1: % Please use the skeleton file you have received in the
2: % invitation-to-submit email, where your data are already
3: % filled in. Otherwise please make sure you insert your
4: % data according to the instructions in PoSauthmanual.pdf
5: \documentclass{PoS}
6:
7: \usepackage{dsfont}
8: \usepackage{slashed}
9: \usepackage{booktabs}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11: \usepackage{float}
12:
13: \newcommand{\Op}{\mathcal{O}} % Fractur O
14: \newcommand{\C}{\mathcal{C}} % Fractur C
15: \newcommand{\eins}{\mathds{1}} % Fractur O
16:
17:
18:
19:
20: \title{Electromagnetic form factors of the $\Delta$ baryon}
21:
22: \ShortTitle{Electromagnetic form factors of the $\Delta$ baryon}
23:
24: \author{C. Alexandrou\\
25: Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus\\
26: E-mail: \email{alexand@ucy.ac.cy}}
27:
28: \author{\speaker{T. Korzec}\\
29: Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus\\
30: E-mail: \email{korzec@ucy.ac.cy}}
31:
32: \author{T. Leontiou\\
33: Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus\\
34: E-mail: \email{t.leontiou@ucy.ac.cy}}
35:
36: \author{J. W. Negele\\
37: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, U.S.A.\\
38: E-mail: \email{negele@mit.edu}}
39:
40: \author{A. Tsapalis\\
41: Institute of Accelerating Systems and Applications, University of Athens, Athens, Greece\\
42: E-mail: \email{a.tsapalis@iasa.gr}}
43:
44: \abstract{We develop a methodology that enables us to extract accurately the
45: electromagnetic $\Delta$ form factors and their momentum dependence.
46: We test our approach in the quenched approximation as a preparation for
47: a study using dynamical fermions.
48: Our calculation of the four form factors
49: covers pion masses between about 410 MeV and 560 MeV on lattices
50: with a size of 2.9 fm and a lattice spacing $\sim\, 0.09$ fm.
51: From the form factors we are able to obtain estimates of
52: the magnetic moment and the charge radius of the $\Delta$, which
53: we compare to existing experimental and theoretical results.
54: Our non-zero result for the electric quadrupole form factor
55: signals a deformation of the $\Delta$, pointing to an oblate
56: charge distribution.
57: }
58:
59: \FullConference{The XXV International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory\\
60: July 30-4 August 2007\\
61: Regensburg, Germany}
62:
63:
64:
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69: Electromagnetic form factors probe
70: the structure of hadrons, yielding information on their size, shape and magnetization.
71: While the nucleon form factors and the $N\to\Delta$ transition
72: form factors have been studied quite thoroughly
73: both experimentally and on the lattice~\cite{Alexandrou:2006ru}, much less
74: has been done for the $\Delta$ form factors. Experiments are
75: notoriously difficult due to the short mean life time of the
76: $\Delta$ of only about $6\times 10^{-24} s$. Nevertheless the magnetic
77: moments of the $\Delta^+$~\cite{Kotulla:2002cg} and $\Delta^{++}$~\cite{LopezCastro:2000cv,Yao:2006px} have been
78: measured. On the lattice the electromagnetic form factors of the $\Delta$ baryon have been evaluated
79: at one value of the momentum transfer in a pioneer
80: %Dina moved ref. at the end of sentence
81: quenched study in the early nineties~\cite{Leinweber:1992hy}.
82: The main advantage of the fixed-sink approach that we adopt here, is that
83: we are able to calculate the form factors for all values and directions
84: of the momentum transfer $\vec q$ simultaneously, allowing for an increased statistical precision.
85: %Dina commas added
86: Furthermore, we construct optimized sources that isolate the suppressed
87: form factors enabling us, for the first time, to extract the electric
88: quadrupole accurately.
89: Other improvements comprise reduced systematic
90: errors due to finer lattice spacings, larger volumes and smaller pion masses.
91:
92:
93:
94:
95: \section{Lattice techniques}
96: We are working in Euclidean space-time throughout the whole paper.
97: We use Wilson fermions and the standard Wilson plaquette
98: gauge-action. At all the pion masses considered in this work the $\Delta$
99: is a stable particle.
100:
101: \subsection{Electromagnetic form factors of the $\Delta$ baryon}
102: %Dina: commas added
103: The matrix element of the electromagnetic current, $V_\mu$, between two
104: $\Delta$-states can be decomposed in terms of four independent
105: covariant vertex function coefficients, $a_1(q^2)$, $a_2(q^2)$, $c_1(q^2)$ and $c_2(q^2)$,
106: which depend only on the momentum transfer squared $q^2=(p_f-p_i)^2$~\cite{Nozawa:1990gt}:
107: \begin{eqnarray}
108: \langle \Delta(p_f,s_f) |\, V^\mu \, | \Delta(p_i,s_i) \rangle &=& \sqrt{\frac{m_\Delta^2}{E_{\Delta(\vec p_f)}E_{\Delta(\vec p_i)}}} \
109: \bar u_\sigma(p_f,s_f)\, \Op^{\sigma \mu \tau}\, u_\tau(p_i,s_i) \\
110: \Op^{\sigma\mu\tau} &=& -\delta_{\sigma\tau} \left[a_1 \gamma^\mu - i \frac{a_2}{2m_\Delta}P^\mu \right]
111: +\frac{q^\sigma q^\tau}{4m_\Delta^2}\left[c_1 \gamma^\mu - i \frac{c_2}{2m_\Delta}P^\mu \right] \nonumber
112: \, .
113: \end{eqnarray}
114: $E_\Delta$ and $m_\Delta$ denote the energy and the mass of the particle, $p_{i}\, (p_f)$ and $s_i\, (s_f)$
115: %Dina: is the sum --> =
116: are the initial (final) four-momentum and spin-projection, while $P=p_f+p_i$.
117: Every vector-component of the Rarita-Schwinger spinor $u_\sigma(p,s)$ satisfies the free
118: %Dina: comma added
119: Dirac equation. Furthermore, the following auxiliary conditions are obeyed
120: \begin{equation}
121: \gamma_\sigma u^\sigma(p,s) = 0, \qquad \qquad
122: p_\sigma u^\sigma(p,s) = 0 \, .
123: \end{equation}
124: The vertex function coefficients are linked to the phenomenologically more
125: interesting multipole form factors $G_{E0}$, $G_{E2}$, $G_{M1}$ and $G_{M3}$ by
126: a linear relation~\cite{Nozawa:1990gt}. The dominant form factors are the electric
127: charge, $G_{E0}$, and the magnetic dipole, $G_{M1}$, form factors.
128:
129:
130:
131: \subsection{Interpolating fields}
132: We use an interpolating field that has the quantum numbers of the
133: $\Delta^+$ baryon
134: \begin{equation}\label{interpolatingfield}
135: {\mathbf \chi}^{\Delta^+}_{\sigma\alpha}(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \epsilon^{abc}\Bigl[2\left({\mathbf u}^{a\top}(x) C\gamma_\sigma {\mathbf d}^b(x)\right) {\mathbf u}_\alpha^c(x)
136: + \left({\mathbf u}^{a\top}(x) C\gamma_\sigma {\mathbf u}^b(x)\right) {\mathbf d}_\alpha^c(x)\Bigr]\, ,
137: \end{equation}
138: where $C$ is the charge conjugation matrix.
139: To facilitate ground-state dominance we employ a covariant Gaussian smearing~\cite{Alexandrou:1992ti} on the
140: quark-fields entering Eq.~(\ref{interpolatingfield})
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: {\mathbf q }_\beta(t,\vec x) &=& \sum_{ \vec y} [\eins + \alpha H(\vec x,\vec y; U)]^n \ q_\beta(t,\vec y) \\
143: H(\vec x, \vec y; U) &=& \sum_{\mu=1}^3 \left(U_\mu(\vec x,t)\delta_{\vec x, \vec y - \hat \mu} + U^\dagger_\mu(\vec x-\hat \mu, t) \delta_{\vec x,\vec y+\hat\mu} \right)
144: \end{eqnarray}
145: Here $q$ is the local quark field (i.e. either $u$ or $d$), ${\bf q}$ is the smeared quark field and $U_\mu$
146: is the $SU(3)$-gauge field.
147: %Dina: rephase adequante
148: For the lattice spacing and pion masses considered in this work, the values
149: $\alpha=4.0$ and $n=50$ ensure ground state dominance with the shortest
150: time evolution that could be achieved.
151:
152: \subsection{Correlation functions}
153: We specialize to a kinematical setup where the final $\Delta$-state is at rest ($\vec p_f =\vec 0$) and
154: measure the two-point and three-point functions
155: \begin{eqnarray}
156: G_{\sigma \tau}(\Gamma^\nu,\vec p, t_f-t_i) &=&\sum_{\vec x_f} e^{-i\vec x_f \cdot \vec p}\,
157: \Gamma^\nu_{\alpha'\alpha}\, \langle {\mathbf \chi}_{\sigma\alpha}(t_f,\vec x_f) \bar{\mathbf \chi}_{\tau\alpha'}(t_i, \vec 0) \rangle \label{twopoint} \\
158: G_{\sigma\ \tau}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma^\nu,\vec q, t) &=& \sum_{\vec x,\, \vec x_f} e^{i\vec x \cdot \vec q}\,
159: \Gamma^\nu_{\alpha'\alpha}\, \langle {\mathbf \chi}_{\sigma\alpha}(t_f,\vec x_f) V^\mu(t,\vec x) \bar{\mathbf \chi}_{\tau\alpha'}(t_i, \vec 0)\rangle \, , \label{threepoint}
160: \end{eqnarray}
161: where $V_\mu$ is the symmetrized, conserved lattice electromagnetic current. We work
162: with a representation of the Clifford-algebra in which $\gamma_4$ is diagonal. In this
163: representation our choices for the $\Gamma$-matrices are
164: \begin{equation}
165: \Gamma^k = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{l l}\sigma^{(k)} & 0\\ 0 & 0\end{array}\right) \quad {\rm and}\quad \Gamma^4 = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{l l}\eins & 0\\ 0 & 0\end{array}\right)\, ,
166: \end{equation}
167: with $k=1,\ldots , 3$ and $\sigma^{(k)}$ being the Pauli matrices.
168: The ratio
169: \begin{equation}
170: R_{\sigma\ \tau}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma,\vec q,t) = \frac{G_{\sigma\ \tau}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma,\vec q,t)}{G_{k k}(\Gamma^4,\vec 0, t_f)}\
171: \sqrt{\frac{G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec p_i, t_f-t)G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec 0 ,t)G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec 0,t_f)}
172: {G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec 0, t_f-t)G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec p_i,t)G_{kk}(\Gamma^4,\vec p_i,t_f)}}\, ,
173: \end{equation}
174: %Dina added: over the indices $k$ with
175: with implicit summations over the indices $k$ with $k=1,\ldots, 3$,
176: becomes time independent for large Euclidean time separations $t_f-t$ and $t-t_i$:
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: R_{\sigma\ \tau}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma,\vec q,t) \to \Pi_{\sigma\ \tau}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma,\vec q) &=&
179: \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\left[\frac{2 E_{\Delta(\vec q)}}{m_\Delta}
180: +\frac{2 E^2_{\Delta(\vec q)}}{m^2_\Delta}
181: +\frac{ E^3_{\Delta(\vec q)}}{m^3_\Delta}
182: +\frac{ E^4_{\Delta(\vec q)}}{m^4_\Delta} \right]^{-\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber \\
183: && {\rm tr}\left[\Gamma\, \Lambda_{\sigma\sigma'}(p_f) \Op^{{\sigma'}\mu{\tau'}} \Lambda_{\tau'\tau}(p_i) \right] \, .
184: \end{eqnarray}
185: The traces act in spinor-space and the Euclidean Schwinger-Rarita spin sum is given by
186: \begin{equation}
187: \Lambda_{\sigma\tau}(p) = - \frac{-i\slashed{p}+m_\Delta}{2m_\Delta}\left[
188: \delta_{\sigma\tau}-\frac{\gamma_\sigma\gamma_{\tau}}{3}
189: +\frac{2p_\sigma p_{\tau}}{3m_\Delta^2}
190: - i \frac{p_\sigma\gamma_{\tau}-p_{\tau}\gamma_\sigma}{3m_\Delta} \right] \, .
191: \end{equation}
192:
193: Since we are evaluating the correlator of Eq.~(\ref{threepoint}) using
194: sequential inversions through the sink~\cite{Dolgov:2002zm},
195: a separate set of inversions is necessary for every choice of vector and Dirac-indices.
196: The total of $256$ combinations is beyond our computational resources, and hence we concentrate on a few
197: carefully chosen combinations given below
198: \begin{eqnarray}
199: \Pi_\mu^{(1)}(\vec q) &=& \sum \limits_{j,k,l=1}^3 \epsilon_{jkl}\Pi_{j\ k}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma^4, \vec q) \label{comb1} \\
200: \Pi_\mu^{(2)}(\vec q) &=& \sum \limits_{k=1}^3 \Pi_{k\ k}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma^4, \vec q) \label{comb2} \\
201: \Pi_\mu^{(3)}(\vec q) &=& \sum \limits_{j,k,l=1}^3 \epsilon_{jkl}\Pi_{j\ k}^{\ \mu}(\Gamma^j, \vec q) \label{comb3}\, .
202: \end{eqnarray}
203: From these all the multipole form factors can be optimally extracted. For instance~(\ref{comb1})
204: is proportional to $G_{M1}$, while (\ref{comb3}) isolates $G_{E2}$ for $\mu=4$.
205:
206: \subsection{Data analysis}
207: For a given value of $q^2$ the combinations given in Eqs.~(\ref{comb1}) to~(\ref{comb3}) are evaluated
208: for all different directions of $\vec q$ resulting in the same $q^2$, as well as for
209: all four directions $\mu$ of the current. This leads to an over-constrained linear
210: system of equations, which is then solved in the least-squares sense yielding
211: estimates of $G_{E0}$, $G_{E2}$, $G_{M1}$ and $G_{M3}$. This estimation is
212: embedded into a jackknife binning procedure,
213: %Dina rephrase
214: thus providing statistical
215: errors for the form factors that take all correlation and
216: autocorrelation effects
217: into account.
218:
219:
220: \section{Results}
221: \subsection{Simulation parameters}
222: The calculation has been performed on a lattice of volume $L^3 \times T = 32^3 \times 64 $
223: in the quenched approximation. The lattice spacing has been estimated
224: using the nucleon mass in the chiral limit~\cite{Alexandrou:2006ru} to
225: be~$a=0.092(3)$, so
226: the spatial extent of the lattice is~$\sim\, 2.9$~fm.
227: We work with two degenerate Wilson valence quarks.
228: %Dina: deleted our
229: Isospin symmetry relates results obtained for the $\Delta^+$ to
230: %Dina: added the
231: those for the $\Delta^{++},\, \Delta^0$ and $\Delta^-$ since they differ only
232: by a charge-factor.
233: The pion and $\Delta$ masses corresponding
234: %Dina: deleted denoted by considered here
235: to the three values of the hopping parameter, $\kappa$, considered here are summarized in Table~\ref{resultstable}.
236: We use 200 well separated gauge configurations for the calculation.
237: Contributions from disconnected diagrams are neglected.
238: The numbers and figures below are obtained from the connected contributions to the
239: full electromagnetic current. They also can be interpreted as the iso-vector
240: form factors with the iso-vector current $V_\mu^{I} = \bar u \gamma_\mu u - \bar d \gamma_\mu d$.
241:
242: \subsection{Electric charge form factor $G_{E0}$}
243: Our results for $G_{E0}$ are displayed in the left panel of
244: Fig.~\ref{ge0gm1fig}. The momentum dependence of our data is
245: described very well by the dipole ansatz
246: \begin{equation}\label{ge0dipoleform}
247: G_{E0}(q^2) = \frac{1}{(1+ c_{E0}\, q^2)^2} \, .
248: \end{equation}
249: Non-relativistically the slope at $q^2=0$ is related to the electric
250: %Dina: via added
251: charge radius via
252: \begin{equation}\label{chargeradius}
253: \left\langle r^2 \right\rangle = -6 \left. \frac{d}{dq^2} G_{E0}(q^2)\right|_{q^2=0} \, ,
254: \end{equation}
255: for which the results are collected in Table~\ref{resultstable}.
256: An extrapolation of the form factor to the physical pion mass, linear in $m_\pi^2$,
257: is used to obtain the last row of the table.
258: One could consider using chiral perturbation theory for the extrapolations~\cite{Arndt:2003we}.
259: This will be done when we have results using dynamical fermions.
260:
261: After a chiral extrapolation, linear in $m_\pi^2$, the authors of ref.~\cite{Leinweber:1992hy} obtained 0.63(7) fm, which
262: is compatible with our value of 0.691(6) fm.
263:
264: \subsection{Magnetic dipole form factor $G_{M1}$}
265: Also $G_{M1}(q^2)$ can be fitted to a dipole ansatz
266: \begin{equation}\label{gm1dipoleform}
267: G_{M1}(q^2) = \frac{a_{M1}(0)}{(1+c_{M1}\, q^2)^2} \, .
268: \end{equation}
269: From the fit parameter $a_{M1}$
270: the magnetic moment $\mu_{\Delta^+}= G_{M1}(0) \left(\frac{e}{2m_\Delta}\right)$
271: of the $\Delta$ can be determined. It is given in Table~\ref{resultstable}.
272: Fits and data are shown in Fig.~\ref{ge0gm1fig}.
273: %Dina: move figure 1 to here
274: %Dina: commas added
275: \vspace{-0.3cm}
276: \begin{figure}[H]
277: \hspace{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[width=0.53\linewidth]{ge0_proc}
278: \hspace{-0.2cm}\includegraphics[width=0.53\linewidth]{gm1_proc}
279: \caption{The two dominant form factors for the three pion masses as well as
280: the result of a linear chiral extrapolation to the physical pion mass.
281: The left panel shows the electric charge form factor, $G_{E0}$, and
282: the right panel shows the magnetic dipole form factor, $G_{M1}$.
283: The lines are fits to the dipole forms Eqs.~(3.1) and~(3.3).
284: The band at $q^2=0$ indicates the experimentally measured value as
285: quoted by the particle data group.
286: }\label{ge0gm1fig}
287: \end{figure}
288: The magnetic moment of the $\Delta^{++}$ has been measured in several experiments.
289: However not all experimental values are in agreement with each other,
290: so the particle data group quotes a rather
291: broad band of $3.7 \mu_N$ to $7.5\mu_N$ ~\cite{Yao:2006px}. The most
292: recent experiment~\cite{LopezCastro:2000cv}
293: quotes $\mu_{\Delta^{++}}=6.14(51) \mu_N$. Our estimate of
294: $\mu_{\Delta^{++}}=2 \mu_{\Delta^+} = 4.64(32) \mu_N $ lies in the middle of
295: %Dina rephase
296: the error band given by PDG
297: and below the result of~\cite{LopezCastro:2000cv}.
298: An experiment~\cite{Kotulla:2002cg} that measures the magnetic
299: moment of the $\Delta^+$ arrives at $\mu_{\Delta^+} = (2.7 \pm 1 \pm 1.5 \pm 3) \mu_N$\, .
300: %Dina present --> yield
301: Also recent lattice calculations yield results on the
302: magnetic dipole moment.
303: The value of $1.6(3)\mu_N$ for the $\Delta^+$, read off from fig.~6 of Ref.~\cite{Boinepalli:2006ng}
304: %Dina added our value of
305: at a pion mass of around 300 MeV lies slightly below our value of $2.32(16) \mu_N$.
306:
307:
308: \subsection{Electric quadrupole form factor $G_{E2}$}
309: %Dina added within lattice QCD
310: This is the first accurate evaluation of the quadrupole form factor, $G_{E2}$,
311: within lattice QCD.
312: The intrinsic quadrupole moment $Q = m_\Delta^{-2} G_{E2}(0)$,
313: %Dina: commas added
314: non-relativistically, is given by~\cite{Leinweber:1992hy}
315: \begin{equation}
316: Q = \int \! d^3r \ \bar \psi(r) \left( 3z^2-r^2\right)\psi(r) \, ,
317: \end{equation}
318: where $\psi$ is the wave function of the $\Delta$.
319: %Dina: commas added
320: A negative value, as that shown in Fig.~\ref{ge2gm3fig}, corresponds to
321: an oblate deformation of the $\Delta$.
322:
323: The value $G_{E2}(0) = -0.4(14)$ obtained in reference~\cite{Leinweber:1992hy} is compatible with ours,
324: but comes with a much larger statistical error.
325:
326: \subsection{Magnetic octupole form factor $G_{M3}$}
327: Our signal for $G_{M3}$ is not very strong, as can be seen in Fig.~\ref{ge2gm3fig}.
328: %Dina: rephrase
329: This form factor has a small
330: negative value, albeit with large statistical errors that,
331: at present, do not exclude a zero value. To next to leading order of a chiral
332: expansion a value of zero is expected~\cite{Arndt:2003we}.
333:
334: \vspace{-0.3cm}
335: \begin{figure}[H]
336: \hspace{-0.5cm}\includegraphics[width=0.53\linewidth]{ge2_proc}
337: \hspace{-0.2cm}\includegraphics[width=0.53\linewidth]{gm3_proc}
338: \caption{The electric quadrupole form factor (left panel) and the
339: magnetic octupole form factor (right panel). The notation is
340: the same as in~Fig.1.
341: }\label{ge2gm3fig}
342: \end{figure}
343:
344: \begin{table}[h]
345: \centering
346: \begin{tabular}{l l l l l l}
347: \toprule
348: $ \kappa $&$ m_{\pi}\ [MeV] $&$ m_\Delta $&$ \langle r^2 \rangle^{\frac{1}{2}} $&$ G_{M1}(0) $&$ G_{E2}(0) $\\
349: \midrule
350: $ 0.1554 $&$ 563(4) $&$ 1.470(15) $&$ 0.614(2) $&$ 3.05(7) $&$ -0.6(3) $\\
351: $ 0.1558 $&$ 490(4) $&$ 1.425(16) $&$ 0.632(2) $&$ 3.05(8) $&$ -0.7(4) $\\
352: $ 0.1562 $&$ 411(4) $&$ 1.382(15) $&$ 0.650(3) $&$ 3.05(10) $&$ -0.7(4) $\\
353: \midrule
354: $ $&$ 135 $&$ $&$ 0.691(6) $&$ 3.04(21)$&$ $\\
355: \bottomrule
356: \end{tabular}
357: \caption{Estimated values of the $\Delta$ mass, the charge radius, $G_{M1}(0)$ and $G_{E2}(0)$ for the
358: pion masses considered. The last row contains our results from data extrapolated
359: to the physical value of the pion mass.}\label{resultstable}
360: \end{table}
361:
362: \section{Conclusions and outlook}
363: Our results on the electromagnetic form factors of the $\Delta$
364: baryon and their momentum dependence confirm the up to
365: now phenomenological description, e.g. the $q^2$-dependence of
366: $G_{E0}$ and $G_{M1}$ are well described by a dipole ansatz.
367: A particularly interesting result of our study is
368: the non-vanishing, negative value of the electric quadrupole
369: form factor, which is associated with an oblate $\Delta$.
370:
371: While the statistical errors in our calculation are under control, there
372: are several sources of systematic errors that we would like to address.
373: The results presented here were obtained in the quenched approximation.
374: A study with dynamical fermions is currently in progress.
375: It is not clear how strongly the neglect of disconnected contributions
376: affects our final results. This is a problem we share with most other
377: calculations of electromagnetic form factors. Only recently, with new methods and faster
378: machines, we are beginning to address the calculation of the disconnected contributions
379: in a statistically controlled manner.
380:
381: While the finite volume effects are expected to be negligible on our rather big
382: lattice, cutoff effects may be significant, especially towards higher
383: momentum transfers.
384:
385: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
386: \bibitem{Alexandrou:2006ru}
387: C.~Alexandrou, G.~Koutsou, J.~W.~Negele and A.~Tsapalis,
388: %``The nucleon electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD,''
389: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 034508, \\
390: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0605017], \\
391: C.~Alexandrou {\it et al.},
392: %``N to Delta electromagnetic transition form factors from lattice QCD,''
393: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 114506, \\
394: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0307018], \\
395: C.~Alexandrou, Ph.~de Forcrand, H.~Neff, J.~W.~Negele, W.~Schroers and A.~Tsapalis,
396: %``The N to Delta electromagnetic transition form factors from lattice QCD,''
397: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94} (2005) 021601
398: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0409122]
399: and references therein.
400:
401: \bibitem{Kotulla:2002cg}
402: M.~Kotulla {\it et al.},
403: %``The reaction gamma p --> pi0 gamma' p and the magnetic dipole moment of the
404: %Delta(1232)+ resonance,''
405: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 89} (2002) 272001.
406: % [arXiv:nucl-ex/0210040].
407: %%CITATION = PRLTA,89,272001;%%
408:
409: \bibitem{LopezCastro:2000cv}
410: G.~Lopez Castro and A.~Mariano,
411: %``Determination of the Delta++ magnetic dipole moment,''
412: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 517} (2001) 339.
413: % [arXiv:nucl-th/0006031].
414: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B517,339;%%
415:
416: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}
417: W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
418: %``Review of particle physics,''
419: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33} (2006) 1.
420: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
421:
422: \bibitem{Leinweber:1992hy}
423: D.~B.~Leinweber, T.~Draper and R.~M.~Woloshyn,
424: %``Decuplet baryon structure from lattice QCD,''
425: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46} (1992) 3067.
426: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9208025].
427: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,3067;%%
428:
429: \bibitem{Nozawa:1990gt}
430: S.~Nozawa and D.~B.~Leinweber,
431: %``Electromagnetic form-factors of spin 3/2 baryons,''
432: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42} (1990) 3567.
433: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D42,3567;%%
434:
435: \bibitem{Alexandrou:1992ti}
436: C.~Alexandrou, S.~Gusken, F.~Jegerlehner, K.~Schilling and R.~Sommer,
437: %``The Static approximation of heavy - light quark systems: A Systematic
438: %lattice study,''
439: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 414} (1994) 815.
440: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9211042].
441: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B414,815;%%
442:
443: \bibitem{Dolgov:2002zm}
444: D.~Dolgov {\it et al.} [LHPC collaboration],
445: %``Moments of nucleon light cone quark distributions calculated in full
446: %lattice QCD,''
447: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 034506.
448: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0201021].
449: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,034506;%%
450:
451: \bibitem{Arndt:2003we}
452: D.~Arndt and B.~C.~Tiburzi,
453: %``Electromagnetic properties of the baryon decuplet in quenched and
454: %partially quenched chiral perturbation theory,''
455: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 114503
456: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 059904].
457: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0308001].
458: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,114503;%%
459:
460: \bibitem{Boinepalli:2006ng}
461: S.~Boinepalli, J.~N.~Hedditch, B.~G.~Lasscock, D.~B.~Leinweber, A.~G.~Williams, J.~M.~Zanotti and J.~B.~Zhang,
462: %``Light quark electromagnetic structure of baryons,''
463: PoS {\bf LAT2006} (2006) 124.
464: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0611028].
465: %%CITATION = POSCI,LAT2006,124;%%
466:
467: \end{thebibliography}
468:
469: \end{document}
470:
471:
472: