1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{From Prestellar Cores to Protostellar Cores}
58: \shortauthors{Aikawa et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Molecular Evolution and Star Formation:\\
70: From Prestellar Cores to Protostellar Cores}
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{Yuri Aikawa}
80: \affil{Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kobe University,
81: Kobe 657-8501, Japan}
82: %\email{aikawa@kobe-u.ac.jp}
83:
84: \author{Valentine Wakelam}
85: \affil{Universit\'e Bordeaux I, LAB, UMR5804,
86: BP 89, 33270 Floirac, France }
87:
88: \author{Robin T. Garrod}
89: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Radioastronomie,
90: Auf dem H\"{u}gel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
91:
92: \and
93:
94: \author{Eric Herbst}
95: \affil{Departments of Physics, Chemistry, and Astronomy, The Ohio
96: State University, Columbus, OH 43210}
97:
98: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
99: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
100: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
101: %% affiliation.
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
107: %% editorial office after submission.
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110: We investigate molecular evolution in a star-forming core that is initially
111: a hydrostatic starless core and collapses to form a low-mass protostar.
112: The results of a one-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamics calculation are adopted
113: as a physical model of the core. We first derive radii at which CO and large
114: organic species sublimate. CO sublimation in the central region starts shortly
115: before the formation of the first hydrostatic core.
116: When the protostar is born, the CO sublimation radius extends to 100 AU, and the
117: region inside $\lesssim 10$ AU is hotter than 100 K, at which some large
118: organic species evaporate.
119: We calculate the temporal variation of physical parameters in infalling shells,
120: in which the molecular evolution is solved using an updated gas-grain chemical
121: model to derive the spatial distribution of molecules in a protostellar core.
122: The shells pass through the warm region of $10 -100$ K in several $\times$
123: $10^4$ yr,
124: and fall into the central star $\sim 100$ yr after they enter the region
125: where $T \gtrsim 100$ K. We find that large organic
126: species are formed mainly via grain-surface reactions at temperatures of $20
127: -40$ K and then desorbed into the gas-phase at their sublimation temperatures.
128: Carbon-chain species can be formed
129: by a combination of gas-phase reactions and grain-surface reactions
130: following the sublimation of CH$_4$.
131: Our model also predicts that CO$_2$ is more abundant in isolated cores,
132: while gas-phase large organic species are more abundant in cores embedded in
133: ambient clouds.
134: \end{abstract}
135:
136: \keywords{stars: formation --- ISM: molecules --- ISM: clouds --- ISM:
137: individual (IRAS 16293-2422, L1527)}
138:
139:
140: \section{Introduction}
141:
142: In a last decade, great progress has been made in our understanding of the
143: chemical evolution of low-mass star-forming cores \citep[][and references
144: therein]{fra07, bt06}. Among the observational advances are the detection of
145: chemical fractionation in several prestellar cores; emission lines of the rare
146: isotopes of CO are weaker at the core center than at outer
147: radii, while emission lines of nitrogen-bearing species (e.g., N$_2$H$^+$)
148: show relatively good correlation with the centrally-peaked dust continuum
149: \citep[e.g.][]{cas99, taf02}.
150:
151: Theoretical models show that the CO depletion is caused by adsorption onto
152: grains \citep{bl97,aik01}, and that the CO depletion helps to temporarily
153: maintain the N$_2$H$^+$ abundance at the core center. Theoretical
154: models also predict that a fraction of the adsorbed CO will be hydrogenated
155: to form H$_2$CO and CH$_3$OH on grain surfaces \citep{ar77,hhl92}, which is
156: confirmed by laboratory experiments \citep{wkl02,fuchs07}. The existence of
157: solid methanol in low-mass star formation regions has been confirmed
158: observationally; \citet{ppp03}
159: detected a high abundance of CH$_3$OH ice (15-25 \% relative to water ice)
160: towards three low-mass protostars among $\sim 40$ observed protostars. Radio observations find gaseous CH$_3$OH
161: to be abundant in the central regions of protostars \citep{sjv02}.
162: Since the formation
163: of CH$_3$OH is inefficient in the gas phase \citep{gpc06,gwh06}, it must be formed
164: by the hydrogenation of CO on grain surfaces in the prestellar core stage,
165: and then sublimated to the gas-phase as the core is heated by the protostar.
166: Although CH$_3$OH ice is not detected towards the majority of low-mass protostars
167: \citep{ppp03} and the background star Elias 16 \citep{chi96}, the upper limit for the
168: CH$_3$OH ice abundance is a few $\%$ relative to water ice, which is not low enough
169: to contradict the idea that gaseous CH$_3$OH around protostars is originally
170: formed by grain-surface reactions and then sublimated.
171:
172: Two major questions, however, remain to be answered, the first being at what stage
173: CO returns to the gas phase. The
174: core remains nearly isothermal as long as cooling by radiation is more
175: efficient than heating by contraction (compression). Eventually, though,
176: the heating overwhelms the cooling, so that the core center becomes warmer.
177: A newly-born protostar further heats the surrounding core.
178: Laboratory experiments show although some fraction of CO can be entrapped in water
179: ice \citep{cdf03}, a significant amount of CO sublimates at around 20 K
180: \citep{sa88}. In order to predict if an observable amount of CO returns
181: to the gas-phase during the prestellar core stage or after the birth of
182: a protostar, the temperature distribution in a core should be calculated by
183: detailed energy transfer. Such a prediction is important in order to
184: observe very young protostars. Once it is sublimated, CO again becomes a
185: useful observational probe. In addition, CO sublimation significantly affects
186: the gas-phase chemistry; for example, it destroys N$_2$H$^+$.
187: %N$_2$H$^+$ is observed to be abundant
188: %even in prestellar cores with heavy CO depletion. In some cores, however, it
189: %is depleted at the core center. It is not clear if N$_2$H$^+$ depletion is
190: %caused by the freeze-out of its mother molecule, N$_2$, or by the sublimation
191: %of CO, the amount of which is still too low to be detected.
192:
193: The second question concerns how large organic molecules are formed in
194: protostellar cores. In recent years, diverse organic molecules, including
195: methanol (CH$_3$OH), dimethyl ether (CH$_3$OCH$_3$), acetonitrile (CH$_3$CN),
196: and formic acid (HCOOH), have been detected towards low-mass protostars
197: \citep[][and references therein]{cec07}. They are still referred to as
198: "hot-core species", because it was once thought that they are only
199: characteristic of hot ($T\sim 200$ K) cores in high-mass star forming regions.
200: A large number of modeling studies
201: on hot-core chemistry show that sublimed formaldehyde (H$_2$CO) and CH$_3$OH are
202: transformed to other organic species by gas-phase reactions within a typical
203: timescale of $10^4-10^5$ yr \citep[e.g.][]{mh98}. In low-mass cores, however,
204: the time scale for the cloud material to cross the hot ($T\sim 100$ K) region
205: should be smaller than $10^4$ yr, considering the infall velocity and
206: temperature distribution in the core \citep{bot04a}. Furthermore, theoretical
207: calculations and laboratory experiments recently showed that gas-phase
208: reactions are much less efficient in producing some hot-core species, such as
209: methyl formate (HCOOCH$_{3}$) and dimethyl ether, than
210: assumed in previous models \citep{hor04, gep06,gh06}.
211:
212:
213: Several model calculations have been performed on the chemistry that occurs
214: in low-mass protostellar cores. \citet{dot04} solved a detailed gas-phase reaction
215: network assuming a core model for IRAS 16293-2422, and succeeded in reproducing
216: many of the observed lines within 50 \%. The physical structure of the core;
217: i.e., its density and temperature distribution, was fixed with time. They assumed
218: gas-phase initial molecular abundances that pertain to the high-mass hot-core
219: AFGL 2591.
220: \citet{lbe04}, on the other hand, constructed
221: a core model that evolves from a cold hydrostatic sphere to a protostellar
222: core by combining a sequence of Bonnor-Ebert spheres with the inside-out collapse
223: model by \citet{shu77}. They solved a chemical reaction network that includes
224: gas-phase reactions along with adsorption and desorption of gas-phase/ice-mantle
225: species. The resulting
226: molecular distributions and line profiles are significantly different from
227: those of the static core models \citep{leb05}. The chemical network of
228: \citet{lbe04}, however, does not include large organic species.
229:
230: In the present paper, we re-investigate molecular evolution in star-forming cores
231: with the partial goal of answering the two questions posed above.
232: We adopt a core model by \citet{mi00}; it accurately calculates the radial
233: distribution of temperature, which determines when and where the ice components
234: are sublimated. The model also enables us to follow molecular evolution smoothly
235: from a prestellar core to a protostellar core.
236: %Our model includes
237: %a non-gray radiation-hydrodynamics code \citep{mi00}, which enables us to follow
238: %molecular evolution smoothly from a prestellar core to a protostellar core. It also
239: %accurately calculates the radial distribution of temperature, which determines
240: %when and where the ice components are sublimated.
241: The chemistry includes both
242: gas-phase and grain-surface reactions according to \citet{gh06}; the surface
243: reactions in particular are important for producing organic molecules in a warming
244: environment. Here, we report a solution of the reaction network following the
245: temporal variation of density and temperature in infalling shells to derive a
246: spatial distribution of molecules, including complex organic ones,
247: in a protostellar core.
248:
249: \section{Model}
250: \subsection{Physical evolution of a star-forming core}
251:
252: Figure \ref{schematic} schematically shows the evolution of a star-forming
253: core. As a model for this process, we adopted and partially reran the model
254: calculated by \citet{mi00}. These authors solved the non-gray radiation
255: hydrodynamics to follow the core evolution from a dense starless (prestellar)
256: core to a protostellar core assuming spherical symmetry.
257: Conservation equations of mass, momentum, and energy were coupled with the
258: frequency-dependent radiation transfer, which was solved by the variable
259: Eddington factor method. \citet{mi00} calculated two models with different
260: initial conditions: a homogeneous core (one of uniform density)
261: and a hydrostatic core (a Bonnor-Ebert sphere). We chose the latter one in
262: the present work.
263:
264: Initially, the central density of the hydrostatic prestellar core is
265: $1.415 \times 10^{-19}$
266: g cm$^{-3}$, which corresponds to a number density of hydrogen nuclei
267: $n_{\rm H} \sim 6 \times 10^4$ cm$^{-3}$. The outer boundary is fixed at
268: $r=4\times 10^4$ AU, so that the total mass is $3.852 M_{\odot}$, which
269: exceeds the critical mass for gravitational instability. The temperature
270: in the core is initially $\sim 7$ K at the center and $\sim 8$ K at the outer
271: edge; the cooling by dust thermal emission is balanced with the heating by
272: cosmic rays, cosmic background radiation, and ambient stellar radiation.
273:
274: In the original model by \citet{mi00}, the core starts contraction immediately.
275: In the present work, however, we assume that the core keeps its hydrostatic
276: structure for $1\times 10^6$ yr, implicitly assuming that turbulence supports
277: it. This period sets the initial molecular abundances for the collapse stage.
278: After $1\times 10^6$ yr, the core starts to contract. The contraction is almost
279: isothermal as long as the cooling
280: rate overwhelms the compressional heating, but eventually the latter dominates
281: and raises the temperature in the central region. Increasing gas pressure
282: decelerates the contraction and eventually makes the first hydrostatic core, known as
283: ``the first core'', at the center.
284: When the core center becomes as dense as $10^{-7}$ g cm$^{-3}$ and as hot as
285: $2000$ K, the hydrostatic core becomes unstable due to H$_2$ dissociation
286: and starts to collapse again (the second collapse). The central density increases rapidly,
287: and within a short period of time the dissociation degree approaches unity at the
288: center. Then the second collapse ceases and the second hydrostatic core; i.e.
289: the protostar, is formed. The protostar is surrounded by the infalling envelope, which we call the
290: protostellar core.
291: After the onset of contraction, the initial prestellar core evolves to the
292: protostellar core in $2.5\times 10^5$ yr. After the birth of the protostar,
293: the model further follows the evolution for $9.3 \times 10^4$ yr, during which
294: the protostar grows by mass accretion from the envelope.
295: At each evolutionary stage, the model gives the total luminosity of the core and the
296: radial distribution of density, temperature, and infall velocity at
297: $r\gtrsim 10^{-4}$ AU. More detailed explanations of core evolution
298: can be found in \citet{mi98} and \citet{mi00}.
299:
300: In the present paper, we report a re-analysis of their results in order to find the sublimation radii
301: of CO and large organic species at each evolutionary stage. We obtained electronic data
302: and the code of \citet{mi00} from the author (H. Masunaga), and re-ran the calculation
303: of the prestellar core phase to increase the number of time steps at which the core
304: structure is recorded. As for the protostellar phase, we used the existing data.
305: We are interested in the region outside 1 AU, which is of importance
306: for radio observations but is not discussed in detail by \citet{mi00}.
307: Based on this physical core model, we followed the temporal variation of density,
308: temperature, and visual extinction in infalling shells, in which the chemical
309: reaction network was solved \citep{aik01, aik05}.
310:
311:
312: \subsection{Chemical reaction network}
313:
314:
315: The chemical evolution was computed with the gas-grain model
316: developed in the OSU astrochemical group \citep{gh06}. The current version of
317: the model calculates the
318: abundance of 655 species (458 gas-phase and 197 grain-surface atoms and molecules) through
319: a total of 6309 reactions. The model follows the gas-phase as well as the
320: grain-surface chemistry using the rate equation method \citep[e.g.][]{hhl92,
321: rh00}. The gas-phase network is based on the osu.2005 database
322: available online (http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/$\sim$eric/research.html)
323: but without the element fluorine, which has been recently added to osu.2005.
324: The model includes chemical reactions that can be important at
325: $T\lesssim 300$ K. At the final stage of our core model, the temperature
326: is somewhat higher than this limit at $r\lesssim$ 10 AU. In the following,
327: we mainly discuss the molecular evolution that occurs at $T\lesssim 300$ K.
328:
329: The assumed elemental abundances, known as ``low-metal'' values because of
330: their strong depletions for elements heavier than oxygen, are listed in
331: Table~\ref{abelem}. Initially the species are assumed to be in the form of
332: atoms or atomic ions except for hydrogen, which is entirely in its molecular form.
333: The cosmic-ray ionization rate $\zeta$ is set to $1.3 \times 10^{-17}$
334: s$^{-1}$.
335:
336: The neutral species in the gas-phase stick to the grains upon collision with
337: a probability of 0.5. At high temperatures, this probability is much too high.
338: However, since evaporation is so rapid at such high temperatures, it is
339: unimportant what assumption is made.
340: The grain-surface species can evaporate through thermal evaporation
341: and two non-thermal desorption processes. The binding energy of each molecular
342: species on the grain surface is taken from \cite{gh06}.
343: The first non-thermal mechanism is
344: the action of a cosmic ray encountering a grain, which rapidly increases the
345: grain temperature and allows the evaporation of the species \citep{hh93}.
346: The second process, as recently developed quantitatively by
347: \citet{gpc06, gwh06}, is based on the assumption that the
348: energy released by exothermic association reactions on grain surfaces can allow
349: the partial evaporation of the products \citep{wil68}.
350: In this process, the fraction of product evaporation is given by
351: \begin{equation}
352: f = \frac{a(1-E_D/E_{reac})^{s-1}}{1+a(1-E_D/E_{reac})^{s-1}},
353: \end{equation}
354: where $E_{\rm D}$ is
355: the binding energy of the product, $E_{\rm reac}$ is the energy of formation in the
356: reaction, and $s$ is the number of vibrational modes in the molecule/surface-bond system.
357: The parameter {\it a} is the ratio between the surface-molecule bond frequency and the
358: frequency at which the energy is lost to the surface. We assumed an $a$ value of 0.01
359: for all species based on \citet{gwh06}. With this value of $a$, less than 1\%
360: of water is evaporated during its formation on grains. Using molecular
361: dynamics calculations, \citet{ka06} showed that it is unlikely that this
362: fraction is larger than 1\%.
363: If it were, however, only the gas-phase
364: abundances of some large molecules such as CH$_3$OH would be increased in the
365: outer parts of the protostellar envelope.
366:
367: Grain-surface species are dissociated by penetrating UV radiation and
368: cosmic-ray induced UV radiation.
369: We note that our model indirectly includes photodesorption via the second
370: non-thermal desorption process discussed above. For example, the photodissociation of
371: water ice produces OH radicals, a fraction of which recombine with hydrogen atoms to
372: re-generate water. Since we assume the partial desorption of the surface-reaction products, UV irradiation of water ice results in desorption of water.
373:
374: Species can diffuse on the grain surfaces by
375: thermal hopping and react with each other when they meet. No quantum tunneling
376: was assumed even for hydrogen atoms based on recent experimental results
377: \citep[see][for discussion on this point]{gwh06}. Other details concerning the
378: model can be found in \citet{gh06} and \citet{gwh06}.
379:
380: During the first $1\times 10^6$~yrs of the integration, we computed the chemical
381: abundances under static dense cloud conditions in order to obtain the initial
382: abundances for the collapse. The chemical evolution in infalling shells
383: was then computed as the shells experience
384: temporal variations of density, temperature and visual extinction
385: $A_{\rm v}$. Although the original model of \citet{mi00} gives the temperatures
386: of gas and dust of various compositions separately, we assumed that
387: the dust temperature is equal to the gas temperature for simplicity.
388:
389: We calculated the column density of hydrogen nuclei ($N_{\rm H}$)
390: from the core outer edge to each shell and converted it to $A_{\rm v}$ by
391: the formula $A_{\rm v}=N_{\rm H}/(1.59 \times 10^{21} {\rm cm}^{-2}$) mag.
392: Initially the visual extinction from the outer edge ($r=4\times 10^4$ AU)
393: to the core center is about 5.5 mag, and the shells we follow are located
394: at $\sim 1\times 10^4$ AU, where $A_{\rm v} \sim 1$ mag. Assuming that our
395: model core is embedded in ambient clouds, we added 3 mag to the visual
396: extinction obtained above, and ignored photodissociation of CO and H$_2$.
397: In \S 4, we also report molecular evolution in an isolated core,
398: in which the extra 3 mag is not added to $A_{\rm v}$
399:
400: \section{Results}
401: \subsection{Physical evolution of the core and sublimation radius}
402:
403: Figure \ref{MImodel} shows the radial distributions of density, temperature and
404: infall velocity in the model core at assorted evolutionary stages.
405: We define the moment of the protostar formation as $t_{\rm core}=0$.
406: The left panels refer to the prestellar phase, which occurs before the birth of
407: the protostar, and the right panels to the protostellar phase. The distributions
408: are shown at different times in each panel.
409:
410:
411: We concentrate on the region outside 1 AU, which is of importance
412: for radio observations but is not discussed in detail by \citet{mi00}.
413: At $t_{\rm core} < -1\times 10^3$ yr, more than
414: $1\times10^3$ yr before the formation of a protostar, the core is almost
415: isothermal and the core contraction is similar to the Larson-Penston (L-P)
416: collapse with a constant temperature \citep{lar69}.
417: At $t_{\rm core}\sim -1\times 10^3$ yr, the core center
418: starts to heat-up, and the core deviates from the L-P core. The increasing
419: pressure decelerates the contraction, and the first hydrostatic core, of radius $\sim 1$ AU,
420: is formed at $t_{\rm core}\sim -5.6\times 10^2$ yr (see the sharp velocity
421: gradient at $\sim 1$ AU in Figure \ref{MImodel}).
422: When the central density and the central temperature reach
423: $n_{\rm H}\sim$ several $10^{17}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim 2000$ K, dissociation of
424: H$_2$ leads to the second collapse, which ceases in a short time scale
425: ($\sim 1$ yr). In the protostellar stage, the density in the core envelope
426: decreases with time because of the accretion to the central star, while the
427: temperature and infall velocity increase.
428:
429:
430: In Figure \ref{central_T}, the temperature at the core center through 200 K is plotted as
431: a function of the central density $n_{\rm H}^{\rm center}$. The dashed line
432: indicates a temperature of 20 K, which is roughly the sublimation temperature
433: of CO, or the temperature at which the rate coefficients of accretion and
434: thermal desorption for pure CO ice becomes equal. In the prestellar
435: phase, the core temperature is determined by the balance between cooling by
436: thermal radiation and heating by cosmic rays, cosmic background radiation,
437: ambient stellar radiation, and compressional effects. The central temperature
438: for a time decreases to $\sim 5$ K, because the increasing column density of
439: the cloud prevents the penetration of optical photons. The core temperature
440: starts to rise at $n_{\rm H}^{\rm center}\gtrsim 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$, when
441: compressional heating dominates radiative cooling. The temperature
442: increase is, however, rather moderate until the central density reaches
443: $\sim 10^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$. Shortly thereafter, CO sublimation starts when
444: the central density reaches a few $\times$ $10^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$.
445: This occurs only several $\times$ $10^2$ yr before the
446: first-core formation and $\sim 10^3$ yr before the second-core formation.
447:
448: Figure \ref{L_R20} shows the temporal variation of two radii, inside of which
449: the temperature is higher than 20 K ($r_{\rm 20K}$) and 100 K ($r_{\rm 100K}$).
450: The former is roughly the sublimation temperatures of CO. Desorption energies and thus sublimation temperatures vary among species,
451: but some large organic species such as CH$_3$OH and HCOOH, which are of
452: current interest, have sublimation temperatures of $\sim 100$ K.
453: The sublimation radii are plotted as
454: a function of total luminosity of the core instead of the core age, since the
455: former is an observable value. The labels with arrows depict the core age
456: $t_{\rm core}$. The plot starts about 770 yr before the second-core
457: formation, when the first core is about to be formed. As the first core grows
458: in density, the core luminosity and envelope temperatures increase.
459: At the moment of the
460: second-core formation ($t_{\rm core}=0$), $r_{\rm 20K}$ and $r_{\rm 100K}$ are
461: $\sim 100$ AU and $\sim 10$ AU, respectively. At the final stage of the model,
462: $t_{\rm core}=9.3\times 10^4$ yr, the total luminosity reaches $\sim 23
463: L_{\odot}$, and the sublimation radii are $r_{\rm 20K}\sim 3.9\times 10^3$ AU
464: and $r_{\rm 100K}\sim1.2\times 10^2$ AU.
465:
466: \subsection{Physical conditions in infalling material}
467:
468: Up to now, we have described the core model with physical parameters that are
469: given as functions of radius at each evolutionary stage, the so-called Eulerian
470: approach. In order to calculate molecular evolution, however, it is more
471: convenient to follow the Lagrangian approach, in which we consider the temporal
472: variation of physical parameters in assorted collapsing shells, because this
473: temporal variation represents the conditions in which the chemical reaction
474: network is solved \citep{aik01, aik05}.
475:
476: Figure \ref{fluid_parcel} shows the temporal variation of density and
477: temperature in shells that reach $r=2.5, 15, 125$ and 500 AU at the final
478: stage of our model ($t_{\rm core}=9.3\times 10^4$ yr $\equiv t_{\rm final}$).
479: The infalling shells begin at $r\sim 1\times 10^4$ AU in the prestellar core, where
480: they stay for $1\times 10^6$ yr, a temporal period omitted in Figure
481: \ref{fluid_parcel}. After the core starts contraction, each shell migrates
482: inwards. In the prestellar stage, the variation of density and temperature is
483: not very significant; these shells are at $r\gtrsim 6\times 10^3$ AU,
484: where the infall velocity is small and the radial gradient of density and
485: temperature is moderate (Figure \ref{MImodel}). In the protostellar stage,
486: which occupies a large fraction of Figure \ref{fluid_parcel},
487: they migrate to inner radii where the infall velocity, temperature, and
488: density steeply increase inwards. Hence, the temporal variation of density
489: and temperature accelerate. In order to highlight the rapid variation near
490: and at the final stage, the horizontal axis in Figure \ref{fluid_parcel}
491: is set to be the logarithm of $t_{\rm final}-t_{\rm core}$.
492:
493: A key parameter for the chemistry of hot-core species is the time scale of
494: the hot-core phase and/or, its predecessor, the warm-up phase.
495: In a classical hot-core chemical
496: model, in which the gas-phase reactions of sublimates are followed with a fixed
497: temperature of $\sim 200$ K, it takes $10^4-10^5$ yr to form new large organic
498: species. In other words, the hot-core phase of $10^4-10^5$ yr is needed to
499: account for the existence of large organic species \citep[e.g.][]{mh98}.
500: In more recent hot-core models, the temperature first increases with time
501: rather than remaining fixed; the warm-up phase is the period in which the
502: temperature rises from
503: 10 K to $\sim 100$ K. Various reactions occur during the warm-up
504: phase, because many volatile species return to the gas phase, and because
505: the sublimation temperature varies with species \citep[e.g.][]{vw99}.
506: Grain-surface reactions between molecular radicals containing heavy elements
507: are also enhanced
508: in this temperature range \citep{gh06}. Considering the formation time scale
509: of stars, \citet{vit04} argued that the warm-up phase is longer in stars
510: with lower masses, and estimated the warm-up phase to be $10^6$ yr for
511: solar-type stars. Our model, in contrast, gives a warm-up phase of only
512: several $10^4$ yr; since the gas and dust are falling inwards towards the central star,
513: the timescale of the warm-up phase is determined not by the time scale of the star
514: formation, but by the size of the warm region divided by the infall velocity.
515: The timescale of the hot-core phase, in which the temperature of the infalling
516: shells is $\sim 100-200$~K, is even shorter; the shell
517: reaching $r=2.5$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$ spends only 100~yr in the region of
518: $T\gtrsim 100$~K before it falls onto the central star. There would thus not be sufficient
519: time for the gas-phase reactions of sublimated species to form complex species.
520: We are dealing here
521: with the formation of a low-mass protostar, so the hot-core stage is more
522: aptly referred to as a ``hot corino'', and short time scales have previously
523: been discussed for such regions \citep{wakelam04,bot04a}. It should also be noted
524: that in our contracting core model, the central region with high temperatures
525: ($T >$ several tens of K) is continuously fed by infalling materials, which are then lost to
526: the central star.
527:
528: \subsection{Molecular evolution in infalling shells}
529:
530: Figure \ref{evol_abun} shows the temporal variation of molecular abundances in
531: the infalling shell that reaches $r=2.5$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$. The
532: horizontal axis is again the logarithm of
533: $t_{\rm final}-t_{\rm core}$. Black and gray lines represent species in the
534: ice mantle and in the gas phase, respectively.
535: The chemical evolution at $t_{\rm final} -t_{\rm core}\le 4$ yr should be taken with
536: caution because the temperature in the shell exceeds 300 K, while our chemical
537: network is originally constructed for temperatures of $\lesssim 300$ K.
538: The species shown in Figure \ref{evol_abun}
539: are mostly (except CO and H) formed by grain-surface reactions.
540: They are desorbed into the gas phase when the shell temperature reaches the
541: sublimation temperature of each species; at this time the fractional abundance
542: of the surface species is simply transferred to a similar fractional abundance
543: in the gas.
544:
545: Water, the most abundant molecule with a heavy atom, is formed by the
546: hydrogenation of oxygen atoms on a grain surface, and is already abundant
547: when the contraction starts. Methanol, on the other hand, takes longer to
548: reach a high abundance: it is formed by the hydrogenation of solid CO, which
549: occurs efficiently until the shell temperature reaches $\gtrsim 15$ K and
550: the H atom abundance in the ice mantle drops due to evaporation.
551: The fractional abundance of methanol exceeds 10$^{-6}$ at times within
552: 10$^{5}$ yr of the final time. Then the abundance reaches a constant value;
553: CH$_3$OH is constantly destroyed by the cosmic-ray induced photodissociation
554: and re-formed by a low rate of hydrogenation.
555: Solid carbon dioxide is formed by O + HCO
556: $\rightarrow$ CO$_2$ + H and CO + OH $\rightarrow$ CO$_2$ + H. It reaches
557: a fractional abundance of 10$^{-5}$ about 10$^{4}$ yr before the final time.
558:
559: The large organic species are also formed mainly by grain-surface reactions.
560: Dimethyl ether (CH$_{3}$OCH$_{3}$)and methyl formate (HCOOCH$_3$) are
561: produced by the surface reactions of the radical H$_2$COH with CH$_3$
562: and HCO, respectively, where H$_2$COH is formed by hydrogenation of H$_2$CO.
563: Formaldehyde, at this stage, is constantly formed by hydrogenation and destroyed
564: by a reaction with OH ice and cosmic-ray induced photodissociation.
565: Both CH$_{3}$OCH$_{3}$ and HCOOCH$_3$ reach terminal fractional abundances of
566: $\approx 10^{-9}$.
567: Formic acid (HCOOH), on the other hand, is formed by the gas-phase reaction
568: of OH with sublimated H$_2$CO, after which it is adsorbed onto grains,
569: and remains in the ice mantle until the temperature gets high enough for
570: its sublimation. Its asymptotic fractional abundance is slightly greater than
571: 10$^{-8}$. Comparing Figure \ref{evol_abun} with Figure \ref{fluid_parcel},
572: we can see that these large organic species are mostly
573: produced at temperatures of $20-40$ K, rather than at $T\gtrsim 100$ K
574: where CH$_3$OH is sublimated into the gas phase \citep[see also][]{gh06}.
575: In this temperature range, heavy-element species such as CO, HCO and CH$_3$ can
576: diffuse on the grain surface and form complex molecules efficiently.
577:
578: \subsection{Distribution of molecules in a protostellar core}
579: In order to derive the spatial distribution of molecules in the protostellar
580: core, we have calculated molecular evolution in 13 shells, which reach
581: $r=2.5-8000$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$. Figure \ref{dist} shows the radial
582: distribution of (a) physical parameters and (b-d) molecular abundances
583: at $t_{\rm final}$.
584: Abundances inside 10 AU are not shown for the following two reasons:
585: firstly they are very similar to the abundances at 10 AU, except that the
586: H$_2$CO abundance drops inwards, and secondly, the temperature in the inner
587: radius is somewhat higher than the temperature range originally
588: considered in our chemical model (\S 2.2).
589: Figure \ref{dist} (b-d) show that large organic molecules are abundant
590: in the gas phase in
591: the central region of the protostellar core. Since they are formed mostly
592: on grain-surfaces, rather than from gas-phase reactions among sublimates,
593: their gas-phase abundances sharply increase at radii corresponding to their
594: own sublimation temperatures and remain high at smaller radii. For example,
595: CH$_3$CHO extends to $\sim 500$ AU, while CH$_3$OH extends to $\sim 100$ AU.
596: One exception, again, is HCOOH, which extends to $\sim 500$ AU because of
597: its formation in the gas phase.
598:
599: Large organic species are abundant in ice mantles at radii of $100-1000$ AU.
600: For radii $r\gtrsim 10^3$ AU, the abundances of these species tend to
601: decrease sharply with increasing radius except for methanol. Water, another
602: hydrogen-rich, or saturated, species, remains nearly constant in abundance.
603: In the outer region ($r > 4000$~AU), a large fraction of carbon on the grain
604: surface is in the form of CH$_4$ \citep[cf.][]{gwh06}.
605:
606:
607: \section{Discussion}
608:
609: \subsection{Physical structure of the core and sublimation radius}
610: We have re-analyzed and adopted the results of \citet{mi00} to derive the sublimation
611: temperatures of CO and large organic species,
612: and to investigate molecular evolution in a star-forming core. The chosen
613: conditions in the envelope can be different from those of other models because
614: %the total luminosity of the core and
615: the temperature
616: distribution in the envelope depends not only on the evolutionary state
617: and mass of the central object (either the first or second core),
618: but also on the mass distribution in the envelope, which should depend
619: on the initial conditions. Recently, \citet{omu07} investigated
620: the temperature distribution in the first-core envelope assuming
621: mass distributions from the L-P model \citep{lar69} and Shu model
622: \citep{shu77} similarity solutions. The former has a more massive envelope
623: than the latter.
624: When the first core has a mass of $0.05 M_{\odot}$, for example, the
625: hydrogen number density at $r=10$ AU is several $10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ and
626: $\sim 10^9$ cm$^{-3}$
627: with the L-P model and the Shu model, respectively.
628: %If the mass distribution
629: The L-P model gives a core luminosity of $10^{-1} L_{\odot}$, and
630: sublimation radii of $r_{\rm 20K} \sim 100$ AU and $r_{\rm 100 K}\sim 10$ AU,
631: while the Shu model yields a core luminosity of $\sim 10^{-3} L_{\odot}$
632: and an $r_{\rm 20 K}$ of $\sim 20$ AU. The latter model does not exceed 100 K
633: at any radius.
634: Our core model is warmer than the Shu model but colder than the L-P model.
635:
636: In the second core stage, on the other hand, the envelope structure can
637: deviate from spherical symmetry and be accompanied by a circumstellar disk.
638: Considering a typical angular velocity for molecular cloud cores
639: \citep[$\sim 10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$; e.g.,][]{ga85},
640: the centrifugal radius (i.e. the initial disk
641: radius) is $\sim 100$ AU. Our results at $r\gtrsim$ several hundred AU are thus
642: relatively robust, while the core structure would be significantly different from
643: our model at smaller radii. For example, the large organic species could be sublimated
644: by the accretion shock onto the forming disk rather than in the envelope, since
645: the centrifugal radius $\sim 100$ AU coincides with
646: the sublimation radius of large organic species in our model.
647: %If a large fraction
648: %of mass accretes onto the disk rather than into the protostar, the core
649: %uminosity and envelope temperature would be lower than estimated in our model,
650: %since these values depend on the mass accretion rate to the central object
651: %\citep{mi00}. Such axisymmetric models are beyond the scope of the present
652: %work, but should be investigated in the future.
653:
654: \subsection{Simple molecules}
655: \cite{lbe04} investigated the evolution of relatively simple molecules, such as HCN
656: and N$_2$H$^+$, in a star-forming core by combining a sequence of Bonnor-Ebert
657: spheres for the prestellar stage with the inside-out collapse model of \cite{shu77}
658: for the core after the first-core formation.
659: These simple molecules are often observed in star-forming cores
660: and are of importance as observational probes, while we mainly discussed large
661: organic species in \S 3. Figure \ref{cfLee} shows the radial distribution of simple
662: molecules in our model at $t_{\rm final}$.
663:
664: Comparison with \cite{lbe04} is not easy because there are many differences in
665: the physical core models and chemical reaction networks. First,
666: the inside-out core model, which is adopted in \cite{lbe04}, yields lower temperatures
667: than our core model, as discussed above. Secondly, we adopt different binding energies
668: for molecules
669: to the grain surface. While the difference is on the order of only a few hundred K for many species, the
670: binding energy of NH$_3$ is significantly higher in our model (5534 K) than in
671: \cite{lbe04} (1082 K); the latter value seems to originate from \cite{hh93}, in which
672: the hydrogen bonding of NH$_3$ is not taken into account.
673: Thirdly, grain-surface reactions, which are the main formation processes of saturated
674: species such as NH$_3$ and H$_2$CO in our model, are not included in \cite{lbe04}. Hence,
675: here we compare our results with \cite{lbe04} qualitatively rather than quantitatively.
676:
677: A main conclusion
678: of \cite{lbe04} is that the molecular abundances vary significantly near and inside the
679: CO sublimation radius. For instance, N$_2$H$^+$ is destroyed by CO, and thus declines
680: steeply inwards across the CO sublimation radius, an effect which happens in our model as well.
681: \cite{lbe04} also found that some molecules, such as H$_2$CO, have their peak abundance
682: at the sublimation radius; the gas-phase abundance first increases inward via
683: sublimation, but then decreases due to gas-phase reactions at smaller radii. Similar
684: phenomena can be seen in our model, but the spatial variation of the gas-phase
685: abundances is more moderate than in \cite{lbe04}, for which we can think of a few
686: reasons. First, \cite{lbe04} calculated the molecular evolution in 512 shells,
687: while we calculated the chemistry in only 13 shells.
688: A larger number of shells are
689: needed to resolve abundance fluctuations on a smaller radial scale. Secondly, higher
690: infall speeds, in general, make the abundance distributions more uniform. Since the infall
691: speed is higher at inner radii in the infalling envelope, it would be natural that the
692: molecular abundances remain relatively uniform at $r\lesssim 100$ AU, which is not
693: calculated in \cite{lbe04}. Thirdly, our chemical network includes a much larger number
694: of species and reactions. \cite{lbe04} used a reduced reaction network with $\sim 80$
695: species and $\sim 800$ reactions to save computational time, while our
696: model includes 655 species and 6309 reactions. In a small reaction network, a sudden
697: increase of a species (e.g., as caused by sublimation) can easily change the abundances of other
698: species though chemical reactions. In a large reaction network, on the other hand,
699: a larger number of reactions contribute to the formation and destruction of
700: each species, and thus the sudden abundance change of one species
701: does not necessararily propagate to
702: other species. Another noticeable difference in our results from those of \cite{lbe04} is that HCO$^+$
703: decreases more steeply inwards at $r\lesssim 1000$ AU in our model;
704: H$_3$CO$^+$ and C$_3$H$_5^+$ are the dominant positive ions rather than HCO$^+$
705: at the inner radii.
706:
707: The oxygen-bearing species atomic oxygen (O), molecular oxygen (O$_2$), and gaseous H$_2$O are also of special interest
708: because O is very reactive and because
709: the two molecules have been intensively
710: observed by {\it the Submillimeter Wave Astronomy Satellite (SWAS)} and {\it Odin}
711: Satellite in recent years. Our model predicts that O reaches
712: an abundance of $4\times 10^{-5}$ relative to hydrogen nuclei at $r=8000$ AU,
713: while it steeply decreases inwards from $\sim 1000$ AU to 100 AU. Even at $r=8000$ AU, however,
714: H$_2$O ice is the most abundant O-bearing species (Figure \ref{dist}).
715: \cite{ber00} summarized the {\it SWAS} observations of cold molecular clouds by stating that
716: the fractional abundance of O$_2$ lies under $10^{-6}$ and that of gaseous water lies in the range
717: $10^{-9}$ to a few $\times$ $10^{-8}$. Molecular oxygen has recently been
718: detected towards $\rho$ Oph by Odin with an abundance of $5\times 10^{-8}$
719: relative to hydrogen \citep{lar07}. These abundances are consistent with our
720: predictions for the
721: outermost radius $r=8000$ AU, where the density $n_{\rm H}\sim 10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ and
722: temperature $T<20$ K are similar to those in molecular clouds.
723:
724:
725: \subsection{Dependence on visual extinction at the core edge}
726:
727: So far we have assumed that the model core is embedded in ambient clouds of
728: $A_{\rm v}= 3$ mag. In reality, some cores (e.g. Bok globules) are
729: isolated, while others are embedded in clouds. Isolated cores are directly irradiated
730: by interstellar UV radiation, which causes photo-reactions (photodissociation and ionization) in the gas-phase and ice
731: mantles \citep[e.g.][]{lee96,rh01}.
732: In order to evaluate the effect of ambient UV radiation,
733: we recalculated molecular abundances
734: in a core that is directly irradiated by interstellar UV radiation; i.e. $A_{\rm v}=0$
735: mag at the outer edge of the core ($r=4\times 10^4$ AU).
736: The photodissociation rates of H$_2$ and CO were calculated
737: by following \citet{lee96}, which gives the shielding factors as a function
738: of $A_{\rm v}$ and column densities of CO and H$_2$ in the outer radii.
739: The outermost shell for which we calculate molecular evolution is initially
740: located at $r\sim 1.4\times 10^4$ AU and declines to $r=8000$ AU at
741: $t_{\rm final}$. Column densities of CO and H$_2$ outside of this shell were
742: estimated by assuming $n$(CO)/$n_{\rm H}=5\times 10^{-5}$ and
743: $n$(H$_2$)/$n_{\rm H}=0.5$.
744:
745: Figure \ref{av0} shows the resultant distribution of molecular abundances
746: in a protostellar core at $t_{\rm final}$. Compared with the embedded core
747: model (Figure \ref{dist}), the fractional abundances of CH$_3$OH and H$_2$CO
748: are lower by more than one order of magnitude, while the CO$_2$ abundance is
749: higher. When the shells are still at $r\gtrsim$ several thousand AU and have
750: relatively low $A_{\rm v}$ ($\lesssim 4$ mag), the photodissociation of
751: H$_2$O ice efficiently produces OH, which reacts with CO
752: to produce CO$_2$ ice. Methanol in the ice mantle is dissociated to H$_2$CO,
753: which is further dissociated to CO. Species such as CH$_3$CHO,
754: HCOOCH$_3$ and CH$_3$OCH$_3$ are also less abundant in the isolated model,
755: because their formation path includes H$_2$CO in the ice mantle. Formic acid
756: in the gas phase extends only up to $\sim 100$ AU, while it extends to several
757: hundred AU in the embedded model. In the isolated model, it is formed mainly
758: by OH + HCO on the grain surface.
759: Our results may indicate that molecular abundances in hot cores and corinos
760: depend on whether the core is isolated or embedded in clouds.
761:
762: The importance of photo-reactions on ice mantle abundances has also been
763: investigated in a number of laboratory experiments. For example, \citet{wk02} and \citet{wm07} found that carbon dioxide is efficiently
764: produced by UV irradiation
765: on a binary ice mixture of H$_2$O and CO, a result that is consistent with our model.
766: However, \cite{wm07} found that the UV irradiation also produces CH$_3$OH with a
767: relative abundance of $n$(CH$_3$OH)/$n$(CO) $\sim 10$ \% in the ice mixture.
768: Comparison of our model with
769: their experiment is not straightforward because of differences in temperature and
770: included reactions, but we
771: may have underestimated the CH$_3$OH ice abundance in the irradiated core model.
772: The discrepancy can arise from the H atom desorption rate in our model. We calculated that
773: UV radiation penetrates into the ice mantle and dissociates H$_2$O to produce
774: H atoms embedded in ice. Although we do not discriminate between H atoms
775: on the ice surface and those embedded in the ice mantle, the embedded H atoms
776: in reality would have a lower desorption rate and a better chance of reacting with
777: neighboring CO, a reaction that initiates the formation of methanol in the mantles. Discrimination between surface and embedded hydrogen atoms should be included in future work.
778:
779: \subsection{Comparison with observation}
780:
781: Our model results can be compared with observational results of low-mass
782: protostars. Comparison of the physical structure of the core has already been
783: discussed in detail by \citet{mi00}. Here we concentrate on molecular
784: abundances. First, we compare molecules in ice mantles. The observation of ices
785: towards the low-mass protostar Elias 29 is summarized in \citet{es00};
786: the abundances of CO, CO$_2$, CH$_3$OH and CH$_4$ relative to water ice are 5.6 \%,
787: 22 \%, $< 4$ \%, and $< 1.6$ \%, respectively. On the other hand, \citet{ppp03} detected
788: a high abundance (15-25 \% relative to water ice) of CH$_3$OH ice towards 3 low-mass
789: protostars among 40 observed protostars. Although the observation of ice
790: features is difficult, it is probable that the composition
791: of ice mantles depends on their environment and the history of the observed
792: regions.
793: From a theoretical point of view, the abundances of molecules on grains and
794: their fractional abundances compared with H$_2$O ice depend on time and
795: radius from the protostar. In addition, an embedded core and an isolated core
796: lead to significantly different calculated abundances for solid CH$_3$OH,
797: H$_2$CO and CO$_2$.
798:
799: Table~\ref{solid_theo} lists ratios of ice species with respect to water ice at $t_{\rm final}$ for local abundances at radii of 1000 AU and 8000 AU and for column densities towards the core center.
800: Since most of the core material exists at $r\le 8000$ AU along the line of sight,
801: and since the ices are present at $r>10$ AU, the column density is calculated by
802: integrating the number density of ice species from 10 AU to 8000 AU.
803: It is interesting to note that regardless of the distance from the protostar,
804: the isolated core model gives smaller surface abundances of CH$_3$OH and
805: H$_2$CO and a higher surface abundance of CO$_2$ than the embedded model.
806: In both models, the surface abundance of CO at
807: 1000 AU is much smaller than observed, but it increases towards larger radii
808: up to 10 and 20\% in the embedded and isolated models respectively. Comparison with the observations is best done using our column density ratios, which are in reasonable agreement with Elias 29 for both models.
809: Considering the variation among cores, our models show reasonable agreement
810: with observation. The disagreement with CO doubtless results from our
811: assumption concerning desorption rates. In the present work, we use a desorption
812: energy for each species mainly referring to laboratory experiments on pure
813: ice sublimation or theoretical estimates that sum up the van der Waals forces
814: between adsorbed atoms and grain surface. But in reality, interstellar ice is a
815: mixture, and hence volatile species can be entrapped by less volatile
816: species; recent temperature-programmed desorption results show that in a
817: mixture rich in water ice, much CO desorbs at considerably higher temperatures
818: \citep{cdf03}.
819: %assumption of a sublimation temperature, since recent temperature-programmed desorption results show that in a mixture rich in water ice, much CO desorbs at considerably higher temperatures \citep{cdf03}.
820:
821: Table \ref{obs} lists the gas-phase abundances of large molecules towards the
822: low-mass protostar IRAS 16293-2422 and in the central region ($r=30.6$ AU)
823: of our core model. The physical and chemical structures of IRAS 16293-2422
824: have been intensively studied \citep{cec00a,cec00b, sch02,cau03,
825: cha05}. The physical parameters derived by the model at $t_{\rm final}$
826: ($\sim 23 L_{\odot}$ and $r_{\rm 100K}\sim1.2\times 10^2$ AU) are very close to
827: the ones of IRAS16293-2422; the observed luminosity of the source is 27
828: $L_{\odot}$ \citep{wal86} and the physical structure has been constrained by
829: multi-line analysis of H$_2$O and H$_2$CO observations through a detailed
830: radiative transfer code \citep{cec00b}.
831: It should be noted that the emission lines of large organic molecules observed
832: in this source are not spatially resolved, except for a few lines investigated
833: by interferometric observations \citep{bot04b, kua04, rem06}.
834: The density and temperature of the gas should vary both within the beam and
835: along the line of sight. Hence the derived molecular abundances vary significantly
836: depending on the assumptions concerning the physical structure of the core and the
837: emitting region, which explains the difference in abundances
838: determined by different investigators (see Table~ \ref{obs}).
839:
840: Although it is not obvious which core model, embedded or isolated, should
841: be compared with IRAS16293-2422, we would prefer
842: the embedded core model. While IRAS16293-2422 is in the Ophiuchus molecular cloud,
843: which harbors several UV sources in the form of OB stars, the $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O
844: observations indicate that the core is embedded in dense gas \citep{lor89,tac00}.
845: The high molecular D/H ratios observed towards IRAS 16293-2422 and its neighboring
846: starless core IRAS16293E \citep{cec07,vas04} indicate that these cores have been
847: very cold and thus well-shielded from the ambient stellar radiation.
848: Considering the uncertainties in observationally-estimated molecular abundances, HCOOCH$_3$, HCOOH, and CH$_3$CN in our embedded
849: core model show reasonable agreement with the observations. The embedded model,
850: however, underestimates CH$_3$OCH$_3$ and overestimates H$_2$CO and
851: CH$_3$OH. The isolated core model, on the other hand, reproduces observed
852: abundances of CH$_3$OH, HCOOH and CH$_3$CN, but strongly underestimates H$_2$CO,
853: HCOOCH$_3$, and CH$_3$OCH$_3$.
854:
855: We can think of several possible solutions to improve the agreement with
856: observation. First, it is noteworthy that the gaseous CH$_3$OH abundance
857: estimated in IRAS 16293-2422 is much lower than the abundance of CH$_3$OH ice
858: ($n$(CH$_3$OH ice)/$n_{\rm H} \sim 10^{-5}$, assuming n(H$_2$O ice)/
859: $n_{\rm H}\sim 10^{-4}$) detected by \citet{ppp03} towards some low-mass
860: protostars. We may have missed or underestimated the reactions which
861: transform CH$_3$OH to other large organic species. Secondly, the abundances
862: of large organic species in the central region can vary with time.
863: In the present work, we have concentrated on the distribution of molecules only at
864: $t_{\rm final}$. Shells that reach the central region at different times
865: should experience different temporal variations of physical conditions.
866: Some shells may experience longer periods at $T\sim 20-40$ K, where large
867: organic species start to be efficiently formed. This possibility will be pursued
868: in a future work. Thirdly, core models with rotation could produce higher
869: abundances of large organic species; because of the centrifugal force,
870: core material migrates more slowly and stays longer in the temperature
871: range preferable for the formation of large organic molecules
872: (e.g. in a forming disk).
873:
874: Because of the beam size of the current radio observations, little is known
875: concerning the spatial distribution of the large organic species; they are mostly
876: confined within a few arc seconds from the core center \citep[e.g.][]{kua04}.
877: But there are exceptions; \citet{rem06} found that HCOOH and HCOOCH$_3$ show
878: extended emission of $\sim 5$ arcsec. Our embedded core model reproduces the
879: extended emission of HCOOH, while HCOOCH$_3$ is confined to $r<100$ AU.
880:
881:
882: % comparison of ice composition
883: % comparison of gas composition
884: % X/CH3OH ratio may depend on timescale of 10 K sphase and a few 10 K phase
885: % spatial distribution
886: %
887: % H2CO 1.1(-7) [Chandler05] 6(-8) [Cauzax03]
888: % CH3OH 3(-7) [Shoier 2002] 9.4(-8) [Chandler 2005]
889: % CH3OCHO (HCOOCH3) 4.3(-9),2.6(-9) [Kuan 2004] a few (-7) [Cauzax 03]
890: % > 1(-8) [Remijian & Hollis 06]
891: % 0.7-5.3(-8) in NGC2264MMS3 [Sakai]
892: % HCOOH 2.5(-9) [Remijian06] 6.2(-8) [Cauzax03]
893: % CH3OCH3 2.4(-7) [Cauzax 03] 7.6(-8) [Chandler05]
894: % CH3CN 1(-8) [Cauzax03] 7.5(-9) [Shoier02]
895:
896: \subsection{Carbon chains in a protostellar core}
897:
898: Recently, \cite{sshk07} detected strong emission lines of carbon
899: chain species such as C$_4$H and C$_4$H$_2$ towards the low-mass protostar L1527,
900: which is considered to be in a transient phase from class 0 to class I.
901: In general, carbon-chain species are associated with the early
902: stages of a cold cloud core when the dominant form of carbon changes from
903: atomic carbon to CO. Hence, the existence of carbon-chain species towards L1527
904: is a surprise.
905: %These species are produced in our model, but a major precursor, solid methane,
906: %is not readily observable in any environment in the interstellar medium \citep{gibb04}.
907:
908: Figure \ref{carbon_chain} (a-b) shows the temporal variation of CH$_4$ and carbon-chain
909: abundances in the shell that reaches $r=2.5$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$. When the
910: core starts to contract, methane (CH$_4$) and C$_3$H$_4$ are already abundant
911: in ice mantles. Methane has been formed by the hydrogenation of carbon on
912: grain surfaces, while C$_3$H$_4$ has been formed by a combination of gas-phase reactions
913: (to form unsaturated carbon chains such as C$_{3}$H and C$_{3}$H$_{2}$) and grain-surface reactions (to hydrogenate them). When the
914: CH$_4$ sublimates, some fraction reacts with C$^+$ to form
915: C$_2$H$_3^+$, which is a precursor for ion-molecule reactions that lead to the production of larger unsaturated hydrocarbons. While gas-phase reactions tend to
916: make the carbon chains longer, adsorbed species
917: experience hydrogenation and dissociation by cosmic-ray induced UV radiation.
918: Figure \ref{carbon_chain} (c-d) shows the distribution of carbon-chain species in our
919: embedded core model. Methane and
920: C$_3$H$_4$ are abundant in the ice mantle even at $r\gtrsim 10^3$ AU, while
921: other hydrocarbons are abundant at a few 100 AU $\lesssim r \lesssim 10^3$ AU.
922: Most of the carbon-chain species desorb at $r\lesssim$
923: a few 100 AU.
924:
925: In summary, our model indicates that carbon-chain species can be re-generated
926: in the protostellar core by the combination of gas-phase reactions and
927: grain-surface reactions. It should be noted, however, that large oxygen-containing organic species
928: are not detected in L1527 \citep{sak07}, while they are abundant in the central
929: region of our model. In future work, the temporal variation of the molecular distribution
930: in model cores should be investigated to see if at certain evolutionary stages
931: carbon-chain species are abundant while large organic species are not. For example, in their recent study of the chemistry of cold cores, \cite{gwh06} found that generation of gas-phase hydrocarbons from precursor surface methane occurs at very late times, after the abundance of surface methanol has essentially vanished.
932: More detailed observations are also needed for a quantitative comparison
933: with models. While our model predicts the column density of C$_4$H to be
934: $2\times 10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$ towards the central star,
935: the observation gives $2\times 10^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$. The actual column density
936: towards the central star can, however, be larger, because the emission is averaged
937: within the beam (a few 10 arcsec) in the current observation.
938: Methane ice, the precursor of the carbon-chain species in our model, is as abundant
939: as 23 \% relative to water ice at the outer edge of our core model. A deep integration of
940: ice features towards field stars is needed to constrain the CH$_4$ ice abundances
941: at the outer edge of the core and/or quiescent clouds, while the column
942: density ratio of CH$_4$ ice to H$_2$O ice (1 \%, see Table 2) in our model is
943: consistent with the
944: observation towards YSO's (\S 4.3), because of the relatively large sublimation
945: radius of CH$_4$.
946:
947: \section{Summary}
948:
949: We have adopted the one-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamical core model of
950: \citet{mi00} to investigate molecular evolution in a low-mass
951: star-forming core.
952: The physical structure (density, temperature and infall velocity) of the core
953: is given as a function of time and radius (distance from the core center).
954: The temporal variation of density, temperature and visual extinction is calculated
955: for assorted infalling shells. The temporal variation of molecular abundances
956: in these infalling shells and the radial distribution of molecules in the
957: protostellar core are calculated by solving a chemical reaction network
958: that couples gas-phase and grain-surface chemistry.
959:
960: In the prestellar phases of star formation, species such as CO, which contain heavy
961: elements,
962: are depleted onto grain surfaces due to low temperatures in the vicinity of 10 K and below.
963: As the contraction proceeds, the compressional heating
964: overwhelms the radiative cooling. When the central density reaches $\sim
965: 10^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$, the temperature at the core center starts to rise sharply
966: and soon reaches the sublimation temperature of CO ($\sim 20$ K). The first
967: hydrostatic core is formed shortly (in several $10^2$ yr) thereafter.
968: %The luminosity and temperature of the core then once again increase with time.
969: When the protostar is born, the CO sublimation radius
970: extends to 100 AU, and the temperature at $r\lesssim 10$ AU is higher than
971: 100 K, at which some large organic species start to evaporate.
972:
973: We investigated the radial distribution of molecules at $9.3\times 10^4$ yr
974: after the birth of a protostar, when the temperature is higher than 20 K and
975: 100 K at $\lesssim 3.9\times 10^3$ AU and $\lesssim 100$ AU, respectively. The
976: time taken by the infalling shells to warm up from 10 K to 100 K is important for the
977: production of large molecules. We found that this warm-up phase occurs for only
978: several $10^4$~yr in our dynamical model. Once the shells enter the region
979: where $T\gtrsim 100$ K, they fall into the central protostar in the very short
980: time of $\sim 10^2$ yr.
981: Large organic molecules such as CH$_3$OH, HCOOCH$_3$ and CH$_3$OCH$_3$ are
982: formed on grain surfaces at temperatures of $20-40$ K and subsequently released
983: into the gas phase by thermal evaporation. In our model, only the abundance of
984: HCOOH seems to be influenced by gas-phase chemistry. As a consequence, the
985: radius at which the gas-phase abundance of an organic molecule typically increases
986: strongly in the envelope corresponds to its sublimation radius.
987: Our model also indicates that carbon-chain species can be formed
988: by a combination of gas-phase reactions and grain-surface reactions
989: after the sublimation of CH$_4$.
990:
991: We compared molecular abundances in an isolated core model,
992: which is exposed to the ambient UV field, and an embedded core model.
993: We found that the photo-reactions in ice mantles are important in determining the
994: ice abundances and thus the molecular abundances in hot corinos. The molecule CO$_2$, in particular,
995: is enhanced in the isolated model, while methanol and formaldehyde are
996: more abundant in the embedded model. Our model shows acceptable agreement
997: with gas-phase observations of the hot corino IRAS 16293-2422
998: and ice-phase observations towards the low-mass protostar Elias 29,
999: considering uncertainties and
1000: variations in observed abundances. A more detailed comparison, including a
1001: radiative transfer treatment to directly compare with the observed spectra,
1002: is desirable.
1003:
1004: \acknowledgments
1005:
1006: This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17039008,
1007: 18026006)
1008: and by ``The 21st Century COE Program of Origin and Evolution of
1009: Planetary Systems" of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
1010: and Technology of Japan (MEXT).
1011: E. H. thanks the National Science Foundation for support of his research program
1012: in astrochemistry.
1013:
1014: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1015:
1016:
1017: \bibitem[Aikawa et al.~(2001)]{aik01} Aikawa, Y., Ohashi, N., Inutsuka,
1018: S.-I., Herbst, E., \& Takakuwa, S. 2001, ApJ, 552, 639
1019:
1020: \bibitem[Aikawa et al.~(2005)]{aik05} Aikawa, Y., Herbst, E., Roberts, H.,
1021: \& Caselli, P. 2005, ApJ, 620, 330
1022:
1023:
1024: \bibitem[Allen \& Robinson (1977)]{ar77}
1025: Allen, M. \& Robinson, G. W. 1997, ApJ, 212, 396
1026:
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Bergin \& Langer (1997)]{bl97}
1029: Bergin, E. A., \& Langer, W. D. 1997, ApJ, 486, 316
1030:
1031: \bibitem[Bergin et al.~(2000)]{ber00}
1032: Bergin, E.A., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, L129
1033:
1034: \bibitem[Bergin \& Tafalla (2006)]{bt06} Bergin, E.A. \& Tafalla, M.
1035: 2006, ARA\&A, in press
1036:
1037:
1038: \bibitem[Bottinelli et al. (2004a)]{bot04a}
1039: Bottinelli, S., Ceccarelli, C. Lefloch, B., Williams, J.P.,
1040: Castets, A., Caux, E., Cazaux, S., Maret, S., Parise, B., \& Tielens,
1041: A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 615, 354
1042:
1043:
1044: \bibitem[Bottinelli et al.~(2004b)]{bot04b}
1045: Bottinelli, S., Ceccarelli, C., Neri, R., Williams, J.P., Caux, E.,
1046: Cazaux, S. Lefeloch, B., Maret, S., \& Tielens, A.G.G.M. 2004, ApJ, 617, L69
1047:
1048: \bibitem[Caselli et al.~(1999)]{cas99}
1049: Caselli, P., Walmsley, M., Tafalla, M., Dore, L., \& Myers, P. 1999,
1050: ApJ, 523, L165
1051:
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Cauzax et al.~(2003)]{cau03}
1054: Cazaux, E., Tielens, A.G.G.M., Ceccarelli, C., Castets, A., Wakelam, V.,
1055: Caux, E., Parise, B., \& Teyssier, D., 2003, ApJ, 593, L51
1056:
1057: \bibitem[Ceccarelli et al.~(2007)] {cec07}
1058: Ceccarelli, C., Caselli, P., Herbst, E.,
1059: Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Caux, E. 2007 in Protostars and Planets., ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, K. Keil
1060: (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 47
1061:
1062: \bibitem[Ceccarelli et al.~(2000a)]{cec00a}
1063: Ceccarelli, C., Castets, A., Caux, E., Hollenbach, D., Loinard, L.,
1064: Molinari, S., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2000a, A\&A, 355, 1129
1065:
1066: \bibitem[Ceccarelli et al.~(2000b)]{cec00b}
1067: Ceccarelli, C., Loinard, L., Castets, A., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Caux, E., 2000b,
1068: A\&A 357, L9
1069:
1070: \bibitem[Chandler et al.~(2005)]{cha05} Chandler, C.J., Brogen, C.L.,
1071: Shirley, Y.L. \& Loinard, L. 2005, ApJ, 632, 371
1072:
1073: \bibitem[Chiar et al.~(1996)]{chi96} Chiar, J.E., Adamson, A. J., \& Whittet, D.C.B. 1996, ApJ, 472, 665
1074:
1075: \bibitem[Collings et al.~(2003)]{cdf03}
1076: Collings, M.P., Dever, J.W., Fraser, H.J., McCoustra, M.R.S., \& Williams, D.A.
1077: 2003, ApJ, 583, 1058
1078:
1079: \bibitem[Di Francesco et al.~(2007)]{fra07} Di Francesco, J., Evans, N. J. II,
1080: Caselli, P., Myers, P. C., Shirley, Y., Aikawa, Y., Tafalla, M. 2007,
1081: in Protostars and Planets V.,ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, K. Keil, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press),
1082: 17
1083:
1084:
1085: \bibitem[Doty et al.~(2004)]{dot04} Doty, S. D., Sch\"{o}ier, F. L.,
1086: \& van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A\&A, 418, 1021
1087:
1088: \bibitem[Ehrenfreund \& Shutte (2000)]{es00}
1089: Ehrenfreund, P., \& Shutte, W. A. 2000, in Astrochemistry: From Molecular
1090: Clouds to Planetary Systems, ed. Y. C. Minh, Y.C. \& E. F. van Dishoeck
1091: (Chelsea, MI; Sheridan Books; Astronomical Society of the Pacific), 135
1092:
1093: \bibitem[Fuchs et al.~(2007)]{fuchs07} Fuchs, G. W., Ioppolo, S., Bisschop, S. E., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Linnartz, H. 2007, A\&A, submitted
1094:
1095: \bibitem[Garrod \& Herbst (2006)]{gh06} Garrod, R. T., \& Herbst, E. 2006,
1096: A\&A 457, 927
1097:
1098: \bibitem[Garrod et al.~(2006)]{gpc06} Garrod, R. T., Park I-H., Caselli P.,
1099: \& Herbst, E. 2006, Faraday Discussions, 133, 51
1100:
1101: \bibitem[Garrod et al.~(2007)]{gwh06} Garrod, R. T., Wakelam, V., \& Herbst, E.
1102: 2007 A\&A, 467, 1103
1103:
1104:
1105: \bibitem[Geppert et al.~(2006)]{gep06} Geppert, W. D., Thomas, R. D.,
1106: Ehlerding, A. et al. 2006, Faraday Discuss. 133, 177
1107:
1108: \bibitem[Gibb et al.~(2004)]{gibb04} Gibb. E. L., Rettig, T., Brittain, S., Haywood, R., Simon, T., \& Kulesa, C. 2004, ApJ, 610, L113
1109:
1110: \bibitem[Goldsmith \& Arquilla (1985)]{ga85} Goldsmith, P.F. \& Arquilla, R. 1985,
1111: in Protostars and Planets II., ed. D.C. Black, M.S. Matthews
1112: (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 137
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Hasegawa et al.~(1992)]{hhl92} Hasegawa, T.I., Herbst, E. ,\&
1115: Leung, C. M. 1992, ApJS, 82, 167
1116:
1117: \bibitem[Hasegawa \& Herbst (1993)]{hh93}
1118: Hasegawa, T. I. \& Herbst, E. MNRAS, 261, 83
1119:
1120: \bibitem[Horn et al.~(2004)]{hor04} Horn, A., M$\o$llendal, H., Sekiguchi, O.
1121: et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 605
1122:
1123: \bibitem[Kroes \& Andersson ~(2006)]{ka06}
1124: Kroes, G. J. \& Andersson, S. 2006, in Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Current Challenges, ed. D. C. Lis, G. A. Blake, E. Herbst (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press) 427
1125:
1126:
1127:
1128: \bibitem[Kuan et al.~(2004)]{kua04} Kuan, Y.-J., Juang, H.-C., Charnley, S.B.,
1129: Hirano, N., Takakuwa, S., Wilner, D.J., Liu, S.-Y., Ohashi, N., Bourke, T.L.,
1130: Qi, C., \& Zhang, Q. 2004, ApJ, 616, L27
1131:
1132:
1133: \bibitem[Larson (1969)]{lar69}
1134: Larson, R.B. 1969, MNRAS 145, 271
1135:
1136: \bibitem[Larson et al.~(2007)]{lar07}
1137: Larsson, B. et al. 2007, A\&A, 466, 999
1138:
1139: \bibitem[Lee et al.~(1996)]{lee96} Lee, H-.H., Herbst, E., Pineau des
1140: For\^{e}ts, G., Roueff, E., \& Le Bourlot, J. 1996, A\&A, 311, 690
1141:
1142: \bibitem[Lee et al.~(2004)]{lbe04} Lee, J.-E., Bergin, E. A., \&
1143: Evans, N. J. II 2004, ApJ, 617, 360
1144:
1145: \bibitem[Lee et al.~(2005)]{leb05} Lee, J.-E., Evans, N. J. II , \&
1146: Bergin, E. A. 2005, ApJ, 631, 351
1147:
1148: \bibitem[Loren~(1989)]{lor89}
1149: Loren, R.B. 1989, ApJ, 338, 902
1150:
1151: \bibitem[Maret et al.~(2004)]{mar04} Maret, S., Ceccarelli, C., Caux, E.,
1152: Tielens, A.G.G.M., J$\o$rgensen, J.K., van Dishoeck, E.F., Bacmann, A.,
1153: Castets, A., Lefloch, B., Loinard, L., Parise, B. \& Sch\"{o}ier, F. L.
1154: 2004, A\&A, 416, 577
1155:
1156: \bibitem[Maret et al.~(2005)]{mar05} Maret, S., Ceccarelli, C.,
1157: Tielens, A.G.G.M., Caux, E., Lefloch, B., Faure, A., Castet, A.,
1158: \& Flower, D.R. 2005, A\&A, 442, 527
1159:
1160: \bibitem[Masunaga \& Inutsuka (2000)]{mi00} Masunaga, H., \& Inutsuka, S. 2000,
1161: ApJ, 531, 350
1162:
1163: \bibitem[Masunaga et al. (1998)]{mi98} Masunaga, H., Miyama, S. M., \&
1164: Inutsuka, S. 1998, ApJ. 495, 346
1165:
1166: \bibitem[Millar \& Hatchell (1998)]{mh98} Millar, T. J., \& Hatchell J. 1998,
1167: Faraday Discuss. 109, 15
1168:
1169: \bibitem[Omukai (2007)]{omu07} Omukai, K. 2007, PASJ in press
1170:
1171: \bibitem[Pontoppidan et al.~(2003)]{ppp03}
1172: Pontoppidan, K. M., Dartois, E., van Dishoeck, E. F., Thi, W. -F., \&
1173: d'Hendecourt, L. 2003, A\&A, 404, L17
1174:
1175:
1176: \bibitem[Remijian \& Hollis (2006)]{rem06}
1177: Remijian, A.J., \& Hollis, J. M. 2006, ApJ, 640, 842
1178:
1179: \bibitem[Ruffle \& Herbst (2000)]{rh00}
1180: Ruffle, D. P., \& Herbst, E. 2000, MNRAS, 319, 837
1181:
1182: \bibitem[Ruffle \& Herbst (2001)]{rh01}
1183: Ruffle, D. P., \& Herbst, E. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 1054
1184:
1185: \bibitem[Sakai et al. (2007b)]{sak07}
1186: Sakai, N., Sakai, T., \& Yamamoto, S. 2007b, ApSS, in press
1187:
1188: \bibitem[Sakai et al. (2007a)]{sshk07}
1189: Sakai, N., Sakai, T., Hirota, T., \& Yamamoto, S. 2007a, ApJ, in press
1190:
1191: \bibitem[Sandford \& Allamandola (1988)] {sa88}
1192: Sandford, S. A., \& Allamandola, L. J. 1988, Icarus, 76, 201
1193:
1194: \bibitem[Schoier et al.~(2002b)]{sch02}
1195: Schoier, F. L., J{\o}rgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F.,\& Blake, G. A.
1196: A\&A, 390, 1001
1197:
1198: \bibitem[Sch\"{o}ier et al.~(2002a)]{sjv02} Sch\"{o}ier, F. L., J$\o$rgensen,
1199: J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Blake, G. A. 2002, A\&A 391, 1001
1200:
1201: \bibitem[Shu (1977)]{shu77} Shu, F. H. 1977, ApJ, 214, 488
1202:
1203: \bibitem[Tachihara et al.~(2000)]{tac00}
1204: Tachihara, K., Mizuno, A., \& Fukui, Y. 2000, ApJ, 528, 817
1205:
1206: \bibitem[Tafalla et al.~(2002)]{taf02}
1207: Tafalla, M., Myers, P. C., Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., \& Comito,
1208: C. 2002, ApJ, 569, 815
1209:
1210: \bibitem[Vastel et al.~(2004)]{vas04}
1211: Vastel, C., Phillips, T.G., Yoshida, H. 2004, ApJ, 606, 127
1212:
1213: \bibitem[Viti \& Williams (1999)]{vw99} Viti, S., \& Williams, D. A. 1999,
1214: MNRAS, 305, 755
1215:
1216: \bibitem[Viti et al.~(2004)]{vit04} Viti, S., Collings, M. P., Dever, J. W.,
1217: McCoustra, M. R. S,. \& Williams, D. A. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1141
1218:
1219: \bibitem[Wakelam et al.~(2004)]{wakelam04}
1220: Wakelam, V., Caselli, P., Ceccarelli, C., Herbst, E., \& Castets, A. 2004, A\&A, 422, 159
1221:
1222: \bibitem[Walker et al.~(1986)]{wal86}
1223: Walker, C. K., Lada, C.J., Young, E.T., Maloney, P.R., \& Wilking, B.A. 1986,
1224: ApJ, 309, L47
1225:
1226: \bibitem[Watanabe \& Kouchi (2002a)]{wkl02} Watanabe, N., \& Kouchi, A. 2002a,
1227: ApJ, 571, L173,
1228:
1229: \bibitem[Watanabe \& Kouchi (2002b)]{wk02}
1230: Watanabe, N, \& Kouchi, A. 2002b, ApJ, 567, 651
1231:
1232: \bibitem[Watanabe et al.~(2007)]{wm07}
1233: Watanabe, N., Mouri, O., Nagaoka, A., Kouchi, A., \& Pirronello, V. 2007,
1234: ApJ, in press
1235:
1236:
1237:
1238: \bibitem[Williams (1968)]{wil68} Williams, D.A. 1968, ApJ, 151, 935
1239:
1240:
1241:
1242:
1243:
1244: \end{thebibliography}
1245:
1246:
1247: \clearpage
1248: \begin{table}
1249: \caption{Elemental abundances with respect to H.}
1250: \begin{center}
1251: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
1252: \hline
1253: \hline
1254: Element & Abundance \\
1255: He & 9.75(-1)\tablenotemark{a} \\
1256: N & 2.47(-5)\\
1257: O & 1.80(-4)\\
1258: C$^+$ & 7.86(-5)\\
1259: S$^+$ & 9.14(-8)\\
1260: Si$^+$ & 2.74(-9)\\
1261: Fe$^+$ & 2.74(-9)\\
1262: Na$^+$ & 2.25(-9)\\
1263: Mg$^+$ & 1.09(-8)\\
1264: P$^+$ & 2.16(-10)\\
1265: Cl$^+$ & 1.00(-9)\\
1266: \hline
1267: \end{tabular}
1268: \end{center}
1269: \tablenotetext{a}{$a(-b)$ means $a\times 10^{-b}$.}
1270: \label{abelem}
1271: \end{table}%
1272:
1273: \begin{table}
1274: \caption{Percentage abundances of ice-mantle species compared with H$_2$O ice in
1275: model cores at $t_{\rm final}$. For each core model, ice abundance at radius of 1000 AU
1276: and 8000 AU are listed. Ratios of column densities integrated towards the core
1277: center are also listed as "column".}
1278: \begin{center}
1279: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c}
1280: \hline
1281: Species & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Embedded core} &
1282: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Isolated core} \\
1283: & 1000 AU\tablenotemark{a} & 8000 AU& column &1000 AU & 8000 AU &column \\
1284: \hline
1285: CO & $7\times 10^{-11}$ & 10 & 0.4 & $8\times 10^{-9}$ & 23 & 0.04 \\
1286: CO$_2$ & 10 & 4 & 4.2 & 125 & 21 & 45\\
1287: H$_2$CO & 6 & 3 & 1.5 & $2\times 10^{-6}$ & 0.08 & 0.03 \\
1288: CH$_3$OH & 3 & 2 & 2.7 & 0.1 & 0.04 & 0.2 \\
1289: %NH$_3$ & 14 & 14 & 14 & 15 & 4.5 & 12\\
1290: CH$_4$ & $3\times 10^{-9}$ & 23 & 1 & $2\times 10^{-9}$ & 5 & 0.4 \\
1291: \hline
1292: \end{tabular}
1293: \end{center}
1294: \tablenotetext{a}{radii}
1295: \label{solid_theo}
1296: \end{table}%
1297:
1298: %\begin{table}
1299: %\caption{Gas-phase molecular abundances towards IRAS 16293-2422}
1300: %\begin{center}
1301: %\begin{tabular}{l c}
1302: %\hline
1303: %Species & Abundance \\
1304: %\hline
1305: %%H$_2$CO & 6.0(-8)\tablenotemark{a}, 1.1(-7)\tablenotemark{b} \\
1306: %%CH$_3$OH & 3.0(-7)\tablenotemark{c}, 9.4(-8)\tablenotemark{b} \\
1307: %H$_2$CO & 1.0(-7)\tablenotemark{f}, 1.1(-7)\tablenotemark{b} \\
1308: %CH$_3$OH & 1.0(-7)\tablenotemark{g}, 9.4(-8)\tablenotemark{b} \\
1309: %HCOOCH$_3$ & 1.7-2.4(-7)\tablenotemark{a}, 2.6-4.3(-9)\tablenotemark{d},
1310: % $>$ 1(-8)\tablenotemark{e}\\
1311: %HCOOH & 6.2(-8)\tablenotemark{a}, 2.5(-9)\tablenotemark{e}\\
1312: %CH$_3$OCH$_3$ & 2.4(-7)\tablenotemark{a}, 7.6(-8)\tablenotemark{b}\\
1313: %CH$_3$CN & 1.0(-8)\tablenotemark{a}, 7.5(-9)\tablenotemark{c}\\
1314: %\hline
1315: %\end{tabular}
1316: %\end{center}
1317: %\tablenotetext{a}{\citet{cau03}}
1318: %\tablenotetext{b}{\citet{cha05}}
1319: %\tablenotetext{c}{\citet{sjv02}}
1320: %\tablenotetext{d}{\citet{kua04}}
1321: %\tablenotetext{e}{\citet{rem06}}
1322: %\tablenotetext{f}{Maret et al. 2004 A\&A 416 577}
1323: %\tablenotetext{g}{Maret et al. 2005 A\&A 442 527}
1324: %\label{obs}
1325: %\end{table}%
1326:
1327:
1328: \begin{table}
1329: \caption{Gas-phase molecular abundances in IRAS 16293-2422 and model results.}
1330: \begin{center}
1331: \begin{tabular}{l c c c}
1332: \hline
1333: Species & IRAS 16293-2422 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{model}\tablenotemark{a}\\
1334: & & embedded & isolated \\
1335: \hline
1336: %H$_2$CO & 6.0(-8)\tablenotemark{b}, 1.1(-7)\tablenotemark{c} \\
1337: %CH$_3$OH & 3.0(-7)\tablenotemark{d}, 9.4(-8)\tablenotemark{c} \\
1338: H$_2$CO & 1.0(-7)\tablenotemark{b}, 1.1(-7)\tablenotemark{c} & 2.8(-6) & 1.3(-11)\\
1339: CH$_3$OH & 1.0(-7)\tablenotemark{d}, 9.4(-8)\tablenotemark{c}& 3.0(-6) & 8.5(-8) \\
1340: HCOOCH$_3$ & 2.5-5.5(-7)\tablenotemark{e}, 2.6-4.3(-9)\tablenotemark{f},
1341: $>$ 1.2(-8)\tablenotemark{g} & 1.8(-9) & 3.2(-11)\\
1342: HCOOH & 6.2(-8)\tablenotemark{e}, 2.5(-9)\tablenotemark{g} & 1.7(-8) & 2.1(-8)\\
1343: CH$_3$OCH$_3$ & 2.4(-7)\tablenotemark{e}, 7.6(-8)\tablenotemark{c} & 3.5(-10) & 5.8(-12)\\
1344: CH$_3$CN & 1.0(-8)\tablenotemark{e}, 7.5(-9)\tablenotemark{h} & 3.0(-8) & 1.3(-8)\\
1345: \hline
1346: \end{tabular}
1347: \end{center}
1348: \tablenotetext{a}{Gas-phase abundances at $r=30.6$ AU are listed, because the abundances
1349: are mostly constant at $r\lesssim 100$ AU.}
1350: \tablenotetext{b}{\citet{mar04}}
1351: \tablenotetext{c}{\citet{cha05}}
1352: \tablenotetext{d}{\citet{mar05}}
1353: \tablenotetext{e}{\citet{cau03}}
1354: \tablenotetext{f}{\citet{kua04}}
1355: \tablenotetext{g}{\citet{rem06}}
1356: \tablenotetext{h}{\citet{sjv02}}
1357: \label{obs}
1358: \end{table}%
1359:
1360:
1361: \clearpage
1362: \begin{figure}
1363: \plotone{f1.eps}
1364: \caption{Evolution of a star-forming core \label{schematic}}
1365: \end{figure}
1366:
1367: \begin{figure}
1368: \plotone{f2.eps}
1369: \caption{Radial distributions of density, temperature and infall velocity in the prestellar core (left panels) and protostellar envelope (right panels). The times shown are relative to the birth of the second hydrostatic core, the protostar. \label{MImodel}}
1370: \end{figure}
1371:
1372: \begin{figure}
1373: \plotone{f3.eps}
1374: \caption{Temporal variation of the central temperature of the prestellar core
1375: plotted as a function of the central density. \label{central_T}}
1376: \end{figure}
1377:
1378: \begin{figure}
1379: \plotone{f4.eps}
1380: \caption{Sublimation radius of CO (r$_{\rm 20K}$) and large organic species
1381: (r$_{\rm 100K}$) as a function of total luminosity of the core. The solid and
1382: dashed lines depict the radius inside of which the temperature is higher than
1383: 20 K and 100 K, respectively. \label{L_R20}}
1384: \end{figure}
1385:
1386: \begin{figure}
1387: \plotone{f5.eps}
1388: \caption{Temporal variation of density and temperature in infalling shells
1389: that reach $r=2.5, 15, 125$ and 500 AU at the final stage of our model
1390: ($t_{\rm core}=9.3\times 10^4$ yr). The horizontal axis is the
1391: logarithm of $t_{\rm final}-t_{\rm core}$.\label{fluid_parcel}}
1392: \end{figure}
1393:
1394: \begin{figure}
1395: \epsscale{0.6}
1396: \plotone{f6.eps}
1397: \caption{Temporal variation of molecular abundances in the shell that reaches
1398: $r=2.5$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$.
1399: The horizontal axis is the logarithm of $t_{\rm final}-t_{\rm core}$.
1400: Black lines represent ice mantle species, while gray lines represent
1401: gas-phase species.
1402: \label{evol_abun}}
1403: \end{figure}
1404:
1405: \begin{figure}
1406: \epsscale{0.5}
1407: \plotone{f7.eps}
1408: \caption{Radial distribution of (a) physical parameters and
1409: (b-d) molecules in the protostellar core at $t_{\rm final}$.
1410: Black lines represent ice-mantle species, while gray lines
1411: represent gas-phase species.
1412: \label{dist}}
1413: \end{figure}
1414:
1415: \begin{figure}
1416: \epsscale{0.5}
1417: \plotone{f8.eps}
1418: \caption{Radial distribution of simple gaseous molecules at $t_{\rm final}$.
1419: \label{cfLee}}
1420: \end{figure}
1421:
1422:
1423: \begin{figure}
1424: \plotone{f9.eps}
1425: \caption{Radial distribution of molecules in the protostellar core, as in Figure 7
1426: (b-d). The core is assumed to be directly irradiated by the interstellar UV radiation.
1427: \label{av0}}
1428: \end{figure}
1429:
1430: \begin{figure}
1431: \epsscale{1.0}
1432: \plotone{f10.eps}
1433: \caption{(a-b) Temporal variation of carbon-chain abundances in the shell
1434: that reaches $r=2.5$ AU at $t_{\rm final}$, as in Figure 6.
1435: (c-d) Radial distribution of carbon-chain species in the protostellar core,
1436: as in Figure 7.
1437: \label{carbon_chain}}
1438: \end{figure}
1439:
1440: \clearpage
1441:
1442:
1443:
1444:
1445:
1446:
1447:
1448:
1449: \end{document}
1450:
1451:
1452:
1453: