1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{emulateapj}

2: \newcommand{\myemail}{miranda@physics.umanitoba.ca}

3: \def\ro{{\it ROSAT\/}}

4: \def\asca{{\it ASCA\/}}

5: \def\xmm{{\it XMM-Newton\/}}

6: \def\cha{{\it Chandra\/}}

7: \def\cgps{{\it CGPS\/}}

8: 

9: \shorttitle{\xmm, \cha, \& \cgps\ observations of G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6}

10: \shortauthors{Jackson, Safi-Harb, Kothes, \& Foster}

11: 

12: \begin{document}

13: 

14: \title{\xmm, \cha, and \cgps\ observations of the Supernova Remnants G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6}

15: 

16: \author{M. S. Jackson\altaffilmark{1}, S. Safi-Harb\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, 

17: R.

18: Kothes\altaffilmark{4, 5}, T. Foster\altaffilmark{6}}

19: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

20: Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.}

21: \altaffiltext{2}{Canada Research Chair}

22: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, George Washington University,

23: Washington, DC 20052, U.S.A.}

24: \altaffiltext{4}{National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute

25: of Astrophysics, Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, P.O. Box 248,

26: Penticton, BC V2A 6J9, Canada.}

27: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

28: Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.}

29: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Brandon University,

30: 270-18th Street, Brandon, MB, R7A 6A9 Canada.}

31: 

32: \begin{abstract}

33: 

34: We present an \xmm\ detection of two low radio surface brightness

35: SNRs, G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6, discovered with the Canadian Galactic

36: Plane Survey (CGPS). High-resolution \xmm\ images revealing the morphology

37: of the diffuse emission, as well as discrete point sources,

38: are presented and correlated with radio and \cha\ images. The new data also permit a

39: spectroscopic analysis of the diffuse emission regions, and a spectroscopic

40: and timing analysis of the point sources. Distances have

41: been determined from \ion{H}{1} and CO

42: data to be $3.5\pm 1.0$ kpc for SNR G85.4+0.7 and $4.8\pm 1.6$ kpc for SNR G85.9$-$0.6.

43: 

44: The SNR

45: G85.4+0.7 is found to have a temperature of $\sim12-13$ MK and a 0.5--2.5~keV

46: luminosity of $\sim1-4\times 10^{33}D^2_{3.5}$ erg/s (where $D_{3.5}$ is

47: the distance in units of 3.5 kpc), with an electron

48: density $n_e$ of $\sim0.07-0.16(fD_{3.5})^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$ (where $f$ is

49: the volume filling factor), and a

50: shock age of $\sim9-49(fD_{3.5})^{1/2}$ kyr.

51: 

52: The SNR

53: G85.9$-$0.6 is found to have a temperature of $\sim15-19$ MK and a 0.5--2.5~keV

54: luminosity of $\sim1-4\times 10^{34}D^2_{4.8}$ erg/s (where $D_{4.8}$ is

55: the distance in units of 4.8 kpc), with an electron

56: density $n_e$ of $\sim0.04-0.10(fD_{4.8})^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$ and a

57: shock age of $\sim 12-42(fD_{4.8})^{1/2}$ kyr.

58: 

59: Based on the data presented here, none of the point

60:  sources appears to be the neutron star associated with either SNR.

61: 

62: 

63: \end{abstract}

64: 

65: \keywords{ISM: supernova remnant --- ISM: individual object: G85.4+0.7 --- ISM: individual object: G85.9-0.6 --- stars: neutron --- X-rays: ISM}

66: 

67: \section{Introduction}

68: 

69: 

70: 

71: In 2001, two new supernova remnants (SNRs) with low radio surface

72: brightness, G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6,  were

73: discovered in Canadian Galactic Plane Survey (CGPS)\citep{tay03} data and confirmed

74: in X-rays with \ro\ data \citep{kot01}. Both show distinct shells in

75: the radio band with an extended region of X-ray emission in the

76: centre. The radio surface brightness of G85.4+0.7 at 1 GHz is

77: $\Sigma_{1 {\rm GHz}}\le 1\times 10^{-22}$ Watt ${\rm m}^{-2}$ ${\rm Hz}^{-1}$

78: ${\rm sr}^{-1}$ and the radio data also indicate that the SNR has a non-thermal shell

79: with angular diameter $\approx0.4^{\circ}$ which is surrounded by a

80: thermal shell with an angular diameter of $\approx0.6^{\circ}$ and is

81: located within an H I bubble. The bubble also contains two B stars which may have been part of the

82: same association as the SNR's progenitor star. G85.9$-$0.6 has a radio surface brightness

83: $\Sigma_{1 {\rm GHz}}\le 2\times 10^{-22}$ Watt ${\rm m}^{-2}$ ${\rm Hz}^{-1}$

84: ${\rm sr}^{-1}$ and it has no discernible H I features, indicating

85: that it is expanding into a low density medium, perhaps between the

86: local and Perseus spiral arms. The most likely event which would

87: produce an SNR in such a region would be a Type Ia supernova.

88: 

89: 

90: X-ray observations are important to the study of SNRs, particularly those with

91: low surface brightness, because they provide information about the

92: morphology and emission processes of these objects, which are

93: indicators of both the nature of the supernova explosion which formed them

94: and the properties of the progenitor star. SNRs

95: with low surface brightness are expected to be formed after the core

96: collapse of a massive star in a Type Ib/c or Type II explosion,

97: because the stellar wind would have blown away much of the

98: interstellar medium (ISM) surrounding it, leaving a low ambient

99: density into which the shock from the supernova expands. A Type Ia supernova can also

100: result in a low surface brightness SNR if the surrounding ISM has a low density, such as 

101: it would if it were located between two spiral arms of the galaxy. 

102: Thermal X-ray emission from a SNR arises as the blast wave of

103: the explosion travels through and shocks the ISM, and as

104: a reverse shock travels back into and shocks the ejecta.

105: The X-ray

106: spectrum of the SNR gives information about the temperature, the

107: density, and the luminosity of the shocked material, while imaging

108: data provides information about the size and morphology of the region. 

109: 

110: 

111: 

112: The low

113: angular and spectral resolutions as well as the small number of counts

114: in the \ro\ data did not allow spectroscopy nor detailed imaging to be 

115: done, so \xmm\

116: observations, described in \S\ref{obs}, have been made in order to confirm the

117: detection of the SNRs, and to perform imaging, spectroscopic and

118: timing studies. Detailed X-ray imaging, described in \S\ref{imaging},

119: is used to map the diffuse emission and compare it to the

120: location and size of the radio shells, and \cha\ data have been used to

121: search for compact objects not resolved by XMM. Spectral parameters obtained in

122: \S\ref{spec} lead to an

123: estimate of such quantities as temperature, density, and luminosity of the

124: SNRs. In \S\ref{ps} the point sources are catalogued and an attempt at

125: identification is made by matching their positions to objects in other

126: catalogues. Timing analysis is performed to identify any pulsar

127: candidates. The distances to the SNRs are derived from \ion{H}{1} and

128: CO data in

129: \S\ref{dist}. The results are discussed in \S\ref{disc}.

130: 

131: 

132: Preliminary results were presented in \cite{jac06} and \cite{saf06}.

133: 

134: 

135: \section{Observations}\label{obs}

136: 

137: \subsection{\xmm\ Observations}

138: SNR G85.4+0.7 was observed with \xmm\ on 2005 May 31 for 11.5 ks (Obs

139: ID: 0307130101, PI: S. Safi-Harb) and again on

140: October 27 for 15.2 ks (Obs ID 0307130301, PI: S. Safi-Harb), because

141: of proton flares in the first 

142: observation which made a large fraction of the data unusable. A 29 ks

143: \xmm\ observation was made of SNR G85.9$-$0.6 on 2005 November 24 (Obs

144: ID 0307130201, PI: S. Safi-Harb). 

145: 

146: The PN \citep{str01} and MOS \citep{tur01} data were reduced with the latest version of SAS (6.5.0) and

147: events during proton flares were filtered out for producing images and

148: spectra by using the SAS routines {\it evselect} to create rate files

149: and {\it tabgtigen} to generate good time intervals (GTIs) for

150: filtering the event files with the {\it evselect} routine.  This rendered the

151: first observation of G85.4+0.7 useful only

152: for imaging, and slightly reduced the integration time, from 29 ks to 26 ks for the

153: G85.9$-$0.6 observation. The second observation of G85.4+0.7 shows no

154: evidence for proton flaring and the removal of proton flares did not 

155: significantly reduce the integration time. Images and spectra were created from the

156: event files using {\it evselect}. The total effective exposure time

157: for G85.4+0.7 was 14~ks for PN and 16~ks for the MOS instruments and

158: for G85.9$-$0.6 it was 23~ks for PN and 26~ks for MOS.

159: 

160: To facilitate source detection, exposure maps were made using {\it

161:   eexpmap} and the images were combined using {\it emosaic}. The

162:   spectra were binned using a minimum of 25-50 counts per bin for the

163: MOS instruments and 50 or 100 counts per bin for the PN for the point source 

164: and diffuse spectra respectively, using {\it grppha}. This latter

165: grouping was necessary because the background subtraction added

166: excessive noise to the spectra, particularly at high energies, where

167: the spectra are background-dominated. The background for both SNRs

168: was calculated using various methods described in \S\ref{bg}.

169: 

170: \subsection{\cha\ Observations}

171: A 14.5 ks observation of SNR G85.4+0.7 was made on 2003 January 26

172: (Obs ID: 3898, PI: S. Safi-Harb) by the 

173: Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-S; G. Garmire\footnote{See 

174: http://cxc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG.}).

175: SNR G85.9$-$0.6 was observed with ACIS-S for 20.2 ks on 2003 October

176: 3 (Obs ID: 3899, PI: S. Safi-Harb). Both observations 

177: were made at a focal plane temperature of $-120^{\circ}$C.

178: 

179: The analysis of the \cha\ data was done using Chandra Interactive

180: Analysis of Observations (CIAO version 3.3\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao}). For both \cha\

181: observations, the data were corrected for charge transfer inefficiency 

182: (CTI) with tools provided by the ACIS team of Pennsylvania \citep{tow00}. Events with \asca\ grades 

183: (0, 2, 3, 4, 6) were retained, and periods of high background rates were removed. Data 

184: from hot pixels were eliminated.

185: The effective exposure time for the observation of SNR G85.4+0.7 was 14.3 ks and for 

186: SNR G85.9$-$0.6 it was 19.9 ks. The backgrounds for the point source spectra were 

187: extracted from annuli surrounding the sources. The spectra were grouped with a mimimum of 30 counts in each bin.

188: Data from the S2 and S3 chips were used. Data from the other chips were not used because they do not overlap the XMM field of view.

189: 

190: \section{Imaging}\label{imaging}

191: 

192: The previous X-ray images from the \ro\ All-Sky Survey did not resolve

193: the SNRs and the point sources in the field, so the \xmm\ PN and

194: MOS data can be used to determine the nature of the sources. The

195: results are described below.

196: 

197: \subsection{G85.4+0.7}

198: The 0.5--2.5 keV \xmm\ PN and MOS mosaic image of G85.4+0.7 with radio contours overlaid is 

199: shown in Figure~\ref{85.4image}. The image includes only energies

200: between 0.5 and 2.5 keV in order to match the ROSAT bandpass and

201: because there is negligible diffuse emission above 2.5 keV. The X-ray

202: image is smoothed with a

203: Gaussian filter with a 3 pixel radius. The X-ray emission is in the same

204: location and is a similar angular size as indicated by the \ro\ data, shown 

205: in Figure 6 of \cite{kot01}, with an approximate angular radius of

206: 6.7$^{\prime}$. It is much better resolved, however, and

207: the regions of diffuse emission and the point sources are clearly visible. 

208: 

209: 

210: The top two panels of Figure~\ref{85.4reg} show the 0.5--2.5~keV and 

211: 2.5--10~keV \xmm\ images of G85.4-0.7, smoothed in the same way as 

212: Figure~\ref{85.4image}. The absence of diffuse emission in the hard X-ray 

213: band is clear from the middle panel. The lower panel shows the 

214: 0.5--2.5~keV image with sources subtracted, smoothed further and scaled to emphasize the diffuse 

215: emission, and smoothed contours are overlaid to show the morphology of the 

216: remnant. The 

217: contours indicate a centrally filled morphology with a slightly elongated 

218: shape. The circles in the top panel indicate spectral extraction regions described in \S\ref{spec85.4} and \S\ref{disc85.4}.

219: 

220: There are nine point sources in the image from which spectra can be

221: extracted, and the analysis is described in \S\ref{ps}. The extraction

222: regions for the spectra, including the

223: background for the diffuse emission, are indicated and labeled in

224: Figure~\ref{85.4reg}, and the spectral analysis of the diffuse

225: emission is described in \S\ref{spec85.4}.

226: 

227: The \cha\ image of SNR G85.4+0.7 is shown in Figure~\ref{cha85.4}. The extraction 

228: regions used for the source and background regions are shown, and the 

229: applicable regions from the \xmm\ observation are overlaid. The

230: {\it wavdetect} tool in CIAO is used for source detection. Six of the point sources 

231: identified with \xmm\ (1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7) are clearly visible on the \cha\ image. Twelve 

232: additional sources appear on the \cha\ image (labeled 10$-$21) but the spectra 

233: extracted from these point sources do not contain enough counts to enable meaningful 

234: spectral analysis, so while they are potential neutron star

235: candidates and sources 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 16 are situated well within the radio shell of the SNR,

236: further investigation of these sources is not possible at

237: this time.

238: 

239: \subsection{G85.9$-$0.6}

240: The \xmm\ PN and MOS mosaic image of G85.9$-$0.6 with radio contours overlaid is shown in

241: Figure~\ref{85.9image}. The image is smoothed in the same way as the

242: G85.4+0.7 image, with a Gaussian filter with a three-pixel radius. As with

243: G85.4+0.7, the angular radius of approximately 5.8$^{\prime}$ and 

244: location of the X-ray emission shown in this figure matches that of

245: Figure 6 of \cite{kot01} and many features are resolved. 0.5--2.5 keV

246: and 2.5--10.0 keV X-ray images are shown in the top two panels of

247: Figure~\ref{85.9reg}. It is clear from the hard X-ray image that the

248: SNR does not appear above 2.5 keV, and the X-ray spectrum is 

249: background dominated above 2.5 keV, as will be explored in 

250: \S\ref{spec85.9}. The bottom panel of Figure~\ref{85.9reg} shows the same 

251: data as in the top panel with point source emission subtracted, scaled to emphasize

252: the diffuse emission. The contours in the bottom panel are smoothed

253: to show the overall morphology of the remnant. The diffuse X-ray emitting region seems to be round

254: in shape, indicating a centrally filled X-ray morphology.

255: The circles in the top panel indicate spectral extraction regions described in \S\ref{spec85.9} and \S\ref{disc85.9}.

256: 

257: Spectra were extracted from 8 point sources and the diffuse region, as

258: indicated in the top panel of Figure \ref{85.9reg}. The

259: analysis of the spectrum from the diffuse region is described in

260: \S\ref{spec85.9}, and

261: \S\ref{ps} describes the analysis of the point sources.

262: 

263: Figure~\ref{cha85.9} shows the \cha\ image of SNR G85.9$-$0.6. The locations 

264: of the extraction circles for sources 1 and 8 in the \xmm\ image are shown, in addition to the additional point sources found on the \cha\ image (labeled 9$-$27). The \cha\ 

265: image does not show any point sources which have sufficient counts to do independent spectroscopic analysis, and only one of the sources identified from the \xmm\ image (source 8) lies 

266: within the field of view of the \cha\ image, with which a \cha\ source has been identified.

267: 

268: 

269: \section{Spectroscopy}\label{spec}

270: 

271: The spectra from the regions of diffuse emission were extracted from

272: areas indicated in Figures~\ref{85.4reg} and \ref{85.9reg} for both PN and

273: MOS. The

274: diffuse emission regions and point sources are indicated and labeled

275: in the Figures. 

276: 

277: The spectra of the diffuse emission for both SNRs were fit to various

278: models: a simple bresstrahlung model with gaussian lines,  VMEKAL, VNEI, and VPSHOCK, each modified by interstellar absorption, in this case the Wisconsin absorption model (wabs in XSPEC, \cite{morr83}). VMEKAL is a collisional ionization equilibrium model based on the 

279: model calculations of \cite{mew85} of the emission spectrum 

280: from hot diffuse gas with Fe calculations by \cite{lie90}, with variable abundances. VPSHOCK is a 

281: non-equilibrium ionization (NEI) model with variable abundances which 

282: models a plane parallel shock in a plasma with constant electron 

283: temperature T and a range of ionization timescales with an upper limit

284: $\tau=n_et$, where $n_e$ is the postshock electron density and $t$ is the 

285: shock age \citep{bor01}. VNEI is a NEI model similar to VPSHOCK, except with a single ionization timescale.

286: 

287: \subsection{Background Estimation}\label{bg}

288: Spectra of diffuse faint regions require particular attention to be

289: paid to the choice of background region. Instrumental emission lines

290: can dominate the spectrum if the background region is poorly chosen,

291: leading to errors in spectral fits and a discrepancy between the PN and

292: MOS spectra. The intuitive background region would be a relatively

293: source free one at approximately the same galactic latitude as the 

294: source to minimize contamination by the Galactic ridge. However, because 

295: the effect of

296: instrumental emission lines is not uniform with position on the CCDs,

297: particularly on the PN instrument

298: \citep{lum02}, and exceeds the variation with galactic latitude for

299: these observations, the background regions were chosen as closely as possible to the point

300: opposite the source region through the centre of the image, taking

301: care that there is no overlap between the source and background

302: regions and omitting regions around point sources. The background regions for both SNRs are necessarily smaller than the source regions, but very little change in the spectral fits resulted from choosing various background regions in the same general area of the image.

303: 

304: An attempt has been made to estimate the MOS background spectra using the

305: \xmm\ Extended Source Analysis Software (XMM-ESAS) \citep{snow06}. As

306: yet, background estimation for the PN instrument is not included in

307: this package. Data from filter wheel closed observations and from the

308: unexposed corners of the MOS CCDs are used to generate background

309: spectra. This serves as a test of the backgrounds generated from the

310: observation itself, described above. To fit spectra using the XMM-ESAS

311: backgrounds, it 

312: is necessary to include some additional spectral components, as

313: recommended in \cite{snow06}. Unabsorbed Gaussian lines of zero width

314: at energies of 1.49 and 1.75 keV are fit to the MOS spectra in

315: addition to the model describing the emission from the SNR. The 1.75

316: keV line was also added to the fit to the MOS spectra using the

317: observation background. It was not necessary to add the 1.49 keV line to the fit of the G85.4+0.7 MOS spectra using observation backgrounds 

318: because it was adequately subtracted, but the 1.49 keV line was added to the G85.9$-$0.6 MOS spectra using observation backgrounds. It was also

319: necessary to include a low energy broken power law component to the

320: G85.9$-$0.6 fit of the ESAS-subtracted spectrum, as instructed in the ESAS documentation, to correct for

321: instrumental effects, because the statistics allowed residuals at low energies

322: to be clearly seen in the ESAS background subtracted

323: spectra. The broken power law was not added to the spectrum of

324: G85.4+0.7 because the spectra were noisy and did not require an additional model

325: component. Results of spectral fits using both background estimation

326: methods for each SNR are given in Table~\ref{dfit}. The parameters in

327: the left hand column of Table~\ref{dfit} for each of the SNRs are

328: from the simultaneous fit to the MOS spectra using the ESAS background subtraction

329: method and the PN spectrum with the background spectrum extracted from

330: the observation itself, and the right hand column contains the

331: parameters from the simultaneous fit to the MOS and PN spectra from

332: both of which has been subtracted the observation background.

333: 

334: As a third background subtraction method, we have attempted to use blank sky event files that are available for the PN and MOS instruments and generated to enable the 

335: production of background spectra for extended sources. These event files comprise 

336: a superposition of pointed observations from which sources 

337: have been removed. Background files produced from blank sky event files therefore 

338: simulate the detector response in an actual observation, including any instrumental emission lines. Events are first 

339: selected from the original event files based on sky position using the {\it SelectRADec} script.

340: The {\it skycast}

341: script \citep{rea03} is then used to cast the new event file onto the sky coordinates 

342: for the particular observation. The background spectra can be extracted from these files from the same

343: region as for the source spectra. The BACKSCAL keyword is adjusted in the background file

344: to scale it to the source file. Unfortunately, the resulting background subtracted spectra 

345: are oversubtracted for the PN instrument, and contain negative 

346: counts below 0.6 keV and above 1.5 keV. Thus the blank sky background spectra cannot be used for this analysis. Possibly the 

347: oversubtraction results from the fact that there are no observations within $30^{\circ}$ 

348: of the SNRs G85.4+0.7 or G85.9$-$0.6 contained in the blank sky datasets, and therefore 

349: systematic errors arise from the different level of background emission. The background 

350: subtracted PN spectra of G85.4+0.6 using a background from the observation itself and from the blank sky

351: file is shown in Figure~\ref{PNback}. The spectra from which the blank

352: sky background was subtracted were not used and thus the parameters do

353: not appear in Table~\ref{dfit}.

354: 

355: 

356: \subsection{G85.4+0.7}\label{spec85.4}

357: 

358: The PN and MOS spectra between 0.5 and 2.5 keV are simultaneously fit in 

359: order to determine

360: the best parameters while reducing instrument-specific and

361: systematic effects. The upper limit of 2.5 keV is used for the spectral fits because the spectra are background dominated above this energy as shown in Figure~\ref{PNback}. 

362: 

363: Fitting to the VMEKAL model results in a reduced $\chi^2$ value of 1.76 for the ESAS background or 1.63 for 

364: the observation background (this refers to the MOS spectra

365: only; the background spectra extracted from the observation was used

366: for every PN spectrum), and a $kT$ value of $0.65\pm0.03$ or $0.65\pm0.01$ keV (all errors are $2\sigma$) 

367: for the ESAS and observation 

368: background respectively.

369: 

370: The spectra are best fit with an absorbed VPSHOCK

371: with with $kT$ of 1.1 $^{+0.8}_{-0.3}$ keV  for the ESAS background or $1.0^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$ keV for the

372: backgrounds extracted from the observation itself, and ionization timescale of

373: $(6.4^{+5.8}_{-2.8})\times 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ s for the ESAS background or $(8.0^{+8.4}_{-3.4})\times

374: 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ s for the background extracted from the observation. The 

375: spectrum for the diffuse region is shown with the ESAS background in

376: Figure~\ref{85.4esasspec} and with the observation background in Figure~\ref{85.4spec}.

377: The parameters for the simultaneous PN and MOS fits, with 2$\sigma$ uncertainties, are given in

378: Table~\ref{dfit}, along with 

379: derived quantities such as luminosity and age. The fitted parameters

380: agree well within uncertainty for the two background estimation

381: methods. The abundances are for the most part consistent with solar,

382: with exceptions given in Table~\ref{dfit}. An analysis of the

383: spectral fit parameters has shown G85.4+0.7 to have a 0.5--2.5 keV

384: luminosity of $(3.1^{+1.3}_{-1.5})\times 10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$ or $(2.0^{+1.6}_{-1.0})\times 10^{33}$

385: erg s$^{-1}$ for the ESAS or observation backgrounds respectively, in

386: both cases based on the estimated distance of $3.5\pm 1.0$ kpc for

387: G85.4+0.7, determined in \S\ref{dist}. The

388: normalizations of the instrumental lines in the MOS spectra from which the

389: ESAS background has been subtracted are (1.7$\pm$0.2)$\times 10^{-5}$ and

390: (5.5$^{+0.9}_{-1.0}$)$\times 10^{-5}$ photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ for the lines at 1.49 and 1.75 keV respectively. The normalization for the 

391: line at 1.75 keV for the observation background is ($3.7^{+1.0}_{-1.1}$)$\times10^{-5}$ photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.

392: 

393: To verify the fits to elemental abundances, the VNEI model 

394: was used in place of VPSHOCK. All 

395: elemental abundances were found to be consistent within error to be solar 

396: or subsolar, except O and Fe. O was clearly enhanced above a solar value, 

397: giving strength to the VPSHOCK result. The elemental abundances using the VMEKAL model were also qualitatively similar to the VPSHOCK result.

398: 

399: 

400: \subsection{G85.9$-$0.6}\label{spec85.9}

401: The approach used for fitting the diffuse spectra of G85.9$-$0.6 is similar to that

402: used for G85.4+0.7. Again, the upper limit of 2.5 keV is used for the spectral fits because the spectra are background dominated above this energy. The PN diffuse spectrum was fitted simultaneously

403: with the MOS spectra from which either the ESAS or observation

404: background was subtracted. 

405: 

406: Fitting to the VMEKAL model results in a reduced $\chi^2$  of 2.21 for the ESAS background and 2.48 

407: for the observation background, a $kT$ value of $0.70\pm0.01$ or $0.68\pm 0.01$ keV.

408: 

409: The spectra of the diffuse emission from the remnants are best fit with

410: an absorbed VPSHOCK model with $kT$ of 

411: $1.3^{+0.5}_{-0.2}$ keV

412: for the ESAS background or $1.6^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$ keV for the

413: background extracted from the observation and ionization timescale $(6.8^{+1.9}_{-0.9}) \times

414: 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ s for the ESAS background or $(5.1^{+1.5}_{-1.0})\times 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$ s

415: for the background extracted from the observation. 

416: The fitted parameters with 2$\sigma$ uncertainties

417: are given in Table~\ref{dfit} and the diffuse spectrum with the ESAS

418: background is shown in

419: Figure~\ref{85.9esasspec} and with the observation background in

420: Figure~\ref{85.9spec}.

421: The abundances are for the most part consistent

422: with solar, and the exceptions are shown in Table~\ref{dfit}. The

423: luminosity of G85.9$-$0.6 is $(2.4^{+1.2}_{-1.1})

424: \times 10^{34}$ erg s$^{-1}$ for the ESAS background or $(2.7^{+1.2}_{-1.3}) \times 10^{34}$ erg s$^{-1}$

425: for the observation background, in both cases

426: based on the estimated distance of $4.8\pm1.6$ kpc for G85.9$-$0.6, determined in \S\ref{dist}. The

427: normalizations for the 1.49 and 1.75 keV lines in the ESAS subtracted

428: MOS spectra are (1.22$\pm0.08$)$\times 10^{-4}$ and

429: (3.7$^{+0.5}_{-0.6}$)$\times 10^{-5}$ photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ respectively.

430: The broken power law which was added to the fit of the MOS ESAS-background

431: subtracted spectrum had $\Gamma_1=1.2^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$, $\Gamma_2=3.3^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$, $E_{\rm

432:   break}=0.91\pm0.05$ keV, and a normalization of

433: $(8.1^{+1.4}_{-1.1})\times 10^{-4}$

434: photons$/$keV$\cdotp$cm$^2\cdotp$ s at 1 keV. The normalization of the

435: 1.75 keV line for the observation background is ($3.2\pm1.1$)$\times10^{-5}$ photons cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.

436: 

437: When the VNEI model was used in place of VPSHOCK to check the elemental abundances, as was done with G85.4+0.7, all 

438: elemental abundances were found to be consistent within error to be solar 

439: or subsolar, except O and Fe, both of which are clearly above solar abundance

440: when the error bar is taken into account, in agreement with the VPSHOCK result. Using the VMEKAL model, the 

441: elemental abundances are again qualitatively similar to those obtained from the VPSHOCK model, except Mg is above solar.

442: 

443: \section{Point Source Analysis}\label{ps}

444: The previous \ro\ data of the SNR regions produced contours of the

445: diffuse emission but did not resolve any point sources. The presently considered

446: \xmm\ and \cha\ data allow for point sources to be resolved and located within

447: the field of view. Nine clearly distinguishable point sources are seen

448: on the image of G85.4+0.7 (Figure~\ref{85.4reg}), of which six (sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7) 

449: are in common with 

450: point sources in the \cha\ observation, as shown in Figure~\ref{cha85.4}. Twelve additional

451: point sources are clearly resolved in the \cha\ observation (labeled as sources 10 

452: through 21 in Figure~\ref{cha85.4}), but they do not possess

453: sufficient counts to allow for meaningful spectral analysis to be done. It should be noted that 

454: the B stars in \cite{kot01} are outside of the field of view of the X-ray observations.

455: Eight point sources are seen on

456: the \xmm\ image of G85.9$-$0.6 (Figure~\ref{85.9reg}) of which only one source (source 8) is visible on 

457: the \cha\ image, which is pointed toward the region encompassing sources 1 and 8 in 

458: Figure~\ref{85.9reg}. Figure \ref{cha85.9} also shows 19 additional point sources from the \cha\ observation 

459: (labeled 9 through 27), but none of them possess sufficient counts for their spectral parameters to be sufficiently constrained.

460: In the present work,

461: the nine point sources detected with \xmm\ in the field of G85.4+0.7 and eight in the field of G85.9$-$0.6 are analysed using spectral and timing

462: techniques, to locate any candidates for identification as neutron stars or pulsars which

463: would have formed at the time of the supernova explosion.

464: 

465: \subsection{Source Identification}\label{sid}

466: 

467: To identify the X-ray point sources in the G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6

468: fields, {\it ewavelet}, a wavelet detection algorithm which is part of

469: the SAS 6.5 package, is used. For each source, the output of the

470: routine gives position on the image and in sky coordinates, source

471: counts, source extent, as well as errors in those quantities. Because the PN

472: and MOS instruments have slightly different fields of view, only those

473: sources found in the combined image which are also found on the PN

474: image are analysed. The sources must also have an extent (size on the

475: image) similar to the PSF at that location on the image, and they 

476: must contain enough counts ($>50$) for the spectral and timing analysis. 

477: 

478: A catalogue of newly discovered X-ray point sources is given in

479: Tables~\ref{pscat85.4} and \ref{pscat85.9}. The letters XMMU in the object designations

480: indicate that they were discovered in \xmm\ data and a prefix of CXO indicates a discovery in \cha\ data. The \ro\ All Sky

481: Survey catalogue was checked to see if any of the sources appear there,

482: and source 1 in the G85.9$-$0.6 image (Figure~\ref{85.9reg}) is well

483: within the 24$^{\prime\prime}$ $1\sigma$ error circle of the

484: coordinates of the \ro\ All Sky Survey object 1RXS J205911.3+444730,

485: and source 1 in the G85.4+0.7 image (Figure~\ref{85.4reg}) lies

486: marginally within

487: the 24$^{\prime\prime}$ $1\sigma$ error circle of the RASS object 1RXS J205058.7+452135. 

488: No

489: other point sources in this study match any in the RASS catalogue,

490: indicating that these point sources are too faint to be

491: included in the RASS catalogue.

492: 

493: The sky coordinates of sources meeting the above criteria are searched within

494: the extent, which is approximately the PSF size, in various

495: catalogues, including the USNO-A2.0 catalogue \citep{mon98}, the

496: USNO-B1.0 catalogue \citep{mon03}, the SKY2000

497: catalogue \citep{my02}, the catalogue given in \cite{gua92}, and the 2MASS

498: catalogue \citep{2mass}, to determine whether the sources have already been

499: identified in another waveband. Some of these catalogues 

500: give blue magnitude and if this is converted into flux with the

501: relation $m_1-m_2=-2.5 log(F_1/F_2)$ and compared with the X-ray flux, 

502: this ratio is one factor that can be checked to favour identification

503: as a neutron star. In the above

504: equation, $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the blue magnitudes of the object and a

505: standard star and $F_1$ and $F_2$ are their fluxes. Typical neutron

506: stars have a flux ratio in optical to X-ray bands of $\sim 10$ \citep{lyn98},

507: whereas X-ray emitting O- or B-type stars such as $\eta$ Carinae \citep{cor00} or $\tau$

508: Scorpii \citep{mew03} have a ratio of $\sim 10^7$, which enables an identification to

509: be made of neutron star candidates. The optical to X-ray flux ratios

510: for the point sources, matched with each of the catalogue objects within

511: their extents are shown in Tables~\ref{pscat85.4} and \ref{pscat85.9}. These values represent

512: the optical to X-ray flux ratio should the catalogue object match the

513: X-ray source. If the optical catalogue source and the X-ray point source

514: are not the same object, the ratio is meaningless. However, an X-ray

515: source without any optical counterparts within the PSF, such as

516: source 6 or 7 from the G85.9$-$0.6 data, may be a good neutron star

517: candidate. In other words, this test does not exclude X-ray point

518: sources as neutron star candidates but rather indicates that a source

519: emits in X-rays, and is much fainter in the optical waveband, and is

520: unlikely to be a stellar object. The optical to X-ray ratios for all

521: point sources for which the ratio can be calculated (ie all sources

522: except 6 and 7 in the G85.9$-$0.6 field) is $>10^{11}$,

523: which is much greater than the ratio expected for neutron stars,

524: indicating that these objects are not neutron stars,

525: assuming that the optical sources are the true counterparts. Other potentially 

526: interesting objects (e.g. neutron star or AGN candidates) are \cha\ sources 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, and 27 in the 

527: G85.9$-$0.6 field, three of which have no counterpart at all (21, 24, and 27), and the 

528: rest of which have either only a 2MASS counterpart or a 2MASS counterpart which is 

529: a much better match for the position than the optical counterpart. These objects are 

530: shown in Figure~\ref{cha85.9} and listed in Table~\ref{pscat85.9}.

531: 

532: \subsection{Spectral Analysis}\label{psspec}

533: In addition to the optical to X-ray flux comparison described in

534: \S\ref{sid}, the X-ray spectra of the point sources can be examined to

535: determine the likelihood that any of them are neutron stars. The X-ray

536: spectrum of a rotation powered pulsar is typically hard with a

537: power law photon index ($\Gamma$) of approximately 0.5$-$2.1 (e.g. \cite{gott06}),  though there may be an

538: additional blackbody component from the neutron star surface which

539: could dominate the spectrum, depending on the age and the star's

540: magnetic field. Anomalous X-ray pulsars typically have photon indices between

541: 2.4 and 4.6 (e.g. \cite{wood04}).

542: The

543: background-subtracted spectra of the point sources, where the

544: background region consists of an annulus

545: surrounding each point source, are fit to an absorbed power law and the resulting

546: fitted parameters are shown in Table~\ref{psspectab}. In addition, the

547: 0.5--2.0 keV and 2.0--10.0 keV counts are given, which is particularly

548: useful for estimating an X-ray hardness ratio when the fit to an

549: absorbed power law yielded a large $\chi^2$ value, indicating an

550: unsuitable model. Sources 1, 4, and 9 in the G85.4+0.7 field and sources 4,

551: 6 and 7 in the field of G85.9$-$0.6 have been identified as neutron star

552: candidates. Sources 1 and 9 of G85.4+0.7 both have photon indices of

553: $\sim 2.5$, which does not rule them out as neutron star candidates

554: but they both have a high optical/X-ray flux ratio.  Both source 4 of

555: G85.4+0.7 and source 4 of G85.9$-$0.6 have a relatively soft X-ray

556: spectrum compared with typical pulsars (and the $\chi^2$ value for the

557: fit of source 4 on G85.9$-$0.6 indicates that the power law model does

558: not match the data well) and both have a high optical/X-ray flux 

559: ratio. However, it is not certain that the optical sources associated with 

560: these objects are the true counterparts. Neutron star candidates 6 and

561: 7 in the G85.9$-$0.6 field have a photon index typical to neutron stars and no 

562: optical counterpart. However, source 6 has a column density ($N_{\rm H}$) which

563: is greater than that of the SNR itself, which indicates, along with

564: its position relative to the SNR, that it is unlikely to be the

565: associated neutron star. Source 7 has a $N_{\rm H}$ value which is

566: similar to that of the SNR, but its position indicates that it is

567: probably not associated with the SNR. When considered separately, \xmm\ and \cha\ spectra of 

568: G85.4+0.7 point sources 1 and 3 yield 

569: spectral parameters which agree with each other well within the range of uncertainty. The \cha\ spectra 

570: of sources 2, 4, 6, and 7 do not contain enough counts for independent spectral 

571: analysis but the \cha\ spectra for these sources are included in the

572: analysis leading to entries in the appropriate 

573: rows of Table~\ref{psspectab}, and the spectral parameters of the combined \xmm\ and \cha\ 

574: spectra of these sources lie within the uncertainty of those for the \xmm\ spectra alone. 

575: As an example, the \xmm\ PN and MOS and \cha\ spectra of G85.4+0.7 source 1 is shown along

576: with a fit to an absorbed power law in Figure~\ref{85.4psspec}.

577: 

578: \subsection{Timing Analysis}

579: A timing analysis is done on the PN data for the neutron star

580: candidates identified above to search for pulsations. The timing

581: resolution in PN full

582: window mode ($68.7$ ms) for both G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6 allows for a

583: search up to $\sim 7$ Hz, which would fail to identify fast 

584: rotation-powered

585: pulsars, but would identify slowly rotating anomalous X-ray pulsars. The PN events file is first

586: barycentre corrected. The photon arrival times for a region

587: surrounding each source are used first in a fast Fourier transform

588: (FFT) search to identify possible frequencies that should be

589: investigated further. Around each frequency identified by the FFT search,

590: Rayleigh \citep{lea83} (also known as $Z_1^2$), $Z_2^2$ and $Z_3^2$

591: \citep{buc83}, and epoch folding searches are done. The statistical

592: significances of any identified frequencies are calculated using the

593: $\chi^2$ probability along with the number of degrees of freedom,

594: which is $2n$ for the $Z_n^2$ search and $n_{\rm bins}-1$ for the

595: epoch folding search, where

596: $n_{\rm bins}$ is the number of bins in the lightcurve. In 

597: this case the number of bins used is 12 and 20 for the two epoch folding tests performed on 

598: the data, chosen because those numbers of bins produce a relatively

599: detailed lightcurve while maintaining a reasonable number of counts per bin. 

600: With regard to the $Z_n^2$ test, the $Z_1^2$, $Z_2^2$, and

601: $Z_3^2$ searches are performed and would identify typical pulsar X-ray

602: lightcurves, which usually exhibit either a broad variation or two or

603: three peaks per cycle.

604: 

605: The timing

606: resolutions of the MOS instruments (which, in the data acquisition mode used

607: for these observations, is 2.6 seconds) and \cha\

608: (3.24 seconds) are not sufficient for

609: meaningful timing analysis of this type to be done. 

610: 

611: Of the six neutron star candidates found from the point source

612: spectra of the two observations, none were found to exhibit a periodic

613: signal. However, a future dedicated timing search may uncover one of

614: these sources as a pulsar. 

615: 

616: \subsection{Results of point source analysis}

617: Based on a combination of the optical to X-ray ratios (assuming the optical sources are the counterparts of the X-ray sources), distances from

618: the SNR centres, spectral parameters, and comparisons of $N_{\rm H}$ value

619: to that of the diffuse emission, none of the point sources is likely

620: to be the neutron star candidate associated with the SNR. However, further observations of 

621: the \cha\ objects may reveal one of them to be a neutron star or AGN.

622: 

623: \section{Distances}\label{dist}

624: It is interesting to note that the absorbing \ion{H}{1} column density derived

625: from the X-ray spectra is smaller for G85.9$-$0.6 than it is for G85.4+0.7,

626: even though G85.9$-$0.6 was predicted to be further away by \cite{kot01}.

627: The knowledge about the foreground \ion{H}{1} column density gives us another

628: option to constrain the distance to these objects. Both SNRs are believed to be

629: located outside the solar circle. In the outer Galaxy the radial velocity

630: is decreasing monotonically with distance, independent of the Galactic rotation

631: model used. Hence, we can integrate foreground atomic and molecular hydrogen

632: as a function of distance, by integrating the spectroscopic data down to

633: the appropriate radial velocity. Neutral hydrogen data are from the Canadian

634: Galactic Plane Survey \citep[see][for further information]{tay03}, and

635: the $^{12}$CO(1-0) molecular line data are from the Columbia CO survey of

636: \citet{dame87}.

637: 

638: Since atomic hydrogen is usually optically thick we could not simply

639: integrate the \ion{H}{1} emission, as emission does not represent all of the hydrogen actually

640: present along a Galactic line of sight. To correct for this we have to determine

641: the optical depth of the \ion{H}{1} along the line of sight. One way of doing

642: this is looking at background point sources, preferably of extragalactic

643: origin, which are very bright radio continuum emitters at 1420~MHz. If these

644: sources are bright enough we can see their emission being absorbed by the

645: foreground \ion{H}{1} and use them to probe the ISM along their line of sight

646: through the whole Galaxy. The absorbing neutral hydrogen column density

647: integrated over the velocity interval dv is then defined by $N_{\textrm{\ion{H}{1}}}(v)

648: [cm^{-2}] = 1.8224\times 10^{18}\, T_s(v)\, \tau(v)\, dv$. $\tau$ is the

649: optical depth, which can be determined from the absorption profile by

650: $\tau(v) = -ln((T_{on}(v) - T_B(v)/T_{bg}) + 1)$, here $T_{bg}$

651: is the brightness temperature of the absorbed background 

652: source, $T_{on}$ is the continuum subtracted \ion{H}{1} brightness temperature

653: at the position of that source, and $T_B$ is the brightness temperature

654: of the absorbing \ion{H}{1} cloud. $T_B$ is represented by the average off-source

655: \ion{H}{1} brightness temperature, which is determined in an $1\arcmin$ wide elliptical

656: annulus just outside the absorbed background source. $T_s$ is the spin

657: temperature of the absorbing cloud, which is 

658: defined by $T_s(v) = T_B(v)/(1 - e^{-\tau(v)})$. Equations for $N_{\textrm{\ion{H}{1}}}(v)$,

659: $\tau(v)$, and $T_s(v)$ can be found in e.g. \cite{roh04}.

660: 

661: To derive the complete foreground \ion{H}{1} column we have to add

662: twice 

663: the molecular hydrogen column density $N_{H_2}$. This is derived

664: over the velocity interval $dv$ using its relation to the CO brightness

665: temperature $T_B^{CO}$, determined by \cite{dame01}: $N_{H_2}(v) [cm^{-2}] = 1.8\times 10^{20}\,T_B^{CO}(v)\,dv$.

666: 

667: For the SNR G85.4+0.7 we used the absorption profiles of two

668: background sources to determine the foreground atomic hydrogen

669: column density. One source is located at the very centre of

670: the remnant (Figure~\ref{hicol}: source 1) at $\ell = 85.31\degr$ and

671: $b = +0.66\degr$ and the other just to the south

672: (Figure~\ref{hicol}: source 2) at $\ell = 85.31\degr$ and $b = +0.32\degr$.

673: For G85.9$-$0.6 we used the bright source at $\ell = 85.80\degr$ and

674: $b = -0.65\degr$. To calculate the amount of foreground molecular

675: hydrogen we averaged the Dame et al. (2001) CO data, which has a

676: pixel size of $30\arcmin$ over the four pixels closest to the centre

677: of the X-ray emission. The final combined \ion{H}{1} column density

678: profiles are displayed in Figure~\ref{hicol}.

679: 

680: If we now compare the absorbing \ion{H}{1} column density, which

681: we derived from the X-ray spectra (see Table \ref{dfit}), with the

682: $N_{\textrm{\ion{H}{1}}}$ - velocity diagrams in Figure~\ref{hicol}, we can get

683: an estimate for the radial velocities of the SNRs.

684: For the SNR G85.4+0.7 we derive a radial velocity of about

685: $-9$~km s$^{-1}$ averaging over source 1 and 2. This nicely

686: confirms the radial velocity of $-12 $~km s$^{-1}$, which was

687: determined for the stellar wind bubble surrounding G85.4+0.7

688: by Kothes et al. (2001). For G85.9$-$0.6 no previous estimate

689: of the radial velocity exists. The comparison of the absorbing

690: \ion{H}{1} column (Table~\ref{psspectab}) with the $N_{\textrm{\ion{H}{1}}}$ - velocity diagram

691: in Figure~\ref{hicol} results in a radial velocity estimate of

692: $-32\pm 6$~km s$^{-1}$.

693: 

694: Previously, \citet{kot01} found a distance to G85.4+0.7 of about

695: 3.8$\pm$0.6~kpc, based on the radial velocity

696: of its host stellar wind bubble using a flat rotation model for the

697: Galaxy with a Galacto-centric radius of

698: 8.5~kpc for the Sun at a velocity of 220~km s$^{-1}$ around the

699: Galactic centre. A distance of $\sim$5~kpc

700: was predicted for G85.9$-$0.6. The radial velocities of G85.4+0.7

701: ($-$12$\pm$3~km s$^{-1}$) \& G85.9$-$0.6 ($-$32$\pm$6~km s$^{-1}$) indicate

702: they are beyond the Solar circle \citep[$R_{0}=$7.6~kpc,][]{eise05}, but from

703: $T_{b}\left(\ell,~v\right)$ diagrams in this direction they are

704: not residents of the Perseus Spiral arm (which shows as a large \ion{H}{1}

705: feature extended in longitude, very nearly centred on $-$40~km s$^{-1}$).

706: 

707: A new kinematic-based distance method has been developed by

708: \citet{fmac06}. The approach is based on a model of the Galactic

709: \ion{H}{1} density distribution and velocity field, that is

710: \textit{fitted} to observations, rather than relying on a purely circular

711: rotation model assigned to the object (as in standard kinematics). The

712: model's density component is that of a warped thick disk of \ion{H}{1},

713: with axisymmetric features, and a two-arm density wave pattern in the

714: disk. The velocity field component models a non-linear response of the gas

715: to the density wave \citep[see][]{robe69, wiel79}, producing shocks at the

716: leading edge of major arms, and streaming motions within the disk,

717: depending on the location of an object in the spiral phase

718: pattern. This distance method has been shown

719: to accurately reproduce spectrophotometric distances to \ion{H}{2}

720: regions throughout the second quadrant of the Galactic plane.

721: 

722: The best fit synthetic \ion{H}{1} profile (with velocity field as in

723: Figure \ref{vfield}) towards these objects shows that G85.4+0.7 is

724: 3.5$\pm$1.0~kpc distant. This distance indicates G85.4+0.7 is within the

725: Local spiral arm, a feature in between the major Sagittarius and Perseus

726: spiral arms of the Milky Way. While the velocity of G85.9$-$0.6 is less

727: certain compared to G85.4+0.7 \citep[determined by association with

728: \ion{H}{1}; see][]{kot01}, it should be noted that in G85.4+0.7's case,

729: comparison of the X-ray absorbing column to the total integrated hydrogen

730: nuclei (in \ion{H}{1} and $^{12}$CO data) gives a good velocity estimate.

731: Hence, we can be reasonably sure that $-$32~km s$^{-1}$ is near to the

732: true velocity of G85.9$-$0.6 as well. This places it within the Perseus

733: arm spiral shock, which is 4.8$\pm$1.6~kpc in this direction (the arm's

734: potential minimum is 5.0~kpc). For any velocity in the range $-$40$\leq

735: v_{LSR} \leq -$18~km s$^{-1}$, the distance range shown in the fitted

736: velocity field (Figure \ref{vfield}) is small, about 4.1$-$4.8~kpc.

737: 

738: Although SNRs stemming from Type II events are primarily found within the

739: arms \citep[as massive progenitors are born mainly in the arm's

740: shock,][]{wiel79}, the location of G85.9$-$0.6's within the shock does not

741: necessarily vitiate its identification as a Type Ia. For example, Tycho's

742: SNR is known to be Type Ia, but its velocity and distance clearly

743: associate it with the Perseus Spiral arm. It is possible that the binary

744: precursor of G85.9$-$0.6 migrated into the arm along its Galactic orbit

745: before exploding as a Type Ia event.

746: 

747: 

748: 

749: \section{Discussion}\label{disc}

750: 

751: 

752: \subsection{Determination of shock age and mass of emitting gas}

753: 

754: To estimate $t$, the shock age, for the

755: SNRs, the relation $t=\tau/n_{\rm e}$ is used, where $\tau$ is the

756: upper limit of the ionization timescale from the VPSHOCK model. The electron density

757: $n_{\rm e}$ is determined from the distance in cm $D_{\rm cm}$, angular

758: size in radians $\alpha$, given by the diameter of the extraction region, and the

759: relation $n_{\rm H}=n_{\rm e}/1.2$, where $n_{\rm H}$

760: is the volume density of hydrogen within. Given

761: that ${\rm Norm}=\frac{\int n_{\rm e}n_{\rm{H}}dV}{10^{14}(4\pi D_{\rm cm}^2)}$, where

762: Norm is the normalization of the

763: VPSHOCK model, which is proportional to the emission measure, and the

764: electron and hydrogen densities $n_{\rm e}$ and $n_{\rm{H}}$ are

765: assumed to be uniform, a volume filling factor $f$ is employed so that

766: $n_{\rm e}=(\frac{2.88\times 10^{15} ({\rm Norm})}{f \alpha^3D_{\rm cm}})^{1/2}$. From

767: these calculations, it is determined that for G85.4+0.7, $n_e \approx

768: (0.11\pm0.03)(fD_{3.5})^{-1/2}$ for the ESAS background (for the MOS

769: instrument) or $(0.11^{+0.05}_{-0.04})(fD_{3.5})^{-1/2}$

770:  for the observation background, and $t =(18^{+17}_{-9})(fD_{3.5})^{1/2}$

771:  kyr for the ESAS background or $(23^{+26}_{-14})(fD_{3.5})^{1/2}$

772:  kyr for the observation

773: background. For G85.9$-$0.6, $n_e \approx (0.07^{+0.03}_{-0.02})(fD_{4.8})^{-1/2}$ for the

774: ESAS background or $(0.07\pm0.03)(fD_{4.8})^{-1/2}$ for the observation

775: background and $t = (30^{+12}_{-13})(fD_{4.8})^{1/2}$ kyr for the ESAS

776: background or $(22^{+11}_{-10}) (fD_{4.8})^{1/2}$ kyr for the observation

777: background. These are larger than the age estimates from the radio

778: data.

779: 

780: The mass of the emitting gas is

781: calculated based on spherical emitting regions with the size given by

782: the extraction radius (given in Table~\ref{dfit}), composed of

783: 92\% hydrogen and 8\% helium, and the relation $n_{\rm H}=n_{\rm

784:   e}/1.2$ is used as for the above calculation of $t$. The mass of the

785: emitting gas in G85.4+0.7 is

786: $(2.8\pm1.5) D_{3.5}^{5/2} M_{\sun}$ for the ESAS

787: background and $(2.8^{+1.8}_{-1.6})D_{3.5}^{5/2} M_{\sun}$ for the

788: observation background and that for G85.9$-$0.6 is

789: $(2.7^{+1.8}_{-1.6}) D_{4.8}^{5/2} M_{\sun}$ for the ESAS

790: background and $(2.7\pm1.8)D_{4.8}^{5/2} M_{\sun}$ for the

791: observation background.

792: 

793: \subsection{Background subtraction}

794: 

795: The background subtraction was problematic, particularly for the

796: spectrum of G85.4+0.7, which is fainter and required a different model

797: to be fit to it depending on which background region on the

798: observation was used, leading to a very careful selection of the

799: background extraction region, the process of which is described in

800: \S\ref{bg}. Instrumental lines, which are fortunately different for PN

801: and 

802: MOS, nevertheless increased the value of $\chi^2$ for the combined fits, even

803: when the background was chosen very carefully, and needed to be

804: explicitly fit when the ESAS background was used, as described in \S\ref{bg}. In addition, the soft

805: spectra of the SNRs exhibit large amounts of noise in the

806: high energy end of the spectra, allowing fits to be made only up to

807: 2.5 keV. Future longer observations of these SNRs will

808: help to resolve these difficulties, allow for better fits to the

809: abundances, eliminate ambiguities in the spectral results, and perhaps

810: allow for conclusive identifications of neutron star and 

811: pulsar candidates in addition to other point sources. 

812: 

813: 

814: 

815: \subsection{G85.4+0.7}\label{disc85.4}

816: 

817: A comparison between the morphologies of the X-ray diffuse emission and the radio emission

818: of G85.4+0.7 can be seen in Figure~\ref{85.4imagens} in which the

819: X-ray point sources have been removed and the X-ray image has been

820: smoothed to 1$^{\prime}$ to match the radio contours. The diffuse

821: X-ray emission exhibits some structure, and it lies in the approximate

822: centre of the radio shell. A spectrum was extracted from the central

823: blob, the position and size of which is shown in the top panel of Figure~\ref{85.4reg}, and it could not be adequately fit with a non-thermal power law

824: model, indicating that a pulsar wind nebula origin for the emission can

825: be ruled out. 

826: 

827: The fact that the SNR does not exhibit any limb brightening and the X-ray

828: emission is mostly concentrated in the centre, as projected in

829: the plane of the sky and three dimensionally, can be interpreted as

830: evidence that the X-ray emission is produced by the ejecta. The fact

831: that there appears to be no emission from the swept up material can be

832: explained if the remnant is evolutionarily young. 

833: 

834: With the ejecta

835: interpretation, if it is assumed that the free electrons are evenly

836: distributed in the extraction area, the resulting ages are 18 and 23

837: kyr for the two backgrounds. In Figure~\ref{85.4imagens} it can be

838: seen that the outer radio shell has an approximately constant radius,

839: whereas the inner shell has a smaller radius in the vertical centre,

840: which expands as the latitude changes, and this indicates that the SNR is

841: moving either toward us or away from us. The two shells appear to

842: meet near the bottom of the image, so the radius of the SNR can be

843: approximated as that of the outer shell, which is $\sim0.3^\circ$ on

844: the image. The average velocity of the

845: expanding SNR is then 910 or 730 km/s for the two ages. However, the

846: morphology of the X-ray emission is not very smooth, indicating that

847: the filling factor $f<<1$. Assuming $f=0.2$, the electron density $n_e$

848: would be 0.25 cm$^{-3}$ for either the ESAS and observation background, 

849: and the ejecta masses would be 1.3 $M_{\sun}$ for

850: either background. The shock age would then be 8000 or 10300 years,

851: and the average expansion velocity would be 2150 or 1640 km/s. For a

852: $10^{51}$ erg supernova explosion, the ejecta mass would be 22 or 37

853: $M_{\sun}$, or 2.2 or 3.7 $M_{\sun}$ for a $10^{50}$ erg

854: explosion, indicating that the lower energy explosion would result in

855: an ejecta mass consistent with a young freely expanding SNR.

856: 

857: The radio continuum emission indicates that there is some swept up

858: material. Assuming that the density inside the stellar wind bubble was

859: $\sim 0.01$ cm$^{-3}$ before the explosion, the SNR would have swept up

860: $\sim 6.5$ $M_{\sun}$ of material, which is on the order of the

861: ejecta mass, and means that the SNR is in the transition between free

862: expansion and Sedov expansion.

863: 

864: The slightly above-solar abundance of O in the diffuse spectra reinforces the hypothesis that

865: the supernova most likely resulted from a core collapse, though the

866: large error bars weaken the argument. The abundances of all elements

867: other than O and Fe are below solar, but they would be enhanced if the

868: X-rays were from the ejecta. However, it is possible that the spectral

869: parameters for the abundances are affected by the poor quality of the

870: spectra and by the uncertainties associated with the background

871: subtraction. 

872: 

873: Since the most likely origin of G85.4+0.7 was a core

874: collapse supernova (see \S\ref{dist}), it is possible that a

875: neutron star or pulsar 

876: which is associated with this SNR can be found. Given its power law X-ray 

877: spectrum, proximity to the centre of the remnant, and

878: similar $N_{\rm H}$ value to the diffuse emission, source 1 in Figure

879: \ref{85.4reg} is possibly the associated neutron star, but sources 4

880: and 9 are

881: within the radio shell and are also candidates, given their

882: spectral parameters. However, the low fit quality of source 4 ($\chi^2\sim2$) 

883: indicates that it is not likely to be a neutron star, and source 9 is situated 

884: far from the centre of the diffuse emission so is less likely to be the 

885: associated neutron star. \cha\ sources 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, or 16 in 

886: Figure~\ref{cha85.4} can also be considered as neutron star candidates (provided 

887: the optical counterparts listed in Table~\ref{pscat85.4} are not the true counterparts.

888: 

889: 

890: \subsection{G85.9$-$0.6}\label{disc85.9}

891: Figure~\ref{85.9imagens} shows X-ray and radio images of

892: G85.9$-$0.6, produced in a similar way to Figure~\ref{85.4imagens}. The

893: diffuse X-ray emission appears to contain less structure than

894: G85.4+0.7, and, as for G85.4+0.7, a spectrum extracted from the central blob, 

895: the position and size of which are shown in the top panel of Figure~\ref{85.9reg},

896: indicates that a pulsar wind nebula origin for the emission can be

897: ruled out. 

898: 

899: Because Figure~\ref{85.4imagens} shows no limb brightening and the

900: emission is mostly from the central blob, a similar argument to that

901: used for G85.4+0.7 can be employed here to suggest an ejecta

902: interpretation for the X-ray emission. Assuming that the free

903: electrons are evenly distributed in the

904: extraction area the resulting age is 30 or 22 kyr for the two

905: backgrounds. Using the average distance between the centre of the

906: X-ray emission and the shell, $\sim 0.2^\circ$, the radius of the

907: shell is 15.3 pc  The average expansion velocity would then be 500 or

908: 680 km/s. The emission is concentrated in the inner $6^\prime$, which

909: indicates an electron density of 0.20 cm$^{-3}$ and an ejecta mass of

910: 1.0 $M_{\sun}$ which agrees with the predicted mass for a type Ia

911: explosion, 1.4 $M_{\sun}$. This would result in an age of 10600 or

912: 7800 years and average expansion velocity of 1350 or 1850 km/s. 

913: 

914: For a Type Ia supernova, the explosion energy is $\sim10^{51}$ erg and

915: the ejecta mass is 1.4 $M_{\sun}$. Unlike

916: for G85.4+0.7, the density in the interarm region is closer to 0.1

917: cm$^{-3}$, resulting in a swept up mass of nearly 50 $M_{\sun}$. This

918: indicates that the SNR is in the Sedov expansion phase, which is

919: described by $R=14 (E_0/n_0)^{1/5}t^{2/5}$, where $R$ is the radius in

920: pc, $E_0$ is the explosion energy in units of $10^{51}$ erg, $n_0$ is

921: the ambient density in cm$^{-3}$, and $t$ is the age in units of

922: $10^4$ years. For an explosion energy of 10$^{51}$ erg, a radius of

923: 15.3 pc, and an age of 10600 or 7800 years, the resulting ambient

924: density is 0.84 or 0.55 cm$^{-3}$ which are consistent with the

925: density of the interarm region, but the swept up mass would be 360 or

926: 240 $M_{\sun}$, from which it should be possible to measure thermal

927: X-ray emission, from the part of the shell that is included in the

928: X-ray pointing. The current expansion velocity would be

929: $dR/dt=0.4(R/t)$, which is 570 or 760 km/s.  

930: 

931: 

932: 

933: The interpretation of G85.9$-$0.6 as having been produced by a Type Ia

934: supernova is reinforced by the Fe abundance, which is well above

935: solar. As with G85.4+0.7, the ejecta interpretation is called into

936: question by the remaining abundances, which should be above solar, but

937: are instead below solar. This could again be a result of poor quality

938: spectra. 

939: 

940: Given that the radio results described in \cite{kot01}, as well as

941: the distance presented here, indicated that

942: G85.9$-$0.6 was most likely produced by a Type Ia supernova, it was not

943: expected to find a neutron star associated with this SNR. The above

944: solar Fe abundance for this SNR is consistent with a Type Ia explosion.

945: An identification of sources 6 and 7 in Figure~\ref{85.9reg} has not

946: yet been made. They are bright X-ray emitting objects with no known

947: optical or radio counterpart, making them good neutron star or

948: radio-quiet AGN candidates, though if one of them were a neutron star,

949: it would be unlikely that it is associated with the G85.9$-$0.6 SNR

950: because they are both situated far outside the radio shell of the

951: remnant, and furthermore, the value of $N_{\rm H}$ for source 6 does not match that

952: of the SNR itself, and the fit quality of source 7 ($\chi^2\sim2$) indicates that an absorbed 

953: power law is not a good fit. Their identification with possible 2MASS

954: counterparts (see Table~\ref{pscat85.9}) makes them more likely radio-quiet AGN than neutron

955: stars, provided the 2MASS objects are the true counterparts. A future

956: detailed deep X-ray or multiwavelength study of these objects should be

957: undertaken to identify and further study them, even though they are

958: probably not associated with the G85.9$-$0.6 SNR. Source 4

959: is on the edge of the radio shell of the SNR, but its identification

960: as a neutron star is questionable because of its photon index and

961: hardness ratio, as well as the fact that it is not expected that there

962: is a neutron star associated with this remnant. 

963: 

964: 

965: \subsection{Mixed Morphology Interpretation}

966: The centrally filled morphology of both SNRs and the thermal nature of

967: their X-ray emission confined within the radio shells

968: suggest that they belong to the class of mixed-morphology SNRs

969: (also known as thermal composites; Rho \& Petre 1997).

970: The origin of the thermal X-ray emission interior to the radio

971: shells in these SNRs has been attributed to several mechanisms which

972: include: a) cloudlet evaporation in the SNR interior (White \& Long 

973: 1991),

974: b) thermal conduction smoothing out the temperature gradient across the

975: SNR and enhancing the central density (Cox et al. 1999), c) a 

976: radiatively

977: cooled rim with a hot interior (e.g. Harrus et al. 1997), and d)

978: possible interaction with a nearby cloud (e.g. Safi-Harb et al. 2005). 

979: While

980: modeling these SNRs in the light of the above mentioned models is beyond

981: the scope of this paper and has to await better quality data, we can 

982: rule

983: out the cloudlet evaporation model based on the low ambient densities

984: inferred from our spectral fits (see \S7.1 and Table~1).  Except for Fe 

985: and possibly O,

986: the abundances inferred from our spectral fits are for the most 

987: elements consistent with

988: or below solar values, as observed in most mixed-morphology SNRs. 

989: However, enhanced

990: metal abundances have been observed in younger SNRs, e.g. 3C~397,

991: estimated to be $\sim$5.3 kyr--old and proposed to be evolving into the

992: mixed-morphology phase (Safi-Harb et al. 2005).  The ages inferred

993: for G85.4+0.7 ($\sim$8--10 kyr; see Table~1 and \S\ref{disc85.4}) and G85.9$-$0.6 ($\sim$8--11 kyrs; 

994: see Table~1 and \S\ref{disc85.9})

995: suggest a later evolutionary phase where only shock-heated ejecta from 

996: Fe

997: (for G85.9$-$0.6) and possibly Oxygen are still observed.

998: 

999: 

1000: 

1001: 

1002: 

1003: \acknowledgments

1004: 

1005: {\it XMM-Newton} is an ESA science mission with instruments and

1006: contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA. This 

1007: research

1008: is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of

1009: Canada (NSERC), and partly by NASA grant NNG05GL15G. This research has

1010: made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System, and

1011: the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey, a Canadian project with

1012: international partners supported by NSERC. We thank an anonymous referee for useful comments.

1013: 

1014: 

1015: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1016: \bibitem[Borkowski et al.(2001)]{bor01} Borkowski, K. J., Lyerly,

1017:     W. J., \& Reynolds, S. P. 2001 \apj, 548, 820

1018: \bibitem[Buccheri et al.(1983)]{buc83} Buccheri, R., et al. 1983,

1019:   A\&A, 128, 245

1020: \bibitem[Corcoran et al.(2000)]{cor00} Corcoran, M. F., Fredericks,

1021:   A. C., Petre, R., Swank, J. H., \& Drake, S. A. 2000, \apj, 545, 420

1022: \bibitem[Cox et al.(1999)]{cox99} Cox, D., Shelton, R. L., Maciejewski, W., Smith, R. K., Plewa, T., Pawl, A., \& Ryczka, M. 1999, \apj, 524, 179

1023: \bibitem[Dame et al.(1987)]{dame87} Dame, T.~M. et al. 1987, \apj,

1024:   322, 706

1025: \bibitem[Dame et al.(2001)]{dame01} Dame, T.~M., Hartmann, D., \&

1026:   {Thaddeus}, P. 2001, \apj, 547, 792

1027: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al(2005)]{eise05} Eisenhauer, F., et al. 2005,

1028: \apj, 628, 246

1029: \bibitem[Foster \& MacWilliams(2006)]{fmac06} Foster, T. \& MacWilliams,

1030: J. 2006, \apj, 644, 214

1031: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2006)]{gott06} Gotthelf, E. V. 2006, in ``Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments'' (IAU Symposium 218, ASP Conference Proceedings), eds. F. Camilo and B. M. Gaensler. 225

1032: \bibitem[Guarinos(1992)]{gua92}Guarinos J. 1992, Distribution of

1033:   interstellar matter in the galactic disk from

1034: visual extinction data, in ``Astronomy from Large Databases II'',

1035:   Haguenau 14-16 September 1992,

1036:       Ed. A. Heck and F. Murtagh, ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings No 43,

1037:       ISBN 3-923524-47-1, p. 301

1038: \bibitem[Harrus et al.(1999)]{har99} Harrus, I. M., Hughes, J. P., Singh, K. P., Koyama, \& Asaoka, I. 1999, \apj, 488, 781

1039: \bibitem[Jackson, Safi-Harb, \& Kothes(2006)] {jac06} Jackson, M., Safi-Harb, S., \&

1040: Kothes, R. 2006 Canadian Astronomical Society Meeting, Calgary, Canada, June 1-4

1041: \bibitem[Kothes et al.(2001)]{kot01} Kothes, R., Landecker, T. L.,

1042:     Foster, T., and Leahy, D. A. 2001, A\&A, 376, 641

1043: \bibitem[Leahy, Elsner, \& Weisskopf (1983)]{lea83} Leahy, D. A.,

1044:   Elsner, R. F., \& Weisskopf, M. C. 1983, \apj, 272, 256

1045: \bibitem[Liedahl et al.(1990)]{lie90} Liedahl, D. A., Kahn, S. M.,

1046:   Osterheld, A. L., \& Goldstein, W. H. 1990, \apj, 350, L37

1047: \bibitem[Lumb(2002)]{lum02} Lumb, D. 2002, EPIC Background Files,

1048:   XMM-SOC-CAL-TN-0016, Issue 2.0, http://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/docs/documents/CAL-TN-0016-2-0.ps.gz

1049: \bibitem[Lyne \& Graham-Smith(1998)]{lyn98} Lyne, A. G., \&

1050:   Graham-Smith, F. 1998, Pulsar Astronomy, Cambridge: Cambridge

1051:   University Press.

1052: \bibitem[Mewe et al.(1985)]{mew85} Mewe, R., Gronenschild,

1053:   E. H. B. M., \& van den Oord, G. H. J. 1985, A\&AS, 62, 197

1054: \bibitem[Mewe et al.(2003)]{mew03} Mewe, R., Raasssen, A. J. J.,

1055:   Cassinelli, J. P., van der Hucht, K. A., Miller, N. A., \& G{\"u}del,

1056:   M. 2003 A\&A, 398, 203

1057:   ,\& van den Oord, G. H. J. 1985, A\&AS, 62, 197

1058: \bibitem[Monet et al.(1998)]{mon98} Monet, D., et al. 1998, USNO-A V2.0, A Catalog of Astrometric Standards

1059: \bibitem[Monet et al.(2003)]{mon03} Monet, D. G., et al. 2003, \aj, 125, 948

1060: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon (1983)]{morr83} Morrison, R., \& McCammon, D. 1983, \apj, 270, 119

1061: \bibitem[Myers et al.(2002)]{my02}Myers J.R., Sande C.B., Miller

1062:   A.C., Warren Jr. W.H., Tracewell D.A. 2002, SKY2000 Master Catalog, Version 4

1063: \bibitem[Read \& Ponman(2003)]{rea03} Read A.M. \& Ponman T.J., 2003, A\&A, 409, 395

1064: \bibitem[Rho \& Petre(1997)]{rho97} Rho, J., \& Petre, R. 1997, \apj, 484, 828

1065: \bibitem[Roberts (1969)]{robe69} Roberts, W. W. 1969, \apj, 158, 123

1066: \bibitem[Rohlfs \& Wilson(2004)]{roh04} Rohlfs, K. \& Wilson. T. L. 2004, ``Tools of Radio Astronomy'', 4th rev. \& enl. ed., Berlin: Springer, 2004

1067: \bibitem[Safi-Harb(2006)] {saf06} Safi-Harb, S. 2006, American Astronomical Society, 208, \#61.03

1068: \bibitem[Safi-Harb et al.(2005)]{saf05} Safi-Harb, S., Dubner, G., Petre, R., Holt, S. S., \& Durouchoux, P. 

1069: 2005,

1070: \apj, 618, 321

1071: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{2mass} Skrutskie, M. F., et al.

1072:     2006, AJ, 131, 1163

1073: \bibitem[Snowden \& Kuntz(2006)]{snow06} Snowden, S. L. \& Kuntz,

1074:   K. D., 2006. Cookbook for Analysis Procedures for \xmm\ EPIC MOS

1075:   Observations of Extend Objects and the Diffuse Background, Version 1.0.1.

1076: \bibitem[Str\"{u}der et al.(2001)]{str01} Str\"{u}der,  L., et al. 2001, A\&A, 365, L18

1077: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(2003)]{tay03} Taylor, A.~R. et al. 2003, \aj, 125, 3145.

1078: \bibitem[Townsley et al.(2000)]{tow00} Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., Garmire, G. P., Nousek, J. A., 2000, \apj, 534, L139

1079: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2001)]{tur01} Turner,  M. J. L., et al. 2001, A\&A, 365, L27

1080: \bibitem[White \& Long(1991)]{whi91} White, R. L.  \& Long, K. S. 1991, \apj, 373, 543

1081: \bibitem[Wielen (1979)]{wiel79} Wielen, R. 1979, in IAU Symp. 84, The

1082: Large-Scale Characteristics of the Galaxy, ed. W. B. Burton (Dordrecht:

1083: Reidel), 133

1084: \bibitem[Woods \& Thompson(2006)]{wood04} Woods, P. \& Thompson, C. 2006 in ``Compact Stellar X-ray Sources'', eds. W. Lewin \& M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 547 

1085: \end{thebibliography}

1086: 

1087: \clearpage

1088: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}

1089: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} 

1090: \tablecaption{Fits of G85.4+0.7 and G85.9$-$0.6 \xmm\ PN and MOS diffuse region spectra to an

1091:   absorbed VPSHOCK and derived quantities. Errors are 2$\sigma$

1092:   uncertainties. Abundances of He, C, and N are frozen to solar.

1093: The Ni abundance is tied to the Fe

1094:   abundance in the fits. \label{dfit}}

1095: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1096: \tablehead{

1097: \colhead{Parameter} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{G85.4+0.7} &

1098: \multicolumn{2}{c}{G85.9$-$0.6}}

1099: \startdata 

1100: MOS Background used:&XMM-ESAS&Region in Figure \ref{85.4reg}&XMM-ESAS&Region in Figure \ref{85.9reg}\\   

1101: \tableline

1102: &&&&\\

1103: $N_{\rm H}$ ($10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$) &$0.86 ^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$& $0.87\pm 0.06$&$0.68^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$&$0.70 \pm 0.03$\\

1104: $kT$ (keV) &$1.1^{+0.8}_{-0.3}$& $1.0^{+0.4}_{-0.2}$&$1.3^{+0.5}_{-0.2}$&$1.6^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$\\

1105: $\tau$ ($10^{10}\rm{cm}^{-3}$s) & $6.4^{+5.8}_{-2.8}$&$8.0^{+8.4}_{-3.4}$&$6.8^{+1.9}_{-0.9}$&$5.1^{+1.5}_{-1.0}$\\

1106: Norm\tablenotemark{a} &$(2.4^{+0.9}_{-0.8})\times10^{-3}$&$(2.3^{+0.8}_{-0.6})\times10^{-3}$ &$(1.1^{+0.1}_{-0.2})\times10^{-3}$&$(1.1\pm0.2)\times10^{-3}$\\

1107: O\tablenotemark{b} & $1.2\pm 0.5$&$1.2^{+2.7}_{-0.6}$ &$1.5^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $1.7^{+0.6}_{-0.4}$\\

1108: Ne & $0.4^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$ &$0.5^{+0.2}_{-0.4}$ & $0.0^{+0.2}_{-0.0}$& $0.0^{+0.2}_{-0.0}$\\

1109: Mg & $0.3\pm0.1$ &$0.4^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $0.6^{+0.2}_{-0.1}$& $0.6^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$\\

1110: Si &$0.1\pm0.1$&$0.2\pm0.2$ &$1.1 \pm0.2$& $0.8\pm0.2$\\

1111: S &$0.4^{+0.2}_{-0.4}$&$0.8^{+1.7}_{-0.8}$&$0.8^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ &  $0.4^{+0.8}_{-0.4}$\\

1112: Fe & $1.1^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$&$1.1^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$ & $2.6^{+0.5}_{-0.2}$&$2.6\pm0.3$\\

1113: $\chi^2_{\nu}$ ($\nu$)&1.41 (209)&1.38 (211) &1.50 (460)& 1.78 (465)\\

1114: \tableline

1115: &&&&\\

1116: Distance (kpc) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$3.5\pm 1.0$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{$4.8\pm1.6$}\\

1117: Radius (pc)\tablenotemark{c}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{($6.4 \pm

1118:   1.8$)$D_{3.5}$}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{($7.5\pm 2.5$)$D_{4.8}$}\\

1119: Temperature (MK) & $13^{+9}_{-3}$&$12^{+5}_{-2}$&$15^{+6}_{-2}$&$19^{+6}_{-3}$\\

1120: 0.5--2.5 keV \\

1121: absorbed flux\tablenotemark{d} &$ 1.1\times10^{-12}$ &$ 9.6\times10^{-13}$&$1.5 \times10^{-12}$&$1.6 \times10^{-12}$\\

1122: 0.5--2.5 keV \\

1123: unabsorbed flux\tablenotemark{d}&$ 2.7\times10^{-11}$ &$1.8 \times 10^{-11}$ &$1.2 \times10^{-11}$&$1.4 \times10^{-11}$\\

1124: Luminosity \\

1125: (0.5--2.5~keV) (erg/s)\tablenotemark{e} & $(3.1^{+1.3}_{-1.5})\times10^{33}D_{3.5}^2$&$(2.0^{+1.6}_{-1.0})\times10^{33}D_{3.5}^2$ &$(2.4^{+1.2}_{-1.1})\times 10^{34}D_{4.8}^2$& $(2.7^{+1.2}_{-1.3})\times 10^{34}D_{4.8}^2$\\

1126: $n_e$ (cm$^{-3}$)&$(0.11\pm0.03)(fD_{3.5})^{-1/2}$&$(0.11^{+0.05}_{-0.04})(fD_{3.5})^{-1/2}$ &$(0.07^{+0.03}_{-0.02})(fD_{4.8})^{-1/2}$&$(0.07\pm0.03)(fD_{4.8})^{-1/2}$\\

1127: $t$\tablenotemark{f} (kyr) & $(18^{+17}_{-9})(fD_{3.5})^{1/2}$&$(23^{+26}_{-14})(fD_{3.5})^{1/2}$ &$(30^{+12}_{-13})(fD_{4.8})^{1/2}$&$(22^{+11}_{-10})(fD_{4.8})^{1/2}$\\

1128: Mass of X-ray \\

1129: emitting gas ($M_{\sun}$)&$(2.8\pm1.5)f^{1/2}D_{3.5}^{5/2}$&$(2.8^{+1.8}_{-1.6})f^{1/2}D_{3.5}^{5/2}$&$(2.7^{+1.8}_{-1.6})f^{1/2}D_{4.8}^{5/2}$&$(2.7\pm1.8)f^{1/2}D_{4.8}^{5/2}$\\

1130: \enddata 

1131: \tablenotetext{a}{($10^{-14}/4\pi D^2$)$\int n_en_{\rm{H}}dV  \rm{cm}^{-5}$}

1132: \tablenotetext{b}{Elemental abundances are relative to solar abundance.}

1133: \tablenotetext{c}{From X-ray extraction radius in

1134:   Figures~\ref{85.4reg} and \ref{85.9reg}. $D_{3.5}$ and $D_{4.8}$ are distances in terms of 3.5

1135:   and 4.8 kpc, respectively.}

1136: \tablenotetext{d}{Flux in ${\rm erg}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$}

1137: \tablenotetext{e}{$f$ is the volume filling factor.}

1138: \tablenotetext{f}{Shock age}

1139: 

1140: \end{deluxetable}

1141: 

1142: \clearpage

1143: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccclcc}

1144: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} 

1145: \tablecaption{Catalogue of point sources surrounding SNR G85.4+0.7. \cha\ positions are denoted by a CXO prefix\label{pscat85.4}}

1146: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1147: \tablehead{

1148: \colhead{\#} & IAU Name & $\alpha_{\rm J2000.0}$ & $\delta_{\rm

1149:   J2000.0}$ & Pos. Err. &Counterpart\tablenotemark{a} & Offset&$\displaystyle\frac{\rm Optical}{\rm X-ray}$

1150: \\

1151: &&&&(arcsec)&&(arcsec)&Flux Ratio}

1152: \startdata 

1153: 1 &XMMU J205101.6+452218& 20 51 01.593 & +45 22 18.47 & 11.9 &1350-13030003 & 1.3&$6.6\times 10^{12}$\\

1154:  & CXO J205101.4+452219 & 20 51 01.392 & +45 22 18.60 & 0.1 & & & \\

1155:  2 &XMMU J205056.8+452322& 20 50 56.750 & +45 23 22.18 & 9.5 & 1350-13027640 & 2.2 &$1.8\times 10^{12}$\\

1156:  & CXO J205056.6+452320 & 20 50 56.603 & +45 23 20.09 & 0.6 & & & \\

1157:  3 &XMMU J205043.2+452213& 20 50 43.212 & +45 22 12.96 & 11.2 & 1350-13020622 &  2.3&$6.1\times 10^{12}$\\

1158:  & CXO J205043.1+452215 & 20 50 43.097 & +45 22 15.49 & 0.8 & & & \\

1159:  4 &XMMU J205034.8+451831& 20 50 34.811 & +45 18 31.47 & 10.1 & 1350-13016264 & 2.9&$6.8\times 10^{14}$\\

1160:  & CXO J205034.9+451836 & 20 50 34.945 & +45 18 35.83 & 1.2 & & & \\

1161:  5 &XMMU J205024.5+452343& 20 50 24.523 & +45 23 42.95 & 11.9 & 1350-13011037 & 2.7&$2.7\times 10^{12}$\\

1162:  6 &XMMU J205120.9+451859& 20 51 20.925 & +45 18 58.73 & 12.4 & J205120.79+451900.1(S)\tablenotemark{b} & 2.4&$1.2\times 10^{15}$\\

1163:  & CXO J205120.8+451901 & 20 51 20.802 & +45 19 01.11 & 0.4 & & & \\

1164: \tablenotemark{c}&&&&& 1350-13039935&4.1&$2.6\times 10^{15}$\\

1165: \tablenotemark{d}&&&&& &5.1&\\

1166: 7 &XMMU J205127.2+452025& 20 51 27.152 & +45 20 24.96 & 11.6 & 1350-13042959 & 1.7&$4.6\times 10^{15}$\\

1167:  & CXO J205127.2+452025 & 20 51 27.158 & +45 20 25.01 & 0.6 & & & \\

1168:  8 &XMMU J205000.7+452044& 20 50 00.657 & +45 20 43.94 & 12.2 & J205000.64+452046.2(S) & 2.0&$1.4\times 10^{15}$ \\

1169: &&&&&1350-12998831&3.7&$1.4\times 10^{15}$\\

1170:  9 &XMMU J204959.8+452349& 20 49 59.800 & +45 23 49.00 & 14.5 & 1350-12998401& 1.7&$4.3\times 10^{12}$\\

1171: &&&&&1353-0399326(B)&2.1&$6.8\times 10^{11}$\\

1172: 10 & CXO J205109.0+452440 & 20 51 09.022 & +45 24 39.85 & 1.4 &1350-13033336 &11.2 &$ 2.3\times 10^{13}$    \\

1173: 11 & CXO J205056.6+451744 & 20 50 56.588 & +45 17 44.11 & 1.0 &1350-130274980& 6.3&$ 1.2\times 10^{12}$    \\

1174: 12 & CXO J205111.9+452136 & 20 51 11.876 & +45 21 36.26 & 1.0 &1350-13035376 &1.7 &$ 2.1\times 10^{14}$    \\

1175: 13 & CXO J205036.9+451945 & 20 50 36.913 & +45 19 45.00 & 1.1 &1350-13017472 &7.8 &$ 1.4\times 10^{12}$    \\

1176: 14 & CXO J205138.4+452333 & 20 51 38.370 & +45 23 33.43 & 1.2 &1350-13049047 &6.0 &$ 3.3\times 10^{12}$    \\

1177: 15 & CXO J205115.5+452207 & 20 51 15.499 & +45 22 07.42 & 1.8 &1353-0400904(B) &6.2 &$ 8.4\times 10^{11}$    \\

1178: 16 & CXO J205103.6+451730 & 20 51 03.641 & +45 17 30.00 & 1.7 &1350-13031016 &3.8 &$ 2.5\times 10^{12}$    \\

1179: 17 & CXO J205149.3+452341 & 20 51 49.264 & +45 23 40.59 & 1.7 &1350-13054386 &2.4 &$ 1.0\times 10^{12}$    \\

1180: 18 & CXO J205140.0+452107 & 20 51 40.002 & +45 21 06.64 & 2.0 &1350-13049401 &5.6 &$ 4.9\times 10^{11}$    \\

1181: 19 & CXO J205143.3+452037 & 20 51 43.338 & +45 20 37.04 & 1.7 &1350-13051265 &3.2 &$ 3.7\times 10^{12}$    \\

1182: 20 & CXO J205135.2+451830 & 20 51 35.164 & +45 18 30.27 & 1.7 &1350-13047169 &1.5 &$ 6.4\times 10^{15}$    \\

1183: 21 & CXO J205126.4+451856 & 20 51 26.420 & +45 18 56.06 & 1.6 &1353-0401091 &7.2 &$ 1.8\times 10^{12}$    \\

1184: \enddata  

1185: \tablenotetext{a}{All designations are from the USNO-A2.0 catalogue \citep{mon98} unless otherwise noted.}

1186: \tablenotetext{b}{(S) denotes SKY2000 designation \citep{my02}}

1187: \tablenotetext{c}{This row refers to the \xmm\ position}

1188: \tablenotetext{d}{This row refers to the \cha\ position}

1189: 

1190: \end{deluxetable}

1191: 

1192: \clearpage

1193: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccclcc}

1194: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} 

1195: \tablecaption{Catalogue of point sources surrounding SNR G85.9$-$0.6. \cha\ positions are denoted by a CXO prefix\label{pscat85.9}}

1196: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1197: \tablehead{

1198: \colhead{\#} & IAU Name & $\alpha_{\rm J2000.0}$ & $\delta_{\rm

1199:   J2000.0}$ & Pos. Err. &Counterpart\tablenotemark{a} & Offset&$\displaystyle\frac{\rm Optical}{\rm X-ray}$

1200: \\

1201: &&&&(arcsec)&&(arcsec)&Flux Ratio}

1202: \startdata 

1203: 1 &XMMU J205911.4+444729&20 59 11.398& +44 47 29.27& 11.3& 1347-0402736(B)\tablenotemark{b}&  5.5&$1.1\times 10^{19}$    \\

1204: 2 &XMMU J205950.5+445954&20 59 50.504& +44 59 53.58& 10.3& HD 200102(I)\tablenotemark{c}&6.0&$3.7\times 10^{15}$\\

1205: 3 &XMMU J205944.3+450741&20 59 44.261& +45 07 40.75& 11.7& 1350-13269810        & 3.7 &$1.1\times 10^{14}$\\

1206: 4 &XMMU J205857.0+450348&20 58 56.993& +45 03 48.25& 11.0& 1350-0403688(B)&  3.7&$1.0\times 10^{13}$\\

1207: 5 &XMMU J210003.3+450342&21 00 03.280& +45 03 41.76& 10.4& 1350-13276811&  4.3&$2.5\times 10^{12}$\\

1208: 6 &XMMU J210023.1+445435&21 00 23.149& +44 54 34.98& 11.1& 21002305+4454364(M)\tablenotemark{d}&  1.4&\nodata\\

1209: 7 &XMMU J210000.1+445631&21 00 00.057& +44 56 30.94&  9.3& 21000013+4456364(M) &  4.9&\nodata   \\

1210: 8 &XMMU J205917.0+445809&20 59 17.009& +44 58 08.71& 10.5& 1349-0404180(B)&  1.4&$4.2\times 10^{12}$\\

1211:  & CXO J205917.3+445821 & 20 59 17.308 & +44 58 20.90 & 0.5 & & 12.2& \\

1212: \tablenotemark{e}&&&&& 1349-0404191(B)&11.7&$2.7\times 10^{14}$\\

1213: \tablenotemark{f}&&&&& &1.1&\\

1214: \tablenotemark{e}&&&&& 1275-14437760&12.3&$5.5\times 10^{13}$\\

1215: \tablenotemark{f}&&&&& &0.7&\\

1216: 9 & CXO J205915.7+445858 & 20 59 15.715 & +44 58 57.64 & 1.1 &1275-14437093 &9.6 & $6.2\times 10^{14}$\\

1217: 10 & CXO J205849.8+445725 & 20 58 49.768 & +44 57 25.00 & 0.8 &1275-14424519 &2.7 &$8.2 \times 10^{13}$\\

1218: 11 & CXO J205839.9+445132 & 20 58 39.924 & +44 51 31.67 & 1.3 &1275-14419711 &5.4 &$1.8 \times 10^{15}$\\

1219: 12 & CXO J205835.3+444640 & 20 58 35.349 & +44 46 40.21 & 1.2 &1347-0402278(B) &1.1 &$8.4\times 10^{11}$\\

1220: 13 & CXO J205825.4+444940 & 20 58 25.398 & +44 49 39.63 & 1.7 &1348-0403023(B) & 7.1&$6.1 \times 10^{14}$\\

1221: 14 & CXO J205823.9+444621 & 20 58 23.867 & +44 46 21.35 & 1.7 &1347-0402123(B) &3.2 &$1.8 \times 10^{12}$\\

1222: &&&&& 20582367+4446195(M)&1.8&\nodata\\

1223: 15 & CXO J205930.8+445729 & 20 59 30.760 & +44 57 29.19 & 1.1 &1349-0404462(B) &4.0 &$2.9 \times 10^{13}$\\

1224: 16 & CXO J205922.2+445416 & 20 59 22.191 & +44 54 15.95 & 1.5 &1349-0404292(B) &3.1 &$1.8 \times 10^{13}$\\

1225: &&&&& 20592216+4454176(M)&1.7&\nodata\\

1226: 17 & CXO J205921.9+445818 & 20 59 21.928 & +44 58 18.35 & 1.1 & 1275-14439638&8.6 &$2.6 \times 10^{12}$\\

1227: &&&&& 20592206+4458188(M)&1.6&\nodata\\

1228: 18 & CXO J205920.0+445321 & 20 59 19.993 & +44 53 21.12 & 1.3 &1275-14439333 &7.0 &$7.0 \times 10^{13}$\\

1229: &&&&& 20592022+4453178(M)&4.1&\nodata\\

1230: 19 & CXO J205912.6+445033 & 20 59 12.619 & +44 50 33.10 & 1.1 &20591251+4450356(M) & &\nodata\\

1231: 20 & CXO J205904.1+445952 & 20 59 04.133 & +44 59 52.38 & 1.1 &1275-14431663 &7.8 & $3.5\times 10^{13}$\\

1232: 21 & CXO J205857.7+450008 & 20 58 57.717 & +45 00 07.51 & 1.2 &\nodata & \nodata&\nodata\\

1233: 22 & CXO J205851.5+450050 & 20 58 51.450 & +45 00 50.04 & 1.3 &1350-0403625(B) &3.5 &$2.4\times 10^{12}$\\

1234: 23 & CXO J205848.7+445920 & 20 58 48.681 & +44 59 19.84 & 1.2 &1275-14423599 &8.4 &$2.3 \times 10^{13}$\\

1235: 24 & CXO J205841.1+445260 & 20 58 41.091 & +44 52 59.50 & 1.1 &\nodata &\nodata & \nodata\\

1236: 25 & CXO J205837.4+445510 & 20 58 37.389 & +44 55 09.86 & 1.1 &1275-14418321 &9.1 & $1.0\times 10^{13}$\\

1237: &&&&& 20583749+4455092(M)&1.3&\nodata\\

1238: 26 & CXO J205834.6+445330 & 20 58 34.649 & +44 53 30.33 & 1.4 &1348-0403158(B) & & $3.2\times 10^{12}$\\

1239: 27 & CXO J205814.7+444606 & 20 58 14.652 & +44 46 05.70 & 2.1 &\nodata &\nodata & \nodata\\

1240: \enddata  

1241: \tablenotetext{a}{All designations are from the USNO-A2.0 catalogue \citep{mon98} unless otherwise noted.}

1242: \tablenotetext{b}{(B) denotes USNO-B1.0 designation \citep{mon03}}

1243: \tablenotetext{c}{(I) denotes designation in \cite{gua92}}

1244: \tablenotetext{d}{(M) denotes 2MASS designation \citep{2mass}}

1245: \tablenotetext{e}{This row refers to the \xmm\ position}

1246: \tablenotetext{f}{This row refers to the \cha\ position}

1247: 

1248: \end{deluxetable}

1249: \clearpage

1250: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}

1251: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} 

1252: \tablecaption{Parameters for fits of \xmm\ PN, MOS and \cha\tablenotemark{a} point source spectra to an absorbed power law. \label{psspectab}}

1253: \tablewidth{0pt} 

1254: \tablehead{

1255: \colhead{\#} & $N_{\rm H}$ ($10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$) & $\Gamma$ & PL

1256: Normalization\tablenotemark{b} & $\chi^2_{\nu}$ ($\nu$)&0.5--2.0 keV &

1257: 2.0--10.0 keV&Hardness ratio\tablenotemark{c} &X-ray 

1258: \\

1259: &&&&&Counts&Counts&&S/N}

1260: \startdata 

1261: \multicolumn{3}{l}{G85.4+0.7}&&&&\\

1262: &&&&&&&&\\

1263: 1&$0.50^{+0.25}_{-0.18}$&$2.47^{+0.63}_{-0.47}$&$4.75^{+3.5}_{-1.8}$&1.20 (37)&210 & 56&0.27 & 3.8    \\

1264: 2& $0.94^{+0.27}_{-0.56}$&$8.7^{+1.3}_{-3.3}$&$11.2^{+11.8}_{-8.2}$&0.93 (14)&122 & 0 & 0.00           & 7.2  \\

1265: 3&   $0.70^{+1.13}_{-0.69}$&$4.9\pm3.1$&$4.9^{+74.1}_{-4.2}$&0.75 (12)&  92 & 0& 0.00         & 6.2 \\

1266: 4&$0.3^{+0.8}_{-0.2}$&$3.8^{+6.5}_{-1.5}$&$2.8^{+7.2}_{-2.4}$&1.10 (13)& 150 & 50& 0.33          & 4.8      \\

1267: 5&$1.1^{+0.1}_{-1.0}$&$9.5^{+0.5}_{-5.4}$&$13.2^{+3.4}_{-12.8}$&2.32 (4)& 83 & 0& 0.00           & 4.5     \\

1268: 6&$0.89^{+0.09}_{-0.18}$&$9.5^{+0.5}_{-1.2}$&$16.5^{+6.8}_{-6.5}$&5.58 (24)&  139 & 0& 0.00          & 4.8  \\

1269: 7&$1.19^{+0.48}_{-0.99}$&$8.7^{+1.3}_{-5.5}$&$17.3^{+32.7}_{-16.5}$&0.73 (5)& 104 & 0& 0.00                & 9.0  \\

1270: 8&$0.93^{+0.19}_{-0.73}$&$9.5^{+0.5}_{-3.4}$&$14^{+9}_{-13}$&1.17 (10)& 96 & 0& 0.00             & 9.2   \\

1271: 9&$0.75^{+0.84}_{-0.31}$&$2.6^{+1.4}_{-0.8}$&$6.4^{+16.6}_{-4.2}$&0.939 (17)& 86 & 43&0.33                    & 3.2   \\

1272: \tableline

1273: &&&&&&&&\\

1274: \multicolumn{3}{l}{G85.9$-$0.6}&&&&\\

1275: &&&&&&&\\

1276: 1& $1.04^{+0.03}_{-0.06}$& $9.5^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$&$117^{+14}_{-20} $&7.73 (35)& 1230&20&0.016           & 35.4     \\

1277: 2& $1.1^{+0.1}_{-0.8}$& $8.5^{+1.3}_{-4.4}$&$53^{+21}_{-47}$ &3.87 (22)& 433&2 &0.005             & 20.9     \\

1278: 3&  $0.86^{+0.05}_{-0.12}$&$9.5\pm 0.5$&$32^{+9}_{-11}$&11.12 (18)& 417&0 & 0.00                 & 20.4     \\

1279: 4& $0.53^{+0.77}_{-0.28}$& $3.9^{+3.8}_{-1.3}$&$4.4^{+30}_{-2.9}$&2.13 (10)& 177& 0& 0.00   & 13.3     \\

1280: 5& $0.85^{+0.21}_{-0.79}$& $8.9^{+1.1}_{-4.3}$& $14^{+19}_{-13}$&1.27 (6)& 117&18&0.15                & 11.6     \\

1281: 6& $1.32^{+0.76}_{-0.52}$&$1.56^{+0.62}_{-0.47}$ & $9.9^{+12.5}_{-4.9}$&1.07 (19)&112& 301&2.69           & 20.3     \\

1282: 7& $0.71^{+1.06}_{-0.50}$&$1.70^{+1.43}_{-0.77}$ & $2.5^{+9.1}_{-9.2} $& 2.19 (10)&26 & 90&3.46      & 10.8     \\

1283: 8& $0.46^{+0.30}_{-0.21}$& $5.3^{+1.8}_{-1.3}$&$5.0 ^{+11.7}_{-2.4}$ & 1.71 (33)&473 &30 & 0.06             & 23.1     \\

1284: 14&$$&$1.3_{-1.3}^{+4.0}$&$0.6_{-0.2}^{+8.0}$&

1285: 23

1286: 26

1287: \enddata  

1288: \tablenotetext{a}{\cha\ spectra are included in fit for sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 of G85.4+0.7 and source 8 of G85.9$-$0.6.}

1289: \tablenotetext{b}{10 $^{-5}$ photons keV$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ at 1 keV}

1290: \tablenotetext{c}{Hardness ratio is the ratio of hard counts to total (hard+soft) counts}

1291: 

1292: \end{deluxetable}

1293: 

1294: \clearpage

1295: \begin{figure}

1296: \scalebox{1.0}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f1.eps}}}

1297: \caption{0.5--2.5 keV \xmm\ X-ray mosaic image of G85.4+0.7 with the

1298:   highest few radio contours overlaid in blue. The X-ray image is Gaussian smoothed with a radius

1299:   of 3 pixels. 

1300: \label{85.4image}}

1301: \end{figure}

1302:  

1303: \clearpage 

1304: 

1305: \begin{figure}

1306: \center{\scalebox{0.45}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f2.eps}}}}

1307: \caption{PN and MOS mosaic images of G85.4+0.7. Top panel: 0.5--2.5

1308:   keV image, showing point

1309:   sources (1-9) and the diffuse emission extraction region, as well as the region used for the central blob (see \S\ref{disc85.4}).

1310:  The

1311:   background region for the diffuse spectra is also shown

1312:   as a dashed circle. The image is smoothed as in

1313:   Figure~\ref{85.4image}. Middle panel: 2.5--10.0 keV image, similarly smoothed

1314:   and with the same contrast as in the top panel. Bottom panel: 0.5--2.5

1315:   keV image, Gaussian smoothed with a radius of 3 pixels and

1316:   logarithmically scaled and adjusted in contrast

1317:   to emphasize the diffuse emission and overlaid with

1318:   contours of the 0.5--2.5 keV emission smoothed similarly to the \ro\

1319:   contours in Figure~6 of

1320:   \cite{kot01}.\label{85.4reg}} 

1321: \end{figure}

1322: 

1323: 

1324: \clearpage  

1325: \begin{figure}

1326: \center{\scalebox{1.}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f3.eps}}}}

1327: \caption{\cha\ image of G85.4+0.7 from the S2 and S3 chips, Gaussian smoothed with a radius of 5 pixels,

1328: showing (in black) point source extraction regions and corresponding regions (in

1329: blue) for \xmm\ data for 

1330: comparison. The large circle indicates the diffuse region in the top panel of Figure~\ref{85.4reg} and the background regions are shown as dashed circles. (See the online version for colour figure.)\label{cha85.4}} 

1331: \end{figure}

1332: 

1333: \clearpage

1334: \begin{figure}

1335: \scalebox{1.0}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f4.eps}}}

1336: \caption{0.5--2.5 keV \xmm\ X-ray mosaic image of G85.9$-$0.6 with the

1337:   highest few radio contours

1338:   overlaid in blue. The X-ray image is Gaussian smoothed with a radius of 3

1339:   pixels. 

1340: \label{85.9image}}

1341: \end{figure}

1342: 

1343: 

1344: \clearpage  

1345: \begin{figure}

1346: \center{\scalebox{.45}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f5.eps}}}}

1347: \caption{PN and MOS mosaic images of G85.9$-$0.6. Top panel: 0.5--2.5

1348:   keV image, showing point

1349:   sources (1-8) and the diffuse emission extraction region, as well as the region used for the central blob (see \S\ref{disc85.9}). The

1350:   background region for the diffuse spectra is also shown

1351:   as a dashed circle. The image is smoothed as in

1352:   Figure~\ref{85.9image}. Middle panel: 2.5--10.0 keV image, similarly smoothed

1353:   and with the same contrast as in the top panel. Bottom panel: 0.5--2.5

1354:   keV image, Gaussian smoothed with a radius of 3 pixels and

1355:   logarithmically scaled and adjusted in contrast

1356:   to emphasize the diffuse emission and overlaid with

1357:   contours of the 0.5--2.5 keV emission smoothed similarly to the \ro\

1358:   contours in Figure~6 of

1359:   \cite{kot01}. \label{85.9reg}} 

1360: \end{figure}

1361: 

1362: 

1363: 

1364: \clearpage  

1365: \begin{figure}

1366: \center{\scalebox{1.}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f6.eps}}}}

1367: \caption{\cha\ image of G85.9$-$0.6 from the S2 and S3 chips, Gaussian smoothed with a radius of 5 pixels. 

1368: Extraction regions for sources 1 and 8 from the \xmm\ image are shown as blue circles. (See the online version for colour figure.)\label{cha85.9}} 

1369: \end{figure}

1370: 

1371: \clearpage 

1372: 

1373: 

1374: \begin{figure}

1375: \center{\scalebox{.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f7.eps}}}}

1376: \caption{\xmm\ PN background subtracted 0.5$-$8.0 keV spectra of G85.4+0.7, using backgrounds 

1377: from the observation (black) and from blank sky event files (grey). The

1378: oversubtraction by the blank sky background is evident. The spectrum using the observation background is clearly background dominated above $\sim$2.5~keV. 

1379: \label{PNback}} 

1380: \end{figure}

1381: 

1382: \clearpage  

1383: \begin{figure}

1384: \center{\scalebox{.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f8.eps}}}}

1385: \caption{\xmm\ PN and MOS 0.5--2.5 keV spectra of G85.4+0.7, fit to an absorbed

1386:   VPSHOCK. The background spectrum for PN was extracted in the same

1387:   way as for the spectrum shown in Figure~\ref{85.4spec} and the

1388:   background for the MOS instruments are extracted from the \xmm\ ESAS package described in \S\ref{bg}. The

1389:   fitted parameters are given in the third column of Table~\ref{dfit}. The PN is shown

1390:   in black, and the MOS 1 and 2 are shown in blue and red

1391:   respectively. The bottom panel displays the residuals in units of

1392:   $\sigma$.

1393: Instrumental lines in the MOS spectra appear at 1.49 and

1394:   1.75 keV (see \S\ref{bg} for details). The line above 1.75 keV is an

1395:   elemental line which appears in spectra from all instruments.

1396: \label{85.4esasspec}} 

1397: 

1398: \end{figure}

1399: 

1400: 

1401: \clearpage  

1402: \begin{figure}

1403: \center{\scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f9.eps}}}}

1404: \caption{\xmm\ PN and MOS spectra of G85.4+0.7, fit to an absorbed VPSHOCK. The background spectra 

1405: used here were extracted from the region shown in Figure~\ref{85.4reg}. The

1406:   fitted parameters are given in the second column of Table~\ref{dfit}. The PN is shown

1407:   in black, and the MOS 1 and 2 are shown in blue and red respectively. The bottom panel displays the residuals in units of $\sigma$. An instrumental line in the MOS spectra appears at 1.75 keV (see \S\ref{bg} for details).

1408: \label{85.4spec}} 

1409: \end{figure}

1410: 

1411: \clearpage  

1412: \begin{figure}

1413: \center{\scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f10.eps}}}}

1414: \caption{\xmm\ PN and MOS 0.5--2.5 keV spectra of G85.9$-$0.6, fit to an absorbed

1415:   VPSHOCK. The background spectrum for PN was extracted in the same

1416:   way as for the spectrum shown in Figure~\ref{85.9spec} and the

1417:   background for the MOS instruments are extracted from the \xmm\ ESAS package described in \S\ref{bg}. The

1418:   fitted parameters are given in the third column of Table~\ref{dfit}. The PN is shown

1419:   in black, and the MOS 1 and 2 are shown in blue and red

1420:   respectively. The bottom panel displays the residuals in units of

1421:   $\sigma$.

1422: Instrumental lines in the MOS spectra appear at 1.49 and

1423:   1.75 keV (see \S\ref{bg} for details). The line above 1.75 keV is an

1424:   elemental line which appears in spectra from all instruments.

1425: \label{85.9esasspec}} 

1426: \end{figure}

1427: 

1428: \clearpage  

1429: \begin{figure}

1430: \center{\scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f11.eps}}}}

1431: \caption{\xmm\ PN and MOS 0.5--2.5 keV spectra of G85.9$-$0.6, fit to an absorbed VPSHOCK. The background spectra 

1432: used here were extracted from the region shown in

1433: Figure~\ref{85.9reg}. The

1434:   fitted parameters are given in the fourth column of Table~\ref{dfit}. The PN is shown

1435:   in black, and the MOS 1 and 2 are shown in blue and red respectively. The bottom panel displays the residuals in units of $\sigma$. An instrumental line in the MOS spectra appears at 1.75 keV (see \S\ref{bg} for details). The excess counts in the MOS spectra around 1.4 and 0.85 keV are most likely due to instrumental effects.

1436: \label{85.9spec}}

1437: \end{figure}

1438: 

1439: \clearpage  

1440: \begin{figure}

1441: \center{\scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{-90}{\plotone{f12.eps}}}}

1442: \caption{\xmm\ PN, MOS, and \cha\ 0.5--5 keV spectra of G85.4+0.7 source 1, fit to an absorbed power law. The

1443:   fitted parameters are given in Table~\ref{psspectab}. The PN is shown

1444:   in solid black, the MOS 1 and 2 are shown in dashed blue and solid red respectively, 

1445: and the \cha\ spectrum is shown as dotted black. The bottom panel displays the residuals in units of $\sigma$.

1446: \label{85.4psspec}} 

1447: \end{figure}

1448: 

1449: \clearpage

1450: \begin{figure}

1451: \center{\scalebox{1.0}{\rotatebox{0}{\plottwo{f13a.eps}{f13b.eps}}}}

1452: \caption{Integrated foreground hydrogen column density profiles as a function

1453: of radial velocity for the two SNRs G85.4+0.7 (left: solid and dotted line)

1454: and G85.9$-$0.6 (right: solid line). The dashed lines represent the upper and

1455: lower limits for the absorbing \ion{H}{1} column density determined from the X-ray

1456: spectra. The dotted-dashed line in the diagram for G85.4+0.7 represents the

1457: radial velocity of the related stellar wind bubble determined by Kothes et al.

1458: (2001). 

1459: \label{hicol}}

1460: \end{figure}

1461: 

1462: 

1463: \clearpage  

1464: \begin{figure}

1465: \center{\scalebox{0.6}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f14.eps}}}}

1466: \caption{The velocity field of the \ion{H}{1} gas

1467: towards $\ell=$86.0$\degr,~b=-$0.6$\degr$, from the \ion{H}{1} modelling

1468: method of \citet{fmac06}. SNRs G85.4+0.7 \& G85.9$-$0.7 are marked with

1469: triangles showing their respective distances of 3.5 and 4.8 kpc. The

1470: Perseus Spiral arm's peak density is at 5.0 kpc and the spiral shock that

1471: precedes the arm is at 4.8~kpc. The solid dark line is the underlying

1472: circular velocity field fitted in this direction, and is a power-law in

1473: galactocentric distance \citep[see][]{fmac06} with a gradient similar to a

1474: Schmidt rotation curve.

1475: \label{vfield}} 

1476: \end{figure}

1477: 

1478: \clearpage

1479: \begin{figure}

1480: \scalebox{1.0}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f15.eps}}}

1481: \caption{0.5--2.0 keV \xmm\ X-ray mosaic image of G85.4+0.7 with radio

1482:   contours overlaid in blue. The X-ray image has had the point sources

1483:   removed and is Gaussian smoothed with a radius

1484:   of 1$^\prime$ to match the radio resolution, in order to compare the radio

1485:   and diffuse X-ray emission regions. The radio contours were chosen to approximate the

1486:   appearance of the top image in Figure~2 in \cite{kot01}.

1487: \label{85.4imagens}}

1488: \end{figure}

1489: 

1490: \clearpage

1491: \begin{figure}

1492: \scalebox{1.0}{\rotatebox{0}{\plotone{f16.eps}}}

1493: \caption{0.5--2.5 keV \xmm\ X-ray mosaic image of G85.9$-$0.6 with radio

1494:   contours 

1495:   overlaid in blue. The X-ray image has had the point sources

1496:   removed and is Gaussian smoothed with a radius

1497:   of 1$^\prime$ to match the radio resolution, in order to compare the radio

1498:   and diffuse X-ray emission regions. The radio contours were chosen

1499:   to approximate the 

1500:   appearance of the top image in Figure~4 in \cite{kot01}.

1501: \label{85.9imagens}}

1502: \end{figure}

1503: 

1504: 

1505: 

1506: \end{document}

1507: