1: \documentclass[11pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{aastex}
3: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
4: %%\usepackage{emulateapj5,times,mathptm}
5: %%\singlespace
6: %\voffset=0.0cm
7:
8: \slugcomment{Accepted for the publication in the {\it Astrophysical Journal Letters}}
9: %\pagenumbering{arabic}
10:
11: \def\ros{{\it ROSAT}}
12: \def\asca{{\it ASCA}}
13: \newcommand{\NH}{\mbox{$N_{\rm H}$}}
14: \def\fdg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}}
15: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}
16: \def\fsecs{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^s$}}
17: \def\la{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
18: \def\ga{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
19:
20: \shortauthors{Park}
21: \shorttitle{G292}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{A Half-Megasecond Chandra Observation of the Oxygen-Rich
26: Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8}
27:
28: \author{Sangwook Park\altaffilmark{1}, John P. Hughes\altaffilmark{2}
29: Patrick O. Slane\altaffilmark{3}, David N. Burrows\altaffilmark{1},
30: B. M. Gaensler\altaffilmark{4}, and Parviz Ghavamian\altaffilmark{5}
31: }
32:
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State
34: University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA. 16802;
35: park@astro.psu.edu}
36: %\altaffiltext{2}{Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering,
37: %University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen Kibana-dai Nishi, Japan}
38: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University,
39: 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019; also Department of
40: Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ
41: 08544-1001 }
42: \altaffiltext{3}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
43: Cambridge, MA. 02138}
44: \altaffiltext{4}{School of Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006,
45: Australia}
46: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,
47: 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218}
48:
49: %\altaffiltext{3}{park@astro.psu.edu}
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52:
53: We report on our initial analysis of a deep 510 ks observation of the
54: Galactic oxygen-rich supernova remnant (SNR) G292.0+1.8 with the {\it Chandra
55: X-ray Observatory}. Our new {\it Chandra} ACIS-I observation has a larger field of
56: view and an order of magnitude deeper exposure than the previous {\it Chandra}
57: observation, which allows us to cover the entire SNR and to detect new metal-rich
58: ejecta features. We find a highly non-uniform distribution of thermodynamic
59: conditions of the X-ray emitting hot gas that correlates well with the optical
60: [O {\small III}] emission, suggesting the possibility that the originating
61: supernova explosion of G292.0+1.8 was itself asymmetric. We also reveal spectacular
62: substructures of a torus, a jet, and an extended central compact nebula all
63: associated with the embedded pulsar J1124$-$5916.
64:
65: \end{abstract}
66:
67: \keywords {ISM: individual (G292.0+1.8) --- supernova remnants --- pulsars:
68: individual (J1124$-$5916) --- X-rays: ISM}
69:
70: \section {\label {sec:intro} INTRODUCTION}
71:
72: G292.0+1.8 is one of only three known ``oxygen-rich'' supernova remnants (SNRs)
73: in the Galaxy \citep{goss79,murdin79}, the others being Cassiopeia A and Puppis A.
74: Optical emission from these SNRs contains fast-moving ($v$ $\ga$ 1000 km s$^{-1}$)
75: O-rich ejecta knots, which is generally taken as evidence for He-burning nucleosynthesis
76: in the core of massive stars ($>$ 10 M$_{\odot}$) (e.g., Blair et al.\ 2000). O-rich SNRs
77: provide a rare opportunity for the study of core-collapse supernova (SN) nucleosynthesis
78: and the subsequent evolution of the remnant, including in particular the interaction
79: of ejecta fragments and the blast wave with circumstellar medium (CSM) produced by
80: massive stellar winds from the progenitor. G292.0+1.8 is especially intriguing
81: because it exhibits all the characteristics of a textbook-example core-collapse SNR:
82: a central pulsar and pulsar wind nebula (PWN), metal-rich ejecta, shocked CSM, and
83: the blast wave.
84:
85: To facilitate a study of SNR G292.0+1.8 in unprecedented detail, we performed
86: a deep AO7 {\it Chandra} observation during 2006 September 13$-$October 20, with
87: the SNR centered on the I-array of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS).
88: Our ACIS-I observation takes advantage of a larger (17$'$$\times$17$'$) field of view
89: (FOV) and an order of magnitude deeper exposure (510 ks) than the previous
90: {\it Chandra} ACIS-S3 observation (8$'$$\times$8$'$ FOV and 43 ks exposure; Hughes et al.
91: 2001). This new deep {\it Chandra} observation is an essential part of our
92: multi-wavelength campaign on G292.0+1.8, including new observations in the radio,
93: infrared, optical, and X-ray bands. Here we report on first results from the new
94: {\it Chandra} images: a large-scale overview of the SNR in \S~2 and new
95: insights into the nature of the PWN in \S~3. A description of the observations, data
96: reduction, and results from extensive spectral and imaging analyses of detailed
97: substructures of the SNR and PWN will be presented elsewhere.
98:
99: \section{\label{sec:snr} Supernova Remnant}
100:
101: Figure~\ref{fig:fig1} shows an X-ray color image of G292.0+1.8 created from our
102: deep {\it Chandra} data. The outer boundary of the radio SNR is overlaid with a
103: white contour. The energy bands displayed in each color were chosen to
104: emphasize major atomic line emission that illustrates the distribution of electron
105: temperatures and ionization states across the SNR (Table~\ref{tbl:tab1}). We note
106: that line and underlying continuum emission is included in each subband; e.g.,
107: the bright blue emission near the SNR's center is dominated by synchrotron
108: emission from the PWN (see the inset in Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}; Hughes et al.\ 2001).
109: Our deep ACIS-I exposure comprehensively images the entire SNR to its faint
110: outermost edge, which matches well the extent of the radio remnant (Figure~\ref{fig:fig1})
111: and traces the location of the blast wave. Ejecta knots (Park et al.\ 2004, Gonzalez
112: \& Safi-Harb 2003) appear brightly colored -- yellow, green or blue -- in
113: Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}. They extend closest to the rim in the west and south and
114: are furthest away in the SE quadrant. Due to their red-orange color in Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}
115: and positional coincidence with [O {\small III}] ejecta \citep{wink06}, the southernmost
116: X-ray knots are likely to be O-rich as well. The SNR's full diameter is $\sim$9$\farcm$6
117: (N-S) and $\sim$8$\farcm$4 (E-W), corresponding to physical sizes of $\sim$14.7$-$16.7
118: $d_6$ pc, where $d_6$ is the distance to G292.0+1.8 in units of 6 kpc, the distance
119: we assume throughout \citep{gaen03}.
120:
121: Our new image of G292.0+1.8 shows little evidence for the featureless, spectrally-hard,
122: and geometrically-thin X-ray filaments that trace sites of efficient particle
123: acceleration in other young SNRs, such as Cas A, Tycho, and SN 1006.
124: Instead the SNR's rim is defined by spectrally-soft emission that is faint and
125: diffuse in places (e.g., the SE rim) and filamentary elsewhere. Particle acceleration
126: is evidently occurring under rather different conditions in G292.0+1.8 than other
127: young Galactic SNRs.
128:
129: The SNR interior contains a complex network of knots and filaments with a variety
130: of colors and morphologies. The overall color distribution of these features is
131: highly asymmetric; red-orange emission is dominant in the S-SE, while the W-NW
132: regions are bright in emission appearing green-blue in color. We are confident that
133: these variations largely reflect differences in the underlying distributions
134: of gas temperature and ionization in the metal-rich ejecta, rather than variable
135: foreground absorption. This is supported by the relative spatial distributions
136: of the Ne He$\alpha$ and Ly$\alpha$ lines. Because these lines are separated in
137: energy by only $\sim$0.1 keV, their flux ratio is insensitive to absorption
138: variations. The equivalent width maps show that Ne He$\alpha$ emission is
139: relatively enhanced in the S-SE, while Ne Ly$\alpha$ emission is enhanced in
140: the W-NW \citep{park02}. The metal abundance variation is also unlikely
141: a significant contributor for the observed large-scale color variation based on
142: our hardness ratio (HR) analysis (see below).
143:
144: We constructed a HR map (Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}a) to investigate further the variation
145: in the thermodynamic state of the ejecta across G292.0+1.8.
146: (For technical reasons we added the continuum component [$E$ $<$ 1.25 keV] to the
147: soft band line emission to enhance the hard band lines and suppress the strong
148: hard continuum emission from the PWN.) There are prominent enhancements in
149: Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}a near the W and NW boundary of the SNR that generally trace
150: ``fingers'' of hot ejecta protruding out to the very boundary of the SNR (green-blue
151: filaments in Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}). There is also an overall large-scale variation
152: from HR values $\sim$2.4 in the hard ``NW'' region to $\sim$1.1 in the soft
153: ``SE'' region (Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}a). Example spectra extracted from small
154: regions within the larger ``NW'' and ``SE'' regions clearly show the distinctive
155: line ratios responsible for the observed HR variation (Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}b).
156: We can draw on our previous work fitting the spectra of individual knots to
157: relate HR values to plasma temperatures. Spectral region 3 from Park et al. (2004)
158: lies in the hard ``NW'' region, and spectral analysis yields a best-fit $kT \sim 5$
159: keV, corresponding to HR $\sim$ 2.5. We find that this HR value strongly traces
160: the electron temperature rather than on individual elemental abundances.
161: Although we did not study knots in the soft ``SE'' region previously, our preliminary
162: spectral modeling of the SE regions favors significantly lower temperatures
163: ($kT$ $\sim$ 0.7 keV), corresponding to HR values $\sim$ 1.0. Thus, the observed
164: HR distribution reveals a large-scale spatial variation of thermal condition of
165: metal-rich ejecta, which could not be detected by previous low-resolution data
166: \citep{hughes94}; i.e., a significantly higher temperature of the hot gas ($kT$
167: $\sim$ 5 keV) is implied in the N-W regions, while a relatively lower-temperature
168: plasma ($kT$ $\la$ 1 keV) prevails in the S-E regions of the SNR.
169:
170: There is also a very similar and highly significant gradient in the optical
171: properties of G292.0+1.8. The region with the lowest HR values is coincident
172: with the bulk of the optical [O {\small III}] emission indicated by
173: ``SE'' region in Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}a \citep{ghav05,wink06}. Across the projected
174: middle of the SNR (within an $\sim$3$'$ wide region aligned roughly N-S),
175: there are dozens of isolated optical knots (generally uncorrelated with X-ray
176: knots), while on the western edge no optical emission appears at all.
177: This high degree of correlation between the optical and X-ray properties suggests
178: the possibility that radiative cooling in the ejecta is responsible for the SE-NW
179: gradient in observed properties. In this picture, the SE ejecta would be undergoing
180: significant, perhaps catastrophic cooling. Across the projected middle of the
181: SNR, cooling is probably just beginning to occur in isolated knots that happen to have
182: the appropriate thermodynamic conditions, while the emission toward the NW remains
183: fully nonradiative. Variation in the ambient density surrounding G292.0+1.8
184: could provide an explanation for the observed asymmetry in the ejecta properties.
185: However, there is no evidence for a higher density in the SE regions \citep{braun86}
186: as would be expected. In fact, 60 $\mu$m images\footnote{The apparent differences in
187: the detailed structure of the two IR images in Figure~\ref{fig:fig1} are unlikely
188: to be real because of the highly processed nature of both images. The {\it ISO} image
189: was constructed from a rastor scan of many pointings using a $3\times 3$ pixel
190: ($\sim$45$^{\prime\prime}$ per pixel) IR array that, unfortunately, did not fully
191: cover the SE rim of the SNR. The {\it IRAS} image, which did cover the entire SNR,
192: was the result of an image reconstruction process intended to improve the angular
193: resolution from the native value of several arcminutes to the level of
194: 1$^{\prime}$$-$2$^{\prime}$. Given these significant differences, the overall general
195: agreement between the images, specifically, the brightness of the SW rim and the
196: faintness toward the SE, seems reasonable to us.} (see upper right and upper left
197: insets to Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}) show that around the rim of the SNR the SE region
198: is a minimum in flux, while the SW is a maximum. Thus, albeit somewhat speculative
199: at the current stage of the analysis, we raise the possibility that the ejecta
200: asymmetry has its origin in some intrinsic asymmetry of the SN explosion itself,
201: such as a variation in the density or velocity distribution from SE to NW. Further
202: work including detailed X-ray spectral analysis of ejecta and hydrodynamic studies
203: appropriate for G292.0+1.8 are required to test this asymmetric explosion scenario.
204:
205: \section{\label{sec:pwn} Pulsar Wind Nebula}
206:
207: Previous {\it Chandra} observations of G292.0+1.8 \citep{hughes01} revealed
208: a point source, now known to be the pulsar J1124$-$5916 \citep{camilo02,hughes03},
209: powering an extended synchrotron nebula \citep{torii98} (see the lower left inset
210: to Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}). The emission from the pulsar itself was observed to be
211: surrounded by a compact elliptical structure roughly 1$\farcs$8 $\times$
212: 1$^{\prime\prime}$ in size. Our deep ACIS-I observation confirms this
213: structure, and reveals additional faint emission suggestive of a jet/torus
214: structure ($\sim 5^{\prime\prime}$ in jet length and torus radius, repectively; see
215: the lower right inset to Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}) similar to those observed
216: to form just outside the pulsar wind termination shock region in a number
217: of other young PWNe (e.g., Gaensler \& Slane 2006 and references therein).
218: Our preliminary spectral analysis indicates that these
219: features show a power law spectrum with photon index $\Gamma$ $\sim$ 1.5$-$1.8,
220: supporting the idea that they are synchrotron emission associated with the
221: PWN. The ratio between the N-S and E-W sizes of the torus implies
222: an inclination of the axis of the torus (with respect to the line of sight)
223: of $\sim$20$^{\circ}$. Physical sizes are then $\sim$0.4 $d_6$ pc for the jet and
224: a radius of $\sim$0.15 $d_6$ pc for the torus. This is similar to the size of the
225: jet/torus structure observed in 3C~58 \cite{slane02}, although we note that
226: there is large variation in the size and relative brightness of such
227: structures from system to system.
228:
229: Since the E-W ``belt'' of the SNR \citep{tuohy82} appears to be a relic feature
230: of the progenitor star's equatorial winds \cite{park02}, the pulsar spin-axis
231: defined by the N-S orientation of the jet is generally aligned with
232: the progenitor's rotation axis, at least in projection. If the pulsar
233: position offset to the SE of the radio center of the SNR represents the
234: direction of the pulsar velocity, a misalignment of $\theta$ $\sim$
235: 70$^{\circ}$ between the projected velocity and spin-axis vectors is implied.
236:
237: This is in contrast to the strong tendency toward spin-kick alignment claimed
238: by Ng \& Romani (2007), although it is important to note that many of their estimated
239: velocity vectors are, like ours, based on pulsar offsets from the geometric centers
240: of their host SNRs -- a technique that is quite sensitive to the ambient density
241: since the SNRs will expand more rapidly in the direction of lower density, thus
242: creating a shell that is not centered on the explosion point. Without a proper motion
243: measurement, our results for J1124$-$5916 are thus not conclusive, although the density
244: distribution inferred from the 60 $\mu$m data, which is enhanced in the NW-W-SW
245: direction, is difficult to reconcile with the current pulsar position if the observed
246: spin axis is aligned with the velocity vector. Finally, we note that our results
247: are even consistent with possible orthogonality between the spin and kick directions,
248: as might be suggested for some pulsars based on polarization measurements
249: \citep{johns05,rankin07}.
250:
251: \section{\label{sec:con} Summary}
252:
253: Our deep {\it Chandra} observation of SNR G292.0+1.8 detects the entire outer
254: boundary of the blast wave and reveals metal-rich ejecta knots reaching the shock front.
255: We find no evidence for strong particle acceleration sites in X-rays. The initial
256: large-scale analysis reveals a highly non-uniform distribution of X-ray emitting hot
257: gas. This overall structure is caused by an asymmetric distribution of the gas
258: temperatures, rather than variable foreground absorption. The expected properties
259: of the ambient medium required to explain this asymmetry are inconsistent with
260: observations, which leads us to the supposition that the supernova explosion itself
261: was asymmetric. A detailed X-ray spectral analysis of the metal-rich ejecta and
262: hydrodynamical simulations will be required to test this scenario. Proper motion
263: measurements of the blast wave using the new radio data and detailed IR/optical
264: studies of thermal states of cooling ejecta will also be important tests.
265:
266: We discover a torus and a jet associated with the PWN of the embedded pulsar
267: J1124$-$5916, similar to a growing number of such structures observed in other young
268: pulsar-driven systems. Assuming that the pulsar's birthplace was at the geometric
269: center of the radio SNR and that the jet defines the direction of the pulsar spin axis,
270: we find a large misalignment of $\sim70^\circ$ between the spin and kick velocity
271: directions, in apparent contrast to suggestions of spin-kick alignments in other systems.
272:
273: \acknowledgments
274:
275: The authors thank the {\it Chandra} Education and Public Outreach group for
276: their help to generate the X-ray color image. This work was supported in part
277: by Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under {\it Chandra} grant GO6-7049A
278: (Penn State), GO6-7049B (Johns Hopkins), and GO6-7049C (Rutgers). P.G. was also
279: supported by {\it Hubble Space Telescope} grant HST-GO-10916.06-A.
280:
281: \begin{thebibliography}{}
282:
283: \bibitem[Blair et al. 2000]{blair00} Blair, W. P. et al. 2000, \apj, 537, 667
284:
285: \bibitem[Braun et al. 1986]{braun86} Braun, R., Goss, W. M., Caswell, J. L., \&
286: Roger, R. S. 1986, \aap, 162, 259
287:
288: \bibitem[Camilo et al. 2002]{camilo02} Camilo, F., Manchester, R. N., Gaensler,
289: B. M., Lorimer, D. R., \& Sarkissian, J. 2002, \apj, 567, L71
290:
291: \bibitem[Cao et al. 1997]{cao97} Cao, Y., Terebey, S., Prince, T. A., \& Beichman,
292: C. A. 1997, \apjs, 111, 387
293:
294: %\bibitem[Chevalier 2005]{chev05} Chevalier, R. A. 2005, \apj, 619, 839
295:
296: %\bibitem[Gaensler et al. 2002]{gaen02} Gaensler, B. M., Arons, J., Kaspi, V. M.,
297: %Pivovaroff, M. J., Kawai, N., \& Tamura, K. 2002, \apj, 569, 878
298:
299: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Wallace 2003]{gaen03} Gaensler, B. M. \& Wallace, B. J.
300: 2003, \apj, 594, 326
301:
302: \bibitem[Gaensler \& Slane 2006]{gaen06} Gaensler, B. M. \& Slane, P. O. 2006,
303: ARAA, 44, 17
304:
305: %\bibitem[Gaensler et al. 2006]{gaen06} Gaensler, B. M., Chatterjee, S., Slane, P. O.,
306: %van der Swaluw, E., Camilo, F., \& Hughes, J. P. 2006, \apj, 648, 1037
307:
308: \bibitem[Ghavamian et al. 2005]{ghav05} Ghavamian, P., Hughes, J. P. \& Williams,
309: T. B. 2005, \apj, 635, 365
310:
311: \bibitem[Gonzalez \& Safi-Harb 2003]{gonz03} Gonzalez, M. \& Safi-Harb, S. 2003,
312: \apj, 583, L91
313:
314: \bibitem[Goss et al. 1979]{goss79} Goss, W. M., Shaver, P. A., Zealey, W. J.,
315: Murdin, P., \& Clark, D. H. 1979, \mnras, 188, 357
316:
317: %\bibitem[Gotthelf \& Wang 2000]{got00} Gotthelf, E. V. \& Wang, Q. D. 2000, \apj, 532, L117
318:
319: %\bibitem[Gvaramadze 2002]{gvar02} Gvaramadze, V. V. 2002, in Neutron Stars in Supernova
320: %Remnants, eds. P. O. Slane \& B. M. Gaensler (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of
321: %the Pacific), 23
322:
323: \bibitem[Hughes \& Singh 1994]{hughes94} Hughes, J. P. \& Singh, K. P. 1994, \apj, 422, 126
324:
325: \bibitem[Hughes et al. 2001]{hughes01} Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O., Burrows, D. N.,
326: Garmire, G. P., Nousek, J. A., Olbert, C. M., \& Keohane, J. W. 2001, \apj,
327: 559, L153
328:
329: \bibitem[Hughes et al. 2003]{hughes03} Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O., Park, S.,
330: Roming, P. W. A., \& Burrows, D. N. 2003, \apj, 591, L139
331:
332: \bibitem[Johnston et al. 2005]{johns05} Johnston, S., Hobbs, G., Vigeland, S.,
333: Kramer, M., Weisberg, J. M., \& Lyne, G. 2005, \mnras, 364, 1397
334:
335: %\bibitem[Laming \& Hwang 2003]{laming03} Laming, J. M. \& Hwang, U. 2003, \apj, 597, 347
336:
337: %\bibitem[Mori et al. 2004]{mori04} Mori, K., Burrows, D. N., Hester, J. J., Pavlov, G. G.,
338: %Shibata, S., \& Tsunemi, H. 2004, \apj, 609, 186
339: %\bibitem[Mori et al. 2004]{mori04} Mori, K. et al. 2004, \apj, 609, 186
340:
341: \bibitem[Murdin \& Clark 1979]{murdin79} Murdin, P., \& Clark, D. H. 1979, \mnras,
342: 189, 501
343:
344: %\bibitem[Murray et al. 2002]{murray02} Murray, S. S., Slane, P. O., Seward, F. D., Ransom,
345: %S. M., \& Gaensler, B. M. 2002, \apj, 568, 226
346:
347: \bibitem[Ng \& Romani 2007]{ng07} Ng, C.-Y. \& Romani, R. W. 2007, \apj, 660, 1357
348:
349: \bibitem[Park et al. 2002]{park02} Park, S., Roming, P. W. A., Hughes, J. P.,
350: Slane, P. O., Burrows, D. N., Garmire, G. P., \& Nousek, J. A. 2002, \apj,
351: 564, L39
352:
353: \bibitem[Park et al. 2004]{park04} Park, S., Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O., Burrows,
354: D. N., Roming, P. W. A., Nousek, J. A., \& Garmire, G. P. 2004, \apj, 602, L33
355:
356: \bibitem[Rankin 2007]{rankin07} Rankin, J. M. 2007, \apj, 664, 447
357:
358: %\bibitem[Romani 2005]{romani05} Romani, R. W. in ASP Conf. Ser. 328, Binary Radio Pulsars, eds.
359: %F. A. Rasio \& I. H. Stairs (San Francisco: ASP), 337
360:
361: \bibitem[Slane et al. 2002]{slane02} Slane, P. O., Helfand, D. J., \& Murray, S. S. 2002,
362: \apj, 571, L45
363:
364: %\bibitem[Slane et al. 2004]{slane04} Slane, P. O., Helfand, D. J., van der Swaluw, E.,
365: %\& Murray, S. S. 2002, \apj, 616, 403
366:
367: \bibitem[Torii et al. 1998]{torii98} Torii, K., Tsunemi, H., \& Slane, P. O. 1998,
368: in The Hot Universe, Proc. of IAU Symp. No. 188, eds. K. Koyama, S. Kitamoto, \& M. Itoh,
369: (Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic), 258
370:
371: \bibitem[Tuohy et al. 1982]{tuohy82} Tuohy, I. R., Clark, D. H., \& Burton, W. M. 1982,
372: \apj, 260, L65
373:
374: %\bibitem[Weisskopf et al. 2000]{weiss00} Weisskopf, C. M. et al. 2000, \apj, 536, L81
375:
376: \bibitem[Winkler \& Long 2006]{wink06} Winkler, P. F. \& Long, K. S. 2006, \aj,
377: 132, 360
378:
379: \end{thebibliography}
380:
381: \clearpage
382:
383: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
384: \footnotesize
385: \tablecaption{Energy Bands Used to Generate the X-ray Color
386: and Hardness Ratio Images.
387: \label{tbl:tab1}}
388: \tablewidth{0pt}
389: \tablehead{ \colhead{Energy Band} & \colhead{Identification} & \colhead{Color} &
390: \colhead{Energy Band} & \colhead{Identification} & \colhead{Color} \\
391: \colhead{(keV)} & & & \colhead{(keV)} & &}
392: \startdata
393: 0.40$-$0.50 & Continuum & - & 1.16$-$1.25 & Continuum & - \\
394: 0.58$-$0.71 & O Ly$\alpha$ & Red & 1.28$-$1.43 & Mg He$\alpha$ & Green \\
395: 0.75$-$0.84 & Continuum & - & 1.81$-$2.05 & Si He$\alpha$ & Blue \\
396: 0.88$-$0.95 & Ne He$\alpha$ & Red & 2.40$-$2.62 & S He$\alpha$ & Blue \\
397: 0.98$-$1.10 & Ne Ly$\alpha$ & Orange & - & - & -
398: \enddata
399:
400: \end{deluxetable}
401:
402: \clearpage
403:
404: \begin{figure}[]
405: \figurenum{1}
406: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{3color_cxc_grid_hard_radio_both2b_xfig.ps}}
407: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f1_new.eps}}
408: \centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f1.eps}}
409: %\vspace{-4cm}
410: \figcaption[]{\small An X-ray-color image of G292.0+1.8. Red is the sum of the 0.58$-$0.71 and
411: 0.88$-$0.95 keV bands (dominated by emission from O Ly$\alpha$ and Ne He$\alpha$),
412: orange is the 0.98$-$1.10 keV band (Ne Ly$\alpha$), green is the 1.28$-$1.43 keV
413: band (Mg He$\alpha$), and blue is the sum of the 1.81$-$2.05 and 2.40$-$2.62 keV bands
414: (Si He$\alpha$ + S He$\alpha$). Each subband image has been exposure-corrected, binned
415: with 2$\times$2 pixels ($\sim$1$^{\prime\prime}$), and smoothed for the purposes of
416: display. The radio SNR center \citep{gaen03} is marked with a black cross. The position
417: of PSR J1124$-$5916 \citep{hughes03} is marked with white bars near the SNR center.
418: {\it Lower left} inset is the 3$-$7 keV band image (binned by 4$\times$4 pixel and
419: smoothed by a Gaussian with $\sigma$ = 2 pixels). The brightest central parts of the
420: PWN is saturated to white. {\it Lower right} inset is the 2$-$7 keV band image of
421: the PWN (20$^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 20$^{\prime\prime}$ FOV centered on
422: the pulsar position). The image is unbinned (0$\farcs$492) and smoothed by a Gaussian
423: with $\sigma$ = 1 pixel to emphasize the faint torus and jet. {\it Upper left} and
424: {\it upper right} insets are the 60 $\mu$m images from {\it IRAS} Galaxy Atlas
425: \citep{cao97} and archival {\it ISO} data, respectively. In all panels except for the
426: {\it lower right}, a boundary contour from the 20 cm radio image taken by Australian
427: Telescope Compact Array is overlaid.
428: \label{fig:fig1}}
429: \end{figure}
430:
431: \begin{figure}[]
432: \figurenum{2}
433: %\centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.6\textwidth]{hr_spec2c_xfig.ps}}
434: \centerline{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.8\textwidth]{f2.eps}}
435: %\vspace{-3cm}
436: \figcaption[]{(a) A hardness radio map of G292.0+1.8: HR = (Ne Ly$\alpha$+Mg+Si+S)/(O+Ne
437: He$\alpha$+continuum[$E$$<$1.25 keV]). Energy bands used for line and continuum images
438: are presented in Table~\ref{tbl:tab1}. Each subband image has been binned with
439: 4$\times$4 pixels. (b) Example spectra representing ``NW'' (black) and ``SE''
440: (red) regions. Each spectrum has been arbitrarily scaled for the purposes of display.
441: In (a), the small region where each spectrum was extracted is marked with a solid box.
442: Regions outlined by the dashed polygon correspond to the location of bright diffuse
443: [O {\small III}] emission (``SE'' region), and the highest HR (``NW'' region).
444: \label{fig:fig2}}
445: \end{figure}
446:
447: \end{document}
448: