}$ was scanned in

332: 48 steps with a sampling resolution of 19 km s$^{-1}$.

333: 

334: We have obtained five data cubes at 6658 \AA, each one with a

335: exposure time of 120 s per channel (implying a total exposure time

336: of 96 min per data cube), during our  observing runs. We have

337: selected the best data cube (the data cube with better seeing and

338: transparency conditions) in order to do our analysis. The best data

339: cube was from 2001. A log of FP observations is presented in Table

340: 3.

341: 

342: The calibration of the data cubes was carried out by obtaining,

343: under the same observing conditions, calibration cubes using the

344: line at $\lambda$6598.95 \AA ~of a diffuse neon lamp. The

345: calibration cubes were obtained before and after SS observations in

346: order to check for possible flexures of the instrument.

347: 

348: 

349: Reduction of the data cubes was carried out using the CIGALE/ADHOCw

350: software \citep{bou93,lec93}. The data reduction procedure has been

351: extensively described in \citet{amr91} and \citet{fue04}. The

352: accuracy of the zero point for the wavelength calibration is a

353: fraction of a channel width ($\leq$ 3 km s$^{-1}$) over the whole

354: field. OH night-sky lines passing through the filter were subtracted

355: by determining the emission in the field outside SS \citep{lav87}.

356: 

357: From PUMA observations we can extract, in addition to the velocity

358: cubes, velocity profiles and the 2D velocity fields of the objects

359: as well as purely monochromatic and continuum images obtained by

360: integrating the intensities of the radial velocity profiles, pixel

361: per pixel, up or down to a certain value of the velocity peak,

362: respectively.

363: 

364: CFHT: The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) data reduction

365: procedure has been extensively described in \citet{amr92} and

366: references therein. A summary of the FP observations can be found in

367: Table 3.

368: 

369: Wavelength calibration was obtained by scanning the narrow Ne 6599

370: \AA\ line under the same conditions as the observations. Velocities

371: measured relative to the systemic velocity are very accurate, with

372: an error of a fraction of a channel width (${\rm <~3 \,~km~s^{-1}}$)

373: over the whole field.

374: 

375: Subtraction of bias, flat fielding of the data and cosmic-ray

376: removal have been performed for each image of the data cube for the

377: CFHT observations. To minimize seeing variation, each scan image was

378: smoothed with a gaussian function of full-width at half maximum

379: equal to the worse-seeing data of the data cube. Transparency and

380: sky foreground fluctuations have also been corrected using field

381: star fluxes and galaxy-free windows for the observations.

382: 

383: The signal measured along the scanning sequence was separated into

384: two parts: (1) an almost constant level produced by the continuum

385: light in a narrow passband around H$\alpha $ (continuum map), and

386: (2) a varying part produced by the H$\alpha $ line (H$\alpha$

387: integrated flux map). The continuum level was taken to be the mean

388: of the three faintest channels, to avoid channel noise effects.  The

389: H$\alpha$ integrated flux map was obtained by integrating the

390: monochromatic profile in each pixel. The velocity sampling was

391: 11~km~s$^{-1}$ at CFHT. Profiles were spatially binned to 3$\times$3

392: or 5$\times$5 pixels in the outer parts, in order to increase the

393: signal-to-noise ratio. Strong OH night sky lines passing through the

394: filters were subtracted by determining the level of emission from

395: extended regions away from the galaxies \citep{lav87}.

396: 

397: 

398: \subsection{Mid- and Far-Infrared}

399: 

400: Mid Infrared (MIR) observations for SS were obtained in the raster

401: imaging mode (AOT:ISOCAM01) with the mid-infrared camera ISOCAM

402: \citep{ces96} on board the satellite ISO \citep[Infrared Space

403: Observatory,][]{kes96}.

404: 

405: We observed our group using the filter LW10, centered at 11.5

406: \micron, and the configuration with a PFOV = 6\arcsec~for the

407: 32$\times$32 infrared array. We adopted a raster mode 2$\times$2,

408: with a raster step of 9\arcsec, for a total exposure time of 450

409: seconds on target (each single exposure had 10 sec integration).

410: 

411: The data were reduced using the software CIA (CAM Interactive

412: Analysis, v. 3) and included standard steps like dark subtraction,

413: removal of cosmic rays events (deglitching), correction for the

414: transient of the detector (stabilization), averaging the frames at

415: each raster position and flat-field correction and, finally

416: combining the frames at each position into one mosaic image taking

417: into account the instrument distortions \citep[projecting; for a

418: detailed description of these steps see][]{sie96}.

419: 

420: Figure 15 shows the isophotal contours of the 12 $\micron$ image

421: overlapped on a DPOSS image of the same group.

422: 

423: In ISOCAM images a major source of photometric error are due to

424: variation of the sky background, correction for the transient

425: (memory) effect and undersampling of the objects. In our case the

426: near blending of galaxies H79b and e is a further source of error. A

427: conservative estimate for the accuracy of our measured fluxes is

428: $\sim$25\% \citep[see also][]{sie96,biv98}.

429: 

430: 

431: \subsection{Radio Line and Continuum}

432: 

433: Observations of SS using the Very Large Array (VLA\footnote{The Very

434: Large Array is a facility of the National Radio Astronomy

435: Observatory which is operated by Associated Universities, Inc. under

436: cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}) were

437: conducted in its 3 km (C) and 1 km (D) configuration on August 2,

438: 1997 and February 6, 1998, respectively, using all 27 telescopes.

439: Shortest baselines at the shadowing limit of 25 meter are present,

440: and structures as large as 15\arcmin\ in size should be visible in

441: each channel maps. The spectrometer was configured in the dual

442: polarization 2IF mode to have 64 spectral channels at a frequency

443: resolution of 48.8 kHz ($\sim$ 10.5 km s$^{-1}$) to cover a total

444: bandwidth of 3.125 MHz ($\sim 660$ km s$^{-1}$). All of the data are

445: calibrated following the standard VLA calibration procedure in AIPS

446: and imaged using IMAGR. Absolute uncertainty in the resulting flux

447: scaling is about 15\%, and this is the formal uncertainty we quote

448: for all physical parameters derived from the flux density.

449: 

450: The synthesized beam produced using a robust weight of $R=1$ is

451: 27\farcs0 $\times$ 16\farcs4. The resulting spectral-line maps have

452: an rms noise level of 0.5 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The 3$\sigma$ HI flux

453: limit in each map is about 0.016 Jy km s$^{-1}$, corresponding to an

454: HI column density limit of $4\times 10^{19}$ atoms cm$^{-2}$. At the

455: adopted distance of the compact group (60 Mpc), the corresponding

456: mass detection limit is $1.4\times 10^7 M_\odot$.\footnote{The

457: atomic gas mass has been calculated as $M_{HI} = 2.36 \times

458: 10^5~D^2_{Mpc} \int S_V dV$, where $S_V dV$ is in Jy km s$^{-1}$.}

459: 

460: A line-free continuum image constructed by averaging the 14

461: line-free channels is shown in Figure 16. This continuum image has

462: an effective bandwidth of 1.37 MHz centered on an effective

463: frequency of 1399 MHz. The rms noise level achieved in Figure 16 is

464: 0.20 mJy beam$^{-1}$.

465: 

466: In addition, we also produced a higher resolution 1.4 GHz continuum

467: image of SS using the data from the archive. The B-configuration

468: snapshot image with $\sim5\arcsec$ resolution is obtained in the

469: continuum mode with a total bandwidth of 200 MHz, and the rms noise

470: in the image is $\sim 0.06$ mJy beam$^{-1}$.

471: 

472: 

473: 

474: \section{Data Analysis}

475: 

476: \subsection{Broad Band Optical}

477: 

478: \subsubsection{SS Environment}

479: 

480: One of the characteristics of the best known local examples of

481: compact groups \citep[H1982;][]{iov02} involves the low galaxy

482: surface density environments in which they are found. Since they are

483: usually selected with an isolation criterion it is not surprising

484: that they are at least locally isolated but they are often so

485: compact that this does not necessarily mean very much in the context

486: of loose group scales. Attempts have been made to estimate the

487: galaxy surface density near H1982 groups over a larger area/volume

488: \citep{sul87,roo89} and a redshift survey has also identified

489: accordant redshift neighbors around 17 Hickson groups \citep{dec97}.

490: Many were found to be quite isolated even on Mpc scales where they

491: are often found on the periphery of nearby superclusters in stark

492: contrast to their implied space densities that can exceed those of

493: cluster cores. SS is arguably the most compact group in the local

494: Universe showing the largest surface density enhancement of any

495: Hickson group. A little reconnaissance usually allows one to

496: identify the component of large scale structure with which a compact

497: group is associated. SS can be assigned to group LGG403

498: \citep{gar93,roo94} whose identified members span several Mpc.

499: NED\footnote{This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC

500: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion

501: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with

502: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.} reveals only one

503: accordant redshift (3400-5400km/s) neighbor  (UGC10127) within

504: $30\arcmin$ ($\sim0.5$ Mpc) radius. Only four additional accordant

505: (within $\pm$1000 km s$^{-1}$) galaxies are found within $60\arcmin$

506: (CGCG137-004, UGC 10117, CGCG137-019, NGC6032). This radius

507: corresponds to crossing time t$_c$$\sim$ 5 Gyr assuming a random

508: velocity on the plane of sky of 200 km s$^{-1}$.

509: 

510: Table 4 provides a census of the 17 known accordant redshift

511: neighbors within 2 Mpc (an Abell radius) of SS and within 1000 km

512: s$^{-1}$ of the mean group recession velocity. This census is based

513: upon SDSS images of the field and includes all galaxies brighter

514: than g magnitude of the faintest member of SS (H79d with

515: g$\sim$15.5; redshift implied luminosity similar to LMC). Redshifts

516: were taken from NED because SDSS does not provide spectroscopy for

517: this field. The g band survey also found twelve galaxies beyond 5500

518: km s$^{-1}$ (many near 10-11000 km s$^{-1}$ associated with the

519: Hercules Cluster), one galaxy near 2000 km s$^{-1}$ and three

520: without redshift measures. An equivalent r-band census to r=15.8

521: (r-band magnitude of H79d) yields many more galaxies (without

522: redshifts) but visual inspection suggest that all/most of these are

523: likely to be much more distant. We adopted g-band census because: 1)

524: it shows higher redshift completeness, 2) we wanted to minimize

525: background contamination and 3) we regard late-type field galaxies

526: as the principal source of infalling intruders as suggested by

527: NGC7318b in SQ and H79d in SS. The census yields a surface density

528: of 1.3 galaxies Mpc$^{-2}$, or 1.6 galaxies Mpc$^{-2}$ if all three

529: bright neighbors with unmeasured redshift show accordant measures.

530: Some recent surface density estimates range from $\sim$ 1 Mpc$^{-2}$

531: for the sparsest environments up to $\sim$ 6 Mpc$^{-2}$ in the

532: poorer cluster cores \citep{got03a}. SS shows a surface density of

533: $\sim$7-8000 galaxies Mpc$^{-2}$ and a surface density enhancement

534: of $\sim$5-6000 in agreement with \citet{sul87}. SS shows the

535: highest density enhancement of any compact group in the local

536: Universe and one of the lowest galaxy surface densities in its

537: Mpc-scale environment.

538: 

539: 

540: \subsubsection{SS Component/Neighbor Morphologies and Geometries}

541: 

542: SS involves four or five accordant redshift (H79abcdf) galaxies plus

543: one discordant redshift galaxy (H79e). H79f on the NE edge of the

544: group can be described either as a tidal tail or as the remnants of

545: a tidally stripped galaxy. The mean separation between the galaxies

546: is about 7.2 kpc and the mean velocity dispersion $\sigma_V$= 121 km

547: s$^{-1}$ \citep[hereafter D2005]{dar05}. Figure 1 identifies

548: specific components of the group following designations in

549: \citet{hic82,hic93a} with the addition of H79f.

550: 

551: Table 4 gives estimated Hubble types for assumed members of SS as

552: well as all neighbors within a radius of $\sim$2 Mpc. Positions and

553: recession velocities are given for all galaxies along with projected

554: separations in arcmin and kpc for the neighbors. SS members show

555: unusual and sometimes ambiguous structure. Figures 3 and 4 present

556: the most interesting standard geometric profiles for the brightest

557: two member galaxies (H79ab). We derived these measures from r-band

558: SDSS images. Results for g-band were very similar. Several sets of

559: geometric profiles and derived parameters have already been given

560: for galaxies in SS: \citet[hereafter H1989a]{hic89a};

561: \citet[hereafter R1991]{rub91}; \citet[hereafter B1993]{bet93};

562: \citet[hereafter N2000a]{nis00}. A serious problem with deriving

563: standard parameters for SS components involves the fact that they

564: are embedded in a luminous halo. For example the r-band surface

565: brightness of the last concentric isophotes in H79abc are 21.7, 21.0

566: and 21.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ respectively.

567: 

568: The three brightest members (H79abc) all show early-type

569: morphologies in the simple sense that they are axially symmetric

570: with no obvious spiral arms or visible emission regions. H79a

571: (NGC6027a) shows a very smooth light distribution and an ellipticity

572: consistent with Hubble type E3-4 although it has been classified E0,

573: S0 and Sa in the past. It is bisected by a prominent dust lane

574: adding to the confusion in assigning a type and in determining the

575: position of the nucleus. The relaxed appearance (i.e. flatness) of

576: the dust lane forces us to consider the possibility that H79a might

577: be an edge-on S0 with a weak stellar disk component. The alternative

578: interpretations are that the dust lane: 1) hints that H79a was

579: originally a spiral galaxy or 2) is the relaxed signature of a past

580: accretion event. ``Relaxed'' is perhaps an overstatement because the

581: dust lane shows a pronounced bend (see Figure 1) in the direction

582: towards the center of the group. Figure 3 shows azimuthally averaged

583: surface brightness and b4 profiles for this galaxy derived with

584: fixed position angle (68\arcdeg) and ellipticity ($\epsilon$=0.36).

585: In the figures a$_{max}$ indicates the semimajor axis of the last

586: concentric isophote. Isophotal boxiness is observed in the center

587: and is probably induced by the dust lane (see also B1993). No

588: surface photometric study of this galaxy has revealed a stellar disk

589: component that might be a counterpart to the dust disk.

590: 

591: The unusual shape and internal structure of H79b revealed by HST

592: images (Figure 1) do not lend themselves to a standard geometric

593: analysis. Figure 4 shows evidence for two disk components (centered

594: at $\approx$ 2-3\arcsec and 5-8\arcsec) in both surface brightness

595: and b4 parameter. Seeing in the SDSS r-band image is $\sim$2.5

596: pixels corresponding to $\sim$1\arcsec. The above mentioned WFPC2

597: images show signs of highly inclined internal (spiral?) structure

598: (see Figure 1 upper right where a tightly wrapped spiral dust lane

599: is seen). Earlier WFPC1 images revealed the presence of a twisted

600: dust lane oriented approximately diagonally across the galaxy

601: \citep{sra94}. The axial ratios of H79b and c suggest that both are

602: highly inclined to our line of sight. The surface brightness and b4

603: profiles for H79c also indicate considerable complexity. The WFPC2

604: images suggest that the tidal tail extending to the NW originates

605: near this galaxy. It crosses the disk at an angle of about

606: 20\arcdeg\ forming an apparent ``X'' structure (see Figure 1 lower

607: right).

608: 

609: H79d is the only member that shows a late-type (spiral) morphology

610: with numerous condensations resembling HII regions detected on many

611: images but most dramatically with WFPC2. It is highly inclined with

612: an axial ratio of 0.18 suggesting an inclination of 80\arcdeg. H79d

613: appears to be projected on H79a because a few dusty condensations

614: can be seen in silhouette against the halo light of that galaxy on

615: the WFPC2 images \citep{pal02}. Some published studies suggest a

616: link between galaxies H79ad \citep[R1991;][]{pla02}.

617: 

618: H79e shows a much higher redshift and is assumed to be a near

619: face-on high luminosity ScI spiral at approximately 4.5$\times$

620: greater distance. H79f lies to the NE of H79b and is either a tidal

621: filament or another early-type member. It was not included as a

622: member by \citet{hic82,hic93a} yet the RC3 catalog \citep[herafter

623: RC3]{dev91} lists it as a galaxy with designation NGC6027e. The

624: surface brightness profile for this galaxy follows an exponential

625: law. The position angle and ellipticity profiles in the outer part

626: of H79f are constant ($\sim$50\arcdeg\ and $\sim$0.57,

627: respectively). The surface brightness of the last concentric

628: isophote in H79f is 21.6 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in r-band and 22.3 mag

629: arcsec$^{-2}$ in g-band. The central concentration and elliptical

630: isophotes argue that it is a member galaxy however in this

631: interpretation it has likely been heavily stripped given the

632: weakness of the central concentration for an apparently early-type

633: morphology (lacking any signs of gas or dust).

634: 

635: Perhaps more unusual than their internal peculiarities are the small

636: measured sizes of all members of SS. Table 5 presents different

637: estimates for the sizes of the galaxies in SS. We compare our SDSS

638: based measurements with four previous studies (H1989a, B1993, RC3

639: and N2000a). We find a large scatter among the measures consistent

640: with the difficult task of extracting discrete diameters from

641: galaxies embedded in a luminous halo. Measured diameters exceed 10

642: kpc only if one attempts to apply a standard model of the galaxy

643: that extends beyond the last concentric isophote. We used SDSS g and

644: r band images to determine the last concentric major/minor axis

645: isophotes in each galaxy. We think that attempts to measure standard

646: diameters (e.g. 25 mag arcsec$^{-2}$) have little or no meaning in

647: the context of individual galaxy properties since this level is

648: three magnitudes below the surface brightness level of the last

649: concentric isophote. The luminous halo of SS likely contains a

650: significant fraction of the stellar mass of galaxies H79abc and

651: especially H79f. Attempts at model-based (e.g. exponential and

652: r$^{1/4}$) galaxy subtraction of H79abcdf suggest that the halo is

653: not a product of isophotal overlap \citep[][N2000a]{sul83}. Galaxy

654: H79d is the only component of SS that shows little sign of tidal

655: stripping and appears to be a recently arrived low luminosity late

656: type spiral.

657: 

658: The shape and extent of the luminous halo in SS is indicated by two

659: contours in Figure 1. The inner very irregular contour shows the

660: extent of the halo on HST and SDSS images. In the latter case this

661: correspond to 24.7 and 24.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in g and r-bands

662: respectively. The outer more symmetric contour shows the the circle

663: best fitting the halo extent on more sensitive NOT B-band images

664: (see also Figure 7) and corresponds to 27 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. The

665: radius of the outer circle is 1.3 arcmin ($\sim$ 23 kpc). The SDSS

666: sky levels at that radius are 26.4 and 26.2 arcsec$^{-2}$ for g and

667: r-bands respectively.

668: 

669: Seventeen accordant redshift neighbors brighter than g=15.5 lie

670: within $\pm1000$ km s$^{-1}$ and r=2 Mpc of SS. Table 4 lists the

671: assigned Hubble types for the galaxies with 75-80\% of SS members

672: (3/4 or 4/5 depending on whether H79f is considered) and 30-40\% of

673: neighbors showing early-type (E/S0 or E/S0/Sa) morphologies. Recent

674: morphological reevaluation of a sample of about 1000 very isolated

675: field galaxies \citep{sul06} leads us to predict a $\sim$14\%

676: early-type fraction in SS and in its neighborhood. The SS

677: environment shows a 2-3$\times$ higher early-type fraction so this

678: prediction is likely too low. A recent quantification of the

679: morphology-density relation \citep{got03a} finds 16\% E plus 30\% S0

680: for environments with surface density similar to the SS neighborhood

681: suggesting that the observed early-type galaxies are overrepresented

682: in SS if we accept H79abc, and possibly f, as {\it bona fide} E/S0

683: galaxies.

684: 

685: Table 6 provides g-band major axis diameters at the 25 mag

686: arcsec$^{-2}$ isophote derived from the SDSS images for thirteen

687: accordant redshift neighbors. Comparison of these diameters with

688: those for SS components leads to the conclusion that the galaxies in

689: SS are 3-4 times smaller. A similar conclusion was found by

690: \citet{wil91} where they noted that the individual galaxies in SS

691: are on average one third the size of a typical normal galaxy. We

692: estimated the diameters of neighboring S0-Sb galaxies truncated to

693: the same surface brightness level as the last concentric isophotes

694: in H79abc. We find neighbor diameters in the range 4-7 kpc at

695: $\mu_g$=21.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and 4-12 kpc at $\mu_g$=21.8 mag

696: arcsec$^{-2}$ compared to 5-8 kpc for H79abc at their last

697: concentric isophotes. The SS members are therefore more similar in

698: size to the bulge components of neighboring spiral galaxies. The

699: galaxies in SS are either: a) intrinsically dwarf or b) normal

700: galaxies that have undergone severe tidal stripping. The angular

701: size of the entire group is $\sim$1.3 arcmin (H1982) $\sim$23 kpc

702: which is comparable to the size of some of the neighboring disk

703: galaxies. The massive common halo in SS implies significant

704: stripping and disfavors the hypothesis that most SS members are

705: intrinsically dwarf galaxies.

706: 

707: \subsubsection{SS Component and Neighbor Luminosities}

708: 

709: Table 7 presents apparent magnitudes for members of SS in different

710: filters. We compare our g and r-band SDSS based measurements to

711: H1989a, R1991, RC3 and N2000a. Our apparent magnitudes measure the

712: light within the last concentric isophote corrected for galactic and

713: internal extinction as well as K-corrected. Extinction corrections

714: were performed using The York Extinction Solver (YES)\footnote{The

715: York Extinction Solver (YES) at http://cadcwww.hia.nrc.ca/yes}

716: \citep{mcc04}. YES allows a user to determine the optical depth at

717: 1$\mu$m from an estimate of the color excess, and then to determine

718: the extinction of the target from the optical depth. Color excess is

719: estimated using \citet{sch98} extinction maps employing a

720: \citet{fit99} reddening law.

721: 

722: Table 8 presents our g and r-band absolute magnitudes and

723: luminosities for SS galaxies. As noted earlier the galaxies appear

724: to be remarkably luminous for their small sizes which are more

725: similar to the size of the bulges of late-type neighbors. Along with

726: diameters, Table 6 presents absolute magnitudes, total luminosities

727: and bulge luminosities for the accordant redshift neighboring

728: galaxies. Overlapping structure in the close spiral pair NGC6052

729: prevents precise determination of their sizes and magnitudes. Other

730: late-type neighbors (NGC6028 and CGCG108-085) lack any SDSS imaging

731: data. Apparent magnitudes are corrected model magnitudes (modelMag-

732: better of exponential/deVaucouleurs fit) given by the SDSS DR5

733: pipeline. The total luminosities in each filter were calculated

734: using the formulae:

735: $$L_{gT}=10^{0.4(M_{g\sun}-g_{TC}+5logD-5)} (L_{g\sun})$$

736: $$L_{rT}=10^{0.4(M_{r\sun}-r_{TC}+5logD-5)} (L_{r\sun})$$

737: where $M_{g\sun}=5.12$ and $M_{r\sun}=4.68$ are adopted for g and r

738: absolute magnitudes of the Sun respectively. To express the

739: luminosities in terms of bolometric solar luminosity we used

740: $M_{\sun}=4.76$ which implies ratios $L_{\sun}/L_{g\sun}=1.39$ and

741: $L_{\sun}/L_{r\sun}=0.93$. The assumed distance is D= 60 Mpc. Bulge

742: luminosities are estimated considering a bulge to disk ratio

743: $(B/D)\sim 1$ for Sa, $\sim0.65$ for Sab, $\sim0.4$ for Sb, $\sim

744: 0.1$ for Sc and $\sim 0.01$ for Sd morphological type

745: \citep{ken85,kop90} and the equation: $B/T=1/(1+D/B)$, where T is

746: total luminosity. $B/T$ is assumed to be 0.68 for SO morphological

747: type \citep{ken85}. Inspection of Tables 6 and 8 shows that the

748: total luminosities of galaxies H79abc are comparable to the bulge

749: luminosities of the Sb-Sc and SO neighbors.

750: 

751: Figure 5 plots apparent diameter versus g-band magnitude for SS

752: galaxies (open circles) and thirteen accordant redshift neighbors

753: (filled squares): 1) within $\pm1000$ km s$^{-1}$, 2) within 2 Mpc

754: radius and 3) brighter than g=15.5. Measured diameters for the

755: neighbors correspond to the 25 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ g-band isophote. We

756: used the corrected modelMag values from SDSS. We also plot the

757: bulges for SO and Sb-Sc neighbors with sizes and magnitudes

758: corresponding to the 21.8 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ g-band isophote.

759: Diameters and magnitudes for SS components correspond to the last

760: concentric g-band isophote. The plot shows the expected correlation

761: between angular diameter and apparent magnitude for the accordant

762: neighbors. It is reasonably well fit by the indicated linear

763: regression line. The brightest neighbor NGC6060 is similar in

764: luminosity to M31 ($M_{g}\sim-21.5$) while H79d is similar to the

765: LMC ($M_{g}\sim-18.2$). H79f, considered as a galaxy, would be 0.4

766: magnitudes fainter than the SMC ($M_{g}\sim-16.9$). Apparent g-band

767: magnitudes for M31, LMC and SMC were estimated from V magnitude and

768: B-V color using the transformation equation: $g=V+0.6(B-V)-0.12$

769: \citep{jes05}. Conversion to absolute magnitudes assumed distances

770: of $\sim$ 750 kpc for M31 \citep{rib05}, $\sim$ 50 kpc for LMC and

771: $\sim$ 60 kpc for SMC \citep{kel06}. SS members are smaller than all

772: of the galaxies in our neighborhood sample.

773: 

774: Figure 5 shows that H79abc are similar in apparent brightness to the

775: faintest neighbors, but they show much higher mean surface

776: brightness. H79abc show g-band mean surface brightness within the

777: last concentric isophote $\mu_g$=19.9-21.1 mag arcsec$^{-2}$

778: compared to $\mu_g$=22.5-23.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ calculated within

779: the 25 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ isophote for neighbors. The two neighbors

780: with most similar size and apparent brightness show

781: $\mu_g$=22.5-22.9 mag arcsec$^{-2}$. Galaxies in SS show much higher

782: mean surface brightness and are embedded in a luminous halo. Their

783: sizes and surface brightness are more similar to the bulge

784: components of neighboring spiral and SO neighbors. The mean surface

785: brightness of one of the brightest neighboring Sb galaxies (NGC6008)

786: would increase from 22.9 to 20.8 mag arcsec$^{-2}$, while the

787: diameter would decrease from 1.5 to 0.2 arcmin if we consider only

788: the central bulge. The overall mean surface brightness of SS is also

789: high. It is by far the highest observed (20.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$) for

790: any H1982 group. Only three other groups (HCG8, 40 and 95) shows

791: values within one magnitude (21.3-21.4 mag arcsec$^{-2}$). Allowing

792: for a different zero point in the surface brightness scale suggests

793: that none of the 121 southern compact groups \citep{iov02}

794: approaches the surface brightness of SS.

795: 

796: Figure 6 is a composite of the B and R images showing the extension

797: of the diffuse halo. According to D2005 the halo contributes

798: $\sim46\%$ of the total light in B band \citep[see also][]{sul83}.

799: We get a similar result with g and r band SDSS images. The halo is a

800: fraction of $46\pm10\%$ and $45\pm10\%$ of the total light in g and

801: r band, respectively, if we don't include galaxy H79f as part of the

802: halo. This corresponds to a corrected apparent magnitude of

803: $g=13.4\pm0.1$ and $r=12.9\pm0.1$. If we included H79f, the halo

804: contribution would raise by $2\%$ in both g and r band. We estimated

805: the diffuse light in SQ using the magnitudes of the halo and

806: component galaxies given in \citet{mol98}. The diffuse light

807: component represents $\sim13\%$ of the total light, suggesting that

808: SQ is a less evolved compact group, younger than SS. The early-type

809: fraction in SQ is about $40-50\%$.

810: 

811: A diffuse light image was derived for SS using the wavelet technique

812: (Figure 6 in D2005). The symmetry and smoothness of the halo light

813: distribution in Figure 6 suggests a reasonable degree of relaxation

814: compared to e.g. SQ. There are two peaks in the halo light

815: distribution of SS. One is coincident with the NW tidal tail marked

816: in that figure. The other, which does not coincide with a galaxy or

817: tail, lies much closer to the center of the diffuse light

818: distribution. We attempted to model the radial profile of the CFHT

819: B-band halo image (D2005) and find that an exponential yields the

820: best fit. We get disk scale lengths R$_d$= 23 and 28 kpc, centered,

821: respectively, on an approximate outer halo contour (circle in Figure

822: 1 left) and on the SE condensation. We also attempted de Vaucouleurs

823: and S\'{e}rsic fits on the surface brightness profile of the halo.

824: However, they could be applied only for the outer part and even so

825: we obtained unphysical results, namely extreme values for the

826: effective radii. While the overall halo is smooth and roughly

827: circular, consistent with relaxation, the condensation connected

828: with the tidal tail indicates that the halo is still growing.

829: 

830: 

831: \subsubsection{Group Morphology and Colors}

832: 

833: We supplement published color information on SS with our SDSS g-r

834: and our NOT B-R measures. Table 9 lists new and old color measures

835: for group members as well as the halo while Figure 7 shows our best

836: attempt at a 2D B-R color image. Tabular results are consistent with

837: Figure 7. The central region of H79a shows the reddest color

838: (B-R$\sim$1.6-1.8) due to the presence of the strong dust lane. The

839: inner parts of galaxies H79a/b show B-R$\sim$1.5 which is typical of

840: an early-type or bulge stellar population. The outer parts of

841: galaxies H79a/b as well as H79f show B-R$\sim$1.3-1.4. The color of

842: galaxy H79f is in good agreement with \citet{nis02}. Galaxy H79c,

843: much of the diffuse halo as the NW tidal tail show B-R$\sim$1.2-1.3

844: while the outer halo is distinctly bluer at B-R$\sim$0.8-1.1. All

845: results indicate that galaxy H79c is bluer than galaxies H79a/b with

846: complex color structure. It is bluest on the side towards the center

847: of the group. The bluest colors are seen in galaxy H79d with

848: B-R$\sim$0.7-0.9 which is typical of a late type spiral. We see a

849: slight color difference $\Delta(B-R)$=0.3 along the major axis with

850: reddest color in the direction of galaxy H79a.

851: 

852: Color measures for the halo component are the most complex. We find

853: a mean halo color that is bluer than galaxies H79a/b and more

854: similar to galaxies H79c/f. D2005 also reported a much bluer color

855: for the halo B-R=0.9 compared to B-R=1.5 for the galaxies. We

856: derived halo properties after subtracting galaxies at their last

857: concentric isophote which might leave a significant red galaxy

858: component in our halo measures. The wavelet technique employed for

859: the D2005 estimates more effectively removes the galaxies leaving a

860: much flatter halo. The resultant galaxy color will be dominated by

861: red galaxies H79a/b. The wavelet derived halo color is similar to

862: galaxy H79d. Figure 7 suggests that the halo shows a significant

863: color gradient and that the outer parts are as blue as those of a

864: late-type spiral. If the mean color of H79d is B-R=0.8 then we can

865: adopt a mean halo color of B-R=1.0$\pm$0.2 as a best estimate. B-R

866: colors were only corrected for galactic extinction using

867: \citet{bur82}. Other corrections are very dependent on the

868: morphological type, which is uncertain for some members of the

869: group. An internal extinction correction for galaxy H79d

870: (morphological type Sd) would make it 0.2 B-R magnitudes brighter.

871: The color of the outermost halo isophotes will be sensitive to the

872: S/N match between the B and R frames; our estimate based on the

873: intermediate halo color is likely to be more robust.

874: 

875: 

876: \subsection{Optical Line (H$\alpha$ Emission)}

877: 

878: Figure 8 presents a continuum subtracted H$_{\alpha}$ image derived

879: from the CFHT Fabry-P\'{e}rot observations. Figure 9 shows a similar

880: continuum subtracted interference filter (IF) image obtained with

881: the Calar Alto 2.2m telescope that confirms all features seen in

882: Figure 8. The former provides higher sensitivity and resolution

883: while the latter image gives a much larger field of view that allows

884: a search to be made for stripped warm gas or gas rich companions. In

885: this section we use the 3D CFHT data only as the source of an

886: additional 2D H$_{\alpha}$ map. H$_{\alpha}$ emission is detected

887: from galaxies H79a, b and d. Emission is detected over the full

888: optical extent of galaxy H79d while emission from H79a and b is

889: detected only in the central regions. The weak emission signature

890: associated with H79c is not confirmed with our slit spectra and is

891: likely an artifact of the strong Balmer absorption detected in that

892: galaxy.

893: 

894: Table 10 summarizes new and published H$_{\alpha}$ fluxes for these

895: galaxies including both IF and slit spectral measures. The former

896: include a contribution from [NII] $\lambda$6548,83 emission. Our

897: flux measures have an uncertainty lower than $\pm$10\%, computed as

898: Poissonian error. We find a large scatter among published EW

899: H$_{\alpha}$(+[NII]$\lambda$6548,83) measures: 1-7{\AA}, 4-8{\AA}

900: and 13-116{\AA} \citep[][N2000a]{igl99,coz04} for galaxies H79a,b

901: and d respectively. We measure 10{\AA}, 9{\AA} and 36{\AA},

902: respectively, for the three galaxies. [NII] contamination could not

903: be avoided with the IF filter employed (FWHM= 76{\AA}). Typical EW

904: for E/SO galaxies range from -3 to 4{\AA} \citep{ken98}. Our EW

905: measure for H79d is similar to published values for normal Sd

906: galaxies \citep{ken98,jam04}. A mean EW H$_{\alpha}$=36{\AA} was

907: found in a recent study involving Sd galaxies \citep{jam04}.

908: H$_{\alpha}$ flux measures for H79d tabulated in Table 10 show much

909: less scatter than EW estimates reflecting the uncertainty of the

910: continuum normalization for this late-type edge-on galaxy. We

911: estimate a star formation rate (SFR= 0.07 M$_{\sun}$ $yr^{-1}$)

912: which is smaller than the mean value (0.6 M$_{\sun}$ $yr^{-1}$)

913: found for normal Sd spirals \citep{ken83,jam04}. SFR is computed

914: using the formula derived for normal disk galaxies:

915: $$SFR(M_{\sun}~yr^{-1})=7.9\times10^{-42}~L(H_{\alpha})~(ergs

916: ~s^{-1})$$ assuming a \citet{sal55} initial mass function (IMF) with

917: mass limits 0.1 and 100 M$_{\sun}$ \citep{ken98}. We derived the net

918: H$_{\alpha}$ luminosities using the [NII]$\lambda$6583/H$_{\alpha}$

919: line ratios from N2000a. The SFR for H79d increases to $\sim$0.11 if

920: we apply the same (1.1 magnitude) extinction correction as used in

921: \citet{jam04}. H$\alpha$ flux and derived SFR values for H79d

922: therefore show no evidence for an interaction induced enhancement.

923: 

924: Using the same formula we estimate SFR $\sim$ 0.05 and 0.06

925: M$_{\sun}$ $yr^{-1}$ for galaxies H79a and b, respectively. The

926: [NII]$\lambda$6583/H$_{\alpha}$ line ratio is $\sim$ 0.5 for both

927: galaxies (N2000a) which is at the lower limit of the typical values

928: (0.5-3) found for early-type galaxies \citep{phi86}. H$_{\alpha}$

929: emission in galaxies H79a and b shows an extension on a scale of 3-4

930: kpc, larger than the typical size of H$_{\alpha}$ emission regions

931: in early type galaxies($<$ 3 kpc) \citep{phi86}. Apparently there is

932: too much gas in H79a/b if they are interpreted as normal SO

933: galaxies. The emission in H79a shows two condensations separated by

934: 3\arcsec\ superimposed on weaker more extended emission. One

935: component (NE) is coincident with or slightly E of the position of

936: the optical nucleus and lies at the end of an apparent emission

937: ``bridge'' between H79d and H79a that can be seen in Figure 8. The

938: other component (SW) is about 0.74$\times$ the intensity of the NE

939: component. Galaxy H79b shows a compact central emission component

940: with diameter D $\sim$ 5\arcsec\ superimposed on a weak elongated

941: diffuse component with major axis diameter D $\sim$ 15\arcsec. The

942: latter component shows distinct curvature or warping. The central

943: component appears to be slightly offset towards the N on Figure 8.

944: 

945: We estimated the mass of ionized gas following \citet{phi86} where:

946: $$M_{ionized~gas}=(L_{H_{\alpha}}m_{H}/N_{e})/(4\pi

947: j_{H_{\alpha}}/N_{e} N_{p})$$ where L$_{H_{\alpha}}$ is the

948: H$_{\alpha}$ luminosity, m$_{H}$ is the mass of the hydrogen atom,

949: j$_{H_{\alpha}}$ is the H$_{\alpha}$ emissivity, N$_{e}$ and N$_{p}$

950: are the electron and proton densities, respectively. The assumed

951: electron temperature was 10$^{4}$ K. [SII] $\lambda6717/\lambda6731$

952: line ratio was used as an electron density indicator \citep{ost06}.

953: [SII] $\lambda6717/\lambda6731$ line ratios for galaxies H79b and d

954: are estimated from our slit spectra and are tabulated in Table 11

955: along with other line ratios. No [SII] $\lambda6717/\lambda6731$

956: line ratio exists for galaxy H79a so we adopted the same ratio as

957: galaxy H79b. The value for $4\pi j_{H_{\alpha}}/N_{e}N_{p}$ was

958: derived using the HI recombination line tables of \citet{ost06}. The

959: computed ionized gas masses are 7.5$\times$10$^{4}$M$_{\sun}$,

960: 9.2$\times$10$^{4}$M$_{\sun}$, 3.5$\times$10$^{5}$M$_{\sun}$ for

961: galaxies H79a, b and d, respectively. The ionized gas masses for

962: galaxies H79a and b are within the range of values (between 10$^{3}$

963: and 10$^{5}$ M$_{\sun}$) found by \citet{mac96} for luminous

964: elliptical and lenticular galaxies. On the other hand \citet{phi86},

965: using a larger sample of early-type galaxies, report a mean value

966: between 10$^{3}$ and 10$^{4}$ M$_{\sun}$. This would place galaxies

967: H79a and b at the upper end of the distribution of ionized gas

968: masses for early-type galaxies. Emission line diagnostic diagrams of

969: \citet{kew06} suggest that much of the gas in H79a may be related to

970: the AGN rather than to star formation so the already uncertain

971: estimated mass may be too high. [OIII]/H$\beta$ line ratio of

972: \citet{coz04} is used.

973: 

974: We used the larger field of view of our PUMA

975: (10\arcmin$\times$10\arcmin) and Calar Alto

976: (13\arcmin$\times$5\arcmin) observations to search for H$\alpha$

977: emission from other galaxies in the field that might represent

978: previously unknown neighbors of SS. The search was performed two

979: different ways: using ADHOCw software and IRAF task DAOFIND imposing

980: a threshold of 4$\sigma$. No candidates were found implying that no

981: gas rich dwarf systems similar to H79d lie within $\sim$ 90 kpc. We

982: also looked for discrete H$\alpha$ condensations similar to the ones

983: found in the debris field of SQ \citep{sul01}. We required

984: confirmation on at least two independent H$\alpha$ images with

985: agreement within a few arcsec to allow for field distortion.

986: 

987: 

988: 

989: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}

990: \subsubsection{H$\alpha$ emission}

991: 

992: H79d is the only galaxy in SS that shows a normal late-type ISM.

993: Figure 10 compares new Fabry-P\'{e}rot (FP) and slit H$\alpha$ line

994: of sight velocity curves. They show good agreement (also with R1991,

995: \citealt{men03} and \citealt{nss00}) when differing spatial/spectral

996: resolutions are taken into account. The rotation curves are not

997: strongly distorted suggesting (along with gas content) that H79d is

998: a relatively recent arrival without evidence of strong perturbation.

999: Figure 10 suggests a reasonable estimate for the maximum rotation

1000: velocity $v_{max}$ for galaxy H79d is $\sim100$ km s$^{-1}$ after

1001: correction for 80\arcdeg\ inclination. Using $v_{max}$  we derive a

1002: mass within 13\arcsec\ radius ($R\sim3.8$ kpc) of

1003: $\sim9\times10^{9}M_{\sun}$ thus

1004: $(M/L_{r})_{H79d}\sim6~M_{\sun}/L_{\sun}$. R1991 find the mass to

1005: R$_{25}$ for H79d $\sim3\times10^{10}M_{\sun}$ and

1006: $(M/L_{B})_{H79d}\sim3.7~M_{\sun}/L_{\sun}$, using the mass and

1007: luminosity within R$_{25}$, radius corresponding to 25 mag

1008: arcsec$^{-2}$ in B-band.

1009: 

1010: Figure 11 presents the line of sight velocity curve for H79a. We

1011: plot the heliocentric velocity along the major axis of the H$\alpha$

1012: emission from FP interferometry using CFHT-MOS/SIS data. Our PUMA

1013: measures were indispensable in interpreting the higher resolution

1014: and S/N CFHT ones. PUMA has more than three times the free spectral

1015: range of CFHT and was able to resolve the order overlap that

1016: affected the higher resolution and S/N CFHT measures. The larger

1017: free spectral range of our PUMA data was used to resolve velocity

1018: redundancy inherent in the higher sensitivity CFHT FP data. A

1019: published stellar velocity curve based on long slit observations

1020: \citep{bon99} is superimposed on this plot. In order to match the

1021: long slit data, we mimic a slit through our FP data at

1022: PA=65$^\circ$. We find two H$\alpha$ velocity components: 1) a weak

1023: and compact ($\sim$ 5\arcsec) nuclear component with velocities

1024: ($\sim$ 4180 km s$^{-1}$) very similar to stellar values in the

1025: nuclear region (this is part of the NE spatial component in Figure

1026: 8) and 2) a more extended (at least $\sim$ 8\arcsec) higher velocity

1027: ($\sim$ 4360 km s$^{-1}$) component (part of NE and all of SW

1028: components in Figure 8). The NE spatial component is more intense

1029: because it involves H$\alpha$ emission from both velocity

1030: components. The infalling emission shows almost constant velocity

1031: that, at the center, is $\sim$150 km s$^{-1}$ higher velocity than

1032: the starlight. The match with the stellar velocity curve suggests

1033: that velocity component 1 is nuclear gas and that velocity component

1034: 2 can be interpreted as an infalling sheet of gas.

1035: 

1036: The infalling gas in H79a is either evidence for feedback from

1037: earlier stripping episodes in SS or cross-fuelling from a gas rich

1038: neighbor. H79d is the obvious candidate if one considers the latter

1039: interpretation and it is supported by the apparent H$\alpha$ bridge

1040: between H79a and d that is shown in Figure 8 which shows the sum of

1041: 5 velocity channels from the MOS/SIS continuum subtracted image.

1042: This corresponds to velocity range 4350-4395 km s$^{-1}$ in the 0th

1043: order and 4615-4660 km s$^{-1}$ in the first order. These velocities

1044: are consistent with emission from both H79a and H79d. While we see

1045: an apparent bridge (see also R1991) between galaxies H79a/d we do

1046: not find velocity continuity. The northernmost condensations in H79d

1047: can be seen in silhouette on the outskirts of H79a \citep{pal02}.

1048: The rotation curve of H79d shows velocities $\sim$ 4650 km s$^{-1}$

1049: near this overlap zone. This is about 500 km s$^{-1}$ higher than

1050: the nuclear gas in H79a and $\sim$ 300 km s$^{-1}$ higher than the

1051: infalling H$\alpha$ component in that galaxy. If the infalling gas

1052: in H79a originated in H79d then the fuelling was episodic and not

1053: continuous. If H79d did not provide the fuel then feedback of gas

1054: previously stripped from SS members would likely be the source.

1055: Using a velocity dispersion $\sigma_{0}\sim155$ km s$^{-1}$

1056: \citep{bon99} we get a mass for H79a within 14\arcsec(last

1057: concentric isophote) $\sim$10$^{10}$-10$^{11}$ M$_{\sun}$.

1058: 

1059: Figure 12 presents the line of sight velocity curve for H79b with

1060: our new SPM-PUMA data. In this case we find a well defined H$\alpha$

1061: emission rotation curve that is counter rotating relative to the

1062: stellar velocity curve from \citet{bon99}. This is evidence for a

1063: minor or quiet (lacking a strong MIR/FIR signature) merger as

1064: suggested by \citet{sra94}. Figure 13 shows the counter-rotation of

1065: the H$\alpha$ gas in galaxy H79b relative to \citet{bon99} and our

1066: new stellar velocity curve obtained with ALFOSC. The estimated mass

1067: of H79b within 11\arcsec ($\sim$ the last concentric isophote) is in

1068: the range $9.0\times10^{9}$ --$1.7\times10^{10}M_{\sun}$ using the

1069: \citet{bon99} and ALFOSC rotation curves (Figure 13), respectively.

1070: This is an underestimation of both the current mass and, much more,

1071: the original mass of H79b. Our estimates of the mass to light ratio

1072: range from 1-2. If H79b entered SS as an L$^{\ast}$ galaxy then it

1073: has lost from 50-90\% of its original mass into the common halo. It

1074: has gained the mass of the counter rotating component estimated from

1075: the H$\alpha$ velocity curve to be $\sim3.3\times10^{9}M_{\sun}$.

1076: The latter value suggests that H79b accreted a late-type dwarf

1077: intruder somewhat less massive than H79d. The lack of H$\alpha$

1078: field detections suggest that no new intruders will visit SS in a

1079: significant fraction of the next Gyr.

1080: 

1081: We attempted to obtain velocity dispersion measures for several of

1082: the galaxies, but our spectral resolution was too low to yield

1083: useful measures except in the case of H79c. Previous measures of

1084: $\sigma$= 155, 130 and 60 km s$^{-1}$ for H79a, b and c respectively

1085: \citep{bon99} all fall close to fundamental plane of elliptical

1086: galaxies (see Figure 7 in \citealt{del01}) and close to a $\sigma$ -

1087: M$_B$ relation defined for dwarf/giant elliptical galaxies, galactic

1088: bulges and dwarf spheroidals \citep{ben92}. H79c, which shows

1089: properties least like an elliptical galaxy, also shows the largest

1090: deviation from $\sigma$ - M$_B$ relation in the sense that the

1091: velocity dispersion is too low. Our corrected estimate for H79c is

1092: slightly higher at $\sigma$=89 km s$^{-1}$.

1093: 

1094: 

1095: 

1096: \subsubsection{H$\alpha$ absorption}

1097: 

1098: Figure 14 shows the slit spectrum of galaxy H79c. We attempted

1099: several different estimates for the age of galaxy H79c: 1) We fitted

1100: the spectrum with theoretical templates \citep{bru03} computed for

1101: different stellar populations and metallicities. The best fit

1102: template corresponds to a stellar population of $\sim$ 1.5 Gyr with

1103: metallicities of both Z=Z$_{\sun}$=0.02 and Z=0.05. 2) Using the

1104: program \emph{indexf} (Cardiel et al. see

1105: \emph{http://www.ucm.es/info/Astrof/users/ncl/index.html}) we

1106: derived some age indices (e.g. D$_{n}$(4000), H$\delta_{A}$, Fe5015,

1107: etc.) that are commonly used to date galaxy stellar populations

1108: \citep[e.g.][]{kau03,gon05,del07}. We obtained D$_{n}$(4000)=1.56,

1109: H$\delta_{A}$=2.09, Fe5015=3.44, H$\beta$=3.18, D(4000)=1.83,

1110: Fe5406=0.88. We performed also simulations (photon counting) on the

1111: spectrum to get an estimate of the errors in the indices due to S/N:

1112: for example, for D$_{n}$(4000) such errors are $\sim$ 0.01-0.02 and

1113: for H$\delta_{A}$ are $\sim$ 0.5-0.08. Following \citet{kau03} (see

1114: their Figure 2), we estimate that H79c had its last burst of star

1115: formation $\sim$ 1.5-1.8 Gyr ago (if an instantaneous,

1116: solar-metallicity burst model is considered). The estimates are

1117: still consistent if bursts of different metallicities are

1118: considered. 3) The value of D(4000)=1.83 seems to be unreliable in

1119: getting age estimates. While D$_{n}$(4000) and H$\delta_{A}$ indices

1120: are in agreement according to Figure 3 of \citet{kau03}, D(4000) and

1121: H$\delta_{A}$ do not match any of the models illustrated in the

1122: Figure 9 of \citet{gon05}. 4) Figure 3 of \citet{pro04} shows

1123: index-velocity dispersion relations. With its estimated $\sigma=$ 89

1124: km s$^{-1}$ the location of H79c in such plots would infer a spiral

1125: bulge behavior, rather than an S0. Using their Figure 4 the age

1126: estimate is $\sim$ 2-3 Gyr and [Fe/H]$\sim$ -0.75. All these methods

1127: used to estimate the age lead to an average age of $\sim$ 2 Gyr for

1128: H79c. This relatively young age is consistent with the bluer colors

1129: reported earlier for galaxy H79c and with the hypothesis that H79c

1130: is a stripped spiral that intruded into the group near that time. It

1131: was likely the intruder that preceded H79d. At the other extreme a

1132: lower S/N spectrum of H79f is consistent with a much older age

1133: consistent with its being one of the original group members now in a

1134: stage of dissolution.

1135: 

1136: 

1137: 

1138: \subsection{MIR/FIR}

1139: 

1140: Compact groups generally show depressed levels of FIR emission

1141: because the component galaxies quickly lose their ISMs to encounters

1142: and collisions \citep{sul93}. Only recently formed groups or

1143: transient systems would be expected to show normal or above normal

1144: emission. SQ revealed low levels of star formation igniting in the

1145: tidal debris \citep{sul01} with very little emission in the

1146: component galaxies. The expectation for SS, viewed as significantly

1147: more evolved than SQ, would be that only recent unstripped intruders

1148: might show significant FIR emission with a possible component from

1149: the debris field. Our H$\alpha$ search failed to turn up evidence

1150: for the latter component. The situation is different for MIR

1151: emission where quasi-continuous interactions might efficiently

1152: channel any residual unstripped gas into component nuclei. Thus MIR

1153: emission from a warm ISM (HII regions) would not be expected while

1154: nuclear sources--sometimes connected with AGN could be common. SQ

1155: tells us that warmer emission from large scale shocks or debris

1156: field starbursts can also occur. We must rely upon the IRAS survey

1157: for information about FIR emission in SS while a new ISO map

1158: provides insights into the MIR emission.

1159: 

1160: SS shows moderate FIR emission \citep{ver98} with estimated

1161: $L_{FIR}\sim8.7\times10^{9}~L_{\sun}$ reflecting IRAS fluxes at 60

1162: and 100 \micron\ S$_{60}$=1.28 Jy and S$_{100}$=2.82 Jy,

1163: respectively. FIR luminosity is computed using

1164: $log~(L_{FIR}/L_{\sun})=logFIR+2logD+19.495$, where

1165: $FIR=1.26\times10^{-14}(2.58S_{60\micron}+S_{100\micron})~W~m^{-2}$

1166: \citep{hel88}, D is the distance in Mpc and S$_{60\micron}$ and

1167: S$_{100\micron}$ are the fluxes at 60 \micron\ and 100 \micron,

1168: respectively expressed in Jy. FIR luminosity is similar to the mean

1169: value for the most isolated luminous Sc spirals in the local

1170: Universe \citep{lis07}. SS is smaller than the IRAS beams at the 25

1171: (3-4$\sigma$), 60 and 100 \micron\ wavelengths where SS is detected.

1172: IRAS processing yields only unresolved detections although various

1173: studies have assigned the FIR emission to one or more members

1174: \citep{hic89b,all96,ver98}. While IRAS resolution was

1175: $\theta$$\geq$1\arcmin\ the pointing accuracy was much higher for

1176: strong detections. The 1$\sigma$ position uncertainty ellipse for

1177: the SS detection was 12\arcsec$\times$4\arcsec\ (PA$\sim$100\arcdeg)

1178: centered E of H79a and S of H79e. This is inconsistent with our

1179: expectation that H79d should dominate the FIR emission. It is almost

1180: certainly a significant contributor however several other sources of

1181: cold dust emission could be present e.g.: 1) H79a: the dust lane and

1182: or the near nuclear H$\alpha$ blobs, 2) H79b: the counter rotating

1183: component and twisted dust lane, 3) H79e: as a luminous background

1184: ScI spiral and 4) possible diffuse dust emission associated with

1185: stripped HI near the IRAS position.

1186: 

1187: We described earlier new ISO MIR observations of SS which are shown

1188: in Figure 15 as an 11.5 \micron\ ISOCAM map with 6\arcsec\

1189: resolution superimposed on a DPOSS optical image. We resolve SS into

1190: three sources involving H79a, b and e. Photometry was performed with

1191: the IRAF APPHOT package where we interactively derived fluxes for

1192: the three sources present in the field adopting aperture photometry

1193: for our measures. For galaxies H79b and e, that are very close to

1194: each other, we masked galaxy H79b/e when measuring aperture

1195: photometry for galaxy H79e/b. Fluxes are listed in Table 12 and

1196: correspond to a total flux from the group that is roughly a factor

1197: of two below the IRAS upper limit of 90 mJy quoted in \citet{mos90},

1198: while each galaxy flux is again a factor of two/three below the flux

1199: limit estimated from the 12 $\micron$ MaxEnt IRAS map of

1200: \citet{all96}. The lack of an 11.5 $\micron$  detection for H79d is

1201: not surprising because late-type spirals tend to show a colder ISM.

1202: At the same time a massive and 4.5$\times$ more distant ScI spiral

1203: like H79e was detected by ISOCAM. MIR emission might be attributed

1204: to the active nucleus in H79a and to the accretion event in H79b.

1205: 

1206: The blue and FIR luminosities of the neighbors detected by IRAS are

1207: presented in Table 13. All of them fall on the L$_B$ vs. L$_{FIR}$

1208: correlation defined for isolated galaxies \citep{per97,lis07},

1209: except the pair UGC10197-8 which shows enhanced FIR emission as

1210: expected. If we assume that all of the FIR emission

1211: ($log~(L_{FIR}/L_{\sun})=9.93$) belongs to H79d that would imply

1212: that it is about 27$\times$ brighter than the isolated galaxy

1213: expectation ($\sim$ 8.5) for sources of similar morphology and

1214: optical luminosity. There are two possible scenarios: either the

1215: emission in galaxy H79d is enhanced by interaction with the rest of

1216: SS or the FIR emission arises from several of the sources listed

1217: above.

1218: 

1219: 

1220: \subsection{Radio Continuum}

1221: 

1222: A combined analysis of VLA (old and new data), NVSS\footnote{NRAO

1223: VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) is found on the web at

1224: http://www.cv.nrao.edu/nvss/ (see also \citet{con98})} and

1225: FIRST\footnote{Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-centimeters

1226: (FIRST) is found on the web at http://sundog.stsci.edu/} provides a

1227: clear picture about the sources of radio continuum emission in SS.

1228: VLA (see Figure 16) and NVSS isophotes indicate that the center of

1229: the emission lies closest to H79a. The archival VLA B-array image

1230: (6\arcsec\ resolution) shows that three galaxies (H79a, b and e) are

1231: reasonably compact radio sources with only H79a detected by FIRST.

1232: H79d is only detected with the C-array observations while H79b and e

1233: are blended together (see Figure 16). The photometry shows that the

1234: B-array data is missing some extended flux (see Table 14). This is

1235: not surprising if the emission from H79b, d and e is connected with

1236: star formation in those galaxies

1237: 

1238: We also detect an apparently unrelated source $\sim$1\arcmin\ north

1239: of the group and near the tidal tail. It shows an integrated C-array

1240: flux of 5.9 mJy in agreement with FIRST, NVSS, \citet{wil91} and

1241: \citet{dic84} measures. The optical counterpart appears to be one

1242: component of a distant interacting galaxy pair that is clearly

1243: resolved on HST images. The $\sim$1 mJy source west of the group

1244: shows no optical counterpart.

1245: 

1246: We explore the well-known radio-FIR correlation \citep{dis84} in

1247: order to estimate/resolve the FIR flux from galaxies in SS. A

1248: complete sample of 250 normal spiral galaxies brighter than B = 12

1249: \citep{con91} shows the following strong correlation:

1250: $$log~(L_{1.4GHz}~[W~Hz^{-1}]) =

1251: 1.29~log~(L_{FIR}~[L_{\sun}])+8.76$$

1252: (we adapted the coefficients for H$_{\circ}$ = 75 km s$^{-1}$

1253: Mpc$^{-1}$). If we assume that radio emission from H79b, d, e is

1254: dominated by star formation related processes then we expect that

1255: H79b and d each account for 25\% of the total FIR flux with galaxy

1256: H79e accounting for 15\%. The residual FIR emission is attributed to

1257: H79a (25-35\%) involving perhaps emission from the AGN, star

1258: formation and the strong dust lane. Using the predicted FIR fluxes

1259: we find that all galaxies fall close to the FIR-optical correlation

1260: found by \citet{lis07} for very isolated galaxies.

1261: 

1262: We also explore the radio continuum-MIR correlation using ISO MIR

1263: and C-array radio continuum fluxes from Tables 11 and 13,

1264: respectively. Galaxies H79b and H79e closely follow the correlation

1265: found in \citet{gru03}. Galaxy H79a falls somewhat above the

1266: correlation showing excess radio continuum flux likely associated

1267: with the AGN.

1268: 

1269: 

1270: 

1271: \subsection{Radio Line (21cm)}

1272: 

1273: \citet{wil91} presented HI velocity channel maps for SS. The

1274: emission was centered on H79d with weak emission extending to the E

1275: and NE apparently overlapping H79f. Our new 21cm observations cover

1276: a wider velocity range (4275-4880 km s$^{-1}$) with detections in

1277: the range 4470-4680 km s$^{-1}$ (see Figure 18). While most of the

1278: emission originates in H79d, the new observations (see Figure 17)

1279: clarify the structure of the HI tail towards the east. We do not

1280: confirm an overlap with H79f and find all the eastward emission to

1281: be S of that galaxy. The velocities for the eastward emission are

1282: continuous with the emission from H79d. This is either a coincidence

1283: or evidence that we are seeing the first stages in the ISM stripping

1284: of H79d. The latter interpretation would exacerbate the problem of

1285: the missing gas in SS \citep{ver01} leaving no residual gas from

1286: galaxies H79a, b, c or f.

1287: 

1288: The velocities in the eastern tidal tail are similar to the

1289: velocities in the southern part of galaxy H79d (see Figure

1290: 18--channel map at 4503 km s$^{-1}$). Long one-sided HI tails have

1291: been found in Virgo cluster spirals \citep{chu07}. Simulations of

1292: one of these galaxies, NGC 4654, suggests that ram-pressure

1293: stripping may be the cause of such HI tails \citep{vol03}. These

1294: galaxies are interpreted as recent arrivals into the Virgo cluster

1295: \citep{chu07}. If this interpretation applies to H79d then the tail

1296: may be telling us that it entered the group from the NE. This does

1297: not provide additional support for the hypothesis that H79d is

1298: crossfuelling H79a because the lowest velocity HI that falls near

1299: H79a shows a velocity $\sim$4550 km s$^{-1}$ (see Figure 18) which

1300: is $\sim$200 km s$^{-1}$ higher than the infalling gas.

1301: 

1302: \citet{ver01} argued that SS as a group was very deficient in cold

1303: gas, traced by HI emission. They estimated the HI deficiency in the

1304: range of 30-50\% depending on whether one assumes that HCG79bc are

1305: intrinsically S0 galaxies or were originally spirals. Similar

1306: numbers were obtained for SQ. The most extreme  estimates are

1307: motivated by the possibility that all E and S0 galaxies in CG are

1308: the product of spiral galaxy ``harassment" (disk destruction and ISM

1309: stripping) as proposed to explain the S0 population in galaxy

1310: clusters \citep{moo96}. This assumption is further supported by the

1311: very high fraction ($\sim$80-85\%) of late-type galaxies found in

1312: low density environments \citep{sul06} that we argue are typical of

1313: CG environments. If we assumed that H79 a and f were also originally

1314: spirals then we would obtain an even more extreme deficiency

1315: ($\sim$70\%). Velocity ranges sampled by old and new 21cm

1316: observations of SS unfortunately do not include the full range of

1317: possible velocities implied by optical measures. It is reasonable to

1318: expect HI with velocities as low as $\sim$4000 km s$^{-1}$. The mean

1319: velocity of galaxy H79c is close to 4000 km s$^{-1}$, so stripped

1320: gas might reasonably be expected down to $\sim$3800 km s$^{-1}$.

1321: Comparison of the new VLA HI spectrum with single dish Arecibo

1322: \citep{bie79,gal81} and GBT (Borthakur et al., in preparation) HI

1323: velocity profiles suggest extended emission ($\sim$20\% of total)

1324: might exist between 3900-4800 km s$^{-1}$. An unpublished

1325: position-velocity plot that includes the region north of H79d shows

1326: evidence for another HI component beginning at 4250 km s$^{-1}$ near

1327: the edge of our velocity range. We suggest a conservative estimate

1328: of 30\% HI deficiency for both SQ and SS.

1329: 

1330: The observed HI mass of galaxy H79d agrees with the mass predicted

1331: for its blue luminosity \citep{ver01}. On the other hand, the HI

1332: mass for H79d is lower than the mean value for Sd galaxies

1333: \citep{rob94}. The position-velocity (PV) plot for H79d (Figure 19)

1334: shows an almost solid-body rotation curve as expected for a low mass

1335: disk galaxy. One can see four fairly equally spaced peaks in the PV

1336: plot, which likely correspond to spiral arms in the disk. The

1337: corresponding local peaks can be seen in the H$\alpha$ image as well

1338: (see Figures 8 and 9).

1339: 

1340: No molecular gas has been detected in SS although, again, only part

1341: of the plausible velocity range has been sampled. H$_{2}$ masses

1342: traced by CO emission have upper limits of $\sim

1343: 5\times10^{8}~M_{\sun}$, $6\times10^{8}~M_{\sun}$,

1344: $6\times10^{8}~M_{\sun}$ for H79a,b and c, respectively

1345: \citep{leo98,ver98}.

1346: 

1347: 

1348: \subsection{X-ray}

1349: 

1350: While the general process producing HI deficiency in a large number

1351: of CG is yet to be clarified, their results suggest that gas heating

1352: may play a role and that very sensitive X-ray maps and flux

1353: measurements could be a way to look for hot gas. In the case of SS

1354: the soft X-ray emission has un upper limit of  L$_{X}<

1355: 2.3\times10^{41}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ \citep{pon96}, using ROSAT PSPC

1356: (Position Sensitive Proportional Counter) data. According to

1357: \citet{pil95}, using the same data, this estimate is a 2.6 $\sigma$

1358: detection. Thus, there is no massive soft X-ray emitting halo of hot

1359: gas. This might indicate a dynamical old system where gas has

1360: cooled. On the other hand, N2000a have argued that the 2.6 $\sigma$

1361: photon excess in SS is consistent with an extended halo component

1362: that follows the diffuse optical light.

1363: 

1364: 

1365: \section{Discussion}

1366: 

1367: We report multiwavelength observations of SS that seek to explore

1368: the evolutionary history of the group especially in the context of

1369: previous work on SQ. We assume SS and SQ are representative of the

1370: CG phenomenon \citep[H1982;][]{sul97} and that SS is considerably

1371: more evolved than SQ. The first assumption is based on the fact that

1372: both groups show n=4 or more accordant redshift members with

1373: evidence that virtually all are interacting. The second assumption

1374: is based upon the much higher luminosity fraction contained in the

1375: SS halo (\S\S\S~3.1.3). SQ is unusual at this time because a new

1376: intruder is entering the group at unusually high velocity. Our

1377: inferences about SQ as a typical compact group were only marginally

1378: affected by this transient event. That collision is generating

1379: excess X-ray, optical emission line and radio radiation. The closest

1380: equivalent in the southern CG sample \citep{iov02} would likely

1381: involve the ``Cartwheel'' system where we are observing the

1382: aftermath of a disk penetrating collision. The frequency of

1383: occurrence of such spectacular events depends upon: 1) the density

1384: of high velocity neighbors near compact groups and/or 2) the number

1385: of groups with high enough mass concentration capable of

1386: accelerating neighbors into a group with suitably high velocity.

1387: Most compact groups are not found in regions of high enough density

1388: for high velocity $\Delta$V$\sim$10$^3$ km s$^{-1}$ intruders to be

1389: common. Yet SQ is certainly not the only group with such a potential

1390: intruder \citep[see Figure 2 in][]{sul97}. The important point to

1391: emphasize is that groups like SQ that are currently undergoing a

1392: spectacular event are not less typical because of it.

1393: 

1394: Specific considerations involve: 1) the age of the group, 2) the

1395: nature of its tidally truncated members, 3) the nature and origin of

1396: its luminous halo, 4) the evidence for merger/accretion events and,

1397: in view of its HI deficiency, 5) the fate of the missing gas. CG can

1398: provide valuable insights into the role of extreme interactions on

1399: galaxy evolution and may be useful for interpreting results at

1400: higher redshift. It was once thought that unstable systems like CG

1401: had very short evolutionary lifetimes that ended in a merger

1402: catastrophe \citep[e.g.][]{mam87,bar89}, however observations do not

1403: support that view \citep{sul87,sul97} and hypothesized dark matter

1404: halos appear able to extend CG lifetimes indefinitely

1405: \citep[e.g.][]{ath97}.

1406: 

1407: SQ is the most studied compact group with published studies spanning

1408: the electromagnetic spectrum: \citet{sul01} and references therein

1409: plus subsequent: X-ray \citep{tri03,tri05}, UV \citep{xan04,xui05},

1410: optical \citep{gut02,xul03}, MIR \citep{app06}, CO

1411: \citep{yun97,lis02,lis04}, HI \citep{wil02} and radio continuum

1412: \citep{xul03,xan04} observations. If SQ can be viewed as a currently

1413: hyperactive prototype of the compact group phenomenon then we infer

1414: the following:

1415: \begin{enumerate}

1416: 

1417: \item  Compact groups form by slow sequential acquisition of neighbors

1418: from surrounding larger scale structure. Nucleation points around

1419: which the process might begin could involve dark matter density

1420: fluctuations. Baryonic (primordial merger) fluctuations

1421: \citep{gov96} are disfavored by the rarity ($\sim$10\%) of

1422: first-ranked early-type galaxies in CG \citep{sul97}. Random

1423: continuous formation from more diffuse galaxy aggregates

1424: \citep[e.g.][]{dia94} is also disfavored for several reasons

1425: \citep[see also][]{sul97}: 1) local environmental densities are too

1426: low to make this process important, 2) few of the predicted majority

1427: population of transient groups is observed and 3) observations

1428: indicate that compact group formation is slow and sequential.

1429: 

1430: 

1431: \item  New intruders are usually captured and quickly lose most of their

1432: ISM leading to: a) suppression of star formation within the

1433: galaxies: b) possible stimulation of active nuclei due to infall of

1434: residual unstripped gas, c) morphological transformation from

1435: primarily spiral intruders into spiral bulges or into early-type

1436: E-S0 members. While brief episodes of enhanced star formation are

1437: expected and observed in compact groups they are likely associated

1438: with the sequential arrival of new gas rich intruders. This activity

1439: is unlikely to be long lived if new arrivals are also rapidly

1440: stripped. SQ suggests that any star formation activity that arises

1441: in the resultant debris field of stripped gas will be weak and will

1442: not approach the level expected from a single unstripped L$^{\ast}$

1443: spiral galaxy.

1444: 

1445: \item  In addition to ISM stripping, which can create a multiphase

1446: gaseous debris field, the outer parts of the stellar components are

1447: stripped leading to the growth of a massive diffuse halo akin to

1448: what is now observed in some clusters. Some diffuse X-ray emission

1449: can be associated with this halo but this component is likely to be

1450: overestimated with low resolution observations if: a) high velocity

1451: intrusions take place, b) AGN are common (e.g. HCG16) and c) major

1452: mergers occur (yet rarely).

1453: 

1454: \item  The major components of the groups persist as discrete (gas poor

1455: early-type) condensations in a diffuse stellar halo for many Gyr. SQ

1456: is mute on the fate of these long lived components but SS, viewed as

1457: a more evolved SQ, suggests that they may slowly dissolve into the

1458: hypergalactic halo before major merging can take place. The rarity

1459: of massive fossil ellipticals outside of cluster cores \citep{sul94}

1460: attests to the rarity of major mergers and the long timescale for

1461: the dissolution process. Groups like SQ and SS disfavor hierarchical

1462: collapse scenarios.

1463: 

1464: 

1465: 

1466: \end{enumerate}

1467: 

1468: 

1469: Our new, as well as older published, measures for SS show many

1470: consistencies with what has been inferred from SQ. A complication in

1471: the case of SS may involve an unfavorable orientation where the

1472: principal plane of most components lies near edge-on to our line of

1473: sight. H79a, b, c and d show morphological features, or axial

1474: ratios, consistent with the interpretation that they are highly

1475: inclined disky systems. Following the same numbering/lettering

1476: scheme above we evaluate the empirical clues available for SS. We

1477: refer to relevant subsections of \S~3 whenever our inferences are

1478: supported by particular observations or previously published work.

1479: 

1480: \textbf{1) CG formation}: Galaxy H79d in SS is an example of the

1481: sequential acquisition process. Such acquisitions are likely to be

1482: rare given the low galaxy surface density environment

1483: \citep{sul87,roo89} in which SS is found. H79d could be regarded

1484: either as a simple projection along the same line of sight or as a

1485: galaxy that is entering the group for the first time. Yet, the low

1486: surface density of accordant and/or discordant galaxies near SS

1487: would justify the latter possibility. This highly inclined late-type

1488: (Sd) spiral shows HI (\S\S~3.6) and H$\alpha$ (\S\S~3.2, 3.3)

1489: distributions consistent with the notion that all or most of the

1490: cold and warm ISM gas components are intact. New and old H$\alpha$

1491: rotation curves (\S\S~3.3) also show little or no evidence for

1492: significant dynamical disruption. The slight ``integral sign'' shape

1493: of the galaxy can be argued to be the result of viewing a disky

1494: spiral at high inclination rather than the product of tidal

1495: deformation. HI emission extending towards NE (see Figure 17; see

1496: also \citealt{wil91}) could be interpreted as debris from earlier

1497: acquisitions although velocity continuity with the gas within H79d

1498: (Figure 18) makes this assumption uncertain and can also be argued

1499: to be the beginning of the stripping process for that intruder.

1500: H$\alpha$ emission appears to link H79d with H79a (Figure 8;

1501: cross-fuelling?), although we do not find velocity continuity

1502: between emission on the side of H79d nearest H79a and the gas

1503: detected in its nuclear region (\S\S~3.3). We cannot unambiguously

1504: establish interaction of H79d with the rest of the group. Typical

1505: timescales for significant dynamical response and/or tidal stripping

1506: are $\sim$10$^8$ years \citep{ion04} coupled with the unequivocal

1507: evidence for lack of tidal perturbation suggests that, if H79d is an

1508: intruder, it must have joined SS within this time frame.

1509: 

1510: H79c is the best candidate for the intrusion that preceded H79d into

1511: SS. It is the bluest (\S\S\S~3.1.4) member after H79d and also shows

1512: spectroscopic evidence (\S\S\S~3.3.2) for a reasonably young

1513: ($\sim$2 Gyr) stellar population perhaps generated just before it

1514: lost its ISM upon joining SS. H79f is the obvious candidate for the

1515: oldest, or one of the oldest members of SS. It is sometimes

1516: described as a tidal tail \citep{nis02} but its morphology

1517: (\S\S\S~3.1.2) and lack of nonstellar component (\S\S~3.2--3.6) are

1518: more consistent with the hypothesis that it is a remnant disk galaxy

1519: slowly dissolving into the common stellar halo \citep[see also

1520: R1991, B1993,][]{bon99}.

1521: 

1522: 

1523: \textbf{2a) HI Stripping and SF suppression}:

1524: 

1525: A statistical study of HI content in CG showed that HI deficiencies

1526: are common \citep{ver01}. Both SQ and SS have estimated deficiencies

1527: in the range 30-70\% depending on how many of the early-type

1528: components entered the groups as spirals (\S\S~3.6). All presently

1529: observed E and S0 components of SQ (3) and SS(4) are candidates

1530: because the environments which supply intruders are spiral rich. Two

1531: recently stripped spirals and, therefore now proto-lenticulars,

1532: \citep[NGC7319 and 7320c;][]{sul01} can be identified in SQ. We

1533: suggest that H79d will likely suffer a similar fate. The reality of

1534: such gas deficiencies virtually guarantees a star formation deficit.

1535: FIR (\S\S~3.4) and H$\alpha$ (\S\S~3.2) observations are regarded as

1536: useful star formation diagnostics. Both are quite consistent with a

1537: normal (for its type and luminosity) level of star formation H79d.

1538: The lack of star formation suppression argues that it is the most

1539: recent SS intruder or a projected field galaxy. If H79d is viewed as

1540: a recent arrival into SS, this is apparently a much slower intrusion

1541: ($\Delta V \sim 200~km~s^{-1}$) than the ongoing one observed in SQ

1542: and is closer to the expectation for a low velocity random capture

1543: in a low density environment. A recent and low velocity intrusion

1544: into SS can be also used to argue that no strong star formation

1545: enhancement would be expected at this time. In CG such disk

1546: starbursts are likely short lived if rapid ISM stripping immediately

1547: follows the onset of the enhanced activity. Residual gas channeled

1548: into the nuclei of galaxies might give rise to low level star

1549: formation or AGN activity. Nuclear fuelling might be particularly

1550: efficient in CG because of the quasi continuous nature of the tidal

1551: perturbations. The excess of compact nuclear radio sources

1552: \citep{men85} and low luminosity AGN \citep{coz04} in CG members

1553: supports this suggestion.

1554: 

1555: Little additional emission related to star formation is observed in

1556: the obviously more evolved members of SS which reflects the observed

1557: deficit of gas in the group. Apart from H79d then SS shows a much

1558: more extreme level of star formation suppression than SQ which is

1559: consistent with it being older and more evolved. H$\alpha$

1560: observations indicate low level star formation is likely  present in

1561: H79b, probably connected with an accretion event and H79a possibly

1562: connected with a feedback event (\S\S\S~3.3.1). Line emission from

1563: H79b shows a reasonably symmetric rotation curve and may originate

1564: entirely from the counter-rotating component. This is consistent

1565: with star formation in a recently accreted dwarf companion

1566: (\S\S\S~3.3.1), although quoted [NII]/H$\alpha$ ratios are close to

1567: those for H79a \citep[N2000a,][see also Table 11]{coz04} and lie

1568: between the HII and Seyfert domains in emission line diagnostic

1569: diagrams \citep{kew06}. The extended H$\alpha$ rotation curve

1570: (Figure 12) argues strongly in favor of star formation in this

1571: galaxy.

1572: 

1573: H79a shows evidence for both nuclear and near nuclear emission

1574: components. The H$\alpha$ image in Figure 8 and velocity decoupling

1575: (Figure 11) are consistent with the near nuclear gas as a feedback

1576: event, possibly the result of cross fueling of gas stripped from

1577: H79d. Our Fabry-P\'{e}rot measures (\S\S\S~3.3.1) support this

1578: interpretation because the extranuclear component is redshifted

1579: relative to the H79a nucleus by about 150 km s$^{-1}$, which is

1580: consistent with the extranuclear gas viewed as infalling onto the

1581: side of H79a closest (in projection) to H79d (\S\S\S~3.3.1). However

1582: no evidence for velocity continuity is found (\S\S\S~3.3.1) and

1583: emission on the side of H79d closest to H79a shows a velocity

1584: $\sim$300 km s$^{-1}$ higher than that of the extranuclear emission

1585: feature (see Figures 10 and 11). The observations would require a

1586: discrete infall or fueling event rather than a continuous flow of

1587: gas from H79d to H79a. All emission line measures for the gas in

1588: H79a should be treated with caution because the two emission

1589: components are separated by only $\sim$3\arcsec\ (\S\S~3.2). This,

1590: and confusion in the literature between members of the group,

1591: explains the large scatter among redshifts quoted for this galaxy in

1592: NED.

1593: 

1594: 

1595: Table 15 provides an interesting comparison of integrated optical,

1596: IR and radio properties for SQ and SS along with corresponding data

1597: for the well studied L$\sim$L* Sb spiral NGC7331. This provides an

1598: alternate demonstration of the HI and star formation deficits. SQ is

1599: $\sim$ two integrated B magnitudes brighter than NGC7331 while SS

1600: shows approximately the same value as that galaxy, but with half of

1601: the luminosity in a diffuse halo (\S\S\S~3.1.3). SQ contains the

1602: same mass of HI as NGC7331 although it originally contained, at

1603: least, three spirals with similar luminosity to that galaxy. SS

1604: currently shows little more than the HI expected from a late-type

1605: spiral like H79d \citep{ver01}. Perhaps 20\% more remains to be

1606: mapped using wider frequency coverage (\S\S~3.6). SQ and NGC7331

1607: show similar integrated star formation measures. However this is an

1608: overestimate of star formation activity in SQ because H$\alpha$ (via

1609: enhanced [NII]) and radio continuum emission in SQ are boosted by a

1610: large scale shock \citep{mol97,sul01}, while those measures and FIR

1611: luminosity are boosted by the luminous AGN NGC7319. SS shows much

1612: lower levels of activity in all measures with H79d contributing most

1613: of the HI and about 60\% of the H$\alpha$ emission (\S\S~3.2). While

1614: composed of less luminous galaxies, if formed from a largely spiral

1615: field, then SS represents an extreme example of star formation

1616: suppression. SQ is clearly evolving in that direction.

1617: 

1618: Another way to characterize the star formation suppression involves

1619: comparison of integrated colors and/or population synthesis measures

1620: for CG members. Our color measures (\S\S\S~3.1.4) indicate a

1621: dominance of older populations in H79abf and c (with a more recent

1622: component with age $\sim$2 Gyr; \S\S\S~3.3.2). Other recent

1623: spectroscopic synthesis studies \citep{del07,pro04} suggest

1624: systematically older populations (compared to field galaxies) in

1625: larger samples of compact group members. An earlier photometric

1626: study of elliptical members in CG showed typical red colors and

1627: little or no evidence for a recent merger population

1628: \citep{zep91,zep93}.

1629: 

1630: H$\alpha$ surveys of compact group members \citep{vil98,igl99}

1631: reveal a wide range of inferred star formation activity. Taken

1632: galaxy by galaxy this is unsurprising. However galaxies in the most

1633: evolved CG (like SS) will show very low levels of star formation

1634: activity in most members except for the occasional unstripped new

1635: intruder. These inferences will be confused if triplets are included

1636: in a CG sample. Less evidence of dynamical evolution is expected in

1637: these more intrinsically unstable configurations. This is especially

1638: true for the most studied samples like HCG where hierarchical

1639: systems are rare.

1640: 

1641: \textbf{2b) AGN}: Gas that is not stripped from CG members will

1642: likely suffer angular momentum dissipation leading to efficient

1643: channeling into component nuclei. There is accumulating evidence

1644: that galaxies in CG show a higher frequency of, generally low level,

1645: AGN activity \citep{coz04,mar06}. This activity can take at least

1646: three forms: Seyfert, LINER and HII nuclei -- the latter not really

1647: an AGN in the classical sense although it has been argued to be a

1648: precursor to Seyfert activity \citep[e.g.][]{bar00}. Recently

1649: stripped NGC7319 in SQ hosts a luminous Seyfert 2 nucleus that is a

1650: strong source from radio to X-ray wavelengths. Both H79 a and b show

1651: evidence for nuclear activity at radio (\S\S~3.5), MIR (\S\S~3.4)

1652: and optical (\S\S~3.1) wavelengths. All H$\alpha$ emission outside

1653: of H79d is found near the centers of these two galaxies. Line ratios

1654: in H79a ([NII]/H$\alpha$ and [OIII]/H$\beta$)

1655: \citep[N2000a,][]{coz04} are consistent with LINER activity

1656: according to emission line diagnostic diagrams of \citet{kew06} if

1657: the derived ratios involve the nuclear gas. Emission from H79b

1658: (NGC6027, VIIZw631) shows well defined counter-rotation in the

1659: emission component (\S\S\S~3.3.1) and is likely dominated by star

1660: forming gas in an accreted neighbor perhaps coupled with some weakly

1661: shocked gas. Radio continuum emission from H79a involves a point

1662: source at all VLA resolutions while H79b shows weaker and more

1663: extended emission (\S\S~3.5) which supports our inference that only

1664: H79a hosts an AGN at this time. Unless CG members host unusually low

1665: mass black holes, the weakness of most AGN activity must be due to

1666: low accretion rates where only residual gas remains to fuel nuclei.

1667: In systems where there is a quasi-continuous perturbation there is

1668: perhaps less opportunity to build up a reservoir of gas that

1669: episodically might fuel more intense AGN activity. The CG

1670: alternative might well involve longer phases of low level activity.

1671: 

1672: \textbf{2c) Morphological transformation}: SQ contains two recently

1673: stripped spirals and another spiral intruder in the process of being

1674: stripped \citep{sul01}. The remaining two members in SQ are either

1675: elliptical galaxies or remnant bulges of spirals. SS galaxies H79a,

1676: b, c and f show early-type (albeit peculiar) morphologies

1677: (\S\S\S~3.1.2). In analogy with SQ we argue that most of these

1678: galaxies entered SS as spirals because the environment of SS is

1679: spiral rich (\S\S\S~3.1.1); they were subsequently stripped and

1680: transformed into E/S0 systems. In the case of SQ some of the

1681: stripping events must have taken place recently because we can still

1682: recognize spiral structure \citep[NGC 7319 and NGC7320c;][]{sul01}

1683: while in SS the disks and associated spiral structure have been

1684: largely destroyed leaving remnant bulges imbedded in a stellar halo

1685: partly or mostly composed of the stripped disks. We also argue that

1686: the galaxies were considerably more luminous when they first entered

1687: SS. This is self evident because the massive halo must have formed

1688: from stars that originated in existing and/or now disrupted members.

1689: The fraction of early-type members in SS ($\sim$0.7-0.8) is larger

1690: than expected if SS was formed from random infall of galaxies from

1691: its environment. The observed early-type fraction in SS environment

1692: is $\sim$0.3-0.4 (\S\S\S~3.1.2) above the expectation from the low

1693: density environment of extremely isolated galaxies $\sim$0.14

1694: \citep{sul06}.

1695: 

1696: 

1697: 

1698: All known accordant redshift neighbors around SS are larger and

1699: brighter than members of the group (\S\S\S~3.1.2, 3.1.3). Of course

1700: the tabulation is likely biased towards the brightest members in the

1701: neighborhood if for no other reason that we are tabulating neighbors

1702: with measured redshift. All members of SS are smaller and most are

1703: fainter than this neighboring population. Taken at face value SS is

1704: a compact group of sub-L$^{\ast}$ galaxies. Few tabulated compact

1705: groups of dwarf galaxies are observed \citep{hic92,iov02} and there

1706: may be dynamical stability and hierarchical structural reasons for a

1707: paucity of dwarf compact groups. The brightest four accordant

1708: members of most tabulated groups tend to show similar

1709: L$\geq$L$^{\ast}$ luminosities (i.e. they are not hierarchical

1710: systems). Thus we argue SS was formed by sequential accretion of

1711: luminous spiral galaxies that have undergone: 1) gas stripping that

1712: transformed them into E/S0 morphologies and 2) stellar stripping

1713: that has significantly reduced their sizes. This stellar harassment

1714: process might be similar to, but even more efficient (because of

1715: lower systemic velocity dispersions), than the one proposed to

1716: explain the existence of S0 galaxies in clusters \citep{moo96}. In

1717: CG a significant population of spiral bulges may exist as

1718: ``early-type'' members.

1719: 

1720: The early-type members of SS are too bright for their sizes and this

1721: can be explained if disks are stripped leaving the higher M/L bulge

1722: region of each galaxy relatively intact. Comparison of the size and

1723: brightness of bulges in some of the bright neighboring spirals

1724: indeed show values similar to those measured for the early-type

1725: members of SS (\S\S\S~3.1.3). The early-type members of SS are

1726: embedded in a relatively blue massive stellar halo (\S\S\S~ 3.1.3,

1727: 3.1.4). It is reasonable to assume that this luminous halo was

1728: generated by stripping/dissipation processes involving the existing

1729: member galaxies. The relatively blue color of the halo supports the

1730: idea that much of it came from a disk stellar population. The excess

1731: brightness for their size (i.e. compactness) of SS members will also

1732: be abetted by minor accretion events of the kind that we observe in

1733: H79b.

1734: 

1735: If most SS members began as spiral intruders then we are faced with

1736: a serious deficit of stripped hot/warm/cold gas in and around SS

1737: \citep[\S\S~3.2--3.7; see also][]{ver01}. In the case of SQ we found

1738: all three components in the IGM although little was found within the

1739: group members. Part of the HI deficit in SQ is now shocked to X-ray

1740: emitting temperatures \citep{tri03,tri05} some of which may have

1741: cooled and condensed into HII regions \citep{xus99,sul01}. In SS we

1742: observe only logM$_{HI}$(M$_{\sun}$)=9.3 \citep{ver01} most of which

1743: is concentrated in H79d.

1744: 

1745: The existence of ``passive spirals'' \citep{got03b} could possibly

1746: help solving the problem of ``missing gas'' (gas deficit) in CG. For

1747: example, one could envision a scenario in which the members of SS

1748: entered the group as extremely poor gas spiral galaxies. As

1749: \citet{got03b} suggests, such galaxies seem to prefer environments

1750: density $\sim$1-2 Mpc$^{-2}$, similar to SS neighborhood

1751: (\S\S\S~3.1.1). On the other hand, these gas deficient spiral

1752: galaxies are very rare ($\sim$0.28\%, i.e. they found 73 cases from

1753: a sample of 25813) and quite red (almost as red as elliptical

1754: galaxies). The members of SS seem to be bluer (see our Table 9) than

1755: those ``passive spirals'' \citep[see Figure 9 in][]{got03b}. A

1756: search (dedicated study) for potential ``passive spirals'' among the

1757: neighbors of CG merits further attention.

1758: 

1759: 

1760: Compact groups pose a problem for radio line (and often

1761: Fabry-P\'{e}rot) studies because the velocity range over which gas

1762: might be present can be large. In the case of SQ optical emission

1763: and absorption line velocities span almost 2000 km s$^{-1}$ (1200 km

1764: s$^{-1}$ in detected HI). Optical velocities in SS span a range

1765: close to 700 km s$^{-1}$ with at least two condensations in HI at

1766: 4400-4700 km s$^{-1}$ (H79d and tail towards E) and $\sim$4200 km

1767: s$^{-1}$ possibly associated with H79a and not well defined in our

1768: new or in previous observations (\S\S~3.6). Earlier single dish

1769: measures \citep{bie79,gal81,gor81} already raised the possibility of

1770: HI at velocities both higher and lower than H79d. We confirm the

1771: latter, but given the scatter among previous single dish mass

1772: estimates it is difficult to estimate how much HI we may have

1773: missed. We cannot rule out the possibility that significant HI

1774: stripped more than 1.5 Gyr ago remains undetected. This is required

1775: in assuming that most of the galaxies H79abcf entered SS as spirals.

1776: A conservative estimate for the total HI content within SS

1777: (logM$_{HI}$(M$_{\sun}$)$\sim$9.4-9.5) is based on the single dish

1778: HI measures. The same comments apply to previous searches for

1779: molecular gas in SS \citep{leo98,ver98}. At the other extreme only a

1780: small hot X-ray emitting component was detected by ROSAT (\S\S~3.7)

1781: which may be associated with the diffuse stellar halo (N2000a).

1782: 

1783: Either our assumption that SS was formed from spirals is incorrect

1784: or we must account for considerable (30-70\%) missing gas

1785: (\S\S~3.6). We have no evidence for extreme starbursts in less

1786: evolved compact groups that should be viewed as the precursors of an

1787: SS system. In fact as dynamically hyperactive systems CG are

1788: surprisingly deficient in FIR emission \citep[e.g.][]{ver98}. Thus

1789: gas depletion via star formation seems unlikely to explain such a

1790: large deficit. Both HI/CO mapping of a wider spatial/velocity field

1791: and deeper searches for a warm gas component (OSIRIS-GTC?) might

1792: yield interesting results.

1793: 

1794: 

1795: 

1796: \textbf{3) Diffuse halo formation}: After an initial period of

1797: negative results \citep{ros77,sul83,pib95} luminous optical halos

1798: are now found in many compact groups

1799: \citep[][D2005]{sul87,pib95,sul97,whi03,agu06}. Estimated diffuse

1800: light fractions ranges from a few percent up to 50\% suggesting that

1801: this measure might be a useful diagnostic for the dynamical age of a

1802: compact group. Recent studies of the SQ halo show it to be very

1803: complex with an integrated luminosity of $\sim$L$^{\ast}$

1804: ($\sim$average luminosity of one L$^{\ast}$ galaxy) \citep{mol98}

1805: and therefore representing about 20\% of the total group luminosity.

1806: A more sensitive study \citep{gut02} suggests that 20\% might be

1807: underestimated. VR/I measures (N2000a) yielded an estimate of

1808: 12-13\% for the halo in SS. More recent wavelet processing of deep

1809: CCD images (D2005) suggest that the halo luminosity fraction is

1810: $\sim$46\% in B band which agrees with our own estimate

1811: (\S\S\S~3.1.3). We reduce the D2005 estimate to 40\% because we

1812: cannot confirm an apparent extension towards the east which we

1813: suggest may be an artifact induced by some relatively bright stars

1814: about one group diameter in that direction (see Figure 6 in D2005).

1815: We conclude that the halo fraction in SS is approximately twice that

1816: in SQ. On this basis alone we conclude that SS is much older group

1817: than SQ.

1818: 

1819: \citet{som06} studied the diffuse light in ``fossil'' groups (FG)

1820: (e.g., hierarchical groups with a very bright central galaxy) and

1821: non-fossil groups (non-FG)(e.g., groups with galaxies of similar

1822: brightness, i.e. non-hierarchical). Their models predict halo

1823: contributions of $\sim$12-45\% with a higher fraction of diffuse

1824: light in FG. Most CG (up to 90\%) tend to be non-hierarchical which

1825: is a long standing argument against a major merger evolutionary

1826: scenario to account for them (\citealt{sul97}; see also

1827: \citealt{pro04,del07} for a different form of evidence). SQ and SS

1828: are certainly non-hierarchical configurations with halo fractions

1829: that appear to exceed the above model expectations. SS provides the

1830: strongest challenges to formation models with a very massive halo

1831: that is also somewhat bluer than the galaxies embedded within it

1832: (see Table 9). It points towards a slow sequential ``dissolution''

1833: process without significant major merger activity. Additional

1834: support for this conclusion comes from the fact that highly evolved

1835: SS is a very weak X-ray emitter compared to many detected compact

1836: and loose groups \citep{hel00} with estimates for any soft halo

1837: component near L$_X$$\sim$10$^{40}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ (N2000a). Before

1838: dismissing SS as atypical it is worth pointing out that the X-ray

1839: luminosity of SQ is strongly boosted by a transient shock component

1840: \citep{tri05}. The X-ray weak halo component in SQ \citep{hel00}

1841: appears to be about 1dex higher than any equivalent component in SS.

1842: 

1843: 

1844: 

1845: 

1846: \textbf{4) Long lived system}: We earlier estimated a minimum age

1847: for SQ of 2-3 Gyr based upon encounter events that we could identify

1848: over the past 1-2 Gyr \citep{sul01}. Various studies have identified

1849: a sequence of compact group ages, or evolutionary stages, using HI

1850: morphology/deficiency \citep{ver01}, diffuse light fraction

1851: \citep{agu06} and dynamical inferences \citep{rib98}. The fraction

1852: of early-type galaxies normalized by local environmental density

1853: \citep{got03a} offers an additional measure (\S\S\S~3.1.2). All

1854: measures suggest that SQ is reasonably evolved and that SS is

1855: significantly more evolved than SQ. If we assume that the halo age

1856: is directly proportional to the luminosity fraction then we can

1857: assume a minimum age for SS of 4-6 Gyr. The episodic accretion rate

1858: in SS appears to be slower than for SQ and this will slow down the

1859: evolutionary process. If nothing precludes compact group formation

1860: in richer environments one expect many to form but with a large

1861: fraction that are transient \citep[e.g.][]{dia94,dia95}. No more

1862: than 10\% of HCG fall in this category \citep{sul87,roo89}. This

1863: would not be the slow sequential process that characterizes SQ and

1864: SS.

1865: 

1866: In the case of SS one could identify H79d as the most recent arrival

1867: while H79c likely arrived more than 1.5 Gyr ago. Both the new

1868: intruder and the accreted object in H79b are relatively low mass

1869: galaxies (\S\S\S~3.3.1). Our optical and H$\alpha$ reconnaissance of

1870: the SS neighborhood reveals no other prospective intruders for the

1871: next $\sim$ Gyr (\S\S\S~3.1.1). Apparently after acquiring the

1872: nearest 4-5 neighbors a ``typical'' CG (in lower density

1873: environments) like SQ or SS creates a local void after which it very

1874: rarely acquires additional members.

1875: 

1876: 

1877: A possible new way to estimate dynamical ages in CG is provided by

1878: the HST search for young blue star clusters (BSC) thought to form

1879: via interactions. A large number of candidate BSC have been

1880: identified in SQ \citep{gal01} although their true nature remains

1881: unconfirmed. A contradiction is provided by the almost total absence

1882: of BSC candidates in SS \citep{pal02} which at 2/3 the distance

1883: should have been easier to detect. Numerous red star cluster

1884: candidates were found around SS galaxies. Our own high pass

1885: filtering of archival WFPC images of H79a appears to show a halo of

1886: assumed globular clusters surrounding that galaxy. If we assume that

1887: the condensations in SQ are BSC and that they are a signature of

1888: major accretion/interaction events then SQ has undergone significant

1889: activity in the past Gyr which is well confirmed by numerous

1890: observations \citep[and more recent references cited

1891: earlier]{sul01}. HST imaging analysis shows the candidate star

1892: cluster color distributions for SQ peak at B-V$\sim$0.1 and

1893: V-I$\sim$0.4 \citep{gal01} while corresponding average colors in SS

1894: are B-V$\sim$0.5 and V-I$\sim$1.0 \citep{pal02}. This suggests no SS

1895: star cluster population with an age of less than 1 Gyr roughly

1896: consistent with our suggestion that H79c was the last major intruder

1897: about 2 Gyr ago. We interpret galaxies H79abcf as old arrivals and

1898: this is supported by the degree of tidal stripping evidenced through

1899: their surface photometric properties and the luminosity fraction in

1900: the halo. Any BSC associated with these past intrusions have now

1901: become significantly redder.

1902: 

1903: 

1904: Galaxies H79abcf are assumed to be the stripped cores of old spiral

1905: intruders. The somewhat bluer color of the diffuse light

1906: (\S\S\S~3.1.4, D2005) is then consistent with the hypothesis that

1907: much of the halo mass came from stripped spiral disks. This bluer

1908: halo color is also evidence that SS formed long ago from a largely

1909: spiral population that has been strongly secularly evolved. Galaxy

1910: H79f is interpreted as the most extreme example of this process. It

1911: has been extensively studied \citep{nis02} and has been interpreted

1912: both as a tidal feature \citep{nis02} and as the remnant of a

1913: disrupted galaxy \citep{bon99}. The central brightness concentration

1914: and concentric luminosity isophotes about the center of this feature

1915: argue for the second interpretation. We suggest that this is the

1916: most evolved member of the group and offers an empirical insight

1917: into the dynamical evolution of compact group members via

1918: dissolution rather than merging. The more remnant cores we identify

1919: in SS, the lower the average initial luminosity of the intruders. If

1920: lower luminosity spirals have a higher average gas fraction then

1921: inclusion of H79f as an intruder remnant actually exacerbates the HI

1922: deficit.

1923: 

1924: We used rotation curves (H79bd) and velocity dispersion measures

1925: (H79a) to estimate masses for different components of SS

1926: (\S\S\S~3.3.1). Masses for H79c and f are estimated via an assumed

1927: M/L ratio $\sim$10 \citep{bac85}. Galaxies H79b, c and d are each

1928: estimated to be $\sim$10$^{10}$ M$_{\sun}$ with H79a

1929: $\sim$5$\times$10$^{10}$ M$_{\sun}$ and H79f $\sim$5$\times$10$^9$

1930: M$_{\sun}$. We must add almost 10$^{10}$ M$_{\sun}$ for the HI mass.

1931: Given truncated luminosity estimates for the galaxies and perturbed

1932: or truncated rotation curves these values are likely underestimates.

1933: The total mass of discrete components probably lies in the range of

1934: 10$^{11}$ M$_{\sun}$ which is similar to our estimate for the halo

1935: mass. While likely not as massive as SQ, SS was not formed from a

1936: dwarf population although most of the members may have entered as

1937: slightly sub L$^{\ast}$ galaxies.

1938: 

1939: 

1940: The lack of major mergers and first-ranked ellipticals in compact

1941: groups \citep{men91,sul94} as well as the rarity of fossil

1942: ellipticals in low density galaxy environments \citep{sul94,zab98}

1943: make clear that such groups evolve very slowly and likely require

1944: massive DM halos \citep{ath97,ace02}. Thus hierarchical collapse

1945: models \citep{bau96,kau96,kau98} are strongly disfavored. SQ and SS

1946: further support these conclusions with no evidence for major

1947: mergers. In one sense there is agreement star formation is rapidly

1948: quenched/truncated in compact groups \citep{del07}. This appears to

1949: contradict predictions of monolithic collapse models \citep{chi02}

1950: where star formation continues for a much longer time. It is

1951: important to point out that none of these models makes predictions

1952: about structure at such high spatial frequencies as typified by SQ

1953: and SS. SS offers one striking example of a minor merger while none

1954: has been identified in SQ.

1955: 

1956: If the majority of SS members are correctly interpreted as cores of

1957: stripped spiral then it is clear that this group, and perhaps most

1958: groups, dynamically evolve via dissolution rather than major

1959: mergers. Rather than the ``beginning of the end'' \citep{pal02} SS

1960: is engaged in a slow process that has already persisted for a

1961: significant fraction of Hubble time. If: 1) fossil ellipticals are

1962: rare \citep{muz99,sul94}, and, concomitantly, 2) major mergers in CG

1963: are rare \citep{sul97} and 3) groups with more than five members are

1964: rare, then we are forced to conclude --without resorting to magic

1965: dark substances--that most CG like SQ and SS that ever formed are

1966: still in existence.

1967: 

1968: 

1969: 

1970: \acknowledgments

1971: 

1972: One of us (A. D.) acknowledges support from a Graduate Council

1973: Research/Creative Fellowship offered by the Graduate School of the

1974: University of Alabama for the 2006/2007 academic year. A. D. also

1975: thanks R.J. Buta and W.C. Keel for helpful discussions. M. R.

1976: acknowledges grants 46054-F from CONACYT and IN100606 from

1977: DGAPA-UNAM, Mexico. A. dO. and J. P. are partially supported by

1978: Spanish research projects AYA2006-1325, AYA2006-1213 and Junta de

1979: Andaluc\'{\i}a TIC114. We thank C. Da Rocha for providing the CFHT

1980: images of the diffuse light component in SS. We acknowledge V.

1981: Avila-Reese for helpful comments. We also acknowledge P. Amram and

1982: C. Balkowski for making the run to obtain the CFHT H$_{\alpha}$ F-P

1983: images. The new radio data presented in this paper were obtained

1984: with NRAO instrument--VLA. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory

1985: is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under

1986: cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.

1987: 

1988: 

1989: 

1990: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1991: 

1992: \bibitem[Aceves \& Vel\'{a}zquez(2002)]{ace02} Aceves, H. \& Vel\'{a}zquez, H. 2002, \rmxaa, 38, 199

1993: 

1994: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2007)]{ade07} Adelman-McCarthy, J.K. et al. - arXiv:0707.3380

1995: 

1996: \bibitem[Aguerri et al.(2006)]{agu06} Aguerri, J. A. L. et al. 2006, \aap, 457, 771

1997: 

1998: \bibitem[Allam et al.(1996)]{all96} Allam, S. et al. 1996, \aaps, 117, 39

1999: 

2000: \bibitem[Amram et al.(1991)]{amr91} Amram, P., Boulesteix, J., Georgelin, Y. M., Laval, A., Le

2001: Coarer, E., Marcelin, M., Rosado, M. 1991, ESO Messenger (ISSN

2002: 0722-6691), no. 64, p. 44

2003: 

2004: \bibitem[Amram et al.(1992)]{amr92} Amram, P., Le Coarer, E., Marcelin, M., Balkowski, C., Sullivan, W. T. III, Cayatte, V. 1992, \aaps, 94, 175

2005: 

2006: \bibitem[Appleton at al.(2006)]{app06} Appleton, P. N. et al. 2006, \apj, 639, L51

2007: 

2008: \bibitem[Athanassoula et al.(1997)]{ath97} Athanassoula, L., Makino, J. \& Bosma, A. 1997, \mnras, 286, 825

2009: 

2010: \bibitem[Bacon et al.(1985)]{bac85} Bacon, R., Monnet, G., Simien, F. 1985, \aap, 152, 315

2011: 

2012: \bibitem[Barmby \& Huchra(1998)]{bar98} Barmby, P. \& Huchra, J. P. 1998, \aj, 115, 6

2013: 

2014: \bibitem[Barnes(1989)]{bar89} Barnes, J. E. 1989, \nat, 338, 123

2015: 

2016: \bibitem[Barth \& Shields(2000)]{bar00} Barth, A. J. \& Shields, J. C. 2000, \pasp, 112, 753

2017: 

2018: \bibitem[Baugh et al.(1996)]{bau96} Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., Frenk, C.

2019: S. 1996, \mnras, 283, 1361

2020: 

2021: \bibitem[Beers et al.(1995)]{bee95} Beers, T. C. et al. 1995, \aj, 109, 874

2022: 

2023: \bibitem[Bender et al.(1992)]{ben92} Bender, R., Burstein, D., Faber, S.

2024: M. 1992, \apj, 399, 462

2025: 

2026: \bibitem[Bettoni \& Fasano(1993)]{bet93} Bettoni, D. \& Fasano, G. 1993, \aj, 105,

2027: 1291 (B1993)

2028: 

2029: \bibitem[Biermann et al.(1979)]{bie79} Biermann, P., Clarke, J. N., Fricke, K.

2030: J. 1979, \aap, 75, 19

2031: 

2032: \bibitem[Biviano(1998)]{biv98} Biviano, A. 1998, The ISOCAM Calibration Error Budget Report, ver. 3.1

2033: 

2034: \bibitem[Bonfanti et al.(1999)]{bon99} Bonfanti, P., Simien, F., Rampazzo, R., Prugniel,

2035: Ph. 1999, \aaps, 139, 483

2036: 

2037: \bibitem[Boulesteix(1993)]{bou93} Boulesteix, J., Manual of the ADHOC software, 1993

2038: 

2039: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(2003)]{bru03} Bruzual, G. \& Charlot, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, 1000

2040: 

2041: \bibitem[Burstein \& Heiles(1982)]{bur82} Burstein, D., Heiles, C. 1982, \aj, 87, 1165

2042: 

2043: \bibitem[Carnevali et al.(1981)]{car81} Carnevali, P., Cavaliere, A., \& Santangelo, P. 1981, \apj, 249, 449

2044: 

2045: \bibitem[Cesarsky et al.(1996)]{ces96} Cesarsky, C. J. et al. 1996, \aap, 315, 32

2046: 

2047: \bibitem[Chiosi \& Carraro(2002)]{chi02} Chiosi, C. \& Carraro, G. 2002, \mnras, 335, 335

2048: 

2049: \bibitem[Chung et al.(2007)]{chu07} Chung, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Kenney, J. D. P., Vollmer,

2050: B. 2007, \apj, 659, L115

2051: 

2052: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1991)]{con91} Condon, J. J., Anderson, M. L., Helou, G. 1991, \apj, 376, 95

2053: 

2054: \bibitem[Condon et al.(1998)]{con98} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley,

2055: R. A., Taylor, G. B., \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693

2056: 

2057: \bibitem[Coziol et al.(2004)]{coz04} Coziol, R., Brinks, E. \& Bravo-Alfaro,

2058: H. 2004, \aj, 128, 68

2059: 

2060: \bibitem[Da Rocha \& Mendes de Oliveira(2005)]{dar05} Da Rocha, C. \& Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2005, \mnras,

2061: 364, 1069 (D2005)

2062: 

2063: \bibitem[de la Rosa et al.(2001)]{del01} de la Rosa, I. G., de Carvalho, R. R., Zepf, S. E. 2001, \aj, 122, 93

2064: 

2065: \bibitem[de la Rosa et al.(2007)]{del07} de la Rosa, I. G., de Carvalho, R. R., Vazdekis,

2066: A., Barbuy, B. 2007, \aj, 133, 330

2067: 

2068: \bibitem[de Carvalho et al(1997)]{dec97} de Carvalho, R. R., Ribeiro, A. L. B., Capelato,

2069: H. V., Zepf, S. E. 1997, \apjs, 110, 1

2070: 

2071: \bibitem[de Vaucouleurs et al.(1991)]{dev91} de Vaucouleurs, G. et al. 1991, Third Reference Catalog of

2072: Bright Galaxies (New York: Springer) (RC3)

2073: 

2074: \bibitem[Diaferio et al.(1994)]{dia94} Diaferio, A., Geller, M. J., Ramella,

2075: M. 1994, \aj, 107, 868

2076: 

2077: \bibitem[Diaferio et al.(1995)]{dia95} Diaferio, A., Geller, M. J., Ramella, M.  1995, \aj, 109, 2293

2078: 

2079: \bibitem[Dickel et al.(1984)]{dic84} Dickel, J. R., Rood, H. J. \&

2080: Williams, B. A. 1984, in \emph{Clusters and Groups of Galaxies},

2081: edited by F. Mardirossian, G. Giuricin and M. Mezzetti (Reidel,

2082: Boston), p.389

2083: 

2084: \bibitem[Dickey \& Salpeter(1984)]{dis84} Dickey, J. M. \& Salpeter, E. E. 1984, \apj, 284, 461

2085: 

2086: \bibitem[Faber \& Jackson(1976)]{fab76} Faber, S. M. \& Jackson, R.

2087: E. 1976, \apj, 204, 668

2088: 

2089: \bibitem[Falco et al.(1999)]{fal99} Falco, E. E. et al. 1999, \pasp, 111, 438

2090: 

2091: \bibitem[Fitzpatrick(1999)]{fit99} Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, \pasp, 111, 63

2092: 

2093: \bibitem[Freudling(1995)]{fre95} Freudling, W. 1995, \aaps, 112, 429

2094: 

2095: \bibitem[Fuentes-Carrera et al.(2004)]{fue04} Fuentes-Carrera, I., Rosado, M., Amram, P. et al. 2004, \aap,

2096: 415, 451

2097: 

2098: \bibitem[Gallagher et al.(1981)]{gal81} Gallagher, J. S., Knapp, G. R., Faber, S.

2099: M. 1981, \aj, 86, 1781

2100: 

2101: \bibitem[Gallagher et al.(2001)]{gal01} Gallagher, S. C. et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 163

2102: 

2103: \bibitem[Garcia(1993)]{gar93} Garcia, A. M. 1993, \aaps, 100, 47

2104: 

2105: \bibitem[Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado et al.(2005)]{gon05} Gonz\'{a}lez Delgado, R. M. , Cervi\~{n}o, M., Martins, L. P., Leitherer,

2106: C., Hauschildt, P. H. 2005, \mnras, 357, 945

2107: 

2108: \bibitem[Gordon \& Gottesman(1981)]{gor81} Gordon, D. \& Gottesman, S.

2109: T. 1981, \aj, 86, 161

2110: 

2111: \bibitem[Governato et al.(1996)]{gov96} Governato, F., Tozzi, P., Cavaliere, A. 1996, \apj, 458, 18

2112: 

2113: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003a)]{got03a} Goto, T. et al. 2003a, \mnras, 346, 601

2114: 

2115: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003b)]{got03b} Goto, T. et al. 2003b, \pasj, 55, 757

2116: 

2117: \bibitem[Gruppioni et al.(2003)]{gru03} Gruppioni, C., Pozzi, F., Zamorani, G., Ciliegi, P., Lari, C., Calabrese, E., La Franca, F., Matute, I. 2003, \mnras, 341, 1

2118: 

2119: \bibitem[Guti\'{e}rrez et al.(2002)]{gut02} Guti\'{e}rrez, C. M., L\'{o}pez-Corredoira, M., Prada, F.,

2120: Eliche, M. C. 2002, \apj, 579, 592

2121: 

2122: \bibitem[Helsdon \& Ponman(2000)]{hel00} Helsdon, S. F. \& Ponman, T.

2123: J. 2000, \mnras, 319, 933

2124: 

2125: \bibitem[Helou et al.(1988)]{hel88} Helou, G., Khan, I. R., Malek, L., Boehmer, L.

2126: 1988, \apjs, 68, 151

2127: 

2128: \bibitem[Hickson(1982)]{hic82} Hickson, P. 1982, \apj, 255, 382 (H1982)

2129: 

2130: \bibitem[Hickson et al.(1989a)]{hic89a} Hickson, P., Kindl , E., Auman , J. 1989a, \apjs, 70,

2131: 687 (H1989a)

2132: 

2133: \bibitem[Hickson et al.(1989b)]{hic89b} Hickson, P., Menon, T. K., Palumbo, G. G. C., Persic,

2134: M. 1989b, \apj, 341, 679

2135: 

2136: \bibitem[Hickson et al.(1992)]{hic92} Hickson, P., Mendes de Oliveira, C., Huchra,

2137: J.P., Palumbo, G.G. 1992, \apj, 399, 353

2138: 

2139: \bibitem[Hickson(1993a)]{hic93a} Hickson, P. 1993a, \aplett, 29, 1

2140: 

2141: \bibitem[Hickson(1993b)]{hic93b} Hickson, P. 1993b, Atlas of compact groups of galaxies (New York: Gordon and Breach Science

2142: Publishers)

2143: 

2144: \bibitem[Hickson(1997)]{hic97} Hickson, P. 1997, \araa, 35, 357

2145: 

2146: \bibitem[Holtzman, J. A. et al.(1992)]{hol92} Holtzman, J. A. et al. 1992, \aj, 103, 691

2147: 

2148: \bibitem[Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo \& V\'{\i}lchez(1999)]{igl99} Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo, J. \& V\'{\i}lchez, J.

2149: M. 1999, \apj, 518, 94

2150: 

2151: \bibitem[Iono et al.(2004)]{ion04} Iono, D., Yun, M. S., Mihos, J.

2152: C. 2004, \apj, 616, 199

2153: 

2154: \bibitem[Iovino(2002)]{iov02} Iovino, A. 2002, \aj, 124, 2471

2155: 

2156: \bibitem[James et al.(2004)]{jam04}  James, P. A. et al. 2004, \aap, 414, 23

2157: 

2158: \bibitem[Jester et al.(2005)]{jes05} Jester, S. et al. 2005, \aj, 130, 873

2159: 

2160: \bibitem[Kauffmann(1996)]{kau96} Kauffmann, G. 1996, \mnras, 281, 487

2161: 

2162: \bibitem[Kauffmann \& Charlot(1998)]{kau98} Kauffmann, G. \& Charlot, S. 1998, \mnras, 294, 705

2163: 

2164: \bibitem[Kauffmann et al.(2003)]{kau03} Kauffmann, G. et al 2003, \mnras, 341, 33

2165: 

2166: \bibitem[Keller \& Wood(2006)]{kel06} Keller, S. C. \& Wood, P. R. 2006, \apj, 642, 834

2167: 

2168: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1983)]{ken83} Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1983, \apj, 272, 54

2169: 

2170: \bibitem[Kennicutt et al.(1994)]{ken94} Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Tamblyn, Peter, Congdon, Charles

2171: E. 1994, \apj, 435, 22

2172: 

2173: \bibitem[Kennicutt(1998)]{ken98} Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, \araa, 36, 189

2174: 

2175: \bibitem[Kent(1985)]{ken85} Kent, S. M. 1985, \apjs, 59, 115

2176: 

2177: \bibitem[Kessler et al.(1996)]{kes96} Kessler, M. F. et al. 1996, \aap, 315, 27

2178: 

2179: \bibitem[Kewley et al.(2006)]{kew06} Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., Heckman,

2180: T. 2006, \mnras, 372, 961

2181: 

2182: \bibitem[K\"{o}ppen \& Arimoto(1990)]{kop90} K\"{o}ppen, J. \& Arimoto, N. 1990, \aap, 240, 22

2183: 

2184: \bibitem[Kormendy \& Djorgovski(1989)]{kor89} Kormendy, J. \& Djorgovski,

2185: S. 1989, \araa, 27, 235

2186: 

2187: \bibitem[Landolt(1983)]{lan83} Landolt, A. U. 1983 \aj, 88, 439

2188: 

2189: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A. U. 1992 \aj, 104, 340

2190: 

2191: \bibitem[Laval et al.(1987)]{lav87} Laval, A.,  Boulesteix, J., Georgelin, Y. P., Georgelin, Y. M.,

2192: Marcelin, M. 1987, \aap, 175, 199

2193: 

2194: \bibitem[Le Coarer et al.(1993)]{lec93} Le Coarer, E., Rosado, M., Georgelin, Y., et al. 1993, \aap, 280, 365

2195: 

2196: \bibitem[Leon et al.(1998)]{leo98} Leon, S., Combes, F., Menon, T.

2197: K. 1998, \aap, 330, 37

2198: 

2199: \bibitem[Lisenfeld at al.(2002)]{lis02} Lisenfeld, U. et al. 2002, \aap, 394, 823

2200: 

2201: \bibitem[Lisenfeld at al.(2004)]{lis04} Lisenfeld, U. et al. 2004, \aap, 426, 471

2202: 

2203: \bibitem[Lisenfeld et al.(2007)]{lis07} Lisenfeld, U. et al. 2007, \aap, 462, 507

2204: 

2205: \bibitem[Macchetto et al.(1996)]{mac96} Macchetto, F. et al. 1996, \aaps, 120, 463

2206: 

2207: \bibitem[Mamon(1987)]{mam87} Mamon, G. A. 1987, \apj, 321, 622

2208: 

2209: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}nez et al.(2006)]{mar06}  Mart\'{\i}nez, M. A., del Olmo, A., Perea, J. \&

2210: Coziol, R. 2006, in \emph{Groups of Galaxies in the Nearby

2211: Universe}, edited by I. Saviane, V. Ivanov \& J. Borissova,

2212: astro-ph/0611098 (in press)

2213: 

2214: \bibitem[McCall(2004)]{mcc04} McCall, M. L. 2004, \aj, 128, 2144

2215: 

2216: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson(1991)]{men91} Mendes de Oliveira, C. \& Hickson,

2217: P. 1991, \apj, 380, 30

2218: 

2219: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira \& Hickson(1994)]{men94} Mendes de Oliveira, C. \& Hickson, P. 1994, \apj,

2220: 427, 684

2221: 

2222: \bibitem[Mendes de Oliveira et al.(2003)]{men03} Mendes de Oliveira, C., Amram, P., Plana, H., Balkowski,

2223: C. 2003, \aj, 126, 2635

2224: 

2225: \bibitem[Menon \& Hickson(1985)]{men85} Menon, T. K. \& Hickson, P. 1985, \apj, 296, 60

2226: 

2227: \bibitem[Moles et al.(1997)]{mol97} Moles, M., Sulentic, J. W., Marquez, I. 1997, \apj, 485, L69

2228: 

2229: \bibitem[Moles et al.(1998)]{mol98} Moles, M., Marquez, I., Sulentic, J. W. 1998, \aap, 334, 473

2230: 

2231: \bibitem[Moore et al.(1996)]{moo96} Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., Oemler, A. 1996, \nat, 379, 613

2232: 

2233: \bibitem[Moshir et al.(1990)]{mos90} Moshir, M. et al. 1990, IRAS Faint Source Catalogue, version 2.0 (1990)

2234: 

2235: \bibitem[Mulchaey \& Zabludoff(1999)]{muz99} Mulchaey, J. S. \& Zabludoff, A.

2236: I. 1999, \apj, 514, 133

2237: 

2238: \bibitem[M\"{u}ller et al.(1999)]{mul99} M\"{u}ller, K. R. et al. 1999, \aaps, 140, 327

2239: 

2240: \bibitem[Nishiura et al.(2000a)]{nis00} Nishiura, S. et al. 2000a, \aj, 120,

2241: 2355 (N2000a)

2242: 

2243: \bibitem[Nishiura et al.(2000b)]{nss00} Nishiura, S. et al. 2000b, \aj, 120,

2244: 1691

2245: 

2246: \bibitem[Nishiura et al.(2002)]{nis02} Nishiura, S. et al. 2002,

2247: \pasj, 54, 21

2248: 

2249: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Ferland(2006)]{ost06} Osterbrock, D. E. \& Ferland, G. J. 2006, \emph{Astrophysics of

2250: Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei}, 2nd. ed., University

2251: Science Books, Sausalito, California

2252: 

2253: \bibitem[Palma et al.(2002)]{pal02} Palma, C. et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 2425

2254: 

2255: \bibitem[Perea et al.(1997)]{per97} Perea, J., del Olmo, A., Verdes-Montenegro, L. \& Yun, M.

2256: S. 1997, \apj, 490, 166

2257: 

2258: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(1986)]{phi86} Phillips, M. M. et al. 1986, \aj, 91, 1062

2259: 

2260: \bibitem[Pildis et al.(1995a)]{pil95} Pildis, R. A., Bregman, J. N., Evrard, A. E. 1995a, \apj, 443, 514

2261: 

2262: \bibitem[Pildis et al.(1995b)]{pib95} Pildis, R. A., Bregman, J. N., Schombert, J. M. 1995b, \aj, 110, 1498

2263: 

2264: \bibitem[Plana et al.(2002)]{pla02} Plana, H. et al. 2002, In proceedings of {\it

2265: Galaxies: The Third Dimension}, Eds. M. Rosado, L. Binette \& L.

2266: Arias, {\it ASP Conf. Ser.}, {\bf 282}, 282

2267: 

2268: \bibitem[Ponman et al.(1996)]{pon96} Ponman, T. J., Bourner, P. D. J., Ebeling, H., Bohringer,

2269: H 1996, \mnras, 283, 690

2270: 

2271: \bibitem[Proctor et al.(2004)]{pro04} Proctor, R. N., Forbes, D. A., Hau, G. K. T., Beasley, M. A., De Silva, G. M., Contreras, R., Terlevich, A.

2272: I. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1381

2273: 

2274: \bibitem[Ribas et al.(2005)]{rib05} Ribas, I. et al. 2005, \apj, 635, L37

2275: 

2276: \bibitem[Ribeiro et al.(1998)]{rib98} Ribeiro, A. L. B., de Carvalho, R. R., Capelato, H. V.,

2277: Zepf, S. E. 1998, \apj, 497, 72

2278: 

2279: \bibitem[Roberts \& Haynes(1994)]{rob94} Roberts, M. S. \& Haynes, M.

2280: P. 1994, \araa, 32, 115

2281: 

2282: \bibitem[Rood \& Williams(1989)]{roo89} Rood, H. \& Williams, B. 1989, \apj, 339, 772

2283: 

2284: \bibitem[Rood \& Struble(1994)]{roo94} Rood, H. J. \& Struble, M. F. 1994, \pasp, 106, 413

2285: 

2286: \bibitem[Rosado et al.(1995)]{ros95} Rosado, M. et al. 1995, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. Ser. Conf.,

2287: 3, 263

2288: 

2289: \bibitem[Rose(1977)]{ros77} Rose, J. A. 1977, \apj, 211, 311

2290: 

2291: \bibitem[Rubin et al.(1991)]{rub91} Rubin, V. C., Hunter, D. A., Ford, W. K.,

2292: Jr. 1991, \apjs, 76, 153 (R1991)

2293: 

2294: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{sal55} Salpeter, E. E 1955, \apj, 121, 161

2295: 

2296: \bibitem[Sanders et al.(2003)]{san03} Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D.-C., Surace, J. A., Soifer, B.

2297: T. 2003, \aj, 126, 1607

2298: 

2299: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525

2300: 

2301: \bibitem[Severgnini et al.(1999)]{sev99} Severgnini, P., Garilli, B., Saracco, P., Chincarini,

2302: G. 1999, \aaps, 137, 495

2303: 

2304: \bibitem[Shimada et al.(2000)]{shi00} Shimada, M., Ohyama, Y., Nishiura, S., Murayama,

2305: T., Taniguchi, Y. 2000, \aj, 119, 2664 (S2000)

2306: 

2307: \bibitem[Siebenmorgen et al.(1996)]{sie96} Siebenmorgen, R., Starck, J. L., Cesarsky, D. A., Guest, S., Sauvage,

2308: M., 1996. ISOCAM Data Users Manual, SAI/95-222/Dc

2309: 

2310: \bibitem[Sommer-Larsen(2006)]{som06} Sommer-Larsen, J. 2006, \mnras, 369, 958

2311: 

2312: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{sto02} Stoughton, C. et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 485

2313: 

2314: \bibitem[Sulentic \& Lorre(1983)]{sul83} Sulentic, J. W. \& Lorre, J. J. 1983, \aap, 120, 36

2315: 

2316: \bibitem[Sulentic(1987)]{sul87} Sulentic, J. W. 1987, \apj, 322, 605

2317: 

2318: \bibitem[Sulentic \& de Mello Raba\c{c}a(1993)]{sul93} Sulentic, J. W. \& de Mello

2319: Raba\c{c}a, D. F. 1993, \apj, 410, 520

2320: 

2321: \bibitem[Sulentic \& Raba\c{c}a(1994)]{sul94} Sulentic, J. W. \& Raba\c{c}a, C. 1994, \apj, 429, 531

2322: 

2323: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(1994)]{sra94} Sulentic, J. W., Raba\c{c}a, C. R., Arp, H. 1994,

2324: in proceedings of {\it Mass-Transfer Induced Activity in Galaxies},

2325: edited by Isaac Shlosman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),

2326: 377

2327: 

2328: \bibitem[Sulentic(1997)]{sul97} Sulentic, J. W. 1997, \apj, 482, 640

2329: 

2330: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2001)]{sul01} Sulentic, J. W. et al. 2001, \aj, 122, 2993

2331: 

2332: \bibitem[Sulentic et al.(2006)]{sul06} Sulentic, J. W. et al. 2006, \aap, 449, 937

2333: 

2334: \bibitem[Tarenghi et al.(1994)]{tar94} Tarenghi, M., Garilli, B., Maccagni, D. 1994, \aj, 107, 1629

2335: 

2336: \bibitem[Tonry \& Davis(1979)]{ton79} Tonry, J. \&  Davis, M. 1979, \aj, 84, 1511

2337: 

2338: \bibitem[Trinchieri et al.(2003)]{tri03} Trinchieri, G., Sulentic, J., Breitschwerdt, D., Pietsch,

2339: W. 2003, \aap, 401, 173

2340: 

2341: \bibitem[Trinchieri et al.(2005)]{tri05} Trinchieri, G., Sulentic, J., Pietsch, W., Breitschwerdt, D. 2005, \aap, 444, 697

2342: 

2343: \bibitem[Verdes-Montenegro et al.(1998)]{ver98} Verdes-Montenegro, L., Yun, M. S., Perea, J., del Olmo, A., Ho,

2344: P. T. P. 1998, \apj, 497, 89

2345: 

2346: \bibitem[Verdes-Montenegro et al.(2001)]{ver01} Verdes-Montenegro

2347: et al. 2001, \aap, 377, 812

2348: 

2349: \bibitem[V\'{\i}lchez \& Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo(1998)]{vil98} V\'{\i}lchez, J. M. \& Iglesias-P\'{a}ramo,

2350: J. 1998, \apjs, 117, 1

2351: 

2352: \bibitem[Vollmer(2003)]{vol03} Vollmer, B. 2003, \aap, 398, 525

2353: 

2354: \bibitem[White et al.(2003)]{whi03} White, P. M., Bothun, G., Guerrero, M. A., West, M. J., Barkhouse, W.

2355: A. 2003, \apj, 585, 739

2356: 

2357: \bibitem[Williams et al.(1991)]{wil91} Williams, B. A., McMahon, P.

2358: M., van Gorkom, J. H. 1991, \aj, 101, 1957

2359: 

2360: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2002)]{wil02} Williams, B. A., Yun, M. S., Verdes-Montenegro,

2361: L. 2002,\aj, 123, 2417

2362: 

2363: \bibitem[Xanthopoulos et al.(2004)]{xan04} Xanthopoulos, E., Muxlow, T. W. B., Thomasson, P., Garrington, S.

2364: T. 2004, \mnras, 353, 1117

2365: 

2366: \bibitem[Xu et al.(1999)]{xus99} Xu, C., Sulentic, J. W. \& Tuffs,

2367: R. 1999, \apj, 512, 178

2368: 

2369: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2003)]{xul03} Xu, C. K., Lu, N., Condon, J. J., Dopita, M., Tuffs,

2370: R. J. 2003, \apj, 595, 665

2371: 

2372: \bibitem[Xu et al.(2005)]{xui05} Xu, C. K. et al. 2005, \apj, 619, L95

2373: 

2374: \bibitem[Young(1974)]{you74} Young, A. T. 1974, \apj, 189, 587

2375: 

2376: \bibitem[Yun et al.(1997)]{yun97} Yun, M. S., Verdes-Montenegro, L., del Olmo, A., Perea, J. 1997, \apj, 475, L21

2377: 

2378: \bibitem[Zabludoff \& Mulchaey(1998)]{zab98} Zabludoff, A. I. \& Mulchaey, J. S. 1998, \apj, 496, 39

2379: 

2380: \bibitem[Zepf et al.(1991)]{zep91} Zepf, S. E., Whitmore, B. C., Levison, H.

2381: F. 1991, \apj, 383, 524

2382: 

2383: \bibitem[Zepf(1993)]{zep93} Zepf, S. E. 1993, \apj, 407, 448

2384: 

2385: \end{thebibliography}

2386: 

2387: \clearpage

2388: 

2389: \input{tab1}

2390: \input{tab2}

2391: \input{tab3}

2392: \input{tab4}

2393: \input{tab5}

2394: \input{tab6}

2395: \input{tab7}

2396: \input{tab8}

2397: \input{tab9}

2398: \input{tab10}

2399: \input{tab11}

2400: \input{tab12}

2401: \input{tab13}

2402: \input{tab14}

2403: \input{tab15}

2404: 

2405: \clearpage

2406: 

2407: \begin{figure}

2408: \figurenum{1} \epsscale{0.9} \plotone {f1.eps} \caption {{HST/WFPC2

2409: images of SS. ($left$) High pass median filter image. ($right$) Low

2410: pass median filter image (5.5X zoom in).}\label{fig1}}

2411: \end{figure}

2412: 

2413: 

2414: 

2415: \begin{figure}

2416: \includegraphics[scale=0.7,angle=-90]{f2.eps}

2417: \figurenum{2} \caption{{SS: The direction of the slits for the

2418: long-slit spectra obtained with ALFOSC at the NOT telescope.}

2419: \label{fig2}}

2420: \end{figure}

2421: 

2422: 

2423: \begin{figure}

2424: \figurenum{3} \epsscale{0.9}

2425: %\includegraphics*[angle=90]{f1.eps}

2426: \plottwo {f3a.eps}{f3b.eps} \caption {{H79a: ($left$) Elliptically

2427: averaged surface brightness profile in r-band. ($right$) b4

2428: coefficient profile. The dotted horizontal line corresponds to a

2429: fourth cosine Fourier coefficient of 0 (perfect ellipse). We

2430: truncated the profile from 3 arcsec because of the dust lane.}}

2431: \label{fig3}

2432: \end{figure}

2433: 

2434: 

2435: 

2436: \begin{figure}

2437: \figurenum{4} \epsscale{0.9}

2438: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2439: \plottwo {f4a.eps}{f4b.eps} \caption {{H79b: ($left$) Elliptically

2440: averaged surface brightness profile in r-band. ($right$) b4

2441: coefficient profile. The dotted horizontal line corresponds to a

2442: fourth cosine Fourier coefficient of 0 (perfect ellipse).}

2443: \label{fig4}}

2444: \end{figure}

2445: 

2446: \clearpage

2447: 

2448: \begin{figure}

2449: \figurenum{5} \epsscale{0.9}

2450: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2451: \plotone {f5.eps}\caption {{Size versus magnitude for neighbors

2452: (filled squares), bulges of SO and Sb-Sc neighbors (crosses) and

2453: galaxies in SS (open circles)} \label{fig5}}

2454: \end{figure}

2455: 

2456: 

2457: \begin{figure}

2458: \figurenum{6} \epsscale{1.0}

2459: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2460: \plotone{f6.eps}\caption{{B+R color image of SS}\label{fig6}}

2461: \end{figure}

2462: 

2463: 

2464: \begin{figure}

2465: \figurenum{7} \epsscale{1.0}

2466: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2467: \plotone {f7.eps}\caption {{B-R color image of SS}\label{fig7}}

2468: \end{figure}

2469: 

2470: 

2471: \begin{figure}

2472: \figurenum{8} \epsscale{0.5}

2473: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2474: \plotone {f8.eps}\caption {{MOS/SIS Fabry-P\'{e}rot (CFHT 3.6m)

2475: continuum-subtracted $H_{\alpha}$ image: Sum of 5 velocity channels,

2476: corresponding to velocities between 4350-4395 km/s (galaxy H79a) in

2477: 0 interference order and 4615-4660 km/s (galaxy H79d) in +1

2478: interference order. }\label{fig8}}

2479: \end{figure}

2480: 

2481: 

2482: \begin{figure}

2483: \figurenum{9} \epsscale{0.7}

2484: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2485: \plotone {f9.eps}\caption {{Continuum-subtracted $H_{\alpha}$

2486: interference filter image centered at 6667 {\AA} of

2487: SS.}\label{fig9}}

2488: \end{figure}

2489: 

2490: 

2491: \begin{figure}

2492: \figurenum{10} \epsscale{0.9} \plotone {f10.eps}\caption {{H79d line

2493: of sight velocity curve along major axis (PA=180\arcdeg - PUMA \&

2494: MOS/SIS; PA=179.3\arcdeg - ALFOSC).}\label{fig10}}

2495: \end{figure}

2496: 

2497: \clearpage

2498: 

2499: \begin{figure}

2500: \figurenum{11} \epsscale{0.9}

2501: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2502: \plotone {f11.eps}\caption {{H79a line of sight velocity curve along

2503: major axis (PA=65\arcdeg). "int" corresponds to the intensity of the

2504: peak of each component.}\label{fig11}}

2505: \end{figure}

2506: 

2507: 

2508: 

2509: \begin{figure}

2510: \figurenum{12} \epsscale{0.9}

2511: %\includegraphics*{f1.eps}

2512: \plotone {f12.eps}\caption {{H79b line of sight velocity curve along

2513: the direction connecting the nuclei of galaxies H79bc

2514: (PA=79\arcdeg).}\label{fig12}}

2515: \end{figure}

2516: 

2517: 

2518: 

2519: \begin{figure}

2520: \figurenum{13} \epsscale{0.9} \plotone {f13.eps}\caption {{Line of

2521: sight velocity curve along the direction connecting the nuclei of

2522: galaxies H79bc (PA=79\arcdeg- \citealt{bon99}; PA=81\arcdeg-

2523: ALFOSC).}\label{fig13}}

2524: \end{figure}

2525: 

2526: 

2527: \clearpage

2528: 

2529: \begin{figure}

2530: \figurenum{14} \epsscale{0.9} \plotone {f14.eps}\caption {{Spectrum

2531: along the slit of galaxy H79c corresponding to an aperture of

2532: 12\arcsec (PA=35\arcdeg).}\label{fig14}}

2533: \end{figure}

2534: 

2535: 

2536: \begin{figure}

2537: \figurenum{15} \epsscale{0.9} \plotone {f15.eps}\caption

2538:  {{Isophotal contours of the LW10 ISOCAM image of the

2539: SS overimposed on a DPOSS image of the same group. The contours

2540: drawn go from 4 to 5.5 mJy per pixel, in steps of 0.15 mJy. The

2541: background level is around 3.8 mJy per pixel. The horizontal bar on

2542: the left shows the aperture radius adopted to measure the fluxes

2543: reported in Table 12.}\label{fig15}}

2544: \end{figure}

2545: 

2546: \begin{figure}

2547: \figurenum{16} \epsscale{1.0} \plotone {f16.eps} \caption

2548:  {{VLA: (Bold contours) C-Array 1.4 GHz radio continuum. (Thin contours:) B-Array 1.4 GHz radio continuum

2549:  }\label{fig16}}

2550: \end{figure}

2551: 

2552: \clearpage

2553: 

2554: \begin{figure}

2555: \figurenum{17} \epsscale{1.0} \plotone {f17.eps} \caption

2556:  {{VLA: HI contours.}\label{fig17}}

2557: \end{figure}

2558: 

2559: \begin{figure}

2560: \figurenum{18} \epsscale{1.0} \plotone {f18.eps} \caption

2561:  {{VLA: HI channel maps.}\label{fig18}}

2562: \end{figure}

2563: 

2564: \begin{figure}

2565: \figurenum{19} \epsscale{1.0} \plotone {f19.eps} \caption

2566:  {{VLA: HI Position-velocity plot of H79d along major axis

2567:  (PA=180\arcdeg).}\label{fig19}}

2568: \end{figure}

2569: 

2570: 

2571: 

2572: 

2573: 

2574: \end{document}

2575: