1: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib,usegraphicx]{mn2e}
2:
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: \title[Spatial distribution in $\sigma$~Orionis]{Spatial distribution of stars
6: and brown dwarfs in $\sigma$ Orionis}
7: \author[Jos\'e A. Caballero]{Jos\'e Antonio Caballero$^{1,2}$\\
8: $^{1}$Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117
9: Heidelberg, Germany \\
10: $^{2}$Dpto. de Astrof\'{\i}sica y Ciencias de la Atm\'osfera, Facultad de
11: Ciencias F\'{\i}sicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, \\
12: E-28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: caballero@astrax.fis.ucm.es}
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \date{Accepted 2007 October --. Received 2007 October --;
16: in original form 2007 August 13}
17:
18: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2007}
19:
20: \maketitle
21:
22: \label{firstpage}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: I~have re-visited the spatial distribution of stars and high-mass brown
26: dwarfs in the $\sigma$~Orionis cluster ($\sim$3\,Ma, $\sim$360\,pc).
27: The input was a catalogue of 340 cluster members and candidates at separations
28: less than 30\,arcmin to $\sigma$~Ori~AB.
29: Of them, 70\,\% have features of extreme youth.
30: I~fitted the normalised cumulative number of objects counting from the cluster
31: centre to several power-law, exponential and King radial distributions.
32: The cluster seems to have two components: a dense core that extends from the
33: centre to $r \approx$ 20\,arcmin and a rarified halo at larger separations.
34: The radial distribution in the core follows a power-law proportional to $r^1$,
35: which corresponds to a volume density proportional to $r^{-2}$.
36: This is consistent with the collapse of an isothermal spherical molecular
37: cloud.
38: The stars more massive than 3.7\,$M_\odot$ concentrate, however, towards the
39: cluster centre, where there is also an apparent deficit of very low-mass objects
40: ($M <$ 0.16\,$M_\odot$).
41: Last, I~demonstrated through Monte Carlo simulations that the cluster is
42: azimuthally asymmetric, with a filamentary overdensity of objects that runs from
43: the cluster centre to the Horsehead~Nebula.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46: \begin{keywords}
47: open clusters and associations: individual: $\sigma$ Orionis --
48: stars: formation -- stars: low mass, brown dwarfs.
49: \end{keywords}
50:
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: The $\sigma$~Orionis region in the {Ori~OB~1~b} association is finally
55: becoming recognised as one of the most important young open clusters, with an
56: age of only about 3\,Ma.
57: In the discovery paper, Garrison (1967) used the term ``clustering'' to refer to
58: an agglomeration of fifteen B-type stars surrounding and including the multiple
59: star {$\sigma$~Ori}.
60: Afterwards, Lyng\aa~(1981) tabulated $\sigma$~Orionis in his catalogue of open
61: clusters.
62: Since the rediscovery of the cluster by Wolk (1996) and its subsequent study in
63: depth, which has revealed the most numerous and best known substellar
64: population (B\'ejar et~al. 1999; Zapatero Osorio et~al. 2000, 2002; Caballero
65: et~al. 2007), only a few authors have investigated the $\sigma$~Orionis spatial
66: distribution.
67: In particular, B\'ejar et~al. (2004) and Sherry et~al. (2004) analysed the
68: radial distribution of $\sigma$~Orionis cluster members and candidates in annuli
69: of width $\Delta r$ as a function of the separation $r$ to $\sigma$~Ori~AB.
70: To maximise the number of objects per annulus and minimise the Poissonian
71: errors, $\Delta r$ must be wide.
72: This leads to have few annuli (no more than 12 in the $r$ = 0--30\,arcmin
73: interval) to fit to a suitable radial profile (exponential decay -- B\'ejar
74: et~al. 2004; King -- Sherry et~al.~2004).
75: Both studies agree that the cluster may extend only up to $\sim$25--30\,arcmin.
76: The low surface density of cluster members at larger separations, the sharp
77: increase of extinction due to the nearby {Horsehead Nebula}-{Flame
78: Nebula}-{IC~434} complex and the closeness to (or even overlapping with)
79: other stellar populations in the Orion Belt surrounding {Alnitak}
80: ($\zeta$~Ori) and {Alnilam} ($\epsilon$~Ori) prevent from suitably
81: broaden the radial distribution analysis (Caballero 2007a).
82: At the canonical heliocentric distance to $\sigma$~Orionis of 360\,pc (e.g.
83: Brown, de~Geus \& de~Zeeuw 1994), the cluster would have an approximate radius
84: of~3\,pc.
85:
86: In spite of the agreement on the size of $\sigma$~Orionis, the fits and the
87: profiles in B\'ejar et~al. (2004) and Sherry et~al. (2004) seem to be rather
88: incomplete and inappropiate, respectively.
89: On the one hand, the King models were designed for tidally truncated globular
90: clusters (King 1962, 1966; Meylan 1987), and have also been satisfactorily used
91: for describing galaxies (e.g. Kormendy 1977; Binggeli, Sandage \& Tarenghi
92: 1984).
93: These systems have had enough time to be isothermal, on the contrary to very
94: young open clusters like $\sigma$~Orionis, where only gravitational relaxation
95: by initial mixing may have occurred (King 1962).
96: On the other hand, B\'ejar et~al. (2004) exclusively focused on the cluster
97: substellar population.
98: Besides, the exponential fit in B\'ejar et~al. (2004) only accounted for the
99: five innermost annuli, which leaded to a high uncertainty in the derived
100: parameters.
101: Last, in the works by Sherry et~al. (2004) and B\'ejar et~al. (2004), the
102: input list of cluster members and candidates came from $VRI/IZ$ optical surveys.
103: Many sources in both analysis had no near-infrared or spectroscopic follow-up.
104:
105: For a correct study of the spatial distribution in $\sigma$~Orionis, it is
106: therefore necessary to use new fitting radial profiles and an input catalogue as
107: comprehensive as possible.
108: It must cover a wide mass interval.
109: Maximum completeness and minimum contamination of the catalogue are also
110: desired.
111: These requirements are verified by the {\em Mayrit} catalogue, which tabulates
112: 339 $\sigma$~Orionis members and candidates in a 30\,arcmin-radius circular area
113: centred on $\sigma$~Ori~AB (Caballero 2007c).
114: Of them, 241 display features of extreme youth (e.g. OB spectral types, Li~{\sc
115: i} in absorption, H$\alpha$ in strong emission, spectral signatures of low
116: gravity, near- and mid-infrared excesses due to discs).
117: The catalogue covers three orders of magnitude in mass, from the
118: $\sim$18+12\,$M_\odot$ of the O9.5V+B0.5V binary $\sigma$~Ori~AB to the
119: $\sim$0.033\,$M_\odot$ of the brown dwarf {B05~2.03--617} (Caballero \&
120: Chabrier, in~prep.).
121: Accounting for $\sigma$~Ori~A and B as different objects separated by
122: $\sim$0.25\,arcsec, then the equatorial coordinates of 340 young stars, brown
123: dwarfs and cluster member candidates are available.
124: I will use this input catalogue to investigate the radial and azimuthal
125: distribution of objects in the $\sigma$~Orionis~region.
126:
127:
128: \section{Analysis and results}
129: %\section{Radial distribution}
130:
131: \subsection{Cluster centre and radial gradient}
132: \label{clustercentre}
133:
134: %______________________________________________Fig.
135: \begin{figure}
136: \centering
137: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or1.eps}
138: \caption{Binned surface density profile for $\sigma$~Orionis with Caballero
139: (2007c) data.
140: The mean number of objects per annulus is 34 for a width $\Delta r$ = 3\,arcmin.
141: All the figures are in colour in the online article on Synergy.}
142: % octsep
143: \label{orhist}
144: \end{figure}
145: %
146:
147: Caballero (2007a) showed that $\sim$46\,\% of the mass in the
148: $\sigma$~Orionis stars with $M \ga 1.2\,M_\odot$ is contained in the
149: quintuple Trapezium-like system that gives the name to the cluster, and
150: $\sim$29\,\% only in the AB components.
151: This suggests using the binary as the cluster centre ($r$ = 0).
152: From the masses for the objects in the {\em Mayrit} catalogue derived in
153: Caballero \& Chabrier (in~prep.), one third of the total cluster mass is
154: encircled in the innermost 5\,arcmin.
155: If the mass were homogenously distributed within the survey area, the
156: innermost 5\,arcmin would contain only 2.8\,\% of the total cluster
157: mass [$(5/30)^2 \approx 0.028$].
158: I~will consider $\sigma$~Ori~AB as the origin of coordinates because of:
159: ($i$) simplicity (the coordinates of the binary are well determined by {\em
160: Hipparcos}; the actual coordinates of the cluster barycentre may change when a
161: different input list of cluster members and individual masses is used);
162: ($ii$) reflection of the geometry of the {\em Mayrit} survey in Caballero
163: (2007c), which was centred on $\sigma$~Ori~AB; and
164: ($iii$) uniformity with previous works (especially with B\'ejar et~al. 2004 and
165: Sherry et~al. 2004, who also used $\sigma$~Ori~AB as the coordinate origin).
166: There might be an additional reason:
167: the largest mass aggregation is probably associated to the
168: densest region of the original molecular cloud where the fragmentation and star
169: formation initiated (assuming that the origin of the referece frame is
170: locked to the --moving-- cluster barycentre).
171: This reason may be unconvincing, because highly turbulent (and fractal-like?)
172: molecular clouds probably do not have a ``centre'' that can be defined in any
173: sensible way, as shown in the simulations of Bonnell, Bate \& Vine (2003).
174: See Section~\ref{azimuthalasymmetry} in this work and fig.~1 in Caballero
175: (2007a) for pictorical views of the spatial distribution of confirmed and
176: candidate cluster members in the $\sigma$\,Orionis region, and Caballero (2007b)
177: for a description of the cluster centre.
178: The old-fashioned plot of the surface density is shown in
179: Fig.~\ref{orhist};
180: see similar plots in Sherry et~al. (2004) and B\'ejar et~al. (2004) for
181: comparison.
182:
183: %______________________________________________Fig.
184: \begin{figure}
185: \centering
186: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or2.eps}
187: \caption{Euclidean minimum spanning tree for $\sigma$~Orionis
188: (${\mathcal Q} \approx$ 0.88).
189: I~have used a {\sc matlab/octave} function based on an open code by F.~W.~J. van
190: der Berg (University of Copenhagen), based in its turn on an algorithm by
191: Hillier and Lieberman (2001).
192: The minimum spanning trees for {$\rho$~Ophiuchus}, {IC~2391}, {IC~348}, {Taurus}
193: and {Chamaeleon} are shown in Cartwright \& Whitworth (2004).}
194: % octmst
195: \label{omst}
196: \end{figure}
197: %
198:
199: There exists a ${\mathcal Q}$-parameter which quickly, and simply, shows if
200: a distribution of cluster members is smooth (a large-scale radial density
201: gradient) or clumpy a (multiscale fractal subclustering; Cartwright \& Whitworth
202: 2004).
203: The ${\mathcal Q}$-parameter is defined by:
204:
205: \begin{equation}
206: {\mathcal Q} = \frac{\overline{m}}{\overline{s}},
207: \end{equation}
208:
209: \noindent where $m$ and $s$ are the edge length of the Euclidean minimum
210: spanning tree and the separation between cluster members, respectively.
211: A minimum spanning tree is a network (``graph'') of $N_{\rm max}$-1 lines
212: (``edges'') that connect the $N_{\rm max}$ objects (``nodes'') in the shortest
213: possible way under the condition no closed loops allowed.
214: See, e.g., Graham, Clowes \& Campusano (1995) for an application of minimum
215: spanning trees in Astrophysics\footnote{The first algorithm for finding a
216: minimum spanning tree was developed to find an efficient electrical coverage of
217: Czech Moravia (Bor\r{u}vka~1926)}.
218: The normalization factors are $(N_{\rm max} \pi r_{\rm max}^2)^{1/2} / (N_{\rm
219: max} - 1)$ and $r_{\rm max}$ for $m$ and $s$ ($N_{\rm max}$ is the total number
220: of cluster members and $\pi r_{\rm max}^2$ is the area of the circular survey).
221:
222: For the 340 $\sigma$~Orionis cluster member and candidates, I~have measured
223: $\overline{m}$ = 0.589 and $\overline{s}$ = 0.668.
224: Therefore, the Cartwright \& Whitworth (2004) parameter is ${\mathcal Q}
225: \approx$ 0.88.
226: This value is larger than 0.80, which distinguish $\sigma$~Orionis as a cluster
227: with a smooth large-scale radial density gradient and a moderate degree of
228: central concentration.
229: This concentration is larger than in $\rho$~Ophiuchus, other cluster
230: with a radial density gradient, but less than in IC~348 (Cartwright \& Whitworth
231: 2004).
232: Other sparse clusters and star-forming regions, like IC~2391, Taurus and
233: Chamaeleon, have ${\mathcal Q}$-parameters in the interval 0.47--0.67, which
234: indicates that they have, on the contrary, subestructure with fractal dimensions
235: between 1.5 and~2.5.
236:
237:
238: \subsection{Surface density and cumulative number of objects}
239: \label{surfacedensity}
240:
241: I present an innovative, accurate, simple method to derive the actual
242: expression of the surface density as a distance from the cluster centre,
243: $\sigma(r)$.
244: It can be applied to other open and globular clusters and galaxies.
245: The normalised cumulative number of objects counting from the cluster centre,
246: $f(r)$, is:
247:
248: \begin{equation}
249: f(r) = \frac{N(r)}{N(r_{\rm max})},
250: \end{equation}
251:
252: \noindent where $N(r)$ is the total number of stars in projection within a
253: distance $r$ of the centre.
254: If there is azimuthal symmetry, $N(r)$ is related to the surface density
255: through the following expression:
256:
257: \begin{equation}
258: N(r) = 2 \pi \int_0^r dr' ~ r' ~ \sigma(r').
259: \end{equation}
260:
261: \noindent
262: The relatively high value of the ${\mathcal Q}$-parameter of
263: $\sigma$~Orionis supports the hypothesis of azimuthal symmetry in this cluster
264: in particular.
265: For systems without azimuthal symmetry (e.g. elliptical galaxies), use instead:
266: \begin{equation}
267: N(r) = \int_0^r \int_0^{2 \pi} ~ dr' d\theta ~
268: r' ~ \sigma(r',\theta).
269: \end{equation}
270: \noindent
271: The surface $\sigma(r)$ and volume $\rho(r)$ densities are linked through the
272: simple relation $\sigma(r) = 2 r \rho(r)$.
273: This equality comes from:
274:
275: \begin{equation}
276: N(r) = 4 \pi \int_0^r dr' ~ r'^2 ~ \rho(r') = 2 \pi \int_0^r dr' ~ r' ~
277: \sigma(r') ~~~ [\forall r],
278: \end{equation}
279:
280: \noindent assuming again azimuthal symmetry\footnote{Cartwright \&
281: Whitworth (2004) demonstrated that the equality is based on a fallacious
282: assumption.
283: The differences between $\sigma(r)$ and $2 r \rho(r)$, linked to distribution
284: functions of type 2D1 and 3D2 in the nomenclature by those authors, are,
285: however, too small to be considered in this~work.}.
286: The function $f(r)$ varies from 0 at $r$ = 0 to 1 at $r$ = $r_{\rm max}$.
287: In the {\em Mayrit} survey, $r_{\rm max}$ = 30\,arcmin and $N(r_{\rm max})$
288: ($\equiv$ $N_{\rm max}$) = 340.
289: In the discrete approximation, $N(r) \approx N^*(r)$ and:
290:
291: \begin{equation}
292: f(r) \approx f^*(r) =
293: \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N^*(r)} i}{\sum_{i=1}^{N(r_{\rm max})} i} =
294: \frac{N^*(r)}{N_{\rm max}}.
295: \end{equation}
296:
297: I~have investigated several functional expressions of $\sigma(r)$ that fit in
298: more or less degree the observed normalised cumulative number of objects,
299: $f^*(r)$.
300: A general expression for a power-law surface density of index $\delta-2$ is:
301:
302: \begin{equation}
303: \sigma(r,\delta) = \frac{\delta N_{\rm max} r^{\delta-2}}{2 \pi r_{\rm
304: max}^\delta},
305: \end{equation}
306:
307: \noindent which, after integration, leads to a simple expression for~$f(r)$:
308:
309: \begin{equation}
310: f(r,\delta) = \left( \frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^\delta.
311: \end{equation}
312:
313: \noindent In this approach, the objects are uniformly distributed in a circular
314: area if $\delta = 2$ ($\sigma$ = constant).
315: Surface densities with parameter $\delta < 0$, that predict a lower number of
316: objects close to the centre, were obvioulsy not considered.
317:
318: Following B\'ejar et~al. (2004), I~have also studied two expressions of
319: exponential decay of the surface density:
320:
321: \begin{eqnarray}
322: \sigma(r,\epsilon) = \sigma_0 e^{-\epsilon r} \\
323: \sigma_0 = \frac{N_{\rm max}}{2 \pi}
324: \frac{1}{\frac{1}{\epsilon^2} - e^{-\epsilon r_{\rm max}}
325: \left( \frac{1}{\epsilon^2} + \frac{r_{\rm max}}{\epsilon} \right)} \\
326: f(r) = \frac{1 - e^{-\epsilon r}}{1 - e^{-\epsilon r_{\rm max}}}
327: \end{eqnarray}
328:
329: \noindent and:
330:
331: \begin{eqnarray}
332: \sigma(r,\epsilon) = \sigma_0 e^{-\epsilon r^2} \\
333: \sigma_0 = \frac{\epsilon N_{\rm max}}{\pi}
334: \frac{1}{1 - e^{-\epsilon r_{\rm max}^2}} \\
335: f(r) = \frac{1 - e^{-\epsilon r^2}}{1 - e^{-\epsilon r_{\rm max}^2}}.
336: \end{eqnarray}
337:
338: Finally, I~have also investigated the King (1962) profile for gravitationally
339: relaxed globular clusters.
340: Close to the centre, the surface density can be expressed by:
341:
342: \begin{equation}
343: \sigma(r) \approx \sigma_c(r) = \frac{\sigma_0}{1 + (r / r_c)^2},
344: \end{equation}
345:
346: \noindent where $r_c$ is the core radius and $\sigma_0$ is the central surface
347: density.
348: In the limit of the cluster, the surface density is:
349:
350: \begin{equation}
351: \sigma(r) \approx \sigma_t(r) = \sigma_1 \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r_t}
352: \right)^2,
353: \end{equation}
354:
355: \noindent where $r_t$ is the tidal radius (the value of $r$ at which
356: $\sigma_t(r)$ reaches zero) and $\sigma_1$ is a constant.
357: The overall normalised cumulative number of objects that embodies $\sigma_c(r)$
358: and $\sigma_t(r)$ is, following the nomenclature by King (1962):
359:
360: \begin{equation}
361: f(r) = \frac
362: {\log{(1+x)} - 4 \frac{(1+x)^{1/2}-1}{(1+x_t)^{1/2}}+\frac{x}{1+x_t}}
363: {\log{(1+x_{\rm max})} - 4 \frac{(1+x_{\rm max})^{1/2}-1}{(1+x_t)^{1/2}}+\frac{x_{\rm max}}{1+x_t}},
364: \end{equation}
365:
366: \noindent where $x = (r/r_c)^2$, $x_t = (r_t/r_c)^2$ and
367: $x_{\rm max} = (r_{\rm max}/r_c)^2$.
368:
369: %______________________________________________Fig.
370: \begin{figure}
371: \centering
372: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or3a.eps}
373: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or3b.eps}
374: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or3c.eps}
375: \caption{Normalised cumulative number of $\sigma$~Orionis objects, $f^*(r)$, in
376: (red) steps plot style and theoretical distribution in (blue) solid line.
377: {\em Top panel:} power-law distributions for $f(r) \propto r^{1/2},
378: ~ r^{0.9}, ~ r^2$ (from top to bottom);
379: {\em middle panel:} exponential distributions for $\sigma (r) \propto
380: e^{-\epsilon r}$ ($\epsilon$ = 1/12\,arcmin$^{-1}$) and $e^{-\epsilon r^2}$
381: ($\epsilon$ = 1/18$^2$\,arcmin$^{-2}$);
382: {\em bottom panel:} King distributions for the core, limit (dotted) and
383: overall radial profiles ($r_c$ = 10\,arcmin, $r_t$ = 200\,arcmin).}
384: % octovo26(n).m, n=...
385: \label{ofrrs}
386: \end{figure}
387: %
388:
389: %______________________________________________Fig.
390: \begin{figure}
391: \centering
392: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or4.eps}
393: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{ofrrs} but for a composite theoretical distribution
394: with $f(r) = 1.1 \left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^{1.0}$ for $r <$ 21\,arcsec
395: and $f(r) = 1.0 \left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^{0.7}$ for $r >$ 23\,arcsec.}
396: % octovo(n).m, n=10
397: \label{ofrr}
398: \end{figure}
399: %
400:
401: Fig.~\ref{ofrrs} illustrates the fits of $f(r)$ to $f^*(r)$ to
402: evaluate the most suitable expression for $\sigma(r)$.
403: The best match for a simple power-law density is aquired for
404: $\delta$ = 0.9.
405: Power-laws with $\delta \gg 1$ and $\delta \ll 1$ provide inaccurate fits.
406: Likewise, the exponential profiles cannot predict the large actual surface
407: density close to the cluster centre (the binned surface density profile in
408: Fig.~\ref{orhist}, when plotted in logarithmic scale, also shows that the
409: innermost bin deviates from the exponential profile).
410: The overall King profile has the same problem.
411: I~performed intensive computations, not shown here, to cover the $(r_t,r_c)$
412: parameter space of the King profile.
413: No clear minimum of the $\chi^2$ exists for the $\sigma$~Orionis radial
414: distribution when fitted to the King empirical density law.
415: The best solutions were found for all the combinations that satisfy $r_c$ =
416: 8--12\,arcmin and $r_t \gg r_c$.
417: The excesses of light at {\em large} radii of young massive clusters with
418: respect to King (and Elson, Fall \& Freeman 1987) profile(s), attributed to gas
419: expulsion by Goodwin \& Bastian (2006), cannot explain the poor fitting for the
420: King profile at {\em small} radii in $\sigma$~Orionis.
421:
422: The best general fit is obtained for a composite power-law, as shown in
423: Fig.~\ref{ofrr}.
424: The cumulative number of $\sigma$~Orionis objects grows proportional to $r$
425: (i.e. $\delta$ = 1.0) up to $\sim$20\,arcmin.
426: This size translates into a physical radius of $\sim$2\,pc.
427: At larger separations, $f(r)$ increses with a lower slope, indicating an
428: exponent $\delta \approx 0.7$.
429: In reality, at such separations, an exponential or a limit King [$\sigma_t(r)$]
430: profile would also fit the data.
431: From the extrapolation of the $f(r) \propto r$ law up to the radius of
432: 30\,arcmin, there is deficit of 30--40 objects in the outermost annulus.
433: As a result, the $\sigma$~Orionis cluster may be spatially described as a
434: central ($r \la$ 20\,arcmin), dense region --the ``core''-- and an outer ($r
435: \ga$ 20\,arcmin), more rarified region --the ``halo''--.
436: From these data, the power-law index transition between the core and the halo is
437: quite smooth.
438: However, the relative drop of $f(r)$ at $r \sim$ 20\,arcmin might be more or
439: less abrupt because of our poor knowledge of the $\sigma$~Orionis stellar
440: population at large separations from the cluster centre.
441: As an example, while more than 90\,\% of cluster members and candidates of the
442: {\em Mayrit} catalogue in the innermost 10\,arcmin have known features of
443: extreme youth, this ratio is about 50\,\% in the halo (past spectroscopic,
444: mid-infrared and X-ray analysis have been naturally focused on the cluster
445: centre and its~surroundings).
446: Going deeply into this subject seems to be meaningless because of the
447: relatively small amount of investigated cluster objects in the halo,
448: contamination by young neighbouring stellar populations in Orion (Jeffries
449: et~al. 2006; Caballero 2007a) or fore-/background stars (e.g. Caballero,
450: Burgasser \& Klement, in prep.), variable extinction to the northeast of the
451: survey area, incompleteness of the {\em Mayrit} catalogue (Caballero 2007c)
452: and the ``anomalous'' radial distribution discussed~next.
453:
454: The radial distribution of the cluster core is, on the contrary to the
455: halo, free of possible systematic errors.
456: The $f(r) \propto r$ law in the core is translated to surface and volume
457: densities $\sigma(r) \propto r^{-1}$ and $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$.
458: Radial profile investigations carried out in other very young star-forming
459: regions have found similar distributions.
460: Not far away from $\sigma$~Orionis, Bate, Clarke \& McCaughrean (1998) noticed
461: that the stars of the Orion Nebula Cluster are distributed with a core of
462: uniform volume density and radius $r_{\rm core}$ = 0.5\,arcmin and a volume
463: density profile $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$ at larger separations.
464: Alike power-law volume densitiy distributions have been found in other
465: star-forming regions, like Taurus (Fuller \& Myers 1992; Ward-Thompson et~al.
466: 1994), or low-mass cold dark molecular clouds, like {Barnard~68} (Alves, Lada \&
467: Lada 2001).
468: Furthermore, the power-law index 2 is an {\em ``often-used initial condition for
469: numerical calculations of star formation''} (Burkert, Bate \& Bodenheimer 1997).
470: The $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$ distribution corresponds to a singular,
471: self-gravitating, (rotating) isothermal sphere.
472: Finally, from fig.~5 in Cartwright \& Whitworth (2004) and the ${\mathcal
473: Q}$-parameter value for $\sigma$~Orionis derived in Section~\ref{clustercentre},
474: I~estimate that the volume density in the cluster varies as $\rho(r) \propto
475: r^{-1.7 \pm 0.4}$.
476: The --1.7$\pm$0.4 index is intermediate between those in $\rho$~Ophiuchus
477: (--1.2) and IC~348 (--2.2) and consistent with $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$.
478:
479: The use of the power-law function $f(r) \propto r$, whose corresponding
480: $\sigma(r)$ diverges at $r$ = 0, has the drawback of an incorrect fit in the
481: innermost 1\,arcmin of the cluster.
482: Characterising the very centre of the cluster is out of the scope of this work,
483: since it can be only accomplished with high spatial-resolution facilities (e.g.
484: adaptive optics or mid-infrared instruments -- van Loon \& Oliveira 2003;
485: Caballero 2005).
486: Moreover, the Bate et~al. (1998)'s value of $r_{\rm core}$ can be suitable
487: applied to $\sigma$~Orionis.
488: There are only seven stars at less than 0.5\,arcmin to $\sigma$~Ori~AB
489: (Caballero 2007b), so the central surface density is $\sigma_0 \approx$
490: 9\,arcmin$^{-2}$.
491: This value matches well with the actual value of $\sigma(r_{\rm core})$ for
492: $f(r) \propto r$.
493: The observational parallelism between the radial distributions of the Orion
494: Nebula Cluster and other star-forming regions and of $\sigma$~Orionis evidences
495: that the collapse of an isothermal cloud to form a star cluster might
496: be~universal.
497:
498:
499: \subsection{Mass-dependent radial distribution}
500:
501: %______________________________________________Fig.
502: \begin{figure}
503: \centering
504: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or5.eps}
505: \caption{Mass-dependent normalised cumulative number of high-mass
506: $\sigma$~Orionis
507: stars as a function of the separation to the cluster centre.
508: The observed $f^*(r)$ for the 340 objects is overplotted as in
509: Figs.~\ref{ofrrs}~and~\ref{ofrr}.}
510: % octovo29.m
511: \label{ofrrmA}
512: \end{figure}
513: %
514:
515: %______________________________________________Fig.
516: \begin{figure}
517: \centering
518: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or6.eps}
519: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{ofrrmA}, but for intermediate-mass stars.}
520: % octovo29.m
521: \label{ofrrmB}
522: \end{figure}
523: %
524:
525: %______________________________________________Fig.
526: \begin{figure}
527: \centering
528: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or7.eps}
529: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{ofrrmA}, but for low-mass stars.}
530: % octovo29.m
531: \label{ofrrmC}
532: \end{figure}
533: %
534:
535: %______________________________________________Fig.
536: \begin{figure}
537: \centering
538: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or8.eps}
539: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{ofrrmA}, but for very low-mass stars and
540: brown~dwarfs.
541: Note the deficit of very low-mass cluster member and candidates at $r \la$
542: 4\,arcmin and the inclined raise at $r =$ 6--7\,arcmin}
543: % octovo29.m
544: \label{ofrrmD}
545: \end{figure}
546: %
547:
548: I have also investigated the radial profile of $\sigma$~Orionis cluster
549: members and candidates for different mass intervals.
550: I~have separated the 340 stars and brown dwarfs in four mass groups that are
551: equally spaced in logarithmic scale.
552: The boundaries between the groups are at about 3.7, 0.77 and 0.16\,$M_\odot$.
553: The groups contain, from the most to the least massive, 10, 103, 155 and 72
554: elements.
555: Figs.~\ref{ofrrmA}~to~\ref{ofrrmD} show the normalised cumulative number of
556: objects for the four groups compared to the average distribution.
557: It is manifest that the ten stars more massive than 3.7\,$M_\odot$ depart from
558: the general trend $f(r) \propto r$, while the brown dwarfs and stars below this
559: mass roughly follow it.
560: The massive stars seem to obey the King profile close to the cluster centre
561: (with a surface density $\sigma_c(r) = \frac{f_0}{1+(r/r_c)^2}$) rather than a
562: power-law, whose exponent should be as low as $\delta \sim$ 0.1.
563: Eight of the ten most massive $\sigma$~Orionis stars are, besides, within the
564: 10\,arcmin-radius circle.
565: This agglomeration of early-type stars towards the cluster centre is typical in
566: other very young star-forming regions, such as the Orion Nebula Cluster, whose
567: centre is defined by the OB-type stars of the {$\theta^1$~Ori} multiple
568: system.
569: This result shows again the resemblance between both Orion~clusters.
570:
571: There is no other characteristic feature in the mass-dependent distribitution in
572: Figs.~\ref{ofrrmA}~to~\ref{ofrrmD}, except for a remarkable deficit of very
573: low-mass stars and high-mass brown dwarfs (0.16\,$M_\odot$ $\le M \le$
574: 0.03\,$M_\odot$) in the innermost 4\,arcmin together with a steep raise of
575: $f^*(r)$ at 6--7\,arcmin (Fig.~\ref{ofrrmD}).
576: On the one hand, there are only two representatives of this mass interval within
577: 4\,arcmin: Mayrit~36273 and the Class I object Mayrit~111208.
578: Both of them are the faintest sources with $I$-band photometry identified in the
579: near-infrared/optical/X-ray survey in the centre of
580: $\sigma$~Orionis by Caballero (2007b).
581: On the other hand, there are almost 20 low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in the
582: narrow annulus 5--8\,arcmin.
583: An 0.16\,$M_\odot$-mass object in the cluster, in the upper limit of low-mass
584: interval, has typical magnitudes $I \sim$ 16.0\,mag, $J \sim$ 14.0\,mag.
585: These values are far brighter than the DENIS and 2MASS completenesses, even in
586: the innermost region affected by the glare of the multiple system $\sigma$~Ori.
587: Caballero (2007b) failed to confirm or refute this absence of very low-mass
588: stars and high-mass brown dwarfs.
589: The raise of $f^*(r)$ at 6--7\,arcmin indicates, on the contrary, a larger
590: density of very low-mass objects in this annulus.
591: One can think of many ways which could give rise to the deficit of low-mass
592: objects at small radii and excess at intermediate radii.
593: Firstly, low-mass objects could actually form in the 6--7\,arcmin annulus and
594: not in the inner regions (maybe core masses were higher in the centre, or
595: competitive accretion caused central brown dwarfs to grow into stars).
596: Alternatively, they could form in the cluster centre, but were ejected via
597: dynamical interactions with the massive stars.
598: Low-mass objects do not have enough energy, however, to move further away from
599: the deep $\sigma$~Ori gravity well of $M >$50\,$M_\odot$.
600: The deficit-excess needs to be explained by theory, but this particular set
601: of observations does not give any indication of a preferred formation scenario
602: [see Whitworth et~al. (2007) for a review on the theory of formation of brown
603: dwarfs and very low-mass stars].
604: Further and innovative observations, able to avoid the extense glare of the OB
605: system, are required to determine if the peculiar distribution of very low-mass
606: objects in the cluster centre are due to an observational bias or to an actual
607: consequence of the formation mechanism.
608: Some observational efforts on this topic have been carried out by Caballero
609: (2005, 2007b) and Sherry, Walter \& Wolk~(2005).
610:
611:
612: \subsection{Azimuthal asymmetry}
613: \label{azimuthalasymmetry}
614:
615: Top window in Fig.~\ref{orades} shows that the distribution of confirmed
616: cluster members and candidates is not whole radially symmetric, with an evident
617: lower density to the west of $\sigma$~Ori~AB with respect to the east.
618: An elongated subclustering is manifest to the east-northeast of the cluster
619: centre, just in the direction to the Horsehead Nebula.
620: On the contrary, B\'ejar et~al. (2004) derived that the variation of the radial
621: distribution of their very-low mass stars and brown dwarfs over their best
622: exponential law fit was Poissonian, implying no evidence of subclustering.
623: The object sample presented in this paper surpasses B\'ejar et~al.'s one and
624: allows to corroborate or invalidate their statement.
625:
626: %______________________________________________Fig.
627: \begin{figure}
628: \centering
629: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or9a.eps}
630: \includegraphics[width=0.57\textwidth]{or9b.eps}
631: \caption{Actual (top) and simulated (bottom) spatial distributions of
632: $\sigma$~Orionis objects in the survey area.
633: The coordinate origin is in $\sigma$~Ori~A.
634: The bottom window shows 10 Monte Carlo simulations following $f(r) =
635: \left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^{1.0}$.
636: One distribution is marked with small filled squares, the remaining ones are
637: marked with points.
638: The sizes of the small and big solid circles are 10 and 30\,arcmin.
639: The eight equal-size segments of annuli used for the computation of the
640: asymmetry factor, $\zeta$, are also indicated.}
641: % octovo27.m (sel), octovonn.m (rand)
642: \label{orades}
643: \end{figure}
644: %
645: % It comes from \subsubsection{Azimuthal asymmetry}
646:
647: I~have looked for an azimuthal asymmetry in the $\sigma$~Orionis cluster in
648: several steps.
649: First, I~have generated 1000 simulated distributions\footnote{In the general
650: power-law distribution case with index $\delta$, if $\bmath{r}$ is a vector of
651: length $N_{\rm max}$ of uniformly distributed pseudo-random radii between $r$ =
652: 0 and $r_{\rm max}$, then the distribution of the vector $\bmath{r}^{1/\delta}$
653: follows $f(r) = \left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^\delta$.} following the
654: power law $f(r) = \left(\frac{r}{r_{\rm max}} \right)^{1.0}$.
655: Ten of them (one is highlighted) are shown in the bottom window in
656: Fig.~\ref{orades}.
657: The resemblance with the actual distribution, in the top window of the Figure,
658: is evident.
659: Second, I~have divided the survey area in nine regions: a central area,
660: 10-arcmin wide, where the asymmetry is difficult to quantify, and eight segments
661: of the annulus in the radius interval 10\,arcmin $< r <$ 30\,arcmin.
662: Third, for each simulated distribution, I~have computed its corresponding
663: asymmetry factor, $\zeta$, defined by:
664:
665: \begin{equation}
666: \zeta = \frac{(N_1+N_2)-(N_7+N_8)}{N_{\rm max}},
667: \end{equation}
668:
669: \noindent where $N_1$ and $N_2$ are the numbers of objects of the two most
670: populated segments of annulus, and $N_7$ and $N_8$ are those of the less
671: populated.
672: The mean and the standard deviation of the 1000 computed asymmetry factors are
673: $\overline{\zeta} = 0.0698$, $\sigma_\zeta = 0.0189$.
674: The maximum and minimum asymmetry factors are $\zeta_{\rm max}$ = 0.1382 and
675: $\zeta_{\rm min}$ = 0.0176.
676: The four values ($\overline{\zeta}$, $\sigma_\zeta$, $\zeta_{\rm max}$ and
677: $\zeta_{\rm min}$) are faultless compatible with the Poissonian errors within
678: each segment of annulus.
679: Finally, I~have measured the asymmetry factor for the actual $\sigma$~Orionis
680: distribution: $\zeta^*$ = 0.1853.
681: This value deviates 6.1 times the $\sigma_\zeta$ from the $\overline{\zeta}$ and
682: is significatively larger than the $\zeta_{\rm max}$ among 1000 Monte Carlo
683: simulations.
684: Considering as a first order of approximation that the values $\zeta_i$ ($i$ =
685: 1...1000) are distributed following a standard normal distribution with
686: parameters $\overline{\zeta}$ and $\sigma_\zeta$, then there is a probability $p
687: = 1 - {\rm erf}(6.1/2^{1/2}) \approx 10^{-9}$ (where ``erf'' is the error
688: function) that the actual value $\zeta^*$ follows such distribution.
689: Even accounting for generous systematic errors or biases, it is highly probable
690: that the radial distribution of objects at more than 10\,arcmin from the
691: centre of $\sigma$~Orionis is azimuthally~asymmetric.
692:
693: The most populated segments of annulus of the actual distribution are, counting
694: anti-clockwise from 12 hours, the second (coinciding with the elongated
695: subclustering in the direction to the Horsehead Nebula) and the fifth ones.
696: Both two segments and the cluster centre spatially coincide with a filamentary
697: region of maximum emission at the 12\,$\mu$m {\em IRAS} passband (see fig.~2 in
698: Oliveira \& van Loon 2004).
699: This ``warmer'' region has not been identified in works based on recent
700: observations with IRAC and MIPS onboard {\em Spitzer} (e.g. Hern\'andez et~al.
701: 2007) or with the Spatial Infrared Imaging Telescope on the Midcourse Space
702: Experiment satellite (Kraemer et~al. 2003).
703: From my data, I cannot postulate whether the largest surface density of
704: $\sigma$~Orionis objects originally arises from an hypothetical larger density
705: of warm dust in the region or, inversely, the filamentary region is a
706: consequence of both the low spatial resolution imaging capabilities of {\em
707: IRAS} and the largest surface density of objects (i.e. the red $\sigma$~Orionis
708: objects, many with mid-infrared excesses due to discs --Oliveira et~al.
709: 2006; Hern\'andez et~al. 2007; Caballero et~al. 2007--, generate a smooth
710: background at 12\,$\mu$m that {\em IRAS} was not able to resolve).
711:
712: The accumulation of stars and brown dwarfs in a filamentary pattern in
713: $\sigma$~Orionis strongly supports some star formation scenarios of collapse and
714: fragmentation of a large-scale turbulent molecular cloud, especially those that
715: predict burst of star formation in filamentary gas ({e.g.} Bate, Bonnell \&
716: Bromm~2003).
717: It is stimulating to notice that these simulations assumed the contraction of an
718: isothermal, spherical molecular cloud with $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$ (see
719: Section~\ref{surfacedensity}).
720: The filamentary accumulation in $\sigma$~Orionis is, however,
721: peculiar, because no similar arrangements have been found in other star-forming
722: regions.
723: For example, G\'omez et~al. (1993) and Larson (1995) found that the
724: subclustering in {Taurus-Auriga} is in the form of star clumps of
725: $\sim$15 components, while Bate et~al. (1998) showed that in the Orion Nebula
726: Cluster there is no subclustering at all.
727: It is obvious that further investigations are needed; percolation or two-point
728: correlation function of stars are different approaches that can be~used.
729:
730:
731: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
732:
733: \section{Summary}
734:
735: The $\sim$3\,Ma-old $\sigma$~Orionis cluster is a perfect laboratory of
736: star formation.
737: I~have investigated the radial distribution of 340 cluster members and
738: candidates in a 30\,arcmin-radius area centred on $\sigma$~Ori~AB, taken from
739: Caballero (2007c).
740: The analysis has covered a mass interval from the 18+12\,$M_\odot$ of
741: $\sigma$~Ori~AB to the $\sim$0.03\,$M_\odot$ of the faintest brown dwarf
742: detectable by DENIS.
743: The cluster shows a clear radial density gradient, quantified by the
744: ${\mathcal Q}$-parameter, that accounts for the mean separation between members
745: and the Euclidean minimum spanning tree of the cluster.
746: I~have calculated the functional relations between normalised cumulative numbers
747: of objects counting from the cluster centre, $f(r)$, and surface densities,
748: $\sigma(r)$.
749: Cumulative distribution functions as these avoid many problems associated
750: with binning.
751: Among the studied radial (power-law, exponential and King) profiles, the best
752: fit is for a composite power-law distribution of cluster members with a core and
753: a rarified halo.
754: The core extends up to $\sim$20\,arcmin from the cluster centre and is nicely
755: modelled by a surface density $\sigma(r) \propto r^{-1}$, that corresponds to a
756: volume density $\rho(r) \propto r^{-2}$.
757: This volume density matches, in its turn, the radial profile in a cluster formed
758: from the collapse of a self-gravitating, isothermal sphere.
759: The most massive $\sigma$~Orionis stars deviate, however, from the general trend
760: and are much more concentrated towards the cluster centre.
761: There is also an apparent deficit of very low-mass stars and high-mass brown
762: dwarfs (0.16\,$M_\odot \ga M \ga$ 0.035\,$M_\odot$) in the innermost 4\,arcmin
763: and an excess in the annulus at 6--7\,arcmin to the central Trapezium-like
764: system.
765: Last, there is a significant azimuthal asymmetry due to a filament-shape
766: overdensity of objects that connects the cluster centre with a part of the
767: Horsehead Nebula.
768: This discovery supports the formation scenarios that predict burst of star
769: formation in filamentary~gas.
770:
771:
772: \section*{Acknowledgments}
773:
774: I thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments.
775: J.A.C. was formerly an Alexander von Humboldt Fellow at the MPIA, and is
776: currently an Investigador Juan de la Cierva at the UCM.
777: Partial financial support was provided by the Universidad Complutense de Madrid
778: and the Spanish Ministerio Educaci\'on y Ciencia under grant
779: AyA2005--02750 of the Programa Nacional de Astronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica
780: and by the Comunidad Aut\'onoma de Madrid under PRICIT project S--0505/ESP--0237
781: (AstroCAM).
782:
783:
784: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
785: \bibitem[]{Alves01} Alves J. F., Lada C. J., Lada E. A. 2001, Nature, 409, 159
786: %\bibitem[]{Bally00} Bally J., O'Dell C. R., McCaughrean M. J., 2000, AJ, 119,
787: %2919
788: \bibitem[]{BaGo06} Bastian N., Goodwin S. P., 2006, MNRAS, 369, L9
789: \bibitem[]{Bate98} Bate M. R., Clarke C. J., McCaughrean, M. J., 1998, MNRAS,
790: 297, 1163
791: \bibitem[]{Bate03} Bate M. R., Bonnell I. A., Bromm V., 2003, MNRAS, 339, 577
792: \bibitem[]{Beja99} B\'ejar V. J. S., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Rebolo, R., 1999,
793: ApJ, 521, 671
794: \bibitem[]{Beja04a} B\'ejar V. J. S., Caballero J. A., Rebolo R.,
795: Zapatero Osorio M. R., Barrado y Navascu\'es D., 2004, Ap\&SS, 292, 339
796: \bibitem[]{Bing84} Binggeli B., Sandage A., Tarenghi M. 1984, AJ, 89, 64
797: \bibitem[]{Bonn03} Bonnell I. A., Bate M. R., Vine S. G., 2003, MNRAS, 343,
798: 413
799: \bibitem[]{Boru26} Bor\r{u}vka O., 1926, Pr\'ace mor.
800: p\v{r}\'{\i}rodov\v{e}d. spol. v Brn\v{e} III, 3, 37
801: \bibitem[]{Brow94} Brown A. G. A., de Geus E. J., de Zeeuw P. T., 1994,
802: A\&A, 289, 101
803: \bibitem[]{Burk97} Burkert A., Bate M. R., Bodenheimer P., 1997, MNRAS, 289,
804: 497
805: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caballero}{2005}]{Ca05} Caballero J. A., 2005,
806: Astron. Nachr., 326, No. 10, 1007
807: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caballero}{2007a}]{Ca07a} Caballero J. A.,
808: 2007a, A\&A, 466, 917
809: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caballero}{2007b}]{Ca07b} Caballero J. A.,
810: 2007b, AN, 328, 917
811: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caballero}{2007c}]{Ca07c} Caballero J. A.,
812: 2007c, A\&A, submitted
813: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Caballero}{2007}]{Ca07} Caballero J. A.,
814: B\'ejar V. J. S., Rebolo R. et~al. 2007, A\&A, 470, 903
815: \bibitem[]{CaWh04} Cartwright A., Whitworth A. P., 2004, MNRAS, 348, 589
816: \bibitem[]{EFF87} Elson R. A. W., Fall M. S., Freeman K. C., 1987, ApJ,
817: 323, 54
818: \bibitem[]{Garr67} Garrison R. F. 1967, PASP, 79, 433
819: \bibitem[]{Gomez93} G\'omez M., Hartmann L., Kenyon S. J., Hewett R., 1993,
820: AJ, 105, 1927
821: \bibitem[]{Hdez07} Hern\'andez J., Hartmann L., Megeath T. et~al., 2007, ApJ,
822: 662, 1067
823: \bibitem[]{HiLi} Hiller F. S., Lieberman G. J., 2001, Introduction to
824: Operations Research, 7th edition, McGraw-Hill College, ISBN 0072321695
825: \bibitem[]{Jeff06} Jeffries R.~D., Maxted P.~F.~L., Oliveira J.~M., Naylor T.,
826: 2006, MNRAS, 371, L6
827: %\bibitem[]{John98} Johnstone D., Hollenbach D., Bally J., 1998, ApJ, 499, 758
828: \bibitem[]{Keny05} Kenyon M. J., Jeffries R. D., Naylor T., Oliveira J. M.,
829: Maxted P. F. L., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 89
830: \bibitem[]{King62} King I., 1962, AJ, 67, 47
831: \bibitem[]{King66} King I., 1966, AJ, 71, 64
832: \bibitem[]{Korm77} Kormendy J., 1977, ApJ, 218, 333
833: \bibitem[]{Krae03} Kraemer K. E., Shipman R. F., Price S. D., Mizuno D. R.,
834: Kuchar T., Carey S. J., 2003, AJ, 126, 1423
835: \bibitem[]{Lars95} Larson R. B., 1995, MNRAS, 272, 213
836: \bibitem[]{vanL03} van Loon J. Th., Oliveira J. M., 2003, A\&A, 405, L33
837: \bibitem[]{Lyng81} Lyng\aa~G., 1981, The Catalogue of Open Star Clusters, ADCBu,
838: 1, 90
839: \bibitem[]{Meyl87} Meylan G., 1987, A\&A, 184, 144
840: \bibitem[]{Oliv04b} Oliveira J. M., van Loon J. Th., 2004, A\&A, 418, 663
841: \bibitem[]{Oliv06} Oliveira J. M., Jeffries R. D., van Loon J. Th., Rushton
842: M. T., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 272
843: \bibitem[]{Sher04} Sherry W. H., Walter F. M., Wolk S. J., 2004, AJ, 128, 2316
844: \bibitem[]{Sher05} Sherry W. H., Walter F. M., Wolk S. J., 2005, Protostars and
845: Planets V, Proceedings of the Conference held October 24--28, 2005, in Hilton
846: Waikoloa Village, Hawai'i. LPI Contribution No. 1286., p.8599
847: \bibitem[]{WaTh94} Ward-Thompson D., Scott P. F., Hills R. E. \& Andre P.,
848: 1994, MNRASm 268, 276
849: \bibitem[]{Whit07} Whitworth A. P., Bate M. R., Nordlund \AA., Reipurth Bo,
850: Zinnecker H., 2007, Protostars and Planets V, Bo Reipurth, D. Jewitt, and K.
851: Keil (eds.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 459--476
852: \bibitem[]{Wolk96} Wolk S. J., 1996, Ph.D. thesis, State Univ. New York at Stony
853: Brook
854: \bibitem[]{Zapa00} Zapatero Osorio M. R., B\'ejar V. J. S., Mart\'{\i}n E. L.,
855: Rebolo R., Barrado y Navascu\'es D., Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Mundt R., 2000,
856: Science, 290, 103
857: \bibitem[]{Zapa02c} Zapatero Osorio M. R., B\'ejar V. J. S., Mart\'{\i}n E. L.,
858: Rebolo R., Barrado y Navascu\'es D., Mundt R., Eisl\"offel J., Caballero J. A.,
859: 2002, ApJ, 578, 536
860: \end{thebibliography}
861:
862: \bsp
863:
864: \label{lastpage}
865:
866: \end{document}
867: