1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[10pt, letterpaper, onecolumn]{emulateapj}
3:
4: \def\Msun{M_\odot}
5: \def\microas{\mu{\rm as}}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{Masses, Luminosities, and Orbital Coplanarities of the $\mu$ Orionis
10: Quadruple Star System from PHASES Differential Astrometry}
11:
12: \author{Matthew W.~Muterspaugh\altaffilmark{1},
13: Benjamin F.~Lane\altaffilmark{2}, Francis C.~Fekel\altaffilmark{3},
14: Maciej Konacki\altaffilmark{4}, Bernard F.~Burke\altaffilmark{5},
15: S.~R.~Kulkarni\altaffilmark{6}, M.~M.~Colavita\altaffilmark{7},
16: M.~Shao\altaffilmark{7}, Sloane J.~Wiktorowicz\altaffilmark{8}}
17: \altaffiltext{1}{Townes Fellow, University of California,
18: Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{Draper Laboratory, 555 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA
20: 02139-3563}
21: \altaffiltext{3}{Tennessee State University, Center of Excellence in
22: Information Systems, 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd., Box No.~9501, Nashville, TN
23: 37203-3401}
24: \altaffiltext{4}{Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of
25: Sciences, Rabianska 8, 87-100 Torun, Poland}
26: \altaffiltext{5}{MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research,
27: MIT Department of Physics, 70 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139}
28: \altaffiltext{6}{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, 105-24,
29: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
30: \altaffiltext{7}{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
31: Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109}
32: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California
33: Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
34:
35: \email{matthew1@ssl.berkeley.edu, blane@mit.edu, maciej@ncac.torun.pl}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38: $\mu$ Orionis was identified by spectroscopic studies as a quadruple star
39: system. Seventeen high precision differential astrometry measurements of
40: $\mu$ Ori have been collected by the Palomar High-precision Astrometric Search
41: for Exoplanet Systems (PHASES). These show both the motion of the long
42: period binary orbit and short period perturbations superimposed on that
43: caused by each of the components in the long period system being themselves
44: binaries. The new measurements enable the orientations of the long period
45: binary and short period subsystems to be determined. Recent theoretical
46: work predicts the
47: distribution of relative inclinations between inner and outer orbits of
48: hierarchical systems to peak near 40 and 140 degrees.
49: The degree of coplanarity of this
50: complex system is determined, and the angle between the planes of the A-B
51: and Aa-Ab orbits is found to be $136.7 \pm 8.3$ degrees, near the predicted
52: distribution peak at 140 degrees; this result is discussed in the context of
53: the handful of systems with established mutual inclinations. The system
54: distance and masses for each component are obtained from a combined fit
55: of the PHASES astrometry and archival radial velocity observations.
56: The component masses have
57: relative precisions of $5\%$ (component Aa), $15\%$ (Ab), and
58: $1.4\%$ (each of Ba and Bb). The median size of the minor axes of the
59: uncertainty ellipses for the new measurements is 20 micro-arcseconds
60: ($\microas$). Updated orbits for $\delta$ Equulei, $\kappa$ Pegasi, and V819
61: Herculis are also presented.
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64: \keywords{stars:individual($\mu$ Orionis) -- stars:individual($\delta$ Equ) --
65: stars:individual($\kappa$ Peg) -- stars:individual(V819 Her) --
66: binaries:close -- binaries:visual -- techniques:interferometric --
67: astrometry -- stars:distances}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: $\mu$ Orionis (61 Ori, HR 2124, HIP 28614, HD 40932) is a quadruple star
72: system that has been extensively studied by radial velocity (RV) and
73: differential astrometry. It is located just North of Betelgeuse, Orion's
74: right shoulder (left on the sky); $\mu$ Ori is a bright star that is visible
75: to the unaided eye even in moderately light-polluted skies. \cite{Frost1906}
76: discovered it to be a short period (four and a half day) single-lined
77: spectroscopic binary; this was component Aa, whose short-period, low mass
78: companion Ab has never been detected directly. \cite{Aitken1914} discovered
79: it also had a more distant component (B) forming a sub-arcsecond visual
80: binary. Much later, \cite{Fekel1980} found B was itself a short-period
81: (4.78 days) double-lined spectroscopic binary, making the system quadruple;
82: these stars are designated Ba and Bb. Most recently, \cite{Fekel2002}
83: (hereafter F2002) reported the astrometric orbit of the A-B motion,
84: double-lined RV orbits for A-B and the Ba-Bb subsystem, and a single-lined RV
85: orbit for the Aa-Ab subsystem. F2002 estimate the spectral types as A5V (Aa,
86: an Am star), F5V (Ba), and F5V (Bb), though they note these are
87: classifications are less certain than usual due to the complexity of the
88: system. For a more complete discussion of the history of $\mu$ Ori, see F2002.
89:
90: Until now, astrometric observations have only been able to characterize the
91: long period A-B motion, lacking the precision necessary to measure the
92: astrometric perturbations to this orbit caused by the Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb
93: subsystems. The method described by \cite{LaneMute2004a} for ground-based
94: differential astrometry at the $\sim 20$ $\microas$ level for sub-arcsecond
95: (``speckle'') binaries has been used to study $\mu$ Ori during the 2004-2007
96: observing seasons. These measurements represent an improvement in precision
97: of over two orders of magnitude over previous work on this system.
98:
99: The goal of the current investigation is to report the center-of-light
100: (photocenter) astrometric orbits of the Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb subsystems. This
101: enables measurement of the coplanarities of the A-B, Aa-Ab, and Ba-Bb
102: orbits. The masses and luminosity ratio of Aa and Ab are measured for the
103: first time.Also presented are updated orbits for the PHASES targets
104: $\delta$ Equ, $\kappa$ Peg, and V819 Her.
105:
106: Astrometric measurements were made at the Palomar Testbed Interferometer
107: \citep[PTI;][]{col99} as part of the Palomar High-precision Astrometric
108: Search for Exoplanet Systems (PHASES) program \citep{Mute06Limits}. PTI is
109: located on Palomar Mountain near San Diego, CA. It was developed by the Jet
110: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology for NASA, as a
111: testbed for interferometric techniques applicable to the Keck Interferometer
112: and other missions such as the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM). It
113: operates in the J ($1.2 \mu{\rm m}$), H ($1.6 \mu{\rm m}$), and K
114: ($2.2 \mu{\rm m}$) bands, and combines starlight from two out of three
115: available 40-cm apertures. The apertures form a triangle with one 110 and two
116: 87 meter baselines.
117:
118: \section{Observations and Data Processing}
119:
120: \subsection{PHASES Observations}
121:
122: \subsubsection{Instrumental Setup}
123:
124: $\mu$ Ori was observed with PTI on 17 nights in 2004-2007 with the observing
125: mode described in \cite{LaneMute2004a}. Starlight is collected from
126: two apertures, collimated, and sent to a central beam combining facility.
127: There, the light from each telescope reflects from movable mirrors (delay
128: lines) whose position is constantly varied to account for sidereal motion
129: and to track atmospheric index of refraction variations. After this first
130: set of delay lines, a beam-splitter is used to divide the light from each
131: telescope; $\sim 70\%$ of the light is sent to an interferometric beam
132: combiner that monitors a single fringe from any star in the field at rapid
133: (10-20 millisecond) time-scales to measure fringe phase variations caused by
134: the atmosphere, and provide feedback to the main delay lines. This
135: process phase-stabilizes the other $\sim 30\%$ of the light
136: \citep[a technique known as phase referencing, ][]{lc03}, which is sent to a
137: second interferometric beam combiner that can add an additional variable
138: delay of order $250\,{\rm \mu m}$ to the light from one telescope. This
139: variable delay is modulated with a triangle waveform, scanning through
140: interferograms from all stars within the subarcsecond field of view. These
141: interferogram scans are the observables used for PHASES astrometry.
142:
143: \subsubsection{Data Reduction}
144:
145: Modifications to the data processing algorithm since the original report are
146: given by \cite{Mut05_delequ} and have been incorporated in the current
147: study. Interferogram templates are fit to each scan, forming a likelihood
148: function of the separations of interferograms formed by components A and B. A
149: grid of differential right ascension and declination is formed, and a $\chi^2$
150: likelihood surface is mapped onto this grid by converting delay separation to
151: differential right ascension and declination. That $\chi^2$ surface is
152: coadded over all the scans of $\mu$ Ori within the night (typically
153: $\sim 1000$ scans or more). The deepest minimum in the $\chi^2$ surface
154: corresponds to the binary separation, while the width of that minimum
155: determines the uncertainty ellipse. Due to the oscillatory nature of the
156: interferograms, other local minima can exist; these ``sidelobes'' are
157: separated by the interferometer's resolution
158: $\sim \lambda / B \sim 4\,{\rm mas}$ ($B$ is the separation between the
159: telescopes, and $\lambda$ the wavelength of starlight), an amount much larger
160: than the width of an individual minimum. The SNR can be increased by coadding
161: many scans and by earth-rotation synthesis, which smears all but the true
162: minimum, and the true minimum then can be established. Only those
163: measurements for which no sidelobes appear at the $4\sigma$ contour of the
164: deepest minimum are used in orbit fitting.
165:
166: All measurements have been processed using this new data reduction pipeline.
167: The measurements are listed in Table \ref{phasesDataMuOri}, in the
168: ICRS 2000.0 reference frame.
169:
170: \subsubsection{Technique Upgrades}
171:
172: Data since mid-2006 have benefited from the use of an automatic alignment
173: system and longitudinal dispersion compensator; the affected data points are
174: noted in Table \ref{phasesDataMuOri}. These modifications reduced the
175: throughput of the astrometry setup; to compensate, a 50 Hz phase tracking rate
176: was sometimes used, whereas observations previous to these changes utilized
177: 100 Hz tracking for monitoring the atmosphere.
178:
179: Drifts in optical alignment may result in variable pupil sampling at the
180: interferometer apertures, changing the effective interferometric baseline. To
181: minimize this potential systematic, a continuous realignment system has been
182: developed. A red laser is coaligned with the starlight and reverse
183: propagated through the interferometer. Four-percent reflective pellicle
184: beamsplitters are placed near the focuses of the interferometer telescopes to
185: extract this tracer beam and redirect to a camera where the pupil is reimaged.
186: The angles of the first flat mirrors receiving incoming starlight in the
187: beam combining lab are continually adjusted by a closed-loop feedback system
188: to hold the laser spot on the camera at the telescope.
189:
190: The path compensation for the geometric delay at PTI has been
191: done with movable mirrors in air, which has a wavelength-dependent index
192: of refraction. The fringe packets of astrophysical sources are
193: dispersed by an amount that depends on the difference in air paths
194: between arms of the interferometer; this changes the shape and overall
195: location of the fringe packets. To compensate, two prisms are introduced in
196: each of the interferometer's two arms. The set in one arm is static. The
197: other pair are slid relative to each other along the slope of the prism to
198: introduce a variable amount of glass dispersion whose shape is opposite that
199: of air to high order. This flattens the variability of delay versus
200: wavelength. The system is calibrated by setting the telescope siderostats
201: into a retroreflecting mode, using an internal white-light source to form
202: interferograms, which are detected with a low-resolution spectrometer (5
203: elements across K band), and measuring the offsets between the
204: interferograms as a function of prism location. During observations, the
205: prism position is continuously changed with an open loop control calculated
206: from the locations of the delay lines.
207:
208: There is insufficient new data to establish the degree two which these
209: instrumental changes might be reducing excess data scatter or to establish a
210: relative weighting between data subsets. No large discontinuities in the
211: orbital motions are seen between pre- and post-upgrade subsets for $\mu$ Ori
212: or the other PHASES targets, suggesting the subsets are compatible. For
213: the purposes of the current investigation, the PHASES observations are
214: treated as a single data set with equal weighting on observations from before
215: and after these upgrades.
216:
217: \subsubsection{The PHASES Astrometric Orbits}
218:
219: The differential astrometry measurements are listed in Table
220: \ref{phasesDataMuOri}, in the ICRS 2000.0 reference frame. The existence of
221: data scatter beyond the level estimated by formal uncertainties from the
222: PHASES analysis algorithm was determined by model fitting the PHASES data
223: alone. Model fitting was performed with standard $\chi^2$ sum of squared
224: residuals minimization, slightly complicated by the two dimensional
225: nature of the uncertainty ellipses but still straight-forward to carry out.
226: The limited number and time span of the PHASES observations prevents
227: an independent fitting of that data set to a 4-body, 3-Keplerian model to
228: determine potential noise excess. Thus the A-B period and Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb
229: periods, eccentricities, and angles of periastron passages were fixed at the
230: values reported in F2002 (in the case of Ba-Bb, which had zero eccentricity
231: in F2002, the angle of periastron passage is undefined and fixed at zero).
232: The minimum $\chi^2$ does not equal the
233: number of degrees of freedom. An excess noise factor of 1.73 is found, and
234: the PHASES uncertainties reported in Table \ref{phasesDataMuOri} have been
235: increased by this amount over the formal uncertainties. The rescaled (raw)
236: median minor- and major-axis uncertainties are 20 (11) and
237: 347 (200) $\microas$. The rescaled (raw) mean minor- and
238: major-axis uncertainties are 27 (16) and 668 (386) $\microas$.
239:
240: % grep FS9_SUM: HDC40932.astrom_reweight.txt | grep -v '#' | sort -n | awk '{printf "%.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}' > HDC40932.phases.tab
241: % grep FS9_SUM: HDC40932.astrom_reweight.hmjd.txt | grep -v '#' | sort -n | awk '{printf "%.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}' > HDC40932.phases.mhjd.tab
242:
243: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllllll}
244: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
245: \tablecolumns{13}
246: \tablewidth{0pc}
247: \tablecaption{PHASES data for $\mu$ Ori\label{phasesDataMuOri}}
248: \tablehead{
249: \colhead{HJD-2400000.5} & \colhead{$\delta$RA} & \colhead{$\delta$Dec} & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm min}$} &
250: \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm maj}$} & \colhead{$\phi_{\rm e}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm RA}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm Dec}$}
251: & \colhead{$\frac{\sigma_{\rm RA, Dec}^2}{\sigma_{\rm RA}\sigma_{\rm Dec}}$} & \colhead{N} &
252: \colhead{LDC} & \colhead{Align} & \colhead{Rate} \\
253: \colhead{} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{($\microas$)} &
254: \colhead{($\microas$)} & \colhead{(deg)} & \colhead{($\microas$)} & \colhead{($\microas$)}
255: & \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
256: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(Hz)}
257: }
258: \startdata
259: 53271.49964 & 59.1469 & 105.9933 & 9.1 & 487.1 & 146.70 & 407.2 & 267.6
260: & -0.99918 & 3092 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
261: 53285.47060 & 61.8963 & 110.1620 & 14.6 & 376.9 & 19.95 & 354.3 & 129.4
262: & 0.99273 & 2503 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
263: 53290.47919 & 62.4497 & 112.0044 & 39.6 & 2034.0 & 151.07 & 1780.2 & 984.6
264: & -0.99894 & 531 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
265: 53312.46161 & 66.0452 & 119.6805 & 5.2 & 108.2 & 158.79 & 100.9 & 39.5
266: & -0.98982 & 6840 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
267: 53334.41210 & 69.4569 & 127.2488 & 11.5 & 235.3 & 160.77 & 222.2 & 78.3
268: & -0.98775 & 2876 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
269: 53340.37952 & 70.2141 & 128.6951 & 15.0 & 165.2 & 157.64 & 152.9 & 64.4
270: & -0.96791 & 2056 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
271: 53341.34723 & 70.4709 & 129.3402 & 13.2 & 146.6 & 153.14 & 130.9 & 67.3
272: & -0.97539 & 3570 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
273: 53639.51295 & 104.4652 & 211.4488 & 16.3 & 226.6 & 149.61 & 195.6 & 115.5
274: & -0.98653 & 1204 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
275: 53663.47636 & 106.2444 & 217.1615 & 10.4 & 121.4 & 153.87 & 109.0 & 54.3
276: & -0.97702 & 1829 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
277: 53698.43902 & 110.2454 & 225.7804 & 46.8 & 894.1 & 37.76 & 707.5 & 548.8
278: & 0.99417 & 827 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
279: 53705.34654 & 108.6092 & 226.3868 & 56.3 & 1797.7 & 151.29 & 1576.9 & 864.9
280: & -0.99724 & 574 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
281: 53732.29696 & 111.8048 & 231.4902 & 20.0 & 187.4 & 156.29 & 171.8 & 77.5
282: & -0.95961 & 1103 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
283: 53753.23270 & 113.4891 & 235.7197 & 43.7 & 346.8 & 158.08 & 322.2 & 135.7
284: & -0.93783 & 621 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
285: 53789.18100 & 117.7579 & 244.2916 & 47.3 & 2294.6 & 36.86 & 1836.0 & 1377.0
286: & 0.99908 & 610 & 0 & 0 & 100 \\
287: 54056.41922 & 131.6278 & 287.8511 & 35.5 & 279.5 & 159.04 & 261.3 & 105.3
288: & -0.93264 & 699 & 1 & 1 & 50 \\
289: 54061.42434 & 132.3749 & 288.4474 & 30.7 & 580.4 & 161.71 & 551.1 & 184.5
290: & -0.98450 & 515 & 1 & 1 & 100 \\
291: 54103.32199 & 134.6975 & 294.9159 & 44.7 & 1066.4 & 163.89 & 1024.6 & 299.0
292: & -0.98780 & 182 & 1 & 1 & 50 \\
293: \enddata
294: \tablecomments{
295: All quantities are in the ICRS 2000.0 reference frame. The uncertainty
296: values presented in these data have all been scaled by a factor of 1.73
297: over the formal (internal) uncertainties within each given night.
298: Column 1 is the heliocentric modified Julian date. Columns 2 and 3
299: is the differential right ascension and declination between A and B,
300: in milli-arcseconds. Columns 4 and 5 are the $1\sigma$ uncertainties in
301: the minor and major axis of the measurement uncertainty ellipse, in
302: micro-arcseconds.
303: Column 6, $\phi_{\rm e}$, is the angle between the major axis of the uncertainty
304: ellipse and the right ascension axis, measured from increasing differential
305: right ascension through increasing differential declination (the position
306: angle of the uncertainty ellipse's orientation is $90-\phi_{\rm e}$).
307: Columns 7 and 8 are the projected uncertainties in the right ascension and
308: declination axis, in micro-arcseconds, while column 9 is the covariance
309: between these. Column 10
310: is the number of scans taken during a given night. Column 11 is 1 if the
311: longitudinal dispersion compensator was in use, 0 otherwise. Column 12 is 1 if
312: the autoaligner was in use, 0 otherwise. Column 13 represents the tracking
313: frequency of the phase-referencing camera. The quadrant was chosen such that
314: the larger fringe contrast is designated the primary (contrast is a
315: combination of source luminosity and interferometric visibility).
316: }
317: \end{deluxetable}
318:
319: \subsection{Previous Measurements}
320:
321: Previous differential astrometry measurements of $\mu$ Ori are tabulated in
322: Table 5 of F2002. These have been included in
323: the current fit, with identical weightings as assigned by that investigation,
324: though it is noted that the text contains a typographical error, and the
325: $\rho$ unit uncertainty $\sigma_{\rho}$ should be 0.024, rather than 0.0024
326: mas. The time span of these measurements is much longer than that of the
327: PHASES program and aids in solving the long period A-B orbit, which also lifts
328: potential fit parameter degeneracies between that orbit and those of the
329: short period subsystems. Measurements marked as $3\sigma$ outliers by that
330: investigation are omitted, resulting in 80 measurements each of separation and
331: position angle being used for fitting. Ten new measurements have been
332: published since that investigation and are listed in Table
333: \ref{muOriNewPrev} with weights computed with the same formula as used in
334: F2002. Two of these measurements are found to be $3\sigma$ outliers. In
335: total, there are 88 measurements of separation and position angle used in
336: fitting.
337:
338: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
339: \tablecolumns{6}
340: \tablewidth{0pc}
341: \tablecaption{New Non-PHASES Astrometry for $\mu$ Ori\label{muOriNewPrev}}
342: \tablehead{
343: \colhead{Besselian Year} & \colhead{$\rho$} & \colhead{$\theta$} & \colhead{Weight} & \colhead{Outlier} & Reference
344: }
345: \startdata
346: 1991.8101 & 0.330 & 31.8 & 0.1 & 1 & \cite{TYC2002} \\
347: 1996.8986 & 0.306 & 13.4 & 8.7 & 0 & \cite{Hor2001b} \\
348: 1999.0153 & 0.200 & 14.8 & 10.1 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
349: 1999.0153 & 0.196 & 13.3 & 9.7 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
350: 1999.0153 & 0.203 & 14.9 & 10.4 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
351: 1999.8915 & 0.150 & 11.7 & 5.8 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
352: 1999.8915 & 0.145 & 12.5 & 5.5 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
353: 1999.8915 & 0.154 & 11.3 & 6.1 & 1 & \cite{hor02} \\
354: 2000.7653 & 0.081 & 359.4 & 2.0 & 0 & \cite{hor02} \\
355: 2005.1331 & 0.179 & 26.4 & 0.2 & 1 & \cite{Sca2007a} \\
356: \enddata
357: \tablecomments{
358: The 10 new astrometry measurements published since F2002 for $\mu$ Ori.
359: Column 1 is the epoch of observation in years, column 2 is the A-B separation
360: in arcseconds, column 3 is the position angle east of north in degrees,
361: and column 4 is the measurement weight on the same scale as F2002.
362: ($\delta$RA $=\rho \sin \theta$, $\delta$Dec $=\rho \cos \theta$.)
363: Column 5 is 0 if the
364: measurement is a $3\sigma$ outlier not used in fitting, 1 otherwise. Column
365: 6 is the original work where the measurement was published.}
366: \end{deluxetable}
367:
368: F2002 also present radial velocity observations of components Aa,
369: Ba, and Bb. Those measurements are included in the present fit, with
370: weightings as reported in Tables 2, 3, and 4 of that paper. Measurements
371: marked as $3\sigma$ outliers by that investigation have not been included in
372: the present analysis. In total, 442 velocities---220 for Aa and 111 for each
373: of Ba and Bb---are used in fitting.
374:
375: \section{Orbital Models}
376:
377: The apparent motions of the centers-of-light (photocenters)
378: of the ${\rm A=Aa-Ab}$ and
379: ${\rm B=Ba-Bb}$ subsystems relative to each other are given by the model
380: %\begin{equation}\label{muOri3DorbitEquation}
381: %\overrightarrow{y_{\rm{obs}}} =
382: %\overrightarrow{r_{\rm{A-B}}}
383: %+ \frac{M_{\rm{Ab}}/M_{\rm{Aa}} - L_{\rm{Ab}}/L_{\rm{Aa}}}{\left(1+M_{\rm{Ab}}/M_{\rm{Aa}}\right)\left(1+L_{\rm{Ab}}/L_{\rm{Aa}}\right)}\overrightarrow{r_{\rm{Aa-Ab}}}
384: %- \frac{M_{\rm{Bb}}/M_{\rm{Ba}} - L_{\rm{Bb}}/L_{\rm{Ba}}}{\left(1+M_{\rm{Bb}}/M_{\rm{Ba}}\right)\left(1+L_{\rm{Bb}}/L_{\rm{Ba}}\right)}\overrightarrow{r_{\rm{Ba-Bb}}}
385: %\end{equation}
386: \begin{eqnarray}\label{muOri3DorbitEquation}
387: \overrightarrow{y_{\rm{obs}}} &=&
388: \overrightarrow{r_{\rm{A-B}}} \nonumber\\
389: &+& \frac{M_{\rm{Ab}}/M_{\rm{Aa}} - L_{\rm{Ab}}/L_{\rm{Aa}}}{\left(1+M_{\rm{Ab}}/M_{\rm{Aa}}\right)\left(1+L_{\rm{Ab}}/L_{\rm{Aa}}\right)}\overrightarrow{r_{\rm{Aa-Ab}}}\nonumber\\
390: &-& \frac{M_{\rm{Bb}}/M_{\rm{Ba}} - L_{\rm{Bb}}/L_{\rm{Ba}}}{\left(1+M_{\rm{Bb}}/M_{\rm{Ba}}\right)\left(1+L_{\rm{Bb}}/L_{\rm{Ba}}\right)}\overrightarrow{r_{\rm{Ba-Bb}}}
391: \end{eqnarray}
392: corresponding to a four-body hierarchical dynamical system (HDS).
393: The quantities $M$ are component masses and $L$ are component
394: luminosities, and each of the summed vectors is determined by a 2-body
395: Keplerian model. This model is used to fit the astrometric data; note that
396: the total masses from the Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb orbits also show up as component
397: masses for the A-B orbit, linking them, and that the mass ratios and
398: luminosity ratios appear as additional parameters, degenerate with each
399: other. The radial velocities are fit by a simple superposition of individual
400: Keplerians; these determine mass ratios, and the luminosity ratios become
401: nondegenerate parameters. The luminosity ratios are primarily
402: constrained by the K-band PHASES data; the other astrometric data are not
403: precise enough to detect the subsystem motions.
404:
405: The combined simultaneous fit to all data sets has 26 free parameters and
406: 626 degrees of freedom. The parameters used are listed in the top half of
407: Table \ref{muOriOrbitModels} with their associated best-fit values and
408: $1\sigma$ uncertainties. It should be noted that while the Ba-Bb
409: eccentricity has been allowed to vary as a free parameter, the best fit value
410: is consistent with zero and could have been fixed; the other parameters are
411: not changed significantly by doing so. Quantities of interest derived from
412: those parameters are listed in the second half of that table, with
413: corresponding uncertainties derived from first-order uncertainty
414: propagation. The apparent center-of-light wobbles of the
415: Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb subsystems are plotted in Figure \ref{MuOriOrbit}; the A-B
416: and RV orbits were plotted in F2002 and are not significantly different in
417: the present model.
418:
419: Including PHASES measurements in the fit introduces the ability to
420: evaluate the inclination and luminosity ratio of the Aa-Ab system and angles
421: of the nodes of the Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb systems, quantities that were entirely
422: unconstrained in the F2002 study. The A-B angular parameters have much
423: smaller uncertainties than in F2002 (the $\Omega_{\rm AB}$, $i_{\rm AB}$, and
424: $\omega_{\rm AB}$ uncertainties are reduced by $13\times$, $6\times$, and
425: $5\times$, respectively). Uncertainties in the A-B period, eccentricity, and
426: epoch of periastron passage are improved by a factor of 2 or more. Most
427: other fit parameters are constrained only marginally better than in F2002.
428:
429: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
430: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
431: \tablecolumns{9}
432: \tablewidth{0pc}
433: \tablecaption{Orbital parameters for $\mu$ Ori\label{muOriOrbitModels}}
434: \tablehead{
435: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Aa} > L_{\rm Ab}$,}
436: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Aa} > L_{\rm Ab}$,}
437: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Aa} < L_{\rm Ab}$,}
438: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Aa} < L_{\rm Ab}$,} \\
439: \colhead{Parameter}
440: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Ba} > L_{\rm Bb}$}
441: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Ba} < L_{\rm Bb}$}
442: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Ba} > L_{\rm Bb}$}
443: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$L_{\rm Ba} < L_{\rm Bb}$} \\
444: }
445: \startdata
446: $\chi^2$
447: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{723.86}
448: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{723.86}
449: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{723.58}
450: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{723.58} \\
451: $P_{\rm AB}$ (days)
452: & $6813.8 $ & $\pm 1.2$
453: & \nodata & \nodata % & $6813.8 $ & $\pm 1.2$
454: & \nodata & \nodata % & $6813.9 $ & $\pm 1.2$
455: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $6813.9 $ & $\pm 1.2$ \\
456: $e_{\rm AB}$
457: & $0.7410 $ & $\pm 0.0011$
458: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.7410 $ & $\pm 0.0011$
459: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.7411 $ & $\pm 0.0011$
460: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.7411 $ & $\pm 0.0011$ \\
461: $i_{\rm AB}$ (degrees)
462: & $96.028 $ & $\pm 0.028$
463: & \nodata & \nodata % & $96.028 $ & $\pm 0.028$
464: & \nodata & \nodata % & $96.028 $ & $\pm 0.028$
465: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $96.028 $ & $\pm 0.028$ \\
466: $\omega_{\rm AB}$ (degrees)
467: & $36.712 $ & $\pm 0.066$
468: & \nodata & \nodata % & $36.712 $ & $\pm 0.066$
469: & \nodata & \nodata % & $36.711 $ & $\pm 0.066$
470: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $36.711 $ & $\pm 0.066$ \\
471: $T_{\rm AB}$ (MHJD)
472: & $46090.7 $ & $\pm 1.0$
473: & \nodata & \nodata % & $46090.7 $ & $\pm 1.0$
474: & \nodata & \nodata % & $46090.7 $ & $\pm 1.0$
475: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $46090.7 $ & $\pm 1.0$ \\
476: $\Omega_{\rm AB}$ (degrees)
477: & $204.877 $ & $\pm 0.011$
478: & \nodata & \nodata % & $204.877 $ & $\pm 0.011$
479: & \nodata & \nodata % & $204.878 $ & $\pm 0.011$
480: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $204.878 $ & $\pm 0.011$ \\
481: $P_{\rm AaAb}$ (days)
482: & $4.4475849 $ & $\pm 1.2\times 10^{-6}$
483: & \nodata & \nodata % & $4.4475849 $ & $\pm 1.2\times 10^{-6}$
484: & \nodata & \nodata % & $4.4475849 $ & $\pm 1.2\times 10^{-6}$
485: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $4.4475849 $ & $\pm 1.2\times 10^{-6}$ \\
486: $e_{\rm AaAb}$
487: & $0.0037 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
488: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.0037 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
489: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.0036 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
490: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.0036 $ & $\pm 0.0014$ \\
491: $i_{\rm AaAb}$ (degrees)
492: & $47.1 $ & $\pm 9.0$
493: & \nodata & \nodata % & $47.1 $ & $\pm 9.0$
494: & $50.0 $ & $\pm 8.1$
495: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $50.0 $ & $\pm 8.1$ \\
496: $\omega_{\rm AaAb}$ (degrees)
497: & $304 $ & $\pm 21$
498: & \nodata & \nodata % & $304 $ & $\pm 21$
499: & \nodata & \nodata % & $305 $ & $\pm 21$
500: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $305 $ & $\pm 21$ \\
501: $T_{\rm AaAb}$ (MHJD)
502: & $43739.69 $ & $\pm 0.26$
503: & \nodata & \nodata % & $43739.69 $ & $\pm 0.26$
504: & \nodata & \nodata % & $43739.69 $ & $\pm 0.26$
505: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $43739.69 $ & $\pm 0.26$ \\
506: $\Omega_{\rm AaAb}$ (degrees)
507: & $50.5 $ & $\pm 3.7$
508: & \nodata & \nodata % & $50.5 $ & $\pm 3.7$
509: & $231.7 $ & $\pm 3.8$
510: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $231.7 $ & $\pm 3.8$ \\
511: $P_{\rm BaBb}$ (days)
512: & $4.7835349 $ & $\pm 3.0\times 10^{-6}$
513: & \nodata & \nodata % & $4.7835349 $ & $\pm 3.0\times 10^{-6}$
514: & \nodata & \nodata % & $4.7835349 $ & $\pm 3.0\times 10^{-6}$
515: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $4.7835349 $ & $\pm 3.0\times 10^{-6}$ \\
516: $e_{\rm BaBb}$
517: & $0.0016 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
518: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.0016 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
519: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.0016 $ & $\pm 0.0014$
520: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.0016 $ & $\pm 0.0014$ \\
521: $i_{\rm BaBb}$ (degrees)
522: & $110.71 $ & $\pm 0.73$
523: & \nodata & \nodata % & $110.71 $ & $\pm 0.73$
524: & \nodata & \nodata % & $110.72 $ & $\pm 0.73$
525: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $110.72 $ & $\pm 0.73$ \\
526: $\omega_{\rm BaBb}$ (degrees)
527: & $217 $ & $\pm 47$
528: & \nodata & \nodata % & $217 $ & $\pm 47$
529: & \nodata & \nodata % & $217 $ & $\pm 47$
530: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $217 $ & $\pm 47$ \\
531: $T_{\rm BaBb}$ (MHJD)
532: & $43746.40 $ & $\pm 0.63$
533: & \nodata & \nodata % & $43746.40 $ & $\pm 0.63$
534: & \nodata & \nodata % & $43746.40 $ & $\pm 0.63$
535: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $43746.40 $ & $\pm 0.63$ \\
536: $\Omega_{\rm BaBb}$ (degrees)
537: & $111.3 $ & $\pm 3.9$
538: & $291.3 $ & $\pm 3.9$
539: & $111.3 $ & $\pm 4.0$
540: & $291.3 $ & $\pm 4.0$ \\
541: $M_{\rm A}$ ($\Msun$)
542: & $3.030 $ & $\pm 0.069$
543: & \nodata & \nodata % & $3.030 $ & $\pm 0.069$
544: & \nodata & \nodata % & $3.031 $ & $\pm 0.069$
545: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $3.031 $ & $\pm 0.069$ \\
546: $M_{\rm B}$ ($\Msun$)
547: & $2.746 $ & $\pm 0.038$
548: & \nodata & \nodata % & $2.746 $ & $\pm 0.038$
549: & \nodata & \nodata % & $2.746 $ & $\pm 0.038$
550: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $2.746 $ & $\pm 0.038$ \\
551: $M_{\rm Ab}/M_{\rm Aa}$
552: & $0.274 $ & $\pm 0.051$
553: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.274 $ & $\pm 0.051$
554: & $0.259 $ & $\pm 0.039$
555: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.259 $ & $\pm 0.039$ \\
556: $M_{\rm Bb}/M_{\rm Ba}$
557: & $0.9764 $ & $\pm 0.0022$
558: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.9764 $ & $\pm 0.0022$
559: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.9764 $ & $\pm 0.0022$
560: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.9764 $ & $\pm 0.0022$ \\
561: $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa}$
562: & $0 $ & $\pm 0.040$
563: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0 $ & $\pm 0.040$
564: & $0.738 $ & $\pm 0.061$
565: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.738 $ & $\pm 0.061$ \\
566: $L_{\rm Bb}/L_{\rm Ba}$
567: & $0.765 $ & $\pm 0.055$
568: & $1.246 $ & $\pm 0.089$
569: & $0.773 $ & $\pm 0.055$
570: & $1.233 $ & $\pm 0.088$ \\
571: $d$ (parsecs)
572: & $46.11 $ & $\pm 0.28$
573: & \nodata & \nodata % & $46.11 $ & $\pm 0.28$
574: & \nodata & \nodata % & $46.11 $ & $\pm 0.28$
575: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $46.11 $ & $\pm 0.28$ \\
576: $V_{0}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$)
577: & $42.548 $ & $\pm 0.027$
578: & \nodata & \nodata % & $42.548 $ & $\pm 0.027$
579: & \nodata & \nodata % & $42.549 $ & $\pm 0.027$
580: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $42.549 $ & $\pm 0.027$ \\
581: \tableline
582: $M_{\rm Aa}$ ($\Msun$)
583: & $2.38 $ & $\pm 0.11 $
584: & \nodata & \nodata % & $2.38 $ & $\pm 0.11 $
585: & $2.408 $ & $\pm 0.092 $
586: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $2.408 $ & $\pm 0.092 $ \\
587: $M_{\rm Ab}$ ($\Msun$)
588: & $0.652 $ & $\pm 0.097 $
589: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.652 $ & $\pm 0.097 $
590: & $0.623 $ & $\pm 0.075 $
591: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.623 $ & $\pm 0.075 $ \\
592: $M_{\rm Ba}$ ($\Msun$)
593: & $1.389 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
594: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.389 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
595: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.390 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
596: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.390 $ & $\pm 0.019 $ \\
597: $M_{\rm Bb}$ ($\Msun$)
598: & $1.356 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
599: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.356 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
600: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.357 $ & $\pm 0.019 $
601: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.357 $ & $\pm 0.019 $ \\
602: $\Phi_{\rm AB-AaAb}$ (degrees)
603: & $136.7 $ & $\pm 8.3 $
604: & \nodata & \nodata % & $136.7 $ & $\pm 8.3 $
605: & $52.2 $ & $\pm 6.1 $
606: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $52.2 $ & $\pm 6.1 $ \\
607: $\Phi_{\rm AB-BaBb}$ (degrees)
608: & $91.2 $ & $\pm 3.6 $
609: & $84.5 $ & $\pm 3.6 $
610: & $91.2 $ & $\pm 3.8 $
611: & $84.5 $ & $\pm 3.8 $ \\
612: $\Phi_{\rm AaAb-BaBb}$ (degrees)
613: & $84.6 $ & $\pm 4.9 $
614: & $125.1 $ & $\pm 6.0 $
615: & $126.2 $ & $\pm 5.9 $
616: & $82.2 $ & $\pm 4.8 $ \\
617: $a_{\rm AB}$ (mas)
618: & $273.7 $ & $\pm 2.1$
619: & \nodata & \nodata % & $273.7 $ & $\pm 2.1$
620: & \nodata & \nodata % & $273.7 $ & $\pm 2.1$
621: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $273.7 $ & $\pm 2.1$ \\
622: $a_{\rm AB}$ (AU)
623: & $12.620 $ & $\pm 0.057$
624: & \nodata & \nodata % & $12.620 $ & $\pm 0.057$
625: & \nodata & \nodata % & $12.622 $ & $\pm 0.057$
626: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $12.622 $ & $\pm 0.057$ \\
627: $a_{\rm AaAb, COL}$ ($\microas$)
628: & $358 $ & $\pm 84$
629: & \nodata & \nodata % & $358 $ & $\pm 84$
630: & $364 $ & $\pm 53$
631: & \nodata & \nodata \\% & $364 $ & $\pm 53$ \\
632: $a_{\rm AaAb}$ (mas)
633: & $1.661 $ & $\pm 0.016$
634: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.661 $ & $\pm 0.016$
635: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.661 $ & $\pm 0.016$
636: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.661 $ & $\pm 0.016$ \\
637: $a_{\rm AaAb}$ (AU)
638: & $0.07659 $ & $\pm 0.00058$
639: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.07659 $ & $\pm 0.00058$
640: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.07660 $ & $\pm 0.00058$
641: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.07660 $ & $\pm 0.00058$ \\
642: $a_{\rm BaBb, COL}$ ($\microas$)
643: & $102 $ & $\pm 30$
644: & \nodata & \nodata % & $102 $ & $\pm 30$
645: & $98 $ & $\pm 30$
646: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $98 $ & $\pm 30$ \\
647: $a_{\rm BaBb}$ (mas)
648: & $1.688 $ & $\pm 0.013$
649: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.688 $ & $\pm 0.013$
650: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.687 $ & $\pm 0.013$
651: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.687 $ & $\pm 0.013$ \\
652: $a_{\rm BaBb}$ (AU)
653: & $0.07780 $ & $\pm 0.00036$
654: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.07780 $ & $\pm 0.00036$
655: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0.07781 $ & $\pm 0.00036$
656: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $0.07781 $ & $\pm 0.00036$ \\
657: $\pi$ (mas)
658: & $21.69 $ & $\pm 0.13$
659: & \nodata & \nodata % & $21.69 $ & $\pm 0.13$
660: & \nodata & \nodata % & $21.69 $ & $\pm 0.13$
661: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $21.69 $ & $\pm 0.13$ \\
662: $K_{\rm Aa}$
663: & $1.03 $ & $\pm 0.26$
664: & \nodata & \nodata % & $1.03 $ & $\pm 0.26$
665: & $1.64 $ & $\pm 0.26$
666: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.64 $ & $\pm 0.26$ \\
667: $K_{\rm Ab}$
668: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$ > 4.58$}
669: & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\nodata} % & $ > 4.58$ &
670: & $1.96 $ & $\pm 0.27$
671: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $1.96 $ & $\pm 0.27$ \\
672: $K_{\rm Ba}$
673: & $1.72 $ & $\pm 0.26$
674: & $1.99 $ & $\pm 0.26$
675: & $1.73 $ & $\pm 0.26$
676: & $1.98 $ & $\pm 0.26$ \\
677: $K_{\rm Bb}$
678: & $2.02 $ & $\pm 0.26$
679: & $1.75 $ & $\pm 0.26$
680: & $2.01 $ & $\pm 0.26$
681: & $1.75 $ & $\pm 0.26$ \\
682: $L_{K,\,{\rm Aa}}$
683: & $8.3 $ & $\pm 2.0$
684: & \nodata & \nodata % & $8.3 $ & $\pm 2.0$
685: & $4.8 $ & $\pm 1.2$
686: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $4.8 $ & $\pm 1.2$ \\
687: $L_{K,\,{\rm Ab}}$
688: & $0 $ & $\pm 0.33 $
689: & \nodata & \nodata % & $0 $ & $\pm 0.33 $
690: & $3.52 $ & $\pm 0.86$
691: & \nodata & \nodata \\ % & $3.52 $ & $\pm 0.86$ \\
692: $L_{K,\,{\rm Ba}}$
693: & $4.4 $ & $\pm 1.1$
694: & $3.45 $ & $\pm 0.84$
695: & $4.4 $ & $\pm 1.1$
696: & $3.47 $ & $\pm 0.84$ \\
697: $L_{K,\,{\rm Bb}}$
698: & $3.35 $ & $\pm 0.82$
699: & $4.3 $ & $\pm 1.0$
700: & $3.38 $ & $\pm 0.82$
701: & $4.3 $ & $\pm 1.0$ \\
702: \enddata
703: \tablecomments{
704: Orbital parameters for $\mu$ Ori. In the second, third, and fourth solutions,
705: ellipses indicate a parameter that changes by less than two units in the last
706: reported digit from the previous model. In the combined fits, all parameter
707: uncertainties have been increased by a factor of $\sqrt{\chi_r^2} = 1.08$
708: (though the $\chi_r^2$ of the combined fit is artificial due to rescaling the
709: uncertainties of the individual data sets, this reflects the degree to which
710: the data sets agree with each other).
711: The first solution is strongly preferred as it produces masses and
712: luminosities that are correlated; the second is also possible because the
713: stars Ba and Bb are very similar. The third and fourth solutions require an
714: unlikely luminosity for component Ab, given its mass, and are not preferred.
715: $a_{\rm COL}$ is the semimajor axis of the motion of the center-of-light of a
716: subsystem, at K-band. $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Y}$ is the K-band luminosity ratio
717: between components X and Y. $K$ is the K-band absolute magnitude, $L_K$ is
718: K-band luminosity, in solar units. For the first two solutions,
719: the best fit solution yields $K_{\rm Ab}$ is infinite; a lower limit is
720: determined by setting $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa}$ to the upper limit of its
721: $1\sigma$ uncertainty range.
722: }
723: \end{deluxetable}
724:
725: \begin{figure}[]
726: %%\epsscale{0.6}
727: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
728: \caption[The Orbit of $\mu$ Ori]
729: { \label{MuOriOrbit}
730: The astrometric orbits of $\mu$ Ori Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb, phase-wrapped about their
731: respective orbital periods. Phase zero is at the epoch of periastron passage
732: ($T$), and each plot is repeated for two cycles (and each measurement is
733: plotted twice) to allow for continuity at all parts of the graph. In both
734: cases, the
735: motions of the A-B system and of the other subsystem have been removed.
736: The projection axis shown for each is 159 degrees East of North (equivalent to
737: position angle 291 degrees), well aligned with the minor axis of many PHASES
738: observations. The plotted uncertainties are those projected along this axis,
739: and have been increased by a factor of 1.73 over the formal
740: uncertainties, to reflect excess noise within the PHASES set. On the left is
741: the motion of Aa-Ab;
742: for clarity, only those observations with rescaled and projected uncertainties
743: less than 200 $\microas$ have been plotted; on the right is the motion of
744: Ba-Bb, for which the cutoff was at 30 $\microas$.
745: }
746: \end{figure}
747:
748: \subsection{Relative Orbital Inclinations}
749:
750: In systems with three or more stars, studying the system coplanarity is of
751: interest for understanding the formation and evolution of multiples
752: \citep{Sterzik2002}. To determine this without ambiguity, one must have both
753: visual and RV orbital solutions for pairs of interest. Previously, this was
754: available only in six triples \citep[for a listing, see][]{Mut06_v819her}.
755: The reason mutual inclination measurements have been rare is due to the
756: observational challenges these systems present---RV signals are largest for
757: compact pairs of stars, whereas astrometry prefers wider pairs. The ``wide''
758: pair must be studied with RV and thus have an orbital period (and
759: corresponding separation) as short as the two-component binaries that are
760: already challenging to visual studies. The ``narrow'' pair is even smaller.
761: The mutual inclination between two orbits is given by:
762: \begin{equation}\label{KapPegMutualInclination}
763: \cos \Phi = \cos i_1 \cos i_2 + \sin i_1 \sin i_2
764: \cos\left(\Omega_1 - \Omega_2\right)
765: \end{equation}
766: \noindent where $i_1$ and $i_2$ are the orbital inclinations and $\Omega_1$
767: and $\Omega_2$ are the longitudes of the ascending nodes. If only
768: velocities are
769: available for one system, the orientation of that orbit is unknown (even if it
770: is eclipsing, the longitude of the ascending node is unknown). If velocities
771: are unavailable for a given orbit, there is a degeneracy in which node is
772: ascending---two values separated by 180 degrees are possible. This gives two
773: degenerate solutions for the mutual inclination (not necessarily separated by
774: 180 degrees).
775:
776: Even when a center-of-light astrometric orbit is available for the narrow
777: pair, there can be a degeneracy between which node is ascending and the
778: luminosity ratio. Having found one possible luminosity ratio
779: $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa} = L_1$, it can be shown that the other possible
780: solution, corresponding to changing the ascending node by 180 degrees, is
781: given by
782: \begin{equation}\label{eqLum}
783: L_2 = \frac{2R+RL_1-L_1}{1+2L_1-R}
784: \end{equation}
785: \noindent where $R$ is the mass ratio $M_{\rm Ab}/M_{\rm Aa}$. In previous
786: studies, support data has been available to lift that degeneracy. For
787: example, in the V819 Her system \citep{Mut06_v819her}, the two possible
788: luminosity ratios were $0.26$ and $1.89$. The eclipsing nature of the Ba-Bb
789: pair lifted that degeneracy because it helped establish that the luminosity
790: ratio is much less than 1. Similarly, in the $\kappa$ Peg system
791: \citep{Mut06_kappeg}, the spectra used for RV also show that component Bb is
792: much fainter than Ba, again lifting the degeneracy (a luminosity ratio either
793: nearly zero or 1.9 were both possible).
794:
795: For a quadruple system, there are as many as four degenerate fit solutions.
796: For $\mu$ Ori, a global minimum $\chi^2$ is found with longitude of the
797: ascending node $\Omega_{\rm AaAb} = 231.7 \pm 3.8$ degrees and
798: $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa} = 0.738 \pm 0.061$. The alternative pair of these
799: parameters solving eq.~\ref{eqLum} would force the luminosity ratio to
800: a negative value (but close to zero within uncertainties). However, searching
801: for solutions with nonnegative luminosity ratios near zero yields a fit
802: solution with only slightly larger $\chi^2$, and the node at roughly 180
803: degrees difference ($\Omega_{\rm AaAb} = 50.5 \pm 3.7$ and
804: $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa} = 0 \pm 0.040$). All parameters other than the node
805: angle and luminosity ratio vary between the two models by amounts less than
806: the fit uncertainties. The two solutions find
807: $M_{\rm Ab}/M_{\rm Aa} = 0.259 \pm 0.039$ or $ 0.274 \pm 0.051$ respectively;
808: given the rough scaling $L \propto M^4$ \citep{MassLuminosity},
809: it is very likely that the larger luminosity ratio is
810: incorrect. The larger luminosity ratio would also imply Ab is as bright as
811: Ba or Bb. However, component Ab is not observed in the spectrum while Ba and
812: Bb are. This is suggestive that Ab is faint, though it is also possible to
813: explain this lack of Ab lines by postulating it is rapidly rotating. However,
814: given that the other stars are not rapid rotators, there is little evidence to
815: support Ab as a rapid rotator. It is concluded that the luminosity ratio near
816: zero is {\em strongly} preferred, despite the slightly worse $\chi^2$ fit.
817: Both fits are reported in Table \ref{muOriOrbitModels}, but the rest of the
818: discussion in this paper refers only to the preferred solution for Aa-Ab.
819: This degeneracy can be fully lifted by a single epoch image with a closure
820: phase capable interferometer with sufficient angular resolution
821: \citep[such as the Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer,][]{arm98}.
822:
823: For each of the Aa-Ab solutions, there exists two solutions for the Ba-Bb
824: pair. In these cases, no negative luminosity ratios are found; the degeneracy
825: is perfect and the $\chi^2$ of the fits are identical. $\Omega_{\rm BaBb}$
826: differs by 180 degrees in the two orbits, and the luminosity ratio
827: $L_{\rm Bb}/L_{\rm Ba}$ switches between being larger (at
828: $\Omega_{\rm BaBb} = 291$ degrees) or smaller (at 111 degrees) than unity;
829: all other parameters remain unchanged. Both solutions are near unity, and
830: the stars have very similar masses
831: ($M_{\rm Bb}/M_{\rm Ba} = 0.9764 \pm 0.0022$). While the solution for which
832: Bb is less luminous than Ba is slightly more consistent because it correlates
833: to the mass ratio, it is conceivable that the other solution is correct.
834: Thus, the solution for which Bb is less luminous than Ba is slightly
835: preferred, but not as conclusively as for the Aa-Ab case, where the
836: differences between the stars are more significant. Thus, both possibilities
837: are considered in the remainder of this paper.
838:
839: \subsection{Evidence for Kozai Cycles with Tidal Friction?}
840:
841: Of particular interest is the potential for Kozai oscillations between orbital
842: inclination and eccentricity in the narrow pairs \citep{Kozai1962}, which can
843: affect the orbital evolution of the system. These occur independent of
844: distances or component masses, with the only requirement being that the mutual
845: inclination is between 39.2 and $180-39.2=140.8$ degrees. Other effects that
846: cause precession can increase the value of this critical angle.
847:
848: \cite{Fabrycky2007} predict a buildup of mutual inclinations near 40 and 140
849: degrees by the combined effects of Kozai Cycles with Tidal Friction (KCTF)
850: for triples whose short-period subsystems have periods between 3 and
851: 10 days.
852: The mutual inclination of $\mu$ Ori AB-AaAb is near 140 degrees, leading one
853: to consider if this trend is starting to be seen. The systems with
854: unambiguous mutual inclinations break down as follows:
855:
856: \begin{itemize}
857: \item {\bf Five systems are outside of the 3-10 day inner period range.}
858: These systems do not meet the criteria to be included in testing the
859: buildup prediction:
860: \begin{enumerate}
861: \item V819 Her ($\Phi = 26.3\pm 1.5$ degrees, 2.23 d; see \S \ref{updates}),
862: \item Algol \citep[$\Phi = 98.8\pm 4.9$ degrees, 2.9 d; ][]{les93, PanAlgol},
863: \item $\eta$ Vir \citep[$\Phi = 30.8\pm 1.3$ degrees, 72 d; ][]{hum03},
864: \item $\xi$ Uma ABC \citep[$\Phi = 132.1$ degrees, 670 d; ][]{Heintz1996},
865: and
866: \item $\epsilon$ Hya ABC
867: \citep[$\Phi = 39.4$ degrees, 5500 d; ][]{Heintz1996}.
868: \end{enumerate}
869: These fall outside the 3-10 day range of inner-binary periods applicable to
870: the prediction in \cite{Fabrycky2007}. However, it is worth noting the
871: mutual inclinations of $\xi$ UMa and $\epsilon$ Hya {\em are} near 140 and 40
872: degrees respectively and in V819 Her and $\eta$ Vir the values are outside
873: the $40-140$ degrees range, so
874: neither would have been predicted to undergo Kozai cycles or KCTF. Algol has
875: a nearly perpendicular alignment, though the dynamics of Algol are different
876: due to quadrupole distortions in the semidetached stars; Algol's alignment
877: has been explained by \cite{eggleton2001}.
878: \item {\bf No systems are outside the 40-140 degrees range, while also in the
879: 3-10 day inner period range.}
880: \item {\bf Two systems are between 40 and 140 degrees and in the 3-10 day
881: inner period range.}
882: These systems would not support the KCTF-driven buildup near 40 and 140
883: degrees:
884: \begin{enumerate}
885: \item $\mu$ Ori AB-BaBb ($\Phi = 91.2 \pm 3.6$ or $84.5 \pm 3.6$
886: degrees are possible, 4.78 d) and
887: \item 88 Tau AaAb-Ab1Ab2
888: \citep[$\Phi = 82.0 \pm 3.3$ or $58 \pm 3.3$ degrees are possible, 7.89 d; ][]
889: {lane88Tau2007_draft}.
890: \end{enumerate}
891: While mutual inclination degeneracies continue to exist in both systems, all
892: possible values are in this range.
893: \item {\bf Three systems are near 40 or 140 degrees, and in the 3-10 day
894: inner period range.}
895: These systems would appear to support the KCTF prediction:
896: \begin{enumerate}
897: \item $\mu$ Ori AB-AaAb ($\Phi = 136.7 \pm 8.3$ degrees, 4.45 d),
898: \item 88 Tau AaAb-Aa1Aa2
899: \citep[$\Phi = 143.3 \pm 2.5$ degrees, 3.57 d; ][]{lane88Tau2007_draft}, and
900: \item $\kappa$ Peg
901: ($\Phi = 43.4\pm 3.9$ degrees, 5.97 d; see \S \ref{updates}).
902: \end{enumerate}
903: \end{itemize}
904:
905: In total, 3 of the 5 systems meeting the criteria for testing the KCTF
906: prediction do appear near the peak points of 40 and 140 degrees.
907: Following equations 1, 22, and 35 in \cite{Fabrycky2007}, in the presence of
908: general relativity (GR) precession one expects the critical angles for $\mu$
909: Ori AB-AaAb and $\kappa$ Peg to be increased from 39.2 degrees to $\sim 68$
910: ($\tau \dot{\omega}_{GR} = 2.3$) and
911: $\sim 54$ degrees ($\tau \dot{\omega}_{GR} = 1.3$),
912: respectively, while for 88 Tau AaAb-Aa1Aa2 GR precession
913: dominates no matter the inclination ($\tau \dot{\omega}_{GR} = 17$).
914: Thus, Kozai oscillations are suppressed
915: by precession in these systems' current states. However, it is possible these
916: were present at earlier stages in the systems' histories and their current
917: configurations were still reached through KCTF---the inner binaries may have
918: originally been more widely separated, in which case GR effects would have
919: been reduced.
920:
921: Alternatively, $\mu$ Ori AB-BaBb and 88 Tau AaAb-Ab1Ab2 both lie well within
922: the range of predicted Kozai cycles, even including GR precession (which
923: raises the critical angles to $\sim 58$ ($\tau \dot{\omega}_{GR} = 1.6$) and
924: $\sim 50$ degrees ($\tau \dot{\omega}_{GR} = 0.9$), respectively).
925:
926: Several more systems with double visual orbits but lacking RV for at least
927: one subsystem component are listed by \cite{Sterzik2002}. Two more
928: (HD 150680 and HD 214608) are mentioned by \cite{orlov2000} and one
929: more (HD 108500) by \cite{orlov2005}. Of these,
930: the inner pair in HD 150680 is doubtful and listing HD 214608 as having a
931: double visual orbit appears to be in error. In the
932: paper cited by \cite{orlov2000} for HD 214608, \cite{duq1987} reveal
933: it to be a double spectroscopic system, but point out that the the visual
934: elements of the inner pair are unconstrained. The value of 150 degrees for
935: the node seems to have been taken as nominal from the outer system (whose true
936: ascending node is 180 degrees different). Because the nodes cannot be
937: distinguished in the visual-only pairs, two values of the mutual inclinations
938: are equally possible for each. Furthermore, all have inner systems with
939: periods longer than 300 days. Thus, these cannot provide further direction
940: on testing the KCTF prediction.
941:
942: \subsection{Masses and Distance}
943:
944: Components Ba and Bb are each determined to $1.4\%$, Aa to $5\%$, while the
945: lowest mass member, Ab, is uncertain at the $15\%$ level. The individual
946: masses of Aa and Ab have not been previously determined; this study enables
947: the exploration of the natures of those stars. Both are members of star
948: classes of interest: Aa is of spectral type Am, and Ab has a mass in the
949: range of late K dwarfs. Through their physical association, it can
950: be assumed both are co-evolved with Ba and Bb, each within the mass range for
951: which stellar models have been well calibrated through observation.
952:
953: The masses of Ba and Bb are determined only slightly better (less than a
954: factor of 2 improvement) over the previous study by F2002.
955: Similarly, the distance is determined to $0.6\%$, a slight improvement.
956: The {\em Hipparcos} \citep{hipcat} based parallax values discussed
957: by \cite{Soder1999} ($21.5\pm 0.8$ mas in the original evaluation, revised to
958: $20.8 \pm 0.9$ mas when the binary nature was considered) are consistent with,
959: but less well constrained, than the current value of $21.69 \pm 0.13$ mas.
960:
961: \subsection{Component Luminosities}
962:
963: The 2MASS K-band magnitude for $\mu$ Ori is $m_{\rm Total} = 3.637\pm 0.260$
964: \citep{2MASS}. F2002 gives the difference between the luminosities
965: of A and B in several bands. Unfortunately, none of these were taken near
966: the K band (2.2 $\mu$m) where PTI operates. However, a Keck adaptive optics
967: image of $\mu$ Ori was obtained on MJD 53227 with a narrow band
968: ${\rm H_2}$ 2-1 filter centered at 2.2622 microns. The A-B differential
969: magnitude in this band is $m_A - m_B = \Delta m_{AB} = -0.073 \pm 0.007$
970: magnitudes; this measurement is reported for the first time here.
971:
972: The combined orbital fit provides the system distance $d = 46.11 \pm 0.28$
973: parsecs and the luminosity ratios. The combined set of
974: $m_{\rm Total}$, $\Delta m_{AB}$, $d$, $L_{\rm Ab}/L_{\rm Aa}$, and
975: $L_{\rm Bb}/L_{\rm Ba}$ determines the component luminosities. Using first
976: order error propagation, the K-band luminosities are
977: $L_{K,\,{\rm Aa}} = 8.3 \pm 2.0$ solar and less than a third solar for Ab.
978: Components Ba and Bb have K-band luminosities of either
979: $L_{K,\,{\rm Ba}} = 4.4 \pm 1.1$ and $L_{K,\,{\rm Bb}} = 3.35 \pm 0.82$ or
980: $L_{K,\,{\rm Ba}} = 3.45 \pm 0.84$ and $L_{K,\,{\rm Bb}} = 4.3 \pm 1.0$ solar.
981: Absolute magnitudes are also given in Table \ref{muOriOrbitModels}. In each
982: case, the uncertainty in the apparent magnitude $m_{\rm Total}$ dominates.
983:
984: \subsection{System Age and Evolutionary Tracks}
985:
986: The masses and absolute K-band magnitudes for the components in this system
987: can be compared to the stellar evolution models from \cite{Girardi2002}. As
988: in F2002, an abundance of $Z=0.02$ is assumed. Figure \ref{MuOriIsochrones}
989: shows the mass vs.~K-band magnitudes for several isochrones downloaded from
990: http://pleiadi.pd.astro.it/ and the values derived for the components of
991: $\mu$ Ori. As the most massive component, the properties of Aa provide the
992: strongest constraints on age, being most consistent with isochrones in the
993: age range of $10^8-10^{8.5}$ years. This is not entirely consistent with the
994: properties of Ba and Bb, though close. Of course, if KCTF has played a
995: significant role in the orbital evolution of this system, one wonders whether
996: stellar evolution models for single stars are really applicable to these
997: stars. One would anticipate the evolution of Aa as being affected by tidal
998: forces because it is part of the subsystem near the predicted 140 degree
999: ``pile-up''. Thus, one would rely more on Ba and Bb for system age
1000: determination, indicating an age over $10^9$ years.
1001:
1002: \begin{figure}[]
1003: \epsscale{0.5}
1004: \plotone{f2.eps}
1005: \caption[$\mu$ Ori Isochrones]
1006: { \label{MuOriIsochrones}
1007: Stellar evolution models predicting isochrones for the elements of the $\mu$
1008: Ori system show disagreement between component Aa with Ba and Bb. Curve
1009: labels give values of ${\rm \log (Age/years)}$. Component
1010: Aa provides the most leverage for determining the system age, though its
1011: evolution may have been altered by tidal friction.
1012: }
1013: \end{figure}
1014:
1015: \section{Updated Orbits}\label{updates}
1016:
1017: During the course of this investigation, a sign error was found in the
1018: analysis software that was used to compute orbital solutions
1019: for $\delta$ Equulei \citep{Mut05_delequ}, $\kappa$ Pegasi
1020: \citep{Mut06_kappeg}, and V819 Herculis \citep{Mut06_v819her}. This error
1021: affected
1022: fits to the radial velocity data only, with the result that the descending
1023: node was misidentified as the ascending, and the angle of periastron passage
1024: is off by 180 degrees. Because the software was self-consistent, this has no
1025: impact on the mutual inclinations derived. Additionally, the finite travel
1026: time of light across the wide orbit is included in the analysis, and this
1027: amount was thus incorrect by the same sign error, but the light travel time
1028: correction has only a small impact on those models. Both errors have since
1029: been corrected.
1030:
1031: Twenty-three new observations of $\delta$ Equ and 11 of $\kappa$ Peg have been
1032: collected since those initial investigations and are presented in Table
1033: \ref{phasesDataOthers}. Also presented in Table \ref{phasesDataOthers} is the
1034: complete set of 34 V819 Her PHASES observations with the 10 measurements taken
1035: during eclipses marked; the previous investigation used less precise methods
1036: for predicting eclipse times, so the flagged measurements have changed.
1037: Measurements made during eclipse are not used in fitting.
1038:
1039: The new analysis
1040: makes use of the V819 Her Ba-Bb inclination constraint derived by eclipse
1041: lightcurves, a feature not included in the previous study. When computing
1042: $\chi^2$, an additional term
1043: $(i_{\rm BaBb} - i_{\rm BaBb, \, eclipse})^2 /
1044: \sigma^2_{i {\rm , \, BaBb, \, eclipse}}$ is added to the sum, where
1045: $i_{\rm BaBb, \, eclipse} = 80.63$ and
1046: $\sigma_{i {\rm , \, BaBb, \, eclipse}} = 0.33$ degrees are the value and
1047: uncertainty of the Ba-Bb inclination from the lightcurve studies of
1048: \cite{vanHamme1994}. Note that this measurement results from an entirely
1049: independent data set. This added constraint lessens covariances between
1050: orbital elements.
1051:
1052: The corrected and updated orbital solutions are presented in Tables
1053: \ref{delEquOrbitModels} and \ref{OthersOrbitModels}, which are fit to the
1054: complete set of PHASES observations and the other astrometric and RV
1055: observations tabulated in those previous papers. (A few new measurement from
1056: speckle interferometry are available for each system since those
1057: investigations. These have little impact on the orbital solutions are not
1058: included in the present fit to avoid over-complicating this update.)
1059: The updated reweighting
1060: factors for the PHASES uncertainties for each data set are 3.91 for $\delta$
1061: Equ, 7.93 for $\kappa$ Peg, and 2.0 for V819 Her. Alternatively, the noise
1062: floor for $\kappa$ Peg is now found at 161 $\microas$.
1063:
1064: % grep FS9_SUM: ~/website/www/pcfs/data/stars/HDC206901/HDC206901.astrom.txt | grep -v '#' | sort -n | awk '{printf "kappa Peg & %.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}'
1065: % grep FS9_SUM: HDC202275.astrom_reweight.hmjd.txt | grep -v '#' | sort -n | awk '{printf "kappa Peg & %.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}'
1066: % grep FS9_SUM: HDC206901.astrom_reweight.hmjd.txt | grep -v '#' | sort -n | awk '{printf "kappa Peg & %.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}'
1067: % grep FS9_SUM: HDC157482.astrom.hmjd.txt | sort -n -k 2 | awk '{printf "V819 Her & %.5f & %.4f & %.4f & %.1f & %.1f & %.2f & %.1f & %.1f & %.5f & %d & & \\\\\n", $2, $3*1000.0, $4*1000.0, $8*1000000.0, $9*1000000.0, $10, $5*1000000.0, $6*1000000.0, $7, $11}'
1068:
1069: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllllllll}
1070: %\begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllllllll}
1071: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1072: \tablecolumns{15}
1073: \tablewidth{0pc}
1074: \tablecaption{New PHASES data for $\delta$ Equ, $\kappa$ Peg, and V819 Her\label{phasesDataOthers}}
1075: \tablehead{
1076: \colhead{Star} & \colhead{HJD-} & \colhead{$\delta$RA}
1077: & \colhead{$\delta$Dec} & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm min}$}
1078: & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm maj}$} & \colhead{$\phi_{\rm e}$}
1079: & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm RA}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{\rm Dec}$}
1080: & \colhead{$\frac{\sigma_{\rm RA, Dec}^2}{\sigma_{\rm RA}\sigma_{\rm Dec}}$}
1081: & \colhead{N} & \colhead{LDC} & \colhead{Align} & \colhead{Rate} & \colhead{Eclipse} \\
1082: \colhead{} & \colhead{2400000.5} & \colhead{(mas)}
1083: & \colhead{(mas)} & \colhead{($\microas$)}
1084: & \colhead{($\microas$)} & \colhead{(deg)}
1085: & \colhead{($\microas$)} & \colhead{($\microas$)}
1086: & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(Hz)} & \colhead{}
1087: }
1088: \startdata
1089: $\delta$ Equ & 53508.50939 & -86.2658 & -117.6468 & 25.7 & 1872.8
1090: & 150.49 & 1630.0 & 922.7 & -0.99949 & 263 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1091: $\delta$ Equ & 53550.41402 & -94.5630 & -143.7433 & 33.6 & 248.4
1092: & 151.98 & 219.8 & 120.4 & -0.94899 & 370 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1093: $\delta$ Equ & 53552.38996 & -95.1309 & -144.7397 & 10.0 & 85.5
1094: & 150.13 & 74.3 & 43.5 & -0.96437 & 1352 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1095: $\delta$ Equ & 53571.33634 & -99.1010 & -155.5409 & 9.8 & 68.1
1096: & 149.71 & 59.0 & 35.4 & -0.94762 & 1089 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1097: $\delta$ Equ & 53584.32135 & -101.4805 & -162.5823 & 10.4 & 104.4
1098: & 151.49 & 91.9 & 50.7 & -0.97257 & 774 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1099: $\delta$ Equ & 53586.30477 & -102.0695 & -163.5727 & 13.2 & 831.5
1100: & 150.94 & 726.8 & 404.0 & -0.99930 & 639 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1101: $\delta$ Equ & 53607.23078 & -105.7105 & -174.9135 & 3.1 & 80.6
1102: & 148.50 & 68.8 & 42.2 & -0.99617 & 4856 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1103: $\delta$ Equ & 53613.22582 & -107.1684 & -177.7125 & 6.7 & 243.8
1104: & 150.28 & 211.8 & 121.0 & -0.99794 & 1601 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1105: $\delta$ Equ & 53614.22329 & -106.8636 & -178.5240 & 5.9 & 174.7
1106: & 150.30 & 151.8 & 86.7 & -0.99697 & 1597 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1107: $\delta$ Equ & 53637.20185 & -111.2007 & -189.7814 & 12.3 & 357.4
1108: & 157.38 & 330.0 & 137.9 & -0.99531 & 570 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1109: $\delta$ Equ & 53656.13045 & -114.1207 & -198.7179 & 16.3 & 215.1
1110: & 154.15 & 193.8 & 94.9 & -0.98163 & 526 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1111: $\delta$ Equ & 53874.48665 & -133.8986 & -275.5257 & 12.3 & 424.2
1112: & 147.53 & 357.9 & 228.0 & -0.99794 & 264 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1113: $\delta$ Equ & 53909.42854 & -134.0082 & -283.8970 & 6.1 & 58.2
1114: & 152.62 & 51.7 & 27.3 & -0.96785 & 2646 & 0 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1115: $\delta$ Equ & 53957.31149 & -133.6026 & -293.0248 & 9.0 & 405.5
1116: & 154.61 & 366.4 & 174.1 & -0.99836 & 1127 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1117: $\delta$ Equ & 53970.25612 & -133.8368 & -294.8599 & 5.7 & 50.6
1118: & 153.56 & 45.3 & 23.1 & -0.96133 & 2387 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1119: $\delta$ Equ & 53971.25621 & -133.8811 & -294.9923 & 7.3 & 62.3
1120: & 152.11 & 55.1 & 29.8 & -0.96095 & 1682 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1121: $\delta$ Equ & 53977.26493 & -133.7524 & -295.9196 & 5.3 & 39.3
1122: & 157.55 & 36.4 & 15.8 & -0.93151 & 3320 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1123: $\delta$ Equ & 54003.21361 & -133.0033 & -299.3443 & 16.7 & 206.4
1124: & 161.12 & 195.4 & 68.6 & -0.96621 & 835 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1125: $\delta$ Equ & 54005.19180 & -133.0818 & -299.4815 & 11.6 & 115.3
1126: & 157.21 & 106.4 & 45.9 & -0.96173 & 1614 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1127: $\delta$ Equ & 54028.10922 & -132.3883 & -301.8627 & 13.3 & 406.9
1128: & 153.38 & 363.9 & 182.7 & -0.99668 & 632 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1129: $\delta$ Equ & 54037.11296 & -132.9388 & -302.3034 & 11.0 & 319.6
1130: & 159.14 & 298.7 & 114.3 & -0.99468 & 556 & 1 & 1 & 100 & 1 \\
1131: $\delta$ Equ & 54230.50355 & -116.0819 & -301.5397 & 13.1 & 508.2
1132: & 146.70 & 424.8 & 279.2 & -0.99843 & 933 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1133: $\delta$ Equ & 54266.47236 & -111.8997 & -297.2144 & 13.2 & 112.0
1134: & 158.12 & 104.1 & 43.5 & -0.94550 & 1315 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1135: $\kappa$ Peg & 53494.50786 & 104.6067 & 43.3687 & 13.6 & 645.9
1136: & 143.23 & 517.5 & 386.8 & -0.99904 & 702 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1137: $\kappa$ Peg & 53586.36471 & 83.9658 & 55.9066 & 2.2 & 11.5
1138: & 166.51 & 11.2 & 3.4 & -0.75093 & 5532 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1139: $\kappa$ Peg & 53637.29586 & 71.2323 & 62.9289 & 6.3 & 53.5
1140: & 173.82 & 53.2 & 8.5 & -0.66476 & 1639 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1141: $\kappa$ Peg & 53921.45172 & 25.0960 & 85.9815 & 43.1 & 10007.6
1142: & 160.71 & 9445.7 & 3306.4 & -0.99990 & 615 & 0 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1143: $\kappa$ Peg & 53963.35858 & -9.1846 & 98.3661 & 6.2 & 79.3
1144: & 165.54 & 76.8 & 20.7 & -0.95159 & 2244 & 1 & 1 & 100 & 1 \\
1145: $\kappa$ Peg & 53978.32708 & -14.0804 & 99.4673 & 2.7 & 17.5
1146: & 162.83 & 16.8 & 5.8 & -0.87056 & 5863 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1147: $\kappa$ Peg & 53995.24384 & -17.0621 & 101.1081 & 11.5 & 514.2
1148: & 159.38 & 481.3 & 181.5 & -0.99770 & 389 & 1 & 1 & 100 & 1 \\
1149: $\kappa$ Peg & 54003.32618 & -22.4829 & 101.1592 & 10.9 & 849.5
1150: & 3.09 & 848.2 & 47.1 & 0.97271 & 1590 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1151: $\kappa$ Peg & 54008.31093 & -21.6029 & 102.0991 & 4.6 & 114.1
1152: & 2.48 & 113.9 & 6.7 & 0.73308 & 2850 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1153: $\kappa$ Peg & 54075.12667 & -38.5846 & 107.2133 & 7.0 & 183.8
1154: & 3.06 & 183.5 & 12.0 & 0.81528 & 1756 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1155: $\kappa$ Peg & 54265.39966 & -84.8163 & 119.9685 & 8.2 & 389.0
1156: & 142.94 & 310.4 & 234.5 & -0.99904 & 3661 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 1 \\
1157: V819 Her & 53109.47951 & 49.6406 & -84.4966 & 7.3 & 282.5
1158: & 158.77 & 263.4 & 102.5 & -0.99707 & 2011 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1159: V819 Her & 53110.48183 & 48.0946 & -84.1334 & 11.9 & 600.4
1160: & 159.53 & 562.5 & 210.3 & -0.99819 & 1334 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1161: V819 Her & 53123.45772 & 49.1860 & -85.9318 & 18.1 & 507.8
1162: & 162.47 & 484.3 & 153.9 & -0.99240 & 1378 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1163: V819 Her & 53130.44208 & 48.4778 & -86.4135 & 6.6 & 205.8
1164: & 162.94 & 196.7 & 60.7 & -0.99360 & 2537 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1165: V819 Her & 53137.43044 & 48.3928 & -87.1396 & 14.0 & 280.2
1166: & 164.34 & 269.9 & 76.8 & -0.98202 & 1226 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1167: V819 Her & 53144.42426 & 47.7017 & -87.6612 & 25.1 & 1039.6
1168: & 167.13 & 1013.5 & 232.9 & -0.99386 & 897 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1169: V819 Her & 53145.39541 & 48.3082 & -87.8013 & 13.7 & 316.5
1170: & 161.59 & 300.3 & 100.8 & -0.98964 & 1673 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1171: V819 Her & 53168.33949 & 47.0275 & -89.7513 & 15.0 & 339.9
1172: & 162.93 & 325.0 & 100.8 & -0.98778 & 1409 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1173: V819 Her & 53172.35221 & 47.3441 & -90.1337 & 6.3 & 170.0
1174: & 168.29 & 166.5 & 35.1 & -0.98309 & 2560 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1175: V819 Her & 53173.33202 & 47.1604 & -90.3599 & 8.0 & 77.4
1176: & 33.97 & 64.4 & 43.8 & 0.97548 & 2904 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1177: V819 Her & 53181.33391 & 46.4333 & -90.7857 & 7.5 & 174.6
1178: & 169.71 & 171.8 & 32.1 & -0.97114 & 2795 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1179: V819 Her & 53182.33164 & 46.5646 & -91.0136 & 13.9 & 333.2
1180: & 169.62 & 327.8 & 61.6 & -0.97328 & 2014 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1181: V819 Her & 53186.30448 & 45.6584 & -91.1213 & 18.2 & 426.3
1182: & 166.80 & 415.1 & 99.0 & -0.98197 & 706 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1183: V819 Her & 53187.30462 & 46.1427 & -91.2225 & 13.0 & 441.5
1184: & 166.94 & 430.1 & 100.6 & -0.99110 & 1578 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1185: V819 Her & 53197.26851 & 46.1852 & -92.1522 & 4.8 & 117.1
1186: & 164.87 & 113.0 & 30.9 & -0.98715 & 5218 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1187: V819 Her & 53198.24258 & 46.2937 & -92.2555 & 5.7 & 54.6
1188: & 160.37 & 51.5 & 19.1 & -0.94836 & 5404 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1189: V819 Her & 53199.29186 & 44.0252 & -91.9446 & 24.7 & 1645.4
1190: & 171.42 & 1627.0 & 246.7 & -0.99488 & 946 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1191: V819 Her & 53208.25236 & 46.4303 & -92.4901 & 6.6 & 181.6
1192: & 37.67 & 143.8 & 111.1 & 0.99718 & 6558 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1193: V819 Her & 53214.24077 & 45.6337 & -93.3429 & 5.5 & 125.9
1194: & 169.45 & 123.8 & 23.7 & -0.97194 & 5251 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1195: V819 Her & 53215.23094 & 45.6364 & -93.5172 & 4.8 & 110.6
1196: & 167.53 & 108.0 & 24.3 & -0.97962 & 5723 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1197: V819 Her & 53221.22209 & 46.2559 & -92.9726 & 8.8 & 342.2
1198: & 38.91 & 266.3 & 215.0 & 0.99860 & 3998 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1199: V819 Her & 53228.20946 & 45.0884 & -94.3310 & 7.2 & 100.6
1200: & 169.45 & 98.9 & 19.7 & -0.92813 & 3180 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1201: V819 Her & 53229.22073 & 45.2196 & -94.5160 & 6.4 & 80.0
1202: & 172.84 & 79.4 & 11.8 & -0.83914 & 3905 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1203: V819 Her & 53233.18295 & 45.0993 & -94.8458 & 6.0 & 64.7
1204: & 167.67 & 63.2 & 15.0 & -0.91188 & 3303 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1205: V819 Her & 53234.20151 & 44.8269 & -94.7637 & 7.6 & 37.8
1206: & 172.74 & 37.5 & 8.9 & -0.51352 & 3701 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1207: V819 Her & 53235.21764 & 45.2153 & -94.9183 & 8.5 & 107.1
1208: & 176.57 & 106.9 & 10.6 & -0.60015 & 2094 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1209: V819 Her & 53236.16733 & 44.4598 & -94.8862 & 4.7 & 78.1
1210: & 166.59 & 76.0 & 18.7 & -0.96552 & 6684 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\
1211: V819 Her & 53249.16006 & 44.2467 & -95.8032 & 4.3 & 87.9
1212: & 172.71 & 87.2 & 12.0 & -0.93121 & 5428 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\
1213: V819 Her & 53466.52265 & 31.4132 & -102.8881 & 9.9 & 204.3
1214: & 163.01 & 195.4 & 60.4 & -0.98524 & 3031 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\ %05096
1215: V819 Her & 53481.50628 & 30.4432 & -103.3348 & 11.1 & 311.1
1216: & 38.18 & 244.6 & 192.5 & 0.99731 & 3301 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 0 \\ %05111
1217: V819 Her & 53494.45305 & 29.5257 & -103.1671 & 18.6 & 251.9
1218: & 163.98 & 242.2 & 71.8 & -0.96316 & 1355 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\ %05124
1219: V819 Her & 53585.24930 & 23.9818 & -102.6116 & 10.1 & 114.7
1220: & 174.02 & 114.0 & 15.6 & -0.76046 & 1479 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\ %05215
1221: V819 Her & 53874.42827 & 1.2427 & -88.7776 & 6.8 & 99.5
1222: & 168.07 & 97.4 & 21.6 & -0.94665 & 2358 & 0 & 0 & 100 & 1 \\ %06139
1223: V819 Her & 53956.21398 & -5.0810 & -81.9129 & 9.2 & 341.7
1224: & 170.23 & 336.8 & 58.7 & -0.98729 & 4028 & 1 & 1 & 50 & 0 \\ %06221
1225: \enddata
1226: \tablecomments{
1227: All quantities are in the ICRS 2000.0 reference frame. The uncertainty values
1228: presented in these data have not been rescaled.
1229: Column 1 is the star name. Columns 2-14 are as columns 1-13 in Table
1230: \ref{phasesDataMuOri}. Column 15 is 0 if the measurement was
1231: taken during a subsystem eclipse, 1 otherwise (V819 Her only).
1232: }
1233: \end{deluxetable}
1234: %\end{deluxetable}
1235:
1236: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
1237: \tablecolumns{3}
1238: \tablewidth{0pc}
1239: \tablecaption{Orbital parameters for $\delta$ Equ\label{delEquOrbitModels}}
1240: \tablehead{
1241: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value} & \colhead{Uncertainty}
1242: }
1243: \startdata
1244: $P$ (days) & 2084.03 & $\pm 0.10$ \\
1245: $T$ (MHJD) & 53112.071 & $\pm 0.052$ \\
1246: $e$ & 0.436851 & $\pm 0.000025$ \\
1247: $a$ (mas) & 231.9650 & $\pm 0.0080$ \\
1248: $V_{0, Lick}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$) & $-15.40$ & $\pm 0.11$ \\
1249: $V_{0, DAO}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$) & $-15.875$ & $\pm 0.080$ \\
1250: $V_{0, C}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$) & $-15.73$ & $\pm 0.10$ \\
1251: $M_1$ ($\Msun$) & 1.192 & $\pm 0.012$ \\
1252: $M_2$ ($\Msun$) & 1.187 & $\pm 0.012$ \\
1253: $M_1+M_2$ ($\Msun$) & 2.380 & $\pm 0.019$ \\
1254: $M_1/M_2$ & 1.004 & $\pm 0.012$ \\
1255: $i$ (deg) & 99.4083 & $\pm 0.0098$ \\
1256: $\omega$ (deg) & 7.735 & $\pm 0.013$ \\
1257: $\Omega$ (deg) & 23.362 & $\pm 0.012$ \\
1258: $d$ (pc) & 18.379 & $\pm 0.048$ \\
1259: \tableline
1260: $\pi$ (mas) & 54.41 & $\pm 0.14$ \\
1261: \enddata
1262: \tablecomments{
1263: All parameter uncertainties have been increased by a factor of
1264: $\sqrt{\chi_r^2} = 1.09$ (though the $\chi_r^2$ of the combined fit is
1265: artificial due to rescaling the uncertainties of the individual data sets,
1266: this reflects the degree to which the data sets agree with each other).
1267: The fit was repeated several times varying the set of non-degenerate
1268: parameters used in order to obtain uncertainty estimates for a number of
1269: desired quantities. The parameters $\{a, R=M_1/M_2\}$ were
1270: replaced with the sets $\{M=M_1+M_2, R\}$ and $\{M_1, M_2\}$.
1271: The parallax is a derived quantity.}
1272: \end{deluxetable}
1273:
1274: \begin{deluxetable}{lllll}
1275: %\begin{deluxetable}{lllll}
1276: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1277: \tablecolumns{5}
1278: \tablewidth{0pc}
1279: \tablecaption{Orbital parameters for $\kappa$ Peg and V819 Her\label{OthersOrbitModels}}
1280: \tablehead{
1281: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\kappa$ Peg} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{V819 Her} \\
1282: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value} & \colhead{Uncertainty} & \colhead{Value} & \colhead{Uncertainty}
1283: }
1284: \startdata
1285: $P_{AB}$ (days)
1286: & 4224.76 & $\pm 0.74$ & 2019.66 & $\pm 0.35$ \\
1287: $T_{AB}$ (MHJD)
1288: & 52401.52 & $\pm 0.96$ & 52627.5 & $\pm 1.3$ \\
1289: $e_{AB}$
1290: & 0.3140 & $\pm 0.0011$ & 0.67974 & $\pm 0.00066$ \\
1291: $i_{AB}$ (degrees)
1292: & 107.911 & $\pm 0.029$ & 56.40 & $\pm 0.13$ \\
1293: $\omega_{AB}$ (degrees)
1294: & 124.666 & $\pm 0.064$ & 222.50 & $\pm 0.22$ \\
1295: $\Omega_{AB}$ (degrees)
1296: & 289.037 & $\pm 0.021$ & 141.96 & $\pm 0.12$ \\
1297: $P_{BaBb}$ (days)
1298: & 5.9714971 & $\pm 1.3 \times10^{-6}$
1299: & 2.2296330 & $\pm 1.9 \times10^{-6}$ \\
1300: $T_{BaBb}$ (MHJD)
1301: & 52402.22 & $\pm 0.10$ & 52627.17 & $\pm 0.29$ \\
1302: $e_{BaBb}$
1303: & 0.0073 & $\pm 0.0013$ & 0.0041 & $\pm 0.0033$ \\
1304: $i_{BaBb}$ (degrees)
1305: & 125.7 & $\pm 5.1$ & 80.70 & $\pm 0.38$ \\
1306: $\omega_{BaBb}$ (degrees)
1307: & 179.0 & $\pm 6.0$ & 227 & $\pm 47$ \\
1308: $\Omega_{BaBb}$ (degrees)
1309: & 244.1 & $\pm 2.3$ & 131.1 & $\pm 4.1$ \\
1310: $V_{0, Keck}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$)
1311: & $-9.46$ & $\pm 0.22$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1312: $V_{1, Keck}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}\,day^{-1}}$)
1313: & $-2.2$ $\times 10^{-4}$ & $\pm 3.4 \times 10^{-4}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1314: $V_{2, Keck}$ (${\rm km\,s^{-1}\,day^{-2}}$)
1315: & $6.8 \times 10^{-6}$ & $\pm 2.4 \times 10^{-6}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1316: $V_{0, C}$ (${\rm km~s^{-1}}$)
1317: & $-9.40$ & $\pm 0.26$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1318: $V_{0, Lick}$ (${\rm km~s^{-1}}$)
1319: & $-8.37$ & $\pm 0.26$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
1320: $V_{0, M/K}$ (${\rm km~s^{-1}}$)
1321: & \nodata & \nodata & $-3.375$ & $\pm 0.059$ \\
1322: $V_{0, DAO}$ (${\rm km~s^{-1}}$)
1323: & \nodata & \nodata & $-3.385$ & $\pm 0.065$ \\
1324: $V_{0, DDO}$ (${\rm km~s^{-1}}$)
1325: & \nodata & \nodata & $-3.35$ & $\pm 0.12$ \\
1326: $M_A$ ($\Msun$)
1327: & 1.533 & $\pm 0.050$ & 1.799 & $\pm 0.098$ \\
1328: $M_{Ba+Bb}$ ($\Msun$)
1329: & 2.472 & $\pm 0.078$ & 2.560 & $\pm 0.067$ \\
1330: $M_{Bb}/M_{Ba}$
1331: & 0.501 & $\pm 0.049$ & 0.742 & $\pm 0.012$ \\
1332: $L_{Bb}/L_{Ba}$
1333: & 0.015 & $\pm 0.021$ & 0.280 & $\pm 0.037$ \\
1334: $d$ (parsecs)
1335: & 34.57 & $\pm 0.21$ & 68.65 & $\pm 0.87$ \\
1336: \tableline
1337: $\Phi_{\rm AB-BaBb}$ (degrees)
1338: & 43.4 & $\pm 3.9$ & 26.3 & $\pm 1.5$ \\
1339: $M_{Ba}$ ($\Msun$)
1340: & 1.646 & $\pm 0.074$ & 1.469 & $\pm 0.040$ \\
1341: $M_{Bb}$ ($\Msun$)
1342: & 0.825 & $\pm 0.059$ & 1.090 & $\pm 0.030$ \\
1343: $a_{AB}$ (AU)
1344: & 8.122 & $\pm 0.063$ & 5.108 & $\pm 0.046$ \\
1345: $a_{BaBb}$ (AU)
1346: & 0.08710 & $\pm 0.00091$ & 0.04569 & $\pm 0.00040$ \\
1347: $\pi$ (mas)
1348: & 28.93 & $\pm 0.18$ & 14.57 & $\pm 0.19$ \\
1349: \enddata
1350: \tablecomments{
1351: Uncertainties for $\kappa$ Pegasi are the maximum of three uncertainties:
1352: the uncertainty from the combined fit that included PHASES-reweighted data,
1353: that including PHASES data with a $161\microas$ noise floor, and the
1354: difference in the fit values for the two models. The parameters are the
1355: average values between a fit including the reweighted uncertainties and
1356: one with the noise floor.
1357: }
1358: \end{deluxetable}
1359: %\end{deluxetable}
1360:
1361: \section{Conclusions}
1362:
1363: The center-of-light astrometric motions of the Aa-Ab and Ba-Bb subsystems in
1364: $\mu$ Ori have been constrained by PHASES observations. While four degenerate
1365: orbital solutions exist, two of these can be excluded with high reliability
1366: based on mass-luminosity arguments, and the fact that Ab is not observed in
1367: the spectra. Ba and Bb are stars of a class (mid-F dwarfs) whose properties
1368: have been well established by studying other binaries. Their association with
1369: Aa and Ab, which are members of more poorly studied classes (Am and late K
1370: dwarfs) allows a better understanding of those objects in a system which can
1371: be assumed to be coevolved. The orbital solution finds masses and
1372: luminosities for all four components, the basic properties necessary in
1373: studying their natures.
1374:
1375: Complex dynamics must occur in $\mu$ Ori. The Ba-Bb orbital plane is nearly
1376: perpendicular to that of the A-B motion, and certainly undergoes Kozai-type
1377: inclination-eccentricity oscillations. It is possible that the mutual
1378: inclination of the A-B pair and Aa-Ab subsystem is a result of KCTF effects
1379: over the system's evolution.
1380:
1381: Finally, it is noted that the orbits in the $\mu$ Ori system are quite
1382: non-coplanar. This is in striking contrast with the planets of the solar
1383: system, but follows the trend seen in triple star systems. With the solar
1384: system being the only one whose coplanarity has been evaluated, it is
1385: difficult to draw conclusions about the configurations of planetary systems in
1386: general. It is important that future investigations evaluate the
1387: coplanarities
1388: of extrasolar planetary systems to establish a distribution. Whether that
1389: distribution will be the same or different than that of their stellar
1390: counterparts may point to similarities or differences in star and planet
1391: formation, and provide a key constraint on modeling multiple star and planet
1392: formation.
1393:
1394: \acknowledgements
1395: We thank Daniel Fabrycky for helpful correspondence about his recent
1396: theoretical work on KCTF. We thank Bill Hartkopf for providing weights for
1397: the new non-PHASES differential astrometry measurements.
1398: PHASES benefits from the efforts of the PTI collaboration members who have
1399: each contributed to the development of an extremely reliable observational
1400: instrument. Without this outstanding engineering effort to produce a solid
1401: foundation, advanced phase-referencing techniques would not have been
1402: possible. We thank PTI's night assistant Kevin Rykoski for his efforts to
1403: maintain PTI in excellent condition and operating PTI in phase-referencing
1404: mode every week. Part of the work described in this paper was performed at
1405: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory under contract with the National Aeronautics
1406: and Space Administration. Interferometer data was obtained at the Palomar
1407: Observatory with the NASA Palomar Testbed Interferometer, supported
1408: by NASA contracts to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This publication makes
1409: use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint
1410: project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and
1411: Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
1412: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.
1413: This research has made use of the Simbad database, operated at CDS,
1414: Strasbourg, France. MWM acknowledges support from the Townes Fellowship
1415: Program. PHASES is funded in part by the California Institute of Technology
1416: Astronomy Department, and by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
1417: under Grant No.~NNG05GJ58G issued through the Terrestrial Planet Finder
1418: Foundation Science Program. This work was supported in part by the National
1419: Science Foundation through grants AST 0300096, AST 0507590, and AST 005366.
1420: The work of FCF has been supported in part by NASA grant NCC5-511 and
1421: NSF grant HRD-9706268. MK is supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and
1422: Higher Education through grants N203 005 32/0449 and 1P03D 021 29.
1423:
1424: \bibliography{main}
1425: \bibliographystyle{plainnat}
1426:
1427: \end{document}
1428: