1: \documentclass[twoside]{ilcws07}
2: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
3: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx,epsfig,color}
4: \usepackage{wrapfig,rotating}
5: \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,array}
6:
7: \pagestyle{empty}
8:
9: % Please don't change the 3 following lines
10: %\setcounter{page}{1}
11: \voffset 0 cm \hoffset 0 cm \addtolength{\textwidth}{0cm}
12: \addtolength{\textheight}{0cm}\addtolength{\leftmargin}{0cm}
13:
14: %***********************************************************************
15: % !!!! USE OF THE ilcws07 LaTeX STYLE FILE !!!!!
16: %***********************************************************************
17: %
18: % Some commands are inserted in the following .tex example file.
19: % To set up your ILC/LCWS07 submission, please use this file and modify it
20: % to insert your text, rather than staring from a blank .tex file.
21: % In this way, you will have the commands inserted in the right place.
22:
23: \begin{document}
24: \title{
25: %%%% Paper title goes here %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: Particle Tracking with a Thin Pixel Telescope} %%
27: %***********************************************************************
28: % AUTHORS INFORMATION AREA
29: %***********************************************************************
30: \author{Marco Battaglia$^{1,2}$,
31: Devis Contarato$^2$,
32: Piero Giubilato$^{2,3}$,\\
33: Lindsay Glesener$^2$,
34: Leo Greiner$^2$,
35: Benjamin Hooberman$^2$
36: % Optional short acknowledgment: remove next line if non-needed
37: %\thanks{This is an optional funding source acknowledgment.}
38: % DO NOT MODIFY THE FOLLOWING '\vspace' ARGUMENT
39: \vspace{.3cm}\\
40: 1- University of California - Dept of Physics, Berkeley, CA - USA \\
41: \vspace*{-.2cm}\\
42: 2- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA - USA \\
43: \vspace*{-.2cm}\\
44: 3- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and Dip. di Fisica, Padova, Italy \\
45: }
46: %%***********************************************************************
47: % END OF AUTHORS INFORMATION AREA
48: %***********************************************************************
49:
50: \maketitle
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: We report results on a tracking performance study performed using a beam
54: telescope made of 50~$\mu$m-thick CMOS pixel sensors on the 1.5~GeV electron
55: beam at the LBNL ALS.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \section{The Thin Pixel Prototype Telescope}
60:
61: The anticipated ILC physics program indicates that identification of
62: heavy fermions with high efficiency and purity is of primary importance.
63: The requirements in terms of track extrapolation accuracy are
64: $\simeq 5~\mu{\mathrm{m}} \oplus \frac{10~\mu{\mathrm{m}}}{{\mathrm{p_t~(GeV)}}}$.
65: The Vertex Tracker design and the sensor R\&D is driven by this requirement.
66: CMOS pixel sensors are an attractive option for the ILC Vertex Tracker.
67: In particular, they can be back-thinned to 50~$\mu$m or less, without
68: significant performance deterioration~\cite{Battaglia:2006tf}.
69:
70: While there has already been some experience with the reconstruction of
71: well-isolated, high momentum particles with monolithic pixel
72: sensors~\cite{Stanic:2006da,Trimpl:2006dc}, no data exists on low momentum
73: particle tracking with thin pixel sensors with occupancy conditions
74: comparable to those expected at the ILC. We present here results obtained
75: with a Thin Pixel Prototype Telescope (TPPT) on the 1.5~GeV
76: $e^-$ beam at the LBNL Advanced Light Source (ALS) accelerator complex.
77: The TPPT is the first beam telescope made of thinned CMOS pixel sensors.
78: It consists of three planes of thin pixel sensors (layers 1 to 3), each spaced
79: by 17~mm. One additional detector (layer 4) is added 17~mm downstream of
80: the third layer. The MIMOSA~5 chip~\cite{mimosa, deptuch-ref}, developed at IPHC in
81: Strasbourg, France, has been selected for the TPPT. This chip, fabricated in the
82: 0.6~$\mu$m AMS process, features a large active area of 1.7$\times$1.7~cm$^2$ and
83: more than 1~M pixels. The epitaxial layer is 14~$\mu$m thick and the pixel pitch
84: 17~$\mu$m.One sector of each MIMOSA~5 chip, corresponding to a 510$\times$512 pixel
85: array, is readout through a custom FPGA-driven acquisition board.
86: The beam spill consists of a single bunch with a repetition rate of 1~Hz and the
87: extraction signal is used as a trigger. For each spill we acquire three frames, one
88: before the particles arrive on the TPPT. Four 14~bits, 40~MSample/s ADCs simultaneously read
89: the four sensors, while an array of digital buffers drive all the
90: required clocks and synchronisation signals. A 32~bits wide bus connects the FPGA
91: to a digital acquisition board installed on a control PC. Data is processed on-line
92: to perform correlated double sampling, pedestal subtraction, noise computation and
93: cluster identification. To reduce the amount of data written to disk only the
94: addresses and pulse heights of the pixels in a fixed matrix around the centre of a
95: cluster candidate are recorded. The data is then converted in the {\tt lcio} format
96: and the offline analysis is performed by processors developed within
97: the {\tt Marlin} framework~\cite{Gaede:2006pj}. Each event is scanned for pixels
98: with pulse height over a signal-to-noise (S/N) threshold of 4.5, these are designated
99: as cluster `seeds'. Seeds are then sorted according to their pulse height values and
100: the surrounding, neighbouring pixels are tested for addition to the cluster. Pixels
101: with a pulse height in excess to 2.0 time the noise are accepted. The neighbour
102: search is performed in a 5$\times$5 matrix. Clusters are not allowed to overlap and
103: we require that clusters are not discontinuous, i.e. pixels associated to a cluster
104: cannot be interleaved by any pixel below the neighbour threshold. The point of
105: impact of the particle track on the detector is determined by reconstructing the charge
106: centre-of-gravity of the cluster.
107:
108: \section{The ALS Beam Test with 1.5~GeV Electrons}
109:
110: The TPPT telescope is operated in an optical enclosure mounted on an optical rail and
111: aligned on the ALS BTF beam line. We report here results of the first data taking
112: performed in Fall~2006. The temperature was kept constant during operation
113: at $\simeq$~27$^{\circ}$C by forced airflow. The cluster S/N averaged on the TPPT layers
114: is 14.5. Due to a drop of the voltage supplied to the chip, one of the planes of the
115: telescope was not fully efficient during the ALS data taking. Because of that we also
116: accept particle tracks reconstructed on two layers, provided they have a hit on the
117: reference plane within 150~$\mu$m.
118: \begin{wrapfigure}{c}{0.5\columnwidth}
119: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.46\columnwidth]{ClusterADC_comp.eps}}
120: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.46\columnwidth]{NPixels_comp.eps}}
121: \caption{Detector response to 1.5~GeV $e^-$s in data (point with error bars) and
122: in the {\tt Geant-4}+{\tt Marlin} simulation and reconstruction. The cluster signal
123: pulse height (left) and pixel multiplicity in a cluster (right) are shown for clusters
124: associated to reconstructed particle tracks.}
125: \label{Fig:1}
126: \end{wrapfigure}
127: Detailed simulation of the TPPT has been carried out, using the
128: {\tt Geant-4} package~\cite{Agostinelli:2002hh} to generate the
129: particle points of impact and energy deposits on the sensitive planes.
130: These have been stored in {\tt lcio} format and used as input to
131: a CMOS pixel simulation program implemented in {\tt Marlin}~\cite{Battaglia:2007eu}.
132: Noise values have been matched to those measured for the detectors in
133: the telescope. Digitised simulation has been passed through the same
134: cluster reconstruction program as the real data and reconstructed hits used
135: to fit straight particle tracks, after pattern recognition. The single detector
136: response is well reproduced by the simulation. Figure~\ref{Fig:1} compares the
137: cluster pulse height and the pixels multiplicity in a cluster for simulation and
138: ALS beam test data.
139:
140: The TPPT at the ALS beam-line allows us to perform detailed studies of particle tracking
141: with various, controllable, levels of track density under realistic conditions.
142: Data have been collected at the BTS with different beam intensities ranging
143: from 0.5 particles~mm$^{-2}$ up to about 5 particles~mm$^{-2}$. These particle
144: densities resemble those expected in the core of hadronic jets at $\sqrt{s}$ = 500~GeV.
145: In particular, the distribution of the distance between a hit associated to a particle
146: track and its closest hit reconstructed on the same layer in the high intensity runs at
147: the ALS reproduces that predicted by simulation for
148: $e^+e^- \to Z^-H^0 \to q \bar q b \bar b$ for $M_H$ = 120~GeV at 500~GeV.
149: % (see Figure~\ref{fig:1}).
150: %\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.5\columnwidth}
151: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{run1049_closest_hit.eps}}
152: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{hzbb_closest_hit.eps}}
153: %\caption{Detector response to 1.5~GeV $e^-$s in data (point with error bars) and
154: %in the {\tt Geant-4}+{\tt Marlin} simulation and reconstruction. The cluster signal
155: %pulse height (left) and pixel multiplicity in a cluster (right) are shown for clusters
156: %associated to reconstructed particle tracks.}
157: %\label{Fig:2}
158: %\end{wrapfigure}
159:
160: After data taking, the beam telescope geometry has been surveyed using an optical
161: metrology machine. The results of this survey have been used as starting point
162: of the alignment procedure, performed on a sample of approximately 20000
163: well-isolated particle tracks with four correlated hits. After alignment,
164: track candidates have been defined by matching hits on two layers.
165: Each track candidate has been extrapolated to the third layer, where
166: the closest hit has been added, if its residual was less than 50~$\mu$m.
167: Pattern recognition ambiguities have been solved based on the number of
168: associated hits and on the difference between the track slope
169: and the expected beam slope, determined from the settings of the beam-line final dipoles.
170: Tracks have then been re-fitted using a modified least-square, to account for kinks due
171: to multiple scattering on the measuring planes~\cite{Lutz:1987vs} and extrapolated to
172: the reference layer, where the residual to the closest reconstructed hit has been computed.
173: Since the beam contains a fraction of lower momentum particles, which increases
174: moving away from the beam axis, only the central region of the beam was used and an
175: additional cut was imposed on the residual on the second coordinate.
176: \begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.70\columnwidth}
177: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.69\columnwidth]{residual_dut1.eps}}
178: \caption{Residual on the vertical coordinate between the extrapolated track position
179: on TPPT first layer and the associated hit reconstructed coordinate. The fitted
180: Gaussian curve has a width of 9.4~$\mu$m.}
181: \label{Fig:2}
182: \end{wrapfigure}
183: The tracking performance
184: has been characterised by the residuals between the extrapolation of a track reconstructed
185: using at least two layers and the point reconstructed on the reference layer using two
186: different geometries.
187: %\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.50\columnwidth}
188: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.47\columnwidth]{cluster_size_trk_run1056.eps}}
189: %\caption{Residual on the vertical coordinate between the extrapolated track position
190: %on TPPT first layer and the associated hit reconstructed coordinate. The fitted
191: %Gaussian curve has a width of 9.4~$\mu$m.}
192: %\label{Fig:3}
193: %\end{wrapfigure}
194: The first uses the extrapolation of the track back to the first layer. This
195: resembles closely the case of track extrapolation from the vertex detector to the interaction
196: point. Using all accepted tracks we measure a residual of (9.4$\pm$0.2)~$\mu$m (see Figure~\ref{Fig:2}),
197: which becomes (8.9$\pm$0.4)~$\mu$m when restricting to three-hit tracks. This should be compared to
198: 6.8~$\mu$m obtained from the
199: simulation, which assumes perfect geometry. Subtracting in quadrature the estimated single point
200: resolution of x~$\mu$m, we obtain an extrapolation resolution of 8.5~$\mu$m for a 1.5~GeV
201: particle, which is consistent with the impact parameter resolution required for the
202: ILC. The second geometry adopted extrapolates the track on the second detector layer.
203: In this case the multiple scattering effect is reduced by having measurements on both
204: side of the extrapolation plane and we measure a residual of (6.9$\pm$0.1)~$\mu$m.
205:
206: Despite the multiple scattering effect, the extrapolation resolution of the TPPT at
207: the ALS is significantly smaller than the MIMOSA-5 pixel pitch. This allows to perform
208: studies of cluster shape as a function of the track point of impact. We compared the
209: number of pixels, along the horizontal coordinate, in clusters reconstructed on the
210: first layer which are associated to two sets of tracks. In the first set tracks
211: with extrapolation along the $x$ horizontal axis within 4~$\mu$m from the pixel centre are
212: chosen: the average pixel multiplicity is 1.5. In the second set the track intercepts the
213: detector more than 8~$\mu$m away from the pixel centre: the average pixel multiplicity
214: increases to 2.3.
215:
216: \section{The T-966 Telescope}
217:
218: A second thin pixel telescope (TPPT-2) has been built for use in the T-966 beam test
219: experiment of the 120~GeV proton beam at the Fermilab MTest facility. The TPPT-2
220: consists of four layers of 50~$\mu$m-thin MIMOSA-5 sensors mounted on new mezzanine
221: cards with low profile components and larger clear region in the PC board below chip.
222: The four layers are mounted using precision mechanics and are spaced by 15~mm.
223: The chips have been positioned on the mezzanine boards using a precision vacuum chuck
224: which gives a mounting accuracy better than 50~$\mu$m. Downstream from the TPPT-2,
225: a detector under test (DUT) can be mounted on a computer-controlled XY stage which
226: allows to remotely align it to the telescope. The DUT spacing from the TPPT-2 can be
227: varied from 5~mm to 20~mm. The TPPT-2 has been tested in May~2007 on a 1.23~GeV $e^-$
228: beam extracted from the ALS. An average S/N of 15.5 has been measured operating at
229: 27$^{\circ}$C. For the first T-966 data taking, planned for July and August 2007, an
230: operating temperature of 20$^{\circ}$C is foreseen, which will reduce the noise.
231:
232: %\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.5\columnwidth}
233: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.45\columnwidth]{ilcws07.eps}}
234: %\caption{ILC Logo}\label{Fig:MV}
235: %\end{wrapfigure}
236:
237: %\subsection{Tables and figures}
238: %\label{sec:figures}
239:
240: %\begin{wraptable}{l}{0.5\columnwidth}
241: %\centerline{\begin{tabular}{|l|r|}
242: %\hline
243: %Plenary talk & 1 page per 3 minutes talk \\\hline
244: %Parallel talk & 1 page per 5 minutes talk \\
245: %\hline
246: %\end{tabular}}
247: %\caption{Page limits.}
248: %\label{tab:limits}
249: %\end{wraptable}
250:
251: \section*{Acknowledgements}
252:
253: This work was supported by the Director, Office of Science, of the
254: U.S. Department of Energy under Contract
255: No.DE-AC02-05CH11231 and used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific
256: Computing Center, supported under Contract No.DE-AC03-76SF00098.
257: We are indebted to the staff of the LBNL Advanced Light Source for their
258: help and the excellent performance of the machine.
259:
260: % ****************************************************************************
261: % BIBLIOGRAPHY AREA
262: % ****************************************************************************
263:
264: \begin{footnotesize}
265: % IF YOU DO NOT USE BIBTEX, USE THE FOLLOWING SAMPLE SCHEME FOR THE REFERENCES
266: % ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
267: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
268: %\bibitem{url} Slides: \\
269: %\verb$http://ilcagenda.linearcollider.org/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=42&sessionId=8&confId=1296$
270:
271: \bibitem{Battaglia:2006tf}
272: M.~Battaglia, D.~Contarato, P.~Giubilato, L.~Greiner, L.~Glesener and B.~Hooberman,
273: %``A study of monolithic CMOS pixel sensors back-thinning and their
274: %application for a pixel beam telescope,''
275: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 579} (2007) 675
276: [arXiv:physics/0611081].
277: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A579,675;%%
278:
279: \bibitem{Stanic:2006da}
280: S.~Stanic {\it et al.},
281: %``Recent progress in the development of a B-factory monolithic active pixel
282: %detector,''
283: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 568} (2006) 181.
284: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A568,181;%%
285:
286: \bibitem{Trimpl:2006dc}
287: M.~Trimpl {\it et al.},
288: %``Performance of a DEPFET pixel system for particle detection,''
289: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 568} (2006) 201.
290: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A568,201;%%
291:
292: \bibitem{mimosa}
293: Yu. Gornushkin {\it et al.}, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ and Meth.\ A {\bf A 513} (2003), 291.
294:
295: \bibitem{deptuch-ref}
296: G.~Deptuch, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ and Meth.\ , A {\bf 543} (2005) 537.
297:
298: \bibitem{Gaede:2006pj}
299: F.~Gaede,
300: %``Marlin and LCCD: Software tools for the ILC,''
301: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 559} (2006) 177.
302: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A559,177;%%
303:
304: \bibitem{Agostinelli:2002hh}
305: S.~Agostinelli {\it et al.},
306: %``GEANT4: A simulation toolkit,''
307: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 506} (2003), 250.
308: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A506,250;%%
309:
310: \bibitem{Battaglia:2007eu}
311: M.~Battaglia,
312: %``Response simulation of CMOS pixel sensors for the ILC vertex tracker,''
313: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 572} (2007) 274.
314: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A572,274;%%
315:
316: \bibitem{Lutz:1987vs}
317: G.~Lutz,
318: %``OPTIMUM TRACK FITTING IN THE PRESENCE OF MULTIPLE SCATTERING,''
319: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 273} (1988) 349.
320: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A273,349;%%
321:
322: \end{thebibliography}
323:
324: \end{footnotesize}
325: \end{document}
326: