1: %\documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{epsf}
4: \usepackage{times}
5: \newcommand{\etal}{{et al}\/.}
6: \newcommand{\hh}{^{\rm h}}
7: \newcommand{\mm}{^{\rm m}}
8: \begin{document}
9: \slugcomment{ApJ Letters, accepted 5th Oct 2007}
10: \shorttitle{Particle acceleration in Cen A}
11: \shortauthors{M.J.\ Hardcastle \etal}
12: \title{New results on particle acceleration in the Centaurus A jet and
13: counterjet from a deep {\it Chandra} observation}
14: \author{M.J.\ Hardcastle\altaffilmark{1}, R.P.\ Kraft\altaffilmark{2}, G.R.\
15: Sivakoff\altaffilmark{3}, J.L.\
16: Goodger\altaffilmark{1}, J.H.\ Croston\altaffilmark{1},
17: A.\ Jord\'an\altaffilmark{2,4}, D.A.\ Evans\altaffilmark{2}, D.M.\ Worrall\altaffilmark{5,2}, M.\ Birkinshaw\altaffilmark{5,2}, S.\
18: Raychaudhury\altaffilmark{6,2}, N.J.\ Brassington\altaffilmark{2}, W.R.\ Forman\altaffilmark{2}, W.E.\ Harris\altaffilmark{7}, C.\ Jones\altaffilmark{2}, A.M.\ Juett\altaffilmark{8}, S.S.\ Murray\altaffilmark{2}, P.E.J.\ Nulsen\altaffilmark{2}, C.L.\
19: Sarazin\altaffilmark{8}, and K.A.\ Woodley\altaffilmark{7}}
20: \altaffiltext{1}{School of Physics, Astronomy \& Mathematics, University of
21: Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK;
22: m.j.hardcastle@herts.ac.uk, j.l.goodger@herts.ac.uk, j.h.croston@herts.ac.uk}
23: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
24: Garden Street, Cambridge, MA~02138, USA; kraft@head.cfa.harvard.edu,
25: ajordan@cfa.harvard.edu, devans@cfa.harvard.edu, nbrassington@cfa.harvard.edu,
26: wforman@cfa.harvard.edu, cjones@cfa.harvard.edu,
27: ssm@cfa.harvard.edu, pnulsen@cfa.harvard.edu}
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University,
29: 4055 McPherson Laboratory 140 W. 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH
30: 43210-1173, USA; sivakoff@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}
31: \altaffiltext{4}{European Southern Observatory,
32: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.\ 2 85748 Garching bei M\"{u}nchen, Germany}
33: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, University of Bristol, Tyndall
34: Avenue, Bristol BS8 ITL, UK; d.m.worrall@bristol.ac.uk, mark.birkinshaw@bristol.ac.uk}
35: \altaffiltext{6}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of
36: Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; somak@star.sr.bham.ac.uk}
37: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster
38: University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada;
39: harris@physics.mcmaster.ca, woodleka@physics.mcmaster.ca}
40: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.
41: O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA;
42: ajuett@virginia.edu, sarazin@virginia.edu}
43: \begin{abstract}
44: We present new deep {\it Chandra} observations of the Centaurus A jet,
45: with a combined on-source exposure time of 719 ks. These data allow
46: detailed X-ray spectral measurements to be made along the jet out to
47: its disappearance at 4.5 kpc from the nucleus. We distinguish several
48: regimes of high-energy particle acceleration: while the inner part of
49: the jet is dominated by knots and has properties consistent with local
50: particle acceleration at shocks, the particle acceleration in the
51: outer 3.4 kpc of the jet is likely to be dominated by an unknown
52: distributed acceleration mechanism. In addition to several compact
53: counterjet features we detect probable extended emission from a
54: counterjet out to 2.0 kpc from the nucleus, and argue that this
55: implies that the diffuse acceleration process operates in the
56: counterjet as well. A preliminary search for X-ray variability finds
57: no jet knots with dramatic flux density variations, unlike the
58: situation seen in M87.
59: \end{abstract}
60: \keywords{galaxies: jets -- galaxies: active -- X-rays: galaxies --
61: galaxies: individual (Centaurus A)}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64: \label{intro}
65: Low-power, Fanaroff-Riley class I (FRI) \citep{fr74} radio galaxies
66: are numerically the dominant population of
67: radio-loud active galaxies in the universe. Their dynamics and energy
68: content are thus essential to models of AGN `feedback' in which the
69: energy released in the process of accretion onto the central
70: supermassive black hole is transported to large spatial scales via the
71: interaction between the jets and the external medium. To understand
72: the dynamics and energetics of these sources it is crucial that we
73: should understand the particle acceleration processes by which the
74: bulk kinetic energy of the jets is translated into the internal energy
75: of relativistic plasma.
76:
77: The discovery with {\it Chandra} that X-ray emission is common in the
78: inner few kpc of FRI jets \citep{wbh01} provides a very strong
79: argument that {\it in situ} high-energy particle acceleration is
80: taking place in those regions. The broad-band spectral energy
81: distribution and X-ray spectrum of the X-ray emission imply a
82: synchrotron origin for the X-rays \citep{hbw01}. For magnetic fields
83: close to the equipartition value in a typical powerful jet, the loss
84: timescale ($\tau = -E/\dot E$) for the $\gamma \sim 10^7$ -- $10^8$
85: electrons emitting X-ray synchrotron emission is tens of years. Thus
86: observations of X-ray synchrotron emission essentially tell us where
87: particle acceleration is happening {\it now}: in particular, resolved,
88: diffuse X-ray emission implies a particle acceleration
89: mechanism that must be distributed throughout the jet.
90:
91: To probe the nature of the acceleration mechanisms in FRI jets we
92: require observations that can reliably distinguish between compact and
93: diffuse X-ray emission: this implies (at the most optimistic) a
94: spatial resolution that is comparable to the loss spatial scale, the
95: distance travelled by an electron before synchrotron losses remove it
96: from the X-ray band, or roughly $c\tau$. Even with the comparatively
97: high angular resolution of {\it Chandra}, this can only be achieved in
98: the nearest FRI radio galaxy, Centaurus A. Given Cen A's distance of
99: $\sim 3.7$ Mpc (the average of 5 distance estimates to Cen A:
100: \citealt{fmst07}), {\it Chandra}'s resolution corresponds to $\sim 10$
101: pc.
102:
103: {\it Chandra} observations of Cen A show a complex, knotty and in
104: places edge-brightened jet structure (\citealt{kfjk00, kfjm02, hwkf03}
105: [hereafter H03]; \citealt{ksat06} [K06]; \citealt{hkw06}
106: [H06]). It has been argued (H03,K06) that at least two
107: acceleration mechanisms are required: the dynamics and spectra of the
108: compact knots in the inner part of the jet are consistent with a shock
109: origin, while the diffuse emission is inconsistent both spectrally
110: (H03) and in terms of the number distribution of knots (K06) with
111: being the sum of many unresolved knots with the same properties as
112: those observed, and is instead probably truly diffuse, implying a
113: distributed acceleration mechanism such as second-order Fermi
114: acceleration \citep[e.g.,][]{so02} or magnetic field line reconnection
115: \citep[e.g.,][]{bl00}. Here we present the results of new, much deeper
116: {\it Chandra} observations and their consequences for the nature of
117: particle acceleration in the Cen A jet and counterjet.
118:
119: \begin{figure*}
120: %\plotone{/home/mjh/pictures/CENA-JETCOL.PS}
121: \epsfxsize 16.6cm
122: \epsfbox{f1n.eps}
123: %\vskip -10pt
124: \caption{False-color image of the jet and counterjet regions of Cen A
125: using all ACIS observations. The {\it Chandra} data from each
126: observation have been exposure corrected at an appropriate energy
127: and then combined, weighting according to the value of the exposure
128: map. The images are binned in standard {\it Chandra} pixels
129: ($0\farcs492$ on a side) and smoothed with a FWHM = $1\farcs0$
130: Gaussian. Red shows exposure-corrected counts in the energy range
131: 0.4--0.85 keV, green shows 0.85--1.3 keV and blue 1.3--2.5 keV.
132: Contours [$7 \times (1,4,16\dots)$ mJy beam$^{-1}$] are from the
133: 5-GHz VLA map of H06 with $6\farcs0$ resolution.}
134: \label{fc}
135: \end{figure*}
136:
137: In this analysis {\it Chandra} data processing was done using {\sc
138: ciao} 3.4 and {\sc caldb} 3.3.0.1. Spectral fitting was carried out in
139: {\sc xspec}. We define the spectral index $\alpha$ such that flux
140: $\propto \nu^{-\alpha}$: the photon index $\Gamma = 1+\alpha$. Errors
141: quoted and plotted throughout are $1\sigma$ for one interesting parameter.
142:
143: \section{Observations}
144:
145: The {\it Chandra} AXAF CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) has observed
146: Cen A four times prior to 2007 (OBSID 316, 962, 2978 and 3965)
147: for a total of 157 ks (see e.g., \citealt{kfjm02}; H03; K06) and six
148: additional times in 2007 for the Cen A Very Large Project (Cen
149: A-VLP; OBSID 7797, 7798, 7799, 7800, 8489 and 8490). The
150: combined ACIS data set has an effective on-source time of 719 ks. All
151: X-ray spectral fits are the result of joint fitting to spectra
152: extracted from matching regions from each separate observation. Fig.\
153: \ref{fc} shows a false-color image of the jet and counterjet region.
154:
155: Cen A has also been extensively observed in the radio using the NRAO
156: Very Large Array (VLA). In this paper we make use of radio data whose
157: reduction was described by H03 and H06. We also use new
158: observations at 8.4 GHz taken on 2007 Jun 04 (observation AG754) as
159: part of our ongoing program to monitor proper motions and variability
160: in the Cen A radio jet. These data and the results of the monitoring
161: program will be presented elsewhere (Goodger \etal , in preparation).
162: For radio/X-ray comparisons, we have aligned both the radio and X-ray
163: frames to the VLBI position of the nucleus quoted by \cite{maef98}.
164: The relative astrometric alignment of the {\it Chandra} data was done
165: in the manner described by \cite{jsmb07}. We then
166: determined the X-ray centroid of the nucleus by two independent
167: methods (determining the intersection of the readout streaks and
168: centroiding on the hard wings of the AGN PSF) which gave consistent
169: results. The resulting radio/X-ray alignment is accurate to $\pm
170: 0\farcs1$.
171:
172: Fig.\ \ref{fc} shows a number of interesting features of the new deep
173: {\it Chandra} observation. The jet is now detected with high signal to
174: noise out to $250''$ (4.5 kpc in projection) from the active nucleus,
175: and this allows us to extract spectra for a large number of jet
176: regions; we discuss the jet spectra in \S\ref{spectra}. Diffuse
177: emission plausibly related to a counterjet is now detected out to
178: $110''$ (2.0 kpc); we discuss the nature of this emission and its
179: implications in \S\ref{cjet-section}. Constraints on large-scale
180: variability in jet knots are discussed in \S\ref{variability}.
181:
182: \section{Spectra of diffuse and compact features}
183: \label{spectra}
184:
185: To investigate the jet X-ray spectrum we followed K06 in dividing the
186: jet into compact and diffuse regions. We defined as a knot any compact
187: feature in the jet that is clearly distinguished (by a factor $\ga 2$)
188: in surface brightness from its surroundings and has radius $<2''$.
189: These criteria include many, but not all, of the knots discussed by
190: \citet{kfjm02} and K06: by our definition there are 26 knots in the
191: jet, all but 4 of which are bright enough for spectral analysis. We
192: extracted spectra for these knots using the {\sc psextract} script,
193: fitting a power-law spectrum with a single normalization and photon
194: index and with absorption that was free to vary above the Galactic
195: value (we adopt $N_{\rm H} = 8.4 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$, as
196: reported by the {\sc colden} code: \citealt{dl90}), but constrained
197: not to fall below it. The effects of knot variability on
198: this fitting are discussed in \S\ref{variability}. Background
199: subtraction was done using local off-source background regions, taking
200: account of the variation in both background surface brightness and
201: column density. The knot spectra may therefore include a small amount
202: of contamination from diffuse jet background.
203:
204: The diffuse region of the jet was taken to be a polygonal region
205: including all jet-related emission but excluding all features defined
206: above as knots. We divided this region into rectangular sub-regions
207: whose long axes were the whole transverse width of the jet (transverse
208: spectral variations in the jet are discussed by \citealt{wbks07}) and
209: whose short axes were allowed to grow in a direction parallel to the
210: jet axis, in steps of one {\it Chandra} pixel, until sufficient counts
211: were enclosed in all regions for spectroscopic analysis ($\ga 1000$
212: counts in the combined dataset before background subtraction). This
213: process gave a total of 53 extended regions. Spectra for these regions
214: were extracted with the {\sc specextract} script and were fitted with
215: absorbed power-law models in precisely the same manner as the knots.
216: All the fits for knots and extended regions were acceptable
217: (probability under the null hypothesis $>2$\%).
218:
219: \begin{figure}
220: \epsfxsize 8.6cm
221: \epsfbox{f2.eps}
222: \caption{Spectral index and surface brightness in the jet of Cen A.
223: Top panel: red line shows the spectral index in the extended
224: regions ($\alpha_{\rm X}$), dashed blue line shows the
225: radio/X-ray two-point spectral index, $\alpha_{\rm RX}$, for
226: extended emission. Green stars show the positions and X-ray
227: spectral indices of knots. Vertical bars are $1\sigma$ errors:
228: horizonal bars show the size of extended extraction regions.
229: Bottom panel: surface brightness profile (arbitrary units) for
230: extended emission in X-ray (red solid line) and radio (blue
231: dashed line).}
232: \label{profile}
233: \end{figure}
234: The results of this process are summarized in Fig.\ \ref{profile},
235: which may be compared with fig.\ 4 of K06 and table 2 of
236: H03. Based on this profile, the extended
237: emission of the jet can be divided into three regions with different
238: radio and X-ray properties:
239:
240: \noindent --- (i) ($\theta < 60''$, except at $\theta \approx 50''$).
241: X-ray flux dominated by knots ($\sim 2/3$ of total flux in knots: H03): radio
242: surface brightness high: extended $\alpha_{\rm X}$ flat, often
243: flatter than $\alpha_{\rm RX}$, and comparable to $\alpha_{\rm X}$
244: of knots.
245:
246: \noindent --- (ii) ($\theta \approx 50''$ and $60'' < \theta <
247: 190''$). Few X-ray knots ($<10$\% of flux in knots): knots have
248: $\alpha_{\rm X}$ less than the extended value. $\alpha_{\rm X} >
249: \alpha_{\rm RX}$ and roughly constant, $\approx 1.2 \pm 0.2$. Radio surface
250: brightness low, increasing by a factor $\sim 2$ along the jet. X-ray
251: surface brightness flat but decreasing by a factor $\sim 2$ along
252: the jet. Edge-brightening along the jet is present in the X-ray.
253:
254: \noindent --- (iii) ($\theta > 190''$; at and beyond the `flare
255: point' of H06). $\alpha_{\rm X}$ steepens to very high
256: values, $\sim 2.5$. Radio surface brightness increases by factor
257: $\sim 3$. X-ray surface brightness
258: increases by factor $\sim 3$, then falls off to zero.
259:
260: In region (i), the flat X-ray spectral index of the extended emission
261: is consistent with the expectations from shock acceleration coupled
262: with rapid downstream expansion losses (though some of
263: the inner knots have well-determined steep spectra, possibly implying
264: higher magnetic fields in these regions), while the fact that
265: $\alpha_{\rm RX} > \alpha_{\rm X}$ is inconsistent with a one-zone
266: model, but is consistent with the idea that much of the particle
267: acceleration here is localized to small sub-regions of the jet. The
268: new data provide some evidence that structures that appeared diffuse
269: in earlier observations (e.g., around knot B) are in fact composed of
270: smaller sub-clumps. In region (ii), on the other hand, the X-ray and
271: radio/X-ray spectral indices and the general appearance of the jet --
272: dominated not by knots but by filamentary, sometimes edge-brightened
273: features -- are consistent with a truly diffuse acceleration
274: mechanism, as argued by K06. Finally, as discussed by H06,
275: region (iii) corresponds to the end of X-ray emission from the jet.
276: The remarkable X-ray spectral steepening in this region cannot be due
277: to synchrotron losses -- the spatial scales involved are too large --
278: but must be due to a progressive loss of efficiency of high-energy
279: particle acceleration. H06 showed that the mid-IR and radio
280: data are consistent with the idea that there is no particle
281: acceleration beyond the end of the X-ray emission at $\sim 240''$: the
282: new data provide additional evidence that whatever happens at the
283: `flare point' -- perhaps a significant jet deceleration -- makes the
284: diffuse acceleration process substantially less efficient at
285: producing high-energy electrons. Our ability to distinguish between
286: the different models for the distributed particle acceleration process
287: (\S\ref{intro}) is limited by the inability of these models to produce
288: detailed predictions for the particle energy spectrum, but the steep
289: spectra seen at the end of the Cen A jet represent a challenge for any
290: current model.
291:
292: \section{The counterjet}
293: \label{cjet-section}
294:
295: H03 showed that a number of X-ray features in the counterjet region
296: had radio counterparts, proving that a coherent counterjet does exist
297: on the kpc scale in Cen A, although no large-scale radio emission is
298: detected from it. With the new X-ray data we detect at least 4 more
299: counterjet features (Fig.\ \ref{cjet}). There is now a weak X-ray
300: counterpart to the compact radio knot SJ3 (using the notation of H03)
301: and to the diffuse feature S1. The feature denoted SX1 by H03, with no
302: radio counterpart, turns out to be strongly variable (see
303: \S\ref{variability}) and so may be unrelated to the counterjet.
304: However, the two radio knots S2A and S2B have very clear X-ray
305: counterparts with stable X-ray fluxes. There is also a clear
306: overdensity of fainter compact X-ray features, some of which may be
307: counterjet knots, though none has a radio counterpart. The most
308: striking new counterjet features are the {\it extended} features SX2
309: and SX3, the former of which has a curious V-shaped morphology with a
310: radio counterpart to one arm of the V, and the latter of which appears
311: as a patch of diffuse emission on scales of $13''$ (230 pc). Both of
312: these have clearly harder spectra than the surrounding thermal
313: emission or than other nearby filamentary structures in the lobe
314: region (Fig.\ \ref{fc}). We extracted spectra for these regions from
315: the 2007 datasets only, obtaining a good fit with power-law models
316: with free absorption as for the other spectra, and found $\alpha_{\rm
317: X} = 1.42_{-0.14}^{+0.21}$ and $0.85_{-0.15}^{+0.10}$ for SX2 and SX3
318: respectively, consistent with the range of spectra seen for extended
319: regions of the jet discussed in \S\ref{spectra}, although we cannot
320: rule out thermal models with $kT \ga 3.5$ keV. SX3's 1-keV flux
321: density of $2.3 \pm 0.4$ nJy would imply a 5-GHz flux density for a
322: counterpart of $\sim 20$ mJy, if it were similar to extended regions
323: of the northern jet at comparable nuclear distances, which is hard to
324: rule out given the strong filamentary structure in the S lobe. (For
325: comparison, 5-GHz flux densities for S1 and S2 are $\sim 60$ and $\sim
326: 80$ mJy respectively.) SX3's similarity in the X-ray to the diffuse
327: structure of jet features at a similar off-nuclear distance gives us
328: the first evidence that the diffuse acceleration process can also
329: operate in the counterjet. If this is so, it is unclear why only this
330: one purely diffuse counterjet feature is visible in X-rays. The fact
331: that the jet-counterjet ratio in the X-ray is in general higher for
332: extended regions than for compact sources lends some support to the
333: model in which X-ray emitting knots are stationary while the diffuse
334: emission comes from the bulk flow.
335:
336: \begin{figure}[!t]
337: \epsfxsize 9cm
338: \epsfbox{f3.eps}
339: \vskip -5pt
340: \caption{The counterjet region of Cen A. Greyscale shows accumulated
341: raw counts in the {\it Chandra} observations in the 0.4--2.5 keV
342: energy band, binned in $0\farcs 246$ pixels. Contours [$0.1 \times
343: (1,2,4\dots)$ mJy beam$^{-1}$] are from the 8.4-GHz
344: A+B-configuration VLA map of H03, smoothed to a resolution of
345: $1\farcs5$. The radio data are only sensitive to features on scales $\la 20''$.}
346: \label{cjet}
347: \end{figure}
348: \begin{figure}[t]
349: \epsfxsize 8.7cm
350: \epsfbox{f4n.eps}
351: \vskip -5pt
352: \caption{The inner jet of Cen A. Greyscale as in Fig.\ \ref{cjet}.
353: Contours [$0.15
354: \times (1,4,16\dots)$ mJy beam$^{-1}$] are from the 8.4-GHz A-configuration VLA data taken in
355: 2007, with a resolution of $0\farcs84 \times 0\farcs22$.}
356: \label{ijet}
357: \end{figure}
358:
359: \section{Knot variability and flaring}
360: \label{variability}
361:
362: A goal of the Cen A-VLP was to search for extreme variability in jet
363: knots such as that seen in knot HST-1 of M87 \citep[e.g.,][]{hcbs06}.
364: Only two bright X-ray features related to the jets show very strong
365: variability in the ten epochs available. The counterjet feature SX1
366: appears to have flared in the 2003 observations (H03) when its 1-keV
367: flux density is $9\pm 1$ nJy compared to $\sim 2$ nJy in all other
368: observations. Its rather flat spectrum ($\alpha_{\rm X} = 0.4 \pm
369: 0.1$), the fact that it is unresolved and the lack of a radio
370: counterpart means that it may well be a LMXB unrelated to the
371: counterjet. More interesting is the feature AX2A detected in the 2007
372: observations in the inner jet (Fig.\ \ref{ijet}). The 1-keV flux
373: density of this feature is a constant $5 \pm 1$ nJy in 2007 and $<1$
374: nJy at all earlier times: it has $\alpha_{\rm X} = 0.65 \pm 0.1$. As
375: Fig.\ \ref{ijet} shows, it is just at the edge of the radio jet, is
376: compact or unresolved, and has no detected radio counterpart: given
377: its flux density, we might have expected one at the level of a few mJy
378: if it were a jet knot. While continued monitoring of this feature will
379: be interesting it seems most likely that it too is an unrelated LMXB.
380: There is thus no evidence for extreme variability in any bona fide jet
381: knot in Cen A, consistent with the fact that many of the X-ray and
382: radio knots are spatially resolved. Evidence for weaker variability in
383: the X-ray and radio will be discussed in a future paper (Goodger \etal
384: , in preparation).
385:
386: \section{Summary}
387:
388: The inner part of the Cen A jet is dominated by the shock-related
389: knots discussed by H03, although we have so far failed to see the
390: dramatic variability seen in M87, interpreted as large changes in
391: particle acceleration processes or in jet flow. The radio-associated
392: compact features in the counterjet are likely also the result of
393: small-scale shocks, presumably caused as the counterjet flow
394: encounters compact obstacles. However, the outer 3.4 kpc of the jet --
395: and possibly also the newly detected extended X-ray counterjet
396: components -- are different from the shock-dominated regions in their
397: X-ray spectra and structure and in their radio/X-ray ratio. Our
398: results add to the evidence that an unknown, distributed particle
399: acceleration process operates in the jet of Cen A. Diffuse X-ray
400: emission with a similar broad-band spectrum is seen in the jets of
401: many other FRI sources (e.g., 3C\,66B: \citealt{hbw01})
402: and it also resembles the extended synchrotron X-ray emission seen in
403: the jets (e.g., K06) and hotspots \citep[e.g.,][]{hck07} of the more
404: powerful FRIIs. The Cen A data allow us to study the spatial and
405: spectral properties of this emission and the physical processes
406: responsible for it in more detail than is possible in any other
407: object.
408: \vspace{-10pt}
409: \acknowledgements
410: We gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work from
411: the Royal Society (research fellowship for MJH), the STFC (reseach
412: studentship for JLG) and NASA (grant GO7-8105X to RPK). The National
413: Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science
414: Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
415: Universities, Inc.
416:
417: {\it Facilities:} \facility{CXO (ACIS)}, \facility{VLA}
418: \begin{thebibliography}{}
419: \bibitem[Birk \& Lesch(2000)]{bl00}Birk, G.T., \& Lesch, M. 2000, \apj, 530, L77
420: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dl90}Dickey, J.M., \& Lockman, F.J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
421: \bibitem[Fanaroff \& Riley(1974)]{fr74}Fanaroff, B.L., \& Riley, J.M. 1974, \mnras, 167, 31P
422: \bibitem[Ferrarese et al.(2007)]{fmst07}Ferrarese, L., Mould, J.R., Stetson, P.B., Tonry, J.L., Blakeslee, J.P., \& Ajhar, E.A. 2007, \apj, 654, 186
423: \bibitem[Hardcastle et al.(2001)Hardcastle, Birkinshaw \& Worrall]{hbw01}Hardcastle, M.J., Birkinshaw, M., \& Worrall, D.M. 2001, \mnras, 326, 1499
424: \bibitem[Hardcastle et al.(2006)Hardcastle, Kraft \& Worrall]{hkw06}Hardcastle, M.J., Kraft, R.P., \& Worrall, D.M. 2006, \mnras, 368, L15 [H06]
425: \bibitem[Hardcastle et al.(2007)Hardcastle, Croston \& Kraft]{hck07}Hardcastle, M.J., Croston, J.H., \& Kraft, R.P. 2007, \apj ~in~press
426: \bibitem[Hardcastle et al.(2003)]{hwkf03}Hardcastle, M.J., Worrall, D.M., Kraft, R.P., Forman, W.R., Jones, C., \& Murray, S.S. 2003, \apj, 593, 169 [H03]
427: \bibitem[Harris et al.(2006)]{hcbs06}Harris, D.E., Cheung, C.C., Biretta, J.A., Sparks, W.B., Junor, W., Perlman, E.S., \& Wilson, A.S. 2006, \apj, 640, 211
428: \bibitem[Israel(1998)]{i98}Israel, F.P. 1998, \aapr, 8, 237
429: \bibitem[Jord\'an et al.(2007)]{jsmb07}Jord\'an, A., et al. 2007, \apj L, submitted
430: \bibitem[Kataoka et al.(2006)]{ksat06}Kataoka, J., Stawarz, \L., Aharonian, F., Takahara, F., Ostrowski, M., \& Edwards, P.G. 2006, \apj, 641, 158 [K06]
431: \bibitem[Kraft et al.(2000)]{kfjk00}Kraft, R.P., et al. 2000, \apj, 531, L9
432: \bibitem[Kraft et al.(2002)]{kfjm02}Kraft, R.P., Forman, W.R., Jones, C., Murray, S.S., Hardcastle, M.J., \& Worrall, D.M. 2002, \apj, 569, 54
433: \bibitem[Ma et al.(1998)]{maef98}Ma, C., et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 516
434: \bibitem[Stawarz \& Ostrowski(2002)]{so02}Stawarz, \L., \& Ostrowski, M. 2002, \apj, 578, 763
435: \bibitem[Worrall et al.(2001)Worrall, Birkinshaw \& Hardcastle]{wbh01}Worrall, D.M., Birkinshaw, M., \& Hardcastle, M.J. 2001, \mnras, 326, L7
436: \bibitem[Worrall et al.(2007)]{wbks07}Worrall, D.M., et al. 2007, \apj L, submitted
437: \end{thebibliography}
438:
439:
440: \end{document}
441: