1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% file template.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % This is a template file for the SUSY07 conference based on the
4: % EPJ styfile
5: %
6: % Copy it to a new file with a new name and use it as the basis
7: % for your article
8: %
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% SUSY07 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: %
11:
12: \documentclass[epj]{svjour}
13: \newcommand\T{\rule{0pt}{0ex}}
14: % Remove option referee for final version
15: %
16: % Remove any % below to load the required packages
17: %\usepackage{latexsym}
18: \usepackage{graphicx}
19: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
20: \def\makeheadbox{{% remove EPJC header
21: % \hbox to0pt{\vbox{\baselineskip=10dd\hrule\hbox
22: % to\hsize{\vrule\kern3pt\vbox{\kern3pt
23: % \hbox{\bfseries\@journalname\ manuscript No.}
24: % \hbox{(will be inserted by the editor)}
25: % \kern3pt}\hfil\kern3pt\vrule}\hrule}%
26: % \hss}
27: }}
28: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.6cm} \setlength{\headheight}{0.5cm}
29: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.2cm} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.8cm}
30: \setlength{\textwidth}{16.9cm} \setlength{\textheight}{24.4cm}
31: % etc
32:
33: %%%%%%%DO NOT CHANGE THE FOLLOWING FOUR LINES. MAKE YOUR SELECTIONS BELOW%%%%
34: \def\mytitle{My title}
35: \def\myauthors{My name}
36: \def\mytype{My type of session}
37: \def\mysession{My session}
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39:
40:
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%SELECTIONS FOR PLENARY SPEAKERS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42: % (uncomment the selections below by removing the %)
43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
44: %\def\mytitle{Short title of talk} %Put your title here!
45: %\def\myauthors{Name of Author} %Put your name here!
46: %\def\mytype{Review}
47: %\def\mysession{\myauthors}
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49:
50:
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%SELECTIONS FOR PARALLEL SPEAKERS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: % (uncomment the selections below by removing the %)
53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
54: \def\mytitle{Study of DiMuon Rare Beauty Decays with ATLAS and CMS} %Put your title here!
55: \def\myauthors{A. Policicchio and G. Crosetti} %Put your name here!
56: \def\mytype{Contributed Talk}
57: %\def\mysession{Cosmology and Astrophysics}
58: %\def\mysession{Colliders - Higgs Phenomenology}
59: %\def\mysession{Colliders - SUSY Phenomenology}
60: %\def\mysession{Alternatives}
61: \def\mysession{Flavor Physics}
62: %\def\mysession{Theoretical Models}
63:
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65:
66:
67:
68:
69:
70: \pagestyle{fancyplain}
71:
72: \renewcommand{\sectionmark}[1]{\markboth{#1}{}}
73: \rhead[\fancyplain{}{{\it\mytype}}] {\fancyplain{}{\it\mytitle}}
74: \chead[\fancyplain{}{}] {\fancyplain{}{}}
75: \lhead[\fancyplain{}{\it\mysession}] {\fancyplain{}{{\it\myauthors}}}
76: \lfoot[\fancyplain{}{}] {\fancyplain{}{}}
77: \cfoot[\fancyplain{}{}] {\fancyplain{}{}}
78: \rfoot[\fancyplain{}{}] {\fancyplain{}{}}
79: %
80: \begin{document}
81: %
82: \title{Study of DiMuon Rare Beauty Decays with ATLAS and CMS}
83: \subtitle{}
84: \author{A. Policicchio\inst{}
85: % \thanks is optional - remove next line if not needed
86: \thanks{\emph{Email:} antonio.policicchio@cern.ch}%
87: \and
88: G. Crosetti\inst{}% etc
89: % \thanks is optional - remove next line if not needed
90: %\thanks{\emph{Present address:} Insert the address here if needed}%
91: } % Do not remove
92: %
93: %\offprints{} % Insert a name or remove this line
94: %
95: \institute{Universita' della Calabria and INFN Cosenza \\ \\ representing the ATLAS and CMS collaborations}
96: %
97: %\date{Received: date / Revised version: date}
98: % The correct dates will be entered by Springer
99: \date{}
100: %
101: \abstract{ The LHC experiments will perform sensitive tests of physics
102: beyond the Standard Model (BSM). The investigation of decays of beauty
103: hadrons represents an alternative approach in addition to direct BSM
104: searches. The ATLAS and CMS efforts concentrate on those $B$-decays
105: that can be efficiently selected already at the first and second level
106: trigger. The most favorable trigger signature will be for $B$-hadron
107: decays with muons in the final state. Using this trigger, ATLAS and
108: CMS will be able to accommodate unprecedentedly high statistics in the
109: rare decay sector. These are purely dimuon decays, and families of
110: semimuonic exclusive channels. Already with data corresponding to an
111: integrated luminosity of \ensuremath{1~fb^{-1}}, the sensitivity in the
112: dimuon channels will be comparable to present measurements (world
113: average). The strategy is to carry on the dimuon channel program up
114: to nominal LHC luminosity. In particular the \ensuremath{B_s \to
115: \mu\mu} signal with \ensuremath{\sim}5 sigma significance can be
116: measured combining low luminosity \ensuremath{10^{33}cm^{-2} s^{-1}}
117: samples with those of one year of LHC operation at a luminosity of
118: \ensuremath{10^{34}cm^{-2} s^{-1} }.
119: %
120: \PACS{
121: {13.30.Ce}{Leptonic, semileptonic, and radiative decays} \and
122: {13.20.He}{Decays of bottom mesons}
123: } % end of PACS codes
124: } %end of abstract
125: %
126: \maketitle
127:
128:
129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
130: \section{Introduction}
131: \label{intro}
132: Rare leptonic and semileptonic $B$-decays, produced by FCNC
133: transitions, are forbidden at the tree level in the Standard Model
134: (SM). These decays occur at the lowest order only through one-loop
135: ``penguin'' and ``box'' diagrams. The branching ratios of these decays
136: are very small: from $4 \times 10^{-5}$ for the rare radiative decay
137: $B^0_d \to K^* \gamma$ to $10^{-15}$ for the rare Cabibbo suppressed
138: leptonic decay $B^0_d \to e^+ e^-$.
139:
140: The careful investigation of rare $B$-decays is mandatory for testing
141: ground of the Standard Model and offers a complementary strategy in the
142: search of new physics. The probing of loop-induced couplings provide a
143: means of testing the detailed structure of the SM at the level of
144: radiative corrections. In particular, FCNC involving $b \to s,d$
145: transitions and $B \to ll$ decays, provide an excellent probe of new
146: indirect effects by yielding informations on the masses and coupling
147: of the virtual particles running in the loops. In SUSY models, the
148: branching fraction for $B^0_{s(d)} \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ has a strong
149: dependence on $tan\beta$. A precise measurement of such decays will
150: allow to constrain the supersymmetric extensions of the SM.
151: %Experimental bounds can restrict allowed regions of
152: %parameter space, specifically the mass of the charged Higgs boson and
153: %$tan\beta$. There has been significant interest in using the decay mode
154: %$B^0_{s(d)} \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ to measure the key parameter $tan\beta$
155: %of the MSSM and to constrain other extensions of the SM.
156:
157: To date the decay modes $B^0_{s(d)} \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ have not yet been
158: observed. The current best upper limits on the branching ratio come
159: from the D0 \cite{Dzero} and CDF \cite{Cdf} collaborations and are
160: $9.3 \times 10^{-8}$ and $5.8 \times 10^{-8}$ respectively at
161: $95\%CL$. The searches for rare $B$ decays at the $B$-factories CLEO,
162: Belle and BaBar have no sensitivity to $B_s$ decays.
163: %and it is unclear whether
164: %the Tevatron will integrate enough luminosity to be able to measure
165: %significant signals for the processes.
166:
167: In the last years the $B$-factories BaBar and Belle presented the
168: first results for $B \to (K^*,K) l^+ l^-$ branching ratios and
169: forward-backward asymmetry ($A_{FB}$) in these rare semileptonic
170: decays \cite{babar},\cite{belle1},\cite{belle2} but those are still
171: affected by large statistical errors.
172: %The experimental branching ratio values are
173: %consistent with SM predictions. More precise measurements are instead
174: %needed for differential dimuon invariant mass and $A_{FB}$
175: %distributions, in order to discriminate between SM and new physics
176: %predictions.
177:
178: In this report we pay attention to the (semi)leptonic decays with
179: $\mu^+ \mu^-$ pairs in final states where ATLAS and CMS can give a
180: significant contribution. We discuss the simulation results and the
181: perspectives of measurements. The SM branching ratios of the decays
182: studied can be found in Table \ref{tab:decays}.
183:
184: \begin{table}
185: \caption{\it Standard Model branching ratios for rare $B$-decays
186: into a $\mu^+ \mu^-$ final state.}
187: \label{tab:decays}
188: \begin{center}
189: \begin{tabular}{lll}
190: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
191: Decay channel & Br. ratio & Ref. \\
192: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
193: $B^0_s \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $3.4 \times 10^{-9}$ & \cite{Buras} \\
194: $B^+ \to K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $3.5 \times 10^{-7}$ & \cite{Ali1} \\
195: $B^+ \to K^{*+} \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $\sim 10^{-6}$ & \cite{Ali1} \\
196: $\Lambda _b \to \Lambda \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $2.0 \times 10^{-6}$ & \cite{chen},\cite{aliev} \\
197: $B^0_d \to K^{0*} \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $1.3 \times 10^{-6}$ & \cite{melikhov1},\cite{melikhov2} \\
198: $B^0_s \to \phi ~ \mu^+ \mu^-$ & $\sim 10^{-6}$ & \cite{melikhov1},\cite{melikhov2} \\
199: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
200: \end{tabular}
201: \end{center}
202: \end{table}
203:
204:
205: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
206: \section{Theoretical description}
207: \label{sec:1}
208: From the theoretical point of view, the $b \to q$ ($q = s,d$)
209: transitions are described using the effective Hamiltonian
210:
211: \begin{equation}
212: {\cal{H}}_{eff}=-4 \frac{G_{F}}{\sqrt{2}} V_{tb}V^*_{tq}
213: \sum_{i=1}^{10} C_{i}(\mu) O_{i}(\mu)
214: \label{effham}
215: \end{equation}
216:
217: in the form of Wilson expansion (see e.g. \cite{Buras96}). The set of
218: Wilson coefficients $C_{i}(\mu)$ depends on the current model and
219: contains the lowest order model contributions and perturbative QCD
220: corrections. The scale parameter $\mu$ is approximately equal to the
221: mass of the $b$-quark ($\sim 5$~GeV). This parameter separates the
222: perturbative and nonperturbative contributions of the strong
223: interactions. The nonperturbative contribution is contained in the
224: matrix elements of basis operators $O_{i}(\mu)$ between the initial
225: and final hadronic states. For the calculation of these matrix
226: elements it is necessary to use different decay-specific
227: nonperturbative methods: QCD Sum Rules, Heavy Quarks Effective Theory,
228: Quark Models and Lattice calculations. The accuracy in
229: nonperturbative calculations depends on the method, but it is not less
230: than 15$\%$. The accuracy of the Wilson coefficient with NLO and NNLO
231: QCD corrections \cite{bobeth} is not greater than 15$\%$ if the $\mu$
232: parameter ranges in $[m_b/2,2m_b]$.
233:
234: In the SM the decay width of the rare muonic decays is:
235:
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: \Gamma(B^0_q \to \mu^+ \mu^-)=\frac{G_{F}^{2}\alpha_{em}^{2}}{16\pi^3} |V_{tq}^{*}V_{tb}|^2 \cdot
238: \\\Big(f_{B_q} m_{\mu} C_{10A}\Big)^2\sqrt{M^{2}_{B_q} - 4m^2_{\mu}}.\nonumber
239: \label{decwidth}
240: \end{eqnarray}
241:
242: This expression contains only one nonperturbative constant
243: $f_{B_q}$. The value of this constant is known with an accuracy of the
244: order of about 5-10$\%$. Furthermore the Wilson Coefficient $C_{10A}$
245: in the NLO approach is not dependent on the scale parameter $\mu$, and
246: does not add any uncertainty to the theoretical predictions.
247:
248:
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: \section{Trigger strategies for rare decays}
251: \label{sec:2}
252: Details of the ATLAS and CMS experiments can be found in
253: Refs. \cite{ATLASTRD,CMSTDR}.
254:
255: \subsection{The ATLAS trigger}
256: \label{subsec:21}
257: ATLAS has a three level trigger system \cite{ATLASTRIG} which reduces
258: the 40~MHz bunch crossing rate to about 100~Hz of events to be
259: recorded. The first level trigger (LVL1) is hardware-based and makes a
260: fast decision (in 2.5~$\mu$s) about which events are interesting for
261: further processing. Coarse granularity informations from calorimeter
262: and muon spectrometer are used to identify region of interest (RoI) of
263: the detector which contain interesting signals (high energy electrons,
264: muons and taus and jets with large transverse or missing energy). The
265: RoIs are used to guide the later stages of the trigger. After LVL1 the
266: trigger rate will be reduced to less than 75~kHz.
267:
268: The high level trigger (HLT) is software-based and is split into two
269: levels. At the level 2 (LVL2) the full granularity of the detector is
270: used to confirm the LVL1 decisions and then to combine informations
271: from different sub-detectors within the LVL1 RoIs. Fast algorithms are
272: used for the reconstruction at this stage and the rate is reduced to
273: $\sim$2~kHz with an average time of execution of $\sim$10~ms. At the
274: level 3, the Event Filter (EF), the whole event is available and
275: offline-like algorithms are used with better alignment and calibration
276: informations to form the final decision. The rate is reduced to 100~Hz
277: with an execution time of $\sim$1~s.
278:
279: \subsubsection{ATLAS trigger for rare decays}
280: The $B$-trigger is expected to account for 5-10$\%$ of the total
281: trigger resources. The core of the $B$-trigger is the LVL1 muon
282: trigger which is based on the measurement of the muon transverse
283: momentum ($p_T$).
284: %The trigger logic allows for both high and low $p_T$
285: %threshold to be implemented. Since muons from $B$ decays are soft, is
286: %the low $p_T$ threshold (6GeV) which will be used for the
287: %$B$-Physics.
288: The efficiency of the muon trigger is expected at about 85$\%$ at the
289: plateau. The dimuon LVL1 trigger (two muons with $p_T$ above 6~GeV),
290: used for rare decay selection, is expected to have a rate of about
291: 500~Hz.
292:
293: The LVL1 dimuons will be confirmed at the LVL2 firstly in the muon
294: system by means of the precision tracking chamber and then by
295: combining muon and inner detector tracks. Finally the two muons can be
296: combined and mass cuts are applied. At the EF the tracks are refitted
297: in the RoIs and vertex reconstruction is performed. Cuts are applied
298: on decay length and invariant $B$-hadron mass. For $B^0_s \to \mu^+
299: \mu^-$ events containing two muons with $p_T >$6~GeV, efficiencies of
300: 60-70$\%$ are expected.
301:
302:
303: \subsection{The CMS trigger}
304: \label{subsec:22}
305: CMS has a two level trigger \cite{CMSTDR} which reduces the bunch
306: crossing rate down to about 150Hz for recording. The Level-1 (L1)
307: trigger uses muon detector and calorimeter informations and is
308: hardware-based with an output rate of about 100~kHz and a latency of
309: 3.5~$\mu$s. The HLT is software-based with the required 150~Hz output
310: rate. It uses reconstruction algorithms similar to the offline with a
311: mean execution time per event of about 40~ms. To speed up
312: reconstruction in the HLT, a partial track reconstruction is
313: performed: the track resolution becomes asymptotic after 5-6 hits are
314: used in the track fit.
315:
316: \subsubsection{CMS trigger for rare decays}
317: As in ATLAS, the CMS trigger for $B$ events uses single and dimuon
318: triggers. The L1 dimuon trigger has a low $p_T$ threshold of 3~GeV
319: which ensures a high efficiency for events with two muons in the final
320: state with a rate of 0.9~kHz at $2 \times 10^{33}$~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.
321: At the HLT the L1 decision will be confirmed using the full muon
322: system and an improved momentum measurement with the tracker. Primary
323: vertex (PV) reconstruction is available from the pixel detector and
324: also track reconstruction is performed in cones around the L1 muons
325: using the partial track reconstruction. The exclusive rare decay is
326: then reconstructed and cuts on the invariant mass, vertex fit quality
327: and decay length are applied.
328:
329:
330:
331:
332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
333: \section{Muonic decays in ATLAS and CMS}
334: \label{sec:3}
335: As purely leptonic $B$-decays are theoretically very clean, they
336: provide an ideal channel for seeking indirect hints of new physics
337: effects. However, they are very difficult to observe because of their
338: small branching ratio (see Table \ref{tab:decays}). Most probably they
339: will not be observed by other experiments before the LHC data
340: taking. ATLAS and CMS will start sensitive measurements at
341: $10^{33}$~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$. Even at high design luminosity
342: ($10^{34}$~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$) the trigger for $B \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ decay
343: is not problematic.
344:
345: A good background rejection is necessary for the signal selection. The
346: main contributions to the background \cite{ATLASBG} come from the
347: processes $b \bar b (b \bar b b \bar b, b \bar b c \bar c) \to X \mu^+
348: \mu^-$ with the muons originating mainly from semi- \\ leptonic $b$
349: and $c$ quark decays. This background can be estimated by
350: extrapolating the Tevatron data on heavy quark production to the LHC
351: energies. It would be remarked that both ATLAS and CMS analysis are
352: limited by the statistics of the MonteCarlo background sample.
353:
354: The event selection relies on topological variables related to the PV,
355: the muon candidates and the $B_s$ secondary vertex and is very similar
356: in both experiments \cite{ATLASBMUMU,CMSBMUMU}. Simple cuts can
357: be applied to distinguish the combinatorial background from the signal:
358:
359: \begin{itemize}
360: \item $B$-hadron invariant mass;
361: \item secondary vertex length and quality;
362: \item pointing of $B$-hadron momentum to PV;
363: \item track isolation.
364: \end{itemize}
365:
366: %The invariant mass window is driven by detector resolution. Secondary
367: %vertex displacement and quality cuts reduce combinatorial background
368: %from PV tracks. Isolation requirement rejects secondary vertices with
369: %more than two tracks and pointing to primary vertex constraint
370: %prevents from existence of detector invisible particles originating in
371: %the same vertex.
372:
373: Table \ref{tab:masses} summarizes the mass resolution and the proper
374: time resolution obtained on the signal MonteCarlo event sample for CMS
375: and ATLAS.
376:
377: \begin{table}
378: \caption{\it Mass and proper time resolution obtained on the $B^0_s
379: \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ signal MonteCarlo event sample for CMS and ATLAS.}
380: \label{tab:masses}
381: \begin{center}
382: \begin{tabular}{lll}
383: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
384: Experiment & Mass res.(GeV) & Proper time res.(fs)\\
385: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
386: ATLAS & 0.084 & 91\\
387: CMS & 0.036 & 95\\
388: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
389: \end{tabular}
390: \end{center}
391: \end{table}
392:
393: The expected number of signal and background events after 30~fb$^{-1}$
394: are summarized in Table \ref{tab:upperl}. This will allow to set a
395: stringent constraint on new physics models.
396:
397: \begin{table}
398: \caption{\it Expected number of $B^0_s \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ signal and
399: background events after 30~fb$^{-1}$.}
400: \label{tab:upperl}
401: \begin{center}
402: \begin{tabular}{lll}
403: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
404: Experiment & signal events & BG events \\
405: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
406: ATLAS & 21.0 & 60$\pm$36 \\
407: CMS & 18.3 & $42^{+66}_{-42}$ \\
408: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
409: \end{tabular}
410: \end{center}
411: \end{table}
412:
413: Figure \ref{fig:limits} shows the ATLAS expectation for the measurement
414: of the $B^0_s \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ branching ratio as a function of the
415: integrated luminosity (or equivalently as a function of time). The
416: SM expectation can be reached with a $\sim$5 sigma significance
417: combining low luminosity $10^{33}$~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ samples with those
418: of one year of LHC operation at the nominal luminosity of
419: $10^{34}$~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.
420:
421:
422: \begin{figure}
423: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,height=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{LIMITS100pb.eps}
424: \caption{ATLAS perspective for the measurement of the $B^0_s \to \mu^+
425: \mu^-$ branching ratio as a function of the integrated luminosity (or
426: equivalently as a function of the time). The shaded band shows the
427: uncertainty in the BG level estimation.}
428: \label{fig:limits}
429: \end{figure}
430:
431:
432:
433:
434:
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
436: \section{SemiMuonic decays in ATLAS}
437: \label{sec:4}
438: Thanks to the dimuon final state (see Table \ref{tab:decays}), the
439: semimuonic decays, as the purely dimuonic ones, are easy to select at
440: the trigger level. The observation of semileptonic decays give access
441: to a number of observables. The precise measurements of such
442: observables could give very interesting informations for new physics
443: reach. $A_{FB}$ is one of the most promising parameters.
444:
445: The small branching ratios of semimuonic decays require a powerful
446: background rejection. Semileptonic decays with $c \bar c$ resonances
447: decaying into two muons represent an irreducible background source. A
448: cut on the dimuon invariant mass around the nominal values for
449: resonances removes this background. Combinatorial background arises
450: from muons originating mainly from semi- leptonic decays of $b$ and
451: $c$ quarks. Specific decay channels can represent background sources
452: due mainly to hadron misidentification as muons, but their
453: contribution is expected to be less important than the previous two
454: sources.
455:
456: The event selection \cite{POLIX1,POLIX2} is related to topological
457: variables:
458:
459: \begin{itemize}
460: \item vertex quality and invariant mass of the dimuon system;
461: \item displacement and quality of vertices and mass of the secondary
462: hadrons;
463: \item pointing of $B$ hadron momentum to PV.
464: \end{itemize}
465:
466: The number of events expected after three years of data taking at low
467: luminosity (30~fb$^{-1}$) are summarized in Table
468: \ref{tab:expected}. The background level estimation is only limited by
469: the low Monte Carlo statistics available at the moment. It should be
470: pointed out that, thanks to the muon pair in the final state,
471: semimuonic decays will be also studied at high luminosity, so that a
472: larger statistics than those of Table \ref{tab:expected} will be
473: collected.
474:
475: \begin{table}
476: \caption{\it Expected number of events from semimuonic decays events
477: and expected background events in ATLAS after 30~fb$^{-1}$.}
478: \label{tab:expected}
479: \begin{center}
480: \begin{tabular}{lll}
481: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
482: Decay & Signal events & Background events\\
483: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
484: $B^+ \to K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-$ & 4000 & $<$10000 \\
485: $B^+ \to K^{*+} \mu^+ \mu^-$ & 2300 & $<$10000 \\
486: $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \mu^+ \mu^-$ & 800 & $<$4000 \\
487: $B^0_d \to K^{0*} \mu^+ \mu^-$ & 2500 & $<$10000 \\
488: $B^0_s \to \phi ~ \mu^+ \mu^-$ & 900 & $<$10000 \\
489: \noalign{\smallskip}\hline
490: \end{tabular}
491: \end{center}
492: \end{table}
493:
494: The expected precision on $A_{FB}$ after 30~fb$^{-1}$ is presented on
495: Figure \ref{fig:asymm} for $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \mu^+ \mu^-$
496: decay. The three dots with error bars correspond to simulated data
497: after offline analysis. The upper point set corresponds to the
498: theoretical SM prediction, and the lower set corresponds to a
499: prediction within the MSSM \cite{chen}. The statistical error in the low dimuon
500: invariant mass region is at level of 6$\%$. The statistical errors
501: expected on branching ratio measurements are at the level of 3.5$\%$
502: and 6.5$\%$ respectively for $B \to K \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $B \to K^{*}
503: \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays. These errors on the branching ratio measurements
504: are much smaller than the current experimental and theoretical ones.
505:
506: \begin{figure}
507: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth,height=0.45\textwidth,angle=0]{fbapoints800Events.eps}
508: \caption{Forward-backward asymmetry for $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \mu^+
509: \mu^-$ as a function of the dimuon invariant mass after 30f~b$^{-1}$
510: (see Section \ref{sec:4}).}
511: \label{fig:asymm}
512: \end{figure}
513:
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515: \section{Conclusions}
516: \label{sec:5}
517: The results obtained for $B^0_s \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ by ATLAS and CMS are
518: comparable and promise an interesting startup analysis with the
519: possibility of setting tight constraints on new physics models beyond
520: the SM. The simulation studies show that the ATLAS detector will be
521: capable to extract signals of semimuonic $B$-decays and reach a good
522: sensitivity to new physics beyond the SM.
523:
524:
525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
526: \section{Acknowledgments}
527: \label{sec6}
528: We would thank ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and especially Maria
529: Smizanska, Sergey Sivoklokov, Pavel Reznicek from ATLAS and Christina
530: Eggel and Urs Langenegger from CMS for their useful suggestions in the
531: preparation of this work.
532:
533:
534:
535: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
536: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
537:
538: \bibitem{Dzero} The D0 Collaboration, D$\oslash$ Note 5344-CONF (2007)
539: \bibitem{Cdf} The CDF Collaboration, CDF Public Note 8956 (2007)
540: \bibitem{babar} B.~Aubert et al. (The BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. {\bf D 73} (2006) 092001
541: \bibitem{belle1} A.~Ishikawa et al. (The Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96} (2006) 251801
542: \bibitem{belle2} K.~Abe et al. (The Belle Collaboration), hep-ex/0410006 (2004)
543: \bibitem{Buras} A. J. Buras, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B 566} (2003) 115
544: \bibitem{Ali1} A. Ali et al., Phys. Rev. \textbf{D 66} (2002) 034002
545: \bibitem{chen} C. H. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. \textbf{D 64} (2001) 074001
546: \bibitem{aliev} T. M. Aliev et al., Nucl. Phys. \textbf{B 649} (2003) 168
547: \bibitem{melikhov1} D. Melikhov et al., Phys. Rev. \textbf{D 57} (1998) 6814
548: \bibitem{melikhov2} D. Melikhov et al., Phys. Rev. \textbf{D 62} (2000) 014006
549: \bibitem{Buras96} G. Buchalla et al., Rev. Mod. Phys.\textbf{68} (1996) 1125
550: \bibitem{bobeth} C. Bobeth et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 574}, (2000) 291
551: \bibitem{ATLASTRD} The ATLAS Collaboration, CERN-LHCC-1999-14/15 (1999)
552: \bibitem{CMSTDR} The CMS Collaboration, CERN-LHCC-2006-001 (2006)
553: \bibitem{ATLASTRIG} The ATLAS Collaboration, CERN-LHCC-2003-22 (2003)
554: \bibitem{ATLASBG} N. Nikitin et al., ATL-PHYS-PUB-2007-009 (2007)
555: \bibitem{ATLASBMUMU} P. Reznicek, Nucl. Phys. B Proceedings Supplements {\bf 167} (2007) 244
556: \bibitem{CMSBMUMU} C. Eggel et al., CMS-AN-2006-097 (2006)
557: \bibitem{POLIX1} A. Policicchio and G. Crosetti, Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B 38} (2007) 947
558: \bibitem{POLIX2} A. Policicchio and G. Crosetti, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2007-017 (2007)
559:
560: \end{thebibliography}
561:
562:
563: \end{document}
564:
565: