1:
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3:
4: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
5:
6: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7:
8: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
9: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
10: %% use the longabstract style option.
11:
12: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
13:
14: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
15: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
16: %% the \begin{document} command.
17: %%
18: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
19: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
20: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
21: %% for information.
22:
23: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
24:
25: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
26:
27: %\newcommand{\nsig}[1]{\mbox{{#1}$\sigma$}}
28:
29: \slugcomment{To be published in ApJ}
30:
31: \shorttitle{The CO Outflows of IRAS 16293--2422}
32:
33: \shortauthors{Yeh et al.}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{The CO Molecular Outflows of IRAS 16293--2422 Probed by the
38: Submillimeter Array}
39:
40: \author{Sherry C. C. Yeh\altaffilmark{1,2},
41: Naomi Hirano\altaffilmark{1},
42: Tyler L. Bourke\altaffilmark{3},
43: Paul T. P. Ho\altaffilmark{1,3}
44: Chin-Fei Lee\altaffilmark{1,4},
45: Nagayoshi Ohashi\altaffilmark{1},
46: Shigehisa Takakuwa\altaffilmark{1,5}
47: }
48:
49:
50: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Academia Sinica,
51: P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
52:
53: \altaffiltext{2}{Current Address: Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics,
54: University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada
55: ; yeh@astro.utoronto.ca}
56:
57: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
58: Street, MS 78, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA}
59:
60: \altaffiltext{4}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
61: Submillimeter Array, 645 North A'ohoku Drive, Hilo HI 96720, USA}
62:
63: \altaffiltext{5}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, ALMA Project
64: Office, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan}
65:
66:
67: %\doublespace
68: \begin{abstract}
69:
70: We have mapped the proto-binary source IRAS 16293--2422 in CO 2--1,
71: $^{13}$CO 2--1, and CO 3--2 with the Submillimeter Array (SMA). The maps
72: with resolution of 1\farcs5--5\arcsec\ reveal a single small scale
73: ($\sim$3000 AU) bipolar molecular outflow along the east-west direction.
74: We found that the blueshifted emission of this small scale outflow mainly
75: extends to the east and the redshifted emission to the west from the
76: position of IRAS 16293A.
77: %This suggests that the small scale outflow detected by the SMA is most
78: %likely driven by IRAS 16293A.
79: A comparison with the morphology of the large scale outflows previously
80: observed by single-dish telescopes at millimeter wavelengths suggests that
81: the small scale outflow may be the inner part of the large scale
82: ($\sim$15000 AU) E--W outflow. On the other hand, there is no clear
83: counterpart of the large scale NE--SW outflow in our SMA maps. Comparing
84: analytical models to the data suggests that the morphology and kinematics
85: of the small scale outflow can be explained by a wide-angle wind with an
86: inclination angle of $\sim$30\degr--40\degr~with respect to the plane of
87: the sky. The high resolution CO maps show that there are two compact,
88: bright spots in the blueshifted velocity range. An LVG analysis shows that
89: the one located 1\arcsec\ to the east of source A is extremely dense,
90: n(H$_2$)~$\sim$10$^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$, and warm, T$_{\rm kin} >$~55 K. The
91: other one located 1\arcsec\ southeast of source B has a higher temperature
92: of T$_{\rm kin} >$~65 K but slightly lower density of
93: n(H$_2$)~$\sim$10$^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$. It is likely that these bright spots
94: are associated with the hot core-like emission observed toward IRAS 16293.
95: Since both two bright spots are blueshifted from the systemic velocity and
96: are offset from the protostellar positions, they are likely formed by
97: shocks.
98:
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: \keywords{stars: formation --- ISM: individual (IRAS 16293-2422) --- ISM:
102: jets and outflows}
103:
104: \section{Introduction}
105:
106: Outflow phenomena have been recognized as an important phase in the star
107: formation processes. It is generally accepted that when stars are formed
108: by gravitational infall, outflows transfer excess angular momentum out of
109: the system \citep[e.g.,][]{shu1987}. Outflows are observed at various
110: wavelengths from the radio to the ultraviolet, among which the
111: millimeter/submillimeter bands probe the molecular outflows. Molecular
112: outflows, recognized as high-velocity wings in CO and other
113: molecular lines, are considered to be the ambient gas entrained or pushed
114: by protostellar winds. By observing molecular outflows, we can determine
115: their physical, kinematic and chemical properties, trace the mass-loss
116: history of protostars, and probe the early phases of the star formation
117: process (\citealt{arce2007}, and references therein).
118:
119: IRAS 16293--2422 (hereafter referred to as I16293) is a well-studied
120: proto-binary system located in the nearby molecular cloud complex L 1689.
121: The distance to L 1689 is often assumed to be 160 pc \citep{whittet1974},
122: however some recent studies suggested a distance of $\sim$120 pc
123: \citep{degeus1989, knude1998}. In this paper we adopt 120 pc as the
124: distance. The projected separation of the two protostars is
125: $\sim$5\arcsec~\citep{mundy1992}, which then corresponds to 600 AU. I16293
126: is classified as a Class 0 young stellar object (YSO) since this system is
127: undetectable at wavelengths shorter than 10 $\mu$m and shows a spectral
128: energy distribution (SED) with very low temperature \citep{andre1994}. The
129: bolometric luminosity of I16293 is estimated to be $\sim$36 $L_\odot$
130: \citep{correia2004}. I16293 is known to have a quadrupolar outflow
131: \citep{walker1988, mizuno1990}; one bipolar pair extends along the east
132: (blue) and west (red) (hereafter the E--W pair) directions, while the other
133: one has an orientation from northeast (red) to southwest (blue) (hereafter
134: the NE--SW pair) with an inclination angle of 30$^\circ$--45$^\circ$
135: \citep{hirano2001} or 65$^\circ$ \citep{stark2004}. The NE--SW pair is
136: more collimated, and its axis crosses the position close to the SE
137: continuum source IRAS 16293A (hereafter source A). Therefore this pair has
138: been thought to be powered by source A \citep[e.g.,][]{walker1988,
139: mundy1990}. On the other hand, the E--W pair is not as well collimated and
140: its axis, though not well defined, seems to pass to the north of source A,
141: where the continuum source IRAS 16293B (hereafter source B) is the only
142: possible driving YSO. Hence source B has often been assumed as the driving
143: source of the E--W pair. \citet{stark2004} showed that source B has very
144: narrow line widths, a low luminosity, and is not evidently associated with
145: high-velocity gas. They interpreted source B as a T--Tauri star that drove
146: the E--W pair and that the E--W pair is now a fossil flow. However, these
147: interpretations are based on observations at low angular resolution (i.e.,
148: $>$5\arcsec), that are insufficient to resolve the two protostars and
149: reveal the relation between the quadrupolar outflow and the binary.
150:
151: In fact, using higher angular resolution observations \citet{chandler2005}
152: proposed an alternative interpretation. They resolved source A into four
153: components, two at 1~mm and another two at 7~mm, and suggested that two of
154: them are responsible for driving the NE--SW and the E--W pair,
155: respectively. In addition, \citet{chandler2005} proposed that source B is
156: actually much younger than previously interpreted and may have not yet
157: begun the phase of mass loss. Their proposition was, however, made based
158: on (1) the dust continuum morphology and proper motions of source A, and
159: (2) the velocity structures of emission of H$_2$CO, H$_2$S, and SO, rather
160: than CO, which is a much better tracer of the overall outflow structure
161: free from chemical peculiarities and shocks.
162:
163: In order to study the molecular outflows in the vicinity of I16293 in more
164: detail, we have carried out CO 2--1, $^{13}$CO 2--1, and CO 3--2
165: observations at higher angular resolutions using the Submillimeter
166: Array\footnote{The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the
167: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of
168: Astronomy and Astrophysics and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and
169: the Academia Sinica.} (SMA). Our SMA observations provide sufficient
170: angular and spectral resolution in the CO lines to resolve the kinematics
171: and the structure of the outflow in the central region of I16293. In this
172: paper, we summarize the observational details in \S2; present our SMA CO
173: 2--1, $^{13}$CO 2--1, and CO 3--2 results in \S3; discuss the outflow
174: driving mechanism, physical parameters of the outflow, and the
175: kinematics in the vicinity of I16293 in \S4.
176:
177: \section{Observations}
178:
179: The Submillimeter Array (SMA) \citep{ho2004} observations of the CO J=2--1
180: (230.538 GHz), CO 3--2 (345.796 GHz), and $^{13}$CO 2--1 (220.399 GHz)
181: transitions were carried out during February 2003 to February 2005. The
182: phase tracking center was $\alpha$(J2000)~=~16$^h$32$^m$22.91$^s$,
183: $\delta$(J2000)~=~$-$24$^{\circ}$28$'$35.52\arcsec. The bandwidth of the
184: spectral correlator was 656 MHz in 2003 and 2 GHz in 2005. The frequency
185: resolution used was 812.5 kHz, corresponding to the velocity resolution of 1.06
186: km s$^{-1}$ at 230 GHz and 0.70 km s$^{-1}$ at 345 GHz. The field of view
187: of the array is $\sim$54\arcsec~at 230 GHz and $\sim$36\arcsec~at 345 GHz.
188: The CO 2--1 and $^{13}$CO 2--1 lines were observed simultaneously on 18
189: February 2005 with 6 antennas, providing 15 baselines ranging from 10 to 70
190: m. The CO 3--2 data were observed on February 26 and April 23 in 2003 with
191: 4 and 5 antennas, respectively, providing 10 independent baselines
192: ranging from 12 to 120 m. We note that the CO 3--2 observations provide
193: fewer short baselines than the CO 2--1 observations, therefore the CO
194: 3--2 data are less sensitive to extended structures.
195:
196: %We note that we
197: %had less shorter baselines in the CO 3--2 observations than the CO 2--1
198: %observations, which makes the CO 3--2 observations less sensitive to
199: %extended structures as compared to the CO 2--1 observations.
200:
201: The visibility data were calibrated using the MIR software package
202: originally developed for Owens Valley Radio Observatory
203: \citep{scoville1993, qi2005} and modified for the SMA. The absolute flux
204: calibration and bandpass calibration were done by observing Callisto (on
205: 2003 February 26), Ganymede (on 2003 April 23), and Uranus (on 2005
206: February 18). The uncertainty in the absolute flux scale is estimated to
207: be $\sim$10\%. The visibility phase and amplitude calibration was achieved
208: by observing the quasars NRAO 530 (J1733-130) in 2003 and J1743--038 in
209: 2005. The continuum level was measured from line-free channels in the
210: calibrated visibility data. The MIRIAD and the NRAO AIPS packages were
211: used to make the spectral images and for further analysis. The maps were
212: restored using uniform weighting, resulting in synthesized beam sizes of
213: 4\farcs7$\times$2\farcs5 with a position angle of 0.0$^{\circ}$ for the CO
214: 2--1, 4\farcs9$\times$2\farcs6 with a position angle of 1.5$^{\circ}$ for
215: the $^{13}$CO 2--1, and 1\farcs6$\times$1\farcs4 with a position angle of
216: 26.2$^{\circ}$ for the CO 3--2. The rms noise levels of the channel maps
217: with $\sim$1 km s$^{-1}$ width are $\sim$0.15 Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the CO
218: 2--1, $\sim$0.13 Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the $^{13}$CO 2--1, and $\sim$0.3 Jy
219: beam$^{-1}$ for the CO 3--2.
220:
221: \section{Results}
222:
223: \subsection{CO 2--1}
224:
225: Fig.~\ref{f1} shows the velocity channel maps of the CO 2--1 emission
226: uncorrected for the primary beam attenuation. The
227: CO 2--1 emission is shown in the channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$7.2 km
228: s$^{-1}$ to 31.9 km s$^{-1}$. In most of the channels, the spatial
229: distribution of the CO 2--1 emission is elongated along the east-west
230: direction. It is likely that this elongated CO emission originates from
231: the molecular outflow previously imaged on larger scales \citep{stark2004}.
232: The CO emission at $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 4.4 km s$^{-1}$ is scattered over the
233: field of view. Since this velocity channel is close to the cloud systemic
234: velocity of $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 4.0 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{mizuno1990}, most of the
235: emission has been resolved out due to the lack of short baselines. The CO
236: distribution at $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 3.3 km s$^{-1}$ and $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 5.5 km
237: s$^{-1}$ shows the east-west elongation, suggesting that the CO emission at
238: these channels comes from the outflowing gas even though the velocity
239: offset from the systemic velocity is small. Therefore, we infer that the
240: CO 2--1 emission seen in the channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$7.2 km
241: s$^{-1}$ to 3.3 km s$^{-1}$ is the blueshifted outflow component and that
242: in the channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 5.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 31.9 km s$^{-1}$ is
243: the redshifted outflow component.
244:
245: The blueshifted emission is extended to the east of source A and the west
246: of source B as well. The eastern component is seen in most of the
247: blueshifted channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$7.2 km s$^{-1}$ to 3.3 km
248: s$^{-1}$, while the western component is in the velocity range from $V_{\rm
249: LSR}$ = $-$0.9 km s$^{-1}$ to 3.3 km s$^{-1}$, and is closer to the
250: systemic velocity compared to the eastern component. As shown in the
251: velocity channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$0.9 km s$^{-1}$ to 1.2 km
252: s$^{-1}$, the eastern blueshifted component has a fan shape pointing to
253: source A with a position angle of $\sim$75$^{\circ}$.
254:
255: The redshifted emission extends to the east and the west of source A. The
256: eastern redshifted component mostly overlaps with the eastern blue
257: emission.
258: %In Fig.~\ref{f2}, the eastern redshifted component appears in the
259: %velocity range $V_{\rm LSR}=$~5.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 11.8 km s$^{-1}$.
260: The western redshifted component has a fan shape structure with its apex at
261: the position of source A at P.A. $\sim$90$^\circ$. This structure appears
262: from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 8.6 km s$^{-1}$, and the emission moves away from the
263: source as the velocity increases.
264: %Note that the primary beam correction is
265: %not applied to the images displayed in Fig.~\ref{f1} and Fig.~\ref{f2}.
266:
267: The total integrated intensity (zeroth moment) maps of the blueshifted and
268: redshifted CO 2--1 line emission are presented in Fig.~\ref{f2}a
269: (uncorrected for primary beam attenuation). In the blueshifted component,
270: there are two prominent peaks 1\arcsec~to the east of source A (labeled b1)
271: and 1\arcsec~southeast of source B (labeled b2). The peak brightness
272: temperature of CO 2--1 emission at b1 and b2 are 57 K and 63 K,
273: respectively. These two peaks are seen in all the blueshifted channels
274: (Fig.~\ref{f1}) starting from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$6.2 km~s$^{-1}$. We note
275: that both b1 and b2 have not been resolved in the previous CO outflow maps
276: observed with the single-dish telescopes \citep{stark2004}.
277:
278: In Fig.~\ref{f3}a we compare the CO 2--1 spectrum observed by the SMA with
279: that observed by the JCMT. We have applied the primary beam correction,
280: smoothed the SMA map to have a 21\arcsec~Gaussian beam, which is same as
281: the JCMT beam at 230 GHz, and obtained the spectrum at the phase tracking
282: center. The JCMT spectrum was resampled to have the same velocity
283: resolution as the SMA data. To convert the antenna temperature $T_{\rm
284: A}$* into brightness temperature, we adopted a main beam efficiency,
285: ${\eta}_{\rm MB}$, of 0.69 for the JCMT at 230 GHz. It is shown that the
286: SMA recovered most of the flux in the velocity range lower than $V_{\rm
287: LSR}\sim$2 km s$^{-1}$, indicating that most of the blueshifted emission in
288: this velocity range comes from the compact regions labeled b1 and b2. The
289: SMA spectrum is slightly brighter than the JCMT spectrum in several
290: channels, probably due to the calibration uncertainties in both the SMA and
291: JCMT data. In the redshifted velocity range, the SMA recovered $\sim$70\%
292: of the flux at $V_{\rm LSR} > 10$ km s$^{-1}$. The flux in the velocity
293: range close to the systemic velocity is recovered $\sim$60\% except the
294: channel of the deep absorption dip at $V_{\rm LSR}=$~4.4 km s$^{-1}$. At
295: this velocity, absorption caused by the foreground cloud also contributes
296: to the total absence of emission in the interferometric map because the
297: JCMT spectrum also shows a deep absorption dip at the same velocity.
298: %At this velocity channel, absorption caused by the foreground cloud also
299: %contribute to the total absence of emission in the interferometric map
300: %because the spectrum observed with the JCMT spectrum also shows the deep
301: %absorption dip at the corresponding velocity.
302:
303: \subsection{CO 3--2}
304:
305: The CO 3--2 total integrated intensity (zeroth moment) map is shown in
306: Fig.~\ref{f2}b (uncorrected for primary beam attenuation). The emission is
307: integrated over the velocity channels from $V_{\rm LSR}=$~$-$7.5 km
308: s$^{-1}$ to 3.5 km s$^{-1}$ on the blueshifted side, and from $V_{\rm
309: LSR}=$~5.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 31.5 km s$^{-1}$ on the redshifted side. There
310: is no significant emission in the velocity channel centered at $V_{\rm
311: LSR}=$~4.5 km s$^{-1}$. The CO 3--2 emission in this velocity range arises
312: from the extended ambient cloud and is poorly sampled by the uv coverage of
313: the CO 3--2 data.
314: %Therefore, we consider that the CO 3--2 emission in this velocity range
315: %arises from the ambient cloud with spatially extended structure.
316: There are two bright blueshifted components, one located 2\arcsec~southeast
317: of source A and the other located 1\arcsec~southeast of source B, that are
318: likely to be the counterparts of b1 and b2 identified in the CO 2--1 map
319: (see Fig.~\ref{f2}a). The peak brightness temperature of CO 3--2 emission
320: is 39 K at b1 and 55 K at b2. These two components are connected by faint
321: emission. The blueshifted emission extending toward the northeast with a
322: P.A. of $\sim $70$^\circ$ corresponds to the eastern blueshifted emission
323: in the CO 2--1 map. As in the case of CO 2--1, the redshifted emission
324: extends to the east and west of source A.
325:
326: In order to estimate the missing flux, we have smoothed the SMA CO 3--2 map
327: to 14\arcsec~resolution, which is the HPBW of the JCMT at 345 GHz, and
328: compared the spectrum at the phase tracking center with that obtained by
329: the JCMT (Fig.~\ref{f3}b). The primary beam correction was applied to the
330: SMA CO 3--2 map before it was smoothed. The JCMT spectrum was converted
331: into the brightness temperature unit by assuming ${\eta}_{\rm MB}=0.63$ at
332: 345 GHz. Fig.~\ref{f3}b shows that the missing flux of the SMA CO 3--2
333: data is larger than that of the CO 2--1 except for the high-velocity part
334: of the redshifted wing at $V_{\rm LSR}~\ga$~14 km s$^{-1}$, where most of
335: the flux is recovered by the SMA. The SMA recovered $\sim$50\% of the CO
336: 3--2 flux in the velocity ranges $-$9.0 $<V_{\rm LSR}<$ 2.0 km s$^{-1}$ and
337: 6.0 $<V_{\rm LSR}<$ 13.0 km s$^{-1}$. That more missing flux is evident in
338: the CO 3--2 data than the CO 2--1 data is likely due to it containing fewer
339: short baselines, as mentioned in \S2.
340:
341: \subsection{$^{13}$CO 2--1}
342:
343: Fig.~\ref{f3}c compares the $^{13}$CO spectrum observed with the SMA and
344: that observed with the JCMT. The SMA spectrum was obtained after we
345: corrected for the primary beam attenuation and smoothed to
346: 21\arcsec~resolution. Due to a software problem, the velocity values of
347: the $^{13}$CO 2--1 data were not recorded correctly. We found that the
348: $^{13}$CO 2--1 spectrum observed with the SMA was blueshifted by $\sim$1 km
349: s$^{-1}$ with respect to that observed with the JCMT. Therefore, we
350: calibrated the velocity of each channel in the SMA data using the $^{13}$CO
351: 2--1 spectrum observed with the JCMT.
352: %Therefore, we referred to the $^{13}$CO 2--1 spectrum observed with the
353: %JCMT and calibrated the velocity of each channel of the SMA data.
354: Most of the $^{13}$CO 2--1 flux is recovered by the SMA at $V_{\rm LSR}<$
355: 2.0 km s$^{-1}$. The velocity channel maps of the $^{13}$CO 2--1 emission
356: presented in Fig.~\ref{f4} (uncorrected for primary beam attenuation) show
357: that emission in this velocity range mainly comes from the compact source
358: close to source A. It is likely that this component corresponds to b1 in
359: the CO 2--1 map. On the other hand, the brightest component b2 in the CO
360: 2--1 map is less significant in the $^{13}$CO 2--1. It is identified as a
361: northwestern extension of the emission in the velocity channels from $-$0.8
362: to 1.5 km s$^{-1}$. The $^{13}$CO emission extends to the east of source A
363: in the redshifted velocity channels at $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 5.9 km s$^{-1}$ and
364: 7.0 km s$^{-1}$, and extends to the east and west of source A at $V_{\rm
365: LSR}$ = 8.1 km s$^{-1}$. It should be noted that a similar structure is
366: seen in the velocity channel maps of the CO 2--1 (see Fig.~\ref{f1}),
367: suggesting that the $^{13}$CO 2--1 emission in this velocity range arises
368: from the dense part of the outflow. The $^{13}$CO 2--1 flux recovered by
369: the SMA is 60--70\% in the velocity channels from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = 5.9 km
370: s$^{-1}$ to 9.2 km s$^{-1}$. In the velocity channels at $V_{\rm LSR}$ =
371: 2.6 km s$^{-1}$ and 3.7 km s$^{-1}$, the $^{13}$CO 2--1 map shows a
372: V-shaped structure. Since the southwestern and southeastern edges of the
373: $^{13}$CO 2--1 correspond to the northern edges of the western and eastern
374: lobes, respectively, it is likely that the $^{13}$CO 2--1 emission in this
375: velocity range comes from the envelope excavated by the outflow. Note that
376: the primary beam correction is not applied to the images shown in
377: Fig.~\ref{f4}.
378:
379: \section{Discussion}
380:
381: \subsection{Outflows in the vicinity of IRAS 16293--2422}
382:
383: \subsubsection{Driving source}
384:
385: As was shown in \S3, the CO 2--1 and 3--2 maps observed with the SMA
386: clearly show small scale outflow emission in the vicinity of I16293. It is
387: quite natural to assume that the CO 2--1 and 3--2 outflow emission has
388: the same origin. Each of the CO 2--1 and 3--2 outflows has a blueshifted
389: component extending to the east and a redshifted component extending to the
390: west of source A (see Fig.~\ref{f2}a and \ref{f2}b). In the CO 2--1
391: channel maps, both the eastern blueshifted component and the western
392: redshifted component show fan-shaped patterns with their apexes pointing
393: toward source A. Although the eastern redshifted component is less clearly
394: extending from the position of source A, its coincidence with the eastern
395: blueshifted emission suggests that the eastern blue- and redshifted
396: components represent the front side and the back side of a single outflow
397: lobe, respectively.
398: %Although the eastern redshifted component has less clear extension from
399: %source A position, it positional coincidence with the eastern blueshifted
400: %one suggests that
401: Such an outflow lobe showing both blue- and redshifted emissions together
402: is likely to be an outflow with a wide opening angle and an axis close to
403: the plane of the sky \citep{Cabrit86}. These morphological characteristics
404: of the small scale outflow suggest that it is most likely driven by source
405: A.
406:
407: The direction of the outflow axis is rather difficult to define clearly.
408: The western redshifted lobe in CO 2--1 shows a position angle of almost
409: $-$90$^{\circ}$, while the blue- and redshifted eastern lobes show position
410: angles of $\sim$75$^{\circ}$. The axis of the CO 3--2 outflow is
411: approximately along a position angle of 80$^{\circ}$. These results
412: suggest that the axis of the small scale outflow is approximately the
413: east-west direction. The difference in direction between the blue- and
414: redshifted components of the CO 2--1 emission, and the CO 2--1 and 3--2
415: emission, could also indicate that the high velocity gas comprises emission
416: from two or more outflows. There may be an interaction between the wind or
417: jet driving the large scale NE--SW outflow and the molecular gas, as
418: indicated by the offset of shock-tracing molecule line emission peaks to
419: the NE of source A (Chandler et al.\ 2005). However, the bulk of the CO
420: emission we observe is consistent with a predominantly E--W outflow.
421:
422: \subsubsection{Comparisons with the large scale outflows}
423:
424: It is important to know the relationship between the small scale
425: ($\sim$3000 AU) outflow observed with the SMA and the large scale
426: ($\sim$15000 AU) outflows previously observed with single-dish telescopes
427: even though the size scales are quite different between them. We should
428: note that the missing flux and the single field of view in the SMA
429: observations prevent us from directly relating the two types of outflows on
430: these very different scales. Nevertheless, morphological comparisons of
431: the small and large scale outflows could allow us to infer their
432: relationship.
433:
434: Single-dish observations showed two large scale outflows; one is the E--W
435: pair and the other is the NE--SW pair \citep{walker1988, mizuno1990, Lis02,
436: stark2004}. The blue- and redshifted lobes of the E--W pair are located to
437: the east and the west, respectively, showing the same velocity trend as the
438: small scale outflow. The outflow axes of these two outflows are also
439: similar. These facts naturally suggest that the small scale outflow is the
440: inner part of the large scale E--W pair, and that the bulk of the CO
441: emission observed by the SMA is due to the E--W outflow. If this is the
442: case, then the E--W pair is not a fossil flow but a currently active one,
443: and the driving source of the E--W pair is most likely to be source A.
444:
445: Do the SMA maps show any counterparts of the NE--SW pair?
446: \citet{chandler2005} proposed that the driving source of the NE--SW pair is
447: one of the radio sources, A2, based on its bipolar morphology along the
448: NE--SW direction in their 43 GHz map. However, our SMA maps show no
449: counterpart of the NE--SW pair, if we consider the small scale outflow
450: mapped with the SMA as the inner part of the E--W pair. One possible
451: reason for why there is no counterpart of the NE--SW pair in the SMA maps
452: is that the NE--SW outflow lobes are located outside the SMA field of view
453: at both 230 and 345 GHz. In fact, single-dish maps \citep{mizuno1990,
454: Lis02, stark2004} show that both blue- and redshifted lobes are detached
455: by $\sim$1\arcmin~from the centroid of I16293. This implies that the
456: NE--SW pair is older than the E--W pair, so the NE--SW pair has already
457: cleaned out the gas along its travel direction. However this
458: interpretation is totally different from those of previous studies, where
459: the NE--SW pair is considered younger than the E--W pair. On the other
460: hand, the NE--SW pair is better collimated than the E--W pair.
461: Observations of CO outflows of YSOs at different evolutionary stages
462: suggest that the opening angle of the outflow lobe
463: %in the vicinity of the central source is small in the earliest phase and
464: becomes larger as the central source evolves \citep[e.g.,][]{arc06}. If we
465: take this into account, it is natural to consider that the well-collimated
466: NE--SW pair is younger than the E--W pair. It is possible that the small
467: scale counterpart of the NE--SW pair is absent because this outflow is
468: currently inactive due to its episodic nature. Eposodic outflows have been
469: found in several YSOs, such as L1157 \citep[e.g.,][]{gueth96}.
470: %Episodic nature is known in several outflows such as the one in L1157
471: %\citep[e.g.,][]{gueth96}.
472: Since there is no counterpart of the NE--SW pair in our SMA maps, we are
473: unable to determine if the NE--SW outflow is driven by source A of B, and
474: to support or refute the different claims by previous studies regarding
475: this flow \citep{stark2004, chandler2005}.
476:
477: \subsection{Kinematics of the small scale outflow}\label{model}
478:
479: Many models have been proposed to explain the relation between molecular
480: outflows and protostellar jets. Of these, two scenarios are considered
481: plausible: (1) the jet-driven model, where molecular outflows consist of
482: ambient gas swept up by the bow shock of the jet head \citep{raga1993,
483: masson1992, chernin1994}, and (2) the wind-driven model, where molecular
484: outflows are the swept-up gas entrained by wide-angle magnetized wind
485: \citep{shu1991, shu2000, li1996}. These scenarios have different
486: kinematical features in a Position--Velocity (P--V) diagram obtained from a
487: cut along the outflow axis. The jet-driven model will produce a convex
488: structure in such a P--V diagram with high velocity components at the jet
489: head; while the wind-driven model will introduce a parabolic structure
490: that originates from the central star \citep[e.g.,][]{lee2000}.
491:
492: In a CO 2--1 P--V diagram, extracted along the outflow axis at
493: P.A.~=~90$^\circ$ (Fig.~\ref{f5}), we found that the western redshifted
494: lobe shows a parabolic shape, as is expected from the wind-driven model.
495: We therefore adopted the simplified analytical model of a wind-driven
496: shell proposed by \citet{lee2000} to study the kinematics of the small
497: scale outflow. In the cylindrical coordinate system, the structure and
498: velocity of the shell can be written as follows:
499:
500: \begin{equation}
501: z=CR^2, {\it v}_R={\it v}_0R, {\it v}_z={\it v}_0z,
502: \end{equation}
503: where $z$ is the distance along the outflow axis; $R$ is the radial size of
504: the outflow perpendicular to $z$ ; $C$ and $v_0$ are free parameters that
505: describe the spatial and velocity distributions of the outflow shell,
506: respectively.
507:
508: First, we generated the model curve that delineates the outflow shell
509: feature\footnote{We only model the red lobe because it shows a clear
510: fan-shape morphology.} (see Fig.~\ref{f6}), to determine the free parameter
511: $C$. In Fig.~\ref{f6} the green line and the black line delineate the
512: curves produced by $C=$~0.20 arcsec$^{-1}$ and $C=$~0.10 arcsec$^{-1}$,
513: respectively. Both curves assume the inclination angle of the axis from
514: the plane of the sky, {\it i} to be 30$^\circ$. However, the curve is
515: insensitive to the inclination angle if {\it i} is smaller than 40$^\circ$.
516: Since both eastern and western lobes have opening angles of
517: 60$^\circ$--80$^\circ$, and are accompanied by the CO emission component
518: with opposite velocity shifts (i.e. the eastern blue lobe is accompanied by
519: the redshifted component and the western red lobe by the blueshifted
520: component), it is unlikely that the inclination angle is larger than
521: 40$^\circ$. Next, we determined {\it v}$_0$ and {\it i} by comparing the
522: velocity pattern of the model curve with the observed P-V diagram. The
523: green curve in Fig.~\ref{f5} was produced by {\it i}~=~30$^\circ$,
524: $C=$~0.20 arcsec$^{-1}$, and {\it v}$_0$~=~1.3 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$;
525: while the dashed curve was produced by {\it i}~=~40$^\circ$, $C=$~0.10
526: arcsec$^{-1}$, and {\it v}$_0$~=~0.8 km s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. A
527: wind-driven outflow model predicts the ``Hubble law'' velocity structure,
528: that is the velocity increases as the emission moves away from the central
529: source \citep[e.g.,][]{shu1991, lee2000}. As we have mentioned in \S3.1,
530: the redshifted lobe of the small scale outflow has this signature. Hence,
531: our simple modeling qualitatively indicates that the driving mechanism for
532: the small scale outflow could be a wide-angle wind inclined to the plane of
533: the sky by $\sim$30$^\circ$ to 40$^\circ$. The dynamical age of the small
534: scale outflow is given by 1/{\it v}$_0$ and is 450--700 years.
535:
536: It should be noted that the wind-driven model does not contradict to the
537: evidence of a precessing jet presented by \citet{chandler2005}. Recent
538: numerical simulations of magnetocentrifugal winds predict an on-axis
539: density enhancement within the $X$-wind type of wide opening angle wind
540: \citep{li1996, shang2002, shang2006}, and so it is possible to have a
541: jet-like feature in such a model that does not show up in CO observations.
542:
543: \subsection{Physical parameters of the small scale outflow}
544:
545: We estimated the outflow mass using the CO 2--1 and $^{13}$CO 2--1 data
546: cubes corrected for the primary beam attenuation and assuming LTE
547: conditions. Since the peak brightness temperature of the CO emission
548: reaches $\sim$50 K, we assumed 50 K as an excitation temperature. We
549: adopted an H$_2$ to CO abundance ratio of 10$^4$ and a mean atomic weight
550: of the gas of 1.36. A comparison between the channel maps of CO 2--1
551: (Fig.~\ref{f1}) and those of $^{13}$CO 2--1 (Fig.~\ref{f4}) suggests that
552: the CO 2--1 emission is significantly optically thick in the low-velocity
553: redshifted component at $V_{\rm LSR}\sim$5--9 km s$^{-1}$ and the
554: low-velocity blueshifted component at $V_{\rm LSR}\sim$0--2 km s$^{-1}$.
555: The $^{13}$CO 2--1 emission is also detected in the positions of the bright
556: spots b1 and b2; however, we excluded these components from our
557: calculation. The physical conditions of these bright spots are discussed
558: in the next subsection. At velocities where the $^{13}$CO emission is
559: detectable, we estimated the optical depth of the CO 2--1 line using the
560: following equation:
561: \begin{equation}
562: \frac{S_{\nu}(\rm{CO})}{S_{\nu}(^{13}\rm {CO})} =
563: \frac{[\rm{CO}]}{[^{13}\rm {CO}]} \left(\frac{1-e^{-\tau}}{\tau}\right),
564: \end{equation}
565: where [CO]/[$^{13}$CO] is the abundance ratio between CO and $^{13}$CO that
566: is assumed to be 77 \citep{wilson1994}. The optical depth of the CO 2--1
567: emission in the low-velocity redshifted component is estimated to be
568: $\sim$3--36 in the western lobe and $\sim$6--24 in the eastern lobe, and
569: that of the low-velocity blueshifted component is $\sim$2--17 in the
570: eastern lobe. Outflow masses in the optically thick velocity channels were
571: corrected using:
572: \begin{equation}
573: M_{thick}=\sum m(v_i)=m'(v_i)\left(\frac{\tau_i}{1-e^{-\tau(v_i)}}\right),
574: \end{equation}
575: where {\it m$^\prime$}({\it v$_i$}) is the mass at velocity {\it v$_i$}
576: without optical depth correction; {\it m}({\it $v_i$}) is the mass after
577: optical depth correction; {\it $\tau_i$} represents the optical depth of CO
578: 2--1 at velocity {\it v$_i$}. Outside the velocity ranges where the
579: $^{13}$CO emission was observed, we assumed that the CO emission is
580: optically thin, and obtained the mass by $M_{thin}=\sum m'(v_i)$. The
581: total mass of the outflow was obtained by $M_{total}=M_{thin}+M_{thick}$.
582: Table~\ref{table1} summarizes the masses of the blueshifted and redshifted
583: components in the eastern and western lobes. The optically thick part of
584: the spectrum dominates the outflow mass calculations. The outflow masses
585: are underestimated by an order of magnitude without the correction for
586: optical depth. Since significant flux is missed in the low velocity range
587: due to the lack of short baseline data and absorption by foreground clouds,
588: the masses derived here are lower limits. In both eastern and western
589: lobes, the redshifted component is significantly more massive than the
590: blueshifted component. This suggests that dense ambient gas exists behind
591: the outflow lobes, so that the blueshifted component in the front can
592: expand rather freely, while the redshifted component in the back needs to
593: push more material.
594:
595: The dynamical parameters of the flow are summarized in Table 2. Table 2
596: gives two kinds of values; one is corrected for the inclination effect
597: ($i=$~35$^\circ$) and the other is without this correction (uncorrected).
598: The inclination angle of 35$^{\circ}$ is chosen based on the kinematical
599: modeling described in the previous section. In order to compare the
600: energies of the small scale outflow with those of the large scale E--W
601: outflow observed with single-dish telescopes, we estimated the momentum
602: supply rate and the stellar mass loss rate. These dynamical quantities can
603: be derived reasonably well even though the map is incomplete
604: \citep[e.g.][]{bontemps1996}. The momentum supply rate and the mass loss
605: rate of the small scale outflow lobes are estimated to be
606: $\sim$2$\times$10$^{-4}$ $M_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ and
607: 9.0$\times$10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, respectively. The CO 1--0
608: single-dish observational result of I16293 \citep{mizuno1990} scaled to a
609: distance of 120 pc suggests that the momentum supply rate and the mass
610: loss rate of the large scale E--W outflow are $\sim$1.6$\times$10$^{-4}$
611: $M_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ and $\sim$8.0$\times$ 10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$
612: yr$^{-1}$ in the eastern lobe, while those of the western lobe are
613: $\sim$1.1$\times$10$^{-4}$ $M_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ and
614: $\sim$5.6$\times$10$^{-7}$ $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, respectively. Although the
615: parameters we derived from the SMA data are lower limits, it is likely that
616: the small scale outflow has comparable momentum and energy with the large
617: scale E--W outflow. This may imply that the E--W outflow has been fairly
618: constant in time, if the compact outflow is the inner part of the large
619: scale E--W outflow.
620:
621: \subsection{Nature of the bright, compact components}
622:
623: As shown in \S3, the high resolution CO maps reveal two bright and compact
624: components, labeled b1 and b2, at blueshifted velocities (see Fig.~\ref{f1}
625: and Fig.~\ref{f2}). In order to investigate the nature of b1 and b2, we
626: carried out an LVG calculation \citep{goldreich1974, scoville1974} using
627: the code developed by \citet{oka1998}. The velocity gradient $dv/dr$ is
628: assumed to be 1000 km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$ as estimated from the CO
629: 2--1 line width of $\sim$ 7 km s$^{-1}$ and the size of $\sim$0.005
630: pc of b1 and b2. The LVG calculation result is shown in Fig.~\ref{f7}.
631: Fig.~\ref{f7}a shows the iso-intensity contours of the CO 2--1 line (solid
632: contours) and iso-line ratio contours of CO 2--1/$^{13}$CO 2--1 (dashed
633: contours) as a function of kinetic temperature and H$_2$ number density.
634: Fig.~\ref{f7}b shows the CO 2--1 iso-intensity contours (solid contours)
635: and iso-line ratio contours of CO 2--1/$^{13}$CO 2--1 (dashed contours).
636:
637: In order to compare the CO 3--2, CO 2--1, and $^{13}$CO 2--1 lines at the
638: positions b1 and b2, we made the maps of these three lines using the
639: visibility data in the range from 10 k$\lambda$ to 52 k$\lambda$,
640: corresponding to the uv range common for the three data sets. The beam sizes
641: in uniform weighting of the CO 3--2, CO 2--1, and $^{13}$CO 2--1 maps were
642: 3\farcs1$\times$2\farcs6 (P.A. 5.2$^{\circ}$), 4\farcs7$\times$2\farcs5
643: (P.A. $-$3.0$^{\circ}$), and 4\farcs8$\times$2\farcs6 (P.A. 1.5$^{\circ}$),
644: respectively. In spite of the same uv range limit, the beam size of the CO
645: 3--2 map is different from those of the CO 2--1 and $^{13}$CO 2--1 due to
646: differet uv coverages. Therefore, we convolved the three maps to the same
647: beam size, i.e. 4\farcs9$\times$2\farcs7 with a P.A. of 0.0$^{\circ}$ after
648: the correction of the primary beam attenuation. The CO 3--2, 2--1 and
649: $^{13}$CO 2--1 spectra obtained at the positions of b1 and b2 are shown in
650: Fig.~\ref{f8}. The brightness temperature of CO 2--1 at the position of b1
651: is $T_{\rm B} \sim$50 K, and that at b2 is $T_{\rm B} \sim$60 K. The CO
652: 2--1 flux integrated over the velocity range from $V_{\rm LSR}$ = $-$8 km
653: s$^{-1}$ to 2 km s$^{-1}$ is 102.2 K km s$^{-1}$ at b1 and 207.5 K km
654: s$^{-1}$ at b2. The $^{13}$CO 2--1 flux integrated over the same velocity
655: range is 55.9 K km s$^{-1}$ at b1 and 18.7 K km s$^{-1}$ at b2. Since most
656: of the CO and $^{13}$CO 2--1 fluxes in this velocity range were recovered
657: by the SMA, the effect of missing flux should not be significant. The CO
658: 2--1/$^{13}$CO 2--1 intensity ratio of 1.8 at b1 suggests that this
659: component is warm ($T_{\rm kin}\sim$55 K) and extremely dense ($n(\rm
660: H_2)\sim$10$^7$ cm$^{-3}$). On the other hand, the CO 2--1/$^{13}$CO 2--1
661: ratio at the position of b2 is $\sim$11, suggesting that b2 is slightly
662: warmer ($T_{\rm kin}\sim$65 K) but less denser ($n(\rm H_2)\sim$10$^6$
663: cm$^{-3}$) than b1.
664:
665: The CO 3--2 flux integrated over the same velocity range as CO 2--1 is 58.4
666: K km s$^{-1}$ at b1 and 105.6 K km s$^{-1}$ at b2. The CO 3--2/2--1 ratio
667: at the positions of b1 and b2 calculated from the integrated intensity
668: values are 0.57 and 0.51, respectively. On the other hand, Fig.~\ref{f7}
669: shows that the line ratio should be $\gtrsim$0.9 if the CO 2--1 intensity
670: is brighter than 20 K. However, in contrast to CO 2--1, only $\sim$50\%
671: of the CO 3--2 flux in this velocity range was recovered by the SMA. If we
672: assume that most of the CO 3--2 flux within the central 14\arcsec~region
673: arises from the compact sources b1 and b2, their actual flux values might
674: be twice the calculated values. If we take this effect into account, the
675: CO 3--2/2--1 ratio might be close to 1 at both b1 and b2. Therefore, the
676: CO 3--2 results do not contradict the physical conditions inferred for b1
677: and b2 from the CO and $^{13}$CO 2--1 data. We should note that there are
678: two effects that could contribute to a low CO 3--2/2--1 ratio. If the CO
679: emission is assumed to be in LTE and optically thick, the CO 3--2 emission
680: has a higher optical depth than CO 2--1. Therefore if there are
681: temperature gradients due to internal heating sources, the CO 3--2 emission
682: will tend to trace outer and cooler gas. Even for a uniform temperature,
683: the $\tau=$~1 surface of the CO 3--2 emission with higher optical depth
684: will be more extended and more flux will be resolved out by the
685: interferometer, independent of the other uv coverage issues.
686:
687: It should also be noted that the kinetic temperature and density derived
688: here are the averaged values over the beam area of
689: 4\farcs9$\times$2\farcs7. Since the bright spots b1 and b2 are compact,
690: the CO 2--1 brightness temperature at b1 and b2 might be higher if we
691: observe with higher angular resolution. Indeed, the brightness
692: temperatures of CO 2--1 and CO 3--2 at b1 and b2 measured in the higher
693: resolution maps are higher than those of the spectra shown in
694: Fig.~\ref{f8}. Therefore it is possible that the kinetic temperatures at
695: b1 and b2 are higher than those estimated here.
696:
697: Complex molecules, such as HCOOCH$_3$ and C$_2$H$_3$CN, have been detected
698: toward both source A and source B \citep{kuan2004,chandler2005}. The
699: estimated kinetic temperatures ($>$55 K at b1 and $>$65 K at b2) are
700: consistent with the rotational temperature of $\sim$100 K derived from the
701: analysis of the SMA HCOOCH$_3$ data \citep{kuan2004}.
702: %\citet{kuan2004} and \citet{chandler2005} have detected complex organic
703: %molecules such as HCOOCH$_3$ and C$_2$H$_3$CN toward both source A and
704: %source B.
705: Since the bright components b1 and b2 are close to source A and B,
706: respectively, it is likely that these warm and dense components are
707: associated with hot core-like emission. Our CO 2--1 and 3--2 maps show
708: that both b1 and b2 are blueshifted from the systemic velocity and are
709: offset from the positions of continuum peaks. These results support the
710: idea that shocks play an important role in forming hot cores around low
711: mass protostars \citep[e.g.][]{vanDishoek1995,chandler2005}. As discussed
712: in \citet{chandler2005}, it is likely that an interaction between the jet
713: from source A and extremely dense ($\sim$10$^7$ cm$^{-3}$) gas at b1
714: contributes to the observed rich chemistry in this region. On the other
715: hand, it is unclear how the b2 component is formed. This component is also
716: seen in HCN 4--3 emission at blueshifted velocities from $-$2.62 to +0.65
717: km s$^{-1}$ \citep{takakuwa2007}. In addition, high resolution H$_2$CO,
718: SO, and H$_2$S maps presented by \citet{chandler2005} show the local
719: emission peaks close to b2 rather than the continuum peak of source B.
720: Since the sulphur-bearing molecules and H$_2$CO are known to be enhanced in
721: shocks \citep[e.g.][]{bachiller2001}, the component b2 is also likely to be
722: a shocked region. If source B is a protostar in the earlier stage than
723: source A as argued by \citet{wootten1989} and \citet{chandler2005}, b2 may
724: be a spatially compact outflow from source B that can interact with dense
725: envelope gas and produce shocks. Another possibility is that b2 indicates
726: the shock produced by the interaction between the outflow from source A and
727: the envelope surrounding source B.
728:
729: \section{Conclusions}
730:
731: We have carried out CO 2--1 $^{13}$CO 2--1, and CO 3--2 observations of the
732: proto-binary system IRAS 16293-2422 with a resolution of
733: 1\farcs5--5\arcsec~using the Submillimeter Array (SMA), which are about a
734: factor of 5 better than previous observations in these lines. Our
735: observations reveal the detailed structures of molecular outflows close to
736: the binary system. Our main results are summarized as follows:
737:
738: 1. The high resolution images of CO 2--1 and CO 3--2 show a compact bipolar
739: outflow along the east-west direction in the vicinity of the binary. The
740: center of this small scale outflow is close to source A, suggesting that
741: source A is the driving source. If we interpret this small scale outflow
742: as the inner part of the large scale E--W pair of the quadrupolar outflow,
743: the E--W pair is a currently active outflow rather than a fossil flow. On
744: the other hand, there is no clear counterpart of the large scale NE--SW
745: pair in our interferometric maps.
746:
747: 2. The shape and velocity structure of the western redshifted lobe are
748: well described by an analytical model suggesting that the small scale E--W pair
749: could be driven by a wide-angle wind with an inclination angle of
750: $\sim$30$^\circ$--40$^\circ$.
751:
752: 3. There are two compact and bright spots at blueshifted velocities. One
753: is located 1\arcsec\ east of source A (labeled b1) and the other is
754: 1\arcsec\ southeast of source B (labeled b2). An LVG analysis shows that b1
755: is extremely dense, n(H$_2$)~$\sim$10$^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$ and warm T$_{\rm kin}
756: >$~55 K, while component b2 has a higher temperature of T$_{\rm kin}
757: >$~65 K but slightly lower density of n(H$_2$)~$\sim$10$^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$.
758: It is likely that these bright spots are produced by means of shocks and
759: are associated with hot core-like activity observed toward both source A and
760: source B.
761:
762: \acknowledgements
763: We would like to thank all the SMA staff who have helped us to carry out
764: the observations. We also wish to thank the anonymous referee who gave the
765: insightful comments.
766: N. H. is supported in part by NSC grant 96-2112-M-001-023.
767: Dr. Y. -N. Su is acknowledged for fruitful discussions
768: on this research.
769:
770: \clearpage
771:
772: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
773: \tablecolumns{3}
774: \tablewidth{0pc}
775: \tablecaption{Masses of the small-scale outflow}
776: \tablehead{
777: \colhead{} & \colhead{Eastern lobe} & \colhead{Western lobe}\\
778: \colhead{Component} & \colhead{(10$^{-3}$ $M_{\odot}$)} & \colhead{(10$^{-3}$ $M_{\odot}$)}}
779: \startdata
780: Blue\tablenotemark{a} & 5.4 & 1.1\\
781: Red\tablenotemark{b} & 19.1 & 12.5\\
782: Total & 24.5 & 13.6\\
783: \enddata
784: %
785: \label{table1}
786: \tablenotetext{a}{Velocity range: $V_{\rm LSR}$= $-$7.2--3.3 km s$^{-1}$}
787: \tablenotetext{b}{Velocity range: $V_{\rm LSR}$= 5.5--31.9 km s$^{-1}$}
788: \end{deluxetable}
789: \clearpage
790:
791: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
792: \tablecolumns{6}
793: \tablewidth{0pc}
794: \tablecaption{Dynamical parameters of the small-scale outflow}
795: \tablehead{
796: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Eastern lobe} & \colhead{} &
797: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Western lobe} \\
798: \cline{2-3} \cline{5-6} \\
799: \colhead{Parameters} & \colhead{{\it i}=35$^\circ$} & \colhead{uncorrected} &
800: \colhead{} & \colhead{{\it i}=35$^\circ$} & \colhead{uncorrected}}
801: \startdata
802: Momentum (M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$) & 10.8$\times$10$^{-2}$ & 6.2$\times$10$^{-2}$ &
803: & 9.1 $\times$10$^{-2}$ & 5.2$\times$10$^{-2}$ \\
804: Kinetic energy (erg) & 12.1$\times$10$^{42}$ &4.0$\times$10$^{42}$ &
805: & 21.9$\times$10$^{42}$ & 7.0$\times$10$^{42}$ \\
806: Dynamical timescale (yr) & 600 & 850 &
807: & 500 & 700 \\
808: Mass loss rate\tablenotemark{b} (M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$) & 9.0$\times$10$^{-7}$ & 3.6$\times$10$^{-7}$ &
809: & 9.0$\times$10$^{-7}$ & 3.6$\times$10$^{-7}$ \\
810: Momentum supply rate (M$_\odot$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$) & 1.8$\times$10$^{-4}$ & 7.2$\times$10$^{-5}$ &
811: & 1.8$\times$10$^{-4}$ & 7.3$\times$10$^{-5}$ \\
812: Mechanical luminosity (L$_\odot$) & 0.31 & 7.2$\times$10$^{-2}$ &
813: & 0.42 & 9.6$\times$10$^{-2}$ \\
814: \enddata
815: %
816: \label{table2}
817: \tablenotetext{b}{The central wind speed is assumed to be 200 km s$^{-1}$. Then we derived the mass loss rate
818: by assuming momentum conservation of the entrained CO gas and the central wind.}
819: \end{deluxetable}
820:
821: \clearpage
822:
823: \begin{thebibliography}{}
824:
825: \bibitem[Andr\'{e} \& Monterle(1994)]{andre1994}
826: Andr\'{e}, P., \& Montmerle, T.~1994, \apj, 420, 837
827:
828: \bibitem[Arce \& Sargent(2006)]{arc06}
829: Arce, H.G., \& Sargent, A.I.~2006, \apj, 646, 1070
830:
831: \bibitem[Arce et al.(2007)]{arce2007}
832: Arce, H. G., Shepherd, D., Gueth, F., Lee, C. -F., Bachiller, R., Rosen,
833: A., \& Beuther, H.~2007, Protostars and Planets V, Edited by B. Reipurth,
834: D. Jewiit, and K. Keil, (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 245
835:
836: \bibitem[Bachiller et al.(2001)]{bachiller2001}
837: Bachiller, R., P\'{e}rez Guti\'{e}rrez, M., Kumar, M. S. N., \& Tafalla,
838: M.~2001, \aap, 372, 899
839:
840: \bibitem[Bontemps et al.(1996)]{bontemps1996}
841: Bontemps, S., Andr\'{e}, P., Terebey, S. \& Cabrit, S.~1996, \aap, 311, 858
842:
843: \bibitem[Cabrit \& Bertout(1986)]{Cabrit86} Cabrit, S., \&
844: Bertout, C.\ 1986, \apj, 307, 313
845:
846: \bibitem[Chandler et al.(2005)]{chandler2005}
847: Chandler, C. J., Brogan, C. L., Shirley, Y. L., \& Loinard, L.~2005, \apj,
848: 632, 371
849:
850: \bibitem[Chernin et al.(1994)]{chernin1994}
851: Chernin, L. M., Masson, C. R., Gouveia dal Pino, E. M., \& Benz, W.~1994,
852: \apj, 426, 204
853:
854: \bibitem[Correia, Griffin, \& Saraceno(2004)]{correia2004}
855: Correia, J. C., Griffin, M., \& Saraceno, P.~2004, \aap, 418, 607
856:
857: \bibitem[de Geus et al.(1989)]{degeus1989}
858: de Geus, E.J., deZeeuw, P.T., \& Lub, J.~1989, \aap, 216, 44
859:
860: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Kwan(1974)]{goldreich1974}
861: Goldreich, P. \& Kwan, J.~1974, \apj, 189, 441
862:
863: \bibitem[Gueth et al.(1996)]{gueth96}
864: Gueth, F., Guilloteau, S., \& Bachiller, R.~1996, \aap, 307, 891
865:
866: \bibitem[Hirano et al.(2001)]{hirano2001}
867: Hirano, N., Mikami, H., Umemoto, T., Yamamoto, S., \& Taniguchi, Y.~2001,
868: \apj, 547, 899
869:
870: \bibitem[Ho, Moran, \& Lo(2004)]{ho2004}
871: Ho, Paul T. P., Moran, James M., \& Lo, Kwok Yung~2004, \apj, 616, L1
872:
873: \bibitem[Knude \& H$\o$g(1998)]{knude1998}
874: %Knude, J. \& H$\o$g, E.~1998, \aap, 338, 897
875: Knude, J. \& H{\o}g, E.~1998, \aap, 338, 897
876:
877: \bibitem[Kuan et al.(2004)]{kuan2004}
878: Kuan, Y. -J. et al.~2004, \apj, 616, L27
879:
880: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2000)]{lee2000}
881: Lee, C. -F., Mundy, L. G., Reipurth, B., Ostriker, E. C., \& Stone, J.
882: M.~2000, \apj, 542, 925
883:
884: \bibitem[Li \& Shu(1996)]{li1996}
885: Li, Z. -Y. \& Shu, F. H.~1996, \apj, 472, 211
886:
887: \bibitem[Lis et al.(2002)]{Lis02}
888: Lis, D.C., Gerin, M., Phillips, T.G., \& Motte, F.~2002, \apj, 569, 322
889:
890: \bibitem[Masson \& Chernin(1992)]{masson1992}
891: Masson, C. R. \& Chernin, L. M.~1992, \apj, 414, 230
892:
893: \bibitem[Mizuno et al.(1990)]{mizuno1990}
894: Mizuno, A., Fukui, Y., Iwata, T., \& Nozawa, S.~1990, \apj, 356, 184
895:
896: \bibitem[Mundy et al.(1992)]{mundy1992}
897: Mundy, L. G., Wootten, A., Wilking, B. A., Blake, G. A., \& Sargent, G.
898: I.~1992, \apj, 385, 306
899:
900: \bibitem[Mundy, Wootten, \& Wilking(1990)]{mundy1990}
901: Mundy, L. G., Wootten, H. A., \& Wilking, B. A.~1990, \apj, 352, 159
902:
903: \bibitem[Oka et al.(1998)]{oka1998}
904:
905: Oka, T., Hasegawa, T., Hayashi, M., Handa, T., \& Sakamoto, S.~1998, \apj,
906: 493, 730
907:
908: \bibitem[Qi(2005)]{qi2005}
909: Qi, C.~2005, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/$\sim$cqi/mircookbook.html
910:
911: \bibitem[Raga \& Cabrit(1993)]{raga1993}
912: Raga, A. \& Cabrit, S.~1993, A\&A, 278, 267
913:
914: \bibitem[Scoville \& Solomon(1974)]{scoville1974}
915: Scoville, N. Z. \& Solomon, P. M.~1974, \apj, 187, L67
916:
917: \bibitem[Scoville et al.(1993)]{scoville1993}
918: Scoville, N. Z., Carlstrom, J. E., Chandler, C. J., Phillips, J. A., Scott,
919: S. L., Tilanus, R. P. J., \& Wang, Z.~1993, PASP, 105, 1482
920:
921: \bibitem[Shang et al.(2006)]{shang2006}
922: Shang, H., Allen, A., Li, Z.-Y., Liu, C.-F., Chou, M.-Y., \& Anderson,
923: J.~2006, \apj, 649, 845
924:
925: \bibitem[Shang et al.(2002)]{shang2002}
926: Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E., Shu, F.H., \& Lizano, S.~2002, \apj, 564, 853
927:
928: \bibitem[Shu, Adams, \& Lizano(1987)]{shu1987}
929: Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., \& Lizano, S.~1987, \araa, 25, 23
930:
931: \bibitem[Shu et al.(1991)]{shu1991}
932: Shu, F. H., Ruden, S. P., Lada, C. J., \& Lizano, S.~1991, \apj, 370, L31
933:
934: \bibitem[Shu et al.(2000)]{shu2000}
935: Shu, F. H., Najita, J., Shang, H., \& Li, Z. -Y.~2000, in Protostars and
936: Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, \& S. S. Russell (Tucson: Univ.
937: Arizona Press), 789
938:
939: \bibitem[Stark et al.(2004)]{stark2004}
940: Stark, R., et al.~2004, \apj, 608, 341
941:
942: \bibitem[Takakuwa et al.(2007)]{takakuwa2007}
943: Takakuwa, S. et al.~2007, \apj, 662, 431
944:
945: \bibitem[van Dishoeck et al.(1995)]{vanDishoek1995}
946: van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., Jansen, D. J., \& Groesbeck, T. D.~1995,
947: \apj, 447, 760
948:
949: \bibitem[Walker et al.(1988)]{walker1988}
950: Walker, C. K., Lada, C. J., Young, E. T., \& Margulis, M.~1988, \apj, 332, 335
951:
952: \bibitem[Whittet(1974)]{whittet1974}
953: Whittet, D.C.B.~1974, \mnras, 168, 371
954:
955: \bibitem[Wilson \& Rood(1994)]{wilson1994}
956: Wilson, T., L., \& Rood, R., T.~1994, \araa, 32, 191
957:
958: \bibitem[Wootten(1989)]{wootten1989}
959: Wootten, A.~1989, \apj, 337, 858
960:
961: \end{thebibliography}
962:
963:
964: \begin{figure*}
965: %\epsscale{1.0}
966: \plotone{f1.eps}
967: \caption{Velocity channel maps of the CO 2--1 emission. Offsets (in
968: arcseconds) are with respect to the phase tracking center,
969: $\alpha=$~16$^h$32$^m$22.91$^s$ and
970: $\delta=$~$-$24$^{\circ}$28$'$35.52\arcsec (J2000). The contour levels
971: correspond to $-$5$\sigma$, 5$\sigma$, 10$\sigma$, 20$\sigma$, then
972: increase in every 20$\sigma$ step. The 1$\sigma$ level is 0.15 Jy
973: beam$^{-1}$. The crosses indicate the positions of the continuum sources A
974: and B; the open circle is the SMA field of view at 230 GHz, and the filled
975: ellipse indicates the synthesized beam.
976: Note that the primary beam correction is not applied to the data.
977: }
978: \label{f1}
979: \end{figure*}
980:
981: \clearpage
982: \begin{figure*}
983: %\epsscale{.70}
984: \plotone{f2.eps}
985:
986: \caption{{\bf a:} Integrated blueshifted (blue contours) and redshifted (red
987: contours) CO 2--1 maps. The emission is integrated over the velocity
988: channels from $V_{\rm LSR}=-$7.2 km s$^{-1}$ to 3.3 km s$^{-1}$ on the
989: blueshifted side and from $V_{\rm LSR}=$~5.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 31.9 km
990: s$^{-1}$ on the redshifted side. Contours are drawn at $-$5$\sigma$,
991: 5$\sigma$, 10$\sigma$, 20$\sigma$, then every 20$\sigma$ step. The
992: 1$\sigma$ levels are 0.6 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the blueshifted
993: component and 0.9 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the redshifted component.
994: The two crosses denote the positions of the two continuum sources.
995: Positions of the two prominent compact components are labeled (b1 and b2).
996: The open circle indicates the field of view at 230 GHz, and the filled
997: ellipse indicates the synthesized beam size.
998: {\bf b:} Same as Fig. 2a for the CO 3--2.
999: The emission is integrated over the velocity channels from $V_{\rm
1000: LSR}=-$7.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 3.5 km s$^{-1}$ on the blueshifted side, and from
1001: $V_{\rm LSR}=$5.5 km s$^{-1}$ to 31.5 km s$^{-1}$ on the redshifted side.
1002: Contour levels are 3$\sigma$, 5$\sigma$, and every 5$\sigma$ steps. The
1003: 1$\sigma$ levels are 1.4 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the blueshifted
1004: component and 2.3 Jy beam$^{-1}$ km s$^{-1}$ for the redshifted component.
1005: The open circle is the field of view at 345 GHz, and the solid oval
1006: indicates the synthesized beam size.
1007: Note that the primary beam correction is not applied to the data.
1008: } \label{f2}
1009: \end{figure*}
1010:
1011: \clearpage
1012:
1013: \begin{figure*}
1014: \epsscale{.50}
1015: \plotone{f3.eps}
1016: \caption{A comparison of the CO 2--1 (a), CO 3--2 (b) and $^{13}$CO 2--1
1017: (c) spectra observed with the SMA (black histograms) and the JCMT (grey
1018: histograms) at the pointing center. The SMA data were first primary beam
1019: corrected, and the spectra were smoothed to have the same angular
1020: resolution as the JCMT data, i.e., 14\arcsec~for the CO 3--2 and
1021: 21\arcsec~for the CO and $^{13}$CO 2--1. The JCMT spectra are resampled to
1022: have the same velocity resolution as that of the SMA data and converted
1023: into brightness temperature by assuming the main beam efficienciies,
1024: ${\eta}_{\rm MB}$, to be 0.69 for the CO 2--1 and $^{13}$CO 2--1, and 0.63
1025: for the CO 3--2.
1026: } \label{f3}
1027: \end{figure*}
1028:
1029: \clearpage
1030:
1031: \begin{figure*}
1032: \epsscale{1.0}
1033: \plotone{f4.eps}
1034: \caption{Velocity channel maps of the $^{13}$CO 2--1 emission. The
1035: contours start at $-$5$\sigma$ and are drawn every 5$\sigma$ step until
1036: 30$\sigma$, and every 10$\sigma$ in the range above 30$\sigma$. The
1037: 1$\sigma$ level is 0.13 Jy beam$^{-1}$. The crosses indicate the positions
1038: of the continuum sources A and B; the open circle is the SMA field of view
1039: at 230 GHz.
1040: Note that the primary beam correction is not applied to the data.
1041: } \label{f4}
1042: \end{figure*}
1043:
1044: \clearpage
1045:
1046: \begin{figure*}
1047: \epsscale{1.0}
1048: \plotone{f5.eps}
1049: \caption{Position-velocity (P--V) diagram of the CO 2--1 along a cut at
1050: P.A.~=~90$^\circ$ through the position of source A. Contours are
1051: logarithmic at: 0.90, 1.43, 2.26, 3.58, 5.68, 9.00, 14.3, 22.6, and 35.8 K.
1052: The horizontal thin dashed line is the position of source A; while the
1053: vertical thin dashed line labels the systemic velocity V$_{\rm sys}$=4.0 km
1054: s$^{-1}$. The green curve: wide-angle wind model curve produced by {\it
1055: i}=30$^\circ$, $C$=0.20 arcsec$^{-1}$, and {\it v}$_0$=1.30 km s$^{-1}$
1056: arcsec$^{-1}$. The black curve: wide-angle wind model curve produced by
1057: {\it i}=40$^\circ$, $C$=0.10 arcsec$^{-1}$, and {\it v}$_0$=0.80 km
1058: s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$. The filled square at the bottom left denotes the
1059: spacial and velocity resolution.
1060: } \label{f5}
1061: \end{figure*}
1062:
1063: \clearpage
1064:
1065: \begin{figure*}
1066: \epsscale{1.0}
1067: \plotone{f6.eps}
1068: \caption{Outflow shell model curves overlaid onto the redshifted CO 2--1
1069: emission. The green line and the black line delineate the curves with
1070: $C$~=~0.20 arcsec$^{-1}$ and $C$~=~0.10 arcsec$^{-1}$, respectively. Both
1071: curves were produced by assuming the inclination angle of the axis from the
1072: plane of the sky to be 30$^\circ$.
1073: } \label{f6}
1074: \end{figure*}
1075:
1076: \clearpage
1077:
1078: \begin{figure*}
1079: \epsscale{0.6}
1080: \plotone{f7.eps}
1081: \caption{{\bf a:} Curves of constant line ratios of CO 2--1/$^{13}$CO 2--1
1082: (dashed lines) and constant CO 2--1 intensity (solid lines) as a function
1083: of the kinetic temperature and the H$_2$ number density for $dv/dr$ = 1000
1084: km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$. The filled squares denote the corresponding
1085: observed values of b1 and b2. {\bf b:} Curves of constant line ratios of CO
1086: 3--2/CO 2--1 (dashed lines) and constant CO 2--1 intensity (solid lines).
1087: The locations of b1 and b2 in this diagram correspond to the physical
1088: conditions derived from CO 2--1 and $^{13}$CO 2--1 data.
1089: } \label{f7}
1090: \end{figure*}
1091:
1092: \begin{figure*}
1093: \epsscale{0.6}
1094: \plotone{f8.eps}
1095: \caption{Line profiles of the CO 2--1 (black line), $^{13}$CO 2--1 (green
1096: line) and CO 3--2 (red line) at the compact components b1 and b2. The
1097: position offsets of each component with respect to the phase tracking
1098: center are labeled in arcseconds at the top right.
1099: } \label{f8}
1100: \end{figure*}
1101:
1102: \enddocument
1103: