1: %%% hs.tex
2: %%%
3: %%% hs1603+3820, observations
4: %%%
5: %%% version accepted to a&a
6: %%%
7: %%% uses bibtex
8: %%%
9:
10: \documentclass{aa}
11:
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: \usepackage{txfonts}
14:
15: \usepackage{longtable}
16: \usepackage{lscape}
17:
18: \usepackage{natbib}
19: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
20:
21: \newcommand{\HS}{\mbox{\rm HS1603+3820}}
22: \newcommand{\zem}{\mbox{$z_{\rm em}$}}
23: \newcommand{\zabs}{\mbox{$z_{\rm abs}$}}
24: \newcommand{\Cf}{\mbox{$C_{\rm f}$}}
25: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{\rm km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}}
26: \newcommand{\cmsq}{\mbox{\rm cm$^{-2}$}}
27:
28: \newcommand{\sh}{\mbox{$\sharp$}}
29: \newcommand{\aox}{\mbox{$\alpha_{ox}$}}
30:
31: \newcommand{\Lya}{\mbox{{\rm Ly}\thinspace{$\alpha$}}}
32:
33: \newcommand{\HI}{\ion{H}{i}}
34: \newcommand{\CII}{\ion{C}{ii}}
35: \newcommand{\CIV}{\ion{C}{iv}}
36: \newcommand{\SiII}{\ion{Si}{ii}}
37: \newcommand{\SiIII}{\ion{Si}{iii}}
38: \newcommand{\SiIV}{\ion{Si}{iv}}
39: \newcommand{\NV}{\ion{N}{v}}
40: \newcommand{\OI}{\ion{O}{i}}
41: \newcommand{\AlII}{\ion{Al}{ii}}
42: \newcommand{\AlIII}{\ion{Al}{iii}}
43: \newcommand{\FeII}{\ion{Fe}{ii}}
44: \newcommand{\FeIII}{\ion{Fe}{iii}}
45: \newcommand{\MgI}{\ion{Mg}{i}}
46: \newcommand{\MgII}{\ion{Mg}{ii}}
47:
48: \newcommand{\dlz}{$\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots$}
49: \newcommand{\dlb}{$\cdots\cdots\cdots$}
50: \newcommand{\dlN}{$\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots$}
51: \newcommand{\err}{\mbox{$\pm$}}
52: \newcommand{\ttil}{\mbox{\char'176}}
53:
54: \begin{document}
55:
56: \title{Absorption spectrum of the quasar HS1603+3820\\
57: I. Observations and data analysis\thanks{Based on the observations
58: collected at the MMT, which is a joint facility of the Smithsonian
59: Institution and the University of Arizona. Some of the data presented
60: herein were obtained at the W.~M. Keck Observatory, which is operated
61: as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of
62: Technology, the University of California and the National Aeronautics
63: and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the
64: generous financial support of the W.~M. Keck Foundation.}}
65:
66: \author{A. Dobrzycki\inst{1}
67: \and
68: M. Nikolajuk\inst{2}
69: \and
70: J. Bechtold\inst{3}
71: \and
72: H. Ebeling\inst{4}
73: \and
74: B. Czerny\inst{5}
75: \and
76: A. R\'o\.za\'nska\inst{5}
77: }
78:
79: \offprints{A. Dobrzycki}
80:
81: \institute{ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany\\
82: \email{adam.dobrzycki@eso.org}
83: \and
84: Faculty of Physics, University of Bia{\l}ystok, Lipowa 41, PL-15424
85: Bia{\l}ystok, Poland\\
86: \email{mrk@alpha.uwb.edu.pl}
87: \and
88: Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA\\
89: \email{jbechtold@as.arizona.edu}
90: \and
91: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive,
92: Honolulu, HI 96822, USA\\
93: \email{ebeling@ifa.hawaii.edu}
94: \and
95: Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, PL-00716 Warszawa, Poland\\
96: \email{bcz,agata@camk.edu.pl}
97: }
98:
99: \date{Received 22 February 2007 / accepted 27 September 2007}
100:
101: \abstract{We present multi-wavelength observations of bright quasar \HS:
102: the optical data taken with the MMT and Keck telescopes, with the
103: 40-50~\kms\ resolution, and X-ray data taken by the
104: \emph{Chandra X-ray Observatory} satellite.}
105: {The optical spectra contain a very large number of
106: absorption lines from numerous heavy elements.
107: Our goal is to analyse those features to obtain constraints on the
108: properties of associated absorbers, to be used in modeling of the
109: quasar intrinsic flux and properties of the clouds.}
110: {We have determined the properties -- column densities and redshifts
111: -- of the individual components. We derived the X-ray properties
112: of \HS\ and the optical-to-X-ray slope index \aox.}
113: {We found \aox\ of 1.70, which is on the high end of the
114: typical range for a radio quiet QSO. We found 49
115: individual heavy element absorption clouds, which can be grouped into
116: eleven distinct systems. Absorbers from the associated
117: system which likely is the one spatially closest to the QSO
118: show large \CIV\ to \HI\ column density ratio, reaching
119: $\sim$20.}
120: {Intrinsic X-ray properties of the quasar are typical. Determination
121: of column densities of ions (including hydrogen) gives a strong
122: foundation for modeling of the quasar ionising flux.}
123:
124: \keywords{quasars: absorption lines -- quasars: individual (\HS)}
125:
126: \titlerunning{HS1603+3820 absorption spectrum. I}
127: \authorrunning{A. Dobrzycki et al.}
128:
129: \maketitle
130:
131: \section{Introduction}
132: \label{sec:intro}
133:
134: \object{HS1603+3820}\ is a $\zem=2.54$ quasar discovered during the
135: Hamburg/CfA Bright Quasar Survey \citep{dobrzycki1996}. With $B=15.9$,
136: it is among the top few brightest quasars known in the $\zem=2-3$
137: redshift interval \citep{veron2006}. The most striking feature of \HS\
138: is, however, the extreme richness of its heavy element absorption
139: spectrum, and in particular the $\zabs\approx\zem$ absorption.
140:
141: The absorption spectrum of \HS\ was first described in
142: \citet[][hereafter D99]{dobrzycki1999},
143: \defcitealias{dobrzycki1999}{D99} based on medium-resolution
144: (90-100~\kms) spectrum obtained in 1997 April with the MMT and the
145: Blue Channel spectrograph. Although in this spectrum many of the
146: absorption systems were blended, it was clear that the quasar held
147: great promise for the analysis of the properties of associated
148: absorbers.
149:
150: The absorption systems which are spatially close to the quasar can be
151: used as probes for the intrinsic emission of the quasar itself, since
152: the conditions in the systems are undoubtedly heavily influenced by
153: the QSO flux \citep[e.g.][and references
154: therein]{crenshaw2003,gabel2005,scott2005}. Systems which contain
155: lines originating from various species and various ionisation levels
156: are particularly interesting, since they can provide independent way
157: of determining physical properties of the absorbing medium, which can
158: cast light at the intrinsic quasar continuum in far UV band as well as
159: the absorbing cloud formation.
160:
161: With that as the principal goal, we initiated a project of
162: multi-wavelength observations of \HS, aiming at obtaining spectral
163: information at various wavelengths. In this paper we present the
164: results of our X-ray and optical observations of the quasar. In the
165: forthcoming paper (R\'o\.za\'nska et al.\ 2007, in preparation;
166: Paper~II) we use those observations to constrain models of the quasar
167: broad band continuum and the cloud confinement.
168:
169: In the meantime, \citet[][hereafter referred to as M03 and M05,
170: respectively]{misawa2003,misawa2005} \defcitealias{misawa2003}{M03}
171: \defcitealias{misawa2005}{M05} observed \HS\ in 2002 March and 2003
172: July in very high resolution (6.7~\kms), using the Subaru telescope
173: with the High Dispersion Spectrograph. The primary goal of those
174: observations was to establish the nature of the absorbers (intervening
175: or associated), using the analysis of line time variability, partial
176: coverage and profile shapes. High resolution of their observations
177: enabled resolving many of the systems into a number of narrow
178: components. \citetalias{misawa2003,misawa2005} grouped the absorbers
179: into several systems, designated with the letters from A to H. In our
180: optical spectroscopy data we see all those systems and three
181: additional intervening systems. For consistency, and to
182: enable easy comparisons, wherever possible we will use those
183: designations throughout this paper.
184:
185: In a very recent paper, \citet[][hereafter M07]{misawa2007}
186: \defcitealias{misawa2007}{M07} expanded the analysis of absorber
187: variability, using new spectra from the Subaru and Hobby-Eberly
188: telescopes, and confirmed the finding from \citetalias{misawa2005}
189: that \CIV\ in system A is highly variable. This paper also described
190: one system (labeled I) which they did not have in their older
191: data. This system was seen in our data, and for consistency with
192: \citetalias{misawa2007} we rewrote parts of this paper to also use
193: this designation.
194:
195: Our optical spectra are of lower resolution (FWHM of 40-50~\kms), but
196: they complement the Subaru data in two important areas: they have
197: higher signal-to-noise ratio (100-140 per pixel in the \CIV\ and \Lya\
198: regions) and they cover much larger wavelength range ($\sim$3700 to
199: $\sim10000$~\AA). The former reduces uncertainty in blended regions
200: containing thick lines and helps in finding weak lines, while the
201: latter allows analysing lines from species inaccessible in the Subaru
202: spectra. The most important addition is detection and
203: analysis of hydrogen lines, not seen in the Misawa et al.'s spectra,
204: as well as detection of heavy-element lines other than \CIV\ in system
205: A.
206:
207: This paper is organised as follows. In Section~\ref{sec:obsxray} we
208: discuss the \emph{Chandra} X-ray observation of \HS. In
209: Section~\ref{sec:obsopt} we present our optical observations of \HS,
210: and we discuss the individual systems and compare our results with
211: those of Misawa et al., discussing the possible sources of
212: discrepancies. We comment on the absorber variability in
213: Section~\ref{sec:variability}. We summarise the results in
214: Section~\ref{sec:summary}.
215:
216: \section{X-ray observations}
217: \label{sec:obsxray}
218:
219: \HS\ was observed for 9.2~ks with the \emph{Chandra X-ray Observatory}
220: on 2002 November 29 (ObsID 4026), with the 128 row subarray of the
221: ACIS-S3 chip in VFAINT mode, with frame time of 0.4~sec. The
222: effective good time for the observation was 8.3~ksec.
223:
224: The data were reduced using the tools available in the CIAO v.~3.3 and
225: SHERPA software packages\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/}, using
226: Chandra calibration database (CALDB) v.~3.2.1. Because of large
227: calibration uncertainties for soft X-rays, the data with $E<0.5$~keV
228: were excluded from the analysis. We extracted source and background
229: spectra from the regions around the quasar using \emph{dmextract}. In
230: total, the net photon yield from the quasar was 145 photons, allowing
231: for most fundamental spectral fits only. We note that the ACIS pile-up
232: is not a problem, both because of the low source count rate and
233: because of the low frame time resulting from the use of the chip
234: subarray.
235:
236: We performed spectral fits with SHERPA, applying the newest gain
237: corrections to the event list. We performed the fit assuming the
238: intrinsic quasar spectrum to be a power law, $A E^{-\gamma}$, with
239: fixed Galactic absorption towards \HS\ of
240: $N_H=1.3\times10^{21}$~\cmsq, as obtained with
241: COLDEN\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/toolkit/colden.jsp}.
242: The best fit gave the photon spectral index of $\gamma=1.91\pm0.20$
243: and normalisation at (rest) 1~keV of $A=(2.43\pm0.79)\times 10^{-4}$
244: photons~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$keV$^{-1}$. The slope of the spectrum is
245: within the typical range for quasars
246: \citep[e.g.][]{fiore1998,reeves2000}. The spectrum and the fit are
247: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:xspectrum}.
248:
249: \begin{figure}
250: \centering
251: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig1.eps}}
252: \caption{\emph{Chandra} ACIS-S3 X-ray spectrum of \HS\ and best fit
253: power law plus Galactic absorption. The bottom
254: panels shows the fit residuals.}
255: \label{fig:xspectrum}
256: \end{figure}
257:
258: We also attempted fits in which we allowed for additional absorption
259: from the quasar, but there was no improvement in the fit.
260:
261: Combination of the above result with the spectrophotometric data from
262: \citet{scott2000} yields the value of the optical-to-X-ray slope,
263: $\aox = -\log (f_{\nu,{\rm 2keV}} / f_{\nu,{\rm 2500A}})/\log(\nu_{\rm 2keV}/\nu_{\rm 2500A})$,
264: of 1.70, which is at the high end of the typical parameter range at
265: $\zem\approx2.5$ \citep{bechtold2003}.
266:
267: \section{Optical spectroscopy}
268: \label{sec:obsopt}
269:
270: \HS\ has been observed by us with two instruments. On 2001 August 19
271: we used the ESI, Echelle Spectrograph and Imager \citep{sheinis2002},
272: on the Keck~II telescope, with the MIT-LL 2048$\times$4096 CCD, with
273: the 0.5\arcsec\ slit. Observing conditions were excellent throughout
274: the night, with clear sky and seeing of the order of 0.7\arcsec. The
275: combined exposure time was 4800~sec. The usable part of the spectrum
276: covered the $\sim$3900 to $\sim$10000~\AA\ wavelength range and had
277: the resolution of 45-50~\kms, with the signal-to-noise ratio
278: peaking at $\sim$140 (per pixel) near the \Lya\ emission line,
279: gradually falling to $\sim$100 near the \CIV\ emission line and then
280: to $\sim$70 in the red end.
281:
282: On 2003 June 21 we used the Blue Channel Spectrograph on the MMT, in
283: the echelette/cross-dispersed mode, using the Lesser 2688$\times$512
284: ``ccd35'' detector with the 1\arcsec\ slit. The observing conditions
285: were variable. Seeing became worse at the end of the night, reaching
286: $\sim$2~arcsec, and the conditions were adversely affected by the moon
287: age of $\sim0.75$ and smoke from forest fires. The combined exposure
288: time was 18,000~sec. The usable spectrum ranged from $\sim$3750 to
289: $\sim$7100~\AA\ and had the resolution of 40-45~\kms. The
290: signal-to-noise ratio in this spectrum is in the 110--130 (per pixel)
291: range throughout the entire wavelength range.
292:
293: For both sets of observations, the initial reduction was done in the
294: standard way with IRAF. We note that despite several attempts, the
295: extracted MMT spectrum appears to show residual flux. Even lines that
296: are clearly saturated and which in the Keck spectrum have black cores,
297: do not reach zero intensity in their bottom in the MMT spectrum. We
298: elected to not correct manually for this effect, but we note that this
299: will likely result in underestimating the column density of the very
300: strong lines in the MMT spectrum.
301:
302: After extracting the spectra from individual orders, we performed the
303: continuum fits to the spectra with the use of the FINDSL programme
304: \citep{aldcroft1994}. The spectra were then normalised, rebinned to
305: common wavelength pixels and co-added, weighed with the variance.
306:
307: Not surprisingly, the trickiest part of this part of the analysis were
308: the continuum fits. The spectra are heavily absorbed bluewards of the
309: \Lya\ emission line. To fit continua in the uncertain areas, we
310: applied technique similar to the one described in
311: \citetalias{misawa2003}, i.e.\ utilising the spectrum shapes in the
312: unabsorbed orders. We note that this effect is less pronounced in our
313: case, since a single echelle order in our spectra -- which have lower
314: resolution than the Subaru spectra -- covers a larger wavelength
315: range, providing for more possibilities to ``anchor'' the continuum.
316:
317: However, the continuum fits remain uncertain in two particularly
318: heavily blended areas. Comparison between continuum location in the
319: normalised spectra from Keck and MMT shows that there remains a
320: 15-20\%\ uncertainty in those regions. In one case it is partly caused
321: by the fact that one of the ESI echelle orders ends inside the blended
322: region, forcing manual anchoring of the continuum fit. In the other
323: case it is the fact that the blended region is on the wing of the
324: emission line, which coincides with the peak sensitivity of the
325: echelle order; this results in very uncertain shape of the continuum
326: exactly where the technique of using shapes from unabsorbed regions
327: cannot be applied. We will return to this issue in
328: Section~\ref{subsubsec:sysa}.
329:
330: We note that our continuum fits generally appear to agree well with
331: the Misawa et al.'s analysis of their data. One notable exception will
332: be discussed in more detail in Section~\ref{subsubsec:sysa}.
333:
334: The next step in the analysis -- resolving and identifying absorption
335: lines -- was a very laborious process, since our spectra were heavily
336: blended. In order to avoid bias, we performed the fits blindly, i.e.\
337: we decided to not use the information from Misawa et al. As a
338: consequence, our results do differ quite significantly in some cases,
339: especially in the number of individual components into which some of
340: the systems were resolved. However, since the primary goal of our
341: analysis is to obtain information on the the column densities of as
342: many ions as possible in order to use them as constraints for modeling
343: of the quasar \emph{intrinsic} emission, the important information is
344: the total column density in the system, and not the number of the
345: individual components. In this regard, in the systems we have in
346: common -- primarily the vicinity of the \CIV\ emission line -- our
347: results do qualitatively agree with those of \citetalias{misawa2003}
348: and \citetalias{misawa2005}.
349:
350: The line fits were done using VPGUESS/VPFIT
351: tools.\footnote{http://www.eso.org/{\ttil}jliske/vpguess/,
352: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/{\ttil}rfc/vpfit.html} This programme fits
353: multiple Voigt profiles, with absorption redshift $\zabs$,
354: column density $N$ and Doppler parameter $b$ as the
355: fitted parameters, and it is very well suited for analysis of blended
356: spectra. However, our spectra are exceptionally crowded and in some
357: cases we had to use simplifying assumptions in order to prevent the
358: programme from performing fits which were obviously non-physical. We
359: also had to apply some judgement calls. The cases where it was
360: necessary are mentioned in the following subsections. We note that the
361: absorption spectrum of \HS\ is so complex and so severely blended that
362: \citetalias{misawa2003} and \citetalias{misawa2005} had to resort to
363: similar approach even in the Subaru spectrum, which had markedly
364: higher resolution.
365:
366: A large part of the work presented in \citetalias{misawa2005} was
367: devoted to the analysis of partial coverage of the QSO by the
368: absorbers. It is clear that at least some of the absorbers in the
369: vicinity of the quasar do not entirely cover the continuum emitting
370: region. In our analysis, we accounted for this effect only in the one
371: case where it was clearly necessary to obtain physically sound
372: parameter fits -- the thick \CIV\ lines in system A (see
373: Section~\ref{subsubsec:sysa}), which were clearly saturated but which
374: did not reach zero intensity in the line bottoms. We note that
375: \citetalias{misawa2005} presented arguments indicating that other
376: systems -- including those with $\zabs\ll\zem$ -- may also show
377: partial coverage. We will discuss this during the description of the
378: relevant systems.
379:
380: The resolution of our spectra was slightly higher than the expected
381: values of the Doppler parameter for heavy element lines. High
382: resolution data from Subaru indicated that in many cases the metal
383: lines had $b$ as low as $\sim$5~\kms, while FWHM of 40-50~\kms\
384: translates (for Gaussian lines) to $b\approx 25-30$~\kms. On the other
385: hand, many lines have $b$ comparable to the spectrum resolution or
386: higher. In our analysis of the spectra we thus used the iterative
387: approach. We first freed all parameters in all fitted lines. Then for
388: all lines for which the resulting value of the Doppler parameter was
389: significantly below the resolution, we fixed $b$ at the value which
390: corresponded to the value of the parameter for other lines for which
391: it was well established (using values for other metal lines
392: wherever it was possible and hydrogen lines in other cases),
393: scaled with the square root of the element's atomic mass,
394: and re-run the fit. In the situation in which one or more lines had
395: inconsistent values of the Doppler parameter, we investigated the
396: possibility of having the line as a blend with other features.
397:
398: It is relatively easy to fall into the trap of adding narrow lines in
399: order to improve the fits of large features. We avoided that issue by
400: adding lines only if it resulted in significant improvement of the
401: fit, and all cases when this was done were individually examined.
402:
403: In total, we found 49 individual absorption clouds, which can be
404: grouped into eleven distinct ``systems.'' We stress that the systems
405: are defined based on their proximity in the spectrum, and the fact
406: that two absorbers are considered members of the same system does
407: \emph{not} in principle mean that they they are physically related.
408:
409: In Tables~\ref{tab:sysa}-\ref{tab:sysek} we show line lists from all
410: systems detected in the spectra from Keck/ESI. In the tables, the
411: first column shows the line designation; the first component refers to
412: the separate cloud within the considered system, and the second part,
413: after the dot, is the ordinal number of individual line seen in this
414: cloud. The second column gives the ion identification (ID). The
415: following columns give the absorption redshift, the Doppler parameter,
416: column density and (in Table~\ref{tab:sysa} the covering factor,
417: \Cf, as defined in \citet{hamann1997}. The last column gives (where
418: available) the line identification in \citetalias{misawa2005}. We mark
419: lines for which the derivation of parameters is made uncertain by
420: blending and/or by the fact that the line is saturated. The line lists
421: from the MMT/Blue Channel spectrum, as well as the entire Keck and MMT
422: spectra are available on the World Wide Web at
423: http://alpha.uwb.edu.pl/mrk/hs1603/.
424:
425: In addition, in Table~\ref{tab:logNtot} we list the total column
426: densities of all ions detected in all systems and compare them to the
427: values found in the Subaru data.
428:
429: The following section contains more detailed discussion of the
430: individual systems.
431:
432: \subsection{Systems at $\zabs\approx\zem$}
433: \label{subsec:associated}
434:
435: Of the eleven distinct systems, four (A-D) are close to the emission
436: redshift of the quasar. The ejection velocities range from
437: $\sim$10,000~\kms\ for system A to \emph{negative} (i.e.\
438: $\zabs>\zem$) $\sim$1,200~\kms\ for system D.
439: Figure~\ref{fig:specad} shows the Keck spectrum of \HS\ in the
440: vicinity of the emission redshift of the quasar for several
441: absorbers. One can clearly see that some of the systems contain lines
442: from several species.
443:
444: \begin{figure}
445: \centering
446: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig2.eps}}
447: \caption{The fragments of the Keck spectrum of \HS\ plotted in the
448: same redshift range for several absorption features. Systems A-D are
449: shown as shaded areas. The \MgII\ lines are near the very red end of
450: the spectrum, and the ``emission'' features seen in their vicinity are
451: residuals of sky lines. The dotted vertical line shows the adopted
452: location of the QSO emission redshift.}
453: \label{fig:specad}
454: \end{figure}
455:
456: \subsubsection{System A, $\zabs=2.44$}
457: \label{subsubsec:sysa}
458:
459: Five heavy-element absorbers were recognised in this system in the
460: medium-resolution data of \citetalias{dobrzycki1999}. At least one of
461: the components, at $\zabs=2.4189$ was identified as associated, since
462: the $\CIV(\lambda1548)/\CIV(\lambda1550)$ ratio was 1, indicating that
463: the cloud was optically thick, yet the lines did not reach zero
464: intensity in their bottoms, suggesting that the cloud in which the
465: lines originated did not obscure the entire continuum emitting source.
466:
467: \citetalias{misawa2003} decomposed this system into seven individual
468: components, while \citetalias{misawa2005} increased this number to
469: fifteen systems. Their analysis also confirmed that the absorbers do
470: not appear to entirely cover the quasar, and they found indication
471: that this system is variable. These findings were confirmed and
472: expanded in the recent paper \citepalias{misawa2007}.
473:
474: \begin{figure}
475: \centering
476: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig3.eps}}
477: \caption{The sample raw spectra from Keck (left panel) and MMT (right
478: panel) as extracted from the echelle order, prior to continuum
479: fitting. The dotted lines show the $\sim$5347-5360 \AA\ region where
480: our continuum fit differs from Misawa et al. See text.}
481: \label{fig:dip}
482: \end{figure}
483:
484: System A is unambiguously associated with \HS, and at the same time it
485: has a large relative velocity with respect to the quasar (ranging from
486: $\sim$7500 to $\sim$10,000~\kms), which means that it is almost
487: certainly located very close to the AGN central engine and its
488: properties are very likely determined by the radiation from the
489: QSO. This system is thus the ideal candidate for modeling of the
490: quasar continuum.
491:
492: In our analysis, we found twenty two components belonging to
493: system~A. The results are listed in Table~\ref{tab:sysa}; we show the
494: \Lya\ and \CIV\ lines on Figure~\ref{fig:sysa}. For the thick
495: absorbers in the blue end of the system we applied the correction for
496: partial covering using empirically determined covering factors (listed
497: in Table~\ref{tab:sysa}). We estimate the uncertainty on the covering
498: factor to be of the order of $\sim$10\%; the values agree
499: qualitatively with the values found in the Subaru data.
500:
501: Our results for system A cannot be directly compared with the results
502: from Subaru, since at least four of the components seen in our spectra
503: (Nos.\ 19-22 in Table~\ref{tab:sysa}) result from the difference
504: between the continuum fits in both sets of data.
505:
506: In their analysis, Misawa et al.\ (also in their very recent paper)
507: treated the wavelength region between $\sim$5345 and $\sim$5360~\AA\
508: as unabsorbed (see Fig.~4 in \citetalias{misawa2005} or Fig.~2 in
509: \citetalias{misawa2007}). However, this region clearly contains
510: absorption in both the Keck and MMT data. In Figure~\ref{fig:dip} we
511: show the \emph{raw} spectra of this region from both Keck and MMT
512: observations. In both cases one can clearly see that the continuum
513: does drop bluewards of $\sim$5360~\AA, and we had to fit lines in this
514: region in order to account for this drop. This was actually a
515: difficult task, since it was hard to resolve the dip into individual
516: systems. We primarily relied on the information from the \Lya\ region,
517: where strong, but heavily blended absorption was present. We found
518: that at least four systems (i.e.\ Nos.~19-22) with reasonable
519: properties are necessary to satisfactorily fit this region. However,
520: while we are confident that the absorbers are present in this region,
521: we have to treat their derived physical parameters as somewhat
522: uncertain. We note that if the derived densities are taken
523: at face value, then the four systems contain of the order 20\%\ of all
524: \HI\ column density in system A, but only 2\%\ of the \CIV\ column
525: density; this would suggest that the presence of those clouds in the
526: vicinity of System A is coincidental and there is no physical relation
527: between them and the system absorbers.
528:
529: The other place in the system A area where there is a difference
530: between our analysis and the results from \citetalias{misawa2005} is
531: the $\sim$5308-5317~\AA\ region. This area contains the
532: \SiII($\lambda$1527) absorption from system~B (it is the feature near
533: $\lambda\approx5312$~\AA\ in Fig.~\ref{fig:sysa}). We obtained a very
534: good fit using eight lines, compared with 11 lines used in
535: \citetalias{misawa2005}. We note, however, that in the earlier
536: analysis \citetalias{misawa2003} also used 8 lines.
537:
538: \begin{figure}
539: \centering
540: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig4.eps}}
541: \caption{Absorption lines from System A. Top panel: \CIV($\lambda$1548),
542: middle panel: \CIV($\lambda$1551), bottom panel: \Lya. Vertical dotted
543: lines with numbers show the positions of individual lines as listed in
544: Table~\ref{tab:sysa}.}
545: \label{fig:sysa}
546: \end{figure}
547:
548: Even though it is a heavily blended region, our analysis was aided by
549: the fact that our spectra cover large wavelength ranges and contain
550: other \SiII\ lines from system B, which we could use to constrain the
551: properties of the $\lambda$1527 transition. Those lines clearly
552: indicated that this line is not as strong as described in
553: \citetalias{misawa2005}. However, this also indicated that this region
554: had to contain additional \CIV\ lines. We added new \CIV\ doublets
555: which are labeled with 5, 6 and 7 in Fig.~\ref{fig:sysa} and
556: Table~\ref{tab:sysa}, and we also added line No.~3. Both spectra, and
557: especially the Keck spectrum, show that those doublets are
558: required. Additionally, we split \citetalias{misawa2005}'s line no. 1
559: into two lines -- our doublets Nos.~1 and 2. This significantly
560: improved our fit.
561:
562: In System A, we also identified the \SiIV, \SiIII, and \NV\ lines. We
563: show the \SiIV\ lines in Fig.~\ref{fig:sysaSi}; the lines from the
564: latter two ions are in the heavily crowded \Lya\ forest region. We
565: note that the \SiIV\ absorption was not seen in the Misawa et al.'s
566: data, even in the spectrum generated by coadding all the Subaru
567: spectra \citepalias{misawa2007}. This is clearly because of high
568: signal-to-noise ratio in our spectra.
569:
570: \begin{figure}
571: \centering
572: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig5.eps}}
573: \caption{The \SiIV$\lambda\lambda$1394,1403 doublets from
574: system A.\label{fig:sysaSi}}
575: \end{figure}
576:
577: We note that the components in system A have a rather large
578: value of the \CIV/\HI\ column density ratio, higher than 1 in
579: virtually all cases and reaching $\sim$20 in the extreme case. This is
580: seen in both Keck (Table~\ref{tab:sysa}) and MMT spectra, and has
581: strong implications for the modeling of the intrinsic spectrum of the
582: quasar (Paper~II). This effect is not seen in other systems, where
583: practically all components have $N_{\CIV}/N_{\HI}<1$.
584:
585: Our determination of the \CIV\ column density agrees
586: well with the value obtained in the Subaru data
587: (Table~\ref{tab:logNtot}). As mentioned earlier, none of the other
588: ions seen in our spectra was seen in the Misawa et al.'s data.
589:
590: Finally, we would like to confirm the suspicion first expressed in
591: \citetalias{misawa2003} that the feature at 5527~\AA\ in the
592: \citetalias{dobrzycki1999} spectrum is \emph{not} a
593: \FeII($\lambda$1608) line at $\zabs=2.4367$. This feature is not
594: present in our Keck and MMT data, and a close examination of the raw
595: 1997 data revealed that it was in fact an artifact caused by a cosmic
596: ray hit.
597:
598: \subsubsection{System B, $\zabs=2.48$}
599: \label{subsubsec:sysb}
600:
601: Even the medium resolution spectrum from \citetalias{dobrzycki1999}
602: clearly showed that this is a strong and complex system. The \Lya\
603: absorption was very broad, and its non-symmetric profile hinted that
604: it is in fact a blend of at least few lines.
605:
606: The Subaru spectrum allowed this complex to be resolved into 18-19
607: separate components. As mentioned earlier, our spectra could be
608: satisfactorily fitted with only eight clouds. We show the vicinity of
609: \Lya\ and \CIV\ lines on Figure~\ref{fig:sysb}. The derived properties
610: of all lines are listed in Table~\ref{tab:sysb}. Note that this system
611: contains lines from as many as fourteen distinct ions.
612:
613: It needs to be noted, however, that in few cases the line properties
614: are uncertain. In particular, the seemingly large column densities of
615: some of the \SiIII($\lambda$1206) lines (Nos.~2 and 6 in
616: Table~\ref{tab:sysb}) very likely originate from blending with the
617: hydrogen lines. Several other components are also likely affected by
618: features in the spectra; some of those features may be unidentified
619: lines, while some are very likely to be spectral artifacts. All those
620: cases are marked in Table~\ref{tab:sysb}.
621:
622: Also, direct fit of \SiII\ (7.\SiII\ in Table~\ref{tab:sysb}) and
623: 4.\FeII\ in the Keck spectrum resulted in unrealistically high column
624: densities. That was confirmed by visual inspection. The only
625: workaround was to perform the fit to those lines by trial-and-error,
626: then fix the column density for those components, and then refit the
627: whole spectrum again.
628:
629: The 4.\OI\ lines near $\sim$4531\AA\ are affected by the \CIV\ doublet
630: from the J system (see below).
631:
632: The reality of the 5.\AlIII, 5.\AlII\ and 5.\FeII\ lines is somewhat
633: uncertain. The programme fitted the lines and they were seen in visual
634: inspection of the spectrum, and we decided to keep them in
635: Table~\ref{tab:sysb}. However, we note that the lines themselves and
636: their vicinity are rather noisy.
637:
638: Total ion column densities seen in our spectra agree well with those
639: seen in the Subaru data (Table~\ref{tab:logNtot}). Differences can be
640: seen for some ions, but they can be resolved when blends and suspected
641: blends are taken into account.
642:
643: \begin{figure}
644: \centering
645: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig6.eps}}
646: \caption{System B: the \CIV\ (upper panel) and \Lya\ (lower panel)
647: regions. Positions of lines from
648: Table~\ref{tab:sysb} are marked.}
649: \label{fig:sysb}
650: \end{figure}
651:
652: \subsubsection{System C, $\zabs=2.54$}
653: \label{subsubsec:sysc}
654:
655: This system (see Figure~\ref{fig:sysc}) is very close to the emission
656: redshift of the quasar. In \citetalias{dobrzycki1999} it was
657: considered to be in-falling because of the QSO emission redshift of
658: 2.51 adopted in this paper. However, the arguments presented in
659: \citetalias{misawa2003} favouring higher value of the emission
660: redshift, $\zem=2.54$, are convincing and we adopt this value in both
661: this paper and in Paper~II.
662:
663: The derived properties of \CIV\ absorption (See Table~\ref{tab:syscd})
664: in this system agree well with the Subaru data. In our data we also
665: see the \Lya\ line. There is no significant absorption seen in other
666: lines, including \MgII.
667:
668: \begin{figure}
669: \centering
670: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig7.eps}}
671: \caption{The \CIV\ (upper panel) and \Lya\ (lower panel) regions of
672: System C. Positions of lines detected in the
673: spectra are shown with dotted line and labeled with the ID from
674: Table~\ref{tab:syscd}.}
675: \label{fig:sysc}
676: \end{figure}
677:
678: \subsubsection{System D, $\zabs=2.55$}
679: \label{subsubsec:sysd}
680:
681: This system is undoubtedly a $\zabs>\zem$ system (see
682: Figure~\ref{fig:sysd}), even with the QSO emission redshift of
683: 2.54. The natural explanation is that this system is infalling onto
684: the quasar.
685:
686: Misawa et al.\ resolved this system into four separate components, and
687: we see the very same absorbers in our data. For all of them we
688: identify \Lya\ and \CIV\ lines.
689:
690: The stronger two components (lines No.~3 and 4 in Fig.~\ref{fig:sysd}
691: and Tab.~\ref{tab:syscd}) also show \SiIV\ and \NV\ lines. We list
692: \NV\ only under component \#4, but it is very likely a blend of
693: components \#3 and \#4, since both lines in the doublet are broader
694: than what would be expected based on the value of the Doppler
695: parameter of the other lines. The nitrogen absorption is certainly
696: real, but the troughs are shallow and are visible only because of high
697: S/N of our spectra; resolving it into two components would be
698: meaningless.
699:
700: In the case of the Keck spectrum, the fits of the \Lya\ lines \#3 and
701: \#4 were diverging when they were combined with lines from other ions.
702: We therefore fitted them separately and then fixed the values; this is
703: reflected in Table~\ref{tab:syscd}, where their values of $N$ and $b$
704: are listed as fixed.
705:
706: We also note that the \HI\ line \#1 in the Keck spectrum shows
707: unusually low value of the Doppler parameter. However, this was
708: confirmed by the visual inspection of the spectrum: the line is
709: isolated but does appear to be very narrow. Since the corresponding
710: \CIV\ absorption is unambiguously identified, we have no doubts about
711: the reality of this line, and we attribute the unusually low measured
712: value of $b$ to noise fluke.
713:
714: \begin{figure}
715: \centering
716: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig8.eps}}
717: \caption{As in Figure~\ref{fig:sysc}, for System D.}
718: \label{fig:sysd}
719: \end{figure}
720:
721: \subsection{Systems with $\zabs\ll\zem$}
722: \label{subsec:intervening}
723:
724: The spectrum of \HS\ contains several other heavy-element systems at
725: $\zabs\ll\zem$. We identified seven of them in our spectra; the lists
726: of lines are shown in Table~\ref{tab:sysek}. Four of those systems: E
727: ($\zabs=1.89$), F ($\zabs=1.97$), G ($\zabs=2.07$), and H
728: ($\zabs=2.27$) were identified in the early Subaru spectra, while
729: system I ($\zabs=2.18$) was described in the recent paper by
730: \citetalias{misawa2007}.
731:
732: In almost all cases, the properties derived from our spectra match
733: reasonably well with those from the Subaru data. The two exceptions
734: are the Nos.~3 and 4 \CIV\ lines from system F. In the first case
735: \citetalias{misawa2003} and \citetalias{misawa2005} have a doublet of
736: lines of similar strength separated by $\sim$7~\kms, which in our
737: spectrum is not deblended, and the second case is a weak line buried
738: in a nearby, stronger line. The total column density derived
739: from our data does, however, agree well with the Subaru value
740: (Table~\ref{tab:logNtot}).
741:
742: Although the \SiIV($\lambda\lambda$1394,1403) lines in system E
743: (Fig.~\ref{fig:syse}) lie in the \Lya\ forest, they are clearly
744: identified in both Keck and MMT spectra. Existence of the second
745: \SiIV\ doublet is rather uncertain. We could not see it in the Keck
746: data, although it is perhaps present in the MMT spectrum.
747:
748: The natural interpretation for the origin of the systems with
749: $\zabs\ll\zem$ is that they are intervening, i.e.\ they are caused by
750: objects which happen to be placed on the line of sight to the quasar
751: but are not related to it, although there are cases in the literature
752: where convincing arguments were presented that systems seemingly far
753: from the quasar could be associated
754: \citep[e.g.][]{hamann1997,richards1999}. \citetalias{misawa2005}
755: indicated that systems E and F could be associated, since their
756: analysis seemed to show that some of the components in those systems
757: had partial coverage, although the lines did not show any
758: variability. In our analysis we obtained satisfactory profile fits
759: without the assumption of partial coverage. This accounts for the
760: difference between line parameters derived here and in the Subaru
761: spectra. However, the total column densities agree well
762: (Table~\ref{tab:logNtot}).
763:
764: \begin{figure}
765: \centering
766: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig9.eps}}
767: \caption{The \CIV\ (upper panel) and \SiIV\ (lower panel) regions for
768: System E. Markings as in Figure~\ref{fig:sysc}.}
769: \label{fig:syse}
770: \end{figure}
771:
772: In our spectra, we also identify two systems which are not seen in the
773: Subaru spectra. We label them J ($z_{abs}=1.9266$) and K
774: ($z_{abs}=2.2622$); the line properties are listed in
775: Table~\ref{tab:sysek}. We show the two systems in
776: Figure~\ref{fig:sysjk}.
777:
778: \begin{figure}
779: \centering
780: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig10.eps}}
781: \caption{The \CIV\ regions for System J (upper panel) and K (lower
782: panel).}
783: \label{fig:sysjk}
784: \end{figure}
785:
786: System J requires a special comment. The \Lya\ line for this system
787: would be outside of the wavelength region covered by both MMT and Keck
788: spectra, and the only identified feature is the \CIV\ doublet. Before
789: we proceed, we note that it is somewhat surprising that the redder of
790: the two lines, at $\lambda_{\rm obs}\approx 4538$~\AA, is apparently
791: not identified in any of the Subaru spectra, since none of the line
792: lists seems to contain it. This line is unambiguously present in both
793: our spectra.
794:
795: What makes this system somewhat uncertain is the fact that both those
796: lines coincide very well with the locations of what we expect to be
797: the strongest \OI($\lambda$1302) and \SiII($\lambda$1304) lines from
798: System B. However, there are indications that \CIV\ is in fact present
799: in this location. First, the spectra contain several other \SiII\
800: lines, and they constrain the column density of that ion quite well,
801: suggesting that \SiII($\lambda$1304) alone cannot account for all of
802: absorption in the redder of the two lines. Second, for \OI\ to be
803: responsible for all of the absorption in the bluer of the two lines,
804: at $\lambda_{\rm obs}\approx 4530$~\AA, it would require \OI\ column
805: density of $\sim10^{15}$\cmsq, which we consider implausible.
806:
807: The above considerations lead us to believe that system J is real,
808: although the fact that both lines are blends makes its properties
809: rather uncertain.
810:
811: Another of the previously unidentified systems is a system at
812: $\zabs=2.2622$, which we label K. It is clearly seen in both our
813: spectra; obviously, we could identify it because of high S/N ratio in
814: our data. The system is displaced by $\sim$400~\kms\ from system H. It
815: is thus likely that both those systems originate in objects from the
816: same group of galaxies.
817:
818: \section{Notes on the variability of the absorbers}
819: \label{sec:variability}
820:
821: Misawa et al.\ present convincing arguments that the system A absorber
822: is variable, but they did not see variability in any of the other
823: systems. In general, unlike the Subaru observations, our optical data
824: are not well suited for the analysis of absorber variability. First,
825: we have data from two epochs only. Second, the data were obtained with
826: two different telescopes/instruments, at different locations and under
827: different atmospheric conditions -- not to mention that one of the
828: observations was likely affected by smoke from forest fires. Third,
829: one of the extracted spectra had issues with residual flux. Fourth, in
830: some places the continuum fits had to be fudged manually. Fifth, the
831: variability range reported in \citetalias{misawa2007} was of the order
832: of $\Delta\log N\sim0.3$, which is only slightly higher than our
833: typical measurement uncertainties. All those factors make direct
834: comparison of the derived properties of the absorption lines
835: questionable, and especially in the regions affected by the continuum
836: fit uncertainty. Any difference between absorber properties derived
837: from the two spectra will likely contain an unknown component
838: attributable to those issues.
839:
840: Being aware of all those considerations, we examined the column
841: densities derived from the MMT and Keck data looking for any
842: systematic differences between the two datasets. In
843: Figure~\ref{fig:mmtvskeck} we show column densities for the same
844: components as derived from the MMT and Keck data. Note that the error
845: bars only show formal uncertainties as derived from the fits and do
846: not include the unknown uncertainty related to the analysis
847: issues. Despite that fact, one can clearly see that the properties of
848: components as derived from our two observations agree very well. Only
849: very few data points deviate from the $N_{\rm Keck}=N_{\rm MMT}$ line
850: by more than 1$\sigma$, and the ones that do are practically all in
851: the high-$N$ region, where issues related to the residual flux in the
852: MMT spectrum are expected to play a role.
853:
854: \begin{figure}
855: \centering
856: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{hs2fig11.eps}}
857: \caption{Comparison of column densities of all lines for which
858: measurements exist from both MMT (x-axis) and Keck (y-axis) data. See
859: text for discussion.}
860: \label{fig:mmtvskeck}
861: \end{figure}
862:
863: This conclusion applies to both $\zabs\approx\zem$ -- including
864: system~A, which Misawa et al.\ have shown to be variable -- as well as
865: the $\zabs\ll\zem$ systems. For the latter systems this is not
866: surprising, although, as mentioned earlier, there were claims in the
867: literature \citep[e.g.][]{hamann1997,richards1999} indicating that
868: systems with large redshift difference showed variability \citep[see
869: also][]{hao2007}.
870:
871: \section{Summary}
872: \label{sec:summary}
873:
874: The following summarises our findings:
875:
876: \begin{itemize}
877:
878: \item The intrinsic X-ray properties of \HS\ are in the typical
879: range. The available X-ray data were insufficient to provide
880: meaningful constraints on the properties of the intrinsic
881: absorber. The optical-to-X-ray slope, $\aox=1.70$, which is
882: at the high end of the typical range at this redshift.
883:
884: \item In addition to systems seen in \citetalias{dobrzycki1999} and
885: Misawa et al.'s papers, we identify two previously unknown intervening
886: systems at $\zabs=1.9266$, and 2.2622. With eleven complexes of heavy
887: element absorbers, which together contain $\sim$50 (or even more)
888: individual clouds -- and that not counting \Lya\ forest systems --
889: \HS\ is truly a spectacular object.
890:
891: \item Some of the clouds in system A have a high ratio of \CIV\ to
892: \HI\ column densities, reaching $\sim$20. Clouds from other
893: systems show $N_{\CIV}/N_{\HI}<1$.
894:
895: \item The data presented in this paper are not well suited for proper
896: analysis of line temporal variability. We note, however, that the data
897: are consistent with absence of variability for all systems.
898:
899: \item The optical data presented in this paper contain identifications
900: and measurements of several lines not seen in the Subaru spectra, in
901: particular the hydrogen and magnesium lines.
902:
903: \item Our data contain measurements of column densities of several
904: ions and therefore provide excellent constraints for modeling of the
905: cloud internal properties and QSO intrinsic flux. We will present such
906: modeling in the forthcoming paper.
907:
908: \end{itemize}
909:
910: \begin{acknowledgements}
911:
912: We thank J.~Liske for his help with the VPGUESS/VPFIT packages,
913: T.~Aldcroft and A.~Siemiginowska for helpful comments, and the referee
914: for a very careful review. MN would like to thank ESO for hospitality
915: during his stay there. This work was partially supported by the ESO
916: Director General Discretionary Fund, by the National Aeronautics and
917: Space Administration through Chandra Award Number 04700527 issued by
918: the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the
919: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory for and on behalf of the
920: National Aeronautics Space Administration under contract NAS8-03060,
921: and by grant 1P03D00829 of the Polish State Committee for Scientific
922: Research.
923:
924: \end{acknowledgements}
925:
926: \bibliographystyle{aa}
927: \bibliography{myrefs}
928:
929: \onecolumn
930:
931: \begin{longtable}{lccccc}
932: \caption{Lines from system A ($\zabs=2.44$) detected in the Keck spectrum.
933: \label{tab:sysa}} \\
934: \hline\hline
935: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & \Cf & M05 ID \\
936: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) & & \\
937: \endfirsthead
938: \caption{continued.} \\
939: \hline\hline
940: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & \Cf & M05 ID \\
941: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) & & \\
942: \hline\hline
943: \endhead
944: \hline\hline
945:
946: \hline
947: 1.\HI & 2.41941\err0.00002 & 62.58\err6.51 & 13.656\err0.033 & 0.61 & \\
948: 1.\CIV\ \P & 2.41941\err0.00002 & 72.74\err3.42 & 14.965\err0.044 & 0.36 & 1; \CIV \\
949: 1.\NV\ \sh& 2.41941\err0.00002 & 26.74\err17.05 & 13.235\err0.964 && \\
950: 1.\SiIV & 2.41941\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.065\err0.182 && \\
951:
952: \hline
953: 2.\HI\ \P & 2.42001\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.496\err0.087 & 0.61 & \\
954: 2.\CIV\ \P & 2.42001\err0.00002 & 198.64\err21.32 & 14.225\err0.054 & 0.36 & \\
955: 2.\NV\ \sh& 2.42001\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.008\err0.257 && \\
956: 2.\SiIV & 2.42001\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 11.789\err0.325 && \\
957:
958: \hline
959: 3.\HI & 2.42344\err0.00025 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.132\err0.037 & 0.61 & \\
960: 3.\CIV\ \P & 2.42344\err0.00025 & 61.09\err18.07 & 13.440\err0.068 & 0.36 & \\
961: 3.\NV\ \sh& 2.42344\err0.00025 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.683\err0.319 && \\
962: \hline
963: 4.\HI & 2.42447\err0.00019 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.131\err0.037 & 0.61 & \\
964: 4.\CIV & 2.42447\err0.00019 & 34.72\err17.17 & 13.090\err0.333 & 0.36 & 2; \CIV \\
965: 4.\NV\ \sh& 2.42447\err0.00019 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.296\err0.349 && \\
966: \hline
967: 5.\HI & 2.42554\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 12.420 (fixed) & 0.61 & \\
968: 5.\CIV\ & 2.42554\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.313\err0.870 & 0.36 & 3; \CIV \\
969: 5.\NV\ \sh& 2.42554\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.885\err0.106 && \\
970: 5.\SiIII\ $\sharp$& 2.42554\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.667\err0.041 && \\
971: \hline
972: 6.\HI\ \P & 2.42696\err0.00003 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.700\err0.050 & 0.61 & \\
973: 6.\CIV & 2.42696\err0.00003 & 44.13\err10.52& 13.322\err0.086 & 0.36 & \\
974: 6.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
975: \hline
976: 7.\HI & 2.42833\err0.00001 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.941\err0.016 && \\
977: 7.\CIV & 2.42833\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.526\err0.055 && \\
978: 7.\NV\ \sh& 2.42833\err0.00001 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.650\err0.200 && \\
979: \hline
980: 8.\HI & 2.43509\err0.00006 & 49.08\err30.79 & 12.361\err0.704 & & \\
981: 8.\CIV & 2.43509\err0.00006 & 38.64\err8.37 & 13.440\err0.058 && 4; \CIV \\
982: 8.\NV\ \sh& 2.43509\err0.00006 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.977\err0.477 && \\
983: 8.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.43509\err0.00006 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$16.000 && \\
984: \hline
985: 9.\HI & 2.43710\err0.00005 & 100.56\err33.64 & 13.091\err0.110 & & \\
986: 9.\CIV & 2.43710\err0.00005 & 81.40\err8.82 & 13.970\err0.024 && 5; \CIV \\
987: 9.\NV\ \sh& 2.43710\err0.00005 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.094\err1.220 && \\
988: 9.\SiIII\ \sh\ & 2.43710\err0.00005 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$16.000 && \\
989: 9.\SiIV & 2.43710\err0.00005 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.050\err0.190 && \\
990:
991: \hline
992: 10.\HI & 2.43753\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.262\err0.061 && \\
993: 10.\CIV & 2.43753\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.596\err0.121 && 6; \CIV \\
994: 10.\NV\ \sh& 2.43753\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.717\err0.327 & & \\
995: 10.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.43753\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$16.000 && \\
996: 10.\SiIV & 2.43753\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 11.839\err0.292 && \\
997:
998: \hline
999: 11.\HI & 2.43911\err0.00030 & 138.45 (fixed) & 13.244\err0.087 && \\
1000: 11.\CIV & 2.43911\err0.00030 & 50.59\err40.10 & 13.273\err0.481 && 7; \CIV \\
1001: 11.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1002: 11.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.43911\err0.00030 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$ 15.376 && \\
1003: \hline
1004: 12.\HI & 2.43989\err0.00019 & 25.00 (fixed) & 12.464\err0.344 && \\
1005: 12.\CIV & 2.43989\err0.00019 & 10.00 (fixed) & 12.825\err0.534 && 8; \CIV \\
1006: 12.\NV\ \sh& 2.43989\err0.00019 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.485\err0.880 && \\
1007: 12.\SiIII\ \sh\ & 2.43989\err0.00019 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$16.000 && \\
1008: \hline
1009: 13.\HI & 2.44079\err0.00042 & 72.42 (fixed) & 13.057\err0.103 && \\
1010: 13.\CIV & 2.44079\err0.00042 & 77.05\err50.41 & 13.518\err1.886 && 9; \CIV \\
1011: 13.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1012: 13.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44079\err0.00042 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.734 && \\
1013: \hline
1014: 14.\HI & 2.44215\err0.00030 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.004\err0.131 && \\
1015: 14.\CIV & 2.44215\err0.00030 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.787\err0.100 && 10; \CIV \\
1016: 14.\NV\ \sh& 2.44215\err0.00030 & 9.30 (fixed) & 14.054\err0.101 && \\
1017: 14.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44215\err0.00030 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$11.587 && \\
1018: \hline
1019: 15.\HI & 2.44228\err0.00021 & 81.41\err43.00 & 13.106\err0.221 && \\
1020: 15.\CIV & 2.44228\err0.00021 & 123.22\err87.76 & 13.240\err0.305 && 11; \CIV \\
1021: 15.\NV\ \sh& 2.44228\err0.00021 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.808\err0.171 & & \\
1022: 15.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44228\err0.00021 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$11.520 && \\
1023: \hline
1024: 16.\HI & 2.44325\err0.00148 & 114.39 (fixed) & 13.086\err0.203 && \\
1025: 16.\CIV & 2.44325\err0.00148 & 100.74 (fixed) & 13.709\err0.055 && 12; \CIV \\
1026: 16.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1027: 16.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44325\err0.00148 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.394 & & \\
1028: \hline
1029: 17.\HI & 2.44480\err0.00018 & 91.30\err64.73 & 13.093\err0.104 && \\
1030: 17.\CIV & 2.44480\err0.00018 & 30.00\err20.54 & 13.070\err0.176 && 14; \CIV \\
1031: 17.\NV\ \sh& 2.44480\err0.00018 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.094\err0.433 && \\
1032: 17.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44480\err0.00018 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.679 && \\
1033: \hline
1034: 18.\HI & 2.44641\err0.00021 & 75.27\err25.93 & 13.154\err0.216 && \\
1035: 18.\CIV & 2.44641\err0.00021 & 109.27\err58.99 & 13.807\err0.202 && 15; \CIV \\
1036: 18.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1037: 18.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44641\err0.00021 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$13.483 && \\
1038: \hline
1039: 19.\HI & 2.44818\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.594\err0.020 && \\
1040: 19.\CIV & 2.44818\err0.00002 & 41.51\err49.68 & 12.920\err0.366 && \\
1041: 19.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1042: 19.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44818\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.467 && \\
1043: \hline
1044: 20.\HI & 2.44954\err0.00035 & 41.27 (fixed) & 12.608 (fixed) && \\
1045: 20.\CIV & 2.44954\err0.00035 & 62.77\err55.72 & 13.133\err0.388 && \\
1046: 20.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&&& \\
1047: 20.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.44954\err0.00035 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.644 && \\
1048: \hline
1049: 21.\HI & 2.45069\err0.00082 & 25.00 (fixed) & 12.874 (fixed) && \\
1050: 21.\CIV & 2.45069\err0.00082 & 65.13\err108.68& 13.117\err0.681 && \\
1051: 21.\NV\ \sh& 2.45069\err0.00082 & 9.30 (fixed) & 11.928\err1.265 & & \\
1052: 21.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.45069\err0.00082 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$12.511 && \\
1053: \hline
1054: 22.\HI\ \P& 2.45174\err0.00041 & 51.00 (fixed) & 14.245 (fixed) && \\
1055: 22.\CIV & 2.45174\err0.00041 & 53.88\err44.25 & 13.059\err0.340 && \\
1056: 22.\NV\ \sh& 2.45174\err0.00041 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.686\err0.923 && \\
1057: 22.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.45174\err0.00041 & 6.50 (fixed) & $\le$14.411 && \\
1058: \hline\hline
1059: \end{longtable}
1060: \noindent
1061: $\sharp$ -- heavy-element line in the \Lya\ forest region of the spectrum; \\
1062: \P\ -- saturated line; \\
1063: (a) -- detected in the MMT spectrum, but not seen in the Keck spectrum.
1064:
1065: \clearpage
1066:
1067: \begin{longtable}{lccccccc}
1068: \caption{Lines from system B ($\zabs=2.48$) detected in the Keck spectrum.
1069: \label{tab:sysb}} \\
1070: \hline\hline
1071: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$& $\log N$ & M05 ID \\
1072: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) & \\
1073:
1074: \endfirsthead
1075: \caption{continued.} \\
1076: \hline\hline
1077: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & M05 ID \\
1078: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) & \\
1079: \hline\hline
1080: \endhead
1081: \hline\hline
1082: 1.\HI\ \P & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.583\err0.228 & \\
1083: 1.\CIV & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.223\err0.141 & 1,2; \CIV\\
1084: 1.\CII & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.320\err0.093 & 1,\CII \\
1085: 1.\NV\ \sh& 2.47723\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.617\err0.426 & \\
1086: 1.\MgII & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 7.00 (fixed) & 12.123\err0.300 & \\
1087: 1.\AlIII & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.923\err0.469 & \\
1088: 1.\AlII & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.020\err1.288 & \\
1089: 1.\SiIV & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.258\err0.082 & 1,2; \SiIV\\
1090: 1.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.47723\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.068\err1.434 & \\
1091: 1.\SiII & 2.47723\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.554\err0.103 & 1,2; \SiII\\
1092: \hline
1093: 2.\HI\ & 2.47762\err0.00004 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.000\err0.154 & \\
1094: 2.\CIV & 2.47762\err0.00004 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.643\err0.110 & 3-5; \CIV\\
1095: 2.\NV\ \sh& 2.47762\err0.00004 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.626\err0.645 & \\
1096: 2.\MgII & 2.47762\err0.00004 & 7.00 (fixed) & 11.915\err0.416 & \\
1097: 2.\AlIII & (a) &&& \\
1098: 2.\AlII & (a) &&& \\
1099: 2.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.47762\err0.00004 & 6.50 (fixed) & 16.616\err0.333 & 1; \SiIII\\
1100: 2.\SiII & (a) &&& \\
1101: \hline
1102: 3.\HI\ \P & 2.47847\err0.00001 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.625\err0.100 & \\
1103: 3.\CIV & 2.47847\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 15.265\err0.135 & 6-10; \CIV\\
1104: 3.\CII & (a) && & 2; \CII \\
1105: 3.\NV\ \sh& 2.47847\err0.00001 & 9.30 (fixed) & 13.493\err0.072 & 1,2; \NV\\
1106:
1107: 3.\AlIII & (a) &&& \\
1108: 3.\AlII & (a) &&& \\
1109: 3.\SiIV & 2.47847\err0.00001 & 26.40\err3.23 & 12.827\err0.077 & 3,4; \SiIV\\
1110: 3.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.47847\err0.00001 & 26.40\err3.23 & 14.203\err0.206 & 2; \SiIII\\
1111: 3.\SiII & (a) && & 3,4; \SiII\\
1112: \hline
1113: 4.\HI\ \P & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 25.00 (fixed) & 15.810\err1.099 & \\
1114: 4.\CIV & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 29.97\err1.36 & 14.515\err0.026 & 11-13; \CIV\\
1115: 4.\CII & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 29.97\err1.36 & 14.671\err0.029 & 3,4; \CII\\
1116: 4.\NV\ \sh,$\dag$& 2.47938\err0.00001 & 38.37\err30.95& 13.512\err0.087 & 3,4,5; \NV\\
1117: 4.\OI\ $\ddag$& 2.47938\err0.00001 & 8.70 (fixed) & 13.754\err0.184 & 1; \OI\\
1118: 4.\MgII\ $\dag$& 2.47938\err0.00001 & 7.00 (fixed) & 15.096\err0.159 &\\
1119:
1120: 4.\MgI & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 7.00 (fixed) & 11.766\err0.209 & \\
1121: 4.\AlIII & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 6.70 (fixed) & 13.054\err0.107 & \\
1122: 4.\AlII & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 6.70 (fixed) & 14.518\err0.239 & 1,2; \AlII\\
1123: 4.\SiIV & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 21.87\err5.96 & 13.398\err0.035 & 5,6; \SiIV\\
1124: 4.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.47938\err0.00001 & 21.87\err5.96 & 13.810\err0.120 & 3; \SiIII\\
1125: 4.\SiII & 2.47938\err0.00001 & 21.87\err5.96 & 13.938\err0.151 & 5,6; \SiII\\
1126: 4.\FeIII\ \sh$\dag$& (b) & & & \\
1127: 4.\FeII\ \sh& 2.47938\err0.00001 & 4.65 (fixed) & 13.250 (fixed) & 1; \FeII \\
1128: \hline
1129: 5.\HI\ \P & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.110\err0.503 & \\
1130: 5.\CIV & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.550\err0.080 & 14,15; \CIV\\
1131: 5.\NV\ \sh& 2.47998\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.843\err0.296 & 6; \NV\\
1132:
1133: 5.\AlIII & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.836\err0.573 & \\
1134: 5.\AlII & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.517\err0.484 & 3; \AlII\\
1135: 5.\SiIV & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 34.32\err5.42 & 13.075\err0.067 & 7; \SiIV\\
1136: 5.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.47998\err0.00002 & 34.32\err5.42 & 12.984\err0.065 & 4; \SiIII\\
1137: 5.\SiII & 2.47998\err0.00002 & 34.32\err5.42 & 11.355\err1.345 & 7; \SiII\\
1138:
1139: 5.\FeIII\ \sh& (b) & & & \\
1140: 5.\FeII\ \sh& 2.47998\err0.00002 & 4.65 (fixed) & 12.843\err0.214 & \\
1141: \hline
1142: 6.\HI\ \P & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.969\err0.590 & \\
1143: 6.\CIV & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.110\err0.076 & 16,17; \CIV\\
1144: 6.\CII & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.983\err0.053 & 6,7; \CII\\
1145: 6.\NV\ \sh& 2.48064\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.423\err0.371 & \\
1146: 6.\MgII & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 7.00 (fixed) & 12.903\err0.115 & \\
1147: 6.\AlIII & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 12.061\err0.362 & \\
1148: 6.\AlII & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.968\err0.199 & 4; \AlII\\
1149: 6.\SiIV & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.334\err0.094 & 8,9; \SiIV\\
1150: 6.\SiIII\ \sh,$\dag$& 2.48064\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 15.883\err0.058 & 5-7; \SiIII\\
1151: 6.\SiII & 2.48064\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.136\err0.122 & 8; \SiII\\
1152: 6.\FeIII\ \sh& (b) & & & \\
1153: \hline
1154: 7.\HI\ \P & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.431\err0.338 & \\
1155: 7.\CIV & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.979\err0.072 & 18,19;\CIV\\
1156: 7.\CII & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.914\err0.052 & 8; \CII\\
1157: 7.\NV\ \sh& 2.48145\err0.00002 & 9.30 (fixed) & 12.423\err0.371 & \\
1158: 7.\MgII & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 7.00 (fixed) & 13.027\err0.112 & \\
1159: 7.\AlIII & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 12.562\err0.150 & \\
1160: 7.\AlII & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 12.068\err0.174 & 5; \AlII\\
1161: 7.\SiIV & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.407\err0.082 & 10; \SiIV\\
1162: 7.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.48145\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.936\err0.171 & 8; \SiIII\\
1163: 7.\SiII & 2.48145\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.449 (fixed) & 9; \SiII\\
1164: 7.\FeIII\ \sh& (b) & & & \\
1165: 7.\FeII\ \sh& 2.48145\err0.00002 & 4.65 (fixed) & 12.526\err0.293 & \\
1166: \hline
1167: 8.\HI\ \P & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 15.111\err0.100 & \\
1168: 8.\CIV & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 12.537\err0.407 & \\
1169: 8.\CII\ $\dag$& 2.48226\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.374\err0.072 & 9-11; \CII\\
1170: 8.\NV\ \sh& (a) &&& \\
1171: 8.\OI & 2.48226\err0.00001 & 8.70 (fixed) & 13.549\err0.066 & \\
1172: 8.\MgII & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 7.00 (fixed) & 13.014\err0.106 & \\
1173: 8.\AlIII & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.751\err0.670 & \\
1174: 8.\AlII & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 6.70 (fixed) & 11.977\err0.197 & 6,7; \AlII\\
1175: 8.\SiIV & (a) &&& \\
1176: 8.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.48226\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.124\err0.113 & 9,10; \SiIII\\
1177: 8.\SiII & 2.48226\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.822\err0.155 & 10,11; \SiII\\
1178:
1179: \hline\hline
1180: \end{longtable}
1181: \noindent
1182: $\sharp$ -- heavy-element line in the \Lya\ forest region of the spectrum; \\
1183: $\ddag$ -- line blended by identified line (\OI\ line is blended by
1184: \CIV\ from system J);\\
1185: $\dag$ -- line is probably blended with an unidentified line;\\
1186: \P\ -- saturated line; \\
1187: (a) -- detected in the MMT spectrum, but not seen in the Keck spectrum;\\
1188: (b) -- detected in the MMT spectrum, but noise is too strong in
1189: order to fit this line in the Keck spectrum.
1190:
1191: \clearpage
1192:
1193: \begin{longtable}{lcccc}
1194: \caption{Lines from systems C and D detected in the Keck spectrum.
1195: \label{tab:syscd}} \\
1196: \hline\hline
1197: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & M05 ID \\
1198: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) & \\
1199: \endhead
1200: \hline\hline
1201: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System C $\zabs = 2.54$} \\
1202: \hline
1203: 1.\HI\ \P& 2.53787\err0.00003 & 25.00 (fixed) & 15.659\err0.270 & \\
1204: 1.\CIV & 2.53787\err0.00003 & 8.32\err4.25 & 13.510\err0.155 & 1; \CIV\\
1205: \hline\hline
1206:
1207: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System D $\zabs = 2.55$} \\
1208: \hline
1209: 1.\HI & 2.55222\err0.00001 & 25.00 (fixed) & 13.569\err0.697 & \\
1210: 1.\CIV & 2.55222\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 12.585\err0.410 & 1; \CIV\\
1211: \hline
1212: 2.\HI\ & 2.55383\err0.00015 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.414\err1.474 & \\
1213: 2.\CIV & 2.55383\err0.00015 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.456\err0.790 & 2,\CIV\\
1214: \hline
1215: 3.\HI\ \P& 2.55409\err0.00018 & 25.00 (fixed) & 16.042\err1.916 & \\
1216: 3.\CIV \P& 2.55409\err0.00018 & 14.45\err7.54 & 14.407\err0.863 & 3; \CIV\\
1217: 3.\SiIV& 2.55409\err0.00018 & 11.81\err8.00 & 12.850\err0.043 & 1; \SiIV\\
1218: \hline
1219: 4.\HI\ \P& 2.55442\err0.00005 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.865\err1.732 & \\
1220: 4.\CIV \P& 2.55442\err0.00005 & 11.40\err3.96 & 15.200\err1.134 & 4; \CIV\\
1221: 4.\SiIV& 2.55442\err0.00005 & 10.64\err4.40 & 13.593\err0.085 & 2; \SiIV\\
1222: 4.\NV\ \# & 2.55442\err0.00005 & 38.57\err16.44& 13.191\err0.105 & \\
1223: \hline\hline
1224: \end{longtable}
1225: \noindent \P\ -- saturated line; \\
1226: \#\ -- likely blend of components 3 and 4.
1227:
1228: \clearpage
1229:
1230: \begin{longtable}{lcccc}
1231: \caption{Lines from systems E-K detected in the Keck spectrum.
1232: \label{tab:sysek}}\\
1233: \hline\hline
1234: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & M05 ID \\
1235: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) &\\
1236: \hline\hline
1237: \endfirsthead
1238: \caption{continued.} \\
1239: \hline\hline
1240: No.Line ID & \zabs & $b$ & $\log N$ & M05 ID \\
1241: & & (\kms) & (\cmsq) &\\
1242: \hline\hline
1243: \endhead
1244: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System E $\zabs = 1.89$} \\
1245: \hline
1246: 1.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1247: 1.\CIV & 1.88805\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.873\err0.032 & 1; \CIV\\
1248: 1.\SiIV\ \sh& 1.88805\err0.00001 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.036\err0.064 & \\
1249:
1250: \hline
1251: 2.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1252: 2.\CIV & 1.88851\err0.00007 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.576\err0.034 & 2; \CIV\\
1253: 2.\SiIV\ \sh & (a) & & & \\
1254: \hline\hline
1255: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System J (new system) $\zabs = 1.93$} \\
1256: \hline
1257: 1.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1258: 2.\CIV\ $\ddag$& 1.92658\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.727\err0.081 & \\
1259:
1260: \hline\hline
1261: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System F $\zabs = 1.97$} \\
1262: \hline
1263: 1.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1264: 1.\CIV & 1.96399\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.699\err0.213 & 1; \CIV\\
1265:
1266: \hline
1267: 2.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1268: 2.\CIV & 1.96420\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.185\err0.179 & 2,3; \CIV\\
1269:
1270: \hline
1271: 3.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1272: 3.\CIV & 1.96519\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.241\err0.030 & 4,5; \CIV\\
1273: \hline
1274: 4.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1275: 4.\CIV & 1.96572\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.574\err0.026 & 6; \CIV\\
1276: \hline\hline
1277: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System G $\zabs = 2.07$} \\
1278: \hline
1279: 1.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1280: 1.\CIV & 2.07061\err0.00005 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.385\err0.576 & 1; \CIV\\
1281: 1.\SiIV\ \sh& 2.07061\err0.00005 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.887\err0.307 & 1; \SiIV\\
1282:
1283: \hline
1284: 2.\HI & (a) &&&\\
1285: 2.\CIV & 2.07091\err0.00005 & 10.00 (fixed) & 14.487\err0.575 & 2; \CIV\\
1286: 2.\SiIV\ \sh& 2.07091\err0.00005 & 6.50 (fixed) & 13.491\err0.188 & 2; \SiIV\\
1287: \hline\hline
1288: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System I $\zabs = 2.18$} \\
1289: \hline
1290: 1.\HI & (c) & & & \\
1291: 1.\CIV & 2.17560\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.295\err0.036 & \\
1292: 1.\SiIV & 2.17560\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.359\err0.069 & \\
1293: \hline
1294: 2.\HI & (c) & & & \\
1295: 2.\CIV & 2.17606\err0.00005 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.066\err0.056 & \\
1296: 2.\SiIV & 2.17606\err0.00005 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.107\err0.123 & \\
1297: \hline
1298: 3.\HI & (c) & & & \\
1299: 3.\CIV & 2.17645\err0.00001 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.741\err0.033 & \\
1300: 3.\SiIV & 2.17645\err0.00001 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.750\err0.040 & \\
1301:
1302: \hline\hline
1303: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System K (new system) $\zabs = 2.26$} \\
1304: \hline
1305: 1.\HI\ \P & 2.26214\err0.00005 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.850\err0.615 & \\
1306: 1.\CIV & 2.26214\err0.00005 & 10.00 (fixed) & 12.827\err0.332 & \\
1307:
1308: \hline\hline
1309: \multicolumn{5}{c}{System H $\zabs = 2.27$} \\
1310: \hline
1311: 1.\HI\ \P & 2.26613\err0.00002 & 25.00 (fixed) & 14.075\err0.570 & \\
1312:
1313: 1.\CIV & 2.26613\err0.00002 & 10.00 (fixed) & 13.200\err0.035 & 1; \CIV\\
1314: 1.\SiIV & 2.26613\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.527\err0.053 & \\
1315: 1.\SiIII\ \sh& 2.26613\err0.00002 & 6.50 (fixed) & 12.784\err0.085 & 1; \SiIII\\
1316:
1317: \hline\hline
1318: \end{longtable}
1319: \noindent
1320: $\sharp$ -- heavy-element line in \Lya\ forest region of the spectrum; \\
1321: $\ddag$ -- line blended with identified line (\CIV\ in system J
1322: is blended with \OI\ from system B); \\
1323: \P\ -- saturated line; \\
1324: (a) -- \HI\ lines are not observable in systems E, J, F, I and G, in
1325: either MMT or Keck spectra. \HI\ lines are seen in system~I in the MMT spectrum.
1326:
1327: \clearpage
1328:
1329: \begin{longtable}{lccc}
1330: \caption{Total column densities of ions detected in the Keck spectrum.
1331: \label{tab:logNtot}} \\
1332: \hline\hline
1333: Ion & $\log N_{\rm tot}$(this paper)& $\log N_{\rm tot}$(M05)& $\log N_{\rm tot}$(M07)\\
1334: & (\cmsq) & (\cmsq) & (\cmsq) \\
1335: \hline\hline
1336: \endfirsthead
1337: \caption{continued.} \\
1338: \hline\hline
1339: Ion & $\log N_{\rm tot}$(this paper)&$\log N_{\rm tot}$(M05)& $log N_{\rm tot}$(M07)\\
1340: & (\cmsq) & (\cmsq) & (\cmsq) \\
1341: \hline\hline
1342: \endhead
1343: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System A $\zabs = 2.44$} \\
1344: \hline
1345: \HI & $15.124 \pm 0.030$ & & \\
1346: \CIV & $15.270 \pm 0.105$ & 15.236 & \\
1347: \NV & $14.527 \pm 0.102$ & & \\
1348: \SiIV & $12.250 \pm 0.164$ & & \\
1349: \SiIII& (a) & & \\
1350: \hline
1351: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System B $\zabs = 2.48$} \\
1352: \hline
1353: \HI & $15.950 \pm 0.713$ & & \\
1354: \CIV & $15.471\pm0.085$ & $15.024\pm0.047$ & $15.144\pm0.162$ \\
1355: \CII & $14.956\pm0.025$ & $14.905\pm0.151$ & $15.570\pm0.997$ \\
1356: \NV & $14.085\pm0.151$ & $13.663\pm0.275$ & $13.730\pm0.023$ \\
1357: \OI & $13.965\pm0.116$ & $14.390\pm0.032$ & $14.608\pm0.028$ \\
1358: \MgII & $15.106\pm0.155$ & & \\
1359: ~~~~~~~~($i$)& $13.493\pm0.062$ & & \\
1360: \MgI & $11.766 \pm 0.209$ & & \\
1361: \AlIII& $13.260\pm0.085$ & & \\
1362: \AlII & $14.522\pm0.237$ & $12.964\pm0.023$ & $13.165\pm0.889$ \\
1363: ~~~~~~~~($ii$)& $12.542\pm0.113$ & & \\
1364: \SiIV (2a)& $14.037\pm0.032$ & $13.909\pm0.020$ & $14.017\pm0.014$ \\
1365: \SiIII& $16.693\pm0.279$ & $14.880\pm0.470$ & $15.328\pm0.301$ \\
1366: ~~~~~~~~($iii$)&$15.902\pm0.056$ & & \\
1367: \SiII (3)&$14.298\pm0.084$ & $15.977\pm0.471$ & $15.783\pm0.354$ \\
1368: \FeIII& (b) & & \\
1369: \FeII (4)& $13.449\pm0.064$ & $13.600\pm0.030$& $13.650\pm0.010$ \\
1370: \hline
1371: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System C $\zabs = 2.54$} \\
1372: \hline
1373: \HI & $15.659 \pm 0.270$ & & \\
1374: \CIV & $13.510 \pm 0.155$ & $13.440 \pm 0.110$ &
1375: $13.410 \pm 0.050$ \\
1376: \hline
1377: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System D $\zabs = 2.55$} \\
1378: \hline
1379: \HI & $16.081\pm1.756$ & & \\
1380: \CIV & $15.272\pm0.967$ & $14.919\pm0.200$ & $16.662\pm0.060$ \\
1381: \NV & $13.191 \pm 0.105$ & & \\
1382: \SiIV (2a)& $13.665\pm0.072$ & $13.514\pm0.091$ & $13.567\pm0.023$ \\
1383: \hline\hline
1384: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System E $\zabs = 1.89$} \\
1385: \hline
1386: \CIV & $14.050\pm0.024$ & $14.054\pm0.163$ & $14.034\pm0.074$ \\
1387: \SiIV\ \sh & $13.036\pm0.064$ & & \\
1388: \hline
1389: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System J (new system) $\zabs = 1.93$} \\
1390: \hline
1391: \CIV\ $\ddag$ & $13.727\pm0.081$ & & \\
1392: \hline
1393: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System F $\zabs = 1.97$} \\
1394: \hline
1395: \CIV & $14.618\pm0.072$ & $15.840\pm3.410$ & $14.505\pm0.024$ \\
1396: \hline
1397: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System G $\zabs = 2.07$} \\
1398: \hline
1399: \CIV & $14.740\pm0.410$ & $14.227\pm0.054$ & $14.331\pm0.021$ \\
1400: \SiIV (2b)& $13.587\pm0.162$ & $13.260\pm0.054$ & $13.327\pm0.017$ \\
1401: \hline
1402: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System I $\zabs = 2.18$} \\
1403: \hline
1404: \CIV & $13.928\pm0.023$ & & $14.019\pm0.072$ \\
1405: \SiIV & $12.991\pm0.032$ & & $12.797\pm0.015$ \\
1406: \SiIII& & & $12.800\pm0.022$ \\
1407: \hline
1408: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System K (new system) $\zabs = 2.26$} \\
1409: \hline
1410: \HI & $14.850\pm0.615$ & & \\
1411: \CIV & $12.827\pm0.332$ & & \\
1412: \hline
1413: \multicolumn{4}{c}{System H $\zabs = 2.27$} \\
1414: \hline
1415: \HI & $14.074\pm0.570$ & & \\
1416: \CIV & $13.200\pm0.035$ & $13.230\pm0.330$ & $13.914\pm0.141$ \\
1417: \SiIV & $12.527\pm0.053$ & & \\
1418: \SiIII& $12.784\pm0.085$ & $13.020\pm2.410$ & $12.807\pm0.119$ \\
1419: \hline\hline
1420: \end{longtable}
1421: \noindent M05 data taken from their Tables 1 and 2 (second
1422: spectrum in both cases). M07 data taken from their Table 3.\\
1423: The symbols denote:\\
1424:
1425: ($i$) -- without blended line 4.\MgII\ in system B;\\
1426: ($ii$) -- without blended line 4.\AlII\ in system B;\\
1427: ($iii$) -- without blended line 2.\SiIII\ in system B;\\
1428: (a) -- but ion detected, but $N$ measurements are unreliable due to blends;\\
1429: (b) -- \FeIII\ in system~B are detected in the MMT spectrum, but
1430: noise is too strong in order to fit this line in the Keck spectrum.\\
1431: $\sharp$ -- heavy-element line in \Lya\ forest region of the spectrum;\\
1432: $\ddag$ -- blend.
1433:
1434: \end{document}
1435: