1: %\documentclass[rnote,longauth]{aa} % for the research notes
2: \documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the research notes
3: %\documentclass[referee,longauth]{aa} % for the research notes
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{txfonts}
7:
8: %
9: % Some definitions
10: %
11: \newcommand{\sori}{S\,Ori~70}
12: \newcommand{\so}{$\sigma$~Orionis}
13: \newcommand{\mj}{$M_{\rm Jup}$}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: %\title{Photomery from 1 to 4.5\,$\mu$m of the young planetary-mass
18: % candidate S\,Ori~70}
19: \title{New constraints on the membership of the T dwarf \sori~in the \so~cluster}
20:
21: \subtitle{}
22:
23: \author{M. R. Zapatero Osorio\inst{1}
24: \and
25: V. J. S. B\'ejar\inst{1}
26: \and
27: G. Bihain\inst{1,2}
28: \and
29: E. L. Mart\'\i n\inst{1,3}
30: \and
31: R. Rebolo\inst{1,2}
32: \and
33: I. Vill\'o-P\'erez\inst{4}
34: \and
35: A. D\'\i az-S\'anchez\inst{5}
36: \and
37: A. P\'erez Garrido\inst{5}
38: \and
39: J. A. Caballero\inst{6}
40: \and
41: T. Henning\inst{6}
42: \and
43: R. Mundt\inst{6}
44: \and
45: D. Barrado y Navascu\'es\inst{7}
46: \and
47: C. A. L. Bailer-Jones\inst{6}
48: }
49:
50: \offprints{M. R. Zapatero Osorio}
51:
52: \institute{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias, E-38200 La Laguna,
53: Tenerife, Spain.\\
54: \email{mosorio@iac.es}
55: \and
56: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient\'\i ficas, Spain.
57: \and
58: University of Central Florida, Department of Physics, P.O.
59: Box 162385, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
60: \and
61: Departamento de Electr\'onica, Universidad Polit\'ecnica de
62: Cartagena, E-30202 Cartagena, Spain.
63: \and
64: Departamento de F\'\i sica Aplicada, Universidad
65: Polit\'ecnica de Cartagena, E-30202 Cartagena, Spain.
66: \and
67: Max-Planck Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17,
68: D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany. Alexander von Humboldt Fellow.
69: Now at Dept. Astrof\'\i sica, Univ. Complutense Madrid, Spain.
70: \and
71: LAEFF-INTA, P.O. 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain
72: }
73:
74: \date{Received ; accepted }
75:
76: \abstract
77: % context heading (optional)
78: {}
79: % aims heading (mandatory)
80: {The nature of \sori~(S\,Ori~J053810.1$-$023626), a faint mid-T type
81: object found towards the direction of the young \so~cluster, is still
82: under debate. We intend to disentangle whether it is a field brown
83: dwarf or a 3-Myr old planetary-mass member of the cluster.}
84: % methods heading (mandatory)
85: {We report on near-infrared $JHK_s$ and mid-infrared [3.6] and
86: [4.5] IRAC/Spitzer photometry recently obtained for \sori. The
87: new near-infrared images (taken 3.82\,yr after the discovery
88: data) have allowed us to derive the first proper motion
89: measurement for this object. }
90: % results heading (mandatory)
91: {The colors $(H-K_s)$, $(J-K_s)$ and $K_s$\,$-$\,[3.6] appear
92: discrepant when compared to T4--T7 dwarfs in the field. This
93: behavior could be ascribed to a low-gravity atmosphere or
94: alternatively to an atmosphere with a metallicity significantly
95: different than solar. The small proper motion of
96: \sori~(11.0\,$\pm$\,5.9~mas\,yr$^{-1}$) indicates that this
97: object is further away than expected if it were a single field T
98: dwarf lying in the foreground of the \so~cluster. Our measurement
99: is consistent with the proper motion of the cluster within
100: 1.5\,$\sigma$ the astrometric uncertainty. }
101: % conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary
102: {Taking into account \sori's proper motion and the new near- and
103: mid-infrared colors, a low-gravity atmosphere remains as the most
104: likely explanation to account for our observations. This supports
105: \sori's membership in \so, with an estimated mass in the interval
106: 2--7~\mj, in agreement with our previous derivation.}
107:
108: \keywords{stars: low mass, brown dwarfs -- stars: pre-main-sequence --
109: open clusters and associations: individual ($\sigma$~Orionis) }
110:
111: \maketitle
112:
113: \section{Introduction}
114: Knowledge of the initial mass function is crucial for understanding
115: the formation processes of stars, brown dwarfs and free-floating
116: planetary-mass objects. Whether and where there is a limit for the
117: creation of objects by direct collapse and fragmentation of molecular
118: clouds has become one of the major goals in the study of very young
119: populations. Planetary-mass candidates with masses in the interval
120: 3--13 Jovian masses (\mj) have been found in various star-forming
121: regions (e.g., Lucas \& Roche \cite{lucas00}; Zapatero Osorio et
122: al. \cite{osorio00}; Chauvin et al. \cite{chauvin04}; Lucas et
123: al. \cite{lucas05}; Luhman et al. \cite{luhman05}; Jayawardhana \&
124: Ivanov \cite{ray06}; Allers et al. \cite{allers06};
125: Gonz\'alez-Garc\'\i a et al. \cite{gonzalez06}; Caballero et
126: al. \cite{caballero07}). These objects are mostly free-floating but in
127: in a few cases appear as wide companions to young brown dwarfs or
128: low-mass stars.
129:
130: \sori~(S\,Ori~J053810.1$-$023626) is the coolest free-floating,
131: planetary-mass candidate so far reported in the literature. It was
132: discovered by Zapatero Osorio et al$.$ (\cite{osorio02a}) and lies in
133: the direction of the \so~cluster (352~pc and 1--8~Myr, with a best
134: estimate at 3~Myr; Perryman et al. \cite{perryman97}; Oliveira et
135: al. \cite{oliveira02}; Zapatero Osorio et al. \cite{osorio02b}; Sherry
136: et al. \cite{sherry04}). The spectral type of \sori~was determined at
137: T5.5\,$\pm$\,1.0 from molecular indices measured over near-infrared
138: $H$- and $K$-band low-resolution spectra. Mart\'\i n \& Zapatero
139: Osorio (\cite{martin03}) obtained an intermediate-resolution spectrum
140: from 1.17 to 1.37~$\mu$m ($J$-band), in which the K\,{\sc i} doublet
141: at 1.25\,$\mu$m was detected. After comparison with theoretical
142: spectra from Allard et al. (\cite{allard01}), the authors inferred an
143: effective temperature and surface gravity of $T_{\rm
144: eff}$\,=\,1100\,$^{+200}_{-100}$~K and
145: log\,$g$\,=\,3.5\,$\pm$\,0.5~cm~s$^{-2}$, in agreement with the
146: expectations for a few megayears-old T dwarf. State-of-the-art
147: evolutionary models (Chabrier \& Baraffe \cite{chabrier00}; Burrows et
148: al. \cite{burrows97}; Baraffe et al. \cite{baraffe98}) yield a mass of
149: 3\,$^{+5}_{-1}$~\mj~if \sori's very young age is finally confirmed.
150:
151: Burgasser et al. (\cite{burgasser04}), in contrast, have raised
152: doubts about the low-gravity atmosphere and true cluster
153: membership of \sori. Based on the supposed similarity of the
154: observed spectra to field T6--T7 dwarfs, these authors argued
155: that the S\,Ori object is ``an old, massive field brown dwarf
156: lying in the foreground of the \so~cluster''. However, this work
157: relied on low signal-to-noise ratio data. Better quality
158: photometry and spectra are needed to assess the true nature of
159: this candidate.
160:
161: Here we present astrometric measurements, IRAC/Spitzer data and
162: $JHK_s$ photometry for \sori. We find that this object has colors
163: unexpected for its spectral classification, which is measured in the
164: range T4.5--T7 with a best estimate at T6. We ascribe this to a low
165: gravity atmosphere, with a different metallicity being an alternative,
166: but less likely, explanation.
167:
168:
169: %
170: %
171: %
172:
173: \begin{table*}
174: \caption[]{Log of near-infrared observations of \sori.}
175: \label{obslog}
176: \centering
177: \begin{tabular}{llcccc}
178: \hline\hline
179: Telescope & Instrument & Field of view & Pixel & Observing dates & Exposure time \\
180: & & (arcmin$^2$) & (arcsec) & & (s) \\
181: \hline
182: 3.5\,m CAHA & Omega-2000 & 225 & 0.45 & 2005 Oct 22 ($JH$), 2005 Oct 25 ($K_s$) & 3600 ($J$), 6000 ($H$), 7200 ($K_s$) \\
183: 10\,m KeckII& NIRSPEC & 0.59 & 0.18 & 2005 Oct 26 ($JK'$) & 405 ($J$), 270 ($K'$) \\
184: \hline
185: \end{tabular}
186: \end{table*}
187:
188: \begin{table*}
189: \caption[]{Near-infrared (2MASS photometric system) and IRAC/Spitzer photometry of \sori.}
190: \label{phot}
191: \centering
192: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
193: \hline\hline
194: Telescope & $J$ & $H$ & $K_s$ & [3.6] & [4.5] & $H-K_s$ & $J-K_s$ \\
195: & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) & (mag) \\
196: \hline
197: 3.5 m CAHA & 19.98\,$\pm$\,0.06 & 20.07\,$\pm$\,0.07 & 19.60\,$\pm$\,0.08 & ... & ... & $+$0.48\,$\pm$\,0.11 & $+$0.38\,$\pm$\,0.10 \\
198: Keck\,II & 19.96\,$\pm$\,0.07 & ... & 19.58\,$\pm$\,0.07 & ... & ... & ... & $+$0.38\,$\pm$\,0.10 \\
199: Spitzer & ... & ... & ... & 18.62\,$\pm$\,0.30 & 17.19\,$\pm$\,0.15 & ... & ... \\
200: \hline
201: \end{tabular}
202: \end{table*}
203:
204: \section{Observations}
205: \subsection{Near-infrared photometry}
206: \sori~was observed in $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ broad-band filters with
207: prime focus wide field camera Omega-2000 (2048$\times$2048 pixels;
208: Bailer-Jones et al. \cite{bailer00}) on the 3.5~m telescope at the
209: Calar Alto (CAHA) Observatory. We also imaged \sori~with the NIRSPEC-3
210: (similar to $J$, see Fig.~\ref{filters}) and $K'$ filters and the
211: slit-viewing camera (256$\times$256 pixels) of the near-infrared
212: spectrometer NIRSPEC (McLean et al. \cite{mclean00}) on the Keck~II
213: telescope (Hawai'i). The observing log containing instrumental
214: information, dates of observations, and exposure times per filter is
215: provided in Table~\ref{obslog}. Images ($J$-band) of the T4.5 spectral
216: standard dwarf 2MASS\,J05591914$-$1404488 (J0559$-$14 from now on)
217: were collected with NIRSPEC immediately after \sori; total exposure
218: time was 27~s. During both the CAHA and Keck observations the weather
219: was photometric and the average seeing was 0\farcs8 (CAHA) and
220: 0\farcs5 (Keck) in the $K$-band. Raw data were reduced in a standard
221: fashion and included both sky subtraction, flat-fielding, and
222: combination of individual frames.
223:
224: We performed point-spread-function (PSF) photometry using
225: {\sc iraf}\footnote{IRAF is distributed by National Optical Astronomy
226: Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities
227: for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract to the National
228: Science Foundation, USA}. CAHA and Keck instrumental magnitudes were
229: transformed into observed magnitudes using between 1 and 33 2MASS
230: sources (depending on the filter) that were present within the fields
231: of view. The dispersion of the photometric zero point is $\pm$0.05~mag
232: in all bands. T dwarfs exhibit complex spectral energy distributions
233: within the near-infrared. To account for this effect and in order to
234: transform the CAHA and Keck magnitudes into the 2MASS photometric
235: system, we applied the following correction factors: $-$0.04~mag
236: ($J$), $+$0.02~mag ($H$), and $+$0.11~mag ($K_s$) for CAHA data,
237: $+$0.02~mag ($J$) and $-$0.03~mag ($K'$) for Keck data. These were
238: obtained via the integration of observed near-infrared spectra of both
239: main-sequence stars of different spectral types as well as T dwarfs
240: (Pickles \cite{pickles98}; Leggett et al. \cite{leggett02}; Geballe et
241: al. \cite{geballe02}), convolved with the Omega-2000, NIRSPEC and
242: 2MASS filter passbands and atmospheric transmission curves of the
243: observatories. All filter passbands are plotted in
244: Fig.~\ref{filters}. Corrections are expected to be larger for the $J$
245: and $K$ filters than for the $H$-band. Nevertheless, we note that
246: color corrections are similar or slightly smaller than the measured
247: photometric uncertainties. CAHA and Keck magnitudes (2MASS photometric
248: system) of \sori~are reported in Table~\ref{phot}. As a test of
249: consistency, we also calibrated the Keck $J$ magnitude of \sori~using
250: the observations of J0559$-$14 (T4.5, any color effect should be
251: minimal), deriving $J$\,=\,19.89\,$\pm$\,0.05~mag, which coincides
252: within the observed errors with the values given in
253: Table~\ref{phot}. The excellent agreement in $J$ and $K$ between the
254: CAHA and Keck data indicates that no strong sistematic errors are
255: affecting the measurements. Our data suggests that \sori~does not show
256: significant photometric variability over a few days ($\le$0.1~mag).
257:
258: \subsection{Mid-infrared photometry}
259: We derived mid-infrared photometry using public mosaic images
260: available from the Spitzer Space Telescope Data Archive, taken on 2004
261: October 9 under the Spitzer Guaranteed Time Observation program
262: \#37. Hern\'andez et al. (\cite{hernandez07}) provides information on
263: data aquisition, exposure times, and data reduction. We downloaded
264: mosaic images in the four channels (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~$\mu$m) of
265: the IRAC instrument (Fazio et al. \cite{fazio04}) using the Leopard
266: software. \sori~is only detected in the [3.6] and [4.5] bands with
267: signal-to-noise ratios of 9 and 16 in the peak flux. We performed
268: aperture photometry on various single, bright sources near \sori~using
269: $daophot$ in {\sc iraf}, with an aperture radius of 12\arcsec~and a
270: background annulus extending from 12 to 24\arcsec. For the [3.6] and
271: [4.5] bands we adopted {\sl daophot} zero point magnitudes of 17.30
272: and 16.82, respectively, as described at
273: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/archanaly/quick.phot. We derived the
274: PSF from the brighter sources and applied this to determine PSF
275: photometry for \sori. Results are reported in Table~\ref{phot}.
276:
277: \subsection{Proper motion}
278: We determined the proper motion of \sori~via the comparison of its
279: position with respect to four common point-like sources in various
280: near-infrared images obtained at different epochs. As a starting point
281: for the astrometric analysis, we used the $K_s$-band frame shown in
282: Fig.~1 of Zapatero Osorio et al. (\cite{osorio02a}), which was
283: obtained on 2001 December 29 with the Keck I telescope and has an
284: average seeing of 0\farcs8 and a field of view of
285: 32\arcsec$\times$32\arcsec. The angular resolution was
286: 0\farcs15~pix$^{-1}$. The three recent CAHA $JHK_s$ images and the
287: Keck $J$ and $K'$ frames reported here act as the second epoch
288: astrometric data. Hence, the time interval spanned by the available
289: observations is 3.82~yr. Our proper motion measurements are shown in
290: Table~\ref{pm} using the CAHA and Keck data separately as well as the
291: combined result. The associated uncertainty is derived from the
292: dispersion of the four reference stars around null motion and the
293: dispersion of the proper motion measurements obtained for \sori~using
294: the various images ($JHK_sK'$) available per epoch.
295:
296: \begin{table}
297: \caption[]{Proper motion of \sori.}
298: \label{pm}
299: \centering
300: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
301: \hline\hline
302: Telescope & $\mu_{\alpha} \rm{cos}\delta $ & $\mu_\delta$ \\
303: & (mas~yr$^{-1}$) & (mas~yr$^{-1}$)\\
304: \hline
305: 3.5 m CAHA & $+$9.9\,$\pm$\,2.6 & $+$6.0\,$\pm$\,5.6 \\
306: Keck\,II & $+$9.8\,$\pm$\,4.2 & $+$3.7\,$\pm$\,4.2 \\
307: Average & $+$9.8\,$\pm$\,3.4 & $+$5.0\,$\pm$\,4.9 \\
308: \hline
309: \end{tabular}
310: \end{table}
311:
312: %
313: %
314: %
315:
316: \begin{figure*}
317: \centering
318: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{1aanda_2.ps}~~
319: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{2aanda_2.ps}~~
320: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{3aanda_2.ps}
321: \caption{Color-color diagrams of \sori~(solid circle) and field
322: T-dwarfs (open circles). For clarity, only the error bars of \sori~are
323: plotted. In the left and middle panels, the sequence defined by the
324: field brown dwarfs is displayed with a solid line. Spectral types are
325: indicated. The right panel shows the solar-metallicity models by Tsuji
326: et al. (\cite{tsuji04}) superimposed onto the data. Gravities of
327: log\,$g$\,=\,3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.5 cm\,s$^{-2}$ are depicted
328: with solid lines. The triangles along each model curve are in $T_{\rm
329: eff}$ invervals of 100\,K, ranging from 700 (bottom) to 1500\,K
330: (log\,$g$\,=\,3.0), 1400\,K (log\,$g$\,=\,3.5), 1600\,K
331: (log\,$g$\,=\,4.0 and 4.5), and 1700\,K (log\,$g$\,=\,5.5). The
332: log\,$g$\,=\,5.0 track is not plotted for clarity. The dotted line
333: connects the $T_{\rm eff}$\,=\,1100\,K points in each model.}
334: \label{colcol}
335: \end{figure*}
336:
337:
338: \section{Discussion}
339: The low proper motion of
340: \sori~($\mu$\,=\,11.0\,$\pm$\,5.9~mas~yr$^{-1}$) makes it unlikely
341: that it is a nearby ($\le$30~pc) T dwarf. On the one hand, we compared
342: our measurement with the motion of 192 Hipparcos stars (Perryman et
343: al. \cite{perryman97}) within a radius of $15^\circ$ around \so~and at
344: a distance between 80 and 130~pc, which is the distance interval
345: expected for \sori~if it were a field, single T6 dwarf. About
346: 70\%~of the Hipparcos stars show larger motion than \sori, suggesting
347: that the S\,Ori object is located farther away. On the other hand, our
348: measurement is consistent (within 1.5~$\sigma$) with the proper motion
349: of the O9.5V--B0.5V-type star \so~AB, which is the most massive member
350: of the cluster of the same name. We note, however, that the relative
351: motion of the Orion OB association is directed away from the Sun (de
352: Zeeuw et al. \cite{zeeuw99}). This makes it very hard to detect
353: cluster members via proper motion analysis. On the contrary, radial
354: velocity studies can be more discriminant (Jeffries et
355: al. \cite{jeffries06}) but the extreme faintness of \sori~prevents any
356: accurate radial velocity measurement with current instrumentation.
357:
358: \subsection{Color-color diagrams}
359:
360: Color-color diagrams are depicted in Fig.~\ref{colcol}. To put
361: \sori~into context, we included $JHK_s$ data of more than 100 field
362: T-dwarfs and IRAC/Spitzer photometry of 36 field T-dwarfs compiled
363: from the literature (Knapp et al. \cite{knapp04}; Tinney et
364: al. \cite{tinney05}; Patten et al. \cite{patten06}; Burgasser et
365: al. \cite{burgasser06a}; Artigau et al. \cite{artigau06}; Mugrauer et
366: al. \cite{mugrauer06}; Leggett et al. \cite{leggett99},
367: \cite{leggett02}, \cite{leggett07}; Liu et al. \cite{liu07}; Luhman et
368: al. \cite{luhman07}; Looper et al. \cite{looper07}). All near-infrared
369: colors were conveniently transformed into the 2MASS photometric system
370: using equations quoted in Stephens \& Leggett (\cite{stephens04}),
371: which are appropriate for ultracool dwarfs.
372:
373: The location of \sori~in Fig.~\ref{colcol} is challenging since this
374: object appears as an outlier, particularly when the $K$-band magnitude
375: is involved. Two field dwarfs lie near it in the near-infrared
376: color-color panels: 2MASS\,J00501994$-$3322402 (Tinney et
377: al. \cite{tinney05}), whose photometric errors are quite large, and
378: 2MASS\,J13243559$+$6358284 (Looper et al. \cite{looper07}). The latter
379: object is widely discussed by Looper et al. (\cite{looper07}) in terms
380: of binarity and low-gravity atmosphere. We applied the criterion
381: defined by Covey et al. (\cite{covey07}, eq.~2) to distinguish objects
382: with photometric properties deviating from the properties typical of
383: field dwarfs and found that \sori~lies more than 2\,$\sigma$ away from
384: the near-infrared sequence defined by the field T-type brown
385: dwarfs. In the mid-infrared wavelengths, the photometry of
386: \sori~deviates from the field on a 1--2\,$\sigma$ level. Covey et
387: al.'s equation takes into account the color uncertainties of \sori~and
388: the width of the field distribution.
389:
390: As compared to T4--T7 field dwarfs, \sori~presents redder $(H-K_s)$,
391: $(J-K_s)$, and [3.6]\,$-$\,[4.5] colors and a bluer $K_s$\,$-$\,[3.6]
392: index than expected for its spectral type ($\sim$T6). However,
393: the $(J-H)$ index is similar to that of T5--T6 field dwarfs. The
394: $K$-band reddish nature of \sori~is also apparent in its
395: low-resolution $HK$ spectrum. Fig.~4 of Burgasser et
396: al. (\cite{burgasser04}) shows these data along with the spectrum of
397: the field T6.5 2MASS\,J10475385$+$2124234. Both spectra were obtained
398: with similar instrumentation and are normalized to unity at
399: 1.57~$\mu$m. While the field dwarf matches reasonably well the
400: $H$-band region of \sori, it underestimates the flux at $K$-band,
401: supporting the redder $(H-K_s)$ index of \sori. Burgasser et
402: al. (\cite{burgasser04}) argued that this may be indicative of a
403: ``lower surface gravity for \sori~relative to
404: 2MASS\,J10475385$+$2124234''.
405:
406: Multiplicity cannot explain the observed photometric properties of
407: \sori. We artificially produced near-infrared colors of L--T and T--T
408: pairs using the absolute magnitudes provided by Liu et
409: al. (\cite{liu06}). None of the combinations were able to reproduce
410: our observations.
411:
412: The comparison of our data to theory is shown in the right panel of
413: Fig.~\ref{colcol}. The models depicted are those of Tsuji et
414: al. (\cite{tsuji04}), but in our analysis we also employed cloudless
415: models by Marley et al. (\cite{marley02}) and Burrows et
416: al. (\cite{burrows06}) obtaining similar results. The agreement
417: between the models and the field dwarf observations is reasonably
418: good. The great majority of the mid- and late-T dwarfs lie within the
419: log\,$g$\,=\,4.0 and 5.5~dex tracks, as expected for ``old'' dwarfs in
420: the solar neighborhood. This is also consistent with the recent
421: results of the spectral fitting work by Burgasser et
422: al. (\cite{burgasser06b}). These authors employed models by Burrows et
423: al. (\cite{burrows06}).
424:
425: The near-infrared photometry of \sori~and current state-of-the-art
426: theory of ultracool dwarfs indicate that this object may have a
427: lower-gravity atmosphere than similarly classified T dwarfs in the
428: solar vicinity. Because of the different pressure and density
429: conditions at which H$_2$, CH$_4$, and CO absorptions are produced,
430: low-gravity objects tend to be brighter at $K$ and redder in all
431: near-infrared and [3.6]\,$-$\,[4.5] colors than comparable
432: high-gravity objects (see discussions and Figures in Knapp et
433: al. \cite{knapp04}; Patten et al. \cite{patten06}; Leggett et
434: al. \cite{leggett07}; Liebert \& Burgasser \cite{liebert07}). This is
435: what we qualitatively observe in \sori.
436:
437: From the right panel of Fig.~\ref{colcol} and using the
438: solar-metallicity models by Tsuji et al. (\cite{tsuji04}), we derive
439: log\,$g$\,$\sim$\,3.0 dex and $T_{\rm
440: eff}$\,$\sim$\,1000--1100~K. This is consistent with previous results
441: obtained from the spectral fitting analysis of low- and
442: intermediate-resolution near-infrared spectra: $T_{\rm
443: eff}$\,$\sim$\,800$^{+200}_{-100}$ K and
444: log\,$g$\,$\sim$\,4.0\,$\pm$\,1.0 dex (Zapatero Osorio et
445: al. \cite{osorio02a}), $T_{\rm eff}$\,$\sim$\,1100$^{+200}_{-100}$ K
446: and log\,$g$\,$\sim$\,3.5\,$\pm$0.5 dex (Mart\'\i n \& Zapatero Osorio
447: \cite{martin03}), respectively. These authors compared observations to
448: theoretical data computed by Allard et
449: al. (\cite{allard01}). Recently, Liu et al. (\cite{liu07}) have
450: quantified the sensitivity of near-infrared spectra with $T_{\rm
451: eff}$\,$\sim$\,700--900~K to changes in metallicity and surface
452: gravity using a different grid of synthetic spectra by Burrows et
453: al. (\cite{burrows06}). \sori~is brighter at $K$ relative to $J$ or
454: $H$ by a factor of $\sim$1.4. Table~5 and Fig.~4 of Liu et
455: al. (\cite{liu07}) suggest that log\,$g$ is thus lower than the field
456: by about 1.0\,dex, in agreement with previous determinations. We
457: caution that current state-of-the-art synthetic spectra do not provide
458: detailed fits to the observed data (e.g., Burrows et
459: al. \cite{burrows06}). Therefore, any quantitative result derived from
460: the direct comparison of observations to models awaits further
461: confirmation. On the contrary, for a given temperature qualitative
462: predictions on the atmospheric relative behavior as a function of
463: gravity and metal content can be more reliable.
464:
465: Metallicity might also be an issue. The \so~cluster has solar
466: abundance ([Fe/H]\,=\,0.0\,$\pm$\,0.1~dex; Caballero
467: \cite{caballero06}); we do not expect any metallicity effect when
468: comparing cluster members to the field. From theoretical
469: considerations, the effects of increasing abundance and decreasing
470: gravity on the near-infrared spectra of cool T dwarfs are
471: similar. From Fig.~20 of Burrows et al. (\cite{burrows06}), which
472: shows $(J-K)$ against $T_{\rm eff}$ for various gravities and metal
473: abundances, we infer a metallicity of [Fe/H]\,$\sim$\,$+$0.5 dex for
474: \sori~if its reddish effect was all due to metallicity. A similar rich
475: metal content is obtained from Liu et
476: al. (\cite{liu07}). Nevertheless, the super-solar metallicity
477: explanation, although possible, seems unlikely. On the one hand, the
478: metallicity distribution of F, G, and K dwarf stars in the solar
479: neighborhood peaks at around [Fe/H]\,=\,0.0 dex and roughly extends up
480: to $+$0.5~dex; less than $\sim$10\%~of the stars are more metal-rich
481: than $+$0.3 dex (Valenti et al. \cite{valenti05}; Santos et
482: al. \cite{santos05}; Boone et al. \cite{boone06}). On the other hand,
483: the IRAC/Spitzer data of the S\,Ori object do not support the high
484: metallicity case. Burgasser et al. (\cite{burgasser06b}) and Liebert
485: \& Burgasser (\cite{liebert07}) have demonstrated
486: 2MASS\,J12373919$+$6526148 (T6.5) and 2MASS J09373487$+$2931409 (T6p)
487: to be old, high surface gravity brown dwarfs with sub-solar
488: abundance. These field dwarfs display [3.6]\,$-$\,[4.5] colors
489: slightly redder (by 0.15\,mag) than expected for their assigned
490: spectral types. In contrast to what could be inferred from the
491: near-infrared colors, this would indicate that \sori~is a low
492: metallicity T dwarf. Thus, a low-gravity atmosphere remains as the
493: most likely explanation to account for the observed photometry of
494: \sori.
495:
496: \begin{figure*}
497: \centering
498: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{4aanda.ps}~~~
499: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{5aanda.ps}
500: \caption{Color-magnitude diagram of \so~low mass members. \sori~is
501: labeled. The 3-Myr isochrone by Chabrier \& Baraffe
502: (\cite{chabrier00}) is overplotted onto the data as a solid line in
503: the left panel (see text for $T_{\rm eff}$, log\,$L/L_\odot$
504: conversion into observables). The right panel shows the sequence of
505: M5.5--T8 field dwarfs at the distance of the cluster (solid line,
506: spectral types are indicated). The dotted line stands for the field
507: sequence shifted by $-$1.8 mag in the $J$-band to match the
508: photometric trend delineated by \so~members. Objects with
509: $J$\,$-$\,[3.6] colors significantly redder than the cluster sequence
510: show infrared flux excesses likely due to circum(sub)stellar disks
511: (Caballero et al. \cite{caballero07}).}
512: \label{colmag}
513: \end{figure*}
514:
515: No obvious infrared flux excesses are detectable in the IRAC/Spitzer
516: [3.6] and [4.5] bands, suggesting that there is no envelope or disk
517: around \sori~emitting intensively at these wavelengths. A possitive
518: detection would have provided strong evidence for its youth. However,
519: we remark that disks around young, low-mass brown dwarfs (close to the
520: deuterium burning mass limit) are seen at wavelengths longer than
521: 5\,$\mu$m (Luhman et al. \cite{luhman05}; Caballero et
522: al. \cite{caballero07}; Zapatero Osorio et al. \cite{osorio07}), while
523: the observed fluxes in the near-infrared up to 5\,$\mu$m are
524: photospheric in origin. The public [5.8]- and [8.0]-band IRAC/Spitzer
525: images are not conclusive for \sori.
526:
527: \subsection{Color-magnitude diagram}
528:
529: The photometric sequence of \so~substellar members, including \sori,
530: is shown in the $J$ vs $J$\,$-$\,[3.6] color-magnitude diagram of
531: Fig.~\ref{colmag} (Caballero et al. \cite{caballero07}; Zapatero
532: Osorio et al. \cite{osorio07}). This sequence follows a relatively
533: smooth progression with increasing color down to $J$\,$\sim$20 and
534: $J$\,$-$\,[3.6]\,=\,2.8~mag. The location of \sori~suggests that the
535: $J$\,$-$\,[3.6] index suddenly turns toward bluer values at a nearly
536: unchanged $J$ magnitude. A similar turnover (ocurring at spectral
537: types L7--L8, 1400--1300~K) is also observed in field ultracool
538: dwarfs. The field sequence of objects with spectral types M5.5--T8
539: moved to the distance of the \so~cluster is displayed in the right
540: panel of Fig.~\ref{colmag} (absolute magnitudes and colors are adopted
541: from Patten et al. \cite{patten06}, and references therein). Because
542: of their very young age, \so~low-mass stars and substellar objects are
543: in the phase of gravitational contraction (e.g., Chabrier \& Baraffe
544: \cite{chabrier00}). Cluster members thus show larger size and
545: luminosity than their older counterparts of related colors in the
546: field. As seen in Fig.~\ref{colmag}, the average cluster photometric
547: sequence appears brighter than the field by about 1.8~mag in the
548: $J$-band. The dotted line in Fig.~\ref{colmag} (right panel)
549: represents the field sequence normalized to the \so~locus of late-M
550: and early-L cluster members. \sori~nicely sits on the location
551: expected for \so~T-type members.
552:
553: We have also compared our data to the {\sc cond} and {\sc dusty} solar
554: metallicity evolutionary models by Chabrier \& Baraffe
555: (\cite{chabrier00}). For the age range 1--8\,Myr, substellar objects
556: with $T_{\rm eff}$ between 700 and 1300~K, corresponding to the mass
557: interval $\sim$1--6\,\mj, show log\,$g$\,=\,3.0--4.0 dex, which
558: coincides within the large error bar with the surface gravity
559: estimation for \sori.
560:
561: The 3-Myr isochrone (Chabrier \& Baraffe \cite{chabrier00}) is
562: displayed along the photometric sequence of \so~in the left panel of
563: Fig.~\ref{colmag}. Theoretical surface temperatures and luminosities
564: were converted into observed magnitudes and colors using the
565: color-temperature-spectral type and spectral type-bolometric
566: correction relationships given in the literature (Dahn et
567: al. \cite{dahn02}; Vrba et al. \cite{vrba04}; Knapp et
568: al. \cite{knapp04}; Patten et al. \cite{patten06}). The model
569: convincingly reproduces the cluster low mass sequence except for the
570: fact that \sori~appears overluminous by about 1~mag, which might
571: suggest binarity. This was also discussed in Zapatero Osorio et
572: al. (\cite{osorio02a}). However, there are issues that prevent us from
573: concluding whether this object is double or whether models make wrong
574: predictions for the smallest masses and young ages: {\sl (i)} as seen
575: from the field sequence (Fig.~\ref{colmag}, right panel), there is a
576: $J$-band brightening across the color turnover that theory fails to
577: reproduce (Vrba et al. \cite{vrba04}; Knapp et
578: al. \cite{knapp04}). {\sl (ii)} The blue color turnover takes place at
579: a roughly constant temperature in the field ($\sim$1300--1400~K), and
580: all color-temperature-bolometric correction transformations show a
581: sharp change at this point; on the contrary, the evolutionary models
582: available to us do not have a complete temperature sampling (this may
583: explain the abrupt color reversal at the bottom of the isochrone in
584: Fig.~\ref{colmag}). {\sl (iii)} The relations used to transform
585: theoretical predictions into observables are obtained for high-gravity
586: field objects. It is now known that gravity impacts significantly the
587: near- and mid-infrared colors of T dwarfs (Leggett et
588: al. \cite{leggett07}; Burrows et al. \cite{burrows06}), whereas the
589: colors of the warmer M and L types are not so sensitive to the gravity
590: parameter. Transformations are thus expected to be gravity-dependent
591: for the coolest temperatures. It becomes necessary to find a physical
592: explanation for the $J$ brightening feature and to discover more
593: \so~T-type, planetary-mass members for a proper comparison with
594: evolutionary tracks.
595:
596: \section{Final remarks}
597: New near-infrared and Spitzer photometric data of
598: \sori~(T6\,$\pm$\,1.0) provide evidence that this object is young. Its
599: colors qualitatively follow the trend predicted for low gravity
600: atmospheres by state-of-the-art models. Its very low proper motion is
601: consistent with membership in the \so~cluster. The mass of \sori~is
602: then estimated from substellar evolutionary models to be within the
603: planetary regime in the range 2--7~\mj~(Zapatero Osorio et
604: al. \cite{osorio02a}; Mart\'\i n \& Zapatero Osorio
605: \cite{martin03}). This mass interval takes into account the object's
606: luminosity uncertainty and the most recent cluster age determination
607: (1--7~Myr; Sherry et al. \cite{sherry04}; Jeffries et
608: al. \cite{jeffries06}). The existence of such low-mass objects in
609: isolation at ages below 10~Myr is a challenging and interesting issue
610: for the theory of formation of stars, brown dwarfs and planets.
611:
612: \begin{acknowledgements}
613: We are indebted to T. Tsuji and M. Marley for providing us
614: computer-ready files of their models. We also thank Sandy Leggett
615: (referee) for useful comments that helped us improve this work. Based
616: on observations collected at the Centro Astron\'omico Hispano Alem\'an
617: (CAHA) at Calar Alto, operated jointly by the Max-Planck Institut
618: f\"ur Astronomie and the Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Andaluc\'\i a
619: (CSIC). Some data were also obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory,
620: which is operated as a scientific partnership between the California
621: Institute of Technology, the University of California, and NASA. The
622: Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the
623: W. M. Keck Foundation. We thank the Keck observing assistants and the
624: staff in Waimea for their kind support. The authors extend special
625: thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are
626: privileged to be guests. This research has made use of data products
627: from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the
628: University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
629: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National
630: Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science
631: Foundation. This work is based in part on archival data obtained with
632: the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
633: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with
634: NASA. Support for this work was provided by an award issued by
635: JPL/Caltech. Partial financial support was provided by the Spanish
636: projects AYA2003-05355 and AYA2006-12612.
637: \end{acknowledgements}
638:
639:
640:
641:
642:
643: \begin{thebibliography}{}
644:
645: \bibitem[2001]{allard01}
646: Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., \&
647: Schweitzer, A. 2001, ApJ, 556, 357
648: \bibitem[2006]{allers06}
649: Allers, K. N., Kessler-Silacci, J. E., Cieza, L. A., \& Jaffe, D. T.
650: 2006, ApJ, 644, 364
651: \bibitem[2006]{artigau06}
652: Artigau, E., Doyon, R., Lafreni\`ere, D., Nadeau, D., Robert, J.,
653: \& Albert, L. 2006, ApJ, 651, L57
654: \bibitem[2000]{bailer00}
655: Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Bizenberger, P., \& Storz, C. 2000, Proc.
656: SPIE, 4008, 1305
657: \bibitem[1998]{baraffe98}
658: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998,
659: A\&A, 337, 403
660: \bibitem[2006]{boone06}
661: Boone, R. H., King, J. R., \& Soderblom, D. R. 2006, New A. Rev., 50, 526
662: \bibitem[2004]{burgasser04}
663: Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. A., McGovern, M. R., McLean, I. S.,
664: Prato, L., \& Reid, I. N. 2004, ApJ, 604, 827
665: \bibitem[2006a]{burgasser06a}
666: Burgasser, A. J., Geballe, T. R., Leggett, S. K., Kirkpatrick, J. D., \&
667: Golimowski, D. A. 2006a, ApJ, 637, 1067
668: \bibitem[2006b]{burgasser06b}
669: Burgasser, A. J., Burrows, A., \& Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2006b, ApJ, 639, 1095
670: \bibitem[1997]{burrows97}
671: Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. L., Guillot, T.,
672: Saumon, D., Freedman, R., Sudarsky, D., \& Sharp, C. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856
673: \bibitem[2006]{burrows06}
674: Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., \& Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1063
675: \bibitem[2006]{caballero06}
676: Caballero, J. A. 2006, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. La Laguna (Tenerife, Spain)
677: \bibitem[2007]{caballero07}
678: Caballero, J. A., et al. 2007, A\&A, 470, 903
679: %\bibitem[2007]{casewell07}
680: % Casewell, S. L., Dobbie, P. D., Hodgkin, S. T., Moraux, E., Jameson,
681: % R. F., Hambly, N. C., Irwin, J., \& Lodieu, N. 2007, MNRAS, in press
682: \bibitem[2000]{chabrier00}
683: Chabrier, G., \& Baraffe, I. 2000, ARA\&A, 38, 337
684: \bibitem[2004]{chauvin04}
685: Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M, Dumas,C., Zuckerman, B., Mouillet, D.,
686: Song, I., Beuzit, J.-L., \& Lowrance, P. 2004, A\&A, 425, L29
687: \bibitem[2005]{chauvin05}
688: Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M, Dumas,C., Zuckerman, B., Mouillet, D.,
689: Song, I., Beuzit, J.-L., \& Lowrance, P. 2005, A\&A, 438, L25
690: \bibitem[2007]{covey07}
691: Covey, K. R., Ivezi\'c, Z., Schlegel, D., et al. 2007, ApJ, in press
692: \bibitem[2002]{dahn02}
693: Dahn, C. C., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 1170
694: \bibitem[1999]{zeeuw99}
695: de Zeeuw, P. T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., \&
696: Blaauw, A. 1999, AJ, 117, 354
697: \bibitem[2004]{fazio04}
698: Fazio G. G., Hora, J. L., Allen, L. E., et al. 2004, ApJ Suppl., 154, 10
699: \bibitem[2002]{geballe02}
700: Geballe, T. R., Knapp, G. R., Leggett, S. K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, 466
701: \bibitem[2006]{gonzalez06}
702: Gonz\'alez-Garc\'\i a, B. M., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B\'ejar,
703: V. J. S., Bihain, G., Barrado y Navasdcu\'es, D., Caballero, J. A.,
704: \& Morales-Calder\'on, M. 2006, A\&A, 460, 799
705: \bibitem[2007]{hernandez07}
706: Hern\'andez, J., Hartmann, L., Megeath, T., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, 1067
707: \bibitem[2006]{ray06}
708: Jayawardhana, R., \& Ivanov, V. D. 2006, Science, 313, 1279
709: \bibitem[2006]{jeffries06}
710: Jeffries, R. D., Maxted, P. F. L., Oliveira, J. M., \& Naylor, T.
711: 2006, MNRAS, 371, L6
712: \bibitem[2004]{knapp04}
713: Knapp, G., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 3553
714: \bibitem[1999]{leggett99}
715: Leggett, S. K., Toomey, D. W., Geballe, T. R., \& Brown, R. H. 1999, ApJ,
716: 517, L139
717: \bibitem[2002]{leggett02}
718: Leggett, S. K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, 452
719: \bibitem[2007]{leggett07}
720: Leggett, S. K., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Geballe, T. R., \& Fan, X.
721: 2007, ApJ, 655, 1079
722: \bibitem[2007]{liebert07}
723: Liebert, J., \& Burgasser, A. J. 2007, Apj, 655, 522
724: \bibitem[2006]{liu06}
725: Liu, M. C., Leggett, S. K., Golimowski, D. A., Chiu, K., Fan, X., Geballe,
726: T. R., Schneider, D. P., \& Brinkmann, J. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1393
727: \bibitem[2007]{liu07}
728: Liu, M. C., Leggett, S. K., \& Chiu, K. 2007, ApJ, 1507
729: \bibitem[2007]{looper07}
730: Looper, D. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., \& Burgasser, A. J. 2007, AJ, 134, 1162
731: \bibitem[2000]{lucas00}
732: Lucas, P. W., \& Roche, P. F. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 858
733: \bibitem[2005]{lucas05}
734: Lucas, P. W., Roche, P. F., \& Tamura, M. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 211
735: \bibitem[2005]{luhman05}
736: Luhman, K. L., Adame, L., D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L.,
737: Megeath, S. T., \& Fazio, G. G. 2005, ApJ, 635, L93
738: \bibitem[2007]{luhman07}
739: Luhman, K. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 570
740: \bibitem[2002]{marley02}
741: Marley, M. S., Seager, S., Saumon, D., Lodders, K., Ackerman, A. S.,
742: Freedman, R., \& Fan, X. 2002, ApJ, 568, 335
743: \bibitem[2000]{mclean00}
744: McLean, I. S., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, L45
745: \bibitem[2003]{martin03}
746: Mart\'\i n, E. L., \& Zapatero Osorio, M. R. 2003, ApJ, 593, L113
747: \bibitem[2006]{mugrauer06}
748: Mugrauer, M., Seifahrt, A., Neuh\"auser, R., \& Mazeh T. 2006, MNRAS,
749: 373, L31
750: \bibitem[2002]{oliveira02}
751: Oliveira, J. M., Jeffries, R. D., Kenyon, M. J., Thompson, S. A., \& Naylor,
752: T. 2002, A\&A, 382, L22
753: \bibitem[2006]{patten06}
754: Patten, B. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 502
755: \bibitem[1997]{perryman97}
756: Perryman, M. A. C., et al. 1997, A\&A, 323, L49
757: \bibitem[1998]{pickles98}
758: Pickles, A. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 863
759: \bibitem[2005]{santos05}
760: Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., Bento, J. P., Almeida, P. C.,
761: Sousa, S. G., Ecuvillon, A. 2005, A\&A, 437, 1127
762: \bibitem[2004]{sherry04}
763: Sherry, W. H., Walter, F. M., \& Wolk, S. J. 2004, AJ, 128, 2316
764: \bibitem[2004]{stephens04}
765: Stephens, D. C., \& Leggett, S. K. 2004, PASP, 116, 9
766: \bibitem[2005]{tinney05}
767: Tinney, C. G., Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., \& McElwain, M. W.
768: 2005, AJ, 130, 2326
769: \bibitem[2004]{tsuji04}
770: Tsuji, T., Nakajima, T., \& Yanagisawa, K. 2004, ApJ, 607, 511
771: \bibitem[2005]{valenti05}
772: Valenti, J. A., \& Fischer, D. A. 2005, ApJ Suppl., 159, 141
773: \bibitem[2004]{vrba04}
774: Vrba, F. J., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 2948
775: \bibitem[2000]{osorio00}
776: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B\'ejar, V. J. S., Mart\'\i n, E. L., Rebolo,
777: R., Barrado y Navascu\'es, D., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., \& Mundt, R. 2000,
778: Science, 290, 103
779: \bibitem[2002a]{osorio02a}
780: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B\'ejar, V. J. S., Mart\'\i n, E. L., Rebolo,
781: R., Barrado y Navascu\'es, D., Mundt, R., Eisl\"offel, J., \& Caballero,
782: J. A. 2002a, ApJ, 578, 536 (Paper~I)
783: \bibitem[2002b]{osorio02b}
784: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B\'ejar, V. J. S., Pavlenko, Ya., Rebolo, R.,
785: Allende Prieto, C., Mart\'\i n, E. L., \& Garc\'\i a L\'opez, R. 2002b,
786: A\&A, 384, 937
787: \bibitem[2007]{osorio07}
788: Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Caballero, J. A., B\'ejar, V. J. S., et al.
789: 2007, A\&A, 472, L9
790: \end{thebibliography}
791:
792: \newpage
793:
794: \begin{appendix} %First online appendix
795:
796: \section {Filter passbands}
797:
798: \begin{figure*}
799: \centering
800: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{j.ps}~~
801: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{h.ps}~~
802: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm]{k.ps}
803: \caption{Passbands of the $J$ (left), $H$ (middle), and $K$ (right) filters used in this work convolved with the observatories atmospheric transmission curves. Labels correspond to the NIRSPEC (Keck) and Omega-2000 (CAHA 3.5-m) instruments, and 2MASS filters. Data have been taken from the observatories web pages. The Omega-2000 filter passbands were convolved with the 2MASS atmospheric transmission curve because the latter information is not available on the CAHA web site.}
804: \label{filters}
805: \end{figure*}
806:
807: \end{appendix}
808:
809:
810:
811: \end{document}
812:
813:
814:
815:
816:
817: