1: %\documentclass[12pt,aasms4,aastexug]{aastex}

2: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4]{article}

3: %\documentstyle[aas2pp4]{article}

4: %\documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}

5: 

6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

7: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{emulateapj}

8: %\usepackage{apjfonts}

9: %\usepackage{rotating}

10: 

11: \def\msun{\rm M_{\sun}}

12: \def\rsun{\rm R_{\sun}}

13: \def\lsun{\rm L_{\sun}}

14: \def\micron{$\mu$m}

15: \def\microns{$\mu$m}

16: \def\mdot{\rm \dot{M}}

17: 

18: \begin{document}

19: 

20: \shortauthors{Espaillat et al.}

21: \shorttitle{UX Tau A \& LkCa 15}

22: 

23: \title{On the Diversity of the Taurus Transitional Disks: UX Tau A \& Lk Ca 15}

24: 

25: \author{C. Espaillat\altaffilmark{1}, N. Calvet\altaffilmark{1}, P.

26: D'Alessio\altaffilmark{2}, J. Hern\'{a}ndez\altaffilmark{1,3}, C.

27: Qi\altaffilmark{4}, L. Hartmann\altaffilmark{1}, E. Furlan\altaffilmark{5,6}, \&

28: D. M. Watson\altaffilmark{7}}

29: 

30: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison

31: Building, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; ccespa@umich.edu, ncalvet@umich.edu, hernandj@umich.edu, lhartm@umich.edu}

32: \altaffiltext{2}{Centro de Radioastronom\'{i}a y Astrof\'{i}sica, Universidad

33: Nacional Aut\'{o}noma de M\'{e}xico, 58089 Morelia, Michoac\'{a}n, M\'{e}xico; p.dalessio@astrosmo.unam.mx}

34: \altaffiltext{3}{Centro de Investigaciones de Astronomia, Merida 5101$-$A,

35: Venezuela}

36: \altaffiltext{4}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,

37: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; cqi@cfa.harvard.edu}

38: \altaffiltext{5}{NASA Astrobiology Institute, and Department of Physics and

39: Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; furlan@astro.ucla.edu}

40: \altaffiltext{6}{NASA Postdoctoral Fellow}

41: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester,

42: NY 14627-0171, USA; dmw@astro.pas.rochester.edu}

43: 

44: 

45: 

46: \begin{abstract}

47: 

48: The recently recognized class of ``transitional disk" systems consists

49: of young stars

50: with optically-thick outer disks but inner disks which are mostly

51: devoid of small dust.

52: Here we introduce a further class of ``pre-transitional disks" with significant

53: near-infrared excesses which indicate the presence of an optically thick

54: inner disk separated from an optically thick outer disk; thus,

55: the spectral energy distributions of pre-transitional disks suggest the

56: incipient

57: development

58: of disk gaps rather than inner holes.

59: In UX Tau A, our analysis of the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum finds that the

60: near-infrared excess is produced by an inner optically thick disk and a gap of

61: $\sim$56 AU is present.

62: The {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum of LkCa 15 is suggestive of a gap of $\sim$46 AU,

63: confirming previous millimeter imaging.  

64: In addition, UX Tau A contains crystalline silicates in its disk

65: at

66: radii $\gtrsim$ 56 AU which

67: poses a challenge to our understanding of the production of this

68: crystalline material. 

69: In contrast, LkCa 15's silicates are amorphous and pristine.  

70: UX Tau A and LkCa 15 increase our knowledge of the diversity of dust clearing 

71: in low-mass star formation. 

72: 

73: 

74: 

75: 

76: 

77: \end{abstract}

78: 

79: \keywords{accretion disks, stars: circumstellar matter, stars: formation, stars:

80: pre-main sequence}

81: 

82: \section{Introduction}

83: 

84: Previous studies have revealed stars with 

85: %inner holes in their 

86: inner disks that are

87: mostly devoid of small dust, and these ``transitional disks" have been proposed as the 

88: bridge 

89: %the evolutionary gap 

90: between Class II objects, young stars surrounded by

91: full disks accreting material onto the central star, and Class III objects,

92: stars where the protoplanetary disk is mostly dissipated and accretion has

93: stopped (e.g. Strom et al. 1989, Skrutskie et al. 1990; Stassun et al. 2001).  

94: 

95: %The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of transitional disks are identified by

96: %a significant deficit of flux in the near-infrared and a substantial infrared

97: %excess in the mid- and far-infrared, prompting searches for these disks in the

98: %infrared wavelength region (e.g. Stassun et al. 2001).  

99: 

100: New spectra 

101: %and images

102: from the {\it Spitzer Space

103: Telescope} which greatly improve our resolution in the infrared have 

104: been used to define the class of ``transitional disks" as those

105: with spectral energy distributions (SEDs) characterized by 

106: a significant deficit of flux in the near-infrared relative to optically

107: thick full disks, and a substantial infrared

108: excess in the mid- and far-infrared.

109: Extensive modeling studies of several transitional disks around T Tauri

110: stars \citep{dalessio05, uchida04, calvet05, espaillat07} and F-G stars

111: \citep{brown07} have been presented.

112: %recently

113: %provoked extensive modeling studies of several transitional disks around T Tauri

114: %stars \citep{dalessio05, uchida04, calvet05, espaillat07} and F-G stars

115: %\citep{brown07}.  

116: In particular, the SEDs of

117: the transitional disks of the T Tauri stars (TTS) CoKu

118: Tau$/$4 \citep{dalessio05}, TW Hya \citep{calvet02, uchida04}, GM Aur, DM Tau

119: \citep{calvet05}, and CS Cha \citep{espaillat07} have been explained by modeling

120: the transitional disks with truncated optically thick disks with most of the

121: mid-infrared emission originating in the inner edge or ``wall" of the truncated

122: disk. In all these cases, except in CoKu Tau$/$4, material is accreting onto the

123: star, so gas remains inside the truncated disk, but with a small or negligible amount of 

124: small dust, making these regions optically thin.  

125: 

126: Here we present models of UX Tau A and LkCa 15, low-mass pre-main sequence stars

127: in the young, $\sim$1 Myr old Taurus star-forming region which have been

128: previously reported as transitional disks \citep{furlan06, bergin04}.   

129: We present evidence for gaps in optically thick disks, as opposed

130: to ``inner holes", that is, large reductions

131: of small dust from the star out to an outer optically thick wall.

132: %We will present evidence for gaps in the inner disks of our objects as opposed

133: %to ``inner holes" which in this paper we will use to indicate large reductions

134: %of small dust from the star out to an outer optically thick wall.   

135: 

136:  

137:     

138: \section{Observations \& Data Reduction}

139: \label{sec:obs}

140: Figures 1 and 2 are plots of the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for UX Tau

141: A and LkCa 15 respectively.

142: For Lk Ca 15, the reduction of the {\it Spitzer} Infrared Array Camera (IRAC)

143: images (Program 37) was done with SSC pipeline S14.0 and the post-BCD (Basic

144: Calibrated Data) MOPEX v030106 \citep{makovoz06}. We extracted the photometry of

145: this object using the apphot package in IRAF, with an aperture radius of 10

146: pixels and a background annulus from 10 to 20 pixels.  Fluxes at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8,

147: and 8.0 {\micron} are 7.55, 7.35, 7.24, 6.41 mag (1 ${\sigma}$=0.05 mag) calibrated according to \citet{reach06}. The

148: Submillimeter Array (SMA) observations of LkCa 15 were made on September 6th,

149: 2003 using the Compact Configuration of six of the 6 meter diameter antennas at

150: 345 GHz with full correlator bandwidth of 2 GHz. Calibration of the visibility

151: phases and amplitudes was achieved with observations of the quasar 0423-013 and

152: 0530+135, typically at intervals of 20 minutes. Observations of Uranus provided

153: the absolute scale for the flux density calibration and the uncertainties in the

154: flux scale are estimated to be 20$\%$. The data were calibrated using the MIR

155: software package (http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/$\sim$cqi/mircook.html).  Fluxes at

156: 216.5, 226.5, 345.2, and 355.2 GHz are 121.4${\pm}$4.3, 152.8${\pm}$5.2,

157: 416.8${\pm}$37.6, and 453.1${\pm}$48.1 mJy respectively.

158: 

159: \section{Analysis}

160: 

161: \subsection{Model Parameters}

162: \label{model}

163: 

164:  

165: We follow D'Alessio et al. (2006, 2005) to calculate the structure and emission

166: of the optically thick disk and the wall.    

167: Input parameters for the optically thick disk are the stellar properties, the

168: mass accretion rate of the disk ($\mdot$), the viscosity parameter ($\alpha$),

169: and the settling parameter $\epsilon=\zeta_{up}/\zeta_{st}$, i.e. the mass

170: fraction of the small grains in the upper layers relative to the standard

171: dust-to-gas mass ratio \citep{dalessio06}.  We use a grain-size distribution

172: that follows a power-law of the form $a$$^{-3.5}$, where $a$ is the grain

173: radius, with a minimum grain size of 0.005 {\micron}.  In the upper, optically

174: thin layer of the disk, the maximum grain size is 0.25 {\micron}.  In the

175: midplane of the disk, the maximum grain size is 1 mm.  The radiative transfer in

176: the wall atmosphere is calculated with the stellar properties, $\mdot$, the

177: maximum and minimum grain sizes, and the temperature of the optically thin wall

178: atmosphere (T$_{wall}$).  Table 1 lists the maximum grain sizes of the walls and

179: other relevant parameters.  We use the same dust composition as

180: \citet{espaillat07} unless otherwise noted.

181: 

182: In each case we use a distance of 140pc to Taurus \citep{kenyon94}.  We assume

183: an outer disk radius of 300 AU.  Spectral types and stellar temperatures are

184: adopted from \citet{KH95}.  Data are dereddened with the \citet{mathis90}

185: reddening law and extinctions are derived from fitting a standard stellar

186: photosphere \citep{KH95} to the data.  Stellar parameters (M$_{*}$, R$_{*}$,

187: L$_{*}$) are derived from the HR diagram and the Baraffe evolutionary tracks

188: \citep{baraffe02}.  Mass accretion rates are estimated from the U-band excess

189: following \citet{gullbring98} with a typical uncertainty of a factor of 3

190: \citep{calvet04}.   

191: 

192: 

193: \begin{deluxetable}{l c c}

194: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

195: \tablewidth{0pt}

196: \tablecaption{Stellar and Model Properties\label{tab:prop}}

197: \startdata

198: \hline

199: \hline

200: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Stellar Properties}\\

201: \hline

202: \hline

203: \colhead{} & \colhead{UX Tau A}  & \colhead{LkCa 15}\\

204: \hline

205: M$_{*}$ (M$_{\sun}$) & 1.5  & 1.1 \\

206: R$_{*}$ (R$_{\sun}$) & 2  & 1.7 \\

207: T$_{*}$ (K) & 4900  & 4350 \\

208: L$_{*}$ ($\lsun$) & 2.18  & .96 \\

209: $\mdot$ (M$_{\sun}$ yr$^{-1}$) & 9.6$\times$10$^{-9}$ & 2.4$\times$10$^{-9}$\\

210: Inclination (deg) & 60 & 42$^{1}$\\

211: A$_{V}$ & 1.3  & 1.2\\

212: Spectral Type & K2 & K5\\

213: \hline

214: \hline

215: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Optically Thick Inner Wall}\\

216: \hline

217: a$_{max}$ ({\micron})$^{2}$ & 10 & 1\\

218: T$_{wall}$ (K) & 1400  & 1400\\

219: z$_{wall}$ (AU)$^{2, 3}$ & 0.01  & 0.01\\

220: R$_{wall}$ (AU) & 0.16 & 0.12\\

221: \hline

222: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Optically Thick Inner Disk$^{4}$}\\

223: \hline

224: R$_{disk,out}$ (AU)$^{2}$ & $<$0.18  & $<$0.15\\

225: M$_{disk, inner}$ (M$_{\sun}$) & $<$8$\times$10$^{-6}$ & $<$5$\times$10$^{-5}$\\

226: \hline

227: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Optically Thick Outer Wall} \\

228: \hline

229: a$_{max}$ ({\micron}) & 0.25  & 0.25\\

230: T$_{wall}$ (K)$^{2}$ & 110  & 95\\

231: z$_{wall}$ (AU)$^{2}$ & 6 & 4\\

232: R$_{wall}$ (AU) & 56 & 46\\

233: \hline

234: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Optically Thick Outer Disk}\\

235: \hline

236: $\epsilon$$^{2}$ & .01  & .001\\

237: $\alpha$$^{2}$ & .015  & .0006\\

238: M$_{disk}$ (M$_{\sun}$)$^{2}$ & .01 & .1\\

239: \hline

240: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Optically Thin Inner Region}\\

241: \hline

242: R$_{in, thin}$ (AU) & -  & 0.15 (0.12)$^{5}$\\

243: R$_{out, thin}$ (AU)$^{2}$ & -  & 5 (4) \\

244: a$_{min, thin}$ ({\micron}) & -  & 0.005\\

245: a$_{max, thin}$ ({\micron}) & -  & 0.25\\

246: M$_{dust,thin}$ (M$_{\sun}$) & - & 4(5)$\times$10$^{-11}$

247: \enddata

248: \tablenotetext{1}{\citet{simon}}

249: \tablenotetext{2}{These are free parameters which are constrained by the best

250: fit to the SED.}

251: \tablenotetext{3}{z$_{wall}$ is the height of the wall above the midplane}

252: \tablenotetext{4}{We assume the same $\epsilon$ and $\alpha$ as the outer disk.}

253: \tablenotetext{5}{For LkCa 15, values in parenthesis refer to parameters in the

254: case that there is no optically thick inner wall.}

255: \end{deluxetable}

256: 

257: 

258: 

259: \begin{figure}

260: \figurenum{1}

261: \epsscale{1.2}

262: \plotone{f1.eps}

263: \caption{SED and model of UX Tau A.  We show ground-based optical, L- and M-band

264: photometry, \citep[open circles]{KH95}, J,H,K (2MASS; filled circles), 

265: $Spitzer$ IRS \citep[blue solid line]{furlan06}, IRAS \citep[open

266: triangles]{weaverjones92}, and millimeter \citep[filled pentagons]{andrews05}

267: data.  The solid black line is the best fit model with an disk gap of $\sim$56

268: AU (see Table 1 for model parameters).  Separate model components are as

269: follows: stellar photosphere (magenta dotted line), inner wall (blue

270: short-long-dash), outer wall (red dot-short-dash), and outer disk (cyan

271: dot-long-dash).  We also show the median SED of Taurus (green short-dashed

272: line).  The insert is a close-up of the {\it Spitzer} IRS spectrum longwards of

273: $\sim$16 {\micron} and indicates the crystalline silicate emission features in

274: addition to underlying features from amorphous silicates (Watson et al. 2007,

275: Sargent et al. in preparation).  [See the electronic edition of the Journal for

276: a color version of this figure.]

277: }

278: \label{figsed}

279: \end{figure}

280: 

281: 

282: \begin{figure}

283: \figurenum{2}

284: \epsscale{0.6}

285: \plotone{f2.eps}

286: \caption{SED and model of Lk Ca 15.  Symbols and lines are the same as listed in

287: Figure 1's caption.  The green long-dash line is the optically thin inner

288: region.  Open pentagons come from this work.  LkCa 15 has an outer disk that is

289: truncated at an inner radius of $\sim$46 AU which is consistent with

290: millimeter results \citep{pietu06}.  Top:  We can fit the SED with an inner optically

291: thick wall and a small amount of optically thin dust in the gap.  Bottom:  Here

292: we show a disk model of Lk Ca 15 without an optically thick inner wall.  Model parameters are listed in

293: Table 1.  The inserts are a close-ups of the SED and models between 3 to

294: $\sim$10 {\micron}.    [See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color

295: version of this figure.]

296: }

297: \label{figsed}

298: \end{figure}

299: 

300: 

301: \subsection{UX Tau A}

302: 

303: The sharp flux increase in the SED of UX Tau A (Figure 1) can be modeled

304: by an optically thick outer disk truncated at

305: $\sim$56 AU. The wall of the outer disk dominates the flux in the

306: mid- and far-infrared while the outer optically thick disk contributes to most

307: of the flux in the millimeter. We note that UX Tau A 

308: is in a multiple system \citep{furlan06}, with the closest component at 2."6 $\sim$ 360 pc

309: in projection; thus, the outer disk may have a smaller R$_{disk,out}$ than assumed

310: here, which may decrease the disk mass but not the derived wall properties

311: a$_{max}$, T$_{wall}$, and z$_{wall}$ which are constrained by the best fit to the mid-infrared.  In modeling the outer disk, we hold $\mdot$ fixed and vary $\alpha$; this is 

312: equivalent to finding the best-fit disk mass since M$_{d}$ {$\propto$} $\mdot$/$\alpha$.  

313: 

314: When compared to the median SED of Taurus \citep[Fig. 1]{dalessio99, furlan06}

315: which has been shown to be representative of an optically thick continuous disk

316: \citep{dalessio99, dalessio06}, UX Tau A's relatively strong mid-infrared

317: deficit makes it apparent that its disk is not continuous i.e. it is

318: not a ``full disk".  However, in contrast with the other transitional disks

319: found around TTS, the near-infrared portion of UX Tau A's SED

320: %(K- and L- band) 

321: agrees with the median SED of TTS in Taurus; this indicates that

322: optically thick material remains in the innermost part of the disk

323: in contrast to all other transitional disks modeled so far.

324: % and that UX

325: %Tau A has a gap rather than a hole in its disk.       

326: %

327: %In the outer wall, a$_{max}$, T$_{wall}$, and z$_{wall}$ are free parameters

328: %constrained by the best fit to the SED.  The radius of the wall is dependent on

329: %the temperature \citep{dalessio05}.  We assume an ISM-sized grain distribution

330: %and keep a$_{max}$ fixed at 0.25 {\micron}.  In the outer disk, $\epsilon$ and

331: %$\alpha$ are varied to achieve the best fit.  The mass of the optically thick

332: %disk is ${\propto}$ $\mdot$$/$$\alpha$.  

333: %

334: %As noted earlier, comparison with the median SED of Taurus indicates that the

335: %inner disk of UX Tau A is optically thick and so it must have a sharp gas-dust

336: Since the inner disk is optically thick, it

337: must have a sharp gas-dust

338: transition at the dust destruction radius 

339: as ``full disks" in CTTS

340: %like that seen in ``full disks"

341: %YOU SHOULD INCLUDE MUZEROLLE ET AL 2003, IF THERE IS ROOM

342: \citep{muzerolle03, dalessio06}.

343: % and so we adopt T$_{wall}$=1400 K.  

344: In Figure 1 we show the

345: contribution from the wall of an optically thick inner disk located at the dust

346: destruction radius at 0.16 AU,

347: assuming T$_{wall}$=1400 K.  

348: The best fit is obtained with large grains, in agreement with the

349: lack of a 10 {\micron} silicate feature.

350: %Since there is no 10 {\micron} silicate feature,

351: %the grains in the wall must be large.

352: %and so we vary a$_{max}$ to achieve the

353: %best fit.  

354: The flux deficit in the SED around 10 {\micron} puts an upper

355: limit to the extent of the inner optically thick disk to $<$0.18 AU.

356: 

357: \subsection{Lk Ca 15}

358: \label{lkca15}

359: 

360: 

361: Our analysis of a model fit to LkCa 15 shows an optically thick disk truncated

362: at $\sim$46 AU, as delineated by millimeter interferometric imaging

363: \citep{pietu06}.  The outer optically thick disk contributes to most of the flux

364: in the millimeter and the wall of the outer disk contributes much of the flux in

365: the mid- and far-infrared (Figure 2).  

366:  

367: 

368: The near-infrared portion of the SED of LkCa 15 lies

369: below the median SED of Taurus, so the case for an optically thick

370: inner disk is not as clear cut as in UX Tau A. However, 

371: the near-IR excess above the photosphere in Lk Ca 15 is substantially

372: higher than is seen in GM Aur

373: \citep{calvet05}, TW Hya \citep{calvet02, uchida04}, or CS Cha

374: \citep{espaillat07}, where the optically thin inner disk contains a small amount of dust.

375: Our analysis suggests that an optically thick inner disk wall

376: at the dust destruction radius (0.12 AU) can account for the significant

377: near-infrared excess in Lk Ca 15 (Fig. 2, top),

378: and that the optically thick component cannot extend beyond 0.15 AU.

379: We also require 4$\times$10$^{-11}$ ${\msun}$ of optically thin

380: dust between 0.15 and 5 AU to produce the 10 {\micron} silicate feature.

381: This optically thin dust mixture is composed of 85$\%$ amorphous silicates,

382: 6.8$\%$ organics, 1.3$\%$ troilite, 6.8$\%$ amorphous carbon, and less than

383: 1$\%$ enstatite and forsterite.  The total emission of this optically thin

384: region is scaled to the vertical optical depth at 10 {\micron}, $\tau_{0}$

385: $\sim$ 0.012.  We follow \citep{calvet02} in calculating the optically thin dust

386: region and note that the dust composition and $\tau_{0}$ are free parameters

387: constrained by the best fit to the SED.    

388: 

389: In the bottom panel of Figure 2 we present an alternative structure for LkCa

390: 15's inner disk.   It is possible to fit LkCa 15's SED with only optically thin

391: dust within the inner hole.  In this model, the near-infrared excess and 10

392: {\micron} emission would originate in 5$\times$10$^{-11}$ M$_{\sun}$ of

393: optically thin dust located between 0.12 to 4 AU.  This optically thin dust

394: mixture would be composed of 61$\%$ amorphous silicates, 7$\%$ organics, 1$\%$

395: troilite, 30$\%$ amorphous carbon, and less than 1$\%$ enstatite and forsterite.

396: The total emission of this optically thin region is scaled to the vertical

397: optical depth at 10 {\micron}, $\tau_{0} \sim 0.018$.  This model (bottom inset,

398: Fig. 2) does not fit the slope of the near-side of the IRS spectrum

399: ($<$7{\micron}) or the IRAC data %or the 20{\micron} turnover 

400: as well as the previously discussed model (top inset, Fig. 2).  The

401: optical depth in the near-infrared is 

402: %SAY HOW MUCH

403: $\sim$0.01, about 5 times greater than that of the

404: previous model, mainly due to the difference in the amorphous carbon fraction.  

405: 

406: While an optically thin region is necessary in both scenarios, we can exclude a

407: model where the optically thin region extends further than $\sim$ 5 AU since the

408: contribution at 20 {\micron} then becomes too strong.

409:     

410: 

411: \section{Discussion \& Conclusions}

412: 

413: Here we introduce the ``pre-transitional disk" class where we see the 

414: incipient

415: development

416: of disk gaps in 

417: optically thick 

418: protoplanetary disks as evidenced by significant near-infrared

419: excesses when compared to the Taurus median SED and previously studied

420: transitional disks \citep{dalessio05, calvet02, uchida04, calvet05,

421: espaillat07}.  

422: The pre-transitional disk of UX Tau A has a $\sim$56 AU gap as

423: opposed to an inner hole.  It is also possible to fit LkCa 15's SED with a

424: $\sim$46 AU gap that contains some optically thin dust; a model that has a hole

425: rather than a gap also fits its SED and future near-infrared interferometry may

426: be able to discriminate between these models.  However, the truncation of LkCa

427: 15's outer disk at $\sim$46 AU is consistent with resolved millimeter

428: interferometric observations \citep{pietu06} which makes it one of three inner

429: disk holes imaged in the millimeter (TW Hya: Hughes et al. 2007; GM Aur: Wilner

430: et al. in preparation).  In addition to our sample, the disks around F-G stars

431: studied by \citet{brown07} also belong to the pre-transitional disk category.  The large gaps that are being detected in pre-transitional disks are most likely due to observational bias since larger gaps will create larger mid-infrared deficits in the SED.  Smaller gaps will most likely have less apparent dips in their SEDS and be more difficult to identify, however, if their gaps contain some optically thin material the silicate emission in these objects should be much stronger than can be explained by a full disk model.  

432: 

433: The existence of an inner optically thick disk may be an indicator of the first

434: stages of disk clearing that will eventually lead to the the inner holes that

435: have been seen in previously reported transitional disks; this has important

436: implications on disk evolution theories since only planet-formation can account

437: for this structure. 

438: Hydrodynamical simulations have shown that a newly formed planet could accrete

439: and sweep out the material around it through tidal disturbances and this is

440: sufficient in producing the hole size in CoKu Tau$/$4 \citep{quillen04}, even

441: maintaining substantial accretion rates \citep{varniere06}.  

442: Moreover, \citet{najita07} have found that the intrinsic properties

443: of transitional disks may favor planet formation.

444: Another proposed formation mechanism for the holes in transitional disks

445: is photoevaporation, in which a photoevaporative wind halts

446: mass accretion towards the inner disk

447: and material in this inner disk is rapidly evacuated creating

448: an inner hole \citep{clarke01}; the hole then increases in size as the edge

449: continues

450: photoevaporating \citep{alexanderarmitage}.

451: Neither this model nor the inside-out evacuation induced by the MRI

452: \citep{chiang07} would

453: explain how an optically thick disk accreting at a sizable

454: accretion rate (see Table 1) would remain inside the hole.

455: Rapid dust growth and settling has also been proposed to explain the holes in

456: disks \citep{lin04}.  Again, this does not account for the presence of optically

457: thick inner disk material given that theory suggests grain growth should be

458: fastest in the inner disk, not at some intermediate radius \citep{weiden97,

459: chiang99}.

460:       

461: Our sample also has interesting dust compositions (Watson et al. 2007, Sargent

462: et al. in preparation).  LkCa 15 has an amorphous silicate feature indicating

463: little if any processing leading to the crystallization seen in other young

464: stars.  Amorphous silicates are also seen in CoKu Tau$/4$, DM Tau, and GM Aur. 

465: In contrast, UX Tau A is different from all the other transitional disks because

466: it has crystalline silicate emission features in addition to amorphous silicate

467: emission features (Fig. 1 inset).  

468: The wall at $\sim$56 AU is the main contributor to the crystalline silicate

469: emission since it dominates the flux in the mid- and far-infrared.  This raises

470: the question of whether crystalline silicates are created close to the star or

471: if they can be created in situ at $\sim$56 AU.  If the former, it challenges

472: current radial-mixing theories, none of which can get significant amounts of

473: crystalline silicates out to this distance \citep{gail01, kellergail04}.  One

474: possibility for {\it in situ} processing may be

475: collisions of larger bodies, which might produce small grains heated

476: sufficiently to create crystals (S. Kenyon, personal communication).  

477: 

478: Pre-transitional disks offer further insight into the diversity of the

479: ``transitional disk" class and future studies of these disks will greatly

480: advance our understanding of disk evolution and planet formation.

481: 

482: 

483: 

484: 

485: \vskip -0.1in \acknowledgments{We thank the anonymous referee, E. Bergin, W.

486: Forrest, S. Kenyon, K. H. Kim, J. Miller, B. Sargent, and M. Zhao for insightful

487: discussions.  This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space

488: Telescope.  N.C. and L.H. acknowledge support from NASA

489: Origins Grants NNG05GI26G and NNG06GJ32G.  P.D. acknowledges grants from

490: CONACyT, M\`exico. D.M.W. acknowledges support from the Spitzer Infrared

491: Spectrograph

492: Instrument Project.}

493: 

494:  

495: 

496: 

497: 

498: \begin{thebibliography}

499:  

500: %\bibitem[Alencar \& Batalha(2002)]{alencar02} Alencar, S.H.P. \& Batalha, C. 

501: %2002, \apj, 571, 378 

502:  

503: %\bibitem[Alexander et al.(2006)]{alexander06} Alexander, R.D,  Clarke, C.J., \&

504: %Pringle, J.E. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 229

505: 

506: \bibitem[Alexander \& Armitage.(2007)]{alexanderarmitage} Alexander, R.D,  \&

507: Armitage, P.J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 500

508: 

509: %\bibitem[Aikawa \& Nomura(2006)]{aikawa06} Aikawa, Y., \& 

510: %Nomura, H.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 1152 

511: 

512: \bibitem[Andrews \& Williams(2005)]{andrews05}Andrews, S.M. \& Williams, J.P.\

513: 2005, \apj, 631, 1134

514: 

515: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2002)]{baraffe02} Baraffe, I., et al. 2002, A\&A, 382,

516: 563

517: 

518: \bibitem[Brown et al.(2007)]{brown07}Brown, J., et al., 2007, astro-ph/0707.0304

519: 

520: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(2004)]{bergin04} Bergin, E., et al. 2004, ApJ, 614, L133 

521: 

522: %\bibitem[Calvet et al.(1991)]{calvet91} Calvet, N., et al. 1991, ApJ, 380, 617

523: 

524: %\bibitem[Calvet \& Gullbring(1998)]{calvetgullbring98} Calvet, N. \& Gullbring,

525: %E.  1998, \apj, 509, 802

526: 

527: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2002)]{calvet02} Calvet, N., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008

528: 

529: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2004)]{calvet04} Calvet, N., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 1294

530: 

531: 

532: %D'Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., \& Sitko, M., 2002, ApJ,

533: %568, 1008

534: 

535: \bibitem[Calvet et al.(2005)]{calvet05} Calvet, N., et al., 2005, ApJL, 630,

536: L185;C05 

537: 

538: \bibitem[Chiang \& Goldreich(1999)]{chiang99} Chiang, E.I. \& Goldreich, P.\

539: 1999, \apj, 519, 279

540: 

541: \bibitem[Chiang \& Murray-Clay (2007)]{chiang07} Chiang, E. I. \& Murray-Clay,

542: R. A., 2007, astroph\ 0706.1241

543: 

544: \bibitem[Clarke, Gendrin, \& Sotomayor(2001)]{clarke01} Clarke, C.J., Gendrin,

545: A., \& Sotomayor, M. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 485

546: 

547: %\bibitem[Cohen et al.(2003)]{cohen03} Cohen, M., Megeath, S.T., Hammersley,

548: %P.L., Mart\'{i}n-Luis, F., \& Stauffer, J. 2003, AJ, 125, 2645

549: 

550: 

551: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(1999)]{dalessio99}D'Alessio, P., et

552: al.,1999,ApJ,527,893

553: 

554: %\bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2001)]{dalessio01}D'Alessio, P., Calvet, N.,\&

555: %Hartmann, L., 2001, ApJ, 553, 321

556: 

557: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2005)]{dalessio05} D'Alessio, P., et al., 2005, ApJ,

558: 621, 461

559: 

560: \bibitem[D'Alessio et al.(2006)]{dalessio06} D'Alessio, P., et al., 2006, ApJ,

561: 638, 314

562: 

563: %\bibitem[Dartois et al. (2003)] {dartois03} Dartois, E., Dutrey, A., \&

564: %Guilloteau, S. 2003,A\&A, 399, 773

565: 

566: \bibitem[Espaillat et al.(2007)]{espaillat07} Espaillat et al., 2007, ApJ, 664,

567: L111 

568: 

569: %\bibitem[Feigelson et al.(1993)]{feigelson93} Feigelson, E., et al. 1993, ApJ,

570: %416, 623

571: 

572: %\bibitem[Feigelson \& Montmerle(1999)]{feigelson99} Feigelson, E.D. \&

573: %Montmerle, T.1999,ARA\&A,37,363

574: 

575: %\bibitem[Forrest et al.(2004)]{forrest04} Forrest, W.J., et al. 2004, ApJS,

576: %154, 443

577: 

578: \bibitem[Furlan et al.(2006)]{furlan06} Furlan, E. et al., 2006, ApJS, 165, 568

579: 

580: \bibitem[Gail (2001)]{gail01} Gail, H.P. 2001, A\&A, 378, 192

581: 

582: 

583: \bibitem[Gullbring et al.(1998)]{gullbring98} Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L.,

584: Brice\~{n}o, C., \& Calvet, N., 1998, ApJ, 492, 323

585: 

586: 

587: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(2007)]{hughes07}Hughes, A.M., et al., 2007, \apj, 664,

588: 536

589: 

590: \bibitem[Keller \& Gail(2004)]{kellergail04}Keller, Ch. \& Gail, H.P., 2004,

591: A\&A, 415, 1177

592: 

593: \bibitem[Kenyon, Dobrzycka, \& Hartmann (1994)]{kenyon94} Kenyon, S.J.,

594: Dobrzycka, D. \& Hartmann, L.\ 1994, AJ, 108, 1872

595: 

596: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{KH95}Kenyon, S.~J.~\& Hartmann, L.\ 1995,

597: \apjs, 101, 117

598: 

599: 

600: 

601: \bibitem[Lin \& Ida (2004)]{lin04}Lin, D.N.C. \& Ida, S.\ 2004, ASP Conf. Ser.

602: 323, 339

603: 

604: 

605: 

606: \bibitem[Makovoz et al. (2006)]{makovoz06}Makovoz, D., Khan, I., Masci, F.,

607: 2006, SPIE, 6065, 330

608: 

609: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{mathis90}Mathis, J.S. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 37

610: 

611: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2003)]{muzerolle03} Muzerolle, J., 

612: Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., \& D'Alessio, P.\ 2003, \apjl, 597, L149

613: 

614: 

615: \bibitem[Najita et al.(2007)]{najita07} Najita, J.~R., Strom, 

616: S.~E., \& Muzerolle, J.\ 2007, \mnras, 378, 369

617: 

618: \bibitem[Pi\`{e}tu et al.(2006)]{pietu06}Pi\`{e}tu, V., et al, 2006, A\&A, 460,

619: L43

620: 

621: \bibitem[Quillen et al.(2004)]{quillen04} Quillen, A.C., et al.

622: 2004,ApJ,612,L137

623: 

624: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2006)]{reach06}Reach, W. et al 2006, Infrared Array Camera Data

625: Handbook, Version 3.0%, Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of

626: %Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 USA

627: 

628: 

629: \bibitem[Sargent et al.(2006)]{sargent06} Sargent, B. et al.\ 2006, \apj, 645,

630: 395

631: 

632: \bibitem[Simon, Dutrey, Guilloteau(2001)]{simon}Simon,M., Dutrey, A., \&

633: Guilloteau, S.\ 2001, \apj, 545, 1034 

634: 

635: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(1990)]{skrutskie90} Skrutskie, M.~F., 

636: Dutkevitch, D., Strom, S.~E., Edwards, S., Strom, K.~M., \& Shure, M.~A.\ 

637: 1990, \aj, 99, 1187

638: 

639: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(2001)]{stassun01} Stassun, K.~G., 

640: Mathieu, R.~D., Vrba, F.~J., Mazeh, T., \& Henden, A.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 1003 

641: 

642: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1989)]{strom89} Strom, K.~M., Strom, 

643: S.~E., Edwards, S., Cabrit, S., \& Skrutskie, M.~F.\ 1989, \aj, 97, 1451 

644: 

645: \bibitem[Uchida et al.(2004)]{uchida04} Uchida, K.I., et al., 2004, ApJS, 154,

646: 439

647: 

648: \bibitem[Varni{\`e}re et al.(2006)]{varniere06} Varni{\`e}re, P., 

649: Blackman, E.~G., Frank, A., \& Quillen, A.~C.\ 2006, \apj, 640, 1110

650: 

651: \bibitem[Watson et al. (2007)]{watson07} Watson et al., submitted ApJ

652: 

653: \bibitem[Weaver \& Jones(1992)]{weaverjones92}Weaver, W. B. \& Jones, G.\ 1992,

654: ApJS, 78, 239

655: 

656: 

657: \bibitem[Weidenschilling(1997)]{weiden97} Weidenschilling, S.J. 1997, Icarus,

658: 127, 439

659: 

660: 

661: 

662: 

663: 

664: 

665: 

666: 

667: 

668: \end{thebibliography}

669: 

670: 

671: 

672: 

673: 

674: \end{document}

675: