1: % ApJL paper about the kinematics of Barnard 68
2:
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters}
9: \shorttitle{Complex Radial Moctions in Barnard 68}
10: \shortauthors{Maret, Bergin and Lada}
11:
12: \newcommand{\eg}{\emph{e.g.}\ }
13: \newcommand{\ie}{\emph{i.e.}\ }
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Using Chemistry to Unveil the Kinematics of Starless Cores:
18: Complex Radial Motions in Barnard 68}
19:
20: \author{S\'ebastien Maret, Edwin A. Bergin}
21: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 500 Church
22: Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA}
23: \and
24: \author{Charles J. Lada}
25: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
26: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We present observations of $^{13}$CO, C$^{18}$O, HCO$^{+}$,
30: H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, DCO$^{+}$ and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ line emission towards
31: the Barnard 68 starless core. The line profiles are interpreted
32: using a chemical network coupled with a radiative transfer code in
33: order to reconstruct the radial velocity profile of the core. Our
34: observations and modeling indicate the presence of complex radial
35: motions, with the inward motions in the outer layers of the core but
36: outward motions in the inner part, suggesting radial
37: oscillations. The presence of such oscillation would imply that B68
38: is relatively old, typically one order of magnitude older than the
39: age inferred from its chemical evolution and statistical core
40: lifetimes. Our study demonstrates that chemistry can be used as a
41: tool to constrain the radial velocity profiles of starless cores.
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \keywords{astrochemistry -- stars: formation --- ISM: abundances
45: --- ISM: molecules --- ISM: individual (Barnard 68)}
46:
47: \section{Introduction}
48: \label{sec:introduction}
49:
50: Starless cores likely represent the earliest stage of the formation of
51: a star. In the standard view of star formation, cores form out an
52: initially magnetically sub-critical cloud, and evolve in a
53: quasi-static fashion through ambipolar diffusion
54: \citep{Shu87,Mouschiovas91}. In the opposite picture, cores are
55: dynamic objects that form by shocks in a turbulent flow, fragment and
56: collapse (or disappear) in a few crossing times
57: \citep{Padoan01,Ballesteros-Paredes2003}. Velocity measurements can
58: provide important constraints on these two scenarios. For example,
59: \cite{Tafalla98} examined the kinematics of L1544 and inferred infall
60: velocities up to 0.1 km s$^{-1}$ \emph{a priori} incompatible with
61: sub-critical ambipolar diffusion models. However, \cite{Ciolek00}
62: argued that these velocities can be understood if the core is
63: super-critical.
64:
65: Line of sight velocities in cores can be established from observations
66: of self-absorbed line profiles. In an infalling core, if the
67: excitation temperature increases towards the center (as one can expect
68: in a centrally condensed core with a roughly constant temperature),
69: self-absorbed lines are expected to be asymmetric, with a blue peak
70: brighter than the red peak \cite[see][]{Evans99}. This technique has
71: been used in the past to detect collapse motions in starless cores
72: and protostars \cite[see][for a review]{Myers00}. One of the major
73: difficulties of this technique is the large degree of chemical
74: complexity within these objects. For example, numerous molecules are
75: observed to deplete in the densest regions of starless cores
76: \cite[e.g.][]{Bergin02a,Tafalla02}, thus hampering our ability to
77: measure the velocity in the dense central regions of these objects.
78:
79: Nevertheless, with a detailed knowledge of the chemistry of these
80: objects, one can choose appropriate molecular transitions to trace
81: different part of the cores, and unveil their radial kinematic
82: structure \citep{Bergin03b,vanderTak05}. In this paper, we use line
83: observations of $^{13}$CO, C$^{18}$O, HCO$^{+}$, H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$,
84: DCO$^{+}$ and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ to reconstruct the velocity profile of
85: the Barnard 68 core (hereinafter B68). With a well defined physical
86: \citep{Alves01,Bergin06b} and chemical
87: \citep{Bergin02a,Maret06,Maret07a} structure, this core is an ideal
88: target for such a study. For this we compare the observed line
89: profiles with the predictions of a chemical network coupled with a
90: radiative transfer code. The paper is organized as
91: follow. Observations are presented in \S \ref{sec:observations}. The
92: analysis is detailed in \S \ref{sec:analysis-results}, and the results
93: are discussed in \S \ref{sec:discussion}.
94:
95: \section{Observations}
96: \label{sec:observations}
97:
98: Maps of H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ (1-0) ($\nu = 86.754288$ GHz), HCO$^{+}$
99: (1-0) ($\nu = 89.188523$ GHz), N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (1-0) ($\nu = 93.173772$
100: GHz) C$^{18}$O (1-0) ($\nu = 109.782173$ GHz), DCO$^{+}$ (2-1) ($\nu =
101: 144.077289$ GHz), DCO$^{+}$ (3-2) ($\nu = 216.112604$ GHz) and
102: HCO$^{+}$ (3-2) ($\nu= 267.557526$ GHz) transitions were observed
103: towards B68 ($\alpha = 17^\mathrm{h} 22^\mathrm{m} 38.2^\mathrm{s}$
104: and $\delta = -23 \degr 49 \arcmin 34.0 \arcsec$; J2000) in April 2002
105: and September 2002 with the IRAM-30m telescope. The $^{13}$CO (2-1)
106: ($\nu = 220.398684$ GHz) transition was observed in September 2003
107: with the \emph{Caltech Submillimeter Observatory} (CSO). These
108: observations have already been presented in \citet{Bergin02a},
109: \citet{Bergin06b}, \citet{Maret06}, and \citet{Maret07a}, and we refer
110: the reader to these papers for technical details.
111:
112: Transitions of HCO$^{+}$ (4-3) ($\nu = 356.734134$ GHz) and
113: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (3-2) ($\nu = 279.511832$ GHz) were observed in August
114: 2005 using the \emph{Atacama Pathfinder eXperiment} telescope
115: (APEX). The APEX-2A receiver was used together with the FFTS
116: spectrometer, which provides a spectral resolution of 61 kHz. The
117: telescope half power beam size is 22\arcsec\ at 280 GHz and 17\arcsec\
118: at 357 GHz. The data were calibrated using the chopper wheel method,
119: and the system temperature was $\sim$100 K at 280 GHz and 130-180 K at
120: 357 GHz. The observations were converted on the $T_\mathrm{mb}$ scale
121: assuming a main beam efficiency of 70\% and a forward efficiency of
122: 95\% (C. de Breuck, priv. comm.). These observations were obtained in
123: beam switching mode.
124:
125: Fig. \ref{fig1} present the observations together with our model
126: predictions (see \S~\ref{sec:analysis-results} for a description of
127: the model). The lines show a variety of different profiles, from
128: Gaussian to self-absorbed and asymmetric double peaked
129: profiles. C$^{18}$O, $^{13}$CO and H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ are probably
130: optically thin (or only moderately optically thick), and have
131: centrally peaked Gaussian profiles. On the other hand, HCO$^{+}$ (1-0)
132: and (3-2) lines are self-reversed and show the typical blue asymmetry
133: (blue peak brighter than the red peak). These line profiles suggests
134: that collapsing motions are present along the line of
135: sight. Surprisingly, self-absorbed HCO$^{+}$ (4-3), DCO$^{+}$ (3-2),
136: and the central component of the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (1-0) line exhibit red
137: asymmetry (red peak brighter than the blue peak), indicating
138: expansion. Finally, the DCO$^{+}$ (2-1) line is self-absorbed but
139: symmetric, hinting at the presence of static gas along the line of
140: sight. The absorption dip velocity of self-reversed lines is
141: consistent with the ${v_\mathrm{LSR}}$ of the source (3.31
142: $\mathrm{km\, s^{-1}}$), as determined from the $\mathrm{C^{18}O}$
143: (1-0) line. In the following, we model the line profiles in order to
144: constrain the line-of-sight velocity of the core.
145:
146: \section{Analysis and results}
147: \label{sec:analysis-results}
148:
149: We have modelled the spectral line profiles shown on Fig. \ref{fig1}
150: following the approach described in \citet{Bergin06b}, \citet{Maret06}
151: and \citet{Maret07a}. The abundance profiles were computed using a
152: chemical network that includes gas grain interactions, as well as the
153: fractionation reactions for carbon, oxygen, and deuterium
154: \citep{Bergin97}. These abundance profiles were used to compute the
155: line emission using a 1-D Monte Carlo radiative transfer code
156: \citep{Ashby00}. These model predictions were convolved at the
157: appropriate spatial resolution in order to be compared with the
158: observations, assuming a distance of 125 pc.
159:
160: The density profile from \citet{Alves01} and the gas and dust
161: temperature from \cite{Bergin06b} were used. We have adopted the same
162: initial abundances and cosmic ionization rate as in the
163: \citet{Maret07a} ``best-fit'' model. As a first approach, we have
164: assumed that no systematic radial motions are present in the core. We
165: have used the turbulent velocity profile determined by
166: \cite{Bergin06b} from C$^{18}$O (1-0) line observations. The turbulent
167: velocity contribution is 0.3 $\mathrm{km \ s^{-1}}$ (FWHM) at the
168: surface of the core, and decreases towards the center down to 0.15 {km
169: s$^{-1}$}. Rotation of the cloud has been neglected. Both the
170: $^{13}$CO (2-1) and the H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ (1-0) lines have an
171: unresolved hyperfine structure that need to be taken into account in
172: order to properly model the line profiles. Following the approach used
173: by \citet{Tafalla06}, we have artificially broadened these two lines
174: by 0.13 km s$^{-1}$, which corresponds to the separation between the
175: two hyperfine components of each species \citep{Schmid-Burgk04}.
176:
177: On Fig. \ref{fig2}, we present the abundances predicted by our
178: chemical model. From this figure we can roughly estimate which lines
179: originate in different parts of the core. For example, the HCO$^{+}$
180: abundance peaks in the outer part of the core ($A_{v} \sim 2$) and
181: decreases towards the center because of the freeze-out of its parent
182: molecule CO. Consequently, HCO$^{+}$ lines probe predominantly the
183: outer layer. Both N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ and DCO$^{+}$ abundances peak deeper
184: inside, at an $A_{v}$ of 5 and 13 respectively. Therefore lines from
185: these two species preferentially trace the inner regions of the
186: core. Of course, excitation effects are also important, and different
187: transitions of the same molecule are expected to probe different
188: depths in the core as well. For example, the HCO$^{+}$ (4-3) opacity
189: is likely lower that the (1-0) and (3-2) lines, and thus the HCO$^{+}$
190: (4-3) line probably arises from deeper regions than the HCO$^{+}$
191: (3-2) and (1-0) lines. Altogether, our observations suggest the
192: presence of complex radial motions in B68, with inwards motions in the
193: outer part of the core -- as indicated by the blue HCO$^{+}$ (1-0) and
194: (3-2) line profiles -- and outward motions in the inner region -- as
195: shown by the HCO$^{+}$ (4-3), DCO$^{+}$ (3-2) and N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (1-0)
196: lines. In addition, the DCO$^{+}$ (2-1) line hints at the presence of
197: an intermediate static region between these two parts.
198:
199: In order to test this hypothesis, we have computed the line profiles
200: for the step-like velocity profile represented on Fig. \ref{fig3}. By
201: convention, negative velocities correspond to inward motions, while
202: positive velocities correspond to outward motions. The velocity is
203: assumed to be negative (-0.045 km s$^{-1}$) at radius greater than
204: 8,000 AU, and positive (0.025 km s$^{-1}$) at smaller
205: radii. Fig. \ref{fig1} compares the observations with our model
206: predictions for this velocity profile. The fit is not
207: perfect. However, given the complexity of our modeling -- chemical
208: network coupled with a radiative transfer model -- the overall
209: agreement between the model predictions and observations is fairly
210: good. The model reproduces quite well the infall asymmetry of
211: HCO$^{+}$ (1-0) and (3-2), as well as the blue asymmetry of the (4-3)
212: line. H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$ (1-0), N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (3-2), C$^{18}$O (1-0)
213: and $^{13}$CO (2-1) line profiles are also well matched. Although the
214: model predicts correct integrated intensities for DCO$^{+}$ (3-2) and
215: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (1-0), it does not reproduce the blue asymmetries seen
216: in these lines. The predicted line profiles have a Gaussian shape,
217: whereas the observed lines are self-absorbed. In these cases, it
218: appears that our model underestimates the opacity of these lines.
219:
220: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
221: \label{sec:discussion}
222:
223: Our observations and modelling indicate that the outer part of the
224: core is collapsing while the inner part is expanding. The velocities
225: in both regions are relatively small (a few tens of meters per second)
226: and are largely sub-sonic. The transition between the collapsing and
227: expanding region occurs at a radius of about 8,000 AU. It is important
228: to note that the fit to the observations is probably not unique.
229: However, large changes in the transition and velocities between the
230: regions are likely ruled out. As already mentioned, our model does not
231: reproduce the asymmetries of the N$_{2}$H$^{+}$ (1-0) and DCO$^{+}$
232: line profiles, due to an underestimating of the opacity. There are
233: several possible explanations for this discrepancy. First, our
234: chemical model might not predict the correct abundance profile for
235: these two species. For example, increasing the DCO$^{+}$ abundance at
236: intermediate radii, with a subsequent reduction at small radii to keep
237: the column density constant would increase the opacity of line without
238: changing the line flux significantly (which is correctly
239: predicted). Indeed, our model predicts a DCO$^{+}$ (2-1) line
240: intensity at $10 < A_{v} < 20$ that is lower than observed \citep[see
241: Fig. 3 in][]{Maret07a}. Second, the physical structure of the core is
242: also somewhat uncertain. For example, the temperature profile may be
243: slightly different than the one predicted by \cite{Bergin06b}
244: \citep[see][]{Crapsi07}, although small changes ($\pm 3$ K) in the
245: temperature profile were found to have little effect on the line
246: intensities. Turbulence at the center of the core might also be
247: different that what assumed here. The turbulent profile was
248: determined by \cite{Bergin06b} using C$^{18}$O observations, which are
249: not a good probe of the innermost regions of the core because of heavy
250: depletion. Decreasing the turbulent velocity profile in the innermost
251: region of the core would also increase the opacity of these two lines.
252: Regardless of the discrepancy with our model predictions, we emphasize
253: these two line profiles, together with the HCO$^{+}$ (4-3) line
254: profile, unambiguously indicate the presence of outwards motions at
255: the center of the core. We found that no constant infalling velocity
256: profile could reproduce the observations.
257:
258: The step-like velocity profile we obtain is suggestive of the presence
259: of radial oscillations in the core. Small non-radial oscillations of
260: the outer layers of the core around a stable equilibrium have been
261: proposed by \citet{Lada03} and \cite{Redman06} to interpret the
262: asymmetry of the CS (2-1) and HCO$^{+}$ (3-2) lines observed in
263: Barnard 68. \cite{Lada03} also suggested that, in addition to the
264: surface oscillations seen in the CS (2-1) line, some radial
265: oscillation might also be present. Our observations and modeling are
266: in agreement with this hypothesis.
267:
268: \cite{Keto05} proposed a hydrodynamic model for the evolution of cores
269: in quasi-equilibrium. In their modeling, a small perturbation of a
270: stable core (according to the Bonnor-Ebert criterion) is found to
271: result in damped oscillations around the equilibrium
272: position. \cite{Keto06} showed that the surface pattern observed in
273: the CS (2-1) line towards B68 is consistent with the (n = 1, l = m =
274: 2) quadripolar oscillation mode for a specific orientation ($\lambda =
275: \theta = 30^\circ$). For the same oscillation mode, the radial
276: velocity is qualitatively similar to the one obtained in this study,
277: but is out of phase: the inner part of the core has a negative radial
278: velocity, while the outer part of the core has a positive velocity. At
279: the other half of the oscillation cycle, the velocity would be
280: reversed and in qualitative agreement with the profile we obtain
281: (E. Keto, \emph{priv. comm.})
282:
283: As pointed out by \cite{Keto06} and \cite{Redman06}, the presence of
284: oscillations in B68 suggests that the core is relatively old,
285: typically older than a few sound speed crossing times ($\sim 10^{6}$
286: yr). This is comparable to the ambipolar diffusion timescale at the
287: center of the core and more than one order of magnitude higher than
288: the free-fall time scale \citep[$10^{6}$ and $7 \times 10^{4}$ yr
289: respectively;][]{Maret07a}. This is also about an order of magnitude
290: higher than the age of the core as determined from the degree of CO
291: depletion \citep[$10^{5}$yr;][]{Bergin02a,Bergin06b}\footnote{Strictly
292: speaking, the age determined by this method is a lower limit of the
293: real age of the cloud, because CO is assumed to be pre-existing, and
294: the density is supposed to be constant \citep{Bergin06b}.}. For $t =
295: 3 \times 10^{5}$ yr, \cite{Bergin06b} model predicts a C$^{18}$O (1-0)
296: line intensity that is three time smaller than the observations, while
297: at $t = 10^{6}$ yr, the greater CO depletion leads to an even greater
298: mismatch between observations and model predictions. The
299: N$_{2}$H$^{+}$, HCO$^{+}$ H$^{13}$CO$^{+}$, and DCO$^{+}$ would also
300: be underestimated by the model because of the freeze-out of their
301: parent of their precursors, N$_{2}$, CO and $^{13}$CO. Thus the
302: ``chemical age'' of B68 inferred from the CO depletion appears to be
303: hard to reconcile with the ``dynamical age'' implied by the presence
304: of surface oscillations. It is also interesting to compare the sound
305: crossing time in B68 to typical statistical starless core lifetimes
306: \cite[see][for a review]{WardThompson07}. Using sub-millimeter
307: continuum emission maps, \cite{Kirk05} obtained lifetimes of $1-3
308: \times 10^{5}$ years which are in good agreement with the age of the
309: B68 determined from CO depletion, but again about an order of
310: magnitude higher than the sound crossing time.
311:
312: The present study emphasizes the importance of understanding the
313: chemistry to constrain the kinematics of starless using spectral line
314: profiles. Because of the strong chemical gradients that exist in these
315: cores -- as well as excitation effects -- different lines can be used
316: to selectively trace different parts of the core. We have demonstrated
317: that, using lines that are appropriately chosen, it is possible to
318: reconstruct the core radial velocity profile. In B68, our observations
319: and modelling suggest the presence of complex line-of-sight motions
320: that are consistent radial oscillations. The presence of such
321: oscillation indicates that some core are long-lived, with lifetimes
322: about an order of magnitude higher than those derived from their
323: chemical evolution or sub-millimeter surveys. So far, oscillations
324: have been inferred in only one other core, FeSt 1-457
325: \citep{Aguti07}. Clearly, similar studies on a larger number of cores
326: are needed to establish if such cores are common.
327:
328: \acknowledgments S.~M. wishes to thank Eric Keto for fruitful
329: discussions. The authors are also grateful to the referee for useful
330: and constructive comments. This work is supported by the National
331: Science Foundation under grant 0335207.
332:
333: {\it Facilities:} \facility{IRAM:30m}, \facility{CSO}, \facility{APEX}
334:
335: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
336: %\bibliography{bibliography}
337:
338: \begin{thebibliography}{31}
339: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
340:
341: \bibitem[{{Aguti} {et~al.}(2007){Aguti}, {Lada}, {Bergin}, {Alves}, \&
342: {Birkinshaw}}]{Aguti07}
343: {Aguti}, E.~D., {Lada}, C.~J., {Bergin}, E.~A., {Alves}, J.~F., \&
344: {Birkinshaw}, M. 2007, \apj, in press
345:
346: \bibitem[{{Alves} {et~al.}(2001){Alves}, {Lada}, \& {Lada}}]{Alves01}
347: {Alves}, J.~F., {Lada}, C.~J., \& {Lada}, E.~A. 2001, \nat, 409, 159
348:
349: \bibitem[{{Ashby} {et~al.}(2000){Ashby}, {Bergin}, {Plume}, {Carpenter},
350: {Neufeld}, {Chin}, {Erickson}, {Goldsmith}, {Harwit}, {Howe}, {Kleiner},
351: {Koch}, {Patten}, {Schieder}, {Snell}, {Stauffer}, {Tolls}, {Wang},
352: {Winnewisser}, {Zhang}, \& {Melnick}}]{Ashby00}
353: {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Bergin}, E.~A., {Plume}, R., {Carpenter}, J.~M., {Neufeld},
354: D.~A., {Chin}, G., {Erickson}, N.~R., {Goldsmith}, P.~F., {Harwit}, M.,
355: {Howe}, J.~E., {Kleiner}, S.~C., {Koch}, D.~G., {Patten}, B.~M., {Schieder},
356: R., {Snell}, R.~L., {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Tolls}, V., {Wang}, Z.,
357: {Winnewisser}, G., {Zhang}, Y.~F., \& {Melnick}, G.~J. 2000, \apjl, 539, L115
358:
359: \bibitem[{{Ballesteros-Paredes} {et~al.}(2003){Ballesteros-Paredes}, {Klessen},
360: \& {V{\'a}zquez-Semadeni}}]{Ballesteros-Paredes2003}
361: {Ballesteros-Paredes}, J., {Klessen}, R.~S., \& {V{\'a}zquez-Semadeni}, E.
362: 2003, \apj, 592, 188
363:
364: \bibitem[{{Bergin}(2003)}]{Bergin03b}
365: {Bergin}, E.~A. 2003, in SFChem 2002: Chemistry as a Diagnostic of Star
366: Formation, proceedings of a conference held August 21-23, 2002 at University
367: of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1. Edited by Charles L. Curry
368: and Michel Fich. NRC Press, Ottawa, Canada, 2003, p. 63., ed. C.~L. {Curry}
369: \& M.~{Fich}, 63--+
370:
371: \bibitem[{{Bergin} {et~al.}(2002){Bergin}, {Alves}, {Huard}, \&
372: {Lada}}]{Bergin02a}
373: {Bergin}, E.~A., {Alves}, J.~., {Huard}, T., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2002, \apjl, 570,
374: L101
375:
376: \bibitem[{{Bergin} \& {Langer}(1997)}]{Bergin97}
377: {Bergin}, E.~A. \& {Langer}, W.~D. 1997, \apj, 486, 316
378:
379: \bibitem[{{Bergin} {et~al.}(2006){Bergin}, {Maret}, {van der Tak}, {Alves},
380: {Carmody}, \& {Lada}}]{Bergin06b}
381: {Bergin}, E.~A., {Maret}, S., {van der Tak}, F.~F.~S., {Alves}, J., {Carmody},
382: S.~M., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2006, \apj, 645, 369
383:
384: \bibitem[{{Bringa} \& {Johnson}(2004)}]{Bringa04}
385: {Bringa}, E.~M. \& {Johnson}, R.~E. 2004, \apj, 603, 159
386:
387: \bibitem[{{Ciolek} \& {Basu}(2000)}]{Ciolek00}
388: {Ciolek}, G.~E. \& {Basu}, S. 2000, \apj, 529, 925
389:
390: \bibitem[{{Crapsi} {et~al.}(2007){Crapsi}, {Caselli}, {Walmsley}, \&
391: {Tafalla}}]{Crapsi07}
392: {Crapsi}, A., {Caselli}, P., {Walmsley}, M.~C., \& {Tafalla}, M. 2007, \aap,
393: 470, 221
394:
395: \bibitem[{{Evans}(1999)}]{Evans99}
396: {Evans}, N.~J. 1999, \araa, 37, 311
397:
398: \bibitem[{{Hasegawa} \& {Herbst}(1993)}]{Hasegawa93a}
399: {Hasegawa}, T.~I. \& {Herbst}, E. 1993, \mnras, 261, 83
400:
401: \bibitem[{{Keto} {et~al.}(2006){Keto}, {Broderick}, {Lada}, \&
402: {Narayan}}]{Keto06}
403: {Keto}, E., {Broderick}, A.~E., {Lada}, C.~J., \& {Narayan}, R. 2006, \apj,
404: 652, 1366
405:
406: \bibitem[{{Keto} \& {Field}(2005)}]{Keto05}
407: {Keto}, E. \& {Field}, G. 2005, \apj, 635, 1151
408:
409: \bibitem[{{Kirk} {et~al.}(2005){Kirk}, {Ward-Thompson}, \&
410: {Andr{\'e}}}]{Kirk05}
411: {Kirk}, J.~M., {Ward-Thompson}, D., \& {Andr{\'e}}, P. 2005, \mnras, 360, 1506
412:
413: \bibitem[{{Lada} {et~al.}(2003){Lada}, {Bergin}, {Alves}, \& {Huard}}]{Lada03}
414: {Lada}, C.~J., {Bergin}, E.~A., {Alves}, J.~F., \& {Huard}, T.~L. 2003, \apj,
415: 586, 286
416:
417: \bibitem[{{Maret} \& {Bergin}(2007)}]{Maret07a}
418: {Maret}, S. \& {Bergin}, E.~A. 2007, \apj, 664, 956
419:
420: \bibitem[{{Maret} {et~al.}(2006){Maret}, {Bergin}, \& {Lada}}]{Maret06}
421: {Maret}, S., {Bergin}, E.~A., \& {Lada}, C.~J. 2006, \nat, 442, 425
422:
423: \bibitem[{{Mouschovias} \& {Morton}(1991)}]{Mouschiovas91}
424: {Mouschovias}, T.~C. \& {Morton}, S.~A. 1991, \apj, 371, 296
425:
426: \bibitem[{{Myers} {et~al.}(2000){Myers}, {Evans}, \& {Ohashi}}]{Myers00}
427: {Myers}, P.~C., {Evans}, N.~J., \& {Ohashi}, N. 2000, Protostars and Planets
428: IV, 217
429:
430: \bibitem[{{Padoan} {et~al.}(2001){Padoan}, {Juvela}, {Goodman}, \&
431: {Nordlund}}]{Padoan01}
432: {Padoan}, P., {Juvela}, M., {Goodman}, A.~A., \& {Nordlund}, {\AA}. 2001, \apj,
433: 553, 227
434:
435: \bibitem[{{Redman} {et~al.}(2006){Redman}, {Keto}, \& {Rawlings}}]{Redman06}
436: {Redman}, M.~P., {Keto}, E., \& {Rawlings}, J.~M.~C. 2006, \mnras, 370, L1
437:
438: \bibitem[{{Roberts} {et~al.}(2007){Roberts}, {Rawlings}, {Viti}, \&
439: {Williams}}]{Roberts07}
440: {Roberts}, J.~F., {Rawlings}, J.~M.~C., {Viti}, S., \& {Williams}, D.~A. 2007,
441: ArXiv e-prints, 708
442:
443: \bibitem[{{Schmid-Burgk} {et~al.}(2004){Schmid-Burgk}, {Muders}, {M{\"u}ller},
444: \& {Brupbacher-Gatehouse}}]{Schmid-Burgk04}
445: {Schmid-Burgk}, J., {Muders}, D., {M{\"u}ller}, H.~S.~P., \&
446: {Brupbacher-Gatehouse}, B. 2004, \aap, 419, 949
447:
448: \bibitem[{{Shu} {et~al.}(1987){Shu}, {Adams}, \& {Lizano}}]{Shu87}
449: {Shu}, F.~H., {Adams}, F.~C., \& {Lizano}, S. 1987, \araa, 25, 23
450:
451: \bibitem[{{Tafalla} {et~al.}(1998){Tafalla}, {Mardones}, {Myers}, {Caselli},
452: {Bachiller}, \& {Benson}}]{Tafalla98}
453: {Tafalla}, M., {Mardones}, D., {Myers}, P.~C., {Caselli}, P., {Bachiller}, R.,
454: \& {Benson}, P.~J. 1998, \apj, 504, 900
455:
456: \bibitem[{{Tafalla} {et~al.}(2002){Tafalla}, {Myers}, {Caselli}, {Walmsley}, \&
457: {Comito}}]{Tafalla02}
458: {Tafalla}, M., {Myers}, P.~C., {Caselli}, P., {Walmsley}, C.~M., \& {Comito},
459: C. 2002, \apj, 569, 815
460:
461: \bibitem[{{Tafalla} {et~al.}(2006){Tafalla}, {Santiago-Garc{\'{\i}}a}, {Myers},
462: {Caselli}, {Walmsley}, \& {Crapsi}}]{Tafalla06}
463: {Tafalla}, M., {Santiago-Garc{\'{\i}}a}, J., {Myers}, P.~C., {Caselli}, P.,
464: {Walmsley}, C.~M., \& {Crapsi}, A. 2006, \aap, 455, 577
465:
466: \bibitem[{{van der Tak} {et~al.}(2005){van der Tak}, {Caselli}, \&
467: {Ceccarelli}}]{vanderTak05}
468: {van der Tak}, F.~F.~S., {Caselli}, P., \& {Ceccarelli}, C. 2005, \aap, 439,
469: 195
470:
471: \bibitem[{{Ward-Thompson} {et~al.}(2007){Ward-Thompson}, {Andr{\'e}},
472: {Crutcher}, {Johnstone}, {Onishi}, \& {Wilson}}]{WardThompson07}
473: {Ward-Thompson}, D., {Andr{\'e}}, P., {Crutcher}, R., {Johnstone}, D.,
474: {Onishi}, T., \& {Wilson}, C. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed.
475: B.~{Reipurth}, D.~{Jewitt}, \& K.~{Keil}, 33--46
476:
477: \end{thebibliography}
478:
479: \clearpage
480:
481: \begin{figure}
482: \epsscale{0.5}
483: \plotone{f1.eps}
484: \caption{Comparison between the line profiles observed towards the
485: extinction peak of B68 (black histograms) and the predictions of
486: our ``best fit'' model (solid grey lines). For the clarity of the
487: plot, lines are shifted vertically, and some of them are scaled by
488: the factor mentioned on the right of each curve. \label{fig1}
489: }
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: \epsscale{0.75}
494: \plotone{f2.eps}
495: \caption{Abundances predicted by our chemical model for the observed
496: species as a function of the visual extinction in the
497: core.\label{fig2}}
498: \end{figure}
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \epsscale{0.75}
502: \plotone{f3.eps}
503: \caption{Best fit radial velocity profile. The solid line shows the
504: systemic velocity profile (values are on the left axis). The
505: dashed line shows the turbulent velocity profile \citep[values are
506: on the right axis, from][]{Bergin06b}.\label{fig3}}
507: \end{figure}
508:
509: \end{document}
510: