1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \documentclass{emulateapj}

3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

4: %\usepackage{amssymb}

5: %\usepackage{amsmath}

6: %\usepackage{amsbsy}

7: %\usepackage{epsfig}

8: %\usepackage{amsthm}

9: 

10: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{.8}

11: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{.8}

12: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{.05}

13: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{.8}

14: \renewcommand{\dbltopfraction}{.8}

15: \renewcommand{\dblfloatpagefraction}{.8}

16: 

17: \def\hi{\textsc{Hi} }

18: \def\hii{\textsc{Hii} }

19: 

20: \begin{document}

21: 

22: \title{Toward Empirical Constraints on the Global Redshifted 21 cm Brightness Temperature during the Epoch of Reionization}

23: 

24: \author{Judd D. Bowman\altaffilmark{1}, Alan E. E. Rogers\altaffilmark{2}, and Jacqueline N. Hewitt\altaffilmark{1}}

25: 

26: \altaffiltext{1}{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Kavli

27: Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Cambridge,

28: Massachusetts, USA}

29: 

30: \altaffiltext{2}{Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Haystack

31: Observatory, Westford, Massachusetts, USA}

32: 

33: \email{jdbowman@mit.edu}

34: 

35: \begin{abstract}

36: 

37: Preliminary results are presented from a simple, single-antenna

38: experiment designed to measure the all-sky radio spectrum between 100

39: and 200~MHz. The system used an internal comparison-switching scheme

40: to reduce non-smooth instrumental contaminants in the measured

41: spectrum to 75~mK. From the observations, we place an initial upper

42: limit of $450$~mK on the relative brightness temperature of the

43: redshifted 21~cm contribution to the spectrum due to neutral hydrogen

44: in the intergalactic medium (IGM) during the epoch of reionization,

45: assuming a rapid transition to a fully ionized IGM at a redshift of

46: 8. With refinement, this technique should be able to distinguish

47: between slow and fast reionization scenarios.  To constrain the

48: duration of reionization to $\Delta z>2$, the systematic residuals in

49: the measured spectrum must be reduced to 3~mK.

50: 

51: \end{abstract}

52: 

53: \keywords{Cosmology: Early Universe, Galaxies: Intergalactic Medium,

54: Radio Lines: General}

55: 

56: 

57: 

58: \section{Introduction}

59: 

60: The transition period at the end of the cosmic ``Dark Ages'' is known

61: as the epoch of reionization (EOR). During this epoch, radiation from

62: the very first luminous sources---early stars, galaxies, and

63: quasars---succeeded in ionizing the neutral hydrogen gas that had

64: filled the intergalactic medium (IGM) since the recombination event

65: following the Big Bang. Reionization marks a significant shift in the

66: evolution of the Universe. For the first time,

67: gravitationally-collapsed objects exerted substantial feedback on

68: their environments through electromagnetic radiation, initiating

69: processes that have dominated the evolution of the visible baryonic

70: Universe ever since. The epoch of reionization, therefore, can be

71: considered a dividing line when the relatively simple evolution of

72: the early Universe gave way to more complicated and more

73: interconnected processes. Although the Dark Ages are known to end

74: when the first luminous sources ionized the neutral hydrogen in the

75: IGM, precisely when this transition occurred remains uncertain.

76: 

77: The best existing constraints on the timing of the reionization epoch

78: come from two sources: the cosmic microwave background (CMB)

79: anisotropy and absorption features in the spectra of high-redshift

80: quasars. The amplitude of the observed temperature anisotropy in the

81: CMB is affected by Thomson scattering due to electrons along the line

82: of sight between the surface of last scattering and the detector, and

83: thus, it is sensitive to the ionization history of the IGM through

84: the electron column density. In addition, if there is sufficient

85: optical depth to CMB photons due to free electrons in the IGM after

86: reionization, some of the angular anisotropy in the unpolarized

87: intensity can be converted to polarized anisotropy. This produces a

88: peak in the polarization power spectrum at the angular scale size

89: equivalent to the horizon at reionization with an amplitude

90: proportional to the optical depth \citep{1997ApJ...488....1Z}.

91: Measurements by the WMAP satellite of these effects indicate that the

92: redshift of reionization is $z_r\approx11\pm4$

93: \citep{2007ApJS..170..377S}, assuming an instantaneous transition.

94: 

95: Lyman-$\alpha$ absorption by neutral hydrogen is visible in the

96: spectra of many high-redshift quasars and, thus, offers the second

97: currently feasible probe of the ionization history of the IGM.

98: Continuum emission from quasars is redshifted as it travels through

99: the expanding Universe to the observer.  Neutral hydrogen along the

100: line of sight creates absorption features in the continuum at

101: wavelengths corresponding to the local rest-frame wavelength of the

102: Lyman-$\alpha$ line.  Whereas CMB measurements place an integrated

103: constraint on reionization, quasar absorption line studies are

104: capable of probing the ionization history in detail along the

105: sight-lines. There is a significant limitation to this approach,

106: however. The Lyman-$\alpha$ absorption saturates at very low

107: fractions of neutral hydrogen (of order $x_{HI} \approx 10^{-4}$).

108: Nevertheless, results from these studies have been quite successful

109: and show that, while the IGM is highly ionized below $z\lesssim6$

110: (with typical $x_{HI}\lesssim10^{-5}$), a significant amount of

111: neutral hydrogen is present above, although precisely how much

112: remains unclear \citep{2001ApJ...560L...5D, 2001AJ....122.2850B,

113: 2002AJ....123.1247F, 2003AJ....125.1649F, 2004Natur.427..815W,

114: 2006AJ....132..117F}.

115: 

116: The existing CMB and quasar absorption measurements are somewhat

117: contradictory.  Prior to these studies, the reionization epoch was

118: assumed generally to be quite brief, with the transition from an IGM

119: filled with fully neutral hydrogen to an IGM filled with highly

120: ionized hydrogen occurring very rapidly.  These results, however,

121: open the possibility that the ionization history of the IGM may be

122: more complicated than previously believed \citep{2003ApJ...595....1H,

123: 2003ApJ...591...12C, 2003MNRAS.344..607S, 2004ApJ...604..484M}.

124: 

125: Direct observations of the 21~cm (1420~MHz) hyperfine transition line

126: of neutral hydrogen in the IGM during the reionization epoch would

127: resolve the existing uncertainties and reveal the evolving properties

128: of the IGM.  The redshifted 21~cm signal should appear as a faint,

129: diffuse background in radio frequencies below $\nu<200$~MHz for

130: redshifts above $z>6$ (according to $\nu=1420/[1+z]$~MHz). For

131: diffuse gas in the high-redshift ($z\approx10$) IGM, the expected

132: unpolarized differential brightness temperature of the redshifted

133: 21~cm line relative to the pervasive CMB is readily calculable from

134: basic principles and is given by \citep[their

135: \S~2]{2004ApJ...608..622Z}

136: %

137: %%\begin{align}

138: \begin{equation}

139: \begin{array}{rl}

140: \label{eqn_intro_temp} \delta T_{21}(\vec{\theta}, z) \approx~&

141: 23~(1+\delta)~x_{HI} \left ( 1 - \frac{T_\gamma}{T_S} \right ) \\

142: & \times \left ( \frac{\Omega_b~h^2}{0.02} \right ) \left [ \left (

143: \frac{0.15}{\Omega_m~h^2} \right ) \left ( \frac{1+z}{10} \right )

144: \right ]^{1/2} \mbox{mK},

145: \end{array}

146: \end{equation}

147: %%\end{align}

148: %

149: where $\delta(\vec{\theta},z)$ is the local matter over-density,

150: $x_{HI}(\vec{\theta},z)$ is the neutral fraction of hydrogen in the

151: IGM, $T_\gamma(z) = 2.73~(1+z)$~K is the temperature of CMB at the

152: redshift of interest, $T_S(\vec{\theta},z)$ is the spin temperature

153: that describes the relative population of the ground and excited

154: states of the hyperfine transition, and $\Omega_b$ is the baryon

155: density relative to the critical density, $\Omega_m$ is the total

156: matter density, and $h$ specifies the Hubble constant according to

157: $H_0=100~ h$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. From

158: Equation~\ref{eqn_intro_temp}, we see that perturbations in the local

159: density, spin temperature, and neutral fraction of hydrogen in the

160: IGM would all be revealed as fluctuations in the brightness

161: temperature of the observed redshifted 21~cm line.

162: 

163: The differential brightness temperature of the redshifted 21~cm line

164: is very sensitive to the \hi spin temperature. When the spin

165: temperature is greater than the CMB temperature, the line is visible

166: in emission. For $T_S \gg T_\gamma$, the magnitude of the emission

167: saturates to a maximum (redshift-dependent) brightness temperature

168: that is about 25 to 35~mK for a mean-density, fully neutral IGM

169: between redshifts 6 and 15, assuming a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with

170: $\Omega_m=0.3$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, $\Omega_b=0.04$, and $h=0.7$.

171: At the other extreme, when the spin temperature is very small and

172: $T_S \ll T_\gamma$, the line is visible in absorption against the CMB

173: with a potentially very large (and negative) relative brightness

174: temperature.

175: 

176: A number of factors are involved in predicting the typical

177: differential brightness temperature of the redshifted 21~cm line as a

178: function of redshift.  In particular, the spin temperature must be

179: treated in detail, including collisional coupling between the spin

180: and kinetic temperatures of the gas, absorption of CMB photons, and

181: heating by ultra-violet radiation from the first luminous sources. We

182: direct the reader to \citet{2006PhR...433..181F} for a good

183: introduction to the topic. The results of several efforts to predict

184: the evolution of the differential brightness temperature of the

185: redshifted 21~cm line have yielded predictions that are generally

186: consistent in overall behavior, but vary highly in specific details

187: \citep{1997ApJ...475..429M, 1999A&A...345..380S, 2004ApJ...608..611G,

188: 2006MNRAS.371..867F}. These models tend to agree that, for a finite

189: period at sufficiently high redshifts ($z\gtrsim20$), the \hi

190: hyperfine line should be seen in absorption against the CMB, with

191: relative brightness temperatures of up to $|\delta

192: T_b|\lesssim100$~mK.  This is because the IGM initially cools more

193: rapidly than the CMB following recombination

194: \citep{1994ApJ...427...25S, 1997ApJ...475..429M}. During this period,

195: fluctuations in the differential brightness temperature of the

196: redshifted 21~cm background should track the underlying baryonic

197: matter density perturbations \citep{1972A&A....20..189S,

198: 1979MNRAS.188..791H, 1990MNRAS.247..510S, 2002ApJ...572L.123I,

199: 2003MNRAS.341...81I, 2004PhRvL..92u1301L, 2005ApJ...626....1B}.

200: Eventually, however, the models indicate that the radiation from the

201: first generations of luminous sources will elevate the spin

202: temperature of neutral hydrogen in the IGM above the CMB temperature

203: and the redshifted 21~cm line should be detected in emission with

204: relative brightness temperatures up to the expected maximum values

205: (of order $25$~mK). Finally, during the reionization epoch, the

206: neutral hydrogen becomes ionized, leaving little or no gas to produce

207: the \hi emission, and the apparent differential brightness

208: temperature of the redshifted 21~cm line falls to zero as

209: reionization progresses. As the gas is ionized, a unique pattern

210: should be imprinted in the redshifted 21~cm signal that reflects the

211: processes responsible for the ionizing photons and that evolves with

212: redshift as reionization progresses \citep{1997ApJ...475..429M,

213: 2000ApJ...528..597T, 2003ApJ...596....1C, 2004ApJ...608..622Z,

214: 2004ApJ...613...16F}. The details of the specific timing, duration,

215: and magnitude of these features remains highly variable between

216: theoretical models due largely to uncertainties about the properties

217: of the first luminous sources.

218: 

219: Measuring the brightness temperature of the redshifted 21~cm

220: background could yield information about both the global and the

221: local properties of the IGM. Determining the average brightness

222: temperature over a large solid angle as a function of redshift would

223: eliminate any dependence on local density and temperature

224: perturbations and constrain the evolution of the product

225: $\overline{x_{HI}(1-T_\gamma/T_S)}$, where we use the bar to denote a

226: spatial average. During the reionization epoch, it is, in general,

227: believed to be a good approximation to assume that $T_S\gg T_\gamma$

228: and, therefore, that the brightness temperature is proportional

229: directly to $\bar{x}_{HI}$. Global constraints on the brightness

230: temperature of the redshifted 21~cm line during the EOR, therefore,

231: would directly constrain the neutral fraction of hydrogen in the IGM.

232: Such constraints would provide a basic foundation for understanding

233: the astrophysics of reionization by setting bounds on the duration of

234: the epoch, as well as identifying unique features in the ionization

235: history (for example if reionization occurred in two phases or all at

236: once).  They would also yield improvements in estimates of the

237: optical depth to CMB photons and, thus, would help to break existing

238: degeneracies in CMB measurements between the optical depth and

239: properties of the primordial matter density power spectrum

240: \citep{2006PhRvD..74l3507T}. 

241: \begin{figure}

242: \centering

243: \includegraphics[width=20pc]{f1_color.eps}

244: \caption[Photograph of EDGES deployed at Mileura Station]{

245: \label{f_edges_photos} EDGES deployed at Mileura Station in Western

246: Australia. The left panel shows the full antenna and ground screen in

247: the foreground and the analog-to-digital conversion and data

248: acquisition module in the background.  The right panel is a close-up

249: view of the amplifier and switching module connected directly to the

250: antenna (through the balun).}

251: \end{figure}

252: For these reasons, several efforts are underway to make precise

253: measurements of the radio spectrum below $\nu<200$~MHz ($z>6$).  In

254: this paper, we report on the initial results of the Experiment to

255: Detect the Global EOR Signature (EDGES). In \S~\ref{s_edges_method},

256: we describe the specific approach used for EDGES to address the issue

257: of separating the redshifted 21 signal from the foreground emission.

258: We then give an overview of the EDGES system in

259: \S~\ref{s_edges_system}, followed by the results of the first

260: observing campaign with the system in \S~\ref{s_edges_results}, along

261: with a discussion of the implications for future single-antenna

262: measurements.

263: 

264: 

265: \section{Method}

266: \label{s_edges_method}

267: 

268: In principle, the global brightness temperature measurement is much

269: less complicated to perform than the detection of local perturbations

270: in the redshifted 21~cm background (which will be attempted in the

271: near future by the Mileura Widefield Array [MWA], Low Frequency Array

272: [LOFAR], Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope [GMRT], and Twenty-one

273: Centimeter Array [21CMA]). Since the desired signal for the global

274: measurement is the mean brightness temperature due to redshifted 21

275: cm emission (or absorption) over the entire sky, there is no need for

276: high angular resolution or imaging. A single antenna tuned to

277: the appropriate frequencies could reach the required sensitivity

278: ($\sim25$ mK) within only one hour of integration time, assuming a

279: reasonable spectral resolution of $\sim1$~MHz (equivalent to $\Delta

280: z\approx0.1$ at $z\approx8$). There is a fundamental complication

281: with such an experiment, however, arising from the global nature of

282: the signal. Since the expected redshifted 21 cm emission fills the

283: entire sky, there is no ability to perform comparison switching

284: between the target field and a blank field. The problem this causes

285: is two-fold. First, it is difficult to separate the contribution to

286: the measured spectrum due to the redshifted \hi signal from that of

287: any other all-sky emission, including Galactic synchrotron and

288: free-free radiation, the integrated contribution of extragalactic

289: continuum sources, or the CMB. Second, for similar reasons, it is

290: difficult to avoid confusing any systematic effects in the measured

291: spectrum due to the instrument or environment with received signal

292: from the sky. The severity of these problems is exacerbated in

293: single-antenna measurements by the intensity of the Galactic

294: synchrotron emission. Unlike interferometric observations, a single

295: antenna is sensitive to the large-scale emission from the Galaxy,

296: providing a 200 to 10,000~K foreground in the measured spectrum.

297: 

298: Determining the $\sim25$ mK redshifted 21 cm contribution to the

299: radio spectrum requires separating the signal from the foreground

300: spectrum at better than 1 part in 10,000.  This can be accomplished

301: by taking advantage of the differences between the spectra of the

302: Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds and the anticipated redshifted

303: 21~cm contribution. As discussed by \citet{1999A&A...345..380S},

304: Galactic synchrotron emission is the dominate component of the

305: astrophysical foregrounds below $\nu<200$~MHz, accounting for all but

306: approximately 30 to 70~K of the foregrounds at 178~MHz

307: \citep{1967MNRAS.136..219B}. Its spectrum is very nearly a power-law

308: given, in temperature units, by $T_{gal}(\nu) \sim \nu^{-\beta}$,

309: where $\beta\approx2.5$ is the spectral index. The spectral index is

310: generally constant over the frequencies of interest ($50 \lesssim \nu

311: \lesssim 200$~MHz), although it is known to flatten with decreasing

312: frequency due to self-absorption. The intensity of the synchrotron

313: emission and the exact value of the spectral index depend on Galactic

314: coordinate. The amplitude varies over an order of magnitude, between

315: about $200 < T_{gal} < 10,000$ K at 150~MHz (peaking toward the

316: Galactic center and along the Galactic plane), while the spectral

317: index has small variations of order $\sigma_\beta\approx0.1$

318: dependent largely on Galactic latitude, with the steepest regions

319: occurring at high Galactic latitudes. Free-free emission in the

320: Galaxy and discrete Galactic and extragalactic continuum sources also

321: have spectra that can be reasonably described by power-laws. The

322: integrated flux from extragalactic continuum sources is generally

323: isotropic on large scales and accounts for the majority of the

324: remaining power in the low-frequency radio spectrum, with free-free

325: emission making up only about 1\% of the total power. The combined

326: spectrum due to the astrophysical foregrounds is smooth and remains

327: similar to a power-law profile.

328: 

329: On the other hand, as the apparent differential brightness

330: temperature of the redshifted 21~cm background transitions from

331: $T_{21}=0$~mK at very high redshift to $T_{21}\approx-100$~mK before

332: heating of the IGM by the first luminous sources, and then climbs to

333: $T_{21}\approx25$~mK at the beginning of the reionization epoch

334: before falling back to $T_{21}\approx0$~mK at the end of

335: reionization, the global mean redshifted 21~cm spectrum may contain

336: up to three relatively sharp features between

337: $50\lesssim\nu\lesssim200$~MHz that would not be represented well by

338: a power-law profile. For the large solid angles of a single antenna

339: beam, the mean redshifted 21~cm signal should vary little from one

340: location to another on the sky. \citet{2006MNRAS.371..867F} and

341: \cite{2004ApJ...608..611G} have calculated example global mean

342: redshifted 21~cm spectra for various assumptions of stellar formation

343: histories.

344: 

345: The specific approach employed with EDGES to exploit these expected

346: differences in spectral characteristics in order to overcome the

347: difficulty in separating the foreground and signal contributions in

348: the measured spectrum is to limit the scope of the experiment to test

349: for discontinuous features in the spectrum, since these would

350: necessarily be due to the rapid transitions in the redshifted 21~cm

351: brightness temperature and not the spectrally smooth foregrounds. In

352: particular, the frequency response of the system is designed to test

353: for fast reionization only (and not the transitions that might arise

354: at higher redshifts from cooling and heating of the IGM). In the

355: extreme case that the transition from a fully neutral to a fully

356: ionized IGM was virtually instantaneous, such that

357: $\dot{\bar{x}}_{HI}(z_r)\rightarrow\infty$, where $z_r$ is the

358: redshift of reionization, the contribution to the global spectrum at

359: the frequencies corresponding to the reionization epoch would

360: approach a step function.  A sharp feature resembling a step function

361: that is superimposed on the smooth power-law-like foreground spectrum

362: should be relatively easy to identify. And if reionization were to

363: progress more slowly, producing a smooth transition that spanned a

364: large range of redshifts and many tens of MHz, a simple model

365: could be used to set limits on the maximum rate of the transition.

366: 

367: In principle, a variety of such models could be devised to use in

368: tests for the presence of a step feature in the radio spectrum due to

369: a rapid reionization. A simple low-order polynomial fit to the

370: measured spectrum would reveal such a discontinuous feature in the

371: residual spectrum after subtracting the fit and, thus, would be able

372: to determine the redshift range of a rapid reionization. Figure

373: \ref{f_edges_model} illustrates this approach by plotting a model

374: (described in Section \ref{s_edges_limits}) of the redshifted 21 cm

375: contribution to the measured spectrum along with the residuals after

376: a seventh-order polynomial fit is removed from a simulated sky

377: spectrum. This is the method used for the preliminary EDGES

378: measurements. An advantage of this approach for global reionization

379: experiments is that, given sufficient sensitivity, even a null result

380: could still constrain $\dot{\bar{x}}_{HI}(z)$ and, thereby,

381: distinguish between slow and fast reionization scenarios.

382: 

383: \section{Experiment Design}

384: \label{s_edges_system}

385: 

386: By focusing (at least initially) on confirming or ruling out a fast

387: reionization scenario, the design of the EDGES system is able to be

388: relatively simple.  The primary need is to reduce any instrumental or

389: systematic contributions to the measured power spectrum that vary

390: rapidly with frequency, since these could be confused with a sharp

391: feature in the spectrum due to a fast reionization of the IGM. Such

392: contributions could be due to terrestrial transmitters, reflections

393: of receiver noise or sky noise from nearby objects, undesirable

394: resonances within the electronics or the radio-frequency interference

395: (RFI) enclosures, or spurious signals introduced by the digital

396: sampling system. In this section, we provide an overview of the

397: experimental design and setup, highlighting aspects that are relevant

398: to reducing the effects of both the external and internal sources of

399: systematic errors. Additional details on the analysis of systematic

400: contributions and the hardware design can be found in the EDGES

401: memorandum

402: series\footnote{http://www.haystack.mit.edu/ast/arrays/Edges/}.

403: %

404: \begin{figure}

405: \includegraphics[width=20pc]{f2.eps}

406: \caption[Model sky spectrum used for EOR constraints]{

407: \label{f_edges_model} Example of redshifted 21~cm contribution

408: (solid) to $T_{sky}$ based on the model described in

409: \S~\ref{s_edges_limits} with $\Delta T_{21}=25$~mK, $z_r = 8$, and

410: $\Delta z = 0.6$. The residuals are also shown for a

411: seventh-order polynomial fit to a simulated spectrum

412: between 130 and 190~MHz with (dash) and without (dot) the redshifted 21 cm contribution.  The foreground contribution was modeled for the plot using $\beta=2.5$, and $T_{gal}(150$ MHz$) = 250$~K.}

413: \end{figure}

414: 

415: \subsection{Site Selection}

416: 

417: Some of the contributions to the systematic uncertainty listed above

418: can be addressed by careful selection of the observing site. Avoiding

419: terrestrial transmitters (primarily from FM radio and television

420: stations) is the most serious problem.  Even at

421: distances of hundreds or thousands of kilometers, tropospheric

422: ducting and scattering (troposcatter), sporadic E propagation in the

423: ionosphere, and reflections from meteors are all capable of

424: transferring a significant amount of power from Earth-based

425: transmitters. The background produced by the integrated effect of

426: many distant transmitters may have significant spectral structure

427: above the expected redshifted 21 cm level.  For example, a single,

428: 100 kW FM radio station at 300 km from the observing site could

429: produce up to a 100 K effective temperature in a 1 MHz channel due to

430: troposcatter, or 100~mK due to meteor reflections. Fortunately, these

431: mechanisms of atmospheric propagation exhibit diurnal or transient

432: behavior (as is the case for sporadic E propagation, tropospheric

433: ducting, and meteor reflections) or require specific geometries for

434: peak efficiency (as is the case for troposcatter), making sensitive

435: measurements possible at remote sites at least some of the time.

436: 

437: Another concern is that local objects in the environment will scatter both external noise and receiver noise, which will then be picked up by the system and correlate with the original noise, causing sinusoidal ripples in the measured spectrum. We have estimated the magnitude of the reflections of the Galactic foreground from objects like trees and mountains on the horizon where the antenna gain is reduced by a factor of 20 dB or more. As long as objects subtend solid angles under about 100~deg$^2$, the spectrum will only be affected by a few parts per million (\textit{ppm}). We have also considered the magnitude of noise originating from the receiver that will be returned by a nearby scatterer. Even if we assume that this noise is perfectly correlated with the internal receiver noise, it will only produce ripples in the spectrum at the level of a few \textit{ppm} provided that the object, like a tree subtending a few deg$^2$, is more than $\sim100$~m away or a larger object, subtending $\sim100$~deg$^2$ is more than $\sim1$~km away.

438: 

439: Reflections of signals from compact radio sources may also be correlated. In this case the scatterer and the receiving antenna act like an adding interferometer to produce ripples in the spectrum. However, these effects are extremely small since a 1~Jy source results in under 1~mK of antenna temperature for the dipole-based EDGES system and the reflected signal is much smaller still. The ground reflection has been eliminated by placing the antenna on the ground. A brief discussion on the impact of these effects in radio astronomy measurements can be found also in \citet{rohlfs_wilson}.

440: 

441: \subsection{Hardware Configuration}

442: \label{s_edges_config}

443: 

444: Following a careful choice of the deployment site for the experiment, the remaining sources of systematic uncertainty result from the hardware design of the system.  The EDGES system consists of three primary modules: 1) an antenna, 2)

445: an amplifier and comparison switching module, and 3) an

446: analog-to-digital conversion and storage unit.  The antenna, shown in

447: Figure~\ref{f_edges_photos}, is a ``fat'' dipole-based design derived

448: from the four-point antenna of \cite{fourpoint1, fourpoint2}.  The

449: design was chosen for its simplicity and its relatively broad

450: frequency response that spans approximately an octave.  The response

451: of the antenna was tuned to 100 to 200~MHz by careful selection of

452: the dipole dimensions. In order to eliminate reflections from the

453: ground and to reduce gain toward the horizon, the antenna is placed

454: over a conducting mesh that rests directly on the ground. The mesh is

455: constructed from thin, perforated metal sheets to reduce weight and

456: is shaped to match an octagonal support structure below the ground

457: screen.  The diameter of this ground screen is approximately 2~m.

458: 

459: Although the antenna is constructed with perpendicular dipoles

460: capable of receiving dual linear polarizations, only one polarization

461: of the crossed-dipole is sampled by the receiver in order to reduce

462: the cost of the system.  This is acceptable since the spatially

463: averaged all-sky spectrum is expected to have essentially no

464: polarized component. The Galactic foreground does exhibit strong

465: polarization in certain regions, such as the ``fan region'' around

466: $\ell\approx140^\circ$, $b\approx8^\circ$, which has an extended

467: polarized component of about 3~K \citep{1973MNRAS.163..147W}. Such a

468: region could produce a ripple in the measured spectrum from a single

469: linear polarization as the polarization angle rotates with frequency.

470: Under the worst circumstances, if such a region were located at the

471: peak of the EDGES beam, the magnitude of the ripple could reach

472: $\sim50$~mK. Away from the Galactic plane, however, where EDGES

473: observations are generally targeted in order to reduce the system

474: temperature, it is more likely that the effects of polarization would

475: be at least an order of magnitude lower. Furthermore, if the rotation

476: measure (RM) is of order 10 rad m$^{-2}$, then the polarized

477: component could be averaged out over $\sim1$~MHz. Nevertheless, in

478: future versions of EDGES, both ports of the antenna will be sampled

479: in order to check for polarization effects and other systematic

480: effects that result from the non-uniformity of Galactic radiation.

481: 

482: A dipole antenna is naturally a balanced electrical system. To

483: convert from the balanced antenna leads to the unbalanced receiver

484: system (in which one lead is grounded), a short coaxial cable

485: enclosed in a clamp-on split ferrite core with a high impedance is

486: used as a common-mode choke balun\footnote{This balun provides a 1:1

487: impedance transition and operates on the same principle as the

488: quarter wavelength sleeve balun described by \citet[page

489: 742]{KrausAntennas}. The ferrite provides a high impedance over a

490: wide frequency range to reduce the common-mode currents, whereas the

491: sleeve balun provides a high impedance over only a limited frequency

492: range close to the quarter wavelength resonance.} and is connected

493: directly to the terminals of the antenna with the central conductor

494: fastened to one element and the braided shielding to the other.

495: 

496: The amplifier module consists of two stages that are contained in

497: separate aluminum enclosures to reduce coupling between the low-noise

498: amplifiers. Each stage provides 33~dB of gain for a total of 66~dB.

499: Bandpass filtering of the signal is also performed in the second

500: stage, and the resulting half-power bandwidth spans approximately 50

501: to 330~MHz. The amplifier chain can be connected through a voltage

502: controlled three-position switch to one of three inputs: the antenna,

503: an ambient load, or an ambient load plus a calibration noise source.

504: Switching between the ambient load and the antenna provides a

505: comparison to subtract spurious instrumental signals in the measured

506: sky spectrum.

507: 

508: Impedance mismatch between the antenna and the amplifiers causes

509: reflections of the sky noise within the electrical path of the

510: instrument that produce an undesirable sinusoidal ripple in the

511: measured spectrum due to the frequency-dependence of the phase of the

512: reflections at the input to the amplifier. To reduce the effects of

513: these reflections in EOR measurements, the input to the amplifier

514: chain is connected directly to the balun on the antenna (with no

515: intermediate transmission cable), as shown in

516: Figure~\ref{f_edges_photos}. While absolute calibration is limited in

517: this configuration by the effect of the unknown phases of the

518: reflections on the measured spectrum, the compact size of the antenna

519: and the small signal path delays result in a smooth spectral

520: response.

521: 

522: The amplifier module is connected to the analog-to-digital conversion

523: module by three low-loss coaxial transmission cables.  The cables

524: provide power, switching control, and signal transmission,

525: respectively. Common-mode current on these cables (i.e. current that

526: is on the outer surface of the shielding in the coaxial cable, or

527: current that is unidirectional on both the central conductor and

528: inner surface of the shielding) is also capable of producing

529: reflections and additional sinusoidal ripples in the measured

530: spectrum. The ferrite core balun used between the antenna and

531: amplifiers allows common-mode current of approximately 10\% of the

532: differential mode. Although most of this current is transferred to

533: the ground screen by direct contact between the amplifier module

534: casing and the ground screen, some current persists and leaks through

535: the casing of the amplifier module and onto the shielding of the

536: three cables connecting the amplification module to the

537: analog-to-digital conversion module. To reduce this current to less

538: than 0.005\% of the differential mode current, additional clamp-on

539: ferrite cores are placed every meter on the transmission cables.

540: 

541: Finally, the analog-to-digital conversion is accomplished with an

542: Acqiris

543: AC240\footnote{http://www.acqiris.com/products/analyzers/cpci-signal-analyzers/ac240-platform.html}

544: 8-bit digitizer with maximum dynamic range of 48~dB (although, in

545: practice, the effective dynamic range was substantially lower due to

546: coupling between the digital output of the converter and its input).

547: The AC240 uses an embedded field programmable gate array (FPGA) to

548: perform onboard Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and integration of the

549: power spectrum in realtime. The spectrometer is clocked at 1~GS/s and

550: the Fourier transform processes 16,384 channels, giving a bandwidth

551: of 500~MHz and a raw spectral resolution of about 30~kHz. The

552: broadband spectrometer employs the FPGA code of

553: \citet{2005A&A...442..767B} and a Blackman-Harris window function is

554: used to improve the isolation between neighboring frequency channels

555: at the expense of reducing the effective spectral resolution to

556: 122~kHz. The unit is contained on a CompactPCI card connected to a

557: host computer. The digitizer and host computer, along with a power

558: transformer and interface circuitry for controlling the amplifier

559: module with the serial port of the computer, are enclosed in an

560: aluminum box to prevent self interference.

561: 

562: \subsection{The Measured Spectrum}

563: \label{s_data_acquisition}

564: 

565: \begin{figure}

566: \includegraphics[width=22pc]{f3.eps}

567: \caption[Measured sky spectrum used for EOR constraints]{

568: \label{f_edges_spectrum} Integrated spectrum used for upper limit

569: analysis of reionization signal.  The sky temperature, $T_{sky}$, is

570: an estimate based on modeled values for cable losses and no

571: correction for antenna reflections. The spectrum represents the best

572: 10\% of the data from observations over two nights.  It is selected

573: by discarding individual observation cycles (see

574: \S~\ref{s_data_acquisition}) containing periods of particularly

575: intense radio frequency interference.  A total of approximately 1.5 h

576: of integration is included (3.75 h including the ambient load and

577: calibrator noise source measurements in each cycle). The black curve

578: shows the spectrum after de-weighting the interferers (shown in gray)

579: present in the retained observations.}

580: \end{figure}

581: 

582: The measured spectra from each of the three switch

583: positions can be combined to produce a calibrated estimate of the

584: true sky spectrum. The three spectra are given by

585: %

586: \begin{equation}

587: \begin{array}{ccl}

588: p_0 & = & g ~ (T_L + T_R) ~ (1 + n_0) \\

589: p_1 & = & g ~ (T_L + T_R + T_{cal}) ~ (1 + n_1) \\

590: p_2 & = & g ~ (T_A + T_R) ~ (1 + n_2)

591: \end{array}

592: \end{equation}

593: %

594: where the explicit frequency dependence of each term has been dropped

595: and $p_0$ is the spectrum for the ambient load, $p_1$ is the spectrum

596: for the ambient load plus calibration noise, and $p_2$ is the

597: spectrum for the antenna.  In this terminology, $g$ is the gain,

598: $T_L$ is the ambient load temperature, $T_R$ is the receiver noise

599: temperature, $T_{cal}$ is the calibration noise temperature, and

600: $T_A$ is the antenna temperature. Thermal uncertainty in the

601: measurements is explicitly included in the Gaussian random variables

602: $n_0$, $n_1$, and $n_2$, the magnitudes of which are given by $n_i =

603: (\epsilon~b~\tau_i)^{-1/2}$, where $\epsilon=0.5$ is the efficiency

604: for the Blackman-Harris window function (which could be improved to

605: 0.93 by processing two sets of overlapping windows), $b =

606: 122\times10^3$~Hz is the resolution bandwidth, and $\tau_i$ is the

607: integration time in seconds (for each switch position, $i$).

608: Temporarily setting the noise terms to zero, $n_i\rightarrow0$, and

609: solving for the antenna temperature yields

610: %

611: \begin{equation}

612: T_A = T_{cal}\frac{p_2 - p_0}{p_1 - p_0} + T_L.\label{eqn_ta}

613: \end{equation}

614: %

615: 

616: In practice, the impedance match between the antenna and receiver is

617: not perfect and some of the incident sky noise may be reflected back

618: out of the system.  This produces deviations between the derived sky

619: temperature found using Equation~\ref{eqn_ta} and the true sky

620: spectrum. Independent measurements of the impedance mismatch can be

621: used to correct these deviations by applying a frequency-dependent

622: multiplicative factor to $T_A$ that is proportional to the inverse of

623: the reflection coefficient. For the EDGES system, this correction was

624: measured by two methods: we used a network analyzer in the laboratory

625: to determine the impedance of the antenna, and we reconfigured the

626: system in the field with a long cable inserted between the antenna

627: and amplifier module so that reflections between the two elements

628: were visible in the measured spectrum and could be used to calibrate

629: the reflection coefficient. In both sets of measurements, the

630: corrections were found to be small (of order 1\%) and smooth (able to

631: be fit by a low-order polynomial in frequency) over the band of

632: interest. For the remainder of this paper, we will ignore this correction since its effects are easily absorbed by the polynomial fit technique used to constrain the redshifted 21 cm contribution to the spectrum.

633: 

634: Adding the noise terms back in and solving in the limit that $T_{cal}

635: \gg (T_L \approx T_A) > T_R$ results in an estimate of the thermal

636: uncertainty per frequency channel of approximately

637: %

638: \begin{equation}

639: \Delta T_{A,rms} \approx \sqrt{ n^2_0 (T_L + T_R)^2 + n^2_1 (T_L)^2 +

640: n_2^2(T_A+T_R)^2}.

641: \end{equation}

642: %

643: For optimal efficiency, the three terms contributing to $\Delta

644: T_{A,rms}$ should be comparable in magnitude.  Substituting

645: $T_L=300$~K, $T_A=250$~K and $T_R=20$~K, we find that the terms are

646: comparable as long as approximately equal time is spent in each

647: switch position.  In addition, a 1~hour integration in each switch

648: position (3~hours total) will result in a thermal uncertainty in the

649: estimate of the antenna temperature of $\Delta T_{A,rms} \approx

650: 35$~mK within each 122~kHz frequency channel.

651: 

652: To acquire a series of estimates of the true sky spectrum using this

653: technique, software on the host computer cycles the amplifier module

654: between the three switch positions and triggers the digitizer to

655: acquire, Fourier transform, and accumulate data for a predefined

656: duration at each of the switch positions. The integration durations

657: per switch position are $\tau_{\{0,1,2\}}=\{10, 5, 10\}$ seconds for

658: the ambient load, ambient load plus calibration noise source, and

659: antenna, respectively, giving a duty cycle of about 40\% on the

660: antenna.  This loop is repeated approximately every 25 seconds for

661: the duration of the observations and the resulting measurements are

662: recorded to disk.

663: 

664: \section{Initial Results}

665: \label{s_edges_results}

666: 

667: \begin{figure}

668: \includegraphics[width=22pc]{f4.eps}

669: \caption[Instrumental residuals in measured spectrum]{

670: \label{f_edges_residuals} Residuals after subtraction of

671: seventh-order polynomial fit to measured spectrum shown in Figure

672: \ref{f_edges_spectrum}. The gray line is the raw spectrum with 122

673: kHz resolution. The black line is after smoothing to 2.5 MHz

674: resolution to reduce the thermal noise to below the systematic noise.

675: The \textit{rms} of the smoothed fluctuations is approximately 75~mK

676: (see Figure \ref{f_edges_rms_vs_time}).}

677: \end{figure}

678: 

679: The EDGES system was deployed at the radio-quiet Mileura Station in

680: Western Australia from 29~November through 8~December~2006.  These

681: dates were chosen such that the Galactic center would be below the

682: horizon during most of the night, keeping the system temperature as

683: low as possible for the measurements.  The system was located

684: approximately 100~m from the nearest buildings in a clearing with no

685: nearby objects and no obstructions above $\sim5^{\circ}$ on the

686: horizon, and the antenna was aligned in an approximately

687: north-south/east-west configuration. The system was operated on 8

688: consecutive nights during the deployment, with 5 of the nights

689: dedicated to EOR observing. In total, over 30~h of relevant drift

690: scans were obtained, but strong, intermittent interference from

691: satellites complicated the measurements and only approximately 8~h of

692: high-quality observations were retained as the primary data set.

693: Although the satellite interferers that complicated the measurements

694: were narrow-band and, in many cases, were easily removed through

695: excision of the effected spectral channels, the limited dynamic range

696: of the EDGES system resulted in clipping of the analog-to-digital

697: converter and corruption of the full band during especially strong

698: transmissions.  This required all channels to be omitted from the

699: data set in those instances. In particular, it was found that the low

700: Earth orbiting satellites of Orbcomm (transmitting between

701: approximately 136 and 138 MHz), as well as satellite beacons (at 150

702: MHz) from discarded spacecraft were particularly troublesome. The

703: Orbcomm activity was somewhat variable and usually decreased during

704: the night.  The typical duration of a pass was approximately 15

705: minutes, during which time the power in the satellite signal could

706: easily reach an order of magnitude greater than the integrated sky

707: noise over the band. While previous observations at the site with

708: prototype MWA equipment \citep{2007AJ....133.1505B} have demonstrated

709: (in a subset of the full target band) that it is possible to reach

710: the sensitivities required for EDGES despite the satellites and other

711: sources of interference, improvements to the EDGES digitizing system,

712: such as an upgrade of the analog-to-digital converter to 10 or 12

713: bits, would certainly help to alleviate the difficulties encountered

714: during this observing campaign and increase the usable fraction of

715: measurements.

716: 

717: From the primary data set remaining after transient RFI exclusion, a

718: stringent filter was applied to select the best 1.5~h of sky-time

719: when transient interference signals were weakest. The final cut of

720: data included measurements from multiple nights and spanned a range

721: of local apparent sidereal time (LST) between 0 and 5~h. The sky

722: temperature at 150~MHz derived from the system during this period was

723: found to have a minimum of $\sim240$~K at about 3~h LST and a maximum

724: of $\sim280$~K at 5~h LST. The integrated spectrum generated from

725: these measurements is shown in Figure~\ref{f_edges_spectrum}.

726: Frequency channels containing RFI were identified in the integrated

727: spectrum by an algorithm that employs a sliding local second-order

728: polynomial fit and iteratively removes channels with large errors

729: until the fit converges.  The affected channels were then weighted to

730: zero in subsequent analysis steps. To look for small deviations from

731: the smooth foreground spectrum, a seventh-order polynomial was fit to

732: the measured spectrum between 130 and 190~MHz (where the impedance

733: match between the antenna and receiver was nearly ideal) and

734: subtracted.

735: 

736: The residual deviations in the measured sky spectrum after the

737: polynomial fit and subtraction are shown in

738: Figure~\ref{f_edges_residuals}. The \textit{rms} level of systematic

739: contributions to the measured spectrum was found to be $\Delta

740: T_{rms} \approx 75$~mK, a factor of $\sim3$ larger than the maximum

741: expected redshifted 21~cm feature that would result from a rapid

742: reionization. Although it is not obvious in

743: Figure~\ref{f_edges_residuals}, the variations in the residuals are

744: due to instrumental contributions and not thermal noise. The large

745: variations between 163 and 170~MHz are due to the 166 MHz PCI-bus

746: clock of the AC240 and computer, while the gap centered at

747: approximately 137~MHz is due to RFI excision of the Orbcomm satellite

748: transmissions over a region spanning more than 2.5~MHz.  Analysis of

749: the dependence of $\Delta T_{rms}$ on integration duration is shown

750: in Figure~\ref{f_edges_rms_vs_time} and illustrates that the

751: \textit{rms} of the residuals follows a thermal profile $\sim(b

752: \tau)^{-1/2}$ initially and then saturates to a constant value. After

753: smoothing to 2.5~MHz resolution ($\Delta z\approx0.2$), the

754: instrumentally dominated 75~mK threshold is reached in approximately

755: 20~minutes (1200~s) of integration on the sky (50~minutes of total

756: integration in all three switch positions). Reordering the individual

757: 25-second observation cycles used in the full integration does not

758: change the behavior in Figure~\ref{f_edges_rms_vs_time}, and longer

759: integrations (up to approximately 3 h of sky time), using observation

760: cycles with more intense interference, continued to decrease the

761: thermal noise, but leave the spurious signals and systematic effects

762: unchanged.

763: 

764: \begin{figure}

765: \includegraphics[width=22pc]{f5.eps}

766: \caption[Amplitude of residuals as a function of integration time]{

767: \label{f_edges_rms_vs_time} Characteristic amplitude of the residuals

768: to the polynomial fit as a function of integration time on the sky.

769: The \textit{rms} follows a thermal $(b \tau)^{-1/2}$ dependency until

770: saturating at a constant 75~mK noise level due to the instrumental

771: errors introduced into the measured spectrum.  The dotted lines are

772: guides for the eye showing a $(b \tau)^{-1/2}$ profile and a constant

773: 75~mK contribution.}

774: \end{figure}

775: \subsection{Limits on Reionization History}

776: \label{s_edges_limits}

777: 

778: Although the sensitivity level of the initial observations with the

779: EDGES system was limited by instrumental effects in the measured

780: spectrum at a level greater than the expected maximum contribution

781: due to redshifted 21~cm emission, weak constraints can still be

782: placed on the reionization history.  In addition, it is possible to

783: make a quantitative assessment of how much improvement must be made

784: before significant constraints are possible, as well as to

785: characterize the best-case outcome of future efforts using similar

786: approaches. To begin, we introduce a model for the sky spectrum such

787: that

788: %

789: \begin{equation}

790: \label{eqn_sky_temp} T_{sky}(\nu) = T_{gal}(\nu) + T_{cmb} +

791: T_{21}(\nu)

792: \end{equation}

793: %

794: where $T_{gal}$ represents the contribution of all the foregrounds

795: (and is dominated by the Galactic synchrotron radiation),

796: $T_{cmb}=2.73$~K is the CMB contribution, and $T_{21}$ is the

797: specific form for the frequency-dependence of the redshifted 21~cm

798: emission during the transition from the fully neutral to fully

799: ionized IGM. This model neglects any directional or temporal

800: variation in $T_{sky}$ and, therefore, implicitly assumes an angular

801: average over the antenna beam and a time average over the drift scan

802: measurements performed for the experiment. Since $T_{cmb}$ and

803: $T_{21}$ are taken to be constant over the sky, only the $T_{gal}$

804: contribution is affected by this simplification.  This does not

805: impact the result, however, as long as the foreground emission varies

806: slowly on the sky and the antenna pattern changes slowly with

807: frequency---conditions that are presumed to be met in the high

808: Galactic latitude region sampled by the dipole-based EDGES system. As

809: a test of this assumption, we calculated the residuals after the

810: polynomial fit for a bright source with flux comparable to Cas A

811: (1400~Jy at 100~MHz) and spectral index $\beta=2.77$ at various

812: positions in the antenna beam using simulated beam patterns to

813: determine the frequency-dependence. We found, in all cases, less than

814: a $\sim50$~$\mu$K residual.

815: 

816: During the reionization epoch, we define $T_{21}$ to be given by

817: \begin{equation}

818: T_{21}(z) = \Delta T_{21} \frac{1}{2} \left \{ 1 + cos \left [ \frac{

819: \pi (z_r - z - \Delta z / 2)} { \Delta z} \right ] \right \},

820: \end{equation}

821: %

822: where $\Delta T_{21}$ is constant and is the maximum amplitude of the

823: redshifted 21~cm contribution, $z_r$ is the redshift when

824: $\bar{x}_{HI}(z_r)=0.5$, $\Delta z$ is the total duration of the

825: reionization epoch, and we use $\nu = 1420 / (1+z)$~MHz to convert

826: back to frequency units. Before the reionization epoch ($z>z_r+\Delta

827: z/2$), $T_{21} \equiv \Delta T_{21}$, while after reionization

828: ($z<z_r-\Delta z/2$), $T_{21}\equiv0$. The exact form of the

829: transition used for $T_{21}$ has little influence on the outcome of

830: the constraints as long as it is reasonably smooth.

831: Figure~\ref{f_edges_model} illustrates the modelled redshifted 21~cm

832: spectrum.  The free parameters in the model are $z_r$, $\Delta z$,

833: and $\Delta T_{21}$.

834: 

835: For the EDGES best-response frequency range, a center redshift around

836: $z_r=8$ allows the largest range of $\Delta z$ to be explored.  By

837: simulating the combined sky spectrum, $T_{sky}$, for a range of the

838: two remaining free parameters, we can determine the \textit{rms} of

839: the residuals that would remain following the polynomial fit used in

840: the EDGES data analysis.  Comparing the \textit{rms} of the residuals

841: in the models to the 75~mK \textit{rms} of the initial measurements

842: gives a good estimate of the region of parameter space ruled out so

843: far. Figure~\ref{f_edges_constraint} illustrates the results of this

844: process. The line defining the ruled-out region is computed by

845: finding the locus of parameters that make the \textit{rms} residuals

846: in the model equal to 75 mK. While a more statistically robust

847: analysis is clearly possible, little benefit would be gained for the

848: initial measurements presented here due to the severe systematic

849: effects present in the spectrum.

850: 

851: From Figure~\ref{f_edges_constraint}, it is clear that the initial

852: results constrain only a small portion of parameter space that is

853: well outside the expected region for both the intensity of the

854: redshifted 21~cm signal and the duration of reionization. The best

855: constraint, in the case of a nearly instantaneous reionization, is

856: that the redshifted 21~cm contribution to the spectrum is not greater

857: than about $\Delta T_{21} \lesssim 450$~mK before the transition.

858: Reducing the systematic contributions in the measured spectrum by

859: more than an order of magnitude to $\Delta T_{rms}<7.5$~mK would

860: begin to allow meaningful constraints, while an improvement of a

861: factor of 25 to $\Delta T_{rms} \approx 3$~mK would be able to rule

862: out a significant portion of the viable parameter range and constrain

863: $\Delta z > 2$. In principle, such an improvement is possible with

864: minor modifications to the EDGES system. Reaching a systematic

865: uncertainty below $\sim3$~mK, however, is likely to be infeasible

866: without a redesign of the experimental approach because errors in the

867: polynomial fit to the overall power-law-like shape of the sky

868: spectrum, $T_{sky}(\nu)$, are the dominant source of uncertainty

869: below that level in the current approach.  The sharp cut-off at

870: $\Delta z\approx2$ in parameter space is the result of using a

871: seventh-order polynomial to fit a 60~MHz bandwidth, thus yielding a

872: maximum residual scale size of order 10~MHz, which corresponds to

873: $\Delta z\approx2$ at $z\approx8$.  If the same polynomial could be

874: reasonably fit to a larger bandwidth (or a lower-order polynomial fit

875: to the existing bandwidth), then $\Delta z$ could be probed to larger

876: values.

877: 

878: 

879: \begin{figure}

880: \includegraphics[width=20pc]{f6.eps}

881: \caption[Initial constraints by EDGES on reionization history]{

882: \label{f_edges_constraint} Constraints placed by EDGES on the

883: redshifted 21~cm contribution to the sky spectrum. The dark-gray

884: region at the top-left is the portion of the parameter space ruled

885: out by the initial EDGES results with $\Delta T_{rms}=75$~mK (solid

886: line). The dashed lined labelled $\Delta T_{rms}=7.5$~mK and the

887: dotted line labelled $\Delta T_{rms}=3$~mK indicated the constraints

888: that could be placed on reionization if the experimental systematics

889: were lowered to the respective values.  The light-gray region along

890: the bottom is the general range of parameters believed to be viable.

891: The redshifted 21~cm contribution to the spectrum is modelled

892: according to the description in \S~\ref{s_edges_limits} with $z_r =

893: 8$.}

894: \end{figure}

895: 

896: \section{Conclusion}

897: 

898: In principle, useful measurements of the redshifted 21~cm background

899: can be carried out with a small radio telescope. These measurements

900: would be fundamental to understanding the evolution of the IGM and

901: the EOR. In particular, the global evolution of the mean spin

902: temperature and mean ionization fraction of neutral hydrogen in the

903: high redshift IGM could be constrained by very compact instruments

904: employing individual radio antennas.  We have reported preliminary

905: results to probe the reionization epoch based on this approach from

906: the first observing campaign with the EDGES system. These

907: observations were limited by systematic effects that were an order of

908: magnitude larger than the anticipated signal and, thus, ruled out

909: only an already unlikely range of parameter space for the

910: differential amplitude of the redshifted 21~cm brightness temperature

911: and for the duration of reionization. Nevertheless, the results of

912: this experiment indicate the viability of the simple global spectrum

913: approach.

914: 

915: Building on the experiences of these initial efforts, modifications

916: to the EDGES system are underway to reduce the residual systematic

917: contribution in the measured spectrum and to expand the frequency

918: coverage of the system down to 50~MHz or lower in order to place

919: constraints on the anticipated transition of the hyperfine line from

920: absorption to emission as the IGM warms before the EOR. Constraining

921: the redshift and intensity of this feature would be very valuable for

922: understanding the heating history of the IGM and, since the

923: transition has the potential to produce a step-like feature in the

924: redshifted 21~cm spectrum with a magnitude over 100~mK (up to a

925: factor of 4 larger than the amplitude of the step during the

926: reionization epoch), it may be easier to identify than the transition

927: from reionization---although the sky noise temperature due to the

928: Galactic synchrotron foreground increases significantly at the lower

929: frequencies, as well. Through these and other global spectrum

930: efforts, the first contribution to cosmic reionization science from

931: measurements of the redshifted 21~cm background will hopefully be

932: achieved in the near future.

933: 

934: \acknowledgements

935: 

936: This work was supported by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

937: School of Science, and by the NSF through grant AST-0457585.

938: 

939: 

940: \input{ms.bbl}

941: %\bibliography{apjmnemonic,../../../references}

942: %\bibliographystyle{apj}

943: 

944: 

945: \end{document}

946: