1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\usepackage{deluxetable}
3: \def\sgra{\hbox{Sgr~A$^*$}}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: \font\eightrm=cmr8 scaled 1000 \font\sevenrm=cmr7 scaled 1000
6: \def\gsim{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle >\over\sim}$}\;}
7: \def\lsim{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle <\over\sim}$}\;}
8: \def\grls{\;\lower4pt\hbox{${\buildrel\displaystyle >\over <}$}\;}
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \title{An Imaging and Spectral Study of Ten X-Ray\\
13: Filaments around the Galactic Center}
14: \author{F. J. Lu\altaffilmark{1},
15: T. T. Yuan\altaffilmark{2},
16: Y.-Q. Lou\altaffilmark{3}}
17:
18: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
19: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
20: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
21: %% affiliation.
22:
23: \altaffiltext{1}{Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics,
24: Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
25: (CAS), Beijing 100049, P.R. China; lufj@ihep.ac.cn }
26: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
27: HI 96822, USA; yuantt@ifa.hawaii.edu}
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Physics Department and Tsinghua Center for
29: Astrophysics (THCA), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R.
30: China; louyq@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn and lou@oddjob.uchicago.edu}
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: We report the detection of 10 new X-ray filaments using the data
34: from the {\sl Chandra} X-ray satellite for the inner $6^{\prime}$
35: ($\sim 15$ parsec) around the Galactic center (GC). All these X-ray
36: filaments are characterized by non-thermal energy spectra, and most
37: of them have point-like features at their heads that point inward.
38: Fitted with the
39: simple absorbed power-law model, the measured X-ray flux from an
40: individual filament in the $2-10$ keV band is $\sim 2.8\times10^{-14}$ to
41: $10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ and the absorption-corrected
42: X-ray luminosity is $\sim 10^{32}-10^{33}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ at a
43: presumed distance of 8 kpc to the GC. We speculate the origin(s) of
44: these filaments by morphologies and by comparing their X-ray images
45: with the corresponding radio and infrared images. On the basis of
46: combined information available, we suspect that these X-ray
47: filaments might be pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) associated with pulsars of
48: age $10^3 \sim 3\times 10^5$ yr. The fact that most of the filament
49: tails point outward may further suggest a high velocity wind
50: blowing away form the GC.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{Galaxy: center --- ISM: magnetic fields
55: --- ISM: supernova remnants--- pulsars: general
56: --- shock waves --- X-rays: ISM
57: %filaments: non-thermal
58: }
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: The Galactic center (GC) is the only place where we can observe
63: parsec details of various interaction in and around the Galactic
64: nucleus. Advances in this research frontier rely primarily on
65: observations at radio, infrared and X-ray wavelengths, because the
66: optical band suffers seriously from a considerable extinction with
67: an $Av\sim 30$ (e.g., Becklin, Matthews, Neugebauer \& Willner
68: 1978). One of the most important discoveries in the GC region is
69: perhaps the presence of many structured non-thermal radio
70: filaments (NTFs) (e.g., Yusef-Zadeh, Morris, \& Chance 1984;
71: Morris \& Serabyn 1996; LaRosa, Kassim, Lazio, \& Hyman 2000).
72: While these non-thermal radio filaments have been intensively
73: studied, their origins and implications on the underlying physical
74: processes around the GC region remain largely unclear. In the
75: current analysis of X-ray filaments around the GC region, these
76: X-ray emitting particles are usually expected to be fairly close
77: to their acceleration zone and evolve very rapidly in time. Thus,
78: the X-ray study of the same region would be essential to probe the
79: origin of these energetic particles. The {\sl Chandra} Galactic
80: center Survey (CGS), with its unprecedented high spatial
81: resolution of $\sim 0.5''$ and moderate spectroscopy capability,
82: has already revealed remarkable X-ray structures (including
83: thousands of X-ray bright point sources and some filaments, as
84: well as clumps of diffuse emission) within the central $200$ pc
85: of our Galaxy (e.g., Wang, Lu, \& Lang 2002a). In this paper,
86: we mainly concentrate on the nature of those thread-like linear
87: structures or filaments as observed in X-ray bands.
88:
89: Up to this point within $15^\prime$ ($\sim 37$ pc at 8 kpc) from
90: \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$} where a $\sim 4\times 10^6M_{\odot}$ black hole
91: resides inside a compact region of less than $\sim 1$AU (e.g.,
92: Shen et al. 2005), 5 X-ray filaments have been studied in details
93: (see also Table 1). For example, G359.95-0.04, a comet-like
94: filament at $\sim 0.32$ pc north of \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$}, is thought
95: to be a ram-pressure confined pulsar wind nebula (PWN) (Wang et
96: al. 2006).
97: %\citep{wanglu06}.
98: Another prominent filament, G359.89-0.08 (SgrA-E), at $\sim 7$ pc
99: southeast of \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$}, was first noticed by Sakano et al.
100: (2003) and an interpretation of a possible PWN origin was discussed
101: in details by Lu, Wang \& Lang (2003). An alternative picture of
102: G359.89-0.08 as a source of synchrotron emission from relativistic
103: particles accelerated by a shock wave of W28 SNR was suggested
104: recently by Yusef-Zadeh et al. (2005); in that same paper, they also
105: detected a new X-ray filament G359.90-0.06, which coincides
106: spatially with a radio filament at $\sim 5.8$ pc southwest of
107: \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$}. They explored the mechanism of an inverse Compton
108: scattering (ICS) for the X-ray emission of G359.90-0.06. Another 2
109: filaments were found in more extensive regions. G0.13-0.11 in the
110: Radio Arc region was first reported by Wang, Lu \& Lang (2003) and
111: was suspected to be also a PWN. Of particular interest is the X-ray
112: filament G359.54+0.18; it associates with only one strand of the
113: obviously bifurcated radio threads (e.g., Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2005;
114: Lu et al. 2003).
115: %\citep{yusef05,lu03}.
116: A common feature shared in the X-ray energy spectra of these filaments
117: is that they all appear to be non-thermal. It should be noted however
118: that any thermal component to these sources would likely be completely
119: absorbed and unobservable, given the high foreground column density.
120:
121: In these earlier investigations, pulsar wind nebulae (PWNs) and
122: supernova remnants (SNRs) seem to offer natural explanations for
123: the appearance of such X-ray filaments. Indeed, it is believed
124: that a considerable number of supernovae should have happened in
125: the GC region
126: (e.g., Figer et al. 1999, 2004; Wang et al. 2006).
127: %\citep{figer99}.
128: One would naturally expect to find some of their end-products such
129: as pulsars and SNRs in the GC region. However, no radio pulsars
130: have yet been found within $\sim 1^\circ$ of the GC (Wang et al.
131: 2006).
132: %\citep{wanglu06}.
133: This might be caused by difficulties in radio observations
134: (Cordes \& Lazio 1997; Johnston et al. 2006).
135: %\citep{wanglu06, cordes97}.
136: Seeking observational clues in X-ray bands might shed new light to
137: the search for radio pulsars embedded in the GC region.
138:
139:
140: Another tempting idea is to use these X-ray filaments as potential
141: tracers for the magnetic field and gas dynamics around the GC region,
142: since the magnetic fields should have played a significant role in
143: producing such
144: non-thermal spectra and the thread-like shapes of these filaments and
145: the gas motion is usually coupled with the magnetic fields. (e.g., Chevalier 1992;
146: Boldyrev \& Yusef-Zadeh 2006).
147: Magnetic fields exist on all scales of the Galaxy as well as in other
148: spiral galaxies and generally trace out spiral patterns on large scales
149: (e.g., Beck \& Hoernes 1996; Fan \& Lou 1996; Zweibel \& Heiles 1997;
150: Wielebinski 2005; Ferriere 2001, 2007),
151: and great progress has been made in measuring them and inferring
152: their influence by various means. For example, the observed
153: high-energy cosmic ray anisotropy at a few times $10^{-3}$ (e.g.,
154: Amenomori et al. 2006) might be physically related to large-scale
155: structures of Galactic magnetic fields and inhomogeneous cosmic ray
156: source distribution. Using diffuse synchrotron radio emissions at 74
157: and 330 MHz frequencies produced by relativistic cosmic-ray
158: electrons and the magnetic field around the Galactic center, LaRosa
159: et al. (2005) inferred a weak magnetic field of order of $\sim 10
160: \mu$G on size scales $\gsim 125''$ based on a minimum-energy
161: analysis. This is about 2 orders of magnitude lower than $\sim 1$ mG
162: usually estimated for the GC region. Very recently, Cowin \& Morris
163: (2007) argued that the assumption of LaRosa et al. (2005) that the
164: magnetic field and cosmic rays are in a minimum-energy state across
165: this region is unlikely to be valid. According to their model
166: estimates, the mean magnetic field is at least 100 microgauss on a
167: scale of several hundred parsecs and peaks at approximately 500
168: microgauss at the center of the diffuse nonthermal source (DNS).
169: This is an important issue to be settled for the GC magnetic
170: environment. Most of the GC radio NTFs are found to be perpendicular
171: to the Galactic plane, implying a local poloidal magnetic fields of
172: about milli-gauss strengths (e.g., Yusef-Zadeh \& Morris 1987). However, recent
173: observations revealed that the GC magnetic field may be more
174: complex than a simple globally ordered dipolar field (e.g.,
175: LaRosa et al. 2004; Nord et al. 2004). It might be possible for
176: X-ray NTFs to also provide clues of the configuration of the
177: local magnetic field as well as the interaction between it and
178: the ambient gas flow.
179:
180: We report morphological and spectral properties of another 10 newly
181: discovered X-ray filaments within a region of $6^\prime .5 \times
182: 6^\prime .5$ surrounding the \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$} (roughly corresponding
183: to a projected sky area of $\sim 15$ pc by $\sim 15$ pc at a
184: presumed distance of 8 kpc to the GC). Their plausible physical
185: origins are discussed in section 4. All error bars in the X-ray
186: spectrum parameter measurements are at the 90\% confidence level,
187: and we express the fitted parameters in the format of $y\ (y_l,\
188: y_u)$, where $y$ is the best fit value while $y_l$ and $y_u$ are the
189: lower and upper limits of the 90\% confidence interval,
190: respectively. For all the images in the paper, north is up and east
191: is to the left. We shall adopt a distance of 8 kpc from the solar
192: system to the GC throughout this paper. We note that during the
193: review process of this manuscript, Muno et al. (2007) submitted a
194: paper also on X-ray filaments around the Galactic center.
195: %have been analysed and discussed by them also.
196:
197: \section{Satellite Observations and Data Reduction}
198:
199: This work takes advantage of a large number of observations by the
200: Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-I) onboard of {\sl
201: Chandra} X-ray satellite aimed at the \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$} (e.g.,
202: Baganoff et al. 2003).
203: %\citep{bag03}.
204: We utilize the archival data available by September 2005,
205: including the eleven observations taken before May 3, 2002, as
206: listed by Park et al. (2005) (1561b excluded), and the three more
207: recent observations (Obs. ID 3549, 4683, and 4684) taken on June
208: 19, 2003 and July 5 and 6, 2004. The total resultant exposure time
209: of the included 14 observations is $\sim$ 760 ks. Following the
210: standard event reprocessing procedures from the package of Chandra
211: Interactive Analysis of Observations (CIAO) (version 3.2.2), we
212: first processed individual observations, including the correction
213: for charge transfer inefficiency, bad-pixel-removing, and
214: light-curve cleaning etc. We then co-add the data from the 14
215: observations by the sky coordinates to generate the composite data
216: set. The detailed data preparation procedures are described in
217: Wang et al. (2006).
218:
219: When placed on axis at the focal plane of the grazing-incidence X-ray
220: mirrors, the imaging resolution (FWHM) is determined primarily by the
221: pixel size of the CCDs of 0$\farcs$492. The CCDs also measure the
222: energies of incident photons with a resolution of $50-300$ eV
223: (depending on photon energy and distance from the read-out node)
224: (e.g., Baganoff et al. 2003).
225: %\citep{bag03}.
226: We used the X-ray data in $0.5-8$ keV energy band for the spectrum
227: study. The CCD frames are read out every 3.2 s, which provides the
228: nominal time resolution of the X-ray data (e.g., Muno et al. 2006).
229: %\citep{muno06}.
230: Here, we focus on the inner $\sim$ $6\farcm5$ region centered
231: around the \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$} where the point spread function (PSF)
232: broadening is insignificant.
233:
234: \section{Data Analysis and Results on X-Ray Filaments}
235:
236: The source region framed for extracting the spectrum of each source
237: is chosen in such a way that it is small enough to minimize
238: contaminations from the surroundings and yet large enough to contain
239: the bulk of filament emission. For those X-ray filaments with a
240: sufficient number of photons for statistics, we divide them into
241: sub-regions to look for the spectral evolution along the filamentary
242: structure. The background spectrum is extracted from one or several
243: regions in the environs of the relevant filament under
244: consideration. For each filament, we have used different background
245: regions to test their effects on the final spectra. Although the
246: best fit parameters do vary slightly with different backgrounds,
247: this variation is much smaller than the uncertainties of the current
248: data statistics. Most of the X-ray spectra are modelled by the
249: absorbed power-law continuum ($phabs(po)$ for short hereafter) in
250: {\sl XSPEC}. The Galactic coordinate of a filament is given by the
251: position of its brightest part. Incidentally, the size of the
252: filament given in this paper should only be regarded as a rough
253: estimate.
254:
255: Fig. 1 gives a panoramic view of the X-ray filaments
256: in the GC region studied here. \sgra\ is buried deep in the lower
257: right region where the emission is saturated in Fig. 1. We studied
258: the images of each X-ray filament in details and the results are
259: shown in the left columns of Fig. 2 and
260: Fig. 3. From the X-ray contours, we can see that
261: there are signs for the existence of point-like sources in some
262: filaments. The right columns of Fig. 2 and
263: Fig. 3 show the $0.5-8$ keV counts image created from
264: the composite event file of the 14 {\sl Chandra} observations as
265: mentioned in the last section. The rectangular boxes drawn on the
266: images represent the source regions (including the sub-regions used
267: for studying spectral evolution along a filament).
268: Fig. 4 shows the final spectra of the ten filaments
269: extracted from the ``entire'' source regions. All of them can be
270: well fitted with the $phabs(po)$ model, implying that the X-ray
271: emissions we detected are dominated by the nonthermal component. It
272: should be noted that if these sources emit any thermal components,
273: they would likely be completely absorbed and unobservable. In
274: Fig. 5, we give the joint-fit spectra extracted from
275: the sub-regions of filaments F1, F3, F6 and F10, whose photon counts
276: are large enough to allow for a comparison of the sub-region
277: spectra. The spectrum fitting results are summarized in
278: Table 1.
279:
280: We have also sought for the counterparts of X-ray filaments in H, K
281: infrared bands and in 20 cm radio band. The infrared images were
282: produced by the 2 Micro All Sky Survey project and were downloaded
283: from the {\it skyview} website.\footnote{The website address is
284: http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/query.pl\ .} The radio data
285: were acquired by the Very Large Array (VLA) on July 23, 2001, with a
286: beam size of 15$\arcsec\times15\arcsec$ (Lang et al. 2007). No
287: obvious filamentary structures were found (with an
288: upper limit of 0.12 Jansky/beam), except for filament F10,
289: which coincides with a statistically significant radio filament. In
290: addition to the fitting parameters for filaments summarized in
291: Table 1, we now describe properties of each X-ray
292: filament below.
293:
294: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f1}
295: \noindent {\bf Filament 1 (F1): G359.936-0.038}
296:
297: Filament F1 lies $\sim 41\arcsec$ ($\sim 1.6$ pc) southwest of
298: \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$}. The brightest part of F1 is near the Celestial
299: coordinates {\it (l, b)}=($359^{\circ}.936$, $-0^{\circ}.038$). The
300: elongation occurs almost in the exact north-south direction with a
301: point-like source residing at the head in the northeast part. It has
302: a rough length of $\sim 17\arcsec$ and a width of $\sim 5\arcsec$.
303: Its spectra can be well fitted by $phabs(po)$. We divided the
304: filament into the head and tail regions, and fitted their respective
305: spectra. Although the the best-fit
306: $\Gamma_{tail}$ appears twice bigger than $\Gamma_{head}$, the error
307: bars are larger than the difference. Therefore, the current data are
308: not good enough to constrain the spectral evolution of F1.
309:
310:
311: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f2}
312: \noindent {\bf Filament 2 (F2): G359.934-0.037}
313:
314: Filament F2 has a size of $3\arcsec\times 9\arcsec$. The most
315: concentrated part of F2 is near the Celestial coordinates {\it (l,
316: b)} = ($359\fdg 934$, $-0\fdg 037$), which is $\sim 48\arcsec$
317: ($\sim 2~{\rm pc}$) southwest of \sgra. The elongation is along the
318: northeast-southwest direction with the head in the northeast end.
319: Similar to F1, there is no obvious emission line and a simple
320: power-law gives a fairly satisfactory fit.
321:
322: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f3}
323: \noindent {\bf Filament 3 (F3): G359.965-0.053}
324:
325: At $1\farcm3$ ($\sim$3 pc) northeast of \sgra\ lies filament F3
326: with a size of $4\arcsec\times 12\arcsec$; the elongation is
327: from northeast (NE) to southwest (SW). This filament was first
328: mentioned by Baganoff et al. (2003)
329: %\citet{bag03}
330: as a ``curious linear feature". They reported its existence in the
331: $1.5-3$ keV and $3-6$ keV bands, but not in the $6-7$ keV band.
332: Our analysis also shows that the bulk of F3 emission comes from
333: photons of energies below 6 keV. The X-ray morphology clearly
334: shows that F3 contains two concentrations. In order to study their
335: spectral evolution, we divide it into the ``head'' (the NE
336: concentration with stronger emission), ``middle'' (between NE and
337: SW), and ``tail'' (the SW concentration with weaker emission)
338: regions. There appears a spectral steepening from the ``tail'' to
339: ``head''. However, since no obvious point-like source is detected
340: in the ``head'' region, the ``head'' to the ``tail'' direction
341: does not necessariely mean the electron flow direction, as will
342: be further discussed in section 4.3.
343:
344: The two-blob morphology is somewhat unexpected and one might wonder
345: whether the three regions we choose are in fact coherent parts of
346: the same source. Actually, the spectral results may cast doubt on
347: the coherence of the ``head'' and ``tail''. First, the $N_H$ value
348: in Table 1 shows that the ``head'' region has a
349: hydrogen column density of $1.9(1.3, 2.6)\times 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$,
350: while the ``tail'' region has a $N_H$ value of $0.7(0.3, 1.1)\times
351: 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, which might suggests that the ``tail'' could be
352: nearer to us than the ``head" is. Second, the spectrum of the
353: ``tail" shows slight signs of 6.7 keV emission line, which is not
354: found in the ``head" and ``middle" regions.
355:
356: However, we find that these spectral ``differences'' are most likely
357: not caused by the emitter proper. The higher $N_H$ to the ``head"
358: region is quite probably due to a small molecular cloud in this
359: direction (e.g., Coil \& Ho 1999, 2000). Fig. 2 of Coil \& Ho
360: (2000) shows that the column density of the NH3 cloud in the
361: ``head'' region is about 1/10 of that of the streamer at
362: R.A.$_{1950}=19 42 28$, Dec$_{1950}=-$29 02 30, while the equivalent
363: $N_H$ of this streamer is $\sim 1.4\times 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ (Coil
364: \& Ho 1999). So $N_H$ of the small NH3 cloud is $\sim 1.4\times
365: 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, comparable to the $N_H$ difference between the
366: ``head'' and ``tail'' spectra. The slight 6.7 keV emission line
367: feature in the spectrum of the ``tail'' is likely due to an
368: insufficient subtraction of the background emission. For comparison,
369: we extract the spectrum of the dense diffuse emission near the
370: ``tail" region and do find that it has a fairly strong 6.7 keV iron
371: line (see the upper panel of Fig. 6). Therefore, F3
372: is most likely one source object in space.
373: %{\bf You mean F3?} not F1 confirmed.
374: %{\bf Fig.~\ref{fig:fig5}, bottom panel)?}.
375:
376: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f4}
377: \noindent {\bf Filament 4 (F4): G359.964-0.056}
378:
379: Filament F4 is close to filament F3 in sky projection. The
380: elongation occurs in the northeast-southwest direction. It has a
381: size of $4\arcsec\times 12\arcsec$. The spectrum also appears to be
382: non-thermal.
383:
384: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f5}
385: \noindent {\bf Filament 5 (F5): G359.959-0.028}
386:
387: This filament lies $1.4^{\prime}$ ($\sim 3.3~{\rm pc}$) northwest of
388: \sgra, with a length of $\sim 10\arcsec$ and a width of $\sim
389: 3\arcsec$. The elongation is oriented along the northwest-southeast
390: direction for fitting parameters).
391: There exists a point source near the southeast end of F5 (separation
392: $\sim 2\arcsec$); however, this is very likely a chance spatial
393: coincidence and thus we do not include it in the source region.
394:
395: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f6}
396: \noindent {\bf Filament 6 (F6): G359.969-0.038}
397:
398: Filament F6 lies $\sim 1.6^{\prime}$ ($\sim 4~{\rm pc}$) northeast
399: of \sgra. It has a width of $\sim 5\arcsec$ and a length of $\sim 16
400: \arcsec$. The elongation occurs in the northeast-southwest
401: direction, and a point-like source resides at the southwest end.
402: Along the elongation, we divide F6 into the head (SW) and tail (NE)
403: parts. The spectra of these two parts are the same within error bars.
404:
405: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f7}
406: \noindent {\bf Filament 7 (F7): G359.920-0.029}
407:
408: Filament F7 also lies $\sim 1.3^{\prime}$ ($\sim 3~{\rm pc}$)
409: southwest of \sgra, with a size of $\sim 4\arcsec\times 15\arcsec$.
410: The elongation is along the northwest-southeast direction fairly
411: close to the east-west direction. Since there are no X-ray photons
412: below 4 keV, the statistics are extremely poor for this filament and
413: therefore, the energy spectrum cannot be fitted to distinguish any
414: models. Nevertheless, we still fit it with an absorbed power-law
415: model.
416:
417: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f8}
418: \noindent {\bf Filament 8 (F8): G359.970-0.009}
419:
420: Filament F8 is located $\sim 2.7^{\prime}$ ($\sim 6~{\rm pc}$)
421: northwest of \sgra. The elongation is along the northwest-southeast
422: direction. It has a width of $\sim 4\arcsec$ and a length of $\sim
423: 9\arcsec$. The energy spectrum of filament F8 also appears to be
424: non-thermal.
425:
426: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f9}
427: \noindent {\bf Filament 9 (F9): G359.974-0.00}
428:
429: Filament F9 is $\sim 3\farcm3$ ($\sim 8~{\rm pc}$) northwest of
430: \sgra. Its elongation is almost parallel to those of filaments F5
431: and F8. It has a width of $\sim 4\arcsec$ and a length of $\sim
432: 7\arcsec$. The energy spectrum of filament F9 also appears to be
433: non-thermal.
434:
435: %\subsection{\label{subsec:f10}
436: \noindent {\bf Filament 10 (F10): G0.029-0.06}
437:
438: This filament lies $\sim 5.1^{\prime}$ ($\sim 12~{\rm pc}$)
439: northeast of \sgra. With a width of $\sim 6\arcsec$ and a length of
440: $\sim 46\arcsec$, it is the longest X-ray filament so far identified
441: within the central 15 pc of the Galaxy center. The energy spectrum
442: of filament F10 is rather flat and non-thermal,
443: %. Fitted with $phabs(po)$, the derived
444: with the column density
445: %for the entire image is $N_H=0.5~[0.4,
446: %0.7]\times 10^{23}\hbox{ cm}^{-2}$, which is
447: of a typical value for the absorption around the GC.
448: %F10 has a rather flat spectrum with a photon index $\Gamma=1.2~[0.9, 1.5]$.
449: To see the photon index evolution along the filament, we divide the
450: filament into three parts: ``head'' (i.e. where the assumed
451: point-source resides), ``middle'', and ``tail'' parts. We then
452: conducted a joint fit for the energy spectra of these three regions.
453: As listed in Table 1, there appears a spectral
454: steepening from the ``head'' to ``tail''. No IR counterparts are
455: found for filament F10. But quite interestingly, there is a 20cm
456: radio filament more or less coincident with F10 spatially;
457: implications of this spatial coincidence will be discussed in $\S
458: 4.2$.
459:
460: \section{Discussion}
461:
462: \subsection{\label{subsec:origins}Properties
463: and possible origins of GC X-ray filaments }
464:
465: While X-ray photon numbers may not be high enough to constrain the
466: exact shapes of the energy spectra, all spectra appear featureless
467: except for filament F3 showing weak iron line features (see Section
468: 3.3) and can be well fitted with power-law models. Fitting of some
469: of these energy spectra with thermal emission models is acceptable
470: statistically; nevertheless, this always gives quite high
471: temperatures, i.e., $>10$ keV. We therefore incline to the view that
472: X-ray emissions from these filaments are non-thermal in nature.
473:
474: Table 2 sums up the inferred parameters for
475: these 15 non-thermal X-ray filaments in the inner $15^{\prime}$
476: around the GC. In addition to the 10 filaments studied in this
477: paper, we also include the other 5 filaments, namely G359.89-0.08,
478: G359.90-0.06, G359.95-0.04, G359.983-0.046, and G0.13-0.11, reported
479: and studied earlier in the literature. Most of their hydrogen column
480: density $N_H$ are of the order of $\sim 10^{22}-10^{23}~{\rm
481: cm}^{-2}$,
482: consistent
483: with other $N_H$ estimates around the GC region. Most of their
484: photon indices $\Gamma$ fall within the range of $\sim 1-2.5$. The
485: chance of these X-ray filaments being background extragalactic
486: sources is very small according to the spectral and morphological
487: properties. For instance, it would be very difficult to explain the
488: linear filamentary morphology using the hypothesis of extragalactic
489: origins. Therefore, these X-ray filaments are most likely unique
490: objects around the GC region.
491:
492: As already discussed in Section 1, there were suggestions that these
493: X-ray filaments may be ram-pressure confined PWNe (Wang et al. 2003,
494: 2006), or synchrotron emissions from MHD shocks associated SNRs or
495: emissions resulting from inverse Compton scattering (Yusef-Zadeh et
496: al. 2005; Figer et al. 1999). The
497: non-thermal X-ray emission mechanisms may be either synchrotron
498: emission or inverse-Compton scattering. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)
499: relativistic pulsar winds (Michel 1969; Goldreich \& Julian 1970;
500: Kennel \& Coroniti 1984a, b; Lou 1996, 1998) and MHD shock
501: interactions of magnetized outflows (e.g., Yu \& Lou 2005; Yu et al.
502: 2006; Lou \& Wang 2006, 2007) with the interstellar medium (ISM) in
503: SNRs and PWNe could provide high-energy electrons needed in these
504: two radiation mechanisms (e.g., Sakano et al. 1993; Lu et al. 2003;
505: Wang et al. 2006). If these X-ray filaments are SNRs, their
506: elongations would probably represent MHD shock fronts and therefore,
507: one would not expect to see a tendency of spectral softening along a
508: filament. The two bright filaments F3 and F10 both show evidence for
509: such a softening tendency. The fact that most of these filaments
510: have point-like sources at the heads also againsts the SNR origin.
511: On the other hand, as nonthermal X-ray emission is only
512: detected in several SNRs within the entire Galaxy, it would be
513: highly unlikely that there are so many nonthermal SNRs around the GC
514: region. For this reason, we would argue that most of these X-ray
515: filaments are not SNRs. Observed properties of these X-ray filaments
516: may be more consistent with those of PWNe. Typical features of a PWN
517: are: non-thermal X-ray spectrum, with photon index of $1.1-2.4$ and
518: a X-ray luminosity $L_x$ range from $4\times 10^{32}$ to $2\times
519: 10^{37}~{\rm erg}~{\rm s}^{-1}$ in $0.2-10$ keV band (e.g.,
520: %Lu et al. 2003; Gotthelf \& Olbert 2002;
521: Gaensler \& Slane 2006; Kaspi,
522: Roberts \& Harding, 2006). The $\Gamma$ and $L_x$ of these 10
523: filaments are consistent with the values of a PWN.
524: %within the 90\% confidence uncertainty.
525: %{\bf Would the referee complain about this?}
526: %For a PWN, the energy spectrum index in the head region (where
527: %the pulsar is supposed to reside) is usually flatter than the
528: %tail region by a factor of $\sim 0.5$ (e.g., Lu et al. 2002;
529: %Gaensler et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2006).
530: The existence of point-like X-ray sources as
531: indicated by the image study also tends to favor a PWN scenario.
532: %{\bf The referee complains about this 0.5!}
533:
534:
535: We may estimate the ages of the putative pulsars with the X-ray
536: luminosities of these X-ray filaments. Li et al. (2007) studied
537: statistically the nonthermal X-ray emission from young rotation
538: powered pulsars and PWNe. They noted that there exists a correlation
539: between the pulsar age $\tau$ and the $2-10$ keV PWN luminosity
540: $L_{x,pwn}$, which can be expressed as
541: $L_{x,pwn}=10^{41.7}\tau^{-2.0\pm 0.3}$. The X-ray luminosities of
542: these 10 filaments are in the range of 0.2-2.2$\times 10^{33}$ erg
543: s$^{-1}$. Using this empirical formula, ages of these putative
544: pulsars are possibly between $\sim 10^3$ to $3\times10^5$ yr.
545: However, given the dispersion about the above empirical relationship
546: (Li et al. 2007), the estimate may be uncertain probably by a factor
547: of 10.
548:
549: Since the ages of pulsars with bright PWNe are usually younger than
550: a few tens of thousand years, one may doubt if a pulsar at the age
551: of several $10^5$ years can produce a detectable X-ray nebula.
552: However, the PWN of a relatively old pulsar can be enhanced in
553: surface brightness and thus become detectable if the pulsar wind
554: materials are confined to one direction. PSR B0355+54 is $\sim
555: 5.6\times10^{5}$ yr old. It converts $\sim 1$\% of its spin-down
556: luminosity to the cometary-like X-ray nebula (e.g.,
557: Tepedelenlio\v{g}lu \& \"{O}gelman 2007). The old pulsar PSR
558: B1929+10 ($\tau\sim3\times10^6$ yr) also converts $2.1\times10^{-4}$
559: of its spin-down luminosity $\sim 3.9\times10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$
560: into the emission of the cometary nebula (e.g., Becker et al. 2006).
561: The X-ray filaments identified in the GC region are similar to these
562: two systems and thus probably powered by pulsars.
563:
564: Now we discuss whether the number of X-ray filaments, if identified
565: with PWNe, would be consistent with the estimated star formation
566: rate in the GC region.
567: %Figer et al. (1999, 2002) studied the Arches
568: %cluster in the GC region and found that the total mass of the Arches
569: %cluster falls between $\sim 1-7\times10^{4}$ $M_{\odot}$ with an age
570: %of $\sim 2$ Myr. It was shown that the Arches cluster has a very
571: %flat mass function compared to other young clusters of stars,
572: %suggesting that the Galactic center environment may favor the
573: %formation of high-mass stars. Consequently, the rate of supernova
574: %explosions could be also higher in this region. Specifically, they
575: %have detected 77 stars with initial masses higher than $\sim
576: %40M_{\odot}$ in the Arches cluster (Figer et al. 1999). As the
577: %typical lifetime of a $\sim 40M_{\odot}$ star is about 10
578: %$(M/M_{\odot})^{-2.5}$ Gyr =1 Myr (e.g., Lang 1999), there should be
579: %a comparable number of stars that exploded in the last $\sim 1$Myr.
580: %Therefore, it would be possible that the Arches cluster has produced
581: %about 10 pulsars younger than $\sim 10^5$ yr. Since the Quintuplet
582: %cluster may have the similar total mass and star mass function
583: %(Figer et al. 1999), it can produce comparable number of young
584: %pulsars. The detected PWN numbers in the GC region is consistent
585: %with the above estimate.
586: According to Figer et al. (2004), the star formation rate at the GC
587: is about $10^{-7} M_{\odot}\hbox{ yr}^{-1}\hbox{ pc}^{-3}$ which is
588: some 250 times higher that the mean star formation rate in the
589: Galaxy. In the field of view of our Fig. 1, we take a radius of
590: about $7$ pc and estimate the star formation rate to be $1.4\times
591: 10^{-3}M_{\odot}\hbox{ yr}^{-1}$. If the mean mass of a star is
592: 10$M_{\odot}$, the frequency of supernova explosions would be $1.4\times 10^{-4}$ per
593: year, leading to about 40 pulsars in the field of Fig. 1 younger
594: than $\sim 3\times 10^5$ yr as estimated above. This number is
595: roughly consistent with the 15 candidate PWNe identified in the field.
596:
597: \subsection{\label{subsec: F10_radio}G0.029-0.06
598: (F10) and its radio counterpart}
599:
600: Filament F10 bears certain unique features to be noted here. First,
601: it has the longest linear structure with the entire image slightly
602: bent towards the northeast, more or less like an arc. Second, it is
603: the farthest away from \hbox{Sgr~A$^*$} and thus has much less
604: contamination from the strong diffuse X-ray emission of Sgr A.
605: Third, there is an obvious 20cm radio NTF coincident spatially with
606: X-ray filament F10.
607:
608: The spectral indices for different regions along filament F10 show
609: evidence of spectral steepening from the ``head" to ``tail" (see
610: Table 1). When $N_H$ is fixed at the best fit
611: value $\sim 7\times 10^{23}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$, the $\Gamma$ values for
612: the ``head", ``middle", and ``tail" regions are 1.1(1.0, 1.3),
613: 1.5(1.4, 1.6), and 1.8(1.7, 1.9), respectively. This might suggest
614: an energetic particle flow direction from the southeast (head) to
615: the northwest (tail). A pulsar moving through the magnetized
616: interstellar medium seems to give a plausible explanation of this
617: scenario. Indeed, the morphology of F10 does imply a point source in
618: the ``head" region. The corresponding point spread function (PSF) at
619: G0.029-0.06 is an ellipse with a size of $\sim 2\arcsec\times
620: 4\arcsec$. For an updated X-ray versus spin-down luminosity
621: correlation of rotation powered pulsars, a modified empirical
622: relation is given by equation (3) of Possenti et al. (2002), namely,
623: $\log L_{x,(2-10)}=1.34~\log\dot{E}-15.34$ where $L_{x,(2-10)}$ is
624: the X-ray luminosity in $2-10$keV energy band; using this empirical
625: relation, we would have a $\dot E\sim 10^{36}~{\rm ergs}~{\rm
626: s}^{-1}$. Since PSRs J1747-2958 and B1929+10 convert about
627: 2.5\% and 2.1$\times10^{-4}$ of their spin-down powers to their
628: cometary X-ray nebulae (e.g., Gaensler et al. 2004; Becker et al. 2006),
629: the ratio $L_x$/$\dot{E}$ of F10 ($\sim 10^{-3}$) indicates that the
630: above estimate for $\dot{E}$ is reasonable.
631: %Other empirical relations between the pulsar X-ray
632: %luminosity and spin-down energy give the similar $\dot{E}$ (e.g.,
633: %Cheng et al. 2004; Li et al. 2007).
634:
635: The arc-like X-ray morphology of F10 and its coincidence with a
636: radio NTF might be a good indicator of its interaction with
637: %between strong and structured
638: the interstellar magnetic field environment of the GC region (Lang
639: et al. 1999; Wang et al. 2002b).
640: %\citep{lang99,wang02b}.
641: Similar to the discussion about G0.13-0.11 by Wang et al. (2002b),
642: we may estimate the magnetic field strength $B$ in the current
643: context. First, the lifetime $\tau$ of synchrotron X-ray emitting
644: particles is given by $\tau\sim (1.3 {\rm~yrs})\epsilon^{-0.5}
645: B_{\rm mG}^{-1.5}$, where $\epsilon$ is the X-ray photon energy in
646: unit of keV (a value of 4 keV is adopted here) and $B_{\rm mG}$ is
647: the magnetic field strength in the filament volume in units of mG.
648: The simulations of Bucciantini et al.
649: (2005)
650: %{\bf Please include the reference in the list.}
651: show that the average flow speed in the tail is about 0.8-0.9 $c$.
652: For a sustained X-ray linear structure, we estimate by requiring
653: $\tau \geq L_{obs}/(0.85 c)$. Adopting a characteristic angular
654: length $L_{obs}$ of $47\arcsec$ ($\sim 2 {\rm pc}$), we thus infer a
655: magnetic field strength $B\sim 0.3$mG, similar to those in the
656: bright radio NTFs (e.g, Yusef-Zadeh \& Morris 1987; Lang et al.
657: 1999).
658:
659: We try to outline a few plausible scenarios in the present context and
660: discuss relevant aspects qualitatively. Magnetized neutron stars move with
661: peculiar speeds in the range of a few tens of kilometers per second (a
662: mean space velocities of $\sim 300-400\hbox{ km s}^{-1}$ for young pulsars;
663: %Cordes \& Chernoff 1998;
664: Hobbs et al. 2005; Faucher-Gigu\`ere \& Kaspi 2006) to well over one thousand
665: kilometers per second ($\sim 1600\hbox{ km s}^{-1}$) and the surrounding ISM
666: is generally magnetized. Generally speaking, a typical peculiar velocity of
667: a neutron star is supersonic and super-Alfv\'enic in a magnetized ISM.
668: Neutron stars or pulsars have different ranges of surface magnetic field
669: strengths: $10^9-10^{10}$G for millisecond pulsars in binaries,
670: $10^{11}-10^{12}$G for a wide range of pulsars, and $10^{14}-10^{15}$G
671: inferred for several magnetars. Several situations may happen. (1) If
672: a pulsar does not involve an active pulsar wind, its peculiar motion
673: through the surrounding magnetized ISM would sustain an MHD bow shock
674: by its magnetosphere as well as a magnetotail. The faster the pulsar
675: moves, the more linear the system would appear. This is basically like
676: a bullet moving through an air supersonically and generating a Mach
677: cone or wake. Relativistic electrons can be produced at the MHD bow
678: shock and synchrotron emissions can be generated and sustained at
679: the same time. (2) In a binary system, the fast wind (say, with a
680: speed higher than 1000 km s$^{-1}$) from a companion star can blow
681: towards a spinning magnetized pulsar in orbital motion. Here, the
682: situations of a companion fast wind blowing across a magnetized
683: pulsar and a pulsar moving through the ISM with a high speed are
684: more or less equivalent. Again, an
685: MHD bow shock and a magnetotail can form in association with the pulsar
686: system. The stronger the companion wind and the faster the pulsar moves,
687: the more linear the pulsar system would appear. Relativistic electron
688: and/or positrons can be generated and sustained to power synchrotron
689: emissions in the bow shock draped around the pulsar magnetosphere. For
690: such a system, one might be able to detect the presence of the
691: companion by various independent means. (3) For a pulsar emitting an
692: active pulsar wind and with misaligned magnetic and spin axes, spiral
693: forward and reverse shock pairs can be generated in the relativistic
694: pulsar wind as a result of inhomogeneous wind and eventually the pulsar
695: wind is stopped by the ISM through a MHD termination shock (e.g., Lou
696: 1993, 1996, 1998). (4) Case (3) can also happen for a pulsar moving with
697: a high peculiar velocity through a magnetized ISM. (5) Case (3) can also
698: happen for a pulsar in binary orbital motion with the companion blows a
699: powerful wind with a speed higher than 1000 km s$^{-1}$. In both cases
700: of (2) and (5), the center of mass of the binary system may also move
701: with a high speed through the ISM. One can further speculate several
702: possible combinations along this line of reasoning (e.g., Chevalier
703: 2000; Toropina et al. 2001; Romanova, Chulsky \& Lovelace 2005).
704:
705: There are two clumps (referred to as the east and west clumps
706: hereafter) of diffuse X-ray emission surrounding filament F10. Although
707: the west clump is also elongated, it is not called a filament
708: because it contains many substructures. To
709: see if these clumps are physically related to F10, we extract
710: their energy spectra separately (see the middle and bottom panels of
711: Fig. 6). The fitted parameters are listed in Table 3.
712: The much higher absorbing column densities
713: of the two clumps indicate strongly that they are located farther
714: away from us than F10 is, while these two clumps themselves are
715: almost at the same distance (see Table 3).
716: Moreover, their X-ray emissions are very likely powered by the
717: same mechanism, as hinted by the characters of their spectra,
718: which can be fitted well with an absorbed power-law model plus a
719: 6.4 keV emission line. The total emission comes
720: mostly from the photon energy $4-7$ keV band, with a strong 6.4
721: keV neutral Fe K line. In contrast, the
722: Fe line feature is not present in the spectrum of F10. A possible
723: explanation for this non-thermal, apparently broadened iron line
724: emission at 6.4 keV is the collisions of low-energy cosmic-ray
725: electrons with irons in molecular clouds (e.g., Valinia et al.
726: 2000)
727: %\citep{val00}
728: or by the radiative illumination from the GC massive black hole
729: that was suggested to be very bright in the past (e.g., Koyama et
730: al. 1989).
731: %\citep{koy89}.
732: In conclusion, F10 and the surrounding clumps do not seem to
733: interact directly.
734:
735: \subsection{\label{subsec:B-fields}X-ray NTFs as tracers of
736: the small-scale magnetic fields and gas dynamics}
737:
738: The oritentation of the X-ray filaments provides an opportunity
739: to probe the physics conditions of the GC region.
740: As discussed in section 4.1, the cometary shapes of the X-ray
741: filaments imply that the pulsar wind particles are confined to
742: one direction by the ambient materials. Mechanism shaping the
743: filamentary structure could be ordered magnetic fields
744: (e.g., Yusef-Zadeh \& Morris 1987; Lang,
745: Morris, \& Echevarria 1999) and/or high relative velocity
746: between the pulsars and the surrounding gas (e.g., Wang et al. 1993;
747: Shore \& LaRosa 1999). The magnetic field could be the
748: product of the gas motion, and the magnetic field could also
749: control the motion of the gas (e.g., Heyvaerts et al. 1988; Chevalier 1992).
750: Radio NTFs suggests that the magnetic field is poloidal at large-scale
751: (e.g., Yusef-Zadeh \& Morris 1987; Lang, Morris, \& Echevarria 1999) with
752: some more complex smaller structures around the GC region (e.g.,
753: Nord et al. 2004).
754: By looking at the X-ray images shown by Figures 1, 2 and 3,
755: there seems to be a tendency that the PWN tails point
756: away from the GC, indicating that the pulsar wind particles
757: are blown outward. This
758: might imply the presence of a Galactic wind of hot plasma blowing
759: away from the center, given the high star formation rate (and so plenty
760: of hot gas) in this region.
761: Pulsars may have typical peculiar velocities of $\sim
762: 400\hbox{ km s}^{-1}$ (e.g., Hobbs et al. 2005; Faucher-Gigu\`ere \&
763: Kaspi 2006) and we would expect them to move in random directions.
764: The tendency for the structures of ten PWNs to orient away from the
765: center seems to suggest that the Galactic wind has a speed
766: comparable to or greater than $\sim 400\hbox{ km s}^{-1}$.
767:
768: In the above scenario, the particle flow direction of
769: the X-ray filament F3 should
770: be from the southwest (closer to Sgr A*) to the northeast. This suggests
771: that the pulsar, the origin site of the particles, is actually in the
772: ``tail'' region defined in Fig 2. Then the evident spectral steepening
773: from the southwest to the northeast (see section 3) can be naturally
774: expained. Therefore, the spectral evolution along F3 also supports the
775: existence of a radial high velocity wind in the GC region.
776:
777: While the X-ray filaments may not completely overlap with their radio
778: NTFs, their overall orientations are similar. This is supported
779: by the four X-ray NTFs (including filament F10 in our analysis)
780: that have radio counterparts: G359.54+0.18 overlays exactly on
781: the northern part of the two radio filaments (e.g., Yusef et al.
782: 2005; Lu et al. 2003);
783: %\citep{yusef05, lu03};
784: G359.89-0.08 and its radio counterpart SgrA-E overlaps partly and
785: extends in the same direction, with a centroid offset of $\sim 10
786: \arcsec$ (e.g., Yusef et al. 2005; Lu et al. 2003);
787: %\citep{yusef05, lu03};
788: G359.90-0.06 (SgrA-F)
789: %\citep{yusef05}
790: (e.g., Yusef et al. 2005) and G0.029-0.06 (F10) (see our subsection
791: 3.10) also show similar spatial property. Generally speaking, the
792: X-ray NTFs tend to be shorter than the radio NTFs. This centroid
793: offset and smaller extent of X-ray filaments could be both explained
794: by the much shorter synchrotron cooling lifetime in X-ray than in
795: radio (e.g., Ginzburg \& Syrovatskii 1965).
796:
797:
798: \section{Summary and Discussion}
799:
800: To summarize, the most important properties of the GC X-ray filaments
801: in this {\it Chandra} data analysis are their non-thermal spectra, and
802: of course, the apparent thread-like linear morphology with point-like
803: sources residing at the ``head". The scenario of pulsars ploughing
804: through the interstellar medium and high energy particles from the PWN
805: interacting with the surrounding magnetic field seems to be a plausible
806: interpretation. However, this relationship with pulsars can only be
807: confirmed by the direct detection of periodic flux variations from the
808: putative point-sources. Future faster timing, higher sensitivity and
809: spatial resolution of X-ray instruments, together with radio and
810: near-IR follow-up observations, should help to reveal the true identity
811: of these X-ray filaments. Meanwhile, these filaments could also provide
812: some clues to the searching for GC pulsars, as well as the study of
813: small-scale magnetic field structures and gas dynamics around the GC.
814:
815: By our suggestion, one might get the impression that there are many
816: pulsar bow shocks within $\sim 15$pc of the Galactic center. Actually
817: in this scenario, there should be even more due to the unavoidable
818: projection effect; some X-ray bright sources may be heading directly
819: towards or away from us with their `tails' behind or in front superposed
820: with their `heads'. We now only catch those suspects readily identified
821: by their linear or arc-like morphologies. By all astronomical standards,
822: our Galactic center is not very active at the present epoch even though
823: there is a black hole with a mass of $\sim 4\times 10^6M_{\odot}$ lurking
824: at the center near Sgr A$^{*}$ (e.g., Shen et al. 2005). Nevertheless,
825: the neighborhood of our Galactic center might have been active in the
826: past with starbursts and magnetized Galactic winds and so forth. While
827: interacting with winds or flows of the ISM, the compact remnants of these
828: massive stars (produced during the starburst phase) with a distribution
829: of peculiar speeds might then have a higher concentration around the
830: Galactic center. A typical peculiar speed of a few hundred kilometers
831: per second would be supersonic and super-Alfv\'enic in a magnetized ISM.
832: With the projection effect taken into account, the physical linear
833: extension of such a PWN should be jointly determined by the local ISM
834: flow direction and the direction of the remnant peculiar velocity.
835:
836: \section*{Acknowledgments}
837:
838: The authors thank the referee and Editor E. D. Feigelson for
839: constructive comments leading to a significant improvement of the
840: manuscript. We thank Q. D. Wang for very helpful discussion, thank C.C. Lang
841: for sending us the 20 cm radio image before publication. This
842: research has been supported in part by the Special Funds for Major
843: State Basic Science Research Projects of China, by the NSFC grant
844: 10573017 at the Institute of High Energy Physics, by NSFC grants
845: 10373009 and 10533020 at the Tsinghua University, by the Tsinghua
846: Center for Astrophysics, and by the SRFDP 20050003088 and the
847: Yangtze Endowment from the Ministry of Education at Tsinghua
848: University. This publication makes use of data products from
849: the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the
850: University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and
851: Analysis Center, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
852: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
853:
854: %%%%%
855: \begin{thebibliography}{}
856: \bibitem[Baganoff et al.(2003)]{bag03}Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris,
857: M., Bautz, M. W., Brandt, W. N., Cui, W., Doty, J. P., Feigelson, E. D.,
858: Garmire, G. P., Pravdo, S. H., Ricker, G. R., \& Townsley, L. K. 2003,
859: ApJ, 591, 891
860: %-915
861: \bibitem[Beck & Hoernes (1996)]{beck96} Beck R., Hoernes P.,
862: 1996, Nature, 379, 47
863: \bibitem[Becker et al. (2006)]{becker06} Becker, W., Kramer, M.,
864: Jessner, A., Taam, R. E., Jia, J. J., Cheng, K. S., Mignani, R.,
865: Pellizzoni, A., de Luca, A., Slowikowska, A., \& Caraveo, P. A.
866: 2006, ApJ, 645, 1421
867: %--49; Magnetic spiral arms in the galaxy NGC6946
868: \bibitem[Becklin et al.(1978)]{beck78} Becklin, E. E., Matthews, K.,
869: Neugebauer, G., \& Willner, S. P. 1978, ApJ, 219, 121
870: %
871: \bibitem[Bian & Lou (2005)]{BianLou05}Bian,
872: F.-Y. \& Lou, Y.-Q. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 1315
873: %-1328; Spherical Isothermal Self-Similar
874: %Shock Flows; astro-ph/0509137
875: \bibitem[Boldyrev \& Yusef-Zadeh (2006)]{Boldyrev06}Boldyrev, S., \& Yusef-Zadeh, F. 2006,
876: ApJ, 637, L101
877: \bibitem[Bucciantini (2002)]{Buc2002a}Bucciantini, N.
878: 2002a, A\&A, 387, 1066
879: %--1073; Pulsar bow-shock nebulae
880: %II. Hydrodynamical simulation
881: \bibitem[Bucciantini (2002)]{Buc2002b}Bucciantini, N.
882: 2002b, A\&A, 393, 629
883: %--635; Pulsar bow-shock nebulae III. Inclusion
884: %of a neutral component and H_{\alpha} luminosity
885: \bibitem[Bucciantini (2005)]{Buc2005}Bucciantini, N.,
886: Amato, E., \& Del Zanna, L. 2005, A\&A, 434, 189
887: \bibitem[Cheng et al. (2004)]{Cheng04}Cheng, K. S.,
888: Taam, R. E., \& Wang, W. 2004, ApJ, 617, 480
889: %--489; Pulsar Wind Nebulae and the X-Ray
890: %Emission of Nonaccreting Neutron Stars
891: \bibitem[Cheng et al. (2006)]{Cheng06}Cheng, K. S.,
892: Taam, R. E., \& Wang, W. 2006, ApJ, 641, 427
893: %-437; Pulsar Wind Nebulae and the Nonthermal
894: %X-Ray Emission of Millisecond Pulsars
895: \bibitem[Chevalier (1992)]{Chevalier1992}Chevalier, R.A.
896: 1992, ApJ, 397, L39
897: \bibitem[Chevalier (2000)]{Chevalier2000}Chevalier, R. A.
898: 2000, ApJ, 539, L45
899: %--L48; A model for the X-ray luminosity of pulsar nebulae
900: \bibitem[Cordes \& Chernoff (1998)]{cordes98}Cordes, J. M.,
901: \& Chernoff, D. F. 1998, ApJ, 505, 315
902: \bibitem[Cordes \& Lazio(1997)]{cordes97}Cordes, J. M.,
903: \& Lazio, T. J. W. 1997, ApJ, 475, 557
904: %James M., T. Joseph W., Finding Radio
905: %Pulsars in and beyond the Galactic Center
906: \bibitem[Cowin Morris 2006]{Cowin06}Cowin,
907: B. J., \& Morris, M. 2006, BAAS,
908: %Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society,
909: Vol. 38, p.1147
910: %Modeling the Galactic Center Magnetic Field
911:
912: %
913: \bibitem[Faucher-Giguere Kaspi (2006)]{FK2006}
914: Faucher-Gigu\`ere, C.-A., \& Kaspi, V. M. 2006, ApJ, 643, 332
915: %Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre; Kaspi, Victoria M.
916: %Birth and Evolution of Isolated Radio Pulsars
917: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...643..332F
918: %
919: \bibitem[Ferriere (2001)]{Ferriere01}Ferriere, K. M. 2001,
920: Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 1031
921: %--1066; The interstellar environment of our galaxy
922: \bibitem[Ferriere (2007)]{Ferriere07}Ferriere, K. M. 2007,
923: EAS Publications Series, 23, 3
924: %-17; Theoretical Introduction to Galactic Magnetic Fields
925: \bibitem[Figer et al.(1999)]{figer99}Figer, D. F.,
926: Kim, S. S., Morris, M., Serabyn, E., Rich, R. M.,
927: \& Mclean, I. S. 1999, ApJ, 525, 750
928: %Donald F.; Sungsoo S.; Mark; Eugene; R. Michael; Ian S.
929: %Hubble Space Telescope/NICMOS Observations of
930: %Massive Stellar Clusters near the Galactic Center
931: \bibitem[Figer et al. (2002)]{figer02}Figer, D.F., Majarro, F.,
932: Gilmore, D., Morris, M., Kim, S. S., Serabyn, E., McLean, I. S.,
933: Gilbert, A. M., Graham, J. R., Larkin, J. E., Levenson, N. A., \&
934: Teplitz, H. I. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258
935: \bibitem[Figer et al. (2004)]{figer04}Figer, D.F., Rich, R. M.,
936: Kim, S.S., Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E. 2004, ApJ, 601, 319
937: %An Extended Star Formation History for the Galactic Center
938: %from Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS Observations
939: \bibitem[Gaensler et al. (2004)]{gaensler04}Gaensler, B. M.,
940: van der Swaluw, E., Camilo, F., Kaspi, V. M., Baganoff, F. K.,
941: Yusef-Zadeh, F., \& Manchester, R. N. 2004, \apj, 616, 383
942: \bibitem[Gaensler Slane (2006)]{gaensler06}Gaensler, B. M.,
943: Slane, P. O., 2006, ARA\&A, 44, 17
944: %The Evolution and Structure of Pulsar Wind Nebulae
945: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ARA%26A..44...17G
946: \bibitem[Ginzburg \& Syrovatskii (1965)]{ginzburg65}
947: Ginzburg, V. L., \& Syrovatskii, S. I. 1965, ARA\&A, 3, 297
948: %Cosmic Magnetobremsstrahlung (synchrotron Radiation)
949: \bibitem[Goldreich \& Julian (1970)]{GW1970}
950: Goldreich, P., \& Julian, W. H. 1970, 160, 971
951: %Stellar Winds
952: \bibitem[Gotthelf \& Olbert(2002)]{got02}Gotthelf, E. V.,
953: \& Olbert, C. M. 2002, in ASP Conf. Ser.271, Neutron Stars
954: in Supernova Remnants, ed. P. O. Slane \& B. M. Gaensler
955: (San Francisco: ASP), 171
956: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2003)]{got03}Gotthelf, E. V. 2003, ApJ, 591, 361
957: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2004)]{got04}Gotthelf, E. V. 2004, astro-ph/0610376
958: \bibitem[Han(2007)]{Han07}Han, J. L. 2007, eprint/arXiv:0705.4175
959: %2007arXiv0705.4175H
960: %Magnetic fields of our Galaxy on large and small scales
961: %IAU Symp.242, 'Astrophysical Masers and their Environments',
962: %Proceedings edited by J. M. Chapman & W. A. Baan
963: %\bibitem[Han(2006)]{han06}Han, J. L. 2006,
964: %\cjaa (in press, astro-ph/0603512)
965: \bibitem[Heyvaerts et al. (1988)]{Hey88}Heyvaerts, J., Norman, C., \& Pudritz, R.E. 1988, ApJ, 330, 718
966: \bibitem[Ho et al.(1985)]{ho85}Ho, P. T. P., Jackson, J. M.,
967: Barrett, A. H., \& Armstrong, J. T. 1985, ApJ, 288, 575
968:
969: \bibitem[Hobbs et al. (2005)]{Hobbs2005}Hobbs, G.,
970: Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., \& Kramer, M., 2005, MNRAS,
971: 360, 974
972: %A statistical study of 233 pulsar proper motions
973: %2005MNRAS.360..974H
974: \bibitem[Johnston et al. (2006)]{johnstonetal06}
975: Johnston, S., Kramer, M., Lorimer, D. R., Lyne A. G.,
976: McLaughlin, M., Klein, B., Manchester, R. N. 2006,
977: MNRAS, 373, L6
978: %--L10; Johnston, Simon; Kramer, M.; Lorimer, D. R.;
979: %Lyne, A. G.; McLaughlin, M.; Klein, B.; Manchester, R. N.
980: %Discovery of two pulsars towards the Galactic Centre
981: %Johnston et al. astro-ph/0606465
982: \bibitem[Kaspi et al. (2006)]{Kaspi2006}Kaspi,
983: V. M., Roberts, M. S. E., Harding, A. K. 2006,
984: %Isolated Neutron Stars,
985: In: Compact stellar X-ray sources. Edited by Walter Lewin \&
986: Michiel van der Klis. Cambridge Astrophysics Series, No. 39.
987: Cambridge, UK, p. 279-339
988: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006csxs.book..279K
989: \bibitem[Kawai et al. (1998)]{Kawaietal98}Kawai, N.,
990: Tamura, K., \& Shibata, S. 1998, in Neutron Stars and Pulsars
991: Thirty Years after the Discovery, ed. N. Shibazaki, N. Kawai, S.
992: Shibata \& T. Kafune (Tokyo: Universal Academy), 449
993: %empirical relation for PWNe from ASCA
994: \bibitem[Kennel \& Coroniti (1984a)]{KC84a}Kennel, C. F.,
995: Coroniti, F. V. 1984a, ApJ, 283, 694
996: %--709; Confinement of the Crab pulsar's wind by its supernova remnant
997: \bibitem[Kennel \& Coroniti (1984b)]{KC84b}Kennel, C. F.,
998: Coroniti, F. V. 1984b, ApJ, 283, 710
999: %-730; Magnetohydrodynamic model of Crab nebula radiation
1000: \bibitem[Koyama et al.(1989)]{koy89} Koyama, K., Awaki, H.,
1001: Kunieda, H., Takano, S., Tawara, Y., Yamauchi, S., Hatsukade, I.,
1002: \& Nagase, F. 1989, Nature, 339, 603
1003: \bibitem[Lang (1999)]{lang992} Lang, K. R. 1999,
1004: Astrophysical Formulae, Volume II, (Springer), 87
1005: \bibitem[Lang, Morris, \& Echevarria (1999)]{lang99}Lang, C. C.,
1006: Morris, M., \& Echevarria, L. 1999, ApJ, 526, 727
1007: \bibitem[Lang et al. (2007)]{la03}Lang, C. C. et al., 2007, in preparation
1008: \bibitem[Larosa et al. (2005)]{la05}LaRosa, T. N.,
1009: Brogan, C. L., Shore, S. N., Lazio, T. J.,
1010: Kassim, N. E., Nord, M. E. 2005, ApJ, 626, 23
1011: %Evidence of a Weak Galactic Center Magnetic Field
1012: %from Diffuse Low-Frequency Nonthermal Radio Emission
1013: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626L..23L
1014: \bibitem[Larosa et al.(2000)]{la00}LaRosa, T. N., Kassim,
1015: N. E., Lazio, T. J. W., \& Hyman, S. D. 2000, AJ, 119, 207
1016: \bibitem[Li \& Lu (2007)]{li06}Li, X. H.,
1017: \& Lu, F. J. 2007, \apj, in preparation
1018: \bibitem[Lou (1987)]{Lou87}Lou, Y.-Q. 1987, ApJ, 322, 862
1019: %-869; ``Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamic Waves in a
1020: %Steady Zonal Circulation for a Shallow Fluid Shell
1021: %on the Surface of a Rotating Sphere"
1022: \bibitem[Lou (1993)]{Lou93}Lou, Y.-Q. 1993, ApJ, 414, 656
1023: %-663; ``Alfv\'enic Fluctuations in Relativistic Wind
1024: %with a Spiral Magnetic Field and Random Magnetic Field
1025: %Structures in the Crab Nebula"
1026: \bibitem[Lou (1996)]{Lou96}Lou, Y.-Q. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 129
1027: %-142; ``Compressible Fluctuations in an Equatorial Pulsar
1028: %Wind and a Scenario for Wisps in the Central Crab Nebula"
1029: \bibitem[Lou (1998)]{Lou98}Lou, Y.-Q. 1998, MNRAS, 294, 443
1030: %--447; ``Wisps and Knots in the Inner Crab Nebula"
1031: \bibitem[Lou (2001)]{Lou01}Lou, Y.-Q. 2001, ApJ, 563, L147
1032: %-L150; ``MHD Tidal Waves on a Spinning Magnetic Compact Star"
1033: \bibitem[Lou \& Bai (2006)]{LouBai06}Lou, Y.-Q.,
1034: \& Bai X. N. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 81
1035: %--112; astro-ph/0607328
1036: %Global structures in a composite system of two
1037: %scale-free discs with a coplanar magnetic field
1038: \bibitem[Lou \& Wang (2007)]{LouWang07}Lou, Y.-Q., \&
1039: Wang, W. G. 2007, MNRAS, 378. L54 (astro-ph/0704.0223)
1040: %``Magnetohydrodynamic Rebound Shocks of Supernovae"
1041: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2002)]{lu02}Lu, F. J., Wang, Q. D., Aschenbach,
1042: B., Durouchoux, P., \& Song, L. M. 2002, ApJ, 568, L49
1043: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2003)]{lu03}Lu, F. J.,
1044: Wang, Q. D., \& Lang, C.C. 2003, AJ, 126, 319
1045: %-326
1046: \bibitem[Manchester (2003)]{Manchester03} Manchester, R. N. 2003,
1047: www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/catalogue/
1048: \bibitem[Michel (1969)]{Michel69} Michel, F. C. 1969, ApJ, 158, 727
1049: %related to pulsar wind
1050: \bibitem[Morris(1996)]{mo96}Morris, M., \& Serabyn, E. 1996, \araa, 34, 645
1051: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2006)]{muno06} Muno, M. P.,
1052: Bauer, F. E., Bandyopadhyay, \& Wang, Q. D. 2006,
1053: \aj, submitted, astro-ph/0601627
1054: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2007)]{muno07} Muno, M.P., Baganoff, F.K., Brandt, W.N.,
1055: Morris, M.R., \& Starck, J.L. 2007 ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0707.1907)
1056: \bibitem[Nord et al.(2004)]{nord04}Nord, M. E., Lazio,
1057: T. J. W., Kassim, N. E., Hyman, S. D., LaRosa, T. N.,
1058: Brogan, C. L., \& Duric, N. 2004, AJ, 128, 1646
1059: %High-Resolution, Wide-Field Imaging of the Galactic Center Region at 330 MHz
1060: \bibitem[Park et al.(2005)]{par05}Park, S., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 964
1061: %--975; Park, Sangwook; Muno, Michael P.; Baganoff, Frederick K.;
1062: %Maeda, Yoshitomo; Morris, Mark; Chartas, George; Sanwal, Divas;
1063: %Burrows, David N.; Garmire, Gordon P.
1064: %A Candidate Neutron Star Associated with Galactic
1065: %Center Supernova Remnant Sagittarius A East
1066: \bibitem[Possenti et al. (2002)]{possenti02}Possenti, A.,
1067: Cerutti, R., Colpi, M., \& Mereghetti, S. 2002, A\&A, 387, 993
1068: %-1002; "Re-examining the X-ray versus spin-down
1069: %luminosity correlation of rotation powered pulsars"
1070: \bibitem[Romanova et al. (2005)]{Romanova05}Romanova, M. M.,
1071: Chulsky, G. A., Lovelace, R. V. E. 2005, ApJ, 630, 1020
1072: %Winds, B-Fields, and Magnetotails of Pulsars
1073: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630.1020R
1074: \bibitem[Sakano et al.(2003)]{sak03}Sakano, M., Warwick, R. S.,
1075: Decourchelle, A., \& Predehl, P. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 747
1076: \bibitem[Seward \& Wang(1988)]{se88}Seward,
1077: F. D., \& Wang, Z. R. 1988, ApJ, 332, 199
1078: %--205; Frederick D., Zhen-Ru
1079: %Pulsars, X-ray synchrotron nebulae, and guest stars
1080: \bibitem[Shen et al. 2005]{shen05}Shen, Z.-Q., Lo, K. Y., Liang,
1081: M.-C., Ho, Paul T. P., \& Zhao, J.-H. 2005, Nature, 438, 62
1082: %--64; A size of \sim 1AU for the radio source
1083: %Sgr A* at the centre of the Milky Way
1084: \bibitem[Shore \& LaRosa 1999]{sho99}Shore, S.N., \& LaRosa, T.N. 1999, ApJ, 521, 587
1085: \bibitem[Spitkovsky 2006]{Spitkovsky06}Spitkovsky, A. 2006,
1086: ApJ, 648, 51
1087: %Time-dependent Force-free Pulsar Magnetospheres:
1088: %Axisymmetric and Oblique Rotators
1089: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648L..51S
1090: \bibitem[Tepedelenlio\v{g}lu \& \"{O}gelman(2007)]{te07}Tepedelenlio\v{g}lu, E. \& \"{O}gelman, H. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1183
1091: \bibitem[Toropina et al. 2001]{Toropina01}Toropina, O. D., Romanova,
1092: M. M., Toropin, Yu. M., Lovelace, R. V. E. 2001, ApJ, 561, 964
1093: %Propagation of Magnetized Neutron Stars through the Interstellar Medium
1094: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...561..964T
1095: \bibitem[Valinia et al.(2000)]{val00}Valinia, A., Tatischeff, V.,
1096: Arnaud, K., Ebisawa, K., \& Ramaty, R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 733
1097: \bibitem[Wang et al. (1993)]{wa93}Wang, Q.D., Li, Z.Y., \& Begelman, M.C. 1993, nature, 364, 127
1098: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2002a)]{wa02a}Wang, Q. D.,
1099: Gotthelf, E. V., \& Lang, C. C. 2002a, \nat, 415, 148
1100:
1101: \bibitem[Wang, Lu \& Lang(2002b)]{wang02b}Wang, Q. D.,
1102: Lu, F. J., \& Lang, C. C. 2002b, ApJ, 581, 1148
1103: \bibitem[Wang, Lu \& Gotthelfi (2006)]{wanglu06}Wang, Q. D.,
1104: Lu, F. J., \& Gotthelf, E. V. 2006, \mnras, 367, 937
1105: \bibitem[Wang \& Lou (2007)]{WangLou07}Wang, W. G.,
1106: \& Lou, Y.-Q. 2007, ApSS, in press
1107: %ASTR842; to be accepted by Astrophysics and Space Science
1108: %Self-Similar Dynamics of a Magnetized Polytropic Gas
1109: \bibitem[Wang, Yang, Zhang, Ma, Zhou, Li, Lou, Li (2005)]
1110: {wangetal2005}Wang, X. F., Yang, Y. B., Zhang, T. M.,
1111: Ma, J., Zhou, X., Li, W. D., Lou, Y.-Q., \& Li, Z. W.,
1112: 2005, ApJ, 626, L89
1113: %--L92; The Progenitor of SN 2004dj in a Star Cluster;
1114: %20Myr, 96000solar mass; progenitor mass 12 solar mass;
1115: \bibitem[Wielebinski (2005)]{Richard}Wielebinski, R.,
1116: 2005, Cosmic Magnetic Fields. eds. Richard Wielebinski
1117: and Rainer Beck. Lecture notes in Physics Volume 664, p89
1118: %Magnetic Fields in the Milky Way, Derived from Radio
1119: %Continuum Observations and Faraday Rotation Studies
1120: %
1121: %http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005LNP...664...89W
1122: %
1123: \bibitem[Willingale et al.(2001)]{will01}Willingale, R.,
1124: Aschenbach, B., Griffiths, R. G., Sembay, S.,
1125: Warwick, R. S., Becker, W., Abbey, A. F., \&
1126: Bonnet-Bidaud, J.-M. 2001, A\&A, 365, L212
1127: \bibitem[Wu \& Lou (2006)]{WuLou06}Wu, Y.,
1128: \& Lou, Y.-Q. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 992
1129: %--1018; astro-ph/0607360
1130: %Scale-Free Thin Discs in an Isopedic Magnetic Field
1131: \bibitem[Yu \& Lou (2005)]{YuLou05}Yu, C., \& Lou, Y.-Q.
1132: 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1168
1133: %--1184; ``Envelope Expansion with Core Collapse -- II.
1134: %Quasi-Spherical Isothermal Similarity Solutions for a
1135: %Magnetofluid"
1136: \bibitem[Yu, Lou, Bian \& Wu (2006)]{YuEtal06}Yu, C.,
1137: Lou, Y.-Q., Bian, F.-Y., \& Wu, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 121
1138: %--140; (astro-ph/0604261).
1139: %``Envelope Expansion with Core Collapse. III.
1140: %Similarity Isothermal Shocks in a Magnetofluid"
1141: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(1984)]{yu84}Yusef-Zadeh,
1142: F., Morris, M., \& Chance, D. 1984, \nat, 310, 557
1143: \bibitem[Yusef-Zadeh et al.(2005)]{yusef05}Yusef-Zadeh, F.,
1144: Wardle, M., Muno, M., Law, C., \& Pound, M. 2005, Advances in
1145: Space Research, 35, 107
1146: \bibitem[Zweibel \& Heiles (1997)]{zweibelheiles97}
1147: Zweibel, E. G., \& Heiles, C. 1997, Nature, 385, 131
1148: %Magnetic fields in galaxies and beyond
1149: \end{thebibliography}{}
1150: %
1151: \clearpage
1152: \begin{figure}[]
1153: \figurenum{1}
1154: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f1.eps}}}
1155: \figcaption[]{A panoramic view of the inner 15 pc around the GC, as
1156: shown by {\sl Chandra} ACIS-I counts in the X-ray photon energy
1157: range of $0.5-8$ keV. The 10 new X-ray filaments analyzed in this
1158: paper are labelled in this image as F1, F2, through F10. Exposure
1159: has not been corrected for this image. The thick dashed line
1160: indicates the direction of the Galactic plane, and the white ``+''
1161: denotes the position of Sgr A*. \label{fig:fig1}}
1162: \end{figure}
1163:
1164: \begin{figure}[]
1165: \figurenum{2}
1166: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f2.eps}}}
1167: \figcaption[]{
1168: %{\it Left column}: X-ray image contours for
1169: %six filaments F1 to F6 superimposed onto the smoothed X-ray
1170: %count image. {\it Right column}: X-ray count maps of filaments
1171: %F1 to F6; the spatial regions used for extracting spectra are
1172: %shown by the rectangular boxes.
1173: Caption of this Figure 2 is on a separate page -- page 21.
1174: %{\it Left:} X-ray images of F1 to F6 with contours overlaid. These
1175: %images are smoothed adaptively with a Gaussian to achieve a
1176: %signal-to-noise ratio of 10. For the same data, these contours
1177: %have the same stepsize of 4 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ but different
1178: %starting values, i.e., 20 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ for F1 to F4 and
1179: %16 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ for F5 and F6.
1180: %{\it Right:} The count maps of the same regions as in the left
1181: %column. The color bars are in logarithmic scale. For F1, F2, F5
1182: %and F6, the lower and upper limits are 4 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and
1183: %120 counts arcsec$^{-2}$, while for F3 and F4 the two limits are
1184: %12 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and 120 counts arcsec$^{-2}$, respectively.
1185: %{\bf Referee 1 point 29: In Figure 2, the energy range over which
1186: %X-rays are displayed needs to be given in the caption.}
1187: \label{fig:fig2}}
1188: \end{figure}
1189:
1190: \vfill\eject
1191: %\newpage
1192: \clearpage
1193: Figure 2 caption here.
1194:
1195: {\it Left:} The 0.5-8.0 keV X-ray images of F1 to F6 with contours overlaid. These
1196: images are smoothed adaptively with a Gaussian to achieve a
1197: signal-to-noise ratio of 10. For the same data, these contours
1198: have the same stepsize of 4 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ but different
1199: starting values, i.e., 20 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ for F1 to F4 and
1200: 16 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ for F5 and F6.
1201: {\it Right:} The count maps of the same regions as in the left
1202: column. The color bars are in logarithmic scale. For F1, F2, F5
1203: and F6, the lower and upper limits are 4 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and
1204: 120 counts arcsec$^{-2}$, while for F3 and F4 the two limits are
1205: 12 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and 120 counts arcsec$^{-2}$, respectively.
1206: rays are displayed needs to be given in the caption.
1207:
1208: \begin{figure}[]
1209: \figurenum{3}
1210: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{f3.eps}}}
1211: \figcaption[]{
1212: %The image frame arrangement is similar to that in
1213: %Figure 2, but for four X-ray filaments F7 to F10.
1214: Image arrangement similar to Figure 2 but for four X-ray
1215: filaments F7 to F10. In all plots, the contours start from 8
1216: counts arcsec$^{-2}$ with a stepsize of 4 counts arcsec$^{-2}$.
1217: The grey bars on the right of each image have the same meaning
1218: of those for filaments F1 and F2 as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:fig2}.
1219: \label{fig:fig3}}
1220: \end{figure}
1221:
1222: \begin{figure}[]
1223: \figurenum{4}
1224: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f4.eps}}}
1225: \figcaption[]{The spectra of the ten X-ray filaments around
1226: the GC in the photon energy $2-8$ keV band. All spectra are
1227: fitted with the absorbed power-law model ($phabs(po)$).
1228: \label{fig:fig4}}
1229: \end{figure}
1230:
1231: \begin{figure}[]
1232: \figurenum{5}
1233: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{f5.eps}}}
1234: \figcaption[]{The X-ray spectra determined from the sub-regions of
1235: X-ray filaments F1, F3, F6, and F10 in the photon energy $2-8$ keV
1236: band. All spectra here are fitted with the absorbed power-law model
1237: ($phabs(po)$). \label{fig:fig5}}
1238: \end{figure}
1239:
1240: \begin{figure}[]
1241: \figurenum{6}
1242: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f6.eps}}}
1243: \figcaption[]{
1244: %{\bf Please use larger fonts for the coordinate axes.}
1245: The X-ray spectra of a vicinity region close to the tail of filament
1246: F3 ({\it top panel}), the left (East) clump ({\it middle panel}) and
1247: the right (West) clump ({\it bottom panel}) surrounding filament
1248: F10.\label{fig:fig6}}
1249: \end{figure}
1250:
1251: \begin{figure}[]
1252: \figurenum{7}
1253: %\centerline{{\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{f7.ps}}}
1254: \centerline{{\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{f7.ps}}}
1255: \figcaption[]{
1256: %A plot of 20cm radio contours superimposed
1257: %onto the smoothed X-ray image of filament F10.
1258: The 20 cm radio contours superimposed onto the
1259: X-ray image of F10. The radio data was obtained by the Very Large Array
1260: (VLA) on July 23, 2001, with a beam size of $15\arcsec\times15\arcsec$.
1261: The contours are at 0.14, 0.15, 0.16 and 0.17 Jansky/beam (Lang et al. 2007).
1262: The X-ray
1263: image is smoothed adaptively so as to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio
1264: of 8, and the greyscale changes from 5 to 20 counts arcsec$^{-2}$
1265: logarithmically.
1266: \label{fig:fig7}}
1267: \end{figure}
1268:
1269: %\begin{figure}[]
1270: %\figurenum{8}
1271: %\centerline{{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.9\textwidth]{f8.eps}}}
1272: %\figcaption[]{{\bf Please use larger fonts.}{\it Left panel}: the
1273: %range of hydrogen column density $N_H$ for the 13 X-ray filaments,
1274: %where the Cannonball and SgrA-F are not drawn here because of
1275: %their large error bars. {\it Right panel}: the range of absorbed
1276: %power-law photon index $\Gamma$ for the 13 X-ray filaments. The
1277: %abscissa points ranging from 1 to 13 correspond to X-ray filaments
1278: %in the order: G359.95-0.04, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9,
1279: %SgrA-E, F10, G0.13-0.11, respectively. \label{fig:fig8}}
1280: %\end{figure}
1281:
1282: %%%
1283: \clearpage
1284: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1285: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1286: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1287: \tablecaption{Spectral fitting results of the
1288: X-ray filaments\label{tab:spect_all}} \tablehead{
1289: Region & $N_H$ & $\Gamma$ &$F_x$&$L_x$& $\chi^2/d.o.f.$\\
1290: &$10^{23}{\rm cm}^{-2}$& &$10^{-14}{\rm erg}~{\rm s}^{-1}{\rm
1291: cm}^{-2}$ &$10^{33}{\rm erg}~{\rm s}^{-1}{\rm d_8}^{2}$ }
1292:
1293: \startdata
1294: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 1 (F1, G359.936-0.038)}\\
1295: Whole & 1.0(0.2, 1.5)& 0.9(-0.3, 1.6) & 8.0 (7.3, 10.2) &0.92 (0.84, 1.15) &29.8/30 \\
1296: Joint-fit & set $N_H$ the same \\
1297: Head(N) & 0.8(0.3, 1.7)& 0.8(-0.2, 2.0) & && 26.3/28\\
1298: Tail(S) & 0.8(0.3, 1.7)& 1.6(0.1, 3.3) & && 26.3/28\\
1299:
1300: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 2 (F2, G359.934-0.037)}\\
1301: Whole & 0.9(0.2, 2.1)& 0.8(0.3, 2.0) & 4.7 (4.2, 5.3)&0.53 (0.44, 0.97)& 13.2/20 \\
1302: Joint-fit& set $N_H$ the same \\
1303: Head(NE) & 0.9(0, 2.7) & 0.8(-0.8, 2.9) & & & 17.1/14\\
1304: Tail(SW) & 0.9(0, 2.7) & 1.2(-0.6, 3.4 )& & &17.1/14 \\
1305:
1306: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 3 (F3, G359.965-0.053)}\\
1307: Whole &1.4(1.1, 1.7) & 2.3(1.8, 2.8) & 11.9 (11.4, 12.5) &2.2 (1.9, 2.78) & 72.2/71 \\
1308: Head &1.9(1.3, 2.6) & 3.1(2.2, 4.3) & && 31/35 \\
1309: Middle &1.8(0.6, 4.2) & 2.2(0.6, 5.3) & && 3.6/10 \\
1310: Tail &0.7(0.3, 1.1) & 1.4(0.9, 1.8) & && 23.5/24\\
1311: Joint-fit & set $N_H$ the same \\
1312: Head &1.2(0.9, 1.5) & 2.0(1.5, 2.7)&&&\\
1313: Middle &1.2(0.9, 1.5) & 1.5(0.8, 2.2)&&&\\
1314: Tail &1.2(0.9, 1.5) & 2.4(1.7, 2.8)&&&\\
1315:
1316: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 4 (F4, G359.964-0.056)}\\
1317: Whole & 0.6(0.1, 1.2)& 1.9(1.2, 3.0) & 4.0 (3.4, 5.2) &0.47 (0.41, 0.75) & 13.8/19 \\
1318: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Filament 5 (F5, G359.959-0.028)}\\
1319: Whole & 0.8(0.4, 1.5)& 1.4(0.9, 2.5) & 4.3 (3.6, 4.8) &0.52 (0.43, 0.79) & 19.5/24\\
1320: Head(SE)& 0.5(0., 1.4) & 0.9(-0.4, 2.6)&&& 9.9/10\\
1321: Tail(NW)& 0.8(0., 5.9) & 0.8(-1.2, 6.8)& && 2.7/2 \\
1322: Joint fit:& set $N_H$ the same \\
1323: Head(SE)& 0.6(0.2, 1.5)& 1.1(-0.3, 2.1)&&& \\
1324: Tail(NW)& 0.6(0.2, 1.5)& 0.9(0.2, 1.5) &&& \\
1325:
1326: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 6 (F6, G359.969-0.038)}\\
1327: Whole & 0.9(0.4, 1.4)& 1.4(0.9, 2.3) & 6.6 (5.7, 7.3) &0.84(0.69, 1.07) & 35/40 \\
1328: Head(SW)& 0.7(0., 2.5) & 1.1(-0.2, 3.8)& && 18/13 \\
1329: Tail(NE)& 0.7(0.1, 1.5)& 1.3(0.6, 2.3) & && 25.4/23 \\
1330: Joint fit:& set $N_H$ the same \\
1331: Head(SW)& 0.8(0.3, 1.5)& 1.2(0.3, 2.3) & & \\
1332: Tail(NE)& 0.8(0.3, 1.5)& 1.6(0.7, 2.0) & & \\
1333:
1334: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 7 (F7, G359.920-0.029)}\\
1335: whole & 0.(0., 3.6)& 0.9(-0.2, 4.4) & 2.8 (1.6, 3.0) &0.21 (0.19, 1.96) &5.1/5.0 \\
1336:
1337: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 8 (F8, G359.970-0.009)}\\
1338: whole & 1.5(0.6, 3.0)& 2.3(0.8, 4.6) & 3.0 (2.3, 3.5) &0.6 (0.4, 1.7) &12.4/12 \\
1339:
1340: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 9 (F9, G359.974-0.000)}\\
1341: whole & 0.7(0., 1.5)& 0.6(-0.9, 1.9) & 4.7 (4.1, 5.1) &0.41 (0.40, 0.46) & 5.8/13 \\\\
1342:
1343: \multicolumn{6}{c}{X-ray Filament 10 (F10, G0.029-0.06)}\\
1344: Whole & 0.5(0.4, 0.7)& 1.2(0.9, 1.5)& 10.4 (9.9, 11.1) &1.06 (1.02, 1.16) & 48.9/55\\
1345: Head & 1.0(0.6, 1.6)&1.8(1.3, 2.8) & & &27/21\\
1346: Middle& 0.4(0., 1.1) &1.0(0., 2.0) & &&8.7/13\\
1347: Tail & 0.3(0., 0.9) &1.0(0.5, 1.5) & && 22/18\\
1348: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Joint fit: set $N_H$ the same and fit all the parameters}\\
1349: Head & 0.7(0.4, 1.0)&1.1(0.6, 1.8) & & & \\
1350: Middle & 0.7(0.4, 1.0)&1.5(0.8, 2.2) & & & \\
1351: Tail & 0.7(0.4, 1.0)&1.8(1.4, 2.2) & & & \\
1352: \multicolumn{6}{c}{Joint fit: set $N_H$ the same and fix it at a value 0.7}\\
1353: Head & 0.7& 1.1(1.0, 1.3) & & & \\
1354: Middle & 0.7& 1.5(1.4, 1.6) & & & \\
1355: Tail & 0.7& 1.8(1.7, 1.9) & & & \\
1356: \enddata
1357:
1358: \tablecomments{The spectral model used here is the
1359: absorbed power-law. Relevant parameters are\\
1360: the hydrogen gas column density $N_H$, X-ray photon index
1361: $\Gamma$, the observed flux in the energy $2-10$ keV band
1362: $F_x$ and the unabsorbed X-ray luminosity $L_x$ in the
1363: energy $2-10$ keV band. For definitions of notations here,
1364: $d_8$ denotes the distance in units of 8 kpc, $d.o.f.$ is
1365: the degree of freedom.
1366: Unless otherwise stated in Table 1 as $Joint~fit$, both $N_H$
1367: and $\Gamma$ are free parameters in the fitting procedure.
1368: }
1369: \end{deluxetable}
1370:
1371:
1372: %% sum up
1373: \begin{deluxetable}{llccccccl}
1374: \tabletypesize{
1375: %\footnotesize
1376: \tiny} \tablecaption{A parameter summary for all the X-ray
1377: filaments\label{tab:table_sumup}} \tablehead{
1378: No.&Name&Galactic&Size&Offset&$\Gamma$&$N_H$&$L_x$&Counterparts\\
1379: &&Coordinates&$\arcsec$& & &$10^{23}{\rm cm}^{-2}$ &$10^{33}{\rm
1380: erg}{\rm s}^{-1}d_{8}^{2}$&Radio/IR\\} \startdata
1381: 1&$^{a}$&G359.95-0.04&2$\times$8&$8\farcs7$
1382: &1.9 (1.8, 2.1)&1.4 (1.3, 1.5)&10. &no\\
1383: 2&F1&G359.936-0.038&5$\times$17&$40\farcs7$
1384: &0.9 (-0.3, 1.6)&1.0 (0.2, 1.5)&$0.9$&no\\
1385: 3&F2&G359.934-0.037&3$\times$9&48$\farcs$
1386: &0.8 (0.3, 2.0)&0.9 (0.2, 2.1) &$0.5$&no\\
1387: 4&F3&G359.965-0.053&4$\times$12&$1\farcm3$
1388: &2.3 (1.8, 2.8) &1.4 (1.1, 1.7)&$2.2$&no\\
1389: 5&F4&G359.964-0.056&4$\times$12&$1\farcm3$
1390: &1.9 (1.2, 3.0)&0.6 (0.1, 1.2)&$0.5$&no\\
1391: 6&F5&G359.959-0.028&4$\times$10&$1\farcm4$
1392: &1.4 (0.9, 2.5)&0.8 (0.4, 1.5)&$0.5$&no\\
1393: 7&F6&G359.969-0.038&5$\times$16&$1\farcm6$
1394: &1.4 (0.9, 2.3) &0.9 (0.4, 1.4)&$0.8$&no\\
1395: 8&F7&G359.920-0.029&4$\times$15&$1\farcm3$
1396: &0.9 (-0.2, 4.4) &0.0 (0.0, 3.6)&$0.2$&no\\
1397: 9&$^{b}$Cannonball&G359.983-0.046&\nodata
1398: &$2\farcm3$&1.6 (1.2, 2.2)&1.6 (0, 4.8)&3.1&no\\
1399: 10&F8&G359.970-0.009&4$\times$10&$2\farcm7$
1400: &2.3 (0.8, 4.6) &1.5 (0.6, 3.0)&$0.6$&no\\
1401: 11&F9&G359.974-0.00&4$\times$7&$3\farcm3$
1402: &0.6 (-0.9, 1.9)&0.7 (0.0, 1.5)&0.4&no\\
1403: 12&$^{c}$SgrA-E&G359.89-0.08&8$\times$30
1404: &$4\farcm0$&2.0 (1.5, 2.5)&3.7 (2.5, 5.1)&$16$&yes (radio)\\
1405: 13&F10&G0.029-0.06&6$\times$47&$5\farcm1$
1406: &1.2 (0.9, 1.5) &0.5 (0.4, 0.7)&1.1&yes (radio)\\
1407: 14&$^{d}$SgrA-F&G359.90-0.06&3$\times$6&$5\farcm3$
1408: &(0.8, 8.2)&(1.7, 7.9)&$10.8$&yes (radio)\\
1409: 15&$^{e}$&G0.13-0.11&2$\times$40&$12^\prime$
1410: &1.8 (1.4, 2.5)&0.6 (0.4, 0.9) &3.2&yes (radio)\\
1411: \enddata %{tabular}
1412: \tablecomments{ Offset denotes the angular distance of the brightest
1413: part of an X-ray filament to the position of \sgra; $L_x$ is the
1414: absorption corrected X-ray luminosity in the energy $2-10$ keV band,
1415: except that of SgrA-F, which is in the energy $2-8$ keV band. Some
1416: parameters of the filaments are obtained from the references $a-e$
1417: listed below. The last column of the table shows whether the
1418: counterparts associated with the
1419: filaments in radio bands have so far been found or not.\\
1420: $^{a}$ Wang, Lu, \& Gotthelf (2006).\\
1421: $^{b}$ Park, et al. (2005).\\
1422: $^{c}$ Yusef-Zadeh, et al. (2005).\\
1423: $^{d}$ Yusef-Zadeh, et al. (2005).\\
1424: $^{e}$ Wang, Lu, \& Lang (2002).\\ }
1425: \end{deluxetable}
1426:
1427: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
1428: %\rotate
1429: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1430: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
1431: \tablecaption{Spectral fitting results of the
1432: east and west clumps near X-ray filament F10\label{tab:f10_clumps}}
1433: \tablehead{
1434: Region&$N_{H}$&$\Gamma$&F$_x$&L$_x$&Line E&E.W.&$\chi^2/d.o.f$ \\
1435: &$10^{23}{\rm cm}^{-2}$& &10$^{-13}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$&
1436: $10^{33}$erg s$^{-1}$&keV&keV&\\} \startdata E. C. & 1.4 (1.2, 1.6)&
1437: 1.0 (0.5, 1.2)&6.1 (5.9, 6.6) & 8.1 (7.5, 8.4)
1438: &6.42 (6.41, 6.43) & 0.75 (0.68, 0.83) & 112/135\\
1439: W. C. & 2.3 (1.6, 2.9)& 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)& 5.4 (5.0, 5.7) & 8.7 (7.8,
1440: 10.9)
1441: &6.39 (6.38, 6.40) & 1.07 (0.94, 1.23) & 126/114\\
1442: \enddata
1443: \tablecomments{Spectral Model: $N_{H}$ (power law+gaussian).
1444: Relevant parameters are: $N_H$: hydrogen gas column density;
1445: $\Gamma$: photon index; $F_x$: absorbed flux in $2-10$ keV band;
1446: $L_x$: X-ray luminosity in $2-10$ keV band; $Line E$: line center
1447: energy; $E.W.$: equivalent width of the line; $\chi^2/d.o.f$:
1448: chi-square divided by the number of degree of freedom (d.o.f).
1449: %{\bf Referee 1 point 26: Table 2: as
1450: %for Table 1, the number of significant figures is excessive. The
1451: %equivalent widths need error bars. Fluxes and luminosities for these
1452: %spectral fits (with errors) need to be given. }
1453: }
1454: \end{deluxetable}
1455:
1456:
1457: \end{document}
1458: \end
1459: