1: %%
2: % International Cosmic Ray Conference 2007 Merida Yucatan Mexico
3: % In This file you will find detailed instructions to correctly
4: % typeset your document.
5: %
6: %
7: %
8:
9: %Class Requeried
10: \documentclass[dvips]{article}
11: %The ICRC Style
12: \usepackage{icrctc07}
13:
14: %The paper title
15: \title{A Search for Prompt Very High Energy Emission from Satellite-detected Gamma-ray Bursts using Milagro}
16: %Short title to print in the headers to the final publication (Not showed in this print).
17: \shorttitle{Search for VHE Emission from GRBs with Milagro}
18: %All paper authors
19: \authors{P. M. Saz Parkinson$^{1}$ \& B. L. Dingus$^{2}$ for the Milagro Collaboration.}
20: %Short title to print in the headers to the final puplication (Not showed in this print).
21: \shortauthors{Saz Parkinson \& Dingus}
22: %All the affiliations.
23: \afiliations{$^1$ Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, U. of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA\\ $^2$ Group P-23, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA}
24: \email{pablo@scipp.ucsc.edu; dingus@lanl.gov}
25:
26: %The abstract.
27: \abstract{Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been detected up to GeV energies and are predicted
28: by many models to emit in the very high energy (VHE, $>$ 100 GeV) regime too. Detection
29: of such emission would allow us to constrain GRB models. Since its launch, in late 2004,
30: the Swift satellite has been locating GRBs at a rate of approximately 100 per year. The
31: rapid localization and follow-up in many wavelengths has revealed new and unexpected
32: phenomena, such as delayed emission in the form of bright X-ray flares. The Milagro
33: gamma-ray observatory is a wide field of view (2 sr) instrument employing a water
34: Cherenkov detector to continuously ($>$ 90\% duty cycle) observe the overhead sky in
35: the 100 GeV to 100 TeV energy range. Over 100 GRBs are known to have been in the field
36: of view of Milagro since January 2000, including 57 since the launch of Swift (through May 2007).
37: We discuss the results of the searches for prompt emission from these bursts, as well as for delayed
38: emission from the X-ray flares observed in some of the Swift bursts.}
39:
40:
41: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
42:
43:
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% B E G I N D O C U M E N T%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45: \begin{document}
46: \maketitle
47: %Begin the section.
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: Almost 40 years after the detection of the first gamma-ray burst (GRB), many questions
52: remain about these powerful explosions. Progress in the field has accelerated in the
53: decade since the detection of the first X-ray afterglow~\cite{costa}. The launch of
54: Swift~\cite{gehrels}, in late 2004, has resulted in the rapid and accurate localization
55: of $\sim$100 GRBs per year. This has enabled an unprecedented number of multiwavelength follow-up
56: observations in every band of the electromagnetic spectrum, from radio to the highest energy gamma
57: rays, paving the way for a more complete understanding of these phenomena.
58:
59: The highest energy emission to be detected conclusively from GRBs was seen by the EGRET
60: instrument. EGRET detected several bursts above 100 MeV, with no evidence for a cut-off in the
61: spectrum~\cite{dingus01}. One burst in particular, GRB 940217, emitted an
62: 18 GeV photon over 90 minutes after the start of the burst~\cite{hurley94}. Another
63: burst, GRB 941017, was found to display a second, higher energy, spectral component which
64: extended up to at least 200 MeV and decayed more slowly than the lower energy component~\cite{gonzalez03}.
65: On this evidence alone, the expectations are that the upcoming launch of GLAST, with its much
66: higher sensitivity than EGRET, will result in a large number of detections at high energies, leading
67: to a better understanding of the GeV properties of GRBs.
68:
69: At very high energy (VHE, $>$100 GeV), there have been no conclusive detections of GRBs, although there
70: have been several tantalizing hints of emission. Milagrito, a
71: prototype of Milagro, searched for emission coincident with 54 BATSE bursts and reported
72: evidence for emission above 650 GeV from GRB 970417a, at the 3$\sigma$ level~\cite{atkins00a,atkins03}.
73: %with a (post-trials) probability of
74: %1.5$\times10^{-3}$ of being a background fluctuation
75: The HEGRA group reported evidence at the 3 sigma level for emission above 20 TeV from
76: GRB 920925c~\cite{padilla98}. Follow-up observations above 250 GeV by the Whipple
77: atmospheric Cherenkov telescope~\cite{connaughton97} failed to find any high energy
78: afterglow for 9 bursts studied, though the delay in slewing to observe these bursts
79: ranged from 2 minutes to almost an hour. More recent efforts by the MAGIC~\cite{magicGRBlimits},
80: Whipple~\cite{whippleGRBlimits}, and Milagro~\cite{milagro1} telescopes have
81: resulted only in upper limits.
82:
83: There is no shortage of models predicting (or explaining) very high energy emission
84: from GRBs (e.g.~\cite{dermer00,pilla98,zhang01,granot03,gupta07}). Many of the proposed
85: emission mechanisms predict a fluence at TeV energies comparable to that at keV-MeV energies.
86: One such mechanism involves the inverse Compton upscattering of lower energy (synchrotron)
87: photons by the energetic electrons which emitted them. The strong magnetic fields and large
88: bulk Lorentz factors present in GRB jets can result in a high energy component peaked at TeV energies.
89: The strength of such a component is highly dependent on the environments of the particle
90: acceleration and the gamma ray production.
91:
92: Milagro\cite{atkins00b,atkins01} is a TeV gamma-ray detector, located at an altitude of
93: 2630 m in northern New Mexico. Milagro uses the water Cherenkov technique to detect
94: extensive air-showers produced by VHE gamma rays as they interact
95: with the Earth's atmosphere. The Milagro field of view is $\sim$2 sr and duty cycle is $>$90\%. The
96: effective area is a function of zenith angle and ranges from $\sim50$ m$^2$ at 100 GeV
97: to $\sim10^5$ m$^2$ at 10 TeV. A sparse array of 175 4000-l water tanks, each with a PMT,
98: was added in 2002. These ``outriggers,'' extend the physical area of Milagro to
99: 40000 m$^2$. The combination of large field of view and high duty cycle make Milagro the best
100: instrument currently available for conducting a search for prompt VHE emission from GRBs. Milagro
101: is also able to operate in ``scaler'' mode, where individual tube rates can be monitored to search for
102: GRB emission in the 1--100 GeV energy range coincident in time with known satellite bursts
103: (see ~\cite{taylor,cesar}). In addition to conducting a search for emission from satellite-detected GRBs,
104: Milagro is capable of performing a blind search for emission at all locations in its field of
105: view and many different durations (see ~\cite{vlasios}).
106:
107: \subsection{The GRB Sample}
108:
109: Twenty-five satellite-triggered GRBs occurred within the field of view of Milagro
110: between January 2000 and December 2001. No significant emission was detected from any of
111: these bursts~\cite{atkins05}. In the period from January 2002 to December 2004 (post-BATSE and pre-Swift),
112: there were only 11 well-localized GRBs within the Milagro field of view. Since the launch of Swift (through the end of May 2007),
113: however, there have been a total of 57 bursts in the field of view of Milagro~\footnote{A good source of information
114: on well-localized GRBs is J. Greiner's web page {\tt http://www.mpe.mpg.de/$\sim$jcg/grbgen.html}},
115: many of them with measured redshift. Table~\ref{grb_table} lists the 57 GRBs in this sample, along with some of
116: their properties. Due to the absorption of high-energy gamma rays by the extragalactic
117: background light (EBL), detections at VHE energies are only expected for redshifts less than $\sim$0.5. The
118: degree of gamma-ray extinction from this effect is uncertain, because the amount of EBL is not well known.
119: In this work we use the model of \cite{primack05}, which predicts an optical depth of roughly unity for 500 GeV (10 TeV)
120: gamma rays from a redshift of 0.2 (0.05).
121:
122: \subsection{Bright X-ray Flares}
123:
124: One of the highlights of the Swift mission has been the detection of bright X-ray flares in the afterglow phase of many
125: GRBs~\cite{burrows05}. These flares can sometimes be as bright as the prompt component of the GRB itself. While the exact
126: nature of the flares is not clear, with various different proposals for what may be causing them
127: (e.g. \cite{guetta07,kobayashi07,krimm07}), there are reasonable expectations that these flares will result in the
128: emission of delayed very high energy photons~\cite{wang06}. The first survey of X-ray flares from GRBs observed by Swift
129: in the first year of operations~\cite{chincarini} shows that approximately one third of GRBs show significant flaring activity.
130: Table~\ref{flare_table} lists the 10 flares from the flare catalog of ~\cite{chincarini,falcone} which were in the field of
131: view of Milagro.
132:
133: \section{Data Analysis and Results}
134:
135: A search for an excess of events above those due to the background was made for each of the 57 bursts
136: in Table~\ref{grb_table}, as well as for the 10 flares listed in Table~\ref{flare_table}.
137: The number of events falling within a 1.6 degree bin was summed for the relevant duration. An
138: estimate of the number of background events was made by characterizing the angular distribution of the background
139: using two hours of data surrounding the burst (or flare), as described in \cite{atkins03b}.
140: No significant emission was detected. The upper limits
141: are given in the final column of Table~\ref{grb_table}
142: and Table~\ref{flare_table}. For those bursts with known redshift, we compute
143: the effect of the absorption, according to the model of \cite{primack05} and print the upper limits in bold.
144:
145: Among the most interesting limits presented here is the one for GRB 070521, recently detected by Swift.
146: Assuming a redshift of 0.55 for the possible host~\cite{hattori}, the Milagro upper limit~\cite{saz} on the
147: fluence is lower than the $\sim$1.8$\times10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ measured by the Konus-Wind
148: experiment~\cite{golenetskii} in the 20 keV -- 1 MeV energy range. It should be noted, however, that
149: \cite{atteia} have calculated a ``pseudo-redshift'' for this burst of pz= 2.28$\pm$0.45, and on these
150: grounds, claim it is incompatible with the spectroscopic redshift of 0.55.
151:
152: %Some of the more interesting bursts in Table~\ref{grb_table}
153: %include GRB 050509b, the second \emph{short/hard} burst detected by \emph{Swift}, with a reported
154: %duration of 30 ms and a relatively low fluence of 2.3$\times10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ in the 15--350
155: %keV range~\cite{barthelmy}. Although Milagro detected no emission from this burst~\cite{saz}, the very
156: %favorable zenith angle ($10^\circ$) and possible low redshift of 0.226 provide the opportunity
157: %to set interesting upper limits for TeV emission from this burst. Another burst that deserves mention
158: %is GRB 051103, a short burst detected by the IPN, possibly originating from the
159: %nearby ($<$ 4 Mpc) galaxy M81~\cite{051103}. Although this burst was not at a favorable zenith
160: %angle for Milagro ($\theta >$45$^\circ$), we chose to analyse the data, due
161: %to its potential interest. If this burst were associated with M81, as has been suggested, the
162: %almost complete absence of absorption would make the Milagro upper limit on the fluence
163: %about 20\% of the measured fluence in the X-ray band~\cite{saz2}. Finally, GRB 051109 occurred
164: %at a zenith angle of less than 10$^\circ$ for Milagro, making it the burst with the best
165: %location of our sample. Unfortunately, this burst had a measured redshift of 2.346, making the
166: %Milagro limit, once absorption is taken into account, several orders of magnitude larger than
167: %the measured fluence in the X-ray band~\cite{saz3}.
168:
169: %In Table~\ref{flare_table} we list 6 flares detected by {\em Swift} from
170: %3 GRBs which were in Milagro's field of view~\cite{falcone05}. Milagro detected no significant
171: %emission from any of these flares. The brightest of these flares, from GRB 050607, had a fluence in
172: %the X-ray range of roughly 1.5$\times 10^{-7}$ erg cm$^{-2}$~\cite{king05}, placing the Milagro
173: %limit about an order of magnitude higher.
174:
175:
176: %\section{Conclusions}
177: %We have searched for VHE emission from GRBs and found none.
178:
179: \section{Acknowledgments}
180:
181: We have used GCN Notices to select raw data for archiving and use in this search, and
182: we are grateful for the hard work of the GCN team, especially Scott Barthelmy. We are
183: grateful to Kevin Hurley for his help with the IPN bursts. We acknowledge
184: Scott Delay and Michael Schneider for their dedicated efforts in the construction and
185: maintenance of the Milagro experiment. This work has been supported by the National Science
186: Foundation (under grants
187: %-0096256, %UW-Madison
188: %-0097315, %LANL via UMD
189: PHY-0245234, %UCI; previous is PHY-0070933
190: -0302000, %UMD
191: -0400424, %Milagro Operations; previous is PHY-0075326
192: -0504201, %NYU current; previous are PHY-9901496 & PHY-0206656
193: -0601080, %UCSC; previous are PHY-0070927 & PHY-0245143
194: and
195: ATM-0002744) %UNH
196: the US Department of Energy (Office of High-Energy Physics and
197: Office of Nuclear Physics), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the University of
198: California, and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics.
199:
200:
201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
202: %% GRB TABLE
203: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
204:
205:
206: %\begin{table}[ht]
207: %\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\columnwidth}%
208: %\centering
209: %\begin{tabular}{c|c}
210: %x & y\\\hline
211: %rr & t\\
212: %rrrrr & g
213: %\end{tabular}
214: %\caption{a side by side figure/table demo (Table Caption No. 1)}
215: %\end{minipage}%
216: %\hfill%
217: %\begin{minipage}[b]{0.48\columnwidth}%
218: %\centering
219: %\begin{tabular}{c|c}
220: %x & y\\\hline
221: %rr & t\\
222: %rrrrr & g
223: %%\caption{a side by side figure/table demo (Table Caption No. 2) }
224: %\end{minipage}
225: %\end{table}
226:
227: %\begin{table}[width=0.7\textwidth]
228:
229: \def \atel {The Astronomer's Telegram}
230: \def \apj {ApJ}
231: \def \aj {AJ}
232: \def \apjl {ApJL}
233: \def \mnras {MNRAS}
234: \def \iaucirc {IAUCIRC}
235: \def \em { }
236: \def \aap {A\&A}
237: \def \nat {Nature}
238: \def \araa {Anual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics}
239:
240:
241:
242: \nocite{ref4}
243: \nocite{ref5}
244: \nocite{ref6}
245: \nocite{ref7}
246: %This is the reference to .bib file (Whitout .bib!)
247: % \bibliography{ms}
248: %This in the bibtex style, is ok.
249: % \bibliographystyle{plain}
250:
251: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
252:
253: \bibitem{costa} Costa, E., et al.\ 1997, \nat, 387, 783
254: \bibitem{gehrels} Gehrels, N., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 1005
255: %\bibitem{dingus95} Dingus, B. L., 1995, Astrophys. \& Space Sci., 231, 187
256: \bibitem{dingus01} Dingus, B. L., 2001, AIP Conf.~Proc.~558, 383
257: \bibitem{hurley94} Hurley, K., et al. 1994, \emph{Nature}, 372, 652
258: \bibitem{gonzalez03} Gonzalez, M.~M.\ et al. 2003, \emph{Nature}, 424, 749
259: \bibitem{atkins00a} Atkins, R. et al. 2000, \emph{ApJL}, 533, L119
260: \bibitem{atkins03} Atkins, R., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 583, 824
261: \bibitem{atkins03b} Atkins, R. et al. 2003, \emph{ApJ}, 595, 803
262: \bibitem{padilla98} Padilla, L., et al. 1998, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics}, 337, 43
263: \bibitem{connaughton97} Connaughton, V., et al. 1997, \emph{ApJ}, 479, 859
264: \bibitem{magicGRBlimits} Albert, J., et al.\ 2006, astro-ph/0612548
265: \bibitem{whippleGRBlimits} Horan, D., et al.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 396
266: \bibitem{milagro1} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.\ 2007, Proceedings of the First International GLAST Symposium, astro-ph/0704.0287
267: \bibitem{dermer00} Dermer, C.\ D., Chiang, J., \& Mitman, K.\ E.\ 2000, \emph{ApJ} 537, 785
268: \bibitem{pilla98} Pilla, R. P. \& Loeb, A. 1998, \emph{ApJL} 494, L167
269: \bibitem{zhang01} Zhang, B.\ \& M\'esz\'aros, P.\ 2001, \emph{ApJ} 559, 110
270: \bibitem{granot03} Granot, J., \& Guetta, D.\ 2003, \apjl, 598, L11
271: \bibitem{gupta07} Gupta, N., \& Zhang, B.\ 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 704, arXiv:0704.1329
272: \bibitem{atkins00b} Atkins, R. et al. 2000, Nucl. Instr. and Meth., A449, 478
273: \bibitem{atkins01} Atkins, R. et al. 2001, astro-ph/0110513
274: \bibitem{taylor} Aune, T., et al., 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, M\'{e}rida, M\'{e}xico (2007)
275: \bibitem{cesar} Alvarez, C., et al., 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, M\'{e}rida, M\'{e}xico (2007)
276: \bibitem{vlasios} Vasileiou, V., et al., 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, M\'{e}rida, M\'{e}xico (2007)
277: \bibitem{atkins05} Atkins, R., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 996
278: \bibitem{primack05} Primack, J.~R., Bullock, J.~S., \& Somerville, R.~S.\ 2005, High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy, 745, 23
279: \bibitem{burrows05} Burrows, D.~N., et al.\ 2005, Science, 309, 1833
280: \bibitem{guetta07} Guetta, D., et al.\ 2007, \aap, 461, 95
281: \bibitem{kobayashi07} Kobayashi, S., Zhang, B., M{\'e}sz{\'a}ros, P., \& Burrows, D.\ 2007, \apj, 655, 391
282: \bibitem{krimm07} Krimm, H.~A., et al.\ 2007, astro-ph/0702603
283: \bibitem{wang06} Wang, X.-Y., Li, Z., \& M{\'e}sz{\'a}ros, P.\ 2006, \apjl, 641, L89
284: \bibitem{chincarini} Chincarini, G., et al.\ 2007, astro-ph/0702371
285: \bibitem{falcone} Falcone, A. D., et al.\ 2007, \emph{in preparation} (private communication)
286: \bibitem{hattori} Hattori, T., et al.\ 2007, GCN Circular 6444
287: \bibitem{saz} Saz Parkinson, P. M., et al.\ 2007, GCN Circular 6448
288: \bibitem{golenetskii} Golenetskii, S. et al.\ 2007, GCN Circular 6459
289: \bibitem{atteia} Pelangeon, A. \& Atteia, J-L \ 2007, GCN Circular 6460
290:
291:
292: %\bibitem{stecker98} Stecker, F. \& de Jager, O. C. 1998, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics} 334, L85
293: %\bibitem{dejager02} de Jager, O.~C. \& Stecker, F.~W. 2002, \emph{ApJ}, 566,738
294: %\bibitem{primack99} Primack, J. R., Bullock, J. S., Somerville, R. S. \& Macminn, D. 1999, \emph{Astroparticle Physics}, 11, 93
295:
296: %\bibitem{noyes} Noyes, D., 29th ICRC, Pune, 2005
297: %\bibitem{lima} Li, T.~P., \& Ma, Y.~Q. 1983, \emph{ApJ}, 272, 317
298: %\bibitem{helene} Helene, O. 1983, Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Methods Phys. Res., 212, 319
299: %\bibitem{feldman}Feldman, G.~J.~ \& Cousins, R.~D.~ 1998 , Phys. Rev. D57,3873
300: %\bibitem{hurkett} Hurkett, C. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3381
301: %\bibitem{barthelmy} Barthelmy, S. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3385
302: %\bibitem{kennea} Kennea, J. A., et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3383
303: %\bibitem{saz} Saz Parkinson, P.~M.~ 2005, GCN Circular No. 3411
304: %\bibitem{bloom} Bloom, J. et al 2005, astro-ph/0505480
305: %\bibitem{bloom05} Bloom, J. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3386
306: %\bibitem{bloom05b} Bloom, J. et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3392
307: %\bibitem{castro-tirado} Castro-Tirado, A.~J.~ et al, \emph{Astronomy and Astrophysics}, accepted, astro-ph/0506662
308: %\bibitem{prochaska} Prochaska, J. X., et al 2005, GCN Circular No. 3390
309:
310:
311:
312:
313:
314:
315:
316: \end{thebibliography}
317:
318:
319: \newpage
320: \begin{table}
321: \begin{minipage}[t]{2.05\columnwidth}%
322: %\centering
323: \begin{small}
324: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
325: \hline
326: GRB &
327: Dur. &
328: $\theta$ &
329: z &
330: Inst. &
331: UL \\
332: \hline
333: 041219a & 520 & 27 & ... & INT. & 5.8e-6 \\
334: 050124 & 4 & 23 & ... & Swift & 3.0e-7 \\
335: 050213 & 17 & 23 & ... & IPN & 1.3e-6 \\
336: 050319 & 15 & 45 & 3.24 & Swift & ... \\
337: 050402 & 8 & 40 & ... & Swift & 2.1e-6 \\
338: 050412 & 26 & 37 & ... & Swift & 1.7e-6 \\
339: 050502 & 20 & 43 & 3.793 & INT. & ... \\
340: 050504 & 80 & 28 & ... & INT. & 1.3e-6 \\
341: 050505 & 60 & 29 & 4.3 & Swift & ... \\
342: 050509b & 0.128 & 10 & 0.226?& Swift & \textbf{1.1e-6} \\
343: 050522 & 15 & 23 & ... & INT. & 5.1e-7 \\
344: 050607 & 26.5 & 29 & ... & Swift & 8.9e-7 \\
345: 050703 & 26 & 26 &... & IPN & 1.2e-6 \\
346: 050712 & 35 & 39 & ... & Swift & 2.5e-6 \\
347: 050713b & 30 & 44 & ... & Swift & 4.0e-6 \\
348: 050715 & 52 & 37 & ... & Swift & 1.7e-6 \\
349: 050716 & 69 & 30 & ... & Swift & 1.6e-6 \\
350: 050820 & 20 & 22 & 2.612 & Swift & ... \\
351: 051103 & 0.17 & 50 & 0.001?& IPN & \textbf{4.2e-6} \\
352: 051109 & 36 & 9.7 & 2.346 & Swift & ... \\
353: %051109 & 36 & 9.7 & 2.346 & Swift & -1.1 & \textbf{4.3e-3}$^\#$ \\
354: 051111 & 20 & 44 & 1.55 & Swift & ... \\
355: %051111 & 20 & 43.7 & 1.55 & Swift & +0.7 & \textbf{3.8e-2}$^\#$ \\
356: 051211b & 80 & 33 & ... & INT. & 2.6e-6 \\
357: 051221 & 1.4 & 42 & 0.55 & Swift & \textbf{9.8e-4} \\
358: 051221b & 61 & 26 & ... & Swift & 1.8e-6 \\
359: 060102 & 20 & 40 & ... & Swift & 2.0e-6 \\
360: 060109 & 10 & 22 & ... & Swift & 4.1e-7 \\
361: 060110 & 15 & 43 & ... & Swift & 3.0e-6 \\
362: 060111b & 59 & 37 & ... & Swift & 2.3e-6 \\
363: 060114 & 100 & 41 & ... & INT. & 5.1e-6 \\
364: 060204b & 134 & 31 & ... & Swift & 2.7e-6 \\
365: 060210 & 5 & 43 & 3.91 & Swift & ... \\
366: 060218 & 10 & 45 & 0.03 & Swift & \textbf{3.8e-5} \\
367: 060306 & 30 & 46 & ... & Swift & 7.2e-6 \\
368: 060312 & 30 & 44 & ... & Swift & 3.3e-6 \\
369: 060313 & 0.7 & 47 & ... & Swift & 2.7e-6 \\
370: 060403 & 25 & 28 & ... & Swift & 1.0e-6 \\
371: 060427b & 0.22 & 16 & ... & IPN & 2.1e-7 \\
372: 060428b & 58 & 27 & ... & Swift & 1.1e-6 \\
373: 060507 & 185 & 47 & ... & Swift & 1.8e-5 \\
374: 060510b & 330 & 43 & 4.9 & Swift & ... \\
375: 060515 & 52 & 42 & ... & Swift & 9.6e-6 \\
376: 060712 & 26 & 35 & ... & Swift & 3.8e-6 \\
377: 060814 & 146 & 23 & ... & Swift & 2.5e-6 \\
378: 060904A & 80 & 14 & ... & Swift & 2.4e-6 \\
379: 060906 & 43.6 & 29 & 3.685 & Swift & ... \\
380: 061002 & 20 & 45 & ... & Swift & 4.0e-6 \\
381: 061126 & 191 & 28 & ... & Swift & 4.3e-6 \\
382: 061210 & 0.8 & 23 & 0.41? & Swift & \textbf{6.1e-6} \\
383: %061210 & 0.8 & 23.4 & 0.41? & Swift & +0.5 & \textbf{1.0e-5}$^\#$ \\ % 0.05-5 TeV
384: 061222a & 115 & 30. & ... & Swift & 5.6e-6 \\
385: 070103 & 19 & 39 & ... & Swift & 1.3e-6\\
386: 070125 & 60 & 9.5 & 1.547 & IPN & \textbf{4.5e-4} \\
387: 070129 & 460 & 31 & ... & Swift & 1.9e-6 \\
388: 070208 & 50 & 32 & 1.165 & Swift & \textbf{4.0e-4} \\
389: 070311 & 50 & 33 & ... & INT. & 2.0e-6 \\
390: 070402 & 12 & 12 & ... & IPN & 4.6e-7 \\
391: 070521 & 60 & 8.7 & 0.55? & Swift & \textbf{1.1e-5} \\
392: 070529 & 120 & 45 & 2.5 & Swift & ... \\
393:
394: \hline
395: \end{tabular}
396: \end{small}
397: \caption{Recent GRBs in the Milagro field of view. Column 1 is the GRB name. Column 2 gives the
398: duration of the burst (in seconds), column 3 the zenith angle for Milagro (in degrees), column 4
399: the measured redshift, when it exists, column 5 the satellite(s) detecting the GRB, and column 6
400: gives the Milagro 99\% confidence upper limit on the 0.2--20 TeV fluence in erg cm$^{-2}$. Numbers
401: in bold take into account absorption by the EBL (using the Primack 05
402: model) for a redshift given in column 4. Those with three dots in column 6 imply the redshifts are
403: so high that all the emission is expected to be absorbed.\label{grb_table}}
404: \end{minipage}
405: \end{table}
406:
407:
408: %\begin{table}[width=0.7\textwidth]
409: \begin{table}%{\quad}
410: \begin{minipage}[l]{0.95\columnwidth}%
411: %\centering
412: \begin{small}
413: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
414: \hline
415: GRB &
416: UTC &
417: $\mathrm{T_i}$&
418: $\mathrm{T_f}$&
419: $\theta$ &
420: UL \\
421: \hline
422: 050607 &33082.8& 94 & 255 & 29 & 2.7e-6\\
423: 050607 &33082.8& 255 & 640 & 29 & 3.2e-6\\
424: 050712 &50427.5& 88 & 564 & 38 & 8.8e-6\\
425: 050712 &50427.5& 302 & 435 & 38 & 4.1e-6\\
426: 050712 &50427.5& 415 & 590 & 30. & 2.9e-6\\
427: 050712 &50427.5& 788 & 952 & 37 & 2.3e-6\\
428: 050716 &45363.6& 155 & 211 & 31 & 1.2e-6\\
429: 050716 &45363.6& 315 & 483 & 32 & 1.8e-6\\
430: 050820 &23693.1& 200 & 382 & 21 & ... \\
431: 060109 &60881.2& 4305 & 6740 & 6.6 & 4.8e-6\\
432:
433: \hline
434: \end{tabular}
435: \end{small}
436: \caption{List of X-ray Flares. Column 1 gives the Swift GRB name during which they occurred. Column 2
437: gives the trigger time in UTC second of the day. Columns 3 and 4 give the start and end times of
438: the flare relative to the trigger time given in Column 2. Column 5 gives the zenith angle for
439: Milagro. Column 6 gives the Milagro 99\% upper limit on the 0.2--20 TeV fluence in
440: erg cm$^{-2}$.\label{flare_table} As in Table~\ref{grb_table}, three dots implies the redshift is
441: so high that all emission is expected to be absorbed.}
442: %\caption{List of 52 GRBs in the field of view of Milagro in 2004-2006.\label{grb_table2}}
443: \end{minipage}
444: %\caption{GRBs in the field of view of Milagro (2000-2006).\label{grb_table2}}
445: \end{table}
446:
447:
448: \end{document}
449: