1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib,floatfix]{revtex4}
22: \documentclass[showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib,floatfix]{revtex4}
23: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib,floatfix]{revtex4}
24:
25: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
28: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
29:
30: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}% Include figure files
31: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
32: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
33:
34: %\nofiles
35:
36: %%%%% Personal Macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: \def\mapgeq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\sim}\vphantom{_x}}$}}}
38: \def\mapleq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel<\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\sim}\vphantom{_x}}$}}}
39: \def\mapgeqeq{\mathbi{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\approx}\vphantom{_2}}$}}}
40: \def\mapleqeq{\mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel<\over{\smash{\scriptstyle\approx}\vphantom{_2}}$}}}
41: % Journal macro
42: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2} (#4) #3}
43: % Journal names
44: \def\MPL{Mod. Phys. Lett. A}
45: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}
46: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys. B}
47: \def\NPBOLD{Nucl. Phys.}
48: \def\NPSUPPL{Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.}
49: \def\PLB{{Phys. Lett.} B}
50: \def\PREPO{Phys. Rep.}
51: \def\PLBOLD{Phys. Lett.}
52: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
53: \def\RMP{Rev. Mod. Phys.}
54: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}
55: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}
56: \def\PTP{Prog. Theor. Phys.}
57: \def\JHEP{JHEP}
58: \def\JCAP{JCAP}
59: \def\EPJ{Euro. Phys. J. C}
60: \def\EPJA{Euro. Phys. J. A}
61: \def\JETPUSSR{Sov. Phys. JETP}
62: \def\JETPUSSRLETT{Sov. Phys. JETP Letters}
63: \def\ZETP{Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.}
64: \def\PismaZETP{Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.}
65: \def\TNYAS{Trans. New York Acad. Sci.}
66: \def\IJMP{Int. J. Mod. Phys. A}
67: \def\IJMPE{Int. J. Mod. Phys. E}
68: \def\JPG{J. Phys. G}
69: \def\PAN{Phys. At. Nucl.}
70: \def\SCI{Science}
71: \def\APJ{Astrophysics J.}
72: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
73: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}
74: \def\NJP{New. J. Phys.}
75: \def\PPNP{Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.}
76: \def\ARNPS{Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part}
77: \def\ACTAB{Acta. Phys. Pol. B}
78: \def\Erratum{Erratum-ibid}
79:
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81:
82: \begin{document}
83:
84: \preprint{TOKAI-HEP/TH-0701}
85:
86: \title{Leptonic CP Violation Induced by Approximately $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism}
87: % Force line breaks with \\
88:
89: \author{Teppei Baba}
90: \email{7atrd014@keyaki.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp}
91: % \affiliation[Also at ]{Physics Department, XYZ University.}%Lines break automatically or can be forced with \\
92: % \affiliation{\vspace{3mm}%
93: % \sl Department of Science and Technology,\\
94: % Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokai University\\
95: % 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan\\
96: % }
97: \author{Masaki Yasu\`{e}}%
98: \email{yasue@keyaki.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp}
99: \affiliation{\vspace{3mm}%
100: \sl Department of Physics, Tokai University,\\
101: 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan\\
102: }
103:
104: \date{October, 2007}% It is always \today, today,
105: % but any date may be explicitly specified
106:
107: %%-------------------------------------------------
108: %% Abstract
109: %%-------------------------------------------------
110: \begin{abstract}
111: Assuming a minimal seesaw model with two heavy neutrinos ($N$), we examine effects of leptonic CP violation
112: induced by approximate $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric interactions. As long as $N$ is
113: subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry,
114: we can choose CP phases of Dirac mass terms without loss of generality in such
115: a way that these phases arise from $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking interactions. In the case that
116: no phase is present in heavy neutrino mass terms, leptonic CP phases are controlled by
117: two phases $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
118: The similar consideration is extended to $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry.
119: It is argued that $N$ subject (blind) to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry
120: necessarily describes the normal (inverted) mass hierarchy.
121: We restrict ourselves to $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric textures giving the tri-bimaximal mixing
122: and calculate flavor neutrino masses to estimate CP-violating Dirac and Majorana phases as well as
123: neutrino mixing angles as functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
124: Since $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are generated by $\mu$-$\tau$
125: symmetry breaking interactions, CP-violating Majorana phase tends to be
126: suppressed and is found to be at most ${\mathcal O}(0.1)$ radian. On the other hand, CP-violating Dirac phase
127: tends to show a proportionality to $\alpha$ or to $\beta$.
128: \end{abstract}
129:
130: \pacs{12.60.-i, 13.15.+g, 14.60.Pq, 14.60.St}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
131: % Classification Scheme.
132: %\keywords{Keywords: neutrino mass, radiative mechanism, lepton triplet}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
133: %display desired
134: \maketitle
135: %%-------------------------------------------------
136: %% Main body
137: %%-------------------------------------------------
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139: \section{\label{sec:1}Introduction}
140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
141: Recent extensive analysis on neutrino oscillations \cite{NeutrinoData} has indicated almost maximal atmospheric
142: neutrino mixing and large solar neutrino mixing as well as suppressed reactor neutrino mixing angle.
143: These observed properties can well be understood by assuming a $\mu$-$\tau$
144: symmetry in neutrino interactions \cite{mu-tau}. Another interesting property of neutrinos, which has
145: not yet been observed, is related to leptonic CP violation. The leptonic CP violation of
146: the Dirac type is known to be absent in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit \cite{mu-tauCP}. Therefore,
147: to discuss physics of leptonic CP violation needs the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking in neutrino interactions.
148:
149: Leptonic CP violation can be parameterized by one Dirac CP-violating phase ($\delta_{CP}$) and
150: three Majorana phases ($\phi_{1,2,3}$) \cite{CPphases} in the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata
151: (PMNS) mixing matrix $U_{PMNS}=U^0_\nu K^0$ \cite{PMNS} with
152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
153: \begin{eqnarray}
154: U^0_\nu&=&\left( \begin{array}{ccc}
155: c_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13}& s_{13}e^{-i\delta_{CP}}\\
156: -c_{23}s_{12}-s_{23}c_{12}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{CP}}
157: & c_{23}c_{12}-s_{23}s_{12}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{CP}}
158: & s_{23}c_{13}\\
159: s_{23}s_{12}-c_{23}c_{12}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{CP}}
160: & -s_{23}c_{12}-c_{23}s_{12}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{CP}}
161: & c_{23}c_{13},\\
162: \end{array} \right),
163: \nonumber \\
164: K^0 &=& {\rm diag}(e^{i\phi_1}, e^{i\phi_2}, e^{i\phi_3}),
165: \label{Eq:Uu}
166: \end{eqnarray}
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168: where $c_{ij}=\cos\theta_{ij}$ and $s_{ij}=\sin\theta_{ij}$ ($i,j$=1,2,3), as adopted by the
169: Particle Data Group \cite{PDG}.
170: The Majorana CP-violating phases are determined by two combinations of $\phi_{1,2,3}$ such
171: as $\phi_i-\phi_1$ ($i$=1,2,3). Since there are arbitrary phases of the flavor neutrinos,
172: the phases of $U_{PMNS}$ vary with these phases. The most general
173: form of $U_{PMNS}$ is given by
174: $U_\nu$ and $K$ \cite{BabaYasue} in place of $U^0_\nu$ and $K^0$:
175: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
176: \begin{eqnarray}
177: U_\nu&=&\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
178: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
179: 0 & {e^{i\gamma } } & 0 \\
180: 0 & 0 & {e^{ - i\gamma } } \\
181: \end{array}} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
182: {c_{12} c_{13} } & {s_{12} c_{13} e^{i\rho } } & {s_{13} e^{ - i\delta } } \\
183: { - c_{23} s_{12} e^{ - i\rho } - s_{23} c_{12} s_{13} e^{i\delta } } & {c_{23} c_{12} - s_{23} s_{12} s_{13} e^{i\left( {\delta + \rho } \right)} } & {s_{23} c_{13} } \\
184: {s_{23} s_{12} e^{ - i\rho } - c_{23} c_{12} s_{13} e^{i\delta } } & { - s_{23} c_{12} - c_{23} s_{12} s_{13} e^{i\left( {\delta + \rho } \right)} } & {c_{23} c_{13} } \\
185: \end{array}} \right),
186: \nonumber \\
187: K &=& {\rm diag}(e^{i\phi^\prime_1}, e^{i\phi_2}, e^{i\phi_3}),
188: \label{Eq:Uu_general}
189: \end{eqnarray}
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191: where $\delta_{CP}=\delta+\rho$ and $\phi_1 = \phi^\prime_1-\rho$,
192: which will be used in this article.\footnote{The phases $\rho$ and $\gamma$
193: are redundant and can be removed by the redefinition of flavor neutrino masses.
194: The resultant $U_{PMNS}$ involves
195: $\delta+\rho$ and $ \phi^\prime_1-\rho$, respectively, as Dirac and Majorana CP-violating phases.
196: Although Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu_general}) contains 6 CP phases, strictly speaking, there
197: are 7 CP phases in total \cite{MostGeneral}. In fact, there is an additional phase for
198: the $2-3$ rotation ($\tau$) contributing to $\delta_{CP}$ as $\delta_{CP} = \delta+\rho+\tau$,
199: which, however, can be removed by introducing a new definition: $\rho^\prime=\rho+\tau/2$,
200: $\gamma^\prime=\gamma+\tau/2$ and
201: $\delta^\prime=\delta+\tau/2$. As a reault, we end up with the same definition of
202: $\delta_{CP}$: $\delta_{CP}=\delta^\prime + \rho^\prime$. See Ref.\cite{BabaYasue}
203: for more details.
204: Therefore, the parameterization with
205: $\delta^\prime$, $\rho^\prime$, and $\gamma^\prime$ gives
206: Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu_general}) as a general form of $U_{PMNS}$.}
207: Another aspect of the role of leptonic CP phases
208: may lie in creation of the baryon asymmetry of the Universe \cite{CP-Baryon}
209: when the seesaw mechanism active at higher energies \cite{leptogenesis} is responsible for
210: generating neutrino masses \cite{MostGeneral,SeeSaw}.
211: More precisely, the minimal seesaw mechanism based
212: on two heavy neutrinos ($N$) provides the direct linkage
213: between the high energy phases in the seesaw mechanism and the low energy phases defined by $U_{PMNS}$ \cite{TwoHeavy}.
214: Therefore, we can predict the size of the low energy phases that
215: yields the observed size of the baryon asymmetry of the Universe.
216:
217: In the present article, we discuss
218: $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking effects in the minimal seesaw mechanism
219: on flavor neutrino masses to study low energy CP violation \cite{mu-tauSeeSaw}. The correlation between
220: the low energy CP violation and its effect in leptogenesis will be discussed in a subsequent article.
221: In Sec.\ref{sec:2}, our minimal seesaw model
222: is described. In Sec.\ref{sec:3}, we calculate flavor neutrino masses in models based on $N$ subject to
223: the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry where the normal mass hierarchy is realized
224: and on $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry where the inverted mass hierarchy is realized.
225: How these mass hierarchies arise is discussed in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix1}.
226: We restrict ourselves
227: to mass terms of $N$ without CP-violating phases. As a result,
228: leptonic CP violation arises in general
229: from the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking terms for the normal mass hierarchy.
230: To compare our predictions
231: with those for the inverted mass hierarchy, the same phase structure is assumed
232: for the inverted mass hierarchy.
233: To simplify our discussions, the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric flavor neutrino
234: mass texture is taken to describe the tri-bimaximal mixing \cite{TriBiMaximal},
235: which predicts the consistent value of $\sin\theta_{12}$ with the observed data.
236: We choose three textures to describe the normal and inverted mass hierarchies.
237: The calculation of the flavor neutrino masses supplied by the seesaw mechanism
238: is performed in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix1}.
239: In Sec.\ref{sec:4}, CP-violating phases as well as neutrino masses and mixing angles are
240: calculated and results are shown in figures. A set of formula used in Sec.\ref{sec:4} is
241: summarized in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix2}. Final section is devoted to summary and discussions.
242:
243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
244: \section{\label{sec:2}Model}
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246: Let us begin with defining superpotential for leptons ($W$)
247: in the minimal seesaw model with three flavors of $L$ ($\ell$) as
248: $SU(2)_L$-doublets (singlets) and two flavors of $N$ to be denoted by ($N_\mu$, $N_\tau$) as $SU(2)_L$-singlets
249: as well as two Higgses $H_{u,d}$:
250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: &&
253: W = e^{CT} {\bf Y}_\ell LH_d + N^{CT} {\bf Y}_\nu LH_u + \frac{1}{2}N^{CT} {\bf M}_R N^C
254: \label{Eq:SuperPotential}
255: \end{eqnarray}
256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
257: where ${\bf Y}_\ell$ and ${\bf Y}_\nu$ are Yukawa couplings and ${\bf M}_R$ is a Majorana mass matrix of $N$.
258: We can always choose the base, where ${\bf Y}_\ell$ is diagonal, which defines the charged leptons
259: $e$, $\mu$ and $\tau$.
260: The coupling ${\bf Y}_\nu$ and the mass matrix ${\bf M}_R$ are parameterized as follows:
261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
262: \begin{eqnarray}
263: &&
264: {\bf Y}_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
265: {h_{\mu e} } \hfill & {h_{\mu \mu } } \hfill & {h_{\mu \tau } } \hfill \\
266: {h_{\tau e} } \hfill & {h_{\tau \mu } } \hfill & {h_{\tau \tau } } \hfill \\
267: \end{array}} \right),
268: \quad
269: {\bf M}_R = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
270: {{\bf M}_{R\mu \mu } } & {{\bf M}_{R\mu \tau } } \\
271: {{\bf M}_{R\mu \tau } } & {{\bf M}_{R\tau \tau } } \\
272: \end{array}} \right).
273: \label{Eq:MassMatrix}
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
276: Our $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry is defined by the invariance of $W$ under the interchange
277: $\nu_\mu\leftrightarrow -\sigma\nu_\tau$,
278: where $\sigma = \pm 1$ will take care of the sign of $\sin\theta_{23}$.\footnote{This interchange should be
279: replaced by $L_\mu\leftrightarrow -\sigma L_\tau$
280: and is consistently described if two extra Higgses $H^\prime_{u,d}$ are introduced.
281: Under the interchange, we require that
282: $H^\prime_{u,d}\rightarrow -H^\prime_{u,d}$ while
283: $H_{u,d}\rightarrow H_{u,d}$, where $\langle 0 \vert H^\prime_{u,d} \vert 0\rangle$
284: yields $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking terms. The interplay of these
285: Higgses supplies a $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric $W$ and also accounts for the appearance of the
286: badly broken $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry for the
287: charged leptons and of the approximate $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry for neutrinos \cite{Charged mu-tau}. For the purpose
288: of the present article,
289: it is sufficient to use Eq.(\ref{Eq:SuperPotential}).}
290: This form of the interchange is based on the
291: choice of $\sin\theta_{23}=\sigma/\sqrt{2}$ defined in $U_{PMNS}$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu}) in the
292: $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit. It is readily seen that the corresponding mass matrix is
293: $M^{(+)}$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mnu-mutau-separation-2}), which has $(0, \sigma/\sqrt{2}, 1/\sqrt{2})^T$
294: as an eigenvector that in turn gives $\sin\theta_{23}=\sigma/\sqrt{2}$ from the third column of
295: $U_{PMNS}$ as long as this eigenvector is assigned to the third neutrino \cite{13-12}. As a
296: result, $M^{(+)}$ is invariant under $\nu_\mu\leftrightarrow -\sigma\nu_\tau$. It is
297: convenient to introduce
298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: &&
301: \nu _ \pm = \frac{{\nu _\mu \pm \left( { - \sigma \nu _\tau } \right)}}{{\sqrt 2 }},
302: \quad
303: N _ \pm^C = \frac{{N _\mu^C \pm \left( { - \sigma N _\tau^C } \right)}}{{\sqrt 2 }},
304: \label{Eq:NuPlusMinus}
305: \end{eqnarray}
306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
307: to discuss property of neutrinos with respect to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry.
308:
309: In addition to the assignment of $N$ to be $N=(N_\mu, N_\tau)$, there are other cases,
310: which contain $N_e$ in models such as those based on $(N_e, N_{\mu,\tau})$. For $N$ subject to the
311: $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, $N$ can be either $(N_+, N_-)$ or $(N_e, N_-)$ while, for $N$ blind to the
312: $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, $N_\pm$ can be any two heavy neutrinos of $N_e$, $N_\mu$ and $N_\tau$.
313: To treat these cases, we use $N=(N_+, N_-)$ instead of $N=(N_\mu, N_\tau)$.
314: The coupling ${\bf Y}_\nu$ and the mass matrix ${\bf M}_R$ are parameterized as follows:
315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: &&
318: {\bf Y}_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
319: {h_{ + e} } \hfill & {h_{ + \mu } } \hfill & {h_{ + \tau } } \hfill \\
320: {h_{ - e} } \hfill & {h_{ - \mu } } \hfill & {h_{ - \tau } } \hfill \\
321: \end{array}} \right),
322: \quad
323: {\bf M}_R = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
324: {{\bf M}_{R++ } } & {{\bf M}_{R+- } } \\
325: {{\bf M}_{R+- } } & {{\bf M}_{R-- } } \\
326: \end{array}} \right).
327: \label{Eq:MassMatrix-e}
328: \end{eqnarray}
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: Another case with $N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry can be discussed by
331: replacing $(N_+, N_-)$ with $(N_e, N_-)$. We classify all cases
332: by specifying couplings of the Yukawa interactions for neutrinos
333: denoted by $f$'s, where neutrinos are expressed in terms of
334: $N_\pm$ and $\nu_{e, \pm}$. The corresponding lagrangian ${\mathcal L}_\nu$ is
335: described by
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: -{\mathcal L}_\nu
339: &=&
340: \left( {f_{ e e}{\overline {N_ e}} + f_{ + e}{\overline {N_ +}} + f_{ - e} {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _e H_{u1}
341: + \left( {f_{ e + }\overline {N_ e} + f_{ + + }\overline {N_ +} + f_{ - + } {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _ + H_{u1}
342: \nonumber\\
343: &+&
344: \left( {f_{ e - } \overline {N_ e} +f_{ + - } {\overline {N_ +}} +f_{ - - } \overline {N_ -} } \right)\nu _ - H_{u1} .
345: \label{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus}
346: \end{eqnarray}
347: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
348: where $H_{u1}$ is defined in $H_u = (H_{u1}, H_{u2})^T$. In each case, if $N$ is subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry,
349: $N_+$ can be $(N_\mu+(-\sigma)N_\tau)/\sqrt{2}$ or $N_e$ and
350: $N_-$ is just $(N_\mu-(-\sigma)N_\tau)/\sqrt{2}$.
351: On the other hand, if $N$ is blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, $N_\pm$ can be any combinations of $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$.
352: The difference of these assignments is absorbed into the definition of $f$'s,
353: which are given by different Yukawa couplings in the starting superpotential expressed
354: in terms of $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ and $\nu_{e,\mu,\tau}$.\footnote{In a seesaw model with $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$,
355: two light heavy neutrinos that effectively describes the minimal seesaw model
356: discussed here are dynamically determined by mass terms of $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$ and can be
357: any combination of $N_{e,\mu,\tau}$. However, if $N$ in the minimal seesaw model
358: is subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, $N$ should include $N_-$ as a light heavy neutrino.}
359: It is sufficient to use the notation of $N_\pm$ for the later discussions.
360:
361: For a complex ${\bf M}_R$, phases of $\theta_{Rij}$ defined by
362: ${\bf M}_{Rij}= \exp(i\theta_{Rij}){\bf M}_{ij}$ ($i.j=+.-$)
363: can be transferred into the phase of
364: ${\bf M}_{R+-}$,
365: where ${\bf M}_{ij}$ ($i,j=+,-$) are taken to be real for $-\pi/2\leq\theta_{Rij}\leq\pi/2$.
366: We here use ($+$, $-$) as the suffix of {\bf M}, which
367: should be replaced by other combinations such as ($e$, $-$), appropriately.
368: This phase becomes $\theta_{R +-}-(\theta_{R ++}+\theta_{R --})/2(\equiv \Theta_{+-})$
369: and ${\bf M}_R$ is given by
370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
371: \begin{eqnarray}
372: &&
373: {\bf M}_R = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
374: {{\bf M}_{+ + } } & e^{i\Theta_{+-}}{ {\bf M}_{+ - } } \\
375: e^{i\Theta_{+-}}{{\bf M}_{+ - } } & {{\bf M}_{- - } } \\
376: \end{array}} \right).
377: \label{Eq:HeavyMassMatrix}
378: \end{eqnarray}
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: Without the loss of generality, we choose that ${\bf M}_{-- } > {\bf M}_{+ + }$.
381: The unitary matrix $U$ that diagonalizes ${\bf M}_R$ to give
382: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
383: \begin{eqnarray}
384: &&
385: {\bf M}_{{\rm{diag}}} = U^ * {\bf M}_R U^\dag
386: =
387: \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
388: {M_ 1e^{2i\varphi _ 1 } } & 0 \\
389: 0 & {M_ 2e^{2i\varphi _ 2 } } \\
390: \end{array}} \right)
391: \label{Eq:HeavyUnitaryMatrix}
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
394: is
395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
396: \begin{eqnarray}
397: &&
398: U = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
399: \cos\theta & { - e^{i\omega } \sin\theta} \\
400: {e^{ - i\omega } \sin\theta} & \cos\theta \\
401: \end{array}} \right),
402: \label{Eq:HeavyUnitaryMatrix2}
403: \end{eqnarray}
404: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
405: where
406: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
407: \begin{eqnarray}
408: &&
409: \omega = \arg\left(e^{i\Theta _{+ -} } {\bf M}_{+ + } + e^{ - i\Theta _{+ -}} {\bf M}_{- - }\right),
410: \label{Eq:HeavyPhaseOmega}\\
411: &&
412: M_ 1 e^{2i\varphi _ 1 } = \cos^2\theta {\bf M}_{+ + } + e^{ - 2i\omega } \sin^2\theta {\bf M}_{- - } - 2\cos\theta\sin\theta e^{i\left( {\Theta _{+ - } - \omega } \right)} {\bf M}_{+ - }.
413: \nonumber\\
414: &&
415: M_ 2 e^{2i\varphi _ 2 } = \cos^2\theta {\bf M}_{- - } + e^{2i\omega } \sin^2\theta {\bf M}_{+ + } + 2\cos\theta\sin\theta e^{i\left( {\Theta _{+ - } + \omega } \right)} {\bf M}_{+ - },
416: \nonumber\\
417: \label{Eq:HeavyPhaseMajirana}
418: \end{eqnarray}
419: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
420: and
421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
422: \begin{eqnarray}
423: \tan \theta = \frac{{2{\bf M}_{ + - } r}}{{{\bf M}_{ - - } - {\bf M}_{ + + } + \sqrt {\left( {{\bf M}_{ - - } - {\bf M}_{ + + } } \right)^2 + 4{\bf M}_{ + - }^2 r^2 } }},
424: \label{Eq:HeavyMixingAngle}
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
427: The parameter $r$ is given by
428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
429: \begin{eqnarray}
430: &&
431: r = {\frac{\left|{e^{i\Theta _{+ -} } {\bf M}_{+ + } + e^{ - i\Theta _{+ -} } {\bf M}_{- - } } \right|}{{{\bf M}_{+ + } + {\bf M}_{- - } }}}.
432: \label{Eq:HeavyMixingAngle-r}
433: \end{eqnarray}
434: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
435: The phase $\omega$ is further expressed as
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437: \begin{eqnarray}
438: &&
439: \tan \omega = \frac{{\bf M}_{+ + }-{\bf M}_{- - } }
440: {{\bf M}_{+ + }+{\bf M}_{- - } }\tan \Theta _{+-}.
441: \label{Eq:HeavyUnitaryMatrixPhase-2}
442: \end{eqnarray}
443: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
444: In the case of $N_-\rightarrow -N_-$ under the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry transformation, we obtain that
445: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
446: \begin{eqnarray}
447: &&
448: {\bf M}_{+-}=0,
449: \label{Eq:HeavyUnitaryMatrixSymmetric}
450: \end{eqnarray}
451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
452: leading to $\theta = 0$ in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit.
453:
454: The coupling ${\bf Y}_\nu$ for $(N_+,N_-)$ and $(\nu_e,\nu_\mu,\nu_\tau)$ can be parameterized to be:
455: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
456: \begin{eqnarray}
457: &&
458: {\bf Y}_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
459: h_{ + e} \hfill & {h_{ + \mu } } \hfill & { h_{ + \tau } } \hfill \\
460: h_{ - e} \hfill & {h_{ - \mu } } \hfill & { h_{ - \tau } } \hfill \\
461: \end{array}} \right),
462: \label{Eq:Yukawas}
463: \end{eqnarray}
464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
465: and formally divided into two parts as
466: ${\bf Y}_\nu={\bf Y}^{(+)}_\nu+{\bf Y}^{(-)}_\nu$, which is just an identity, where
467: the superscripts $(+)$ and $(-)$ of ${\bf Y}_\nu$ are, respectively, so chosen to stand for the $\mu-\tau$
468: symmetry preserving and breaking terms.
469: We obtain the following ${\bf Y}_\nu$:
470: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
471: \begin{enumerate}
472: \item For $N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry,
473: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
474: \begin{eqnarray}
475: &&
476: {\bf Y}_\nu ^{\left( + \right)} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
477: {h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & { - \sigma h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill \\
478: 0 \hfill & {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & {\sigma h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill \\
479: \end{array}} \right),
480: \quad
481: {\bf Y}_\nu ^{\left( - \right)} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
482: 0 \hfill & {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill & {\sigma h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill \\
483: {h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill & {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill & { - \sigma h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill \\
484: \end{array}} \right),
485: \label{Eq:mu-tauMassMatrix-1}
486: \end{eqnarray}
487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
488: where
489: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
490: \begin{eqnarray}
491: &&
492: h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ + e} ,
493: \quad
494: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + + }}}{{\sqrt 2 }},
495: \quad
496: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
497: \nonumber\\
498: &&
499: h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} = f_{ - e},
500: \quad
501: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
502: \quad
503: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
504: \label{Eq:mu-tau-h-1}
505: \end{eqnarray}
506: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
507: from
508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
509: \begin{eqnarray}
510: &&
511: -{\mathcal L}_\nu
512: =
513: \left( {f_{ + e} {\overline {N_ +}} + f_{ - e} {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _e H_{u1}
514: + \left( {f_{ + + }\overline {N_ +} + f_{ - + } {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _ + H_{u1}
515: + \left( {f_{ + - } {\overline {N_ +}} + f_{ - - } \overline {N_ -} } \right)\nu _ - H_{u1} ,
516: \label{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-1}
517: \end{eqnarray}
518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
519: for $N=(N_+, N_-)$, and where
520: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
521: \begin{eqnarray}
522: &&
523: h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ e e},
524: \quad
525: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ e + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
526: \quad
527: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
528: \nonumber\\
529: &&
530: h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} = f_{ - e} ,
531: \quad
532: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ e - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
533: \quad
534: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
535: \label{Eq:mu-tau-h-1-2}
536: \end{eqnarray}
537: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
538: from
539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
540: \begin{eqnarray}
541: &&
542: -{\mathcal L}_\nu
543: =
544: \left( {f_{ee} {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{ - e} {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _e H_{u1}
545: + \left( {f_{e + } {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{ - + } {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _ + H_{u1}
546: + \left( {f_{ e - } {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{- - } {\overline {N_ -}} } \right)\nu _ - H_{u1},
547: \label{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-1-e}
548: \end{eqnarray}
549: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
550: for $N=(N_e, N_-)$. In the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit,
551: it is obvious to see that this case provides $\nu_e\nu_+$, $\nu_+\nu_+$ and $\nu_-\nu_-$
552: as flavor neutrino mass terms and the phase of $U$ is absent because of
553: Eq.(\ref{Eq:HeavyUnitaryMatrixSymmetric}).
554: Since the quantity $U^ *{\bf Y}^{(+)}_\nu {\bf Y}^{(+)\dagger}_\nu U^T $
555: related to the leptogenesis turns out
556: to be real, the leptogenesis requires $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking couplings \cite{mu-tauNoCP}.
557: In the Yukawa interactions, we see that phases of
558: ($f_{ + e} $, $f_{ + + }$, $f_{ - - }$) in Eq.(\ref{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-1})
559: or
560: ($f_{ e e}$, $f_{ e + }$, $f_{ - - }$) in Eq.(\ref{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-1-e})
561: are, respectively, absorbed by adjusting phases of $\nu _e$, $\nu _ + $ and $\nu _ -$. As a result, the phases arises solely from
562: the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking couplings.
563: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
564: \item For $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry,
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: \begin{eqnarray}
567: &&
568: {\bf Y}_\nu^{\left( + \right)} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
569: {h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & { - \sigma h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill \\
570: {h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill & { - \sigma h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \hfill \\
571: \end{array}} \right),
572: \quad
573: {\bf Y}_\nu ^{\left( - \right)} = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
574: 0 \hfill & {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill & {\sigma h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill \\
575: 0 \hfill & {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill & {\sigma h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \hfill \\
576: \end{array}} \right),
577: \label{Eq:mu-tauMassMatrix-2}
578: \end{eqnarray}
579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
580: where
581: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
582: \begin{eqnarray}
583: &&
584: h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ + e} ,
585: \quad
586: h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ - e} ,
587: \quad
588: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
589: \quad
590: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
591: \nonumber\\
592: &&
593: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
594: \quad
595: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ - - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
596: \label{Eq:mu-tau-h-2}
597: \end{eqnarray}
598: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
599: from the Yukawa interactions given by Eq.(\ref{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-1})
600: for ($N_+$, $N_-$) and
601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
602: \begin{eqnarray}
603: &&
604: h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ e e} ,
605: \quad
606: h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} = f_{ + e} ,
607: \quad
608: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ e + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
609: \quad
610: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + + } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
611: \nonumber\\
612: &&
613: h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ e - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
614: \quad
615: h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} = \frac{{f_{ + - } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
616: \label{Eq:CouplingFlavorMasses2}
617: \end{eqnarray}
618: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
619: from
620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
621: \begin{eqnarray}
622: &&
623: -{\mathcal L}_\nu
624: =
625: \left( {f_{ee} {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{ + e} {\overline {N_ +}} } \right)\nu _e H_{u1}
626: + \left( {f_{e + } {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{ + + } {\overline {N_ +}} } \right)\nu _ + H_{u1}
627: + \left( {f_{ e - } {\overline {N_ e}} + f_{+ - } {\overline {N_ +}} } \right)\nu _ - H_{u1},
628: \label{Eq:FlavorCoulingPlusMinus-2-e}
629: \end{eqnarray}
630: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
631: for $N=(N_e, N_+)$. Similarly for the other cases.
632: Since $N$ can couple to $\nu_+$ but not to $\nu_-$ in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit, flavor neutrino mass terms
633: consist of $\nu_e\nu_+$ and $\nu_+\nu_+$, which are phenomenologically favorable \cite{NuPlus}. Furthermore,
634: $U^ *{\bf Y}^{(+)}_\nu {\bf Y}^{(+)\dagger}_\nu U^T $
635: becomes complex even in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit due to the presence of
636: the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric Majorana phase $\omega$ and may be
637: preferable to the leptogenesis.
638: In the Yukawa interactions,
639: phases of the couplings of $f$'s can be absorbed into those associated with $\nu_{e,\pm}$. However, in general
640: we cannot make the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry preserving couplings real. We have to adjust the $\nu_{e,+}$-couplings to
641: be real by hand so that the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking associated with the $\nu_-$-couplings supplies CP-phases.
642: \end{enumerate}
643: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
644: The major conclusion is that $N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry has real $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry preserving couplings.
645: Therefore, the leptonic CP-phases come from the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking couplings.
646: For $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, the same situation arises only if
647: we assume that phases are associated with the $\nu_-$-couplings.
648: In the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit,
649: the flavor neutrino masses can be parameterized to be:
650: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
651: \begin{eqnarray}
652: &&
653: \frac{1}{2}a_0 \nu _e \nu _e + b_0 \frac{{\nu _e \nu _ + + \nu _ + \nu _e }}{{\sqrt 2 }} + d_ + \nu _ + \nu _ + + d_ - \nu _ - \nu _ - ,
654: \label{Eq:NuMassTermSym-1-0}
655: \end{eqnarray}
656: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
657: as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMassTermSym}) for $N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, and
658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
659: \begin{eqnarray}
660: &&
661: \frac{1}{2}a_0 \nu _e \nu _e + b_0 \frac{{\nu _e \nu _ + + \nu _ + \nu _e }}{{\sqrt 2 }} + d_ + \nu _ + \nu _ +,
662: \label{Eq:NuMassTermSym-3-0}
663: \end{eqnarray}
664: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
665: as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMassTermSym-2}) for $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, where $a_0$. $b_0$ and $d_\pm$ are
666: mass parameters.
667:
668: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
669: \section{\label{sec:3}Flavor Neutrino Mass Matrix}
670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
671: The seesaw mechanism generates the following Majorana neutrino mass matrix $M_\nu$ for flavor neutrinos:
672: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
673: \begin{eqnarray}
674: &&
675: M_\nu = - v^2 {\bf Y}_\nu ^T U^T {\bf M}_{{\rm{diag}}}^{ - 1} U {\bf Y}_\nu,
676: \label{Eq:SeesawMajorana}
677: \end{eqnarray}
678: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
679: where $v=\langle 0 \vert H_{u1}\vert 0\rangle$.
680: We estimate effects of the leptonic CP violation provided by $M_{ij}$ ($i,j=e,\mu,\tau$) defined
681: in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix1}. For the sake of simplicity, we assume that there is
682: no phase in ${\bf M}_R$.\footnote{We keep terms containing the phase in our calculations, whose
683: results are shown in the Appendix and will be used in our future study.}
684:
685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
686: \subsection{\label{sec:3-1}$N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry}
687: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
688: From Eq.(\ref{Eq:MassFlavorAppendix-1}), we find that
689: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
690: \begin{eqnarray}
691: &&
692: M_{ee} \approx - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)2} M_1^{ - 1},
693: \nonumber\\
694: &&
695: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} M_1^{ - 1},
696: \nonumber\\
697: &&
698: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} \approx - v^2 \left[ {\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} + s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
699: \nonumber\\
700: &&
701: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 \left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_1^{ - 1} + h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
702: \nonumber\\
703: &&
704: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} \approx - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
705: \nonumber\\
706: &&
707: M_{\mu \tau } \approx - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_1^{ - 1} - h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
708: \label{Eq:FlavorMasses}
709: \end{eqnarray}
710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
711: up to the first order in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking terms $h_{- e}^{\left( - \right)}$,
712: $h_{+ \mu }^{\left( - \right)}$, $h_{- \mu }^{\left( - \right)}$ and $s\propto{\bf M}_{+ -}$.
713: The results accord with our naive expectation that the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric masses of
714: $M_{ee}$, $M^{(+)}_{e\mu}$ and $M^{(+)}_{\mu\mu}$ are controlled
715: by the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric couplings.
716: Since phases only arise from the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking couplings,
717: we readily observe that this property shows the followings:
718: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
719: \begin{enumerate}
720: \item the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric parts: $M_{ee}$, $M^{(+)}_{e\mu}$, $M^{(+)}_{\mu\mu}$ and $M_{\mu\tau}$
721: are real, and
722: \item the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking parts: $M^{(-)}_{e\mu}$ and $M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu}$ are complex,
723: \end{enumerate}
724: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
725: within our approximation. It should be noted that $M_{ee}$, $M^{(+)}_{e\mu}$, $M^{(+)}_{\mu\mu}$ and $M_{\mu\tau}$
726: would have imaginary parts if second order terms of the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking are included.
727: For example, in $M_{ee}$, its phase arises from $h^{(-)}_{- e}$ because $\omega=0$.
728: We then have a complex term proportional to $h^{(+)}_{+ e}h^{(-)}_{- e}$, whose coefficient
729: is $cs$ which is the first order quantity because $s=0$ in
730: the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric limit. Since $h^{(-)}_{e\mu}$ being
731: itself is the first order quantity, the whole contribution from this term is the
732: second order quantity, which can be safely neglected. In this way, we confirm that $M_{ee}$ can
733: be almost real. Similarly, we can confirm
734: that $M^{(+)}$ itself is almost real.
735: Therefore, main contributions to leptonic CP violation are given by $M^{(-)}_{e\mu}$ and $M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu}$. We will
736: specify the phases of $M^{(-)}_{e\mu}$ and $M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu}$ by $\alpha$ and $\beta$, respectively.
737:
738: As suggested by the above phase structure, the flavor neutrino mass matrix can be
739: parameterized by $M_\nu$: $M_\nu = M^{(+)}_\nu+M^{(-)}_\nu$ with
740: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
741: \begin{eqnarray}
742: &&
743: M^{(+)}_\nu=\left(
744: \begin{array}{*{20}c}
745: a_0 & b_0 & - \sigma b_0 \\
746: b_0 & d_0 & \sigma e_0 \\
747: - \sigma b_0& \sigma e_0 & d_0\\
748: \end{array}
749: \right),
750: \quad
751: M^{(-)}_\nu=\left(
752: \begin{array}{*{20}c}
753: 0 & b'_0 e^{i\alpha } & \sigma b'_0 e^{i\alpha } \\
754: b'_0 e^{i\alpha } & d'_0 e^{i\beta } & 0 \\
755: \sigma b'_0 e^{i\alpha } & 0 & - d'_0 e^{i\beta } \\
756: \end{array}
757: \right),
758: \label{Eq:NuMatrixSimple}
759: \end{eqnarray}
760: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
761: where $a_0$, $b_0$, $d_0$, $e_0$, $b^\prime_0$ and $d^\prime_0$ are all real
762: and $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are phases.
763: We also use the notation: $a=a_0$, $b= b_0+b'_0 e^{i\alpha }$,
764: $c= - \sigma \left(b_0-b'_0 e^{i\alpha }\right)$,
765: $d= d_0+d'_0 e^{i\beta }$, $e= \sigma e_0$ and
766: $f= d_0-d'_0 e^{i\beta }$.
767: In approximately $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric models, $b^\prime_0\approx 0$ and
768: $d^\prime_0\approx 0$ are realized and yield the smallness of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ and
769: the large mixing given by $\sin 2\theta_{23}\approx 1$ as a natural consequence.
770: However, to understand the observed smallness
771: of $\Delta m^2_\odot/\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert$, where $\Delta m^2_\odot = m^2_2-m^2_1(>0)$ and
772: $\Delta m^2_{atm} = m^2_3-m^2_1$, needs an additional
773: small parameter, which we call $\eta$.
774:
775: The $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric mass matrix $M^{(+)}_\nu$ gives
776: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
777: \begin{eqnarray}
778: &&
779: \sin 2\theta _{12} = \frac{{2\sqrt 2 b_0 }}{{\sqrt {\left( {d_0 - e_0 - a_0 } \right)^2 + 8b_0^2 } }},
780: \quad
781: \cos 2\theta_{23} = \sin\theta_{13} = 0,
782: \label{Eq:PredictionsMixingSym}\\
783: &&
784: m_1 = \frac{{a_0 + d_0 - e_0 }}{2} - \frac{{\sqrt 2 b_0 }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }},
785: \quad
786: m_2 = \frac{{a_0 + d_0 - e_0 }}{2} + \frac{{\sqrt 2 b_0 }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }},
787: \nonumber\\
788: &&
789: m_3 = d_0 + e_0,
790: \label{Eq:PredictionsMassSym}
791: \end{eqnarray}
792: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
793: as well as
794: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
795: \begin{eqnarray}
796: &&
797: \Delta m^2_\odot = \frac{2\sqrt{2}({a_0 + d_0 - e_0 })b_0}{\sin 2\theta_{12}}.
798: \label{Eq:PredictionsAtmSolSym}
799: \end{eqnarray}
800: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
801: The spectrum contains one massless neutrino if the relation
802: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
803: \begin{eqnarray}
804: &&
805: a = \frac{{b\left( {bf - ce} \right) - c\left( {be - cd} \right)}}{{df - e^2 }},
806: \label{Eq:PredictionsMasslessSym1}
807: \end{eqnarray}
808: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
809: for $df \neq e^2$, is satisfied. For $df= e^2$, we find that $be=cd$, leading to $m_3=0$ for $M^{(+)}_\nu$.
810: Similarly,
811: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
812: \begin{eqnarray}
813: &&
814: e = \frac{{bc \pm \sigma \sqrt {\left( {b^2 - ad} \right)\left( {c^2 - af} \right)} }}{a},
815: \label{Eq:PredictionsMasslessSym2}
816: \end{eqnarray}
817: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
818: is another useful relation.
819: For $M^{(+)}_\nu$, it is readily understood that
820: \begin{enumerate}
821: \item for the normal mass hierarchy, $m_1=0$ is obtained
822: form Eq.(\ref{Eq:PredictionsMasslessSym1}) if $a_0 + d_0 - e_0 \geq 0$,
823: \item for the inverted mass hierarchy, $m_3=0$ is obtained
824: form Eq.(\ref{Eq:PredictionsMasslessSym2}) giving $d_0 + e_0=0$.
825: \end{enumerate}
826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
827:
828: The minimal seesaw mechanism in this case only allows the normal mass hierarchy \cite{mu-tauNoCP}
829: to account for the observed results
830: as discussed in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix1}. One of the authors (M.Y.) has shown variety of textures,
831: which are approximately $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric \cite{NuPlus}, from which we choose
832: the following neutrino mass matrix:
833: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
834: \begin{eqnarray}
835: &&
836: M^{(+)}_\nu
837: =
838: m_0 \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
839: {p\eta } & \eta& - \sigma \eta \\
840: \eta & 1 & \sigma \left( {1 - s\eta } \right) \\
841: - \sigma \eta & {\sigma \left( {1 - s\eta } \right)} & 1 \\
842: \end{array}} \right)\quad (p=\frac{2}{s}),
843: \label{Eq:Normal-13-1}
844: \end{eqnarray}
845: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
846: giving
847: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
848: \begin{eqnarray}
849: &&
850: \tan 2\theta _{12} = \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{s-p},
851: \label{Eq:Normal-13-1-angles}
852: \end{eqnarray}
853: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
854: where $\eta$ is to be estimated in Sec.\ref{sec:4} to give
855: $\eta (\sim\sqrt{\Delta m^2_\odot/\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert})$=${\cal{O}}(10^{-1})$ and
856: $s$ (and $p$) are parameters of ${\cal {O}}(1)$.
857: The condition of $\det(M_\nu)=0$ is satisfied by
858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
859: \begin{eqnarray}
860: &&
861: a = \frac{{b\left( {bf - ce} \right) - c\left( {be - cd} \right)}}{{df - e^2 }}(=\frac{{2\eta }}{s}m_0~{\rm for}~M^{(+)}_\nu).
862: \label{Eq:Normal-13-1-zro}
863: \end{eqnarray}
864: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
865:
866: The minimal seesaw model yields
867: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
868: \begin{eqnarray}
869: &&
870: m_0 = - v^2 \left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_1^{ - 1} + h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
871: \nonumber\\
872: &&
873: \eta = \frac{{h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} M_1^{ - 1} }}{{h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_1^{ - 1} + h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} M_2^{ - 1} }},
874: \nonumber\\
875: &&
876: s = 2\frac{{h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} }}{{h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} }},
877: \label{Eq:MassParamSeesaw}
878: \end{eqnarray}
879: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
880: where $p=2/s$ is automatically satisfied as expected. Since $s={\cal{O}}(1)$ and $\eta={\cal{O}}(10^{-1})$ , we have to
881: adjust the parameters such that
882: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
883: \begin{eqnarray}
884: &&
885: \left| {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right| \sim \left| {h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right|
886: \ll
887: \left| h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)}\right| \sqrt{\left| {M_1/M_2} \right|},
888: \label{Eq:MassParamSeesawAdjusted}
889: \end{eqnarray}
890: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
891: equivalently,
892: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
893: \begin{eqnarray}
894: &&
895: \left|f^{(+)}_{+ e}\right| \sim \left|f^{(+)}_{++}\right| \ll\left|f^{(+)}_{-- }\right| \sqrt{\left| {M_1/M_2} \right|},
896: \label{Eq:MassParamSeesawAdjusted1}
897: \end{eqnarray}
898: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
899: which gives $\nu_-\nu_-$ as a dominant mass term.
900:
901: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
902: \subsection{\label{sec:3-2}$N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry}
903: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
904: From Eq.(\ref{Eq:MassFlavorAppendix-2}), we find that
905: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
906: \begin{eqnarray}
907: &&
908: M_{ee} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
909: \nonumber\\
910: &&
911: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
912: \nonumber\\
913: &&
914: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
915: \nonumber\\
916: &&
917: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
918: \nonumber\\
919: &&
920: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} {\rm{ }} = - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
921: \nonumber\\
922: &&
923: M_{\mu \tau } \approx - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
924: \label{Eq:FlavorMasses2}
925: \end{eqnarray}
926: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
927: up to the first order in the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking terms $h_{+ \mu}^{\left( - \right)}$,
928: and $h_{- \mu }^{\left( - \right)}$.
929:
930: The minimal seesaw mechanism forbids the normal mass hierarchy to account for the observed results
931: as discussed in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix1}. There are two types of neutrino mass textures \cite{NuPlus}.
932: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
933: \begin{enumerate}
934: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
935: \item As the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$),
936: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
937: \begin{eqnarray}
938: &&
939: M^{(+)}_\nu
940: =
941: m_0 \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
942: {2-p\eta } & \eta& -\sigma \eta \\
943: \eta & 1 & -\sigma \\
944: - \sigma \eta & -\sigma & 1 \\
945: \end{array}} \right),
946: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-1}\\
947: \end{eqnarray}
948: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
949: leading to
950: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
951: \begin{eqnarray}
952: &&
953: \tan 2\theta _{12} = \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{p}.
954: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-1-angles}
955: \end{eqnarray}
956: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
957: The condition of $\det(M_\nu)=0$ is satisfied by
958: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
959: \begin{eqnarray}
960: &&
961: e = \frac{{bc - \sigma \sqrt {\left( {b^2 - ad} \right)\left( {c^2 - af} \right)} }}{a}
962: (=-\sigma d_0~{\rm for}~M^{(+)}_\nu).
963: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-1-zro}
964: \end{eqnarray}
965: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
966: These parameters are related to those in the seesaw mechanism given by
967: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
968: \begin{eqnarray}
969: &&
970: m_0 = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
971: \nonumber\\
972: &&
973: \eta = \frac{{\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} }}{{\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} }},
974: \nonumber\\
975: &&
976: p = \frac{{\left[ {2\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right]M_1^{ - 1} + \left[ {2\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right]M_2^{ - 1} }}{{\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} }},
977: \label{Eq:MassParamSeesaw2-1}
978: \end{eqnarray}
979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
980: \item As the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$),
981: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
982: \begin{eqnarray}
983: &&
984: M^{(+)}_\nu
985: =
986: m_0 \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
987: -\left(2-\eta\right) & q& -\sigma q \\
988: q & 1 & -\sigma \\
989: - \sigma q & -\sigma & 1 \\
990: \end{array}} \right),
991: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-2}
992: \end{eqnarray}
993: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
994: leading to
995: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
996: \begin{eqnarray}
997: &&
998: \tan 2\theta _{12} = \frac{{2\sqrt 2 q}}{{4 - \eta }}.
999: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-2-angles}
1000: \end{eqnarray}
1001: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1002: The condition of $\det(M_\nu)=0$ is satisfied by
1003: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1004: \begin{eqnarray}
1005: &&
1006: e = \frac{{bc + \sigma \sqrt {\left( {b^2 - ad} \right)\left( {c^2 - af} \right)} }}{a}
1007: (=-\sigma d_0~{\rm for}~M^{(+)}_\nu).
1008: \label{Eq:Inverted-13-2-zro}
1009: \end{eqnarray}
1010: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1011: These parameters are related to those in the seesaw mechanism given by
1012: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1013: \begin{eqnarray}
1014: &&
1015: m_0 = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1016: \nonumber\\
1017: &&
1018: \eta = \frac{{\left[ {2\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right]M_1^{ - 1} + \left[ {2\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right] M_2^{ - 1} }}{{\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} }},
1019: \nonumber\\
1020: && q = \frac{{\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {s h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)M_2^{ - 1} }}{{\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - s h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + s h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 M_2^{ - 1} }},
1021: \label{Eq:MassParamSeesaw2-2}
1022: \end{eqnarray}
1023: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1024: \end{enumerate}
1025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1026: The parameter $\eta$ is to be estimated in Sec.\ref{sec:4} to give
1027: $\eta (\sim\Delta m^2_\odot/\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert)$=${\cal{O}}(10^{-2})$ and
1028: $p$ and $q$ are parameters of ${\cal {O}}(1)$. We have to adjust sizes of the parameters of
1029: the seesaw to account for the neutrino mass spectrum.
1030:
1031: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1032: \section{\label{sec:4}CP Phases}
1033: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1034: In this section, we discuss how leptonic CP phases are generated by $M_\nu$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixSimple}).
1035: For $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry, the phase structure of Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixSimple}) is not a general
1036: consequence. So, we choose a specific parameter set so that phases only arise from
1037: $M^{(-)}_{e\mu}$ and $M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu}$. In other words, phases should be associated with the couplings of $\nu_-$.
1038: Furthermore, there have been arguments that the renormalization effects
1039: are significant for the inverted mass hierarchy \cite{RGE}, which is the case of $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry.
1040: However, the smallness of $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ is not disturbed because it is a result of the approximate $\mu$-$\tau$
1041: symmetry but the CP-violating phases may receive significant distortion.
1042: This subject will be discussed elsewhere. For a moment,
1043: we show the case of the inverted mass hierarchy to
1044: make a comparison with the case of the normal mass hierarchy.
1045:
1046: Our seesaw model has four phases from three Yukawa couplings and one Majorana
1047: phase of heavy neutrinos corresponding to one Dirac phase and three Majorana phase where one
1048: overall Majorana phase is redundant. Therefore, three CP-violating phases are present.
1049: This number is consistent with the general result of the seesaw model
1050: with $N$-flavor and $M$-heavy neutrinos, giving $N(M-1)$. Since the $\mu$-$\tau$
1051: symmetry breaking is so small that terms up to its first order contributions as in
1052: Eq.(\ref{Eq:FlavorMasses}) can
1053: well describe neutrino phenomenology, two phases $\alpha$ and $\beta$ become active
1054: and other phases associated with second-order contributions are safely neglected.
1055: The CP-phases including $\delta_{CP}=\delta+\rho$
1056: are in general complicated functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
1057: These two phases are the sources of the Dirac and Majorana phases in $U_{PMNS}$.
1058: However, we will see that
1059: when mass
1060: hierarchies are taken into account, $\rho$ is found to be small and the
1061: dependence of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ can be derived to give $\delta_{CP} \sim \alpha$
1062: for the normal mass hierarchy and $\delta_{CP} \sim -\alpha$ the inverted mass
1063: hierarchy (with $m_1 \sim m_2$). These features can be viewed in the figures of
1064: $\delta_{CP}$ to be presented.
1065:
1066: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1067: \subsection{\label{sec:4-1}Estimations}
1068: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1069: The Dirac CP-violating phase is given by $\delta+\rho$ evaluated from Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23})
1070: in the Appendix \ref{sec:Appendix2}, from which we obtain that
1071: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1072: \begin{eqnarray}
1073: &&
1074: c_{13} X \approx \sqrt 2 \left( { b_0 \left( {a_0 + d_0 - e_0 } \right) + b'_0 d'_0 e^{i\left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)} + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)\left( {a_0 b'_0 e^{i\alpha } + b'_0 e^{ - i\alpha } \left( {d_0 + e_0 } \right) + b_0 d'_0 e^{i\beta } } \right)} \right),
1075: \label{Eq:X}\\
1076: &&
1077: Y \approx \sqrt 2 \sigma \left( - {\left( { \Delta - i\gamma } \right)\left( { b_0 \left( {a_0 + d_0 - e_0 } \right) + b'_0 d'_0 e^{i\left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)} } \right) + a_0 b'_0 e^{i\alpha } + b'_0 e^{ - i\alpha } \left( {d_0 + e_0 } \right) + b_0 d'_0 e^{i\beta } } \right),
1078: \label{Eq:Y}
1079: \end{eqnarray}
1080: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1081: where the approximation is due to $\vert \gamma\vert \ll 1$,
1082: $\cos\theta_{23}=(1+\Delta)/\sqrt{2}$ and $\sin\theta_{23}= \sigma(1-\Delta)/\sqrt{2}$ for
1083: $\vert \Delta\vert \ll 1$. The phases $\delta$ and $\rho$ are calculated from
1084: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1085: \begin{eqnarray}
1086: &&
1087: \delta = -\arg(Y),
1088: \quad
1089: \rho = \arg(X).
1090: \label{Eq:X-Y}
1091: \end{eqnarray}
1092: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1093: From Eq.(\ref{Eq:X}), it is
1094: expected that $\rho\approx 0$ if $b_0 \left( {a_0 + d_0 - e_0} \right)$ is not suppressed. This expectation
1095: is valid in the two textures of the inverted mass hierarchy; however, $\rho$ may not be suppressed
1096: in the normal mass hierarchy because $a_0 + d_0 - e_0\approx 0$ by Eq.(\ref{Eq:Normal-13-1}).
1097: The parameters $\gamma$ and $\Delta$ are estimate to be:
1098: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1099: \begin{eqnarray}
1100: &&
1101: \gamma \approx \frac{{4\left( {b_0 b'_0 \sin \alpha - e_0 d'_0 \sin \beta } \right) - \sigma \sin\theta_{13}\sin 2\theta _{12} \sin \left( {\rho + \delta } \right) \Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{2\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1102: \label{Eq:gamma}\\
1103: &&
1104: \Delta \approx - \frac{{4\left( {b_0 b'_0 \cos \alpha + d_0 d'_0 \cos \beta } \right) + \sigma\sin\theta_{13}\sin 2\theta _{12} \cos \left( {\rho + \delta } \right) \Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{2\Delta m_{atm}^2 }}.
1105: \label{Eq:Delta}
1106: \end{eqnarray}
1107: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1108: The CP-violating phase $\delta+ \rho$ can be numerically obtained from Eqs.(\ref{Eq:X}) and (\ref{Eq:Y}) by using iteration,
1109: where $\Delta \pm i\gamma$ is given by
1110: $
1111: \gamma \approx {2 \left( {b_0 b'_0 \sin \alpha - e_0 d'_0 \sin \beta } \right)}/{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }
1112: $
1113: and
1114: $
1115: \Delta \approx - {2\left( {b_0 b'_0 \cos \alpha + d_0 d'_0 \cos \beta } \right)}/{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }
1116: $
1117: as a first trial.
1118:
1119: The CP-violating Majorana phase is estimated from Eq.(\ref{Eq:M}) for $m_{1,2,3}$.
1120: We have assured, as expected, that $m_1= 0$ for the normal mass hierarchy and
1121: $m_3= 0$ for the inverted mass hierarchy within our numerical accuracy.
1122: From Eq.(\ref{Eq:M}), we find that
1123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1124: \begin{eqnarray}
1125: &&
1126: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi_2 } \approx \frac{{2\sqrt 2 }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}\left[ {\left( {1 + i\gamma \Delta } \right)b_0 + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)b'_0 e^{i\alpha } } \right]e^{i\rho },
1127: \nonumber\\
1128: &&
1129: m_3 e^{ - 2i\phi_3 } \approx \lambda _3 + s_{13}^2 \left( {\lambda _3 - e^{2i\delta } a} \right),
1130: \label{Eq:normal-Majorana-phase}
1131: \end{eqnarray}
1132: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1133: where $\lambda _3 \approx d_0 + e_0 - 2i\left( {2\Delta \gamma d_0 - \left( {\gamma + i\Delta } \right)e^{i\beta } d'_0 } \right)$,
1134: for the normal mass hierarchy with $m_1=0$, and
1135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1136: \begin{eqnarray}
1137: m_1 e^{ - 2i\phi_1 } &\approx& \frac{{ae^{2i\rho } + d_0 - e_0 + 2\left( {2i\Delta \gamma d_0 + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)e^{i\beta } d'_0 } \right)}}{2}
1138: \nonumber\\
1139: &&
1140: - \frac{{\sqrt 2 }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}\left[ {\left( {1 + i\gamma \Delta } \right)b_0 + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)b'_0 e^{i\alpha } } \right]e^{i\rho },
1141: \nonumber
1142: \end{eqnarray}
1143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1145: \begin{eqnarray}
1146: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi_2 } &\approx& \frac{{ae^{2i\rho } + d_0 - e_0 + 2\left( {2i\Delta \gamma d_0 + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)e^{i\beta } d'_0 } \right)}}{2}
1147: \nonumber\\
1148: &&
1149: + \frac{{\sqrt 2 }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}\left[ {\left( {1 + i\gamma \Delta } \right)b_0 + \left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)b'_0 e^{i\alpha } } \right]e^{i\rho },
1150: \label{Eq:inverted-Majorana-phase}
1151: \end{eqnarray}
1152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1153: for the inverted mass hierarchy with $m_3=0$.
1154: It should be noted that the size of $\phi_{1,2}$ is generically small
1155: since the nonvanishing $m_{1,2}$ for the inverted mass hierarchy start with
1156: the unsuppressed $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric terms.
1157:
1158: % atm-min= 2.58180e-03, atm-max= 2.60780e-03
1159: % sol-min= 7.85552e-05, sol-max= 7.93447e-05
1160: To perform our numerical calculations, we use exact formula without approximation:
1161: Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23}) for $\theta_{12,13}$, $\delta$ and $\rho$,
1162: Eq.(\ref{Eq:Exact-cos23-solution}) for $\theta_{23}$
1163: Eq.(\ref{Eq:Exact-gamma-solution}) for $\gamma$ and
1164: Eq.(\ref{Eq:M}) for $\phi_{1,2,3}$.
1165: The tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing \cite{TriBiMaximal} is assumed for
1166: $M^{(+)}_\nu$ and is realized by
1167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1168: \begin{enumerate}
1169: \item $s=2$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Normal-13-1}) for the normal mass hierarchy,
1170: \item $p=1$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted-13-1}) for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$),
1171: \item $q=4-\eta$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted-13-2}) for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$).
1172: \end{enumerate}
1173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1174: We estimate the CP-violating phases $\delta+\rho$ and $\phi_1-\phi_2$ (or $\phi_2-\phi_3$)
1175: as well as the mixing angles as functions of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ for given values of
1176: $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert= 2.59\sim 2.61$ $(\times 10^{-3}$ eV$^2$) and
1177: $\Delta m^2_\odot= 7.87\sim 7.93$ $(\times 10^{-5}$ eV$^2$), which are taken to sit on
1178: values around their center values
1179: in the recent data:
1180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1181: \begin{eqnarray}
1182: &&
1183: \vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert = \left(2.6\pm0.2\right) \times 10^{-3}~{\rm eV}^2,
1184: \quad
1185: \Delta m^2_\odot = \left(7.9\pm 0.3\right) \times 10^{-5}~{\rm eV}^2,
1186: \label{Eq:NuData}
1187: \end{eqnarray}
1188: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1189: as the allowed 1$\sigma$ ranges \cite{NeutrinoData}. Our iteration starts with the calculation of $m_0$ by using
1190: $D_+$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-M-MassRelation}) for given values of
1191: $\Delta m^2_{atm}$ and $\Delta m^2_\odot$ and
1192: these given values are compared with their computed values from our formula for a consistency check.
1193:
1194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1195: \subsection{\label{sec:4-2}Predictions}
1196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1197: Before performing numerical calculations, we show our predictions from three textures:
1198: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1199: \begin{enumerate}
1200: \item for the normal mass hierarchy ($p=2/s$ with $s=2$),
1201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1202: \begin{eqnarray}
1203: &&
1204: \frac{\Delta m^2_\odot}{\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert} \approx \frac{\left(s+p\right)\eta^2}{\sqrt{2}\sin 2\theta_{12}},
1205: \label{Eq:Normal-eta}
1206: \end{eqnarray}
1207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1208: suggesting that $\eta$=${\cal{O}}(10^{-1})$, and
1209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1210: \begin{eqnarray}
1211: &&
1212: c_{13} X \approx \sqrt 2 \left( m^2_0{\left( {s + p} \right)\eta ^2 + b'_0 d'_0 e^{i\left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)} + 2m_0\left( {\Delta + i\gamma } \right)b'_0 e^{ - i\alpha } }\right),
1213: \quad
1214: Y \approx \sqrt 2\sigma m_0b'_0 e^{ - i\alpha } ,
1215: \label{Eq:Normal-XY}
1216: \end{eqnarray}
1217: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1218: leading to
1219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1220: \begin{eqnarray}
1221: &&
1222: \rho = {\rm arbitrary},
1223: \quad
1224: \delta \approx \alpha,
1225: \label{Eq:NormalPhases}
1226: \end{eqnarray}
1227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1228: where we will numerically find that the term proportional to $\eta^2$ gives dominated contribution in
1229: $c_{13} X$, which result in $\rho \approx 0$, and
1230: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1231: \begin{eqnarray}
1232: &&
1233: \sin\theta_{13} e^{ - i\delta } \approx \frac{Y}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1234: \nonumber \\
1235: &&
1236: \gamma \approx 2\left( { \eta b'_0\sin \alpha - d'_0 \sin \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} - \frac{1}{2}\sigma s_{13} \sin \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1237: \nonumber \\
1238: &&
1239: \cos 2\theta _{23} \left(\approx 2\Delta\right) \approx - \left( {4\left( { \eta b'_0\cos \alpha + d'_0 \cos \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} +\sigma s_{13} \cos \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }}} \right),
1240: \label{Eq:NormalPredictions}
1241: \end{eqnarray}
1242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1243: as well as
1244: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1245: \begin{eqnarray}
1246: &&
1247: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi _2 } \approx \frac{{2\sqrt 2 \eta m_0 e^{i\rho } }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }},
1248: \quad
1249: m_3 e^{ - 2i\phi _3 } \approx
1250: \left( {2 - s\eta } \right)m_0 - 2\left( {2i\Delta \gamma m_0 + \left( {\Delta - i\gamma } \right)e^{i\beta } d'_0 } \right),
1251: \label{Eq:NormalPredictionsMasses}
1252: \end{eqnarray}
1253: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1254: leading to $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert \approx 4m^2_0$ and
1255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1256: \begin{eqnarray}
1257: &&
1258: {\phi \approx - \frac{{\rho}}{4}},
1259: \label{Eq:Normal-phi}
1260: \end{eqnarray}
1261: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1262: for $\rho\approx 0$,
1263: \item for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$ with $p=1$),
1264: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1265: \begin{eqnarray}
1266: &&
1267: \frac{\Delta m^2_\odot}{\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert} \approx \frac{2\sqrt{2}\eta}{\sin 2\theta_{12}},
1268: \label{Eq:Inverted1-eta}
1269: \end{eqnarray}
1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1271: suggesting that $\eta$=${\cal{O}}(10^{-2})$, and
1272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1273: \begin{eqnarray}
1274: &&
1275: c_{13} X \approx 4\sqrt 2 m^2_0 \eta ,
1276: \quad
1277: Y \approx 2\sqrt 2 \sigma m_0b'_0 e^{ i\alpha } ,
1278: \label{Eq:Inverted1-XY}
1279: \end{eqnarray}
1280: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1281: leading to
1282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1283: \begin{eqnarray}
1284: &&
1285: \rho \approx 0,
1286: \quad
1287: \delta \approx -\alpha,
1288: \label{Eq:Inverted1Phases}
1289: \end{eqnarray}
1290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1291: and
1292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1293: \begin{eqnarray}
1294: &&
1295: \sin\theta_{13} e^{ - i\delta } \approx \frac{Y}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1296: \nonumber \\
1297: &&
1298: \gamma \approx 2\left( {\eta b'_0 \sin \alpha + d'_0 \sin \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} - \frac{1}{2}\sigma s_{13} \sin \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1299: \nonumber \\
1300: &&
1301: \cos 2\theta _{23} \left(\approx 2\Delta\right) \approx
1302: - \left( {4\left( {\eta b'_0 \cos \alpha + d'_0 \cos \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} + \sigma s_{13} \cos \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }}} \right),
1303: \label{Eq:Inverted1Predictions}
1304: \end{eqnarray}
1305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1306: as well as
1307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1308: \begin{eqnarray}
1309: &&
1310: m_1 e^{ - 2i\phi_1 } \approx \left( {1 + e^{2i\rho } - \frac{{p\eta e^{2i\rho } }}{2} - \frac{{\sqrt 2 \eta e^{i\rho } }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}} \right)m_0,
1311: \nonumber \\
1312: &&
1313: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi_2 } \approx \left( {1 + e^{2i\rho } - \frac{{p\eta e^{2i\rho } }}{2} + \frac{{\sqrt 2 \eta e^{i\rho } }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}} \right)m_0,
1314: \label{Eq:Inverted1PredictionsMasses}
1315: \end{eqnarray}
1316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1317: leading to $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert \approx m^2_0$ and
1318: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1319: \begin{eqnarray}
1320: &&
1321: \phi = 0,
1322: \label{Eq:inverted-phi}
1323: \end{eqnarray}
1324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1325: up to $\mathcal{O}(\rho^2)$ and
1326: \item for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$ with $q=4-\eta$),
1327: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1328: \begin{eqnarray}
1329: &&
1330: \frac{\Delta m^2_\odot}{\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert} \approx \frac{\sqrt{2}\eta\sin 2\theta_{12}}{q},
1331: \label{Eq:Inverted2-eta}
1332: \end{eqnarray}
1333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1334: suggesting that $\eta$=${\cal{O}}(10^{-2})$, and
1335: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1336: \begin{eqnarray}
1337: &&
1338: c_{13} X \approx 2\sqrt 2 m^2_0\eta q,
1339: \quad
1340: Y \approx - \sqrt 2 \sigma m_0\left( {2b'_0 e^{i\alpha } - qd'_0 e^{i\beta } } \right),
1341: \label{Eq:Inverted2-XY}
1342: \end{eqnarray}
1343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1344: leading to
1345: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1346: \begin{eqnarray}
1347: &&
1348: \rho \approx 0,
1349: \quad
1350: \delta \approx {\rm arbitrary},
1351: \label{Eq:Inverted2Phases}
1352: \end{eqnarray}
1353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1354: and
1355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1356: \begin{eqnarray}
1357: &&
1358: \sin\theta_{13} e^{ - i\delta } \approx \frac{Y}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1359: \nonumber \\
1360: &&
1361: \gamma \approx 2 \left( {qb'_0 \sin \alpha + d'_0 \sin \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} - \frac{1}{2}\sigma s_{13} \sin \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1362: \nonumber \\
1363: &&
1364: \cos 2\theta _{23} \left(\approx 2\Delta\right) \approx
1365: - 4\left( {qb'_0 \cos \alpha + d'_0 \cos \beta } \right)\frac{{m_0 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }} + \sigma s_{13} \cos \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\sin 2\theta _{12} \frac{{\Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{{\Delta m_{atm}^2 }},
1366: \label{Eq:Inverted2Predictions}
1367: \end{eqnarray}
1368: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1369: as well as
1370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1371: \begin{eqnarray}
1372: &&
1373: m_1 e^{ - 2i\phi_1} \approx \left( {\frac{{2\left( {1 - e^{2i\rho } } \right) + \eta e^{2i\rho } }}{2} - \frac{{\sqrt 2 qe^{i\rho } }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}} \right)m_0,
1374: \nonumber \\
1375: &&
1376: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi _2 } \approx \left( {\frac{{2\left( {1 - e^{2i\rho } } \right) + \eta e^{2i\rho } }}{2} + \frac{{\sqrt 2 qe^{i\rho } }}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}} \right)m_0,
1377: \label{Eq:Inverted2PredictionsMasses}
1378: \end{eqnarray}
1379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1380: leading to $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert \approx m^2_0$ and
1381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1382: \begin{eqnarray}
1383: &&
1384: \phi \approx - \frac{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }}{{\sqrt 2 q}}\rho,
1385: \label{Eq:Inverted2-phi}
1386: \end{eqnarray}
1387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1388: which becomes $- \rho/6$ for $\sin 2\theta_{12}\approx 2\sqrt{2}/3$ and $q\approx 4$.
1389: \end{enumerate}
1390: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1391: It is expected that $\sin\theta_{13}$ has no distinct dependence
1392: of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ because $\sin\theta_{13}$ is determined by the radial part
1393: of $Y$ whose phase from $\alpha$ and $\beta$ controls $\delta$.
1394:
1395: The predictions are depicted in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal}-FIG.\ref{Fig:rho-majorana} for the
1396: normal and inverted mass hierarchies. The effect of the sign of $\sigma$ is irrelevant because
1397: it always accompanies $\sin\theta_{13}$. The gross features of the figures
1398: for the Dirac CP-violating phase $\delta_{CP}$
1399: accord with our results Eqs.(\ref{Eq:NormalPhases}), (\ref{Eq:Inverted1Phases}) and (\ref{Eq:Inverted2Phases}).
1400: Namely,
1401: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1402: \begin{enumerate}
1403: \item for the normal mass hierarchy, the crude proportionality of $\delta_{CP}$ to $\alpha$ shown in
1404: FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal} is accounted by Eq.(\ref{Eq:NormalPhases}) with $\rho\sim 0$ and
1405: the effect of $\rho$ gives scattered plots around the line $\delta_{CP}\propto\alpha$;
1406: \item for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$), the clear proportionality of
1407: $\delta_{CP}$ to $\alpha$ is shown in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted1} as suggested by
1408: Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted1Phases});
1409: \item for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$), the proportionality of
1410: $\delta_{CP}$ to $\beta$ can be seen as sharp edges in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted2} and
1411: is suggested by Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted1Phases}) for the region of $b^\prime_0\sim 0$;
1412: \item In FIG.\ref{Fig:delta-phase}, the Dirac CP-violating phase is found to be proportional to $\delta$. This
1413: behavior indicates that $\rho \sim 0$. This is because
1414: $X$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23}) starts with the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric contribution,
1415: which can be taken to be real, and, then, the phase $\rho$ starts with the $\mu$-$\tau$ breaking contribution,
1416: which generically suppressed, giving $\rho\sim 0$.
1417: \end{enumerate}
1418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1419: The CP-violating Majorana phases $\phi$ are predicted
1420: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1421: \begin{enumerate}
1422: \item in FIG.\ref{Fig:majorana-normal}, FIG.\ref{Fig:majorana-inverted1}
1423: and FIG.\ref{Fig:majorana-inverted2}, where
1424: the CP-violating Majorana phase almost vanishes for the inverted mass hierarchy I as predicted
1425: in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted1PredictionsMasses});
1426: \item in FIG.\ref{Fig:rho-majorana}, where the CP-violating Majorana phase is found to be proportional to $\rho$.
1427: This feature can be roughly understood because of $\rho\sim 0$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:M})
1428: and the contribution of $\delta$ in the difference of Majorana phases almost vanish. Namely, we
1429: can estimate that $\phi \propto \rho$. More precisely, our predictions Eqs.(\ref{Eq:Normal-phi}),
1430: (\ref{Eq:inverted-phi}) and (\ref{Eq:Inverted2-phi}) on $\phi$ are consistent
1431: with the behavior of these figures.
1432: \end{enumerate}
1433: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1434: The mixing angle $\theta_{13}$ satisfies the constraints:
1435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1436: \begin{enumerate}
1437: \item $\sin\theta_{13}\mapleq 0.05$ for the normal mass hierarchy;
1438: \item $\sin\theta_{13}\mapleq 0.09$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$);
1439: \item $\sin\theta_{13}\mapleq 0.05$ and $\sin\theta_{13}\sim 0.05$ around $\alpha\sim\beta\sim \pi$
1440: for the inverted mass hierarchies I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$),
1441: \end{enumerate}
1442: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1443: as can be seen from FIG.\ref{Fig:sin13-normal}, FIG.\ref{Fig:sin13-inverted1}
1444: and FIG.\ref{Fig:sin13-inverted2} and $\tan^2\theta_{23} > 1$
1445: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1446: \begin{enumerate}
1447: \item if $0\leq\beta\leq\pi/2$ for the normal mass hierarchy;
1448: \item if $\pi/2\leq\beta\leq\pi$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1\sim m_2$);
1449: \item $\pi/2\leq\alpha\leq\pi$ for the inverted mass hierarchies I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1\sim -m_2$),
1450: \end{enumerate}
1451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1452: as in FIG.\ref{Fig:tan23-normal}, FIG.\ref{Fig:tan23-inverted1}
1453: and FIG.\ref{Fig:tan23-inverted2}.
1454:
1455: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1456: \section{\label{sec:5}Summary}
1457: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1458: We have estimated CP-violating phases as well as mixing angles in the approximately $\mu-\tau$ symmetric minimal
1459: seesaw model.
1460: When heavy neutrino mass terms are real,
1461: we have shown that CP-violating phases are determined by $\mu-\tau$ symmetry breaking phases
1462: in the neutrino Yukawa couplings as long as heavy neutrinos are transformed under the discrete $\mu-\tau$
1463: symmetry group.
1464: As a result, phases in the flavor neutrino masses are expressed in terms of two phases
1465: $\alpha$ and $\beta$ as given by Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixSimple}). On the other hand, such a property is not a
1466: general one if heavy neutrinos are not transformed.
1467: We have assumed the same phases $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to compare our predictions.
1468: Furthermore, we have found that the normal mass hierarchy is permitted if
1469: heavy neutrinos are subject to the $\mu-\tau$ symmetry giving
1470: a constraint of
1471: $M_{e\mu}^{(+)2} \approx M_{ee}M_{\mu\mu}$, which is used to exclude the inverted mass hierarchy
1472: and that the inverted mass hierarchy is permitted if the heavy neutrinos are blind to
1473: the $\mu-\tau$ symmetry giving a constraint of
1474: $M_{\mu\tau} \approx -\sigma M_{\mu\mu}^{(+)}$, which is used to exclude the normal mass hierarchy.
1475: The restriction on the mass hierarchy is a general consequence
1476: of approximately $\mu-\tau$ symmetric minimal seesaw models
1477: as long as no phases are present in heavy neutrinos.
1478:
1479: We have also presented three textures, which give the consistent results with
1480: the current neutrino oscillation data:
1481: one describes the normal mass hierarchy as determined by Eq.(\ref{Eq:Normal-13-1})
1482: and the other two describe the
1483: inverted mass hierarchy as determined by Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted-13-1}) and Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted-13-2}).
1484: Each textures have a small parameter $\eta$ to explain the smallness
1485: of the ratio of mass squared differences $\Delta m_\odot / \Delta m_{atm}(\equiv R)$,
1486: which is ${\mathcal O}(\sqrt{R})$ $({\mathcal O}(R))$ for the normal (inverted) mass hierarchy.
1487: The Dirac CP-violating phase is predicted from our formula Eq.(\ref{Eq:X-Y}) to yield $\delta_{CP} = \rho +\delta$.
1488: Because of $\rho\sim 0$, we have found that
1489: the phase $\delta_{CP}$ is determined by $\alpha$ as $\delta_{CP} \approx \alpha$
1490: as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NormalPhases})
1491: for the normal mass hierarchy and
1492: $\delta_{CP} \approx -\alpha$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1 \sim m_2$)
1493: as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted1Phases})
1494: while
1495: $\delta_{CP}$ shows no dependence of $\alpha$ but a certain dependence of $\beta$
1496: for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1 \sim -m_2$)
1497: as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Inverted2Phases}).
1498: The numerical calculation is performed to make definite predictions, whose results are shown
1499: in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal}-FIG.\ref{Fig:rho-majorana}.
1500: We have observed that
1501: \begin{enumerate}
1502: \item
1503: The Dirac CP-phase $\delta_{CP}$ turns out to have a crude proportionality to $\alpha$ in the normal
1504: mass hierarchy as FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal}, a clear proportionality to
1505: $\alpha$ in the inverted mass hierarchy I (with
1506: $m_1 \sim m_2$) as FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted1} and
1507: an proportionality to $\beta$ (for $b^\prime_0 \sim 0$) for inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with
1508: $m_1 \sim -m_2$) as FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted2}.
1509: \item
1510: The Majorana CP-violating phase $\phi$ is found to be suppressed since its main contributions
1511: arise from $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry breaking terms and is estimated to be:
1512: $\phi\approx -\rho/4$ for the normal mass hierarchy, $\phi\approx 0$
1513: for the inverted mass hierarchy I (with $m_1 \sim m_2$) and
1514: $\phi\approx -\rho/6$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I (with $m_1 \sim -m_2$)
1515: as in FIG.\ref{Fig:rho-majorana},
1516: \item Our phases $\delta$ and $\rho$, respectively, yield main contributions
1517: to $\delta_{CP}$ and $\phi$ with $\rho\sim 0$ as in FIG.\ref{Fig:delta-phase} and \ref{Fig:rho-majorana}
1518: , whose behaviors accord with our theoretical expectation.
1519: \end{enumerate}
1520: From these observations, we expect that the size of the CP-violating Majorana phase can be enhanced if we include
1521: the phase of the heavy neutrinos $\Theta_{+-}$ as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:HeavyMassMatrix}). For
1522: the inverted mass hierarchy, we may relax our assumption that the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric terms are set
1523: to be real.
1524:
1525: Last but not least, we have to comment on the effective neutrino mass $m_{\beta\beta}$ \cite{TheoryMass-ee}
1526: used in the detection of the absolute neutrino mass \cite{AbsoluteMass}.
1527: In our textures, $m_{\beta\beta}$ corresponds to the flavor mass of $e^{2i\rho}M_{ee}$ as in
1528: Eq.(\ref{Eq:M-nu-ee-PDG}).
1529: As stated in the Appendix, it is not $M_{ee}$ defined in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NewNuMatrix}) that can be
1530: compared with experimental parameters, which are based on Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu}).
1531: In our case, since Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu_general}) is an appropriate matrix, which should be transformed
1532: into Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu}). In the course of this transformation, $M_{ee}$ in Eq.(\ref{Eq:NewNuMatrix}) is
1533: changed to $e^{2i\rho}M_{ee}$, which is parameterized to be
1534: $e^{2i\rho}a$ for a real $a$. Therefore, in principle the phase $\rho$ has a chance
1535: to be measured. It is known that
1536: $\vert m_{\beta\beta}\vert $ is suppressed for the normal mass hierarchy,
1537: where the suppression
1538: factor $\eta$ appears in our texture, and is estimated to be
1539: $a(\sim\eta m_0)\sim\sqrt{\Delta m^2_\odot}$ with
1540: $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert \approx 4m^2_0$
1541: while, for the inverted mass hierarchy,
1542: $\vert m_{\beta\beta}\vert \approx 2 m_0$ with $\vert\Delta m^2_{atm}\vert \approx m^2_0$
1543: are obtained.
1544:
1545: The predicted behaviors of CP phases are those at the seesaw scale. Radiative corrections to CP-phases should be
1546: evaluated to yield their observed values at the low-energy scale. Since these corrections are expected to be
1547: significant for the inverted mass hierarchy, we will estimate these corrections in the future publication.
1548: Furthermore since we know CP phases of the Yukawa couplings of neutrinos that can be inferred from the predicted
1549: Dirac and Majorana CP-violating phases, we can discuss how the leptogenesis is realized without referring to a
1550: specific from of flavor neutrino mass matrix but only with referring to more general framework of the $\mu-\tau$
1551: symmetry breaking.
1552:
1553: \vspace{3mm}
1554: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1555: \noindent
1556: \centerline{\small \bf ACKNOWLEGMENTS}
1557:
1558: The authors are grateful to T. Kitabayashi for useful advices.
1559: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1560:
1561: \appendix
1562: %%-------------------------------------------------
1563: %% Appendix
1564: %%-------------------------------------------------
1565: \section{\label{sec:Appendix1}Flavor Neutrino Masses from Seesaw Mechanism}
1566: In this Appendix, we evaluate flavor neutrino masses $M_{ij}$ ($i,j=e,\mu,\tau$)
1567: that form a mass matrix $M_\nu$:
1568: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1569: \begin{eqnarray}
1570: && M_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1571: M_{ee} & M_{e\mu} & M_{e\tau} \\
1572: M_{e\mu} & M_{\mu\mu} & M_{\mu\tau} \\
1573: M_{e\tau} & M_{\mu\tau} & M_{\tau\tau} \\
1574: \end{array}} \right) = M^{(+)}+M^{(-)}.
1575: \label{Eq:NewNuMatrix}
1576: \end{eqnarray}
1577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1578: with
1579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1580: \begin{eqnarray}
1581: &&
1582: M^{(+)} = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1583: M_{ee} & M^{(+)}_{e\mu } & - \sigma M^{(+)}_{e\mu } \\
1584: M^{(+)}_{e\mu } & M^{(+)}_{\mu\mu } & M_{\mu \tau } \\
1585: - \sigma M^{(+)}_{e\mu } & M_{\mu \tau } & M^{(+)}_{\mu\mu }\\
1586: \end{array} \right),
1587: \quad
1588: M^{(-)} = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1589: 0 & M^{(-)}_{e\mu } & \sigma M^{(-)}_{e\mu } \\
1590: M^{(-)}_{e\mu }& M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu } & 0 \\
1591: \sigma M^{(-)}_{e\mu } & 0 & - M^{(-)}_{\mu\mu } \\
1592: \end{array} \right),
1593: \label{Eq:Mnu-mutau-separation-2}
1594: \end{eqnarray}
1595: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1596: where $M^{(\pm)}_{e\mu} = (M_{e\mu} \mp \sigma M_{e\tau})/2$ and $M^{(\pm)}_{\mu\mu} = (M_{\mu\mu} \pm M_{\tau\tau})/2$.
1597: This decomposition is just an identity. However, it is so arranged that $M^{(+)}$ is invariant under
1598: the interchange $\nu_\mu\leftrightarrow -\sigma\nu_\tau$.
1599:
1600: After the Higgses develop vacuum expectation values, the seesaw mechanism gives
1601: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1602: \begin{eqnarray}
1603: &&
1604: M_{ee} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e} + ch_{ - e} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1605: \nonumber\\
1606: &&
1607: M_{e\mu } = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu } } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e} + ch_{ - e} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu } + ch_{ - \mu } } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1608: \nonumber\\
1609: &&
1610: M_{e\tau } = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \tau } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \tau } } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e} + ch_{ - e} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \tau } + ch_{ - \tau } } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1611: \nonumber\\
1612: &&
1613: M_{\mu \mu } = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu } } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu } + ch_{ - \mu } } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1614: \nonumber\\
1615: &&
1616: M_{\tau \tau } = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \tau } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \tau } } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \tau } + ch_{ - \tau } } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1617: \nonumber\\
1618: &&
1619: M_{\mu \tau } = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu } } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \tau } - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \tau } } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu } + ch_{ - \mu } } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \tau } + ch_{ - \tau } } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1620: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntries}
1621: \end{eqnarray}
1622: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1623: where ${\tilde M}_ \pm^{-1} = M_\pm^{-1} e^{\pm i\varphi}$, $c=\cos\theta$, $s=\sin\theta$, and $v=\langle 0 \vert H_{u1}\vert 0\rangle$ for
1624: $H_u = (H_{u1}, H_{u2})^T$.
1625: It is not difficult to demonstrate that Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries}) satisfies $\det(M_\nu)=0$,
1626: which indicates the known property that the minimal seesaw model has one massless neutrino.
1627: The Yukawa couplings of $h_{\pm i}$ ($i=e,\mu,\tau$) literally represent the couplings to $N_\pm$.
1628: Therefore, the couplings of $h_{\pm i}$ should be expressed by the original Yukawa
1629: couplings defined in Eq.(\ref{Eq:SuperPotential}).
1630: For example, in the case of $N=(N_\mu, N_\tau)$,
1631: we obtain that
1632: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1633: \begin{eqnarray}
1634: &&
1635: h_{ + e} = \frac{{h_{\mu e} + \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau e} }}{{\sqrt 2 }},h_{ + \mu } = \frac{{h_{\mu \mu } + \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau \mu } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},{\rm{ }}h_{ + \tau } = \frac{{h_{\mu \tau } + \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau \tau } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
1636: \nonumber\\
1637: &&
1638: h_{ - e} = \frac{{h_{\mu e} - \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau e} }}{{\sqrt 2 }},{\rm{ }}h_{ - \mu } = \frac{{h_{\mu \mu } - \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau \mu } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},{\rm{ }}h_{ - \tau } = \frac{{h_{\mu \tau } - \left( { - \sigma } \right)h_{\tau \tau } }}{{\sqrt 2 }},
1639: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntriesSpecific}
1640: \end{eqnarray}
1641: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1642: where the original Yukawa couplings are $h_{ij}$ ($i=\mu,\tau$, $j=e,\mu,\tau$).
1643:
1644: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1645: \subsection{\label{sec:Appendix1-1}$N$ subject to the $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry}
1646: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1647: In terms of Eq.(\ref{Eq:mu-tauMassMatrix-1}), Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries}) is expressed as,
1648: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1649: \begin{eqnarray}
1650: &&
1651: M_{ee} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1652: \nonumber\\
1653: &&
1654: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1655: \nonumber\\
1656: &&
1657: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1658: \nonumber\\
1659: &&
1660: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ \begin{array}{l}
1661: \left( {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} \\
1662: + \left( {\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} \\
1663: \end{array} \right],
1664: \nonumber\\
1665: &&
1666: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} {\rm{ }} = - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1667: \nonumber
1668: \end{eqnarray}
1669: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1671: \begin{eqnarray}
1672: &&
1673: M_{\mu \tau } = - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left[ \begin{array}{l}
1674: \left( {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} \\
1675: + \left( {\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} \\
1676: \end{array} \right],
1677: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-1}
1678: \end{eqnarray}
1679: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1680: where $c=\cos\theta$ and $s = \sin\theta$.
1681: The suffices $\pm$ represent for $(N_+, N_-)$ that have $N_\pm\rightarrow \pm N_\pm$ under the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry
1682: transformation.
1683:
1684: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1685: \subsubsection{\label{appendix:1-1-1}$\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry Breaking Case}
1686: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1687: The approximate $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry calls for
1688: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1689: \begin{eqnarray}
1690: &&
1691: h_{- e}^{\left( - \right)}\approx 0,
1692: \quad
1693: h_{+\mu}^{\left( - \right)}\approx 0,
1694: \quad
1695: h_{-\mu}^{\left( - \right)}\approx 0,
1696: \label{Eq:FirstOrder1-1}
1697: \end{eqnarray}
1698: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1699: as well as ${\bf M}_{+- }\approx 0$,
1700: which yields
1701: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1702: \begin{eqnarray}
1703: &&
1704: \cos\theta \approx 1,
1705: \quad
1706: \sin\theta \approx
1707: \frac{{{\bf M}_{R + - } r}}{{{\bf M}_{R - - } - {\bf M}_{R + + } }},
1708: \label{Eq:FirstOrder1-2}
1709: \end{eqnarray}
1710: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1711: where
1712: $r$ is defined in Eq.(\ref{Eq:HeavyMixingAngle-r}).
1713: Using these approximations, we obtain Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-1}) up to the first order in the
1714: parameters of Eqs.(\ref{Eq:FirstOrder1-1}) and (\ref{Eq:FirstOrder1-2}):
1715: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1716: \begin{eqnarray}
1717: &&
1718: M_{ee} \approx - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1},
1719: \nonumber\\
1720: &&
1721: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_1^{ - 1},
1722: \nonumber\\
1723: &&
1724: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} \approx - v^2 \left[ {\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {h_{ - e}^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1725: \nonumber\\
1726: &&
1727: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 \left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
1728: \nonumber\\
1729: &&
1730: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} \approx - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1731: \nonumber\\
1732: &&
1733: M_{\mu \tau } \approx - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} - h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
1734: \label{Eq:MassFlavorAppendix-1}
1735: \end{eqnarray}
1736: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1737: where $s \approx 0$.
1738:
1739: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1740: \subsubsection{\label{appendix:1-1-2}$\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetric Case}
1741: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1742: The $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric textures containing one massless neutrino
1743: should describe either the normal mass hierarchy or the inverted mass hierarchy.
1744: Imposing the conditions:
1745: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1746: \begin{eqnarray}
1747: &&
1748: \cos\theta =1,
1749: \quad
1750: \sin\theta = 0,
1751: \label{Eq:HeavyMixing}
1752: \end{eqnarray}
1753: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1754: we obtain from Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-1}) that
1755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1756: \begin{eqnarray}
1757: &&
1758: M_{ee} \left( { = a_0 } \right) = - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1},
1759: \nonumber\\
1760: &&
1761: M_{e\mu } \left( { = b_0 } \right) = - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_1^{ - 1},
1762: \nonumber\\
1763: &&
1764: M_{e\tau } \left( { = c_0 } \right) = - \sigma M_{e\mu },
1765: \nonumber\\
1766: &&
1767: M_{\mu \mu } \left( { = d_0 \equiv d_ + + d_ - } \right) = - v^2 \left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
1768: \nonumber\\
1769: &&
1770: M_{\mu \tau } \left( { = e_0 \equiv - \sigma \left( {d_ + - d_ - } \right)} \right) = - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left( {h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} - h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right),
1771: \nonumber\\
1772: &&
1773: M_{\tau \tau } \left( { = f_0 } \right) = M_{\mu \mu },
1774: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntriesSym-1}
1775: \end{eqnarray}
1776: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1777: This texture turns out to give mass terms
1778: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1779: \begin{eqnarray}
1780: &&
1781: \frac{1}{2}a_0 \nu _e \nu _e + b_0 \frac{{\nu _e \nu _ + + \nu _ + \nu _e }}{{\sqrt 2 }} + d_ + \nu _ + \nu _ + + d_ - \nu _ - \nu _ - .
1782: \label{Eq:NuMassTermSym}
1783: \end{eqnarray}
1784: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1785: This form of Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMassTermSym}) is also valid for the model with $(N_e, N_-)$. We then obtain
1786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1787: \begin{eqnarray}
1788: &&
1789: M_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1790: {a_0 } & {b_0 } & { - \sigma b_0 } \\
1791: {b_0 } & {d_ + + d_ - } & { - \sigma \left( {d_ + - d_ - } \right)} \\
1792: { - \sigma b_0 } & { - \sigma \left( {d_ + - d_ - } \right)} & {d_ + + d_ - } \\
1793: \end{array}} \right),
1794: \label{Eq:NuTextureSym-1}
1795: \end{eqnarray}
1796: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1797: where
1798: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1799: \begin{eqnarray}
1800: &&
1801: a_0 = - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} ,
1802: \quad
1803: b_0 = - v^2 h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \tilde M_1^{ - 1},
1804: \nonumber\\
1805: &&
1806: d_ + = - v^2 h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_1^{ - 1} ,
1807: \quad
1808: d_ - = - v^2 h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)2} \tilde M_2^{ - 1}.
1809: \label{Eq:NuTextureParam-1}
1810: \end{eqnarray}
1811: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1812: from which we observe that
1813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1814: \begin{eqnarray}
1815: &&
1816: b^2_0 = a_0d_+
1817: \label{Eq:NuTextureParamConstraint}
1818: \end{eqnarray}
1819: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1820: is satisfied.
1821:
1822: To see how the
1823: mass hierarchies are realized, it is sufficient to check the ideal case, where $m_1=m_2=0$ with
1824: $m_3 \neq 0$ for the normal mass hierarchy and $m_1 = \pm m_2$ with $m_3 = 0$ for the inverted mass hierarchy.
1825: The gross structure of $M_\nu$ for the inverted mass hierarchy is described by ideal textures:
1826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1827: \begin{eqnarray}
1828: &&
1829: M^{(1)}_\nu=m_0\left(
1830: \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1831: 2 & 0 & 0\\
1832: 0 & 1 & -\sigma \\
1833: 0& -\sigma & 1\\
1834: \end{array}
1835: \right),
1836: \quad
1837: M^{(2)}_\nu=m_0\left(
1838: \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1839: -2 & b_0 & -\sigma b_0\\
1840: b_0 & 1 & -\sigma \\
1841: -\sigma b_0& -\sigma & 1\\
1842: \end{array}
1843: \right)(b_0\neq 0),
1844: \label{Eq:NuMatrixIdeal}
1845: \end{eqnarray}
1846: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1847: respectively, corresponding to $m_1= m_2 $ and $m_1=- m_2 $, which can be seen from Eq.(\ref{Eq:PredictionsMassSym}).
1848: Since $d_+ = m_0$ and $d_- = 0$ should be satisfied,
1849: we find that Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuTextureParamConstraint})
1850: gives $0 = 2 m^2_0$ for $M^{(1)}_\nu$ and $b^2_0 = - 2 m^2_0$ for $M^{(2)}_\nu$.
1851: Therefore, the $M^{(1)}_\nu$ case is obviously ruled out and the $M^{(2)}_\nu$ case is allowed
1852: if $b_0$ is nearly pure imaginary. Since no phases is present in the $N$ mass terms, $b_0$ is (almost)
1853: real and the $M^{(2)}_\nu$ case is also excluded.
1854:
1855: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1856: \subsection{\label{sec:Appendix1-2}$N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry}
1857: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1858: In terms of Eq.(\ref{Eq:mu-tauMassMatrix-2}), Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries}) is expressed as
1859: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1860: \begin{eqnarray}
1861: &&
1862: M_{ee} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1863: \nonumber\\
1864: &&
1865: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1866: \nonumber\\
1867: &&
1868: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1869: \nonumber\\
1870: &&
1871: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ \begin{array}{l}
1872: \left( {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} \\
1873: + \left( {\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} \\
1874: \end{array} \right],
1875: \nonumber\\
1876: &&
1877: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} {\rm{ }} = - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1878: \nonumber\\
1879: &&
1880: M_{\mu \tau } = - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left[ \begin{array}{l}
1881: \left( {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} \\
1882: + \left( {\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 - \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)^2 } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} \\
1883: \end{array} \right].
1884: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-2}
1885: \end{eqnarray}
1886: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1887: The suffices $\pm$ represent for $(N_+, N_-)$ that have $N_\pm\rightarrow N_\pm$ under the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry
1888: transformation. The heavy neutrinos $(N_+, N_-)$ can be $(N_\mu, N_\tau)$, $(N_e, N_\mu)$ or any other combinations.
1889:
1890: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1891: \subsubsection{\label{appendix:1-2-1}$\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetry Breaking Case}
1892: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1893: The approximate $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry calls for
1894: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1895: \begin{eqnarray}
1896: &&
1897: h_{+\mu }^{\left( - \right)}\approx 0,
1898: \quad
1899: h_{- \mu }^{\left( - \right)}\approx 0,
1900: \label{Eq:FirstOrder3-1}
1901: \end{eqnarray}
1902: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1903: Using the approximation, we obtain from Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-2})
1904: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1905: \begin{eqnarray}
1906: &&
1907: M_{ee} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1908: \nonumber\\
1909: &&
1910: M_{e\mu }^{\left( + \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1911: \nonumber\\
1912: &&
1913: M_{e\mu }^{\left( - \right)} = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1914: \nonumber\\
1915: &&
1916: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( + \right)} \approx - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1917: \nonumber\\
1918: &&
1919: M_{\mu \mu }^{\left( - \right)} {\rm{ }} = - 2v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( - \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( - \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1920: \nonumber\\
1921: &&
1922: M_{\mu \tau } \approx - v^2 \left( { - \sigma } \right)\left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1923: \label{Eq:MassFlavorAppendix-2}
1924: \end{eqnarray}
1925: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1926: up to the first order in the parameters of Eq.(\ref{Eq:FirstOrder3-1}).
1927:
1928: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1929: \subsubsection{\label{appendix:1-3-2}$\mu$-$\tau$ Symmetric Case}
1930: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1931: We obtain from Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntries-2}) that
1932: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1933: \begin{eqnarray}
1934: &&
1935: M_{ee} \left( { = a_0 } \right) = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1936: \nonumber\\
1937: &&
1938: M_{e\mu } \left( { = b_0 } \right) =
1939: - v^2 \left[ \begin{array}{l}
1940: \left( {ch_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_1^{ - 1} \\
1941: + \left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + e}^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - e}^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\left( {se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)\tilde M_2^{ - 1} \\
1942: \end{array} \right],
1943: \nonumber\\
1944: &&
1945: M_{e\tau } \left( { = c_0 } \right) = - \sigma M_{e\mu },
1946: \nonumber\\
1947: &&
1948: M_{\mu \mu } \left( { = d_0 \equiv d_ + + d_ - } \right) = - v^2 \left[ {\left( {ch_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} - se^{ - i\omega } h_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_1^{ - 1} + \left( {ch_{ - \mu }^{\left( + \right)} + se^{i\omega } h_{ + \mu }^{\left( + \right)} } \right)^2 \tilde M_2^{ - 1} } \right],
1949: \nonumber\\
1950: &&
1951: M_{\mu \tau } \left( { = e_0 \equiv - \sigma \left( {d_ + - d_ - } \right) } \right) = - \sigma M_{\mu \mu },
1952: \nonumber\\
1953: &&
1954: M_{\tau \tau } \left( { = f_0} \right) = M_{\mu \mu },
1955: \label{Eq:NuMatrixEntriesSym-2}
1956: \end{eqnarray}
1957: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1958: leading $d_-=0$. This texture gives the following mass terms:
1959: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1960: \begin{eqnarray}
1961: &&
1962: \frac{1}{2}a_0 \nu _e \nu _e + b_0 \frac{{\nu _e \nu _ + + \nu _ + \nu _e }}{{\sqrt 2 }} + d_ + \nu _ + \nu _ + .
1963: \label{Eq:NuMassTermSym-2}
1964: \end{eqnarray}
1965: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1966: Since $m_3=0$ is realized because of the relation $e_0 = -\sigma d_0$ as in Eq.(\ref{Eq:PredictionsMassSym}),
1967: Eq.(\ref{Eq:NuMatrixEntriesSym-2}) is only consistent with the inverted mass hierarchy.
1968: Contrary to the previous case, the normal mass hierarchy is not
1969: realized in the minimal seesaw mechanism based on $N$ blind to the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetry.
1970:
1971: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1972: \section{\label{sec:Appendix2}Formula for Masses, Mixings and Phases.}
1973: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1974: By adopting $U_{PMNS}$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu_general}) to diagonalize ${\rm\bf M}(\equiv M^\dagger_\nu M_\nu)$,
1975: where $U^\dagger_{PMNS}{\rm\bf M}U_{PMNS}$=diag.($m^2_1, m^2_2, m^2_3$) is satisfied, we can derive a set of
1976: formula to express neutrino masses and mixing angles as well as phases in terms of the flavor neutrino masses
1977: \cite{BabaYasue}.
1978: The Hermitean matrix ${\rm\bf M}$ is parameterized by ${\rm\bf M}={\rm\bf M}^{(+)} +{\rm\bf M}^{(-)}$ with
1979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1980: \begin{eqnarray}
1981: &&
1982: {\rm\bf M}^{(+)} = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1983: A & B_+ & - \sigma B_+ \\
1984: B^\ast_+ & D_+ & E_+ \\
1985: - \sigma B^\ast_+ & E_+ & D_+\\
1986: \end{array} \right),
1987: \quad
1988: {\rm\bf M}^{(-)} = \left( \begin{array}{*{20}c}
1989: 0 & B_- & \sigma B_- \\
1990: B^\ast_- & D_- & iE_- \\
1991: \sigma B^\ast_- & -iE_- & - D_-\\
1992: \end{array} \right),
1993: \label{Eq:Mdagger-M}
1994: \end{eqnarray}
1995: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1996: where
1997: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1998: \begin{eqnarray}
1999: &&
2000: A = \left| {M_{ee} } \right|^2 + 2\left( {\left| {M_{e\mu }^{( + )} } \right|^2 + \left| {M_{e\mu }
2001: ^{( - )} } \right|^2 } \right) ,
2002: \nonumber \\
2003: &&
2004: B_ + = M_{ee}^ \ast M_{e\mu }^{( + )} + M_{e\mu }^{( + ) \ast } \left( {M_{\mu \mu }^{( + )} -
2005: \sigma M_{\mu \tau } } \right) + M_{e\mu }^{( - ) \ast } M_{\mu \mu }^{( - )} ,
2006: \nonumber \\
2007: &&
2008: B_ - = M_{ee}^ \ast M_{e\mu }^{( - )} + M_{e\mu }^{( - ) \ast } \left( {M_{\mu \mu }^{( + )} +
2009: \sigma M_{\mu \tau } } \right) + M_{e\mu }^{( + ) \ast } M_{\mu \mu }^{( - )},
2010: \nonumber \\
2011: &&
2012: D_ + = \left| {M_{e\mu }^{( + )} } \right|^2 + \left| {M_{e\mu }^{( - )} } \right|^2 + \left| {M_
2013: {\mu \mu }^{( + )} } \right|^2 + \left| {M_{\mu \mu }^{( - )} } \right|^2 + \left| {M_{\mu \tau } }
2014: \right|^2 ,
2015: \nonumber \\
2016: &&
2017: D_ - = 2{\rm Re} \left( {M_{e\mu }^{( - ) \ast } M_{e\mu }^{( + )} + M_{\mu \mu }^{( - ) \ast } M_
2018: {\mu \mu }^{( + )} } \right),
2019: \nonumber \\
2020: &&
2021: E_+ = {\rm Re}(E) = \sigma \left( {\left| {M_{e\mu }^{( - )} } \right|^2 - \left| {M_{e\mu }^{( + )} } \right|^2 }
2022: \right) + 2{\rm Re} \left( {M_{\mu \mu }^{( + ) \ast } M_{\mu \tau } } \right),
2023: \nonumber\\
2024: &&
2025: E_- = {\rm Im}(E) = 2{\rm Im} \left( {M_{\mu \mu }^{( - ) \ast } M_{\mu \tau } - \sigma M_{e\mu }^{( - ) \ast } M_
2026: {e\mu }^{( + )} } \right),
2027: \label{Eq:A-F}
2028: \end{eqnarray}
2029: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2030: for $E=E_++iE_-$. Similarly, we define
2031: $B$=$B_++B_-$, $C$=$-\sigma (B_+-B_-)$, $D$=$D_++D_-$, and $F$=$D_+-D_-$ to describe matrix elements of ${\rm\bf M}$.
2032: We, then, obtain that
2033: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2034: \begin{eqnarray}
2035: &&
2036: \tan 2\theta _{12}e^{i\rho} = \frac{{2X}}{{\Lambda _2 - \Lambda_1 }},
2037: \quad
2038: \tan 2\theta _{13}e^{-i\delta} = \frac{2Y}{{\Lambda _3 - A}},
2039: \label{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles12-13}
2040: \nonumber\\
2041: &&
2042: {\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right)\cos 2\theta _{23} + D_-\sin 2\theta _{23}
2043: + i{\rm Im} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) = - s_{13} e^{- i\delta} X^\ast,
2044: \label{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23}
2045: \end{eqnarray}
2046: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2047: for three mixing angles and three phases, and
2048: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2049: \begin{eqnarray}
2050: &&
2051: m_1^2 = c_{12}^2 \Lambda _1 + s_{12}^2 \Lambda _2 - 2c_{12} s_{12} \left| X\right|,
2052: \quad
2053: m_2^2 = s_{12}^2 \Lambda _1 + c_{12}^2 \Lambda _2 + 2c_{12} s_{12} \left| X\right|,
2054: \quad
2055: m_3^2 = \frac{{c_{13}^2 \Lambda _3 - s_{13}^2 A}}{{c_{13}^2 - s_{13}^2 }},
2056: \label{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMasses}
2057: \end{eqnarray}
2058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2059: for three masses, where
2060: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2061: \begin{eqnarray}
2062: &&
2063: X = \frac{{c_{23} e^{i\gamma} B - s_{23} e^{-i\gamma} C}}{c_{13} }
2064: = \frac{e^{i\rho}\left| c_{23} e^{i\gamma} B - s_{23} e^ {- i\gamma} C\right|}{c_{13} },
2065: \nonumber\\
2066: &&
2067: Y = s_{23} e^{i\gamma } B + c_{23} e^{ - i\gamma } C
2068: = e^{-i\delta}\left| s_{23} e^{i\gamma } B + c_{23} e^{ - i\gamma } C\right|,
2069: \nonumber\\
2070: &&
2071: \Lambda _1 = \frac{{c_{13}^2 A - s_{13}^2 \Lambda _3 }}{{c_{13}^2 - s_{13}^2 }},
2072: \quad
2073: \Lambda _2 = c_{23}^2 D + s_{23}^2 F - 2s_{23} c_{23} {\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right),
2074: \quad
2075: \nonumber\\
2076: &&
2077: \Lambda _3 = s_{23}^2 D + c_{23}^2 F + 2s_{23} c_{23} {\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right).
2078: \label{Eq:Mdagger-MassParameters}
2079: \end{eqnarray}
2080: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2081: In the $\mu$-$\tau$ symmetric case, where $B_-=D_-=E_-=0$, we obtain that $\rho=\arg(B)$,
2082: $\gamma = 0$, and $\cos 2\theta_{23} = \sin\theta_{13}=0$.
2083: The Dirac CP violation involves the angle $\rho+\delta$.
2084:
2085: There are useful relations:
2086: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2087: \begin{eqnarray}
2088: &&
2089: \left| X\right|= \frac{\Delta m^2_\odot\sin 2\theta_{12}}{2},
2090: \quad
2091: A \approx
2092: \frac{{\Sigma m_ \odot ^2 - \cos 2\theta _{12} \Delta m_ \odot ^2 + s_{13}^2 \left( {2\Delta m_{atm}^2 - \left( {1 - \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 } \right)}}{2},
2093: \nonumber\\
2094: &&
2095: D_ + \approx
2096: \frac{1}{2}\left( {\Delta m_{atm}^2 + \Sigma m_ \odot ^2 - \frac{{\left( {1 - \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 + s_{13}^2 \left( {2\Delta m_{atm}^2 - \left( {1 - \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 } \right)}}{2}} \right),
2097: \nonumber\\
2098: &&
2099: \sigma {\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) - 2D_ - \Delta \approx
2100: \frac{1}{2}\left( {\Delta m_{atm}^2 - \frac{{\left( {1 + \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 + s_{13}^2 \left( {2\Delta m_{atm}^2 - \left( {1 - \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 } \right)}}{2}} \right),
2101: \nonumber\\
2102: &&
2103: \Lambda _1 \approx \frac{{\Sigma m_ \odot ^2 - \cos 2\theta _{12} \Delta m_ \odot ^2 }}{2},
2104: \quad
2105: \Lambda _2 = \frac{{\cos 2\theta _{12} \Delta m_ \odot ^2 + \Sigma m_ \odot ^2 }}{2},
2106: \nonumber\\
2107: &&
2108: \Lambda _3 \approx
2109: \frac{{2\Delta m_{atm}^2 + \Sigma m_ \odot ^2 - \Delta m_ \odot ^2 - s_{13}^2 \left( {2\Delta m_{atm}^2 - \left( {1 - \cos 2\theta _{12} } \right)\Delta m_ \odot ^2 } \right)}}{2},
2110: \label{Eq:Mdagger-M-MassRelation}
2111: \end{eqnarray}
2112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2113: up to ${\mathcal{O}}(\sin^2\theta_{13})$, where $\sum m_ \odot ^2 = m_1^2 + m_2^2$.
2114: The real part of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23})
2115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2116: \begin{eqnarray}
2117: &&
2118: {\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right)\cos 2\theta _{23} + D_ - \sin 2\theta _{23}
2119: = -s_{13} \cos \left(\rho + \delta \right) \left|X\right|\left( \equiv -z\right),
2120: \label{Eq:Exact-Angle23}
2121: \end{eqnarray}
2122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2123: determines $\cos 2\theta_{23}$, which is given by
2124: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2125: \begin{eqnarray}
2126: &&
2127: \cos 2\theta _{23} = - \frac{{\kappa\sigma D_ -\sqrt {{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 - z^2 } + z{\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right)}}{{{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 }}
2128: = \cos \left( \sigma\frac{\pi}{2}+\theta + \phi \right),
2129: \nonumber\\
2130: &&
2131: \cos \theta = \sqrt {\frac{{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 - z^2 }{{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 }},
2132: \quad
2133: \sin \theta = \frac{\sigma z}{\sqrt {{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 } },
2134: \nonumber\\
2135: &&
2136: \cos \phi = \frac{{\rm Re} \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right)}{\sqrt {{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 } },
2137: \quad
2138: \sin \phi = \frac{\kappa D_-}{\sqrt {{\rm Re} ^2 \left( {e^{ - 2i\gamma } E} \right) + D_ - ^2 } },
2139: \label{Eq:Exact-cos23-solution}
2140: \end{eqnarray}
2141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2142: where $\kappa$ is the sign of ${\rm Re}( e^{ - 2i\gamma }E)$, from which we obtain that
2143: $\theta _{23} = \sigma\pi/4 + (\theta + \phi)/2$.
2144: On the other hand, the imaginary part of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Mdagger-ExactMixingAngles23})
2145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2146: \begin{eqnarray}
2147: &&
2148: \cos 2\gamma {\rm Im} \left( E \right) - \sin 2\gamma {\rm Re}\left( E \right) = s_{13} \sin \left( {\rho + \delta } \right)\left|X\right|\left( \equiv z^\prime\right),
2149: \label{Eq:Exact-gamma}
2150: \end{eqnarray}
2151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2152: determines $\gamma$, which is given by
2153: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2154: \begin{eqnarray}
2155: &&
2156: {\sin 2\gamma = \frac{{ \kappa^\prime {\rm Im}\left( E \right)\sqrt {\left| E \right|^2 - z^{\prime 2} } - z^\prime {\rm Re} \left( E \right)}}{{\left| E \right|^2 }}
2157: = \sin \left( \phi^\prime-\theta^\prime \right)},
2158: \nonumber\\
2159: &&
2160: \cos \theta^\prime = \frac{\sqrt {\left| E \right|^2 - z^{\prime 2} }}{{\left| E \right|}},
2161: \quad
2162: \sin \theta^\prime = \frac{z^\prime}{{\left| E \right|}},
2163: \nonumber\\
2164: &&
2165: \cos \phi^\prime = \frac{{\rm Re} \left( E \right)}{{\left| E \right|}},
2166: \quad
2167: \sin \phi^\prime = \frac{\kappa^\prime{\left| {{\rm Im} \left( E \right)} \right|}}{{\left| E \right|}},
2168: \label{Eq:Exact-gamma-solution}
2169: \end{eqnarray}
2170: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2171: where $\kappa^\prime$ is the sign of ${\rm Re}( E)$, from which we obtain that
2172: $\gamma = (\phi^\prime-\theta^\prime)/2 $.
2173:
2174: The Majorana phases are calculated by the following formula derived by
2175: $U_{PMNS}^T M_\nu U_{PMNS}$ = diag.$(m_1,m_2,m_3)$:
2176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2177: \begin{eqnarray}
2178: &&
2179: m_1 e^{ - 2i\left(\phi^\prime_1-\rho\right) }
2180: \left( = m_1 e^{ - 2i\phi_1 }\right)
2181: = \frac{{\lambda _1 + \lambda _2 }}{2} - \frac{x}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }},
2182: \quad
2183: m_2 e^{ - 2i\phi_2 } = \frac{{\lambda _1 + \lambda _2 }}{2} + \frac{x}{{\sin 2\theta _{12} }},
2184: \nonumber\\
2185: &&
2186: m_3 e^{ - 2i\phi_3 } = \frac{{c_{13}^2 \lambda _3 - s_{13}^2e^{-2i\delta } a}}{{c_{13}^2 - s_{13}^2 }},
2187: \label{Eq:M}
2188: \end{eqnarray}
2189: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2190: where
2191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2192: \begin{eqnarray}
2193: &&
2194: \lambda _1 = e^{2i\rho } \frac{{c_{13}^2 a - s_{13}^2 e^{ 2i\delta} \lambda _3 }}{{c_{13}^2 - s_{13}^2 }},
2195: \quad
2196: \lambda _2 = c_{23}^2 e^{2i\gamma } d + s_{23}^2 e^{ - 2i\gamma } f - 2s_{23} c_{23} e,
2197: \nonumber\\
2198: &&
2199: \lambda _3 = s_{23}^2 e^{2i\gamma } d + c_{23}^2 e^{ - 2i\gamma } f + 2s_{23} c_{23} e,
2200: \quad
2201: x = \frac{{e^{i\rho } \left( {c_{23} e^{i\gamma } b - s_{23} e^{ - i\gamma } c} \right)}}{{c_{13} }}.
2202: \label{Eq:M-lambda}
2203: \end{eqnarray}
2204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2205: The CP violating Majorana phase denoted by $\phi$ is represented by $(\phi_2-\phi_3)/2$
2206: for $m_1=0$, leading to $K$ = diag.$(1,e^{i\phi}, e^{-i\phi})$, and
2207: by $ (\phi_1-\phi_2)/2$ for $m_3=0$, leading to $K$ = diag.$(e^{i\phi}, e^{-i\phi}, 1)$.
2208: To see the phase of $M_{ee}$, which affects the detection of the absolute neutrino mass $m_{\beta\beta}$
2209: in double beta decay experiments,
2210: we have to refer to $U_{PMNS}$ of Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu}) denoted by $U^{PDG}_{PMNS}$, which is associated with
2211: $M^{PDG}_\nu$ defined by
2212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2213: \begin{eqnarray}
2214: &&
2215: U^{PDG~T}_{PMNS} M^{PDG}_\nu U^{PDG}_{PMNS} = U_{PMNS}^T M_\nu U_{PMNS},
2216: \label{Eq:U-M-PDG}
2217: \end{eqnarray}
2218: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2219: where $M^{PDG}_\nu$ is used in theoretical calculations compared with results of neutrino experiments.
2220: From Eq.(\ref{Eq:U-M-PDG}), by adjusting phases of the flavor neutrinos
2221: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2222: \begin{eqnarray}
2223: &&
2224: \nu '_L = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
2225: {e^{ - i\rho } } & 0 & 0 \\
2226: 0 & {e^{ - i\gamma } } & 0 \\
2227: 0 & 0 & {e^{i\gamma } } \\
2228: \end{array}} \right)\nu _L ,
2229: \label{Eq:nu-redifined}
2230: \end{eqnarray}
2231: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2232: for $\nu _L = (\nu_e, \nu_\mu. \mu_\tau)^T$ used in Eq.(\ref{Eq:SuperPotential}), we find that
2233: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2234: \begin{eqnarray}
2235: &&
2236: M^{PDG}_\nu = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
2237: e^{2i\rho }M_{ee} & e^{i\left( {\rho + \gamma } \right)}M_{e\mu} & e^{i\left( {\rho - \gamma } \right)}M_{e\tau} \\
2238: e^{i\left( {\rho + \gamma } \right)}M_{e\mu} & e^{2i\gamma }M_{\mu\mu} & M_{\mu\tau} \\
2239: e^{i\left( {\rho - \gamma } \right)}M_{e\tau} & M_{\mu\tau} & e^{-2i\gamma }M_{\tau\tau} \\
2240: \end{array}} \right),
2241: \nonumber \\
2242: &&
2243: K^{PDG} = {\rm diag}(e^{i\phi_1}, e^{i\phi_2}, e^{i\phi_3}), \quad \delta_{CP}=\delta+\rho, \quad \phi_1 = \phi^\prime_1-\rho,
2244: \label{Eq:M-nu-PDG}
2245: \end{eqnarray}
2246: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2247: where $K^{PDG}$ is obtained from $K = {\rm diag}(e^{i\phi^\prime_1}, e^{i\phi_2}, e^{i\phi_3})$,
2248: as defined in Eq.(\ref{Eq:Uu_general}).
2249: Therefore, it should be noted that $m_{\beta\beta}$ is equal to
2250: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2251: \begin{eqnarray}
2252: &&
2253: e^{2i\rho }M_{ee},
2254: \label{Eq:M-nu-ee-PDG}
2255: \end{eqnarray}
2256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2257: but not to $M_{ee}$.
2258:
2259: %%-------------------------------------------------
2260: %% References
2261: %%-------------------------------------------------
2262: %%\begin{references}
2263: %%\end{references}
2264: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2265: %%-------------------------------------------------
2266: %% References
2267: %%-------------------------------------------------
2268: %%%%%%%%%%
2269: \bibitem{NeutrinoData}
2270: See for example,
2271: M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, ``Phenomenology with Massive Neutrinos", arXiv:0704.1800 [hep-ph].
2272:
2273: %%%%%%%%%%
2274: \bibitem{mu-tau}
2275: Some of earlier references include
2276: T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, in {\it Proceedings of International Workshop on Masses and Mixings of Quarks and Leptons},
2277: Shizuoka, 1997, edited by Y. Koide (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p.252,
2278: ``Mass Matrix of Majorana Neutrinos", arXiv:hep-ph/9702253;
2279: R.N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, \Journal{\PRD}{60}{013002}{1999};
2280: Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PRD}{61}{057301}{2000}; \Journal{\PRD}{64}{093013}{2001};
2281: E. Ma and M. Raidal, \Journal{\PRL}{87}{011802}{2001}; [\Journal{\Erratum}{87}{159901}{2001}].
2282: C.S. Lam, \Journal{\PLB}{507}{214}{2001};
2283: W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, \Journal{\JHEP}{0107}{045}{2001};
2284: T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasu\`{e}, \Journal{\PLB}{524}{308}{2002};
2285: P.F. Harrison and W.G. Scott, \Journal{\PLB}{547}{219}{2002};
2286: T. Ohlsson and G. Seidl, \Journal{\NPB}{643}{247}{2002}.
2287:
2288: %%%%%%%%%%
2289: \bibitem{mu-tauCP}
2290: R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri and Hai-Bo Yu, \Journal{\PLB}{615}{231}{2005};
2291: W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, \Journal{\JHEP}{0508}{013}{2005};
2292: T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasu\`{e}, \Journal{\PLB}{621}{133}{2005}.
2293:
2294: %%%%%%%%%%
2295: \bibitem{CPphases}
2296: S.M. Bilenky, J. Hosek and S.T. Petcov, \Journal{\PLBOLD}{94B}{495}{1980};
2297: J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, \Journal{\PRD}{22}{2227}{1980};
2298: M. Doi, T. Kotani, H. Nishiura, K. Okuda and E. Takasugi, \Journal{\PLBOLD}{102B}{323}{1981}.
2299:
2300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2301: \bibitem{PMNS}
2302: B. Pontecorvo, \Journal{\JETPUSSR}{7}{172}{1957} [\Journal{\ZETP}{34}{247}{1958}];
2303: Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, \Journal{\PTP}{28}{870}{1962}.
2304:
2305: %%%%%%%%%%
2306: \bibitem{PDG}
2307: S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), \Journal{\PLB}{592}{149}{2004}.
2308: See also, L.-L. Chau and W.-Y. Keung, \Journal{\PRL}{53}{1802}{1984}.
2309:
2310: %%%%%%%%%%
2311: \bibitem{MostGeneral}
2312: See for example,
2313: W.-l. Guo and Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PLB}{583}{163}{2004}.
2314:
2315: %%%%%%%%%%
2316: \bibitem{BabaYasue}
2317: T. Baba and M. Yasu\`{e}, \Journal{\PRD}{75}{055001}{2007}.
2318:
2319: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2320: \bibitem{CP-Baryon}
2321: A.D. Sakharov, \Journal{\JETPUSSRLETT}{5}{24}{1967} [\Journal{\PismaZETP}{5}{32}{1967}].
2322:
2323: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2324: \bibitem{leptogenesis}
2325: M. Fukugida and T. Yanagida, \Journal{\PLBOLD}{B174}{45}{1986}.
2326:
2327: %%%%%%%%%%
2328: \bibitem{SeeSaw}
2329: P. Minkowski, \Journal{\PLBOLD}{B67}{421}{1977};
2330: T. Yanagida, in {\it Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theories and
2331: Baryon Number in the Universe} edited by A. Sawada and A. Sugamoto
2332: (KEK Report No.79-18, Tsukuba, 1979), p.95; \Journal{\PTP}{64}{1103}{1980};
2333: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, in {\it Supergravity} edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D.Z. Freedmann (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1979), p.315;
2334: R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi\'{c}, \Journal{\PRL}{44}{912}{1980}.
2335: See also, P. Minkowski, in {\it Proceedings of XI International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes in Venice}, Venice, 2005,
2336: edited by M. Baldo Ceolin (Papergraf S.p.A., Italy, 2005)), p.7,
2337: ``Neutrino oscillations, a historical overview and its projection", arXiv:hep-ph/0505049.
2338:
2339: %%%%%%%%%%
2340: \bibitem{TwoHeavy}
2341: L. Lavoura and W. Grimus, \Journal{\JHEP}{0009}{007}{2000};
2342: T. Endoh, S. Kaneko, S.K. Kang, T. Morozumi and T. Tanimoto, \Journal{\PRL}{89}{231601}{2002};
2343: P.H. Frampton, S.L. Glashow and T. Yanagida, \Journal{\PLB}{548}{119}{2002};
2344: M. Raidal and A. Strumia, \Journal{\PLB}{553}{72}{2003};
2345: V. Barger, D.A. Dicus, H-J. He and T. Li \Journal{\PLB}{583}{173}{2004};
2346: R.G. Felipe, F.R. Joaquim and B.M. Nobre, \Journal{\PRD}{70}{085009}{2004}.
2347: For a review, see for example, W.L. Guo, Z.Z. Xing, and S. Zhou, \Journal{\IJMPE}{16}{1}{2007}.
2348:
2349: %%%%%%%%%%
2350: \bibitem{mu-tauSeeSaw}
2351: See for example,
2352: R.N. Mohapatra, \Journal{\JHEP}{0410}{027}{2004};
2353: S. Chang, S.K. Kang and K. Siyeon, \Journal{\PLB}{597}{78}{2004};
2354: W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, \Journal{\JPG}{30}{1073}{2004}; \Journal{\JHEP}{0508}{013}{2005};
2355: R.N. Mohapatra and S. Nasri, \Journal{\PRD}{71}{033001}{2005};
2356: R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri and Hai-Bo Yu, \Journal{\PLB}{615}{231}{2005}; \Journal{\PRD}{72}{033007}{2005}; \Journal{\PLB}{636}{114}{2006}; \Journal{\PLB}{639}{318}{2006};
2357: S.K. Kang, Z.Z. Xing and S. Zhou, \Journal{\PRD}{73}{013001}{2006};
2358: Y.H. Ahn, S.K. Kang, C.S. Kim and J. Lee, \Journal{\PRD}{73}{093005}{2006}; \Journal{\PRD}{75}{013012}{2007};
2359: R.N. Mohapatra and Hai-Bo Yu, \Journal{\PLB}{644}{346}{2007};
2360: Z.Z. Xing and S. Zhou, \Journal{\PLB}{653}{278}{2007};
2361: Y. Koide and E. Takasugi, \Journal{\PRD}{77}{016006}{2008}.
2362:
2363: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2364: \bibitem{TriBiMaximal}
2365: P.F. Harrison, D.H. Perkins, and W.G. Scott, \Journal{\PLB}{530}{167}{2002};
2366: Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PLB}{533}{85}{2002};
2367: P.F. Harrison and W.G. Scott, \Journal{\PLB}{535}{163}{2002}.
2368:
2369: %%%%%%%%%%
2370: \bibitem{Charged mu-tau}
2371: For the latest attempt, see for example,
2372: F. Feruglio and Y. Lin, ``Fermion Mass Hierarchies and Flavour Mixing from a Minimal Discrete Symmetry",
2373: arXiv: arXiv:0712.1528 [hep-ph].
2374:
2375: %%%%%%%%%%
2376: \bibitem{13-12}
2377: K. Fuki and M. Yasu\`{e}, \Journal{\PRD}{73}{055014}{2006}.
2378:
2379: %%%%%%%%%%
2380: \bibitem{mu-tauNoCP}
2381: R.N. Mohapatra and S. Nasri, in Ref.\cite{mu-tauSeeSaw}.
2382:
2383: %%%%%%%%%%
2384: \bibitem{NuPlus}
2385: K. Fuki and M. Yasu\`{e}, \Journal{\NPB}{783}{31}{2007};
2386: N.N. Singh, H.Z. Devi and M. Patgiri,
2387: ``Phenomenology of Neutrino Mass Matrices obeying $\mu$-$\tau$ Reflection Symmetry", arXiv: 0707.2713 [hep-ph].
2388:
2389: %%%%%%%%%%
2390: \bibitem{RGE}
2391: See for example,
2392: S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner and M. Ratz, \Journal{NPB}{674}{401}{2003};
2393: S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz and M.A. Schmidt, \Journal{JHEP}{0503}{024}{2005};
2394: R.N. Mohapatra, M.K. Parida and G. Rajasekaran, \Journal{\PRD}{71}{057301}{2005};
2395: J.W. Mei and Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PRD}{69}{073003}{2004};
2396: J.W. Mei, \Journal{\PRD}{71}{073012}{2005};
2397: S. Luo, J.W. Mei and Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PRD}{72}{053014}{2005};
2398: S. Luo and Z.Z. Xing, \Journal{\PLB}{632}{341}{2006}.
2399:
2400: %%%%%%%%%%
2401: \bibitem{TheoryMass-ee}
2402: See for example,
2403: S. Pascoli and S.T. Petcov, \Journal{\NPSUPPL}{138}{233}{2005};
2404: S. Pascoli, S.T. Petcov and T. Schwetz, \Journal{\NPB}{734}{24}{2006};
2405: M. Hirsch, E. Ma, J.W.F. Valle and A.V. del Moral, \Journal{\PRD}{72}{091301}{2005}; [\Journal{\Erratum}{72}{119904}{2005}];
2406: M. Hirsch, ``Phenomenology of Double Beta Decay",
2407: Talk given at {\it Neutrino 2006: The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics},
2408: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA (June 13-19, 2006), ``Phenomenology of neutrinoless double beta decay'', arXiv: hep-ph/0609146.
2409:
2410: %%%%%%%%%%
2411: \bibitem{AbsoluteMass}
2412: See for example,
2413: C. Giunti, \Journal{\ACTAB}{36}{3215}{2005}.
2414: \end{thebibliography}
2415:
2416: \newpage
2417: %%-------------------------------------------------
2418: %% Figures
2419: %%-------------------------------------------------
2420: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2421: \noindent
2422: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2423: \begin{flushleft}
2424: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2425: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2426: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2427: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2428: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2429: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2430: \includegraphics*[20mm,162mm][195mm,263mm]{phase-n.eps}
2431: \end{flushleft}
2432: \vspace{-4mm}
2433: \caption{The predictions of the Dirac CP phase $\delta+\rho$ as function of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ for the normal mass hierarchy.}
2434: \label{Fig:phase-normal}
2435: \end{figure}
2436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2437: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2438: \begin{flushleft}
2439: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2440: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2441: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2442: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2443: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2444: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2445: \includegraphics*[13mm,161mm][205mm,263mm]{phase-majorana-n.eps}
2446: \end{flushleft}
2447: \vspace{-4mm}
2448: \caption{The prediction of the Majorana phase as a function of the CP phase.}
2449: \label{Fig:majorana-normal}
2450: \end{figure}
2451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2452: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2453: \begin{flushleft}
2454: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2455: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2456: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2457: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2458: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2459: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2460: \includegraphics*[20mm,162mm][195mm,263mm]{sin13-n.eps}
2461: \end{flushleft}
2462: \vspace{-4mm}
2463: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal} but for $\sin\theta_{13}$.}
2464: \label{Fig:sin13-normal}
2465: \end{figure}
2466: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2467: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2468: \begin{flushleft}
2469: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2470: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2471: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2472: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2473: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2474: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2475: \includegraphics*[19.0mm,162mm][195mm,263mm]{tan23-n.eps}
2476: \end{flushleft}
2477: \vspace{-4mm}
2478: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-normal} but for $\tan^2\theta_{23}$.}
2479: \label{Fig:tan23-normal}
2480: \end{figure}
2481: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2482: \noindent
2483: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2484: \begin{flushleft}
2485: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2486: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2487: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2488: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2489: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2490: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2491: \includegraphics*[20mm,158mm][195mm,263mm]{phase-i1.eps}
2492: \end{flushleft}
2493: \vspace{-4mm}
2494: \caption{The predictions of the Dirac CP phase $\delta+\rho$ as function of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I.}
2495: \label{Fig:phase-inverted1}
2496: \end{figure}
2497: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2498: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2499: \begin{flushleft}
2500: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2501: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2502: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2503: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2504: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2505: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2506: \includegraphics*[13mm,161mm][205mm,263mm]{phase-majorana-i1.eps}
2507: \end{flushleft}
2508: \vspace{-4mm}
2509: \caption{The prediction of the Majorana phase as a function of the CP phase.}
2510: \label{Fig:majorana-inverted1}
2511: \end{figure}
2512: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2513: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2514: \begin{flushleft}
2515: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2516: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2517: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2518: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2519: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2520: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2521: \includegraphics*[20mm,162mm][195mm,263mm]{sin13-i1.eps}
2522: \end{flushleft}
2523: \vspace{-4mm}
2524: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted1} but for $\sin\theta_{13}$.}
2525: \label{Fig:sin13-inverted1}
2526: \end{figure}
2527: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2528: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2529: \begin{flushleft}
2530: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2531: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2532: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2533: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2534: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2535: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2536: \includegraphics*[20mm,162mm][195mm,263mm]{tan23-i1.eps}
2537: \end{flushleft}
2538: \vspace{-4mm}
2539: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted1} but for $\tan^2\theta_{23}$.}
2540: \label{Fig:tan23-inverted1}
2541: \end{figure}
2542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2543: \noindent
2544: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2545: \begin{flushleft}
2546: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2547: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2548: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2549: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2550: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2551: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2552: \includegraphics*[20mm,157mm][195mm,263mm]{phase-i2.eps}
2553: \end{flushleft}
2554: \vspace{-4mm}
2555: \caption{The predictions of the Dirac CP phase $\delta+\rho$ as function of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ for the inverted mass hierarchy I\hspace{-.1em}I.}
2556: \label{Fig:phase-inverted2}
2557: \end{figure}
2558: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2559: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2560: \begin{flushleft}
2561: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2562: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2563: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2564: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2565: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2566: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2567: \includegraphics*[13mm,161mm][205mm,263mm]{phase-majorana-i2.eps}
2568: \end{flushleft}
2569: \vspace{-4mm}
2570: \caption{The prediction of the Majorana phase as a function of the CP phase.}
2571: \label{Fig:majorana-inverted2}
2572: \end{figure}
2573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2574: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2575: \begin{flushleft}
2576: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2577: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2578: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2579: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2580: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2581: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2582: \includegraphics*[20mm,161mm][200mm,263mm]{sin13-i2.eps}
2583: \end{flushleft}
2584: \vspace{-4mm}
2585: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted2} but for $\sin\theta_{13}$.}
2586: \label{Fig:sin13-inverted2}
2587: \end{figure}
2588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2589: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2590: \begin{flushleft}
2591: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2592: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2593: %80==>90 title moves closer to figure
2594: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2595: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2596: %265==>235 figure moves upward
2597: \includegraphics*[20mm,157mm][195mm,263mm]{tan23-i2.eps}
2598: \end{flushleft}
2599: \vspace{-4mm}
2600: \caption{The same as in FIG.\ref{Fig:phase-inverted2} but for $\tan^2\theta_{23}$.}
2601: \label{Fig:tan23-inverted2}
2602: \end{figure}
2603: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2604: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2605: \begin{flushleft}
2606: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2607: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2608: %80==>90 タイトルが図に近づく
2609: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2610: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2611: %265==>235 図が上に移動する
2612: \includegraphics*[13mm,183mm][195mm,263mm]{delta-phase.eps}
2613: \end{flushleft}
2614: \vspace{-4mm}
2615: \caption{The $\delta$-dependence of Dirac CP phase.}
2616: \label{Fig:delta-phase}
2617: \end{figure}
2618: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
2619: \begin{figure}[!htbp]
2620: \begin{flushleft}
2621: %\includegraphics*[20mm,80mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2622: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2623: %80==>90 タイトルが図に近づく
2624: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,265mm]{phase.eps}
2625: %\includegraphics*[20mm,90mm][200mm,235mm]{phase.eps}
2626: %265==>235 図が上に移動する
2627: \includegraphics*[13mm,187mm][195mm,263mm]{rho-majorana.eps}
2628: \end{flushleft}
2629: \vspace{-4mm}
2630: \caption{The $\rho$-dependence of Majorana phase.}
2631: \label{Fig:rho-majorana}
2632: \end{figure}
2633: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2634: \end{document}
2635: %
2636: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
2637:
2638: