1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{graphicx,epsfig}
3:
4: \def\etal{{et al.}}
5: \def\kms{\ {\rm km~s}$^{-1} $}
6:
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Jets or high velocity flows revealed in high-cadence spectrometer and imager co-observations?}
11:
12:
13: \author{M.S. Madjarska\altaffilmark{1}, J.G. Doyle\altaffilmark{2}, D. Innes\altaffilmark{1}
14: and W. Curdt\altaffilmark{1}}
15:
16:
17: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Sonnensystemforschung, Max-Planck-Str. 2,
18: 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany}
19: \email{madjarska@mps.mpg.de}
20: \altaffiltext{2}{Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG,
21: N. Ireland}
22:
23: \shorttitle{Jets or high velocity flows}
24: \shortauthors{Madjarska et al.}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: We report on active region EUV dynamic events observed simultaneously at high-cadence
28: with SUMER/SoHO and TRACE. Although the features appear in the TRACE~Fe~{\sc ix/x}~171~\AA\
29: images as jets seen in projection on the solar disk, the SUMER spectral line profiles
30: suggest that the plasma has been driven along a curved large scale magnetic structure,
31: a pre-existing loop. The SUMER observations were carried out in spectral lines covering
32: a large temperature range from 10$^4$~K to 10$^6$~K. The spectral analysis revealed
33: that a sudden heating from an energy deposition is followed by a high velocity plasma flow.
34: The Doppler velocities were found to be in the range from 90 to 160 \kms.
35: The heating process has a duration which is below the SUMER exposure time of 25 {\rm s}
36: while the lifetime of the events is from 5 to 15 {\rm min}. The additional check on
37: soft X-ray Yohkoh images shows that the features most probably reach 3 MK (X-ray)
38: temperatures. The spectroscopic analysis showed no existence of cold material during the events.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{Sun: corona; Sun: transition region; line: profiles, methods: observational}
43:
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46: A large variety of jet-like phenomena are often observed in the solar atmosphere such
47: as surges, spicules, sprays, Extreme-UltraViolet (EUV) and X-ray jets. X-ray jets
48: (Shibata \etal\ 1992) were first identified in data obtained with the Soft X-ray
49: Telescope (SXT) on Yohkoh (Tsuneta \etal\ 1991). They represent X-ray enhancements
50: with an apparent collimated motion and were found to have a typical size of 5~$\times$~10$^3$ --
51: 4~$\times$~10$^5$~{\rm km} and an apparent velocity of 30 to 300 \kms. Their kinetic
52: energy is estimated to be 10$^{25}$ -- 10$^{28}$~{\rm ergs}. Most of the jets were associated
53: with small flares in large X-ray bright points or active regions. Shimojo \& Shibata (2000)
54: derived the physical parameters of X-ray jets and found temperatures from 3 to 8 MK (determined by
55: using Yohkoh filter ratios) and densities of 0.7 -- 4.0 $\times$ 10$^9$~{\rm cm}$^{-3}$.
56: It is strongly believed that they are produced by magnetic reconnection and represent the
57: evaporation flow resulting from the reconnection heating.
58:
59: EUV jets were studied by Brekke (1999) in off-limb data from the Coronal Diagnostics
60: Spectrometer (CDS) and the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT). From the
61: CDS data it was found that the jet was emitting only at transition region temperatures
62: showing Doppler shifts in the O~{\sc v} 629.73 \AA\ line up to -75 \kms. The event was
63: also seen in the EIT Fe~{\sc xii}~195~\AA\ passband propagating with an apparent velocity
64: of 180 \kms. The plasma seemed to be ejected along a large looped magnetic structure.
65: Jets were also analysed in on-disk data from
66: the Transition Region And Coronal Explorer (TRACE) taken in the 171~\AA\ and
67: 1216~\AA\ passbands by Alexander \& Fletcher (2000). In the 171~\AA\ channel the ejected
68: plasma was seen both in emission and absorption which suggests that simultaneously highly
69: collimated hot and cold material was ejected along the magnetic field lines. An EUV jet
70: from a new emerging active region (a large Bright Point) was analysed in simultaneous
71: TRACE, EIT and CDS data by Lin \etal\ (2006). The authors found the plasma jet to emit in a wide
72: temperature range from 10\,000~K (He~{\sc i}) to 2.5~MK (Fe~{\sc xvi}, the upper
73: temperature limit of their observations).
74:
75: H$_\alpha$ surges are often associated with EUV and X-ray emissions showing the co-existence of
76: cool (H$_\alpha$) and hot ejections of plasma (Jiang \etal\ 2007 and references therein).
77: Only recently, however, have the spatial and temporal relation of these emissions been
78: studied in detail (Jian \etal\ 2007) during surge events in a plage area
79: of an active region. The authors first observed the bright structures in TRACE 171 \AA\
80: followed by the cooler H$_\alpha$ jet which they interpret as cooling of the hot
81: plasma with a cooling time lasting about 6 -- 15 {\rm min}.
82:
83:
84:
85:
86: \section{Observations}
87:
88: The events discussed here occurred in the active region NOAA 8558 on 1999 June 2. No
89: flares were registered during the events. Simultaneous Solar Ultraviolet Measurements
90: of Emitted Radiation (SUMER) telescope and TRACE observations were taken
91: during several hours. The field-of-view (FOV) of the two instruments is shown in Figure~\ref{fig-1}.
92: EIT Fe~{\sc xii}~195~\AA\ single images for some of the events are also available,
93: as well as a few SXT images. In the present letter only TRACE and SUMER data will be shown.
94:
95:
96: The SUMER spectrometer (Wilhelm \etal\ 1995, Lemaire \etal\ 1997) data were taken on 1999 June 2
97: starting at 09:17~UT and ending at 11:02~UT. A slit with a size of 0\farcs3 $\times$
98: 120\arcsec\ was used exposing for 25~{\rm s} pointed at
99: the plage area of the active region between two sunspots (Figure~\ref{fig-1}). Four spectral
100: windows were telemetred, each with a size of 120 spatial $\times$ 50 spectral pixels.
101: The spectral lines read out are shown in
102: Table~\ref{table:1}. At the start of the observations the spectrometer was pointed at
103: solar disk coordinates
104: xcen~=~-217~\arcsec (at 09:17~UT) and ycen~=~257\arcsec. Subsequently, the observations
105: were compensated for the solar rotation. The spectral analysis was made in
106: respect to a reference spectrum obtained by averaging over the entire dataset.
107:
108: The TRACE (Handy \etal\ 1999) data were obtained in the Fe~{\sc ix/x}~171~\AA\ and 1600~\AA\
109: passbands starting at 09:00~UT and finishing at 11:30~UT on June 2, 1999.
110: The integration time was 2.9~{\rm s} for the 171~\AA\ passband and 0.3~{\rm s} for 1600~\AA.
111: The 171~\AA\ channel cadence was 10~{\rm s} which increased to 15 {\rm s} when an image in the
112: 1600~\AA\ channel was taken. From 09:18:38~UT until 09:32:28~UT only observations in the 1600~\AA\
113: channel were taken.
114:
115:
116: The co-alignment of SUMER and TRACE observations (spatial resolution of 1.5\arcsec\
117: and 1\arcsec, respectively) was done by using SUMER raster observations,
118: taken just before the time series in the Si~{\sc ii}~1260.44~\AA\ line
119: which falls in the transmitted O~{\sc v} 629.73~\AA\ spectral window, and TRACE~1600~\AA\ images.
120: The SUMER raster was obtained with 5~{\rm s} exposure time and 0.37\arcsec\ increment.
121: The emission in the TRACE~1600~\AA\ passband mainly comes from continuum emission, C~{\sc iv},
122: C~{\sc i}, and Fe~{\sc ii}. Note that the SUMER times mark the beginning of the exposures,
123: while the TRACE times the end of the exposures.
124:
125:
126: \section{Features analysis: temporal evolution, velocity and temperature}
127:
128: We identified three events in the SUMER data which we will call further in the text
129: EV1, EV2 and EV3. Only EV3 was fully co-registered by SUMER and TRACE. Figure~{\ref{fig-2}}
130: demonstrates through a sequence of difference images the appearance of EV3 as a jet-like event
131: in the TRACE images. The difference images were obtained by substracting an image taken
132: at 09:55:49~UT. The entire lifetime of EV1 and EV2 is only seen in the SUMER data, while
133: TRACE registered only the fading phase of these features.
134:
135:
136:
137: EV1 started at 09:20:29~UT (12 min before the first TRACE~171~\AA\ image after the observing gap,
138: see Section 2) with a sudden increase in the emission of the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line
139: (Figure~\ref{fig-3}, left) coupled with a Doppler shift of up to 30 \kms\ to the red. This
140: increase is seen over-imposed on the already relatively higher and red-shifted emission of
141: the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line due to a pre-existing feature (not discussed in this paper).
142: Around 2 {\rm min} later, at 09:22:20~UT, the emission in O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and
143: N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA\ started to increase rapidly as well, reaching a maximum around 75~{\rm s}
144: (three exposures) after the maximum in the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line. A strong red-shift
145: is seen in the O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ line (up to 110 \kms) and just a few \kms\ in
146: the N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA\ line.
147:
148: The detailed study on the line profiles revealed that the feature started with a sudden large
149: radiance increase of the rest component of the spectral lines and a red-shifted component.
150: This suggests that an energy deposition took place followed by a collimated high velocity plasma
151: flow. The heating process and the initial acceleration had a duration below the exposure time
152: of 25~{\rm s}. It took around 75~{\rm s} for the three lines (Mg~{\sc x}, O~{\sc V} and N{\sc v})
153: to reach their maximum with the response in O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA\, coming
154: approximately 75 {\rm s} (three exposures) later. That was followed by a further acceleration of the
155: flow and simultaneous decrease of the emission at the rest component in less
156: than a minute. We clearly see the cooling of the event as a delay in the response in
157: O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA\ (Figures~\ref{fig-3} and 4). The feature had
158: a stronger presence in the O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ lines and a modest response
159: in the N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA\ line with no signature at chromospheric
160: temperatures, indicating a high electron density (Doyle \etal\ 2006a). Its lifetime was
161: around 10 {\rm min}. The Doppler shifts in the O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\
162: line are in the range from 90 to 160 \kms\ derived from a double Gauss fit.
163:
164:
165:
166: EV 2 started 5 {\rm min} after EV1 around 09:25:05~UT appearing along the SUMER slit just
167: above EV2. The maximum emission in the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line lasted during 3 exposures
168: and the delay in the response of the transition region lines was again around 2 {\rm min}.
169: The first TRACE~171~\AA\ image at 09:32:28~UT revealed a jet-like event (see Figure~\ref{fig-1},
170: left). The time of this image corresponds to the decaying phase of the features seen in the
171: SUMER data (Figure~\ref{fig-3}, left). In the SUMER data at the start of EV2, it was still
172: possible to separate both features along the slit. During the decaying phase, however, the
173: events appeared as a single feature along the SUMER slit, and that is how they were seen
174: in the first TRACE image at 09:32:28~UT (see Figure~\ref{fig-1}, left).
175: In Figure~\ref{fig-4} the TRACE~171~\AA\ image taken at 09:32:28~UT and the time
176: corresponding SUMER spectral line profiles during the events (EV1 \& EV2) are shown. The
177: features appeared as a radiance increase of the rest component of the O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\
178: line (Figure~\ref{fig-3}) and a strong red-shifted component (Figure~\ref{fig-4}).
179: The same is observed in the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line although the Doppler shift is smaller.
180: No change in the emission of the chromospheric lines (Table 1) was observed. The width of
181: EV2 is around 3\arcsec\ derived from its projection along the SUMER slit.
182:
183:
184:
185: EV3 was registered during the observations starting at 09:59:52~UT with a width of
186: $\approx$3\arcsec\ (Figure~\ref{fig-1}, right). The temporal evolution of the amplitude of the
187: radiance derived from a single Gauss fit in all three spectral lines can be seen
188: in Figure~\ref{fig-3} (right). In Figure~\ref{fig-5} a TRACE 171 \AA\ image and the time
189: corresponding SUMER line profiles during EV3 are shown. The event showed the same
190: temporal behaviour as the events described above and had a duration of around 15~{\rm min}.
191: As for EV1 and EV2 no response was found in the chromospheric emission.
192:
193:
194: In order to find out with more precision whether cold plasma exist during the events
195: we studied the ratio of the continuum emission of the SUMER first and second
196: order radiation. The first order emission ($\sim$1238 \AA) is above the H Lyman limit,
197: while the second order ($\sim$629~\AA) is below. Second order emission will be absorbed
198: by H~{\sc i} along the line-of-sight and the first order emission not (for details on the
199: method see Innes \etal\ 2003). Therefore, the second- to first order ratio would show a
200: decrease if cold material existed along the line-of-sight. The ratio did not show any
201: changes which indicated that emission at low temperatures was not present. During all
202: three events brightenings were observed in SXT and EIT Fe~{\sc xii}~195 \AA\ data.
203: Such brightenings were often observed in SXT data and their energetics is studied
204: in detail by Shimizu (1995).
205:
206:
207:
208: \section{Discussion}
209: This letter presents, to our knowledge for the first time, EUV transient features in
210: an active region identified and analysed in on-disk SUMER data and simultaneously
211: obtained TRACE images. These instruments provide data at highest existing
212: (1.5\arcsec and 1\arcsec) spatial and 2 \kms\ spectral resolution (SUMER). Additionally,
213: the combination of spectrometer and imager data obtained at high cadence (25~{\rm s} and below)
214: permitted the temporal and spatial evolution, velocities and especially temperatures of EUV
215: active region transients to be derived with the highest possible precision. Three dynamic
216: events were studied in spectral lines covering a temperature range from 10$^4$ to 10$^6$~K.
217: All three features showed strong red-shifted emission in the O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and
218: Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ lines suggesting high velocity flows which propagate in a direction
219: away from the observer, i.e. towards the solar surface. Considering the
220: magnetic fields structure of the active region field by the loops seen in TRACE~171 \AA, we
221: suggest that the features although appearing with a jet-like structure in TRACE~171 \AA\ images
222: may rather represent a high velocity flow driven along a curved magnetic field, most
223: probably a pre-existing loop. No signature of the events was found at chromospheric
224: temperatures. Both EIT/Fe~{\sc xii}~195~\AA\ and Yohkoh/SXT showed brightenings in
225: a pixel row indicating the presence of a 1 to 3 MK plasma during the transients. The lower
226: resolution of these instuments ($\approx$6\arcsec) in comparison to TRACE (1\arcsec) do not permit
227: the events to be identified as jets.
228: The response in the transition region lines is delayed by around 2~{\rm min} in respect
229: to the coronal line suggesting cooling of the events. In the future hydrodynamic numerical
230: simulations (see for detail Doyle \etal\ 2006b) will be performed with the results
231: converted into observable quantities to be then compared with the present data.
232: We believe that the capabilities of the Hinode mission will bring a better
233: understanding on these features and, more important, the physical mechanism behind them.
234:
235: \acknowledgments
236: The SUMER project is financially supported by DLR, CNES, NASA, and PRODEX.
237: Armagh Observatory's research is grant-aided by the N. Ireland Dept. of
238: Culture, Arts \& Leisure.
239:
240: Facilities:\facility{SUMER/SoHO},
241: \facility{TRACE},
242: \facility{Yohkoh/SXT},
243: \facility{EIT/SoHO}
244:
245: \begin{thebibliography}{}
246: \bibitem[]{287} Alexander,~D. \& Fletcher,~L., 1999, \solphys, 190, 167
247: \bibitem[]{288} Brekke,~P., 1999, \solphys, 190, 379
248: %\b%\bibitem[]{289} Boris, J.~P. \& Mariska, J.~T., 1982, \apj, 258, L49
249: \bibitem[]{290} Doyle, J.~G., Ishak, B., Madjarska, M.~S., O'Shea, E. \& Dzif\'ckakov\'a, E., 2006a,
250: \aap, 451, L35
251: \bibitem[]{292} Doyle, J.~G., Taroyan, Y., Ishak, B., Madjarska, M.~S. \& Bradshaw, S.~J., 2006b,
252: \aap, 452, 1075
253: \bibitem[]{294} Handy, B.~N., Acton, L.~W., Kankelborg, C.~C., et al., 1999, \solphys, 187, 229
254: \bibitem[]{295} Innes, D.~E., McKenze, D.~E. \& Wang, T., 2003, \solphys, 217, 247
255: \bibitem[]{296} Jiang, Y.~C., Chen, H.~D., Li, K.~J., Shen, Y.~D. \& Yang, L.~H., 2007, \aap, 469, 331
256: \bibitem[]{297} Lemaire, P., Wilhelm, K., Curdt, W., et al., 1997, \solphys, 170. 105
257: \bibitem[]{298} Lin, Ch.-H., Banerjee, D., O'Shea, E. \& Doyle, J.~G., 2006, \aap, 450, 1181
258: \bibitem[]{299} Madjarska, M.~S., Doyle, J.~G., Ishak, B. \& Curdt, W., 2007, A\&A, to be submitted
259: \bibitem[]{301} Mazzotta, P., Mazzitelli, G., Colafrancesco, S. \& Vittorio, N., 1998, \aaps, 133, 403
260: \bibitem[]{306} Shibata, K., Nozawa, S. \& Matsumoto, R., 1992, \pasj, 44, 265
261: \bibitem[]{307} Shimojo, M. \& Shibata, K., 2000, \apj, 542, 1100
262: \bibitem[]{308} Tsuneta, S., Acton, L., Bruner, M. \etal, 1991, \solphys, 136, 37
263: \bibitem[]{309} Wilhelm, K., Curdt, W., Marsch, E., \etal., 1995, \solphys,
264: 162, 189
265:
266:
267: \end{thebibliography}
268:
269: \clearpage
270:
271: \begin{table}
272: \centering
273: \caption{The observed spectral lines.\label{table:1}}
274:
275: \begin{tabular}{c c c c c}
276: \hline\hline
277: Ion & $\lambda$(\AA) & log(T)$_{max}$ & Comment\\
278: \hline
279:
280: N~{\sc v} & 1238.82 & 5.3 & \\
281: C~{\sc i} & 1248.00 & 4.0 & \\
282: & 1248.88 & & blend\\
283: C~{\sc i} & 1249.00 & 4.0 & \\
284: O~{\sc iv}/2 & 1249.24 & 5.2& blend\\
285: Si~{\sc x}/2 & 1249.40 & 6.1 & blend\\
286: C~{\sc i} & 1249.41 & 4.0 & \\
287: Mg~{\sc x}/2 & 1249.90 & 6.1 & \\
288: O~{\sc iv}/2 &1250.25&5.2& blend\\
289: Si~{\sc ii} & 1250.09&4.1 & \\
290: Si~{\sc ii} & 1250.41 &4.1 & \\
291: C~{\sc i} & 1250.42 & 4.0 & blend\\
292: S~{\sc ii} & 1250.58 &4.2 &\\
293: Si~{\sc ii} & 1251.16 &4.1 & \\
294: C~{\sc i} & 1251.17 &4.0 & blend\\
295: O~{\sc iv}/2&1251.70&5.2&\\
296: Si~{\sc i} & 1258.78 &4.1 &\\
297: S~{\sc ii} & 1259.53 &4.2 &blend\\
298: O~{\sc v}/2&1259.54&5.4&& \\
299: Si~{\sc ii}&1260.44&4.1&\\
300: \hline
301: \tablenotetext{}{Note: The expression /2 means that the spectral line was observed
302: in second order. The comment `blend' means that the spectral line is
303: blending a close by line. The line formation temperatures are taken from CHIANTI v5.0
304: using the Mazzota \etal\ (1998) ionization equilibrium. }
305: \end{tabular}
306: \end{table}
307:
308:
309:
310: \clearpage
311:
312: \begin{figure}
313: \plottwo{f1a.ps}{f1b.ps}
314: \caption{Colour table reversed TRACE Fe~{\sc ix}~171~\AA\ images obtained on 1999 June 2.
315: The images are derotated to a reference time. The overplotted vertical line shows the
316: SUMER slit position.}
317: \label{fig-1}
318: \end{figure}
319:
320:
321: \begin{figure}
322: \epsscale{0.7}
323: \plotone{f2.ps}
324: \caption{TRACE 171 \AA\ image sequence of EV3. The dimenstions of the images are 100\arcsec
325: $\times$ 50\arcsec\
326: and were taken approximately 50 {\rm s} apart.
327: \label{fig-2}}
328: \end{figure}
329:
330:
331:
332: \begin{figure}
333: \epsscale{0.8}
334: \plottwo{f3a.ps}{f3b.ps}
335: \caption{{\bf Left:} The peak radiance (background substructed) averaged over 11 pixels along
336: the SUMER slit obtained from a single Gauss fit during EV1 and EV2. The solid line corresponds to
337: the Mg~{\sc x}~625~\AA\ line, dotted -- O~{\sc v}~629~\AA\ and dashed -- N~{\sc v}~1238~\AA.
338: The vertical solid line shows the time of the restart of the TRACE~171~\AA\ image taking
339: (see Section 2). The shaded area marks the time period during which another event appeared
340: along the line-of-sight unrelated to the features discussed here (See for details Madjarska
341: \etal\ 2007). {\bf Right:} The peak radiance (background substructed) averaged over 7 pixels along the
342: SUMER slit during EV3. The linestyles have the same correspondence as in the left Figure.
343: \label{fig-3}}
344:
345: \end{figure}
346:
347:
348: \begin{figure}
349: \epsscale{0.5}
350: \plotone{f4.ps}
351: \caption{{\bf Left:} TRACE 171 \AA\ color table reversed image showing the first two events
352: -- EV1 \& EV2. The time of the image corresponds to the vertical solid line on Figure~\ref{fig-2},
353: left. The vertical line marks the position of the SUMER slit, while the two horizontal lines
354: outline the slit position which was analysed in the SUMER data. {\bf Right:} The SUMER spectral
355: line profiles at 09:32:06~UT. The dotted lines show the reference spectra.
356: \label{fig-4}}
357: \end{figure}
358:
359:
360: \begin{figure}
361: \epsscale{0.5}
362: \plotone{f5.ps}
363: \caption{{\bf Left:} TRACE 171 \AA\ color table reversed image showing EV3.
364: The time of the image corresponds to the vertical solid line on Figure~\ref{fig-2},
365: right. The vertical line marks the position of the SUMER slit, while the two horizontal
366: lines outline the slit position which was analysed in the SUMER data. {\bf Right:}
367: The spectral line profiles at 10:01:16~UT. The dotted lines show the reference spectra.
368: \label{fig-5}}
369: \end{figure}
370:
371:
372:
373: \end{document}
374:
375: