1: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
2: \usepackage{apjfonts}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5: \journalinfo{Astrophysical Journal Letters}
6: \shortauthors{Fish et al.}
7: % 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
8: \shorttitle{Excited OH in Supernova Remnants and W3(OH)}
9: %
10: \title{Effelsberg Observations of Excited-State (6.0 GH\lowercase{z})
11: OH in Supernova Remnants and W3(OH)}
12: %
13: \author{ Vincent L.\ Fish\altaffilmark{1,2},
14: Lor\'{a}nt O.\ Sjouwerman\altaffilmark{1},
15: \& Ylva M.\ Pihlstr\"{o}m\altaffilmark{3}}
16: %
17: \altaffiltext{1}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1003 Lopezville
18: Rd., Socorro, NM 87801}
19: %
20: \altaffiltext{2}{Jansky Fellow}
21: %
22: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
23: New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131}
24: %
25: \begin{abstract}
26: %Context
27: While masers in the 1720~MHz transition of OH are detected toward many
28: supernova remnants (SNRs), no other OH transition is seen as a maser
29: in SNRs.
30: %Aims
31: We present a search for masers at 6049~MHz, which has recently been
32: predicted to produce masers by pure collisional excitation at
33: conditions similar to that required for 1720~MHz masing.
34: %Methods
35: The Effelsberg 100 m telescope was used to observe the excited-state
36: 6016, 6030, 6035, and 6049~MHz lines of OH toward selected SNRs, most
37: of which have previously-detected bright 1720~MHz masers.
38: %Results
39: No excited-state masers are found toward SNRs, consistent with
40: previous observations of the 6049~MHz and other excited-state
41: transitions. We do not see clear evidence of absorption toward SNR
42: target positions, although we do see evidence of absorption in the
43: molecular cloud at $+50$~km\,s$^{-1}$ near Sgr~A East. Weak
44: absorption is detected at 6016~MHz toward W3(OH), while stronger,
45: narrower emission is seen at 6049~MHz, suggesting that the 6049~MHz
46: emission is a low-gain maser.
47: %Conclusions
48: We conclude that conditions in SNRs are not conducive to excited-state
49: maser emission, especially in excited-state satellite lines.
50: \end{abstract}
51: \keywords{masers --- supernova remnants --- ISM: individual (W3(OH),
52: Sgr~A East) --- radio lines: ISM --- radiation mechanisms:
53: non-thermal}
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: About two dozen supernova remnants (SNRs) are known to host 1720~MHz
58: OH masers \citep[][and references therein]{green06}. The excitation
59: mechanism for 1720~MHz masers in SNRs is commonly believed to be
60: collisional excitation from a C-type shock \citep{lockett99,wardle99}.
61: Other ground-state OH transitions are sometimes seen in absorption
62: \citep[e.g.,][]{goss68}, which can be helpful for modelling the
63: physical conditions in the 1720~MHz masing region \citep{hewitt06}.
64: However, to date no other OH transition, nor a transition of any other
65: molecule, has been detected as a maser associated with an SNR. The
66: detection of a second maser transition in SNRs would place strong
67: constraints on physical conditions (density, temperature, OH fraction,
68: ortho-to-para H$_2$ ratio, etc.) in the masing region, especially if
69: spatial coincidence with a 1720~MHz maser was observed. Excited-state
70: transitions, which occur at higher frequencies, would be especially
71: useful if detected toward the Galactic center, where angular
72: scattering is large \citep[see \S~1 of][]{pihlstrom07}.
73:
74: Another motivation for finding a second masing transition in SNRs is
75: to confirm the Zeeman interpretation of splitting seen between left
76: and right circular (LCP, RCP) components at 1720~MHz. Differences in
77: LCP and RCP velocities are used to compute magnetic field strengths in
78: SNRs \citep[e.g.,][]{brogan00}, important for quantifying magnetic
79: pressures. However, \citet{elitzur96,elitzur98} shows that circular
80: polarization can be generated by non-Zeeman mechanisms when the maser
81: is saturated and splitting is small compared to a line width, as is
82: the case in SNR 1720~MHz masers. While there are theoretical reasons
83: to believe the Zeeman interpretation of SNR 1720~MHz maser splitting
84: \citep[see \S~4.1 of][]{brogan00}, direct confirmation of the magnetic
85: field strengths from a second OH transition would lend greater
86: confidence in the derived magnetic field strengths.
87:
88: Theoretical modelling predicts that collisions alone can excite
89: several transitions of OH. In the low-density ($n \sim
90: 10^5$~cm$^{-3}$) regime, only the 1720~MHz transition is inverted, but
91: at higher number and/or column densities the 6049~MHz transition also
92: becomes inverted, with some overlap in parameter space allowing
93: simultaneous inversion of the 1720 and 6049~MHz lines
94: \citep{pavlakis00,wardle07,pihlstrom07}. At still higher densities
95: ($n \sim 5~\times~10^6$~cm$^{-3}$), the 4765 and 1612~MHz transitions
96: become inverted \citep{pavlakis96,pihlstrom07}. The 6035~MHz line may
97: also become inverted at high temperatures \citep[$T \sim
98: 200$~K;][]{pavlakis00}. Regardless of the details of the pump
99: mechanism, weak inversion (emission) is predicted in the 6049~MHz and
100: weak anti-inversion (enhanced absorption) in the 6016~MHz line from
101: the structure of the OH level diagram alone when infrared trapping
102: becomes important \citep{litvak69,elitzur77}.
103:
104: Few observations have sought excited-state OH masers in SNRs.
105: \citet{mcdonnell07} looked for 6030, 6035, and 6049~MHz OH maser
106: emission toward southern SNRs but did not detect any 6049~MHz
107: emission. Although they did find three new 6030 and 6035~MHz maser
108: sources, \citet{mcdonnell07} believe that these masers are associated
109: with \ion{H}{2} regions and therefore represent emission from
110: star-forming regions (SFRs), not SNRs. In states of higher
111: excitation, \citet{pihlstrom07} searched for emission in the 4.7~GHz
112: $\Lambda$-doubling triplet and the 7.8 and 8.2~GHz quadruplets toward
113: four SNR complexes (as well as the 23.8~GHz quadruplet toward
114: Sgr~A~East) but did not detect any emission. \citet{pihlstrom07} also
115: cross-correlated positions of single-peaked and irregular-spectrum
116: 1612~MHz masers from blind surveys in the literature with positions of
117: known SNRs but found no probable associations.
118:
119: For small velocity differences along the amplification path, the
120: 6049~MHz transition is theoretically the most promising transition in
121: which to find new OH SNR masers, given that the collisional excitation
122: conditions require only slightly higher densities than those that
123: produce 1720~MHz masers. We report on targeted observations of the
124: four 6.0~GHz lines mostly toward SNRs with bright 1720~MHz masers.
125:
126:
127: \section{Observations}
128:
129: We observed 32 target positions with the Effelsberg 100 m telescope in
130: two runs on 2007~July~12 and 13. Pointing centers are given in
131: Table~\ref{source-table}. Observations were taken in
132: position-switched mode using the 5 cm primary focus receiver. The
133: full width at half maximum (FWHM) beam size of the telescope is
134: approximately 130\arcsec\ at the 6.0~GHz frequencies of OH. The
135: assumed sensitivity of the telescope is 1.55~K\,Jy$^{-1}$.
136:
137: Data were collected using both the AK90 8192-channel autocorrelator as
138: well as the Fast Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FFTS). The AK90 was
139: configured to produce 8 spectral windows of 10~MHz bandwidth, each
140: divided into 1024 spectral channels with an effective channel spacing
141: of 0.5~km\,s$^{-1}$. Two spectral windows, one each for LCP and RCP,
142: were centered at the systemic LSR (local standard of rest) velocity of
143: the source in each of the four transitions at 6016.746, 6030.747,
144: 6035.092, and 6049.084~MHz. On the second day, velocities were
145: shifted by 20~km\,s$^{-1}$ to confirm that features present in the
146: data were not artifacts of the autocorrelator. Data from the FFTS
147: were of lesser quality but were used to confirm that suspected
148: features were not artifacts of the AK90 system.
149:
150: The data were reduced using the Continuum and Line Analysis
151: Single-dish Software (CLASS) package. Hanning smoothing was applied
152: to the data to remove the effects of correlated noise generated by
153: strong continuum and line sources. Polynomial baselines were removed
154: from the scans.
155:
156: \section{Results}
157:
158: \begin{deluxetable}{lllrrl}
159: \tablecaption{Observed Sources \label{source-table}}
160: \tablewidth{\hsize}
161: \tablehead{
162: % Row 1
163: \colhead{Source} &
164: \colhead{RA\tablenotemark{a}} &
165: \colhead{Dec\tablenotemark{a}} &
166: \colhead{$V_\mathrm{LSR}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
167: \colhead{$\sigma$\tablenotemark{b}} &
168: \colhead{Notes\tablenotemark{c}} \\
169: % Row 2
170: \colhead{} &
171: \colhead{(J2000)} &
172: \colhead{(J2000)} &
173: \colhead{(km\,s$^{-1}$)} &
174: \colhead{(mJy)} &
175: \colhead{}
176: }
177: %
178: \startdata
179: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Supernova Remnant Pointings} \\
180: \tableline \\[-0.1truein]
181: \object[3C 58]{3C58} & 02 05 38.1 & $+$64 49 41 & 0 & 11 & X \\
182: \object{Crab Nebula} & 05 34 31.9 & $+$22 00 52 & 0 & 26 & X \\
183: \object{IC 443} G & 06 16 43.6 & $+$22 32 34 & $-$5 & 4 & \nodata \\
184: \object{Sgr A East} SW\tablenotemark{d}& 17 45 38.0 & $-$29 01 15 & $-$130 & 31 & \nodata \\
185: \object{Sgr A East} NW\tablenotemark{d}& 17 45 40.2 & $-$28 59 45 & 130 & 41 & \nodata \\
186: \object{Sgr A East} S & 17 45 43.0 & $-$29 01 25 & 60 & 34 & A? \\
187: \object{Sgr A East} N & 17 45 44.5 & $-$28 58 45 & 50 & 28 & X,A? \\
188: \object{Sgr A East} SE & 17 45 48.0 & $-$29 01 00 & 60 & 23 & X,A? \\
189: \object{Sgr A East} NE & 17 45 48.5 & $-$28 59 45 & 60 & 23 & A \\
190: \object{Sgr D} & 17 48 52.7 & $-$28 11 18 & 0 & 12 & \nodata \\
191: \object[SNR 1.4-0.1]{G1.4$-$0.1} & 17 49 28.1 & $-$27 47 35 & 0 & 18 & \nodata \\
192: \object[W 28]{W28} A & 18 00 45.2 & $-$23 17 43 & 10 & 9 & \nodata \\
193: \object[W 28]{W28} C & 18 01 34.7 & $-$23 24 00 & 10 & 18 & \nodata \\
194: \object[W 28]{W28} F & 18 01 51.6 & $-$23 18 58 & 10 & 9 & \nodata \\
195: \object[W 28]{W28} E & 18 01 51.6 & $-$23 17 44 & 10 & 9 & \nodata \\
196: \object[SNR16.7+0.8]{G16.7$+$0.8}& 18 20 58.3 & $-$14 21 52 & 20 & 6 & \nodata \\
197: \object{Kes 69} & 18 33 12.0 & $-$10 00 40 & 70 & 6 & \nodata \\
198: \object{G27.3+0.1} & 18 40 35.1 & $-$04 57 45 & 35 & 6 & \nodata \\
199: \object[3C 391]{3C391} E & 18 49 22.6 & $-$00 57 32 & 110 & 6 & \nodata \\
200: \object[3C 391]{3C391} W & 18 49 37.1 & $-$00 55 31 & 110 & 6 & \nodata \\
201: \object{Kes 78} & 18 51 24.0 & $-$00 08 23 & 85 & 6 & \nodata \\
202: \object[W 44]{W44} A & 18 55 27.2 & $+$01 33 46 & 45 & 8 & \nodata \\
203: \object[W 44]{W44} B & 18 56 00.9 & $+$01 12 57 & 45 & 8 & \nodata \\
204: \object[W 44]{W44} E & 18 56 29.1 & $+$01 29 39 & 45 & 11 & \nodata \\
205: \object[W 44]{W44} D & 18 56 29.3 & $+$01 20 29 & 45 & 8 & \nodata \\
206: \object[W 44]{W44} F & 18 56 36.7 & $+$01 26 35 & 45 & 6 & \nodata \\
207: \object[W 51]{W51} C & 19 22 54.1 & $+$14 15 42 & 70 & 6 & \nodata \\
208: \tableline \\[-0.1truein]
209: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Other Pointings} \\
210: \tableline \\[-0.1truein]
211: \object[W 3 (OH)]{W3(OH)} & 02 27 03.8 & $+$61 52 26 & 0 & 8 & A,M \\
212: \object{AU Gem} & 07 45 28.6 & $+$30 46 43 & 15 & 6 & X \\
213: \object[Onsala 1]{ON 1} & 20 10 09.1 & $+$31 31 34 & 10 & 9 & M \\
214: \object{NML Cyg} & 20 46 25.5 & $+$40 07 00 & 0 & 9 & X \\
215: \object{NGC 7027} & 21 07 01.6 & $+$42 14 10 & 70 & 14 & X
216: \enddata
217: %
218: \tablenotetext{a}{Pointing center and center LSR velocity of
219: observations.}
220: %
221: \tablenotetext{b}{Average rms noise in the four transitions after
222: Hanning smoothing.}
223: %
224: \tablenotetext{c}{A: absorption, M: maser emission, X: pointing
225: without 1720~MHz masers.}
226: %
227: \tablenotetext{d}{Includes circumnuclear disk.}
228: %
229: \end{deluxetable}
230:
231:
232:
233: Table~\ref{source-table} summarizes our results. We do not detect
234: masers or thermal emission in any of the 6.0~GHz transitions toward
235: SNRs at a typical level of 30~mJy (5\,$\sigma$). This limit is
236: approximately an order of magnitude better than that previously
237: obtained toward southern SNRs \citep{mcdonnell07} and comparable to
238: the noise limits obtained in other transitions by \citet{pihlstrom07}.
239:
240: The SFRs \object[W 3 (OH)]{W3(OH)} and \object[Onsala 1]{ON~1} were
241: observed to confirm the reliability of the system. In both cases,
242: bright masers were detected at both 6030 and 6035~MHz. Since our
243: spectral resolution was insufficient to resolve the maser line widths,
244: the reader is referred to previously-published literature for
245: information on the 6030 and 6035~MHz masers in these two sources. We
246: note, however, that we do not see emission in W3(OH) near
247: $-70$~km\,s$^{-1}$ at 6030~MHz to a $4\,\sigma$ level of 30~mJy in
248: Stokes~I (after Hanning smoothing the spectral resolution to
249: 1~km\,s$^{-1}$ to eliminate ringing from the bright masers), as
250: previously reported by \citet{fish06}. It is not clear whether these
251: masers are variable or whether the original detection was an artifact
252: of the Effelsberg autocorrelator system.
253:
254: In the satellite lines, 6016~MHz absorption and 6049~MHz emission are
255: seen at the same velocity toward W3(OH), as shown in
256: Figure~\ref{fig-w3oh}. A single-Gaussian fit to the 6049~MHz emission
257: gives 165~mJy centered at $-45.30 \pm 0.03$~km\,s$^{-1}$ with an FWHM
258: line width of $1.39 \pm 0.08$~km\,s$^{-1}$. These values are
259: consistent with those obtained by \citet{guilloteau84}, when they use
260: the \citet{meerts75} rest frequency of 6049.084~MHz for the
261: transition. Parameters for the 6016~MHz absorption are $-52$~mJy at
262: $-45.22 \pm 0.13$~km\,s$^{-1}$ and a line width of $1.96 \pm
263: 0.28$~km\,s$^{-1}$. The emission and absorption span the same
264: velocity range (full width at zero power), although the peak of the
265: emission is narrower (FWHM) than the absorption peak, in qualitative
266: agreement with the observations of \citet{baudry97b}. The agreement
267: in velocities suggests that the 6016~MHz absorption and 6049~MHz
268: emission come from the same physical region in W3(OH).
269:
270:
271: Generally no absorption is seen toward these SNRs. Likely absorption
272: is detected in the main lines in the Galactic center region
273: (Figure~\ref{fig-ae}), although spectral baselines are poor due to
274: strong continuum flux. The velocity ($\sim +50$~km\,s$^{-1}$), width
275: ($17.5 \pm 1.5$~km\,s$^{-1}$ 6030~MHz, $20.1 \pm 1.0$~km\,s$^{-1}$
276: 6035~MHz), and location of the strongest absorption (on the east side
277: of Sgr~A East) are all consistent with the densest $^{13}$CO seen in
278: the data of \citet{zylka96}, suggesting that excited-state molecular
279: content is strongest in that region. Similar but weaker features are
280: seen in other scans on the eastern side of Sgr~A East, but we cannot
281: rule out that absorption-like features seen near $+50$~km\,s$^{-1}$ in
282: the other Sgr~A scans are due to errors in baseline removal. As
283: discussed in \S~\ref{ae-discussion}, this absorption may be due to the
284: unusual molecular cloud in the region rather than its interaction with
285: the SNR. Otherwise, no absorption is seen in any of the four
286: transitions in any of the other sources, even when scans from separate
287: sources (excluding the Galactic center sources) are aligned in
288: velocity and co-added.
289:
290: We also observed \object[AU Gem]{AU~Gem} and \object[NML
291: Cyg]{NML~Cyg}, the only two evolved stars in which excited-state OH
292: emission has previously been reported \citep{zuckerman72,claussen81}.
293: In neither case do we detect any emission. This is consistent with
294: the Expanded Very Large Array observations of \citet{sjouwerman07}
295: taken less than two months previously, in which no maser emission is
296: definitively detected in either the 6030 or 6035~MHz transitions
297: toward NML~Cyg.
298:
299: \begin{figure}
300: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f1.eps}}
301: \caption{Spectra of the 6016 and 6049~MHz transitions in
302: W3(OH). Emission in the 6049~MHz transition is stronger than
303: absorption in the 6016~MHz transition. A single-Gaussian fit to the
304: emission is narrower than a similar fit to the absorption.
305: \label{fig-w3oh}
306: }
307: \end{figure}
308:
309: \begin{figure}
310: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}
311: \caption{Spectra of the 6030 and 6035~MHz transitions in Sgr~A East.
312: The sharp spike near $+60$~km\,s$^{-1}$ is a correlator artifact.
313: Weak baseline ripples are still present after polynomial baseline
314: fitting.
315: \label{fig-ae}
316: }
317: \end{figure}
318:
319:
320: \section{Discussion}
321:
322: Though our original interest was on the 6.0~GHz OH transitions in
323: SNRs, we start off the discussion with our findings on our reference
324: source, the SFR region W3(OH).
325:
326: \subsection{Satellite Lines in W3(OH)}
327: \label{satellite}
328:
329: The 6049~MHz ($F = 3 \rightarrow 2$) emission in W3(OH) is stronger
330: than the 6016~MHz ($F = 2\rightarrow 3$) absorption, as noted in the
331: calculations by \citet{guilloteau84}, who did not detect the 6016~MHz
332: absorption at all. This effect, in which 6016~MHz absorption is
333: enhanced relative to the expected LTE value (from 6030 and 6035~MHz
334: absorption) and the 6049~MHz line is seen in weak absorption or even
335: emission, was seen in other SFRs by \citet{whiteoak76}
336: and \citet{gardner83}. This behavior was predicted by
337: \citet{elitzur77}, who showed that anti-inversion at 6016~MHz and
338: inversion at 6049~MHz should occur whenever the 120~$\mu$m radiation
339: linking the first-excited $J = 5/2$ state with the ground $J = 3/2$
340: state in the $^2\Pi_{3/2}$ ladder is optically thick, regardless of
341: the details of the pump mechanism.
342:
343: Interestingly, a similar phenomenon is seen in the next highest state
344: in the $^2\Pi_{3/2}$ ladder. Absorption in the 13442~MHz ($F = 3
345: \rightarrow 4$) transition is always stronger than at 13433~MHz ($F =
346: 4 \rightarrow 3$) and always enhanced from LTE values compared to the
347: main lines \citep{fish05}. The \citet{elitzur77} result is
348: generalizable: whenever intra-ladder decays dominate and are optically
349: thick, the $\Delta F = +1$ line will be seen in enhanced
350: absorption and the $\Delta F = -1$ line will be seen in
351: emission or reduced absorption. For the 13.4~GHz transitions,
352: infrared overlaps in the 84~$\mu$m transitions linking the $J = 7/2$
353: and $5/2$ states may also be important, as proposed by
354: \citet{matthews86}.
355:
356: We find that a Gaussian fit to the 6049~MHz emission in W3(OH) is also
357: \emph{narrower} than the fit to the 6016~MHz absorption, even though
358: the full width at zero power of the two lines is the same. This is
359: consistent with weak inversion and suggests that the 6049~MHz emission
360: should be understood as a low-gain maser, as discussed by
361: \citet{baudry97b}. Further sensitive observations at higher spectral
362: resolution will be required to confirm the maser nature of the
363: 6049~MHz emission. High angular resolution interferometric
364: observations would be particularly useful to determine the size and
365: brightness temperature of the 6049~MHz emission region, as well as to
366: isolate the region of emission and determine whether the inversion
367: exists over the entire source or merely in cluster C \citep[in the
368: nomenclature of][]{fish07}, which must be a region of very high
369: excitation based on the presence of highly-excited OH
370: \citep{baudry93,baudry97}.
371:
372: In general, satellite-line masers are seen almost exclusively in the
373: lowest states of the $^2\Pi_{3/2}$ and $^2\Pi_{1/2}$ ladders. In the
374: $^2\Pi_{3/2}, J = 3/2$ rotational state, masers are seen in the
375: 1612~MHz transition in evolved stars and some SFRs, and 1720~MHz
376: masers are seen in SNRs and some SFRs. Masers in the $^2\Pi_{1/2}, J
377: = 1/2$ state are seen only in SFRs, with 4765~MHz ($F = 1 \rightarrow
378: 0$) masers much more common than 4660~MHz ($F = 0 \rightarrow 1$)
379: masers \citep[e.g.,][]{gardner83,cohen95}, in agreement with
380: \citet{elitzur77}. Even though the brightest main-line 6030 and
381: 6035~MHz masers in SFRs can have flux densities of several hundred~Jy
382: \citep[e.g.,][]{fish07}, the only other satellite-line maser found to
383: date is the low-gain 6049~MHz maser in W3(OH). It thus appears to be
384: a general result that it is extremely difficult to invert satellite
385: lines except in the lowest rotational state in each ladder.
386:
387:
388: \subsection{Sgr~A East}
389: \label{ae-discussion}
390:
391: We see 6030 and 6035~MHz absorption near $+50$~km\,s$^{-1}$ in
392: pointings on the eastern side of Sgr~A East. The absorption at
393: 6035~MHz is deeper than at 6030~MHz, as would be expected for thermal
394: absorption. This absorption is likely neither part of the interaction
395: of the SNR with the molecular cloud nor located at the interaction
396: region \citep[with most 1720~MHz masers in the slightly higher
397: velocity range $V_\mathrm{LSR} =
398: 53$--$68$~km\,s$^{-1}$;][]{pihlstrom06}, although interferometric
399: confirmation, as with the Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA) will be
400: required to establish the location of the absorption. The molecular
401: material is denser to the east and partially obscured by the
402: circumnuclear disk to the west \citep{mcgary01,herrnstein05},
403: consistent with our absorption detections as well as the ground-state
404: absorption detected by \citet{karlsson03}.
405:
406: The detection of excited-state absorption toward Sgr~A East but not
407: toward any other SNR may find its explanation in a chance alignment,
408: the special conditions in the Galactic center region, or a combination
409: thereof. The difference with the other SNRs may be due to the
410: geometry of a dense cloud in the line of sight with a relatively
411: intense radio continuum background in the case of Sgr~A East,
412: resulting in a larger column density and absorption of OH. Or, the
413: difference may be due to a difference in heating of the cloud: the
414: +50~km\,s$^{-1}$ cloud toward Sgr~A East may be heated more, not by
415: the impact of the SNR into the cloud \citep{herrnstein05} but, e.g.,
416: due to a strong local radiation field absorbed by high-metallicity
417: material, dissipation of kinetic energy or collisions of local clumps
418: in a steep gravitational potential, etc., providing a larger column
419: density of OH in excited states. As this absorption is likely not due
420: to the SNR, further studies are required to investigate its origin.
421:
422: Interferometric observations would be very useful in order to
423: understand the distribution of excited-state OH in the molecular cloud
424: near Sgr~A East. Higher angular resolution than that provided by
425: Effelsberg will be required to understand the origin of the 6.0~GHz
426: absorption in Sgr~A East. This absorption is an obvious target for
427: reobservation with the EVLA when a sufficient number of antennas are
428: equipped with the new C-band (4--8~GHz) receivers.
429:
430:
431: \subsection{Other Sources}
432:
433: No emission was seen in any 6.0~GHz transition toward SNRs. To date,
434: a total of 23 $\Lambda$-doublet transitions have been observed toward
435: SNRs: the quadruplets at 1.6, 6.0, 7.7, 8.1, and 23.8~GHz and the
436: triplet at 4.7~GHz. Only the 1720~MHz transition produces a
437: detectable maser. The 6049~MHz transition is the next one after
438: 1720~MHz predicted to go into inversion as densities are increased
439: \citep{pihlstrom07,wardle07}, yet searches for 6049~MHz masers have
440: not uncovered any detections \citep[this work, as well
441: as][]{mcdonnell07}. Searches for SNR OH masers at 4765 and 1612~MHz,
442: the next two transitions expected to produce masers via collisional
443: excitation, have also produced only non-detections
444: \citep{pihlstrom07}. It is probable that no OH masers, other than in
445: the 1720~MHz transition, will be detected toward SNRs with current
446: instrumentation.
447:
448: Absorption at 6016~MHz is not seen toward any SNR, despite predictions
449: that it should be anti-inverted. We do not see absorption toward SNRs
450: with the exception of 6030 and 6035~MHz absorption toward Sgr~A East.
451: Much more sensitive observations will be required to test whether
452: excited-state $\Delta F = +1$ transitions are in enhanced absorption
453: in SNRs.
454:
455: No emission was seen toward the evolved stars AU Gem and NML Cyg.
456: Excited-state OH maser emission has previously been reported in the
457: 4750~MHz transition toward AU Gem \citep{claussen81} and the 6035 (and
458: possibly 6030) MHz transition toward NML Cyg \citep{zuckerman72},
459: although subsequent observations have failed to confirm these
460: detections \citep[e.g.,][]{sjouwerman07}. It is likely that
461: excited-state OH maser emission from evolved stars is temporary and
462: extremely rare \citep{sjouwerman07}. Our continued non-detection of
463: excited-state emission toward these stars supports this hypothesis.
464:
465:
466: \acknowledgments
467:
468: Based on observations with the 100-m telescope of the MPIfR
469: (Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Radioastronomie) at Effelsberg. The
470: National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
471: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
472: Universities, Inc.
473:
474: {\it Facilities: \facility{Effelsberg}}
475:
476: \begin{thebibliography}{}
477:
478: \bibitem[Baudry et al.(1997)]{baudry97b} Baudry, A., Desmurs, J.~F.,
479: Wilson, T.~L., \& Cohen, R.~J.\ 1997, \aap, 325, 255
480:
481: \bibitem[Baudry \& Diamond(1997)]{baudry97} Baudry, A., \& Diamond,
482: P.~J.\ 1997, \aap, 331, 697
483:
484: \bibitem[Baudry et al.(1993)]{baudry93} Baudry, A., Menten, K.~M.,
485: Walmsley, C.~M., \& Wilson, T.~L.\ 1993, \aap, 271, 552
486:
487: \bibitem[Brogan et al.(2000)]{brogan00} Brogan, C.~L., Frail, D.~A.,
488: Goss, W.~M., \& Troland, T.~H.\ 2000, \apj, 537, 875
489:
490: \bibitem[Claussen \& Fix(1981)]{claussen81} Claussen, M.~J., \& Fix,
491: J.~D.\ 1981, \apj, 250, L77
492:
493: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1995)]{cohen95} Cohen, R.~J., Masheder,
494: M.~R.~W., \& Caswell, J.~L.\ 1995, \mnras, 274, 808
495:
496: \bibitem[Elitzur(1977)]{elitzur77} Elitzur, M.\ 1977, \mnras, 179, 143
497:
498: \bibitem[Elitzur(1996)]{elitzur96} Elitzur, M.\ 1996, \apj, 457, 415
499:
500: \bibitem[Elitzur(1998)]{elitzur98} Elitzur, M.\ 1998, \apj, 504, 390
501:
502: \bibitem[Fish et al.(2005)]{fish05} Fish, V.~L., Reid, M.~J., \&
503: Menten, K.~M.\ 2005, \apj, 623, 269
504:
505: \bibitem[Fish et al.(2006)]{fish06} Fish, V.~L., Reid, M.~J., Menten,
506: K.~M., \& Pillai, T.\ 2006, \aap, 458, 485
507:
508: \bibitem[Fish \& Sjouwerman(2007)]{fish07} Fish, V.~L., \& Sjouwerman,
509: L.~O.\ 2007, \apj, in press, arXiv:0706.3314
510:
511: \bibitem[Gardner \& Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado(1983)]{gardner83} Gardner,
512: F.~F., \& Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J.\ 1983, \mnras, 204, 709
513:
514: \bibitem[Goss(1968)]{goss68} Goss, W.~M.\ 1968, \apjs, 15, 131
515:
516: \bibitem[Green(2006)]{green06} Green D.~A., 2006, A Catalogue of
517: Galactic Supernova Remnants (2006 April version), Astrophysics
518: Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (available
519: at \url{http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/})
520:
521: \bibitem[Guilloteau et al.(1984)]{guilloteau84} Guilloteau, S.,
522: Baudry, A., Walmsley, C.~M., Wilson, T.~L., \& Winnberg, A.\ 1984,
523: \aap, 131, 45
524:
525: \bibitem[Herrnstein \& Ho(2005)]{herrnstein05} Herrnstein, R.~M., \&
526: Ho, P.~T.~P.\ 2005, \apj, 620, 287
527:
528: \bibitem[Hewitt et al.(2006)]{hewitt06} Hewitt, J.~W., Yusef-Zadeh,
529: F., Wardle, M., Roberts, D.~A., \& Kassim, N.~E.\ 2006, \apj, 652,
530: 1288
531:
532: \bibitem[Karlsson et al.(2003)]{karlsson03} Karlsson, R., Sjouwerman,
533: L.~O., Sandqvist, Aa., \& Whiteoak, J.~B.\ 2003, \aap, 403, 1011
534:
535: \bibitem[Litvak et al.(1969)]{litvak69} Litvak, M.~M., Zuckerman, B.,
536: \& Dickinson, D.~F.\ 1969, \apj, 156, 875
537:
538: \bibitem[Lockett et al.(1999)]{lockett99} Lockett, P., Gauthier, E.,
539: \& Elitzur, M.\ 1999, \apj, 511, 235
540:
541: \bibitem[Matthews et al.(1986)]{matthews86} Matthews, H.~E., Baudry,
542: A., Guilloteau, S., \& Winnberg, A.\ 1986, \aap, 163, 177
543:
544: \bibitem[McDonnell et al.(2007)]{mcdonnell07} McDonnell, K.~E.,
545: Vaughan, A.~E., \& Wardle, M.\ 2007, IAU Symp.\ 242, in press,
546: arXiv:0704.2271
547:
548: \bibitem[McGary et al.(2001)]{mcgary01} McGary, R.~S., Coil, A.~L., \&
549: Ho, P.~T.~P.\ 2001, \apj, 559, 326
550:
551: \bibitem[Meerts \& Dymanus(1975)]{meerts75} Meerts, W.~L., \& Dymanus,
552: A.\ 1975, Canadian J.\ Phys., 53, 2123
553:
554: \bibitem[Pavlakis \& Kylafis(1996)]{pavlakis96} Pavlakis, K.~G., \&
555: Kylafis, N.~D.\ 1996, \apj, 467, 300
556:
557: \bibitem[Pavlakis \& Kylafis(2000)]{pavlakis00} Pavlakis, K.~G., \&
558: Kylafis, N.~D.\ 2000, \apj, 534, 770
559:
560: \bibitem[Pihlstr{\"o}m \& Sjouwerman(2006)]{pihlstrom06}
561: Pihlstr{\"o}m, Y.~M., \& Sjouwerman, L.~O.\ 2006, Journal of Physics
562: Conference Series, 54, 77
563:
564: \bibitem[Pihlstr\"{o}m et al.(2007)]{pihlstrom07} Pihlstr\"{o}m,
565: Y.~M., Fish, V.~L., Sjouwerman, L.~O., Zschaechner, L.~K., Lockett,
566: P.~B., \& Elitzur, M.\ 2007, \apj, submitted
567:
568: \bibitem[Sjouwerman et al.(2007)]{sjouwerman07} Sjouwerman, L.~O.,
569: Fish, V.~L., Claussen, M.~J., Pihlstr\"{o}m, Y.~M., \& Zschaechner,
570: L.~K.\ 2007, \apjl{L}, in press, arXiv:0707.3788
571:
572: \bibitem[Wardle(1999)]{wardle99} Wardle, M.\ 1999, \apj, 525, L101
573:
574: \bibitem[Wardle(2007)]{wardle07} Wardle, M.\ 2007, IAU Symp.\ 242, in
575: press, astro-ph/0703508
576:
577: \bibitem[Whiteoak \& Gardner(1976)]{whiteoak76} Whiteoak, J.~B., \&
578: Gardner, F.~F.\ 1976, \mnras, 174, 21P
579:
580: \bibitem[Zuckerman et al.(1972)]{zuckerman72} Zuckerman, B., Yen,
581: J.~L., Gottlieb, C.~A., \& Palmer, P.\ 1972, \apj, 177, 59
582:
583: \bibitem[Zylka(1996)]{zylka96} Zylka, R.\ 1996, The Galactic Center,
584: 102, 77
585:
586: \end{thebibliography}
587:
588:
589:
590: \end{document}
591: