1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% SELECT THE LAYOUT
3: %%
4: %% The class supports further options.
5: %% See aipguide.pdf for details.
6: %%
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8:
9: \documentclass[
10: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
11: %% ,draft % use draft while you are working on the paper
12: %% ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
13: %% , % add further options here if necessary
14: ]
15: {aipproc}
16:
17: \layoutstyle{8x11double}
18: \usepackage{amssymb}
19:
20: \newcommand{\Teff}{T_{\rm eff}}
21: \newcommand{\ThetaB}{\Theta_B}
22: \newcommand{\vecB}{\mathbf B}
23: \newcommand{\zg}{z_g}
24: \newcommand{\Rinfty}{R^{\infty}}
25: \newcommand{\xmm}{\textit{XMM-Newton}}
26: \newcommand{\rxj}{RX~J1856.5$-$3754}
27: \newcommand{\onee}{1E~1207.4$-$5209}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: \title{Modeling Phase-resolved Observations of the Surfaces of Magnetic
33: Neutron Stars}
34:
35: \classification{97.60.Jd; 26.60.Kp; 95.30.Gv; 95.75.-z; 95.85.Nv; 97.10.-q}
36: \keywords{stars: atmospheres - stars: magnetic fields - stars: neutron
37: - stars: rotation - X-rays: stars}
38:
39: \author{Wynn C.~G. Ho}{
40: address={Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
41: Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA}
42: }
43: \author{Kaya Mori}{
44: address={Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto,
45: 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H4, Canada}
46: }
47:
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49: \begin{abstract}
50: Recent observations by \xmm\ detected rotational pulsations in the total
51: brightness and spectrum of several neutron stars. To properly
52: interpret the data, accurate modeling of neutron star emission is necessary.
53: Detailed analysis of the shape and strength of the rotational variations
54: allows a measurement of the surface composition and magnetic field,
55: as well as constrains the nuclear equation of state.
56: We discuss our models of the spectra and light curves of two of the most
57: observed neutron stars, \rxj\ and \onee, and discuss some implications of
58: our results and the direction of future work.
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61: \maketitle
62:
63: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64: \section{Introduction \label{sec:intro}}
65:
66: Thermal radiation from the surface of neutron stars (NSs) can provide
67: invaluable information on the physical properties and evolution of NSs.
68: NS properties, such as the mass $M$ and radius $R$,
69: in turn depend on the poorly constrained physics
70: of the stellar interior, such as the nuclear equation of state (EOS) and
71: quark and superfluid/superconducting properties at supra-nuclear densities.
72: Many NSs are also known to possess strong magnetic fields
73: ($B \sim 10^{12}-10^{13}$~G), with some well above the quantum critical
74: value ($B\gg B_{\rm Q}\equiv 4.4\times 10^{13}$~G).
75:
76: The observed thermal radiation originates in a thin atmospheric
77: layer (with scale height $\sim 1$~cm) that covers the stellar surface.
78: To properly interpret the observations of NS surface emission and to
79: provide accurate constraints on their physical properties, it is
80: important to understand in detail the radiative behavior of NS
81: atmospheres in the presence of strong magnetic fields
82: (see \citep{pavlovetal95,holai01,zavlinpavlov02,holai03,zavlin07},
83: for more detailed references on observations and on previous works
84: in NS atmosphere modeling).
85: The properties of the atmosphere, such as the chemical composition,
86: EOS, and radiative opacities, directly determine the characteristics
87: of the observed spectrum.
88: While the surface composition of the NS is unknown,
89: a great simplification arises due to the efficient gravitational
90: separation of light and heavy elements \citep{alcockillarionov80}.
91: A pure hydrogen atmosphere is expected even if a small
92: amount of accretion/fallback occurs after NS formation;
93: the total mass of hydrogen needed to form an optically thick atmosphere
94: can be less than $\sim 10^{16}$~g.
95: On the other hand, a heavy element atmosphere may be possible if no
96: accretion takes place.
97:
98: The strong magnetic fields present in NS atmospheres significantly
99: increase the binding energies of atoms, molecules, and other bound states
100: (see \citep{lai01}, for a review). Abundances of these bound states can
101: be appreciable in the atmospheres of cold NSs (i.e., those with surface
102: temperature $T\lesssim 10^6$~K; \citep{laisalpeter97,potekhinetal99}).
103: In addition, the presence of a magnetic field causes emission to be
104: anisotropic and polarized; this must be taken into account
105: when developing radiative transfer codes.
106: The most comprehensive early studies of magnetic NS
107: atmospheres focused on a fully ionized hydrogen plasma and
108: moderate field strengths ($B\sim 10^{12}-10^{13}$~G;
109: \citep{miller92,shibanovetal92,pavlovetal94,zaneetal00}).
110: These models are expected to be valid only for relatively high temperatures.
111: More recently, atmosphere models in the ultra-strong field
112: ($B\gtrsim 10^{14}$~G) and relevant temperature regimes have
113: been presented (\citep{ozel01,zaneetal01,holai03,lloyd03,vanadelsberglai06};
114: see also \citep{bezchastnovetal96,bulikmiller97}, for early work), and all
115: of these rely on the assumption of a fully ionized hydrogen composition.
116: Magnetized non-hydrogen atmospheres have been studied by
117: \citep{miller92,rajagopaletal97}, but because of the complexity of the
118: atomic physics, the models were necessarily crude
119: (see \citep{moriho07}, for more details).
120: Only recently has self-consistent atmosphere models
121: \citep{hoetal03,potekhinetal04,moriho07} using the latest EOS and opacities
122: for partially ionized hydrogen \citep{potekhinchabrier03,potekhinchabrier04}
123: and mid-$Z$ elements \citep{morihailey02,morihailey06} been constructed.
124:
125: The atmosphere models discussed above only describe emission from a
126: local patch of the stellar surface.
127: By taking into account surface magnetic field $\vecB$ and temperature $T$
128: distributions, we can construct more physically correct models of emission
129: from NSs.
130: However, these spectra from the whole NS surface are necessarily
131: model-dependent, as the $\vecB$ and $T$ distributions are unknown.
132: Nevertheless, detailed comparisons of the models with rotation phase-resolved
133: observations is a powerful tool to study NSs, e.g., spectral features
134: that vary with phase are essential to disentangling magnetic
135: field effects from other parameters and to probe the magnetic field
136: geometry on the surface of the star.
137: Indeed there have been recent works attempting to fit magnetic
138: atmosphere spectra to observations of NSs (see \citep{ho07}, and
139: references therein).
140: Here we describe some of the details and observational applications
141: of our work.
142:
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: \section{Model for Neutron Star Surface Emission \label{sec:model}}
145:
146: In order to construct models of emission from the entire NS surface,
147: we first build atmosphere models for a given effective temperature
148: $\Teff$ and magnetic field strength $B$ and direction $\ThetaB$
149: relative to the surface normal;
150: these (local) models describe a patch of the NS surface.
151: In the presence of magnetic fields $B\gtrsim 10^{12}$~G, radiation propagates
152: in two photon polarization modes (see, e.g., \citep{meszaros92});
153: therefore, the atmosphere models are obtained by solving the radiative
154: transfer equations for the two coupled polarization modes
155: (see \citep{holai01,hoetal03,hoetal07,potekhinetal04}, for details on the
156: construction of the atmosphere models).
157: In addition to $\vecB$ and $\Teff$,
158: the atmosphere models have a dependence, through hydrostatic
159: balance, on the surface gravity $g$~$[=(1+\zg)GM/R^2]$,
160: where the gravitational redshift $\zg$ is given by
161: $(1+\zg)=(1-2GM/Rc^2)^{-1/2}$;
162: however, the resulting spectra do not vary significantly using different
163: values of $g$ around $2\times 10^{14}$~cm~s$^{-2}$ \citep{pavlovetal95}.
164:
165: Next, the entire NS surface is divided into regions with different
166: $\vecB$ and $\Teff$. Relatively simple surface distributions of
167: $\vecB$ and $\Teff$ are adopted: we assume the surface is symmetric
168: (in $\vecB$ and $\Teff$) about the magnetic equator and divide the
169: hemisphere into several magnetic colatitudinal regions.
170: An example parametrization is given in Table~\ref{tab:nssurf};
171: note that the magnetic field distribution is roughly dipolar.
172: Emission from any point within a colatitudinal region is given by the
173: atmosphere model for that region.
174:
175: %-------------------------------------------
176: \begin{table}[htb]
177: \begin{tabular}{c c c c}
178: \hline
179: \tablehead{1}{c}{c}{magnetic colatitude}
180: & \tablehead{1}{c}{c}{$B$}
181: & \tablehead{1}{c}{c}{$\ThetaB$}
182: & \tablehead{1}{c}{c}{$\Teff$} \\
183: (deg) & ($10^{12}$~G) & (deg) & ($10^6$~K) \\
184: \hline
185: 0$-$20 & 6 & 0 & 7 \\
186: 20$-$50 & 5 & 30 & 6 \\
187: 50$-$70 & 4 & 60 & 5 \\
188: 70$-$90 & 3 & 90 & 4 \\
189: \hline
190: \end{tabular}
191: \caption{Neutron Star Surface Parametrization \label{tab:nssurf}}
192: \end{table}
193: %-------------------------------------------
194:
195: Finally, the spectra from the entire NS surface is computed by
196: summing over the emission from the different regions for a given
197: rotation phase (see \citep{pavlovzavlin00,ho07}, for details).
198: The observed emission depends on two angles ($\alpha,\zeta$):
199: $\alpha$ is the angle between the rotation and magnetic
200: axes and $\zeta$ is the angle between the rotation axis and the
201: direction to the observer.
202: We also account for the bending of the path of light due to gravity,
203: which causes more of the NS surface to be visible
204: ($135^\circ$ and $115^\circ$ as compared to $90^\circ$ without
205: light-bending for $M=1.4M_\odot$ and $R=10$~km and 14~km, respectively;
206: see \citep{pechenicketal83,beloborodov02}).
207:
208: %-------------------------------------------
209: \begin{figure}[htb]
210: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{pulse.eps}
211: \caption{
212: Light curves for different geometries ($\alpha,\zeta$):
213: class~I with (20$^\circ$,30$^\circ$), class~II with (30$^\circ$,60$^\circ$),
214: class~III with (60$^\circ$,80$^\circ$), and class~IV with
215: (10$^\circ$,80$^\circ$).
216: $\alpha$ is the angle between the spin and magnetic axes, and
217: $\zeta$ is the angle between the spin axis and the line-of-sight.
218: The four classes are defined in \citep{beloborodov02}.
219: The solid lines are for the magnetic model described in the text
220: [dashed line is for (50$^\circ$,50$^\circ$)],
221: while the dotted lines are analytic light curves (scaled arbitrarily
222: in amplitude) for isotropic emission from two antipodal hot spots
223: (see \citep{beloborodov02}).
224: \label{fig:nsmodelpulse}}
225: \end{figure}
226: %-------------------------------------------
227:
228: Figure~\ref{fig:nsmodelpulse} shows the light curves, for various
229: geometries ($\alpha,\zeta$), of the NS model
230: using the parametrization given in Table~\ref{tab:nssurf}, $\zg=0.2$,
231: and $g=1.1\times 10^{14}$~cm~s$^{-2}$.
232: We also plot the analytic light curves from \citep{beloborodov02} for
233: isotropic emission from two antipodal hot spots
234: (see \citep{zavlinpavlov98,bogdanovetal07}, for
235: examples of pulse profiles from non-magnetic hydrogen atmosphere hot spots).
236: The classification scheme (for isotropically-emitting hot caps)
237: is defined in \citep{beloborodov02}:
238: (I) only the primary cap is visible, and the pulse profile is purely
239: sinusoidal with a single peak,
240: (II) the opposite cap is seen around pulse minimum due to relativistic
241: light-bending, which reduces the strength of the modulation,
242: (III) the primary cap is not seen during a segment of the rotation,
243: and (IV) both spots are seen at all phases and thus there is no modulation.
244:
245: Several important features are evident from a comparison of magnetic
246: atmosphere emission to that of isotropic emission.
247: The angular-dependence of the radiation (or beam pattern)
248: manifests as a narrow ``pencil-beam'' along the direction of the magnetic
249: field and a broad ``fan-beam'' at intermediate angles
250: (see \citep{pavlovetal94,lloyd03},
251: for beam patterns and spectra at various $\ThetaB$).
252: As discussed in \citep{pavlovetal94}, the pencil-beam is the result of the
253: lower opacity at angles $\lesssim (E/E_B)^{1/2}$, where
254: $E_B=\hbar eB/m_{\rm e}c=11.6\,(B/10^{12}\mbox{ G})$~keV is the electron
255: cyclotron energy; the width of the pencil-beam is thus
256: $\sim (E/E_B)^{1/2}$, and the radiation is more strongly beamed at higher
257: magnetic fields.
258: This narrow beam is seen in the (50$^\circ$,50$^\circ$)-light curve plotted
259: in Figure~\ref{fig:nsmodelpulse}, which is the only instance shown that has
260: the observer's line-of-sight exactly crossing the magnetic cap and coinciding
261: with the peak of the isotropic emission.
262: Also evident is the fan-beam (most obvious in the light curves of classes
263: II and III), which occur on either side of the magnetic cap and can increase
264: the number of light-curve peaks.
265: Finally, the anisotropic beam pattern (combined with the surface
266: temperature variation) can produce an apparent phase shift compared to
267: isotropic emission and modulation when an isotropic beam pattern
268: suggests none (c.f. class IV).
269:
270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
271: \section{\rxj \label{sec:rxj1856}}
272:
273: \rxj\ is one of the brightest, nearby isolated NSs \citep{kaplanvankerkwijk07},
274: and considerable observational resources have been devoted to its study.
275: Recently, \xmm\ observations
276: uncovered pulsations from \rxj\ with a period of 7~s
277: and an upper limit on the period derivative
278: \citep{tiengomereghetti07,mereghettitiengo07}.
279: The EPIC-pn and MOS light curves are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:pulse_rxj}.
280: Several characteristics of the observed light curves
281: suggest possible values of $\alpha$ and $\zeta$:
282: (1) the 1.6\%$\pm$0.2\% amplitude of the pulsations,
283: (2) a single peak (or two peaks close in phase, as may be the case
284: for the pn light curve) per rotation,
285: and (3) no significant energy-dependence for the single observation
286: and small energy-dependence for all
287: \xmm\ data \citep{ho07,tiengomereghetti07}.
288:
289: %-------------------------------------------
290: \begin{figure}[htb]
291: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{fitpulse1.eps}
292: \caption{ Energy-integrated (0.15$-$1.2~keV) light curves of \rxj.
293: Histograms are the \xmm\ EPIC-pn (top) and EPIC-MOS (bottom) observations
294: (see Fig.~1 of \citep{tiengomereghetti07}).
295: Solid and dotted lines are the models with ($3^\circ$,$40^\circ$) and
296: ($7^\circ$,$60^\circ$), respectively, along with the fit deviations
297: [i.e., (data-model)/$\sigma$] in the corresponding lower panels.
298: Two rotation periods are shown for clarity.
299: \label{fig:pulse_rxj}}
300: \end{figure}
301: %-------------------------------------------
302:
303: In previous work \citep{hoetal07}, we found that our models of a
304: magnetic, partially ionized hydrogen
305: atmosphere matches well the entire spectrum, from X-rays to optical,
306: of \rxj\ [best-fit parameters: gravitational redshift $\zg\sim 0.22$,
307: magnetic field $B\approx 4\times 10^{12}$~G, and radius
308: $\Rinfty\approx 17$~km, where $\Rinfty=R(1+\zg)$;
309: see Figure~\ref{fig:sp_rxj}].
310: With the discovery of rotational modulation of the X-ray emission
311: \citep{tiengomereghetti07}, we use the light curves predicted by our
312: model (described in the previous section) to constrain the geometry
313: ($\alpha,\zeta$) of \rxj\ \citep{ho07}.
314: We find angles of $< 6^\circ$ and $\approx 20-45^\circ$
315: (example fits ares shown in Figure~\ref{fig:pulse_rxj}).
316: This indicates that either the rotation and magnetic axes are
317: closely aligned or we are essentially seeing down the spin axis of the
318: NS (see also \citep{brajeromani02}).
319:
320: %-------------------------------------------
321: \begin{figure}[htb]
322: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{f1.eps}
323: \caption{ Spectrum of \rxj\ from optical to X-ray wavelengths.
324: Data points are observations taken from various sources;
325: error bars are 1$\sigma$ uncertainties.
326: The solid line is the absorbed (and redshifted by $\zg=0.22$) atmosphere
327: model spectrum with $B=4\times 10^{12}$~G, $\Teff = 5.3\times 10^5$~K,
328: and $\Rinfty=17$~km;
329: the dashed line is the unabsorbed atmosphere model spectrum.
330: The dash-dotted line is the (absorbed) blackbody fit to the X-ray spectrum
331: with $\Rinfty=5$~km.
332: Note that our atmosphere model underpredicts the optical flux by 15\%;
333: however, observational and model uncertainties here is $\sim 20\%$.
334: \label{fig:sp_rxj}}
335: \end{figure}
336: %-------------------------------------------
337:
338: From the results of our modeling of the phase-resolved observations,
339: we can better determine where \rxj\ belongs in the broader context
340: of NS studies.
341: For example, Figure~\ref{fig:eos} shows the constraints placed on the
342: mass-radius relationship for NSs. Our results imply a relatively stiff
343: but standard nuclear EOS (see, e.g., \citep{lattimerprakash07}).
344: Also if \rxj\ is losing rotational energy by magnetic dipole
345: radiation, the rate of spindown is given by
346: $dP/dt=10^{-15}\mbox{ s s$^{-1}$}(B/\mbox{10$^{12}$ G})^2
347: (P/\mbox{1 s})^{-1}=5\times 10^{-15}\mbox{ s s$^{-1}$}$;
348: this is well below the upper limit
349: $dP/dt < 1.9\times 10^{-12}\mbox{ s s$^{-1}$}$ obtained by
350: \citep{tiengomereghetti07} and illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:ppdot}.
351: Note that \rxj\ has not been detected in the radio
352: \citep{brazierjohnston99,burgayetal07,kondratievetal07}, though its
353: location in $P-\dot{P}$ space (see Figure~\ref{fig:ppdot}) is below
354: the theoretical death line for radio pulsars.
355:
356: %-------------------------------------------
357: \begin{figure}[htb]
358: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{eos.eps}
359: \caption{
360: Constraints on NS mass $M$ and radius $R$ from fitting the
361: observations of \rxj.
362: The upper left regions are excluded by general relativity and causality.
363: The upper right and lower left regions exceed the $\sim 30\%$ uncertainty
364: in $\Rinfty$, which is dominated by the uncertainty in the distance
365: (see \citep{kaplanvankerkwijk07}).
366: The dotted lines indicate 3$\sigma$ uncertainty in $\zg$; note that this
367: is just the uncertainty from the fit and does not include systematic
368: uncertainties in the data and model.
369: \label{fig:eos}}
370: \end{figure}
371: %-------------------------------------------
372:
373: %-------------------------------------------
374: \begin{figure}[htb]
375: \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{ppdot.eps}
376: \caption{
377: NS period derivative $\dot{P}$ as a function of spin period $P$.
378: Lines indicate constant magnetic field
379: [$B=3.2\times 10^{19}(P\dot{P})^{1/2}$~G].
380: Dots are pulsars whose $P$ and $\dot{P}$ are obtained from
381: {http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/}
382: (see \citep{manchesteretal05}).
383: We highlight a particular class of NSs, for which \rxj\ is a member:
384: sources with a measured $B$ from their X-ray spectrum (open squares)
385: and the same sources with a measured $\dot{P}$ (solid squares) or upper
386: limit to $\dot{P}$ (triangles) (see \citep{haberl07}, and references therein).
387: The star indicates \rxj\ from our measured $B$.
388: \label{fig:ppdot}}
389: \end{figure}
390: %-------------------------------------------
391:
392: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
393: \section{\onee \label{sec:1e1207}}
394:
395: \onee\ is a NS (with spin period = 0.424~s) in the center of supernova
396: remnant G~296.5+10.0.
397: Its X-ray spectrum is remarkable in that it shows two broad
398: absorption features at $\sim 0.7$ and $\sim 1.4$~keV
399: \citep{mereghettietal02,sanwaletal02,morietal05,delucaetal07,
400: gotthelfhalpern07b}.
401: Even more surprising is that these features show greater phase-variability
402: than the continuum spectrum \citep{bignamietal03,delucaetal04}.
403: Proposed models involving ion cyclotron or atomic lines from a light
404: element atmosphere at $B\sim 10^{14}$~G
405: \citep{sanwaletal02,turbinerlopez04}
406: seem unlikely due to weakening of line strengths
407: by vacuum resonance effects \citep{holai03,holai04,vanadelsberglai06}
408: or low abundance of the ionization states possibly responsible for the
409: observed lines \citep{morihailey06}.
410: Recent timing analysis also imply $B<3.3\times 10^{11}$~G
411: (by assuming vacuum dipole braking);
412: this suggests the spectral features are electron cyclotron lines
413: \citep{gotthelfhalpern07}.
414: Alternatively, \citep{haileymori02,morihailey06}
415: proposed a mid-$Z$ element atmosphere at $B\sim 10^{12}$~G.
416: We are studying this last case by building atmosphere models
417: composed of mid-$Z$ elements (see \citep{moriho07}, for details)
418: in an attempt to fit the phase-resolved observations.
419:
420: As an illustration of our models, Figure~\ref{fig:model1207} shows the
421: phase-resolved model oxygen atmosphere spectra, light curve, and pulse
422: fraction [$=(C_{\rm max}-C_{\rm min})/(C_{\rm max}+C_{\rm min})$,
423: where $C$ is the count spectrum].
424: We assume here that $\zg=0.2$, $(\alpha,\zeta) = (10^\circ,20^\circ)$,
425: and the NS surface is parametrized by
426: $\Teff=4\times10^6$~K and [$B(10^{12}\mbox{G}),\ThetaB$]= ($1.2,0^\circ$)
427: for magnetic colatitudes 0--5$^\circ$
428: and ($1,30^\circ$) for colatitudes 6--20$^\circ$.
429: Note that our models roughly match the continuum shape and line
430: locations and strengths of the phase-averaged spectrum of \onee.
431: More detailed analysis will be reported elsewhere.
432:
433: %-------------------------------------------
434: \begin{figure}[htb]
435: \includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{f2.eps}
436: \caption{
437: Top: Model atmosphere spectra (convolved with the \xmm\ EPIC-pn energy
438: resolution) at different rotation phases.
439: Inset: Energy-integrated light curve.
440: Bottom: Pulse fraction as a function of energy.
441: The dashed horizontal lines indicate the observed pulse fractions
442: over the given energy range for \onee\
443: (see \citep{delucaetal04}).
444: \label{fig:model1207}}
445: \end{figure}
446: %-------------------------------------------
447:
448: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
449: % \section{}
450:
451: In summary, we discussed briefly our continuing work on understanding the
452: emission process of NS surfaces, as well as detailed comparisons
453: of our models to phase-resolved observations of the NSs \rxj\ and \onee.
454: Analyses of other sources is ongoing. In the near future, we are
455: integrating our model spectra into \texttt{XSPEC} for community use
456: \citep{hoetal07b}.
457:
458: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
459: \begin{theacknowledgments}
460: WH is extremely grateful to Gilles Chabrier, Philip Chang, David Kaplan,
461: Dong Lai, Alexander Potekhin, and Matthew van Adelsberg, without
462: whom this work would not have been possible.
463: WH appreciates the use of the computer facilities at the Kavli
464: Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology.
465: \end{theacknowledgments}
466:
467: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
468: \bibliographystyle{aipproc} % if natbib is available
469: %\bibliographystyle{aipprocl} % if natbib is missing
470:
471: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
472:
473: \bibitem{pavlovetal95} G.~G. Pavlov, Yu.~A. Shibanov, V.~E. Zavlin,
474: and R.~D. Meyer, ``Neutron Star Atmospheres'' in \emph{Lives of the
475: Neutron Stars}, edited by M.~A. Alpar, \"{U}. Kizilo\u{g}lu, and
476: J. van Paradijs, Kluwer, Boston, 1995, pp.71--90.
477:
478: \bibitem{holai01} W.~C.~G. Ho and D. Lai, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{327},
479: 1081--1096 (2001).
480:
481: \bibitem{zavlinpavlov02} V.~E. Zavlin and G.~G. Pavlov, ``Modeling Neutron
482: Star Atmospheres'' in \emph{Proc.\ 270 Heraeus Seminar on Neutron Stars,
483: Pulsars and Supernova Remnants}, edited by W. Becker, H. Lesch, and
484: J. Tr\"{u}mper, MPE Rep. 278, MPE, Garching, 2002, pp.263--272.
485:
486: \bibitem{holai03} W.~C.~G. Ho and D. Lai, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{338},
487: 233--252 (2003).
488:
489: \bibitem{zavlin07} V.~E. Zavlin, ``Thermal Emission from Isolated Neutron
490: Stars: Theoretical and Observational Aspects'' in
491: \emph{363rd Heraeus Seminar on Neutron Stars and Pulsars}, submitted,
492: astro-ph/0702426 (2007).
493:
494: \bibitem{alcockillarionov80} C. Alcock and A. Illarionov, \emph{ApJ}
495: \textbf{235}, 534--553 (1980).
496:
497: \bibitem{lai01} D. Lai, \emph{Rev. Mod. Phys.} \textbf{73}, 629--662 (2001).
498:
499: \bibitem{laisalpeter97} D. Lai and E.~E. Salpeter, \emph{ApJ} \textbf{491},
500: 270--285 (1997).
501:
502: \bibitem{potekhinetal99} A.~Y. Potekhin, G. Chabrier, and Yu.~A. Shibanov,
503: \emph{Phys. Rev. E} \textbf{60}, 2193--2208 (1999).
504:
505: \bibitem{miller92} M.~C. Miller, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{255}, 129--145 (1992).
506:
507: \bibitem{shibanovetal92} Yu.~A. Shibanov, V.~E. Zavlin, G.~G. Pavlov, and
508: J. Ventura, \emph{A\&A} \textbf{266}, 313--320 (1992).
509:
510: \bibitem{pavlovetal94} G.~G. Pavlov, Yu.~A. Shibanov, J. Ventura, and
511: V.~E. Zavlin, \emph{A\&A} \textbf{289}, 837--845 (1994).
512:
513: \bibitem{zaneetal00} S. Zane, R. Turolla, and A. Treves, \emph{ApJ}
514: \textbf{537}, 387--395 (2000).
515:
516: \bibitem{ozel01} F. \"{O}zel, \emph{ApJ} \textbf{563}, 276--288 (2001).
517:
518: \bibitem{zaneetal01} S. Zane, R. Turolla, L. Stella, and A. Treves, \emph{ApJ}
519: \textbf{560}, 384--389 (2001).
520:
521: \bibitem{lloyd03} D.~A. Lloyd, \emph{MNRAS}, submitted, astro-ph/0303561 (2003).
522:
523: \bibitem{vanadelsberglai06} M. van Adelsberg and D. Lai, \emph{MNRAS}
524: \textbf{373}, 1495--1522 (2006).
525:
526: \bibitem{bezchastnovetal96} V.~G. Bezchastnov, G.~G. Pavlov, Yu.~A. Shibanov,
527: and V.~E. Zavlin,
528: ``Radiative Opacities and Photosphere Models for Soft Gamma Repeaters''
529: in \emph{AIP Conf. Proc. 384, Gamma-Ray Bursts}, edited by C. Kouveliotou,
530: M.~F. Briggs, and G.~J. Fishman, AIP, Woodbury, 1996, pp.907--911.
531:
532: \bibitem{bulikmiller97} T. Bulik and M.~C. Miller, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{288},
533: 596--608 (1997).
534:
535: \bibitem{rajagopaletal97} M. Rajagopal, R.~W. Romani, and M.~C. Miller,
536: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{479}, 347--356 (1997).
537:
538: \bibitem{moriho07} K. Mori and W.~C.~G. Ho, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{377},
539: 905--919 (2007).
540:
541: \bibitem{hoetal03} W.~C.~G. Ho, D. Lai, A.~Y. Potekhin, and G. Chabrier,
542: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{599}, 1293--1301 (2003).
543:
544: \bibitem{potekhinetal04} A.~Y. Potekhin, D. Lai, G. Chabrier, and W.~C.~G. Ho,
545: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{612}, 1034--1043 (2004).
546:
547: \bibitem{potekhinchabrier03} A.~Y. Potekhin and G. Chabrier,
548: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{585}, 955--974 (2003).
549:
550: \bibitem{potekhinchabrier04} A.~Y. Potekhin and G. Chabrier,
551: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{600}, 317--323 (2004).
552:
553: \bibitem{morihailey02} K. Mori and C.~J. Hailey, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{564},
554: 914--929 (2002).
555:
556: \bibitem{morihailey06} K. Mori and C.~J. Hailey, \emph{ApJ}, \textbf{648},
557: 1139--1155 (2006).
558:
559: \bibitem{ho07} W.~C.~G. Ho, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{380}, 71--77 (2007).
560:
561: \bibitem{meszaros92} P. M\'{e}sz\'{a}ros, \emph{High-Energy Radiation from
562: Magnetized Neutron Stars}, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992.
563:
564: \bibitem{hoetal07} W.~C.~G. Ho, D.~L. Kaplan, P. Chang, M. van Adelsberg,
565: and A.~Y. Potekhin, \emph{MNRAS} \textbf{375}, 821--830 (2007).
566:
567: \bibitem{pavlovzavlin00} G.~G. Pavlov and V.~E. Zavlin, \emph{ApJ}
568: \textbf{529}, 1011--1018 (2000).
569:
570: \bibitem{pechenicketal83} K.~R. Pechenick, C. Ftaclas, and J.~M. Cohen,
571: \emph{ApJ} \textbf{274}, 846--857 (1983).
572:
573: \bibitem{beloborodov02} A.~M. Beloborodov, \emph{ApJL} \textbf{566},
574: L85--88 (2002).
575:
576: \bibitem{zavlinpavlov98} V.~E. Zavlin and G.~G. Pavlov, \emph{A\&A}
577: \textbf{329}, 583--598 (1998).
578:
579: \bibitem{bogdanovetal07} S. Bogdanov, G.~B. Rybicki, and J.~E. Grindlay,
580: \emph{ApJ}, in press, astro-ph/0612791 (2007).
581:
582: \bibitem{kaplanvankerkwijk07} D.~L. Kaplan and M.~H. van Kerkwijk, this
583: proceedings.
584:
585: \bibitem{tiengomereghetti07} A. Tiengo and S. Mereghetti, \emph{ApJL}
586: \textbf{657}, L101--104 (2007).
587:
588: \bibitem{mereghettitiengo07} S. Mereghetti and A. Tiengo, this proceedings.
589:
590: \bibitem{brajeromani02} T.~M. Braje and R.~W. Romani, \emph{ApJ},
591: \textbf{580}, 1043--1047 (2002).
592:
593: \bibitem{lattimerprakash07} J.~M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, \emph{Phys. Rep.}
594: \textbf{442}, 109--165 (2007).
595:
596: \bibitem{manchesteretal05} R.~N. Manchester, G.~B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and
597: M. Hobbs, \emph{AJ} \textbf{129}, 1993--2006 (2005).
598:
599: \bibitem{haberl07} F. Haberl, \emph{Ap\&SS} \textbf{308}, 181--190 (2007).
600:
601: \bibitem{brazierjohnston99} K.~T.~S. Brazier and S. Johnston, \emph{MNRAS}
602: \textbf{305}, 671--679 (1999).
603:
604: \bibitem{burgayetal07} M. Burgay, this proceedings.
605:
606: \bibitem{kondratievetal07} V.~I. Kondratiev, this proceedings.
607:
608: \bibitem{mereghettietal02} S. Mereghetti, A. De Luca, P.~A. Caraveo,
609: W. Becker, R. Mignani, and G.~F. Bignami, \emph{ApJ} \textbf{581},
610: 1280--1285 (2002).
611:
612: \bibitem{sanwaletal02} D. Sanwal, G.~G. Pavlov, V.~E. Zavlin, and M.~A. Teter,
613: \emph{ApJL} \textbf{574}, L61--L64 (2002).
614:
615: \bibitem{morietal05} K. Mori, J.~C. Chonko, and C.~J. Hailey, \emph{ApJ},
616: \textbf{631}, 1082--1093 (2005).
617:
618: \bibitem{delucaetal07} A. De Luca, this proceedings.
619:
620: \bibitem{gotthelfhalpern07b} E.~V. Gotthelf and J.~P. Halpern, this proceedings.
621:
622: \bibitem{bignamietal03} G.~F. Bignami, P.~A. Caraveo, A. De Luca, and
623: S. Mereghetti, \emph{Nature} \textbf{423}, 725--727 (2003).
624:
625: \bibitem{delucaetal04} A. De Luca, S. Mereghetti, P.~A. Caraveo, M. Moroni,
626: R.~P. Mignani, and G.~F. Bignami, \emph{A\&A} \textbf{418}, 625--637 (2004).
627:
628: \bibitem{turbinerlopez04} A.~V. Turbiner and J.~C. L\'{o}pez Vieyra,
629: \emph{Mod. Phys. Lett. A} \textbf{19}, 1919--1923 (2004).
630:
631: \bibitem{holai04} W.~C.~G. Ho and D. Lai, \emph{ApJ} \textbf{607},
632: 420--425 (2004).
633:
634: \bibitem{gotthelfhalpern07} E.~V. Gotthelf and J.~P. Halpern, \emph{ApJL}
635: \textbf{664}, L35--L38 (2007).
636:
637: \bibitem{haileymori02} C.~J. Hailey and K. Mori, \emph{ApJL}, \textbf{578},
638: L133--L136 (2002).
639:
640: \bibitem{hoetal07b} W.~C.~G. Ho, A.~Y. Potekhin, G. Chabrier, et al.,
641: in preparation.
642:
643: \end{thebibliography}
644:
645: \end{document}
646:
647: \endinput
648: